WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 13 June

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>From the Sky News Center.

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Good evening, and welcome to the program. You're watching Paul

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Murray Live. I'm James Morrow here sitting in for the

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Great Man from the Man Cave. And guess what it is,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>All killer, no filler tonight, and we are gonna have

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>tons of fun and get stuck into tons of controversy

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with some of your absolute favorites tonight. But before we

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>get to our all star panels, look, is it just

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>me or does Peter Dutton seem to have really struck

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a nerve here with this whole nuclear power option and saying,

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty thirty, that's a bit too soon to

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>be doing what Labor's talking about. I mean when I

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>watch the reaction to what the opposition is saying these days,

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>namely that there's no way that we are going to

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:00.639
<v Speaker 1>hit our twenty thirty carbon reduction targets without causing massive

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>pain in the economy, and that if we have a

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>hope in hell of getting the next zero by twenty fifty,

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>well nuclear is going to have to be part of

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the mix. I think they are worried. I think they're

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>worried that the jig is up and that the more

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>people here Dutton say what I think are actually some

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty sensible and non controversial truth, the more support will

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>bleed away from a Labor party that is already in

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>need of a serious transfusion of primary votes. Here's a

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit of what mister Dunt had to say this

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>morning to two GB's Ray Hadley about the continuing hikes

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and energy prices as we put more of what Labor

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>keeps insisting is the cheapest form of energy into the grid,

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and about reports by this station's own Sherry Markson that

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Labor has even more extreme targets planned for as soon

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>as twenty thirty five. Have a listen.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just can't believe how I just connected that

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>from people are at the moment, in their own paying

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>budgets and in their own small business budget, people can't

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 3>afford another twenty or thirty percent increase in their electricity process.

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 3>We already pay the highest prices.

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 4>In the world, and now they're talking about the sixty

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 4>five to seventy five percent target by twenty thirty five.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 4>I haven't said any of the economic model, and I

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 4>don't think the Prime Minister has on there, so it

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 4>needs to be transparent and honest with the Australian public

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 4>about what does it mean and particularly if the economy

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 4>goes into recession.

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, indeed, yet remarks like this and a growing concern

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>about this whole scheme whereby a bunch of renewables investors

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>get rich while the rest of us are left with

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 1>more expensive electricity, the threat of brownouts and oh so

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>called smart meters that allow power companies to dial down

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>your AC when there's not enough renewable electricity in the

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>grid coincidentally on days when some months from now you're

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>most likely to eat it. Well, they've got labor and

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the renewable energy types in it. Tis that's why they

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>spun Peter Dunn's energy policy as a threat to get

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the Paris Agreement on Climate, to frighten the

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>horses and get all the teal seats worked up. Here's

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>what a Legraspender had to say about nuclear and the

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>threat of getting out of Paris.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 5>There are other things that we should be doing right

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 5>now that are really about helping Australian households, but it

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 5>is not the answer is not to stop the transition,

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 5>because the cheapest form of new energy is renewable energy.

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 5>So if you're trying to hold people, help people with

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 5>their power bills, it's not to commit to nuclear because

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 5>we know that is the most expensive form of energy

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 5>and will be the most expensive form of energy going forward.

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's not true about renewables being the cheapest form,

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and we've got to talk about that in a little bit.

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But it is also pretty hilarious when people fret about

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Australia getting under the Paris Agreement, given that seventy percent

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of the electricity in Paris, home of the Paris Accords,

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and indeed all of France comes from nuclear energy, and

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the French, who want to retain manufacturing and jobs and prosperity,

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have just committed to building eight more reactors. Anyway, what

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>are the French known? Nuclear? Maybe expensive Vispender, But how's

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that snow a hydra working out for you? I know? Right?

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>And also here's what Chris Bowen, Energy Minister had to

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>say the other day.

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 6>And of course it's not just about the Pacific. You

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 6>look at what's happening in our region. You look at

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 6>the partnerships in Australia as engaging with with United States,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 6>as climate and Energy, as the third pillar of our alliance.

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 6>You look at what we're doing with Germany on green hydrogen.

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 6>Peter Dutton would be a wrecking ball, a risky wrecking

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 6>ball when it comes to our foreign policy.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>You can see this air campaign coming. You know, it's

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>not just the energy builds, not just as the climate.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a foreign policy thing now too. It's all really

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>really cynical. And Simon Benson at the OHS belled the

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>cat on this today and said this is all about

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a potential early election, maybe as soon as hold onto

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>your hats September fourteen, writes Benson. Quote the coalition would

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be caught off guard and Albanesi could seek a mandate

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>on renewables over nuclear with the accompanying scare campaign of

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>mushroom clouds and three headed fish, and make it about

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>anything other than the economy un quote, well as you

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>would want to. Oh, and then there's this. If you

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>needed any more proof that the renewables mob, labor and

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the teals and everybody who is lining their pockets with

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the billions in subsidies being chucked at the transition are nervous.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Check this out. A story about none other than Simon Holmes,

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a court and an apparent silencing of a nuclear advocate

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>an engineer at his behest. Just a little while ago,

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>John Keiho at The Australian Financial Review reported that a

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>nuclear energy scientist said that he is a victim of

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>cancel culture after the nation's peak Engineering Professional group called

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>off his scheduled pro nuclear speech following pressure from billionaire

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy advocate Simon Holmes. A Court engineer and nuclear

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>energy advocate Rob Parker was due to present to more

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>than four hundred people registered for an Engineer's Australia webinar

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday on Wednesday night in a scheduled address titled

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>avoiding an Energy Blunder down Under. But just twenty four

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>hours before the talk, mister Holmes the Court slammed Engineer

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Australia on social media for hosting mister Parker. Holmes Court tweeted, Seriously,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Engineers Australia, you're hosting an anti renewables event for nuclear

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for climate. He posted on x I would have thought

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>your body was dedicated to improving understanding, not muddying the waters. Well.

