Speaker 1: Lately, well late debate, Well, good evening. I'm James Macpherson
Speaker 1: with Liz Storer and Joe Hildebrand coming up tonight. Fake
Speaker 1: Picasso's discovered in a Hobart museum. We'll tell you all
Speaker 1: about that later. Plus when we look at the papers,
Speaker 1: the depth of Tasmania's drug problem revealed, And why is
Speaker 1: Chappelle Corby on the front page of Tomorrow's Gold Coast Bulletin.
Speaker 1: We'll get to all of that a little later, but first,
Speaker 1: just when you thought it could not possibly get any
Speaker 1: worse for US President Joe Biden. I mean, he had
Speaker 1: that terrible debate, then Democratic lawmakers abandoned him, donors abandoned him,
Speaker 1: the left wing media abandoned him. But it's just got
Speaker 1: even worse. The entire cast of Ocean's eleven have now
Speaker 1: abandoned him, or at least George Clooney has. George Clooney
Speaker 1: wrote a devastating column in The New York Times. The
Speaker 1: headline read, I love Joe Biden, but we need a
Speaker 1: new nominee.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: What's amazing about this column is that less than a
Speaker 1: month ago, go George Clooney and Julia Roberts were fronts
Speaker 1: and center of a fundraising campaign that raised thirty million
Speaker 1: dollars to help Biden in his reelection campaign. Well, listen
Speaker 1: to what George Clooney wrote in The New York Times yesterday.
Speaker 1: It's devastating to say it, but the Joe Biden I
Speaker 1: was with three weeks ago at the fundraiser was not
Speaker 1: the Joe big f and dal Biden of twenty ten.
Speaker 1: He wasn't even the Joe Biden of twenty twenty. He
Speaker 1: was the same man we all witnessed at the debate.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: I could go on reading what George Clooney said, but
Speaker 1: why don't I just show you what George Clooney did. Liz.
Speaker 1: That pretty much sums up.
Speaker 2: Well, I don't put any more stock in celebrity disendorsements,
Speaker 2: and I do celebrityments. But Clooney's clearly realized, well, let's
Speaker 2: be gracious and say that he just realized three weeks
Speaker 2: after raising thirty million dollars for the Dems and watching
Speaker 2: that disastrous debate, he's clearly realized, I don't want to
Speaker 2: be seen as backing this kid either, And in doing so,
Speaker 2: he's joined a very, very long list of people who
Speaker 2: have actually knowingly lied. I mean, what a fraud We're
Speaker 2: supposed to believe that all of a sudden, just over
Speaker 2: the last three weeks, George Clooney's been like, wait a minute,
Speaker 2: where have you been the last four years? Why this
Speaker 2: poor old man has slurred and stumbled his way through
Speaker 2: the most prestigious and important high office in the world.
Speaker 2: I don't buy for a second. He's just come to
Speaker 2: his senses and been like, well, actually, three weeks after
Speaker 2: raising thirty grand for the thirty million dollars for the Dems,
Speaker 2: I have to disindorse him now. I just can't go
Speaker 2: through with it. He always knew. They all always knew,
Speaker 2: the mainstream media, the guy's press secretary, everyone who works
Speaker 2: for him, his friends and family. They all knew. The
Speaker 2: president has been struggling for a very long time. So
Speaker 2: this pretending I'm just just had my come to Jesus moment,
Speaker 2: great act, George Clooney, that's what you do for a living.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't think he's done that at all. I
Speaker 3: think the video is actually the most accurate representation. Clooney
Speaker 3: hasn't just decided to He hasn't just so sat up
Speaker 3: and I might knock out an op ed for The
Speaker 3: New York Times. He's clearly doing this at the behest
Speaker 3: of the Democratic Party. You have clearly asked him to
Speaker 3: do this because they know that it's going to take
Speaker 3: a name and as much momentum as they know that
Speaker 3: will gather.
Speaker 2: Why have they lied for so long? Because if you are, it's.
Speaker 3: Not about not about the lying, it's just about it's
Speaker 3: about it. It's nothing to do with the lying. It's
Speaker 3: nothing to do with morality or honesty or this is
Speaker 3: been a.
Speaker 2: Massive cover up for a very long time. Who cares
Speaker 2: those holt Stan Who cares.
Speaker 3: They're just trying to win the next election, right, And
Speaker 3: they thought maybe we can get away with it like
Speaker 3: we did in twenty twenty, and we keep him in
Speaker 3: his basement for as long as possible, stage manage his appearances.
Speaker 2: He now reached here.
Speaker 3: They've now realized there's absolutely no way they can do that.
Speaker 3: Biden's not going because he is deranged and senile, and
Speaker 3: his handler Jill won't let him, and so they.
Speaker 2: Need to lying about it.
Speaker 3: Well, we all know, we've all seen that, yes, exactly,
Speaker 3: in the State of the Office. It's like saying the
Speaker 3: sky is blue.
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 2: This many people who were complicit in propping this poor
Speaker 2: old man up on the world stage for years and years.
Speaker 2: I certainly like George Clooney turning around and being like, oh,
Speaker 2: a sad state of affairs. Actually, I think we might
Speaker 2: need someone else. Here's one of those Democratic reps, Daniel Goldman,
Speaker 2: being pressed by a reporter in the hallways of power,
Speaker 2: being like, oh, what do you make of George Clooney's comment.
Speaker 5: I appreciate hearing mister Flooney's opinion. And you know, we'll
Speaker 5: continue to deal with this within our democratic family to
Speaker 5: make sure that we.
Speaker 1: Beat Donald Trump as a protectivemocracy in the future.
Speaker 5: People close to President Biden are being honest about his
Speaker 5: mental scene.
Speaker 2: Just to beat Donald Trump and protect democracy, because those
Speaker 2: two terms, according to the Democrats, are synonymous. If Trump
Speaker 2: is not beaten, that is the end of democracy. As
Speaker 2: we know what, the world is falling apart. But speaking
Speaker 2: of lying Democrats, let's go to a woman who does
Speaker 2: it for a living. In fact, she's paid by the
Speaker 2: American taxpayer one hundred and eighty thousand US dollars every
Speaker 2: year to play cover up for the president. Her name
Speaker 2: is Karine Jean Pierre. She is the Press secretary She's
Speaker 2: going to be very familiar to you, I'm sure. So
Speaker 2: she was asked recently. I'm about to play you this clip.
Speaker 2: She was asked recently about a visit to the White
Speaker 2: House by a very esteemed neurologist. This visit took place
Speaker 2: on January seventeenth. Now they knew, through they being the press,
Speaker 2: knew through the White House visitor logues that this neurologist
Speaker 2: and Biden's personal doctor had been there at the same time.
