WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 17 February

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Lately the general welcome late to play well, thanks for

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>joining us.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm James Macpherson with Caleb Bond and filling in for

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Listra Caroline Marcus. We've got a lot to get through tonight,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>including you know, there's a fair bit of animosity between

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the US and Canada at the moment after Donald Trump

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 2>suggested that Canada should become the fifty first US state

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>will they faced off in an ice hockey game at

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>the weekend. There wasn't a lot of hockey. We'll show

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>you what did happen a little later. Plus, when we

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>look at the papers, concerns that Australian school students know

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>almost nothing about our political system. It tends to show

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>around voting time and fire departments issue fresh warnings about

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the dangers of e scooters. All of that when we

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>get to the papers. Oh, there's also possibly a rate

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>cut tomorrow, the papers doing that one as well.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll look at that a bit later.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 2>But first, with the polls turning against him, Anthony Albinezi

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 2>has sought help to revive his fortunes. So who do

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>you think Anthony Albanesi is turning to for advice? Remember

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albenese's never been particularly good at reading the room,

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>which perhaps explains why Australia's I don't know dopious man

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 2>has turned to Australia's most hated man for help, Daniel Andrews.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Anthony Albanesi, in need of help, has decided

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>to turn to the former Victorian Premier, Dan Andrews to

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 2>help him prepare for debates with Peter Dutton. Now, I

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 2>know most people regard Dan Andrews as having been the

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 2>consummate political mastermind. He did win three elections, after all,

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>but Caleb and Caroline that's mostly because he avoided tough

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>interviews famously, he didn't go on three aw for years.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>And of course Anthony Alberenezi needs to bear in mind

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>unlike Victoria, Australia isn't gripped by Stockholm syndrome.

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, Neil Mitchell, I'm told still takes sleeping pills to

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>get over the fact that Daniel Andrews wouldn't talk to

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>him for years and years and years. But you're right,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean he is one of the best. Actually, I'm

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 3>going to say he is the best politician this country.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Andrews iman has seen in fifty years. When I

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>say best, I don't mean that he did great things

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>for Victoria, but that he was just an excellent politician.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 3>He understands how to gather and hoard power and to

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 3>then use that over everyone else.

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 4>That's why he.

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Was so successful as premier. Not because he was necessarily

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the greatest salesman to the public, but he understands power

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>and how power works better than almost anyone else in

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 3>this country. And he single handedly turned the Labor Party

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>in Victoria from the Labor right to the socialist left.

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 3>And by the end of his premiership he had ministers,

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 3>including Tim Pallas who just recently departed as a treasurer

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 3>and on the way out left a ten percent swing

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 3>against his party in his seat of Werribee, coming from

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 3>the Labor right to sign up to the socialist left

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 3>so he can remain as treasurer. That is how Daniel

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Andrews operated. That is what Albanez he wants. He wants

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 3>a bit of that big dog energy that Daniel Andrews had,

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 3>because he is as limp as a piece of wet letters.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 3>To use the line, of course that another Labor leader,

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 3>Paul Keating once used once upon a time, and it's

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 3>no surprise that he would go to someone like Daniel

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Andrews for a bit of advice. The only problem I

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>suspect is that it ain't going to do much for him.

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean at this point in the game, and if

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 3>you look at the debate he had last time in

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 3>when was it?

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 4>When was the last leg?

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Twenty two Scott Morrison, I mean, it feels.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Like yesterday anyway, it feels like a day. I still

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I remember sitting there on the night in the news.

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 4>It feels like yesterday to me. But the debates they had.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Last time were terrible, right, he was so out of form,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not surprised that Albo would want to give

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 3>it a better go this time. I don't think you

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>could tell him anything though. He's just weak in front

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>of a camera.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that changes.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you reckon? Carole?

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 5>I disagree with Caleb. I think it's one thing to

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 5>captivate a Victorian demographic. It's another thing altogether to win

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 5>over the rest of the country. And if you put

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Dan Andrews almost anywhere else in the country, I don't

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 5>think he would have performed as well as he did

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 5>in Victoria, where Let's face it, a lot of the

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 5>voters are not like anywhere else in Australia, and at

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 5>the moment he's not even He's pretty on the nose

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 5>himself within his own state, after what came out of

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 5>the review into what happened with the car crash that

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 5>he was involved in, after revelations that he's taken this

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 5>very cushy consultancy job post politics. So I don't know

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 5>that it would even help Anthony Albanezi win in places

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 5>like Queensland, where the latest News poll shows that he's

0:04:55.000 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 5>recorded the highest dissatisfaction ratings. That's the seats that those

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 5>are the places he really needs to convince, not the

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 5>people in Victoria who Daniel Andrews was speaking to in

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 5>keeping his power. Those people are already on labor side.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Maybe some of them might be thinking of going Greens,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 5>but those people are already one over. And I think

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 5>there's probably this news looks terrible for the government that

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 5>this has come out because among pretty much the rest

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 5>of the country, if not as a point out Victoria itself,

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 5>he is deeply unpopular. Daniel leaving in Victoria.

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean he can't join a golf club. Kenny in

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 2>his own state. They don't want him as a member.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Newspaul. Let's have a quick look at some

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 2>of the latest results from Newspaul out over the weekend.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 2>The two party preferred vote sees Labor on forty nine

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>percent training the Coalition on fifty one percent. Anthony Alberinezi

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 2>is still regarded as the better prime minister.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>He leads Peter Dutton by five points.

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to whether Labour should be given

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>a second term, well that's good news for Albanzi. Only

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty four percent of voters say yes he deserves another

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>go in the lodge, fifty three percent saying no, he

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 2>does not, thirteen percent still unsure.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Of course, their.

