1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,680 Speaker 1: This podcast was recorded on the land of the Gatigel 2 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: people of the Eur Nation. 3 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:10,760 Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to the Real Story with Joe hild 4 00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:14,800 Speaker 2: Around another absolutely huge week. We've had that crazy, historic, 5 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:19,120 Speaker 2: controversial march across the Harbor Bridge over the weekend. So 6 00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:21,239 Speaker 2: what does it really mean? Is it going to make 7 00:00:21,320 --> 00:00:24,799 Speaker 2: any difference in the conflict between Israel and Palestine or 8 00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:29,480 Speaker 2: the starvation in Gaza. Reveal everything about that. Plus, China 9 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:32,239 Speaker 2: is not just on our doorstop, it's in among us. 10 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:35,440 Speaker 2: We've just had the arrest of an alleged Chinese operative 11 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:40,080 Speaker 2: infiltrating organizations in Canberra. So how do these spies really 12 00:00:40,120 --> 00:00:42,480 Speaker 2: work and how do our spies really work? I'll reveal 13 00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:44,800 Speaker 2: a little bit about that as well. Plus what is 14 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:48,080 Speaker 2: China's endgame? What are they trying to do with us? 15 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:50,440 Speaker 2: What are they trying to do to us? I'll speak 16 00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 2: to someone who is the ultimate expert in these matters. 17 00:00:54,080 --> 00:01:02,560 Speaker 2: All that more coming up. So first up, I want 18 00:01:02,600 --> 00:01:05,320 Speaker 2: to talk about the really big issue that has been 19 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:10,679 Speaker 2: consuming pretty much everybody in the media and politics this week, 20 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:15,360 Speaker 2: and that is this march across the Harbor Bridge on Sunday. 21 00:01:15,760 --> 00:01:19,720 Speaker 2: This was an asoric event in many ways, almost one 22 00:01:19,760 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 2: hundred thousand people. About ninety thousand people they reckon march 23 00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:25,800 Speaker 2: across the Harbor Bridge. There were of course other protest 24 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:29,760 Speaker 2: marches in Melbourne especially as well, but it was the 25 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:33,080 Speaker 2: Harbor Bridge March that really caught the nation's attention because 26 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:36,000 Speaker 2: I think so few people expected it to happen, and 27 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:39,200 Speaker 2: because the Harbor Bridge is such an iconic image of 28 00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:43,040 Speaker 2: not just Sydney but Australia, and so when people saw 29 00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:48,800 Speaker 2: this symbol co operted for a particular cause caused very 30 00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:51,800 Speaker 2: visceral emotions among some sections of the community. And there 31 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:54,200 Speaker 2: are other people who were also a bit uneasy about 32 00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:57,080 Speaker 2: it as well, people who were very sympathetic to the 33 00:01:57,080 --> 00:02:01,720 Speaker 2: Palestinian cause but weren't quite weren't quite comfortable with how 34 00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:05,840 Speaker 2: the bridge got pulled into it. This was of course 35 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:10,320 Speaker 2: a march for Gaza, a march for Palestine, a march 36 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:14,240 Speaker 2: for humanity, a march against Israel, and a march, according 37 00:02:14,240 --> 00:02:17,600 Speaker 2: to some placards that were being held, march for the 38 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:21,760 Speaker 2: Highatola of Iran. And that I think is part of 39 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:26,920 Speaker 2: the problem and the complexity with what took place on 40 00:02:26,960 --> 00:02:29,040 Speaker 2: the weekend, that there were all these sort of different 41 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:36,280 Speaker 2: causes and agendas, some of which were purely humanitarian and compassionate, 42 00:02:36,400 --> 00:02:40,280 Speaker 2: like the awful situation in Gaza where you have obviously, 43 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:42,160 Speaker 2: no matter where you stand, I think you have to 44 00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:45,240 Speaker 2: acknowledge that there is a huge amount of starvation, just 45 00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:51,680 Speaker 2: catastrophic results fueled by both I dare say, Hamas and Israel. 46 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 2: But there was also a whole bunch of people again 47 00:02:56,120 --> 00:03:00,960 Speaker 2: who were holding flags that were linked to terror organizations, 48 00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:06,560 Speaker 2: holding pictures of Ayatola Kamani, who is the most barbarous, brutal, 49 00:03:06,960 --> 00:03:13,400 Speaker 2: murderous theocratic dictator of Iran. So how did it happen 50 00:03:14,040 --> 00:03:17,600 Speaker 2: and what was it for and what difference will it 51 00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:20,840 Speaker 2: even mate? What were they trying to achieve? And this 52 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:25,040 Speaker 2: is what kind of gets me about these things, about 53 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:30,160 Speaker 2: these protests. Yes, obviously anyone with any sense of compassion 54 00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:35,120 Speaker 2: with the human heart is horrified by what's happening in Gaza, 55 00:03:36,160 --> 00:03:38,360 Speaker 2: But what does jumping up and down and saying how 56 00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:41,839 Speaker 2: horrified you are, and kind of I dare say, making 57 00:03:41,880 --> 00:03:44,240 Speaker 2: it a bit about you instead of about the people 58 00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:47,280 Speaker 2: who are starving. What does that actually achieve and what 59 00:03:47,320 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 2: are you trying to achieve by that? So this was 60 00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:57,080 Speaker 2: a march that like I suppose you know, the march 61 00:03:57,120 --> 00:03:58,880 Speaker 2: before it, and the March before that, and all the 62 00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:01,880 Speaker 2: other marches that have been every weekend since the October 63 00:04:01,960 --> 00:04:07,600 Speaker 2: seven terror attack by her Mass and Israel's reprisals been 64 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:12,120 Speaker 2: taking place in capital cities across Australia, but most particularly 65 00:04:12,160 --> 00:04:18,880 Speaker 2: Sydney and Melbourne. And after this image of a poor 66 00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:23,159 Speaker 2: young child starving being held by his mother circulated around 67 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:28,480 Speaker 2: the world, this seemed to escalate things and certainly created 68 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:33,360 Speaker 2: a huge amount of sympathy for the Gazan situation, which 69 00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:37,200 Speaker 2: was not necessarily there before. Sympathy that came from ultra 70 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:42,560 Speaker 2: conservative newspapers for example, that would have been otherwise very 71 00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:45,240 Speaker 2: pro Israel, but said, hey, I know enough is enough. 72 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:48,680 Speaker 2: But anyway, this crowded this sort of global momentum. And 73 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:52,520 Speaker 2: of course what does the usual rent a crowd in 74 00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:56,479 Speaker 2: Australia that's been protesting every week to no avail, what 75 00:04:56,600 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 2: do they think this is the time to do another protest? 