WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 14 July

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>From the Sky News Center. This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, good evening, James Borrow here tonight filling in for

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Paul Murray on Paul Murray Live and all through the week.

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 2>And you know it's Monday Night, so you know what

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>that means. That's right, it's Monday Night. Fights with our

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 2>friends Senator Matt Canavan and Nicholas Reese coming up in

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. So these are the rules. No sooks,

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 2>one lefty, no killer, all filler tonight on Paul Murray Live.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get straight into it, and I want

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>to start with a little story about the Canberra bubble,

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the Canberra of bureaucracy, and a little oopsie, or, as

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>they say in politics, a gaff. Yes, that's right, a gaff,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 2>which is a term which has been famously defined as

0:00:52.760 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>when someone in politics accidentally tells you the truth. Well, this,

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 2>this accidental truth telling, is an abstinute classic in terms

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 2>of telling us stuff we didn't already know, but which

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 2>it is already pretty nice to have confirmed. So here's

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>what happened. Well, it seems that an ABC Business reporter

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 2>put in a freedom of information request to the Department

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 2>of the Treasury asking for the briefings that Treasury prepared

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>for the incoming government at the last federal election. Now,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>these are briefings that they do and they give to

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 2>whoever wins, whether they the incumbent, whether the challenger, whether

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>they're labor or liberal. It's basically a big booklet that says,

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 2>here's the state of play with each department, that goes

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>to the new ministers.

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And guess what happened here.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, Treasury accidentally came through with the goods and they

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>gave our friend at the ABC a version of the

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>briefing that was not properly redacted.

0:01:58.480 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>II.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>It did not have all the juicy bits that they

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't want people to know crossed out, and it.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Contains some pretty interesting truths.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Truth like, well, you know that that one point two

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>million dollar home building target that the government has been

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 2>promising that they were going to meet, Well, according to

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the briefing, that's impossible. And all that being spending the

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>government's been doing well. According to the Treasury, it's going

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>to require higher taxes and if we weren't taxed enough already. Also,

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 2>they said they're going to need to cut spending as

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 2>well if they're ever going to get the budget back

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 2>into some sort of good health. Now we knew all

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>of this already, but this made for some fun moments.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>At a press conference today with the Treasurer.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 4>The Incoming Government's break makes an assessment of the government's policies,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 4>your election commitments, and then gives advice to that implementation.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 4>But this one says that the house and type would

0:02:58.919 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 4>not be met.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>What gives it?

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 4>It seems like the challenges in the sector are too

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 4>great for the government's policy.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, first of all, you're responding to a subheading

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 5>in a document, a partial. You know, you're referring to

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 5>a Well, governments don't release the Incoming Government Brief. It's

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 5>been released in error, and that's you know, these things

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 5>happen from time to time. As I said before, I'm

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 5>pretty relaxed about it.

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Did he look pretty relaxed about it to you anyway?

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 2>Sure you are a treasure now. The treasure also went

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>the full word salad after being asked this question.

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 6>You've always spoken about the importance and value of independent advice.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 6>Treasury says you can't fix the budget without raising taxes

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 6>or slashing spending.

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 3>So are you open to this advice?

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Straightforward question. But what do you reckon? Do you think

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the treasure gave a straightforward answer.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, a couple of things about that. I mean, first

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 5>of all, you're responding to some headings in the advice

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 5>that we've got in the incoming government brief. What's happened

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 5>here is a Treasury official has sent those documents in error.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 5>That sort of thing happens from time to time. We've

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 5>already made it really clear that we will need to

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 5>do more to meet our housing targets. So the priorities

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 5>which are being reported today are not you know, those

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 5>other sorts of things that I have mentioned before, including

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 5>at the National Press Club, I gave a whole speech

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 5>on how we need to do more to meet our

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 5>housing targets. We do need to do more to make

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 5>our budget more sustainable and our economy more productive.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Listen, Treasurer, the first rule of halls is when you're

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>in one, stop digging. I mean, that was some real

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>bart Simpson giving a book report there on a bookie

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 2>he didn't read kind of stuff now. Of course, hilariously,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the Treasury tried to quash the story and when they

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 2>released the data in error, they asked the ABC reported

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to delete the e delete the incorrectly redacted brief, and

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say good on the reporter, he said, fat chance.

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 2>But you know what, this all gets to a bigger

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>problem here, and that is the nature of truth and

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 2>government and what we the people, you and I are

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 2>allowed to know rather.

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Than just assume.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Because you know, what's the funny thing here is that

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 2>what's been revealed here is the way the Canberra game works.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 2>It's like an episode of Yes Minister or Utopia. Hide

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 2>the facts, hope we don't figure it out, redact the

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 2>things they don't want us to know, and let everyone

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>keep on doing what they're doing, ad infinitum. Now, this issue,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, the stuff that was in that report, not

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 2>going to beat the housing targets, spending too much money.

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 2>These aren't secrets, This is not These are not the

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of things here that are.

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Like issues of national security.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're not talking about a document that accidentally

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>got released with the specifications of like our over the

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>horizon radar or what are we looking at acquiring in

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the way of underwater drones? Or hell what face cream?