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Primary vote at the moment is just thirty one percent.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 2>That's the lowest ever, and bear in mind it's lowest

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.559
<v Speaker 2>still than at the last election when it was thirty

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>two point six percent. What Dan Andrews is going to

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>do specifically for Peter for Anthe Albanesi hang on. I

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>was about to say Peter Dutton, but I'll tell you why,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 2>because Albaneze will have to debate Dutton, and Albanzi is

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 2>a terrible debater.

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's terrible with detail.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Remember prior to the last election, he was quizzed on

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 2>some pretty basic economic information and he couldn't come up

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>with the cash rate, for instance. So he's going to

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 2>be rehearsing debates and Dan Andrews is going to stand

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>in and pretend to be Peter Dutton in these mock debates,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>preparing him for the real thing.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Andrews will help because he'll run rings around Albanese

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>as a debate exactly.

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But I mean he'll be.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Teaching Albanezer to say things like I don't recall, that's

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>not how I remember it.

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I have no recollection of that. We're doing good things.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's pretty much what he said for nine

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>years as the premiere.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, if Elbow starts saying, look, we're just following

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>your health advice, and I will defer to brit Sutton

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 3>on this, or perhaps Shane Patton, who of course has

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 3>just lost his job as police commissioner in Victoria, we

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>should be a bit worried.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 4>But the polling you mentioned there with news POLM, there was.

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Quite a few poles out over the weekend, and I

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>know Paul was going into detail on some of them.

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Just an hour ago.

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.559
<v Speaker 3>But it's interesting if you look at the Ugov pole

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>which came out yesterday and the ABC was running, which

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>went down into sort of a seat by seat breakdown.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>What we're talking about here is two interesting things. One

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 3>is that none of the TL seats, according to this pole,

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>would go back to the Libs, which to me indicates

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 3>that the Libs need to forget about the inner city

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>and they need to folks on the outer suburbs. Because

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>the other thing this pole found was that outer suburban

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Melbourne and outer suburban Sydney were the two places where

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>they had found the biggest swings towards the Liberal Party.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Keep in mind these are areas with large migrant.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Populations as well, and that on that pole, Labor would

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 3>lose three seats in the Hunter, which is coal Marning

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 3>territory that has always been labor heartland. So what we're

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 3>looking at here is a major turnaround in the stocks

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 3>of who votes for the Labor Party and who votes

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 3>for the Liberal Party, which in politics in the last

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>four or five decades is almost unprecedented.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Basically, the other interesting thing, Caroline, is that these polls

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>found very little difference in men and women when asked

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>do we need a change of government? I think it

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>was fifty three percent of men said yes and fifty

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 2>two percent of women. So maybe the Liberals don't need

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 2>to worry too much about their perceived women problem either.

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Just get on with good policies rather than quotas and

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 2>all that kind of not Just remember they famously ditched

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Warren Mundine as a pre selected candidate because they felt

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 2>they needed a woman in that seat.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 5>Look, I mean, as our colleague Peter Kretlin put it

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 5>so well the other week, women vote on the same

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 5>issues as men. They're also concerned with cost of living

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 5>for their families. They're also concerned with immigration levels, housing, affordability, crime.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 5>Of course, there's some separate concerns that women have that

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 5>perhaps men don't. But these are not issues that generally

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 5>speaking drive people at elections, and it's certainly not for

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 5>a lot of women. How many women give me the

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 5>percentage breakdown they are in a party? I mean, I

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 5>think a lot of women would feel the way I

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 5>do and despise that kind of tokenism. Don't want to

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 5>see women being put in a certain position simply because

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 5>of their gender. It's offensive. So look, I'm not surprised

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 5>to see that results and I think it just validates

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 5>what so many of us have been saying for so long.

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 5>But look, speaking of Anthony Albanisi, who would have thought it.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 5>But the ABC has been inundated with complaints for being

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 5>too pro coalition after the Prime Minister gave a testy

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 5>interview with the public broadcasters Alice Springs Breakfast Show. Stuart

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Brash conducted an interview with mister Albanzi on February seven

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 5>when he visited the Northern Territory and the Ompartsman revealed

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 5>a report revealed twenty one complaints were made to the

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 5>ABC about that interview. Apparently, complainants were concerned the interview

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 5>lacked in partiality because the interviewer asked questions that demonstrated

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 5>a pro coalition bias and repeatedly interrupted the Prime minister.

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 1>We've got a little bit of that interview.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's have a listen and then we'll talk about whether

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 2>or not the ABC gave the Prime minister two difficult

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 2>a time.

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's what happened.

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, I thought you're going to go with me for verbaling.

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 4>You ever being on the nose with.

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>The electorc as opposed to being an underdog.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 3>But that's okay, Can I ask you one last thing?

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Beat whatever, there's enough people joined in, there's a bit

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 2>of a media and the ABC joined in on it sometimes.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I've got to say.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I've got to say twenty one complaints. That must have

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>been everyone who was listening to that radio program rang

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 2>in to complain. But what was more revealing I felt

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>than the interviewers probing of Anthony Albanezi. And I mean,

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 2>he is on the nose with the electorate. Their primary

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 2>vote is as low as it's ever been. It was

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 2>a fair enough question, but Elberinizi then complained about the

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 2>ABC interviewer giving him a tough time, saying we've got

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>enough media outlets doing that without the ABC, which sort

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 2>of is saying the quiet part out loud that the

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister actually expects to be given easy run by

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the National Broadcast, which is what we've always said, and

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister clearly thinks, yes, they ought to.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, when he gives them payol or of a billion

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 3>dollars a year, he might expect something in return. Indeed,

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 3>and this goes back to the point we're making before

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 3>about why he's got Daniel andrews In.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 4>He has a tendency to do this.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 3>He gets really testy with interviewers when they go places

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't like. We've seen him do it with our

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>own Pete Stefanovic when he's tried to question him on

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 3>comments he's made before. He's done the same thing over

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 3>on the Today Show. When you get into territory, particularly

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 3>previously he's been talking about the RBA and comments that

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.359
<v Speaker 3>have been made about whether or not government money contributes

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to inflation.

