WEBVTT - The Media Show | 14 March

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Vince is the Media Show.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to the Media Show. I'm Caroline Derusso.

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on the show tonight.

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 2>And the ABC's new managing director starts in the job

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 2>on Monday.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to wrestle the Beast? Or can we

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>expect more of the same?

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>CNN, Well, it drops its bundle this week with example

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>after example of everyone and everything being racist, fascists and transphobic.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>And the ABC's Four Corners does a hit piece on

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 2>the Australian War Memorial and as per usual, being a

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 2>bit light on for alternative perspectives. But first, the Australian

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Energy Regulator has released a draft decision to lift price

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 2>caps for hundreds of thousands of customers on energy company's.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Default offers from July one.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>And what was the rationale from The Sydney Morning Herald

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>in its reporting, Well, a year of low wind and rain,

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>sudden cold, generator breakdowns and elevator fossil fuel costs pushed

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 2>up wholesale prices. Now cap rises could increase household power

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>bills by up to two hundred dollars a year, and

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 2>the SMH did acknowledge that this was a problem for

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanezi and that prices had risen despite assurances from

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Albo and Co prior to the last election. Anyway, it

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>went on to refer to comments by the Energy Minister

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>which went totally unchallenged. It said Bowen said more renewables

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>were needed to cut prices and attacked the Opposition for

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 2>its energy policy, which includes building nuclear power plants across

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the country and limiting the rollout of renewable energy. Here

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>is what Bowen had to say in his presser.

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>One of the reasons for this decision today is spikes

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 3>caused by coal fire power stations breaking down. Not a

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 3>day in the last two years have we had a

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>call fire POWERstation not breakdown somewhere in Australia. Not talking

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 3>about plan maintenance. I'm talking about unexpected breakdowns which sends

0:01:58.360 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the energy prices spike.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, back to the SMH and it went on to

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>say that Dutton has criticized the government's eggs in one

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>basket renewables policy and set a balanced energy mix including

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>gas and nuclear was needed. He has claimed that the

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>opposition's nuclear policy would cut energy bills by forty four

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>percent by twenty fifty and that experts, including the CSIRO

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 2>have rejected that claim, stating that a grid dominated by

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>renewables and backed by massive expansion in transmission lines, pumped

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>hydro and batteries would be significantly cheaper. But SMH readers

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>would know that the reasoning colon gass are so expensive

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 2>is because of labour's crippling net zero laws. A mistruth

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>repeated that renewables are bringing down power prices. Of course

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 2>they're quick to debunk Dutton, but offer no scrutiny of

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the Energy Minister.

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Interesting.

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 2>The piece was published at nine oh six am yesterday,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>but was heavily updated.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>At six twenty two pm last night.

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Thankfully, Simon Benson at The Australian pulled the hend and

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>break up on the Energy Minister, noting that Bowen's default

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 2>position on prices is to blame the industry rather than

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge the pressure's labor policy has injected into the market,

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>and signs off by stating that the Albanesi government has

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 2>had three years to fix this problem. Subsidizing power bills

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 2>is not the long term answer. Well, that sounds pretty logical,

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>But here is Bowen's solution, again unchallenged by the SMH

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>and other soft left media.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 3>I think these figures show an important opportunity to remind

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Australians that you can do better and shop around for

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>a better deal. Now we've made it easier and the

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Albanezi government to switch energy providers. And there are two

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>websites which are very.

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Useful joining me now on the Panelisky News contributor Louise

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Roberts and Radio to Double C hosts Steven China Tempo Louise. Look,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>we can all see that power prices are going up.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 2>It's happening before our very eyes, and yet no substantive

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>criticism of the minister. How can that sort of balance

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>not be present given the significance of this particular energy issue.

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, the federal government and Chris Bowen's failure to deliver

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 4>on their promise of a two hundred and seventy five

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 4>dollars cut to our power bills is shameful to all

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 4>Australians and I would include readers of the SMH in

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 4>that so. Feasibly, they should expect their publication of choice

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 4>to challenge the government on this, rather than use it

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 4>as an opportunity to pump out propaganda about how coal

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 4>fired power is to blame for these sky high power prices.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 4>It just beggars belief that they haven't actually gone in

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 4>and actually addressed the key issue, which is why is

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 4>our power so expensive? And what's the government doing about

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 4>it when they claim to have fixed it, when of

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 4>course clearly they haven't. You think you're reading it's some

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of alternative publication rather than a mainstream newspaper.

