WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 8 May

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:04.439
<v Speaker 1>On scorn Loves Australia.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the Reader Panalty Show.

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panekey Show. Coming

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 3>up tonight with the demise of Adam band, who among

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 3>the Green senators will be the next leader of the

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 3>far left party, Gary Hartgrave and Nikata will join me

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 3>shortly to discuss the day's top stories, including how Advance

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 3>brought down the cocky Greens leader. French President Emmanuel mccron

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>meets with Siria's Islam as President and immediately calls for

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>sanctions to be eased. Josh Hammer will be here to

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 3>discuss that and the latest from the US, and later

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 3>in the hour Best in the Business Kinsey Schofield, we'll

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>have the latest celebrity and royal news. Left is losing it.

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 3>We never forget that. It features an update on this

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>woman spoiler she's gone to jail.

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 4>What the what do I have to do Council in

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 4>order to get respect as a black woman.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not afraid of anybody here. But first, the Greens

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>have been dealt a terrible blow. The party have been

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 3>being effectively annihilated from the Lower House. They've gone from

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>holding four seats to just one, falling well short of

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 3>their stated goal of nine seats, and among the casualties,

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 3>of course, is former leader Adam Bant losing his seat

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 3>of Melbourne to Labor. Conservative Lobby group Advances claimed responsibility.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I've done no, my home was never on the ground.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not nor myle was never on the.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 5>I've got now was by Matthew she In advents a

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 5>Stradia camera.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now for more on this is the panel,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Sky News contributor Gary Hardgrave and Menzies Research Center scene

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Fella Nikata. Gary, I'll start with you. Advance ran an

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 3>effective campaign. Their goal was to get the Greens.

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well they're going to take credit for it. But

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Australia got the Greens and I'm not sure they're actually

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>even going to hold that one seat of Ryan that

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is still a bit up in the air.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Labor is probably more likely to end up with that seat,

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which will make it interesting. But look, you know, in

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the end, it was all about it. If you came second

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>or third, you won. In Ryan, for instance, the Liberal

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>candidate was six thousand votes in front of but the

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Greens and Labor. If you're going to go with the

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of don't really like Australia stuff. You're going to

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>go with the kind of name calling, juvenile university politics stuff.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>People are going to judge you poorly, and I must

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have been. I'm a bit surprised about Max Chandler May

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that everyone told me, Everyone told me he was a guru,

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he was never going to lose. I'm actually right now

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in the electorate of Griffin. He was never going to lose.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>That everyone told me he's gone. So you know, in

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the end the guru has gone. Who him? But I

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>just say it is purely by the way the numbers fell.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>The nasty left is out, that's good, but a lot

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of it's still in labor and that's not so good.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how that rolls over the next three years.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, Nick, everyone thought Adam Bant was pretty safe as well.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, maybe he should have hosted less dance

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 3>parties and occasionally made an appearance in his electorate.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 6>Look, I'm trying, reader to show the necessary compassion that

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 6>one should always show to somebody who loses their job suddenly.

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 6>But I'm struggling. I'm struggling. I have to admit it.

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 6>It's a terrific move and I will just give a

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 6>shout out to Advance. They did play a major role

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 6>behind the scenes in this whole exercise, and they haven't

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 6>got the credit. Advance, if you remember, is of course

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 6>a big player too in the Voice debate. They are

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 6>really become a very powerful force for good in the

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 6>political debate, much as Get Up used to be on

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 6>the other side. But where's get Up now? I mean

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 6>I heard here. They're really on the ropes and possibly

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 6>going to fold.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 3>So it's great.

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 6>It's great to see the people on the conservative center

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 6>right do something really well in this space because we

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 6>need that uplift, don't we after this rather dismal campaign.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, Advanced are clever in how they do things. They

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>have limited resources, it seems, but they get maximum bang

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>for their buck. We saw it during the Voice campaign.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 3>We saw it with their social media work. During this campaign,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 3>of course, their target was primarily to get the Greens.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 3>The Greens. I've been plunged into crisis mode with the

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 3>party blaming liberal and one Nation preferences for losing their

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>leader instead of I don't know, taking a moment to

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 3>reflect on their missteps. One labor saucer said of Adam

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Bant and his party. It turns out being morally superior

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 3>has a shelf life. Blame Labor, he'll blame the Liberals,

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>He'll blame voters, but he'll never blame himself. That quote

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 3>given to the Australian newspaper Gary. The Australian is reporting

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 3>that Larissa Waters the Senate leader the South Australian Senator

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Hanson Young. They're the two front runners to be

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 3>the new leader. Also, Marine Ferruki is in the running.

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, if she's the answer, how stupid's the question? Look,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I would reckon Larissa Waters is probably most likely out

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>of Queensland. She's been around a lot and she's won

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>her return for six more years in the Senate. But

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it. They've gone from the house. There are absolutely

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>no use to anybody when it comes to the Labor

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Party government. And I think that's probably, to be fair,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a good thing that the Labor Party can govern in

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>their own right. Everything is their own goal or otherwise.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But in the Senate different matter, and the Greens will

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>try and tear them from to the left. We'll probably

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>see more taxes on super unrealized capital gains, tax taxes

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on housing, all those things. The Greens have been hoping

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and are wishing for for years because the Labor Left,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>which is half the caucus, is going to go mad

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>during this term. Albo says he's going to govern for

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>all Australians, but only if the Left and his party

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>room lets him. And that's going to be the problem

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>because the Labor Party is fundamentally attached to the idea

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of redistribution of wealth, taxing people who lift and giving

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it to people who lean, and that is your problem.

