WEBVTT - The case that haunts me: David Heilpern Pt.2

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Detective see aside of life. The average person is never

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>exposed her I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years I was catching killers.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to part two of my chat. We've retired

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>magistrate David Helper. Now, if you listen to part one,

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you would have found David is probably not the type

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of person who you would think occupied a magistrate's position

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for over twenty years. In part two, David told me

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>about the time his family was relocated to a safe

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>house over concerns of retribution from a man who appeared

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>at his court. We get his surprising views on drug legislation.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And we also talked about the emotional and mental impact

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of someone in a judicial position. I think this is

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>something most of us had not considered, but David really

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>opened up about it. We also talked about sovereign citizens

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and how AI might change the face of our legal system.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>It was a great chat. David. Welcome back to part

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>two of I Catchkillers.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, that's a bit underwhelming. Thanks well.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 2>I enjoyed the first half, so I hope the second

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 2>half is as good.

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Great local courts. We were talking during the break that

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you see all aspects of life, and the good, the bad,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the ugly literally come through the local courts and you

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>see some humor and there's you see some humanity. You

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>see every aspect of life. Any funny things happened to

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you when you're on the bench.

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Looks so many that I'm sure I could bore your

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>audience for dat. But I did sentence somebody who refused

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>to stand up, and I said stand up, please, and

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>he didn't, and I said, come on, stand up, this

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>is serious. And then I realized he was in a wheelchair.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 2>That was not a good look.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>That's embarrassing.

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>But another guy I refused bail too, and you know,

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 2>as he was being led out of court very unhappy,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>he goes to me, oh, you fat cunt, and said,

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 2>did you call me fat? And fortunately he laughed. I

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 2>laughed and we left it at that. But you know,

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>court is a funny place. It's tense, and so anything

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 2>that breaks the ice can be really very funny, even

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>though it's not so funny outside court.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and there's a certain sharpness and a wit that

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>comes with the type of people in court. And I'm

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>not just talking the legal for there. Some of the

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>defendants come before the court, some of the comments that

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they make are quite hilarious.

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 2>And you know, there's language that they don't understand, like

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>a defense low will often call prosecutor on my friend

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>or my learned friend or my very learned friend. And

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>half the time you see the defendants and sometimes they

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 2>jump up and go, I'm not staying here is your friends,

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, and you just think, well, you know, what

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>hope is there?

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Well, I think in that environment you've got to

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to laugh where you can. It's a little

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>bit hard when you're sitting there as a magistrate that

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>sees you when you're sitting in at the back of

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the court.

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, and it's even worse when everyone in front

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>of you starts laughing and you've got to keep it

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 2>straight face. Yeah, you just learn to be a good actor.

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And I also and no, I don't want you to

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge this. I can say it from my position when

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting in the gallery. Some court matters can be

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>very dry and very long, and it might be after

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lunch and it's been a long day and you start

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to start the nod off or your mind drift somewhere else.

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of concentration that's required as a magistrate.

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm always gobsmacked by I could have worked on

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a brief, not just magistrates, with judges as well, for

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a long time, intricate briefs. It's taken to the court,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been explained once to the person sitting on the bench,

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and they seem the grasp of the concept. There's a

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>real skill to be able to pick up what's important.

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 2>As hard as it is to believe, I actually found

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 2>it quite a relief because the vast majority of judging

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>is actually listening. Yeah, you know, and you do get

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 2>better at it over time and there's very little after

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 2>ten or fifteen or twenty years, there's not that much

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that's new that you haven't seen before and that you

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>can't pick up pretty quickly. But good lawyers, good lawyers

0:04:56.240 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 2>make for good cases. And you know, good lawyers and

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>never boring. They may be thorough, but they're always they

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 2>always explaining things in short bites that you can comprehend

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and that really give a good grasp on the case.

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's why if you've got really excellent lawyers and

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>prosecutors in front of you, then cases run smoothly.

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense. Did you find that your skills improved,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>like your skills your experience and that did you think

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a better magistrate towards the latter part of your

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>career or when you've got like over a decade of experience?

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Was it something a job that you continually learn.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>On absolutely every day was learning experience? And I think

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 2>those who stopped learning stopped being good at what they're doing.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 2>And look, I'm sure you found that in policing too,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>and probably in podcast making or me now being back

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 2>at the university. Every day's a learning experience. But certainly

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 2>I think the other thing is is that what I

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 2>got much better at was recognizing that people weren't with

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 2>some exceptions, people weren't generally good or bad. Their behavior

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 2>was good or bad. And once I drew that distinction,

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>which took quite a few years to get to, it

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 2>really started to dawn on me that we're dealing with

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 2>whole humans, some of whom are behaving badly, but that

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make them bad people. And keeping that in and

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, you could see that both in victims and perpetrators,

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 2>in witnesses, in police and it really helped me. But

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I did get better at it. I think over time,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 2>certainly I was calmer.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would imagine that you're confident, and you've seen

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>something like this before, you know how to deal with it.

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>What you said about someone does something bad doesn't make

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>them a bad person. I work very closely with doctor

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Sarah ull A forensic psychologists in homicide, and she and

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I valued her opinion on some really interesting, tough, tough cases.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And she was great to work with because she'd be

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at things from a slightly different perspective than the

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>looking through it from the police lens. But she was

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>always at pain saying to me, Gary, just because someone's

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>done something bad doesn't make them a bad person. And

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I've really come to accept that as you found out

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that we all make mistakes in life, and you know,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.559
<v Speaker 1>it's what you've done before then what you do after

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it that doesn't sort of define you. And I think

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing to hang on to when you,

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>especially in your role when you're judging people, to be

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>able to see that people but not necessarily bad. They've

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>made a mistake, as we all do at some stage

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in our life.

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And as part of sentencing, would I would say that,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.559
<v Speaker 2>I would say, you know clearly, you know from reading

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>all the submissions your family care and love for you,

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>as do many members of the community have written on

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>your behalf. On the other hand, what you've done is

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>behavior that's completely unacceptable in our community, and you have

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>to be punished for it, both for you and for

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>all of society and for the victims. But people would

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>if if you approach people like that, you know, for

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>a judicial officer to say to someone you're a bad

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>person and you're evil, it takes away it robs them

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 2>of an ability to reform and rehabilitate, I think, or

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>it makes it much harder for them. Of course, there's

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>some exceptions, and I did deal with some people who

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I would describe as really pathologically evil, not many, but some.

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Did you come across some like that as well?

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, most definitely. There's some people that are in jail

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of their lives that I was involved in,

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm more than happy. I know the evil side

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that those people, and you're not going to change them.

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>But there are other people and people thought as a

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective, like everyone that you locked up must have

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>been a terrible human being. No, yeah, yes, done a

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>terrible thing, and there's you know, in the scale of things,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>there's not much worse than murder. But some of the

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>people have made a mistake, a huge, huge mistake, and

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the consequences have been devastating, But doesn't make them that

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>evil person. There is pure evil. That's my take on that.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Other people might have different opinions, but I think it

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>would be supported with research. There's some people that just

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>inherently evil and society does need to be protected from them.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely. I dealt with one case and when it

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 2>went to the district court, he got forty eight years.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 2>That's what he said to what he did to his daughters,

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I'm glad. I'm glad he's behind bars

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 2>until after his death. For sure.