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>And Steve, we just need to shop around. That's it,

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>nothing more. I find that obviously extraordinary from the Energy minister.

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 2>But we know that renewable energy isn't cheaper, and we

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 2>know that manufacturing nations across.

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The world rely on nuclear.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>How is that context, which quite frankly is pretty important.

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>It's always missed or diminished.

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a couple of points here.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the first thing is shop around for what

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 6>for a bunch of energy providers who have all seen

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 6>their cost go up, So no matter where you go,

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 6>your energy prices are going up. And how's that two

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 6>hundred and seventy five dollars discount going.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 5>By the way. But the reality is here that I

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 5>think a lot of media.

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 6>Outlets are afraid to challenge the CSIRO who have got

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 6>their figures wrong and anybody who digs a little bit

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 6>deeper into how they've come up with their numbers, you

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 6>can actually see the flaw in their modeling. But I think,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, I've always maintained a lot of journalists are

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 6>lazy and they'll just use whatever drops in their lap,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 6>and if the CSIRO comes out and says the sky

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 6>is green, then that's what they'll run with. But if

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 6>you dig a little bit deeper and find out why

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.559
<v Speaker 6>the sky is green, you see that the modeling doesn't

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 6>actually take into account the full cost of the renewables

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 6>roll out, particularly the rewiring of Australia, and it doesn't

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 6>also allow for the longevity of nuclear power plants. But

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 6>the thing that Chris Bowen misses here is the reason

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 6>that col fight power stations are breaking down is because

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 6>there's no certainty for the operators to actually maintain them

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 6>because they don't know when they're going to be switched off.

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Onto our next topic, and the Trump arrangement syndrome afflicted

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>lefties while they've joined ALBO to have asok about the

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 2>USA's position on tariffs, carrying on like jilted lovers, how

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>can they not care about us anymore? Trump is such

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 2>a big meaning now. Matthew Not from the SMH went

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 2>with the special friendship is over.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump doesn't care about Australia.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Also at the SMH, Peter Hartch's piece was titled Trump

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 2>has done us a favor by showing us where we

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 2>stand during peacetime. Nikki Hutley the Guardian proffered Trump's senseless

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 2>tariffs will extend the economic malaise felt by so many

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 2>in Australia and around the world. According to the Guardian,

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 2>this is a painful global lesson into why we should

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>listen to rather than denigrate the experts. I think there's

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>a few people who would be.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>To differ anyway. And Bernard Keane or he got the

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>strops on.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>As well, because albow, he must ignore the boot lickors,

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 2>get off his knees and punch back at Trump. Meanwhile, thankfully,

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>others took a more practical approach, pointing out that while

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 2>some of these should be a wake up call for

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the government, the correct response is to get serious about

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 2>improving the Australian economy, diversifying our trade, and there is

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 2>no point in bashing the Yanks. For example, Robert Godlibson,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>as per usual, arrived with some common sense. The US

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 2>snubs Australia, but there are ways. Here's how we can offset.

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump's tariffs, Steve.

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Look, Granted, it's a pretty unfriendly thing for an ally

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to do, but is the media Are they covering for

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>a lackluster government performance here?

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Look, to a certain extent they are.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 6>But look, I don't buy into the all in with

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 6>Trump mentality of some people on the right. I mean,

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 6>Trump can be wrong, and with these tariffs he is wrong,

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 6>not only from a perspective of his relationship with Australia

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 6>and his other partners, but it's not good for the

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 6>American economy either. I don't necessarily think he understands what

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 6>these tariffs do, because he made the comment the other

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 6>day that these tariffs are going to raise so much

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 6>money that he won't know what to spend it on. Well,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 6>if they work, they won't raise a single dollar. That's

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 6>how tariffs work. But the reality is here that yeah,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 6>I mean the media in this country, all certain sections

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 6>of the media have been running cover for the government

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 6>for the whole three years they've been in and we

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 6>can't despite the fact that I think America has done

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 6>the wrong thing by Australia in this we can't discount

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 6>the inability of the Australian government to maintain our most

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 6>important partnership. Now, you can blame Trump all you like,

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 6>but we can't even get a phone call with the

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 6>bloke because our government's on the nose. Why because we've

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 6>got Australia's second worst prime minister in Washington as our ambassador,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 6>Australia's worst ever prime minister in the lodge who can't

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 6>even get a phone call with the president, and Australia's

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 6>third worst ever prime minister and Malcolm Turnbull sniping from

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 6>the sideline. So it put all that together, why would

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 6>the American administration want to talk to us? So once

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 6>the adults get back into power, I think we can

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 6>probably smooth this over. But you're not going to hear

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 6>that from certain media outlets.

