WEBVTT - Sharri | 29 May

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News. This is Sharry.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Good Evening Tonight our exclusive on how Susan Lee ghosted

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Jane Hume for days in the lead up to her

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.119
<v Speaker 2>ruthless dumping. I'll tell you about their phone call just

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 2>ninety minutes before the press conference.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 3>More details in a minute.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Paul Keating is set to launch a campaign against Jim

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Chalmers taxon unrealized capital gains. Robert gott Liebsen has that

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>scoop and he'll join meet tonight. Israeli President Isaac Hertzog

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>implause Alban easy to actually visit Israel and see for

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 2>himself what's going on. Chris Kenny met with Herzog today

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and he'll be on the show live.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Plus.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Matt Canavan kickstarts his campaign against Net zero.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>He'll be here to explain why.

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>But first tonight I can reveal that Liberal leader Susan

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Lee ghosted Jane Hume for days, ignoring her texts and

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>phone calls, before finally telling her she'd been dumped just

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>ninety minutes before announcing her shadow cabinet Sauces close to

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Senator Hume told me that multiple texts and phone calls

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>to Susan Lee went unanswered.

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 3>This for several days while Lee was formulating her front

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>bench team.

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Susan then finally rang Jane Hume and told her there

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>was no role for her. This was an hour and

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.559
<v Speaker 2>a half before she fronted the press. The source told

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 2>me it was completely ruthless. We've gone from people talking

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 2>about Susan facing a glass cliff to now watching her

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 2>pull up the ladder behind her to ensure no woman

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 2>can follow in her footsteps. Either Susan thinks a woman's

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>place isn't in the cabinet, or she doesn't like dealing

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>with strong women. Pretty cutting comments there now, Jane Hume

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 2>isn't the only senior coalition figure who was given the

0:01:59.200 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>cold shoulder.

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Susan Lee also did not respond.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 2>To an approach from Senator Claire Chandler, who sent a

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>text message saying that she'd like to continue serving in

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>a senior position in the shadow cabinet.

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>There was no reply.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Today, Susan Lee doubled down on her decision to dump

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 2>or demote four of the most senior coalition women, and

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>when asked about this today, she said she was promoting

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 2>women who were younger in terms of political experience. Have

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 2>a look at that strange remark.

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Of course, Pete, I want to see more women, more

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 5>women come into our party, and I was able to

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 5>announce women who are younger in terms of their political career,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 5>and I know that they're going to do very well too.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Younger in terms of their political career. Younger is a

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 2>word you only use in.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Relation to age.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So perhaps she was about to say that she was

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 2>promoting younger women and realized that wouldn't be a good look.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>It would be be agist and would reinforce a sexist,

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>outdated view that women have no value to society if

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 2>they're too old. Now, Sarah Henderson is sixty one, Jane

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Hume in her fifties declared Chandler is thirty seven, just

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Enter Price forty four, and their.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Ages are irrelevant.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>They are among the most high profile and high performing

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 2>coalition women. When Parliament returns, it'll be an embarrassing site

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>to see these talented women relegated to the backbench instead.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Susan Lee has leapfrogged the likes of Giselle Captirian, who

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>is only three votes ahead of Teal Nicolette Bowl in

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the recount. She might not even get into parliament if

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>she does, she'll be on the front bench, but of

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 2>course she poses no threat to Susan Lee. This shadow

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>cabinet undoes the efforts to rebrown the Liberal Party as

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>modern with a Liberal leader. And you couple this with

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 2>giving the overqualified Dave Sharma a junior assistant Ministry position

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>when he probably should have been in Foreign Affairs. As

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Peter Kredlin said last night, it's like leaving your best

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>players in the change room.

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 6>I just don't think you take on an empowered and

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 6>dominant labor party by leaving some of your best talent

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 6>in the change room and giving the factional bobber boys

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 6>are reward.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 3>And She's right.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 2>While there are a few good appointments, this is at

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 2>best a meteorocre team. It's shocking to think that Susan

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Lee's shadow cabinet now has fewer women than either Scott

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Morrison's or Peter Dutton's had. Dutton had ten women in

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 2>his shadow cabinet and Morrison had eight, the same number

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Lee now has, and only a third of Lee's shadow

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 2>cabinet are women. This is despite the fact she's often

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 2>publicly argued for years that we need more women in

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Parliament and in senior positions. Take a look at some

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>of those comments.

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 7>I want to say right here and now, we need

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 7>more women in our party. We need more women in

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 7>our party organization, We need more women in.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 3>This party room.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 7>As I said quite some time ago, I do want

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 7>to see a fifty percent target for women. We need

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 7>a fifty percent target by twenty twenty five. That's my view.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 7>And how we get there, of course, will vary where

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 7>you encourage young women to get into the party, where

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 7>you mentor them successfully, where you give them a platform

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 7>to talk about their ideas which might not be your ideas,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 7>and you have a system that really strongly supports them.

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So the woman who argued for a fifty percent target

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>now has only a third of her shadow cabinet being women.

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 2>This is a case of clear hypocrisy. Now that she's

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>in a position to elevate more women. Instead, she dumped

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>or demoted for and has presided over the lowest number

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>of women in cabinet or shaw cabinet for the Liberal

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 2>Party since twenty nineteen.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>And by was she hammered on this today?

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, let's look at your team. You demotioned senior women,

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 8>Hume Henderson Price, Why was that a good idea given that,

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 8>as you know, your party has problems with women. Let's

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 8>move to some of the decisions you've made on that

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 8>shadow cabinet for a party that's trying to rebrand itself

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 8>with Australian women, why so few women in the shadow cabinet.