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Ko's report continued quote minutes after his social media post

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that Simon Holmes Court's post on Tuesday, the engineer's Australia

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>X profile responded, thanks, Simon, this event has been pulled.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>This does not meet our guidelines and we are investigating

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>how it was scheduled. Unquote Seriously, Simon, what are you

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>afraid of? Well, if you ask me, there's a lot

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>he and all the others in that renewable anti nuclear

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>mob should be afraid of. My read on this is

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that nuclear power is going to be the next voice debate.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember how that went. On the one side, you had

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>all the elites, the teals, the c suites of all

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the major ASX companies urging a yes vote and telling

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the great unwashed they were dumb and ignorant and didn't

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>know what they were talking about. And then you had

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that great and washed that said, well, how's this song

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna help me? And how is this not going to

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>make the country worse off? While a bunch of virtue

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>signalers feel good about themselves, increase their power and in

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>some cases line their pockets. See the parallels. When the

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>debate started, the yes vote was well ahead in the polls,

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and in the end, though the referendum failed something like

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty forty very similar energy here. I think with nuclear

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>versus all these renewables, all the big end of town

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>types who talk climate and investing in things with guaranteed

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>government returns and who don't care if it costs war

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to heat the pool. Everyone else, of course they say

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not so much. By the way, John Keho it should

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>be at the AFR has also written an excellent dissection

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of those claims by the CSIRO and their gen cost

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>report that nuclear is the most expensive form of energy, noting,

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>among other things, CSIRO's analysis claim that nuclear power plants

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>last only thirty years when more than eighty years is

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the norm, That the CSIRO alleged that nuclear plants only

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>run it between fifty three and eighty nine percent capacity,

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when in fact they generally run it over ninety percent,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And that the CSIRO bizarrely assumes cold is more expensive

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>than renewables. But remember CSRO, they're scientists, not economists, so

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to gen cost, probably not the best

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>people for the job. But in the end does any

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of this matter? I mean, look at this chart global

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>annual CO two emissions over time. There you see the

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>world up top, and then China lower down powering ahead.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the US tailing off a bit but still

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>big in India's on the rise, and then all the

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>way down at the bottom, Little Lord Australia with nuclear

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>powered France two or three times population by the way,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>taking up the rear. Big question I have then is

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>why are we putting ourselves through this? Now? I've got

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot to talk about today. Let's bring in Keith

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Pitt from the Nationals and my Sky News colleague, Senior

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>porter Caroline Marcus. Welcome both of you to the panel

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to night, guys. Let's start with Anthony Albinezi and Peter

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Dunton's war of words this week over Australia's twenty thirty

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>climate target. The Prime Minister spoke yesterday and refused to

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>commit to Australia's twenty thirty five target before the next

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>election when he was pressed by reporters, have a look.

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 7>You, I'm guaranteeing the twenty thirty target that we have legislided,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 7>as well as and zero by twenty fifty. What we're

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 7>concentrating on is delivering forty three percent by twenty thirty

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 7>and we've got a mechanism to get there.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, guys. Albert has insisted that all the pastoring this

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>week of the climate targan will have no bearing on

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>an early election and whether that be called, but two

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>dates have been tossed up by some liberal and peace

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>including September fourteenth and December seventh. Keith Pitt, let's go

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to you first. Do you think the Prime Minister is

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>setting us up for an early election?

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 8>It's the golden rule of politics. You go when you

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 8>can win. And I'm confident that this Prime Minutes is

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 8>not like every Prime Minutes the before, and.

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 9>We'll go when he thinks the best opportunity is for

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 9>Labor to win government again. And I think that will

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 9>come down to a couple of things, mostly around the economy,

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 9>whether interest rates have come off, whether inflation is back

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 9>in target, and of course if they want to have

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 9>a big fight around nuclear. Our issue will be one

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 9>of time, because this is a difficult policy to educate

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 9>people on. We need to be in the field, and

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 9>the earlier that the Prime Minister goes at, the better

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 9>Labor's chances, would be my view.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And Caroline, you know, there's all these stories out today

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that show that there's a necessity of getting some nuclear

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>into the grid. We saw France eight new reactors, new

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Zealand is now having a blackout problem. Warning you know,

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>after just into our durn Do you think that Keith

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sends a big education piece here, will Australians ultimately back

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in Dutton on this scheme?

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 10>Well?

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 11>I think Australians will ultimately back in whoever they think

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 11>can deliver energy affordability and long term security, and that

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 11>if they can be educated on it, which I think

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 11>they will need to be because there has been such

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 11>a scare campaign around nuclear energy for such long time,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 11>then I absolutely think that this could be a winner

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 11>for the coalition. As the reports that I have pointed out,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 11>every time Liberals take a similar stance to Labor on

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 11>energy promising equal meeting the same kinds of targets the

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 11>Labor has put forward, they don't do well at an election.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 11>So only when they really take the fight up to

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 11>them in recent years, as we've seen with Tony Abbott

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 11>and Scott Morrison in twenty nineteen, that they've actually succeeded.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 11>And I think ultimately people can say the right things

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 11>when they asked in surveys if they care about climate change,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 11>and some people really genuinely do want to see better

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 11>emissions levels for the country. But people mainly care about

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 11>their hip pocket and that's what recent polls have shown.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 11>So if he can pick, if he can back energy

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 11>that's going to be more affordable in the long run

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 11>for people, we can and they can convince people of

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 11>that that. I absolutely think he's onto a winner.