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't hold back, Steve and Louise.

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Look, does our domestic media take too narrow of you

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 2>on these sorts of things?

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think they do. I mean to Stephen's point

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 4>as well, that you know they have to look at

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 4>this globally and actually work out what the strategy is

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 4>for dealing with the fact that we now have these

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 4>tariffs instead of making it all about the sort of

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.359
<v Speaker 4>anti Trump narrative and sort of weeping into their lattes

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 4>about the end of the special relationship between the US

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 4>and Australia, which of course is nowhere near close to

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 4>the truth at all. So I would like to see

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 4>a bit more discussion, a bit more robust discussion about

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 4>what it means now. I mean, Robert's piece was a

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 4>classic example of that. I think, as you've pointed out, Caroline.

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 2>And look, while that discussion, well that rages I should say,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and Steve, you made the point. Here is the snippet

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>from the Miserable Ghost chiming.

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 5>In, I do not leave.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 7>You should give in to bullies right now? What Trump's

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 7>Trump wants people to suck up to him and to

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 7>be sick a fantic pretty much all the people I've

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 7>seen international leaders that have sucked up to Trump and

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 7>been sickerphans have been run over.

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>And then Sarah Ferguson follows up with what I'm pretty

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 2>sure was the question on everyone's mind, and the response

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 2>was just astounding.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 8>Is it easier and better for Australia in this acute

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 8>moment when the tariff decision is obviously being made if

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 8>diplomacists are given the maximum opportunity to operate behind closed

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 8>doors without your intervention.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 7>I never thought I'd have to defend free speech here

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 7>on the seven point thirty report, and I'm glad you're

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 7>you're you're a little bit.

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 5>Embarrassed raising that with me.

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Defending free speech.

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Louise I thought that was a pretty fair question by

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Ferguson.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely a fair question because as a former Prime minister,

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Malcolm tambull is in a very position he has to

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 4>weigh up this sort of ego boost of commenting on

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 4>issues over which he no longer has any jurisdiction versus

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the potential damage his comments can cause, particularly to the

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 4>current Prime Minister of calls Anthony Albanezi. And by extension,

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 4>I would add Peter Jutton as the Opposition leader to.

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 5>That as well.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 4>So for him to just sort of then try and

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 4>weaponize it as free speech, and look, I support free speech.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 4>He's entitled to his comments, but he has to be

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 4>very careful what he says going forward as well, like

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 4>any ex prime minister does.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And Steve, look, I know the media they love to have,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, past politicians commentate on things that happens all

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>of the time. I'm even surprised by Timbull with the

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 2>approach that he took, and I'm probably giving him a

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit more credit.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Obviously Trump didn't hold back on him.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>That just sets everything back as far as I'm concerned,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, for Australia.

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 5>And that's the point.

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 6>And I made this comment earlier in the week on

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 6>Chris Kenny's program that Malcolm Turnble's actually right in some

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 6>of the comments he's made, but making them isn't helpful.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 6>And the reality is that you can talk about free

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 6>speech all you like, but free speech has consequences, and

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 6>when a former prime minister decides to insert himself in

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 6>to aggrandize his own ego rather than actually help the country,

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 6>it does set things back. You know, He's right, Trump

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 6>does want sick of fans, but it doesn't help for

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 6>a former prime minister of the country when we're in

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 6>these negotiations to come out and call Trump out for

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 6>what he thinks of him.

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 5>That is not going to help anybody.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 6>And the consequences of Malcolm Turnble's free speech is that

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 6>once again he's put himself ahead of the country, which

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 6>well he did for his entire Prime ministership didn't he.

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, there is that, and I think you'll find some

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 2>people who would sympathize with that view.

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Steve now on to our friends at the ABC and

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Hugh Marx, Well he starts as ABC's managing director on Monday.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 2>David Anderson, the former managing director, will he tap the

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 2>mat and parted ways with the public broadcaster and the

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 2>new era is here also all of us long suffering

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 2>tax payers hope anyway.

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Columnists for the AFR Pro Gowart offered.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Some long overdue and probably really refreshing advice, suggesting a

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Doge like efficiency is the fix for the ABC's news bias.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 2>Steve is an efficiency rinse at the ABC.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, it sounds delightful to me. Is that what it needs?