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>They're going to run out of other people's money at

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>some stage. So you know, my grandchildren, I've got a

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of another one soon to arrive. They're going to

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be asking the years from now, doo'd you do? Granddad? Well,

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had to go. I spoke to rid A Pana here,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I was with Nick Kata. I've had a try. But

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>their children and maybe their children's children are still going

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to be paying off the debt that's going to be

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>clocked up over the next three years thanks to the

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Labor Left. Nick.

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 3>He makes an excellent point there, does Gary. The Greens

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 3>are probably going to have the balance of power in

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 3>the Senate, and if Labor opts to deal with them

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to the other crossbenches or doing deals with

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the coalition. We may have a government that is even

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 3>more radically left than the one we've seen in the

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 3>last three years.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, this is a symbolic victory in the lower House,

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 6>of course, with the size of majority that Anthony Albaneze

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 6>is going to have, you know, Adam Banton his chums

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 6>would have been triddling their fingers really in there. The

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 6>real work will be done in the upper House, where

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 6>as you say, they've got the balance of power, so

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 6>Labor will be inclined to move further to the radical left.

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 6>And don't forget there's a lot of people within their

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 6>own party, within their own backbench now who really should

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 6>be in the Green Party. But I guess they wanted

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 6>to be in Labor because they've got more chance of

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 6>actually being in government. So that's something to watch out for.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 6>But I would give some free advice to Larissa Waters.

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 6>I assume, like the rest of us, she never misses

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 6>an episode of your show, Reta. But my advice is this,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 6>get back to the tree hugging, you know. I mean,

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 6>I don't think I ever saw rightaway with the Greens,

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 6>but they are much nicer bunch when they're actually trying

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 6>to save nature, which we'd all like to do, and

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 6>do it without fear or favor. So when they're bulldozing

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 6>bits of native forest to put up wind farms, you

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 6>should be out on the streets. You should be out

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 6>snarling in front of the bulldozers for that. Let's see

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 6>this old style Bob Brown. I never thought I'd be

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 6>yearning for the return of Bob Brown, but please, that's

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 6>where they should be going.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh yes, we missed Bob Brown these days. Now, the

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Senate battle for Tasmania's two remaining seats is heating up

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Lamby and Lee Hanson. That's Pauline Hanson's daughter, Lee Hanson.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Among the four remaining candidates, two seats have already gone

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 3>to Labor, one to the Liberals, and one of the Greens.

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Amid the Senate battle, Pauline Hanson has hit out at

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Lamby's saying that she votes with the Greens or the

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party and she doesn't have any idea about the policies. Nick,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I'll start with you. Jackie Lamby has provided me with

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>plenty of content, particularly for Left. He's losing it. But

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>will she be much of a loss. If she doesn't

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>make it.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 6>It should be a loss to you're show reader, but

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 6>not to the Parliament in fact. And I don't know.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 6>I don't know Pauline's I don't know Pauline's daughter at all,

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 6>but I just take it that if she's a chip

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 6>off the old block, I think i'd rather up her.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 6>It's nice to see Pauline Hanson. She's behaving like a

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 6>soccer mum, isn't she. She's sort of, you know, like

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 6>you go to these kick soccer games and the parents

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 6>are yelling from the touch line. It seems to me

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 6>what she's doing here. But good hon her, and good

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 6>on her daughter for having the courage to stand, and

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 6>good on the Tasmanian people for recognizing somebody who will

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 6>really represent their interests as opposed to somebody who votes

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 6>with labor Green's whoever, and just looks always rather wild

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 6>and angry.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 3>And makes some of the most demented comments I have heard.

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 3>Remember when she wanted to lock up Elon Musk for

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 3>having free speech on X. I mean, incredible antics, Gary,

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 3>You've got to say about Tasmania though, I mean they're

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 3>an example of why the Senate is called unrepresentative swill

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>as Paul Keating said some years ago.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well he did say it, and I get what

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he says. But look, that's the deal we've signed up.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Our constitution says first states, the six first ones under

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the constitution all got twelve senators. Well originally it was ten.

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I also would quote what Graham Richardson observed,

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure I'm not misreading or misrepresenting Richo. He

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>was concerned when Labor brought in extra senators for each

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>state by increasing the size of the House of Representatives

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty four. He said, we're going to rule

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the day. We're going to end up with some crazy

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>people in the Senate. Now you know, make of that,

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>which I like, but we're going to end up with

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a few interesting results. And so one of the best

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>things that could be done, if we were serious about

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>what was good for Australia is to actually reform the parliament.

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Fewer members in the House, drive down the numbers in

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, actually have fewer senators, and that way you

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>needed a bigger chunk of vote to get elected. You'd

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be more mainstream automatically, and you wouldn't have some of

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the kind of well entertaining for the readA Panahy show

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of contributions from some people in the Senate just

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>saying but look, I'm not rewriting the Electoral Act right now,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but if they want me to, I could bring in

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>first past the post voting, make it non compulsory voting.

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>These sorts of things I think are all part of

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the reform. But winners are never going to change the

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>system that got them across the line.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, those last two suggestions I think are very sensible. Indeed,

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 3>first past the post and make it optional. Why should

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 3>you be forced to vote with the threat of a fine.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Now I want to bring to your attention a couple

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 3>of pieces in the Australian News paper and see where

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 3>you stand on this debate. Paul Kelly has argued in

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>his column that the Liberals must return to the Howard

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 3>concept of the broad church in order to win. He

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 3>writes that its revival is the only viable strategy because

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 3>it opens the lens wide. It is inclusive, It incorporates

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 3>both the liberal and conservative traditions. It offers a broad

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 3>basis for public policy and a welcoming window for a

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 3>wide range of Australians. It would open the party to

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 3>the country, not shut its doors. Nick, is it a

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit naive? Naive? Hasn't the political landscape changed markedly

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 3>since those Howard years? You could argue one of the Liberals'

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 3>biggest issues is at an identity crisis, where they try

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 3>to be all things to all people.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 6>I suppose I'm going to side with Paul on this.