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 4>He goes, oh, no, the RBA has never said that.

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 4>You're making that up.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's all on the public record. And his response

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 3>to things he doesn't like is not to go look,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I disagree with you on that.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 4>One.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Next question, he actually gets angry, and I think that

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 3>says a lot about where the Prime Minister's head is at.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 3>He is supposedly saying behind closed doors that he thinks

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 3>he can win the next election with an increased majority, right.

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I think in his head though, he knows he's in

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 3>a bit of trouble and that's how he gets into

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 3>a position like this. As for the twenty one people

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>seemed in a complaint, I mean, come on, imagine having

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>that much time in your day and loving the Prime

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Minister so much that you would actually write into the

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 3>ABC to say that I think there's a great bastion

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 3>of left wing broadcasting is somehow biased against.

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 5>The Prime mist It actually doesn't surprise me, because if

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 5>you look at the amount of complaints that the ABC

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 5>had over its coverage of the Guars at War, for instance,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 5>the majority of them have accused the ABC of being

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 5>too pro Israel. Its audience is just so starved of

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 5>any balance that when there's any semblance of some even

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 5>just the faintest whiff of it, as there has been

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 5>with the Guys and Conflicts coverage, then there's accusations of bias.

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 5>In this example, it seemed pretty straightforward to me. This

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 5>was a stock standard political interview. It's how it should

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 5>be conducted. You have to ask tough questions of people

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 5>and power, hold them to account, ask for clarification. Sometimes

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 5>that requires interruption, which the host seemed to do fairly,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 5>and that's normal. But the ABC listeners and viewers have

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 5>just come to expect that the broadcaster is a mouthpiece

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 5>for the government.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>We should give some credit to the ABC radio host

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Stuart Brash for taking on the Prime Minister brash by

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 2>nature exactly.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 4>That was the problem.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>It was a little too brash for the gint listens

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 3>of the abbey s. But have you seen the drips

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 3>on x or Twitter as it used to be, who

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 3>complain had nauseum that Insiders on a Sunday Morning has

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 3>turned into some sort of liberal party mouthpiece. There are

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 3>actually ABC viewers out there who watched the ABC and

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>even the ABC is not left wing enough for them.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's the sort of crazies we're talking about here.

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Caroline mentioned Gaza before. You will remember, of course, the

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 3>shocking case last week of two nurses in New South

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Wales who were working at Bankstown Hospital who were caught

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 3>on film saying that they would kill Israeli patients and

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 3>they would refuse to treat them, etc. The New South

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Wales government turned around straight away and said they will

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>never work in a New South Wales hospital again, thank.

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 4>You very much.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the country followed soon after that all

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 3>the other states said they'll never work in our hospitals

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 3>again either. Well, they finally found some supporters. Would you

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 3>believe it amongst a bunch of Islamic groups, Now you

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 3>would think this would be the easiest thing in the world.

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 4>If you want to make the point that.

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 3>We don't actually agree with going that far. We might

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.239
<v Speaker 3>have our disagreements over whose land it is, Israel or Palestine,

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 3>but surely we can all agree that you don't kill

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Israeli patients.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Apparently not.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 3>This is from the odds today, a United Community COMMUNICA

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 3>put together by Stand for Palestine, which was a group

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 3>established and largely run by long standing his book Terrera

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Operatives and his book Terrea is an extremist organization.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 4>We know that, but this has other groups on board

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 4>with it.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 3>It should be noted that the Muslim Votes, Independent Mob etc.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Saying they've slammed.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 3>What they call a coordinated outrage, claiming the response to

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the two nurses comments was manufactured to serve a political narrative.

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>This is the quote from their communicay. The most revealing

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>aspect of the reaction to the nurses video is not

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the footage itself, but the speed, intensity, and uniformity of

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 3>response from certain political leaders and media outlets. It read,

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 3>which was endorsed by more than fifty bodies or leaders

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 3>rang small mosques to statewide or nationwide groups. Outrage is

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 3>manufactured when it serves a political narrative with silence deployed

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 3>when the truth might expose the complicity of those in power.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Silence over what exactly and what sort of feigned outrage?

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what a strange idea that if you heard

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 3>someone saying that they would kill patients on the basis

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 3>of their nationality, that there would.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Be national outrage.

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 3>And oh, some media outlets, every media outlet in the country,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 3>every mainstream media outlet, treated that exactly as it should

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 3>have been treated. Every right thinking person in the country

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 3>treated that exactly how it should have been treated. And

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 3>yet you have more than fifty Islamic bodies in this

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 3>country saying, oh, well, they were treated too harshly. And

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 3>this goes to the point I was making last week

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 3>that when you import religions and cultures that are anathema

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 3>to yours, there will eventually come a point.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Where we start to see the results of that.

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 3>And I think this last week was one of those

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 3>moments where we go, hang on it, we actually have

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 3>a problem here, and then they're backed in by all

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>their compatriots. It proves the point.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 2>This begs a question to me that I've been grappling

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>with for some time, What exactly is the difference between

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 2>moderates and extremists, because I would love someone to explain

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 2>it to me. When you've got the Australian Federation of

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Islamic Councils, when you've got the Islamic Council of Victoria,

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the Islamic Council of Western Australia, these are so called

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 2>moderate Islamic groups signing the same document as Wa Sinhadid,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>who described Jews as the descendants of pigs and monkeys.

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>When you've got shik Ibrahim Dadoun, who said he was

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 2>elated at the October seven attacks on this same communicay

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 2>represented alongside these supposed moderate organizations. If you're moderate, you

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>say no to these extremists having anything to do with

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 2>your statement.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>We've all been involved in.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Politics and community organizations long enough that when joint communicators

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>are put out, you're very specific about who is part

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 2>of it and who is not part of it.