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 6>Look, I'd love to go over and check it out,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 6>but unfortunately my unicorns at the vets this week, so

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 6>I can't ride into the ABC and see how their

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 6>efficiency is going. But yeah, maybe get rid of getting

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 6>rid of twice daily mail deliveries and tea ladies and

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 6>all that kind of thing might be a start, But

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 6>also maybe go back to its charter. Look, I think

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 6>Prue gowit's onto something here. But I think she might

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 6>be a little bit delusional thinking it's going to happen.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, fair enough, And Louise, does the new managing director

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>know what is coming?

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Does he know what is getting in for? Will he

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>manage or will he join the collective?

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's hope he does not join the collective because

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 4>the biggest challenge for him is making the ABC cost

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 4>efficient and relevant to all of Australia. So that's an

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 4>enormous task ahead of him and one he'll be acutely

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 4>aware of a nodes that all eyes will be on

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 4>him and trying to make that work. It's interesting though,

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 4>because when he was leading Channel nine quite successfully, he

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 4>was critical of the ABC and made a point I

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 4>think of several years back, suggesting that Channel nine was

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 4>thirty percent more efficient in production costs than the ABC,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 4>and he also said the ABC should focus on content

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 4>that is not offered by the private sector, so that

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 4>maybe would suggest it he'll take a knife to certain

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 4>areas in order to shore up that budget. So it'll

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 4>be very interesting to see what's ahead. He also has

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 4>to work with Kim Williams. I think that you have

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 4>to be very careful that he's looking at it in

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 4>a pragmatic sense and not an ideological sense. So all

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 4>eyes on you, Marks, I would.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Think absolutely, and let's see how he goes with.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Nailing that jello to the wall.

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Luise, Robert Stephen China Tempo, thank you so much for

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 2>your time. Now after the break and everything it's Dan

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 2>is racist, fascists and transphobic. We have that and more

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>on the death throes of the mainstream media in the US.

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the show and now to Stars and Gripes,

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>where we tear about the actions of the bitter activist

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 2>masquerading as journalists in the United States. And joining me

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>this week is Sky News contributor Kosher Gada and Kosher,

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 2>we think the tariff debate is hated here in Australia.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Here it is playing out in the US between Press

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Secretary and Caroline Levett and AP journalist Josh bog When

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 2>he was.

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 9>On the campaign trail, his big push was on tax cuts.

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 10>He's going there today as he's proposing tax heights in

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 10>a form of terrorists.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Now and I'm curious he's now for why.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 11>He's prioritizing that over the tax cuts.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 9>He's actually not implementing tax hikes. Tariffs are a tax

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 9>haike on foreign countries that again have been ripping us off.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 9>Tariffs are a tax cut for the American people. And

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 9>the President is a staunch advocate of tax cuts.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>As you know, he campaigned on no.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 9>Taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, no taxes on

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 9>social security benefits. He is committed to all three of

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 9>those things, and he expects Congress to pass them later

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 9>this year.

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 7>I'm sorry, have you.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 5>Ever paid a terre? Because I have.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 6>Don't get charged on foreign companies, they get charged on

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 6>the importers.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 9>And ultimately, when we have fair and balanced trade, which

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 9>the American people have not seen in decades, as I

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 9>said at the beginning, revenues will stay here, wages will

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 9>go up, and our country will be made wealthy again.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 9>And I think it's insulting that you are trying to

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 9>test my knowledge of economics and the decisions that this

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 9>president has made. I now regret giving a question to

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 9>the Associated Press.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And lasse hous Nicole Wallace will she fied back with

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>these I.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 12>Mean, she's a wash and regret and re Morrison offense.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 12>But she's either tragically uninformed or lying. There is no

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 12>economists that's been tapped to sit in Donald Trump's cabinet,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 12>who would testify under oath to what she just said, quote,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 12>tariffs are a tax cut for the American people. Simply

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 12>the opposite is reality kosher.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>This is all becoming pretty hated. Who's the casualty here?

