1 00:00:01,880 --> 00:00:04,880 Speaker 1: The public has had a long held fascination with detectives. 2 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:08,039 Speaker 1: Detective sy aside of life the average person is never 3 00:00:08,119 --> 00:00:11,080 Speaker 1: exposed to. I spent thirty four years as a cop. 4 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:14,040 Speaker 1: For twenty five of those years I was catching killers. 5 00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:16,200 Speaker 1: That's what I did for a living. I was a 6 00:00:16,200 --> 00:00:20,560 Speaker 1: homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead, 7 00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:23,120 Speaker 1: I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated. 8 00:00:23,840 --> 00:00:26,400 Speaker 1: The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories 9 00:00:26,440 --> 00:00:28,760 Speaker 1: from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw 10 00:00:28,800 --> 00:00:31,440 Speaker 1: and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some 11 00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:34,640 Speaker 1: of the content and language might be confronting. That's because 12 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:37,640 Speaker 1: no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged. 13 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:47,960 Speaker 1: Join me now as I take you into this world, Greg, 14 00:00:48,159 --> 00:00:52,080 Speaker 1: I like to like I did prepare before court. I 15 00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:55,800 Speaker 1: prepare before I do podcasts, and it's in part of 16 00:00:55,800 --> 00:00:59,240 Speaker 1: my investigation. Before I've sat down spoken to you that 17 00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:02,040 Speaker 1: it's come to my attention, there's an allegation that you'll 18 00:01:02,040 --> 00:01:06,360 Speaker 1: fired a three fifty seven magnum in central local court. 19 00:01:06,440 --> 00:01:08,840 Speaker 1: Now I'm going to ask you about that. I want 20 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:11,480 Speaker 1: you to understand you're not obliged to say anything or 21 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,640 Speaker 1: do anything, but anything you do, say or do may 22 00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:16,760 Speaker 1: later be used in evidence. Do you understand that. 23 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:17,840 Speaker 2: I do understand that. 24 00:01:17,959 --> 00:01:21,119 Speaker 1: Gary, Okay, well, I want you to choose your words 25 00:01:21,240 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 1: very carefully and think what I'm asking you here. Greg. 26 00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:27,800 Speaker 1: Have you ever fired a three point fifty seven magnum 27 00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:29,240 Speaker 1: in Central Local Court? 28 00:01:30,280 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 2: I have, fortunately it was later with blanks, but I 29 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:40,240 Speaker 2: have fired the gun in the presence of two ones. 30 00:01:40,280 --> 00:01:41,840 Speaker 2: To cease now, so we've got to speak well of 31 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 2: you two, very very well. They thought they were funny. 32 00:01:48,840 --> 00:01:49,240 Speaker 2: Detect this. 33 00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:53,000 Speaker 1: I think it's pretty funny. In this day and age. 34 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:56,640 Speaker 1: I definitely wouldn't think it'd be acceptable, can you. I 35 00:01:57,040 --> 00:01:59,840 Speaker 1: was reading about that and it's written down somewhere about 36 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:04,560 Speaker 1: you firing that three point fifty seven magnum in the 37 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:07,720 Speaker 1: courthouse or in the front of the courthouse. 38 00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:10,760 Speaker 2: No, it was. It was in the foyer of Central 39 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:12,960 Speaker 2: Local Court. And anyone who's been to Central Local Court 40 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:17,160 Speaker 2: will know that you walked through these a walk up 41 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 2: the steps of this beautiful old court building. It was 42 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:23,080 Speaker 2: the original Magistrates court, and you walk through some glass 43 00:02:23,160 --> 00:02:27,040 Speaker 2: doors and further glass doors into this big area which 44 00:02:27,120 --> 00:02:30,800 Speaker 2: leads off into various court rooms and the court office 45 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:34,959 Speaker 2: and It was probably about three o'clock in the afternoon, 46 00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:36,880 Speaker 2: and for some reason I had to go down there. 47 00:02:36,880 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 2: It may have been to file something or to find 48 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:41,120 Speaker 2: out what was going on in a particular court that 49 00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:43,840 Speaker 2: I had some interest in. And I walked in and 50 00:02:43,880 --> 00:02:48,280 Speaker 2: I ran into a now deceeased officer, Billy Mansell, who 51 00:02:48,360 --> 00:02:50,919 Speaker 2: was a genuinely nice guy and had actually done a 52 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:54,200 Speaker 2: lot of undercover worker and it all seemed to me 53 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:57,799 Speaker 2: that he was too nice a black to be involved 54 00:02:57,800 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 2: in that sort of stuff. And in any event, Billy 55 00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:04,600 Speaker 2: was there with another detective who I can't recall, and 56 00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:06,239 Speaker 2: when I ran into Bell, and he'd been involved in 57 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:08,840 Speaker 2: a lot of drug investigations that I had been involved in, 58 00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:12,080 Speaker 2: and I lusted what they were doing there. And they 59 00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:14,160 Speaker 2: said they were hanging around waiting to give evidence, and 60 00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:19,200 Speaker 2: what was the case about, and they said it's drugs 61 00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:24,440 Speaker 2: and guns. And I'd sort of been glanced to my 62 00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:28,520 Speaker 2: right and just to the left of the entrance to 63 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:33,400 Speaker 2: the court room there's this great, big revolver sitting on 64 00:03:33,440 --> 00:03:35,120 Speaker 2: the chair, large as life. 65 00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:37,480 Speaker 1: Clean Eastwood Stock exactly. 66 00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 2: It was. They're big guns. They're big guns. And so 67 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 2: I've walked over and I said, is that a three 68 00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 2: five seven mag And they said, yeah, you have a 69 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:49,600 Speaker 2: look at it, pick it up. Well, they were really 70 00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:52,480 Speaker 2: really friendly about it and encouraging. Man, I'm not a 71 00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:56,360 Speaker 2: particularly lover of guns, but I thought, well, I'll just 72 00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:58,600 Speaker 2: want to get a feel of this thing. What they 73 00:03:58,640 --> 00:04:00,280 Speaker 2: didn't tell me was that the bloody thing had a 74 00:04:00,320 --> 00:04:04,240 Speaker 2: hair trigger and that they'd put blanks in it. I've 75 00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:08,120 Speaker 2: touched I've picked it up. As I was turning around 76 00:04:08,200 --> 00:04:12,360 Speaker 2: to say something like, just bloody heavy, isn't it, I've 77 00:04:12,360 --> 00:04:15,280 Speaker 2: touched the trigger and it's gone off. In the middle 78 00:04:15,320 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 2: of the foyer with cases going on, Well, all hell 79 00:04:18,560 --> 00:04:22,480 Speaker 2: break loose there and people started running from everywhere, and 80 00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:25,200 Speaker 2: excuse me using this language. There's Billy and the other 81 00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:30,279 Speaker 2: copper absolutely pissing themselves with laughter and having a great 82 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:33,200 Speaker 2: joke at my expense. And it took me a long 83 00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:34,200 Speaker 2: time to live that down. 84 00:04:35,400 --> 00:04:38,440 Speaker 1: That is a that is a good get. That is 85 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 1: a very good job. But could you imagine if that 86 00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:45,320 Speaker 1: happened today? The courthouse would be shut down, It'd be secured, 87 00:04:45,520 --> 00:04:49,600 Speaker 1: there'd be negotiaders called out, it would just and everyone 88 00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:52,400 Speaker 1: involved in it would be in all sorts of trouble 89 00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 1: and people who would be off on post aumatic stress. 90 00:04:56,160 --> 00:04:57,440 Speaker 1: It's a different world, isn't it. 91 00:04:57,520 --> 00:04:59,240 Speaker 2: It is it is we take I think I think 92 00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:01,240 Speaker 2: in some respects we take life too seriously. 93 00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:03,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, And like you were the scene, some of the 94 00:05:03,760 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 1: characters in the police and some of the crooks, some 95 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:08,720 Speaker 1: of the people in the court, some of the court officers. 96 00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:12,000 Speaker 1: There was a little bit more robust and there was 97 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:14,520 Speaker 1: a lot of sense. There was a sense of humor 98 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:15,480 Speaker 1: in there as well. 99 00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:18,880 Speaker 2: There was It's one of my favorite, not warding homes, 100 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:21,520 Speaker 2: but lunching places is a Greek restaurant. I give them 101 00:05:21,560 --> 00:05:22,720 Speaker 2: a plug called Vietne's. 102 00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:25,640 Speaker 1: Yeah. I had many a meal there and it's. 103 00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:30,720 Speaker 2: Still great food. And i'd regularly see tables of detectives 104 00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:34,280 Speaker 2: down there on a Friday afternoon. And as I said, 105 00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 2: you leave everything in the courtroom. It's everyone got a 106 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:39,360 Speaker 2: job to do in this industry and you've got to 107 00:05:39,400 --> 00:05:42,039 Speaker 2: take it seriously, but you shouldn't carry it with you 108 00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:43,839 Speaker 2: when you leave. And you'd always have a laugh. 109 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:47,400 Speaker 1: And I think that that's good. And there's I'm sure 110 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:51,800 Speaker 1: there's people that you've crossed it that you don't get 111 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:55,599 Speaker 1: past that. But the people that I've dealt with when 112 00:05:56,080 --> 00:05:59,360 Speaker 1: I don't mind playing hard but fair, and I respect 113 00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 1: people with the doing their job coming at the hard 114 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:05,839 Speaker 1: but fair and vice versa, and there's not it's nice 115 00:06:05,839 --> 00:06:09,120 Speaker 1: sometimes after it's finished that you can actually yeah, it 116 00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:12,520 Speaker 1: might be just a begrudging nod, but showing respect to 117 00:06:12,560 --> 00:06:15,120 Speaker 1: the person that you've been up against in an adversarial 118 00:06:15,160 --> 00:06:17,200 Speaker 1: system because you are up against them, and the way 119 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:20,040 Speaker 1: you described it in part one, it's like a playing 120 00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 1: within the rules of a sporting match. 