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 2>The Prime Minister uses to say, looking so youthful. No,

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 2>this stuff is the real basic bread and butter stuff

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 2>of government. Our tax money houses bread and butter stuff.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 2>As I say, and I'm sorry, I mean this government,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the Albanezy labor government. Let's not forget they came to

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>power in twenty twenty two on the basis of saying, Hey,

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna be transparent, we're gonna be open, we're gonna

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.679
<v Speaker 2>be honest, we're not gonna hide stuff from you. And also,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 2>by the way, we trust the advice of public servants. Well,

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>how about guys, I don't know, maybe putting this stuff

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 2>into practice that could be nice. And there's one more

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>thing too. You know, all of this is play out today.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 2>The Treasurer had that Crimsworthy press conference, and one question

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 2>kept ringing in my head. Where or where is the

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>opposition in all of this?

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we even have an opposition these days? I mean

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of issue.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>We've got this big release in the incoming government briefing

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.119
<v Speaker 2>that tells us the actual truth about the state of things,

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>not what Chalber's in Albaneze. He want us to think. Well,

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I mean, call me crazy, but it

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 2>seems like the sort of thing that Susan Lay might

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>have hopped on as an issue, or maybe the shadow

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 2>treasure ted O'Brien, Well, look he did to in his defense.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>He set out a media release late in the morning

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 2>around eleven fourteen. But as far as I can tell,

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>and I watched the news all day, that was pretty

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>much all we heard from the opposition. I have to

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>wonder why wasn't everyone in shadow cabinet out hopping on

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 2>this issue, saying typical La, they're addicted to spending and

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>taxing you more. This is politics one oh one, and

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say this opposition needs to spend less time

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about itself and start coming up with solutions for

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in Australia that, as that leaked briefing reveals, is going

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>badly off track. Anyway, enough of that, let's move on

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>to China. This is the big story of the day,

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know, in some senses this may be the

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 2>defining story of the century.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 2>After landing in Beijing earlier, this evening tomorrow is, by

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the way, the big day. Anthony albines, he gets to

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 2>see Jijin Ping again. And you gotta feel bad for

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister because this was all supposed to be

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>such a big and special event. Yes, the Prime Minister

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>was supposed to go to sleep tonight and is absolutely

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>not bugged hotel suite with visions of being called a

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 2>handsome boy dancing in his head. But Albanize's apparent pivot

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 2>to China could be knocked off balance by some very

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 2>recent history and his own doing. What to remind you

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 2>of this little moment from the last federal election campaign,

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 2>remember this when the Prime Minister barged onto ABC Talk

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 2>radio in Darwin at four to twelve pm in the

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>afternoon or because he was trying to beat Peter Dutt

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 2>into the punch about an announcement about the Port of Darwin.

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 7>Could you write the headline for me on this announcement today.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 8>Australia needs to own the Port of Darwin.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 7>So are you buying back the lease of the Port

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 7>of Darwin or not.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, what we're doing is trying to get to say

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 8>if there's a private buyer through particularly superannuaction tons that

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 8>we've had discussions with.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 7>Three years Prime Minister to deal with the port lace.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 7>What would you say to local voters who might say

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 7>this is an election stunt.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 8>That is something that we have had a consistent view on.

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, they had a consistent view on it, not that

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 2>they did anything about it for the first three years

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 2>that they were in government, and it somehow only became

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 2>an issue in the minutes, the literal minutes before Peter Dutton,

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>the then opposition leader, was supposed to announce the coalition's

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 2>own policy on the Port of Darwin. You got to

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>ask why didn't they do something about it before? But hey,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>you know what they say, no time like the present.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Now this seemed like a clever bit of campaigning. But

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 2>now this has come back to bite Albinizi. The whole

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 2>thing seems to be putting a little bit of a damper.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>On his trip, there was a little warning of the

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Chinese social media from a Chinese social media influencer today

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 2>who you bet cleared this post with head office. There's

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a guy called Lou wen Jing, and he used to

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 2>edit a Chinese propaganda rag called Voice of the Strait,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and he put it out there on Chinese social media

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>that any attempt to retake the port could provoke countermeasures.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 2>His words, he has written, quote, if the Australian side

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 2>insists on tearing up the lease agreement, the Chinese side

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>may take countermeasures such as restricting Australian companies market access

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 2>in China or tightening imports of key resources such as

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 2>iron ore unquote. Well, you know, we've seen this movie

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 2>before and we all remember how that all played out

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 2>under the Morrison government. But it seems like now that

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>poor Anthony Albanezi's in the chair all this foreign policy stuff,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 2>it's really hard and he can't seem to catch a

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>break because guess what, He's been copying it for being

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 2>too soft on the Chinese. Now he's copying it from

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 2>China for being too tough on him.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You can't win.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>The Prime Minister was asked about this in a press

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 2>conference in Shanghai today.

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Can I ask you, are you concerned about that kind

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 4>of blowback if you go through with your election commitment.

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 8>The answer to that is no. We had a very

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 8>clear position that we want the port to go into

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 8>Australian ownership. We're being clear about it, we're going orderly

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 8>about it, and we will go through that process.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.479
<v Speaker 2>The whole press conference here in Shanghai was absolutely fascinating

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>because the Prime Minister was flanked by business leader leaders

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 2>like Twiggy Forrest, all eager to do more business in China.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>But the big elephant in the room, the fact that

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 2>China is a totalitarian state with aims to dominate the Pacific,

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>if not the globe. Well that could be ignored. And

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I have to say credit to this journalist in the

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>press pack who asked this question picking up on the

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 2>theme that we talked about last night. That is just

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 2>what and are not the actions of a friend?

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, is your message about the circumnavigation of Australia by

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 9>the Chinese flotilla, live fire drills and suspected surveillance ships,

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 9>no watching talents, mandsaber?

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Is this an actual friend?

