WEBVTT - Credlin | 26 October

0:00:07.580 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Chris. Good evening. Welcome to the program. Here's

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.610
<v Speaker 1>what's coming up tonight on Credlin. The latest polling out

0:00:13.630 --> 0:00:16.370
<v Speaker 1>of Victoria. News polls got the coalition on track for

0:00:16.410 --> 0:00:20.660
<v Speaker 1>power in its own right. Labor's primary vote is crashing.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.710
<v Speaker 1>But be careful, a good poll can be a danger

0:00:23.770 --> 0:00:26.750
<v Speaker 1>zone test for a party with still four weeks to

0:00:26.770 --> 0:00:30.060
<v Speaker 1>go now until Election Day. We'll catch up with Liberal

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.700
<v Speaker 1>leader Jess Wilson as Labor licks against its own man.

0:00:34.270 --> 0:00:37.410
<v Speaker 1>saying that the Premier needs an afternoon nap just to

0:00:37.450 --> 0:00:41.910
<v Speaker 1>get by. The AFP whistleblower who first raised the alarm

0:00:41.970 --> 0:00:46.820
<v Speaker 1>about lack of counter terrorism resources before Bondi overlooked it

0:00:46.940 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>yet again. He's not been called to give evidence despite

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:55.710
<v Speaker 1>those extra hearings for the Royal Commission. Plus protests re-erupt

0:00:55.750 --> 0:01:00.310
<v Speaker 1>across Europe. Radical groups now planning the unthinkable in Australia,

0:01:00.910 --> 0:01:05.230
<v Speaker 1>hijacking Remembrance Day. And a Victorian MP, the latest to

0:01:05.270 --> 0:01:08.470
<v Speaker 1>receive a threat from the public after an engraved bullet

0:01:08.490 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was left on the roof of his car, prompting this

0:01:11.500 --> 0:01:14.620
<v Speaker 1>blast from the former leader of the Nationals.

0:01:15.540 --> 0:01:16.860
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's just bullshit.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.020
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for Christ's sakes, everyone's just got to take

0:01:20.060 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 3>a deep breath. I mean, I get we've all got

0:01:21.900 --> 0:01:23.500
<v Speaker 3>to be angry these days. We've all got to have

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>a cause. We've all got to show it somehow. But,

0:01:26.580 --> 0:01:29.050
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's just some civility. I mean, our country's

0:01:29.060 --> 0:01:32.010
<v Speaker 3>better than this. This is not what our country is

0:01:32.050 --> 0:01:32.670
<v Speaker 3>being built on.

0:01:34.190 --> 0:01:37.830
<v Speaker 1>But first, today in the Parliament, rightly, we heard a

0:01:37.870 --> 0:01:41.550
<v Speaker 1>lot of fine words about injured MP Helen Haynes as

0:01:41.590 --> 0:01:45.690
<v Speaker 1>she continues to recover from a horrific incident outside her

0:01:45.709 --> 0:01:50.740
<v Speaker 1>Wengereta office this time last week. But the commentary from

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Albanese remained jarring, given it was his office that

0:01:55.530 --> 0:01:59.510
<v Speaker 1>had circulated a dirt sheet about Haynes just weeks before

0:01:59.590 --> 0:02:00.810
<v Speaker 1>her alleged assault.

0:02:01.070 --> 0:02:04.150
<v Speaker 4>The shock from what happened last Monday is like a

0:02:04.230 --> 0:02:08.430
<v Speaker 4>stone in our hearts. We look across to the member

0:02:08.450 --> 0:02:11.590
<v Speaker 4>for Indi's place and despite ourselves, half expect to see

0:02:11.630 --> 0:02:14.990
<v Speaker 4>her face. Like a trick that the heart plays on

0:02:15.030 --> 0:02:17.790
<v Speaker 4>the mind, if only to grant us a moment's respite

0:02:18.550 --> 0:02:19.169
<v Speaker 4>from the truth.

0:02:20.910 --> 0:02:25.100
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Prime Minister, but no one has forgotten what happened.

0:02:25.460 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 5>The dirt file that the Labor people put on many

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 5>politicians who may go against the Albanese Labor government, what

0:02:34.930 --> 0:02:36.370
<v Speaker 5>they're doing, is wrong.

0:02:36.389 --> 0:02:38.989
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think it goes to the character of the

0:02:39.030 --> 0:02:44.709
<v Speaker 6>Prime Minister and his office that they seek to denigrate

0:02:44.990 --> 0:02:49.630
<v Speaker 6>the reputation of Helen Haynes. with the media to get

0:02:49.669 --> 0:02:53.900
<v Speaker 6>a bad story up simply because she was asking legitimate

0:02:53.940 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 6>questions about why he was awarding $ 6. 05 million to the

0:03:00.900 --> 0:03:01.860
<v Speaker 6>Marrickville Golf Club.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.860
<v Speaker 1>That that was their first response.

0:03:04.980 --> 0:03:07.830
<v Speaker 7>I also think it's a bit odd to have the

0:03:07.850 --> 0:03:12.430
<v Speaker 7>Prime Minister calling for a lower temperature of debate when

0:03:12.730 --> 0:03:17.590
<v Speaker 7>his own office was distributing a shit sheet about Helen

0:03:17.620 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 7>Haynes just a few weeks ago.

0:03:20.620 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>That's Albanese's problem, isn't it? He lacks the grace to apologise,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the humility to admit when he's got it wrong, despite

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>ample opportunities to show the sort of leadership that Australians

0:03:32.580 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>are desperate for.

0:03:34.990 --> 0:03:37.290
<v Speaker 8>Were you aware or give approval to your office to

0:03:37.330 --> 0:03:43.050
<v Speaker 8>distribute to the press gallery information about Helen Haynes? about

0:03:43.090 --> 0:03:46.190
<v Speaker 8>grants that she'd sought after she criticised you over the

0:03:46.190 --> 0:03:48.690
<v Speaker 8>$ 6 million Marrickville grant?

0:03:49.810 --> 0:03:53.530
<v Speaker 4>Helen Haynes is a good local member. She put forward

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:59.340
<v Speaker 4>applications like other members do for grants and that's what

0:03:59.380 --> 0:04:00.540
<v Speaker 4>good local members do.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 2>So did the office send that out? Do you regret

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.370
<v Speaker 2>that in hindsight given the events of recent days?

0:04:05.380 --> 0:04:08.930
<v Speaker 4>Well, Helen Haynes is a strong advocate for her community.

0:04:10.100 --> 0:04:15.650
<v Speaker 1>Now, let's not forget either why the mild-mannered Haynes had

0:04:15.730 --> 0:04:19.570
<v Speaker 1>so got under the Prime Minister's skin, because she had

0:04:19.610 --> 0:04:24.850
<v Speaker 1>the temerity to question the probity about his community grants program,

0:04:25.630 --> 0:04:30.510
<v Speaker 1>as she should. as every decent MP should, given just

0:04:30.570 --> 0:04:34.490
<v Speaker 1>how rotten this pork barrel grant scheme is proving itself

0:04:34.570 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>to be, following more revelations about the $ 6 million the

0:04:39.390 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister gave to his mates at the Marrickville Golf

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.540
<v Speaker 1>Club just days out from last year's federal election. And

0:04:46.580 --> 0:04:50.700
<v Speaker 1>they were his mates. They were his mates. Even if

0:04:50.740 --> 0:04:53.070
<v Speaker 1>he told the Parliament, they were not.

0:04:54.089 --> 0:04:56.730
<v Speaker 4>I do not have a card as a member of

0:04:56.790 --> 0:04:57.830
<v Speaker 4>Marrickville Golf Club.

0:04:58.300 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 9>I haven't spoken. And I've been coming here for decades

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.099
<v Speaker 9>and using this club. I don't know who the executive

0:05:05.180 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 9>of Marrickville Golf Club are.

0:05:07.100 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.620
<v Speaker 9>Who the executive of Marrickville Golf Club are. I don't

0:05:11.740 --> 0:05:14.900
<v Speaker 9>use the facilities. And I've been coming here for decades

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 9>and using this club.

0:05:16.580 --> 0:05:18.530
<v Speaker 4>I don't do anything whatsoever for it.

0:05:18.550 --> 0:05:19.730
<v Speaker 10>Today I want to announce.

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:25.490
<v Speaker 9>that a federal Labor government is committing.

0:05:24.370 --> 0:05:26.770
<v Speaker 11>$ 350, 000.

0:05:24.970 --> 0:05:29.810
<v Speaker 12>To make sure that this club can host more events.

0:05:30.110 --> 0:05:32.790
<v Speaker 13>I don't play golf, Mr Speaker.

0:05:32.810 --> 0:05:37.060
<v Speaker 9>For them to draw this extraordinarily long bow.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so all of that we know, but here's what's new.

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:48.109
<v Speaker 1>Last week at the Senate inquiry that's investigating the Marrickville millions,

0:05:48.790 --> 0:05:51.870
<v Speaker 1>there was a long discussion about the purpose of the

0:05:51.930 --> 0:05:57.630
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer grant. Remember when pushed on the $ 6 million issue

0:05:57.690 --> 0:06:01.460
<v Speaker 1>during question time last month, on the 9th of September,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.860
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister told the House that the grant was

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>necessary to fix raw sewerage flowing into the nearby Cooks River.

0:06:11.220 --> 0:06:14.700
<v Speaker 9>It's existed for a long period of time, almost 100 years,

0:06:15.380 --> 0:06:19.169
<v Speaker 9>and they have a septic tank which, because when it

0:06:19.260 --> 0:06:23.409
<v Speaker 9>is on the floodplain, when it floods in Marrickville, raw

0:06:23.470 --> 0:06:28.370
<v Speaker 9>sewerage flows into the Cooks River. That is what the

0:06:28.450 --> 0:06:29.529
<v Speaker 9>funding is for.

0:06:31.029 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>OK, that is September this year. Now, in question time,

0:06:35.690 --> 0:06:39.260
<v Speaker 1>the next day, Albanese doubled down.