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm assuming there that it must be a child's

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>sexual abuse. And indeed, the thing that about that offense

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that separates it from a lot of others is that

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>children should be protected, that there is no mitigating circumstances

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>for a child to be sexually assaulted. And also the

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>level of planning and the reoffending and the ongoing offending.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not like a one punch situation of about the

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>side of the local club in an argument. This is

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>people that have deliberately decided to do this and then

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>do it again and again.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, and I think there's a cost in the

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 2>criminal justice system. And of course I'm not taking away

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 2>from the harm to the victims and the victims family,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>but the investigating police, the magistrates and judges, the jurors,

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the witnesses, for everyone. It's an incredibly grueling experience. I mean,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 2>it's at least in homicide, they're either dead or they're not.

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're saying.

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know that that whole process is incredibly

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>damaging for people. I'm sure we've all seen it in

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 2>our careers, people who are so harmed, not by their

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>involvement in those cases.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I like there's pressure on the homicide when

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>leading investigations, and the rare occasion that you're looking for

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer or a contract killer, you know that

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it's consequences you don't bring that person to justice. But

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>the pressure on the investigators in sex crimes, especially child protection.

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Please you get a report of that. And you know,

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if I don't move on this straight away, maybe the

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>child's going to be assaulted again. There's a lot of

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>pressure there. It brings me I jumping forward. But we

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>can go back to what we're talking about. You write

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:34.599
<v Speaker 1>a paper on lifting the judicial veil, Vicarious Trauma PTSD

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and the judiciary. A personal story. I bought some quotes

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>out there because we're talking about the impact of child

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sexual abuse and this is an extract from your experience.

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll read it out and I'll get you get you

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to comment on it. About twelve years ago, I was

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a series of cases involving child pornography in

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Bateman's Bay. In those days, it was necessary for the

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>courts to view the pictures and the videos to determine

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the seriousness of the charges. Fortunately, that is far less

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>often today due to computer classification. As is regular the case,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the charges include thousands and sometimes tens of thousands of

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>images and hundreds of videos. I'll not retraumatize all of

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>us or revictimize the victims by describing the images. That's

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty heavy. And I think from there you've read on

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a quote by the Chief Magistrate and Police versus Power,

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>who describes what you described there. To see the pale

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>death of innocence and the trust in the eyes of

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so many young children is to bemoan the capacity of

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>some members of the human race to descend into the

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>dark and depraved side of the human condition. I pulled

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>both those quotes out because I thought that at some

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>point in time we would talk about that. But that

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is that is really what we're talking about. The heaviness

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of what you.

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 2>See, absolutely, and let's keep in mind who Power was.

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>It was Patrick Power, who was the Deputy DPP for

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the state of New South Wales who was charged with

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>possession of that child pornography.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 2>He was working as a Deputy DPP of New South

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Wales and his computer needed some repairs. He sent it

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 2>in and they discovered a cash of child pornography material there.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 2>They then conducted an investigation obviously searched his home and

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the like, and found more. He pleaded guilty and was

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 2>sentenced to a term of imprisonment several years imprisonment, and

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 2>obviously that was the end of his career. That was

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 2>the case that I was quoting from, which is extraordinary

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 2>for a whole set of other reasons that we could

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 2>talk about.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I didn't pick it up. He prosecuted the murder

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>trial I was involved in. I knew him well, and

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I was disgusted and shocked when I heard of what

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>happened there.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>So the reaction for me of having to deal with

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 2>it that nest of cases was really horrific. I couldn't

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 2>get the images out of my head and as a result,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, I really went through a very difficult mental time.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 2>And again I don't you know, there's police who have

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>to classify this every day, and of course these are

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 2>real children who are being filmed. So I don't want

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>to take away from a moment the horror of the victims.

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>But the price of that of needing to deal with

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that material for me was really high. I found it

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>very difficult to sleep. I had nightmares with those recurring images,

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and it became very difficult for me to do my job.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not ashamed of that at all. In fact, you'd

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>think it's a sign of humanity that you can't cope

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 2>with that sort of stuff. And clearly I thought I

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>was terrifically resilient. In the first few cases I did

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>didn't affect me. But it's a bit like a sponge,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 2>and over time that sponge got full, and you know,

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I realized that I had choices, so I could either

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>stop doing cases like that or get some help.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and as a magistrate, you've got help. You've got

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>professional help there to I did.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I find the Chief Magistrate and said, I'm not coping

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 2>with these cases. I explained what was happening to me,

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and so delight, you know, pleased that my colleagues, you know,

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I spoke to them and they said, well, you just

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 2>don't do those cases for I will swap. And I

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 2>did spent twelve eighteen months not doing those cases, getting

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>some professional help, getting some therapy and talk therapy about it,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and it really helped. And coincidentally, during that time, a

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of the computer classification came in and rarely after

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 2>that did I need to certainly not look at the

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 2>same numbers of pictures. But you know, I think it's

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the price. One of the prices that people don't talk

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>about or even think about of doing that kind of

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 2>work is that it can have a really significant impact

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 2>deep down.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It can take a time, but the fact that you

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>put your hand up and addressed it and then could

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>move forward from I think a lot of people, and

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking more so with police because they understand that

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>world more. A lot of people don't put their hand

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>up until it's too late, and yeah, if they got

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just acknowledge, Okay, let me step away from this a

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I need to break from this type of work.

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, in the last few years we've had two magistrates

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 2>in Victoria kill themselves and one family court judge in

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Queensland to kill himself. So you know, there's and of

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>course we know about the rates of police suicide and

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>suicide and the legal profession and is it any wonder

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 2>when you're dealing with that kind of pressure and that

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of crime.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And it is a dark world, and as we talked

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about in part one, you are isolated as a magistrate,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Like even in policing, we see some horrific things, but

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you could share it with the team because invariably there's

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>people that have experienced it. As a magistrate, you sit there,

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>sit there on your own and confronted with all this.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>And you're meant to be above it all. You're meant

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 2>to be Cupucantan and not affected by it.

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I think it says a lot because you

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>would have heard it, and we all hear it with

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the shock jocks and the headlines in the paper about judges.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>If this happened to if this happened to their loved one,

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>they'd give the person the harder sentence. I think sitting down,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>having a chat with you and giving it the exposure

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to our audience and listeners allow them to understand that

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>there is a human sitting there. Quite often you're just

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this character that sitting on the bench and we don't

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>think about that you've got emotions. You're just the magistrate

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>or the judge. So I think it's good that we

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about it and there is an impact.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you realize that there's discretion. I mean, when

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 2>you're sentencing someone, you've got discretion from the very minor

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>penalties to the maximum penalties, and where you drop that line,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 2>of course, is to do with precedent and what high

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 2>courts are said, what the lawyers say before you and

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 2>point out what's an appropriate sentence. But you also carry

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 2>your own baggage. And there weren't many chop pornography offenders

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 2>who left mich court without getting really long jail sentences

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 2>because of my abhorrence for the crime.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think we had a brief discussion about it

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the other day, but I was surprised about the amount

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of people in prison that had been sexually assaulted as

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>children and the trajectory that took them on their life

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>from that point in time. And when we talk about

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>reducing crime, and we talked about other ways of preventing

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>crime from happening, I think we need to have a

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>real hard look at child sex offenders and the impact

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that they have on society. Because the amount of people

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>in prison that have been sexually abused as children that

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>might necessitate them going into prison, but it's the way

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they live their life with a risk they might become

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>drug dependent sorts of things because it disrupts their life.

