1 00:00:00,440 --> 00:00:03,119 Speaker 1: As I mentioned earlier in the program, former Foreign Minister, 2 00:00:03,320 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: Liberal leader and diplomat Alexander Dana has written a compelling 3 00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: article in this Morning's Advertiser. He says we should forget 4 00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:12,760 Speaker 1: the subs and find better ways to invest in South Australia. 5 00:00:12,880 --> 00:00:15,440 Speaker 1: He joins me in Alexander Danna, welcome, thanks for coming 6 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:16,160 Speaker 1: on the show today. 7 00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:18,560 Speaker 2: It's a pleasure Graham. 8 00:00:19,480 --> 00:00:21,919 Speaker 1: You believe that the billions of dollars being spent on 9 00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:25,720 Speaker 1: preparation for the subs that Osborne should be put in 10 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:26,360 Speaker 1: other areas. 11 00:00:27,960 --> 00:00:30,720 Speaker 2: Yes, well, I think it's wasted because in the end, 12 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 2: I don't think submarines will ever be built in Adelaide 13 00:00:34,400 --> 00:00:37,760 Speaker 2: because of the cost and the amount of time and 14 00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:41,159 Speaker 2: the amount of skilled labor book fire to do that. 15 00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:44,960 Speaker 2: And I think ultimately common sense will prevail and will 16 00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:48,880 Speaker 2: buy the submarine from either the US or the UK, 17 00:00:49,120 --> 00:00:55,600 Speaker 2: where they have felt nuclear submarines for generation. And I 18 00:00:55,640 --> 00:00:58,280 Speaker 2: think we would be much better investing the money in 19 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:03,680 Speaker 2: South Australia in promoting our education institutions, the arts, obviously 20 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 2: dealing with some of the health and education problems that 21 00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:12,240 Speaker 2: we have, such a branding which means more hospital beds. 22 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 2: There are so many things a week that invest the 23 00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:19,840 Speaker 2: money in rather than I mean, frankly, I think in 24 00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:22,959 Speaker 2: then we're going to waste it on building a shipyard 25 00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:25,039 Speaker 2: for submarines that will never be built. 26 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 1: It's seen as a panacea for employment in the economy. 27 00:01:28,800 --> 00:01:30,160 Speaker 1: A lot of people would say if we don't go 28 00:01:30,319 --> 00:01:32,760 Speaker 1: down that path, there are tens of thousands who won't 29 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:33,560 Speaker 1: get jobs. 30 00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:38,240 Speaker 2: Well, I won't create tens of thousands of jobs. I 31 00:01:38,280 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 2: mean not even the government, as the most prosy optimistic, 32 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:45,640 Speaker 2: think that there'll be tens of thousands of jobs. It 33 00:01:45,680 --> 00:01:49,400 Speaker 2: will be a few thousand jobs. But on the other hand, 34 00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:52,160 Speaker 2: you have to think when you're investing money in the 35 00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:56,320 Speaker 2: opportunity cost of what you're doing. You're investing the money 36 00:01:56,520 --> 00:02:02,480 Speaker 2: in building submarines or building a facility for constructing submarines, 37 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:07,000 Speaker 2: and therefore you're not using that money for something else. 38 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:10,480 Speaker 2: And my argument is that you will create a lot 39 00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:15,480 Speaker 2: more sustainable and long term jobs and a lot more 40 00:02:15,560 --> 00:02:21,160 Speaker 2: dynamism in South Australia if you invested in a series 41 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:24,280 Speaker 2: of other areas and try to build on some of 42 00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 2: South Australia's traditional strength. If you channel all your money 43 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:33,960 Speaker 2: into one area like building submarines. Well, of course, the 44 00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:37,240 Speaker 2: people who get the money will do very well after that. 45 00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 2: But think about the people who don't get it. It's 46 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:44,280 Speaker 2: about all the projects that we just don't go ahead 47 00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:47,960 Speaker 2: with because we're putting their money into building submarines. When 48 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:50,920 Speaker 2: we could get the submarines, and we do need the submarines, 49 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 2: we could get them much more cheaply getting them built 50 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 2: off shore. I mean, let me give you an example. 