76 00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:06,240 Speaker 2: So you've actually got this kind of sea change in 77 00:05:06,320 --> 00:05:10,880 Speaker 2: sort of global sentiments and most importantly the sentiment of 78 00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:14,880 Speaker 2: the US President Donald Trump. I'm not sure the protests 79 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:17,800 Speaker 2: are too fond of him. But he's he's the one 80 00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:22,240 Speaker 2: who's the image has affected, who is in the most 81 00:05:22,839 --> 00:05:26,400 Speaker 2: powerful position to affect what Israel actually does. And it 82 00:05:26,440 --> 00:05:29,159 Speaker 2: seems that he did have a word because Israel he'sed 83 00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 2: the supply of aid into Gaza. Once that picture did 84 00:05:32,960 --> 00:05:36,680 Speaker 2: the rounds and Donald Trump said how concerned he was 85 00:05:36,720 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 2: by it. But these guys say no, no, we'll just 86 00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:41,840 Speaker 2: go and have another protest, and well, you know, we'll 87 00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:44,719 Speaker 2: piss off half of Sydney by shutting down the Harbor 88 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:49,159 Speaker 2: Bridge and the CBD and this will again do what 89 00:05:50,240 --> 00:05:54,880 Speaker 2: So neither the protest is nor the government actually thought 90 00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:56,800 Speaker 2: that this would be able to go ahead. The government, 91 00:05:57,040 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 2: state government. You said, that was absolutely no way. The 92 00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:02,120 Speaker 2: cop said no. Why. This is a public safety issue. 93 00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:05,880 Speaker 2: Apart from the massive inconvenience to shutting down the biggest 94 00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:09,440 Speaker 2: piece of infrastructure in Sydney or the CBD, where police 95 00:06:09,480 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 2: are just donet go because it's going to be a nightmare, 96 00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:16,039 Speaker 2: it's also a crowd safety issue, the safety of the 97 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 2: marches themselves when you have that many people all in 98 00:06:19,600 --> 00:06:22,920 Speaker 2: the one place, all on a piece of vital infrastructure, 99 00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:27,440 Speaker 2: and with no time to actually prepare and for the 100 00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:31,360 Speaker 2: police to make contingency plans and transport arrangements and make 101 00:06:31,400 --> 00:06:34,360 Speaker 2: sure there's ways for people to get off and out. 102 00:06:34,640 --> 00:06:38,840 Speaker 2: And indeed that was what ended up happening, but not 103 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:40,919 Speaker 2: before the Supreme Court say oh no, it'll be fine. 104 00:06:41,880 --> 00:06:45,320 Speaker 2: Very weird decision by the court, but yes, no, they 105 00:06:45,320 --> 00:06:48,080 Speaker 2: took it to the court. Even the protesters seem to 106 00:06:48,120 --> 00:06:51,039 Speaker 2: think that they weren't going to get prival because they 107 00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:52,839 Speaker 2: were making noise, they were just going to do it anyway, 108 00:06:53,960 --> 00:06:56,240 Speaker 2: But the judge said, yeah, no, fine, yeah that sounds great, Yeah, 109 00:06:56,279 --> 00:07:02,520 Speaker 2: go for it, no worries inspiring. Exactly what happened was 110 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:05,279 Speaker 2: what police had for fear that there was the threat 111 00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:08,160 Speaker 2: of a massive crush. They were deeply alarmed and they 112 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:12,160 Speaker 2: basically had to tell the protesters to stop and turn 113 00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:14,880 Speaker 2: around when they're halfway across the bridge because they could 114 00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:18,440 Speaker 2: see it all bottling up into a situation where there 115 00:07:18,520 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 2: could be a massive crowd crush. And eyewitnesses were saying 116 00:07:23,400 --> 00:07:28,200 Speaker 2: the same thing that it looked really, really hairy. So nonetheless, 117 00:07:28,200 --> 00:07:31,400 Speaker 2: they got their pickop, they got their photo holding the banner, 118 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:35,000 Speaker 2: they got their photo of people holding a picture of 119 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:41,240 Speaker 2: the Ietoler Kamane, And what did it actually achieve. What 120 00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:43,120 Speaker 2: impact did it actually have? Well, did it have any 121 00:07:43,160 --> 00:07:46,679 Speaker 2: impact on Benjamin et Yahoo, who was the one person 122 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:51,080 Speaker 2: in the most immediate position to be able to if 123 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:53,720 Speaker 2: you know, again, all these claims that it's simply Israel 124 00:07:54,120 --> 00:07:57,320 Speaker 2: that's lifting the boomgate on the aid coming in or out, 125 00:07:58,560 --> 00:08:00,840 Speaker 2: did have any impact on him letting the aid come 126 00:08:00,840 --> 00:08:03,640 Speaker 2: in there out? Well, no, because Israel had already let 127 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,240 Speaker 2: more aid in on the back of that picture that 128 00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:08,560 Speaker 2: did the rounds, however questionable you might think the picture 129 00:08:08,640 --> 00:08:12,480 Speaker 2: is it created enough of a change in global mood 130 00:08:12,880 --> 00:08:16,120 Speaker 2: for Israel to think, oh, we better better do something 131 00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:18,440 Speaker 2: about this and stop looking like the pariah, stop looking 132 00:08:18,480 --> 00:08:21,160 Speaker 2: like the bad guys. And again, what was the biggest 133 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 2: factor in that? It was Donald Trump? It was Donald Trump. 134 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:27,720 Speaker 2: Just like when Malania saw the pictures of a Ukraine 135 00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 2: being bombed by the Russians and had a quiet word 136 00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:33,760 Speaker 2: and oh, oh really, yeah, maybe the Russians are the 137 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,200 Speaker 2: bad guys. Better do something about that. If only I 138 00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:37,760 Speaker 2: knew the President of the United saying oh hey, no, 139 00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:41,760 Speaker 2: that's me whoo So Donald he comes around, comes around 140 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:45,000 Speaker 2: in Ukraine and made the same noises about what was 141 00:08:45,040 --> 00:08:48,199 Speaker 2: happening in Gaza after the photo did the rounds. Donald 142 00:08:48,320 --> 00:08:51,760 Speaker 2: is a very visual guy. He bombed Syria after he 143 00:08:51,840 --> 00:08:54,720 Speaker 2: saw the pictures of the children had been affected by 144 00:08:55,559 --> 00:08:57,920 Speaker 2: the chemical weapons. He sees that says, oh that's not right. 145 00:08:58,080 --> 00:09:01,680 Speaker 2: Maybe he's a simple man, but you know, he sees something, 146 00:09:01,720 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 2: he doesn't like it, he does something about it. He's 147 00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:06,520 Speaker 2: been the only person on the face of the planet 148 00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:12,319 Speaker 2: bar Nan, who's been able to get Benjamin Netanyahoo to 149 00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:14,320 Speaker 2: change his mind to do something he doesn't want to do. 150 00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:16,680 Speaker 2: He was the one who got Net and Yahoo to 151 00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:19,520 Speaker 2: turn the planes around when they were on their way 152 00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:22,959 Speaker 2: back to Iran for another bombing raid, just after the 153 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:29,880 Speaker 2: US had dismantled destroyed the nuclear bunkers and Bibie wanted 154 00:09:29,920 --> 00:09:33,720 Speaker 2: to re escalate again after a bit of tip for tat, 155 00:09:33,920 --> 00:09:38,120 Speaker 2: and Trump famously said, you know, they don't know what 156 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:42,000 Speaker 2: they're doing, and he got on the phone and those 157 00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:44,080 Speaker 2: planes got turned around. No one else has been able 158 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:46,199 Speaker 2: to do that, right, No one else has that kind 159 00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:51,720 Speaker 2: of power on the planet. So again, if the protesters 160 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:55,720 Speaker 2: really what to make an impact, they should be protesting 161 00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:58,520 Speaker 2: in favor of Donald Trump. Say go Donald, you tell 162 00:09:58,600 --> 00:10:01,200 Speaker 2: him he's the only one who's been able to make 163 00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:02,839 Speaker 2: a difference. That is just a fact, whether you like 164 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:04,120 Speaker 2: the guy or not. But of course they don't like 165 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:07,319 Speaker 2: Donald Trump either, So that, I suppose is the first 166 00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:10,280 