Speaker 2: So the press simply asked Jean Pierre, so were these
Speaker 2: guys there to inquire after the president's health, maybe run
Speaker 2: some tests, And in typical Jean Pierre style, she dutifully
Speaker 2: lied for the president, misleading the American people and the
Speaker 2: rest of the world still trying to convince us. Oh no,
Speaker 2: these two rando doctors just happened to be there hanging out.
Speaker 2: I guess I get a current.
Speaker 5: Vacation on the ladder that was not last night from
Speaker 5: my doctor O'Connor. And you can correct me if I wrong,
Speaker 5: But it didn't seem to explicitly describe in the nature
Speaker 5: of doctor Connor's meeting with doctor O'Connor. So can you
Speaker 5: say whether that one meeting is related to care for
Speaker 5: the presidents himself, I can say that.
Speaker 3: It was not.
Speaker 2: It was not very agree So their visit wasn't with
Speaker 2: regards to Biden's health. They weren't there to check him
Speaker 2: out or anything. Well, it turns out she lied, and
Speaker 2: she's had to back paddle big time as it came
Speaker 2: to light that the two doctors were indeed there to
Speaker 2: run some tests on Biden and swap notes, she said
Speaker 2: because the date was not mentioned in the question, I
Speaker 2: want to be clear that on January seventeen, meeting between
Speaker 2: doctor O'Connor and doctor Canned was for the president's health. Now,
Speaker 2: that is the only meeting between the two doctors that
Speaker 2: the press could have ever been referring to, because that
Speaker 2: is the only meeting in the White House visitors' logs
Speaker 2: that they knew had ever happened. Ever, so for Jean
Speaker 2: pr to now come out and say, oh no, no,
Speaker 2: I was confused. I thought you meant maybe another meeting
Speaker 2: between these esteemed medical doctors. Oh, oh no, the January
Speaker 2: six that's.
Speaker 3: My favorite part. Yes, you meant that meeting.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I thought you were talking about all the other
Speaker 6: days in January where they didn't oh, you mean the
Speaker 6: meeting in January where they did meet.
Speaker 3: Oh, yes, that did take place.
Speaker 1: To b Joe Biden spokes basing, it's almost a prerequisite
Speaker 1: for the job that you are perpetually confused.
Speaker 6: One and eighty k K is not actually that much
Speaker 6: American money.
Speaker 3: No, no, by Australian top Australian spin doctors here would
Speaker 3: get paid more, and I think I think our PM
Speaker 3: actually gets paid more than the president.
Speaker 2: It's very lowly more than the average American, that's right.
Speaker 3: Because they don't have unions and minimum wages, which I'm
Speaker 3: sure you would endorse.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't count to income from Chinese business people
Speaker 1: Ukrainian business that's right.
Speaker 3: That's why, that's why you've got to get the lobby
Speaker 3: of stuff on this.
Speaker 1: As the visitologues showed that this doctor, while he only
Speaker 1: is recorded as meeting with Biden's personal doctor on one occasion,
Speaker 1: this expert on Parkinson's disease visited the White House eight
Speaker 1: times in eight months, and so Jean Pierre said, well,
Speaker 1: he was also promoting research into Parkinson's disease. They were
Speaker 1: doing the research in the over.
Speaker 3: In the whole life of the White House.
Speaker 1: How can you.
Speaker 3: Research. It is absolutely speaking of the words. Do you
Speaker 3: remember when we were worried about the age and declining
Speaker 3: mental health of another scenior Democrat, mainly the former House
Speaker 3: Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Well, now it seems that Nancy, who
Speaker 3: is only marginally better at stringing a sentence together than
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, has has basically she's came out in recent
Speaker 3: days and said, Joe Biden needs to decide whether he's
Speaker 3: running for president or not.
Speaker 2: It's up to him.
Speaker 3: And this surprised a lot of people because Joe Biden
Speaker 3: has said on multiple occasions that he has decided and
Speaker 3: he is running for president. Maybe Pelosi hasn't, maybe Nancy
Speaker 3: hasn't renewed her subscription to The New York Times, but
Speaker 3: very much on the record, and so a lot of
Speaker 3: people said, well, clearly this is Nancy Pelosi's not quite
Speaker 3: as articulate as George Clooney, but clearly this is Nancy
Speaker 3: Pelosi saying that Biden shouldn't run, or at very least
Speaker 3: perhaps Joe Biden should have run, which indeed is what
Speaker 3: she seemed to be saying when she was saying what
Speaker 3: she wasn't saying about him needing to make a decision
Speaker 3: when he'd already made the opposite decision, but she just
Speaker 3: pretended that he hadn't made a decision. So, in case
Speaker 3: this wasn't crystal clear to all and sundry, here's Nancy
Speaker 3: Pelosi clarifying it for a reporter who's trying to find
Speaker 3: out just what exactly she is trying to say.
Speaker 4: About, do you want to get you a three election?
Speaker 2: I'm made, I'm.
Speaker 4: About pining a.
Speaker 3: Cap They now in the folly amazing is it? That
Speaker 3: was Nancy Pelosi's impersonation of an American abroad in any
Speaker 3: non English speaking con Do you speak English? Do you
Speaker 3: speak English in your country Australia. It's just un level.
Speaker 3: But anyway, point being, the Clooney hit job was not
Speaker 3: just Clooney having a come to Jesus moment. Clearly there
Speaker 3: is an orchestrated campaign being run by every Democrat under
Speaker 3: the sun to send out these people, one after the other,
Speaker 3: after the other after the other, to just drop the bombs.
Speaker 3: And then of course they have their ass covering sort
Speaker 3: of catch all, which is that, oh well, no, I
Speaker 3: didn't say that he should resign. I just said he
Speaker 3: should consider his future or whatever whatever whatever. Clooney doesn't
Speaker 3: have to do that, of course, because he's not actually
Speaker 3: an elected member of Congress or the Senate, so he's
Speaker 3: got more leeway to be able to say, Joe, just go.
Speaker 3: But clearly there is a full on someone top absolutely
Speaker 3: that Joe Biden had all the momentum of Kevin Rudd
Speaker 3: in twenty ten.
Speaker 1: It's a hit job. I mean, Clooney lives in France
Speaker 1: for first year and second, you know, he says that
Speaker 1: it was clear at the fundraiser three weeks ago. Well
Speaker 1: then why didn't he speak up immediately because we're trying
Speaker 1: to protect democracy? But he waited until fifty two million
Speaker 1: people who watched live the debate had all seen the
Speaker 1: same thing before he bravely spoke up.
Speaker 3: Told her by the DNC.
Speaker 1: That's exactly. That's why for Pelosi, I mean her claim
Speaker 1: that I don't make comments in the hallway, Well she
Speaker 1: does if it's to trash Donald Trump all about Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: And then politicians get accosted in the hallway, and always
Speaker 2: she says to the black reporter, am I not speaking English?