121 00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:26,640 Speaker 2: I've had the benefit. On one occasion, I was in 122 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:30,440 Speaker 2: the Old Courthouse Hotel after a trial. I think it 123 00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:33,160 Speaker 2: was up there with Pat Costello. Pat and I'd get 124 00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:36,360 Speaker 2: involved in a trial up there, and we're actually having 125 00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:39,920 Speaker 2: a drink with a very legend detective by the name 126 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:44,520 Speaker 2: of Johnny Burke. It was as hard as nails have 127 00:06:44,520 --> 00:06:46,120 Speaker 2: a drink with John and he was the nicest blake 128 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:49,159 Speaker 2: in the world. When someone came up and started giving 129 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:51,680 Speaker 2: either him or the grief, well, he went from the 130 00:06:51,760 --> 00:06:54,320 Speaker 2: nicest blake in the world to a bloke I wouldn't 131 00:06:54,320 --> 00:06:55,480 Speaker 2: want it to have been arrested by. 132 00:06:55,680 --> 00:06:59,120 Speaker 1: Didn't want to take that different person, didn't want to 133 00:06:59,240 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 1: wan across at the court house. I tell yeah, many 134 00:07:02,839 --> 00:07:08,279 Speaker 1: a victory drink spent there, just leading into that when 135 00:07:08,279 --> 00:07:12,160 Speaker 1: you do win a case is there and I would 136 00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:16,120 Speaker 1: imagine and people that you genuinely don't believe it are 137 00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:19,000 Speaker 1: guilty and the justice would be served if they've gone off. 138 00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:21,640 Speaker 1: Do you go out then celebrate? And you don't have 139 00:07:21,720 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 1: to specific examples, but is it something that's done. 140 00:07:25,040 --> 00:07:27,560 Speaker 2: Oh, yeah, it is something that's done. You go and 141 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:31,360 Speaker 2: have a drink with the with the sort of the 142 00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:34,680 Speaker 2: defendants group, with the q's group, but you don't spend 143 00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:37,360 Speaker 2: it a lot of time there. I got caught once 144 00:07:37,400 --> 00:07:40,440 Speaker 2: down at Aubrey with the with the Black Ullans after 145 00:07:40,440 --> 00:07:42,120 Speaker 2: winning a case there, and I was supposed to be 146 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:43,360 Speaker 2: It was a Friday, and I was I supposed to 147 00:07:43,360 --> 00:07:45,560 Speaker 2: beginning home the next day to move house with my wife. 148 00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 2: And she never lets me forget this, but they got 149 00:07:48,160 --> 00:07:51,080 Speaker 2: me absolutely drunk to the point where I couldn't get 150 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:52,880 Speaker 2: on the plane they had. They had to carry me 151 00:07:52,920 --> 00:07:55,600 Speaker 2: home to someone's bed and put me on the plane 152 00:07:55,640 --> 00:07:56,200 Speaker 2: the next day. 153 00:07:57,480 --> 00:08:00,960 Speaker 1: Okay, great caution, I shouldn't have to. Yeah, it might 154 00:08:01,040 --> 00:08:05,239 Speaker 1: sound exciting going for a drink at the clubhouse, but yeah, okay, 155 00:08:05,320 --> 00:08:08,200 Speaker 1: they got you, they got me. Okay, well you've learnt, 156 00:08:08,240 --> 00:08:11,800 Speaker 1: you learned your lesson. You've been around long enough to 157 00:08:11,840 --> 00:08:14,680 Speaker 1: see King's Cross when it was that that golden mile, 158 00:08:14,760 --> 00:08:19,280 Speaker 1: when it was the under the King's Cross, underworld, the underbelly. 159 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:21,840 Speaker 1: Tell us about your experiences there because you're working in 160 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: criminal law there before the Royal Commission of the Wood 161 00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:28,280 Speaker 1: Royal Commission, I'm talking about the commission into police corruption 162 00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:32,440 Speaker 1: that dragged a lot of people in. But you you 163 00:08:32,480 --> 00:08:35,600 Speaker 1: knew that world, you understood that world, and tell us 164 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:36,880 Speaker 1: about those times. 165 00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:39,840 Speaker 2: It was. It was an interesting It was an interesting 166 00:08:39,880 --> 00:08:42,840 Speaker 2: world because it was it was the place where people 167 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:47,760 Speaker 2: went to enjoy themselves. But it was it was, as 168 00:08:47,840 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 2: I said, we go back to the Vietnam War as 169 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,280 Speaker 2: being I think the crucial element in the development of 170 00:08:53,320 --> 00:08:57,440 Speaker 2: the drug culture in Australia. The American R and R 171 00:08:57,480 --> 00:09:04,439 Speaker 2: boys brought drugs back and it's sort of burgeoned after that, 172 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 2: and King's Cross was the place where everyone went, and 173 00:09:09,920 --> 00:09:13,320 Speaker 2: it was just there were so many clubs. You could 174 00:09:13,320 --> 00:09:15,160 Speaker 2: go to some clubs and you could get your weed. 175 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 2: You you can go to other clubs to get your 176 00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:21,679 Speaker 2: meth or your coke. There was a little well, I 177 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:23,880 Speaker 2: suppose I don't know whether I should name the person 178 00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 2: who was responsible. He's done his fifteen years, but he 179 00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:29,960 Speaker 2: was well known and he was represented in Underbelly. But 180 00:09:30,040 --> 00:09:33,599 Speaker 2: he added a little shoot where he It was like 181 00:09:33,600 --> 00:09:36,079 Speaker 2: a little service Winday, I don't get what you wanted, 182 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:39,640 Speaker 2: but it was really really quite straight and back in 183 00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:42,640 Speaker 2: the day you had people who were in and around 184 00:09:42,679 --> 00:09:46,640 Speaker 2: the cross of Imember Sweethearts Cafe. It's famous from a 185 00:09:46,720 --> 00:09:50,480 Speaker 2: Jimmy Barnes song, Breakfast Sweethearts. I ate breakfast at Sweetheart's 186 00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:54,040 Speaker 2: quite a few times after going in at four o'clock 187 00:09:54,040 --> 00:09:56,160 Speaker 2: in the morning or two o'clock in the morning to 188 00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:59,800 Speaker 2: King's Cross police station to advise clients. 189 00:10:00,960 --> 00:10:04,840 Speaker 1: Okay, thew we're up now, we may as well have breakfast. 190 00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:09,000 Speaker 2: But it was interesting times garrier because of the nature 191 00:10:09,080 --> 00:10:12,000 Speaker 2: of the location. It was just one of those places 192 00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:16,880 Speaker 2: at that particular time where from a person who didn't 193 00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:19,080 Speaker 2: have to be involved in the crime, so to speak, 194 00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:20,600 Speaker 2: was absolutely amazing. 195 00:10:20,840 --> 00:10:23,800 Speaker 1: Well, I think you do get then you're fortunate. And 196 00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:27,560 Speaker 1: I found that in policing, in the work that I did, 197 00:10:27,679 --> 00:10:30,280 Speaker 1: you get to look in to a world that you 198 00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:32,120 Speaker 1: don't want to be part of You don't want to 199 00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:35,440 Speaker 1: be fully embedded in it. But you get to see 200 00:10:35,480 --> 00:10:38,320 Speaker 1: what's going on and get an understanding of it. Because 201 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:42,880 Speaker 1: Louis Bay you had dealings with him. Did you act 202 00:10:42,880 --> 00:10:44,559 Speaker 1: for him or just came across? 203 00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:48,680 Speaker 2: No, I acted for Louis, and then I had Then 204 00:10:48,720 --> 00:10:51,960 Speaker 2: I had cause not to want anything else to do 205 00:10:52,040 --> 00:10:56,600 Speaker 2: with Louis. At one stage I was in some respects 206 00:10:56,640 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 2: I was naive in relation to the way I thought 207 00:11:00,120 --> 00:11:03,040 Speaker 2: I handled my relationship with him. But I can say 208 00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:05,960 Speaker 2: that on a number of occasions Louis said, I want 209 00:11:05,960 --> 00:11:08,080 Speaker 2: you to come and have a Chinese lunch out at 210 00:11:08,080 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 2: Parramatta with me. Well, I've turned up and I'm sitting 211 00:11:11,559 --> 00:11:12,720 Speaker 2: at a table with Roger. 212 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:16,959 Speaker 1: Yeah, Roger Rogerson, the former New South Wales police officer, 213 00:11:17,559 --> 00:11:21,400 Speaker 1: corrupt police officer and convicted murderer. 214 00:11:21,679 --> 00:11:25,520 Speaker 2: Lanny McPherson, a couple of other people who wait, a 215 00:11:25,559 --> 00:11:28,560 Speaker 2: good crew, you've got the game, and Lurry and Sorry 216 00:11:28,559 --> 00:11:32,959 Speaker 2: and Louis. And it was a bit of an education. 217 00:11:33,200 --> 00:11:36,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, And it's funny, isn't it. Well it's not funny, 218 00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:40,000 Speaker 1: but that's how you get indoctrinated into that world, like 219 00:11:40,080 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 1: come and have a lunch and then oh, well, yeah 220 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:44,240 Speaker 1: I've spoken to that person, and then the next thing, 221 00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:46,080 Speaker 1: Roger's on the phone. I want you to do a 222 00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:48,280 Speaker 1: favor for me, and you can get caught up in 223 00:11:48,880 --> 00:11:49,680 Speaker 1: that world, can't you. 224 00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:53,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. I never had anything to do with Roger. Wilst 225 00:11:53,040 --> 00:11:55,880 Speaker 2: it was a detective. He was actually doing wrought iron 226 00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:57,880 Speaker 2: and putting rowed iron in gold and jar you know, 227 00:11:58,280 --> 00:12:00,840 Speaker 2: different bars and things, which is quite it looks. 228 00:12:01,080 --> 00:12:02,880 Speaker 1: I think he was doing some other stuff too, but. 229 00:12:02,920 --> 00:12:05,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, well and he didn't learn from his first job. 230 00:12:07,240 --> 00:12:09,200 Speaker 1: His last one was a classic was yeah. 231 00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:11,600 Speaker 2: Well yeah, anyone who can think they could walk around 232 00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:13,959 Speaker 2: a city the size of Sydney, you'll not be photographed 233 00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:15,440 Speaker 2: a thousand times. He's got another thing. 