1 00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:08,200 Speaker 1: From the Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey. 2 00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:15,000 Speaker 1: It's Monday, February sixteen, twenty twenty six. They've been outlawed, 3 00:00:15,040 --> 00:00:17,960 Speaker 1: but the neo Nazis and Islamist group his book to 4 00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:21,520 Speaker 1: Rear are back in action, the Australians revealing today the 5 00:00:21,640 --> 00:00:26,239 Speaker 1: National Socialist Network, which claimed it was fully disbanded, is 6 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 1: telling its black clad would be Nazi troops to join 7 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 1: the anti immigration March for Australia movement. His book to 8 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:39,120 Speaker 1: Reassigned a joint statement with mainstream Muslim community groups expressing 9 00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:42,960 Speaker 1: outrage about police tactics at last week's anti Israel protest 10 00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:46,840 Speaker 1: in Sydney. That's an exclusive live now at the Australian 11 00:00:46,960 --> 00:00:53,560 Speaker 1: dot com dot Au. Preparations for the four month trial 12 00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:58,520 Speaker 1: of former broadcaster Alan Jones, who's fighting in decent assault chargers, 13 00:00:58,760 --> 00:01:01,120 Speaker 1: have been rocked by a complaint from one of the 14 00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:05,319 Speaker 1: alleged victims about phone calls from someone purporting to be 15 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:08,800 Speaker 1: a journalist from the Sydney Morning Herald. The tabloid's owner 16 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:13,760 Speaker 1: Nine Entertainment denies it was them. Today, Media Diary editor 17 00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:16,760 Speaker 1: Steve Jackson joins us to talk about the Jones trial, 18 00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:20,640 Speaker 1: a very messy dispute between two top legal figures, and 19 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:25,760 Speaker 1: why terrorism investigators are interested in internal communications at the 20 00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:40,240 Speaker 1: ABC and SBS. Jacko's here in just a moment, Steve 21 00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:43,720 Speaker 1: Jackson edits The Australian's Media Diary and Jacko today you're 22 00:01:43,760 --> 00:01:47,280 Speaker 1: reporting on a twist in their ongoing Alan Jones legal saga. 23 00:01:47,319 --> 00:01:47,880 Speaker 1: What's happening? 24 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:50,160 Speaker 2: That's right, Claire. There's already been so many twists and 25 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:52,200 Speaker 2: turns and we haven't even got to the trial yet. 26 00:01:52,360 --> 00:01:55,000 Speaker 2: What I've discovered is that there are now complaints that 27 00:01:55,080 --> 00:01:58,200 Speaker 2: witnesses who are expected to be called in Allen Jones's 28 00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:01,520 Speaker 2: defense have been contacted by someone purporting to be a 29 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:05,400 Speaker 2: tabloid journalist and asked questions about the evidence that they're 30 00:02:05,440 --> 00:02:08,560 Speaker 2: going to give. Now. Of course, as you know, it's 31 00:02:08,639 --> 00:02:10,720 Speaker 2: not illegal for journalists to do this, but there's a 32 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:14,440 Speaker 2: real gray area when that becomes a feeling of intimidation 33 00:02:14,760 --> 00:02:17,799 Speaker 2: or a scare tactic, whether or not that's the intent 34 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:20,280 Speaker 2: of the journalist, it's the way that at least one 35 00:02:20,320 --> 00:02:23,119 Speaker 2: witness has taken it. And I can reveal that one 36 00:02:23,160 --> 00:02:26,160 Speaker 2: witness at least has gone to the detectives who've led 37 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:29,639 Speaker 2: this investigation and charged mister Jones, and said that they 38 00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:31,919 Speaker 2: feel as though there's this pressure being put on them 39 00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:34,959 Speaker 2: by the media and that they're being told that they're 40 00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:35,720 Speaker 2: being watched. 41 00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:44,280 Speaker 1: The person who made these phone calls allegedly described themselves 42 00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:47,680 Speaker 1: as working for nines tabloid newspaper The Sydney Morning Herald, 43 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:52,639 Speaker 1: which has published several stories containing allegations against Jones, all 44 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:57,079 Speaker 1: of which he has denied. Nine denied any of its 45 00:02:57,160 --> 00:03:02,840 Speaker 1: journalists had intimidated any witness, What if anything are you 46 00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:04,919 Speaker 1: reporting about who this journalist might be? 47 00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:08,040 Speaker 2: Look to be fair, we don't even know it's a journalist. 