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>We're really got to look at going as hard as

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we can on it, and I don't think there would

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>be many people that would argue against it.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I think that's true, and I think the other aspect

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 2>is the harm that's done to children by witnessing domestic violence.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, over the years, I realized that young people

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 2>who came before me had a lot of things differences,

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of things in common. And one of

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the really common features of young young criminals, kids who

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>are committing crimes, who were all concerned about increases in crimes,

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 2>and particularly young people, but one thing they all or

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 2>almost all had in common was that they had witnessed crime,

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.479
<v Speaker 2>They had witnessed violence in their homes. And you know,

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 2>there's a price to pay for the kinds of violence

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>that is perpetrated on children, all perpetrated around children, and

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a big price.

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. Certainly clearly understand what you're saying there, and

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just processing in my mind, But that environment that

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>those formative views as a child growing up, if you're

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in a safe environment, that sets you on a pathway

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're given your best chance of making the most

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the life. If you've grown up in a violent

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>household with domestic violence going on. I can see the

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>problems that that could create, but you actually recognize it

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and saw that in all the years that you were

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>on the bench and people that were coming before you.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's I think I better do some research on it.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, there you go, there's the next paper. We'll

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>bring you. We'll bring you back. How long were you

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>taken the whole three years?

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>It'll take me a little.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll book you in domestic violence. There's a lot of

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about it across the country, not just New South Wales,

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and how we really need to get a handle on

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it and the end result where partners, invariably female partners

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are taken to the conclusion where they've been murdered. How

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>did you deal with domestic violence situations in the court,

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>because in the local court and in the areas that

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you presided in, I would imagine that a lot of

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>your casework would have been avios and domestic violence situations.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, And it's not the most glamorous work for police either,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, And it's frustrating. So often victims would get

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 2>into the witness box and I can't remember I fell over,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I was drunk. I don't know what happened. But you know,

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 2>at one time in Grafton Local Court a woman her

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>partner had been charged with beating her on several occasions,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 2>and I think it was about the fourth or fifth

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 2>time she got in the witness box and we're all

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 2>expecting the same again, and I saw the defeated look

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 2>on the arresting officer's faces, saying here we go, and

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>she said he hit me, and we all were just staggered.

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>It took five times, five lots of great police work, patience,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 2>making a safe environment, and eventually she'd had enough. And

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 2>it was a real lesson to me that there's a

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 2>power in just bringing people to court. The outcome doesn't

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 2>matter so much as getting people protected as much as possible,

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.239
<v Speaker 2>but it really is. I don't know if there's been

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 2>an increase in domestic violence or there's just been an

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>increase in the recognition that it's a crime.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>The awareness of it, the willingness to report it.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 2>But the fact that the police now are starting to

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I think only now really take it seriously as serious

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 2>as some of the less serious crimes is a terrific thing.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's a cultural shift that we just

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 2>need to continue. I had recently went to a domestic

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>violence specialist court in Queensland to have a look at

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 2>how they're operating, just to find, you know, really terrific

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 2>thing where people feel safe, where justice is done, where

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the emphasis is not so much on well lock them up,

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 2>but on how we're going to change the behavior in

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 2>this family and by this man, and you know, really

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 2>successful programs and you know, I've got a lot of

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 2>hope for change, but I don't think we need We

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>can possibly underestimate the seriousness of the problem.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I think part of and police are more aware of

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it because we've had some horrific situations where people looked

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>at it and we've got to have this get a

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>handle of this type of crime. But I think there's

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>more accountability now like we can't. You know, when you

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>look and sadly, quite often you see a murder and

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you look back and there's all these red flags. And

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we had an expert a criminologists from overseas and described

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as murdered by slaveh motion where a domestic situation there's

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>been for falling out and I can't remember the percentages,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>but it was quite frightening that if you've been in

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a domestic situation and your partner has threatened to key you.

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>When we're talking to men kill a woman, the likelihood

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of that occurring the ridiculous percentage. We've got to acknowledge

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that domestic violence is a red flag and indicator that

0:23:58.440 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>something much worse can.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Happen totally, and you know, the hardest decisions I think

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 2>that courts have to make is bail. You know, if

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 2>people are found guilty or they plead guilty. Sentencing is

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 2>relatively easy, but bail is the first time. And of

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 2>course we're all aware that there's situations where there's false allegations.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 2>We're aware that people are innocent until they're proven guilty.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 2>But if you locked up every man where a threat

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 2>was alleged, well, the jug you couldn't do it. So

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 2>it's really tough, tough call. And I think every magistrate

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, every judge will have released someone on bail

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>who then commits an offense. Has refused people bail who

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>end up being found not guilty. It's a net loss

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 2>game and you can only do your best.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough one. I want to thry this out

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's just something that in my simple mind it

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.959
<v Speaker 1>seems like a simple solution, and I saw that. It

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>came to me when I was speaking to Hannah Clark's

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>parents that I know you're met, and talking about the

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>lead up to before Hannah and the three children were murdered,

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that she was living in fear. There

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was concerns. We talk hypothetically, so it's not Hannah's situation,

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>but hypothetically man and woman in a relationship. There's domestic

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>accusations of an assault, the person's perhaps charge on that

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>AVOs are taken out if they breached that AVO once.

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Why can't we bring in I'm talking Angril bracelets, electronic

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>monitoring of people. Now. I've raised it a couple of

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>times and people said, well, the costing of it, we

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't got the technology. Well, when we're going through COVID,

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we knew where everyone, we knew how a bloke went

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to ten different stores to buy a barbecue. You know,

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we can track people. I raised this with Hannah's parents

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and said, would you have felt more safe if the offender,

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if he came within a five kilometer radius of Hannah,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>she would have been notified because she was limiting fear,

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And they said most definitely, most definitely that would have

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>given her comfort. And if she knew that he was

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>within five kilometers of her location, she would take certain action.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And then the naysayers say, but they could cut the

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>ankle bracelet off. Well, if they cut the ankle bracelet off,

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the potential victim gets notified. I see it as a

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>way of a compromise between, as you identified, sending everyone

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that's in breach to jail because the Giles just couldn't

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>deal with it, and protecting the victim and for the accused,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>why do I have to walk around with an ankle braceleon? Well,

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you were given the chance, you failed in that chance,

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is the next alternative. If you've breached it again,

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>then you go into custody. Am I looking at things

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>too simplistically? No?