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 6>The thing is, reader, we have a west is the system.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 6>Westminster systems work a lot better when you have two

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 6>major parties and people join those parties with different views

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 6>and they argue that toss within them. I am all

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 6>for the broad Church, but on this condition that everybody

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 6>who wants to be in that broad church number one

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 6>has to subscribe to liberal values and number two has

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 6>to want the party to win the next election. Because

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 6>I sense there are people on the so called moderate

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 6>friends of the party who sometimes look to me as

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 6>if they don't want the party to win, and they'll

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 6>sabotage it at every opportunity. And that's what's going on

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 6>right at the moment over this, you know, this unseemly

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 6>battle over the leadership, which which you know, I mean,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 6>just have that discussion respectfully behind closed doors, because the

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 6>longer this goes on, the more vicious it is, and

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 6>there's some horrible, horrible stuff being thrown around to Angus Taylor,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 6>completely unwarranted. But as long as this goes on Rita,

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 6>the longer it'll be before the party ever has a

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 6>chance of getting back at it. And I personally support

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 6>the Liberal Party because I think they're better in government

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 6>than Labor, full stop, and I don't want to see

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 6>him in opposition a day longer than they have to be.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, you say you disagree with my take, but what

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 3>you're arguing for is I think some sense of uniformity

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 3>within the party. Obviously going to have people with different passions,

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 3>different points of view, but if they have to subscribe

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>to the Liberal position and they have to be disciplined

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and loyal, then that is very different to the sort

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>of broad Church we have seen in recent years, where

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 3>there is the infighting, the moderates trying to get rid

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 3>of the Conservatives, the wide anting that's happened. And I've

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>got to say this piece by Janet Orbrickson in The

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Australian is I think far more sensible advice. She argues

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 3>that without a firm foundation of values. A political party

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 3>is just a house of cards, and that instead of

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the Liberal party running from the culture war, they need

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to embrace them. She writes, everything is about culture. What

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of country do you want to be? If liberals

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 3>don't start embracing that, explaining policies through the prism of

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 3>what kind of culture we want, they may as well

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 3>fold their tent and save donors a heck of a

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of money. Gary, how do you see it? What

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 3>is the path forward for the liberals? How can they

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 3>become electable again after this catastrophic result.

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>They've got to stand for stuff, although fall for everything.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And look, I understand next point, and I also understand

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Paul Kelly's point. And in theory, the concept of the

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>broad church is okay. But my caveats are this, You've

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>got to have purpose, you've got to have passion, you

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have vision, you've got to be authentic. And so they

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>can have a broad range of personalities, a broad range

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of policies, positions, and I guess a broad range of

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>moderate to more conservative views exercise. But in the end

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got to actually galvanize all of that for a purpose.

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And the purpose has to be Australia and so the

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Liberal Party desperately needs that kind of strength of leadership.

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>When Sir Robert A. Mensis was around, the leadership was

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>against the extreme left, the communists. He took all of

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that on. I remember reading Jim Killen's first speech in

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen fifty six. I wasn't around, but I read

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it years later. You know where he was talking about

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the fight between mainland China and Free China, Taiwan and China.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>He was right onto the whole kind of threat of

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the reds that were coming for us, the way that

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>society would change. John Howard equally also galvanized Australians for

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a purpose. So a broad church got behind a leader,

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we need. We need to have a

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>strength of leadership, authenticity, values based, to Janet Olbrigson's excellent point,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>values based, and to own the australianisms associated with everything.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Stop the world trying to interfere with us, Make Australia

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for Australia, make it great again. Can I say that?

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can't do it. Why are we getting

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>so scared? Every first bit of criticism from the left.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, this seems to be the problem. They're so terrified

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 3>of some sort of media backlash, backlash from people who

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 3>will never back them in the activist class academia, and

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 3>they scared to actually have an authentic, principal, strong position

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 3>that is dramatically different to labor. And we saw that

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 3>at this election. We saw them go with this small

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 3>target strategy. It was a disaster. And yet you've got

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 3>all these hacks in the media telling them to do

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 3>more of that, to veer even more to the left,

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 3>to try to appeal to voters who are never going

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 3>to back them. Gentlemen, Gary Hartgrave Nicasia, thanks for your

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 3>time tonight, stilta karma Lefties losing at class. French President

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Emmanuel mccron meets with Sirius Islamus President the brilliant Josh

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Hammer joins me. Next, you're watching the Reader Panehy Show,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's time for left is losing it now. This

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 3>is just maddening. First, the heartbreaking story of two young

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.239
<v Speaker 3>siblings missing in Nova Scotia for the better part of

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 3>a week. Canadian police are beginning to scale back search efforts.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 3>They say there are low odds that children will still

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 3>be alive. But listen to how they start a press

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 3>conference into this tragic story with a inane land acknowledgment.

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 3>This is Canada.

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 8>First, I acknowledge that we are in mcmagi the traditional

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 8>and unsuited and sacral territory of the Migmah people. I

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 8>also recognize that African Nova Scotians are a distinct people

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 8>whose histories, legacies, and contributions have enriched that part of

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 8>Mcmagie known as Nova Scotia for over four hundred years.