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>How can you be moderate.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 2>When you're allowing people who have said Jews are apes monkeys,

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that October seven was a day of elation. When you

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 2>allow them to be part of your statement, you forfeit

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the right to call yourself a moderate organization. You have

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>become as extreme as those who sign your document, and

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 2>I think we need to stop talking about extremists moderates.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got a real problem here.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Show me who your friends are, and I will tell

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 5>you who you are.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 5>The fact that they have signed a document not only

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 5>with the sheikhs and the hate preachers who you mentioned,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 5>but with his book Terrier, which is not banned in

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Australia shamefully, it should be banned in many other countries,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 5>including Arab countries, for being too extremist, tells you everything

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 5>you need to know about these groups. Not one of

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 5>them has come out and unequivocally condemned, not this incident

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 5>or any of the other anti Submitic incidents, and there

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 5>have been so many since October seven. There's always an

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 5>attempt of minimization, of what aboutism, of reversing the victims

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 5>somehow making these nurses who threatened to kill Israelis and

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 5>have claimed that they've killed Israelis the victims in this episode.

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 5>It's deeply concerning. And then we saw Fatima Payman, the

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 5>former labor and a senator in Western Australia now in independence,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 5>speak out and this is what she had to say

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 5>about it.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 6>These individuals have been fired, banned from ever working as

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 6>nurses again, raided by police, placed under the most intense

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 6>public scrutiny, and now the ones being hospitalized, they've apologized, they.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Have been punished.

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 6>What is the end goal here? What exactly are we

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 6>trying to achieve justice or just public humiliation? We never

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 6>see the same level of anger and vitriol when the

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 6>roles are reversed, and.

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 5>Of course the roles are never reversed. She got I

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 5>was on to mention a case that is before the

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 5>courts of a woman who is a diagnosed schizophrenic who

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 5>drove her car at an Islamic shake that was in

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 5>the papers as well, that was covered, that is before

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 5>the cause. That woman has actually been charged, unlike these nurses,

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 5>which by the way, why haven't they been charged? What

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 5>are police waiting for here? But you know, I just

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 5>it sickens me that these groups cannot call this out

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 5>for what it is, and I think that it tells

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 5>you everything about who they are.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 2>The other hypocrisy here is they say that all of

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 2>this outrage about the nurses who boasted of killing Israeli

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 2>patients and threatened to kill more Fatima Payment says, they

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 2>made some comments.

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>They didn't make no comments.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>They boasted about committing murder and they threatened to do

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>it again.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>That's not just comments.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 5>And one of them was found with morphine in his locker.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 5>They yeah a colleague to help clear out before the

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 5>police could find and as our colleague share remarks and

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 5>exposed earlier tonight, these were just the tip of the iceberg.

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Correct healthcare industry is absolutely infiltrated with this type of

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 5>anti semitism.

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 2>So then Fatima Payment says, this is all just a

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 2>political narrative, and that's what the Communica by fifty Islamic

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>organizations also said. But the hypocrisy here is that Fatima

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Payment is trying to create a political narrative because of

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 2>course she's running again, but now as an independent, she's

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to gather together the Muslim community. Most of these

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 2>Islamic organizations that signed them communicay are all about the

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Muslim voice.

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So if anyone is trying to create a political narrative

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>out of this, it's the Islamic community.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.239
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, they say these outrageous things that oh,

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 2>this is a political narrative, it's a coordinated manufactured outrage

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 2>and we all think, how.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>The heck can they say that? But they're not talking

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to us.

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 2>They're talking to a specific audience of Islamic communities, particularly

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 2>in Western Sydney, that they are trying to gather together

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 2>to create political power. That's what's really going on.

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:05.719
<v Speaker 3>And that was because you know, on the face of it,

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 3>you'd say, how brain did would you have to be

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 3>to say what Patterman Fatima Payment said just then? But

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 3>it's not that she's brain did. It's that Aien, she

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 3>is playing to a certain audience of a certain religion.

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>How scary is that?

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 4>Right? And that is what she is talking about.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 3>She is not talking from a place of Okay, I

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 3>can look at this objectively as a human being and

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 3>recognize that any nurse saying that they would kill anyone

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 3>of any nationality should never work in a hospital.

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Again, no, no, no, no no.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 3>We complicated with the issue of religion, and suddenly there's

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 3>an explanation for why you might say that. There is

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 3>never an explanation for why you would say that, And

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 3>anyone who thinks that there is an explanation for why

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 3>you should say that should be forcibly put on a

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>plane and said elsewhere as far as I'm concerned, now,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 3>I know we can't do that, but this is a

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 3>problem of our own creation.

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 4>That we have for years and years and years allowed.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 3>This to festa in Australia and only now we're really

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 3>seeing the consequences of that. But this is something we've

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 3>done to ourselves. I think that's the saddest part about.

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>But what does it say about the base of those

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>who will become part of Muslim votes or Muslim what's

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 2>it called Muslim voices or.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 5>There's two, there's Muslim votes and Muslim voices.

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 2>Right, So what does it say about their base that

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Fatima Payment believes talking like that is going to appeal

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to the sort of people who will form her key

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>constituency and it's just rank tribalism.

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:37.959
<v Speaker 5>Well, you see it in some of the statements that

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 5>have been made by the candidates that are running out

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 5>of the independent candidates that are running against Tony Burke

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 5>and other labor Labor members in their seats that they

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 5>have come out within most horrendous offensive statements about October seven.