Speaker 1: Could you imagine if Donald Trump said that to an
Speaker 1: American reporter or a woman? I mean, there would be
Speaker 1: hell to pay. But my favorite part of that interview
Speaker 1: is she's saying, you know, I'm sure Biden can win,
Speaker 1: but her tone of voice and her body language says
Speaker 1: the exact opposite. She's a woman who knows they're in
Speaker 1: all sorts.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And this is the closest that Nancy has has come
Speaker 2: to being like, look, maybe there is a problem. Just
Speaker 2: so you can watch it yourself. Here she is on
Speaker 2: the MSNBC saying, oh, Biden has to make up his
Speaker 2: own mind. As Joe said, long after Biden has just
Speaker 2: kept on announcing I'm running. I'm staying in the race.
Speaker 2: There's no getting rid of me. Does he have your
Speaker 2: support to be the head of the Democratic ticket?
Speaker 7: As long as the president had the president, it's up
Speaker 7: to the president to sucide if he is going to run.
Speaker 7: We're all encouraging him to make that decision because time
Speaker 7: is running short to subside.
Speaker 2: Not if they're not encouraging him to stay, that's board.
Speaker 2: They're encouraging him to make a decision, a decision that
Speaker 2: he's already that's right.
Speaker 3: And it is can't stress enough. It's like, even if
Speaker 3: you have one Democrat saying to a sitting president. Don't.
Speaker 3: The last time this happened was with Lyndon Johnson in
Speaker 3: nineteen sixty eight, which turned out very very poorly, by
Speaker 3: the way, and you know, and he pulled out of
Speaker 3: the race. He said, right, if a single person is
Speaker 3: not going to is not going to back me, or
Speaker 3: the party leadership is not going to back me off,
Speaker 3: there's going to be a move against me, against me,
Speaker 3: screw you. I'm out of there. And that is what
Speaker 3: you do. That's how big a deal it is if
Speaker 3: a party moves against an incumbent president as the candidate
Speaker 3: for the next election, you know, four more years. So
Speaker 3: but again there's a couple so there's absolutely no ambiguity
Speaker 3: or question that these people are all telling Biden to
Speaker 3: go and to go. Now. The most amazing thing, though,
Speaker 3: is can you just imagine when it's Nancy Pelosi telling
Speaker 3: someone that they are too old and infirm to serve
Speaker 3: in public. I would listen. I would listen because this
Speaker 3: is someone knows, because there's someone who knows from deep,
Speaker 3: deep experience. Now, this is just someone that this is
Speaker 3: coming from a place of true empathy. And they're also
Speaker 3: big ice cream lovers as well. I think you'll remember.
Speaker 1: What you said earlier is so true that I mean,
Speaker 1: I always thought, how can Nancy Pelosi still be front
Speaker 1: and center? But now compared to Joe Biden, she's practiced
Speaker 1: good right.
Speaker 3: He has a long and making out in the back
Speaker 3: of the Cadillac come.
Speaker 1: Longman, promising ahead of her. Well, Joe Biden is not
Speaker 1: the only man in the world with problems. Plenty of
Speaker 1: guys in Australia have problems. An article in the press
Speaker 1: today told how ossie blokes are spending fifteen hundred dollars
Speaker 1: to go on mail only retreats to tackle their toxic masculinity. Now,
Speaker 1: at these retreats, these guys get into ice baths, sit
Speaker 1: around fire circles, discussing all of their vulnerabilities, crying with
Speaker 1: each other, and apparently this is supposed to help. Now
Speaker 1: we may talk seriously about some of the issues men
Speaker 1: are facing in a moment, but this is not simply
Speaker 1: unique to Australia. That article from the Career Mail, But
Speaker 1: check out this video of a similar men's retreat where
Speaker 1: the guys are just helping each other to connect with
Speaker 1: their real masculinity.
Speaker 8: Clean my soule, Lena cry.
Speaker 2: With the joy and the soul, the fear.
Speaker 8: Let myself cry.
Speaker 1: I got that retreat costs ten thousand dollars to go
Speaker 1: on that and completely lose all self respect.
Speaker 3: Can I just say if I just paid ten thousand
Speaker 3: dollars for that experience, I would be crying too.
Speaker 2: I think a lot of guys back up.
Speaker 3: I think they call that bs war.
Speaker 1: I mean, clearly there are issues with guys, right, I
Speaker 1: mean that the Australian Health Department recently reported one in
Speaker 1: eight men in this country suffer depression at some point
Speaker 1: when it comes to education with males, the labor market,
Speaker 1: addiction rates. There's lots of problems with guys. But I
Speaker 1: don't think they need to redefine masculinity. It'd be good
Speaker 1: if they rediscovered them.
Speaker 2: Masculin's here, Oh my goodness. I mean the amount of
Speaker 2: things that are now told to men. You must be this,
Speaker 2: you can't be that, and inevitably everything in the can't
Speaker 2: aisle is everything masculine. It's what women want. We want
Speaker 2: men to please be. Men don't hang out and cry
Speaker 2: together and sob and hold each other in some ten.
Speaker 1: Thousand tollar Do you not find that attractive?
Speaker 2: So repulsive and repugnant.
Speaker 1: There there is a little bit of Stanley.
Speaker 2: There is genuinely the testosterone levels of men, look this up.
Speaker 2: Has been decreasing over decades now because the stuff we
Speaker 2: have in our water, food, in our environment. This is
Speaker 2: something that has knowingly, willingly being done. And I genuinely
Speaker 2: believe it's because what government sphere more than anything is
Speaker 2: healthy testosterone filled men. Because those guys aren't too busy
Speaker 2: to take on the establishment. Those guys are keeping a
Speaker 2: finger on the pulse. No, they are, and they take
Speaker 2: the fight to injustice.
Speaker 3: And the government is the government is deliberately reducing.
Speaker 2: The levels of Why is it Why is it in
Speaker 2: our food? Why are men fed things that have been
Speaker 2: shown through studies to reduce testosterone?
Speaker 3: The goverment, the men are going out and buying this
Speaker 3: that they're feeding themselves.
Speaker 2: We can still do that, tested the strength of men's hands.
Speaker 3: The government, the government doing that was the last your
Speaker 3: heads on for the government come out and start feeding your.
Speaker 2: Have things in our water that are affecting testosterone levels.
Speaker 2: Do you not agree with that?
Speaker 3: I do not know what is in the water affecting
Speaker 3: testosterone levels. My wife, My wife is the one who
Speaker 3: does that at my house, but I just love like.