234 00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:18,920 Speaker 1: And look, Roger was from a police point of view, 235 00:12:18,960 --> 00:12:22,880 Speaker 1: and like my early days in policing, I remember being 236 00:12:22,880 --> 00:12:25,600 Speaker 1: in the witness boxes. I was in the arm hole 237 00:12:25,679 --> 00:12:28,760 Speaker 1: up squad in the nineties. Again in the witness box. 238 00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:31,720 Speaker 1: I've never met Roger, but being cross examined. So you're 239 00:12:31,760 --> 00:12:33,439 Speaker 1: in the arm toole up squad, aren't you. I don't 240 00:12:33,480 --> 00:12:36,520 Speaker 1: think it was you. Okay, you're in the arm hole 241 00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:40,040 Speaker 1: up squad, aren't you? Yes, and so you're you're the 242 00:12:40,080 --> 00:12:42,280 Speaker 1: tough guys. You bash them, you lower them, you do this. 243 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:45,880 Speaker 1: Roger Rogerson's your hero. And that was a narrative because 244 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:47,880 Speaker 1: he put a stain on all of us, and not 245 00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:52,640 Speaker 1: just Roger, there was other people. But that's world that 246 00:12:52,679 --> 00:12:55,679 Speaker 1: you're in. Before the Royal Commission exposed it all and 247 00:12:56,559 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 1: people were accountable, it was a dangerous, dangerous place to operate, 248 00:13:00,880 --> 00:13:01,200 Speaker 1: wasn't it. 249 00:13:01,720 --> 00:13:04,480 Speaker 2: I never felt it was dangerous, right, Okay? As I said, 250 00:13:04,679 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 2: and I've said this to others, the only person who 251 00:13:07,280 --> 00:13:10,480 Speaker 2: I really thought uncomfortable with was Lenny was with with 252 00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:11,160 Speaker 2: Netdie Smith. 253 00:13:11,440 --> 00:13:12,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, what what was it about that? 254 00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:16,240 Speaker 2: I just think that it was Nettie's persona, his demeanor. 255 00:13:16,520 --> 00:13:22,320 Speaker 2: He was sort of this brooding character and just felt 256 00:13:22,360 --> 00:13:23,720 Speaker 2: slightly uncomfortable with him. 257 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:28,280 Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, even look for the crimes and yeah he's 258 00:13:28,280 --> 00:13:31,880 Speaker 1: passed away, we can we can talk openly. But the 259 00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:35,320 Speaker 1: the crimes that he was involved in, and he sounded 260 00:13:35,360 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 1: like a grub in some of the things that he 261 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:40,680 Speaker 1: did that you know, he had that persona of being 262 00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:45,160 Speaker 1: a gangster, but there was that other side side to him. 263 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:50,400 Speaker 2: He was psychopathical, didn't seem to have any regard for 264 00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:53,040 Speaker 2: human like now that others may say differently. 265 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:55,760 Speaker 1: I take on board that that's your impression. 266 00:13:55,320 --> 00:13:58,840 Speaker 2: But that's but I and I was never exposed to 267 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:02,080 Speaker 2: his really really outside but I just felt there was 268 00:14:02,080 --> 00:14:07,600 Speaker 2: sort of this brooding presence there that was difficult. 269 00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:11,880 Speaker 1: It's interesting you identify him of all the people you've 270 00:14:11,920 --> 00:14:14,400 Speaker 1: dealt with, and you've come across a wide range of 271 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:19,400 Speaker 1: let's call them villains or colorful identities, that he was 272 00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:22,000 Speaker 1: one that you got that got that sense from. 273 00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:23,920 Speaker 2: Well, when you think of a person who I had 274 00:14:23,920 --> 00:14:26,720 Speaker 2: some regard for, and that's Abbot Henry Graham. Abbot Henry. 275 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:31,240 Speaker 1: He's a former gangster that used to run with Neddie 276 00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:33,280 Speaker 1: Smith during the Roger Rogerson era. 277 00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:36,760 Speaker 2: Graham is the nicest flake and the funniest blake you're made. 278 00:14:37,120 --> 00:14:39,640 Speaker 2: And to put him in the same gang as Neddie, 279 00:14:40,120 --> 00:14:42,440 Speaker 2: I think he was ran in that sort of circle. 280 00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:44,560 Speaker 2: He just too totally different type of people. 281 00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:47,800 Speaker 1: Well, I know Graham pretty pretty well now and he's 282 00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:50,880 Speaker 1: been on the podcast and I've caught up with him 283 00:14:51,000 --> 00:14:53,760 Speaker 1: a bit. When you say it's a nice blake, I 284 00:14:53,760 --> 00:14:55,360 Speaker 1: grew up in the same area and they used to 285 00:14:55,480 --> 00:15:00,000 Speaker 1: terrorize people were young, changed Yeah, he's changed, let's say. 286 00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 1: But yeah, I know what you're saying. Very personal saw 287 00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:06,680 Speaker 1: the blake. You can sit down and speak to Graham 288 00:15:06,720 --> 00:15:09,240 Speaker 1: and have a laugh, have a drink, and yeah. 289 00:15:09,680 --> 00:15:13,640 Speaker 2: You see, there's the difference between police officers and criminal lawyers. 290 00:15:13,640 --> 00:15:15,440 Speaker 2: When you're dealing with the same people, they have a 291 00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:19,200 Speaker 2: totally different attitude to you than they do to me. Yeah, 292 00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:21,000 Speaker 2: and so you see them from different perspectives. 293 00:15:21,040 --> 00:15:24,800 Speaker 1: Gary, Well, that's true, that's true. What you had interesting 294 00:15:24,880 --> 00:15:28,160 Speaker 1: when you were dealing with Louis Baya that he had 295 00:15:28,160 --> 00:15:28,680 Speaker 1: a young. 296 00:15:28,560 --> 00:15:30,880 Speaker 2: Driver that was Johnny Ibrahim. 297 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:35,240 Speaker 1: Did you identify john as someone that was going to 298 00:15:35,960 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 1: rise to the level he did? 299 00:15:38,320 --> 00:15:41,600 Speaker 2: No, No, I didn't recognize it, but having observed it 300 00:15:41,640 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 2: over the many years, I have no doubt that he 301 00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:48,840 Speaker 2: was always going to do well for himself. Yeah. John 302 00:15:49,280 --> 00:15:55,480 Speaker 2: reads situation as well, and he was. I think he 303 00:15:55,520 --> 00:15:58,720 Speaker 2: found himself in the right place at the right time, 304 00:15:58,760 --> 00:16:03,479 Speaker 2: with the rights skills to be able to gain from 305 00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:04,720 Speaker 2: his good luck. 306 00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:09,720 Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, he's where he's at now, He's many his 307 00:16:09,840 --> 00:16:11,960 Speaker 1: way through, so he must have something going for him. 308 00:16:12,040 --> 00:16:18,080 Speaker 2: Yeah. He's sort of that old expression about laying down 309 00:16:18,120 --> 00:16:21,080 Speaker 2: with dogs and getting up with fleas is relevant to 310 00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:24,560 Speaker 2: all of us. But John's been able to deal with 311 00:16:24,600 --> 00:16:28,160 Speaker 2: that aspect of his life in a reasonable sort of way, 312 00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:30,480 Speaker 2: so that he's come out relatively unscathed. 313 00:16:33,160 --> 00:16:37,120 Speaker 1: Charlie Staunton, you would have had dealings with Charlie Staunton, 314 00:16:37,200 --> 00:16:40,040 Speaker 1: greg He was a former New South Wales police officer 315 00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:44,560 Speaker 1: and he got into some trouble ended up leaving the police, 316 00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:47,880 Speaker 1: so I think he became a private investigator and did 317 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:51,160 Speaker 1: a bit of wheeling and dealing around King's Cross Again. 318 00:16:51,480 --> 00:16:54,440 Speaker 1: I'm looking at all the people we've had on the podcast, 319 00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:56,200 Speaker 1: but that's what happens when you've been going for a 320 00:16:56,200 --> 00:17:00,360 Speaker 1: few years. But I've got to say, if Charlie didn't exists, 321 00:17:00,360 --> 00:17:03,680 Speaker 1: you'd have to invent him quite the way he's lived 322 00:17:03,720 --> 00:17:04,200 Speaker 1: his life. 323 00:17:04,400 --> 00:17:05,800 Speaker 2: One of Well's lovable rogues. 324 00:17:05,960 --> 00:17:09,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, what what's your what's your take on Charlie? Because 325 00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:10,879 Speaker 1: I had to laugh at some of the things that 326 00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:11,560 Speaker 1: he got up to. 327 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:14,720 Speaker 2: He's got up to so much. One book's not enough 328 00:17:14,720 --> 00:17:16,800 Speaker 2: for Charlie in terms of what he's been through. But 329 00:17:17,920 --> 00:17:24,080 Speaker 2: Charlie is is is a rogue to start with, and 330 00:17:24,760 --> 00:17:27,120 Speaker 2: we all love him. We don't always want to see 331 00:17:27,160 --> 00:17:29,480 Speaker 2: him because he's gonna he's going to put the pinch 332 00:17:29,520 --> 00:17:32,240 Speaker 2: on us. But when he comes you can always have 333 00:17:32,240 --> 00:17:35,560 Speaker 2: a laugh and you always know what you're getting with Charlie. 334 00:17:35,600 --> 00:17:36,679 Speaker 2: He's pretty upfront. 335 00:17:36,880 --> 00:17:39,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, I found that with him in my dealings with him, 336 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:42,560 Speaker 1: and I've caught up with him and bumped into him 337 00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:48,600 Speaker 1: at certain certain places, and yeah, he's a character, and like, 338 00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:52,760 Speaker 1: we're not condoning crime. We've sit here, we'll put that 339 00:17:53,080 --> 00:17:57,040 Speaker 1: out there on things. But back in those days there 340 00:17:57,080 --> 00:18:00,040 Speaker 1: were larger than life characters, weren't they. And I I 341 00:18:00,040 --> 00:18:03,280 Speaker 1: don't know. And you mentioned in part one and I 342 00:18:03,359 --> 00:18:06,639 Speaker 1: reflected on it during the break about the way the 343 00:18:06,680 --> 00:18:10,720 Speaker 1: gangsters go about their business now and look at me 344 00:18:11,040 --> 00:18:13,720 Speaker 1: type attitude. It has changed, hasn't it. 345 00:18:14,359 --> 00:18:18,160 Speaker 2: Well, everyone wants to know what you're doing, starting off 346 00:18:18,200 --> 00:18:20,879 Speaker 2: with what you had at the last restaurant you were at, 347 00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:23,560 Speaker 2: who you're laying by the swimming pool with now, and 348 00:18:23,600 --> 00:18:24,240 Speaker 2: who you're killing. 349 00:18:24,920 --> 00:18:27,240 Speaker 1: Don't you take those of your breakfast each morning? 350 00:18:27,320 --> 00:18:29,480 Speaker 2: Don't face it to everyone. It's going to be the 351 00:18:29,480 --> 00:18:30,719 Speaker 2: same every morning, I'm afraid. 352 00:18:31,880 --> 00:18:36,320 Speaker 1: But yeah, I know what you're saying. Interesting, if we're 353 00:18:36,359 --> 00:18:39,879 Speaker 1: talking the way things change, is it harder to be 354 00:18:39,920 --> 00:18:42,760 Speaker 1: a crook now than it would be let's say twenty 355 00:18:42,840 --> 00:18:45,680 Speaker 1: thirty years ago, with all the technology that's changed. 356 00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:49,560 Speaker 2: Do you think it's harder. Certainly harder. But if you're 357 00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:53,720 Speaker 2: switched on crook and you know how to run under 358 00:18:53,760 --> 00:18:58,280 Speaker 2: the radar, I think that you are likely to last 359 00:18:58,280 --> 00:19:00,719 Speaker 2: a lot longer than these guys who have no regard 360 00:19:00,800 --> 00:19:06,240 Speaker 2: to the fact that everything we do in public is scrutinized, 361 00:19:06,280 --> 00:19:10,000 Speaker 2: either by virtue of public cameras or private cameras. Everyone's 362 00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:11,879 Speaker 2: running around with a camera to take photos of you 363 00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:16,920 Speaker 2: these days. Your likelihood of your telephone calls being monitored 364 00:19:17,880 --> 00:19:20,840 Speaker 2: is real. So if you're going to do anything, you've 365 00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:23,280 Speaker 2: better to do it face to face because telephones aren't 366 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:26,160 Speaker 2: safe and people don't wake up to that. It keeps 367 00:19:26,200 --> 00:19:26,800 Speaker 2: me in business. 