48 00:03:08,120 --> 00:03:10,560 Speaker 2: As I say, it's not illegal if a journalist has 49 00:03:10,639 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 2: done it, but it could just be someone who is 50 00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:16,280 Speaker 2: purporting to be a journalist. And for at least one witness, 51 00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:18,400 Speaker 2: this has been too much a lot of stress, and 52 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:21,680 Speaker 2: they've gone to the authorities and said this is really uncool. 53 00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:24,000 Speaker 2: How do they know I'm being called? And why are 54 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:26,720 Speaker 2: they contacting me? Are they just calling and asking for 55 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:30,800 Speaker 2: details as a journalist could and should do or is 56 00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 2: it something murkier? And in at least one instance, one 57 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:36,600 Speaker 2: of the witness says they feel as though it's murkier. 58 00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:40,600 Speaker 1: Often when criminal matters come to court. The witnesses are civilians. 59 00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:43,720 Speaker 1: They've never encountered the court process before. They've also never 60 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 1: encountered the media before. And we know that the wheels 61 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 1: of justice turned very slowly, particularly at this low level court, 62 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:53,800 Speaker 1: the local court where Alan Jones trial will be held. 63 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:56,520 Speaker 1: There's a huge number of matters going through those courts 64 00:03:56,560 --> 00:04:00,000 Speaker 1: all the time. It takes a lot of dedication from 65 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:03,360 Speaker 1: police to keep witnesses in the case, don't they because 66 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:05,520 Speaker 1: if they feel the stress, often witnesses just want to 67 00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:06,000 Speaker 1: drop out. 68 00:04:06,320 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 2: Well exactly because even if you're not being accused of anything, 69 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:13,880 Speaker 2: the whole court process is extremely stressful. It's marginally more 70 00:04:13,920 --> 00:04:16,599 Speaker 2: stressful than turning up on your podcast and being interrogated, 71 00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:18,800 Speaker 2: you know, like what are they going to ask me? 72 00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 2: Are they going to accuse me of any any wrongdoing? 73 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:24,719 Speaker 2: And it's hard for witnesses to remember sometimes they're not 74 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 2: being accused of anything. They're just there to tell the 75 00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:30,320 Speaker 2: honest truth about what they remember. But it's a very 76 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:32,960 Speaker 2: stressful process. We know the last year I've already reported 77 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:36,520 Speaker 2: they were told basically you could be called at any 78 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:39,560 Speaker 2: point for four months from August, so block that out 79 00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:42,440 Speaker 2: because we also know that when they tell witnesses, hey, 80 00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:46,400 Speaker 2: you're going to be called next Tuesday, delays happen quite regularly. 81 00:04:46,640 --> 00:04:50,200 Speaker 2: Evidence runs long and they end up sitting around for days. 82 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:52,920 Speaker 2: So there's a four month window where they've all been 83 00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 2: told reserved. This time. We know that the prosecution's calling 84 00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:57,960 Speaker 2: one hundred and thirty nine or up to one hundred 85 00:04:57,960 --> 00:05:00,800 Speaker 2: and thirty nine witnesses. We know from Brian Wrench, who's 86 00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:04,720 Speaker 2: Allen Jones's lawyer, said that there are eight witnesses that 87 00:05:04,800 --> 00:05:07,800 Speaker 2: they say will help defend Allen Jones by saying that 88 00:05:07,839 --> 00:05:10,600 Speaker 2: they didn't see anything. Whether or not not seeing anything 89 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:14,520 Speaker 2: actually proves anything, that's a different question. But again it 90 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:17,760 Speaker 2: is a very stressful experience and you can see why 91 00:05:17,760 --> 00:05:18,839 Speaker 2: they're jumping at shadows. 