Speaker 2: kind of question, like what difference do you think this 167 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:16,120 Speaker 2: march is going to make over there? The second is, okay, well, 168 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:18,160 Speaker 2: maybe we just have to take care of what's happening 169 00:10:18,200 --> 00:10:22,319 Speaker 2: in our own backyard and say, you know, Anthony Albanezi, 170 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:24,760 Speaker 2: we want you to do this. We want Australia to 171 00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:27,320 Speaker 2: say this that or the other, or do this that 172 00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:32,080 Speaker 2: or the other. Obviously Israel's not listening to Australia either, Albo. 173 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:34,320 Speaker 2: I don't think I was even able to get a 174 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:38,400 Speaker 2: phone call or with Benjamin et Yahu this week, and 175 00:10:38,920 --> 00:10:41,040 Speaker 2: you know why would he? I mean, I don't think 176 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:44,040 Speaker 2: the two particularly close friends, and Australia has been very 177 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:49,200 Speaker 2: critical of Israel, often rightly. So then you say, all right, well, 178 00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 2: why doesn't Australia just come out and do what the 179 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:54,679 Speaker 2: UK or France has done and just say, oh, now 180 00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:57,160 Speaker 2: we recognize Palestine as a state. We're just going to 181 00:10:57,240 --> 00:11:04,079 Speaker 2: recognize it. Okay, well what state? Who? Hermas a mus 182 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:06,559 Speaker 2: is still the government of Gaza. But everyone says that 183 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:09,520 Speaker 2: the condition of the past unstated. A Musk can have 184 00:11:09,520 --> 00:11:12,480 Speaker 2: no role because they are literally a prescribed terrorist organization. 185 00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:15,600 Speaker 2: So to say, oh, now, actually it's okay for us stays. 186 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:18,080 Speaker 2: That's fine, they can stay there. Say no, no, no, 187 00:11:18,240 --> 00:11:21,520 Speaker 2: a maus has to go. So all right, well, what 188 00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:26,160 Speaker 2: if the people of Gaza vote for Hamas. What if 189 00:11:26,160 --> 00:11:28,520 Speaker 2: the same people under the same name or even a 190 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:32,600 Speaker 2: different name run for election and get voted in. You're 191 00:11:32,600 --> 00:11:34,199 Speaker 2: going to say no, no, you voted the wrong way. 192 00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:37,600 Speaker 2: You're not allowed to do that. You could, you know, 193 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:40,040 Speaker 2: you can have democracy, but only if you vote the 194 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:42,640 Speaker 2: way we tell you to, because that's how Mask got 195 00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:46,280 Speaker 2: in last time they were elected. They not voted. That 196 00:11:46,360 --> 00:11:49,240 Speaker 2: is why they are still officially the government of Gaza. 197 00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:54,640 Speaker 2: So is that the state that the protesters want Australia 198 00:11:54,679 --> 00:11:58,720 Speaker 2: to just unilaterally recognize, not that even if they did that, 199 00:11:58,840 --> 00:12:02,120 Speaker 2: even it would make the slow difference whatsoever. Australia or 200 00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:04,120 Speaker 2: France or the UK doesn't just get to decide to 201 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 2: wish a country into existence and it just happens. And that, 202 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:10,800 Speaker 2: of course is just Garza. That's just one part of 203 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:15,959 Speaker 2: the future Palestinian state. What about the West Bank. West 204 00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:19,360 Speaker 2: Bank is run by a completely different government, completely different 205 00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:24,480 Speaker 2: organization by Fatah, which hates ha Mass and it's terrified 206 00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:26,839 Speaker 2: of for Mass because if they had an election in 207 00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:29,120 Speaker 2: the West Bank, Mass would probably win there too, or 208 00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:31,240 Speaker 2: at least would have before the whole you know, who 209 00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:34,280 Speaker 2: are with the civil war and the terrorist atrocities and everything. 210 00:12:34,520 --> 00:12:37,319 Speaker 2: And of course even in the West Bank, you've got Hebron, 211 00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:41,240 Speaker 2: shake of Hebron saying no, we want to declare ourselves 212 00:12:41,320 --> 00:12:44,960 Speaker 2: our own independent kind of Palestine, align ourselves with other 213 00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:50,880 Speaker 2: Arab states, recognize Israel. Hebron's largest city in the West Bank. 214 00:12:51,280 --> 00:12:55,480 Speaker 2: So now you've got three Palestinian states run by three 215 00:12:55,559 --> 00:13:02,760 Speaker 2: different parties, organizations, systems of government. Do you just recognize 216 00:13:02,800 --> 00:13:05,200 Speaker 2: all of them? Like what actually happens? And this is 217 00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:07,480 Speaker 2: a thing. It's fine to jump up and down and 218 00:13:07,480 --> 00:13:09,800 Speaker 2: say how upset you are, how outraged you are about 219 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:12,880 Speaker 2: whatever's happening over there. And I get it, I'm upset, 220 00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:15,480 Speaker 2: I'm outraged. You couldn't be human and not be upset 221 00:13:15,520 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 2: and outraged by what's happening. But what do you want 222 00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:20,480 Speaker 2: to happen? How do you want to fix it? What's 223 00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:24,440 Speaker 2: your plan that you've got in your head that you're 224 00:13:24,480 --> 00:13:28,080 Speaker 2: so sure about that makes you smarter than the smartest 225 00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:29,960 Speaker 2: brains on the planet who haven't been able to fix 226 00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:34,599 Speaker 2: this for the last eighty years. But now you just 227 00:13:34,640 --> 00:13:36,319 Speaker 2: go and have a protest, go and have a march, 228 00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:40,240 Speaker 2: do a few chance, that'll solve everything. That is what 229 00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:48,880 Speaker 2: I don't get. Now. The other big story this week is, 230 00:13:48,920 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 2: of course, the arrest of this alleged Chinese spy operating 231 00:13:54,040 --> 00:13:59,920 Speaker 2: in camera infiltrating a Buddhist club. Now, I've got to say, 232 00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:01,839 Speaker 2: I know a lot of people have made a lot 233 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:05,560 Speaker 2: of sacrifices for their country, but this, to me seems 234 00:14:05,600 --> 00:14:09,440 Speaker 2: the ultimate one. I cannot think of anything more boring, 235 00:14:10,280 --> 00:14:16,319 Speaker 2: more soul crushingly, earnest and dull than having to infiltrate 236 00:14:16,400 --> 00:14:20,800 Speaker 2: a Buddhist club when you're not even a Buddhist. I mean, 237 00:14:20,880 --> 00:14:23,960 Speaker 2: that is a level of commitment. You almost kind of think, 238 00:14:24,560 --> 00:14:27,120 Speaker 2: I wish you'd got away with it, you know, because 239 00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:28,960 Speaker 2: once you're there, I mean, I don't know, how long 240 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,720 Speaker 2: do you have to meditate for before you achieve self 241 00:14:31,760 --> 00:14:35,680 Speaker 2: actualization and nirvana? What if you're there doing it, just 242 00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:40,000 Speaker 2: sitting there doing the full lotus, you don't even think 243 00:14:40,040 --> 00:14:41,880 Speaker 2: you're gonna get there, you don't even believe in it, 244 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:45,520 Speaker 2: and everyone else has like got their manager there. You 245 00:14:45,560 --> 00:14:49,400 Speaker 2: just have to sit there through that, knowing that you're 246 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:51,280 Speaker 2: never going to get there, knowing that the only true 247 00:14:51,360 --> 00:14:56,440 Speaker 2: nirvana is the People's Republic of China. I mean that 248 00:14:56,600 --> 00:15:00,000 Speaker 2: is that is commitment anyway, alleged, led, alleged, alledged, alleged, 249 00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:04,520 Speaker 2: but great work by our spooks both here and abroad. 