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so at all. And I think it's

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't have to be an ankle bracelet these days.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we can all we can all find our phones,

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 2>we'll find my and you know, this technology exists, it's

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 2>there and that's where it should belong. I often think

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the fanciest technology seems to be stuck on offenses like

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 2>major drug crimes and things like that. You know, the

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Australian Federal Police seem to have every single gizmo known

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 2>humanity and investigating importation of drugs. If we put that

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 2>same effort, technology and money into domestic violence offenses, and

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 2>you're right, the geographic separation of people does two things.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it protects the victim, but it also protects

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the perpetrator from unfair or unrealistic allegations because we know

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 2>where they are and if it's false, it's clearly false.

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's absolutely win win, and there should be much

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 2>much more.

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And the technology and you know, I'm speaking out of

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>my era of expertise, but I'm sure the technology is

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>available to set that in place, and I think that

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>will give that separation because we really have got to

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>make a difference in it because it's happening too much.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>There's a quote that you talked about the role of

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a magistrate, and I think it sort of will get

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>you to discuss it from there. A magistrate cannot stop

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence or alcoholism or turn around the economy of

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>dyeing towns. What we can do is ensure that the

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>law is upheld and that there is humanity and consideration

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in its application. Do you just want to expand on

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what was meant there? Yeah.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 2>Look, the sense of sitting in rural and regional New

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 2>South Wales is often a fairly depressing thing. As you

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>see these towns that were once boyant, they're in economic decline.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Often all that's left is the ragtag army of original

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 2>inhabitants or older people and a lot of disaffected young people.

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 2>They don't have the services, they don't have the medical

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 2>or mental health or educational services that other places have.

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 2>But the biggest injustice occurs when people aren't listened to.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 2>And I found that the smaller the town and the

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>more you know, the tougher the regional environment, the more

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>time you took, the better justice was served. People have

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 2>a story that they want to tell. And you know,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the worst thing I've seen in court when I was

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 2>a lawyer and since is when magistrates just cut everyone

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 2>off and just you know, don't allow people to have

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 2>their say, win, lose or draw. If people manage to

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>have their say, they feel that justice has been done,

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 2>whether they're believed or not. If justice is seemed to

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>be done, people will leave court not happy, but not

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>begrudging the entire system. And I think it's really important

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to show that it takes a bit of time, takes

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 2>a bit longer, you might get home as early, but

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>in the end justice is done.

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Well saying that your day in court, you'll get your

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>day in court, I think that very much reflects what

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you just said.

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 2>There absolutely and you know you see this particularly you

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 2>know in the masty court. As I said, there's no jury,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>so you're not only the person who's doing the sentencing.

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 2>You're the person who's trying to determine the truth in

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the situation. And that often means you believe one person

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 2>and don't believe the other. But if you explain why

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>you come to that conclusion that the man really did

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 2>beat his wife, that she was telling the truth because

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 2>of the bruises, or the immediacy of the complaint, or

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 2>his prior record or whatever. He may not be happy

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 2>with that decision, but as long as as long as

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a process that is fair and open and he

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>gets a chance to have his say, well hopefully the

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 2>resentment will be less.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, understandable. Now, there was one defendant that you had

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>before you that he wasn't satisfied with the court, which

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:48.239
<v Speaker 1>resulted in you having to relocate your family. Do you

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>care to tell a story?

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Because it was that was a family law dispute which

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 2>had been going on for a while, and this fellow

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 2>who was ex army, decided that he would go to

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 2>his ex wife's house while she was at work and

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the children were at school, and he got the dog

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.959
<v Speaker 2>and nail guned the dog to the front door. So

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>when the children came home, that's what they were confronted with.

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 2>He was arrested and I refused him bail because I

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 2>thought the crime was just so horrendous that he was

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 2>a real d I mean, anyone, there's this whole psychology

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and you would know this better than me from homicide,

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 2>but harm to animals is a really is a in

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the red flag. Definitely, I refused him bail. In their wisdom,

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court granted him bail. And his response to

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 2>that he didn't like me much, was to plant a

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 2>bomb at the courthouse on the gas tank on a

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>sitting day. So that then led to the police rightly

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 2>saying in the sheriff's office and you know the security

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>apparatus that we get the protective officers relocating us to

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a motel until he was caught, and you know, that's

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously a chilling experience. I'm sure it happens to a

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of people in the community, but it also gives

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.239
<v Speaker 2>you a taste of what it's like to be to

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 2>have to hide.

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not good. It's not good if you're under threaten,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.719
<v Speaker 1>your family's under threaten, and especially in your red flag.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, someone that's prepared to commit a crime like

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>nailing the family pet to the front door, well that

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>tells me a great deal. And I don't think we

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be psychologists or experts in the field to

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>know that that is a dangerous person.

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 2>And there's not many magistrates, not many judges who haven't

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 2>had stalkers, who haven't had threats, and you know, particularly

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the Sovereign Citizen movement are very threatening often to judges

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 2>and magistrates. Desi Freeman sought to that's the fellows on

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the run sought to arrest the magistrate who originally found

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 2>his decision that he didn't like, and then he sought

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to arrest the Attorney General and others. And obviously there

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 2>would have been a fear factor, and that fear, as

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 2>we now know, was well found.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a worrying I find it worrying with this. It's

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>an ideology that in past times, a sovereign citizen, we

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>go back thirty years, come up on a show like

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a Current Affairs, someone that's declared he's seceded from the country,

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and we'd all have a laugh and think there's nothing

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in it. My take on it. Now, we've been doing

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on sovereign citizens and we've had actually

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>documents served on us from the sovereign citizens and they

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>want us to appear at the court and all that

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of nonsense. But the danger of them now is

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's an ideology that is harmless in isolation, but then

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they can connect in the social media world where people

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they go down a rabbit hole and people are supporting

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>their views. So their radical view is that's what's skeet

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>fed back to them. And I see them as a

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>real risk. We had someone in and I'm not saying

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>sovereign citizen here, but just alone actor situation, someone fire

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and show a couple of weeks ago in Sydney and

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>led off something like fifty shots. I see them as

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the real danger of the future and sovereign citizens that

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:13.959
<v Speaker 1>they're not something that we should laugh at we've got

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 1>as the two police officers down there. There are other

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>links with the police that were killed up in Queensland

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that there was an ideology or a link with the

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ideology of sovereign citizens. Have you had them before your

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>court at the preside over.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I've had them. I certainly had them a lot before

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 2>my court, particularly in the later years, and you know,

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 2>everybody reports there's been an exponential growth in those people

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 2>appearing before court, and since joining the university it's been

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 2>a area of focus of my research and publishing is

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 2>on the sovereign citizen movement. And it's hard to think

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 2>of any other ideology where four police have been killed

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>and yeah at least several injured as a result of

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.720
<v Speaker 2>a set of common beliefs. I can't think of another

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 2>example in Australian recent history where that's occurred. So we

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 2>really are dealing with a dangerous edge and their numbers

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 2>are growing and the gobbledygook that they come out with

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 2>is just so crazy. And when they first appeared before

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 2>me in court, I just couldn't believe anyone would ever

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 2>spout such nonsense, you know. And when I say that,

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm not laughing at them, but.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You're not ridiculing them, you're just saying you're completely wrong.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>And they're not ill educated. A lot of these people,

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 2>they don't fit within the category of right wing or

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 2>left wing either. And certainly, sitting in Lismore, I had

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of, you know, people who were alternate healers

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 2>and the like who really follow sovereign citizenship as well.

