Speaker 1: On scolds Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the Wader Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Riada Panety Show.
Speaker 4: Coming up tonight, Australia's terrorism threat level raised from possible
Speaker 4: to probable. We'll discuss the weapon grade gas lighting that
Speaker 4: sees women told to accept that two boxes with ex
Speaker 4: five chromosomes are female. A thirty billion dollar gas project
Speaker 4: in Wa Block.
Speaker 3: I'll speak to Professor im Plimer about that.
Speaker 4: Also joining me tonight PRU McSween Kin, Ciscofield.
Speaker 3: And alex Stein. And of course Left is.
Speaker 5: Losing it Frans.
Speaker 6: Women getting pregnant is not as far off as you think.
Speaker 6: In the past ten years, fifty babies have been born
Speaker 6: from a uterus transplant.
Speaker 4: Let's bring in Sky News contributor pro McSween Nappru. We'll
Speaker 4: start with Australia's terrorism threat level being raised from possible
Speaker 4: to probable. This follows several incidents since April, with the
Speaker 4: israel Hermas ward deemed by AZO to be just one
Speaker 4: of the contributing factors. The PM has pointed out that
Speaker 4: a probable terrorist threat does not mean it is inevitable,
Speaker 4: and that we must all focus on social cohesion.
Speaker 2: I want to reassure Australians. Probable does not mean inevitable,
Speaker 2: and it does not mean there is intelligence about an
Speaker 2: imminent threat or danger. But the advice that we've received
Speaker 2: is that more Australians are embracing a more diverse range
Speaker 2: of extreme ideologies and it is our responsibility to be
Speaker 2: vigilant prove.
Speaker 4: The AZO Director General Mike Burgess said more Australians are
Speaker 4: being radicalized and that espionage and foreign interference remain principal
Speaker 4: security concerns.
Speaker 3: What do you make of this news today?
Speaker 4: I think it would have taken a lot of people
Speaker 4: by surprise to have the threat level increased.
Speaker 7: Well, not me, you know, I think it's inevitable given
Speaker 7: number of factors. RITA. Firstly, I find it amusing that
Speaker 7: the Prime Minister is making those comments when he's contributed
Speaker 7: a lot to the lack of social cohesion in this
Speaker 7: country and the unrest with his tolerance of you know,
Speaker 7: the protests that have been going on post October seven,
Speaker 7: the fact that we have imported so many historic and
Speaker 7: cultural problems to this country, and you know, it's also
Speaker 7: the policy that we have in regard to you know, immigration,
Speaker 7: where we seem to be indiscriminate, and we're not imposing
Speaker 7: restrictions in terms of having a mandatory understanding of English
Speaker 7: assimilating people, so they're not forming try belong on claves
Speaker 7: where we have you know, children who are exposed to
Speaker 7: social unrest. But more importantly, the preachers, the mosque preachers
Speaker 7: that are allowed to really incite violence and radicalize these
Speaker 7: young minds. So there are so many contributing factors to
Speaker 7: what's going on here in Australia. And when you look
Speaker 7: at what's going over on in Europe, particularly in the
Speaker 7: UK as well, where we see you know, so much anger.
Speaker 7: It's like there is the public at a boiling point
Speaker 7: where they are sick of the police turning a blind
Speaker 7: eye to what's going on because they're terrified of you know,
Speaker 7: being called racist.
Speaker 3: And it's happening here too.
Speaker 7: The police are going soft on Islamist protests when they're
Speaker 7: really you know, becoming quite violent, and when you talking
Speaker 7: about you know, killing Jews, etc. And turning a block,
Speaker 7: then we have a problem here. So no, I'm not
Speaker 7: surprised at all.
Speaker 4: Well, the issue of two tier policing is certainly something
Speaker 4: that we've spoken about on this program, and it's a
Speaker 4: massive issue right now in the UK that perception, and
Speaker 4: I would argue it's not just a perception, it's a
Speaker 4: reality in the UK from what we've seen. That's just
Speaker 4: adding fuel to the fire. But moving on from that issue,
Speaker 4: the Prime Minister has been at Gama Festival in the
Speaker 4: Northern Territory. He told those gathered there that he's still
Speaker 4: committed to Macarata to truth telling despite the Voices comprehensive defeat.
Speaker 4: He also told the ABC's Insiders program that feelings are
Speaker 4: still hurt over the failed referendum.
Speaker 2: There is no doubt that there was considerable hurt, not
Speaker 2: just by the outcome, but by some of the way
Speaker 2: that the campaign was conducted. And that is just a reality.
Speaker 2: And people's feelings still raw and emotional, which is why
Speaker 2: you didn't wake up the next day and say, okay,
Speaker 2: now here's what we're doing. These issues take time to
Speaker 2: work their way through the system.
Speaker 4: True, is that what the country needs right now? A
Speaker 4: Macarata Commission, truth Telling possible treaty. I thought we had
Speaker 4: a vote on this not that long ago. And if
Speaker 4: the Voice is going to be voted down comprehensively, then
Speaker 4: you can you could just imagine what the figures would
Speaker 4: be if we were talking about treaty or truth telling commissions.
Speaker 7: Well, the bloke is not only weak and incompetent, but
Speaker 7: he's a slow learner clearly. And you know he's so
Speaker 7: always playing to the various audiences and giving them different messages.
Speaker 7: You know, he's been in Ghama, so he wants to
Speaker 7: do the grand gesture, even though of course all that talk,
Speaker 7: all those hundreds of millions of dollars that were wasted
Speaker 7: on the voice, have not done one thing to close
Speaker 7: the gap, and he refuses to acknowledge what the real
Speaker 7: reasons are for that gap. And then we have this
Speaker 7: situation again where you know, we know that he's allocated
Speaker 7: millions to Macarata. He does, he's got a tin ear
Speaker 7: when it comes to it, he's never given it up
Speaker 7: and he doesn't really care that the priorities in Australia
Speaker 7: now are much more focused on just surviving and being
Speaker 7: able to pay their energy bills due to his ineptitude
Speaker 7: and ridiculous policy. So look, you can't trust the bloke.
Speaker 7: You know, he wants a grand gesture to put himself
Speaker 7: into history, and that's what he's after.