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Yep. Canada a country that has suffered enormous damage thanks

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>to the far left policies of the Trudeau government, and

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 3>they just voted for more of this same Let's look

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 3>at a couple celebrating Mark Carney's big win Canada.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 4>You hit it.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 9>You chose over hate, unity over.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Division Trump techno.

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 10>This is what democracy looks like.

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 4>Mark Kearney is the leader of Canada and what the

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 4>world needs right now, someone.

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 11>That's ready to stand strong against Trump and defend democracy.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Tonight, Canada sent a.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 8>Message Tyranny doesn't win here, Fear doesn't win here, division

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 8>doesn't win here.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I've tried all weeks to save you from the dangerous,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 3>weapon grade levels of cringe of this following interview a

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 3>podcast featuring Meghan Markel but alas we must all suffer together.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Here is Meghan talking to a woman called Jamie kern Limo,

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.239
<v Speaker 3>who seems to be even more fake and insufferable than

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the Duchess.

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 12>Very first question, because I think in friendship it's so important,

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 12>and I think so many people also have this question

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 12>for you, is.

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, Meghan? How are you? And I'm okay, that's

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>so kind.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 4>I am.

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 13>I'm better than okay. How are you?

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>I know?

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 12>You eyes make it about me today, which, by the way,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 12>I just have to say, you are the most generous friend.

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 12>You show up for your friends. Today I just get

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 12>to talk about you.

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh I'm excited about Yes, it really is that all

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 3>fool The whole hour long ordeal may have even been longer.

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 3>May have blacked out from smacking myself in the head.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 3>How else are you supposed to deal with trip like this?

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 13>Oh my gosh. I work so hard, and I appreciate

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 13>what hard work looks like. I like working hard, and

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 13>I'm still working hard. Right the moment that everything sells out,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 13>it doesn't mean that we're done. Yeah, it means we're

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 13>working on replenishment. And what are the next cues and

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 13>what's the next tranch of products and what's the timing

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 13>on that, and writing the newsletters and writing the social

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 13>media captions and making sure that all that appeels in

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 13>line and what's the cadence of it, and what's the

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 13>photography that we want to do and what do I

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 13>want to wear for those shoots, while also editing all

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 13>the time coded notes for season two of With Love Meghan,

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 13>and then being an edits for the podcast and making

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 13>and being a mom and a wife and a friend.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 13>Those are all jobs.

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Meghan wants you to know that she's so busy.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 3>She's got no staff, She's out there writing the social

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 3>media captions herself, so so busy. And don't forget she's

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 3>a princess too, and Harry is slaying dragons to rescue her.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 13>You know what we've built. We've built a beautiful life

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 13>and we have two healthy, beautiful children. And you know,

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 13>I always think about it like the end of Super

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 13>Mario Brothers, when you get to the final final level,

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 13>what's the goal? And Super Mario they're like, slay the

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 13>dragon and save the princess. I'm like, that's my husband

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 13>who is.

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Harry, rescuing her from the family she abandoned before making

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 3>him abandon his. But don't feel too sorry for Prince Harry.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 3>This is a middle aged man, after all, is about forty,

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 3>chose to embarrass his family, brought tons of grief to

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>the ailing grandmother who supported him throughout his life, Queen

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Elizabeth iiO in her final days, and he now wants

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 3>to rewrite history.

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 6>You accuse members of your family of racism. You don't

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 6>even know well.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 9>The British press said that, right, I did Megan never

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 9>mention the races?

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>She said there were troubling comments about about her skin color?

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Right? Does he think we've forgotten this diabolical travesty?

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 13>Concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 13>when he's born.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 3>What who is having that conversation? There is a conversation

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:42.959
<v Speaker 3>to hold up?

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 13>There are several conversations.

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 14>There's a conversation with you with Harry about how dark

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 14>your baby is going to be.

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Now it's time for some miss Andrew. Here is a

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 3>young lass who dreams of the world without men.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 7>And are not going to like me for saying this,

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 7>But you know what, I don't care America. I think

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 7>it's time we form a state where only women can live.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 3>No men allows.

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 7>It's an estrogen field utopia where we can all finally

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 7>live in peace.

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that sounds pretty boring to men. I'm not sure

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 3>which ladies are going to sign up to do these

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 3>very necessary jobs. Oh, I think we need to see

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 3>more of this oil reg work for our education purposes.

0:23:38.440 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Of course. Now you may recall our favorite lefty losing

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.479
<v Speaker 3>at Boston City councilor Tanny Anderson. If you don't remember her,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 3>let's have a look at her previous work. People are

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 3>not innocent until proven guilty. People are guilty first. People

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>are crucified.

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 4>People are lynched, Same old tricks, same masters, though, fight.

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 3>Don't fight. What do I have to do in the

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 3>city council in.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 4>Order to get respect as a black woman. I'm not

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 4>afraid of anybody here.

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, she's off to prison, folks. She's pled guilty to

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 3>federal corruption charges, but remarkably, she hasn't resigned as a counselor.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 3>While she reflects on her.

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 11>Pain tonight, Boston City Councilor Tanya Fernandez Henderson says she

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 11>loves her constituents and isn't sure when she'll resign.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 3>WBC's Julia McDonald has the latest on the saga that

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 3>has rock City Hall to make I love you, I

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 3>Love you dearly.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 10>Outside of federal court Monday, after pleading guilty to corruption charges,

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 10>Boston City council or Tanya Fernandez Anderson said she's reflecting

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 10>on her faith and practicing gratitude for the paint.

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now is Newsweek Senior editor at Large and

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Article three Projects Senior Council Josh Hamma. Josh. She wielded

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 3>her official powers for her own financial gain. She was divisive,

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>She was a race faiting politician, really the worst of

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the modern left.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's like one of those or Willian Frankenstein like concoctions, right,

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 9>I mean it's all like the absolute worst ingredients producing

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 9>this one particularly iniquitous and just genuinely horrific public official.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 9>I mean, this really does have all the various ingredients.