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 2>So there really is a broad spectrum of people involved,

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's extraordinary and it's dangerous, and they honestly believe

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 2>that the law doesn't apply to them. And when you think,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 2>if you think that through logically, that the law doesn't

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 2>apply to them, of course they engage in risky and

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 2>dangerous behavior because they think that it doesn't apply to them.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 2>They genuinely believe that, and that's a pretty dangerous starting

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 2>point from any law enforcement or judicial determination point of view.

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It is dangerous and it can have impact, and you

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>see it from your role, and I understand the sort

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of impact they can have. But also to the uninformed

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in regards to legal matters, they serve these documents and

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they throw in a couple of legal things and stamps

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and that, and I can imagine that being served on

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a person that isn't educated in that area, and the

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>confusion that would create just a simple thing like that.

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally.

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>You get the document served or they raise it in

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>court and you can dismiss it out of hand. But yeah,

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I imagine there's a lot of people that have been

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>impacted upon by them standing over people with the so

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>called Yeah.

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Well it's okay for Scott Morrison and me to be

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.439
<v Speaker 2>sent to jail. They senced me to five years jail,

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 2>they send him to ten. I thought the worst thing

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.399
<v Speaker 2>could be is if we have to have a cell together.

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>That would be that would be unfee That wouldn't.

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Have been a lot of fun for I'm sure, But yeah,

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to appeal. But I think you're right. You know,

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 2>there's the Nagari Court that they've set up in Gimpi,

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 2>which purports to be a family court and which is

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 2>actually making orders for the return of children where the

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 2>family court has determined the children are with person X

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:23.879
<v Speaker 2>in the In the leading case, it's it's a male

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the father and the mother, who is the sovereign citizen

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 2>has got orders that she's serving on all sorts of

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 2>agencies and places saying that she actually has custody you

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 2>know there's an inherent danger in that.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>How can we reduce the movement or the impact of

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the movement. Have you got any thoughts on that? I have.

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Firstly, I think when people come to court and start

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 2>expressing sovereign citizen views, I think we should give them

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 2>an option, just like we do with anger management, just

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 2>like we do with drug and alcohol counseling, just like

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>we do with gambling. And that is some sort of program,

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 2>at least a pilot, a program where you try and

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 2>debunk a lot of these beliefs, explain to them that

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 2>they won't hold up in court, and seek to change

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 2>their behavior. I've had success with that on a one

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 2>to one level, and I think it could work on scale.

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 2>We haven't done it yet, but I think it's worth exploring.

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 2>The second aspect is that there is people making money

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 2>out of the sovereign citizen movement. There are a lot

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 2>of subscription services where you subscribe and these people will

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 2>get you out of your speeding fine if you just

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 2>follow this script and just write these letters and just

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 2>take put your names in capitals and say you're a

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 2>traveler not a driver, and etc. The authorities really need

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 2>to crack down on these agencies of profit because behind

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>this movement there are people who are making a lot

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 2>of money and if you go for them, like the

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 2>drug trade, like a lot of crime, then if you

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 2>cut the head off the snake, the rest of it

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 2>really doesn't know what it's doing.

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a difficult area and talking danger. You mentioned

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Family Law Court the bomb that was placed, but we

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>had the Family Law Court judges and that was I

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>think it was even before my career but started in

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the police. But I remember we're working on it and

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>very much aware of the recent charging of the conviction

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of the person for it. That's horrific. That's where society is.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can all complain about the court so

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>they made the wrong decision, but when you start to

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 1>get people putting bombs in judges homes and people being murdered,

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that's horrific.

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it really is. And I think also we

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 2>should be grateful that we've got such an independent judiciary.

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I know that that means sometimes decisions are made that

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 2>people don't like, too soft, too hard, whatever.

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But in my time, David, I'm not talking about my

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>personal case here.

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 2>No, no, I'm not either, But you know, look at

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 2>the situation in America now where all judges are effectively

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:59.240
<v Speaker 2>political appointments and there's no break on the excesses of government,

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the excesses of enforcement agencies, and no one wants to

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 2>live in a society like that. When I was a magistrate,

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I saw in that time, you know, literally hundreds of

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>magistrates come and go, and whether they are appointed because

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 2>they were prosecutors or ex defense lawyers or government officials,

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 2>all of them genuinely sought to apply the law according

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 2>to legal standards, not according to you know, one favoring

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 2>one party or another. And we should be so grateful

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 2>we've got that independent judiciary.

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's crucial with separation of powers between politics,

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the courts of police. We need those separation of powers,

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and if they all become too aligned, I think that's

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>where that's where problems are made, and it leans one

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>way or the other. That doesn't do the society justice.

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>It's so importantly. I don't like seeing politics get involved

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in court matters. I'm a big believer in legislation changes

0:40:57.719 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>if it needed to be changes, but I don't like

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Neederk reaction where legislations changes because it's become a

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>popular vote winner and oh, we're going to bring in

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this law.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, and also you know, magistrates and judges should

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 2>be criticized. It's you know, when the media would criticize

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 2>me saying, you know, you're at least a person and

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 2>then they did a crime fair cop, you know, like

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I never had a problem with that in the sense

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 2>that you know, you can't afford to be reactive in

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:27.919
<v Speaker 2>that situation and not cop criticism. But yes, as you say,

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 2>simply changing the law because of one bad case or

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 2>one bad decision, it always has implications that no one's

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 2>happy with in the end, and then you have to

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 2>go back and it takes time, and there's injustice.

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>The scrutiny called. I'm a big believer in open justice

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, and I've seen it in my career times

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>where I think that's not good that the doors are

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>shut to the media or the public on this one,

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes I think there's mistakes made or things that

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't people are not accountable when there's not the public scrutiny.

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I get the sense through your career you were very

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>much open to the open justice system, even in the

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>way that you talked and you'd offer opinions on current

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>situations and weren't afraid to voice those opinions.

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 2>If I thought the law was being silly, I would

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 2>certainly say so, but then I would go ahead and

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 2>apply it as you must. You take an oath, like

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 2>an oath to uphold the laws and usages of the

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 2>State of New South Wales without fear or favor, affection

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:31.399
<v Speaker 2>or ill will. And what that means is whatever your

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 2>personal view is, the law is the law. And you know,

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I had problems, like we've talked about with possession minor

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 2>possession charges for prohibited drugs, but you've got a lot

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>of discretion there. You don't have to send everyone to

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:45.720
<v Speaker 2>jail for it. Indeed, you don't have to convict people

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 2>for it, and you know, especially first offenders, that's what

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 2>I would do. But it has to be open and

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 2>you have to have a good appeal system because the

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:58.919
<v Speaker 2>scrutiny that's given by the media, whether it be whether

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 2>it be tabloid me or so called non tabloid media.

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 2>The more intellectual approach, I honestly don't think it matters.