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 13>Great to be with the Caroline, You know, I think

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 13>that this one is a little bit of a roarershock

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 13>test because tariffs are a controversial issue, as we all know,

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 13>and there are many on both sides of the political

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 13>isle who do not agree with it. It goes against

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 13>fifty years or so of free market theory and economics

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 13>and all of that. So to them, they would have

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 13>seen it as a win for the other side, for

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 13>the AP journalists. And then there's a whole bunch of

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 13>people who just understand the concept of fair and balanced trade,

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 13>as Caroline Lovett put it. They like the idea of

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 13>re orienting America from a consumer driven society to a

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 13>production driven society. And even if that means consumer pricing

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 13>for goods go up little bit, if it brings back

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 13>manufacturing and jobs and everything that comes with that society

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 13>lead back home, that's a win. So for those folks.

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 13>I think they'd be a team. Caroline Lovett over there.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 13>I think another thing that was interesting too is in

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 13>the follow up question that the AP journalist asked. He

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 13>was a little bit pejorative, where he questioned her like,

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 13>have you ever paid a tariff?

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Because I have?

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 13>And what that really was? I think the very lead

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 13>There is a war of credibility between the two, and

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 13>it's worth remembering. You know, she flipped that on him.

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 13>She didn't let that slide. She said, you know, you're

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 13>questioning my understanding of economics. It's worth remembering journalists typically,

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 13>not all, but typically, and certainly he, because I looked

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 13>up his background, is not an economist either. He's never

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 13>run a business as far as I can tell, so

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 13>he doesn't actually have practical understanding of how tariffs could

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 13>be absorbed along the supply chain. And so for him

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 13>to question her credibility, I don't think he came across

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 13>as particularly credible either. And that goes back to that

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 13>roarershock test. I think of how people are going to

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:52.719
<v Speaker 13>see that exchange.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but it was a very very interesting exceriences, like

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you have to say, and the US show the view well,

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 2>it provides us with some of our more unhinged content,

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I would say, and this ran from Whoopi Goldberg while

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 2>trans woman Dylan.

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Mulvaaney was on the show.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think this left pretty much everyone speechless.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 14>The problem that the trans community is facing, and it's

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 14>the same problem that women face, is if you don't

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 14>know anything about our bodies, you don't know how it works.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 14>So when you come in and you say, oh, you

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 14>know these men, these are men, you know, competing and

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 14>competing against women, you're assuming that the women are weak

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 14>and just can't do anything yourself.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 14>Have you seen female athletes? They know what they're doing.

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 14>So I'm not sure what's going on or why.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 5>This is an issue.

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 14>The same for me as when people say, oh, you know,

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 14>I don't know how I feel about you.

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 4>You do.

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 14>God doesn't make mistakes, And the challenge is not to

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 14>the trans people, is to the people who are not trans.

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 14>That's what God is looking to see.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>How you treat people. Yeah, that's what that value is.

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 14>Happy.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Even Dilla Monviny looks uncomfortable, does what we think she's

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 2>helping here?

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 10>On some level?

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 13>I hope she does think that because that was quite

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 13>the rant. You know, this issue is one of the

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 13>few that's an eighty twenty issue. Eighty percent of the

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 13>American electorate agrees that boys should not be playing in

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 13>girls sports, men should not be playing in women's sports,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 13>regardless of how you believe or feel about the trans

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 13>community and what rights they should be eligible for or not,

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 13>and all the rest of it. This is a very

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 13>unifying issue. It was a big, high contrast moment in

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 13>the presidential election. It was actually the reason why Trump

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 13>won a lot of those suburban moms and people groups

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 13>like that that he was typically softer with and not

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 13>didn't have as much support with.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 4>They really rallied.

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 13>Behind him on this issue. So she seems to be

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 13>doubling down to that twenty p As for you know

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 13>how she tried to frame it as, oh, you know,

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 13>women athletes know what they're doing, and she tried to

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 13>flip it as though it's sort of denigrating women. Ask

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 13>any of them, from Riley Gaines to Peton McNabb who

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 13>was injured because of a biological male spiking volleyball in

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 13>her face. There is a reality to this. It's common sense.

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 13>Everybody sees it. But she's she's one of the last

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 13>true believers Carolines. So I think that's where she's going

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 13>to stick.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Without twenty percent, She's going to be very lonely very soon.

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 2>During Trump's recent joint speech to Congress, he.

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 15>Said this eight billion dollars for making mice transgender.

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 5>This is real.

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 2>C and N went on to fact check that comment,

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>claiming that Trump's statement was false. Anyway, the White House

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>released the information on quite literally gender transition treatments given

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 2>to animals like mice, showing that Trump's claim was true.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>CE and N.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, then it backtracked on its fact check.