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 5>So it's not really surprising, but the base is filled

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 5>and absolutely trenched with this jew hatred.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I should note that The Australian Tomorrow is reporting that

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Anti Albanzi and Tony Burke were approached to comment on

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 2>this communicate put out by Muslim organizations. Remember some of

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>these Muslim organizations deal with government agencies, and neither the

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister nor the Immigration Minister were willing to comment

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>about it. So Anti Albanzi, for all his talk about

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 2>social cohesion and you know there's no tolerance, no place

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 2>for anti Semitism, you'd think this would be an issue

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 2>that he would nip in the bud speak about immediately.

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he'll talk about it tomorrow, Maybe you'll get around

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 2>to it in three days.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when's the Australian open.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe after that politicians out of office. But because that's

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the thing is, he's got seats in Western Sydney with

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 3>large Muslim populations. Now do I have a story for you.

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 3>This is news you've probably never heard before.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Drum roll please. People think they pay too much tax?

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 3>Now, I know it doesn't sound that extraordinary. Who he

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 3>does we pay too many every other thinks they pay

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 3>too much tax.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 4>But there is actually an organization called Per Capita.

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 3>They're a left wing think take that's been doing polling

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 3>on this for a decade now, and what they've found

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 3>is previously, people who earn more than two hundred thousand

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 3>dollars a year feel like they pay more tax. The

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:20.719
<v Speaker 3>majority of them in this pole have always said they

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 3>pay too much tax. And that's because if you're earning

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 3>that amount of money, you're paying beyond all the other thresholds,

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 3>you've gone through basically fifty cents in the dollar to

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the government. And of course at that point you'd feel like,

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 3>what the hell am I doing this? For fifty cents

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.719
<v Speaker 3>of every dollar I earn goes to the government. But

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 3>what the latest poll is exposed is that for the

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 3>first time ever, people earning eighty grand to one hundred

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 3>grand a year, which is quite a lot of people,

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 3>they now for the first time, feel like they are

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 3>paying too much tax.

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 4>This is from an exclusive report in the Age Today.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 3>It is among those earning between eighty one hundred k,

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 3>fifty five percent said they paid too much tax, a

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 3>six percentage point increase on the proportion recorded in twenty

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty three. Less than forty percent said they pay about

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the right amount. It was the second highest proportion of

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 3>any income group behind only those on more than two

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 3>hundred k year, sixty three percent of whom said they

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 3>were over tax now. They did this polling five months

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 3>after Labor fiddled with the Stage three tax cuts, which

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 3>of course were meant to deliver more tax to people

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 3>or you know that you pay less tax, a bigger

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 3>tax cut to more Australians, particularly those who are in

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 3>that eighty k to one hundred k tax bracket, and

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 3>even after that, they still feel like they're paying more

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 3>tax than they should. The median income in Australia is

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 3>seventy two grand six hundred bucks a year, right, so

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 3>eighty grand to one hundred is very much in that

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 3>middle range, and for the first time ever they feel

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 3>like they're paying too much because they can see what

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 3>the rest of us can see, which is that the

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 3>cost of living has gone through the roof and if

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 3>you look at the tax books, the income tax take

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 3>in the last decade has gone like that. It has

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 3>shot up exponentially, thanks of course to wage growth, but

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 3>also bracket creep. And this is what the government failed

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 3>to address in their fiddled with Stage three tax cut

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>is that bracket creep is the biggest problem our tax

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 3>system faces at the moment where your wages naturally go up,

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 3>and they've gone up significantly potentially because of inflation in

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the last three or four years, but the tax bracket

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 3>hasn't moved with it. So the EIGHTYK that you're earning now,

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 3>which was back sixty five K three or four years ago,

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 3>you're going, hang on a minute, why am I paying

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 3>so much tax? Because government put inflation through the roof

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 3>and then at the end of it decided you should

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 3>give the more of your income.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 2>So bracket creep is one thing, a cost of living

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 2>is the other. I mean, everything has gone through the roof.

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And the other one.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 2>And I give Donald Trump a little bit of credit

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>for this is we've all suddenly become or where because

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 2>of dose of government waste. And I mean, we've done

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 2>dozens and dozens of stories on this program about taxpayer

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 2>money being used for ridiculous things, whether it's our First

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Nations Ambassador, our Climate ambassador, or Kevin Rudd doing drag

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>show parties of his Washington Ambassadorial house or whatever. And

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>people are hyper aware that they're paying all these taxes

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and they're not getting a lot of service for it.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>We've got all sorts of problems with our hospital systems,

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 2>with our schools, but we always seem to have enough

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 2>money for politicians to waste on silly ideas. And I

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 2>should point out this survey comes five months after Anthony

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Albaneze's Stage three tax cuts, So if Elbow was help

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>hoping that those tax cuts were going to sort of

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>soften people's attitudes towards his government, this poll would appear

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>to show that has not worked.

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's not looking good, and I agree. I think

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 5>it's also on top of the other fact as we mentioned,

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 5>where the taxes are going, it seems wasteful. People don't

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 5>agree with where it's going. We talked about some of

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 5>those hate preachers and the people who signed this letter,

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean some of them receive The guy who said

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 5>he was elated over October seven, he got a government grant.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 5>Another one got two million dollars to promote youth programs.

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 5>The secretary of the Lebanese Muslim Association who signed this,

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean the coalition is asking for those sorts of

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 5>taxpayer grants to now be reviewed in light of these statements.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 5>And we've seen so many examples of extremism and anti

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 5>Australian values being pushed by people who get millions and

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 5>millions of dollars in grants. So is it fair that

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 5>hard working Australian Australians are putting so much of their

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 5>income towards taxes. They're not seeing it reflected in our

0:30:55.360 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 5>healthcare services, in our public transport, schools, everything else, but

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 5>they are seeing it go to people who are entirely

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 5>undeserving of receiving a portion of their money their wages.

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 5>So I'm not surprised at all by this. The only

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 5>thing that surprises me is it's taken some people this

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 5>long to realize that they're paying.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>This much tax and the role, and that forty percent

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 2>of people apparently think, no, I'm paying about the right, about.