Speaker 4: Yes, his desire to be in the history books and
Speaker 4: to have that legacy, I think has just got to
Speaker 4: put that to one side, because, like you said, cost
Speaker 4: of living are what most Australians are preoccupied with. It's
Speaker 4: not about racial divisions and focusing on something that we've
Speaker 4: already had a national vote on.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 4: Meanwhile, one of the Chief Voice advocates, Thomas Mayo, he's
Speaker 4: furious with Opposition leader Peter Dutton because Peter Dutton will
Speaker 4: not support Macarata the truth telling process. Mayo posted this
Speaker 4: on x He said, Peter Dutton said there will be
Speaker 4: no Macarata, will be revisiting or truth telling under a government.
Speaker 4: He leads, he's out of touch with the majority of
Speaker 4: Australians who, unlike him, appreciate the truth and what Macarata
Speaker 4: stands for.
Speaker 3: Peace and justice.
Speaker 4: Again, majority of Australians had a vote and I think
Speaker 4: that vote was pretty clear.
Speaker 3: I was rejected by every state the Voice.
Speaker 4: Now let's go to this gender ow surrounding two boxes
Speaker 4: at the Paras Olympics. It's not going away. You got
Speaker 4: the Algerian boxer Emana Khalifa tearfully declaring I am a female.
Speaker 4: But Khalif along with the Taiwan's lin uting we're only
Speaker 4: last year thrown out of the Women's World Boxing Championship
Speaker 4: for failing gender eligibility tests, and now it wasn't a
Speaker 4: testoster own test. They have x Y chromosomes. We're told
Speaker 4: that's a deal breaker. In my book, pro that means
Speaker 4: they are male. Olympic officials have now admitted that the
Speaker 4: pair have disorders of sex development, which is unfortunate for them,
Speaker 4: but having x Y chromosomes means they have an unfair
Speaker 4: advantage against female competitors.
Speaker 8: Prou.
Speaker 3: There are all sorts of Russian.
Speaker 4: Conspiracy theories, and some are even blaming Zionists for the
Speaker 4: al Juran Algerian being criticized. The our Duran Olympic and
Speaker 4: Sports Committees director told the Sydney Morning Herald the Zionist
Speaker 4: lobby they want to break the mind of Immand but
Speaker 4: now she is very strong. They don't want a Muslim
Speaker 4: girl or Arabic girl to go higher in the ranks
Speaker 4: of female boxing.
Speaker 3: Prou, What do you make of this? Because I have.
Speaker 4: Seen normally sensible people come to some very strange conclusions
Speaker 4: about this. I have not seen gas lighting like this
Speaker 4: for some time.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I agree with you. You know, look, even if
Speaker 7: you didn't accept that having an exive chromosome didn't make
Speaker 7: them a man, and you know, I'm with you, it
Speaker 7: doesn't make sense. People are saying, well, they're inter sex,
Speaker 7: so that's the reason, but there's still women. Well, the
Speaker 7: fact is that they have more testosterone levels than women
Speaker 7: x ex women, and consequently that gives them much more powerful,
Speaker 7: makes them much more powerful. So you know, let's not
Speaker 7: just say that the passports are the evidence that they're women.
Speaker 7: For God's sake, how insulting was that? You know, do
Speaker 7: some at dosterone testing, and maybe that's what's going to
Speaker 7: have to be mandatory if.
Speaker 4: You've beyond testoster and testing. I think it's beyond testosterone testing.
Speaker 4: I think because they've got x Y chromosomes, there's actual
Speaker 4: gender tests you can do that establish this. But the
Speaker 4: IOC refuses to do them. It hasn't done them for
Speaker 4: some twenty years. Other sporting codes do them. Other sporting
Speaker 4: codes will ban athletes on that basis, But the IOC
Speaker 4: has got its own philosophy, and I would suggest it
Speaker 4: is one that is throwing women under the bus. Both
Speaker 4: these fighters are in line form medals prough. I think
Speaker 4: that's a travesty. And there are brave women making a protest,
Speaker 4: including Bulgaria's Svetlana Steneva, who made an ex symbol after
Speaker 4: her loss to lin Uting. She refused to speak to reporters,
Speaker 4: and who can blame her when so many are repeating
Speaker 4: the IOC's lies and half truths. But her coach also
Speaker 4: made a protest, holding a piece of paper with the
Speaker 4: words I'm xx save women sport. I think that says plenty.
Speaker 4: And the pressure on these women not to speak out,
Speaker 4: to to sink from the IOC narrative, I think is
Speaker 4: just so deplorable that you not only are throwing them
Speaker 4: under the bus by having these x Y chromosome fighters
Speaker 4: in their competition, but then if they speak out, they're
Speaker 4: attacked for that. Now, before you go, I want to
Speaker 4: ask you about these riots that are happening across Great
Speaker 4: Britain and even Northern Ireland. Mass protests and unrest, a
Speaker 4: lot of ill feeling about mass immigration and crime, and
Speaker 4: there's been a lot of violence, a lot of dreadful scenes.
Speaker 4: The clashes are primarily between white British groups you could
Speaker 4: call them, and Muslim groups in places like Bolton, Middlesbrough, Liverpool, Southport.
Speaker 4: That's where three little girls were fatally stabbed. The protests
Speaker 4: have even spread to Northern Ireland where both sides of
Speaker 4: the Irish British divide are uniting in opposition. And this
Speaker 4: is quite incredible scenes to see. This footage is from Belfast.
Speaker 4: Incredible set to see pro Irish and British nationalists on
Speaker 4: the same side waving their flags and on the other
Speaker 4: side you've got the left waving rainbow and Antifa flags
Speaker 4: and Palestinian flags. We are seeing prou new alliances being
Speaker 4: formed to fight what he is seen as a common enemy.
Speaker 4: And a lot of this stems from mass immigration and
Speaker 4: really not having any sort of requirement to assimilate. You've
Speaker 4: got mass migration without assimilation, and these problems, I would argue,
Speaker 4: are entirely predictable.
Speaker 7: Absolutely, and you know, if we're not careful, we're going
Speaker 7: to import them as well.
Speaker 3: You know this.