0:06:39.750 --> 0:06:43.330
<v Speaker 9>And one for the upgrade of the Inner West Council-owned

0:06:43.510 --> 0:06:47.729
<v Speaker 9>Marrickville Golf Club. Included in that was funding to fix

0:06:47.810 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 9>the sewerage because it goes into the river and causes

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.020
<v Speaker 9>a problem when it floods.

0:06:57.180 --> 0:07:00.580
<v Speaker 1>Well, how is that right? Given a media release I

0:07:00.620 --> 0:07:03.490
<v Speaker 1>showed you a couple of weeks ago, from the Crown

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Works Department in New South Wales, announcing last year that

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.180
<v Speaker 1>they were funding the sewerage works at a cost of

0:07:11.180 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>$ 270, 000 to state taxpayers. I put this all out on

0:07:17.580 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>air at the time as well, but not that the

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>facts stop the lies from the Prime Minister, but maybe

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:29.220
<v Speaker 1>these comments will. Here's Jacinta MacDonald, a senior official in

0:07:29.260 --> 0:07:33.230
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Government Department of Infrastructure, giving evidence to the

0:07:33.290 --> 0:07:39.070
<v Speaker 1>Senate Inquiry. on the Marrickville Millions on Thursday, confirming that

0:07:39.090 --> 0:07:43.550
<v Speaker 1>the $ 6 million golf club grant had nothing at all

0:07:43.630 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to do with sewerage, despite the Prime Minister telling the

0:07:46.940 --> 0:07:49.340
<v Speaker 1>Parliament twice that it did.

0:07:49.740 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 10>The grantee must deliver the design and upgrade of the

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:58.750
<v Speaker 10>Marrickville Golf Club, including the following deliverables. The club precinct refurbishment,

0:08:00.630 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 10>which includes a range of installation of a stormwater harvesting system,

0:08:06.140 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 10>including storage tanks and pump, creation of a botanical garden

0:08:10.900 --> 0:08:15.100
<v Speaker 10>and biodiversity area, and an upgrade of the existing electrical

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 10>capacity to 200 amps. The sewerage works are not in

0:08:20.460 --> 0:08:21.410
<v Speaker 10>the scope of this grant.

0:08:21.430 --> 0:08:23.110
<v Speaker 13>This grant focuses on the stormwater.

0:08:24.130 --> 0:08:28.010
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Now, what's also telling and appears to

0:08:28.070 --> 0:08:31.420
<v Speaker 1>confirm the evidence of McDonald's is the fact that on

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:36.140
<v Speaker 1>the government's own Grant Connect website, there's no mention of

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:41.179
<v Speaker 1>sewerage in the funding description. So either the public servant

0:08:41.420 --> 0:08:44.990
<v Speaker 1>and the government's own website are making it up, or

0:08:45.030 --> 0:08:49.170
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister misled the House, pure and simple.

0:08:49.490 --> 0:08:51.490
<v Speaker 4>Reducing power prices by $ 275.

0:08:51.190 --> 0:08:53.110
<v Speaker 9>Can you rule.

0:08:53.010 --> 0:08:56.470
<v Speaker 14>Out any changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax?

0:08:56.510 --> 0:08:56.590
<v Speaker 12>Yes.

0:08:57.210 --> 0:09:08.819
<v Speaker 4>How hard is it for the 50th time? You know,

0:09:09.020 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 4>I stepped off the stage. I didn't fall over on

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 4>my backside.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:15.939
<v Speaker 1>I stumbled.

0:09:16.220 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 13>That's what happened.

0:09:16.980 --> 0:09:19.420
<v Speaker 4>The Japanese Prime Minister brought a melon.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 15>She?

0:09:19.860 --> 0:09:20.740
<v Speaker 1>Did she smuggle it?

0:09:21.020 --> 0:09:21.420
<v Speaker 10>I don't know.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm expecting.

0:09:23.300 --> 0:09:24.220
<v Speaker 13>Got a couple of melons.

0:09:24.460 --> 0:09:27.189
<v Speaker 1>She brought two. She brought two, as you do.

0:09:27.490 --> 0:09:30.809
<v Speaker 4>Certainly, as the interpretation that some have put on this

0:09:31.070 --> 0:09:32.490
<v Speaker 4>is simply not correct.

0:09:35.010 --> 0:09:38.130
<v Speaker 1>This bloke is making lying an art form. You can

0:09:38.210 --> 0:09:41.580
<v Speaker 1>see it there. It's a pattern of behaviour. What was

0:09:41.660 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>also uncovered in the Senate inquiry was just how involved

0:09:45.330 --> 0:09:50.660
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party head office was in this whole grants program,

0:09:51.220 --> 0:09:54.620
<v Speaker 1>with party operatives calling the shots on where and how

0:09:55.040 --> 0:10:00.620
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer money was spent. And this was confirmed yesterday. by

0:10:00.660 --> 0:10:02.940
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure minister, Catherine King.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.939
<v Speaker 13>It's a pork barrel, isn't it? You administered a pork barrel.

0:10:09.020 --> 0:10:12.740
<v Speaker 15>Well, there are election commitments and obviously the party that

0:10:12.780 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 15>wins government then gets to deliver its election commitments and

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:16.740
<v Speaker 15>that's what they are.

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.340
<v Speaker 16>Labor's head office involved in that.

0:10:20.710 --> 0:10:22.980
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, absolutely.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Like, yeah, absolutely.

0:10:24.420 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 15>Because it's an election commitment process. It's a political process. So,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.980
<v Speaker 15>of course, you know, that is done through the party machinery,

0:10:32.020 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 15>not through government machinery.

0:10:36.370 --> 0:10:39.189
<v Speaker 1>Remember, this was not an open grants program where any

0:10:39.270 --> 0:10:42.849
<v Speaker 1>community organisation could put up their hand for help. It

0:10:42.890 --> 0:10:47.430
<v Speaker 1>was invite only. Organisations only got a go if they

0:10:47.470 --> 0:10:50.410
<v Speaker 1>were tapped on the shoulder by a Labor MP mate

0:10:50.470 --> 0:10:54.610
<v Speaker 1>and told to apply after, and she confirms it there,

0:10:55.150 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>head office, the politicos, made the call on how much

0:10:59.020 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of your money they needed to spend in the seat

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.260
<v Speaker 1>to win it. In the case of the golf club,

0:11:06.300 --> 0:11:09.460
<v Speaker 1>they didn't even have to apply given their number one

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:14.219
<v Speaker 1>patron's home, the Prime Minister, was a mere 200 metres

0:11:14.340 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>from their back fence.

0:11:16.420 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 17>And thanks to the federal Labor government and to Prime

0:11:19.420 --> 0:11:22.339
<v Speaker 17>Minister Albo for the $ 6 million grant that they committed

0:11:22.380 --> 0:11:23.460
<v Speaker 17>to during the campaign.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 13>So what are you guys thinking about how this will

0:11:25.580 --> 0:11:26.220
<v Speaker 13>improve the club?

0:11:26.490 --> 0:11:27.709
<v Speaker 2>Oh, look, it's going to be fantastic.

0:11:27.750 --> 0:11:29.250
<v Speaker 13>This will be the start of a whole new era

0:11:29.270 --> 0:11:29.750
<v Speaker 13>for the club.

0:11:29.790 --> 0:11:31.610
<v Speaker 11>We'll be able to turn this place into such a

0:11:31.710 --> 0:11:33.089
<v Speaker 11>wonderful community area.

0:11:33.390 --> 0:11:35.550
<v Speaker 13>This is going to be able to bring forward all

0:11:35.590 --> 0:11:37.750
<v Speaker 13>the projects that we've had planned for years and years

0:11:37.770 --> 0:11:40.670
<v Speaker 13>and years. And we've always been after grant funding for this.

0:11:40.710 --> 0:11:42.290
<v Speaker 13>Now we've got a big kick of money and we'll

0:11:42.330 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 13>be able to do it all.

0:11:45.690 --> 0:11:49.150
<v Speaker 1>Big bucket of your money. If Albanese does this with

0:11:49.150 --> 0:11:53.740
<v Speaker 1>$ 6 million, what does it say about every other grant

0:11:54.179 --> 0:11:57.890
<v Speaker 1>in this half a billion dollar program? Law professor Anne

0:11:57.950 --> 0:12:01.670
<v Speaker 1>Toomey has called it grey corruption and it is. Just

0:12:01.710 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like the $ 15 billion allegedly siphoned off in Victoria with

0:12:05.940 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the big build and handed over to corrupt union thugs

0:12:08.940 --> 0:12:12.820
<v Speaker 1>and organised crime, taxpayers are being ripped off by Labor

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.500
<v Speaker 1>on a grand scale, state and federal. And this is

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>just the tip of the iceberg. But misleading the Parliament,

0:12:21.260 --> 0:12:24.750
<v Speaker 1>that's all there for you tonight. Well, that's a new low,

0:12:25.330 --> 0:12:32.830
<v Speaker 1>even for this Prime Minister. All right, let's get our

0:12:32.850 --> 0:12:35.990
<v Speaker 1>headlines now with our political reporter, Ruben Sparco.

0:12:37.350 --> 0:12:37.849
<v Speaker 13>Good evening.

0:12:38.070 --> 0:12:41.290
<v Speaker 16>Parliament is rallying around Helen Haynes as the member for

0:12:41.390 --> 0:12:45.010
<v Speaker 16>Indi recovers from an alleged deliberate attack. It was a

0:12:45.050 --> 0:12:47.590
<v Speaker 16>moment of solidarity inside the lower house.

0:12:47.910 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 4>The shock from what happened last Monday is like a

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:52.620
<v Speaker 4>stone in our hearts.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.380
<v Speaker 16>The Prime Minister also warned of what he described as

0:12:56.500 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 16>growing anger in political debate.

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.620
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing a normalisation of the language of grievance and violence.

0:13:02.940 --> 0:13:09.570
<v Speaker 18>Robust, rigorous debate has long been the substitute for Violence.

0:13:09.850 --> 0:13:11.970
<v Speaker 13>This is getting rid of violence.

