WEBVTT - Does Biden actually want Kamala to win?

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You can listen to the Front on your smart speaker

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>every morning to hear the latest episode. Just say play

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the news from The Australian. From the Australian, Here's what's

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Front. I'm Claire Harvey. It's Friday, July twenty six.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Albinizi is setting the scene for his first cabinet reshuffle,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>with Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Bernie quitting politics and pressure

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>to dump underperforming Immigration Minister Andrew Giles. Australia has imposed

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>sanctions and travel bands on seven Israelis and one religious

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>youth group linked to beatings and sexual assaults against Palestinians.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It comes as the conflict continues to rage in Gaza

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and Israeli PM Benjamin Netnia, who begs the UN for

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>more weapons. That story is live now at the Australian

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Dot A you a presidential address to the

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>United States and a decidedly luke warm endorsement of Kamala Harris.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Today we unpacked Joe Biden's first public appearance since he

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>stepped out of the race for the White House. Greg

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Sheridan is The Australian's Foreign editor. Greg Joe Biden started

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>his speech in the Opal Office, referencing the fact that

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he was sitting behind the resolute desk.

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I follow Americans, I'm speaking of from behind the resolute

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>tesk in the Oval Office.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>There were flags and golden curtains behind him. The symbolism

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>was all about being the president. Wasn't at all about power?

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes it was, But he betrayed the symbolism, of course,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 3>by his very faltering delivery.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I came to office, conventional wisdom was

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a China would inevitably pass, passing United Dates.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean.

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 3>In a very short address which he must have rehearsed

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>five thousand times, he still couldn't read the teleprompter properly.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>But over office speeches inherently radiate the power of the presidency.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Although in recent years they haven't been very successful, they

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 3>have less and less magic about them. Over office speeches,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 3>they just looked so artificial.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>It became clear from quite early in this speech that

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't going to acknowledge that he was in cognitive

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>decline or in any kind of distress. He talked about

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>it being the honor of his life to have served

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>as president, but presented himself as someone who was such

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a patriot that he was going to step aside.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I reviewed this office. I love my country more. It's

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>been the honor of my life to serve as your

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>president with this secret task perfecting our union. It's not

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>about me. It's about you, your families, your futures. It's

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 2>about we the people. We can never forget that, and

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I never have.

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>What did you think about that choice not to reference

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>explicitly the fact that he was struggling.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 4>We look to be.

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Honest with your class. I've been in America several weeks now.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm watching this on the West coast, and first of all,

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>most Americans couldn't care less about politics, and especially if

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 3>they're not in the battleground states. But secondly, the whole

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 3>premise of Biden's speech was ridiculous. I mean, he was

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 3>saying that fifty Democrats could beat Trump, and I my

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 3>record as the best in the world, and I'm fabulous,

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 3>But I've got to drop out to maintain democratic unity.

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, original weeks has become clear to me I

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 2>need to unite my party in this critical endeavor. I

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>believe I record as president, my leadership in the world

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I visioned for America's future all married it a second term,

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 2>but nothing, nothing can come in the way of saving

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>our democracy that includes personal ambition.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 4>So there's a logical flaw in this.

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Why is the Democratic Party so disunited if his record

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>and prospects are so fantastic. So the question you ask

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>is very acute. He said he was resigning to preserve unity,

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 3>but he didn't say what had caused the disunity. And

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>what has caused the disunity is that in the debate

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 3>with Trump, he was obviously not competent. And I think

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 3>it's very ineffective in politics when you try to deny

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 3>what is just.

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Obvious before the voter's eyes.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>So you know, the liberal press will be weeping over

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>this and saying, how you know what a noble, splendid

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 3>Churchill in figure Biden is.

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 4>But I thought the thing just lacked the slightest semblance

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 4>of logic.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 3>He neither said I'm no longer confident, nor did he say,

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, thirty congressman and a half a dozen senators

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>and a million fundraisers have all told me to quit

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 3>because they won't support me any longer.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Did he seem to you like someone who's been dragged

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to this moment and who still doesn't really acknowledge that

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>he is into client.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, absolutely so.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 3>According to Joe Biden, he has selflessly trying to run

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 3>again even though he would win, and his record is

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 3>unequaled in the world, and America is the greatest position

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 3>it's ever been in that lacks no logic. So what

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>that means is is a guy denying reality. But you know,

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>he's a sort of an old fashioned political pro and

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 3>he has at least been able to take the message

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 3>that this is an offer you can't refuse, you know,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Democratic Marfia has come to him and said, look,

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>let me make you an offer you can't refuse.

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 4>So you're either going to resign.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Your candidacy nobly and we're all going to weep about

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 3>what a saint you are, or you're going to get

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>beaten by Trump eighty twenty because none of us is

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 3>going to support you. And you know, it's not too

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 3>late for us to swing behind a third party candidate.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 3>And all kinds of threats were, no doubt made behind

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the scenes, and you know, we'll look again at Hunter's

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 3>situation and who knows what sort of things were said privately,

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>but he was bludgeoned into this decision.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 4>There's no doubt about that.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to call for a Supreme Court reform because

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 2>this is critical to our democracy. Supreme Court reform. You know,

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll keep working when sure American remains strong, secure, and

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 2>the leader of the free world.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the first ideas he invoked was Supreme Court reform. Now,

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I was watching this speech on the YouTube feed of

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Associated Press, which was also running a comments thread

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>from people who were watching. Forty eight thousand people watching,

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and that remarks Supreme Court reform prompted a wave of

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>kind WTF, you know, what.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>The hell is he talking about? So what is he

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 4>talking about?