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, Keith, I mean the old rule of politics is,

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, it's the economy stupid. And Keith,

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to just come to you one more question

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>on this topic because it is fascinating to me. Caroline

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>points out this whole idea of points of difference between

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the coalition and Labor going into an election. I spoke

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a moment ago about the parallels I see between the

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Voice campaign and how that worked out for the Liberals

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and the No side going up against a very similar

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>coalition of people that are all in favor of renewables.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Is there a parallel here, Keith Pitt, with the way

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the No case was prosecuted from a point where everybody said, oh,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no way that's going to get up, because you know,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all the received wisdom says yes, it's a smart way

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to go. Is there a parallel here with renewables versus nuclear?

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, you have to form a contest otherwise the voter

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 9>sprays all over the place. If there's no differential between

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 9>the major parties, well why vote for one side or

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 9>the other. It's like Barnaby said the last election where

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 9>sign whre on them and they signed it's our turn.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 8>And I don't think that went well for anybody. The

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 8>primaries were very, very low.

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 9>But there is one other big issue in place, and

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 9>I don't think people are really identifying just how bad

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 9>it is.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 8>Like out in the real world. People are really really struggling.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 8>I've never seen anything like this. It is incredibly difficult.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 9>They can't pay their rates bill, they can't pay their rent,

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 9>they can't pay their mortgage, they're flat buying food, they

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 9>spend all of their savings. And this is the everyday

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 9>Australian who's out working hard, who's doing the right thing

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 9>by the country, and they're having kids, they're trying to

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 9>pay for a house, and yet they are just getting

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 9>absolutely slaughtered in an economic manner because of Labour's policies.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 9>And a big part of that is their climate policies

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 9>and their energy policies.

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we're in the middle of the.

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 9>Big beta test here and no one can say to

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 9>me that the changes that have been made haven't driven

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 9>up prices because they have.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, Caroline, is it correct too that, like

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's basically an admission that renewables are not the cheapest

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>form of power. When Jim Chalmers had to in the

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>budget give us back three hundred bucks to pay for

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>our higher bills, which are higher because of all the.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 11>Renewables, I know, and we're still waiting for the two

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 11>hundred and seventy five dollars discount energy bills they had that,

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 11>I think that they've completely forgotten about that because clearly

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 11>it can't be delivered. So instead they're bribing people with

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 11>this three hundred dollars of our own tax payer money

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 11>being given back to us. Ultimately, I think you're going

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 11>to have to convince the Party's going to have to

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 11>convince people about whether the short term expense of building

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 11>the infrastructure that's needed for nuclear is going to pay

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 11>off in the long term. But if we're seeing all

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 11>these countries around the world, like the irony, the great

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 11>irony is that in France where they have the Paris

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 11>a qorters at the Paris Agreement, as you point out,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 11>that's where they have such a strong investment in nuclear

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 11>and yet we're here with these great uranium stores and

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 11>we're not putting them to use. It just is an

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 11>awful waste.

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense to me. It's never made

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>any sense to me. But anyway, let's move on because

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got another big issue I think we got to

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about here, and that is CFMU boss John Setka,

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>who is building support over his threats to the afl

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>umpiring boss Steve McBurnie. He of course was the head

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of the A Triple AB Triple C before. Here's Setka

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>saying yesterday it's absolutely not a threat, though I.

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Will not make any threat. So I'm we're talking about

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 2>exposing people. I mean, people like McBurney can't attack workers

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 2>and their conditions and be so undemocratic they make in

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 2>North Korea look like a democracy and then just right

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 2>off into the sunset like nothing's ever happened. I mean,

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 2>there is going to be consequences.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, anyway, everybody rest assured because Prime Minister Anthony Albanezi

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>today delivered an absolute rejection of this kind of bullying.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, sorry, wait no, he didn't say anything about.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 7>That, and obviously is absurd to suggest that the decision.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 7>I've never heard of this blike to be honest, AFL,

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 7>I'm not even sure what the job is running the

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 7>judiciary or the refs, the umpiring, the umpiring there you go, uh,

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 7>the umpiring, that's a matter for the I f L frankly,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 7>and I don't know. There's too much uh except to

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 7>say that that's the case. Common sense tells you that.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>They kind of let that one wash over him and

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Anaka Wells, the Sports Minister, was even less ready to

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>criticize Setka I love this year. An Aid had to

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>spring to her defense to stop a dreaded question on

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the topic.

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 12>Effect, can I just take the Australian representatives of wife

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 12>that's again.

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, sorry, well that's a real profile encouraged right there.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But to his credit, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton declared, the

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister needs to stand up to John's and the CFMEU.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 13>We know the CFMU donates four and a half million

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 13>dollars a year to the Labor Party, but the Prime

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 13>Minister needs to stand up for Australians and to stand

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 13>up against this bullying. The Prime Minister would be the

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 13>first out of the blocks as any of us would

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 13>to condemn bullying in the workplace.