368 00:19:26,880 --> 00:19:31,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think you've got a phone on you like 369 00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:35,560 Speaker 1: just the tracking, the ability, and I look at from 370 00:19:35,600 --> 00:19:39,160 Speaker 1: an investigative point of view, if there was a murder. Yeah, 371 00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:42,240 Speaker 1: pre mobile phone days, it was you check who you 372 00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:45,040 Speaker 1: phoned on your landline, what public phones were in the 373 00:19:45,080 --> 00:19:50,040 Speaker 1: area of fingerprints. Look at the technology available now, see 374 00:19:50,800 --> 00:19:52,800 Speaker 1: we could track you from the time you left your 375 00:19:52,840 --> 00:19:55,720 Speaker 1: office in the city to come here and your movements 376 00:19:55,760 --> 00:20:01,080 Speaker 1: and basically everything you've done it so much harder. 377 00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:04,800 Speaker 2: I think I'm involved in a murder case at the moment, 378 00:20:04,880 --> 00:20:09,560 Speaker 2: my client, I think will be I've negotiated him out 379 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:14,560 Speaker 2: of that aspect of the case or his accessorial involvement 380 00:20:14,600 --> 00:20:17,760 Speaker 2: in the case. But when you looked at the evidence, 381 00:20:17,960 --> 00:20:23,919 Speaker 2: the police were able to track the vehicle that the 382 00:20:23,960 --> 00:20:27,119 Speaker 2: shooters or the assassins if I can call them, that 383 00:20:27,359 --> 00:20:30,240 Speaker 2: used from the time it was stolen until the time 384 00:20:30,320 --> 00:20:33,840 Speaker 2: it was burnt, and in relation to my client who 385 00:20:33,960 --> 00:20:38,399 Speaker 2: was involved in picking them up, exactly where his vehicle 386 00:20:38,400 --> 00:20:43,120 Speaker 2: went as well, because you can't drive around anything that's 387 00:20:43,400 --> 00:20:46,280 Speaker 2: you'd regard as a main arterial road or any arterial 388 00:20:46,400 --> 00:20:47,959 Speaker 2: road without being photographed. 389 00:20:48,040 --> 00:20:53,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a reality of it, isn't well talking about technology, 390 00:20:54,320 --> 00:20:57,720 Speaker 1: And I understand that there's some appeals going through court 391 00:20:57,880 --> 00:21:01,040 Speaker 1: or currently, so if you can't talk too much about it, 392 00:21:01,080 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 1: but just your take on that you involved in that 393 00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:03,960 Speaker 1: at all. 394 00:21:04,040 --> 00:21:06,040 Speaker 2: I am involved in that from three different aspects. I've 395 00:21:06,040 --> 00:21:09,560 Speaker 2: got an appeal currently running in relation to a couple 396 00:21:09,600 --> 00:21:13,359 Speaker 2: of clients who pleaded guilty and got rewarded for what 397 00:21:13,400 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 2: we call facilitating the course of justice, but that's under 398 00:21:17,080 --> 00:21:20,879 Speaker 2: appeal by the ground as to the inadequacy of the penalties. 399 00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:24,159 Speaker 2: Of opinion that if you want to get people to 400 00:21:24,440 --> 00:21:26,600 Speaker 2: plead guilty, you've got to show them that it's going 401 00:21:26,640 --> 00:21:28,800 Speaker 2: to be worthwhile, because at the end of the day, 402 00:21:28,840 --> 00:21:31,160 Speaker 2: they get locked up, cost one hundred and fifty thousand 403 00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:34,080 Speaker 2: dollars per prisoner to keep them in jail, and in 404 00:21:34,119 --> 00:21:35,800 Speaker 2: some respects they don't come out any better than what 405 00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:38,080 Speaker 2: they went in. So you've got to change the system 406 00:21:38,080 --> 00:21:42,159 Speaker 2: in that regard. I'm involved with others who are waiting 407 00:21:42,960 --> 00:21:45,320 Speaker 2: on the outcome of the High Court appeal, and it's 408 00:21:45,320 --> 00:21:46,879 Speaker 2: a very interesting aspect picture. 409 00:21:47,359 --> 00:21:50,000 Speaker 1: Sorry, and I probably should have because you and I 410 00:21:50,119 --> 00:21:53,280 Speaker 1: know what we're talking about. But that was the sting 411 00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:58,399 Speaker 1: operation that started in America but also used in law 412 00:21:58,520 --> 00:21:59,679 Speaker 1: enforcement over here. 413 00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:06,080 Speaker 2: Operation Inside and cuphibially didn't know the creator or the 414 00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:09,560 Speaker 2: person who organized the creation of what we call the 415 00:22:09,560 --> 00:22:12,480 Speaker 2: phantom Secure Phones, which is one of the encrypted phanes 416 00:22:12,520 --> 00:22:17,160 Speaker 2: that was used some time ago. He was arrested by 417 00:22:17,200 --> 00:22:22,119 Speaker 2: the police and charged with racketeering offenses, which are their 418 00:22:22,119 --> 00:22:26,840 Speaker 2: conspiracy offenses in relation to providing telephones to the Sinaloa cartel. 419 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:30,760 Speaker 2: So by doing that he was facilitating their ability to 420 00:22:30,960 --> 00:22:39,560 Speaker 2: communicate large drug trafficking enterprises. And he was threatened with 421 00:22:39,600 --> 00:22:42,680 Speaker 2: thirty years in jail and was given the option of 422 00:22:44,359 --> 00:22:46,280 Speaker 2: doing the thirty years or assisting the police and getting 423 00:22:46,280 --> 00:22:50,320 Speaker 2: a lesser sentence. Well, he took the latter, and whilst 424 00:22:50,440 --> 00:22:55,040 Speaker 2: that was in train, he got one of his technicians, 425 00:22:55,800 --> 00:23:00,120 Speaker 2: at the request of the police, to put together the plat. 426 00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:05,159 Speaker 1: For that and people involved in criminal enterprise or I 427 00:23:05,160 --> 00:23:08,120 Speaker 1: won't say that as a defense so you object, your 428 00:23:08,160 --> 00:23:15,440 Speaker 1: honor great as a podcast listener, but that they were 429 00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:17,720 Speaker 1: passed out to people that may or may not have 430 00:23:17,760 --> 00:23:20,920 Speaker 1: been involved in criminal activities, and the police were monitoring 431 00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:24,440 Speaker 1: the cause on phones that the people that had them 432 00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:27,280 Speaker 1: felt they were encrypted and safe, that there's no way 433 00:23:27,280 --> 00:23:30,440 Speaker 1: that law enforcement could monitor what was going on. Is that? 434 00:23:31,520 --> 00:23:35,520 Speaker 2: Well? The way the way that worked was that like 435 00:23:35,600 --> 00:23:37,960 Speaker 2: you or I would send a text and I was 436 00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:41,320 Speaker 2: intending it to go from me to you, I would 437 00:23:41,320 --> 00:23:44,480 Speaker 2: type in the text. That text would then be copied 438 00:23:44,480 --> 00:23:48,399 Speaker 2: within the platform and when when when the text text 439 00:23:49,840 --> 00:23:55,200 Speaker 2: press send, the copy would immediately go through a system 440 00:23:55,280 --> 00:23:59,119 Speaker 2: called called bots eyebots to the police who were monitoring it, 441 00:23:59,240 --> 00:24:01,760 Speaker 2: and there were several agencies that were doing so, and 442 00:24:01,840 --> 00:24:03,639 Speaker 2: there was some suggestion that it had gone through an 443 00:24:03,680 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 2: overseas country like Romania, I think, or somewhere like that. 444 00:24:06,560 --> 00:24:13,240 Speaker 2: It was quite kite of complicated. But the South Australian 445 00:24:13,720 --> 00:24:17,359 Speaker 2: Supreme Court, in a case involving I think a conspiracy 446 00:24:17,400 --> 00:24:20,359 Speaker 2: that murder, dealt with the matter first and Justice Kimber 447 00:24:20,400 --> 00:24:23,600 Speaker 2: there decided that it was admissible because it didn't contravene 448 00:24:23,720 --> 00:24:27,479 Speaker 2: the definition of what an actual intercept was because of 449 00:24:27,600 --> 00:24:31,119 Speaker 2: when you press sent. It didn't go to the receiver, 450 00:24:31,520 --> 00:24:34,320 Speaker 2: it went to the police and it was very technically 451 00:24:34,320 --> 00:24:43,840 Speaker 2: and that's a very very simplistic explanation. But the accused 452 00:24:43,840 --> 00:24:47,400 Speaker 2: then appealed. It went to a three court bench who 453 00:24:47,640 --> 00:24:51,119 Speaker 2: upheld Judge Justice Kimber's decision that it wasn't an intercept, 454 00:24:51,680 --> 00:24:55,120 Speaker 2: and now it's gone to the High Court. In the meantime, 455 00:24:56,119 --> 00:24:59,200 Speaker 2: Mark Drayfus, our Attorney General, decided that he'd put through 456 00:24:59,280 --> 00:25:05,600 Speaker 2: legislation and declaring that that particular function that platform, what 457 00:25:05,760 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 2: at the anom phone did was not an intercept right 458 00:25:09,880 --> 00:25:15,760 Speaker 2: and that's created a possible constitutional problem because it raises 459 00:25:15,800 --> 00:25:18,240 Speaker 2: the separation of powers and what the courts are there 460 00:25:18,280 --> 00:25:20,399 Speaker 2: to do, and what the High Court is there to 461 00:25:20,400 --> 00:25:23,280 Speaker 2: do to interpret the laws as they apply and the 462 00:25:23,280 --> 00:25:27,000 Speaker 2: definitions as they apply. An interesting question which will now 463 00:25:27,040 --> 00:25:31,560 Speaker 2: arise is has the Attorney General usurped the functions of 464 00:25:31,600 --> 00:25:36,800 Speaker 2: the court and basically denied the operation of the separation 465 00:25:36,880 --> 00:25:39,600 Speaker 2: of powers of which there are three. That Parliament makes laws, 466 00:25:40,040 --> 00:25:43,800 Speaker 2: the Executive enforces the laws, and the judiciary interprets the laws. 467 00:25:44,000 --> 00:25:48,439 Speaker 1: Okay, is going to be interesting. So when we looking 468 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:50,400 Speaker 1: at decision coming back about. 469 00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:53,480 Speaker 2: That, we're looking at it. I think it'll probably get 470 00:25:53,480 --> 00:25:56,080 Speaker 2: to the High Court between June and August sometimes. 471 00:25:55,800 --> 00:25:59,440 Speaker 1: And there's a lot of people because there's some large 472 00:25:59,520 --> 00:26:02,919 Speaker 1: numbers of people that were charged flowing on from that, 473 00:26:03,040 --> 00:26:04,560 Speaker 1: so high stakes. 474 00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:07,280 Speaker 2: A lot of political pressure out there. I think I'm 475 00:26:07,320 --> 00:26:07,960 Speaker 2: being practical. 476 00:26:08,119 --> 00:26:14,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, I would imagine it's well, get on. 477 00:26:14,880 --> 00:26:16,560 Speaker 2: It's a really interesting It is. 478 00:26:16,560 --> 00:26:19,640 Speaker 1: Interesting because if you're making legislation and make it, well, 479 00:26:19,640 --> 00:26:24,040 Speaker 1: it's retrospective, isn't it. It's capturing something from the past. 480 00:26:24,240 --> 00:26:27,000 Speaker 2: And you'd agree. The interesting part about well, your former 481 00:26:27,080 --> 00:26:30,560 Speaker 2: job and my current job is that it's it's all 482 00:26:30,600 --> 00:26:34,560 Speaker 2: about how society works. From the underbelly to the very top. 483 00:26:34,760 --> 00:26:39,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's interesting. I've got to say, from an ex 484 00:26:40,080 --> 00:26:42,520 Speaker 1: detectives point of view, I thought it was a great 485 00:26:42,560 --> 00:26:46,520 Speaker 1: plan when I heard about it. I'm thinking, damn it, well, 486 00:26:46,560 --> 00:26:50,000 Speaker 1: didn't I think about something like that that's simplistic in 487 00:26:50,040 --> 00:26:54,240 Speaker 1: the planning but very complicated in the actual getting it 488 00:26:54,320 --> 00:26:57,960 Speaker 1: up and running. And I'm surprised. I'm surprised. And I 489 00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:00,439 Speaker 1: can talk like this because I'm not invold them, but 490 00:27:00,680 --> 00:27:04,199 Speaker 1: I'm surprised it didn't get out like there would have 491 00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:04,960 Speaker 1: been a lot of pot. 492 00:27:05,280 --> 00:27:07,320 Speaker 2: You started to get out because someone realized there was 493 00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:08,600 Speaker 2: a leak at the end of it, and that was 494 00:27:08,640 --> 00:27:12,000 Speaker 2: going straight to the police. But it's my turn to object. 