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a very good example of the bidon non secuitur.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 3>So early on in the speech, he says, we must

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 3>stop thinking of people we disagree with as enemies.

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>They're just fellow Americans we disagree with.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Then he says, but this election is for the preservation

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>of American democracy, meaning that my opponents are fascists, they're

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>all anti Democrats, and if you elect them, that's the

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>end of American democracy. Similarly, there's a contradiction with the courts.

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 3>When the courts are delivering decisions which Biden the Democrats like,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 3>they say, the Republicans are intensely irresponsible for undermining the

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>court and the court system, which is independent of politics,

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>and which sometimes gives you decisions you like, sometimes gives

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 3>you decisions you don't like, and you should put up

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 3>with the decisions you don't like and not undermine the system.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 5>At the Supreme Court today, an historic upheaval in a

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 5>sweeping ruling that overturned a half a century of presidents,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 5>five justices ended the right of American women to choose

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 5>abortion under the Constitution.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 3>But then if the Court gives a series of decisions

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 3>that the Democrats don't like, it all of a sudden

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>becomes a corrupt Supreme Court and they no longer want

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 3>the judiciary to exercise the power of the judiciary. Now, theoretically,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 3>there are many ways you could reform the court. You

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>could legislate for another twenty justices and appoint them all yourself,

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and then you've got a wonderfully stacked court. But that'd

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 3>be very hard to do because you'd have to get

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 3>the legislation through their House of Representatives and the Senate.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.479
<v Speaker 3>Or you could legislate for term limits. But the independence

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>of the Supreme Court justices has always meant that they

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 3>can't be fired. There is no term limit and there's

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 3>only a certain number of them. And if you make

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the court something which the administration can shape absolutely. I

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>mean the Australian High Court only has a certain number

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 3>of members. The government appoints the members. That doesn't have

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 3>to go through the Parliament or anything. But it only

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 3>has a certain number of members. If you enlarge it

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>by twenty or something, then every incoming administration can just

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 3>appoint twenty new judges and the court becomes completely politicized,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>even much more than it has been with fifty years

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 3>of judicial activism under it's spelt.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So, is that a gift to Trump and the Republicans

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to suddenly throw into the minds of people who hadn't

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>thought about it before that the constitution of the Supreme

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Court is now up for grams.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think that is probably a mistake for the

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Democrats to campaign on that. But Kamala Harris doesn't have

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 3>many issues she can campaign on. Despite what Biden said,

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, the border has been a disaster. I legal

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>immigration has been a disaster. Inflation is problematic, crime is

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 3>very disturbing to people. But the main thing she's going

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 3>to campaign on, I think is abortion rights.

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 6>We'll believe reproductive freedom will stop Donald Trump's extreme abortion

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 6>bands because we trust women to make decisions about their

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 6>own body and not have their government tell them what

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 6>to do.

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Because restrictions on abortion, whether they're ethical, on proper or not,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 3>are unpopular across the United States, and the Supreme Court

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 3>reform will be seen as a way of getting back

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 3>to a position where the federal authorities guarantee abortion rights

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 3>from the moment of conception to the moment of birth,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Whereas what the Supreme Court has done in overturning Roe

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 3>versus Way is effectively meant that every state can legislate

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 3>however it likes.

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 7>Florida's six week abortion band goes into effect today, that

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 7>significantly shorter than the fifteen week band that had been

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 7>in place up until this point. Now almost every state.

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>In the South has restrictions on the procedure.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 7>Arizona will soon be the latest state with a near

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 7>total abortion ban after that state Supreme Court revived a

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 7>one hundred and sixty year old law. The law provides

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 7>no exceptions for rape or incest, and in its four

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 7>to two opinion, the conservative majority wrote quote, physicians are

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 7>now unnoticed that all abortions except those necessary to save

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 7>a woman's life, are illegal.

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 3>So I suspect that Kamala Harris will think she can

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 3>energize young voters, voters with a feminist consciousness, college activists

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>and so on on the abortion issue, and the Supreme

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Court is linked to that. It's almost inconceivable that any

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 3>administration would get Supreme Court reformed through because you would

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 3>think that the Senate would block it under any configuration.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Coming up. Joe Biden has endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to run for resident, but did his address reveal what

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he really thinks about his second in command? And if

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for up to date analysis on the American election,

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>written by some of the sharpest political commentators in the world,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>head to the Australian dot com dot u. In front

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of a screaming crowd of Republican faithful, Donald Trump took

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to the stage in North Carolina.

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 8>Thank you very much, Thank you, Richard.

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>This was his first rally since President Joe Biden announced

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't contend the election. It was vintage Trump.