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 8>Well? With regard to the second question, that would be

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 8>nothing unusual that has happened in the past, And I'll

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 8>continue to assert Australia's national interest as I do.

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Nothing unusual that has happened in the past. Well, okay,

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, lots of things have happened in the past.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Pearl Harbor happened in the past, the Black Death happened

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 2>in the past. Past Steel Day which the French celebrate today,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 2>that happened in the past. But that doesn't mean we

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>just brush these things aside. I mean this answer here

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 2>that the Prime Minister gave here is disgraceful and it

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 2>is part of this incredible pattern that he seems to

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 2>have of any time China does anything that is offensive

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>to Australian interests, to Western interests, to the interests of

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 2>liberal democracies, he says, ah, well, you know, stuff kind

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>of happens. You know, ships surfcum navigate Australia all the time,

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 2>ship's fire off missiles all the time. These sorts of

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 2>things happen. But of course when it's the West, when

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 2>it's the United States, when it's Donald Trump, who will

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 2>talk about in a moment, well that that is not

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 2>the action of a friend anyway. I don't know if

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the Sky News app by the way, download it if

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 2>you haven't already, because it is absolutely great. I don't

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 2>know if that app works in China. But the traveling

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>press pack also noticed another thing we talked about last night,

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and that is the subtle poss of labor towards China

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and away from the US. Though whether that's now going

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>to happen with Darwin on the table, we'll see.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 9>Just to go back to what you were saying before

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 9>about stability with China, chooting ping president, she seems to

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 9>be positioning China as a more stable alternative? Is that

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 9>an assessment that you share, and that's an alternative to

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 9>the US to.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 8>Kind of I don't draw alternatives. What I do is

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 8>I want to see a stable and secure region. I

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 8>think that's in the interest of everyone in the Indo Pacific.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 8>But that's an approach I take to global politics as well.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Stable, that's prime Minister. Do you understand what is going

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>on here?

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Stability is not good if that means that China winds

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 2>up dominating the Pacific, because you know what, that's not

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 2>good for us here in Australia. Stability is actually quite

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 2>bad if it means that China's strength and power winds

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>up growing in the Pacific. What's necessary here, I think,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 2>is to understand the fact that sometimes in life you

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 2>need to pick your friends, stick with them and push back.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't necessarily mean you're going to fight a war,

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>but it does mean you're going to stand up for

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Australian interests. Australian interests which are closely tied to not

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 2>only the United States but of liberal democracies around the world,

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 2>and included in that has to be the country of Taiwan,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>which is of course under constant threat from the People's

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Republic of China. Now this is a thing, This is

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 2>not Prime Minister.

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're.

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Watching a both sides issue. You cannot both sides this question.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 2>And I want to bring this in here because earlier

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>today I had a chat to John Lee. Now he's

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and he is,

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>among other things, was the Foreign ad Minister's lead advisor

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 2>on the twenty seventeen Foreign policy white Paper. Now I

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 2>talked to him for the Daily Telegraph newspaper and you

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 2>can read more about this in tomorrow's paper. But this

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>line he told me struck me and I wanted to

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>share it with you.

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 2>John Lee told me quote, it is one thing to

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 2>assert Australian diplomatic independence China, not Trump's America. Is the

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:36.479
<v Speaker 2>dangerous and more serious structural disruption to regional and global

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 2>peace and stability that Anthony Albinizi seems more comfortable with

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Chinese policy rather than US policy is something he needs

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 2>to explain to the Australian electorate. And moreover, John Lee

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 2>said there was a bipartisan mindset. Only a few years

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>ago that Australia needed to diversify its economic interests away

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>from China for the national resilience and as a hedge

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 2>against Chinese economic coercion which will occur again in the future.

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanisi, he said, seems to have abandoned that position. Well,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 2>how true that is it? I mean, seriously, don't you

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 2>remember when COVID happened. And I don't want to talk

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>about COVID, but when that happened, that was the big

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>thing that we talked about. We said, universities, get off

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>the drip of Chinese students, diversify yourself, everybody's supply chains,

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 2>don't get everything from China. The risk is just to

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>be everything coming from China. Well, we know the position

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>that puts you into it. That was the position that

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 2>we were put in a week one. As a result

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:44.239
<v Speaker 2>of that, we said, as a nation, we're not going

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to do that anymore. But apparently here we are, and

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>without any consultation or taking it to the election or

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 2>having a you know, national conversation. To use one of

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 2>my least favorite expressions, we are going all in on China.

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 2>More trade with China, not less. Okay, Well, let's give

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister for a moment the benefit of the

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 2>doubt on this, because he does seem to be stock

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 2>in this old mindset that says if the West, if

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Australia just has enough free trade with China, China will

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 2>become a freer and more peaceful nation. Well, this is

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 2>a mistake that has driven decades of China policy. Through

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 2>allowing Beijing to join the WTO, through the aftermath the

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 2>TMN Square disaster, to the great cover up around COVID

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 2>and everything else from influenced buying scandals to the theft

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>of intellectual property and so much more. We know that

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 2>this whole idea that if we just expose the totalitarian

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Chinese communist government to Western liberal democracy and trade with

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>them and the people get rich, whether they're going to

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>become or liberal, that hasn't worked. It has been just

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 2>the opposite. This was a fantasy that we would and

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>in fact what has happened, honestly, if you think about it,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>is we've become a bit more like China than China

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 2>has become like us. And you don't need to go

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>very far to see examples of that. You know, we

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>saw that start during COVID. We see it today with

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the increasing realms of Internet surveillance and the e Safety

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Commissioner and the Great Australian Firewall that's coming our way.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Although this is a sort of a fantasy, though we've

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 2>seen this fantasy for decades.