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 2>It's good to have people in court and watching and

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:12.879
<v Speaker 2>I would love it when school kids came in and

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 2>I tell the first thing I tell law students is

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 2>spend as much time in court as you can. Just

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 2>become a courtroom junkie. Just watch it. I still am

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 2>if I still practice a little now, and if I

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 2>have a case that's not going to get on till

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon, no better way to spend the day than

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 2>watch the morning A.

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you can, you can certainly learn things from there.

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>So with the as a magistrate, you talked about the

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>drug laws, and I think the issues that you had

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>with people that have used let's say, what's the medical

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>based cannabis and then being pulled over. You had a

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people coming before the court's there with a

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>miniscule amount of cannabis still in their system and people

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>being charged. What's your you take on that situation.

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't so much problem when cannabiates was just an

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 2>illicit drug, But of course we know now that it's

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 2>available by prescription and there's a million prescriptions now in

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 2>excess of a million prescriptions, So what we've got is

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:16.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people driving around who use THHC as

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 2>their preferred medication prescribed by their doctor. But if they

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 2>have a detectable level in their system. We're not talking

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 2>about people being stoned, but just a detectable level. Then

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 2>they're committing an offense and they lose their license. Now

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 2>that when I was sitting as a magistrate, I would have,

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, single mums who who were getting medication for

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of things, be it PTSD, or who were

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:45.279
<v Speaker 2>getting THHDC prescribed by their doctors, or chronic pain or epilepsy,

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and they would say, you can't take away my license.

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>How am I going to get my kids to school

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 2>or to sport or all the other things. And I

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 2>would say, I'm sorry, this is the law. And I

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 2>just felt that that was really wrong and I spoke

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 2>out about it, and I still speak out about it.

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 2>And you know, the drug some we just had in

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales with John Brogden and Carmel Tabbitt recognize

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 2>that the overwhelming view of the unanimous view as far

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 2>as I know of the drug Summit, certainly of the report,

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 2>was that this law should change, and hopefully we're going

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 2>to see that this year.

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it is something that needs to come

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in because I've got friends that use medical cannabis and

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I see them drive and that might be a week later,

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking, I'm no expert, but I'm thinking if

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you get pulled over that there's a good chance that

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.839
<v Speaker 1>you'd still have it in your system.

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Typically, how people take medicinal cannabis is they would take

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 2>it after dinner. It would help them sleep, and of

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 2>course the effects of that eight, ten, twelve hours later

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 2>would be zero. There's no question that they are driving

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 2>while they're intoxicated or anything. The other aspect to this,

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 2>of course, is what's their alternative. Do they go on

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:55.399
<v Speaker 2>benzodiazepines or valium or anti anxiety medication, or do they

0:45:55.480 --> 0:46:00.280
<v Speaker 2>drink a residual amount of any other prescription drug doesn't

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:03.800
<v Speaker 2>trigger this law. I jokingly said at Parliament House a

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 2>few weeks ago, I was speaking about this and I

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:07.919
<v Speaker 2>jokingly said, I feel like I need a T shirt

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.479
<v Speaker 2>that says just like any other prescription drug, and that's

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 2>all people, that's how we should treat it, just like

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 2>every other. Imagine if there was a new drug we'll

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 2>call it weed, that came in from America that had

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:23.320
<v Speaker 2>these benefits, no one would even think about making it

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 2>an offense to have a detectable level, like with desperine

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 2>or alcohol or anything else.

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>No, Well, it's again this is where I've always been

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:34.919
<v Speaker 1>of the belief that the lawsuit evolved to reflect the

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 1>needs of society and the changes in society. Talking of changes,

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I know that caused me concerned what

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I saw of the effect and we're still talking drugs

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with a completely different drug ice in the communities. And

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine in the communities, even when you're a magistrate,

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that would would have been prevalent. And what was the

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>impact that you saw of the prevalence of ice in

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the me these.

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.200
<v Speaker 2>And the two things, the two topics, the drug driving

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 2>topic and ice are not unrelated because for ice, as

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 2>we all know, it's water soluble, whereas cannabis as fat soluble.

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 2>So people could use ice on a Friday night if

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to go out, it was cheap, they could

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 2>use it. They could then drive the next day without detection.

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 2>And it had a shocking impact on the operations of

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the court. Lismore Courthouse has been there for at least

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 2>a couple of hundred years, but there'd never been the

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>need for a walled in, glassed in or barred dock.

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 2>That's where prisoners are kept while the court's on. But

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 2>with ice, there was people escapes, there was a lot

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 2>of violence in the court. There's people jumping over the

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 2>railing and injuring themselves. We had to double the number

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 2>of sheriffs in court. The impact of ice. People who

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 2>are craving ice, who are addicted and have been arrested,

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:02.280
<v Speaker 2>they lose all sense of logical sense, and they're extremely

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 2>strong and extremely violent, and we saw that in the

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 2>court time after time. It's a really bad.

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Drug and it's readily available too.

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 2>It's an absolute tragedy. You know. My students now tell

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 2>me that, Well, if they go out, you know, for

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 2>a big for a big night, as young people are

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.279
<v Speaker 2>wont to do alcohol all costs them, you know, and

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe one hundred dollars cannabis. Well they've got the risks

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 2>of driving and it smells and whatever. Ice fifteen bucks.

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a concern, isn't it.

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 2>You know? I mean, that's that is just a that's

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 2>a failure of drug policy, and it's a failure of

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 2>our society that the most dangerous drug is there is

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 2>the cheapest and most prevalent. That's a really difficult and

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:51.320
<v Speaker 2>dangerous situation for those involved. Now I get the sense

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 2>that we may have reached the peak of it and

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 2>we're on the downhill slide. Is that your sense as well?

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it doesn't like there was a point in time

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>where it was the usage was growing exponentially and with

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>almost and you would get the information that's hit the town,

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the town the dynamics of the town change,

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and maybe there is it's planted out, but it is

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so concerning, and the crimes can be very violent when

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the people have been on ice, and towards the latter

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>part of my career, in the homicide out at the

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Tamworth there was someone that was affected by ice and

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:29.919
<v Speaker 1>committed a horrific murder. But I remember speaking to him

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and just it was chilling. It was like I was

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:36.800
<v Speaker 1>talking to a zombie, like there was no soul behind

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the eyes, and it was something different. I'd seen all

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>types of people affected by drugs, but there was something

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>not quite right when I was speaking to this person.

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think I think the involvement of a

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of programs really have proven pretty successful. We

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 2>have the Drug Court, which doesn't sit in enough places,

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 2>but at least it's in Sydney and it's in Dubbo

0:49:57.400 --> 0:50:01.359
<v Speaker 2>now and it's in Newcastle. We also have MERIT, which

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:05.319
<v Speaker 2>is magistrate's early referral into treatment, which means that drug

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:09.280
<v Speaker 2>offenders can be dealt with via rehabilitation process as opposed

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:13.279
<v Speaker 2>to know, a more punishment based process. So I think

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the system always a bit slow, is a bit too late,

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 2>but still is effectively gearing up to deal with these

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 2>problems in a much more constructive way than we were

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:27.240
<v Speaker 2>dealing with them before. Because you know, the other scary

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 2>aspect is the urine samples that are taken from prisons.