Speaker 7: You know Europe has just porous borders. They're just particularly
Speaker 7: labor you know, or left governments are now you know,
Speaker 7: look at Karl Steim and what he's saying, alienating the
Speaker 7: Brits who are there, who are so concerned about their security.
Speaker 7: It is a huge worry. Well, I don't know where
Speaker 7: it's going to end, and I.
Speaker 4: Think it goes beyond labor because we've had the Tories
Speaker 4: empowering the UK for some time and they and they
Speaker 4: kept arguing that they're going to slash immigration numbers that'd
Speaker 4: go to elections promising tens of thousands, and then I
Speaker 4: think the last year they had a million come in
Speaker 4: and also legal immigration. Really that have done nothing about
Speaker 4: so these problems I think are only going to grow.
Speaker 3: Prou McSween, thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 4: Joining me now is a steam geologist, Professor Ian Plymer.
Speaker 4: In we will get to Woodside's thirty billion dollar gas
Speaker 4: project being blocked by the WA Environment Protection Agency, But first,
Speaker 4: mining magnate Andrew Tugifarres claims he has the solution for
Speaker 4: New South Wales energy woes. He told the Saturday Telegraph
Speaker 4: that while his Plan A had always been green hydrogen,
Speaker 4: his bulletproof Plan B is already underway. Import Kembler on
Speaker 4: the New South Wales south coast, the importing of liquefied
Speaker 4: natural gas from overseas is built a giant llen G
Speaker 4: gas import terminal there. But should we be importing when
Speaker 4: we're sitting on so much of the stuff in our
Speaker 4: own country.
Speaker 1: Well, Rita. Australia is a gas exporter. We have huge
Speaker 1: exports from northwestern Australia, huge exports out of Gladstone. We
Speaker 1: put gas into the pipelines that go right across to
Speaker 1: western Queensland and into South Australia, and that's gas that
Speaker 1: comes from Queensland. We've got gas from Queensland that goes
Speaker 1: to New South Wales and into Victoria. So we already
Speaker 1: have a lot of gas. We already are exporting gas.
Speaker 1: This seems to me rather odd because what skills does
Speaker 1: he have to do this? Is he an electrical engineer?
Speaker 1: Is he just chasing subsidies? What's this all about? And
Speaker 1: we've seen the four that New South Wales was short
Speaker 1: of energy.
Speaker 3: And never ran.
Speaker 1: The Premiere then built the Rahring power station that was
Speaker 1: nearly three thousand megawatts as a very big power station
Speaker 1: that's now forty years old, and that is clearly for
Speaker 1: New South while the cheapest and simplest way of creating
Speaker 1: electricity is to build another big coal power station in
Speaker 1: the coal fields and forget about the gas that's coming
Speaker 1: from Queensland.
Speaker 4: Well, we're going to talk about Chris Bowen saying that's
Speaker 4: not the case at all, so you may have to
Speaker 4: do a fact check on the spot, professor.
Speaker 3: But talking about Chris.
Speaker 4: Bowen, he is still pushing EVS and using our money
Speaker 4: to do so. He has pledged another twenty million of
Speaker 4: taxpayer funds to encourage this time right share drivers to
Speaker 4: go electric.
Speaker 9: Today we're announcing the next round of funding twenty million
Speaker 9: dollars or splends, will enable Splends to go to the
Speaker 9: next level, which is repeating what they've done the last
Speaker 9: the plus five hundred more evs, electric vehicles for wide
Speaker 9: shair drivers that produced emissions, reduce their fields and are
Speaker 9: good possible in a bit, also, I was shotting with
Speaker 9: some of the why's your drivers earlier? They shall be
Speaker 9: how much money they've saved, it's aultic in its servicing
Speaker 9: and a bits more money at their point.
Speaker 4: I just love sharing the videos Chris Bowen puts on
Speaker 4: social media because really everyone should see what he's up to.
Speaker 3: Is that a good use of public money?
Speaker 1: Professor, Well, he's spending our cash for an ideological idea
Speaker 1: that he's been pushing for a long time. If we
Speaker 1: look at the markets. We see around the world that
Speaker 1: there are huge stockpiles of evs. People are just not
Speaker 1: buying them. They're not buying them because of the rapid depreciation.
Speaker 1: They're not buying them because they lose so much money
Speaker 1: so quickly, so it's just not worth while putting all
Speaker 1: that capital out there. They don't have the longevity of
Speaker 1: an internal combustion engine. They can't go for sixty years
Speaker 1: like some internal combustion engines do. So I think he's
Speaker 1: pushing his ideology. He's having our pay for it. Electric
Speaker 1: vehicles will not take off in Australia. They might if
Speaker 1: people want to go down to their corner shop and
Speaker 1: buy something, but Australia is a very big country. People,
Speaker 1: especially in rural Australia, travel very long distances. We need
Speaker 1: an internal combustion engine. The market has already given them
Speaker 1: the message, and the message is there's very little interest
Speaker 1: in electric vehicles. So I think, yet again, Chris Bowen
Speaker 1: is absolutely totally wrong.
Speaker 4: Now, let's talk about that massive project that has been rejected.
Speaker 4: West Australia's Environmental Protection Agency has ruled the Woodside Energies
Speaker 4: proposed thirty billion dollar g project poses an unacceptable risk
Speaker 4: to scott Reef and should not be allowed to go ahead.
Speaker 4: As a lot of Greenies who are celebrating this decision today,
Speaker 4: it is a major blow to what has been described
Speaker 4: as Australia's largest untapped gas resource.
Speaker 3: What does this miss decision mean for.
Speaker 4: Australia In this project was going to produce enormous amounts
Speaker 4: and at the moment it looks dead.
Speaker 10: Well.
Speaker 1: The Greens have been very successful in polluting our government departments.
Speaker 1: They sell them and they are using these departments to
Speaker 1: stop development in Australia that creates revenue and creates jobs.
Speaker 1: We've been producing gas in Australia for a very long
Speaker 1: period of time. We've been producing it offshore for a
Speaker 1: long period of time. And last week I was in
Speaker 1: the gas fields of the Sirat Basin in the Roma
Speaker 1: area and it is incredibly impressive what is being done there.