92 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:22,560 Speaker 1: Another arm of nine nine radio is the subject of 93 00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:25,159 Speaker 1: a really gripping story in the New South Wales court 94 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:28,679 Speaker 1: system too. This was a leak to ben Fordham about 95 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:32,000 Speaker 1: a judge Penelope Was. She's a former senior council, a 96 00:05:32,120 --> 00:05:35,680 Speaker 1: very respected jurist and lawyer in her own right. Ben 97 00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:39,840 Speaker 1: Fordham got a leak that she had allowed an accused 98 00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:43,760 Speaker 1: person to give a welcome or acknowledgment of country in 99 00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:47,200 Speaker 1: her court. Ben Fordham reported on it, and then subsequently 100 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 1: it emerged that she was accusing the Office of the 101 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:54,240 Speaker 1: DPP Sally Dowling, of having orchestrated that leak. Sally Dowling 102 00:05:54,279 --> 00:05:56,920 Speaker 1: the DPP, has admitted that this leak did come from 103 00:05:56,960 --> 00:05:59,839 Speaker 1: her office. A junior member of staff who she said 104 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,599 Speaker 1: in a meeting suggested this as an idea and Sally 105 00:06:02,640 --> 00:06:06,359 Speaker 1: Dowling was busy reading emails and sending text messages and 106 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:08,520 Speaker 1: didn't really focus on whether it was the right thing 107 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 1: to do or not. It's obviously blown up in her 108 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:12,360 Speaker 1: face and it's very embarrassing. 109 00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:15,880 Speaker 2: Do you need to sorry, sorry, sorry, I'm just busy 110 00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:20,520 Speaker 2: sending out sending a message, So yes, yes, definitely do that. 111 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:22,120 Speaker 2: Whatever you said, go ahead. 112 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:29,400 Speaker 1: Sally Dowling has said in a submission to a parliamentary 113 00:06:29,440 --> 00:06:32,719 Speaker 1: inquiry that she was unaware her staffer was planning to 114 00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:35,600 Speaker 1: leak the information and never would have approved it if 115 00:06:35,640 --> 00:06:39,040 Speaker 1: she had known. She said she deeply regrets not paying 116 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:44,520 Speaker 1: more attention in the meeting. One of your favorites in 117 00:06:44,520 --> 00:06:47,600 Speaker 1: the media diary is witch hunts within organizations to find 118 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:49,800 Speaker 1: the leaker who's giving you things. You then report on 119 00:06:49,800 --> 00:06:51,440 Speaker 1: the witch hunt, which is great fun. What would be 120 00:06:51,480 --> 00:06:53,560 Speaker 1: your advice to organizations you have suffered a leak. 121 00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:56,520 Speaker 2: My advice would be, don't go after the leaka. It's 122 00:06:56,560 --> 00:06:58,400 Speaker 2: one of those things that we see quite often. There's 123 00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:00,480 Speaker 2: one I've got going on at the moment, the story 124 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:03,480 Speaker 2: that we spoke about last week about an incident involving 125 00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:06,919 Speaker 2: a reporter and a cameraman heated words. Don't know if 126 00:07:06,920 --> 00:07:11,000 Speaker 2: they exchanged, probably one direction, But there is now a 127 00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:13,640 Speaker 2: witch hunt at Channel seven for who provided me with 128 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:16,640 Speaker 2: that vision. And all you do when you do witch 129 00:07:16,720 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 2: hunts for your own staff or say that what they've 130 00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:22,640 Speaker 2: told people isn't true, is that you're not addressing the problem. 131 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:25,920 Speaker 2: If people are leaking against your own organization, it's because 132 00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:28,880 Speaker 2: they feel that information needs to be told or shared 133 00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:31,840 Speaker 2: because it's not being addressed internally. And I'd also say 134 00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:36,080 Speaker 2: it's particularly reprehensible when it's conducted by media companies, because 135 00:07:36,280 --> 00:07:38,640 Speaker 2: we talk about we will go to court not to 136 00:07:38,680 --> 00:07:41,520 Speaker 2: reveal our sources. We will go to court unless it's 137 00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:43,560 Speaker 2: in our newsroom, in which case we'll hunt them down 138 00:07:43,560 --> 00:07:45,440 Speaker 2: and get rid of them. And I just think again, 139 00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:47,840 Speaker 2: This is something we've talked about a lot, is when 140 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:51,080 Speaker 2: you see that all it happens is that leaker, all 141 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:53,040 Speaker 2: of a sudden, all their friends start leaking, and there's 142 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:55,920 Speaker 2: it has the opposite effect, you know, you try to 143 00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:58,080 Speaker 2: get one person next thing, and I've got nine people 144 00:07:58,120 --> 00:07:58,560 Speaker 2: calling me. 145 00:07:58,640 --> 00:08:03,160 Speaker 1: It's often very futile. Well, because sources are just like 146 00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:05,640 Speaker 1: everyone else in the world now, very sophisticated