Speaker 1: Here's here's some other things we need to talk about.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 1: Firstly, this is in America, but it would be similar
Speaker 1: to Australia. Thirty one percent of boys grow up without
Speaker 1: a biological father. That's certainly contributing to troubles that males
Speaker 1: are having. And it seems to me these retreats, and
Speaker 1: I'm not making a direct parallel at all, but you
Speaker 1: used to go to church for self reflection, for a
Speaker 1: sense of community, to talk to people about where you're at.
Speaker 1: These days we don't, and so we've got people doing no.
Speaker 3: People talk about that really seriously. They talk about what's
Speaker 3: called the third place, and this is something that they
Speaker 3: actually is coming too. This review of schools where where
Speaker 3: you've got home, you've got schools slash work when an adult,
Speaker 3: and then you used to have the third place, where
Speaker 3: it be church or it might be you know, boy
Speaker 3: scouts or community organization, sporting a sporting team that you
Speaker 3: would do and that would give you other sense of community.
Speaker 3: So you know, the family didn't have to do everything,
Speaker 3: the school didn't have to do everything, and the church
Speaker 3: or whatever other organization didn't have to do everything. But
Speaker 3: between those things, You've got what you needed. And as
Speaker 3: we're going into a much more sort of secular society
Speaker 3: and where people I suppose and not participating in other
Speaker 3: community events as much. Line, So it's a big it's
Speaker 3: a big problem for educators as well, because, for example,
Speaker 3: suddenly the school is meant to do all the things
Speaker 3: that every other organization.
Speaker 1: Schools are basically parenting kids. Governments are making lunch. In Queensland,
Speaker 1: they've just announced we're going to provide lunch for kids.
Speaker 1: And I mean mum and dad used to do that.
Speaker 3: Now the schools are doing right, But let's go back
Speaker 3: to the ice parts and fire circles. Can I just
Speaker 3: stress right, this is a courier male storry. Yeah, it's
Speaker 3: a creer malester queens Queensland. This is Queensland men. These
Speaker 3: are Queenslanders who are paying one thousand, five hundred.
Speaker 6: Southeast queens If this is what's happening in Queensland, this
Speaker 6: is what Queensland men are doing, imagine what the Victorians are.
Speaker 2: Although, to be fair for the men, it's not just
Speaker 2: the men. Check out a similar retreat. This one's in
Speaker 2: bar where women go to do I guess the female
Speaker 2: version it's like an exorcism, but a witch instead of
Speaker 2: a priest. And I'm pretty sure the demons are entering,
Speaker 2: not exiting. I mean, who pays for this stuff? You
Speaker 2: can scream for free.
Speaker 3: At home, exactly. This is the old thing. If you
Speaker 3: want to see a screaming woman and a bloke completely
Speaker 3: just deprived of testosterone, come to my place. You can
Speaker 3: see it for free.
Speaker 2: But one minute you're fighting that it isn't lowered levels
Speaker 2: of testosteron.
Speaker 6: No, I'm just not sure that.
Speaker 3: I'm just not sure that it's the water. I suspect
Speaker 3: it's probably an evolutionary trend that's the result of us
Speaker 3: not having to go out, and that is and has.
Speaker 2: Been absolutely disproven.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm sure you feel the show couldn't get an
Speaker 1: stupider than that, but it can, because we're going to
Speaker 1: go to the Yarra City Council in Melbourne where they've
Speaker 1: just released a climate emergency plan eighty one pages. It
Speaker 1: took for them to write this emergency plan. They declared
Speaker 1: a climate emergency back in twenty twelve, by the way,
Speaker 1: but they've finally got round to the plan, which, amongst
Speaker 1: other things, demands that people in their locality stop eating meat,
Speaker 1: because of course meat is bad for the environment, all
Speaker 1: that methane. The irony, of course, the delicious irony of
Speaker 1: this is that it's just been revealed that at the
Speaker 1: ARA Council, prior to every council meeting, all the executives
Speaker 1: and councilors are served roast beef, chicken or lamb before
Speaker 1: their meeting. In fact, the other night when they approved
Speaker 1: this climate Emergency plan which says residents should no longer
Speaker 1: eat meat, they were served roast meat right before they
Speaker 1: voted to endorse this plan. Joe, you could not make stuff.
Speaker 3: I just love this story so much. And again it
Speaker 3: just tells you everything you need to know about the Greens,
Speaker 3: who of course dominate. So it tells you everything you
Speaker 3: need to know about inner city Melbourne, which of course
Speaker 3: where you're a city council is, And it tells you
Speaker 3: everything you need to know about vegetarians or indeed what
Speaker 3: used to be vegetarians. Now of course you've got to
Speaker 3: go vegan otherwise it just doesn't count. And we're talking
Speaker 3: completely plant based. And again, if you want to you know,
Speaker 3: this is what you do when you can't afford the
Speaker 3: fifteen hundred dollars to go on a mail retreat and
Speaker 3: lie in a pool with other middle aged Greens council
Speaker 3: So you've become a Greens counselor and there's your third
Speaker 3: place and you and you put out the little communicators saying, hey,
Speaker 3: I think everybody should be vegetarian just like me. I
Speaker 3: just love it so so much. Just imagine, like just
Speaker 3: imagine being on a city count like on a local
Speaker 3: government council and just thinking, just imagine just having the
Speaker 3: thought across through your head. I don't you know what
Speaker 3: we should do? We should tell out residents what to
Speaker 3: eat and.
Speaker 1: While everyone's going vegan. They've also set goals for how
Speaker 1: many residents in that area would be going to work
Speaker 1: on scooters. So they want to increase scooter use by
Speaker 1: forty percent come mid twenty thirties, because that would be great.
Speaker 2: Have you read their actual plan, though, very just the highlights.
Speaker 1: Have you read the eighty one pages?
Speaker 2: I mean it is but this whole time with the
Speaker 2: evidence they have substantial evidence mac go on, people at home,
Speaker 2: you need to be aware of this. There is substantial evidence,
Speaker 2: they say, to suggest that the emissions associated with current
Speaker 2: dietary patterns, particularly the high and increasing rate of consumption
Speaker 2: of animal products, I'm likely to make it impossible to
Speaker 2: limit global eating to one point five celsius. The Plan says,
Speaker 2: it is widely understood that a shift of plant blazed
Speaker 2: diets is critical in responding to the climate emergency. So
Speaker 2: here they are telling you, we are not going to
Speaker 2: make it unless you stop eating animal based products. They say,
Speaker 2: while they eat animal based products, these ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 2: Is a perfect encapsulation of what I like to call
Speaker 2: climate communism, because it wasn't the people at the top
Speaker 2: who were starving during communist regimes. Wasn't the people at
Speaker 2: the top who were suffering and doing it hard and
Speaker 2: dying in millions, whether they were shot into mass graves
Speaker 2: or it just didn't have enough to eat or from exposure. No, no,
Speaker 2: everything about climate communism means less for you, less food
Speaker 2: for you, less travel for you, less options for you, period.