Speaker 1: We're putting gas into the Eastern Australian grid. Now, gas
Speaker 1: actually is one of the forms of energy we need
Speaker 1: because it not only tops up the revenues, but it's
Speaker 1: an alternative to coal. It's an alternative for when the
Speaker 1: wind doesn't blow in, the doesn't shine, and it's an
Speaker 1: alternative to hydro. So I think this is a very
Speaker 1: very short sighted view from Western Australia. And the bottom
Speaker 1: line is that what this means is that this is
Speaker 1: frightening off people investing in Australia. And every person in
Speaker 1: Australia needs energy. We need a lot of energy. The
Speaker 1: more you become a Western country, the more energy you use.
Speaker 1: And if you're frightening away capital, it's got plenty of
Speaker 1: other places to go to. And so one of the
Speaker 1: real problems we have in Australia and these sort of
Speaker 1: environmental decisions made by greenies in government departments that tie
Speaker 1: up companies in red tape and black tape and green
Speaker 1: tape and now the blue tape of the U in
Speaker 1: this is basically part of the process that the greenies want,
Speaker 1: and that is to de industrialize Australia and to have
Speaker 1: people struggling with the electricity bills and cutting back all
Speaker 1: sorts of modern industries that we need to run a
Speaker 1: country like Australia. So I think it's a very retrograde step.
Speaker 4: Now, before you go, don't have a long but I
Speaker 4: do want to get your take on the Sydney Morning
Speaker 4: Herald's claims that aging coal power is driving up electricity bills.
Speaker 4: This is something Chris Bowen seized on He posted on
Speaker 4: x that after a decade of denial, delay and dysfunction,
Speaker 4: the Liberals left Australia with increasingly unreliable coal and more
Speaker 4: expensive grid and a more expensive grid.
Speaker 3: Now is that accurate?
Speaker 4: Is coal now unreliable and is the grid more expensive?
Speaker 1: Coal is aging because we have had green movements prioritize
Speaker 1: the wind and the soul into the grid. A coal
Speaker 1: five power station needs to run twenty four to seven
Speaker 1: producing base load electricity. Now what's happened is the green
Speaker 1: policies have stopped us twenty four to seven electricity and
Speaker 1: the coal fire power stations have to be on standby,
Speaker 1: and that is running but not providing electricity, using up
Speaker 1: huge amounts of coal and expenses, and not getting paid
Speaker 1: to the electricity. So Chris Bone is partially right. The
Speaker 1: aging coal fire power stations and the costs are due
Speaker 1: to the fact that when the coal fired power station
Speaker 1: delivers electricity, it cannot sell that electricity. Yet we have
Speaker 1: the ironical situation with wind and solar where they produce
Speaker 1: electricity and for many of these they earth that electricity
Speaker 1: into the ground. They cannot put it into the grid
Speaker 1: because of grid instability. So what has happened is the
Speaker 1: grid instability has killed off the aging coal fire power stations.
Speaker 1: It still is the best and the cheapest power in Australia,
Speaker 1: especially in Victoria.
Speaker 4: But we've got the market manipulation. As you've explained us
Speaker 4: so many times, it's not a level playing fielder, Professor Emplyman,
Speaker 4: thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me coming up.
Speaker 4: Left is losing it and Alex Steine will tell me why.
Speaker 4: Kamala Harris's husband is in the headlines. Welcome back. Now
Speaker 4: it's time for lefties losing it. Let's start with the
Speaker 4: bad news of the former Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi.
Speaker 3: Appears to be over indulging again.
Speaker 4: How else does one to explain this performance where she
Speaker 4: told CBS.
Speaker 3: That Joe Biden is so good he.
Speaker 4: Deserves a place at Mount Rushmore along the likes of Lincoln,
Speaker 4: Washington and Jefferson.
Speaker 11: Such a consequential president of the United States, a Mount
Speaker 11: Rushmore kind of president of the United States.
Speaker 10: Next, that he.
Speaker 7: Belongs up there on Mount Rushmore.
Speaker 11: Lincoln and Joe Biden but you got Teddy Roosevelt up there,
Speaker 11: and he's wonderful. I don't say take him down, but
Speaker 11: you can add Biden mount Rushmore.
Speaker 4: She said that Biden was at the top of his
Speaker 4: game and among the most consequential presidents are.
Speaker 3: Then why did she play a key part.
Speaker 4: In the plot to remove him as the Democrats nominee
Speaker 4: even after he secured more than fourteen million primary votes.
Speaker 4: Talk about threats to democracy. We will get back to
Speaker 4: the Democrats shortly, but first let's check in with one
Speaker 4: of our favorite transactivists explaining the science.
Speaker 3: Of dudes giving birth. Apparently it's not a matter of
Speaker 3: if but when.
Speaker 6: Trans women getting pregnant is not as far off as
Speaker 6: you think. In the past ten years, fifty babies have
Speaker 6: been born from a uterus transplant. So far, these implants
Speaker 6: have only been attempted on CIS women, but there's nothing
Speaker 6: that says it couldn't work on a trans woman. After all, my.
Speaker 12: Hormone levels are pretty similar to a cisgender woman, so
Speaker 12: why not. The main thing in the way is that
Speaker 12: the science is new, so there aren't enough surgeons out
Speaker 12: there to do the testing, so it's less about if
Speaker 12: we can do it and more about when we can
Speaker 12: do it. Imagine a trans woman using her own DNA along.
Speaker 6: With her partner's egg to create life. Wouldn't that be incredible?
Speaker 3: Incredible? I have some other words I would have used.
Speaker 4: And we're also told by other transactivists that men identifying
Speaker 4: as women can have periods.
Speaker 5: Once a month, transoman will experience what is known as
Speaker 5: a period. Some astute viewers might notice that most transomen
Speaker 5: don't have a uterus, let alone an ovaries or anything
Speaker 5: along the lines of that, but that doesn't change the
Speaker 5: fact that they are experiencing a period.
Speaker 4: Look, I'm not sure why anyone wants to pretend to
Speaker 4: have a menstrual cycle when they clearly don't. But here's
Speaker 4: a reality check. If you don't have ovaries, you.
Speaker 3: Ain't getting periods.