0:13:12.350 --> 0:13:15.690
<v Speaker 16>Question time went ahead as planned today and parliamentary business

0:13:15.730 --> 0:13:19.530
<v Speaker 16>will resume as normal tomorrow. The Treasurer is conceding he

0:13:19.580 --> 0:13:22.660
<v Speaker 16>needs to spend more time listening to colleagues concerned about

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:26.420
<v Speaker 16>the government's tax changes. Jim Chalmers acknowledges Labor has lost

0:13:26.500 --> 0:13:27.900
<v Speaker 16>ground since the May budget.

0:13:28.220 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 13>I should make more time for my colleagues. I see

0:13:30.340 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 13>a lot of them.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:32.620
<v Speaker 7>But if the message is that I need to do

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.660
<v Speaker 7>more of that, then I take that message seriously.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 16>He says it's up to the Prime Minister and other

0:13:38.340 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 16>ministers to explain their own roles in the government's decisions.

0:13:44.260 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into a whole lot of the

0:13:45.540 --> 0:13:49.180
<v Speaker 1>issues out there today with our political contributor, Chris Ullman,

0:13:49.220 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>who joins me now from Canberra. Chris, we saw at

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.110
<v Speaker 1>the start of the day today all those tributes to

0:13:57.190 --> 0:14:00.990
<v Speaker 1>Helen Haynes, but still a cloud around the Prime Minister,

0:14:01.050 --> 0:14:04.530
<v Speaker 1>the dirt unit. sheet that was issued by his office

0:14:04.740 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>against the independent MP. He's all tea and sympathy today,

0:14:11.740 --> 0:14:16.470
<v Speaker 1>but there's absolutely nothing in his character which allows him

0:14:16.570 --> 0:14:20.470
<v Speaker 1>to admit where he's made a mistake or even apologise.

0:14:21.070 --> 0:14:24.030
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say, this is what hurts him

0:14:24.110 --> 0:14:25.330
<v Speaker 1>so much with people.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, Peter, let me start by saying that I don't

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.620
<v Speaker 18>doubt the sincerity of anyone in Parliament today is talking

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:32.460
<v Speaker 18>about Helena Haynes.

0:14:32.500 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>This strikes very close to home.

0:14:34.020 --> 0:14:36.380
<v Speaker 18>They were close to the woman and, of course, they

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.260
<v Speaker 18>worry about their own safety and what this means for

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.870
<v Speaker 18>politics in Australia. And if it had not been for

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.330
<v Speaker 18>that horrible assault on Helena Haynes, we would not now

0:14:43.390 --> 0:14:45.210
<v Speaker 18>be talking about this because I've seen these kind of

0:14:45.290 --> 0:14:47.810
<v Speaker 18>background documents go out for at least the last two

0:14:47.870 --> 0:14:50.770
<v Speaker 18>decades from ministers and prime ministers' office when they essentially

0:14:51.210 --> 0:14:53.210
<v Speaker 18>get peeved by something that's said against them and try

0:14:53.230 --> 0:14:56.170
<v Speaker 18>to impugn the character of others. I think that document

0:14:56.230 --> 0:14:59.390
<v Speaker 18>is there for people to read. It jars with the way.

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.130
<v Speaker 2>That Anthony Albanese is interpreting it.

0:15:01.540 --> 0:15:03.140
<v Speaker 18>And in the long run, he has to think about

0:15:03.180 --> 0:15:06.020
<v Speaker 18>how these things add up over time and how it

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.700
<v Speaker 18>is that that does damage his standing in the community

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.170
<v Speaker 18>when his words seem to be at odds to the

0:15:13.270 --> 0:15:16.470
<v Speaker 18>things that they can see and judge for themselves. So,

0:15:16.930 --> 0:15:18.650
<v Speaker 18>you know, it is, I think, a tragedy that this

0:15:18.670 --> 0:15:21.190
<v Speaker 18>gets dragged into what's happened to Helen Haynes and we

0:15:21.210 --> 0:15:23.510
<v Speaker 18>should all be thinking about her rather than how.

0:15:23.930 --> 0:15:25.450
<v Speaker 2>Legal officers have dealt with each other.

0:15:25.490 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 18>But, yes, I do think this sort of thing is

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 18>an accumulation, I think, which you showed at the top

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 18>of the show, an accumulation of damage to character that

0:15:34.780 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 18>we are seeing.

0:15:37.580 --> 0:15:40.580
<v Speaker 1>You're right to say, Chris, that almost every side of

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:45.570
<v Speaker 1>politics does it. They do, I guess, an aggregation of

0:15:45.630 --> 0:15:48.930
<v Speaker 1>things that their opponent has got wrong or said against

0:15:48.990 --> 0:15:52.210
<v Speaker 1>them in the past. It's not always personal. You know,

0:15:52.250 --> 0:15:55.550
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it can be sort of ineptitude in delivering a

0:15:55.610 --> 0:15:58.950
<v Speaker 1>government program or something to do with the portfolio. But

0:15:59.050 --> 0:16:02.610
<v Speaker 1>what is different here is I've seen other politicians called

0:16:02.670 --> 0:16:04.750
<v Speaker 1>out like this, Chris, and they admit they've got it wrong.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.060
<v Speaker 1>They apologise. They just go, well, you know, that's not

0:16:08.140 --> 0:16:10.180
<v Speaker 1>aged well. Yeah, it looks pretty terrible now. I wish

0:16:10.220 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't done it. He never does any of that.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>On every single time, at every single point he's pulled up,

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.980
<v Speaker 1>It's denial, it's deflection, it's, you know, black is white

0:16:21.020 --> 0:16:24.220
<v Speaker 1>or white is black. He will never admit to getting

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>things wrong. That's the problem.

0:16:27.180 --> 0:16:29.500
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, and I think you'll find that the research of

0:16:29.590 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 18>both major political parties does show at the moment that

0:16:32.570 --> 0:16:37.030
<v Speaker 18>the word that people associate with Anthony Albanese now, the

0:16:37.110 --> 0:16:40.270
<v Speaker 18>most common word that comes up in focus groups, is liar.

0:16:41.450 --> 0:16:43.550
<v Speaker 2>And the Labor Party must be aware of that.

0:16:43.430 --> 0:16:45.870
<v Speaker 18>Because I doubt that their internal polling is any different

0:16:45.890 --> 0:16:47.890
<v Speaker 18>from the polling that I've seen elsewhere.

0:16:47.910 --> 0:16:51.430
<v Speaker 2>And that is a worry for the Prime Minister.

0:16:51.450 --> 0:16:54.710
<v Speaker 18>That is a word that has now stuck to his character.

0:16:54.730 --> 0:16:56.290
<v Speaker 18>And as you know, you get a certain amount of

0:16:56.350 --> 0:16:58.730
<v Speaker 18>time to try and form your character in public.

0:16:58.790 --> 0:17:00.630
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanese has had a long time.

0:17:01.110 --> 0:17:03.310
<v Speaker 18>Once that kind of thought gets stuck in the mind

0:17:03.370 --> 0:17:07.230
<v Speaker 18>of voters, that's a very difficult thing to shake. And unfortunately,

0:17:07.310 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 18>not just with some of the things that Anthony Albanese

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.100
<v Speaker 18>has said and done, but the things that his government

0:17:12.140 --> 0:17:16.140
<v Speaker 18>continues to say and do that jar so dreadfully with

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.660
<v Speaker 18>the public record. Like, just give you one more example.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 18>Chris Bowen led people to believe that the cost of

0:17:21.980 --> 0:17:26.310
<v Speaker 18>the pre-COP event in Fiji was about $ 20 million. What

0:17:26.330 --> 0:17:29.430
<v Speaker 18>does it turn out today? It's $ 34 million. Now, there's

0:17:29.450 --> 0:17:32.010
<v Speaker 18>a long way between 20 and 34, and he would

0:17:32.030 --> 0:17:34.889
<v Speaker 18>have had access to those figures. So Again, why do

0:17:34.950 --> 0:17:38.030
<v Speaker 18>you allow that to be believed by people when eventually

0:17:38.070 --> 0:17:39.250
<v Speaker 18>the truth will out?

0:17:39.330 --> 0:17:40.910
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't even make any sense to me.

0:17:43.210 --> 0:17:45.130
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, of course, that you're cutting money

0:17:45.210 --> 0:17:48.310
<v Speaker 1>to veterans, you're cutting money to those with private health

0:17:48.350 --> 0:17:52.150
<v Speaker 1>insurance over the age of 65. This is where the government, again,

0:17:52.190 --> 0:17:54.730
<v Speaker 1>has got a problem. And cost of living is huge.

0:17:55.020 --> 0:17:58.100
<v Speaker 1>We know it's a massive issue for anyone on a

0:17:58.130 --> 0:18:01.100
<v Speaker 1>fixed income or with a mortgage. We've got inflation data

0:18:01.140 --> 0:18:03.490
<v Speaker 1>out tomorrow. I mean, no one's going to take a

0:18:03.530 --> 0:18:05.500
<v Speaker 1>bet to say there will not be a rate hike

0:18:06.070 --> 0:18:08.929
<v Speaker 1>on Melbourne Cup Day. That's coming. We've got the property

0:18:08.970 --> 0:18:12.290
<v Speaker 1>market in free fall. Reports today that fewer than half

0:18:12.350 --> 0:18:14.430
<v Speaker 1>the homes that were listed for auction on the weekend

0:18:14.710 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have sold. And now we've got the Treasurer basically apologising

0:18:19.260 --> 0:18:23.300
<v Speaker 1>to colleagues that his budget's blowing up their chances of

0:18:23.380 --> 0:18:28.740
<v Speaker 1>holding their seats. That's not about anything other than here's

0:18:28.770 --> 0:18:32.030
<v Speaker 1>the votes in that room, in the caucus room, should

0:18:32.050 --> 0:18:35.150
<v Speaker 1>he ever want to run as leader. It's not about you, Chris.

0:18:35.730 --> 0:18:38.170
<v Speaker 1>It's not about anyone with a mortgage. It's about his

0:18:38.270 --> 0:18:40.189
<v Speaker 1>votes in that room for leader.