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 5>Serious not paying any tax, who are just getting benefits

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 5>the role.

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll tell you people in South Australia might be

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit upset about how their money is being

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>used because in trying to slow traffic down, they've decided

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to paint the roads. Now I'll show you in a

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 2>moment what they're doing, but I'm going to point out

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 2>there have been numerous studies done around the world that

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>have demonstrated the more road traffic signs you have, the

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 2>more dangerous the roads and the more likely there are

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 2>to be accidents. I guess because drivers either become distracted

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 2>or drivers figure I don't really need to drive. If

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a sharp bend, there'll be a sign telling me

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a sharp bend, and so I can just sort

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 2>of auto pilot and count on signage to advise me

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>if I need to pay attention. There was one study

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 2>done in the US that the American Authority has decided

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 2>to put on digital signs the number of traffic fatalities

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 2>in certain areas, and they actually found that within ten

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 2>kilometers of a sign pointing out how many traffic fatalities

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>there had been, traffic fatalities went up four point five percent.

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>So they're actually causing more deaths by alerting people to

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 2>how many deaths there had been. Now in Adelaide, they're

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to slow people down to forty kilometers an hour.

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 2>So to trick drivers into slowing down, they've created an

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>optical illusion on the road. You can see them there.

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 2>They're three D optical illusion triangles painted on the road.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 2>They become increasingly smaller and closer together as you drive,

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 2>giving the illusion that you are going faster so that

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you will slow down though you're not actually going faster.

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>It's all an optical illusion, but it's designed to slow

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>you down. I'm not sure how well it's working because

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>some people thought it was an art installation and part

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 2>of the two down Under advertising, which is a big

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 2>cycling event in South Australia, and surely that is a

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>waste of money. Just put up a sign saying forty

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 2>kilometers an hour and let people drive rather than creating

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 2>these three D optical illusions all over the road.

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I will say though, as someone who's driven on quite

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of South Australian roads as an adelaide boy,

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 3>it's better.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Than what they've got at the moment.

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Because in New South Wales actually paint the speed limit

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 3>on the road, so when the speed limit changes, if

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>the sign is obscured by a tree or something, it's

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 3>actually printed on the road for you to see.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 4>They don't do that in South Australia.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 3>So anything to give you an indication that the speed

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 3>limit is changing I think is probably good because I

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 3>think too often you don't know that a speed has

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 3>necessarily changed on a road and goes from sixty to

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 3>fifty to forty to fifty to sixty in all this

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of stuff, and of course they put a speed

0:33:58.240 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 3>camera in the middle of it so they can catch

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 3>you out and make lots of money. Anything they can

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 3>do to alert you to the fact that the speed

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 3>is changing, I think is a good thing.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I was driving in Brisbane a couple of weeks ago

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 2>and they actually had some digital signs and you get

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 2>a green smiley face. Oh and you get a red

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 2>unhappy face if you're going.

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Too quick, which I thought was a little bit being

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>treated like a child.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 5>I feel, well, this is as well, because you're almost

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 5>trying to trick someone into well it is. It's trickery.

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 5>You're trying to trick them into going slower. And I

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 5>just think it would be distracting. I found the concept

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 5>of it confusing enough even to read an article trying

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 5>to explain the idea behind it. Let alone, if I

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 5>saw it on the road, what would I be thinking

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 5>I have to do? I think I'd spent too much

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 5>time trying to interpret this weird visual art than actually

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 5>doing the right thing in my car. So it feels

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 5>like one of those ink blot tests.

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 4>But what does this look like.

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I just I don't think you know what's been done

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 3>in reverse before to make people go faster.

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 4>They've done it in the Burnley tanneling.

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Likeness, and we're in Sydney to me and actually works.

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 3>They found it works because the problem with the Burnley

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Tunnel is you go down a decline and then you've

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 3>got to come up an incline, and.

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 4>Everyone was slowing down on the incline.

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 3>So they put these lights in it that apparently make

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 3>drivers try to chase the light, so it actually makes

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 3>them drive faster.

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd put that everywhere, the thing about the road markings

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in South Australia. Once you know what's happening, so it

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 2>makes you feel like you're driving slower. So once you

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 2>know that, I mean, my mentality is just the foot

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 2>to compensate for the optical illusion and overcome it. So

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how well it's going to work. Before

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 2>we go, We've got to mention jd Vance, who went

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to Munich to make a speech. It was supposed to

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 2>be about the war in Ukraine, but he ended up

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:47.760
<v Speaker 2>talking to political leaders in Europe about what he believes

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 2>is the greatest problem facing Europe.

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's some of what he had to say.

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 7>The threat that I worry the most about visav Europe

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 7>is not Russia, it's not China, it's not any other

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 7>external actor. And what I worry about is the threat

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 7>from within, the retreat of Europe from some of its

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 7>most fundamental values, values shared with the United States of

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 7>America and Britain and across Europe. Free speech, I fear

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.439
<v Speaker 7>is in retreat now.

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Political leaders were very upset about that. How dare he

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 2>criticize them? And there's no problem with free speech in Europe.

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 2>But have a look at CBS sixty minutes report on

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Germany and how police are criminalizing gossip, fake quotes, lies.

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Have a listen. Is it a crime to insult somebody

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in public? Yes, yes, and it's a crime to insult

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>them online as well.

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes. How do people.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>React when you take their phones from them? They are shocked.

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 6>It's a kind of punishment if you lose your smartphone,

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 6>it's even worse than the find you have to pick use.

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Your whole life is typically on your phone.

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, that's a group of government prosecutors that were being

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 2>into and I'm amazed at how they laugh about people's

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>phones being confiscated because they posted some gossip online. They've

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 2>got sixteen police units across the country investigating online speech crimes.