Speaker 4: Now, back to the Democrats and their propaganda arm the
Speaker 4: overwhelming majority of the media who can continue with their
Speaker 4: race obsessions. He is former Democrat operative and now an
Speaker 4: ABC host George Stephanopoulos yelling at Byron Donald's here's another
Speaker 4: lefty losing it.
Speaker 8: There are a lot of people who are trying to
Speaker 8: figure this out, but again that's.
Speaker 13: A side issue, not the main issue.
Speaker 5: The man is you, sir one second. So you just
Speaker 5: did it.
Speaker 3: You just did it again.
Speaker 13: Of the United States.
Speaker 8: Why do you why do you questioning her racial identity?
Speaker 13: Do you want me to talk?
Speaker 3: I want you to answer my question.
Speaker 13: Yell at George.
Speaker 8: George, now that you're done yelling at me, let me answer.
Speaker 4: Oh dear, there's about another four minutes of George losing
Speaker 4: it asking about race and then getting upset when Byron
Speaker 4: donalds answers his questions. White men yelling at black folk
Speaker 4: is well vintage Democrats, isn't it. And CNN have joined in.
Speaker 4: They sent out a reporter in a Michael Jordan T
Speaker 4: shirt to a barbershop and when the black workers there
Speaker 4: and the customers didn't give them the answers they wanted, well,
Speaker 4: white dude on camera, call them low information voters.
Speaker 5: If kinda going to make you a little more likely
Speaker 5: or less likely to vote Democrats, of.
Speaker 13: Course, is great.
Speaker 10: Hold on raat is it's Kamala black GI's he No,
Speaker 10: I'm gonna let her speak on that.
Speaker 2: But to me, no, oh as Gamla Blah gets an,
Speaker 2: I share that same view.
Speaker 14: Wow, it's Kamla blood gets No.
Speaker 8: I heard she was I heard she did have black
Speaker 8: game half Asian. When I played that audio on my
Speaker 8: serious XM radio program on Thursday, many callers who self
Speaker 8: identified as African American were quick to tell me that
Speaker 8: those men were the exception, not the rule. Some describe
Speaker 8: them as low information voters, no different than you'd find
Speaker 8: among whites.
Speaker 4: Amazing stuff there from CNN and the same DEI enthusiasts
Speaker 4: who insisted that Joe Biden pick a black female veep
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty, and now outrage that Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: Would be seen as a DEI peak.
Speaker 10: Are you committed to naming a black woman as your
Speaker 10: vice presidential running mate? What makes this so ugly is
Speaker 10: that it reveals a truth that is clearly broadly held
Speaker 10: within Republican circles that white men, by definition, when they
Speaker 10: have a job, earned it and deserve it, and anybody
Speaker 10: but a white man is a deihim.
Speaker 4: You know what, There are a growing number of people
Speaker 4: from all backgrounds, including plenty of black men, who know
Speaker 4: that DEI is not only racist, it's actually not good
Speaker 4: for them. It's often affluent white liberal women who are
Speaker 4: the biggest beneficiaries, like this white woman for Kamala.
Speaker 3: Is here to help gentle parents us through this election.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Hi everybody.
Speaker 14: I am so honored to speak today. I am like
Speaker 14: shaking to just be among such incredible company. We are
Speaker 14: here because as if you were here earlier, you've heard
Speaker 14: BIPOC women have happed us in as white women to
Speaker 14: step up. Listen and get involved the selection season.
Speaker 3: Ah, that's aerial Phota.
Speaker 4: She's not new to activism. Let's check in on some
Speaker 4: of her earlier work. And I'm gonna warn you this
Speaker 4: may be one of the most annoying people in the world.
Speaker 14: They just want to put a little warning sticker on
Speaker 14: your stove so that you know that it actually means
Speaker 14: methane gas. Yeah, the one making the world warmer.
Speaker 3: Yes, that is really happening.
Speaker 14: Can you catch a bubble please? California has used stickers
Speaker 14: to warn people about chemicals for a long long time,
Speaker 14: and the stickers are nothing to be afraid of. I promise.
Speaker 14: They just want people to know about the health impacts
Speaker 14: of burning gas so that we can be safer.
Speaker 4: Imagine being lectured to by that lady on the IELs
Speaker 4: of the world. We should send that sort of footage
Speaker 4: down to Gitmo. Should probably be more effective than water boarding.
Speaker 14: That's why they're saying that there should be more information
Speaker 14: people can learn about them. Nobody is coming to take
Speaker 14: your stop. Do you want to sign this paper with me?
Speaker 3: Okay, let's do it. Learning new things is great.
Speaker 14: I'm glad you're not scared anymore.
Speaker 4: Now to another painfully annoying lefty who brags about ruining
Speaker 4: a family gathering.
Speaker 3: So I just got kicked out of a gender reveal party.
Speaker 5: Everybody's clapping. It's a boy, and I just happen to say, well.
Speaker 3: Let's give it ten years and see if a sticks.
Speaker 5: Grandma clutches are per I'm leaving.
Speaker 3: There are seeds in the bag.
Speaker 5: I got them a pride onesie from Target.
Speaker 4: And while we're on gender reveal parties, it's never too
Speaker 4: late to throw them. Here is a mom and dad
Speaker 4: throwing one for their son who now identifies as their daughter.
Speaker 4: And have a look at just how happy the dad
Speaker 4: seems to be about all this, and there'll be.
Speaker 3: More lefties losing it content with.
Speaker 4: My next guest, Alex Stein, has been sparring with the
Speaker 4: young folk, some of them painfully woke and naive.
Speaker 3: Let's have a look allurance. Citizens can't vote, Yes, they
Speaker 3: can made.
Speaker 5: It illegal in nineteen ninety five.
Speaker 6: Okay, you're right, you're right, right, you're right right, and
Speaker 6: you don't.
Speaker 1: Let me just say this.
Speaker 15: You don't think it illegal immigrant has ever voted in
Speaker 15: the federal election?
Speaker 13: No, because it's not.
Speaker 3: I actually disagree with that.
Speaker 15: I am not thinking no, no, no, no, this guy,
Speaker 15: the delegate.
Speaker 13: Guy, you're so smart.
Speaker 10: You don't think an.