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Keith. We've seen this government get bullied by Palestine activists

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and dragged the left. Now they seem to be getting

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>bullied by unions and not calling out this outrageous behavior. Now,

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>unions have their place, but surely you know what John

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Setka has been talking about. That's unacceptable.

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 9>Well, James, whatever happened to your rights at work? I

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 9>seem to remember something about your rights at work? What's

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 9>wrong with an individual who did his best and the

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 9>Raleigh had previously and he's now got another job and

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 9>the union wants to get rid of him because they

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 9>didn't like the job he did last time. I mean,

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 9>that's just it's an outrageous attack on an individual's right

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 9>to actually earn a living.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 9>I don't know the gentleman involved. I don't think I've

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 9>ever met him. But for every single Austrie that changes

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 9>jobs or picks up another one, if the union gets

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 9>a bent against you because if your previous role, apparently

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 9>you can't be imployed again ever anywhere, I just think

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 9>this is outrighteous.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Just unbelievable. In Caroline, also here in Sydney, you know,

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this crazy situation where the light rail drivers

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>and boy, they're going to be so happy when the

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>driverless light rail comes in, aren't. They have been trying

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to strike and they did do strike because they want

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a twenty three percent pay increase. Is the figuring now

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on the part of the union's well, we've got labor

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>wall to wall. Let's just, you know, get as many

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>runs on board as we can.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I would like a twenty three percent pay increase,

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 11>true play pretty please. I mean most of the country would.

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 11>We're all going for a cost of living crisis. But

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.719
<v Speaker 11>it's I mean, they do they I guess it is.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 11>That's what you get when you pretty much have a

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 11>political party and the governing political party in your pocket.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 11>And it couldn't come at a worse time because we

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 11>have vivid here at the moment, which is already chaos

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 11>for the city, and now they're are all these strikes

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 11>and closures happening on the road. We cannot afford this

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 11>at this time.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And it comes down to how, you know, the only

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>growth and employment now is in the government government sectors.

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that's another topic because I want to talk

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to you Caroline you have had an exclusive to Day

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>about well, embarrassing is not even the word appalling, horrifying

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>new campaign about cervical cancer that's been supported by Labor,

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>The campaign, which has been granted millions of dollars in

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer funding, uses messages such as people with a cervix

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and I can't even believe I have to say this

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>front Hall, Caroline, well done? What more can you tell

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>us about about this?

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 11>I felt the same way, have to say those words

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 11>as part of my new story today. Well, this is

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 11>a campaign, as you say, the government has poured millions

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 11>of dollars into three point three millions of dollars giving

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 11>it to this organization called Acorn, which was originally set

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 11>up in the eighties to tackle HIV and AIDS, which

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 11>obviously impacts mainly people within the LGBTQ community. As they're

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 11>now known, it's moved on to become more of an

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 11>activist organization generally, and then their most recent cervical cancer campaign,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 11>the one that's running currently, doesn't even use the word

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 11>women in its campaign video about a disease that is

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 11>deadly for women. It is the fourth most deadly cancer

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 11>for women in the world, and more than two hundred

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 11>women in Australia die from it every year, something like

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 11>nine hundred women. This is a women's disease. Shouldn't be

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 11>afraid to point out that biological fact that it affects

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 11>women because the cervix is part of us, is a

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 11>reproductive organ of women. But because the government wants to

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 11>target particular groups, and among them are LGBTQ groups, which

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 11>are one of the groups along with Indigenous migrant low

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 11>education women to be more likely of not getting screened,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 11>they've poured funding into this activist organization. Now the problem

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 11>with that is they've come up with this campaign. We

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 11>don't know what the new campaign is going to look

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 11>like exactly. We can only base it on what they've

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 11>currently been doing, which is using words like front hole

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 11>and people with a cervix.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>People you mean women?

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, they did women in some of their campaign material,

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 11>but not in this particular video which I've shown. They

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 11>they they're trying to appeal to everyone, and it just

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 11>doesn't work because it's confusing language. When you have a

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 11>public health message, the experts say you have to keep

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 11>it as plain easy to understand as possible. A lot

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 11>of people don't even know what a cervix is even women.

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 11>So if you're trying to reach those people by saying

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 11>anyone with a cervix, it's not especially clear. So you're

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 11>alienating and offending a large proportion of people. I find

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 11>it offensive to have words like front hole being used

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.239
<v Speaker 11>to describe parts of my anatomy. I'm sorry I said it,

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 11>but I do know.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Look, you're absolutely right. Cyril cancer is a really serious disease.

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>As you say, it deserves a lot more respect than this. Keith,

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>my question for you is, you know, labor, the left,

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the progressives, they love to say, oh, we're the party

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of science, We're the party of you know, reality and

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>trusting evidence of all this sort of stuff, and yet

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the federal government has let something like this through. How

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>does this happen?

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's just you know, that creeping incursion. If you

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 9>allow this language to start and then take hold and

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.239
<v Speaker 9>then become common, well it becomes every And these are

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 9>the reasons that I think people need to stand up

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 9>and stop this sort of nonsense. And I a great

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 9>complaintly with Caroline. I think it's highly offensive. And let's

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 9>look at what the outcoming is here. You were trying

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 9>to get people to do something about their health and

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 9>what is a very very serious matter, and yet it

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 9>gets caught up in all of this white gender mannerism.

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 9>I can tell you a hot tip your day and

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 9>I don't lie one or the other.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 8>That's just how it is.