Speaker 2: Whether we're talking about where you can get your energy from,
Speaker 2: how much energy you're allowed to use on a daily basis,
Speaker 2: which car you can drive. Now, it will not affect
Speaker 2: any of them, and they know it. So they're happy
Speaker 2: to make these rules. They're happy to virtue signal for
Speaker 2: as long as the day is long, but not themselves.
Speaker 2: They will not putting. In fact, just remember when Davos
Speaker 2: got pulled up doing this very thing they're all having.
Speaker 2: Such an agriculture is raping the planet. There's no way
Speaker 2: we can say that for as long as there's agriculture
Speaker 2: on earth, how do you want us to live? There
Speaker 2: is this thing called food. Meanwhile, they were facing on
Speaker 2: the front of the leafbase.
Speaker 3: You said so yourself. If they don't, if they don't
Speaker 3: get their meaty proteins, they won't have the strength and
Speaker 3: testosterone read the Revolution, They won't get a story.
Speaker 1: Save you from ever having to read Animal Farm because
Speaker 1: the Yarraw Council approving all animals are equal, but some
Speaker 1: are more equal than others. The other thing I like
Speaker 1: about this climate action Plan, which we must mention, is
Speaker 1: the Yarra Council did say that deforestation is a massive problem,
Speaker 1: and I can only imagine how bad it is in Fitzroy,
Speaker 1: Collingwood and Richmond, where they are responsible for what happens. Seriously,
Speaker 1: what a joke.
Speaker 3: Although to be fair, it is often said you know
Speaker 3: that the left will eat itself. Well, now they can't
Speaker 3: because that would be that.
Speaker 2: That would be.
Speaker 3: Read to me unless although if you ate a vegan,
Speaker 3: would that be a vegan diet.
Speaker 2: I'm just wondering if it was members of the Yarra
Speaker 2: Council that then took themselves as animal rights activists to
Speaker 2: the Victorian Premier's office and decided to graffiti it, because
Speaker 2: you know, that's how you stand up for animal rights.
Speaker 2: You've got to stand up for everyone's rights these days.
Speaker 2: You notice that I swear if there was a zombie
Speaker 2: apocalypse tomorrow, there would be a group of zombie activists
Speaker 2: being like, these guys need rights. We just need to
Speaker 2: be more welcoming. What about the zombies. Here is the
Speaker 2: premiere saying her to Bucks, saying, why didn't you just
Speaker 2: come to my office. We could have had a chat.
Speaker 2: It didn't need to come to this.
Speaker 9: This is all done under the cover of darkness, which
Speaker 9: is disgustingly cowardly behavior. Come out into the daylight, Come
Speaker 9: and have the conversation, Come and had the policy discussion
Speaker 9: that is consistent with our democratic right in this state
Speaker 9: and in this nation to have a difference of opinion,
Speaker 9: to express it peacefully, respectfully and not compromise community safety.
Speaker 2: Nah violence speaks louder than words. You know that perimie
Speaker 2: are because you let plenty of violent people through your town,
Speaker 2: don't you. And it seems like the very ones that
Speaker 2: we always do want pulled up and reprimanded never get
Speaker 2: their day in court. But the ones that actually vandalize
Speaker 2: your office, then you're upset about it because it's touched me.
Speaker 2: I mean, what really struck me as hilarious about this
Speaker 2: particular shall we say, missetting of the Premier's office was
Speaker 2: they weren't actually objecting any particular thing. It's not like
Speaker 2: she's me recently that will hurt animals.
Speaker 1: And this same group vandalized her office back in February,
Speaker 1: and they produced a video where they said, and I
Speaker 1: love this that the vandalism was and I quote in
Speaker 1: defense of water birds and in solidarity with Palestine. What
Speaker 1: waterbirds and Palestine have in common? I have no idea.
Speaker 3: It's what's known as the omni cause, where left is traina.
Speaker 3: It's like queers for Palestine. It's like when they sit
Speaker 3: down and say, all right, we need to be in
Speaker 3: favor of all these progressive causes, even if they are
Speaker 3: completely at odds with one another. And it is just
Speaker 3: an absolutely ridiculous thing. Let's not forget obviously the accord
Speaker 3: that sections the far far left of the Liparty. And
Speaker 3: of course the Greens have given to pro Palestine protesters
Speaker 3: who have vandalized. Oh they're not in protest as vandals?
Speaker 1: Is that what they're on Palestine? They're free parts.
Speaker 3: Who broke into who broke into the Victorian State Labor Conference,
Speaker 3: Who who attacked the officers of Josh Burns, Bill Shorten,
Speaker 3: Mark Dreyfus and of course Anthony Albanezi himself. Again, you
Speaker 3: lie down with dogs, you get fleas. And this is
Speaker 3: what happens when you know you're adjacent to these kind
Speaker 3: of extremist activist groups. They don't care the one eye.
Speaker 3: They don't have any sense of solidarity or reasonableness or
Speaker 3: you know, friendliness or camaraderie or whatever. They do not care.
Speaker 3: They will put you up against the wall and shoot you.
Speaker 1: Let me give you two questions. Firstly, what do you
Speaker 1: reckon will be repaired first? Just into Ellen's office or
Speaker 1: the statues that have been cut down and are still
Speaker 1: lying in disrepair, is the second question. If and when
Speaker 1: they get round to repairing the Premier's office, Let's say
Speaker 1: the quote comes in at ten grand, it will blow
Speaker 1: out to three million and take five years.
Speaker 3: That's right, it will end up costing more than the
Speaker 3: Commonwealth Games and the East Westley. But yeah, no, it's
Speaker 3: an absolute. It's absolutely terrible. These people are absolutely disgusting
Speaker 3: and disgraceful and it's a salutary lesson that the Labor
Speaker 3: Party and those little people on the left of the
Speaker 3: Labor Party who like to flirt with a bit of activism,
Speaker 3: that is what you are really flirting with, and it
Speaker 3: will come back and it will bite you on the
Speaker 3: ask speaking of things that we hope will come back.
Speaker 3: So how is that that?
Speaker 1: There?
Speaker 3: I go on? That was very Astronauts are apparently confident
Speaker 3: that this special capsule will bring them back from the
Speaker 3: International Space Station to Earth, despite the fact that it's
Speaker 3: made by Boeing and Boeing I don't know if you've
Speaker 3: been watching the late debate this week hasn't got a
Speaker 3: particularly a great track record of keeping things airborne anyway.