about how 147 00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:09,280 Speaker 1: they transmit information. You see companies going through the process 148 00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:12,440 Speaker 1: of analyzing people's emails and then looking at their official 149 00:08:12,440 --> 00:08:14,880 Speaker 1: company devices to see if they send any text messages 150 00:08:15,400 --> 00:08:18,880 Speaker 1: or maybe which systems they've logged into recently. Any source 151 00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:21,320 Speaker 1: worth their salt who is going to take the risk 152 00:08:21,360 --> 00:08:22,920 Speaker 1: of doing a leak is not going to be using 153 00:08:22,960 --> 00:08:25,600 Speaker 1: any of those platforms and leaving little fingerprints, are they? 154 00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:28,800 Speaker 2: The TV networks love this going through people's emails and 155 00:08:28,840 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 2: text messages. It's as easy as the email screenshot on 156 00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:34,600 Speaker 2: their phone and it's sent Viace signal or WhatsApp. But 157 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:36,560 Speaker 2: what we're seeing as a result of this is a 158 00:08:36,600 --> 00:08:41,240 Speaker 2: lot more editorial staff inside places. And we know from 159 00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:43,640 Speaker 2: the message that went out at the ABC, hey don't 160 00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:46,960 Speaker 2: send signal about certain topics that could be covered by 161 00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 2: their Royal Commission into anti Semitism. We know that by 162 00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:52,280 Speaker 2: virtue of them saying that it's because all their staff 163 00:08:52,280 --> 00:08:54,440 Speaker 2: are on signal and at seven they're all on signal. 164 00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:56,960 Speaker 2: At nine they use WhatsApp, but they're not prepared to 165 00:08:57,000 --> 00:08:59,920 Speaker 2: send open text messages over their work phone. Is that 166 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:02,400 Speaker 2: to protect their sources and it's to protect themselves. And 167 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:05,319 Speaker 2: when you're in a situation where your own editorial staff 168 00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:08,200 Speaker 2: are worried that their bosses are spying on them, there's 169 00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:10,240 Speaker 2: only one impact that it has on morale, and it's 170 00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:10,920 Speaker 2: not a good one. 171 00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:14,080 Speaker 1: Every organization invests a huge amount of money in their 172 00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:17,920 Speaker 1: computer systems and then in their official communication channels Slack, 173 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:22,440 Speaker 1: Google Chat, whatever it is. But then other conversations and 174 00:09:22,480 --> 00:09:25,160 Speaker 1: this range is from government departments right through to everywhere 175 00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:28,960 Speaker 1: in the private sector. Everyone is actually talking on WhatsApp 176 00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:33,840 Speaker 1: or signal or other encrypted apps. The Bondi Royal Commission 177 00:09:33,960 --> 00:09:37,640 Speaker 1: issued a directive to the ABC and SPS for them 178 00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:41,680 Speaker 1: to retain all their communications official communications about the news 179 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:44,560 Speaker 1: gathering related to Bondi. I mean, that's quite chilling for 180 00:09:44,600 --> 00:09:45,560 Speaker 1: any newsroom, isn't it. 181 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:47,560 Speaker 2: When you're in the heat of the moment, there are 182 00:09:47,559 --> 00:09:49,600 Speaker 2: things said, and we see it happen time and again 183 00:09:49,720 --> 00:09:53,160 Speaker 2: that messages that people are sent historically while chasing a 184 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 2: story or celebrating getting a story, or. 185 00:09:55,880 --> 00:09:56,640 Speaker 1: They don't age well. 186 00:09:56,800 --> 00:09:58,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, they don't age well and they don't get read 187 00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:02,200 Speaker 2: well in black and white office banter. You know, we 188 00:10:02,280 --> 00:10:05,120 Speaker 2: talk about gallos humor in newsrooms all the time. We're 189 00:10:05,160 --> 00:10:07,920 Speaker 2: dealing with a lot of dark stuff, particularly people who 190 00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:11,960 Speaker 2: do national security, counter terrorism crime rounds. If you're trying 191 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:14,560 Speaker 2: to get the best story for your viewers, you'll be 192 00:10:14,600 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 2: excited that, hey, I've got the father of a victim, 193 00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:20,600 Speaker 2: and you know, should you be celebrating that. It doesn't 194 00:10:20,640 --> 00:10:25,120 Speaker 2: always translate to the empathy and sympathy that you do 195 00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:29,040 Speaker 2: feel after deadline, that adrenaline and that pressure. And sometimes 