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, exactly, exactly right now, I want to end

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this segment here with China. On the subject of China,

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as Anthony Albinizi announced on Tuesday that China's premier Lee Kang,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is coming here to Australia next week for a four

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>day visit. It's the first visit to Australia about Chinese

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>preer since twenty seventeen. Now you may recall that Lee

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Kang was the guy who referred to Albo when he

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>visited China as a handsome boy coming from Australia last November.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>So how will Albo treat our distinguished guest, especially just

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>nine days after Penny Wong's weak statement commemorating the thirty

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>fifth anniversary of the Canaman Square masker Keith Anthony Albani

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be Is he going to be intimidated

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.959
<v Speaker 1>by China's premiere and We're going to see more of

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the kind of weakness over major issues like those naval

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>incidents and other things. When we see Lee Kyang visit here.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 8>Unfortunately the Prime Minister has got form.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 9>You can't play both sides of the street here and

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 9>at what cost to our sovereignty? Are these decisions being

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 9>made now? China has reopened tried in a number of

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 9>areas and that's very valuable for Austria's economy in Austrie

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 9>and produces, But once.

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 8>Again, at at what cost?

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 9>And on a liner note, will Bill Shorten be back

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 9>from measuring up the curtains in Europe?

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 8>We'll d here's it be out of the fraser? Will

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 8>any of them be there? It came out on company tax?

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 14>And well, this is a great question to me because

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 14>you know, Carolyn Marcus, what you know We've got Bill

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 14>Shorten off in Switzerland next week when.

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be at a Ukraine peace summit. What

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>does this have to do? What does sending the NDIS

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Minister to do with Zelensky and are frankly not always

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that forthcoming aid to Ukraine have to do with Bill

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Shorten and the NDIS. Is this just like a cynical

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>play to get him off the front pages.

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 11>It must be because there's all these stories about fraud

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 11>happening within the NDIS. It's costing us billions, it's going

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 11>up every year. Just get him out of the country

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 11>and then he doesn't have to face those tough questions

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 11>because unless they're going to suggest that Putin has some

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 11>kind of learning disability, what does someone with the NDIS

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 11>portfolio have to do with a negotiating piece for Ukraine.

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 11>It makes absolutely no sense. But they're also sending ann

0:27:54.240 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 11>Ali over to Jordan to help negotiate for peace in

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 11>the Middle East. It's what does that have to do

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 11>with the early childhood portfolio unless they're going to tackle

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 11>the issue of how Palestinian children in Gaza are being

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 11>brainwashed and indoctrinated to hate Jewish children. And I don't

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 11>think she's going to be a Jews. I don't think

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 11>she's going to be tackling that. I dare say she

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 11>doesn't have a lot to do with them.

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, last word to you, Keith Pitt, I mean,

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>why isn't Penny Wong off on this important mission. Every

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>other major country is going to have somebody of that caliber.

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And also Albo skipped D Day. What do you make

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of that?

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, Firstly, I think Senator Wong's not playing up. You've

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 9>got Edie Whusick out calling for company tax changes.

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 8>Hey got put in the freezer.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 9>You've got Bill Shorton's overseas, and I think it's in Switzerland.

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 8>That's not too far from France.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 9>He might drop into Paris to measure the curtains over

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 9>there for an opportunity as an ambassador.

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 8>Oh and you know, there's.

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 9>Some serious issues at hand. And I've got to give

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 9>Penny wonger joie. I mean, she's she's quite a formidable

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 9>foreign minister, there's no doubt about that. I'd agree with it,

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 9>with all of her positions, but she is a good performer.

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 9>And why wouldn't you send the foreign minister to these

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 9>types of events. I think they just try to hide

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 9>the trouble before anything gets completely out of hand.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right, Keith Pitt, Caroline Marcus, thank you so much

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for your time this evening, and we'll be back after

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the break. Coming up. Australian universities are wasting billions of

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars who knew on administrative staff. Plus a radical proposal

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to listen more troops to the ADF and solve the

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>housing crisis after the break. Welcome back to Paulbury Live.

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.479
<v Speaker 1>James Morrow here sitting in for the great Man. Now

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in my next panelist, Queensland lnp MP LNPMP

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Henry Pike. I can get that and from PR Council.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Christy mcsweetey, thank you so much for joining us here

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on the program tonight. I want to talk first about

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this story we had in the Daily Telegraph today that

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>revealed that Australian universities are spending billions on administrative staff

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>instead of professors who knew more administrative staff are now

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>employed at universities than actual lecturers and researchers fifty seven

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>percent compared to forty three percent. At the University of Sindey,

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>which has been littered with pro Palestine protests and encampments.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>This year, the university spent six hundred and three million

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars on forty nine hundred and nine administrative staff, compared

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with five hundred and seventy seven million on thirty five

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy four academic staff, according to the latest

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>publicly available figures that've been released, Christy, what do you

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>make of this gross miscalculation by our universities, and at

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a time when the universities are saying, oh no, you

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>can't cut foreign students because you know that's how we

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>fund all of our research and teaching and all the

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. Well, it sounds like the soliv word war,

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it.