0:18:42.310 --> 0:18:44.510
<v Speaker 18>Well, if Jim Chalmers should apologise to anyone, he should

0:18:44.570 --> 0:18:47.340
<v Speaker 18>apologise to the Australian people for the budget he's brought

0:18:47.380 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 18>down and the cumulative things that the government has done

0:18:50.980 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 18>to tank the housing market in Australia, which is the

0:18:53.940 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 18>wealth creation engine for ordinary Australians in this country, and

0:18:57.820 --> 0:19:00.100
<v Speaker 18>they are now seeing that being shredded.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 2>I was talking to a very, very good.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.570
<v Speaker 18>Judge of these things today, who believes that in the

0:19:05.650 --> 0:19:08.129
<v Speaker 18>long term this will have an effect on helping to

0:19:08.170 --> 0:19:11.150
<v Speaker 18>destroy parts of the construction industry in Australia, which means

0:19:11.190 --> 0:19:13.949
<v Speaker 18>that there won't be as many new houses that we

0:19:13.990 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 18>hope might be being built and that all of the

0:19:16.890 --> 0:19:19.230
<v Speaker 18>effects of what the government has done will lead to

0:19:19.300 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 18>a tanking of the economy because people will feel poorer

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.180
<v Speaker 18>and they won't spend as much. So I think that

0:19:25.220 --> 0:19:27.899
<v Speaker 18>Jim Chalmers does have an enormous amount of apologising to

0:19:27.940 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 18>do and at some point he may have to make

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.350
<v Speaker 18>a very embarrassing retreat from the policies. He's already done some,

0:19:34.390 --> 0:19:36.820
<v Speaker 18>but a big retreat from the policies brought.

0:19:36.619 --> 0:19:37.340
<v Speaker 2>Down in the budget.

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 18>And if that's the case, I can't see how the

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 18>Treasurer hangs on to his own job, let alone covets

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 18>the Prime Minister's.

0:19:45.650 --> 0:19:48.790
<v Speaker 1>OK, Chris Bowen, how does he survive? I mean, Snowy

0:19:48.790 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>2.0 has gone from... 2 to 12. He's changed the

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.230
<v Speaker 1>contract rules. No longer fixed price. Basically, it's whatever you want.

0:19:56.270 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>You write it on the cheque, he'll just sign it.

0:19:59.070 --> 0:20:03.070
<v Speaker 1>It's upwards of $ 25 billion. I don't think it'll end

0:20:03.130 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at $ 25 billion. Is it time we walk away?

0:20:08.570 --> 0:20:09.570
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think it is, Peter.

0:20:09.590 --> 0:20:11.990
<v Speaker 18>And by the way, on your program last week at

0:20:12.030 --> 0:20:15.670
<v Speaker 18>around about this time, I said that it would be about.

0:20:14.830 --> 0:20:18.670
<v Speaker 2>$ 22 billion. Well, $ 22.

0:20:17.190 --> 0:20:21.380
<v Speaker 18>2 billion was the cost that the contractor has been telling.

0:20:21.390 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 18>It's now $ 2. 0. But they so doubt that now they

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 18>put in a contingency of another $ 3 billion. Now, we're

0:20:28.619 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 18>about halfway through the digging of this particular project.

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.290
<v Speaker 2>We've spent nearly half the money. What are we doing

0:20:36.350 --> 0:20:37.270
<v Speaker 2>this for?

0:20:37.490 --> 0:20:40.470
<v Speaker 18>If we're going to spend $ 25 billion to apparently get

0:20:40.510 --> 0:20:44.379
<v Speaker 18>an electricity saving over 45 years of $ 7 billion, in

0:20:44.420 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 18>no universe does any of this stuff add up. And so, again,

0:20:48.420 --> 0:20:50.900
<v Speaker 18>everything that we have seen has been.

0:20:50.700 --> 0:20:53.699
<v Speaker 2>A vast underestimate of where we land.

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.030
<v Speaker 18>Almost every single thing that Chris Bowen says is a

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.910
<v Speaker 18>million miles from where the truth actually lies.

0:21:01.290 --> 0:21:01.490
<v Speaker 19>Again.

0:21:02.210 --> 0:21:05.110
<v Speaker 18>In the private sector, how anyone would hang on to

0:21:05.170 --> 0:21:08.770
<v Speaker 18>a job with a performance that's been put in by

0:21:08.810 --> 0:21:12.790
<v Speaker 18>some of these ministers would beggar belief, and yet they

0:21:12.950 --> 0:21:13.970
<v Speaker 18>fail upwards.

0:21:16.780 --> 0:21:20.180
<v Speaker 1>Yep, if it was a performance pay, poor old taxpayers

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>would be saving money with these clowns, but that's not

0:21:22.780 --> 0:21:25.590
<v Speaker 1>what it is, unfortunately. Chris, we'll leave it there. Let's

0:21:25.609 --> 0:21:28.730
<v Speaker 1>go now to the EU trade deal that the Albanese

0:21:28.770 --> 0:21:32.869
<v Speaker 1>government is so desperate to sign off. Plenty of scrutiny here.

0:21:33.250 --> 0:21:38.250
<v Speaker 1>Claims that secret legally binding climate targets are included and

0:21:38.310 --> 0:21:42.730
<v Speaker 1>could leave Australian producers exposed to crippling penalties. And that's

0:21:42.750 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the fact that EU farmers are

0:21:45.460 --> 0:21:50.100
<v Speaker 1>subsidised by the governments there in a way no Australian

0:21:50.180 --> 0:21:53.010
<v Speaker 1>farmer is. Let's bring in the Shadow Trade Minister, Ted O'Brien,

0:21:53.450 --> 0:21:58.330
<v Speaker 1>who's been raising the alarm over this agreement. I have

0:21:58.369 --> 0:22:01.590
<v Speaker 1>to say, Ted, I was always dubious. We started the

0:22:01.750 --> 0:22:04.990
<v Speaker 1>FTA for the EU in the Abbott era. I remember

0:22:05.030 --> 0:22:07.949
<v Speaker 1>the early negotiations, of course. And a lot of the

0:22:08.030 --> 0:22:10.689
<v Speaker 1>time back then, they wanted to load it up with

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all of these climate commitments. Labor walked away from the

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>deal in 2023 because they said the offer wasn't good enough.

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So what's changed now and why is it a good deal?

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>So says the Prime Minister.

0:22:26.369 --> 0:22:27.449
<v Speaker 13>Great to be with you, Peter.

0:22:27.670 --> 0:22:30.709
<v Speaker 12>And you do remember that well, of course, because the

0:22:30.750 --> 0:22:33.730
<v Speaker 12>coalition has such a strong track record when it comes

0:22:33.770 --> 0:22:36.950
<v Speaker 12>to free trade. I mean, if you look at what

0:22:37.030 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 12>Tony Abbott pulled off with Andrew Robb, you know, China, Japan, Korea, done. CPTPP, done.

0:22:43.900 --> 0:22:47.100
<v Speaker 12>You know, negotiated all the way through with the UK and,

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.719
<v Speaker 12>of course, kicked off a lot of these discussions with

0:22:49.740 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 12>the European Union. Candidly, to answer your question, not much

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.690
<v Speaker 12>has changed. When Labor walked away from this very deal

0:22:58.090 --> 0:23:01.790
<v Speaker 12>because it wasn't a good deal, they return this year

0:23:02.390 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 12>and now it is a good deal. I don't know

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.659
<v Speaker 12>why they've done that. My suspicion is it is because

0:23:10.700 --> 0:23:14.699
<v Speaker 12>they saw an opportunity to make their climate targets for

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:19.190
<v Speaker 12>the first time legally binding. And so what they've dished

0:23:19.270 --> 0:23:24.820
<v Speaker 12>up now is really two deals. One, a free trade agreement,

0:23:25.180 --> 0:23:29.190
<v Speaker 12>and two, a climate treaty. They never talked about that

0:23:29.270 --> 0:23:33.030
<v Speaker 12>second one publicly. They tried to keep it secret. But

0:23:33.330 --> 0:23:36.060
<v Speaker 12>as you well know, we've built the cat on it,

0:23:36.950 --> 0:23:38.630
<v Speaker 12>as did you, I remember very well.

0:23:40.910 --> 0:23:45.140
<v Speaker 1>So what will it mean... You might actually remind people

0:23:45.180 --> 0:23:47.580
<v Speaker 1>of the process because it's not like the United States

0:23:47.660 --> 0:23:51.220
<v Speaker 1>where the entire agreement goes to the parliament. It's usually

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.030
<v Speaker 1>a rubber stamp in Australia. I note you and the

0:23:55.090 --> 0:23:57.270
<v Speaker 1>National Party are saying you will not cop it in

0:23:57.310 --> 0:24:01.750
<v Speaker 1>its current form. But explain the ramifications if it is

0:24:01.830 --> 0:24:03.730
<v Speaker 1>signed off and what it would mean to us in

0:24:03.770 --> 0:24:06.669
<v Speaker 1>terms of climate policy in some specific form.

0:24:08.670 --> 0:24:10.609
<v Speaker 13>So, Peter, what it means is.

0:24:12.090 --> 0:24:16.030
<v Speaker 12>The Albanese government has signed Australia up under the United

0:24:16.150 --> 0:24:21.410
<v Speaker 12>Nations to achieving certain reductions in emissions. As we know,

0:24:21.470 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 12>the way they're doing that is collapsing businesses. Industries are

0:24:25.500 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 12>going offshore. Power prices are going through the roof. Now,

0:24:29.740 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 12>they will continue to drive the economy down to achieve

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.620
<v Speaker 12>those targets. What this deal does is, for the very

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:41.109
<v Speaker 12>first time, it means if Australia... fails to achieve those

0:24:41.210 --> 0:24:45.310
<v Speaker 12>targets or a future government comes in and changes the

0:24:45.550 --> 0:24:48.469
<v Speaker 12>rubbish energy policies of the Albanese government, says we're going

0:24:48.490 --> 0:24:50.669
<v Speaker 12>to get rid of all that stuff, if it is

0:24:50.810 --> 0:24:56.369
<v Speaker 12>deemed that those new policies actually go against the climate targets, well,

0:24:56.950 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 12>this agreement means our businesses could be penalised. So all

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 12>the trade preferences that are delivered to Australia through the

0:25:05.820 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 12>deal can be suspended, can be paused. And so this

0:25:10.420 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 12>has never happened before for Australia. So the climate targets

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.619
<v Speaker 12>that I think any sensible person knows will never be

0:25:17.660 --> 0:25:23.070
<v Speaker 12>achieved by this country. This government has put legal binding

0:25:23.130 --> 0:25:26.930
<v Speaker 12>commitments in a deal. And who pays the price of that?