51 00:02:56,919 --> 00:03:01,120 Speaker 2: We don't build F thirty five fighter aircraft Australia because 52 00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:03,920 Speaker 2: it will just be too expensive. It would just be 53 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:06,639 Speaker 2: a waste of our resources when we can buy them 54 00:03:06,680 --> 00:03:09,800 Speaker 2: much more cheaply from the US. Not with their chief, 55 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:12,600 Speaker 2: but we buy them more cheaply from the US. Well, 56 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 2: it's the same with a nuclear submarine. 57 00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 1: You said in your article. Modern South Asralia was founded 58 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:19,720 Speaker 1: on ambition, but today it doesn't seem to have quite 59 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:22,160 Speaker 1: the same burning desire to build a great society. 60 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:24,760 Speaker 3: No. 61 00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:29,360 Speaker 2: I'm sorry to say that because I am a native 62 00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:33,560 Speaker 2: South Australian and my parents, grandparents and great grandparents were 63 00:03:33,560 --> 00:03:37,120 Speaker 2: all born in South Australia. So I remain very committed 64 00:03:37,160 --> 00:03:40,000 Speaker 2: to state. But I think it has lost a lot 65 00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:42,640 Speaker 2: of a lot of the ambition. I was reminded the 66 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 2: other day of Robert Barr Smith, who was an early 67 00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:52,120 Speaker 2: nineteenth century pioneer grazier in South Australia. He made a 68 00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:54,520 Speaker 2: huge amount of money and he puts some of us 69 00:03:54,560 --> 00:03:58,960 Speaker 2: as a philanthropis into the University of Adelaide because, as 70 00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:02,080 Speaker 2: he said, he wanted the University of Adelaide to be 71 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:04,960 Speaker 2: one of the best in the world. Well, now that 72 00:04:05,360 --> 00:04:08,600 Speaker 2: a University of South Australia and the University of Adelaide 73 00:04:08,640 --> 00:04:12,880 Speaker 2: are going to merge, that's an opportunity for us to 74 00:04:12,960 --> 00:04:16,880 Speaker 2: think about, well, how can we make this merge university 75 00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:20,040 Speaker 2: the best in Australia and one of the great universities 76 00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:23,559 Speaker 2: of the world. Will will require investment, but we won't 77 00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:26,520 Speaker 2: have the investment because we're investing at all in building 78 00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:30,640 Speaker 2: facilities for the construction of nuclear submarine and we could 79 00:04:30,680 --> 00:04:31,640 Speaker 2: buy that offshore. 80 00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:32,680 Speaker 3: That's what I mean. 81 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:37,240 Speaker 1: You look back in your article to your relationship with 82 00:04:37,279 --> 00:04:39,680 Speaker 1: Mike ran when he was Premier and you were Foreign Minister. 83 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:42,440 Speaker 1: You work together to try to create Adelaide as a 84 00:04:42,520 --> 00:04:45,479 Speaker 1: university center, and you had some success, but that now 85 00:04:45,520 --> 00:04:47,680 Speaker 1: has a long distant memory. 86 00:04:49,279 --> 00:04:52,279 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, we did have early success. I mean the 87 00:04:52,360 --> 00:04:54,479 Speaker 2: two of us, he being the premier of the state 88 00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:57,240 Speaker 2: and me being one of the senior members of the 89 00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:02,040 Speaker 2: federal cabinet were we are obviously had power in those days, 90 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:07,680 Speaker 2: which neither of us have anymore, and we work together 91 00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:11,320 Speaker 2: to get Carnegie Mellon established in Adelaide, and then he 92 00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:15,359 Speaker 2: got ucild University College London, which is one of the 93 00:05:15,400 --> 