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 15>Well, James, you and I have done this over enough

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 15>budget cycles and enough government change now to know that

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 15>the universities number one concern is going cap in hand,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 15>no pun intended, particularly what we call the Gaight Universities,

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 15>which is the group of establishment university Sandstone universities of

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 15>which the University of Sydney is won, going to the

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 15>government every budget and every election cycle to seek commitments

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 15>for we need more money for research. And their point

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 15>of view and their argument is always Australia it's going

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 15>to lose its international standing. It's going to lose numbers

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 15>of the number of universities on the top one hundred

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 15>times university list, which is their benchmark standard that they

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 15>measure against, in which they use as a selling point

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 15>to get more international students who come to Australia as

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 15>part of our twenty six billion dollar international education sector.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 15>Do not cry poor at election time or budget time.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 15>If you are spending hundreds of millions of dollars on

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 15>administration stuff, not teaching stuff, and not research stuff. And

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 15>I want to know, James, is this an FTE account

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 15>or does this include the hundreds of thousands of stuff

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.719
<v Speaker 15>on flexi time and part time contracts and people working

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 15>one day week from home remotely. I would like to

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.719
<v Speaker 15>know that breakdown as well.

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Well. Yeah, and Henry, I mean it begs the question,

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you reckon these people are doing all day?

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you know you're a student who's paying for

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this university, if you're paying off a hex dat, if

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you're a parent helping a kid through university, where's the

0:32:58.240 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>money's worth here?

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 10>That's a very good question, James. I think that the

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 10>bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy,

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 10>and I think that seems to be as true in

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 10>university campuses as it is in government bureaucratic establishments across

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 10>our cities. I think that it's clear that the universities

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 10>have got their priorities wrong here. They're not really focused

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 10>on achieving those educational outcomes they should be focused on. Instead,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 10>it seems that they are building little empires to feed

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 10>more and more mouths. It's just getting ridiculous and I

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 10>think it's high time that these vice chancellors have a

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 10>proper look at this and every other issue that we're

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 10>seeing pure on campuses at the moment.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that's before we get even into the

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>whole question of vice chancellors and their salaries, but that

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>might be another topic for another night. Now, Henry, I

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you about this year question, your deputy

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>chair of the Parliament's Human Rights Committee, where Labor is

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing a human rights bill which aims to you say,

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>devalue societal norms around free have thought, religion and belief.

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Now you've got six thousand signatures on a petition against this.

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Tell us, Henry Pake, what is this all about and

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>what's the real danger here?

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 10>Well, James, this is very much about an attempt by

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 10>the left of the human rights establishment to try to

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 10>create a trojan horse to get into our legislation. They're

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 10>essentially trying to find a way to create some sort

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 10>of super quasi constitutional bit of legislation that will essentially

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 10>take out of the hands of the Parliament the ability

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 10>to legislate on matters related to human rights and give

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 10>the power to interpret these laws through to the judiciary,

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.439
<v Speaker 10>who are going to be asked to make all sorts

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 10>of different calls on all sorts of contentious issues. We've

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 10>seen this create all sorts of issues in the United Kingdom,

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 10>and unfortunately the left in Australia are trying to create

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 10>the same problem for us here. We saw massive conference

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 10>last week of left wing academics and different figures, probably

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 10>some of the people we discussed in the first question

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 10>there who came together and discussed what, you know, what

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 10>they want to see within this act. And I've seen

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 10>what the draft act is. It doesn't make pretty reading.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 10>We lodged it, senting report against it, and I'm trying

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 10>to blow the whistle here to say everyone please pay

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 10>close attention to what the government's going to be proposing

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 10>through this Human Rights Act, because it's certainly not going

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 10>to be good for faith groups in this country, and

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 10>it's not going to be good for anyone who likes

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 10>to exercise their freedom of speech.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, Christy, you know, I come from the

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>United States, where obviously the thing is that you know,

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 1>we've got a Bill of Rights, not a Human Rights Act,

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>and it says basically the government will not interfere with

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>your freedom of speech and your freedom of religion and

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>sort this seems like very much an effort to interfere

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with and meddle with freedom. It's almost only an anti

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>freedom act. Christy, what are your thoughts on this?

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 15>What's outsourcing issues that could be controversial? We have seen

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 15>several governments put religious freedom to bed and do their

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 15>best to try and put that away or sweep it

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 15>under the rug, or reform it in various ways, so

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 15>it's not controversial. This is a way of doing that.

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 15>But of course, as we've seen with immigration, when you

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 15>outsource decision making to the judiciary, or when the judiciary

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 15>already has those decision making powers as in the immigration case,

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 15>the judiciary can catch the government by surprise. It's incumbent

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 15>upon the government to take the advice from the Australian

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 15>Government solicitor to make sure they know what the judiciary

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 15>is going to do and implement and is thinking of doing.

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 15>And any government who wants to outsource controversial decisions to

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 15>the judiciary needs to pull up their desk make sure

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 15>it sits directly next to the Australian governments solicitor. You're

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 15>creating more proper then you're trying to get away from often.

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, indeed, now I'm glad you mentioned immigration there, Christy,

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>because I want to move on to the topic of housing,

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>which is of course closely tied to immigrations and a

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of big stories on this topic. Three of the

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>nation's capitals have been ranked among the ten most unaffordable

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>global cities. Keith, what hope is there going to be

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for younger Australians to buy a home get into the

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>market after you've seen these sort of figures, which Adelaide

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is ninth and Sydney second in unaffordability, I mean Adelaide's

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in that top ten. Now, what is going on and

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what is the LNP going to do to help break

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this sort of cycle of unaffordability at the next election.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>This seems to be the key to getting the youth vote.