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 5>Look, forty percent of my shadow ministry is made up

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 5>of women, and across that party were more broad as

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 5>many as under plays.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 2>Not as many under the former leader cut So that

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>was on Channel seven and the ABC and she didn't

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>have a better time over on Channel nine.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 9>You need to win back women as well, they said

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 9>Peter Dutton had a problem with female voters. But now

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 9>you've deliberately reduced the number of women in shadow cabinet.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Of my shadow ministry are women.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Of course, I want to see more women in our

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 5>party room every single day and.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 10>Reduced me as leader.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 3>That does well, Carl, as a woman leader.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 5>That sends a signal to women.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 9>You champion for more women in parliament, you championed more

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 9>in cabinet, but at the first chance you promoted men

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 9>and dumped women. How is that anything other than personal?

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 5>That's commentary, Karl, and it's simply not.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 7>How I see it.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 5>As I said, Shadow Ministry.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>It's great women.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>He did a good job there. Karl Stefanovic.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Now Susan Leoso told Paul Murray last night that just

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 2>sent to Nampa, jimper Price was very happy with her

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>demotion to shadow Cabinet.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 5>I spoke to her before this appointment, Paul. She's very

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 5>pleased to take it on.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Pleased.

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's taking spin to the next level, because

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>three hours earlier, Ja told Peter Kredlin that actually she

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>was very disappointed and that the shadow cabinet team wasn't

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>appointed based on Marria at all.

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 11>I'll be honest to say that there are probably some

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 11>appointments that have not been predicated on.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Experience or merit.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 11>But this is what this is the team we have

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 11>to work with, that we're working.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 3>With going forward.

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 11>And you know, I mean, I'm not going to lie

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 11>and say that I'm not disappointed that I'm not within

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 11>cabinet itself.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>And this is the problem with politicians like Susan Lee.

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Center gave an honest answer she's disappointed with the demotion,

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 2>as she should be, and instead of Acknowledgingcenter's public position,

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Susan Lee lies and insists Center's very happy and a

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 2>politician junior to Center, Kerry Anne Little, has now been

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 2>promoted to shadow Cabinet. So the message it sends is

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that Jacenter, one of the top performers in the coalition,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>is not valued by Susan Lee.

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 3>It sends the message that.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Talent and merit are not the key drivers of this

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 2>shadow cabinet team. And those involved behind the scenes in

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>this shadow cabinet include Alex Hawk, who was Scott Morrison's

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>numbers man, also Lee's chief of staff, Dean Shakha, and

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm told Susan also sought advice from Scott Morrison.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Now I put all.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Of this and I've reported here to Susan Lee's office,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and her spokesman told me tonight that the Opposition leader

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>has spoken with every single one of her parliamentary colleagues

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 2>several times since the election resulted.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Prior to the.

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Announcement of the shadow ministry. The leader has announced a

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>team with enormous talent and as she said this morning,

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 2>every member of the party room has an important role

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to play. Suggestions that there were voices in the room

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to influence.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Decisions are wrong.

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Now clearly Susan Lee has created even more enemies than

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>she had before with this shadow cabinet, and that's before

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 2>she's been tested against the ruthless Albanese government. Deputy leader

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Ted O'Bryan has been making phone calls to try and

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>calm everyone down, but it's not working because right now

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Susan Lee only has the support of half the party.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Three people who I believe to have voted for her,

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 2>like my friend Holly Hughes, are no longer in the

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 2>party room. They've left politics, yet they participated in the

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>leadership ballot. Now, internally, I can tell you that coalition

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 2>figures are discussing how long Lee will last. Some say

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>some estimate that she has between six and eighteen months

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 2>as leader.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 3>The clock is ticking now.

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>She could have used this shadow cabinet to unite the party. Instead,

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>she's given power to factional players devoid of talent, and

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 2>in doing so has only succeeded in driving a deep

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 2>wedge through the coalition. Now we've been speaking a lot

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 2>about how farmers and other Australians may have to sell

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 2>property or assets to pay their tax bill as a

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 2>result of Labour's new supertax, and it's not just the supertax,

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 2>which starts in July with a thirty percent tax rate

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 2>on earnings above three million in a superfund, but it's

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>also this unprecedented tax on unrealized capital gains above three million.

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 3>That's profit that you.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Haven't made yet and could apply if the value of

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>your property goes up. As we know, the market goes

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>up and down, valuations go up and down. The National

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Farmers Federation are warning that many farmers won't be able to.

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Pay the increased tax bill.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 2>If you were watching last night, you would have seen

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>David Johinkey saying this.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 12>And if it was a applied buck it is proposed

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 12>to be at the start of the financial year.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Partments would have to stump up.

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 12>An increase that they have no ability to pay and

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 12>essentially would put their farm at risk.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Put their farm at risk.

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 2>So do you think that there will be farms that

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 2>will have to be sold over this businesses that will

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>go under farming businesses?

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I have to find money somewhere.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 12>Now.

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 2>The figure show that seventeen thousand super accounts hold farmland.

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Three and a half thousand of those have more than

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 2>three million dollars as if life wasn't hard enough already

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 2>for our farmers, with this cost of living crisis, with

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>weather fluctuations, and now they're worried about having to sell

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>up to meet a tax liability on increased land valuations.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's insane and quite frankly unethical.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Yet look at how heartless.

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>And cold the Herald's economics writer Ross Gittens is. He

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 2>doesn't feel sorry for these farmers. He says, the old

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 2>earn more than the young, find it easier to save

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>and get the benefit from super sooner than the young.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what is that nonsense?