250 00:15:04,560 --> 00:15:08,840 Speaker 2: But ASIO obviously the domestic spy agency which uncovered this, 251 00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:14,400 Speaker 2: and then of course the AFP which publicly arrested this person, 252 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:17,480 Speaker 2: a Chinese national who was a permanent resident of Australia. 253 00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 2: And the most interesting thing about this, this was done 254 00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:24,440 Speaker 2: under new laws that were just recently passed. And the 255 00:15:24,480 --> 00:15:28,400 Speaker 2: most interesting thing is that this was public and it 256 00:15:28,400 --> 00:15:30,760 Speaker 2: was done under new laws which obviously publicly passed, and 257 00:15:30,800 --> 00:15:35,600 Speaker 2: it was done by after Mike Burgess, the head of AZO, 258 00:15:35,680 --> 00:15:39,640 Speaker 2: the Director General of AZIO very publicly said we know 259 00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:43,520 Speaker 2: that China is in here. It's got its fingers in 260 00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:46,520 Speaker 2: our pie. We know you're crawling all over the joint 261 00:15:47,400 --> 00:15:49,120 Speaker 2: and we'd like you to stop it please because it's 262 00:15:49,120 --> 00:15:53,960 Speaker 2: costing us a lot of money. Cost more than ten 263 00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:56,680 Speaker 2: billion bucks I think in the last year thirteen billion 264 00:15:56,720 --> 00:16:00,520 Speaker 2: something like that in the last year. Foreign interference is 265 00:16:00,560 --> 00:16:03,840 Speaker 2: costing us. And that is the interesting thing about all this, 266 00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:07,160 Speaker 2: not that it's happening, because it's always happening. You should 267 00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:10,560 Speaker 2: just assume that spies are just crawling among us all 268 00:16:10,600 --> 00:16:13,160 Speaker 2: the time, but that it's public. Usually these things get 269 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:17,040 Speaker 2: taken care of behind closed doors. Someone might just be 270 00:16:17,120 --> 00:16:21,680 Speaker 2: quietly booted out of the country, or a spying network 271 00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:26,560 Speaker 2: or a capability might just be quietly disabled. And again 272 00:16:26,600 --> 00:16:31,160 Speaker 2: you also have diplomats in Australia who are effectively spying 273 00:16:31,880 --> 00:16:34,120 Speaker 2: all the time, but they have diplomatic community and we 274 00:16:34,200 --> 00:16:35,840 Speaker 2: know they're doing it, but there's nothing much we can 275 00:16:35,880 --> 00:16:38,240 Speaker 2: do about it because of course if we crack down 276 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:42,320 Speaker 2: too hard on them. And guess what, our diplomats who 277 00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:45,160 Speaker 2: are doing the exact same thing in other countries they 278 00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:47,480 Speaker 2: get cracked down on as well. So there's a sort 279 00:16:47,480 --> 00:16:50,160 Speaker 2: of thing. It's almost like a gentleman's agreement that all 280 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:54,200 Speaker 2: of this stuff is going on, and everyone's gathering information 281 00:16:54,360 --> 00:16:57,760 Speaker 2: and reporting back to their respective governments. And again this 282 00:16:57,800 --> 00:17:00,280 Speaker 2: is not James Bond stuff. This is not jumping out 283 00:17:00,280 --> 00:17:04,480 Speaker 2: of helicopters or you know, unearthing secret lairs at the 284 00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:10,119 Speaker 2: bottom of volcanoes. This is people who often have perfectly 285 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:15,720 Speaker 2: normal or you know, respectable day jobs. Again, they'll often 286 00:17:15,760 --> 00:17:20,280 Speaker 2: be diplomats or people who work in various overseas roles 287 00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:21,760 Speaker 2: who will just be doing a little bit of spying 288 00:17:21,760 --> 00:17:25,479 Speaker 2: on the side. You know, what did you learn today, buddy, Well, 289 00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:28,800 Speaker 2: I learned that you know, China is ramping up its 290 00:17:28,840 --> 00:17:34,440 Speaker 2: surveillance of the Taiwan Straits. Oh great, So this sort 291 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:36,280 Speaker 2: of thing sort of happens all the time, and so 292 00:17:36,720 --> 00:17:40,200 Speaker 2: the fact that this has been made public is actually 293 00:17:40,240 --> 00:17:43,520 Speaker 2: the most interesting thing about it, in my view, is 294 00:17:43,560 --> 00:17:46,120 Speaker 2: that the government is actually saying and again you get 295 00:17:46,119 --> 00:17:50,680 Speaker 2: all these people saying, oh, it isn't standing up to China. Actually, 296 00:17:50,720 --> 00:17:53,200 Speaker 2: this is what standing up to China looks like, saying, 297 00:17:53,560 --> 00:17:57,920 Speaker 2: you know what, you've crossed the line. You know you've 298 00:17:57,960 --> 00:18:01,760 Speaker 2: infiltrated the Buddhist Club. You know you can you can 299 00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:05,159 Speaker 2: take whatever you want, take the Bureau of Meteorology. We 300 00:18:05,240 --> 00:18:09,320 Speaker 2: know that you did that. But you touch our Buddhists 301 00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:13,760 Speaker 2: and you're going home, mister. So this is what it 302 00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:16,000 Speaker 2: actually looks like, and I think it shows that Australia 303 00:18:16,119 --> 00:18:19,159 Speaker 2: is actually standing up to China. It is actually we 304 00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:21,840 Speaker 2: are showing them that we know what they're up to 305 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:31,480 Speaker 2: and maybe maybe that's our pathway to our own nirvana. Well, 306 00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:33,280 Speaker 2: it wouldn't be an episode of the real story if 307 00:18:33,280 --> 00:18:35,960 Speaker 2: we didn't have World War three on our doorstep. And 308 00:18:36,480 --> 00:18:40,040 Speaker 2: this week well kind of maybe it sort of is. 309 00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:44,159 Speaker 2: We've just had, of course, the Chinese spy alleged Chinese 310 00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:48,160 Speaker 2: spy be arrested in Canberra. We've got a new deal 311 00:18:48,440 --> 00:18:52,280 Speaker 2: with Japan to buy a whole fleet of frigates, which 312 00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:56,080 Speaker 2: we've been sorely needing for well over a decade now, 313 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:59,760 Speaker 2: but basically had one bloken a rowboat circumnavigating the country. 314 00:19:00,119 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 2: And so we need an uber expert to tell us 315 00:19:03,760 --> 00:19:06,920 Speaker 2: what is actually happening in the region. Are we going 316 00:19:06,960 --> 00:19:09,000 Speaker 2: to go to war with China over Taiwan? What is 317 00:19:09,080 --> 00:19:11,640 Speaker 2: China trying to do with us or for us? And 318 00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:15,040 Speaker 2: we've got one. Jennifer Parker is the principal and founder 319 00:19:15,119 --> 00:19:18,919 Speaker 2: of Barrier Strategic Advisory. She's an Expert Associate at the 320 00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:23,720 Speaker 2: National Security College, the Australian National University and an adjunct 321 00:19:23,800 --> 00:19:27,040 Speaker 2: Fellow in Naval studies at the University of New South 322 00:19:27,080 --> 00:19:32,000 Speaker 2: Wales in Canberra and has twenty years experience working at 323 00:19:32,280 --> 00:19:36,920 Speaker 2: very senior levels in the Department of Defense. Jen, Welcome 324 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:40,040 Speaker 2: to the real story. What did you make of the 325 00:19:40,119 --> 00:19:44,720 Speaker 2: revelations about the arrest of the Chinese alleged Chinese operative 326 00:19:45,040 --> 00:19:48,040 Speaker 2: in Canberra this week? I suppose it just shows how 327 00:19:48,359 --> 00:19:51,320 Speaker 2: omnipresent China's reach is in this region, doesn't it. 328 00:19:51,960 --> 00:19:53,800 Speaker 3: Yeah, it certainly does, Joe, and I think it comes 329 00:19:53,840 --> 00:19:56,440 Speaker 3: on the back to of quite an impactful speech from 330 00:19:56,840 --> 00:19:59,600 Speaker 3: the AZO Director General Mike Burgess last week where he 331 00:19:59,640 --> 00:20:02,560 Speaker 3: actually said that over the past three years there had 332 00:20:02,600 --> 00:20:07,919 Speaker 3: been twenty four major interference incidents. Now what that involves, 333 00:20:08,080 --> 00:20:11,480 Speaker 3: it's not exactly clear, but he's talking about this idea 334 00:20:11,520 --> 00:20:14,440 Speaker 3: of foreign interference costing the economy, you know, twelve point 335 00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:17,240 Speaker 3: five billion dollars in the last twelve months. So it is, 336 00:20:17,480 --> 00:20:21,359 Speaker 3: I guess, a public manifestation of what the AZIO director 337 00:20:21,400 --> 00:20:25,200 Speaker 3: has been talking about, saying that state actors, and particularly China, 338 00:20:25,280 --> 00:20:27,560 Speaker 3: not just China, There's been examples of Russia and Iraq 339 00:20:27,600 --> 00:20:30,520 Speaker 3: as well, and other countries are very interesting in what 340 00:20:30,560 --> 00:20:33,520 Speaker 3: Australia is doing. Now that's not just the Australian government 341 00:20:33,520 --> 00:20:35,920 Speaker 3: and the Australian military, but that's also as we see 342 00:20:35,960 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 3: from this reporting this week, the Chinese diaspora, and this 343 00:20:39,160 --> 00:20:44,359 Speaker 3: example is actually foreign interference where we've seen alleged, alleged 344 00:20:44,520 --> 00:20:49,359 Speaker 3: an Australian permanent resident actually infiltrating and reporting on a 345 00:20:49,440 --> 00:20:54,040 Speaker 3: group within the Chinese diaspora that is banned in China. 