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>This is all quite confusing.

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 2>And then say an a guess go on to say

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 2>this totally unchallenged.

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't really need the transgender mice, do we?

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it is I'm sorry man, it's real. Listen,

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 5>is it real or not?

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 16>Hold a second?

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 5>Did we did we have to did we have to

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 5>say it was real or not? It's real?

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean was a sheep?

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 16>So my point listen, what they weren't talking about trans

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 16>don't defend the mice. No, no, listen, you don't want

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 16>to talk about it.

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 15>We don't talk about it.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 16>But and then this, I would also like to see

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 16>this done with honesty. When the president comes in and

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 16>says we're giving all this money for transgender mice, and

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 16>it's transgenic mice which actually help us fight cancer. Or

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 16>when we say, oh we cut eight billion, it was

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 16>actually eight million. You're not doing this in an honest

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 16>and transparent way, and even worse, you are pretending to

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 16>be transparent when you are not. And you know, if

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 16>this was a movie or a book and this person

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 16>cut the Department of Education then showed an absolute lack

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 16>of understanding of government in his behavior, he'd be like,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:04.959
<v Speaker 16>that was too on the nose. You can't have him

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 16>cutting the d wee and then not knowing enough to

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 16>do his job. The incompetence is.

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Ranked kosher CNN, along with much of the mainstream. Maybe

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 2>they've got a bit of work to do, you know,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 2>patching their credibility back together.

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Carry on like this.

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Again, and we've talked about this already earlier in the show.

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>How does this help?

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, they do have just a little bit of work

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 13>to do to patch up their credibility, for sure. This

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 13>is another one where they're missing the forest for the

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 13>trees and they're just splicing these details about. You know,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 13>it's transgenic instead of transgender. I actually don't know what

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 13>that means, or the dollar amount was not exactly precise,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 13>And they're getting into semantics about what the purpose of

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 13>the experiment was. Was it just about converting mice or was

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 13>it using them as a lab model to figure something

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 13>out for humans. Nobody cares. That's minutia that they're splicing

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 13>the details. The big picture that people care about is

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 13>that there is unlimited, crazy amounts of fraud, waste, and

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 13>abuse in the government that Trump is actually doing something

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 13>about for the first time in decades. Everybody talks about it,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 13>nobody's done it. He's doing something with it through DOGE

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 13>and other means. And also the transition that we just

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 13>talked about is another eighty twenty issue. So nobody wants

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 13>to see this stuff. And what they're doing is they're

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 13>falling in the frame of like arguing in details and

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 13>missing the big picture. I guess on purpose, and I

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 13>don't think that's going to go very far to repair

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 13>their credibility, which has many issues with it. And this

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 13>is the wrong path for sure.

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 2>And just going on from that, you know, many things

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 2>should have been really obvious in the last presidential election,

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 2>including you know Americans, they seek of illegal immigration, they're

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>seek of government wise, they're seek of feeling as though

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>everyone gets put ahead of Americans. Obviously, the Democrats, they

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 2>blame sexism and racism for Kamala's loss, despite the fact

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 2>that she was.

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Legitimately a terrible candidate. And this blame Doge for Look

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just watch the video yourself.

0:24:56.280 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 10>There are people who are charged with trying to find savings. So, yes,

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 10>it's an attack on government, but it's also an attack

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 10>on this government. What I mean by that is it's

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 10>an attack on this government that used to be headed

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 10>by a black man. It's an attack on this government

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 10>that almost elected a black woman to the highest office

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 10>in the land. It's an attack on a government that

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 10>has been more welcoming and more supportive of people who

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 10>have come to this country and search for a better life.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Kosher doje is racist?

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Again? Do these people refuse to learn.

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 13>That old chestnut? It's such a trustee argument for them,

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 13>and it has worked for a period of time. Label

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 13>everybody racist, sexist, misogynist, you know, whatever the slur is.

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 13>And he's going back to that. And I also love

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 13>how he was going back to President Obama, who was

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 13>legitimately very popular, even though many people from the right

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 13>side of politics obviously did not agree with most of

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 13>his policy agenda. He was a gifted politician and was

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 13>very popular. So I think he's trying to attach that

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 13>or claim to the golden years of the Democrat Party,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 13>which is the Obama years, and say that this is

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 13>an attack on that, even though most of the spending

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 13>has been in place for decades and decades and decades

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 13>well before Obama, not only from him. So it made

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 13>no sense. But I think it's just like a very

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 13>intellectually lazy argument to make, and when all else fails

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 13>and you're on camera, go to racism.