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 2>The old find it easier to save, and oh it's

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>so unfair that they get the benefit from super sooner. Well,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>they had to wait to access their superannuation. They lived

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and worked those long years. But it gets worse, he writes,

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 2>These rich people just don't want to pay more tax,

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and as usual, are hunting around for the best counter

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 2>arguments they can find. He says, I can afford to

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 2>pay it, and so can they. I mean, that's a

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>ludicrous takers. One economist said to me today he urgently

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 2>needs to retire. Well, let's turn to someone who actually

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 2>knows what he's talking about. Veteran business columnist Robert gott

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>leaps It. He's written at length about this topic in

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>The Australian, reporting that Jim Chalmers is set to be

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>remembered as the Treasurer who's unrealized capital gains tax destroyed

0:13:55.600 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 2>the historic nineteen ninety two universal superannuation vision of Paul Keating.

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Keating must know that aspiring Australians, mostly in self managed funds,

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:14.599
<v Speaker 2>will exit superannuation rather than pay tax on unrealized gains. Accordingly,

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 2>a third of Superannuation will exit, leaving it as a

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 2>lower to middle income Australian movement. And now we hear

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 2>that Paul Keating is reportedly furious about the idea of

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 2>taxing unrealized capital gains got leaps, and reports that both

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Paul Keating and Bill Kelty are preparing to publicly blast

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the Alberteazy government over this. Industry funds have told got

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Leaps and that Keating is white hot with anger, and

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Robert wrote a number of those funds now believe, as

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 2>a result of receiving an ear full of that Keating anger,

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that in due course the former Prime Minister and Treasurer

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 2>will go public with a withering blast against Charmers more

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>intense than any ever directed to a Cabinet minister. Keating

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 2>will be backed with more moderate language by Bill Kelty,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 2>who in nineteen ninety two brought the Union movement into

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the Keating vision that Charmers is now set to destroy.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 2>This will be big if Keating and Kelty are preparing

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 2>to wage war on the Albanezy government's plans to tax

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>unrealized capital gains, and let's hope they do, because it's

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>unlikely Susan Lee will be able to stop Jim Charmers.

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 2>It would be like being flogged with a warm lettuce

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>or being moored by a dead sheep.

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>As Keating would say, I was.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 13>Like being flogged with a warm letters a blog with

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 13>a warm letters.

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 14>Has he got up? You know?

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 9>More mold by a dead shape, more by a dead shape.

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Biting criticisms from the father of superannuation against this would

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 2>be highly effective. Whether it will be enough to encourage

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Labor to back down on their contentious policy is yet

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 2>to be seen, and Robert gott Leibsen will be on

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the show later on to speak about this. But now

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>let's bring in National Senator Matt Canavan and Chief economist

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>at the Institute of Public Affairs, Adam Crichton.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to you both. Look, I want to start with

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the shadow cabinet now. We're going to get to net

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>zero in a moment.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Matt.

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 2>But Matt, you ran against David little Crowd for leader

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and you've chosen not to be in shadow cabinet. But

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>your friend Barnaby Joyce, your colleague Michael McCormack, were dumped.

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>That's not the best decision to have experienced former leaders

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 2>to leave them on the back bench.

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 12>Is it. Yeah, Look, Sharry, I'm probably going to disappoint you.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 12>I just don't really care too much about who's who

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 12>in the zoo.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It's never knows who in the zoo.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>It's putting forward the best coalition teams so that they

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>can win against out in the Albanize. He surely, Matt,

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 2>you care about kicking the Albanezy government out and you

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 2>need your best team.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 12>I do do that. I do care about that. I

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 12>do care about that show. But just on that point,

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 12>as a general rule, I'm just not so sure that

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 12>the lineup of the Shadow Cabinet makes that much difference. So,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 12>I mean every parliamentary and all of us have the

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 12>ability to hold an executive governor account in the Senate

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 12>or the House of Reps and through committee processes whatever

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 12>we are in. I mean, one of the more effective

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 12>campaigns I ever saw against an elected government was by

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 12>Tim Wilson, a colleague of mine, give him his due.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Against the franking credits.

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 12>Now, Tim wasn't a member of the Shadow Ministry when

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 12>he did that work and took down effectively or at least

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 12>a big part of the government on that issue. And

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 12>so I just think all of us could focus a

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 12>little bit more about that job. That's our first job,

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 12>to oppose the government in the parliament. It actually doesn't

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 12>matter too much. Yeah, look, the leaders matter that sort

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 12>of stuff, but you know that's being done now. I

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 12>support both leaders making the best best deal this they can.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 12>But yeah, who's in every particular portfolio. I'm not sure

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 12>it's going to make that much different at the election

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 12>in a fears.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Time, Adam, would you agree that there are a lot

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 2>of talented players left on the backbench that this shadow

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 2>cabinet hasn't been appointed based on merit in some cases?

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 15>Well, look, Showy, I think I'll probably disappoint you as well.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 15>I mean, I think you're being slightly harsh on Susan Lee.

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 15>I mean, she's just appointed the people that she thinks

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 15>will maximize her time in the job, like any leader does,

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 15>whether they're Prime Minister or Leader of the Opposition.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 4>She's done that.

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 15>Look, I agree it's somewhat amusing that the number of

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 15>women has dropped from eleven to eight in the Shadow

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 15>ministry because of course we're always you're listening to always

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 15>talk about well, we always hear all this talk about

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 15>the importance of women, but of course, in reality it's

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 15>just rhetoric, you know, I mean, neither side actually believes

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 15>in it. One vote is one vote, whether you're male

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 15>or female, and that's what informs the decisions of both

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 15>the Prime Minister and the leader of the position. So look,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 15>there are some you know, there's lots of talented people

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 15>in the Parliament, and you know, I want the opposition

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 15>to be a functioning and effective opposition, so I wish

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 15>Susan Lee, well, look, let's let's just wait and see

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.479
<v Speaker 15>what happens. Right, there's there's there's always fallouts. I mean,

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 15>Tony Abbitt famously said that you know, every time there's

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 15>a reshuffle, you make more enemies than you make friends.