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, it certainly is a massive issue out there and

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 10>talking to a lot of young people within my electric

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 10>I know Brisbane isn't quite on the top three list there,

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 10>but luckily we're a little bit further down, but still

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 10>concerningly unaffordable out in my neck of the woods, and

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 10>certainly a lot of young people that I'm talking to

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 10>are talking about the fact that they've basically given up

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 10>on the ability to own their own home, and I

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 10>think that's a terrible thing.

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 10>I come from the party of Robert Menzies, who talked

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 10>about in the Forgotten People's Speech about the importance of

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 10>home ownership and the importance of giving Australians that stake

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 10>in the country. And I think it's really important that

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 10>governments turn their mind to how we're actually going to

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 10>address this. And it's not about pumping demand. It's got

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 10>to be about finding new ways to boost supply. You know,

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 10>we are globally unaffordable now that's official. Those numbers demonstrate

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 10>that we need to find ways to boost supply. It's

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 10>about investing in infrastructure. It's about lowering property taxes. It's

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 10>about getting onto councils and ensuring that they get those

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 10>approvals done. And I want to see more of that

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 10>from L and P oppositions, you know, creating those policies

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 10>as we head towards an selections, both at state level

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 10>and the federal level.

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And Chris, we've seen some really interesting solutions proposed in

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the media along with all of this stuff about supply

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and taxes and things like that. There's even been a

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>veteran today who proposed giving people who sign up for

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the ADF where we know there's a big recruitment crisis

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>fifty grand bang cash on the barrel to help them

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>buy a house. Is this a two birds with one

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 1>stone solution or is that just a little too pat Christy?

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 15>Look, I'm not an advocate or a fan of that

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 15>policy just because I don't think it's going to work.

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 8>I think in this.

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 15>Precarious global environment that we're operating goo politically, I don't

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 15>think there's a lot of young people who would see

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 15>the upside tipped in favor of getting fifty thousand dollars.

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 15>I think there's a lot of young people out there, though,

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 15>who would like to access their super at a time

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 15>of life of which they have that available and make

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 15>sure it's paid back into, as is the coalition's policy.

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 15>But I will say that there is absolutely no pathway

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 15>back to victory for the Coalition if it does not

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 15>promote its superannuation access policy to young people in teal seats.

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 15>Because parents are also worried about their children. And I

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 15>say children, but I mean people under forty thirty five

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 15>to forty who can't afford property, who can't afford to

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 15>live in the neighborhood that they grew up with or

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:39.240
<v Speaker 15>nearby their family, and because of that, they're delaying having

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 15>families because they don't have that economic structure of owning

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 15>a home around them, which they feel quite rightly is

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 15>the most appropriate environment for them to go forth and

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 15>have a family within. So it is a real issue

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 15>and it has to be hammered home to people in

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 15>teal seats, not just the outer suburbs.

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And Henry, let's go back to Queensland, your home state. There,

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Opposition leader dear Chris fully with a bold new proposal

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to see that if a young couple they're building their

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>first home, it's buying their first home, and they build

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>it no stamp duty, it's going to save tens of

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:18.439
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars potentially. How much is the state's addictions

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to stamp duty helping to cruel the hopes of so

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>many people trying to get into the market. What do

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you make of the opposition's policy there. Obviously, I suppose

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be in favor of that one.

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 10>I am going to be in favor of it. You'd

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 10>be surprised to hear, James. But I think it's broader

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 10>than just that. I mean, the getting rid of stamp

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 10>duty for first home buyers who are going to buy

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 10>a new home is a I think a really strong

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 10>message to send to first home buyers. But getting rid

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 10>of stamp duty, you know, broader than that. It's not

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 10>just about first home buyers. You know, if we can,

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 10>if we can sort of lower the level of stamp

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 10>duty across the board, across states, then we could see

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 10>a lot more older people decide to get into a

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 10>property that might be for the rights for their retirement

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 10>and free up more stock in the housing market. But

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 10>what I was particularly pleased about today with the Coalition's

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 10>policy that they've announced in the budget reply up here

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 10>in Queensland was a big fund to help local governments

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 10>build that sort of trunk infrastructure that they need to

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 10>actually boost supply. We can't currently where the suburbs are

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 10>rolling out into new areas, we just haven't got the infrastructure.

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 10>And I think it's a really important announcement today from

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 10>David Chrisofully and his team, and I think he'll be

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 10>really well received by aspiring first home buyers in particularly

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 10>in southeast Queensland.

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, you guys are the box seat to win that election,

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>so we might get to see how that plays out.

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Henry Play, Christy McSweeney, thank you so much for your time. Now,

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 1>don't go anywhere, because coming up, we've got child and

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>adalystent psychologist Claire Role right here on the program, right

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>here on set to break down Peter Dutton's proposal to

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:56.959
<v Speaker 1>lift the minimum age of access to social media. After

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the break, welcome back to Paul Murray Live. I'm your

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 1>host James Borrow for the evening. Now our position leader

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dutton has vowed to lift the minimum age of

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>social media to sixteen within one hundred days of office

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>if he is elected.

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 13>It's inconceivable that you would just allow your thirteen year

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 13>old to go down to a local park and just

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 13>start mingling with any random person who comes by, Or

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 13>that you would have a magazine on the table with

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 13>all sorts of explicit content in it and that you

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 13>would allow your kid to flick through that content. I mean,

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 13>it's just it's inconceivable. So there's a lot that we

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 13>can do, and the technology is trending in our favor

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:45.800
<v Speaker 13>to make sure that we can deal with the scale

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 13>of the problem.