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It has been.

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Espoused for decades by the likes of academics such as

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Hugh White, and this notion was on full display today

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>when Anthony Albanizi addressed the Shanghai business launch. Cameras weren't

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>allowed in apparently, but he said, quote, this is Albanesi speaking.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>He said, quote, there is no fixed model for a

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>stabilized relationship. There's that word stable again. Our job is

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that we manage our relationship so that

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 2>we can contribute to regional and global peace and prosperity. Yet,

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 2>I ask you what is missing from that statement, which

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 2>weirdly sounds like it could have been written by the CCP,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 2>by ggpings Comm's people. Tell you what's missing? Any talk

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 2>of what it means for us to be a liberal democracy,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>upholding liberal values, the sort of thing we are supposed

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 2>to do in the Pacific and around the globe. It's

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 2>what our alliance with the US is supposed to be

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 2>not just a security arrangement, but an alliance of people

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 2>and nations with shared values. Now, yeah, I know that

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump tests all of this a bit. I'm not

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 2>going to argue that now. But again, Australia, we have

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>to ask ourselves what are the alternatives. Alliances are not

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 2>a one white way street. An alliance has a much

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 2>deeper philosophical and strategic meaning. It is a mutual commitment

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 2>to the defense of our shared values. And as we know,

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and this has been going on since before Trump, the

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 2>world is dividing into totalitarian and free states. Again, this

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 2>has been happening for a long time now, since the

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 2>end of the Cold War. And Australia and the Albanese

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>government cannot walk both sides of the fence any longer.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 2>We will as a country have to make a choice.

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 2>We will have to ask ourselves what happens if Taiwan

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 2>is invaded and the US has a right to ask

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>us as an alliance partner for support. Remember, if China

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 2>dominates specific it is uniformly bad for US. This is

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 2>not a good outcome. Anthony ALBANESEI talks about Australian values,

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 2>but he does not seem to know what they are anymore,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 2>and he certainly can articulate them. This is why this

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Labor Prime Minister ironically seems so focused on the market

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 2>and free trade in his talks with China, because I

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 2>guess that's easier. But Labor also, of course, has a

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 2>long tradition of anti Americanism and isolationism that is coming

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to the fore. We saw this the other day with

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Albanisius John Kurtin lecture, and now we are seeing it

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 2>repeat again at a very dangerous time. Jijinping has us

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 2>just where he wants us, and he must be laughing

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 2>as he sees the fault lines appear in an alliance

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>officially founded by Robert Menzies back in nineteen fifty one.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I just cannot.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Believe that Albo is falling for all the false flattery. Now,

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Matt Canavan and Nikree is gonna be coming with me

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 2>after the break.

0:23:51.640 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 10>Don't go anywhere, did my guys pull marihi Aunt, Gambia

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 10>in South Australia is the next location for a town Sunday,

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 10>the twenty seventh of July, and I'd love you to

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 10>join me in the audience ourtown at skynews dot com.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 10>Do I use the white I said this an email.

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 10>It is one of the great hidden treasures of Australia.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 10>Halfway between Melbourne and Adelaide and Bang on the Pliswagonna

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 10>Bay Sunday the twenty seventh. Mount Gambia a town at

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 10>skottews dot com dot Au.

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Now back to James, thank you, Paulie, and yeah, Mount

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Gambier is fantastic. Hatch ass to go there a couple

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 2>of years ago. It is amazing. Now we're going to

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>bring a panel in in just a second, but also

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 2>first before that, I've got some really exciting news for you.

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm thrilled to bring a little news here to you

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 2>for our many thousands of regional viewers who rely on

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Sky for all the hard news and opinion that they

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 2>can't get elsewhere. Today here we at Sky News Australia

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 2>have entered into a new multi year agreement with Network

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 2>ten so that we can continue broadcasting our free to

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 2>air Sky News regional channel into regional markets across New

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 2>South Wales, Victoria and Queensland. Great news for everybody out there.

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 2>So if you're sitting at home in the regions right

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 2>now on the couch. That hello, and we can't wait

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to keep bringing you more of our leading political coverage,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 2>breaking news, sport and opinion. All right, let's get into

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>it now with the panel National Center Llen p Senator

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Matt Canavan and Lord Mayor of Melbourne Nick Reese. And

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I have a feeling we're gonna have

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a fiery evening here tonight here, because

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 2>there's so much to talk about.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Gentlemen.

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for joining me here. Let's kick

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 2>off here. I just had a big, long rant. I

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 2>guess you can call it about China and the Prime

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Minister's speech time in China here, and one thing I

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 2>want to talk to both of you about here, and Matt,

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe i'll start with you here. Alexander Downer, the former

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Minister, has written a brilliant piece in the Australian

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 2>newspaper today and he said that Australia is retreating. We

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 2>are coming critical commentators and not contributors to the security

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 2>of free peoples. And this week the Prime Minister is

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 2>rushing to catch up with China's unelected dictator Jijinping before

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 2>he's even met the President of the United States. The

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>symbolism is stark. Matt Canavan. Even if we take Donald

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Trump out of the equation, I do find the way

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that Labor is treating this trip as entirely a trade

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 2>mission and in ignoring basically all of the national security

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and geopolitical implications of this are really kind of disturbing.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like he is breaking us away ever

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 2>so slightly from the United States, and Beijing must be

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at this and laughing.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, there's some of that. I agree with James.