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 15>But you know, but she had to appoint a new

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 15>shadow ministry, and she had to appoint one with her preferences,

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 15>and that's that's what's happened. So let's let's just judge

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 15>her by that kind.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Of bothers me that not many men are coming out

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 2>against the fact that for senior four of the most

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 2>senior coalition women have been dumped.

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Matt, surely you have a view on that.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 12>Well, look, I want a shadow ministry based on merit.

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Look what I would say.

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 12>About some of my female colleagues is they definitely have

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 12>done I think a very good job. I mean, Sarah

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 12>Henderson did a great job as Education spokesperson. But look,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 12>some people have to be appointed and sometimes some people

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 12>will miss out. There are talented people right across the

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 12>Liberal and National parties, So I do do feel for Sarah,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 12>for Claire, for Jane. All of contributed enormously to our

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 12>party in the last few years. But they'll continue to contribute.

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 12>And I've been in contact with all of them today

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 12>and said, hey, you like on the backbenchain, too bad?

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>You can have lots of fun and still achieve a lot.

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 12>I feel like I've achieved a lot of the last

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 12>few years as a Senator for Queensland, so it's a

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 12>great honor to have this role. It's a yes, an

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 12>even greater honor sometimes to be in a ministerial role.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 12>But let's be real here. We've got thumped at the

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 12>election and we're talking about shadow ministers not ministers, so

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 12>there's a big, big difference.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a big difference, of course, But the issue is

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 2>you need the absolute top fighting coalition team to have

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 2>even a chance at cloring back the thirty plus seats

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 2>that is ahead of the coalition to try and regain

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the ability to govern, and that's not going to happen

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 2>with the current team. Right, Let's turn to net zero

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 2>because I know you're desperate to speak about that, Matt.

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Now there are liberals speaking out saying that net zero

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 2>needs to be kept. Zoe mackenzie is one of them,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 2>which Barnaby Joyce then on with Antrew Bolt argued against.

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Have a look.

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 16>I am personally optimistic that we will continue to observe

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 16>the net zero goal. It is important for an electorate

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 16>like mine where environment is very highly valued. But more

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 16>importantly it's very important in the minds of the people.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 16>In Australia's metropolitan seats. There are eighty eight of them,

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 16>and my side of politics only now holds eight.

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 13>If you ever are questioned them, you know you're abhorrent.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 13>You know you want the kidding sinstantaneously combus. It's guarded

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 13>in guilt and we suck this rubbish up and we

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 13>should be turning around saying no, no, do net zero.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Adam.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 2>This is clearly going to divide the Liberal Party and

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 2>potentially the coalition.

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 15>Yes, look but I think I think if the Coalition

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 15>opposes it, they're just going to be getting ahead of

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 15>public opinion. I know net zero is still popular because

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 15>most people think it means pollution, but of course it's

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 15>got nothing to do with pollution.

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 4>It's a great slogan net zero.

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 15>But as energy prices keep rising ten percent year after

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 15>year after year, I think more people are going to

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 15>realize that it is because of the changes in the

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 15>energy market that the government is leading, so you know,

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 15>and it's I mean, you look at New Zealand, you

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 15>look at the UK Tories, you look at Northern Territs

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 15>in Queensland, you look at the US and China and India,

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 15>I mean, all these jurisdictions are really not paying any

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 15>attention to net zero, and it's just somewhat laughable that Australia,

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 15>you know, such a small economy relative to the rest

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 15>of the world, you know, so few carbon emissions are

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 15>relative to the rest of the world, is going to

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 15>destroy its economy to pursue net zero.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's eventually going to change. I mean,

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't like betting.

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 15>I'm not a gambling man, but I would certainly bet

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 15>that in the next six years net zero will be dumped,

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 15>as you know, as a target by both major parties.

0:22:58.200 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 4>There's no question in my mind.

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to imagine the Labor Party dumping it, Matt.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's tough to Matt.

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 2>It seems like the Nationals might move to a position

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 2>where they're against net zero, but the Liberal Party, and

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 2>especially with the Moderates in charge you just heard Zoe McKenzie,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 2>would be I can't see a unified position from the Liberals.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 3>How do you think this is going to play out?

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 12>Well, look, I just hope we have a debate, Shari.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 12>We've never had a debate on net zero in the

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 12>joint party room. Never Scott Morrison adopted as a captain's

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 12>pick the captain's call, and it hasn't turned out to

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 12>be a very good one, at least from electoral perspective.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 12>We've been beaten twice, the last time the worst results

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 12>since the inception of the Liberal Party. So on any measure,

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 12>this hasn't worked for us politically, And perhaps the most

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 12>frustrating thing in this debate, Shari and I say to

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 12>someone like Zoe, a lovely person, but everybody I speak

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 12>to who's got a different view than me now coalition

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 12>on this issue pretty much Their only argument now is oh, Matt, yeah,

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 12>we can't drop net zero because we need to win

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 12>these votes. Now, wouldn't you think something so important as this,

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 12>which is fundamentally about changing our whole economy, potentially costing

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 12>thousands of people's their jobs. It already has cost thousands

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 12>of jobs so far. Wouldn't we want to argue about

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 12>this on whether it's best for Australia. Shouldn't that be

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 12>the fundamental question we have in front of the joint

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 12>party room. Is meeting a net zero target in just

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 12>twenty five years good for our country or not? That

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 12>should be the absolute primary question in front of us

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 12>and to drop this rubbish of it.