00:05:19,320 Speaker 2: twenty top universities in the world, to invest there as well. 94 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:23,440 Speaker 2: So we got off to a great start actually with 95 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:27,679 Speaker 2: this vision. But to be honest, subsequent governments haven't shown 96 00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:31,040 Speaker 2: much interest in the project at all. And so I 97 00:05:31,040 --> 00:05:33,839 Speaker 2: mean liberal and labor. It's not a question of one 98 00:05:33,960 --> 00:05:37,400 Speaker 2: versus the other. Neither of them have shown much interest 99 00:05:37,440 --> 00:05:41,080 Speaker 2: in this vision. They get bogged down in issues which 100 00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:44,280 Speaker 2: I mean are not claiming, so people shouldn't ring in 101 00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:48,440 Speaker 2: and say I'm saying these things are unimportant. They get 102 00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:53,279 Speaker 2: bogged down in issues like ramping, which is important, but 103 00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:56,440 Speaker 2: you have to have you have to have a basic 104 00:05:56,600 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 2: vision for the state and an ambition for the state. 105 00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:03,039 Speaker 2: Not just to make sure we have enough hospital beds. 106 00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:05,919 Speaker 2: All states have to do, all countries have to do that, 107 00:06:07,160 --> 00:06:09,760 Speaker 2: but we have to have some bigger idea in our 108 00:06:09,800 --> 00:06:14,080 Speaker 2: heads than that. And I thought creating Adelaide as the 109 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:19,520 Speaker 2: sort of Boston of Australia as a leading educational particularly 110 00:06:19,640 --> 00:06:23,919 Speaker 2: tertiary education center, but not just Australia but Southeast Asia. 111 00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:28,359 Speaker 2: I thought that was a great idea. But to be 112 00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:31,680 Speaker 2: honest with you, Mike Gran did that nobody else might 113 00:06:31,839 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 2: seems to have done since. 114 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:38,000 Speaker 1: Another area that you allude to us the fact that 115 00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 1: Adelaide was a trendsetter when it came to the arts. 116 00:06:40,880 --> 00:06:44,520 Speaker 1: I mean the Adelaide Festival is still the country's leading festival, 117 00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:47,440 Speaker 1: but we seem to have lost direction and focus regarding 118 00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:48,240 Speaker 1: the arts. 119 00:06:49,279 --> 00:06:52,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, they're not given the priority that they were when 120 00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:56,039 Speaker 2: I mean Steel Hall started, who had just died recently, 121 00:06:56,160 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 2: had started the Adelaide Festival Center project and that was 122 00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:06,400 Speaker 2: built on by his successor, Don Dunstan. So there was 123 00:07:06,520 --> 00:07:10,960 Speaker 2: great enthusiasm I think actually the festival started under Sir 124 00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 2: Thomas Playford, but there was great enthusiasm to make Adelaide 125 00:07:17,040 --> 00:07:20,920 Speaker 2: this sort of cultural capital of Australia, which was a 126 00:07:20,960 --> 00:07:26,480 Speaker 2: fantastic idea actually, So we built the festival center and 127 00:07:26,680 --> 00:07:29,120 Speaker 2: in half the time and for much less cost than 128 00:07:29,320 --> 00:07:33,120 Speaker 2: Sydney opera hows. We got off to a great start, 129 00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 2: but since then we have rarely fallen behind. I mean 130 00:07:38,160 --> 00:07:41,560 Speaker 2: I think other states have I mean, we have a 131 00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:45,880 Speaker 2: symphony orchestra, but every state that has a symphony orchestra 132 00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 2: has a concert hall for at symphony orchestra and we 133 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:52,040 Speaker 2: don't have one because that's never been a priority to 134 00:07:52,120 --> 00:07:57,600 Speaker 2: South Australia. I mean, you know, I think if you 135 00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:01,240 Speaker 2: go to the South Bank of Brisbane you will see 136 00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:05,520 Speaker 2: this huge ambition that governments there have had to turn 137 00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:10,280 Speaker 2: the South Bank into a great, a great cultural center. 