495 00:27:12,480 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 2: It's my turn to object in criminal law. And I 496 00:27:16,640 --> 00:27:18,600 Speaker 2: think in life, there's a saying which a lot of 497 00:27:18,600 --> 00:27:21,680 Speaker 2: people don't get better, that ninety nine guilty men go 498 00:27:22,359 --> 00:27:27,000 Speaker 2: free than one innocent man be wrongly convicted. And it's 499 00:27:27,080 --> 00:27:31,000 Speaker 2: the chance of using these mechanisms, these platforms, these things, 500 00:27:31,520 --> 00:27:36,919 Speaker 2: or creating a case against a person wrongly that puts 501 00:27:36,920 --> 00:27:39,560 Speaker 2: in a position where people are wrongly convicted. And I 502 00:27:40,280 --> 00:27:42,840 Speaker 2: say to people who say this to me, do you 503 00:27:42,960 --> 00:27:45,960 Speaker 2: really care about these people and how can you act 504 00:27:45,960 --> 00:27:48,080 Speaker 2: for criminals? It's all this sort of stuff, and I say, well, 505 00:27:48,080 --> 00:27:51,399 Speaker 2: hang on a sec We've got a system that should 506 00:27:51,440 --> 00:27:55,960 Speaker 2: be fair, should be reasonable, and shouldn't it shouldn't be 507 00:27:55,960 --> 00:27:58,680 Speaker 2: adam and even giving them the apple again to commit 508 00:27:58,720 --> 00:28:02,760 Speaker 2: a mortal sin because you might get dragging in an 509 00:28:02,800 --> 00:28:05,399 Speaker 2: innocent person and that innocent What I say, do you 510 00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:07,600 Speaker 2: want your son to be that innocent person and do 511 00:28:07,680 --> 00:28:08,800 Speaker 2: twenty years? Yeah? 512 00:28:09,119 --> 00:28:12,399 Speaker 1: Look, and you can't argue with that. Let's saying I 513 00:28:12,520 --> 00:28:14,199 Speaker 1: might have been the old days. I'm not going to. 514 00:28:14,600 --> 00:28:17,680 Speaker 1: I'm not going to now. But yeah, I do understand 515 00:28:17,720 --> 00:28:19,720 Speaker 1: what you're saying, and there needs to be checks and 516 00:28:19,760 --> 00:28:26,480 Speaker 1: balances exactly and to make the system work. But yeah, 517 00:28:26,760 --> 00:28:29,440 Speaker 1: that's going to be fascinating how that comes across, because 518 00:28:29,440 --> 00:28:32,280 Speaker 1: this is a real test is this is the High Court, 519 00:28:32,359 --> 00:28:35,080 Speaker 1: This is making the big decisions, and. 520 00:28:35,000 --> 00:28:39,240 Speaker 2: It's not just lawyers being nerdy. It really has an impact. 521 00:28:39,400 --> 00:28:43,280 Speaker 1: Look, I in regards and I always make comments about 522 00:28:43,320 --> 00:28:47,640 Speaker 1: lawyers and slices and whatnot. I do understand the need 523 00:28:47,720 --> 00:28:52,200 Speaker 1: for proper defense, and I take issue with some people 524 00:28:52,200 --> 00:28:54,160 Speaker 1: that I think cross the line, as you would take 525 00:28:54,240 --> 00:28:56,760 Speaker 1: issue with where you think police have cross across the line. 526 00:28:56,920 --> 00:28:59,560 Speaker 1: I've seen come up against some lawyers. I just think 527 00:28:59,840 --> 00:29:03,080 Speaker 1: that that's stooping too what they've done there. And it 528 00:29:03,200 --> 00:29:07,120 Speaker 1: might be just the way that they're they're cross examining 529 00:29:07,160 --> 00:29:10,160 Speaker 1: someone or the way that they're playing, but we do 530 00:29:10,280 --> 00:29:12,040 Speaker 1: need the checks and balances, so I think we're on 531 00:29:12,560 --> 00:29:16,120 Speaker 1: a grance there. I have now seen it, and I 532 00:29:16,200 --> 00:29:18,600 Speaker 1: keep saying it because it did change my perspective, like 533 00:29:18,800 --> 00:29:21,520 Speaker 1: having the full way that the state coming after you. 534 00:29:21,920 --> 00:29:24,400 Speaker 1: And I know when I was going to court, I 535 00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:27,440 Speaker 1: was thinking, well, that the worst that's going to happen 536 00:29:27,520 --> 00:29:30,000 Speaker 1: to me, you know, I might get a fine or 537 00:29:30,040 --> 00:29:33,280 Speaker 1: something like that. I can't imagine the impact that would 538 00:29:33,280 --> 00:29:36,480 Speaker 1: have on you. If the consequences were when this jury 539 00:29:36,520 --> 00:29:39,000 Speaker 1: comes back or this judge comes back, that could dictate 540 00:29:39,360 --> 00:29:40,360 Speaker 1: the rest of your life. 541 00:29:40,680 --> 00:29:44,800 Speaker 2: Like its high stakes, but the Lord doesn't always work 542 00:29:44,800 --> 00:29:49,120 Speaker 2: in favor of the accused. It also works in favor 543 00:29:49,120 --> 00:29:51,440 Speaker 2: of people down the track in terms of how evidence 544 00:29:51,520 --> 00:29:56,080 Speaker 2: is considered and recrafted. For instance, in the Hey Dad 545 00:29:56,120 --> 00:30:01,320 Speaker 2: case where the Hughes was charged with there's a multiplicity 546 00:30:01,360 --> 00:30:07,960 Speaker 2: of terrible child sexual asside offenses that changed the tendency law, 547 00:30:08,040 --> 00:30:10,200 Speaker 2: so that a lot more material can come in. Now, 548 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:12,800 Speaker 2: if you've got if you've got a tendency to do, 549 00:30:12,840 --> 00:30:15,560 Speaker 2: then that can be established. So that's in favor of 550 00:30:15,600 --> 00:30:19,440 Speaker 2: the person who's saying that. Those people who say, well, oh, 551 00:30:19,520 --> 00:30:21,280 Speaker 2: but he did this and he did that, why wasn't 552 00:30:21,280 --> 00:30:22,840 Speaker 2: that raised, Well, now things. 553 00:30:22,600 --> 00:30:24,800 Speaker 1: Like that, it can be raised. 554 00:30:24,840 --> 00:30:25,720 Speaker 2: It's called tendency. 555 00:30:26,120 --> 00:30:30,280 Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I was involved through campaigning with the Bearable 556 00:30:30,280 --> 00:30:34,320 Speaker 1: community on the double jeopardy legislation. It hasn't changed the 557 00:30:34,640 --> 00:30:38,120 Speaker 1: changed the landscape, and I don't think there's any I 558 00:30:38,120 --> 00:30:40,720 Speaker 1: don't think there's been a situation where someone's being convicted. 559 00:30:40,760 --> 00:30:43,160 Speaker 1: And what I'm talking about there is that if someone 560 00:30:43,320 --> 00:30:46,440 Speaker 1: was acquitted of a crime, they couldn't be retried until 561 00:30:46,480 --> 00:30:50,440 Speaker 1: the double jeopardy legislation was changed. Now fresh and compelling 562 00:30:50,480 --> 00:30:54,400 Speaker 1: the evidence and that and that's in the interests of justice. 563 00:30:54,800 --> 00:30:56,720 Speaker 1: The fact that sitting there, I think is a good 564 00:30:56,720 --> 00:30:59,320 Speaker 1: thing because I would hate to have someone and what 565 00:31:00,240 --> 00:31:02,400 Speaker 1: could have been someone that acquitted of a murder could 566 00:31:02,440 --> 00:31:03,880 Speaker 1: walk out of court and go, well, I got a 567 00:31:03,920 --> 00:31:06,240 Speaker 1: way of that and we could never recharge. So the 568 00:31:06,280 --> 00:31:09,200 Speaker 1: fact that the legislation is sitting there hasn't been implemented. 569 00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:12,520 Speaker 1: I think is a good thing. But I've always been 570 00:31:12,560 --> 00:31:16,080 Speaker 1: on about legislation or the justice system, and I get 571 00:31:16,080 --> 00:31:18,920 Speaker 1: your thoughts on it. A justice system is set up 572 00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:23,880 Speaker 1: to serve the community. That's therefore, and if adjustments have 573 00:31:23,920 --> 00:31:27,320 Speaker 1: got it, if it's not serving the community, legislation needs 574 00:31:27,360 --> 00:31:30,680 Speaker 1: to be changed. Are you an advocate for changing legislation 575 00:31:30,720 --> 00:31:33,120 Speaker 1: where it needs to be changed or is it more 576 00:31:33,160 --> 00:31:35,800 Speaker 1: old school? Now we've been doing this for two hundred years, 577 00:31:36,040 --> 00:31:37,440 Speaker 1: white change, No. 578 00:31:37,600 --> 00:31:39,840 Speaker 2: No, I hear what you say, and what I don't 579 00:31:39,880 --> 00:31:43,560 Speaker 2: like is knee jerk. Yeah, let's just live changed where 580 00:31:44,000 --> 00:31:47,840 Speaker 2: you get change for the sake of satisfying some particular 581 00:31:50,920 --> 00:31:55,960 Speaker 2: publicity agenda, agenda, and then you end up with victims 582 00:31:56,120 --> 00:31:59,760 Speaker 2: of that agenda who are wrongly convicted or wrongly accused, 583 00:32:00,360 --> 00:32:06,959 Speaker 2: and we find that the law is then used to 584 00:32:07,000 --> 00:32:10,040 Speaker 2: assist politicians in their electoral cycle. 585 00:32:11,320 --> 00:32:16,560 Speaker 1: Well, let's you talk about changing the law agendas and 586 00:32:16,600 --> 00:32:19,840 Speaker 1: the media interests and all that. The bail laws on 587 00:32:20,120 --> 00:32:23,480 Speaker 1: youth crime and baiol laws. I know there's been a 588 00:32:23,480 --> 00:32:26,280 Speaker 1: lot of talk about that, but I think you articulate 589 00:32:26,920 --> 00:32:30,360 Speaker 1: very well that quite often it's changed for a political agenda, 590 00:32:30,440 --> 00:32:34,320 Speaker 1: and it doesn't always work, and innocent people can be 591 00:32:34,360 --> 00:32:34,960 Speaker 1: caught up in it. 592 00:32:35,320 --> 00:32:38,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's because we live in a reactive rather than 593 00:32:38,280 --> 00:32:41,680 Speaker 2: proactive society. We're reacting to what we see as being 594 00:32:41,720 --> 00:32:47,960 Speaker 2: a problem, and we're chastising and punishing those who are 595 00:32:48,000 --> 00:32:52,240 Speaker 2: involved in perpetrating those problems. But we're not going back 596 00:32:53,200 --> 00:32:55,120 Speaker 2: in the way that we were talking about how jails 597 00:32:55,120 --> 00:32:58,680 Speaker 2: are changing Gary and saying, how can we stop young 598 00:32:58,720 --> 00:33:02,600 Speaker 2: Indigenous kids from running right in our springs? How can 599 00:33:02,640 --> 00:33:04,960 Speaker 2: we stop them before they leave home to go and 600 00:33:05,080 --> 00:33:08,160 Speaker 2: run right? And how can we stop kids in Sydney 601 00:33:08,240 --> 00:33:11,120 Speaker 2: or in Melbourne, and then the poorer parts going out 602 00:33:11,160 --> 00:33:13,760 Speaker 2: and creating habit and getting into postcode gangs or getting 603 00:33:13,800 --> 00:33:15,920 Speaker 2: into whatever it is. We've got to look at those 604 00:33:15,960 --> 00:33:19,080 Speaker 2: aspects and we've got to put our resources into stopping 605 00:33:19,120 --> 00:33:20,280 Speaker 2: crime before it starts. 606 00:33:20,280 --> 00:33:25,320 Speaker 1: Diversionary plans you talked about keeping someone in custody come 607 00:33:25,440 --> 00:33:28,959 Speaker 1: across one hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year to 608 00:33:29,040 --> 00:33:32,880 Speaker 1: keep a person in custody when you look at the 609 00:33:32,960 --> 00:33:36,680 Speaker 1: expense that is spent. There had Tim Watson Monroe, a 610 00:33:36,760 --> 00:33:39,560 Speaker 1: criminal psychologist, on them. He made the point that for 611 00:33:39,600 --> 00:33:41,760 Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, you could have each 612 00:33:42,800 --> 00:33:46,239 Speaker 1: inmate with their own personal psychologists looking after them to 613 00:33:46,360 --> 00:33:49,120 Speaker 1: keep them on the straight and narrow. It's a huge amount, 614 00:33:49,200 --> 00:33:52,560 Speaker 1: and I know there are people that we need to 615 00:33:52,600 --> 00:33:55,960 Speaker 1: protect society from. I've got no problems, and there needs 616 00:33:55,960 --> 00:33:58,040 Speaker 1: to be deterrens, there needs to be punishments. All the 617 00:33:58,040 --> 00:34:02,000 Speaker 1: things that you talked about get taken into with sentencing. 618 00:34:03,560 --> 00:34:05,480 Speaker 2: Tim being a psychologist, would say that I might say, 619 00:34:05,480 --> 00:34:07,400 Speaker 2: spend one hundred and fifty thousand. Not a good lawyer. 620 00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:13,080 Speaker 1: And look, Greg, we've got to be on us here. 621 00:34:13,120 --> 00:34:15,839 Speaker 1: If we clear up, if we solve all the solutions 622 00:34:15,840 --> 00:34:17,520 Speaker 1: of crime, you're going to be out of business. 623 00:34:17,880 --> 00:34:19,719 Speaker 2: I don't think that's going to happen, Gary Ott. But 624 00:34:19,800 --> 00:34:25,000 Speaker 2: I think we're entitled as members of a great democracy 625 00:34:25,120 --> 00:34:28,399 Speaker 2: to have a system that's fair and that's reasonable and 626 00:34:28,440 --> 00:34:32,320 Speaker 2: we get it right as many times as is possible 627 00:34:32,320 --> 00:34:35,640 Speaker 2: within a fallible system. And all systems are fallible. But 628 00:34:35,719 --> 00:34:36,200 Speaker 2: I think we do. 629 00:34:36,320 --> 00:34:42,239 Speaker 1: Okay here, Okay, let's talk other clients that you've had 630 00:34:42,280 --> 00:34:46,200 Speaker 1: and if I mentioned someone and you're not comfortable talking 631 00:34:46,239 --> 00:34:49,560 Speaker 1: about it, but got a lot of media publicity, so 632 00:34:49,600 --> 00:34:52,960 Speaker 1: we're not talking out of the school. But John Abraham's girlfriend, 633 00:34:53,040 --> 00:34:56,120 Speaker 1: Sarah Budge, that was charged with the possession of the firearm. 