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And this comes just a week after a male teenager

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>was arrested and released by police as the investigated AI

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>generated nude images using the faces of at least fifty

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:03.680
<v Speaker 1>female students from a Victorian high school that were circulated online.

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>The fake images used the schoolgirls' faces on AI generated bodies,

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and there were some pretty disturbing stuff there, believe me,

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:13.919
<v Speaker 1>but not everybody agrees with all of this. National Center

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of Matt Canavan opposed the proposed law when speaking on

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>nine earlier today.

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 16>I don't necessarily think it's something a governmental a law

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 16>can change. It does take, as I say, a village

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 16>to raise a community, and we've all got a chip

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 16>in to try and make sure that young boys understand

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:33.439
<v Speaker 16>what it means to grow up to be a man

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 16>and live by the standards that to society expects well.

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>To sort through all of this now, I am thrilled

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to be joined by child and adolescent psychologist Claire rou Claire.

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the program. Now tell me who's right here?

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Is Peter Dutton on the money about restricting access or

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:55.719
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to things like these horrendous AI generated

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 1>images and all these bands. Are we treating more the

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>symptoms rather than an underlying societal disease as Matt Cannavan suggests.

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 8>Okay, well, I think it's a bit of both. But

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 8>first of all, I'd like to.

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 17>Say, I think this is a really strong statement from

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 17>the opposition leader. I mean, I think he's come out there.

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.399
<v Speaker 17>I think this is a play at middle Australia, at

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 17>families about things that parents are really struggling with. I

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 17>would say far more than say the Paris Agreement. I

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 17>think you know, and I think going to what you're

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 17>talking about earlier in the program, I mean it does

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.399
<v Speaker 17>he know something we don't know. I feel like we're

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 17>warming up in election modus with that statement. Actually, you know,

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 17>if you vote for us within one hundred days, we

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 17>will ban this for kids. I mean that's a pretty

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 17>strong and it's come out swinging today. I think with that, look,

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 17>I understand. My position is as a child psychologist, no surprise,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 17>I am passionately against kids under the age of sixteen

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 17>having any access to social media.

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So you think sixteen is the age?

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 17>I think kids under sixteen shouldn't have a smartphone. Yeah, right,

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 17>I actually think it's broader than social media. I actually

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 17>don't think I don't think we should legislate that, okay,

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 17>but I don't think kids should be given the Internet

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 17>in the pocket all day at age twelve. I just

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 17>I am, you know, very supportive of parents of giving

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 17>them a flip dumb phone if they need to call

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 17>parents and not have access to the internet at thirteen

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 17>years old, on them at all times. But I understand

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 17>the difficulties with how do we enforce this, And from

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:20.399
<v Speaker 17>a legislative perspective, I can understand that we don't want

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 17>to make laws that can't be enforced. I mean, that

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:25.959
<v Speaker 17>makes a mockery of laws, right. But from what Matt

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:29.919
<v Speaker 17>Canavan was saying, that the issue with social media could

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 17>be solved tomorrow and what it would take, it's collective

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 17>action by parents.

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 17>No parent hands their child a mobile phone with Snapchat

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 17>and Instagram and social media at age thirteen willingly and

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 17>happily they hand it over because they're the only ones

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 17>in the classroom without it, okay, and so they're isolated

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:54.280
<v Speaker 17>and they're not on the messages, and they're like, oh okay,

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 17>roll well, they hand it over. If there was a

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 17>couple more in that classroom that didn't have it, parents

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 17>would feel confident and in boldened to say no, you're

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:03.439
<v Speaker 17>not having it.

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>How much of the problem then is that, you know,

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like these laws are already going to be respected by people,

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the parents who are doing the right thing or what,

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just that bit of backup, but they're being undermined by

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, other parents or just by sort of other

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 1>messages in society.

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 17>Well, I think that that's why. I mean, I was

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 17>very opposed to legislating this purely because I don't like

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 17>big brother and people telling you a government telling us

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 17>how to parent. But at the end of the day,

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 17>I think that's what legislation will do. It will give

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.439
<v Speaker 17>parents the confidence to be able to say no, mate,

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:36.839
<v Speaker 17>it's against the law. And you're not the only ones.

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 17>There's a pocket of view in the class who don't

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 17>have it, and I think that pocket will then grow.

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So is there a danger then, though, that if

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:47.399
<v Speaker 1>everybody has to sign up for the internet, though, you're

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>also losing the anonymity which gives government war control over

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:53.320
<v Speaker 1>other aspects of our lives very quickly.

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 15>Yeah.

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 17>Well, this is a problem, is how it's going to

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 17>be enforced, and I feel very uncomfortable if we're going

0:47:57.520 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 17>down to kind of the ID identity face recognition thing

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.280
<v Speaker 17>like that. And so the debate that needs to happen

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 17>is not should we ban it? But then, you know,

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:07.760
<v Speaker 17>what is the process of signing up to these sites?

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:09.839
<v Speaker 1>A lot to unpack there. Thank you so much, Child

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and adolescent psychologist Claire row Now that's it from me tonight.

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching, and thanks to Paul

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for letting me host. Paul will be back in the

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:21.959
<v Speaker 1>man game on Sunday, and I'll be hosting my regular show,

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The US Report tomorrow night at eight. You can also

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>see me Sunday morning at nine am for Outsiders with

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Rowan and Rita. In the meantime, the Late Debate coming

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:32.319
<v Speaker 1>up next Good night,