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 8>So now we have a new victim to defeat lion,

0:12:52.280 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 8>Kamala Harris, lion l Yianna pass the most inc and

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 8>far left a vice president and American history. By the way,

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 8>they did a poll, she was rated the worst vice

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 8>president in history. I've never seen that poll before, but

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 8>that's the poll.

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>A few hours later, Joe Biden would address the nation.

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>This was his time to throw his support behind the

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>de facto democratic nominee to dilute the vitriol of Donald Trump.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Just a few months. The American people choose the course

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>of America's future. I made my choice, I made my

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>views known. I like to thank our great Vice President

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris. She experienced, she's tough, she's capable, She's been

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 2>an incredible partner to me and the leader for our country.

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>That took twenty seconds, and that's all Joe Biden said

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on the topic of Kamala Harris, the woman who hopes

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to become the forty eighth president of the United States

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of America. Hardly a glowing endorsement.

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I thought there was a bit strange, really quit So

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>obviously Biden kind of hates Kamala Harris because she's edged

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 3>him out of the presidency, but you would think he'd

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 3>be ruthless enough to know that it's much better for

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 3>him if she wins, much much better for him. First

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 3>of all, he certainly won't be prosecuted for anything, nor

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>will his family. And secondly, his resignation and his legacy

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 3>will look much better. But he didn't do anything for

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 3>her in this speech much now.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Of course, he never liked her.

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 3>He never, I mean, he chose her because he boxed

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 3>himself into a corner saying that he would have to

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 3>choose a nominee, a vice presidential nominee who was an

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>African American woman, and she was the most prominent African

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 3>American woman at the same time. He was quite happy

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 3>to choose her because she was so profoundly mediocre that

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>she would never pose any threat to him. So he

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 3>foresaw this moment and like a lot of presidents in history,

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 3>chose a mediocre vice president on purpose. You know, Richard

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Nixon chose both Spiro Agnew and Gerald Ford, as is

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 3>abundantly clear in all the biographies, because he thought they

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 3>were both such mediocre dunderheads that nobody would ever try

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 3>to over him. Dwight Eisenhower chose Richard Nixon for much

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>the same reason. And leaders do this, especially in secure leaders.

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 3>The only leader who really chose a coequal but Ronald

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Reagan chose Bush Senior and Bill Clinton chose Al Gore.

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 3>But they're the only two examples in probably the last

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 3>sixty years where you could say a president chose someone

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>who really would be a very viable replacement for them.

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden's speech had a vibe of this is it over

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to you, Kamala. So now the handover from Biden is done,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>what are her prospects?

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Remember Kamala Harris.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 3>She ran in the twenty twenty Democratic presidential primary, and

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 3>her campaign was so poor that she actually quit before

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the first care or primary was held. She had no

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>votes from anyone. Now, she might still win the presidency

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 3>because half the nation likes Trump and half the nation

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 3>hates him, and that half the nation who hates him

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 3>will certainly vote for her, and the pro Democrat media,

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, CNN and the New York Times and so on,

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>will paint her as a magnificent, genius, fabulous blah blah

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 3>blah blah.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 4>She failed her first bar exit.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, she won her first election in California by

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 3>less than one percent, when every other Democrat running for

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 3>statewide office run by more than ten percent. There is

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>no evidence at all that she is either a vote

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 3>winner or a competent person. And then as Vice president,

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 3>everything she's touched has turned to misery. She had the

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 3>assignment of fixing the southern border and that was an

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.479
<v Speaker 3>absolute disaster, and then she ran away from that assignment,

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 3>and then Biden never gave her really a serious job

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 3>to do as vice president. So Kamala Harris, even though

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>I think she is extraordinarily mediocre and poor as a

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>presidential candidate, nonetheless could win. We had two old men

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 3>who both of them the whole of the United States detested.

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 3>The polls were overwhelming that Americans wished neither of them

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 3>was running. So Biden has been replaced. But because he's

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 3>so selfishly clung to office for so long, the Democrats

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 3>haven't been able to have a primary.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to imagine Kamala Harris would have beaten Gretchen

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Whitmer or Shapiro or any of these powerful governors in

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 3>all our primary and she's been handed the job, just

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 3>as she was handed the jobs in California. Now, of course,

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 3>the campaign will bear a bingdong battle between Kamala Harris,

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 3>who is a California Liberal, and Trump, who is a

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of wild rhetorically wild nationalist. So it's intensely unpredictable.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a better choice than Biden versus Trump, I guess,

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 3>because Kamala Harris has not ended the sort of mental

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 3>decline that Biden.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Has entered, but is still a pretty poor choice.

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 3>For a country as big and magnificent as the United

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 3>States to produce Kamala Harrison Donald Trump as their two

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 3>presidential alternatives. I mean, frankly, I'd like to buy both

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 3>of them at my estimate, sell them both at their estimate.

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 3>I think i'd be Quin's ahead.

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sheridan is the Australians Foreign Editor. Thanks for joining

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>us on the front this week. Our team is Stephanie Coombs,

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Burton, Jasper leak Leat, Sam mcglue, Christian Amiot, Tiffany

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Demac and me Claire Harvey.