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I know because this electorate.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 12>Says this, and that person says that opinions can change

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 12>and they're fickle. And you can see in all of

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 12>the polling that nobody wants to pay hardly anything to

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 12>reach net zero. In fact, there was some polling release

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 12>just two weeks ago which showed that ninety three percent

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 12>of Australians would pay less than two dollars a week

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 12>to meet net zero missions by twenty to fifty. And so,

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 12>with all respect to my colleagues on this issue, we

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 12>are now the odd man out politically.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Across the world.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 12>There is no center right party political party in the

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 12>western world now there's as adopted net zero as their

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 12>platform in the English speaking world, I should say, not one.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 12>In the UK the Conservators have dropped it, the Republicans

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 12>have never been on board obviously, in the US, in

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 12>Canada they've dropped it, or in New Zealand they've just

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 12>dropped it. So maybe maybe we should at least have,

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 12>as I say, a debate on this issue in the

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 12>joint party room, and I hope that when we do so,

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 12>we put the country's interest first, not our party's interest.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Our own jobs first. That's not the way to go

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>about these debates.

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 2>A long way to run on that, and Matt, that

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 2>is clearly going to be your focus moving forward as well.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Just before we go, you know, we often speak on

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>this show about how long the friendship or the bromance

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 2>between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, how long it was.

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Going to last.

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, Elon Musk today confirmed that he's leaving the Trump administration.

0:25:58.359 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 3>He shared this post.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 2>He said, as my scheduled time as a special government

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 2>employee comes to an end, I'd like to thank Trump

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending, et cetera, et cetera.

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 2>But he also criticized the president's One Big Beautiful Bill legislation,

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>which he says will increase budget deficits. And he said

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 2>in a television interview how disappointed he was with the spending.

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Adam, what's gone on here behind the scenes?

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>And is this not a great thing that we're not

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 2>going to have Elon Musk's influence anymore on Donald Trump.

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 15>Well, I mean to be honest, I'm surprised it didn't

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 15>happen sooner because this has come a huge personal financial

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 15>costs for Elon Musk being associated with Donald Trump. There's

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 15>been massive falls in profits at Telstra, a massive decline

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 15>in the share price, and that's all largely because of

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 15>the association with Donald Trump. And you know, his central

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 15>point is right that you know, this bill before Congress

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 15>is basically just more of the same. The debt ceiling

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 15>is going to go up for trillion dollars. Deficits are

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 15>still two jilldred dollars a year. There's really no significant

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 15>cuts in spending, and of course a mask through his DOGE,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 15>the Department of Governor Effingency, has has been singling out

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 15>various areas to cut spending and they haven't really been cut.

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 4>So so I do feel you know, I do feel sympathy.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 15>I think he's realized that, you know, politics is largely rhetoric,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 15>and there's huge inertia in government and it's very, very

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 15>hard to change the direction of the US government. So

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 15>I understand why he's leaving. I think it's probably good

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 15>for both of them. Franklin, and at least it hasn't

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 15>been a spectacular blow up as yet.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 3>As yet, wait and see whether that happens, right. Matt Canavan,

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Adam Crichton great to see you as always.

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Now still to come, Alban Ezy goes on the attack

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 2>instead of listening to a think tanks warning about defense

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 2>his glass jaw yet again on Show Plus Will Cross

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Live to Chris Kenny and Israel after his meeting with

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 2>President Hertzog today, Israel wants Albin Easy to actually visit

0:27:58.280 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 2>instead of spreading misinformat.

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 3>That's after this quick break.

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, Israeli President Isaac Hertzog has invited Alban Easy to

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 2>visit Israel. The invitation comes after the Prime Minister here

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 2>labeled Israel's actions outrageous this week and he falsely accused

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Israel of blocking food trucks into Gaza and a lot

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 2>to say about that on Monday Night Now. Paul Kelly

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 2>in The Australian writes that the deterioration in Australia Israel

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 2>ties is deepening. He says that in remarks to Australian

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 2>editors and journalists, President Herzog made clear he would like

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 2>to see Albanizi involved more directly, a sentiment that reflects

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the ingrained Israeli view that Australia has become both a

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 2>remote and poorly informed critic of Israel's Gaza strategy and

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 2>that's putting it politely. Hertzog also made it clear he

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 2>would be happy to visit Australia now. Former Treasurer Josh

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Friedenberg is part of that delegation in Israel, along with

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>other journalists and editors, including Chris Kenny. And I'm thrilled

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 2>to say we're going live to Israel now to join

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Chris Kenny. If only I could jump through the television

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 2>and actually be there with you, Chris. And it's great

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 2>to see you back again in Israel. You visited multiple times.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Can you tell us how was the meeting with President

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Hertzog and how frustrated does he seem with the Albaneze

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>government position.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, good to talk to you, Sharry. I'm coming to

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 17>you from the Golden Heights. This is about one hundred

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 17>meters from the Syrian border. Here offer to my left

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 17>another front that Israel has had to come fun in

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 17>recent decades and particularly in the rest of nineteen months.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 14>Yes, that meeting.

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 17>Israeli President Isaac Herzog yesterday afternoon was a fascinating one.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 17>It was generally speaking on background, and we spoke in

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 17>detail about the challenges confronting Israel and also the way

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 17>it's getting so much criticism from the international commit and

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 17>the President was very frustrated with Australia's attitude, and it's

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 17>important for people to understand this.

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 14>The invitation is important.

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 17>He made the point in this meeting that now we're

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 17>going on the record. I want this invitation to be

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 17>on the record so that we could report it and

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 17>it could be public. And it's very clear that the

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 17>President wants Anthony Albanezi to come to Israel, not just

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 17>as a matter of diplomatic nicety, but because he thinks

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 17>the criticism that's coming from Australia is misinformed and unproductive,

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 17>and he wants the Prime Minister to come here learn

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 17>for himself about the challenges, the threats that Israel's dealing with,

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 17>the challenges in delivering aid into Gaza and keeping it

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 17>out of the hands of the Hummas terrorists, and he

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 17>wants Australia to then have the knowledge and then offer

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 17>constructive criticism, more constructive ideas and assistants. So it was

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 17>very much in that spirit so that this offer was made.