196 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:33,120 Speaker 2: it's really unfair because you know, again the way things 197 00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:35,400 Speaker 2: are read in retrospect. Oh why did I Why did 198 00:10:35,400 --> 00:10:38,760 Speaker 2: I put it that way? 199 00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:42,440 Speaker 1: We're going to get accused of being hypocrites here now 200 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:44,839 Speaker 1: because we've just been advocating for freedom of speech and 201 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:48,560 Speaker 1: complete transparency. But now I do agree there are in 202 00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:52,000 Speaker 1: newsrooms conversations that you have to have also about the 203 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:55,480 Speaker 1: trustworthiness or veracity of sources, like you need to be 204 00:10:55,480 --> 00:10:57,560 Speaker 1: able to say this person's dodgy. I don't think we 205 00:10:57,559 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 1: should go there with this story. You need to be 206 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:01,360 Speaker 1: able to have that conversation to make sure that what 207 00:11:01,400 --> 00:11:05,640 Speaker 1: you are actually publishing is legit. So that's also a 208 00:11:05,679 --> 00:11:08,200 Speaker 1: bit of a sobering prospect, isn't it for those kinds 209 00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:09,760 Speaker 1: of communications to be aired well? 210 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:12,840 Speaker 2: Particularly and to your point, like, there are questions that 211 00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:15,120 Speaker 2: need to be asked, what's this guy's story. He looks 212 00:11:15,120 --> 00:11:18,440 Speaker 2: a bit dodgy again, doesn't age well. But you know, 213 00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:21,920 Speaker 2: they're the questions that every journalist or every reporter gets 214 00:11:21,960 --> 00:11:24,960 Speaker 2: pushed back from their editors or executive producers in television 215 00:11:25,040 --> 00:11:27,160 Speaker 2: because they want to make sure are we right on this? 216 00:11:27,400 --> 00:11:30,080 Speaker 2: Are we sure about that? So there's a lot of pushback. 217 00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:32,760 Speaker 2: And it's not saying that the organization doesn't think it 218 00:11:32,800 --> 00:11:35,160 Speaker 2: stands up. It's like, you know, let's test it, let's 219 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:38,400 Speaker 2: test everything. It's really difficult balancing at for anyone. 220 00:11:38,720 --> 00:11:41,000 Speaker 1: For me, one of the subtexts of that request from 221 00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:44,120 Speaker 1: the Royal Commission, which only went to the public broadcasters 222 00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:49,199 Speaker 1: SBS and ABC, is about antisemitism. Are they having conversations 223 00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:53,280 Speaker 1: inside those public broadcasters that might reflect the fear in 224 00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:57,240 Speaker 1: some parts of the Jewish community that they are antisemitic, 225 00:11:57,320 --> 00:12:02,200 Speaker 1: or that they allow antisemitic attitudes to thrive within their organizations. 226 00:12:02,840 --> 00:12:08,240 Speaker 1: What have you noticed since BONDI about the reckoning that's 227 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:12,120 Speaker 1: happening if there is one in those public broadcasters about 228 00:12:12,200 --> 00:12:14,640 Speaker 1: the kind of opinion they've been broadcasting. 229 00:12:15,080 --> 00:12:17,240 Speaker 2: We know that there are some instances that have been 230 00:12:17,280 --> 00:12:20,040 Speaker 2: referred to the Ombudsman saying, you know there are comments 231 00:12:20,080 --> 00:12:23,319 Speaker 2: that that shows some level of prejudice. I mean, it's 232 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:26,440 Speaker 2: one of those ones that in those newsrooms, specifically because 233 00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:29,320 Speaker 2: they're taxpayer funded and they are held to an extremely 234 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:32,400 Speaker 2: high standard because they have to be impartial, and the 235 00:12:32,440 --> 00:12:37,200 Speaker 2: expectations because they're effectively public servants, are so high that 236 00:12:37,280 --> 00:12:40,080 Speaker 2: there is a massive pushback. And we are seeing people 237 00:12:40,160 --> 00:12:44,560 Speaker 2: like Chairman Kim Williams and Managing Director Hu Mark's focusing 238 00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:46,760 Speaker 2: on what's being said on social media, and we do 239 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:50,000 Speaker 2: see two leaders at the top who are very invested 240 00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 2: in making sure that those changes do come about. 241 00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:54,600 Speaker 1: Steve Jackson, thank you very much. 242 00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:55,360 Speaker 2: Thank you for having me. 243 00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:03,640 Speaker 1: Steve Jackson edits the Diary in the Australian's Media section 244 00:13:03,760 --> 00:13:06,920 Speaker 1: every Monday. This week's edition is live right now at 245 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:09,000 Speaker 1: the Australian dot com dot au