634 00:34:56,560 --> 00:35:02,440 Speaker 2: Yes, decent, lovely girl, Sarah. I've got a lot of 635 00:35:02,520 --> 00:35:06,600 Speaker 2: time for Sarah Budge and now she's John's wife, A 636 00:35:06,719 --> 00:35:10,920 Speaker 2: really really decent gale. As you might say, that was 637 00:35:10,960 --> 00:35:14,359 Speaker 2: an interesting case. I was part of a really really 638 00:35:14,360 --> 00:35:19,560 Speaker 2: good team of lawyers and had a fair jury who 639 00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:20,680 Speaker 2: came back with the right decision. 640 00:35:20,840 --> 00:35:24,160 Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, and that people haven't heard about that there 641 00:35:24,200 --> 00:35:28,719 Speaker 1: was a firearm found found at the premises and it 642 00:35:28,760 --> 00:35:32,200 Speaker 1: was what was the actual charge. 643 00:35:31,800 --> 00:35:35,360 Speaker 2: It was The charge was possession of an unlicensed pistol, 644 00:35:36,840 --> 00:35:39,280 Speaker 2: which I think can carry up to fourteen years in jail. 645 00:35:39,760 --> 00:35:43,440 Speaker 2: It's a guns are something we take seriously in our 646 00:35:43,440 --> 00:35:47,680 Speaker 2: community and rightly so, as you'd recall and you'd agree 647 00:35:47,719 --> 00:35:54,000 Speaker 2: with that, And it was the prosecution couldn't establish that 648 00:35:54,040 --> 00:35:55,719 Speaker 2: she had knowledge that was there or even put it 649 00:35:55,760 --> 00:35:58,640 Speaker 2: there on you, and given that other people had access 650 00:35:58,680 --> 00:36:01,440 Speaker 2: to her apartment, I thought that was the right decision. 651 00:36:01,480 --> 00:36:05,439 Speaker 1: An element of doubt, of doubt there absolutely Another high 652 00:36:05,520 --> 00:36:09,920 Speaker 1: profile person that you've represented was Scott Miller, the former 653 00:36:10,120 --> 00:36:12,960 Speaker 1: and I think it's a sad case. And I know 654 00:36:13,520 --> 00:36:18,239 Speaker 1: sentencing you addressing the issues that created that situation. For 655 00:36:18,280 --> 00:36:21,000 Speaker 1: those that don't know, Scott Miller, he was a silver 656 00:36:21,040 --> 00:36:26,840 Speaker 1: medalist at the Olympics, a swimmer and got involved in drugs. 657 00:36:28,040 --> 00:36:30,239 Speaker 2: You should when you say silver medalist, you've got to 658 00:36:30,239 --> 00:36:32,440 Speaker 2: put that in context. Garat, he should have been the 659 00:36:32,440 --> 00:36:36,000 Speaker 2: gold medalist. He was the fastest butterfly swimmer on top 660 00:36:36,040 --> 00:36:38,400 Speaker 2: of the water. Now, if anyone knows anything about swimming, 661 00:36:38,760 --> 00:36:40,719 Speaker 2: and you dive into a twenty five meter peol or 662 00:36:40,719 --> 00:36:43,320 Speaker 2: a fifty meter pool, you go fifteen meters and you 663 00:36:43,400 --> 00:36:45,080 Speaker 2: look up and there's all these flags. There's a big 664 00:36:45,120 --> 00:36:48,200 Speaker 2: string of flags across. You've got to be surfaced by them. 665 00:36:49,080 --> 00:36:54,080 Speaker 2: His nemesis was a guy called Dennis Pankrotov, a Russian, 666 00:36:55,160 --> 00:37:00,440 Speaker 2: bloody Russians again, yeah, absolutely yeah, And it was invading 667 00:37:00,480 --> 00:37:05,400 Speaker 2: the swimming pool and he was spending probably sixty percent 668 00:37:05,760 --> 00:37:08,400 Speaker 2: of the time that he swamm the butterfly under the 669 00:37:08,400 --> 00:37:10,920 Speaker 2: water doing a dolphin kick, So it wasn't butterfly at all. 670 00:37:11,480 --> 00:37:14,000 Speaker 2: But strangely enough, you can swim faster underwater than you 671 00:37:14,040 --> 00:37:16,080 Speaker 2: can by breaking the surface on top of the water. 672 00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:21,799 Speaker 2: And he beat. He came up probably a body length 673 00:37:21,880 --> 00:37:25,920 Speaker 2: in front of Scott in the nineteen six Olympics and 674 00:37:26,120 --> 00:37:30,640 Speaker 2: he beat Scott to the wall by a bee's knees. 675 00:37:31,120 --> 00:37:33,560 Speaker 1: Right, Well, I didn't think. I didn't think we're going 676 00:37:33,600 --> 00:37:35,960 Speaker 1: to dissect the and Scotty. 677 00:37:36,080 --> 00:37:39,000 Speaker 2: Then they then changed the rules after that, and so 678 00:37:39,120 --> 00:37:43,000 Speaker 2: Scott's had that you know is an also rad you 679 00:37:43,000 --> 00:37:44,120 Speaker 2: don't win the gold. 680 00:37:44,520 --> 00:37:49,280 Speaker 1: Well, that's yeah, okay, I didn't realize the backstory to it. Okay, 681 00:37:49,320 --> 00:37:50,759 Speaker 1: so you've gone in depth there. 682 00:37:50,880 --> 00:37:53,600 Speaker 2: And then he got injured coming up to the Sydney Olympics, 683 00:37:53,600 --> 00:37:57,480 Speaker 2: which was which was every every sportsman's dream who was 684 00:37:57,760 --> 00:38:00,960 Speaker 2: an Olympic class at sporting events, missed out on that, 685 00:38:01,120 --> 00:38:03,360 Speaker 2: tried to come back for two o four and injuries 686 00:38:03,440 --> 00:38:06,960 Speaker 2: put him out, but then found himself, like a lot 687 00:38:07,000 --> 00:38:11,160 Speaker 2: of swimmers do, suffering what we call post elite sportsman's suppression. 688 00:38:11,600 --> 00:38:14,560 Speaker 2: You go and swimmings, you know, you follow the black line. 689 00:38:14,800 --> 00:38:18,279 Speaker 2: It's you're in your own world training and then you 690 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:21,520 Speaker 2: come out of this bubble into the limelight. You're some 691 00:38:21,719 --> 00:38:23,840 Speaker 2: hero and you've got to deal with that with no 692 00:38:23,920 --> 00:38:26,400 Speaker 2: training for it. No, it's a sad story. 693 00:38:26,840 --> 00:38:29,360 Speaker 1: Is a sad story. How did you come to be 694 00:38:29,520 --> 00:38:31,560 Speaker 1: representing him? 695 00:38:31,960 --> 00:38:37,319 Speaker 2: Because just through associations and through well actually through his 696 00:38:37,360 --> 00:38:44,279 Speaker 2: wife and through my associations with other people involved in 697 00:38:45,160 --> 00:38:49,120 Speaker 2: swimming got to know got to know Scott and looked 698 00:38:49,160 --> 00:38:49,560 Speaker 2: after him. 699 00:38:49,960 --> 00:38:54,839 Speaker 1: You see a lot of elite sportsmen that have had 700 00:38:54,920 --> 00:38:57,799 Speaker 1: the highs and then struggle after it. But yeah, it 701 00:38:57,840 --> 00:39:01,480 Speaker 1: plays out in rugby league for a lot of different reasons, 702 00:39:01,480 --> 00:39:03,080 Speaker 1: but you see a lot that happened with a lot 703 00:39:03,120 --> 00:39:04,160 Speaker 1: of a lot of sportsmen. 704 00:39:06,000 --> 00:39:08,040 Speaker 2: I think rugby is a sort of different category. Yeah, 705 00:39:08,120 --> 00:39:12,279 Speaker 2: it's well in that it's young men weekly being involved 706 00:39:12,480 --> 00:39:18,960 Speaker 2: in this glamorous, high profile Adelatian type sport and you 707 00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:21,920 Speaker 2: know there's cocaine around, and there's good looking girls at 708 00:39:21,920 --> 00:39:24,840 Speaker 2: clubs and so forth, and it's not the sort of 709 00:39:24,920 --> 00:39:30,520 Speaker 2: same sort of the isolation of a swimmer. And you 710 00:39:30,560 --> 00:39:37,000 Speaker 2: look at a lot of our swimmers have had Lisal 711 00:39:37,120 --> 00:39:41,600 Speaker 2: Jones had problems and so you know Scotty wasn't is 712 00:39:41,640 --> 00:39:46,080 Speaker 2: not alone. He was just one that fell further than others. 713 00:39:46,120 --> 00:39:47,280 Speaker 2: As I said, it's a sad. 714 00:39:47,080 --> 00:39:52,239 Speaker 1: Story, and representing him, you're obviously the way that you 715 00:39:52,280 --> 00:39:56,320 Speaker 1: relay the story, you felt felt it personally the responsibility 716 00:39:56,320 --> 00:39:57,560 Speaker 1: of representing him. 717 00:39:57,640 --> 00:40:01,560 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Yeah, people commit crime, but doesn't stop them 718 00:40:01,600 --> 00:40:03,600 Speaker 2: from being human beings. And you can set the crime 719 00:40:03,600 --> 00:40:05,200 Speaker 2: aside and you've still got Sometimes you've got a really 720 00:40:05,280 --> 00:40:07,520 Speaker 2: decent human being there. He's made a lot of bad mistakes, 721 00:40:08,680 --> 00:40:13,320 Speaker 2: but you can't throw the good person out with the bathwater. 722 00:40:14,120 --> 00:40:16,480 Speaker 1: Another person that you've come across in your career, and 723 00:40:16,520 --> 00:40:21,400 Speaker 1: we're going back into the dark, well, the King's Cross. 724 00:40:21,440 --> 00:40:25,640 Speaker 1: But Sally Anne Huckstep who was by way of introduction, 725 00:40:25,800 --> 00:40:31,640 Speaker 1: people probably heard her name, but Warren France, Warren lan 726 00:40:31,719 --> 00:40:36,040 Speaker 1: Franchi lanb Francie's girlfriend at the time that Tea was 727 00:40:36,040 --> 00:40:39,480 Speaker 1: shot and killed by Roger Rogerson and was sort of 728 00:40:39,520 --> 00:40:42,680 Speaker 1: considered she might have been an informant giving information, but 729 00:40:42,960 --> 00:40:44,600 Speaker 1: she ended up being murdered. 730 00:40:45,080 --> 00:40:47,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. Sure, her body was found in one of the 731 00:40:47,239 --> 00:40:48,920 Speaker 2: Centennial Park lakes. 732 00:40:48,560 --> 00:40:51,279 Speaker 1: And she was at the time she was vocal in 733 00:40:51,400 --> 00:40:53,560 Speaker 1: speaking up about police corruption. 734 00:40:54,080 --> 00:40:56,719 Speaker 2: Well, she was speaking up to the extent that she 735 00:40:57,040 --> 00:41:02,960 Speaker 2: believed that Roger Rogerson had had killed Warren in cold blood. 736 00:41:03,719 --> 00:41:07,120 Speaker 2: And there's all sorts of different stories about that. Yeah, 737 00:41:07,160 --> 00:41:13,440 Speaker 2: and she was a victim of a time when collusion 738 00:41:13,520 --> 00:41:18,359 Speaker 2: I think between people in positions of relative power, either 739 00:41:18,400 --> 00:41:23,320 Speaker 2: from the criminal malieu or from the police mailieu, were 740 00:41:23,640 --> 00:41:24,560 Speaker 2: bound to catch up with. 741 00:41:24,960 --> 00:41:28,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, and how did you find her as a person. 742 00:41:29,880 --> 00:41:32,400 Speaker 2: We didn't, I don't. I think we may have acted 743 00:41:32,400 --> 00:41:34,040 Speaker 2: for when I was in to practice out at Bondi 744 00:41:34,080 --> 00:41:36,279 Speaker 2: junction with one of my older partners in with our 745 00:41:36,280 --> 00:41:40,600 Speaker 2: deceased as well. We acted for just on my smartor things, 746 00:41:40,640 --> 00:41:44,480 Speaker 2: I think, but we got more caught up in in 747 00:41:44,800 --> 00:41:48,200 Speaker 2: that aspect of it because we were alleged to have 748 00:41:48,280 --> 00:41:51,440 Speaker 2: had her diaries in my in my office, and in 749 00:41:51,520 --> 00:41:56,200 Speaker 2: my office was then broken into and ow and we nothing, no, 750 00:41:56,800 --> 00:41:59,520 Speaker 2: nothing of value taken except there was a nice neatly 751 00:41:59,600 --> 00:42:02,560 Speaker 2: cut section of our roof. 752 00:42:02,880 --> 00:42:07,440 Speaker 1: Sorry break break this down. Just my detective minds thinking 753 00:42:07,480 --> 00:42:11,200 Speaker 1: hole it. So you the information was that you had 754 00:42:11,520 --> 00:42:12,880 Speaker 1: Sally's diaries. 755 00:42:12,480 --> 00:42:14,279 Speaker 2: Well, that was a rumor that was out there and 756 00:42:14,320 --> 00:42:17,799 Speaker 2: that had come through another girlfriend of hers, for whom 757 00:42:17,800 --> 00:42:19,960 Speaker 2: we acted, and it was thought that that had been 758 00:42:20,040 --> 00:42:22,000 Speaker 2: left in our in our care. 759 00:42:21,960 --> 00:42:24,840 Speaker 1: And that could be very damaging for certain people. 760 00:42:24,880 --> 00:42:27,960 Speaker 2: We didn't have it. We didn't have it safe. And 761 00:42:28,000 --> 00:42:29,960 Speaker 2: in fact that when people were playing with checks, they 762 00:42:29,960 --> 00:42:32,520 Speaker 2: were stuck in a jar. On the top of a 763 00:42:32,560 --> 00:42:34,600 Speaker 2: filing cabinet. Well, they were all still there, but there 764 00:42:34,640 --> 00:42:39,279 Speaker 2: was a well precisely cut hole in our roof and 765 00:42:39,320 --> 00:42:41,279 Speaker 2: they got through the roof and through the ceiling, and 766 00:42:41,560 --> 00:42:45,280 Speaker 2: I think and there was clearly all our filing cabinets 767 00:42:45,320 --> 00:42:46,080 Speaker 2: had been rifled. 768 00:42:47,120 --> 00:42:49,840 Speaker 1: You can't. You can't make this stuff up. You can't 769 00:42:49,880 --> 00:42:53,960 Speaker 1: make this stuff up. Okay, I'm just. I'm just I 770 00:42:54,120 --> 00:42:57,320 Speaker 1: hadn't realized that. Just thinking about that. Okay, that's interesting. 771 00:42:57,520 --> 00:43:02,680 Speaker 1: The diaries. Wow, what do you think makes a good solicitor? 772 00:43:02,760 --> 00:43:04,920 Speaker 1: I'm going to I haven't forgotten about the saying that 773 00:43:05,040 --> 00:43:08,680 Speaker 1: you've ever met and I'll exclude myself from this question. 