0:30:56.120 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 17>And I think it's very important that people understand how

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 17>badly the Albanesi Labor government in this critical time has

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 17>damaged relations between Australia and Israel. This is a low

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 17>point for the relationship and the pretense of it improving

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 17>underneath the Albanesi labor government with anti Albanesi and Pennywong

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 17>in charge of foreign policy.

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 14>It's not good.

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 17>You would understand that as much as anyone, Sharry, it

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 17>doesn't look prospective. But nonetheless, if Alberizi really wants to

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 17>be constructive and informed, he should come here.

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and not just the anti Israel sentiment. But Chris,

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 2>throughout your meetings this week, has there been a sense

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of shock also at the anti Semitism that's arisen in Australia,

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 2>which I believe is inextricably linked to the government's anti

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Israel attitude.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, you're right, and people do raise it with us,

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 17>probably not as much as they have done in the past,

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 17>but it has been mentioned on what's going on in Australia.

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 14>Haven't you been?

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 17>Your government and your authority has been stronger against anti

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 17>semitism in Australia. What's behind it? Why you're seeing it?

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 17>There's been those sorts of those sorts of comments, but

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 17>primarily there's so many people who have spoken to government

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 17>officials and other non government agencies and citizens have talked

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 17>about what they call betrayal from Australia. And the history

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 17>between Israel and Australia goes back to before this country

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 17>was formed in nineteen forty eight, of course, and it's

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 17>been especially strong since then, and they feel that they've

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 17>been stabbed in the back by Australia and betrayed. In

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 17>their darkest now, of course, Israel is fighting for its

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 17>very existence and this is when Australia has decided to

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 17>abandon it in United Nations forums and through this sort

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 17>of rectoric.

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 14>So it's a very clear theme here.

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 17>It is sad, but the people, the people Link says,

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 17>you would understand Sharia are still very strong. I've bumped

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 17>into many many Australians here and many Israelis who know

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 17>Australia and have visited there, and they're all over this

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 17>country and they want to keep the relationship strong. But

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 17>at a government to government level, it's in a really

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 17>bad place.

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 2>It is, indeed, Chris just here in Australia. The ABC

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 2>issued a correction to their repetition of that inaccurate claim

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 2>that fourteen thousand babies were at risk of starvation in

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Gaza in a forty eight hour period. Now the ABC

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 2>only corrected this today, it's a full week after the

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 2>BBC issue to correction. This is typical of the misinformation

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing from the public broadcaster. It's typical of

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the bias that we're seeing from mainstream media outlets.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, this is disgraceful from the ABC showy, absolutely disgraceful.

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 14>This was a blatant lie.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 17>The moment it was uttered by the United Nations, you

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 17>could see it was an utter lie. I corrected this

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 17>on my program with some analysis of the facts a

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 17>full week ago. The ABC ran with it and don't

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 17>correct it till a week later.

0:33:58.440 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 14>This is all of a pattern.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 17>You know, the media reports that Israel kills five hundred

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 17>people in a hospital. It's a lie, But the retractions

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 17>and corrections never get the coverage that the.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 14>Origin the original allegations get.

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 17>And in this case, the ABC and many other arms

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 17>of the media around the world, it should be said,

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 17>went with this claim that fourteen thousand babies would die

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 17>in forty eight hours.

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 14>Now a moment's thought. If you know anything about.

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 17>The situation and the numbers of people and Allied and

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 17>the medical situation.

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 14>Do you know anything about that?

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 17>You know that whole clear preposterous implaus But when you

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 17>drew into it and ask about it, of course they

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 17>referred that the only basis for it, the only slim

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 17>basis for it, was a report on humanitarian issues that

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 17>said if the war goes on for another year, when

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 17>in the worst case scenario, if aid doesn't improve, there

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 17>could be fourteen thousand cases of malnutrition in children up to.

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 14>Five years of age.

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 17>This is reported as fourteen thousand babies in two days time.

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 14>It is lassable and it is so damaging.

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Chris love having you joined us from Israel.

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Look forward to seeing you when you're back, and of

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 2>course stay safe, good travels.

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 14>Thanks Charry.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Still to come.

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Poor Keating is set to launch a campaign against Jim

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Chalmers tax and unrealized capital gains. Robert Gottleibsen will join

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:23.439
<v Speaker 2>me shortly with more details and straight after the break.

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Our defense is not up to fighting condition, but alban

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Easy instead attacks the Messenger.

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Karen Milner and David Gazzard next.

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, the leading security think tank has exposed the grim

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 2>reality of our defense force. The head of the Australian

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Strategic Policy Institute.

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Justin Vassi had this.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 10>Warning, spending a lot of money, as we should on

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 10>these exquisite capabilities that are likely to come to fruition

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 10>in the late twenty thirties twenty forties, like the Orchest submarines.

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 10>But with the world as dangerous as it is, so

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 10>many national security threats, he's a risk that we have

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 10>a gap in the short term.

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Albinizi listening to these smart minds, the brilliant analysts.

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Instead of taking their advice, he went on the attack.

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 18>Well that's what they do, isn't it. Asp I mean, seriously,

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 18>they need to, I think have a look at themselves

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 18>as well, and the way that they conduct themselves and debates.

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 18>We've had a defense strategic review, We've got considerable additional

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 18>investment going into defense.

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 2>The way they conduct themselves in debates. Does that mean

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 2>don't criticize my government in a debate. I mean, this

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>is a matter of public interest whether we can defend

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 2>our nation. Albanzi shouldn't be attacking the think tank. And

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 2>by the way, in his comments about someone from a

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>former government, he's referring to Justin Bassi, who used to

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 2>work as chief of staff to Foreign Minister Maurice Payne.