Speaker 3: Astronauts are confident that Boeing star Liner will bring them
Speaker 3: home after being trapped on the s. The first two
Speaker 3: astronauts to fly Boeing star on a capsule'll say from
Speaker 3: the International Space Station, that they are confident in the
Speaker 3: spacecraft's ability to return them home whenever the company and
Speaker 3: NASA fix an array of thruster issues that have kept
Speaker 3: them in space far longer than expected? Can I say
Speaker 3: far longer than expected? Is not the sort of phrase
Speaker 3: you use? It like, you know, how long did you know?
Speaker 3: How long did you have to wait for a train?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 3: Longer than expected? To be honest, that's when you say
Speaker 3: longer than expected? How long were the International Space Station
Speaker 3: up there in isolation from the planet because Boeing couldn't
Speaker 3: actually fix the little spaceship. It's menditata, oh longer than expected. Actually,
Speaker 3: that's not how that phrase works.
Speaker 1: These guys took off on the Boeing star Liner on
Speaker 1: June five, though were meant to be back on June thirteen.
Speaker 1: What are we now? July eleven, and they're still there.
Speaker 1: But I love this quote from one of the astronauts.
Speaker 1: This is just fantastic. Interviewed about what's going on, how
Speaker 1: she's feeling about being stuck in space for over a month. Quote,
Speaker 1: I have a real good feeling in my heart that
Speaker 1: this spacecraft will bring us home no problem. Well, if
Speaker 1: good feelings in your heart will get you back home
Speaker 1: from out of space. I reckon, she'll be fine.
Speaker 2: Then they will, then they will. The other guy out
Speaker 2: there said, we're absolutely confident the mantre you've heard failure
Speaker 2: is not an option. That's not Boeing's mantra. By the way, mate,
Speaker 2: that's just yours.
Speaker 1: Here's the best part of this though. This was the
Speaker 1: final test of the Boeing star Liner before it was
Speaker 1: given NECES certification, and it's not going so well. Thrusts
Speaker 1: and velveleaks as well.
Speaker 3: Yeah, although it might they're looking into whether it might
Speaker 3: actually have been human error and the astronauts all accidentally
Speaker 3: clicked one way on the Boeing website.
Speaker 2: In the US, now where the Republicans have done it,
Speaker 2: they've got their safe bill over the line, this bill
Speaker 2: that was seeking to stop illegal immigrants from voting in
Speaker 2: the upcoming elections. Now the Dems are already finding a
Speaker 2: way around this. But I'll get into that a bit.
Speaker 2: You've got to see some of the circus that the
Speaker 2: Dems put on in complaining about this bill, saying, look,
Speaker 2: you're just trying to get illegals not to vote in
Speaker 2: our election. It's going to affect everyone. This is racist.
Speaker 2: Doesn't do it for yourself. How's republican?
Speaker 4: So call Save Act is a dangerous anti democratic bill
Speaker 4: that has no place on this floor. They don't want
Speaker 4: to hear black voices, brown voices, LGBTQIA voices, young voices.
Speaker 4: Our fundamental access to our democracy is being politicized, and
Speaker 4: this xenophobic attack that we're debating today will make it
Speaker 4: harder for Americans to vote. This is the twenty twenty
Speaker 4: four version of the Jimcrow poll tax, and we should
Speaker 4: vote against it.
Speaker 2: It's not racist to want only American citizens to vote
Speaker 2: in an American election. But of course the Dems are
Speaker 2: wasting no time getting around this. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whipner
Speaker 2: has already signed a controversial election recount fraud bill into law,
Speaker 2: which means that fraudulent votes, even if someone can prove
Speaker 2: that they took place, there will be no recount. I
Speaker 2: bet this is going to now I'll be a trend
Speaker 2: among Democratic governors just being like not in my state,
Speaker 2: the Republicans will not have a chance to be like.
Speaker 2: There's been some fraudulent votes, there's been some illegal immigrant votes.
Speaker 2: There has to be a recount. They're like, well, we're
Speaker 2: past a bill, so we're just not going to that
Speaker 2: kind of efforts.
Speaker 1: The Dems are making sure they're covering all their bases.
Speaker 1: I just can't get over how ageous, racist, homophobic, transphobic
Speaker 1: the Dems are. I mean, they're basically getting up and
Speaker 1: saying black people couldn't organize an ID. Young people, they
Speaker 1: couldn't organize an ID. And as for the LGBTQ community,
Speaker 1: where they could never organize an IDA where I wanted to.
Speaker 3: This is what I did not understand. So, like as
Speaker 3: I said earlier, but there is a long history of
Speaker 3: black people, especially in the South, having lower education levels,
Speaker 3: less likely to actually have idea. These are often people
Speaker 3: who went from sort of generational slavery just a couple
Speaker 3: of generations earlier, to get sort of indentured labor and
Speaker 3: stuff like this, and there's political pressure put on them,
Speaker 3: social pressure put on not to register the vote. Of course,
Speaker 3: that's how the civil rights may become. So I can
Speaker 3: understand the whole black white argument. I don't understand why
Speaker 3: it discriminates against lgbt Q I A plus people. Why
Speaker 3: are they more likely to be illiterate or not have
Speaker 3: id maybe that maybe that maybe the trans people would
Speaker 3: have difficulty producing a birth certificate. Fair enough, but what
Speaker 3: about everyone else? Like I said, you know, are you
Speaker 3: a citizen Sarah?
Speaker 2: Hell? Now, they wouldn't want anything to stop this bill?
Speaker 6: Is there a huge hoard of LGB two.
Speaker 2: People voted against it.
Speaker 3: All these gay people in the southern border coming through,
Speaker 3: and we.
Speaker 1: Should illegal there's is these things you can say, and
Speaker 1: if as long as you use these phrases, no one
Speaker 1: is allowed to question.
Speaker 3: What is the cause.
Speaker 1: It's the Omni cause, water birds and insolidarity with Palestine.
Speaker 1: We're going to go to a break when we come
Speaker 1: back to look at what's what is making news in
Speaker 1: the papers tomorrow. It's coming up in a second. All right,
Speaker 1: let's take a look at what's making news tomorrow. Joe Hildebrand,
Speaker 1: you are officially the Daily.
Speaker 3: Time and the Daily Daily Telegraph correspondent. Yeah. It beats
Speaker 3: doing actual, any real work for them. Daly Tig magnificent newspaper.
Speaker 3: We came up with the crazy idea. When I say where,
Speaker 3: I mean the bosses. I'm just here to spook it.