346 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:57,200 Speaker 3: So we are seeing this permeate through Australia. 347 00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:00,600 Speaker 2: And this is obviously and again not talking about this 348 00:21:00,720 --> 00:21:04,680 Speaker 2: case generally, specifically before the courts, but generally it is 349 00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:07,920 Speaker 2: a common tactic, is it not of the Chinese Communist 350 00:21:07,920 --> 00:21:13,399 Speaker 2: Party to apply pressure on Chinese residents in Australia that 351 00:21:13,640 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 2: either a puts pressure on them in their lives here, 352 00:21:16,640 --> 00:21:21,359 Speaker 2: but also potentially on family members and relations back home 353 00:21:21,440 --> 00:21:24,320 Speaker 2: as well. So it sort of applies. It's a very 354 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:27,639 Speaker 2: totalitarian approachase, isn't it It is. 355 00:21:27,680 --> 00:21:29,719 Speaker 1: It's not just in Australia. 356 00:21:30,359 --> 00:21:33,479 Speaker 3: It is happening through kind of a Chinese United Front's 357 00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:37,199 Speaker 3: work concept around the world, but Australia has had a 358 00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:40,320 Speaker 3: number of experiences of this now and no, look, this 359 00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:43,639 Speaker 3: is only the third charges laid under our kind of 360 00:21:43,680 --> 00:21:47,000 Speaker 3: semi recent twenty eighteen foreign interference laws, but there are 361 00:21:47,119 --> 00:21:49,720 Speaker 3: other examples, and there's been a lot of investigations into 362 00:21:50,359 --> 00:21:54,639 Speaker 3: pressure applied through Chinese media in Australia and Chinese social 363 00:21:54,680 --> 00:21:57,919 Speaker 3: media in Australia, that pressure on the Chinese diaspora to 364 00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:04,200 Speaker 3: either influenced thinking around elections or other debates within Australia. 365 00:22:04,200 --> 00:22:06,640 Speaker 3: In fact, there was I can't remember which channel, maybe 366 00:22:06,680 --> 00:22:08,959 Speaker 3: I can't mention here anyway, there was an interesting documentary 367 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:11,480 Speaker 3: in terms of how this was applied through things like 368 00:22:12,119 --> 00:22:14,919 Speaker 3: the Yes campaign in Australia and the debate around that, 369 00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:18,680 Speaker 3: and how there was actually a pressure on the Chinese 370 00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:22,000 Speaker 3: diaspora around this, which seems a little bit strange, but 371 00:22:22,040 --> 00:22:25,320 Speaker 3: it is part of this broader foreign interference issue that 372 00:22:25,359 --> 00:22:29,280 Speaker 3: we're experiencing in Australia. And from the Director General Azio's 373 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:32,679 Speaker 3: speech last week, it's only going to get worse and 374 00:22:32,680 --> 00:22:35,800 Speaker 3: that kind of reflects that the greater global uncertainty. 375 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:38,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, and it d election campaigns as well, 376 00:22:38,400 --> 00:22:41,680 Speaker 2: whether or not there's been tacit or subtle pressure put 377 00:22:41,720 --> 00:22:44,720 Speaker 2: on the Chinese community here to vote one way or 378 00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:48,240 Speaker 2: the other, because that's what the CCP perceives to be 379 00:22:48,359 --> 00:22:52,080 Speaker 2: in China's national interest as well. What do you make 380 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:55,080 Speaker 2: of the fact that it was this was done so publicly, 381 00:22:55,080 --> 00:22:57,760 Speaker 2: obviously under the new laws as well, But these things 382 00:22:57,760 --> 00:23:01,040 Speaker 2: are often taken care of covertly. You know, ASIO will 383 00:23:01,040 --> 00:23:04,720 Speaker 2: be aware of things and will monitor them or disable 384 00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:07,639 Speaker 2: what is going on without it being made public. The 385 00:23:07,640 --> 00:23:09,240 Speaker 2: fact that this has been made public, do you think 386 00:23:09,240 --> 00:23:12,480 Speaker 2: this is a deliberate attempt by our security agencies to 387 00:23:12,760 --> 00:23:14,679 Speaker 2: send a message to Beijing to say, look, we know 388 00:23:14,720 --> 00:23:16,560 Speaker 2: what you're doing, please stop it. 389 00:23:17,560 --> 00:23:19,800 Speaker 3: Look look, I think it probably is, and I think 390 00:23:19,800 --> 00:23:21,439 Speaker 3: that you've again you've got to read that in the 391 00:23:21,440 --> 00:23:24,840 Speaker 3: messaging that we're seeing from Mike Burgess the directional Asia, 392 00:23:24,880 --> 00:23:28,800 Speaker 3: where he's becoming increasingly public about some of the incidents. 393 00:23:28,840 --> 00:23:31,400 Speaker 3: I mean his speech last week he described a range 394 00:23:31,440 --> 00:23:35,399 Speaker 3: of incidents where foreign actors, Now you can read which foreign. 395 00:23:35,119 --> 00:23:38,360 Speaker 1: Actors they are. I think it's pretty obvious buying up. 396 00:23:38,400 --> 00:23:43,199 Speaker 3: Infrastructure around bases, are encouraging some of their agents to 397 00:23:43,240 --> 00:23:45,560 Speaker 3: apply for government jobs, and he gives a list of examples. 398 00:23:45,560 --> 00:23:50,200 Speaker 3: So I think the AFP's releasing of these charges having 399 00:23:50,280 --> 00:23:56,160 Speaker 3: been laid and their statement is pretty clear is part 400 00:23:56,200 --> 00:23:58,480 Speaker 3: of this I think broader campaign. And that's why I 401 00:23:58,520 --> 00:24:02,280 Speaker 3: refer so much to my Burgess's speech last week, because 402 00:24:02,280 --> 00:24:04,080 Speaker 3: it is I think it's making trying to make the 403 00:24:04,119 --> 00:24:05,679 Speaker 3: general public aware of this pressure. 404 00:24:05,720 --> 00:24:07,920 Speaker 2: That's right. The first law of spycraft is you don't 405 00:24:07,920 --> 00:24:09,359 Speaker 2: tell people what you're doing. But he's actually come out 406 00:24:09,400 --> 00:24:11,720 Speaker 2: and said, look, we see you, we know what you're doing, 407 00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:14,399 Speaker 2: and you know, I just don't think you care about 408 00:24:14,880 --> 00:24:18,439 Speaker 2: Speaking more broadly, you wrote a great piece recently about 409 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:22,240 Speaker 2: China and its long term ambitions for Taiwan and in 410 00:24:22,240 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 2: the region more generally. But what is China's endgame in 411 00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:28,919 Speaker 2: your view? Is it just to we know they openly 412 00:24:28,960 --> 00:24:31,600 Speaker 2: say Taiwan is in a real country, it's part of us. 413 00:24:31,800 --> 00:24:35,960 Speaker 2: We want it back. Is that their endgame there? Do 414 00:24:36,040 --> 00:24:39,000 Speaker 2: they say once that's the one United China, do they 415 00:24:39,119 --> 00:24:42,400 Speaker 2: just stop or are they going to continue to want 416 00:24:42,440 --> 00:24:46,439 Speaker 2: to assert assert their authority in the region, control all 417 00:24:46,440 --> 00:24:49,480 Speaker 2: the sea lanes, like in the South China Sea where 418 00:24:49,480 --> 00:24:52,600 Speaker 2: they're sort of building these man made islands. Are they 419 00:24:52,640 --> 00:24:55,720 Speaker 2: going to want assert to assert more sort of economic 420 00:24:55,760 --> 00:24:58,800 Speaker 2: and strategic dominance over other people in the region. What 421 00:24:59,240 --> 00:25:01,440 Speaker 2: is China's end What do they want jen. 422 00:25:02,160 --> 00:25:04,680 Speaker 1: Well, look, if I knew that, I'd probably be a billionaire. 423 00:25:04,720 --> 00:25:06,399 Speaker 3: But I guess some of the key some of the 424 00:25:06,480 --> 00:25:10,840 Speaker 3: key elements of this is China certainly sees reunification of Taiwan. 