Speaker 15: Illegal immigrant has ever voted in the presidential federal election?
Speaker 3: Probably not?
Speaker 13: Oh myke i, I do.
Speaker 3: You know what I mean?
Speaker 4: That is the host of Prime Time with Alex Stein
Speaker 4: on Blaze TV. Alex, What was that all about? What
Speaker 4: are you doing terrorizing those young folk?
Speaker 15: Well, you're right, that guy was very naive. But to
Speaker 15: be honest, it's been exposed that a lot of illegal
Speaker 15: immigrants vote in our election. And that's why there's Congressman
Speaker 15: trying to get the Save Act passed to make it
Speaker 15: where you have to be a citizen to vote. And
Speaker 15: you know, it's obvious that these elections have loopholes in
Speaker 15: ways where people can go and vote without showing an idea.
Speaker 15: I mean, even Kamala Harris, the vice president, the woman
Speaker 15: running for president, said that voter ID law is racist
Speaker 15: and there's only one reason you don't want to have
Speaker 15: to id people when they vote is so that they
Speaker 15: can vote illegally.
Speaker 4: Well, it's crazy not to have a viotal idea. I
Speaker 4: just cannot understand it. And the overwhelming majority of Americans
Speaker 4: wanted So it's not something that's unpopular that the people
Speaker 4: wanted because they don't trust that the elections are completely
Speaker 4: above board. Now talking about Kamala Harris, she's been what
Speaker 4: the candidate now for two weeks, but no interviews alex nothing.
Speaker 4: This is just amazing to me because you would have
Speaker 4: the easiest time. The questions are probably going to be
Speaker 4: why are you so brave? And how you're going to
Speaker 4: save America? And why is Old Trump such a racist ogre?
Speaker 4: But she's still not sitting down with the friendly media.
Speaker 4: They're being treated with absolute disdain here.
Speaker 3: What's been the response.
Speaker 4: Is there any pressure growing for her to sit down
Speaker 4: and do an interview, not just read from an autoque.
Speaker 15: No, there's not enough pressure. I mean CNN, MSNBC, this
Speaker 15: ABC debate that's up in the air. Nobody's actually asked
Speaker 15: Kamela any questions. And I think the one time where
Speaker 15: she did speak at the prisoner exchange with Joe Biden.
Speaker 15: She absolutely embarrassed herself. She's not able to read, just improv.
Speaker 15: She can't just naturally have a speech that sounds coherent
Speaker 15: and clear. She's always saying these very weird word salad
Speaker 15: answers that don't actually answer the question that she's being asked.
Speaker 15: So I think it's just a lack of talent, And sadly,
Speaker 15: I would argue and say that she's even less talented
Speaker 15: than Joe Biden at public speaking. I mean, Joe Biden
Speaker 15: has done it a lot longer, and sadly, you know,
Speaker 15: the wear and terror is showing. But Kamala Harris is
Speaker 15: not only untalented, she's, for lack of a better word,
Speaker 15: she's dumb. And that's coming from a dumb guy myself.
Speaker 15: So I'm allowed to say that, I know a lot
Speaker 15: of yours are going to get mad, but Kamala Harris
Speaker 15: is not a rocket scientist as we see here in
Speaker 15: the United States.
Speaker 4: Well, she's treating the media with absolute disdain, despite the
Speaker 4: fact that they've gone full North Korean state media for her.
Speaker 4: The campaign they have run for her, rebranding her as
Speaker 4: some sort of a visionary leader, when she was always
Speaker 4: seen as a massive liability for the Biden administration. There
Speaker 4: have been so many pieces in all the leftist media
Speaker 4: saying what a problem she has been, how she hasn't
Speaker 4: lived up to her potential. But now all of that's
Speaker 4: been buried and forgotten, and I want to.
Speaker 3: Just get a little bit more lighthearted with you.
Speaker 4: There's a clip that's doing the rounds of Kamala dancing
Speaker 4: with a husband, Doug. It's resurfaced and.
Speaker 3: It's gone viral. Now, what's your take on this?
Speaker 15: Is this just.
Speaker 16: Wholesome and sweet or is it a little bit cringe?
Speaker 3: What do you think, Alex, it's kind of endearing.
Speaker 4: I know it's not you know, it may not be cool,
Speaker 4: it may not be getting the zoomers and the millennials
Speaker 4: are going, but it's kind of sweet to see a
Speaker 4: couple dancing together.
Speaker 15: Well, you know, I love to cut a rug and
Speaker 15: I actually like that video because now we don't need
Speaker 15: to do a DNA test. We can tell that Kamala
Speaker 15: is Indian. I think it's pretty obvious.
Speaker 1: By our dance.
Speaker 15: She probably leans more Indian than African American. But you know,
Speaker 15: on a serious note, I do kind of like it.
Speaker 15: But you know, Kamala's problem is not that she acts
Speaker 15: like an elitist. She was on Vogue with just regular
Speaker 15: Chuck Taylor tennis shoes. I think she does appeal to
Speaker 15: I guess just normal people. But at the end of
Speaker 15: the day, she is not capable of running our country.
Speaker 15: She's going to be a huge liability. We're having a
Speaker 15: stock market crash right now, cryptocurrency is crashing, and it's
Speaker 15: all based on speculation that Kamala Harris might be the
Speaker 15: president in the near future, and so that's scaring the banks,
Speaker 15: all these corporations, companies. I mean, Kamala Harris becoming president
Speaker 15: of the United States could theoretically in the republic in
Speaker 15: which we have right now.
Speaker 4: Well, that's a big call, Alex. Let's look at that dramatic.
Speaker 4: Let's talk a little bit about everything.
Speaker 3: He's a no.
Speaker 15: I would say, what if everything crashes?
Speaker 16: Worried.
Speaker 4: Yeah, nothing surprises made these diyes. I mean, if you
Speaker 4: told me three weeks ago the President Trump would have
Speaker 4: come one inch from being shot dead, and the whole
Speaker 4: event has pretty much been buried and we've moved on
Speaker 4: like it never happened. Nothing surprises me these days. But
Speaker 4: this story is something that the Harris campaign are not
Speaker 4: happy about dug em Offer Kamala Harris's husband. It's been
Speaker 4: revealed that he cheated on his first wife with their
Speaker 4: child's nanny getting her pregnant, and the Harris campaign is
Speaker 4: apparently in panic about this story coming out. Is this
Speaker 4: going to impact the honeymoon run she's had.