774 00:43:08,920 --> 00:43:11,360 Speaker 1: Have you ever met a good detective? But before I do, 775 00:43:11,920 --> 00:43:15,520 Speaker 1: what do you consider is the good traits of a 776 00:43:15,760 --> 00:43:16,920 Speaker 1: defense solictener? 777 00:43:17,600 --> 00:43:22,680 Speaker 2: Be a good listener, be compassionate and be prepared to 778 00:43:23,960 --> 00:43:29,000 Speaker 2: look at the case from every available angle, and to 779 00:43:29,120 --> 00:43:32,400 Speaker 2: do your best by your client and be truthful to 780 00:43:32,440 --> 00:43:32,880 Speaker 2: your client. 781 00:43:34,000 --> 00:43:39,239 Speaker 1: Good advice. Did you have mentors throughout your career or 782 00:43:39,280 --> 00:43:41,800 Speaker 1: people that you learned from. 783 00:43:42,560 --> 00:43:47,520 Speaker 2: I had different barristers who I worked with. I had 784 00:43:47,520 --> 00:43:50,919 Speaker 2: the benefit of working with some great lawyers and being 785 00:43:50,960 --> 00:43:53,879 Speaker 2: opposed by some great lawyers. A lot of them became 786 00:43:53,960 --> 00:43:58,960 Speaker 2: really good judges. And if you know, laws are really 787 00:43:59,440 --> 00:44:03,160 Speaker 2: rewarding place because you sort of feel like you're doing good, 788 00:44:03,640 --> 00:44:06,520 Speaker 2: you feel like you've not done and done. It can 789 00:44:06,560 --> 00:44:13,320 Speaker 2: be self critical too much sometimes, but now I generally 790 00:44:14,000 --> 00:44:17,920 Speaker 2: had the benefit of working with good barristers and with 791 00:44:18,080 --> 00:44:19,960 Speaker 2: people who were really, really smart. 792 00:44:20,280 --> 00:44:23,800 Speaker 1: Do you have have barristers that you Is it Forbes 793 00:44:23,880 --> 00:44:28,200 Speaker 1: Chambers that you engage with a lot of barristers from 794 00:44:28,239 --> 00:44:29,040 Speaker 1: Forbes Chambers? 795 00:44:29,120 --> 00:44:31,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, I regard Forbes is probably the premier criminal chambers. 796 00:44:32,920 --> 00:44:34,600 Speaker 2: But across the board there. 797 00:44:34,719 --> 00:44:38,200 Speaker 1: I used to hate walking up there server brief Forbes Chambers. 798 00:44:38,920 --> 00:44:43,719 Speaker 2: But across the across the across the span of barristers. 799 00:44:44,160 --> 00:44:47,600 Speaker 2: Samuel Griffiths have got some very good barristers, and there's 800 00:44:47,600 --> 00:44:49,280 Speaker 2: some other chambers spread around. 801 00:44:49,640 --> 00:44:52,480 Speaker 1: And what's what's the working relationship with the solicitor and 802 00:44:52,480 --> 00:44:55,360 Speaker 1: the barrister, Like, what's the dynamic dynamics there. 803 00:44:55,400 --> 00:44:59,360 Speaker 2: Well, I've always regarded myself as anything but a bad carrier. 804 00:45:00,120 --> 00:45:03,960 Speaker 2: I say jokingly, I'm anicat I'm anicating today which has 805 00:45:04,000 --> 00:45:05,839 Speaker 2: gone getting paid and not doing any of the work. 806 00:45:05,880 --> 00:45:10,759 Speaker 2: But I tell my clients that they're at a two horse race, 807 00:45:10,880 --> 00:45:13,560 Speaker 2: I says, as a prosecution, and there's us. I say, 808 00:45:14,640 --> 00:45:17,799 Speaker 2: I'm the trainer, the barrasses, the jockey, and you know 809 00:45:17,840 --> 00:45:20,759 Speaker 2: what you are. You're a horse, okay, So if you 810 00:45:20,760 --> 00:45:23,280 Speaker 2: don't run across the line first, you're in big trouble. 811 00:45:23,719 --> 00:45:26,680 Speaker 1: I haven't heard that description. Break that down again, Run 812 00:45:26,719 --> 00:45:28,200 Speaker 1: it past me again, so I don't forget it. 813 00:45:28,280 --> 00:45:32,280 Speaker 2: I say, the solicitors, the trainer, the barrasses, the jockey, 814 00:45:32,520 --> 00:45:35,640 Speaker 2: but the client's the horse. It's a good analogy because 815 00:45:35,920 --> 00:45:37,920 Speaker 2: if the horse doesn't run across the line first, the 816 00:45:37,960 --> 00:45:40,040 Speaker 2: jockey and the trainer walk away. They go home. 817 00:45:41,880 --> 00:45:47,239 Speaker 1: That's not a bad way of describing it. Policing have 818 00:45:47,360 --> 00:45:52,000 Speaker 1: you seen. You've been in the as a defense solicit 819 00:45:52,160 --> 00:45:55,480 Speaker 1: for forty years, so you've seen changes in police like 820 00:45:55,680 --> 00:45:58,320 Speaker 1: you wouldn't even recognize what policing was in the eighties, 821 00:45:58,360 --> 00:46:00,480 Speaker 1: the early eighties compared to one of these is Now, 822 00:46:01,200 --> 00:46:03,399 Speaker 1: what do you think the quality of investigations are? 823 00:46:04,040 --> 00:46:08,600 Speaker 2: Like? I think the quality of investigations has improved markedly. 824 00:46:08,760 --> 00:46:13,160 Speaker 2: I think that's because I came into law on the 825 00:46:13,160 --> 00:46:16,360 Speaker 2: cusp of a change where we'd gone through that period 826 00:46:16,520 --> 00:46:20,279 Speaker 2: where there were suggestions of corruption and so forth, and 827 00:46:20,360 --> 00:46:23,799 Speaker 2: police were prepared to make up conversations that they'd had 828 00:46:23,800 --> 00:46:27,719 Speaker 2: with suspects, which we called verbals, in order to gain 829 00:46:27,760 --> 00:46:31,680 Speaker 2: a conviction. So they were walking working more on gut 830 00:46:31,760 --> 00:46:34,000 Speaker 2: instinct than they were on real hard work. 831 00:46:34,719 --> 00:46:36,799 Speaker 1: I think that's fair and say, and I think to. 832 00:46:36,760 --> 00:46:39,839 Speaker 2: The credit of the police force, that's greatly improved and 833 00:46:40,000 --> 00:46:42,440 Speaker 2: with the advance that we advances that we've had in 834 00:46:43,200 --> 00:46:47,040 Speaker 2: what I talked about earlier about forensic technologies, which is 835 00:46:47,360 --> 00:46:51,440 Speaker 2: listening devices and telephone intercepts, better surveillance, long range cameras 836 00:46:51,440 --> 00:46:55,920 Speaker 2: and long range and basically putting in the time to 837 00:46:56,840 --> 00:46:59,440 Speaker 2: act on where you start off with a suspicion and 838 00:46:59,480 --> 00:47:03,040 Speaker 2: then were your way through to look at how things 839 00:47:04,200 --> 00:47:07,600 Speaker 2: work and whether you've got something that's just a spinoff, 840 00:47:07,600 --> 00:47:10,359 Speaker 2: And a lot of the major busts that have been 841 00:47:10,719 --> 00:47:14,000 Speaker 2: achieved by police is by just looking at that spinoff. 842 00:47:14,160 --> 00:47:16,440 Speaker 2: Is there something here this person's met that person, We're 843 00:47:16,440 --> 00:47:17,600 Speaker 2: going to look at what he's doing. 844 00:47:18,200 --> 00:47:24,640 Speaker 1: It's definitely evolving and changing changing landscape for criminal investigation. 845 00:47:25,600 --> 00:47:27,680 Speaker 1: A good detechnic if you've come up against in your 846 00:47:27,680 --> 00:47:31,000 Speaker 1: career someone because there's been some ding dog battles in 847 00:47:31,000 --> 00:47:35,120 Speaker 1: the courts and over time, is there one that you 848 00:47:35,120 --> 00:47:38,279 Speaker 1: could say that you respected for the way he or 849 00:47:38,320 --> 00:47:39,799 Speaker 1: she went about their job. 850 00:47:39,920 --> 00:47:43,200 Speaker 2: Well, in terms of just dogged determination, i'd have to 851 00:47:43,760 --> 00:47:46,759 Speaker 2: talk about Justin Murray. I've actually got Justin in a 852 00:47:46,840 --> 00:47:49,279 Speaker 2: case now. But Justin was the officer in charge of 853 00:47:49,280 --> 00:47:54,200 Speaker 2: the investigations into the Armor Guard robberies across the pavement 854 00:47:54,280 --> 00:48:00,280 Speaker 2: Armorgard robberies. When I think Chubb an Armourguard security trucks 855 00:48:00,320 --> 00:48:06,160 Speaker 2: were being attacked as they stopped to fill up ATMs 856 00:48:06,160 --> 00:48:08,840 Speaker 2: and so forth. And I think overall seven at some 857 00:48:08,920 --> 00:48:12,240 Speaker 2: point one million or seven point six million dollars was 858 00:48:12,239 --> 00:48:13,720 Speaker 2: was stolen by the police. 859 00:48:14,520 --> 00:48:18,560 Speaker 1: Well, I stule was I said, yeah, and go, okay, 860 00:48:19,160 --> 00:48:23,240 Speaker 1: we're going make sure we're recording this the alleged cross 861 00:48:24,560 --> 00:48:30,160 Speaker 1: highlight that trip. There's your headline in the paper. Okay. 862 00:48:30,239 --> 00:48:33,360 Speaker 2: I made the mistake in court last week this last 863 00:48:33,360 --> 00:48:36,680 Speaker 2: week of referring to one of my clients as as 864 00:48:36,719 --> 00:48:40,320 Speaker 2: a graffiti artist. Well, the magistrate went ballistic and said 865 00:48:41,000 --> 00:48:44,120 Speaker 2: I said, said, and it criticized me for that. I 866 00:48:44,200 --> 00:48:46,440 Speaker 2: was trying to get in. Well, I'll refrase that and 867 00:48:46,480 --> 00:48:49,640 Speaker 2: say he was an exponent, but it wasn't the police, 868 00:48:50,280 --> 00:48:54,160 Speaker 2: and we eventually won that case one hundred and sixty 869 00:48:54,200 --> 00:49:00,759 Speaker 2: one charges to nil, which was a great success justin 870 00:49:01,400 --> 00:49:03,400 Speaker 2: to his well, I won't say to his credit, but 871 00:49:03,480 --> 00:49:05,399 Speaker 2: he was so convinced of their guilt that he tracked 872 00:49:05,400 --> 00:49:07,120 Speaker 2: down everyone and got them all for something else. 873 00:49:07,400 --> 00:49:10,840 Speaker 1: Right, Okay, Well I like that type of dog inness. 874 00:49:10,560 --> 00:49:15,280 Speaker 2: That was reginess. I've met a lot of police officers, 875 00:49:15,280 --> 00:49:19,440 Speaker 2: but who now, being armed with the technology and the 876 00:49:19,520 --> 00:49:21,960 Speaker 2: ability to track crime, do an amazing job. 877 00:49:22,040 --> 00:49:26,160 Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, Well it takes the pressure off to a degree. 878 00:49:26,320 --> 00:49:28,440 Speaker 1: Is a police officer that you can rely on the 879 00:49:28,480 --> 00:49:31,960 Speaker 1: technology and that because before I won't say before, but 880 00:49:32,000 --> 00:49:33,680 Speaker 1: there was a lot of hard graft. You had to 881 00:49:33,719 --> 00:49:36,279 Speaker 1: get the statements and then you've got a brief that's 882 00:49:36,320 --> 00:49:40,359 Speaker 1: not Yeah, there would be I'm saying here just from 883 00:49:40,400 --> 00:49:42,920 Speaker 1: my thoughts, there seemed to be a lot more trials 884 00:49:42,920 --> 00:49:44,960 Speaker 1: because you didn't have that evidence. You didn't have the 885 00:49:44,960 --> 00:49:47,440 Speaker 1: technical evidence of the phone records or things that could 886 00:49:47,480 --> 00:49:50,120 Speaker 1: back it up. So it came down to witness testimony, 887 00:49:50,320 --> 00:49:53,640 Speaker 1: which you'd know and I'm sure you're sure you've exploited 888 00:49:53,840 --> 00:49:58,680 Speaker 1: in a fair way that eyewitness testimony is not always 889 00:49:58,480 --> 00:50:00,040 Speaker 1: that reliable. 890 00:50:00,160 --> 00:50:04,120 Speaker 2: Nor his memory. Yeah, and psychologists will tell you that 891 00:50:04,200 --> 00:50:08,000 Speaker 2: constructed memory can be really fallible. But it's then up 892 00:50:08,000 --> 00:50:09,960 Speaker 2: to the jury to decide whether they believe it or not, 893 00:50:10,040 --> 00:50:13,480 Speaker 2: and that itself is a fallible system. We saw that 894 00:50:13,560 --> 00:50:15,239 Speaker 2: with George pell and a lot of people that have 895 00:50:15,320 --> 00:50:19,400 Speaker 2: their views on that. But knowing from my point of view, 896 00:50:19,520 --> 00:50:23,040 Speaker 2: looking at what the High Court said, you know, I 897 00:50:23,040 --> 00:50:25,680 Speaker 2: think the jury didn't make a mistake that other minds 898 00:50:25,719 --> 00:50:29,360 Speaker 2: would differ. Also, having been seeing bishops come to Catholic 899 00:50:29,400 --> 00:50:31,120 Speaker 2: churches and know how many people they drag with them 900 00:50:31,160 --> 00:50:33,440 Speaker 2: and never were alone, I thought it was pretty difficult. 901 00:50:33,440 --> 00:50:35,799 Speaker 2: But you've got to look at the system and look 902 00:50:35,800 --> 00:50:39,200 Speaker 2: at the fallibilities and say, well, the police are getting 903 00:50:39,200 --> 00:50:43,240 Speaker 2: better tools these days to take suspicion to the point 904 00:50:43,239 --> 00:50:46,200 Speaker 2: of proof, and that's it. And even though I'm a 905 00:50:46,239 --> 00:50:49,360 Speaker 2: criminal defense lawyer, I'm a member of a society as well, 906 00:50:49,640 --> 00:50:52,120 Speaker 2: and in that respect, I expect prosecutors to do their 907 00:50:52,200 --> 00:50:54,279 Speaker 2: job properly. In his hard I don't expect to get 908 00:50:54,440 --> 00:50:57,000 Speaker 2: to cut me any slack because I'm paying them to 909 00:50:57,000 --> 00:50:59,959 Speaker 2: do their job. And so, yeah, police are getting better, 910 00:51:00,040 --> 00:51:01,800 Speaker 2: better resources and that's to our advantage. 