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean, someone who is wielding Hunter biden Sq corruption,

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 9>but doing it through official power, not even under kind

0:25:57.800 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 9>of the auspices of your parents, as Hunter Biden was

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 9>doing and when he was trafficking buying family influence. She's

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 9>literally just wielding power there, and she plucked guilty. I

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 9>have no idea what her particular argument is. I have

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 9>a sneaking suspicion as to why she thinks that she

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 9>can get away with it, especially in a very blue

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 9>city like Boston, Massachusetts. You know, I mean, she's she's ranking,

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 9>based on what I can see here on this clip read,

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 9>she's ranking pretty high in the intersectional dei totem pole.

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 9>So I suspect that the good liberals at Harvard University

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 9>and MIT and all the various other dens of Marxist

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.719
<v Speaker 9>iniquity there in Boston, Massachusetts are probably going to support

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 9>here through thick and thin there. That's probably why she

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 9>can get away with it there. But it really is

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 9>just the perfect encapsulation of all that is wrong with

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 9>the contemporary American left, isn't it.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to New York now sanctuary city and other

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 3>sanctuary city, and it's a more gang of violence. This

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 3>time we've had illegal immigrant, some very young ones, at

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 3>targeting police offices.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, new video out of New York City tonight of

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 6>teenage Venezuelan and migrants alleged to be trend de Ragua

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 6>gang members attacking two NYPD officers.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 3>In Times Josh the officers were attacked while trying to

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 3>break up a wolf pack star robbery. Tell me about

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 3>these offenders, this sort of violence that we're saying. Some

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 3>of the members of this gang at Tinage just somewhere

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 3>as young as.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 9>Twelve, So Trendy or Augula. Just so everyone is aware,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 9>this is the Venezuelan gang. They are on the same

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 9>level as MS thirteen is among the most absolutely vicious

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 9>transnational criminal gangs in the entire Western hemisphere. MS thirteen

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 9>has his origins in El Salvador, and trendyar Augua has

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 9>his origins in Venezuela. So this is the very gang

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 9>actually that Donald Trump made a lot of headlines a

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 9>couple months ago for for invoking the eighteenth century Alien

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 9>Enemies Acts, this kind of older statute, which will allow

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 9>him in theory, if he was not facing an unprecedented

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 9>judicial insurrection. In theory, invoking the statute would allow him

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 9>to expedite these highly necessary deportations. So the point, rita

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 9>is that have Donald Trump and his and his DHS,

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 9>his Ice, Tom Home and the borders are Christy Noah

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 9>at d if they have been able to do their job,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 9>if these Article three Black robed oracle judicial tyrants had

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 9>allowed the executive branch to actually enforce this nation's immigration law.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 9>I think it's entirely possible that that footage never would

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 9>have existed. These people, It's entirely possible they never would

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 9>have been. In fact, it's quite likely that they would

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 9>never have been in this country in the first place.

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 8>There.

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 9>But unfortunately, when it comes to a city like New

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 9>York City, and I'm from the New York area, most

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 9>of my family still lives in the area there, this

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 9>is unfortunately run of the mill here in Los Angeles,

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 9>San Francisco, New York, Washington, Boston, which we were just

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 9>talking about. This is run of the mill stuff in

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 9>blue city America. The good news someone like, as someone

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 9>who lives in Florida, I can speak to this. The

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 9>good news that migration trends in America are away from

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 9>blue city left wing hell holes like New York City

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 9>and Los Angeles. People are flocking to cities like Dallas

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 9>Fort Worth, Texas, like Miami, Florida, South Florida there, and

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 9>you know, og, I wonder why. It's definitely partially I

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 9>would say for footage just like this.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:29:00.239
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely Now you mentioned the term judicial insurrection there. I

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 3>like that. I haven't heard that before. But we do

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 3>have a constitutional crisis, and it's not emanating from the

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 3>White House. It is from these activist judges who think

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 3>that can you surp the power of the president, you

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 3>surp the democratic process, the will of the American people.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 3>How is that traveling? Where are we with that? Well read?

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 9>I'm glad you liked the term. I'm pretty sure that

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 9>I was one who actually coined it. So I'm quite

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 9>a hading myself with the term digital insurrection. It's actually caught

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 9>on a little bit here in American media, but it

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 9>really is pretty unprecedent. I mean, Donald Trump during his

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 9>first four years as president from twenty seventeen to twenty

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 9>twenty one, he faced sixty five so called niche wine injunctions,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 9>which by the way, is more than the first forty

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 9>four presidents combined. And there was a case in twenty

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 9>eighteen called Trump versus Trump versus Hawaii, the so called

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 9>travel band case. Justice Clarence Thomas very presciently said in

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 9>any concurring opinion, he said, you know what, unless this

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 9>just dies down off it's on a cord, We're going

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 9>to have to confront this sooner rather than later. This

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 9>issue of the so called Lower cour and niche Y injunctions.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 9>That was seven years ago and here we are and

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 9>it's still just raging like wildfire. So the good news, potentially,

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 9>potentially is that next week, on Thursday, there is a

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 9>birthright citizenship oral argument with the US Supreme Court. But

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 9>they're not actually going to be arguing the fourteen Amendment

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 9>merits of birthright citizenship. Rather, this is going to be

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 9>an argument about the scope of the injunction power of

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 9>the federal course. This is actually a really golden opportunity

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 9>if the justices actually wanted to do so, to define

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 9>what the judicial power in our constitutional order means and

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 9>what it does not mean. I'm cautiously optimistic they will

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 9>not let that opportunity go to waste there, But as

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 9>with all things judicial branch related RIDA, I can only

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 9>be cautiously optimistic. I've just been burned too many times

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 9>before to be just particularly gung ho about it either.