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>In Germany. JD. Vance was onto something.

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 3>G I'm glad I'm not in Germany because I'd be

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 3>up on sixteen charges at least of pointing out your hairline, wouldn't.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I James public insult can't do that. I mean, he

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 4>is absolutely right.

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 3>And if you watch that full speech, Vance is so impressive.

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 3>He just builds the idea that if he's not the

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 3>next Republican candidate for president, then they've got rocks in me.

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 5>Indeed, you know, we have a problem in Australia with

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 5>us too. I mean we laugh and joke about it.

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 5>We're not that far off. We have any Safety Commissioner

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 5>scrubs videos online, we have the toughest defamation laws in

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 5>the world. You can already can't offend people using a

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 5>carriage service, so we're not that far off. Maybe JD.

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 5>Van should come here and speak to.

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Us, if only that'd be good. We're going to go

0:37:59.160 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to a break.

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, look at what's making news tomorrow,

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 2>including consternation about tomorrow's RBA meeting. Will there be a

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 2>rate cut or not all of that and a bit

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 2>more in just a moment.

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, welcome back.

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a look at what's making news in tomorrow's papers.

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll start with a Daily Telegraph and of course the

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 2>news everyone will be sweating on tomorrow will there be

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 2>a rate cut? The headline reads rate expectations, Ossie sweat

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 2>on relief as PM praise for pre election gift. Anthony

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Abenezi is praying he'll be able to bask in the

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>afterglow of an interest rate cut by this afternoon. Of course,

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 2>this is tomorrow's paper, and thousands of Australian households are

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 2>willing the Reserve Bank to give them relief at last.

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Expectations are mounting. Mister Albanezi will call the federal elections

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 2>soon after the rates decision. It's a pretty important one

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 2>for Anthony Albanzi. Though I'm not sure a rate cut

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is really going to change many people's opinions. I read

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 2>one commentator who described a rate cut as like throwing

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 2>a glass.

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Of water on a bush fire.

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 2>If you expect it's going to provide much relief, but

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean things are difficult. The Australian is reporting seven

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty six businesses failed in the month of January,

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 2>and that's the highest ever business rate failure in this

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 2>country for that month. And since labor came to power,

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight thousand businesses have gone into bankruptcy. So Anthony

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Albanezi certainly needs it, the country needs it, but will

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the Reserve Bank give it? Inflation is still a problem,

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 2>the job market is still hot, and if they give

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a rate cut, is it seen as an economically wise

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 2>decision or is it seen as appeasing a government that

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Let's face it, Jim Charmers and other labor MPs came

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 2>out today really piling on the pressure for Michelle Bullet to.

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Make this decision to cut rates.

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 3>I suspect they will have a cut, but I think

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 3>it'll be the only one for quite some time. I

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 3>think it's the have a mind to give it a

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 3>go and see what happens, and then on the they

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 3>want to monitor the effects of that before they make

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 3>any further decisions. So I wouldn't be hopeful of having

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 3>multiple cuts this year. Maybe you get another one or

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 3>two after that, but I think they'll probably have a cut,

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 3>see what happens and monitor the situation. But any political

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 3>benefit I think that the government could get out of

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 3>a cut.

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Is long gone. Now.

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 3>If we were talking about a rate cut before the

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 3>end of last year, and then potentially another one or

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 3>two before an election, maybe you could make an argument

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 3>that it was something the government could say, Look, you know,

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 3>we're back on track now, we're going in the right direction.

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.399
<v Speaker 4>We need you to support us to finish the job.

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 4>With one rate cut potentially under their belt. I don't

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 4>think they're able to set up as well.

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 5>I still see why a lot of people are putting

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 5>the money on the fact that the government will call

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 5>an election soon because it's the first potential bit of

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 5>good news in a long time. So even though it

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 5>might not change things magnificantly, what else can we expect

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 5>to see? This is the time nothing they have to

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 5>go so I can see, you know, this weekend next weekend.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 5>If there is a right cut, then the election good will.

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 2>But of course if they don't go, then they're going

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to have to deliver a budget they do not.

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Why would you want to do that. Let's go to

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 3>the Australian to borrow where it says set to schools compo.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 3>When former Victorian C if emmy you boss. John Secker,

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 3>who spent decades working for the Militant Construction Union, has

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 3>won limited acceptance of his workers' compensation claim, alleging he

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 3>is suffering from post traumatic stress disorder and will have

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 3>his medical expenses paid.

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 4>The article also goes on to say that he.

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Will be awarded weekly payments totaling three thousand, six hundred

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 3>and thirty six dollars for the period of November twenty

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to December seventeen last year, but he won't get anything

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 3>after December seventeen because they've decided that he wasn't incapacitated

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 3>to work after that.

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I find it rather amusing.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 3>That's, you know, such a thug as John Secker, who

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 3>ran the union in the way he did, ran roughshod

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:09.280
<v Speaker 3>over everyone, went in and took over the South Australian branch,

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:14.439
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. Was then suffering PTSD after everything that he did.

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, that's what has been found.

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 5>The people that he bullied and all the thugs who

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.919
<v Speaker 5>worked under him, who bullied people out of jobs, and

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 5>just the most horrendous abuse that people faced on job

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 5>sites under this bloke, and how he treated his enemies,

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 5>his political enemies. It's just I wonder if they'll be

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 5>entitled to compensation how they all feel reading this news

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:40.399
<v Speaker 5>in the.

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Morning, would have thought anyone dealing with the CFMU should

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 2>be exactly you've got The.

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 5>Herald see the Herald Son has a story about two

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 5>thirds of Year ten and more than half of Year's

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 5>six students in Victoria lack basic political knowledge. Now this

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 5>is according to a national rapport The Australian so I

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 5>was carrying the story on the front page. Experts are

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 5>wanting over crisis in political and civics education as the

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 5>proportion of students meeting standards has plunged to twenty year lows.