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not quite as idealistic as some of the commentators

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.360
<v Speaker 3>in the newspaper. I mean, I'm not so sure it's

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 3>our job to spread democracy around the world, and even

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 3>if we wanted to, couldn't. And it's not even our

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 3>job to necessarily secure the borders of every country in

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.959
<v Speaker 3>the world. Again, we just can't do that, and there

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 3>are many conflicts in the world we do not get

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 3>involved in. I squarely believe that we must conduct our

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 3>foreign policy according to what's in the best interests of Australia. Now,

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 3>it isn't the best interests of our country to countries

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 3>that show aggression. Aggression or seek to pressure and bully

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 3>other countries are not allowed to get away with it.

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 3>So that's something we do need to combat and something

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 3>that I think is being completely missed here in as

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I say, this flowery, idilistic language about democracy and freedom.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 3>It's that right now, as we stand right now, the tactics,

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the industrial tactics of the Chinese Communist Party have put

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 3>one thousands of Australians out of work in the last

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 3>year and there are thousands more on the chopping block

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 3>if their practices continue, and there's almost zero commentary on this.

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 3>It was because of the aggressive Chinese financed qulified powerstations

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Indonesia that ten thousand Australians in the nickel industry lost

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 3>their jobs last year and now they're pretty much every

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 3>smelter in the country, from copper to aluminium to lead

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 3>and zinc is un a threat because China is aggressively

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 3>seeking to dominate those industrial supply chains. They're doing someone

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 3>a way that is clearly inconsistent with international trade rules,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 3>and there's not anyone raising this issue or the government

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 3>raising it with China. And as I say, look, democracy

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 3>would be great, but as I say, it's not our

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 3>job to spread democracy to the building of buddiest of China,

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 3>but it is our job to protect our own jobs,

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 3>and our own interests, and our own industry, our own

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing capability, and hardly anyone is taking up that fight

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, look bad, I agree with you.

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, this isn't some idea that we need to

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 2>idealistically turn China into some sort of liberal democracy. But

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I think what we want to do is make sure

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that they're not dominating the specific And you know, Nick Rees,

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to take this over to either because the

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Senator makes a really good point here about all those

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 2>jobs in critical minerals industries, in call and all of

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>these things. Part of the reason, of course, is because

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 2>of China's really sharp and you know, unethical and really

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>an awful lot of times illegal according to various trade

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>courts practices. But part of that too is because this country,

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>in the Albanezi government, has insisted so much on net

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 2>zero and other environmental regulations that has meant we also

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 2>simply cannot compete. So it's sort of funny that we are,

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 2>on the one hand saying we want to do more

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.959
<v Speaker 2>business with China, but at the same time we're tying

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 2>one hand behind our back on this.

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 11>Book James, I thought your editorial earlier was very entertaining

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 11>and thank you, thank you. I read Alexander Danna's face

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 11>in The Australian today, which look if it was entertaining

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 11>as well.

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm fortunately on both scores.

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 11>I think you've got it wrong though, and unfortunately, you know,

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 11>the conservative side of politics in Australia has got a

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 11>long history of getting it badly wrong when it comes

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 11>to dealing with China. I mean, probably most famously there

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 11>was GoF Whitlam's trip to China in nineteen seventy one,

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 11>which you know, Billy McMahon wasn the Liberal Prime Minister,

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 11>and the Conservatives all piled in and criticized.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Weekends for beating China.

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 11>Of course, shortly thereafter, Richard Nixon visited China, opened up

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 11>relations with the West and it was one of Nixon's

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 11>finest moments as presidents. So, you know, more recent times

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 11>you've got like Scott Morrison who thought, you know, beating

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 11>up on China and criticizing Australians of Chinese background was

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 11>somehow a pathway to elections.

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Completely we're going to pull until here were on that history. Sorry,

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 2>long history getting sorry, Nicholas Ris. We have to put

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 2>pull you up on that here, and I think I

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 2>think that wants to hop in on this too. But

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you know we're not talking about this is what Leverol

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 2>is does. They always say, if you criticize the CCP,

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>you're criticizing Chinese people. Nothing could be further from the

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 2>truth that Scott Morrison, I think, did it add little

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>job of asking a very simple question which the world

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>deserves an answer to, which is where did COVID come from?

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Open the books?

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, it was clearly part of you asked that question and.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 11>Question and it was something that has been the subject

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 11>of many investigations, academic studies, and of course it's the

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 11>right question. But along enough, that's not what it was about.

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 11>It was about Scott Morrison trying to muscle up against

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 11>China's ridiculous Franklin ways to try and win an election.

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 3>It was disasterus on both fronts. Happened.

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Morrison wanted to let's let let's let that talk. Did

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>let that talk?

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, what actually happened was James absolutely right. It wasn't

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 3>actually even Scott Morrison. It was the foreign mister Mary's

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 3>pain asked a reasonable question about a need for an

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.479
<v Speaker 3>investigation to the origins of COVID, and in response to that,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese governments issued fourteen demands through the Australian media.