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Amphetamines are rife in prisons, so you know, that's obviously

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 2>not an answer. I think the other thing that's happened,

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 2>also for good or for bad, is that cocaine has

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:48.919
<v Speaker 2>really taken over to a bigger extent than ice. And

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 2>what you know, not saying one drug is better than

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the other, but I think that the consequences of violence

0:50:56.000 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 2>are less.

0:50:56.640 --> 0:50:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's far to say about putting ourselves

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>up experts in the field, but I think I'm not

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:08.360
<v Speaker 1>saying anything. I think that, yeah, the damages from ice,

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that's far far reaching. There's damages. I've seen people lose

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:15.279
<v Speaker 1>track and lose path in in Cokaine, but it's more

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of a gradual thing with ice. It gave from a

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>normal person to a shell of a human being in

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a very short period of time. You work at the

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 1>UNI with the students. What are you doing there? What's

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>your title and what's your role that you're doing there.

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Dean of Law, which means I'm head of

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the law discipline, which we have, you know, students doing

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 2>law degrees, students doing paralegal degrees, students doing conveyancing. I'm

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 2>in a large faculty which is the faculty Business Law

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and Arts, so there's compatibility with arts. We have a

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of double degrees. And you know, it's marvelous for

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 2>me to be back in an environment where I'm teaching again.

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 2>It's an absolute delight. And I've got a great crew

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 2>of really dedicated academics. I guess we pride ourselves on

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 2>producing great lawyers as opposed to other universities which focus

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:10.720
<v Speaker 2>much more on research and on higher degrees. We're a rural,

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 2>a regional law school. We were based in Lismore. Now

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 2>we're also at the Gold Coast and Coffs Harbor, and

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, we produce lawyers who go to small firms

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:24.279
<v Speaker 2>and practice law, who go to Aboriginal Legal Service, legal

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 2>aid government departments. We have some in the larger firms,

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 2>but it's you know, I've been living in the country

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 2>so long that produced to produce great country lawyers is

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 2>there's a shortage of them. There's not enough lawyers in

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the country, in the country areas.

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And what do you think you're saying making great lawyers?

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:46.840
<v Speaker 1>What are the attributes you're looking for or what's the

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 1>finished product that comes out after they've got their qualifications?

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking at for a good lawyer?

0:52:53.600 --> 0:52:56.839
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think there's really only two things that's

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 2>actually really simple. The first is you've got to be

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 2>able to communicate, and you've got to be able to

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:04.760
<v Speaker 2>communicate with an incredible range of people, from the judges

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:08.759
<v Speaker 2>and magistrates to your colleagues, the other lawyers, to the

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:12.279
<v Speaker 2>people on the street, to your staff. You've just got

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 2>to have that real ability to talk to people and

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 2>not talk down to people and not complicate things. So

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 2>the first is communication. The second thing is you've got

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 2>to have a love of the law. You've got to

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 2>enjoy researching it, finding out what the latest is, seeing

0:53:27.640 --> 0:53:29.920
<v Speaker 2>how it's useful for your client, or how it fits

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 2>in better for the society. So if you've got those

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:35.640
<v Speaker 2>two factors, then you've got a great lawyer and an

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.360
<v Speaker 2>employable one and one that will be a benefit to

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the community. And you know, we have a lot of

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:41.880
<v Speaker 2>people who we have a lot of police who are

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 2>studying law because they want to become prosecutors or join

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the DPP or go into private practice. At the average

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 2>age of our student is not school leaver age. It's

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 2>in their late twenties, so people have had a bit

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:54.760
<v Speaker 2>of a life.

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not a bad thing going into that environment. Having

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:01.280
<v Speaker 1>life experience it makes it I saw it in policing,

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and I would imagine that it's very much similar in law.

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I remember reading I can't remember. I think it was

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the Wood Royle Commission into Police corruption said that the

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 2>older the age you employed the police, the less likely

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:19.120
<v Speaker 2>they are to be corruptible. You know, when people were

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:22.480
<v Speaker 2>brought into professions at seventeen and eighteen, and you know

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 2>they were Whereas if you've got a trade to fall

0:54:25.600 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 2>back on if all else fails, then you know you're

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:30.759
<v Speaker 2>less likely to be culturally influenced by negative things as

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 2>opposed to positive.

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:34.040
<v Speaker 1>David, that's and I haven't heard it put that way,

0:54:34.080 --> 0:54:36.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's an interesting point, the non reflection. I think

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>it's very very true that if we had what was

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>called cadets where you could basically go straight from school

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:47.640
<v Speaker 1>into the police, that's the only culture you knew outside

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>of school. I worked in the building industry and got

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>an electrical trade for six years before I joined the police,

0:54:55.360 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think that was the best thing that happened

0:54:57.080 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to me. And I was also in like I was

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 1>age of crime before the Royal Commission and all that,

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 1>so I was around that time, but I had the

0:55:06.400 --> 0:55:09.279
<v Speaker 1>life experience to navigate my way through through that in

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I could stand up for myself. I

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>could sense this person wasn't quite right. I didn't buy

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 1>into the whole culture. And so I think that's a

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:22.759
<v Speaker 1>good idea that having that life experience before taking on

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the profession, that once you're in there, it gets your

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 1>wholess ballus and you get caught up in the whole thing.

0:55:28.320 --> 0:55:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And a lawyer, I always laugh when police are complaining

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:33.880
<v Speaker 1>how tough the job is, and I think spend the

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>day on the jackammer and the hot sun spend the

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 1>day on the jackammer and tell me what we're doing

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 1>here at the crime scene is hard. So I wanted

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to ask you this because I'm falling. We're talking about

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.239
<v Speaker 1>sovereign citizens falling down rabbit holes. I'm falling down the

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:53.480
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole of AI. At the moment I had to

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 1>do a talk with a lady about crime and AI

0:55:57.560 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the future of training lawyers. But I'm thinking the access

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that you've got to material case law, which is always

0:56:05.160 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a part of a good lawyer being able to research

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the cases and get the material. Where do you see

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the future of law with the advent of AI.

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, in terms of teaching law, I think we've got

0:56:16.440 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to come pretty quickly to the conclusion that the bedrock

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:24.359
<v Speaker 2>method of assessment, which was assignments, is gone. You know,

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:27.799
<v Speaker 2>we can catch some now, we'll be able to catch

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 2>less in five years and less five years later. So

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:34.840
<v Speaker 2>if you can't test people by writing assignments, how do

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:37.799
<v Speaker 2>you test them? Well, the other is exams. Well, then

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:40.080
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have closed book exams. Can people have

0:56:40.120 --> 0:56:43.879
<v Speaker 2>their computers there? Because if they can, then AI will

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 2>just take over. Are you going to go back to

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:49.920
<v Speaker 2>closed book handwritten exams, Well, what does that test? Just

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 2>tests memory and we're not testing whether people are those

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:55.360
<v Speaker 2>skills that I said before, I love and passion for

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the law and the ability to communicate. So I guess

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I see the law school of the future with AI

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 2>as being what I call, without being derogatory at all,

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:07.720
<v Speaker 2>the Plumber model where you go out into the field

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:09.880
<v Speaker 2>four days a week, you're working with other lawyers or