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in our former Morrison government advisor David Gazzard

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm a shot in Chief of Staff Cameron min

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 2>are good to see you both, Cameron. Quite bizarre to

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 2>attack a credible think tank. Is this another case of

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:09.399
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister's glass jaw?

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 19>Absolutely, Chari it is Albow's glass jaw, and the inconvenient

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 19>truth of someone talking about the fact that our defense

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 19>capability required a virgin pilot to bring in Chinese live

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 19>far exercise. I mean, our defenses are not what they

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 19>should be, especially in an era where things are just

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.280
<v Speaker 19>so dangerous on our doorstep. And sure Ucus is great,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 19>but why not point out the fact, as Aspy has,

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 19>that we've got a big issue between now and ten

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 19>years time and we need to be able to defend

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 19>ourselves right now. So if it's inconvenient truth for Albo,

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 19>I'm sorry, but he's actually got to listen to the experts.

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, especially when it comes to defense.

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 4>David, this is the time we want to ask me.

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 20>I can think of really only two influential think tanks

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 20>that have really punched above their weight over the last

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 20>half decade. One would be the left of center Australian Institute,

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.919
<v Speaker 20>and the other is ASPY. And of course, because it's

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 20>been effective, because it's been influential, it has got up

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 20>the nose of the Chinese. And let's not forget here

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:17.399
<v Speaker 20>that one of the fourteen egregious demands the Chinese made

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 20>of the Australian government was to defund ASPI exactly for

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 20>the muzzling of the press. And it also called for

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 20>Parliament to stop criticizing China as well as the defunding

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 20>of ASPI, and that is exactly what is occurring. So Australia,

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 20>at a time of great strategic weakness, is defunding at

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 20>the request of China, the one instrument that has been

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 20>probably front and center pointing out where we're strategically weak.

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 4>And where we're strong. At its time we need it.

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Very good points, at excellent points that I want to

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 2>ask you both as Bomber Political Insights, about the shadow

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 2>cab that was just announced yesterday afternoon. And we've been

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 2>reporting on how senior women were demoted. You know, other

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 2>talented people like Dave Sharma weren't given great jobs very

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 2>junior Olds Cameron, you know, as a veteran insider. You

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 2>both know how ministries are put together. I mean, Cameron,

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 2>this is flawed. This is a failure, isn't it.

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 19>Well I'd think so, and I think you've actually got

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 19>to give them a bit of a chance. I mean,

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 19>you know, James Patterson going to finance. I think it's

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.320
<v Speaker 19>an excellent move. James McGrath from you know, from Queen's

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 19>a's very good. Zoe McKenzie coming into the out of ministry.

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 19>So there's some young talent coming through as well, and

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 19>Julian Lessa coming back in as well, So I think.

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>There's some good things.

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 19>Look, the reason is that Jane Hume wasn't dump because

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 19>she's a woman.

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 4>She's dump because she's a dud.

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 19>She had work from home, she had Chinese spies, she

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 19>cost seed after seed after seat. So no, if you're

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 19>a dud, you've got to be deleted and gone. It's

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 19>not about gender, it's about capacity and competence.

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 3>David, what do you think?

0:39:57.360 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean?

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Would you agree that Susan Lee has made task even

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 2>harder after enraging so many people?

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 20>It is a tough thing forming a cabinet or a shadow, Well,

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 20>it's always going to be a shadow cabinet when the

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 20>numbers are as low as they are, and you've just

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 20>lost a whole range of talented people, but also you've

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 20>had a very close run leadership battle, so the numbers

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 20>are delicately poised. So you have to make a choice

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 20>between a whole range of things, representation in the states,

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 20>representation of gender, representation of factions. Somewhere down the line

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.359
<v Speaker 20>comes talent, probably not as high as it should be, to.

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Be honest, the problem. That's the problem.

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 20>And then you've got to also balance out who are

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 20>the people who voted for you that you want to

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 20>reward and who are the people that voted for your

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 20>opponent that you don't want to give too much ago,

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 20>Although you've got to keep some in the ten. So

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 20>this was always going to be a fraud exercise. I

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 20>do think there is a crop of young people within

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 20>the coalition's ranks that deserve a go. Some that didn't

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 20>get in at all. But it is good to see

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 20>a group of young people coming through that can can

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.959
<v Speaker 20>form the generational change that I think so desperately needed

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 20>in the coalition.

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, in many respects, the generational changes happened anyway

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 2>because so many people lost their seats, so there's hardly

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 2>anyone left Camerin. I'm interested in your thoughts on Susan

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Lee as a leader. I know you know you're being

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 2>polite and you say let's give it a go or

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the benefit of the doubt.

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 3>But in terms of actually.

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Winning against Albanezi, who none of us here think is

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 2>any good.

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Is she the coalition's best option, Well.

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't think.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 19>I don't think the opposition from now is going to

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 19>defeat Anthony Albanize. The voters will get out Anthony Albanize

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 19>well before the opposition does. And that's the point I

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 19>made in a column the other week about Starmer. Ten

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 19>months in, he's running scared a huge majority, but the

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 19>voters have turned on him midterm, and so I think

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 19>that's what happens first, is is if Albanie lose the

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 19>support of voters, the opposition gets played back into the game.

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 19>And let's not forget the fact that that even under

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 19>Peter Dutton they were ahead until December last year. They

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 19>lost the campaign, but they didn't necessarily lose the voters

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 19>up until the last moment, and obviously very badly.

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Nevertheless, let's still.

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Need a strong and I was saying sorry to interrupt,

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.439
<v Speaker 2>but you still need a strong, incredible opposition leader.

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 3>Otherwise, as in the case with.

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Victoria, where Victorians are so frustrated with their state government,

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 2>but if there's a weak opposition, they've got no one

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 2>to turn to.