138 00:08:11,240 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 2: And we started that way, but then we've sort of 139 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:18,320 Speaker 2: lost direction and lost interest. And you know, politicians are 140 00:08:18,320 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 2: more interested in other issues. They don't seem to be 141 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:23,240 Speaker 2: so interested in the arts anymore. 142 00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:25,280 Speaker 1: A lot of money has been spent in the state 143 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:28,720 Speaker 1: by the premier. It's generated a lot of income. To 144 00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:33,160 Speaker 1: be fair with the AFL gather around and you know, 145 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:36,160 Speaker 1: live golf and the two down Under bring in lots 146 00:08:36,200 --> 00:08:39,199 Speaker 1: of money. But it's all sport focused. Do you think 147 00:08:39,240 --> 00:08:43,280 Speaker 1: we should be looking at broader areas well. 148 00:08:43,280 --> 00:08:46,400 Speaker 2: I wouldn't take the money away from sport. I actually 149 00:08:47,480 --> 00:08:49,840 Speaker 2: am a supporter of what the premier has done. I 150 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:52,160 Speaker 2: mean I went to one of the gather around games 151 00:08:52,360 --> 00:08:56,120 Speaker 2: with the n Adelaide essence of game, but with the 152 00:08:56,240 --> 00:09:02,840 Speaker 2: usual result, and I think that's great, and I'm glad 153 00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:06,120 Speaker 2: he brought back via car race as well, because I 154 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:09,120 Speaker 2: thought that was always a good thing for Adelaide to have. No, 155 00:09:09,120 --> 00:09:11,880 Speaker 2: I'm in Australia as a country that loves its sports 156 00:09:11,880 --> 00:09:15,800 Speaker 2: and South Australians included, and it does make a lot 157 00:09:15,840 --> 00:09:18,840 Speaker 2: of difference to the state if we do invest in sports. 158 00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:23,679 Speaker 2: But we don't want to lose our status as a 159 00:09:23,960 --> 00:09:29,559 Speaker 2: great art center. And I mean the Festival and actually 160 00:09:29,600 --> 00:09:33,160 Speaker 2: the Fringe are still by far the biggest and the 161 00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:36,400 Speaker 2: best in Australia, but we want to make sure we 162 00:09:36,520 --> 00:09:40,079 Speaker 2: don't lose that status. And I think, you know, there's 163 00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:44,079 Speaker 2: too little interest and enthusiasm for the arts for us 164 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:47,600 Speaker 2: to maintain our premier position that we once had. 165 00:09:48,920 --> 00:09:51,760 Speaker 1: Tight economic times, people would say, look, you know, we've 166 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:55,719 Speaker 1: got to spend on the realities of life, ramping the 167 00:09:55,760 --> 00:10:01,120 Speaker 1: health and medical education system. We can't widen our focus 168 00:10:01,120 --> 00:10:03,160 Speaker 1: at this time. Is that what you're saying is this 169 00:10:03,240 --> 00:10:04,559 Speaker 1: for the future, It's not for the day. 170 00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:10,720 Speaker 2: Well, my argument is that we are spending a lot 171 00:10:10,800 --> 00:10:15,400 Speaker 2: on those things, and I'm not criticizing that, but we're 172 00:10:15,440 --> 00:10:18,960 Speaker 2: also spending a huge amount on building submarine in Nablade, 173 00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 2: and I don't see I think having the submarine is 174 00:10:22,920 --> 00:10:27,079 Speaker 2: an essentral component about defense, the parents against the research 175 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:30,679 Speaker 2: in China and all of that. I'm familiar with all 176 00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:34,679 Speaker 2: those issues obviously, so I do think that's a priority. 177 00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:38,000 Speaker 2: But building the submarines in Adelaide is going to impose 178 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:42,320 Speaker 2: a huge premium on the cost of building it, of 179 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:45,920 Speaker 2: buying submarines when we could get them much more cheaply 180 00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:50,280 Speaker 2: flem offshore, and that would free up billions of billions 181 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:53,679 Speaker 2: of dollars which we could invest in a whole range 182 00:10:53,720 --> 00:10:56,240 Speaker 2: of other things, including some of the things that I've 183 00:10:56,240 --> 00:10:58,720 Speaker 2: been talking about and the things. 