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 3>May I say not to Australian of the Australian gup

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 3>to change our laws on a bunch of things and

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 3>all else. But and I think any self respecting gub

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 3>and hopefully this guver would do the same. They're about

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 3>to be tested potentially on this, but hopefully any Istralian

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 3>government would tell another foreign comment, No, we don't just

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 3>respond to bullying and threats like China tried to do

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 3>to us. And so they did. They did. They did

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 3>ban our coal, they banned our wheat, they ban a

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 3>bali and guess what, we didn't miss a beat, despite

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the Labor Party saying the sky was going to fall,

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and I remember Murray Whattt in the Senate saying, oh,

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 3>the Australian coal industry is going to be devastated because

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Matt Canavan is not toning up with China. Well it

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't happen because we saw our colder elsewhere. China was

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 3>hurt by not buying our coal and they eventually had

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to back down. So it's a massive victory for Australia

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 3>by doing that. And second title, Labor Party not standing

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 3>up for our country on that, because you're about to

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 3>be tested as well now because China has just said

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 3>that if you go through, if Anthony Ebanizi goes through

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 3>his election commitment to take back the Port of Darwin,

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 3>they are going to place trade sanctions on us. So

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 3>what is the Labor Party going to do? I hope,

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I hope they deliver on their election commitment and they

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 3>stand to such threats and buildings, because there's no way

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 3>any self respecting country should let other nations dictate terms

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 3>to it like China has tried to done the last

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 3>couple of years. And thank god for Scott Morrison for

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 3>not kneeling over, not backing down on what is our

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 3>sovereign nation and independence.

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 2>And I mean this is this is the thing that

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas rees. Let's just you know, if you look across

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>specific the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP government led by

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Ji Jinping, I want to be very clear about what

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about, has used all sorts of aggressive tactics,

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 2>built islands where they're not supposed to build islands up,

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, intimidated the Philippines intimidated, Vietnam intimidated, all sorts

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>of other countries with navies, with coastguard fleets. They're doing

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 2>similar things here. At some point, you know, free countries

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 2>have to simply say enough, don't.

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 11>We Well, let's hope we don't, Actually, James, let's hope

0:33:55.600 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 11>that China continues to be a rational, self interested because

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 11>Australia has got very rich, become very prosperous off the

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 11>back of the economic rise of China.

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, after that.

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 11>Whitlam visit, we've seen five decades of phenomenal economic growth

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 11>of China and Australia has been one of the world's

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 11>biggest beneficiaries of that. We enjoy incredibly good, prosperous lives

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 11>in this country thanks in no small part to the

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 11>rise of China economically. And so what you see in

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 11>any I been easy traveling as Prime Minister to China

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 11>is a very pragmatic, self interested, independently minded prime minister,

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 11>putting Australia's interests first. We've done very well out of

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 11>China problem, and.

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's we continue to do so.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 3>We continue to do so.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's let's let's let that be the last word, Matt,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I got a lot to say on this,

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 2>and I do too, and I think the viewers at host.

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to say that the problem I've got

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.359
<v Speaker 3>is I've always and I was a resources minister wanted

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to see a good relation of China. That wouldn't let

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 3>me visit. This was long before the COVID issue, but

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 3>they wouldn't even let the streaming to go there. So remember,

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the original threats happened because we had the temerity to

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 3>pass a foreign interference law.

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Nick.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 3>That's that's when the that's when the threats and bullings

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 3>from China started, a law that the Labor Party supported.

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Uh And so again we've got to stand up to

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 3>this sort of bullying. But the issue we've got now

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 3>is we're far too dependent on China. So I don't

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 3>understand why the primise for spending his longest visit in

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 3>China and not visiting India or Vietnam or Indonesia and

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 3>other countries, because we clearly need to again exactly let's.

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 11>Look, hang on, hang on a second, let's not forget

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.240
<v Speaker 11>mad but China. China is bigger than Australia's next five

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 11>trade parts.

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>That's because the.

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Risk we have business is that big.

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't we stop this car?

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 3>No no, no, no, no no no no no no no.

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Risk management.

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 2>It is not risk management. It is diversification. We need

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a diverse And I want to talk we need to

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 2>resky our questions here.

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And I want to.

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Talk about two because this is also a great story here,

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 2>this story about the ABC puts it an FOI request

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 2>to the Treasury and they find out guess what, oh yeah, no, no, no, sorry,

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 2>we are spending too much money. Oh yeah, we are

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 2>going to need to raise taxes. Oh yeah, that one

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 2>point two billion house target, I don't know who's going

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 2>to build those houses isn't going to happen. But Matt Canavan,

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 2>let me start with you here. Why is the government

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 2>so secretive? They were acting like this is a matter

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 2>of national security that we can't know what Treasury thinks

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 2>about the forecast for Australians. This seems, you know, to

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 2>be against the idea of a very transparent government.

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Senator, Well, look, I'm not going to be hypocritically James.

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean all governments don't like to reveal advice from

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 3>their department's agencies. We would be the same. I think

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 3>that's particularly the major issue here. The sad thing I

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 3>think for our country is that we have a premier

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 3>economic advisory body who has given up, given up on

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 3>spending restraint and just telling the government raised taxes. I mean,

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 3>I've said on this show before that pre COVID, your government,

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.479
<v Speaker 3>the Australian government spent to four hundred and seventy seven

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars a year four and seventy eight four and

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 3>seventy eight billion dollars a year. So and now seven

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 3>years later, in the last budget, this financial year, you're

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 3>set to spend seven hundred and seventy seven billion dollars

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 3>three hundred billion dollars a year more on an average basis.