0:25:27.650 --> 0:25:32.350
<v Speaker 12>It'll be the Australian farmers, the Australian businesses. But Labor

0:25:32.390 --> 0:25:34.750
<v Speaker 12>has sneakily put it in the middle of this deal,

0:25:35.300 --> 0:25:39.910
<v Speaker 12>hiding it away, trying to wedge the coalition... and basically

0:25:40.109 --> 0:25:46.020
<v Speaker 12>leaving Australian businesses exposed to penalties when eventually it is

0:25:46.140 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 12>clear that these targets won't be met and future governments

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:54.250
<v Speaker 12>cannot be constrained by choosing different policies for the Australian people.

0:25:55.070 --> 0:25:57.090
<v Speaker 12>So that's really what it's all about. It's just that

0:25:57.130 --> 0:26:01.450
<v Speaker 12>they've set this up to make it harder for future

0:26:01.490 --> 0:26:03.889
<v Speaker 12>governments to change climate policy in this country.

0:26:06.609 --> 0:26:09.370
<v Speaker 1>Future voters too, because the issue is if Australians want

0:26:09.390 --> 0:26:10.850
<v Speaker 1>to get out of net zero, if they want to

0:26:10.869 --> 0:26:13.050
<v Speaker 1>scrap Paris, if they want to do any of the

0:26:13.090 --> 0:26:17.430
<v Speaker 1>things on the global climate agenda and they vote for

0:26:17.530 --> 0:26:21.970
<v Speaker 1>it at a future election, our farmers under this EU

0:26:22.030 --> 0:26:25.780
<v Speaker 1>free trade deal will bear the cost. Now, we already

0:26:25.820 --> 0:26:29.300
<v Speaker 1>know that most of the European farmers will get access

0:26:29.540 --> 0:26:33.010
<v Speaker 1>to Australian markets under this deal. As I said, some

0:26:33.030 --> 0:26:35.409
<v Speaker 1>of them, I know the dairy guys, well, they're 31%

0:26:35.410 --> 0:26:39.050
<v Speaker 1>subsidised by government compared to our dairy, which gets sweet

0:26:39.090 --> 0:26:44.010
<v Speaker 1>bugger all. But at the same time, we, our growers

0:26:44.070 --> 0:26:47.670
<v Speaker 1>and our producers, beef, sheep, meat, dairy, sugar, all of those,

0:26:48.180 --> 0:26:52.060
<v Speaker 1>they don't get access to the European market. They're stuck

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.770
<v Speaker 1>with permanent quotas. I mean, we talk about free trade

0:26:55.790 --> 0:26:58.619
<v Speaker 1>and we talk about trade deals. This isn't a deal.

0:26:58.660 --> 0:27:02.180
<v Speaker 1>This is win-win for the EU and it's grossly unfair

0:27:02.619 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for Australian farmers.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:10.830
<v Speaker 12>Peter, trade that is not fair is not free and

0:27:10.869 --> 0:27:14.750
<v Speaker 12>that should be the basic principle here. The Trade Minister

0:27:14.790 --> 0:27:19.490
<v Speaker 12>has done an awful deal, terrible outcomes. It's the sort

0:27:19.540 --> 0:27:23.010
<v Speaker 12>of deal Chris Bowen would do in energy. It basically

0:27:23.109 --> 0:27:26.810
<v Speaker 12>does not look after our national interests. Now, the coalition

0:27:27.390 --> 0:27:30.170
<v Speaker 12>is interested. We want to see a deal done with Europe,

0:27:30.570 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 12>but only if it's in our national interest. And at

0:27:33.859 --> 0:27:37.980
<v Speaker 12>a minimum, that means that these climate commitments have to

0:27:38.020 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 12>be taken out and we need a better deal for

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:45.190
<v Speaker 12>our farmers, for our businesses. Unfortunately, the government has negotiated

0:27:45.210 --> 0:27:47.090
<v Speaker 12>a very bad deal. Just because there's a deal on

0:27:47.109 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 12>the table... doesn't mean you take it. But I think

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 12>they've just rushed in on this. A deal they previously

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.190
<v Speaker 12>said was bad is now suddenly good and they can't

0:27:57.230 --> 0:27:57.870
<v Speaker 12>explain why.

0:28:00.170 --> 0:28:03.510
<v Speaker 1>Ted, I noticed in the announcement today made by the

0:28:03.550 --> 0:28:08.310
<v Speaker 1>opposition leader and the shadow treasurer, there's some $ 31 billion

0:28:08.410 --> 0:28:13.090
<v Speaker 1>of savings that the opposition can get out of government

0:28:13.130 --> 0:28:19.620
<v Speaker 1>spending that basically relates primarily... to climate spending. Now, this

0:28:19.670 --> 0:28:21.940
<v Speaker 1>is an extraordinary amount of money. I was just talking

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:27.500
<v Speaker 1>to Chris Yeoman about the calamity that is Snowy 2.0

0:28:27.500 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 1>now ratcheting up to $ 25 billion. Do you think ordinary

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:39.900
<v Speaker 1>people understand how much money is being thrown at this

0:28:40.090 --> 0:28:43.350
<v Speaker 1>industry of green boondoggles by Chris Bowen?

0:28:44.990 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 12>Peter, I don't think the average Australian does, which is

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.300
<v Speaker 12>why we need to keep telling them the story. And

0:28:50.500 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 12>the crazy thing is the more money the government spends,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 12>the higher the prices are for the everyday Australian. I mean,

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.100
<v Speaker 12>how does that make good commercial sense?

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:00.020
<v Speaker 13>It doesn't.

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.090
<v Speaker 12>Certainly the big news today, and Chris Ullman and you

0:29:03.110 --> 0:29:06.350
<v Speaker 12>were just speaking about it, was Snowy 2.0. To think

0:29:06.430 --> 0:29:10.770
<v Speaker 12>that that project under this government has quadrupled in cost,

0:29:10.910 --> 0:29:15.260
<v Speaker 12>quadrupled in from $ 6 billion to up to $ 25 billion.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.820
<v Speaker 12>I mean, that's a difference of $ 19 billion. Think about

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.340
<v Speaker 12>what you could buy for $ 19 billion. I mean, you're

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 12>probably talking around about nine public hospitals. You're probably talking

0:29:23.540 --> 0:29:27.290
<v Speaker 12>about 130 new high schools. There's always a cost, an

0:29:27.410 --> 0:29:32.650
<v Speaker 12>opportunity cost, when you waste money. But, of course, this

0:29:32.730 --> 0:29:37.130
<v Speaker 12>Labor government is just ideologically driven. It'll keep spending taxpayer

0:29:37.190 --> 0:29:41.430
<v Speaker 12>money on a green dream that by the way, isn't

0:29:41.510 --> 0:29:46.100
<v Speaker 12>even reducing emissions. So it's not even achieving the ideological

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.719
<v Speaker 12>objective Emissions aren't even going down. We're becoming poorer and

0:29:50.820 --> 0:29:53.980
<v Speaker 12>weaker as a country, and they're just doubling down. They

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.660
<v Speaker 12>are doubling down, which is why we need to have

0:29:56.700 --> 0:29:58.260
<v Speaker 12>the fight. We need to call it out. But we

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:02.090
<v Speaker 12>need to demonstrate through policy why we have an alternative here,

0:30:02.460 --> 0:30:05.290
<v Speaker 12>and that's what Angus Taylor is doing, and he continues

0:30:05.570 --> 0:30:07.370
<v Speaker 12>to lead from the front in that, and I'm delighted

0:30:07.410 --> 0:30:07.700
<v Speaker 12>for it.

0:30:10.070 --> 0:30:11.990
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for fleshing out some of that detail on

0:30:12.030 --> 0:30:15.850
<v Speaker 1>that EU unfair trade deal, we'll call it. Ted O'Brien,

0:30:15.870 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Coming up, the whistleblower who first warned me

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:24.570
<v Speaker 1>and I then warned you about the under-resourcing of counter-terrorism

0:30:24.590 --> 0:30:28.490
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, well, he's been ignored again by the Bondi

0:30:28.590 --> 0:30:37.150
<v Speaker 1>Royal Commission. We'll find out more after the break. Welcome back.

0:30:37.190 --> 0:30:38.990
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we'll take a closer look at the latest

0:30:39.030 --> 0:30:42.310
<v Speaker 1>polling in the news poll out of Victoria that shows

0:30:42.370 --> 0:30:46.650
<v Speaker 1>Labor's facing a wipeout in just under a month's time.

0:30:47.340 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But now to the latest on the Anti-Semitism Royal Commission

0:30:50.020 --> 0:30:54.100
<v Speaker 1>and revelations today that it has knocked back again an

0:30:54.580 --> 0:31:00.670
<v Speaker 1>AFP whistleblower from appearing at its extended secret hearing. Here

0:31:00.690 --> 0:31:02.630
<v Speaker 1>to discuss this and more, the man who helped me

0:31:02.690 --> 0:31:08.209
<v Speaker 1>expose the detail from that whistleblower, former AFP Detective Superintendent

0:31:08.230 --> 0:31:13.460
<v Speaker 1>David Craig. David, thank you again. So they've extended these hearings.

0:31:14.020 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>They are in camera, so there's no risk of intelligence

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.970
<v Speaker 1>or other security information making its way into the public domain,

0:31:21.430 --> 0:31:27.090
<v Speaker 1>and yet still that bombshell submission by the AFP whistleblower

0:31:27.510 --> 0:31:31.890
<v Speaker 1>about resources, about being warned pre-Bondi that not enough was

0:31:31.970 --> 0:31:35.530
<v Speaker 1>being done in counter-terrorism, that's been ignored.

0:31:38.980 --> 0:31:43.070
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean, perhaps ignored previously, is not that accurate, Peter.