Speaker 3: Crazy idea instead of just saying, you know, hey, hey
Speaker 3: men stop hitting women and being made and everything. Why
Speaker 3: not go after the men who actually do abuse women
Speaker 3: and name and shame them. They have put on the
Speaker 3: front page of the newspaper for tomorrow's edition the photographs
Speaker 3: of eighteen of some of the worst domestic violence offenders
Speaker 3: in the state. It's an absolute disgrace. And if you
Speaker 3: just look at these people part of it we were
Speaker 3: sort of looking at before, like like some of them,
Speaker 3: you just think, all right, they've got to face, you know,
Speaker 3: face like a prison informant. A couple of them though,
Speaker 3: you just think it just could be anyone. And this
Speaker 3: obviously is a wake up call that everybody needs to
Speaker 3: show that. And also I think there's a database in
Speaker 3: New South as well where women can actually see if
Speaker 3: people have a history of domestic violence. Men too, for
Speaker 3: that matter.
Speaker 1: The other thing the Telegraph are doing, and I don't
Speaker 1: know how serious they are, maybe you can tell us,
Speaker 1: but they say on the front page that they want
Speaker 1: to stop using the term domestic violence, start talking about
Speaker 1: coward attacks.
Speaker 3: That's exactly right, that's exactly right. So there's a bit
Speaker 3: of history here and this when I was this one
Speaker 3: I was heavily involved in, was a campaign against the
Speaker 3: one hit punches that was happening, particularly in around King's
Speaker 3: Cross and the CBD. This was what led to the
Speaker 3: lockout laws. People were being literally killed by it became
Speaker 3: this weird phase that and glassing. Believe it or not,
Speaker 3: this is many many years ago, and of course it's
Speaker 3: normally referred to, or was historically referred to, as a
Speaker 3: King hit, and we all, like the Telly the newsroom
Speaker 3: and others were sort of getting around saying, well, King
Speaker 3: hit kind of sounds kind of cool, like it sounds
Speaker 3: like a good thing, and so we basically along with others,
Speaker 3: but we just started calling it throughout this cam pain
Speaker 3: calling it a coward punch. And of course suddenly there's
Speaker 3: not much Oh what did you do? What did you
Speaker 3: do on Friday night? And you know I am telling
Speaker 3: this right, Oh yeah, coward punched in mate obviously doesn't
Speaker 3: have the same cash. And now that language is really
Speaker 3: baked in and so it basically picks up on that.
Speaker 3: So we're not saying that, We're not going to call
Speaker 3: them attackers anymore, not going to say this is an
Speaker 3: active so called domestic violence or whatever. We're just saying
Speaker 3: they're cowards. This is who they are, and this is
Speaker 3: what they look like, and how big and tough and
Speaker 3: strong do they look now that they've been named in
Speaker 3: shame one hundred.
Speaker 1: And forty three murders across New South Wales in the
Speaker 1: past five years. So it's a massive issue. The men's
Speaker 1: government taking action and good to see the Day Telegraph
Speaker 1: on board as well.
Speaker 2: Here here better than name and shame, just picture their face,
Speaker 2: show and show you'd be dating one of these guys.
Speaker 2: Swipe and right on Hinge And if you just go
Speaker 2: check out the front page of the Daily Telly, I
Speaker 2: think twice to the front page of the Camera Times.
Speaker 2: Now I'm just sure on air?
Speaker 1: Would you let me help you, Liz. Front page of
Speaker 1: the Canberra Times power struggle reads the headline Wallaroo residents
Speaker 1: are angry about plans for a one hundred megawatt solar farm,
Speaker 1: which they say will destroy the tranquility, amenity and land
Speaker 1: values of their properties. It's a good front page photograph
Speaker 1: there of the family standing on their property, beautiful green
Speaker 1: pastures behind them. But not for long. It's going to
Speaker 1: be hundreds and hundreds of solar panels. Just what you
Speaker 1: want when you move to the country for the peace
Speaker 1: and quiet and the beautiful view.
Speaker 3: I moved to the country for the smug knowledge that
Speaker 3: I'm doing my part to save the planet by staring
Speaker 3: at it's not for a greater good. Guys, come on,
Speaker 3: get on.
Speaker 2: My voice back. Yes it is testing one too. So yes,
Speaker 2: this is our one hundred and seventy million dollar win farm.
Speaker 2: It's supposed to I sound like it's supposed to power
Speaker 2: forty eight one thousand homes. Those homes are obviously being
Speaker 2: powered just fine right now. But no, no, we need
Speaker 2: this big, ugly solar farm now, they're saying, because the
Speaker 2: residents were so angry about it, and the local council
Speaker 2: was like, not in my backyard. It will be decided
Speaker 2: by an independent path of course.
Speaker 1: All right, let's go to the front page of the
Speaker 1: Tasmanian Mercury Hobart Register's highest use of fentanyl killer drug
Speaker 1: fear reads the headline Tasmania had the highest use of cannabis, fentanyl, oxydone,
Speaker 1: ketamine and mdm A of any capital city in Australia.
Speaker 1: A new report says, now, cocaine other drugs were familiar
Speaker 1: with cannabis, but fentanyl is an.
Speaker 3: Interesting to one's very America.
Speaker 1: Of course, when you talk about fentanyl, you immediately think
Speaker 1: the US border. It's been struggled in.
Speaker 3: I think Prince was Prince was a fentanyl overdose, wasn't it.
Speaker 1: I certainly don't think Hobart No.
Speaker 3: But obviously now you know Little Hobart's punching above its way.
Speaker 3: You know, I joined the Big Birds. It's truly global city.
Speaker 3: On an unrelated note, can we just go back to
Speaker 3: the front page of the Tasmania Mercury. This is, I
Speaker 3: should stress, completely unrelated to the story below about all
Speaker 3: sorts of crazy drugs. But what is going on in
Speaker 3: that picture? This is? This is Marcus Gibbo Gibbon and
Speaker 3: musician Theresa Dixon, who are putting the final touches on
Speaker 3: Big Willie. I think Big Willie is the burning man
Speaker 3: who's not burning yet. He is still luke warm Willie.
Speaker 1: It's a music festival and I'm sure there'll be no
Speaker 1: drugs present.
Speaker 3: What is just so much to unpack? What's going on there?
Speaker 3: I saw a big Willy I thought.
Speaker 1: Speak of unpacking. Unpack the front page of the Gold.
Speaker 3: Car it was another thing. I just don't know what's
Speaker 3: going on anymore, right, So I've got a podcast I've
Speaker 3: been I've got a podcast, The Real Story with Joe Hildebrand.
Speaker 3: Don't miss that every Thursday, where I meant to explain
Speaker 3: to people, like what's really going on in the news.
Speaker 3: I no longer know what's really going on in the news.
Speaker 3: Check out this one right, Gold Coast Bulletin, Great little newspaper.