911 00:51:02,080 --> 00:51:05,640 Speaker 1: What about the court system? Is there things that you 912 00:51:06,000 --> 00:51:08,759 Speaker 1: think could be improved? And you said I think in 913 00:51:08,800 --> 00:51:12,040 Speaker 1: part one that you've believed the system where God is 914 00:51:12,040 --> 00:51:17,880 Speaker 1: as good as any other other system across the Well, yeah, I. 915 00:51:18,200 --> 00:51:22,880 Speaker 2: Think what needs to be improved in our court system 916 00:51:22,960 --> 00:51:27,240 Speaker 2: is not the system of the determination of guilt or 917 00:51:27,520 --> 00:51:31,200 Speaker 2: the application of court time. When you've got judges and 918 00:51:31,360 --> 00:51:36,799 Speaker 2: juries and magistrates actually doing the sentencing jobs or doing 919 00:51:36,840 --> 00:51:39,560 Speaker 2: the trial jobs. The problem we have got is we're 920 00:51:39,600 --> 00:51:42,719 Speaker 2: over burden with administrative stuff. I was in a court 921 00:51:42,760 --> 00:51:46,200 Speaker 2: the other day out of Campbelltown and the magistrate had 922 00:51:46,239 --> 00:51:49,040 Speaker 2: to deal with one hundred and fifty matters in this list, 923 00:51:49,719 --> 00:51:53,879 Speaker 2: and these were all serious matters, and the majority of 924 00:51:53,880 --> 00:51:55,880 Speaker 2: them gary were matters that could have been done by 925 00:51:55,880 --> 00:51:59,000 Speaker 2: our registrar. They were just adjourney matters because they weren't 926 00:51:59,000 --> 00:52:02,560 Speaker 2: ready to proceed. Now we're paying big money to have 927 00:52:02,840 --> 00:52:06,600 Speaker 2: a judicial officer sit there and do an administrative job, 928 00:52:07,120 --> 00:52:09,319 Speaker 2: and so there are ways and means of cleaning up 929 00:52:09,360 --> 00:52:13,200 Speaker 2: that system which would save money and I think expedite 930 00:52:13,200 --> 00:52:14,040 Speaker 2: the system as well. 931 00:52:14,440 --> 00:52:18,120 Speaker 1: Yeah. I see what you're saying there, because the time 932 00:52:18,160 --> 00:52:20,719 Speaker 1: that appears to be wasted in court going through what 933 00:52:20,760 --> 00:52:22,000 Speaker 1: you've just described is. 934 00:52:22,160 --> 00:52:24,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's we call them mentions. 935 00:52:24,920 --> 00:52:29,399 Speaker 1: The mentions sit there what's the called on in at 936 00:52:29,719 --> 00:52:31,719 Speaker 1: down in center that wherever they have the mentions and 937 00:52:31,760 --> 00:52:33,600 Speaker 1: you've virtually got to fight your way in to get 938 00:52:33,640 --> 00:52:33,960 Speaker 1: in there. 939 00:52:34,040 --> 00:52:37,480 Speaker 2: Oh that's the registrar's court four point four. But they're 940 00:52:37,480 --> 00:52:39,879 Speaker 2: get through the mentions really quickly, by about by eleven thirty, 941 00:52:39,880 --> 00:52:44,160 Speaker 2: it's all over and done with. But it's yeah, but 942 00:52:44,239 --> 00:52:46,719 Speaker 2: sometimes you've got to you've got in the custody courts, 943 00:52:46,719 --> 00:52:49,959 Speaker 2: it's all dealt with by a magistrate, and the magistrates 944 00:52:50,400 --> 00:52:53,239 Speaker 2: are basically just shuffling paper in the journey matters, and 945 00:52:53,280 --> 00:52:57,520 Speaker 2: sometimes you've you've got to go before a magistrate. Fortunately, 946 00:52:57,520 --> 00:52:59,200 Speaker 2: in the Supreme Court we have registrartions who do a 947 00:52:59,239 --> 00:53:01,560 Speaker 2: lot of that work. Less there's an issue that needs 948 00:53:01,600 --> 00:53:04,640 Speaker 2: determination by a judge which is just not shifting the 949 00:53:04,719 --> 00:53:07,320 Speaker 2: dates or saying this has got to be filed in time, 950 00:53:07,960 --> 00:53:10,000 Speaker 2: you're getting get referred to a judge. It doesn't happen 951 00:53:10,040 --> 00:53:12,280 Speaker 2: in the local courts and sometimes in the district courts. 952 00:53:12,400 --> 00:53:16,080 Speaker 1: What would you say when I throw this to you 953 00:53:16,160 --> 00:53:21,720 Speaker 1: that an inquisitorial system is better than adversarial system. Why 954 00:53:22,239 --> 00:53:27,399 Speaker 1: because you talked about going into the Royal Commission, which 955 00:53:27,440 --> 00:53:31,239 Speaker 1: is more of an inquisitorial type system in quest than 956 00:53:31,760 --> 00:53:34,600 Speaker 1: as compared to an adversarial system. Do you think there's 957 00:53:34,640 --> 00:53:38,319 Speaker 1: any value in leaning more towards an inquisitorial system rather 958 00:53:38,360 --> 00:53:41,520 Speaker 1: than adversarial system. Not. 959 00:53:41,760 --> 00:53:44,120 Speaker 2: While we are entitled to the right. 960 00:53:44,080 --> 00:53:47,759 Speaker 1: Silence, Okay, that's a stickler for it. 961 00:53:48,040 --> 00:53:50,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, and proof beyond reasonable doubt. And I think that's 962 00:53:50,800 --> 00:53:53,960 Speaker 2: if you're going to take away a person's liberty. And 963 00:53:54,080 --> 00:53:58,000 Speaker 2: we're talking about Jarles before. People don't understand is that 964 00:53:58,080 --> 00:54:00,319 Speaker 2: every day you and I can get up and we 965 00:54:00,400 --> 00:54:03,200 Speaker 2: have a choice as to what we do. Now, choices 966 00:54:03,200 --> 00:54:06,840 Speaker 2: are limited because life's repetitive, but we don't have to 967 00:54:06,880 --> 00:54:08,440 Speaker 2: go to work if we don't really want it. We 968 00:54:08,480 --> 00:54:11,320 Speaker 2: can take a sickie, we get our four weeks holiday. 969 00:54:11,680 --> 00:54:12,680 Speaker 2: At the end of the day, we can go and 970 00:54:12,719 --> 00:54:14,160 Speaker 2: have a beer with our mates. But if you'll get 971 00:54:14,200 --> 00:54:15,680 Speaker 2: up and you put on your green shorts and your 972 00:54:15,680 --> 00:54:17,880 Speaker 2: T shirt and you know exactly what you're going to 973 00:54:17,920 --> 00:54:19,040 Speaker 2: be doing for the rest of the day in the 974 00:54:19,040 --> 00:54:21,560 Speaker 2: next four or five or ten years, that's not liberty. 975 00:54:22,000 --> 00:54:26,200 Speaker 1: Okay, and look, I agree with you, and to understand 976 00:54:26,200 --> 00:54:29,160 Speaker 1: the punishment. The punishment has been taken away from society 977 00:54:29,200 --> 00:54:32,600 Speaker 1: and it's not a nice place to be in prison. 978 00:54:32,680 --> 00:54:37,160 Speaker 1: And even the prisoners acknowledge that some people have to 979 00:54:37,200 --> 00:54:42,160 Speaker 1: being there. They're not saying that everyone, Yeah, we should 980 00:54:42,200 --> 00:54:44,560 Speaker 1: open the jail gates. They know that people should be 981 00:54:44,560 --> 00:54:48,239 Speaker 1: in there. What about the jury system. I've had a 982 00:54:48,280 --> 00:54:52,200 Speaker 1: problem sometimes throughout my career where there's a voir the 983 00:54:52,280 --> 00:54:55,680 Speaker 1: year and the jury is excluded because there's evidence that 984 00:54:57,280 --> 00:55:00,680 Speaker 1: might be prejudicial if the jury hears that. The problem 985 00:55:00,760 --> 00:55:03,000 Speaker 1: I have is that we select the jury that there 986 00:55:03,239 --> 00:55:07,280 Speaker 1: he is to judge the person's guilt or innocent based 987 00:55:07,320 --> 00:55:11,000 Speaker 1: on all the information available. We're saying the jury have 988 00:55:11,120 --> 00:55:14,879 Speaker 1: got the skill set, the life experience to form a view, 989 00:55:15,440 --> 00:55:18,680 Speaker 1: and then the jury are excluded from so much information 990 00:55:18,760 --> 00:55:21,320 Speaker 1: that I think is relevant. Then perhaps we've got to 991 00:55:21,320 --> 00:55:23,080 Speaker 1: give them the benefit of the doubt that they can 992 00:55:23,120 --> 00:55:25,400 Speaker 1: interpret the weight that should be placed on that evidence. 993 00:55:25,400 --> 00:55:27,160 Speaker 2: Well, that comes back to what I was saying about 994 00:55:27,160 --> 00:55:30,920 Speaker 2: the hey Dad tendency aspect of evidence where there's other 995 00:55:31,600 --> 00:55:35,400 Speaker 2: like events that this person has perpetrated, and then the 996 00:55:35,520 --> 00:55:38,880 Speaker 2: jury just in some respects and still don't hear that 997 00:55:39,000 --> 00:55:42,280 Speaker 2: all the time. But there are rules of evidence which 998 00:55:42,800 --> 00:55:47,360 Speaker 2: are there to protect the person who is entitled to 999 00:55:47,400 --> 00:55:51,320 Speaker 2: a fair trial. And as I said before, no system 1000 00:55:51,400 --> 00:55:55,920 Speaker 2: is fallible, and that is always up for reassessment and 1001 00:55:56,000 --> 00:55:59,120 Speaker 2: for change. The laws of evidence are constantly changing and 1002 00:55:59,160 --> 00:56:02,200 Speaker 2: constantly being find and you can have faith in the 1003 00:56:02,200 --> 00:56:06,880 Speaker 2: fact that if there's a problem that law reform commissions 1004 00:56:06,880 --> 00:56:09,880 Speaker 2: are looking at those and trying to make things better. Now, 1005 00:56:10,160 --> 00:56:12,720 Speaker 2: from my point of view, they don't always make them better. 1006 00:56:13,480 --> 00:56:16,880 Speaker 2: And there's been a very very substantial drift in the 1007 00:56:16,920 --> 00:56:21,839 Speaker 2: criminal law to taking for granted what the victim says 1008 00:56:21,920 --> 00:56:25,360 Speaker 2: is being true and not being able to challenge the victim, 1009 00:56:25,360 --> 00:56:27,960 Speaker 2: particularly in sexual assault cases. I have a certain view 1010 00:56:28,000 --> 00:56:30,319 Speaker 2: about that. The me Too movement has a totally different view. 1011 00:56:30,560 --> 00:56:32,719 Speaker 2: So you've got to accept what a person says has 1012 00:56:32,719 --> 00:56:37,120 Speaker 2: been in gospel. Well, sorry, but there's as many truths 1013 00:56:37,120 --> 00:56:39,480 Speaker 2: come out as a person's mouth as lies do as well, 1014 00:56:40,080 --> 00:56:43,400 Speaker 2: and you should have the opportunity, if you're an accused person, 1015 00:56:43,480 --> 00:56:46,840 Speaker 2: to test the evidence that's being given against you. So 1016 00:56:46,960 --> 00:56:49,040 Speaker 2: I think adversarial systems in that respect. 1017 00:56:49,360 --> 00:56:54,920 Speaker 1: Other way to go okay, fair, fair comment. Would you 1018 00:56:55,800 --> 00:56:59,239 Speaker 1: I see young solsteners especially, I saw them more with 1019 00:56:59,320 --> 00:57:02,080 Speaker 1: the DPP, but I saw it with defense as well. 1020 00:57:02,520 --> 00:57:06,719 Speaker 1: Always seem to be overworked, underpaid, and stressed. It looks 1021 00:57:06,760 --> 00:57:09,799 Speaker 1: like a tough career. But I also see people like 1022 00:57:09,880 --> 00:57:12,239 Speaker 1: yourself that spend lifetime in the career, and I can 1023 00:57:12,280 --> 00:57:15,759 Speaker 1: tell that you've enjoyed your career, and yeah, you think 1024 00:57:15,800 --> 00:57:22,160 Speaker 1: it's a worthwhile vacation. Would you recommend law to people? 1025 00:57:23,280 --> 00:57:28,240 Speaker 2: Strangely, I tell people if someone some young kid comes 1026 00:57:28,320 --> 00:57:29,640 Speaker 2: up to me or a prayer and comes up to 1027 00:57:29,680 --> 00:57:31,320 Speaker 2: me and says, I agree, Do you think I think 1028 00:57:31,400 --> 00:57:34,919 Speaker 2: Johnny should go into law? I say, listen, doesn't matter 1029 00:57:34,920 --> 00:57:38,640 Speaker 2: whether it's law or medicine or any profession. Get a 1030 00:57:38,720 --> 00:57:45,520 Speaker 2: job dealing with people's money, not people's problems. But no, 1031 00:57:45,600 --> 00:57:49,240 Speaker 2: it's professional life as a lawyer is satisfied if you 1032 00:57:49,480 --> 00:57:53,520 Speaker 2: if you understand that it's not going to make you, 1033 00:57:53,520 --> 00:57:57,560 Speaker 2: you know, a billionaire, but it's it's a it's it's 1034 00:57:57,560 --> 00:58:00,520 Speaker 2: a worthwhile profession if if you take it and you're 1035 00:58:00,520 --> 00:58:01,360 Speaker 2: actually helping people. 1036 00:58:01,440 --> 00:58:05,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, Now, well, I see the lawyers that I respect, 1037 00:58:05,920 --> 00:58:07,640 Speaker 1: You can see that they've put in the time and 1038 00:58:07,680 --> 00:58:09,640 Speaker 1: that might be where they're turning up in the middle 1039 00:58:09,680 --> 00:58:11,960 Speaker 1: of a trail and it's clear they've been up all night, 1040 00:58:12,040 --> 00:58:13,840 Speaker 1: not on the drink, but up all night working on 1041 00:58:13,880 --> 00:58:17,200 Speaker 1: the brief and that type of thing. I think we'll 1042 00:58:17,200 --> 00:58:19,160 Speaker 1: wrap it up at this point in time. I just 1043 00:58:19,160 --> 00:58:21,280 Speaker 1: want to say I've really enjoyed sitting down and having 1044 00:58:21,280 --> 00:58:23,120 Speaker 1: that chat with you, for you guys are not as 1045 00:58:23,160 --> 00:58:25,320 Speaker 1: bad as other people are telling me you are. 1046 00:58:27,840 --> 00:58:31,280 Speaker 2: I'll go wait, I'll go await, enlightened and hardened by 1047 00:58:31,320 --> 00:58:32,200 Speaker 2: that character. 1048 00:58:32,240 --> 00:58:35,840 Speaker 1: No, but you've given a good insight, good insight into 1049 00:58:35,960 --> 00:58:38,720 Speaker 1: the world of world of crime, and some funny stories 1050 00:58:38,720 --> 00:58:40,960 Speaker 1: that I think anyone that's spent a career like you 1051 00:58:41,080 --> 00:58:44,640 Speaker 1: have is going to have. And thanks for giving us 1052 00:58:44,640 --> 00:58:46,800 Speaker 1: the opportunity to sit down and have a chat with you. 1053 00:58:47,240 --> 00:58:47,760 Speaker 2: My pleasure. 1054 00:58:47,960 --> 00:58:48,280 Speaker 1: Cheers,