Speaker 3: Or is this just going to.
Speaker 4: Create more sympathy because at the end of the day,
Speaker 4: this isn't her fault, it's her husband's.
Speaker 3: Since surely no.
Speaker 4: One would be judging Kamala for what her husband did
Speaker 4: with his first wife.
Speaker 15: Well, nobody in America is really going to care that
Speaker 15: he cheated on his first wife. Sadly, you know, morals
Speaker 15: are not the most important things to these voters these days,
Speaker 15: you know. I think what this does tell us is
Speaker 15: why Doug Imov's daughter is so disturbed. I mean, you
Speaker 15: look at her tiktoks and her tweets. She looks like
Speaker 15: a crazy person. And when you compare her to Baron Trump,
Speaker 15: who is you know, I guess top of his class
Speaker 15: or you know, well respected, kind of shows you that,
Speaker 15: you know, maybe Doug Imov is not as good a
Speaker 15: dad as he tries to portray. Himself as.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 4: Getting the nanny pregnant is probably not the best thing you.
Speaker 3: Can do as a loving husband and father.
Speaker 4: Now, let's talk about more consequential issues. To prominent Black
Speaker 4: women who are backing Kamala Harris were caught on a
Speaker 4: zoom call slinging racial slurs and using expletives against white voters,
Speaker 4: particularly white women.
Speaker 3: Let's have a look and sound like the women.
Speaker 5: Excuse me, forget the white women.
Speaker 3: They're gonna do what the web would the white man tell.
Speaker 1: Them to do.
Speaker 5: That's what they tell themselves.
Speaker 4: Now, these comments were made by Cora Masters Barry and
Speaker 4: Melanie Campbell. Now, they visited the White House more than
Speaker 4: fifty times combined during the Biden administration, the clips from
Speaker 4: twenty twenty one.
Speaker 3: But I think that says plenty. There's not much unity
Speaker 3: in that clip.
Speaker 15: Well, Rita, you have, you know, the best segment left.
Speaker 15: He's losing it and you just explain that DEI basically
Speaker 15: benefits white women the most. So maybe that she's been
Speaker 15: you know, passed over from white women so much, and
Speaker 15: maybe that's why she has animosity towards white women because
Speaker 15: the DEI program that she stands for those women like
Speaker 15: actually could hurt them, and you know, really and truly,
Speaker 15: that woman's probably not that racist. You know, everybody that's
Speaker 15: you know, fighting this social justice or political activism. They
Speaker 15: like to use rhetoric like that because they think that
Speaker 15: it resonates with the people watching, and it probably does
Speaker 15: to the viewers at home that watched that clip, you know,
Speaker 15: live they're from, Like, you know what, I'm anti white.
Speaker 15: But at the end of the day, the race problem
Speaker 15: here in America is not as bad as they like
Speaker 15: to say, you know, on TV. I think that if
Speaker 15: we do have a natural disaster, people will come together
Speaker 15: and that shows are true colors of what makes America strong.
Speaker 15: But sadly, there is a little bit of racism, but
Speaker 15: it's not as bad as the TV tells you.
Speaker 4: Now, Donald Trump told Fox News that metaboss. Mark Zuckerberg
Speaker 4: has been in touch with him a few times. He's
Speaker 4: called him since that near assassination, and he's expressed his
Speaker 4: admiration for him.
Speaker 3: But Alex, I'm not.
Speaker 4: Trusting Mark Zuckerberg because you only have to look at
Speaker 4: Facebook and Instagram to see how it leans left, how
Speaker 4: they suppress speech, how they mark things and put fact
Speaker 4: checks on things that don't need fact checks and how
Speaker 4: they promote things that are obviously not true.
Speaker 3: What's your take?
Speaker 4: Is Mark Zuckerberg really just going to play it straight
Speaker 4: this election because last time around he donated around four
Speaker 4: hundred million dollars of his own money to fortify the election.
Speaker 15: Well, even more important than the money that he donated
Speaker 15: was just the censorship that he did on Facebook. And
Speaker 15: if he agrees to I do that this election, I
Speaker 15: think it'll be a much different outcome. But at the
Speaker 15: end of the day, you know, Mark Zuckerberg's coming around
Speaker 15: now that he's a UFC fighters. Testosterone levels are up,
Speaker 15: So maybe Mark Zuckerberg is maga Now.
Speaker 4: No, I don't think so. I'm not buying it. Alex Stein,
Speaker 4: thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 15: Thank you rider always a pleasure.
Speaker 3: Still to come.
Speaker 4: Megan Markel does another tell all interview and how Beyonce
Speaker 4: hopes to.
Speaker 3: Influence the presidential election.
Speaker 4: Welcome back joining me now as entertainment and royal reporter
Speaker 4: Kinsey's schofield. Let's start with Meghan Michaels. She attended a
Speaker 4: very exclusive business summit at the Hamptons last month, but
Speaker 4: the only evidence we have that she was there is
Speaker 4: this photo with makeup mogul Bobby Brown, Because the New
Speaker 4: York Post reveals, Yeah, that other celebrities didn't want to
Speaker 4: pose with the duchess.
Speaker 3: Surely that can't be right, Kinsey.
Speaker 13: Well, keep in mind readA Reese Witherspoon was there, Gwyneth
Speaker 13: Paltrow was there. I mean there were some Diane Sawyer
Speaker 13: was there. There were some very big names. There are
Speaker 13: names that Meghan likes to have her name aligned with.
Speaker 13: Meghan reached out allegedly Teres withers Spoon and tried to
Speaker 13: have her on the Archetypes podcast. Season one was denied,
Speaker 13: where we continuously hear the name Gwyneth Paltrow and Meghan
Speaker 13: together because of the launch of American Riviera Orchard. Also,
Speaker 13: there was a story that they had dinner together, although
Speaker 13: we never saw photographs of that dinner either. But a
Speaker 13: source Old News Nation that celebrities know that if they
Speaker 13: are in a picture with Megan, you know it is
Speaker 13: a pretends at approval of her to promote herself, that
Speaker 13: she can use to promote herself, and that Megan can
Speaker 13: continue to show up at events where they are or
Speaker 13: move into their neighborhood. But they simply do not consider
Speaker 13: her their friend.