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Now let's go back to Times Square and a new

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 3>piece of public art has been unveiled and it's pretty underwhelming.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say I could use stronger language. Yah

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 3>tell me The reason isn't behind directing this twelve foot

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 3>statue of a fictionalized mildly obese black woman in Times Squares.

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 3>It's not exactly a stunning piece of art the craftsmanship there.

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 3>It ain't Michelangelo's David, that's for sure. Yeah.

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it really is quite a long way from Michelangelo,

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 9>isn't it. Look, I mean, this is the whole body

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 9>positivity movement, right, I mean, I mean this is kind

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 9>of the whole notion of just trying to exalt people

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 9>who just kind of just just go with the diet

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 9>and they don't exercise, and just trying to make it

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 9>seem like that. Oh, you know, we've discriminated against obese

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 9>people for so long by having all these flashy ads

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 9>with the people who are rail thin there, and you're

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 9>encouraging all these people to be anarext I mean, you

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 9>know that's the argument there. But in reality, in reality,

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 9>we want people to be healthy. I mean, last night, Chah,

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 9>that's the whole Maha make America Healthy Again RFT Junior platform.

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 9>We don't want to be the most obese country in

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 9>the world, at least I don't. I don't want America

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 9>to be the most obese country in the world. But unfortunately,

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 9>you know, pr stunts like this when you are just

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 9>exalting morbidity, when you are exalting obesity there, I mean,

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 9>what do you think is gonna happen there? Frankly, this

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 9>seems to me to be in fairly direct response actually

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 9>to the whole RFK Junior Maha phenomenon.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 4>There.

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 9>They're basically saying, Okay, you know what I mean, are

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 9>RFK is going to do this in DC when it

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 9>comes to some vaccine stuff, to food dies all of

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 9>that there, But you know what, we're going to double

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 9>down on the notion that it's actually okay to be overweight.

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 9>The problem, among other things, is that when you exalt

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 9>obesity in this country there you are straining the healthcare system,

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 9>and America's healthcare system or entitlement programs Medicare, it's all

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 9>going bankrupt. So, even if you don't particularly care about health,

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 9>which you should as a pure fiscal matter, encouraging this

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 9>sort of stuff it's not a good.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Idea, now I'm with you there, And just esthetically, it's

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.239
<v Speaker 3>not a beautiful piece of work. I think anything at

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 3>time you erect art somewhere, particularly something that's a twelve

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 3>foot structure. It has to have some beauty about it.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 3>I think we've kind of lost track of that. And

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 3>they used to make beautiful buildings, they make beautiful public

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 3>pieces of art, and now we've got things like that. Now,

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about the Trump administration's tariff policy, particularly the

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 3>trade war with China. It's working as intended in driving

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 3>down demand for Chinese made products. Imports from China have

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 3>dropped dramatically. Josh, what's that going to mean? Now We're

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 3>going to see shortages, big price hikes. Are you seeing

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 3>some of those short term impacts? And how far are

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 3>we from getting some details about trade deals? The administration

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 3>has been touting that they're not far away.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, I've not personally noticed any retail price hikes yet,

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 9>but I think a lot of Americans are starting to

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 9>potentially gear themselves for exactly that sort of thing. In fact,

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 9>if you look at the international ports they're shipping, it

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 9>really plummeted after the tariffs were announced, unsurprisingly in mid

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 9>to late April. But if we actually go back to

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 9>the March data, it was actually, if I call proptly,

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 9>there was a pretty large increase actually in imports including

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 9>from China, because a lot of people were expecting this

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 9>tariff role out there. So look, we'll see there definitely

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 9>could be a short term price effect. The good news,

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 9>as you said, is that Scott bess and to our

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 9>Treasury secretary, is currently meeting this week with his Chinese counterparts.

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 9>We'll see what happens. Look, China is ultimately more dependent

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 9>on the United States than the United States is on China.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 9>It would be a tough economic decoupling. I'm not suggesting

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 9>this is the kind of thing that can easily happen.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 9>I'm frankly not suggesting that this is the kind of

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 9>thing that could happen in the short to near term

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 9>at all. Frankly, But if America can ultimately become less

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 9>dependent on its chief art geopolitical rival, a country that

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 9>literally flies spy balloons across our continent, the country that

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 9>spies on us through everything from TikTok to Confucius institutes,

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 9>the campus, if we can get less dependent on them,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 9>that is a good thing. And if we can reasure

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 9>more jobs in the process, that's a doubly good thing.

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Franklin, Now to another example of America First policies from

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration. This one has some Democrats support. It's

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 3>good to see senat Is Josh Hawley and Peter Welch

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 3>are producing legislation to force drug companies not to charge

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 3>high prices in the US than the international average. This

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 3>war against big farmer, it's extending well beyond RFK Junior.

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 9>Josh, Yeah, this has become this is rapidly become a

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 9>very aggressive part I think of the new Republican parties platform.

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 9>But as you mentioned, this is a bipartisan piece of legislation.