184 00:10:58,400 --> 00:10:59,960 Speaker 3: That you're talking about as well. 185 00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:03,400 Speaker 2: We could do both, but instead we're investing the money 186 00:11:03,840 --> 00:11:06,960 Speaker 2: in trying to build nuclear powered submarines. I mean, we 187 00:11:07,080 --> 00:11:11,199 Speaker 2: have no experience of building US were powered submarines. So 188 00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:14,200 Speaker 2: we have to train up a workforce, we have to 189 00:11:14,200 --> 00:11:19,000 Speaker 2: find the workforce. We we have to invest in building 190 00:11:19,040 --> 00:11:24,200 Speaker 2: the infrastructure. It's huge ex that infrastructure already exists in 191 00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:29,400 Speaker 2: America and in the UK. The workforces are already there. 192 00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 3: In Australia in the UK, although they're a bit short 193 00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:35,560 Speaker 3: of labor in both cases, but their workforces do exist. 194 00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 3: Not far better, far better to get them to build 195 00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:43,319 Speaker 3: the submarines. Just that, just five the submarines off. 196 00:11:43,120 --> 00:11:46,200 Speaker 2: The shelf and spend some of the change. We could 197 00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:49,280 Speaker 2: save some of the change. But since spend some of 198 00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:52,520 Speaker 2: the change when you're talking to billions of dollars on 199 00:11:52,600 --> 00:11:54,720 Speaker 2: some of the sorts of things that would give us 200 00:11:54,760 --> 00:11:56,640 Speaker 2: Australia more ambitions, is it. 201 00:11:56,600 --> 00:11:57,880 Speaker 1: Too late for us to change course? 202 00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:02,480 Speaker 2: I mean, I'm sure we won't because it would be 203 00:12:02,520 --> 00:12:05,400 Speaker 2: politically top. I mean, what I'm saying. 204 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:06,400 Speaker 3: Is politically toxic. 205 00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:11,760 Speaker 2: I imagine nobody would get elected. It would be the argument 206 00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:16,120 Speaker 2: that the political pundits would put. But of course it's 207 00:12:16,160 --> 00:12:18,880 Speaker 2: not too late. I mean, the sooner we change direction, 208 00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:23,920 Speaker 2: the better. Frankly, I mean, because then we'll save money. 209 00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:28,760 Speaker 2: But at the moment we're investing in land and materials 210 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:33,880 Speaker 2: and training of people and starting to build up towards 211 00:12:33,960 --> 00:12:37,679 Speaker 2: this new facility as Osborne to build the submarines. And 212 00:12:37,720 --> 00:12:42,160 Speaker 2: then you know, the day, the day probably won't arrive, 213 00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:45,120 Speaker 2: that the day could arrive when we start actually building 214 00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:48,640 Speaker 2: the submarines, I personally don't think that will ever happen 215 00:12:48,760 --> 00:12:52,160 Speaker 2: because the cost of building the submarines, the total cost 216 00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:55,280 Speaker 2: of the project is said by the federal government to 217 00:12:55,360 --> 00:13:00,040 Speaker 2: be around three hundred and sixty billion dollars. Well, I 218 00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:04,360 Speaker 2: mean that's deployed over many years, but that is a 219 00:13:04,720 --> 00:13:08,520 Speaker 2: huge amount of just a huge, an i watering amount 220 00:13:08,559 --> 00:13:11,920 Speaker 2: of money and the time that it would take to 221 00:13:11,920 --> 00:13:18,480 Speaker 2: build these submarines. I mean, I've often said this as 222 00:13:18,559 --> 00:13:21,840 Speaker 2: I doubt very much, even with the best hope in 223 00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:24,160 Speaker 2: the world that I may have, that I would live 224 00:13:24,240 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 2: to see the last of the submarine built in that 225 00:13:26,920 --> 00:13:29,880 Speaker 2: leg because if they were built in that lad, I 226 00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:32,920 Speaker 2: think it would be beyond my lifetime that they would 227 00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:34,520 Speaker 2: be built, and most of us. 228 00:13:34,600 --> 00:13:36,720 Speaker 1: Alexander Dna thank you so much for your time today. 229 00:13:37,120 --> 00:13:39,400 Speaker 1: If you haven't read the article I recommended to you, 230 00:13:39,800 --> 00:13:43,160 Speaker 1: it's in the Advertiser today. A former foreign minister, Liberal 231 00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:46,679 Speaker 1: leader and diplomat Alexander Dunna a compelling article, Should we 232 00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:49,160 Speaker 1: forget the subs and find a better way to invest 233 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:50,160 Speaker 1: in South Australia