Speaker 4: And she may have had a film crew with her
Speaker 4: filming the next reality series slash documentary, So I think
Speaker 4: that's another reason just to kind of steer clear of her,
Speaker 4: because you don't want to end up on that absolute
Speaker 4: mess of a reality Shoft still haven't recovered from that
Speaker 4: last Netflix series, but Megan has also done a tell
Speaker 4: interview with CBS. She talks here about her barely scraping
Speaker 4: the surface of how bad she felt during her time
Speaker 4: in the world family.
Speaker 17: When you've been through any level of pain or trauma,
Speaker 17: I believe part of our healing journey, certainly part of
Speaker 17: mine is being able to be really open about it.
Speaker 17: And I haven't really scraped the surface on my experience,
Speaker 17: but I do think that I would never want someone
Speaker 17: else to feel that way, and I would never want
Speaker 17: someone else to be making those sort of plans, and
Speaker 17: I would never want someone else to not be believed. So
Speaker 17: if me voicing what I have overcome will save someone, Kinsey, why.
Speaker 4: Are we revisiting this all over again? It really does
Speaker 4: feel like deja vu all over again.
Speaker 13: Look, I think a cynical person might look at the
Speaker 13: amount of attention that the King and Kate have received
Speaker 13: over their cancer diagnosis and wonder why Megan Markle is
Speaker 13: bringing up an incident that occurred five years ago during
Speaker 13: such a turbulent time health wise for her in laws.
Speaker 13: You know, I have had friends that reached out to
Speaker 13: me and said, a Catherine has cancer, and she's talking
Speaker 13: about this again. If the objective is to put a
Speaker 13: spotlight on children that are no longer with us because
Speaker 13: of online bullying, I feel like a much more powerful
Speaker 13: message would be to focus on those families. Megan Markle
Speaker 13: was suicidal in a castle and fled to America, where
Speaker 13: she lives with two beautiful babies, rescue chickens and palm
Speaker 13: trees that hold hands in a Montecito mansion. She has
Speaker 13: a loving husband, she survived, She's thriving. These parents go
Speaker 13: to bed every night with empty beds and bedrooms where
Speaker 13: their children used to sleep. I think it's wildly inappropriate
Speaker 13: to make an interview like that about yourself. You will
Speaker 13: not see the Princess of Wales do a sit down
Speaker 13: interview and laugh and smile her way through a cancer conversation.
Speaker 13: She might take up pediatric cancer causes, and she might
Speaker 13: spotlight stories of children that touch her deeply, but she
Speaker 13: is not going to mike up and sit in front
Speaker 13: of a camera and try to garner sympathy for herself.
Speaker 13: Harry and Meghan not only lack credibility, but they lack
Speaker 13: self aware And I can't imagine what a nightmare from
Speaker 13: hell it must be to work for these two.
Speaker 4: That's probably why they've got such a high turnover of staff.
Speaker 3: And let's talk a little bit of politics.
Speaker 4: Beyonce and jay Z have always been political, well, they
Speaker 4: have been political for quite a few years now, and
Speaker 4: that's only going to intensify with Beyonce giving Kamala Harris
Speaker 4: permission to use all her songs in her presidential campaign.
Speaker 4: And she is said to donate a sizeable amount herself.
Speaker 4: And could we see her hitting the campaign trial perhaps Kinsey.
Speaker 4: She seems to be very invested in having Kamala Harris
Speaker 4: become president.
Speaker 13: We do expect her to fundraise for Kamala. Will that
Speaker 13: be like Megan the Stallion and taking the stage and
Speaker 13: singing something and appearing at a larger event, an actual
Speaker 13: campaign event. I think that that's likely at.
Speaker 3: This point in time.
Speaker 13: I do think that there's an air of desperation in
Speaker 13: being associated with this candidate. And again I've said, I
Speaker 13: think we'll see Megan jump on the trail as well
Speaker 13: in some way, shape or form. If Beyonce is fundraising,
Speaker 13: perhaps that's where Megan slides in. She's a huge fan.
Speaker 13: We saw her attend two of her concerts in LA.
Speaker 13: But fundraising is what we know for shore to expect
Speaker 13: when it comes to Beyonce and Kamala's campaign.
Speaker 4: Do you think it will have any sort of impact?
Speaker 4: The Democrats always get the celebrity class. They've got Hollywood,
Speaker 4: they get the big stars.
Speaker 3: It did them no good.
Speaker 4: In twenty and sixteen, there was I don't think there
Speaker 4: was barely a single a lister who would was bold
Speaker 4: enough to come out for Trump. This time around, it's
Speaker 4: a bit different. There are athletes and some stars who
Speaker 4: are saying we're voting for Trump.
Speaker 3: But does anyone care?
Speaker 4: Does anyone care that my celebrities are Democrats who lay
Speaker 4: left and who back Kamala Harris?
Speaker 16: Yeah?
Speaker 13: I mean think about Hillary Clinton on stage with Katy
Speaker 13: Perry or on a grande Biden had Lady Gaga. I
Speaker 13: think as long as Trump continues to hammer home lower
Speaker 13: gas prices, lower groceries, I'm going to focus. I'm going
Speaker 13: to I'm going to wipe out our immigration issues. He
Speaker 13: has to continue to focus on is what appeals to
Speaker 13: a normal person, because Lady Gaga isn't upset when her
Speaker 13: cards declined at the gas station, Katy Perry isn't having
Speaker 13: issues at the grocery store. And I think if he
Speaker 13: focuses on what's really affecting everyday people, that the message
Speaker 13: will continue to be heard loud and clear.
Speaker 4: I thank you one hundred percent Ride. I think sometimes
Speaker 4: they can actually be counterproductive, these celebrity endorsements, KINSI, Scophiel,
Speaker 4: thank you so much for your time. And that's it
Speaker 4: for tonight.
Speaker 3: I'll see you at eleven tomorrow. Up next is Newsnight.