Speaker 3: Man Yar, Big Splash Exclusive ceo stood down during probe
Speaker 3: into workplace claims. Surf Boss shock Waves and independent investigation
Speaker 3: is underway into workplace claims made against surfing Queensland CEO
Speaker 3: Adam Yates. Mister Yates has been stood down penning the
Speaker 3: outcome of the probe. What is surfing Queensland? Queensland has
Speaker 3: got a whole government department dedicated to surfing?
Speaker 5: What is going on there?
Speaker 3: I mean, I know surfing is great and everything. I
Speaker 3: know they've got a lot of coastline. But they've got
Speaker 3: like a whole surfing department. Why not? It's pretty good idea,
Speaker 3: But why don't we have one? Why don't then everybody
Speaker 3: have one?
Speaker 1: Tell us about the other front page story there, Joe,
Speaker 1: because the other one makes me curious.
Speaker 3: I'm so confused. Chappelle Bells is the verse strap ring
Speaker 3: of truth for Corby. Chappelle Corby celebrated her birthday in Paris,
Speaker 3: but eagle eyed social media followers spotted a ring that
Speaker 3: could signal wedding bells for the convicted drug smoke.
Speaker 2: When a Chappelle Corby front page news, not front page
Speaker 2: traffic drugs into other countries, you can still to it.
Speaker 3: Was a long time ago.
Speaker 2: It was a long time Corby living it up in Paris, engaged,
Speaker 2: front page of the Gold Coast.
Speaker 3: Come on, she's turned over a new leaf.
Speaker 2: Beyond several new leafs.
Speaker 1: The best part of this article, though, is we don't
Speaker 1: know if she's engaged. It may mean could, but they
Speaker 1: got a front page.
Speaker 3: She's nowhere near the Gold Coast like she's in Paris,
Speaker 3: but because she's a Gold Coast girl. Originally that guy
Speaker 3: the like angle, that is skilled, but that is journalist.
Speaker 3: It works.
Speaker 1: We're on TV talking about it.
Speaker 2: So very nice to the front page of the ODS.
Speaker 2: Now we are reading this tiny little hideaway. Murdoch Howard.
Speaker 2: This is Rupert Murdoch, obviously the one, the only Murdochel
Speaker 2: Howard was our best PM, but Turnbull was nuts. John
Speaker 2: Howard achieved more in office than any other Australian Prime
Speaker 2: Minister Rupert Murdoch says in a series of interviews to
Speaker 2: mark the sixtieth anniversary of the Australian Newspaper on July fifteenth,
Speaker 2: mister Murdoch, who founded this mass heead said mister Howard,
Speaker 2: prime minister from March nineteen ninety six to November two
Speaker 2: thousand and seven, was the best leader during his lifetime.
Speaker 2: Are there really that many Australians who would disagree with that?
Speaker 1: If you're talking about political analysis, Yeah, but.
Speaker 2: You're from the Labor Party like that Howard.
Speaker 1: If you want sharp political analysisco Turnbull was Nuts is
Speaker 1: about a succinct and sharp as you can.
Speaker 2: Synopsis spot on.
Speaker 1: The documentary is on Monday at eight pm here on
Speaker 1: Sky News. Don't forget the tune in. We're going to
Speaker 1: go to a break when we come back. Fake the
Speaker 1: Picasso's in a Hobart museum. That intriguing story in a second,
Speaker 1: all right, welcome back. There is a art scandal in Hobart,
Speaker 1: Liz so.
Speaker 2: Scandal so art. So you don't be familiar with the
Speaker 2: court case that the guy who was not allowed into
Speaker 2: the Ladies exhibit at Mona and he was really upset
Speaker 2: about it, so he took the case to court, and
Speaker 2: he actually won because yes, this is discrimination, despite the
Speaker 2: fact you are clearly a man. He wasn't even pretending
Speaker 2: to be a woman. He was a man wanting to
Speaker 2: go into the woman's exhibition. Well, it turns out that
Speaker 2: the lady who fought that case to the back teeth
Speaker 2: painted the paintings herself. They weren't true picassos. She has
Speaker 2: kept this for four long years and still didn't admit it.
Speaker 2: Even after the court ruled in this guy's case. She
Speaker 2: moved them to the women's toilets, being like, well, you
Speaker 2: can't come in here, buddy, it's still female lonely artwork,
Speaker 2: and has only now chosen to tell everyone, you know what,
Speaker 2: I played you all. They're fake. I painted them myself.
Speaker 2: I love this woman is such a troll.
Speaker 1: I love it. Apparently one of them was hanging upside down,
Speaker 1: which was.
Speaker 2: A clue that she was trying to give the nod.
Speaker 1: She said, she's been waiting months for someone to point
Speaker 1: it out, and she's thrilled that Samone has now.
Speaker 3: Realized what does that tell you?
Speaker 1: It's also have to make it a little apology to
Speaker 1: the Picasso foundation.
Speaker 3: Well, I was going to say, what does that tell
Speaker 3: you about Picasso? Anyone can if that's right, if she
Speaker 3: can just scribble something out, put out there, that's a Picasso.
Speaker 3: Everyone's going in there. Oh my god, it's so powerful.
Speaker 3: Oh weeping woman, Oh Gernica. Oh what does that go?
Speaker 3: W does that tell you about everything you need to
Speaker 3: know about art? Turns out picsso not that great. Yeah,
Speaker 3: you heard me?
Speaker 1: All right, Before we finish, you're going to show you
Speaker 1: one of the more unusual headlines we saw today. Man
Speaker 1: gets caught smuggling snakes into China down his trousers. We
Speaker 1: don't recommend this. Here's the statement from Chinese customs. Upon inspection,
Speaker 1: customs officers discovered that the pockets of the trousers the
Speaker 1: passenger was wearing were packed with six canvas drawstring bags
Speaker 1: and sealed with tape. Once opened, each bag was found
Speaker 1: to contain living snakes in all kinds of shapes, sizes,
Speaker 1: and colors. One hundred and four snakes down his trousers
Speaker 1: as he tried to get from Hong Kong into mainland China.
Speaker 1: There's some of the sneaks this guy had pants.
Speaker 3: Oh my, could I just say, I don't know what
Speaker 3: the big deal is here like that, Joe, you do
Speaker 3: this on a weekly basis. I've been carrying around a
Speaker 3: snake in my trousers for years now, Joe.
Speaker 1: It's not the only example of people trying to smuggle
Speaker 1: snakes snakes into China. In twenty twenty three, a woman
Speaker 1: was found with five snakes in her bra trying to
Speaker 1: get into China. So apparently it's a common thing amongst
Speaker 1: people entering mainland China. We're going to go now. That's
Speaker 1: it from us to stick around. Coming up with Nika
Speaker 1: de Giorgio, who is hosting Rita Beenahi show that's coming
Speaker 1: up now.