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 9>Cener Holly and Senator Welch, who's a pretty liberal center

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 9>from the state of Remands. Josh Holly, who personally is

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 9>one of my absolute favorite senators. I'm a big fan

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 9>of his. He has very much been the tip of

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 9>the sphere of a lot more actually of these more

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 9>shall we say, pop list inclined economic styles of bill

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 9>legislation that he's had previously previous legislation when it comes

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 9>to trying to cap credit card fees, a lot of

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 9>stuff that your typical kind of nineteen eighties nostalgia Republican

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 9>wouldn't necessarily dream of there. But this is a new

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 9>breed of Republican. I mean the entire Donald Trump Maga

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 9>Maha coalition. There. Yeah, it's partially about taking on big

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 9>pharma for sure, and big Pharma I think it has

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 9>a lot of bipartis and enemies across the entire spectrum

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 9>these days in Washington, d C. But it's also just

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 9>partially about this kind of more economically nationalists, more populars

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 9>style of economic stake craft as well. The tariff policy

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 9>certainly fits into that as well. There Again, these are

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 9>the kind of things that the Republican Party prior to

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump's to send down the gilded escalator of Trump

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 9>Tower in twenty fifteen, Never in a million years we

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 9>would dreaming, I mean, thinking back to like the twenty

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 9>twelve Mitt Romney Paul Ryan platform, the notion of punitive

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.919
<v Speaker 9>tariffs on other countries, the notion of trying to cap

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 9>prescription drug prices. I mean, it would have been a

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 9>totally foreign exercise there. But this is a very very

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 9>different Republican Party in the year twenty twenty five.

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Very different than neo cons are gone. It's a new GOP,

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 3>it certainly is. But before you go, I just want

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 3>to quickly ask you about French President Emmanuel mccron. He

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:16.240
<v Speaker 3>hosted the Syrian leader I'med al Shara, and earlier today

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 3>he called on the US and the European Union to

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 3>lift sanctions against Syria. Josh, this character, al Shara is

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 3>an Islamist, he is a former member of al Qaeda.

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 3>He's got supporters right now targeting religious minorities in Syria.

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 3>Should he be treated like some dignitary here?

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 9>This is disgusting, I mean, this is just utterly appalling.

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 9>And unfortunately Emmanuel Macron is not the only person who

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 9>is treating this al Qaeda jihadi in a suit as

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 9>some sort of legitimate leader. I mean, you actually had

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 9>multiple US congressmen who became the first to fly to

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 9>Damascus to meet with this Islamist thug about a week

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 9>and a half, two weeks ago or so. So this

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 9>is rapidly becoming a normalized situation that simply should not

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 9>be normalized because, among the other things, what you alluded

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 9>to is totally crap. There's actually been there have been

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.399
<v Speaker 9>recent massacres. The media is really not reporting this at all.

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 9>There have been recent massacres of the Syrian Druze population.

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 9>It's horrific stuff there. Because the current government in Damascus

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 9>is an Islamist government there. This guy puts on a suit,

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 9>he talks like he's a Harvard Dei professor, talking about

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 9>the beauty of diversity there. When it's when it comes

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:31.439
<v Speaker 9>to two different types. Assunni Shia Drew's Christians so warth there.

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 9>He is not a Westerner. This Cau's an Islamist. He

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 9>was literally a purpatetic Al Qaeda Jihati, going from country

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 9>to country throughout the Middle East, fighting for various offshoots

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 9>of al Qaeda, from the original one to al Nusra

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 9>to HRT And now Emmanuel McCrone is talking about why.

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 9>I literally don't get it there. The only thing I

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 9>can think of is that Macron in France they have

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 9>very unique They have a very unique relationship with Lebanon

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 9>of course there and Syria. The current government there is

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 9>very cozy with Hasbola, which still has a major presence

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 9>in Loveanon there. So maybe that maybe that's that's what's

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 9>going on here. But it's really quite appalling and dare

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 9>I say even outright disgusting.

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Josh Hamma, thank you so much for your time tonight.

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you still to come. Former First Lady Michelle Obama

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 3>reveals that she's receiving therapy. Kinsey Schofield joins me next

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back, Joining Me now celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Schofield Kinsey Former First Lady Michelle Obama has revealed that

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 3>she's now in therapy in a tell All interview with Jay.

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 14>Shetty, I believe in couples therapy. I believe I believe

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 14>in it all. Whatever works for you. And at this

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 14>you know, phase of my life, I'm in therapy right

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 14>now because I'm transitioning.

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm sixty years old.

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 14>I finished a really hard thing in my life with

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 14>my family intact, I'm an empty nester. My girls are in,

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 14>you know, they've been launched.

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know we had to have therapy for each

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 3>stage of life at Kinsey, what else can you tell

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 3>me about this interview?

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 11>I can tell you that Joan Rivers would have had

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 11>a field day with a transitioning clip.

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 11>What I can tell you is that the most captivating

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 11>people are those.

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Who leave room for curiosity.

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 11>You know, mystery invites intrigue and over sharing, demands attention

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 11>without earning it.

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 3>And no matter how.

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 11>Many headlines she gets with some of these random revelations,

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 11>whether it's a fight with Barack. It does not help

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:45.439
<v Speaker 11>her podcast on the charts. She's a commercial flop so far,

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 11>and that's why you're seeing her do all of these interviews.

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 11>But at the end of the day, people are really

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:52.479
<v Speaker 11>not interested in what she has to say.

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 3>Now. I think the last election campaign and certainly since

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the launch of this filing podcast past, it's really diminished

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 3>her standing and revealed that she's not as wildly popular

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 3>as the media told us she was for years. Now,

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about Anna Winter, the editor in chief of

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Vogue and chair of the Met Gala. She's snubb singer

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:22.720
<v Speaker 3>songwriter Nicole Scherzinger, leaving her out of the sea every

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 3>look from the Met Gala twenty twenty five red carpet

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 3>last night in the photo collection there. This comes after

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the singer caused a bit of an uproar because she

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 3>expressed her approval of Russell Brand's MAGA styled Make Jesus

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 3>First Again hat. So it was just a hat that

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 3>was celebrating Jesus, but apparently that is also something that

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 3>is unacceptable among the left. At the moment, Kinsey, the

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Met Gala has become pretty lame, these days, is Anna

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Winter a big part of why it's lost its luster.