425 00:25:10,920 --> 00:25:12,800 Speaker 3: Now there are debates about whether it was ever part 426 00:25:12,840 --> 00:25:15,560 Speaker 3: of Pia China. In fact, Taiwan as it is now 427 00:25:15,640 --> 00:25:17,760 Speaker 3: was never part of the People's Republic of China, which 428 00:25:18,040 --> 00:25:20,240 Speaker 3: came about in nineteen forty nine after the Civil War. 429 00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:24,400 Speaker 3: But clearly they see the island of Formosa as part 430 00:25:24,440 --> 00:25:26,440 Speaker 3: of their core interests, and they have stated that they 431 00:25:26,480 --> 00:25:30,440 Speaker 3: also see control over the South China Sea as part 432 00:25:30,440 --> 00:25:32,760 Speaker 3: of their core interests. And China is kind of working 433 00:25:32,800 --> 00:25:36,000 Speaker 3: towards this national rejuvenation, and they've got a number of 434 00:25:36,040 --> 00:25:38,960 Speaker 3: goals under this national rejuvenation which needs to occur by 435 00:25:39,240 --> 00:25:41,800 Speaker 3: twenty forty nine, twenty forty nine being the one hundredth 436 00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:45,440 Speaker 3: anniversary of the People's Republic of China. Those goals are 437 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:48,320 Speaker 3: economic in nature, they are military in nature, they are 438 00:25:48,359 --> 00:25:51,720 Speaker 3: political in nature when it comes to Taiwan. Look, I 439 00:25:51,720 --> 00:25:55,480 Speaker 3: think China's been incredibly clear, and if anyone is unclear 440 00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:56,640 Speaker 3: on their message, you need to. 441 00:25:56,680 --> 00:25:58,120 Speaker 2: Just watch the footage of the. 442 00:25:58,400 --> 00:26:02,760 Speaker 3: Joint military deurials they are doing around Taiwan now on 443 00:26:03,119 --> 00:26:06,480 Speaker 3: a fairly regular basis. You know, they're releasing cartoons of 444 00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:11,320 Speaker 3: missiles striking Taiwan, They're releasing cartoons of the president of 445 00:26:11,359 --> 00:26:16,040 Speaker 3: Taiwan as a parasite leaking over time. This is quite aggressive, 446 00:26:16,040 --> 00:26:18,760 Speaker 3: and I think, you know, I think China hasn't decided 447 00:26:18,760 --> 00:26:20,680 Speaker 3: to get what they intend to do with Taiwan. 448 00:26:20,760 --> 00:26:23,280 Speaker 1: I think, you know, the Chinese Communist. 449 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:26,199 Speaker 3: Party would very much like Taiwan to just agree, but 450 00:26:26,240 --> 00:26:29,560 Speaker 3: that is not going to happen. And certainly the recent 451 00:26:29,680 --> 00:26:34,520 Speaker 3: election beginning of last year of President Lighting Chai, many 452 00:26:34,560 --> 00:26:38,760 Speaker 3: of his statements around the relationship between China and Taiwan 453 00:26:39,240 --> 00:26:43,280 Speaker 3: have become I guess, more clear about how he sees 454 00:26:43,320 --> 00:26:46,480 Speaker 3: that relationship. And that's certainly not what the CCP is likely. 455 00:26:46,560 --> 00:26:48,840 Speaker 3: So where does this all end? Look, I don't think 456 00:26:48,960 --> 00:26:51,480 Speaker 3: we know, but we can't take off the cards the 457 00:26:51,600 --> 00:26:54,360 Speaker 3: chances of some sort of military conflict, right, So it's 458 00:26:54,400 --> 00:26:57,160 Speaker 3: not inevitable, but it is increasingly likely. When we are 459 00:26:57,200 --> 00:27:00,960 Speaker 3: seeing China conduct stockpiling a certain goals and commodities, we 460 00:27:01,000 --> 00:27:06,000 Speaker 3: are seeing this increased the increased size and the increased 461 00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:09,440 Speaker 3: complexity of these drills around Taiwan, the increased strength in 462 00:27:09,480 --> 00:27:12,080 Speaker 3: their propaganda, and so the idea of China attempting to 463 00:27:12,119 --> 00:27:15,760 Speaker 3: either blockade or invade Taiwan in the new future, I think, 464 00:27:15,800 --> 00:27:18,200 Speaker 3: although not inevitable, is certainly not off the cards, and 465 00:27:18,240 --> 00:27:21,000 Speaker 3: it's something that the region Australia needs to be prepared for. 466 00:27:21,400 --> 00:27:25,639 Speaker 3: But I think it extends beyond Taiwan. It is about 467 00:27:25,720 --> 00:27:29,520 Speaker 3: China having a degree of control which they intend to 468 00:27:29,560 --> 00:27:34,840 Speaker 3: assert militarily over the region, both Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia. 469 00:27:34,400 --> 00:27:36,800 Speaker 2: Which of course China historically has It's really only been 470 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:39,359 Speaker 2: in the last sort of century or two that China 471 00:27:39,440 --> 00:27:43,399 Speaker 2: hasn't been the absolute master of all its surveys. So 472 00:27:43,600 --> 00:27:46,440 Speaker 2: I suppose they said, well, I don't suppose they openly 473 00:27:46,480 --> 00:27:49,600 Speaker 2: say that this is actually just reasserting China's sort of 474 00:27:49,720 --> 00:27:53,959 Speaker 2: historic right. What does that mean for Australia. So if 475 00:27:54,040 --> 00:27:57,919 Speaker 2: there is if China does attempt to retake Taiwa or 476 00:27:57,920 --> 00:28:02,520 Speaker 2: take Taiwan and and invade it, if the US then 477 00:28:02,560 --> 00:28:06,360 Speaker 2: gets drawn into that conflict and in is defending Taiwan, 478 00:28:06,400 --> 00:28:09,639 Speaker 2: and it has you know, sort of deliberately ambiguous and 479 00:28:09,680 --> 00:28:13,199 Speaker 2: has actually called an ambiguous stands on Taiwan, but it 480 00:28:13,320 --> 00:28:17,199 Speaker 2: seems that the US would be prepared to defend it 481 00:28:17,280 --> 00:28:22,800 Speaker 2: in such a case. Does Australia then get drawn into that? 482 00:28:22,840 --> 00:28:26,520 Speaker 2: I mean, the Ances Treaty obviously obliges US to consult 483 00:28:26,560 --> 00:28:29,440 Speaker 2: with the US anytime there's a threat to US. Would 484 00:28:29,480 --> 00:28:32,639 Speaker 2: that constitute a threat to the US and therefore Australia 485 00:28:32,680 --> 00:28:35,440 Speaker 2: would ANSAs would be triggered and we'd have to join 486 00:28:35,520 --> 00:28:38,240 Speaker 2: in or would that require a separate commitment from Australia 487 00:28:38,320 --> 00:28:41,240 Speaker 2: And then if we didn't give that commitment, would that 488 00:28:41,360 --> 00:28:43,880 Speaker 2: mean that Orcus is off the cards? I mean, there's this. 489 00:28:44,120 --> 00:28:46,280 Speaker 2: There's a real sort of house of cards here, isn't there? 490 00:28:46,840 --> 00:28:47,200 Speaker 1: There is? 491 00:28:47,200 --> 00:28:48,840 Speaker 3: And this is really kind of one of the key 492 00:28:49,000 --> 00:28:51,960 Speaker 3: questions at the center of Australia's strategy debate right now. 493 00:28:52,240 --> 00:28:54,160 Speaker 3: I guess before I get to that, i'd just say that, 494 00:28:54,320 --> 00:28:57,000 Speaker 3: you know, China, of course, is an incredibly powerful economy. 495 00:28:57,520 --> 00:29:00,280 Speaker 3: It has a huge population. Although it hasn't challenge just 496 00:29:00,320 --> 00:29:02,600 Speaker 3: with that, that's a huge population. It is a key 497 00:29:02,640 --> 00:29:04,120 Speaker 3: player in this region and we do need to have 498 00:29:04,160 --> 00:29:08,040 Speaker 3: a constructive relationship. But when it comes to their aggression 499 00:29:08,320 --> 00:29:12,120 Speaker 3: in the cyber domain, the space domain, the maritime domain. 500 00:29:12,480 --> 00:29:14,680 Speaker 3: It is not in Australia's interest to exist in a 501 00:29:14,720 --> 00:29:17,960 Speaker 3: region where we're subject to that degree of coercion. And 502 00:29:18,040 --> 00:29:20,360 Speaker 3: you know, we've talked about the economic coercion at length 503 00:29:20,360 --> 00:29:21,920 Speaker 3: in our media, but you know, we don't talk so 504 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:24,640 Speaker 3: much about the experiences that our adf women and men 505 00:29:24,920 --> 00:29:27,640 Speaker 3: have in Southeast Asia and Northeast Asia where our assets, 506 00:29:27,880 --> 00:29:31,320 Speaker 3: you know, our planes, our aircraft operating in international airspace 507 00:29:31,320 --> 00:29:35,320 Speaker 3: and international seas are harassed by Chinese vessels. 508 00:29:35,320 --> 00:29:36,600 Speaker 1: So this there is, is this. 509 00:29:36,520 --> 00:29:39,720 Speaker 3: Military aggression over Taiwan. Look, I think we need to 510 00:29:39,720 --> 00:29:43,200 Speaker 3: think about this debate a little bit differently. I don't 511 00:29:43,200 --> 00:29:47,040 Speaker 3: see if China makes a decision to invade Taiwan, they 512 00:29:47,080 --> 00:29:49,200 Speaker 3: need to go one hundred and miles across the strait. 513 00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:53,480 Speaker 3: That's a long way with a big invasion force. Taiwan itself, 514 00:29:53,520 --> 00:29:57,360 Speaker 3: geographically is an ireland, is very difficult to invade because 515 00:29:57,360 --> 00:30:00,040 Speaker 3: of the nature of beaches, because of the mountains. I 516 00:30:00,200 --> 00:30:03,400 Speaker 3: even getting to Taipei, you'd have to fight through jungle, 517 00:30:03,480 --> 00:30:05,320 Speaker 3: you'd have to fight through mountains. So it's a really 518 00:30:05,320 --> 00:30:08,720 Speaker 3: difficult prospect. And in fact, during World War Two, because 519 00:30:08,720 --> 00:30:11,000 Speaker 3: of course there is a long history of Japan having 520 00:30:11,040 --> 00:30:15,440 Speaker 3: colonized Taiwan. During World War Two, the US actually planned 521 00:30:15,480 --> 00:30:18,920 Speaker 3: initially as part of their campaign moving north, taking islands 522 00:30:18,920 --> 00:30:21,080 Speaker 3: to the north, which ended in them taking ok An. 523 00:30:21,080 --> 00:30:24,720 Speaker 3: Hour they planned to take Taiwan, they actually didn't because 524 00:30:24,720 --> 00:30:28,200 Speaker 3: it was such a difficult military task, so they abandoned it. 525 00:30:28,480 --> 00:30:30,280 Speaker 3: So I think if you think about an invasion Taiwan 526 00:30:30,280 --> 00:30:32,720 Speaker 3: in that context, if China makes the decision to do it, 527 00:30:32,960 --> 00:30:35,320 Speaker 3: my view is that this would be a regional conflict instantly, 528 00:30:35,640 --> 00:30:38,760 Speaker 3: because any military planner looking at that is unlikely to 529 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:41,880 Speaker 3: leave US and Japanese assets to the north of them 530 00:30:41,920 --> 00:30:45,080 Speaker 3: as they attempt this difficult feat or US assets to 531 00:30:45,160 --> 00:30:46,960 Speaker 3: the south of them in the Philippines. So I think 532 00:30:47,000 --> 00:30:50,000 Speaker 3: that if China made the decision, you may well see 533 00:30:50,560 --> 00:30:53,920 Speaker 3: preemptive strikes on US assets in the region, in Japan 534 00:30:53,960 --> 00:30:56,520 Speaker 3: and the Philippines. And in that context, if that happens, 535 00:30:56,840 --> 00:30:58,880 Speaker 3: then actually what you're looking at as a regional conflict 536 00:30:58,920 --> 00:31:03,520 Speaker 3: where's key alli and til It's key partners have been engaged. 