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 19>Look, as I say, I think he give susan ago,

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 19>see how she goes, give us some clear air. Peter

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 19>Dutton had that blessing from his cabinet after the Morrison loss.

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 19>So I think she deserves the same chance. And yes,

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 19>if she fails, she needs to go. But if not,

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 19>give her a go.

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, Cameron, David, great to see you again.

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up next, Paul Keating is set to launch

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 2>a campaign against Labour's tax on unrealized capital gains. Robert

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 2>got Leibsen has the story and he joins me after

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 2>this break, welcome back, Well Australia's a legendary economics reporter.

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Robert got Leibsen writes that former Prime Minister Paul Keating

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is white hot with anger over the superttas and plans

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 2>to tax unrealized capital gains.

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 3>He writes that it goes.

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 2>Against our highly prized to prenuation scheme that Keating established

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and got leaps In reports that in due course the

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 2>former Prime Minister and Treasurer will go public with a

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 2>withering blast against charmers, more intense than any ever directed

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 2>to a cabinet minister. Now, please to say, Robert joins me. Now, Robert,

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 2>good to see you. Look, you have written amazing columns

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 2>on this topic, and you're saying that you're concerned that

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 2>there is this campaign building against the Albanezy government. The

0:43:57.120 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 2>issue is that they have the numbers in the Senate

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 2>to get this through. So do you think that the

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister and Treasurer will reconsider their position?

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I obviously should do that, but.

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 21>When politicians are locked into a situation that's stupid and

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 21>they've got it wrong, they find it very, very difficult

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 21>to change. And I can't focast that. All I can

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 21>say is that the damage they're going to do to

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 21>the economy and the damage they will particularly do to

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 21>our capital raising ability is it will be severe.

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Now, as I just read there, you're reporting that both

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Paul Keating and Bill Kelty are concerned about this legislation.

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 2>What are their main concerns?

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 21>Well, you have to understand what Paul Keating was trying

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 21>to do with superannuation, and that was to have a

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 21>retirement savings pool of great magnitude. But all people of

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 21>different levels of well and income participated in this exercise.

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 21>Now what he now knows is that about a third

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 21>of the funds, that's the self managed funds, won't put

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 21>up with a tax on unrealized gains and they will

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 21>take their savings elsewhere in due course. And so what

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 21>will happen is exactly what he didn't want to happen.

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 21>That is a superannuation movement that's dominated by the lower

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 21>income and middle income people instead of the whole society.

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.399
<v Speaker 21>And as I understand it, he equates it with many care.

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 21>Everyone uses many cares. Some people get to bog build,

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:39.280
<v Speaker 21>some get a little bit of rebound, others get more rebound.

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 21>But everyone's in it. And that's his vision of superannuation.

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 21>And that's what Charmers appears to go. Well, he's getting

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 21>destroyed if he keeps going.

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And you're hearing that Keating's as you write white hot

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 2>with anger about this is understated.

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 21>Imagine how would you feel if you'd said up this

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 21>vision and you got it there and it was now

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 21>producing it and a young treasure turns out and he says,

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 21>I'm going to do something really tough on your movement.

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 21>Can you imagine I heard you play some of feetings

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 21>and remarks, or just double those because here is attacking

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.640
<v Speaker 21>the whole vision of this form of treasure.

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 2>And he's been active, he's been speaking to some of

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 2>the industry supervines.

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 21>Is that right, well, yes, of course they probably ring

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 21>him up. The thing is that everybody knows this is

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 21>silly and the only you'd have to think charmers must

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 21>think now at two. But it's as I said you before,

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 21>it's very hard for politicians to understand that. Just take

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 21>you back a little bit as to what they are doing.

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:49.920
<v Speaker 21>You remember, we agreed it roughly as a community that

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 21>for for income on superannomation balances above three million, it

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 21>should be taxed at thirty percent instead of fifteen percent.

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 21>Now what you and I would have done, and just

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 21>about everyone else in the nation w said, Okay, if

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:06.280
<v Speaker 21>we're going to do that, we'll tax that second fifteen

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:09.320
<v Speaker 21>percent will bit of thirty percent, but the same method

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 21>exactly the same methods we use for first thirty fifteen

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:14.879
<v Speaker 21>percent will apply to a second fifteen percent.

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:16.959
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense.

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 21>Instead of that, young Jim, what he did was he said, oh, no,

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:24.480
<v Speaker 21>I'm going to have a new tax. I'm going to

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 21>in that second fifteen percent, I'm going to tax you

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.799
<v Speaker 21>on your unrealized gains. Almost know when the world has

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 21>ever done that. And he then said, the treasury, look,

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:38.760
<v Speaker 21>estimate how much I'll get, and try gave in that estimate,

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 21>but of course they didn't get count the fact that

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 21>a lot of people are going to leave supernuation and

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 21>in fact the estimates will be wrong over two fo years.

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 21>And so you know, it's the sort of thing you

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 21>shouldn't do, but it's hard to admit mistakes.

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and now as you're reporting that this could be

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 2>an unprecedented campaign against the Albanesi government.

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 3>That's united. You know you write this, it's united parts of.

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 2>Industry, Superannuation, the union movement and the business community, a

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 2>combination without precedent. And if the likes of Poor Keating

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 2>and Bill Kelty as well get involved, then perhaps the

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 2>government will be forced to reconsider this because this will

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 2>be an argument against it. I mean, based absolutely on fact,

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 2>but one that there's no question the opposition has not

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 2>had the ability to prosecute Robert.

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 3>I've loved having you on the show.

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for your time and look forward

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 2>to hopefully having you on again to talk about this

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 2>topic as it progresses. And thanks everyone for your company

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 2>this week. I'll see you on Monday at eight o'clock.

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Have a lovely weekend, and here's calebont