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 3>It's become a subject of mockery rather than something to admire.

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 11>I mean, she had a stain on her dress, This

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 11>woman who is apparently everyone is terrified of in the

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 11>fashion industry, what in turn lost their head this week?

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Is what I want to know.

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, I think Anna Wintour, along with the

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 11>met Gala, is way past their cell by date. You know,

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 11>it's pretentious, it lacks creativity, and I don't You're seeing

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 11>all the attendees inside taking selfies, which is against the rules,

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 11>like they're teenagers at prom. Even the celebrities have lost

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 11>respect for her. I think it is over. It is

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 11>not the it's not the Princess Diana event that it

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 11>used to be.

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Now. It used to be something that really turned heads.

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 3>Everyone wanted to say what the fashions were, everyone wanted

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 3>to say who was attending. But these days you just

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 3>look at it and cringe. Eighty percent of it, and

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 3>the big names don't seem to be going the way

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 3>they were. There were a lot of people there where

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I had no idea who they were. They were like

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 3>contestants on Big Brother that you have to Google to

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 3>see which celebrity they are. Now, this story with Bill Belichick,

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say, I can't get enough of it.

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 3>This is a football coach, a legend of the game.

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 3>He's reportedly sidelined his twenty four year old girlfriend, Jordan

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Hudson after that humiliating CBS interview where she kept interrupting

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 3>his answers. Now, Bill's seventy three. We're talking about a

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 3>forty nine year age gap here. He's looking to hire

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:46.760
<v Speaker 3>a PR specialist, Kinsey, to take over from Hudson, who's

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 3>been acting as his PR manager. Tell me more about

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 3>this relationship. I mean, I'm hearing, I'm hearing comparisons with

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Jill Biden, doctor Jill saying that might have some elder

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 3>abuse happening here. That's hilarious.

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 11>Okay, Well, I didn't know this the last time I

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 11>talked to you, but I did find out.

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 3>They met on a plane.

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 11>She was reading a book and he started talking to

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 11>her about that book.

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's how they met. But here's some of the

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 3>good gossip.

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 11>He was having a docuseries built around him and this

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 11>new team he's coaching, this college team. Jordan came in

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 11>with a list of demands wanted to be heavily involved.

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 11>Within two days of production, they killed this entire show.

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 3>She was too much for them.

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 11>And then we find out she actually inserted herself in

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 11>the super Bowl commercial, the Dunkin Donut super Bowl commercial.

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 11>They reached out to her to try to get to

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 11>Bill and she wormed her way into the commercial as well.

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:50.720
<v Speaker 3>So she is drama. Oh, drama with a capital day.

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 3>My god, yeah, she's But the whole thing is enthralling

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 3>and slightly creepy. I want to ply this enthrolling clip

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 3>of actually enthralling is the wrong word for this. It's

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 3>more hilarious than enthralling. It's adorable. It's Prince Louis making

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 3>fun of his big brother, Prince George during victory in

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 3>Europe Day commemorations in London. It's just adorable, the whole thing,

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the mockery, the death set from the future King there.

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 3>We love George, but if I could make Prince Louis

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 3>King tomorrow, I would Kinsey Louis has a way of

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 3>stealing the show. Tell me about this royal unity that

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 3>we saw at this event. We had King Charles there,

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the royal family all there, to mark

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the eightieth anniversary of Victory in Europe Day, and it's

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 3>been interpreted as a power move to send a clear

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 3>message to Prince Harry and Megan Markle that the family

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:08.760
<v Speaker 3>is united.

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I don't think that they even I don't even

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.399
<v Speaker 11>think Prince Harry's on their radar, quite honestly. And that's

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 11>what I'm hearing. That they gave up on him a

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 11>long time ago. But seeing you know, the four generations

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 11>on the balcony, the Duke of Kent, that the King

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:26.760
<v Speaker 11>and the Queen and Prince Louis with his without his teeth,

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 11>it did send a strong message that this family is

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 11>this family has a long way to go, and that

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 11>they love each other and that they love their country.

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 3>And I actually have heard, here's.

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 11>A little piece of information I haven't told anybody yet,

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 11>that Prince Harry is obsessed with this footage. Will watch

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 11>the footage from the day, will watch to see what

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 11>they look like on the balcony. Clearly he misses this

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 11>life and they have moved on.

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I think he has some regrets, though he may not

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 3>admit it to himself. Off, before you go, this footage

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 3>of Kanie a West walking out on an interview with

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:10.319
<v Speaker 3>PS Morgan has gone viral, understandably, So what do you

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 3>talk about?

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:14.720
<v Speaker 2>It's thirty Okay, now you're not taking accountability or response,

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, of course, I no, no, sir. This is

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 2>what you get for now. We can we can circle

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:27.800
<v Speaker 2>back when you can count.

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Kinsey, we can't be shocked anymore, can we.

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 11>You know, Kanye once said he's more more influential than Picasso,

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 11>and honestly, his public breakdowns might be his most abstract

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:45.919
<v Speaker 11>work yet.

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Kinsey Schofield, thank you so much for your time, and

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 3>that's all the time I've got. I'll see you at

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 3>nine pm tomorrow night for Left, He's losing it up.

0:47:58.120 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Next it's Newsnight.

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 8>S