0:31:43.090 --> 0:31:45.930
<v Speaker 11>I think, in fairness, they accepted a written submission from

0:31:45.950 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 11>this person. However, I would like to have seen that

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.780
<v Speaker 11>person called to give evidence because there is a real

0:31:53.860 --> 0:31:58.590
<v Speaker 11>disconnect between what the interim Royal Commission report said about

0:31:58.710 --> 0:32:02.950
<v Speaker 11>AFP counter-terrorism resourcing And what this report, which wasn't written

0:32:02.990 --> 0:32:04.650
<v Speaker 11>by one person, by the way, it was written by

0:32:04.780 --> 0:32:09.900
<v Speaker 11>three AFP specialist commanders in counterterrorism that were saying that

0:32:10.500 --> 0:32:13.940
<v Speaker 11>vacancy rates were 25%. So that is one in every

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:20.450
<v Speaker 11>four positions vacant in counterterrorism. just before our threat level

0:32:20.910 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 11>went from possible to probable and about 12 months before

0:32:25.100 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 11>the Bondi shooting. So this is a critical document and

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.220
<v Speaker 11>it'll be a real test for the Royal Commission final report.

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 11>It can't stay silent. It needs to justify or reconcile

0:32:35.370 --> 0:32:38.170
<v Speaker 11>how this can be different. The AFP could be saying

0:32:38.210 --> 0:32:42.110
<v Speaker 11>that they have the same budget, but budget doesn't equal capability.

0:32:42.150 --> 0:32:44.070
<v Speaker 11>You can have the same budget applied but then have

0:32:44.350 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 11>positions vacant and your capability... And your skill set is

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:48.300
<v Speaker 11>simply not up to scratch.

0:32:51.850 --> 0:32:55.290
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know how it works. You know, there's 20,000

0:32:55.290 --> 0:32:58.810
<v Speaker 1>submissions put into Bondi. Of course, the Commissioner's not going

0:32:58.830 --> 0:33:02.070
<v Speaker 1>to hear evidence from everyone, but you get a submission

0:33:02.150 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like this that goes to the material facts, as this

0:33:05.860 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>person and the others have said, who were heavily involved

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in counterterrorism at the time, that there wasn't enough resources.

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.220
<v Speaker 1>It was in critical areas that impacted, obviously, the events

0:33:16.300 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bondi. that they were warned 18 months before the

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>massacre that things would happen if resourcing did not improve,

0:33:25.090 --> 0:33:28.490
<v Speaker 1>if that person is not brought before the Royal Commission

0:33:28.510 --> 0:33:32.770
<v Speaker 1>and that information is not interrogated and tested by the Commissioner,

0:33:33.290 --> 0:33:36.130
<v Speaker 1>that tells me that they're not placing much weight on it, David.

0:33:38.530 --> 0:33:40.890
<v Speaker 13>Look, sadly, it does appear that way, Peter.

0:33:40.910 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 11>But, I mean, Chrissie Barrett, the AFP Commissioner, was Deputy

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 11>Commissioner of National Security.

0:33:46.530 --> 0:33:48.090
<v Speaker 13>at the time that report was submitted.

0:33:48.630 --> 0:33:50.930
<v Speaker 11>Now, she did say in Senate estimates that she wasn't

0:33:51.110 --> 0:33:54.170
<v Speaker 11>formally advised about that document, but even if you were

0:33:54.290 --> 0:33:59.390
<v Speaker 11>informally aware of a 25% shortfall in your counter-terrorism resources

0:33:59.490 --> 0:34:03.410
<v Speaker 11>and you're the Deputy Commissioner for National Security, now Commissioner

0:34:03.450 --> 0:34:05.820
<v Speaker 11>for the AFP and Commissioner of the AFP when the

0:34:05.860 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 11>Bondi shooting took place, I would have thought that she

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 11>would be a number one witness to find out the

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.500
<v Speaker 11>truth of what actually happened in the AFP with that document.

0:34:16.070 --> 0:34:18.650
<v Speaker 11>If it was an accounting error, as they've said in

0:34:19.210 --> 0:34:22.170
<v Speaker 11>Senate estimates, the AFP this is, then that's fine. But

0:34:22.190 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 11>it doesn't mean that a capability and vacancy rate is

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 11>not correct. The Australian people need to know how seriously

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:33.780
<v Speaker 11>the AFP took this document because I know the people

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 11>involved with writing that document were taking a particular career

0:34:38.219 --> 0:34:41.469
<v Speaker 11>risk in doing so and they did so with the

0:34:41.730 --> 0:34:44.130
<v Speaker 11>best interest of the Australian community at heart and it

0:34:44.290 --> 0:34:47.419
<v Speaker 11>seems to me that this has just been pushed under

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:52.820
<v Speaker 11>the carpet and ignored by the AFP Commissioner and hopefully

0:34:53.010 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 11>not the Royal Commission.

0:34:53.860 --> 0:34:55.230
<v Speaker 13>We'll see what the final report says.

0:34:57.450 --> 0:34:59.130
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what the final report says, David, when it's

0:34:59.150 --> 0:35:02.310
<v Speaker 1>dropped out just before Christmas. I think the government's hope

0:35:02.350 --> 0:35:05.870
<v Speaker 1>it gets washed away with the holiday season. I want

0:35:05.890 --> 0:35:07.330
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about a story that was in the

0:35:07.370 --> 0:35:09.990
<v Speaker 1>papers today. This is about a Yazidi woman who says

0:35:10.030 --> 0:35:13.299
<v Speaker 1>she was enslaved and tortured for five months as a

0:35:13.420 --> 0:35:19.009
<v Speaker 1>nine-year-old allegedly by an Australian woman linked to Islamic State. Now,

0:35:19.110 --> 0:35:23.580
<v Speaker 1>she wants justice, rightly so, telling The Australian she was

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly beaten and abused by a woman she knew as

0:35:26.100 --> 0:35:31.660
<v Speaker 1>Umm Osama, believed by investigators to be the Australian ISIS bride,

0:35:31.820 --> 0:35:36.380
<v Speaker 1>Hoden Abbey, while living inside the terrorist caliphate in Syria.

0:35:37.110 --> 0:35:40.750
<v Speaker 1>Authorities were bracing for Abby's return since June after she

0:35:40.830 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was hit with a permit that overrode a temporary exclusion

0:35:47.219 --> 0:35:51.220
<v Speaker 1>order designed to keep her out of Australia. David, these

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>are allegations, of course, should she face charges. of crimes

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>against humanity, it'll go before the courts. But how do

0:35:59.300 --> 0:36:02.690
<v Speaker 1>we ensure justice for this alleged victim and what are

0:36:02.730 --> 0:36:06.629
<v Speaker 1>the guarantees there if Abby does return that she will

0:36:06.690 --> 0:36:09.330
<v Speaker 1>be investigated and monitored?

0:36:12.410 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, this witness, who is an eyewitness and a victim,

0:36:18.180 --> 0:36:22.450
<v Speaker 11>has offered to give evidence to the AFP in July. Now,

0:36:22.739 --> 0:36:25.170
<v Speaker 11>we've had a few months have passed since then And

0:36:25.310 --> 0:36:27.870
<v Speaker 11>as I understand it, that evidence has not been tested.

0:36:27.950 --> 0:36:31.649
<v Speaker 13>Now, I would think that the AFP would be.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:36.380
<v Speaker 11>Very interested when an Australian citizen is alleged to have

0:36:36.420 --> 0:36:42.020
<v Speaker 11>committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, enslaving and sexually and

0:36:42.060 --> 0:36:46.590
<v Speaker 11>physically abusing a child in a war zone, that's the allegation,

0:36:47.350 --> 0:36:50.690
<v Speaker 11>that even Tony Burke with his one eye shut to

0:36:50.750 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 11>radical Islam would take notice and want this investigated to

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:58.100
<v Speaker 11>find out if there's veracity to what this victim eyewitness

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.489
<v Speaker 11>is saying or whether or not it's just made up

0:37:01.550 --> 0:37:05.109
<v Speaker 11>or fabricated or unreliable. We have precedence here. We have

0:37:05.170 --> 0:37:09.150
<v Speaker 11>two ISIS brides facing charges at the moment in Australia.

0:37:09.370 --> 0:37:12.270
<v Speaker 11>There's a precedence for us to prosecute this. When this

0:37:12.310 --> 0:37:14.549
<v Speaker 11>person comes back at her own will, because we don't

0:37:14.570 --> 0:37:16.630
<v Speaker 11>have any control over it, the government seems to have

0:37:16.670 --> 0:37:23.380
<v Speaker 11>lost that, She needs to face immediate prosecution and refuse bail.

0:37:23.860 --> 0:37:28.299
<v Speaker 11>Her behaviour, if proven, is simply some of the worst

0:37:28.340 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 11>crimes you could commit.

0:37:31.670 --> 0:37:34.270
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, Amitari, we talked about him last week. This

0:37:34.290 --> 0:37:37.910
<v Speaker 1>is the convicted ISIS supporter due from release from prison

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.460
<v Speaker 1>on the 1st of November. What, got six days to

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>go before he's out? Do we know if there has

0:37:43.860 --> 0:37:47.190
<v Speaker 1>been some sort of control order put in place or

0:37:47.210 --> 0:37:49.009
<v Speaker 1>has the Commonwealth even made an application?

0:37:51.940 --> 0:37:56.090
<v Speaker 11>Last I saw, Peter, Home Affairs Department of Tony Burke

0:37:56.190 --> 0:38:00.670
<v Speaker 11>is refusing to let any details out about this. I mean,

0:38:00.710 --> 0:38:05.029
<v Speaker 11>this person, Isaac Almatari, is a convicted ISIS supporter. He's

0:38:05.070 --> 0:38:08.460
<v Speaker 11>been imprisoned twice, once in Lebanon, once in Australia. He

0:38:08.500 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 11>has a walking terror machine and he's going to be

0:38:11.860 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 11>out in about six days' time. I would think that

0:38:14.460 --> 0:38:17.740
<v Speaker 11>the Australian public are entitled to know whether our government

0:38:18.180 --> 0:38:20.430
<v Speaker 11>is trying to keep this person in prison longer with

0:38:20.469 --> 0:38:23.230
<v Speaker 11>a continuing detention order or will be released and the

0:38:23.310 --> 0:38:27.010
<v Speaker 11>AFP will have an extended supervision order or a control

0:38:27.090 --> 0:38:30.090
<v Speaker 11>order to make sure that this person can't cause any harm.