537 00:31:04,360 --> 00:31:07,640 Speaker 3: You're looking at a contested maritime DeMay where Australia as 538 00:31:07,680 --> 00:31:10,640 Speaker 3: a trading nation will be severely impacted. I mean, we 539 00:31:10,640 --> 00:31:12,680 Speaker 3: import ninety one percent of our fuel at the moment 540 00:31:12,720 --> 00:31:15,000 Speaker 3: in a refined state that comes from Northeast Asia and 541 00:31:15,080 --> 00:31:18,960 Speaker 3: Southeast Asia. It is difficult to see a scenario where 542 00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:22,120 Speaker 3: in that context Australia isn't directly threatened in terms of 543 00:31:22,520 --> 00:31:26,160 Speaker 3: not our geography necessarily, but our vital interests. So we're 544 00:31:26,240 --> 00:31:29,080 Speaker 3: involved in that scenario. Now, in terms of the ancest Treaty, 545 00:31:29,080 --> 00:31:32,479 Speaker 3: there's different arguments about the interpretation of the eleven articles 546 00:31:32,480 --> 00:31:34,920 Speaker 3: in the ancest Treaty. Yes, there is a duty to consult. 547 00:31:35,200 --> 00:31:38,120 Speaker 3: There is also some degree of a duty to respond. 548 00:31:38,200 --> 00:31:41,360 Speaker 3: Now it's not like Article five in NATO, but there 549 00:31:41,440 --> 00:31:43,320 Speaker 3: is some sort of obligation. And I think there would 550 00:31:43,360 --> 00:31:46,200 Speaker 3: be an expectation of Australia, but not just the expectation. 551 00:31:46,560 --> 00:31:48,440 Speaker 3: I mean we need to think back to what are 552 00:31:48,480 --> 00:31:52,600 Speaker 3: our national interests, and our national interests would be significantly impacted. 553 00:31:52,600 --> 00:31:55,120 Speaker 3: So I think we would be involved. Should we be 554 00:31:55,200 --> 00:31:58,760 Speaker 3: pre committing to have deals on submarines. No, as you 555 00:31:58,800 --> 00:32:01,640 Speaker 3: mentioned before, the US position is one of strategic ambiguity. 556 00:32:02,560 --> 00:32:05,440 Speaker 3: No government of Australia should either privately or publicly commit 557 00:32:05,480 --> 00:32:08,200 Speaker 3: to a hypothetical scenario and that's what we're talking about. 558 00:32:08,680 --> 00:32:10,760 Speaker 3: But we should understand that in the event of a 559 00:32:10,800 --> 00:32:13,880 Speaker 3: regional conflict, it would be difficult for Australia not to 560 00:32:13,880 --> 00:32:16,800 Speaker 3: be involved, and as I said before, Australia would likely 561 00:32:16,840 --> 00:32:17,360 Speaker 3: to cut off. 562 00:32:17,760 --> 00:32:23,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. And speaking of obviously the August deal is 563 00:32:23,360 --> 00:32:28,480 Speaker 2: under review quote unquote by the Trump administration. How much 564 00:32:28,920 --> 00:32:31,880 Speaker 2: is this kind of performative and how much do you 565 00:32:31,880 --> 00:32:37,920 Speaker 2: think the treaty is actually the pact is actually under 566 00:32:38,240 --> 00:32:43,440 Speaker 2: threat or under real sort of consideration, Because of course 567 00:32:43,560 --> 00:32:46,880 Speaker 2: Trump came out with Kiir Starmer and at least didn't 568 00:32:46,880 --> 00:32:50,400 Speaker 2: interrupt him when Kis Starmer said that unless the UK 569 00:32:50,560 --> 00:32:54,000 Speaker 2: part of August was absolutely one hundred percent going ahead, 570 00:32:54,640 --> 00:32:58,880 Speaker 2: do you think that this review by you know, the Pentagon, 571 00:32:59,120 --> 00:33:04,160 Speaker 2: is actually Trump about to tear up ucast or is 572 00:33:04,200 --> 00:33:07,720 Speaker 2: it just him posturing to put himself in a better 573 00:33:07,760 --> 00:33:11,440 Speaker 2: position so that when he does meet Albanezi he can say, look, 574 00:33:11,560 --> 00:33:14,120 Speaker 2: you increased defense spending to three percent, or you know, 575 00:33:14,280 --> 00:33:15,200 Speaker 2: the chicken gets it. 576 00:33:16,400 --> 00:33:19,320 Speaker 3: Well, maybe the chicken gets it, but look, actually, I 577 00:33:19,360 --> 00:33:23,160 Speaker 3: think you know, when it comes to August, we need 578 00:33:23,200 --> 00:33:25,120 Speaker 3: to remember that there is a lot in this deal 579 00:33:25,160 --> 00:33:27,560 Speaker 3: for the US, So I can't predict the future. Again, 580 00:33:27,600 --> 00:33:29,360 Speaker 3: if I could predict the future, i'd be a billionaire. 581 00:33:29,440 --> 00:33:31,240 Speaker 1: But I think if we think about. 582 00:33:31,000 --> 00:33:32,880 Speaker 3: The core interest of the US, so the ability to 583 00:33:32,960 --> 00:33:36,440 Speaker 3: operate from Australia, the ability to expand their maintenance base 584 00:33:36,560 --> 00:33:40,600 Speaker 3: for submarines because we'll be able to maintain submarines in Australia, 585 00:33:40,640 --> 00:33:43,760 Speaker 3: and then the wider support Australia support provides, including things 586 00:33:43,840 --> 00:33:46,720 Speaker 3: like you know on Northwest Cape where we support the 587 00:33:46,800 --> 00:33:49,200 Speaker 3: US's ability to communicate with a nuclear submarines through our 588 00:33:49,240 --> 00:33:52,480 Speaker 3: communication station. I think the wider relationship as well plays 589 00:33:52,520 --> 00:33:55,200 Speaker 3: into this. So I think it's highly unlikely the US 590 00:33:55,240 --> 00:33:57,080 Speaker 3: is going to decide that AUCUST is not in their 591 00:33:57,080 --> 00:34:00,040 Speaker 3: interests and rip it up. They didn't enter Aucus for 592 00:34:00,080 --> 00:34:03,240 Speaker 3: altruistic reasons. No country does things like this altri risk. 593 00:34:03,520 --> 00:34:06,400 Speaker 3: All three countries entered AUCUST for their own national interests, 594 00:34:06,440 --> 00:34:08,600 Speaker 3: and those national interests aren't the same. So I think 595 00:34:08,640 --> 00:34:10,920 Speaker 3: it is a great benefit to the US if you 596 00:34:10,920 --> 00:34:12,759 Speaker 3: think about it in that context, then I think that 597 00:34:12,800 --> 00:34:15,080 Speaker 3: they will do everything they can to make it work, 598 00:34:15,120 --> 00:34:17,360 Speaker 3: and that to be fair. The person leading the review, 599 00:34:17,400 --> 00:34:19,520 Speaker 3: Eldridge Colby, actually said that when he went through his 600 00:34:19,560 --> 00:34:22,919 Speaker 3: Senate confirmation hearings in January this year. I also don't 601 00:34:22,920 --> 00:34:24,799 Speaker 3: think this review was directed by Trump. In fact, there's 602 00:34:24,800 --> 00:34:27,000 Speaker 3: a lot of evidence that UCUST is not a focus 603 00:34:27,040 --> 00:34:29,640 Speaker 3: of Trump. He's more focused on Europe, he's more focused 604 00:34:29,680 --> 00:34:32,640 Speaker 3: on the Middle East. This was directed internally in the Pentagon. 605 00:34:32,800 --> 00:34:34,920 Speaker 3: Now there are pressures and Arinsk to AUCUST. The US 606 00:34:34,920 --> 00:34:39,040 Speaker 3: submarine industrial base is one, but I would argue three 607 00:34:39,120 --> 00:34:43,040 Speaker 3: submarines in the thirties, so under AUCUST Phase two, Australia 608 00:34:43,080 --> 00:34:45,440 Speaker 3: is meant to be sold through Virginia class submarines to 609 00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:47,880 Speaker 3: get us starting to operate the capability before we be 610 00:34:47,960 --> 00:34:52,000 Speaker 3: at our own three submarines in the thirties for the 611 00:34:52,120 --> 00:34:55,200 Speaker 3: US on paper versus everything they get out of the 612 00:34:55,280 --> 00:34:57,759 Speaker 3: Orcist deal. I mean, to be honest, you can see 613 00:34:57,760 --> 00:34:59,560 Speaker 3: they're getting a lot out of it. So I'm not 614 00:34:59,600 --> 00:35:01,799 Speaker 3: sure that to rip it up, will they change it? Sorry, 615 00:35:01,840 --> 00:35:03,359 Speaker 3: I don't think they're going to rip it up at all. 616 00:35:03,640 --> 00:35:05,520 Speaker 1: Will that change it? Maybe? 617 00:35:05,680 --> 00:35:08,360 Speaker 3: Will that be real changes or just changes around the rhetoric? 618 00:35:08,400 --> 00:35:10,879 Speaker 3: So it looks like a win potentially. I mean, we've 619 00:35:10,880 --> 00:35:13,400 Speaker 3: seen that play out in the tariffs in terms of 620 00:35:13,520 --> 00:35:16,880 Speaker 3: using orcus of leverage. Look probably so if we look 621 00:35:16,920 --> 00:35:20,920 Speaker 3: at the way Donald Trump approached NATO and the NATO 622 00:35:21,000 --> 00:35:23,360 Speaker 3: conference in June this year, I mean at the beginning 623 00:35:23,360 --> 00:35:25,160 Speaker 3: of the year when Trump took over, there was a 624 00:35:25,160 --> 00:35:27,719 Speaker 3: lot of concern that the US might pull out of NATO, right, 625 00:35:27,760 --> 00:35:31,160 Speaker 3: this was a real concern. He refused to endorse Article five. 626 00:35:31,239 --> 00:35:32,920 Speaker 3: In fact, in June when he got on the plane 627 00:35:32,920 --> 00:35:36,480 Speaker 3: to the NATO conference, he's like, oh, there's different interpretations. 