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Now they are only about ten million households in Australia,

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 3>so that's an extra thirty thousand dollars per household. So

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 3>every house watching this show tonight, your government is spending

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty thousand dollars a year more. That's not the total spending.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 3>They're spending that more compared to COVID. Now are we

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 3>getting thirty thousand dollars a year more extra services and

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 3>need Treasury saying hey, maybe it's a few items we

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 3>could cut back on here we could have some efficiencies

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 3>and so that we don't place such a burden on

0:37:57.719 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the Austraian taxpay because at least there's one bit of

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 3>honesty advice is if we keep going with the spending

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.879
<v Speaker 3>we've got, taxes are going to have to go up.

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 3>We can't keep borrowing like this as we are, and

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Austraine people have been prepared for that,

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 3>and the government hasn't been honest about that. And we

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 3>need to have some ideas here that are not just

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 3>about raising taxes but actually get about government spending within

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 3>their means.

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, Nicholas Real. So that makes an awful

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of good points there, you know, putting aside the

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 2>secrecy of it. We're not in a great position if

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 2>we are going to have to raise taxes and we

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 2>can't get all these houses built and all these promises

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 2>that you know, we've had a great economic management and

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 2>so the housing phrases well, you know, according to at

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 2>least as treasury bureaucrat, and I think probably a lot

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 2>of people out there just with their own eyes think

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that ain't going to happen.

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 11>Look, I actually could it. It was a good thing

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 11>for Australian that this advice has become public. I think

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 11>we should be able to openly and transparently see the

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 11>advice that you know ministers are receiving. On most issues,

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 11>I totally accept there would be exceptions to that, you know,

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 11>on sensitive defense matters commercial dealings where the government would

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 11>be prejudiced if the information was disclosed, But on so

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 11>many things I think we're better off as a democracy

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 11>if the advice is out there in the public.

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't mean that the.

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 11>Government we elect needs to follow the advice all the time.

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 11>In fact, you know, we elect them to be our

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 11>democratically democratic leaders, not just to follow the bureaucratic advices

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 11>on but actually putting that advice out there is a

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 11>good thing.

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I continue.

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 11>The City of Melbourne, we've got a council meeting tomorrow night.

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 11>It was the number of things we're voting on to

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 11>make decisions on the advice of the public servants at

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 11>the City of Melbourne is actually publicly available for people

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 11>to see on the website. They put a report and

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 11>a recommendation to counsel. Tomorrow night we vote on whether

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 11>we follow those recommendations, not follow it, or do a

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 11>variation on the advice with God. But it's all out

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 11>in the open and it's a really good system.

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Look, I can see the larger of that. Gentlemen, stick around,

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 2>don't go to where it'll come back more Monday Night

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Fights here on Palmer Live. Now, you don't go anywhere either,

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 2>because we're gonna have a lot more fired up debate

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 2>after the break. Welcome back to the program. James Borrow

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 2>here hosting Monday Night Fights on Paul Murray Live. We've

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 2>got Nicholas Reese and Senator Matt Canavan here. We've had

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fired up debate before the break. We're

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 2>gonna have some fired up debate in this segment too. Hey,

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 2>let's just move back Jents real quick because I just

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 2>want to talk and get one more little China topic

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 2>knocked over here because Matt. This one here, I think

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 2>is also important. Port of Darwin, the Prime Minister said

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 2>right before the election. He said, I want to take

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 2>that back and it was sort of throwaway thing to

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 2>Gazump Peter Dutton, very clever. It doesn't seem so clever

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.919
<v Speaker 2>now because it seems to be interfering with his trip.

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 2>But frankly, the port of Darwin getting that back in

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 2>our hands. That can't be a bad idea Canada.

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, look I write that before James. If nothing else

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the problem Minister did Mike a promise to the Australian

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 3>people at the election that he would do this, take

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 3>that back into Australian hands. I think it's something that

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.439
<v Speaker 3>the Australian people have long wanted to see. It's an

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 3>extremely important and vital port for our nation's interests. We

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 3>have a large naval base there. I should stress that

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese owned or Chinese least part of the port

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 3>is not where a defense assets are. But be that

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:25.919
<v Speaker 3>as it may, it's still very sensitive location. It's right

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 3>next door, and really it makes sense I think for

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 3>that to be in Australian hands now. As I said earlier,

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we should in any way here. It's

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a test the newly elected Albanezi government.

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 3>We certainly shouldn't see our government's reneg on a promise

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the Australian people based on a demand from another country.

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.280
<v Speaker 3>And I also think if it is true that China

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 3>wants to be a friendly nation to us, that this

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 3>makes perfect common sense. I mean, can you imagine if

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 3>an Australian infrastructure company, say Mcquarie Bank sought to take

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 3>a lease over the Tjin port near Beijing. I mean,

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 3>let's it's just not.

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't see that. I can't see that happen.

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 3>What's good for the ghost should be good for the Ganda,

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 3>and it's in our national interest and that should be

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 3>respected from out the country and should like no one

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 3>is talking about taking it back.

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>No, of course, not something like that.

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:18.919
<v Speaker 3>We don't.

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just outing.

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 3>But we should pursue our national interests.

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Correct, correct, And just on that national interest question there,

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, Nicholas Rees, you say, and you made an

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 2>eloquent case that really trade with China is the thing

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 2>that makes us all rich and everybody be happy.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's the.