0:38:30.630 --> 0:38:34.020
<v Speaker 11>If not, then we know that Tony Burke has... advised

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:36.390
<v Speaker 11>or as believes that this person is no threat and

0:38:36.450 --> 0:38:38.029
<v Speaker 11>should be welcome to live next to any one of

0:38:38.110 --> 0:38:38.469
<v Speaker 11>our viewers.

0:38:40.700 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'll look forward to the questions in the Parliament

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:44.890
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow because this is the sort of stuff in the

0:38:44.950 --> 0:38:49.630
<v Speaker 1>past that Prime Ministers and Home Affairs Ministers have publicly

0:38:49.690 --> 0:38:53.430
<v Speaker 1>dealt with, openly dealt with, obviously preserving all the legalities

0:38:53.510 --> 0:38:56.510
<v Speaker 1>as required, but this isn't good enough yet again from Labor.

0:38:56.570 --> 0:38:58.670
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave it there. Thank you, David. Let's go to

0:38:58.690 --> 0:39:02.460
<v Speaker 1>the polls after the break. Risk of hubris here for

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.820
<v Speaker 1>the Liberals if they're not careful. Opposition Leader Jess Wilson,

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>she won't allow it, she says, and she'll join me

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:15.430
<v Speaker 1>after the break. Welcome back. Coming up, the survey that

0:39:15.489 --> 0:39:20.020
<v Speaker 1>shows support for coal surging. 78% of voters in Chris

0:39:20.060 --> 0:39:25.530
<v Speaker 1>Bowen's own electorate keen to keep coal-fired generators running. Let's

0:39:25.590 --> 0:39:28.049
<v Speaker 1>now go to that news poll in Victoria that's got

0:39:28.070 --> 0:39:29.969
<v Speaker 1>the Coalition well and truly ahead of them.

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 13>Labor.

0:39:31.100 --> 0:39:36.660
<v Speaker 1>Two-party preferred terms, 55-45. There was Labor thinking that switch

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.420
<v Speaker 1>from Jacinta Allen to Ben Carroll would save them, but

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.020
<v Speaker 1>not if the polls are right. A 4% drop there

0:39:42.060 --> 0:39:45.180
<v Speaker 1>for Labor, down to just 24% on primary voters. For

0:39:45.219 --> 0:39:48.860
<v Speaker 1>the Coalition, there's been an uptick, three points up to 33%.

0:39:48.860 --> 0:39:53.580
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Hanson's moved from 19% to 20%. That's One Nation.

0:39:54.100 --> 0:39:58.860
<v Speaker 1>Greens are up 1% to 14%. Now, if replicated on

0:39:58.910 --> 0:40:02.270
<v Speaker 1>Election Day, that's about four weeks away, it would deliver

0:40:02.310 --> 0:40:06.830
<v Speaker 1>a massive 10-point swing against Labor. This is on the

0:40:06.830 --> 0:40:10.850
<v Speaker 1>2022 election numbers and put Jess Wilson in the job

0:40:11.230 --> 0:40:14.420
<v Speaker 1>of Premier. And the woman now, the woman with it

0:40:14.460 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>all to lose before her, Jess Wilson, joins me. Well, Jess,

0:40:18.180 --> 0:40:21.430
<v Speaker 1>really strong numbers today. You'd much rather be in your

0:40:21.510 --> 0:40:26.050
<v Speaker 1>position than the Premier's. A month out, though, anything can happen.

0:40:26.090 --> 0:40:29.530
<v Speaker 1>How on earth do you keep a team focused because

0:40:30.350 --> 0:40:34.850
<v Speaker 1>no-one likes hubris and this is not a foregone conclusion,

0:40:34.910 --> 0:40:38.170
<v Speaker 1>is it? Absolutely not.

0:40:38.230 --> 0:40:40.990
<v Speaker 14>It's good to be with you, Peter. My team takes

0:40:41.290 --> 0:40:45.210
<v Speaker 14>absolutely nothing for granted. Not one single vote has been

0:40:45.310 --> 0:40:49.130
<v Speaker 14>counted at this election. And that's exactly why my team

0:40:49.190 --> 0:40:51.170
<v Speaker 14>is out on the ground. I'm out on the ground

0:40:51.370 --> 0:40:55.009
<v Speaker 14>every single day talking to Victorians and making sure that

0:40:55.030 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 14>we earn their trust. We have got a lot of

0:40:57.890 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 14>work to do over the next 33 days to demonstrate

0:41:01.340 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 14>to Victorians that we have a plan, a plan to

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.290
<v Speaker 14>reduce crime, to lower costs and deliver a government that works.

0:41:07.670 --> 0:41:09.990
<v Speaker 14>But that means we're out on the ground, we're listening

0:41:10.030 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 14>to Victorians, we're understanding their concerns, but most importantly, we're

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 14>sharing our plan to fix this state and earning their trust.

0:41:19.780 --> 0:41:24.390
<v Speaker 1>You need a significant swing, 8% across the board. Those

0:41:24.469 --> 0:41:26.569
<v Speaker 1>numbers in that poll would give you about 10, but

0:41:27.350 --> 0:41:32.310
<v Speaker 1>no swings ever uniform. Preference flows will be significant. The

0:41:32.350 --> 0:41:35.130
<v Speaker 1>game changer of One Nation, how that will play out.

0:41:35.670 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So what's your message to voters, Jess?

0:41:40.540 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 14>My message, Peter, is that we cannot afford to wait

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 14>to start fixing Victoria. I've been honest that the problems

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 14>here in Victoria are very big. Whether it's record levels

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:54.180
<v Speaker 14>of debt, record levels of crime, roads that are littered

0:41:54.219 --> 0:41:57.980
<v Speaker 14>with potholes, we cannot fix it overnight. But we need

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:01.030
<v Speaker 14>a team that is ready to get started straight away.

0:42:01.469 --> 0:42:04.130
<v Speaker 14>A team that knows what to do. And my team

0:42:04.210 --> 0:42:07.390
<v Speaker 14>not only has a plan, we have a 100-day plan

0:42:07.450 --> 0:42:10.230
<v Speaker 14>to demonstrate that we know what to do immediately if

0:42:10.290 --> 0:42:12.330
<v Speaker 14>we are given the honour of being the next government

0:42:12.390 --> 0:42:15.509
<v Speaker 14>here in Victoria. But we have a team with the experience.

0:42:15.910 --> 0:42:19.469
<v Speaker 14>The real world experience, importantly, but also the government experience

0:42:19.510 --> 0:42:22.340
<v Speaker 14>to not waste a moment. I love this state, Peter.

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 14>I've said that to you many times. And I want

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 14>to start turning Victoria around immediately. But in order to

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.910
<v Speaker 14>do that, I'm asking Victorians for their support. A vote

0:42:31.989 --> 0:42:35.510
<v Speaker 14>for the Liberals and Nationals deliver us majority government because

0:42:35.550 --> 0:42:38.790
<v Speaker 14>we cannot risk wasting any time to get started on

0:42:38.830 --> 0:42:40.230
<v Speaker 14>putting Victoria back on track.

0:42:42.550 --> 0:42:45.010
<v Speaker 1>There was a story on the weekend that the Premier

0:42:45.030 --> 0:42:47.890
<v Speaker 1>needs to have an afternoon kip just to cope with

0:42:47.930 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 1>a busy job. Now, interesting for two reasons. One, that

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was an internal hit from someone who was in his

0:42:55.180 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>office or connected to Labor. That tells me that things

0:42:58.020 --> 0:43:01.300
<v Speaker 1>are pretty crook for the party at the moment. But also,

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:06.129
<v Speaker 1>it demonstrated to me how quickly your CHQ's working because

0:43:06.150 --> 0:43:09.150
<v Speaker 1>there was a billboard on top of a Captain Snooze

0:43:09.330 --> 0:43:13.469
<v Speaker 1>store within a couple of hours. What does this tell

0:43:13.510 --> 0:43:14.410
<v Speaker 1>you about Labor?

0:43:17.070 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 14>Well, I mean, it's a very demanding job being Premier,

0:43:20.420 --> 0:43:23.859
<v Speaker 14>and it's clearly not for everyone. Perhaps Ben Carrolls isn't

0:43:23.940 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 14>up to the task and needs to take a snooze

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:29.280
<v Speaker 14>in the afternoon. But what's clear is that our team,

0:43:29.380 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 14>we didn't hit the snooze button. We were focused on

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:35.550
<v Speaker 14>how do we demonstrate to Victorians that we're hungry, but

0:43:35.590 --> 0:43:38.350
<v Speaker 14>most importantly, that we can't be asleep at the wheel.

0:43:38.430 --> 0:43:40.710
<v Speaker 14>We need a team with a plan to fix this state,

0:43:40.810 --> 0:43:42.250
<v Speaker 14>and that's exactly what my team has.

0:43:44.580 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to play a grab because it looks like

0:43:46.060 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you were out in the lawnmower while he was having

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:48.580
<v Speaker 1>a sleep.

0:43:48.860 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 13>Have a look.

0:43:50.590 --> 0:43:55.290
<v Speaker 14>This is the grass the Labor government can't afford to mow. Well, well, well,

0:43:55.550 --> 0:43:59.210
<v Speaker 14>look who's back mowing the grass because Labor still can't.

0:43:59.010 --> 0:43:59.700
<v Speaker 1>Afford to do it.

0:43:59.850 --> 0:44:02.190
<v Speaker 14>Only my team and I have a plan for a

0:44:02.250 --> 0:44:03.819
<v Speaker 14>fresh start for Victoria.

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:04.900
<v Speaker 17>More fresh grass.