628 00:35:35,760 --> 00:35:36,400 Speaker 2: Of that article. 629 00:35:36,800 --> 00:35:39,880 Speaker 3: I mean, it's written in plain English, there's no different interpretations. 630 00:35:40,480 --> 00:35:43,480 Speaker 3: But what he was doing is using its leverage US 631 00:35:43,520 --> 00:35:46,200 Speaker 3: commitment to NATO, US commitment to Article five, which is 632 00:35:46,239 --> 00:35:48,280 Speaker 3: an attack on all, attack on one is an attack 633 00:35:48,320 --> 00:35:50,680 Speaker 3: on all. He's using it as leverage to get the 634 00:35:50,760 --> 00:35:52,520 Speaker 3: NATO countries to do what he wants them to do, 635 00:35:52,560 --> 00:35:55,520 Speaker 3: which is to increase spending. And it's not only Trump 636 00:35:55,560 --> 00:35:58,120 Speaker 3: that's been saying that. I mean different US administrations have 637 00:35:58,200 --> 00:36:00,719 Speaker 3: been saying that since like two thousand. I found a 638 00:36:00,760 --> 00:36:02,960 Speaker 3: quote from condoles Arise in two thousand, before she took 639 00:36:02,960 --> 00:36:06,600 Speaker 3: over as a national security advisor, saying, Hey, Europe need 640 00:36:06,640 --> 00:36:08,920 Speaker 3: to spend more on defense and do more on conventional defense. 641 00:36:09,719 --> 00:36:12,759 Speaker 3: The moment Europe agreed to the three point five percent 642 00:36:12,800 --> 00:36:15,799 Speaker 3: on defense plus one point five percent on national infrastructure, 643 00:36:15,800 --> 00:36:19,399 Speaker 3: the big five percent of defense spending. Trump sat there 644 00:36:19,520 --> 00:36:21,320 Speaker 3: with Mark Ruther and said, yeah, of course. 645 00:36:23,120 --> 00:36:25,120 Speaker 2: It's a great it's a great pack. It's a great pack. 646 00:36:25,160 --> 00:36:28,200 Speaker 2: We're going to have a great time, probably the best ever. 647 00:36:29,160 --> 00:36:33,279 Speaker 2: And finally, jed, speaking of defense spending, We've just done 648 00:36:33,280 --> 00:36:36,440 Speaker 2: a deal with the Japanese to buy a bunch of 649 00:36:37,120 --> 00:36:40,680 Speaker 2: navel destroyers. This is a long time coming, isn't it. 650 00:36:40,719 --> 00:36:44,120 Speaker 2: I mean, we've heard these nightmare stories about Australia's defense 651 00:36:44,160 --> 00:36:46,640 Speaker 2: capability where there have been reports that there was only 652 00:36:46,680 --> 00:36:49,320 Speaker 2: one boat in the water at any given point in time. 653 00:36:50,200 --> 00:36:55,000 Speaker 2: How important is this for both Australia's national security and 654 00:36:55,040 --> 00:36:58,480 Speaker 2: again I suppose sending a message to the Americans that yes, 655 00:36:58,520 --> 00:37:01,080 Speaker 2: we are serious about spending. We're not just going to 656 00:37:01,200 --> 00:37:04,400 Speaker 2: ride on their coattails, and we are going to bulk 657 00:37:04,440 --> 00:37:05,839 Speaker 2: up our own capability as well. 658 00:37:06,360 --> 00:37:07,800 Speaker 1: Okay, it's a really important decision. 659 00:37:07,840 --> 00:37:10,719 Speaker 3: So the Australian government has selected the Japanese upgrade of 660 00:37:10,800 --> 00:37:12,000 Speaker 3: Magami Forget. 661 00:37:12,040 --> 00:37:14,200 Speaker 1: We're going to acquire eleven of those. 662 00:37:14,400 --> 00:37:16,399 Speaker 3: Three will be built in Japan and the other eight 663 00:37:16,480 --> 00:37:19,880 Speaker 3: supposedly built in Australia not coming until twenty thirty, so 664 00:37:19,880 --> 00:37:21,799 Speaker 3: there's a time from issue. But it's very important because 665 00:37:21,800 --> 00:37:24,759 Speaker 3: you've got to remember, as somebody on the ABC may 666 00:37:24,760 --> 00:37:26,600 Speaker 3: fund me for saying this, but it's true, Australia is 667 00:37:26,600 --> 00:37:28,440 Speaker 3: an island nation, right. We forget this when we think 668 00:37:28,440 --> 00:37:31,480 Speaker 3: about our strategic geography. So this idea that we could 669 00:37:31,560 --> 00:37:34,160 Speaker 3: just have missiles and UAVs on our borders and protect 670 00:37:34,200 --> 00:37:36,640 Speaker 3: ourselves is kind of null and void because you don't 671 00:37:36,680 --> 00:37:39,319 Speaker 3: need to step foot on Australia to impact Australia's national 672 00:37:39,320 --> 00:37:41,719 Speaker 3: security interests. All you need to do is interdict the 673 00:37:41,840 --> 00:37:44,280 Speaker 3: ninety one percent of fuel we import or the fertilizer 674 00:37:44,360 --> 00:37:46,400 Speaker 3: we imported all yet like you just need to interdict 675 00:37:46,440 --> 00:37:49,240 Speaker 3: this in the maritime domain. So having a strong navy 676 00:37:49,880 --> 00:37:53,000 Speaker 3: really mitigates against that. When you look back at the 677 00:37:53,040 --> 00:37:54,840 Speaker 3: state of our navy. You know the two thousand and 678 00:37:54,920 --> 00:37:57,919 Speaker 3: nine white paper nearly twenty years ago now said hey, 679 00:37:58,040 --> 00:38:00,600 Speaker 3: we need to replace our ends out class, so we 680 00:38:00,600 --> 00:38:02,000 Speaker 3: need to do a bunch of other things like get 681 00:38:02,000 --> 00:38:02,840 Speaker 3: twelve submarines. 682 00:38:03,640 --> 00:38:05,160 Speaker 1: We are in twenty. 683 00:38:04,920 --> 00:38:07,279 Speaker 3: Twenty five and we still hadn't had a concrete plan 684 00:38:07,400 --> 00:38:09,680 Speaker 3: really to replace our Inxact class frigates. There was some 685 00:38:09,719 --> 00:38:11,560 Speaker 3: stuff around the Hunter that we won't delve into that. 686 00:38:12,160 --> 00:38:14,160 Speaker 3: So we have actually gotten to the point where the 687 00:38:14,239 --> 00:38:17,160 Speaker 3: a Andao said in twenty nineteen, our current frigates are 688 00:38:17,160 --> 00:38:19,000 Speaker 3: so old, the holes are sold degraded, They're not going 689 00:38:19,040 --> 00:38:20,200 Speaker 3: to last much longer. 690 00:38:21,040 --> 00:38:22,600 Speaker 1: So we really need to make this decision. 691 00:38:23,000 --> 00:38:25,200 Speaker 3: Maybe is in a bad state in terms of you know, 692 00:38:25,200 --> 00:38:27,359 Speaker 3: despite the hard working women and men, they have ten 693 00:38:27,400 --> 00:38:30,440 Speaker 3: frigates and destroyers, ten frigates and destroyers for a country 694 00:38:30,440 --> 00:38:33,560 Speaker 3: that imports ninety one percent of its fuel is bananas. 695 00:38:34,000 --> 00:38:37,800 Speaker 3: So this was an important decision. Will the US like it, Yes, 696 00:38:37,840 --> 00:38:39,680 Speaker 3: because it is a demonstration that we are trying to 697 00:38:39,680 --> 00:38:43,400 Speaker 3: strengthen our defense capability, but still we are not increasing 698 00:38:43,400 --> 00:38:45,880 Speaker 3: defense spending to the rate they would like at this stage. 699 00:38:45,920 --> 00:38:48,160 Speaker 3: And we do need to do so, not just because 700 00:38:48,239 --> 00:38:50,680 Speaker 3: the US says, but because we actually don't have the 701 00:38:50,760 --> 00:38:53,760 Speaker 3: range of capabilities. We need to protect our own national interest, 702 00:38:53,840 --> 00:38:56,160 Speaker 3: so this needs to be an important national conversation. Frigates 703 00:38:56,200 --> 00:38:58,080 Speaker 3: is a good step, but we need to go further. 704 00:38:58,200 --> 00:39:00,239 Speaker 2: And I dare say an announcement to that effect. We'll 705 00:39:00,280 --> 00:39:04,040 Speaker 2: probably come after Anthony Alberanezi and Donald Trump finally get 706 00:39:04,080 --> 00:39:08,200 Speaker 2: the world's most sought after bilateral meeting. Jen Parker, thank 707 00:39:08,239 --> 00:39:09,719 Speaker 2: you so much for joining us on the Real Story. 708 00:39:09,719 --> 00:39:10,720 Speaker 2: It's been an absolute pleasure. 709 00:39:11,200 --> 00:39:12,200 Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Joe. 710 00:39:12,960 --> 00:39:15,120 Speaker 2: And that is all we have time for this week. 711 00:39:15,239 --> 00:39:17,480 Speaker 2: Once again, we've given you peace in the Middle East 712 00:39:17,520 --> 00:39:21,600 Speaker 2: and we've prevented World War three with China. You're welcome Australia. 713 00:39:22,440 --> 00:39:25,080 Speaker 2: Please join us again next week. But in the meantime 714 00:39:25,120 --> 00:39:27,799 Speaker 2: you can leave us a review, or you can leave 715 00:39:27,880 --> 00:39:30,279 Speaker 2: us a five star rating. I don't know if there 716 00:39:30,280 --> 00:39:33,759 Speaker 2: are any other ratings available hypothetical point, let's not get 717 00:39:33,800 --> 00:39:37,120 Speaker 2: bogged down in academic minutia. You can also drop us 718 00:39:37,120 --> 00:39:40,480 Speaker 2: a line at The Real Story at Nova podcast dot 719 00:39:40,480 --> 00:39:43,319 Speaker 2: com dot au, or you can hit me up on 720 00:39:43,360 --> 00:39:47,120 Speaker 2: the Gram Joe Underscore Hildebrand slide with my DMS. You've 721 00:39:47,120 --> 00:39:49,479 Speaker 2: got any questions or anything you want us to look into, 722 00:39:49,520 --> 00:39:51,719 Speaker 2: and thank you for all the comments and questions and 723 00:39:51,800 --> 00:39:55,120 Speaker 2: messages I've gotten thus far. Just drop us a line 724 00:39:55,160 --> 00:39:57,520 Speaker 2: and we'll get into it. Any questions you want answered. 725 00:39:57,600 --> 00:39:59,800 Speaker 2: Trust me, I know everything so more than happy to 726 00:39:59,840 --> 00:40:02,759 Speaker 2: shar Yeah. You can also grab me in the News 727 00:40:02,800 --> 00:40:07,120 Speaker 2: Corp newspapers every Monday and Saturday. And if that doesn't 728 00:40:07,320 --> 00:40:10,279 Speaker 2: float your boat, if that doesn't fill you up, there'll 729 00:40:10,280 --> 00:40:12,239 Speaker 2: be plenty more of the real story next week. See then,