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Alb and easy line here. But what about this idea

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 2>about critical infrastructure, Because there are controversies in a lot

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:41.919
<v Speaker 2>of countries, the United States here as well, and people

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 2>are passing legislation in some places, say foreign governments, particularly

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 2>hostile governments and governments that are totalitary and decartorships like

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 2>China cannot own critical infrastructure because they have the ability

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 2>to cut us off or make trouble for us in

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 2>times of would you be supportive of you and as

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 2>you support all of this trade with Beijing, also say

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 2>you know there needs to be limits on what they

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 2>can know in terms of infrastructure, far land resources here

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 2>in Australia as a matter of our sovereignty, not as

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 2>a matter of trade, but a sovereignty.

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 11>Short answer is yes, James, I do support those measures.

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I think the Port of Darwin is a

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 11>strategically important asset for our country and it's not surprising

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 11>that our Prime Minister and then Opposition leader Peteton both

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 11>made promises to see that asset return to Australian ownership

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 11>after the election and Prime Minister One Anthony Alberti and

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 11>now he's going to move to do that. And look,

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 11>I'm sure something that will come up in discussions in Beijing,

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 11>and I'm confident that the Prime Minister will explain very

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 11>calmly and rationally the reasons for doing so. And as

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 11>I think that has quite eloqantly said, China will do

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 11>the same thing for their nationally strategically important asset. And

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 11>so look, the port's one good example of something that

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 11>fits in that category. And yes, I do think there

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 11>are other assets that fit in that category. As well,

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 11>and so again, what's what's you need to have a

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 11>framework that you used to apply to make these decisions,

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 11>and so that includes things like things that are important

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 11>to preserving our sovereignty and things that ultimately serve our

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 11>national interest to remain in Australian hands.

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely right, Hey, that's pretty well said there. You say

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 2>that's eloquent. But hey, let's just end on a fun

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 2>note here, because there has been the FIFA Club World

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Cup Final and it was visited by none other than

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 2>your favorite President Donald J. Trump, and he had this

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 2>thought about whether we should call it soccer or football.

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Have a look at this.

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Johnny's a friend of mine.

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 5>He's done such a great job with the league and

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:58.760
<v Speaker 5>with soccer or if they would call it football.

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 8>But I guess we call it soccer.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that change could be made very easily.

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:03.919
<v Speaker 11>What if we make an executive order we can only

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 11>say football from now on.

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 5>I think we could do that, and I think I

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 5>could do that.

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Quick responses from both of you, Matt Canavan, soccer or football?

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>What should be called?

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, Matt, I've got a ten year old son who's

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 3>mad about football and that's what he demands. It to

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 3>be called. So I'll have to back that one. How

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 3>about Donald Trump on the on the celebration stage with

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 3>the team. It's not like it. Trump's just all about

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 3>getting there and making that.

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 1>It was an iconic shot. I don't know if we've

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>got it. We've got it there on the screen for you.

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 1>There this guy.

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 2>You know when everything was politics, you could churn out

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the images, say it and down. Nicholas reaes very quickly.

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Soccer or football? What are we calling it?

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 11>Look, if I'm at a soccer function, I of course

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 11>call it football. If I'm at an Aussie rules or

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 11>rugby function, I call the round ball game soccer. So

0:45:57.120 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 11>you know you used to write names for the writer audiences.

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 11>Is how I Very diplomatic, gentlemen.

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have to leave with here, Nicholas Rees, Matt Canavan,

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining me tonight on Paulbury Live.

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Now after the break, I'm gonna show you a funny

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 2>video from the United States that you're not.

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Gonna want to miss. Stick around.

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey thereon James Borrow here for Paulbury Live. Gosh, it's

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 2>been great to be here tonight with Nick Reese and

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Matt canavan. We've had a lot of fun. Well the

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 2>fun ain't orient. We've got a little news item I

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.359
<v Speaker 2>want to share with you before we go. It's from

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the United States. You know, I always love to share

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 2>news from the US with you. Check this out here.

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 2>According to our friends at the New York Post, there's

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 2>a mountain lion on the loose in upstate New York,

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 2>specifically in the city of Rochester. And this man here, yep,

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 2>he says he encountered this mountain lion on his street.

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 2>And I'm gonna tell you what. He gave one of

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 2>the best play by play interactions of a of an

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:07.920
<v Speaker 2>interaction with a mountain lion.

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I've ever.

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Heard, not that I've heard a lot of them, but

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I think this one has to be number one. Here's

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.760
<v Speaker 2>what this gentleman told his local news station about the encounter.

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Heard, I heard, Rau. I felt I felt down, RAU.

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I know to keeping pushing, I know that.

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 10>Curtis Jones says he was walking near Robber Street late

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 10>Wednesday when he saw people running from what appeared to

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 10>be a large wild cat.

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I thought, I see the people.

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll just see some big just walking just right over here.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Right everybody, but way right over here, I swear, I

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 2>promised him right over there.

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 9>They just it's a row.

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll just I'll just cut walk.

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:46.319
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it, seen me see it, so in my head,

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, no, I gotta go, man, I'm about like

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 2>this bit.

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It was it was it was it was just walking

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Slytherin like it was. I don't know, man, it.

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Was just walking and slithering. I got my base bat.

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Never seen anything like that. But I haven't hed a

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 2>mountain lion in upstate New York either, But you know,

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 2>who knows what else is out there? And thank you

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 2>so much to the New York Post and our friends

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 2>in the local news environment for that. You never know

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 2>what you're going to wind up getting when you pick

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 2>up the local news in the.

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 1>New York Post.

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, stay safe out there, watch out for mountain lions,

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and if you do see a mountain lion, get your

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 2>baseball bat and say ur ah, I'm gonna say or

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 2>are because guess what the late debate is coming up

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 2>right now