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Every time, and it seems to work for them.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>It seems to go totally unchallenged, and then we just

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 2>we stay exactly where we are without improving that position.

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Kosher Gata, thank you so much for your time.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 2>After the break, and we have the low lights of

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the ABC this week, including a hit piece on the

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Australian War Memorial.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Jared Henderson joins me next.

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back and joining me now, as he does each

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and every week, This Guy News, Australia's media watched your columnist,

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Jared Henderson Jared Lovely to have you back and look

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 2>while reporting on Trump's decision to you know, slap to

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Braffs on Australia.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>ABC.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Journo Melissa Clark made this astonishing claim on Our and Breakfast.

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 17>Their argument is somewhat undercut by someone from their own side.

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 17>Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull yesterday saying whilst he was

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 17>able to secure an exemption last Trump administration, that took

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 17>over a year, and the circumstances this time are very different.

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Turnbull on the Liberal side, well, it's been a

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>long time and I'm not quite so sure about that.

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>How about this?

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 2>If I said the name Peter Dutton, what one word

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 2>springs into your mind?

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Thug jered, What was your reaction?

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 15>I found it pretty funny actually, because if anyone understands

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 15>Malcolm Turnbull and the current Liberal Party, it's pretty clear

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 15>he's not on the side of people like Peter Dutton,

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 15>and he's the leader of the Liberal Party and the

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 15>leader of the coalition. So when I saw this, the

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 15>idea that Peter Dutton's argument, whether it's valid or not,

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 15>is somehow diminished by the fact that Malcolm Turnbull doesn't

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 15>agree with it because he's on dutton side. I mean,

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 15>that's just totally fallacious. He's not on Peter dutton side.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 15>He's on his own side and is entitled to be.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 15>But the idea that somehow you bring him into this

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 15>debate is one of these comments that is Melissa Clark

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 15>is now doing and others on the ABC when someone

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 15>is interviewed, someone comes on and makes a comment about

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 15>what they think about it. I mean Melissa Clark or

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 15>Peter Martin or someone else. But it just totally misunderstands

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 15>Malcolm Turnbull's position. He hasn't been a strong supporter of

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 15>the Liberal Party since he was the Liberal Party leader

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 15>and lost the support of a majority of his colleagues

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 15>in the party room in twenty eighteen. I don't think

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 15>he would deny that himself. I think he would be

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 15>surprised to think he was on Peter Dutton's side on

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 15>any issue.

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Correct, And it has been a downhill since twenty eighteen.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Now over at the Public Broadcaster and it's chief political correspondent,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>well Laura Tingle, she had this analysis of the situation

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>on seven.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 18>Thirty Australian politicians have expended a lot of oxygen hyperbole

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 18>over the years extolling the virtues and depth of the

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 18>special friendship we have with the United States. It has

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 18>justified jumping on board American military adventures, hosting defense facilities

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 18>and military bases, and more recently an orchest alliance which

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 18>makes us even more dependent on the US for our

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 18>defense strategy. On the domestic political stage, the US alliance

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 18>is played out in terms of schoolyard besties. Prime ministers

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 18>are judged in terms of whether they are best mates

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 18>with the President of the day.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And then she followed up with this.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 18>If anyone should know about the difficulties of getting foreign

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 18>leaders on the phone, it's the leader of the Federal Coalition.

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 18>When last in government, the coalition was unable to get

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 18>anyone in the Chinese government to speak to Coalition ministers

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 18>for several years about all the trade restrictions imposed on

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 18>Australian products on its watch.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Jared, is this straying a bit towards activism?

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 15>Well, the new ABC chair when he came in about

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 15>a year ago, Kim Williams. He hasn't done I think

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 15>a lot of things that he should have done, but

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 15>he has condemned activism and that's an example of pure activism.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 15>Laura Tingle there is editorializing. She's an activist commentator and

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.719
<v Speaker 15>some of the things she says are profoundly false. I mean,

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 15>the idea that somehow that Australia shouldn't have been involved

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 15>with the United States and the Pacific War when many

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 15>thought the very future of Australia was at stake is

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 15>just a ludicrous proposition and I think if Miss Tingle

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 15>had a chance to consider it, she wouldn't say it again.