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:16.359
<v Speaker 5>And they also found that many students were concerned about diversity,

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 5>indigenous issues, pollution, climate change and racism. I wonder why

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 5>that might be nothing to do with ideology among the

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 5>teachers or in the curriculums.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Funny about that, isn't it.

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 3>The first column I ever had published in a newspaper

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 3>January the seventh, twenty fifteen, just over ten years ago, when.

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 4>I was fifteen years old, was on this topic.

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Was about the fact that young people don't understand politics.

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Because there was a discussion going on at the time,

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I think being led by the Greens about a reducing

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 3>booting age to sixteen.

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 4>And I've made the point you.

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Could potentially talk about that at a later date, but

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 3>you can't do that when we haven't actually equipped people

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 3>to understand how the political system works.

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 4>And you know, when I was at school, it was no.

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Secret I was a bit of a political nerd and

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I would be asked questions by other students like who's

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 3>the president of Australia.

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is basic staff, but it's not.

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Taught, yep.

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 2>But climate change, indigenous issues, all of that, our kids

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:22.720
<v Speaker 2>are right across. Let's go to the Gold Coast Bulletin

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the front page story, there alarm over silent killer in

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 2>homes and if you guess the silent killer is e scooters,

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:32.240
<v Speaker 2>you'd be right. The head of the Queensland Fire Department's

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.760
<v Speaker 2>investigation unit has issued a warning over residents charging scooters

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 2>inside their homes, calling it a recipe for disaster. He

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 2>said that fire crews were responding to lithium ion battery

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:46.959
<v Speaker 2>fires multiple times a week. I've lost count of how many.

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 2>It blows my mind, he said. And of course the

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 2>problem with lithium batteries. Is even if you managed to

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 2>put the fire out, they can spontaneously reignite again after that.

0:44:57.680 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 2>And so they're warning people if you're going to charge

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 2>your scooter, don't do it while you're asleep, don't do

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 2>it while you're out, don't put the scooter in the

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 2>in front of an exit where you're going to be

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 2>unable to escape if it catches fire.

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're better off just walking. Caleb.

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, if it catches on fire, I think you

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 3>should be charged with a salt and battery. I just

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 3>want to note as well, on the front of that

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Gold Coast bulletin page, if we can get it there,

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 3>there's a thing down the bottom and says time to

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 3>go nude. I'm not sure who called for that or

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 3>why they called for that, but there you go.

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:27.959
<v Speaker 4>That's what goes on on the Gold Coast.

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 3>And very quickly before we go to a break, another

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary front page on the Newcastle Herald, Jawsome fishermen have

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 3>captured spectacular pictures of a five meter great white shark

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 3>they encountered during an annual game fishing competition off the

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 3>coast of Port Stevens that is possibly one of the

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 3>scariest things.

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 4>You could ever say.

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, imagine you just reel it in a fish

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 3>and this big, great white comes at you. I'd have

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to go and buy a whole new set of underpants. Right.

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm amazed he got the photo rather than and took off.

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Good work by whoever it was that took that photograph.

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:03.280
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go to a break when we come back.

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 2>The USA take on Canada in the ice hockey, but

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 2>not much ice hockey was played.

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll show you why in just a second.

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, the rivalry between the United States and Canada was

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 2>already well known, but it was made worse when Donald

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump threatened to put tariffs on Canada and then suggested

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 2>that Canada should become the fifty first state.

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Of the US.

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 2>He then started referring to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Governor Trudeau.

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So tensions were already high.

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 2>When the USA took on Canada in an ice hockey

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 2>game over the weekend. When the American anthem was played,

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the crowd in Montreal booed. When the American players were introduced,

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the crowd in Montreal booed.

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the game started.

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually the game didn't really start is what actually happened.

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Ka Chuck Brothers around the ace, King Jack eckl Jo.

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Run away Kutchuck, Brendon Hoog right off for help.

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 2>There were three fights in the first nine seconds of

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 2>that game, and canab this is why we love ice hockey.

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, I didn't know, but apparently this is like a

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 3>traditional thing in American ice hockey that they all just

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 3>punch on. I mean, we've got to bring back the

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 3>a fil that once upon a time, that's how things went.

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 4>The VFL said sanitized the.

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 5>Afl UFC on frozen water.

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Look.

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 5>Speaking of the US and Trump's Trump's controversial statements, Well,

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 5>he did a lap recently of the Daytona five hundred.

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 5>This is the NASCAR big car racing event, I'm told,

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 5>apparently not knowing much about car racing myself, and he

0:47:56.440 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 5>did a lap of it in his big car, the Beast,

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 5>and he made a few comments to the drivers as

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:03.959
<v Speaker 5>he did.

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 6>So this is your favorite president.

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:10.720
<v Speaker 1>A BIF fan, I am a really big fan of.

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, but I just want.

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 7>You to be cheap now.

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>The people are a great people in Americans.

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 6>Have a good day, you have a lot of fun,

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 6>and I'll be later.

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, when we first saw this, we thought, is

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 5>this parody? We had to check, but it is. It's

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:29.440
<v Speaker 5>Trump speaking to the driver.

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 6>I know.

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:31.799
<v Speaker 3>It's just like a lot of things with Trump, you'd

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 3>think it's parody, right, just like the fact that he's

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 3>put up his mug shot at the entrance to the

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Oval Office. If you go to visit the President, that

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 3>is what you are met with. I mean, this is

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 3>why we love the guy, right, apart from the fact

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 3>that he's actually reforming America, he's brought entertainment back to politics,

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 3>and thank heavens for that.

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>He certainly has.

0:48:51.080 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of entertainment, don't go anywhere because coming up in

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 2>just a moment is to read a penny show.

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Good Night,