0:44:07.830 --> 0:44:09.910
<v Speaker 1>Again, I say this to people outside of Victoria, this

0:44:09.930 --> 0:44:12.870
<v Speaker 1>seems crazy that something like mowing the lords cuts through

0:44:12.930 --> 0:44:16.870
<v Speaker 1>like it does, but just like potholes, the place is

0:44:16.930 --> 0:44:17.630
<v Speaker 1>in decline.

0:44:20.180 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 14>That's right, Peter. And, you know, while it's a bit

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 14>of fun to mow the grass, I think that I

0:44:24.739 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 14>had a number of people stop and toot their horns

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:28.219
<v Speaker 14>while we were doing it and say, you know, good

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 14>on you, Jess, let's actually get the basics right in

0:44:30.739 --> 0:44:34.140
<v Speaker 14>this state. But whether it's potholes, whether it's graffiti, whether

0:44:34.180 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 14>it's the overgrown grass... These are visible signs of decline

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.230
<v Speaker 14>of Victoria under this Labor government. And one of the

0:44:41.290 --> 0:44:44.430
<v Speaker 14>things that I am absolutely focused on doing and why

0:44:44.489 --> 0:44:46.570
<v Speaker 14>I get out of bed every morning is that I

0:44:46.610 --> 0:44:49.140
<v Speaker 14>want to make sure that we are proud to be Victorian.

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:51.660
<v Speaker 14>We bring pride back to this state. I talk a

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:55.089
<v Speaker 14>lot about hope and optimism. That's so important, but so

0:44:55.150 --> 0:44:57.670
<v Speaker 14>is pride. Pride in making sure that we get the

0:44:57.730 --> 0:45:00.610
<v Speaker 14>basics right. We fix the roads, we mow the grass,

0:45:00.850 --> 0:45:03.380
<v Speaker 14>we clean up the graffiti. This is what a government

0:45:03.590 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 14>should deliver, a government that is getting on with the basics.

0:45:06.980 --> 0:45:08.860
<v Speaker 14>Unless you get on with the basics and you deliver

0:45:08.900 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 14>the basics, you cannot deliver the bigger things that this

0:45:11.420 --> 0:45:14.410
<v Speaker 14>state needs, and that's why I'm so focused on fixing Victoria.

0:45:16.570 --> 0:45:18.710
<v Speaker 1>Good luck, Jess. Four weeks to go. We'll catch up

0:45:18.750 --> 0:45:21.259
<v Speaker 1>with you soon. Thank you. Isn't it nice to see

0:45:21.300 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>a state leader wanting to do just state government stuff, hey?

0:45:25.140 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>How about the local councils get back to their knitting,

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:28.830
<v Speaker 1>leave the feds to do what they should be doing.

0:45:29.510 --> 0:45:31.530
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the break. After the break, those huge

0:45:31.650 --> 0:45:36.489
<v Speaker 1>numbers for coal in Chris Bowen's own seat. Paddles up next.

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. Let's bring my panel straight in. Nicole Flint,

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, former Liberal MP from South Australia and One

0:45:46.980 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Nation National Director James Ashby, who was in the headlines

0:45:50.620 --> 0:45:55.060
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon with my colleague Andrew Clennell. He read out

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.819
<v Speaker 1>a text message you sent him last night, apparently, that

0:45:57.860 --> 0:45:59.980
<v Speaker 1>your boss thinks he's a bit of a dick, that

0:46:00.020 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't going to come on and discuss something or other.

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Your right of reply, James Ashby.

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.209
<v Speaker 2>That's what I said. And I think the same thing.

0:46:09.290 --> 0:46:11.270
<v Speaker 17>And I have more letters or emails, should I say,

0:46:11.330 --> 0:46:14.950
<v Speaker 17>of support and text messages from people even within the

0:46:14.989 --> 0:46:18.149
<v Speaker 17>News 24 room. So I'm sorry, Andrew, but look, some

0:46:18.190 --> 0:46:20.450
<v Speaker 17>people do think you're a dick and I'm not afraid

0:46:20.469 --> 0:46:21.430
<v Speaker 17>to call it out at times.

0:46:23.810 --> 0:46:24.009
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:46:24.030 --> 0:46:27.630
<v Speaker 1>Will she still come on News 24, mate? Oh, yeah,

0:46:27.750 --> 0:46:28.150
<v Speaker 1>of course.

0:46:28.390 --> 0:46:30.509
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, it's just Andrew. She's got no interest in talking

0:46:30.550 --> 0:46:33.720
<v Speaker 17>to at the moment. So no issues there. A little

0:46:33.739 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 17>more honesty.

0:46:34.260 --> 0:46:35.020
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Carl.

0:46:35.060 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 17>Be brought out of more politicians.

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

0:46:39.940 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind that at all. Let's go to coal. 78%

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of voters in Chris Bowen's own electorate say they want

0:46:46.180 --> 0:46:50.220
<v Speaker 1>coal kept running until there's a better alternative. But 80%

0:46:50.219 --> 0:46:53.330
<v Speaker 1>of those across New South Wales say we need more

0:46:53.390 --> 0:46:57.870
<v Speaker 1>coal-fired power plants. This is Compass polling on behalf of

0:46:57.910 --> 0:47:02.710
<v Speaker 1>Affordable Energy Australia, and this is quite significant. 82% of

0:47:02.770 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>voters in Grayndler, well, they think coal should be kept

0:47:06.780 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in the system.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 13>Nicole?

0:47:08.230 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Flint, any surprises here?

0:47:09.780 --> 0:47:15.020
<v Speaker 19>None whatsoever, Peter, and maybe... Labor will finally face the

0:47:15.060 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 19>reality that their failed renewables green nightmare is despised by

0:47:19.820 --> 0:47:23.020
<v Speaker 19>the Australian people and they know exactly who is to

0:47:23.060 --> 0:47:26.540
<v Speaker 19>blame for record high power prices, whether they're a small business,

0:47:26.580 --> 0:47:29.299
<v Speaker 19>whether they're a family just trying to pay the bills,

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:31.650
<v Speaker 19>you know, whether they're seeing the prices pass through in

0:47:31.670 --> 0:47:34.230
<v Speaker 19>their groceries. It's an absolute disgrace and I could not

0:47:34.270 --> 0:47:39.190
<v Speaker 19>be happier to see Labor getting the political reality check

0:47:39.350 --> 0:47:41.290
<v Speaker 19>that they very much deserve.

0:47:41.290 --> 0:47:49.950
<v Speaker 1>27% of voters in that poll, James, only 27% trust

0:47:50.010 --> 0:47:54.290
<v Speaker 1>Labor to bring down power prices. No surprises there?

0:47:56.590 --> 0:47:58.190
<v Speaker 17>No, but it gives me a great deal of hope

0:47:58.270 --> 0:48:00.930
<v Speaker 17>that we can get rid of this lying Labor government,

0:48:00.969 --> 0:48:03.130
<v Speaker 17>because it doesn't matter whether it's Chris Bowen or the

0:48:03.170 --> 0:48:06.270
<v Speaker 17>Prime Minister telling us that they're going to bring energy

0:48:06.330 --> 0:48:08.330
<v Speaker 17>prices down. They've had four years to prove that, and

0:48:08.350 --> 0:48:11.850
<v Speaker 17>they've not been able to. When we've got competition from

0:48:11.910 --> 0:48:17.700
<v Speaker 17>countries like China... that are producing coal-fired power at $ 65

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.060
<v Speaker 17>a megawatt. That's six and a half cents a kilowatt.

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:23.310
<v Speaker 17>We're paying here somewhere around the vicinity of 40 cents

0:48:23.330 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 17>a kilowatt. as household users. And businesses have been, they're

0:48:27.060 --> 0:48:30.100
<v Speaker 17>feeling that price gouge as well. So look, under a

0:48:30.180 --> 0:48:33.320
<v Speaker 17>one-nation government, we've said we'll build more coal-fired power stations

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:36.950
<v Speaker 17>to fill that void, bring power prices down until we

0:48:36.969 --> 0:48:42.190
<v Speaker 17>can get that halt on nuclear energy overturned. I think

0:48:42.230 --> 0:48:44.730
<v Speaker 17>that's got to go. The Liberal Party put that into

0:48:44.790 --> 0:48:46.670
<v Speaker 17>place with a deal they did under the Greens. It's

0:48:46.710 --> 0:48:48.700
<v Speaker 17>got to go. And we have to catch up with

0:48:48.739 --> 0:48:51.320
<v Speaker 17>the times and bring energy prices down for the sake

0:48:51.820 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 17>of ensuring that we've got ongoing industry here in the country,

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:57.399
<v Speaker 17>but more importantly, households can afford to live.

0:48:57.420 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Nicole, quick one from you. The sort of the infection

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.420
<v Speaker 1>in Paris, if I can call it that, is making

0:49:06.460 --> 0:49:08.460
<v Speaker 1>its way to Australia with talk there's going to be

0:49:08.580 --> 0:49:11.510
<v Speaker 1>mass protests on Remembrance Day.

0:49:12.230 --> 0:49:15.610
<v Speaker 19>Well, Peter, that's just an absolute and utter disgrace. And

0:49:15.670 --> 0:49:18.490
<v Speaker 19>I sincerely hope that we will see the protesters properly

0:49:18.530 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 19>dealt with, governments had no hesitation stopping freedom protesters during COVID.

0:49:25.100 --> 0:49:28.370
<v Speaker 19>Why don't we see the same standards applied to this

0:49:28.469 --> 0:49:32.350
<v Speaker 19>sort of insanity, which is really, really dangerous? What we've

0:49:32.390 --> 0:49:34.090
<v Speaker 19>seen in Europe is an absolute travesty.

0:49:35.770 --> 0:49:38.419
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Thank you to you both. I'm out of time.

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:40.180
<v Speaker 1>I've got to leave it there. I will say to

0:49:40.219 --> 0:49:41.879
<v Speaker 1>my viewers, thank you for all your emails. I've been

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:45.500
<v Speaker 1>inundated with those comments I made about Ben Robert Smith and,

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular, your anger at the retrospectivity of the laws

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he has been charged under. We will stay across that.

0:49:54.219 --> 0:49:55.439
<v Speaker 1>See you tomorrow. Here's Andrew.