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 15>But she's too involved in the politics of it all.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 15>And that came out later in the same comment that

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 15>she used in the introduction and when she was again

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 15>taking an activist in an activist's role about China. I mean,

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 15>for example, I can understand that there is a problem

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 15>getting in touch with President Bush. I don't know whether

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 15>Peter Dutton would have been able to do so he

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 15>was Prime Minister or not. He may have. Anthony Albinezi

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 15>on the third occasion wasn't. But it's got nothing to

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 15>do with China. The argument Australia had with China, and

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 15>most people now would conceide that China was the aggressor

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 15>in that argument. You're dealing there with the head of

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 15>the Chinese Communist Party. In the United States, you're dealing

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 15>with the democratically elected leader of the United States, and

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 15>we do have our disagreements with the United States. But

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 15>there's no comparison between trying to get a phone call

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 15>with Donald Trump and not being able to get a

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 15>phone call with President z. There's just no valid comparison.

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 15>It's just it's not a sensible proposition unless you want

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 15>to score a point against Peter Dutton, which is what

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 15>Laura Tingle was doing and.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Jared just a little a little bit more on that.

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Look, these are really complicated issues, These are.

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Really nuanced issues.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like sometimes that context or that nuance

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>against lost.

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>In that sort of in that sort of editorializing.

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.959
<v Speaker 15>Well, it does because it doesn't really it doesn't examine

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 15>the arguments because it is an editorial position, and when

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 15>people can get to hear both arguments, both sides of

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 15>this argument, those people usually can form their own opinion.

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 15>But it is a complicated matter. It's not a simple matter.

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 15>But when it's presented as a simple matter, I don't

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 15>know where anyone goes from there. But there absolutely no

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 15>comparison between our relationship with the United States and our

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 15>relationship with China now or a few years ago. There's

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 15>absolutely no comparison whatsoever.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>No fair enough.

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 2>And finally the ABC rolled out Mark Willersy on its

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Full Corners program to put together well, you'd have to

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 2>call it a hit piece.

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>On the Australian War Memorial.

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's the kind of people they chose for the interview.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 17>Redevelopment is to put it bluntly in abomination.

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 11>No, I think that's dirty money. It should not be

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 11>accepting money from merchants of death.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And here's what they had to say on Afghanistan.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 11>The panel next to the display is to me, the

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 11>most merely mouthed of writing the memorials ever put up.

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 11>It was completely inadequate because it didn't explain the moral

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 11>vacuum that those soldiers have fallen into.

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Jared Unfortunately, the ABC falls into this trap where there's

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 2>not much in the way of alternative views, and I

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 2>feel like that's what's happened to here.

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 15>Well, Peter Stanley is a good historian, but on this matter,

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 15>I mean, there's just the left wing view that there's

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 15>something wrong with the armaments industry. But if we didn't

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 15>have an arm industry in the Second World War, the

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 15>other side would have won. I mean, this is the

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 15>old left wing thing about the agents of death. Now

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 15>my problem with the program. I mean, the other argument

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 15>is that that the War Memorial shouldn't be extended. But

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 15>they put the two of them together plus some others

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 15>to run a line. So three people who were connected

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 15>with the War Memorial who would expect to support it,

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 15>the chair, the managing director and a board member, they

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 15>got brief says, and then the ten other people they

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 15>rolled out. Ten of them were opposed, so there was

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 15>absolutely no balance whatsoever. And Mark Willisy himself, the presenter,

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 15>he was vehemently opposed, So you had sort of an

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 15>eleven three. But the three viewer would think, well, they

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 15>would say that, wouldn't they they're running the joint. But

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 15>all the other people who are not running the joint

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 15>come in and bag it. And some of the things,

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 15>as said, are completely offensive. And I think most Australians

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 15>admire the War Memorial, Many who know anything about it

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 15>would think it probably after all these years, should be

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 15>extended a bit beyond when it was last extended. But

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 15>somehow just condemn it all with only one side really

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 15>of the debate heard, it really means that under Kim Williams,

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 15>and he's only the chairman, he's not the managing director,

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 15>so be fair to him. But under the new chair

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 15>it's no different to what it was under the old chair.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 15>There's still no viewpoint diversity, and a program like that

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 15>on four corners, a very influential program should have heard

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 15>from different views and I could produce many people, intelligent,

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 15>articular people, men and women who would rock up and

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 15>say the exact opposite, but they didn't get a chance.

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Jared Henderson, thank you for your analysis. As always, Now

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's all we have a time for this evening up.

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Next is news Note