0:57:10.000 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 2>judges or police or anyone within the justice system, and

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 2>a day a week you come back and you learn

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 2>your theory, rather than what we're doing now, which is

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 2>just trying to ram it into three years or four

0:57:22.360 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 2>years into a degree and it's all intellectual without very

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 2>much going out into the field. And you know, I

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 2>think that that model, which which ironically is what they

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 2>used to call article clerks, it's how people used to

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:39.040
<v Speaker 2>go to UNI. That model of learning, I think is

0:57:39.040 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 2>what we're going to have. And that's not a model

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 2>that will come to any surprise for people, say in

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the medical profession or indeed teaching as well. You know,

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 2>they do a lot of their learning in the field. Well,

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the way law has to move. As

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:56.919
<v Speaker 2>for AI and the practice of law, I can see

0:57:56.960 --> 0:58:00.960
<v Speaker 2>situations where, for example, in sentencing, where all the factors

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:04.160
<v Speaker 2>are fed into AI, you know, just to drink, drive,

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 2>charge the bread and butter of the local court tens

0:58:06.800 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 2>of thousands of matters every year. Well do they really

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:16.000
<v Speaker 2>need individual assessment by a judge or should it instead

0:58:16.120 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 2>be fed into a big mega computer and a proposed

0:58:18.520 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 2>penalty comes out taking into account all the factors that

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:23.720
<v Speaker 2>are fed in and if you don't like that penalty

0:58:23.760 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 2>you can go to the court and say, well this

0:58:25.280 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 2>is why it should be different. Similarly, you know the

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 2>preparation of documents. You know, the Chief Justice of New

0:58:31.920 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 2>South Wales has said we're not going to use AI

0:58:33.880 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and affidavits and well, really, really, what you're inviting there

0:58:39.360 --> 0:58:41.560
<v Speaker 2>is people to do it and then cover it up

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's even worse.

0:58:42.880 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wondered about that because that was a big

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>part of policing, like Affhi Davids, and I'm thinking, what's

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:51.920
<v Speaker 1>happening because I've been out of the police five years,

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>what's happening now? Because that was to type up an

0:58:55.000 --> 0:58:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Affidavid to get a Supreme Court warrant at two o'clock

0:58:57.840 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. It took skill and that was a

0:58:59.720 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>real the skill that you developed as a detective. You

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>could you got renowned for your skills to be able

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to type up in that for David, and it was

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a particular skill drawing all the evidence together succinctly. That's

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>going to pass the test with a Supreme Court judge.

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking at two o'clock in the morning, with AI available,

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what's happening exactly.

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:24.200
<v Speaker 2>And look, you know we set exams or assignments now,

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 2>which says, here's the problem. This is what AOI says.

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Criticize this response.

0:59:29.440 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you know it's interesting.

0:59:31.280 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 2>That's one way that you can get around it. Also,

0:59:33.440 --> 0:59:35.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, in criminal law now we say to people,

0:59:35.840 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 2>don't do an assignment on bayl law sentencing. You have

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 2>to do a BAILA application and you have to do

0:59:41.680 --> 0:59:45.600
<v Speaker 2>a sentencing. And so we do mock courts for assessment

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 2>rather than an exam or an assignment. So look, you

0:59:49.320 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 2>can do all that. But then I think to myself, well,

0:59:52.760 --> 0:59:54.520
<v Speaker 2>if you really want people to learn criminal law, we

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 2>aren't they working with legal aid or police prosecutions for

0:59:57.880 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 2>six months that had learner.

1:00:00.640 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I like the way you're thinking, and until you raise it,

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't given it much thought on how to prepare

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for the future like that. But I suppose even as

1:00:10.400 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>your career as a magistrate, you're an agent of change

1:00:13.280 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and pushing against some of the some of the more

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>accepted practices of offensive behavior and different things. The future,

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the future of law. Do you think it's a career

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that you advise people to go into and what are

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the rewards for pursuing a career in law.

1:00:36.240 --> 1:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>One of the joys and pleasures of having been an

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 2>academic and then a judicial officer is you get to

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>see your students appearing in front of you, you know,

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>and it was just wonderful. Occasional they'd bring books you'd

1:00:47.280 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>written and put them on the bar table and think

1:00:49.000 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>they're being very smart. But there is an enormous satisfaction

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I think in the practice of law. And the other

1:00:55.920 --> 1:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>thing is law degrees are really the new arts degree.

1:00:58.840 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>There are no arts degrees at many universities now, and

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>people do law as their base degree because it's such

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>a great starting point. You know, if you didn't know

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>what you wanted to do, you used to do an

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:11.479
<v Speaker 2>arts degree. Now I think, well, why wouldn't you do law?

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess a lot of people think to themselves, well,

1:01:15.120 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm going to make more money as a plumber,

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and you might well, or I'm going to have bad

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>off school holidays if I become a teacher, and you

1:01:23.600 --> 1:01:27.800
<v Speaker 2>may well. But to me, at least, the satisfaction and

1:01:27.840 --> 1:01:30.360
<v Speaker 2>seeing it in my students, the satisfaction and learning the

1:01:30.440 --> 1:01:32.959
<v Speaker 2>law and applying it and trying to change the world

1:01:32.960 --> 1:01:36.840
<v Speaker 2>to make it a better place, is enormously satisfying. So

1:01:36.880 --> 1:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I would always encourage people to practice, to study law,

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know, if you don't like it, you'll soon

1:01:42.960 --> 1:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>know and you can go and do something else.

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I get the sense that it served you well.

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You seem like you still have the joy for life

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and great future ahead of you. I'd like to thank

1:01:57.040 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you for coming on. I catchkillers. You're the second magist,

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but we had Hugh Dillon that I know you know,

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the coroner on there before. But I think you've given

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating insight because we talked about a lot of

1:02:10.000 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>people don't know who the person is sitting on the bench,

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time sitting in the courts wondering

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in that person's mind. But you've given

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>us a bit of insight into that. I think. I

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>mean this sincerely too. I'd like to thank you for

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the service that you've brought to the communities, because someone

1:02:29.160 --> 1:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that's got some humanity and empathy in them, sitting in

1:02:32.760 --> 1:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a position of power like you have as a magistrate

1:02:35.720 --> 1:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is so important. I think you really make a potentially

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>make a difference the fact you understand crime when these

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, yeah, what would they know, it's never

1:02:46.040 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>happened to them. You understand the impact it has, and

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's so important. So congratulations on an impressive

1:02:53.240 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>career and a future educating lawyers in the right direction.

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much. Has been real pleasure talking to you,

1:03:01.200 --> 1:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and obviously our shared experience in these things makes for

1:03:05.560 --> 1:03:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a great base of knowledge. I've certainly learned things too,

1:03:07.840 --> 1:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>so it's been great. And I'll come back in a

1:03:10.280 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>few years once I've done that research on children being

1:03:13.160 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>victims of crime then committing crimes. We'll talk about that.

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we'll booked the studio. I'll just check the calendar.

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll get that sorted out. But thanks very much and

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>all the best, David, sincerely.

1:03:24.600 --> 1:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanks very much.

1:03:25.720 --> 1:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Cheers,