1 00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:09,240 Speaker 1: You can listen to the Front on your smart speaker 2 00:00:09,360 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: every morning to hear the latest episode. Just say play 3 00:00:13,520 --> 00:00:22,680 Speaker 1: the news from the Australian. From the Australian, here's what's 4 00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:26,000 Speaker 1: on the Front. I'm Claire Harvey. It's Monday, August nineteen. 5 00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:34,040 Speaker 1: Patients are waiting nearly two years to access medicines even 6 00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:38,280 Speaker 1: after they've been approved by medical regulators. A new report 7 00:00:38,360 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 1: in The Australian reveals widespread delays in vital treatments getting 8 00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:46,320 Speaker 1: on the shelves. That stories live now at the Australian 9 00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 1: dot com dot au. Today is the ultimate episode in 10 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:59,440 Speaker 1: a special series honoring The Australian's sixtieth anniversary. On today's episode, 11 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:03,840 Speaker 1: one of the Cory's most famous political journalists, The Australian's 12 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:07,280 Speaker 1: Editor at Large, Paul Kelly, telling us about the most 13 00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:12,440 Speaker 1: important characteristic of a journalist, the courage to think for yourself. 14 00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:26,200 Speaker 1: Paul Kelly is a legend. 15 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:29,720 Speaker 2: Speak things gloss. 16 00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:35,959 Speaker 1: Not that one, because. 17 00:01:35,640 --> 00:01:36,479 Speaker 2: He does it needs. 18 00:01:40,280 --> 00:01:42,360 Speaker 1: Not that one, this one. 19 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:47,840 Speaker 2: There's a conflict between economics and politics. This has been 20 00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:49,040 Speaker 2: the Treasurer's dilemma. 21 00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:52,680 Speaker 1: Just like the singer and the AFL superstar are Paul 22 00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 1: Kelly is one of the greats. He started at The 23 00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:02,680 Speaker 1: Australian in nineteen seventy one, when our paper was just 24 00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:07,480 Speaker 1: seven years old. Paul was a public servant who decided, 25 00:02:07,680 --> 00:02:11,359 Speaker 1: quite rightly, political journalism was a lot more interesting than 26 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:15,480 Speaker 1: being a bureaucrat. His bosses at the Department of Prime 27 00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:17,680 Speaker 1: Minister and Cabinet couldn't believe it. 28 00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:22,040 Speaker 2: They were asking me, well, Paul, I mean, what on 29 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:24,600 Speaker 2: earth are you doing. You've got a wonderful career ahead 30 00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:28,440 Speaker 2: of you and the public service if you really know, 31 00:02:29,320 --> 00:02:31,800 Speaker 2: concentrate for the next forty years you might end up 32 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 2: a departmental head. By the way, what are you going 33 00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:37,800 Speaker 2: to do? And I said, well, I'm moving to the 34 00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:42,200 Speaker 2: press gollery. Whereupon there was a you know, the sort 35 00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:46,560 Speaker 2: of smiles disappeared from their face and there was an 36 00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 2: awareness this could be a problem for them. 37 00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:53,800 Speaker 1: That's Paul speaking at a live gathering to mark The 38 00:02:53,880 --> 00:02:58,600 Speaker 1: Australian's sixtieth anniversary. He started out as the most junior 39 00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 1: reporter in a bureau of nine, but Paul had a 40 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:06,680 Speaker 1: stunning rise. Within four years, this rookie had been promoted 41 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:08,120 Speaker 1: to political correspondent. 42 00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:12,320 Speaker 2: So I had a departure from The Australian in nineteen 43 00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:17,040 Speaker 2: seventy five, which was a very dramatic year of Australian politics. 44 00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:20,160 Speaker 2: We had the constitutional crisis. I was the political correspondent 45 00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:24,079 Speaker 2: at the time and I had a bad falling out 46 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:24,720 Speaker 2: at the paper. 47 00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:34,679 Speaker 1: Well, may we say, God save the Queen. A dramatic year. Indeed, 48 00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: was nothing well say with the Governor General. 49 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 2: The paper supported the blocking of supply and supported Sir 50 00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:50,200 Speaker 2: John kurse dismissal of the Whitlam government. I both opposed 51 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:52,600 Speaker 2: at the blocking of supply and wrote to that effect, 52 00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:57,840 Speaker 2: and strenuously opposed Sir John Ker's dismissal of Whitlam's Prime Minister, 53 00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:01,600 Speaker 2: and wrote to that effect that the paper not surprisingly 54 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:06,760 Speaker 2: felt that given the discrepancy between its position and my position, 55 00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:09,920 Speaker 2: it was best if I had part of the post 56 00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 2: of political correspondent, which I did, which I did. 57 00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:19,120 Speaker 1: Governor General Sir John Kerr used his constitutional power to 58 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 1: dismiss the government and call a double dissolution election, which 59 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 1: was won by Malcolm Fraser. The Australian had endorsed Whitlam 60 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:30,360 Speaker 1: when he was elected in nineteen seventy two, but the 61 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:35,120 Speaker 1: paper took an editorial line supporting the dismissal and endorsing 62 00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:41,560 Speaker 1: Malcolm Fraser's election in nineteen seventy five. Was part of 63 00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:45,280 Speaker 1: your decision making informed by who John Kerr was, that 64 00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 1: he was sort of getting drunk at the races and 65 00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:50,440 Speaker 1: that he was very unorthodox or was it about the 66 00:04:51,000 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 1: for you about the constitution? 67 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 2: No, I wasn't interested in his personal life. I mean 68 00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:59,680 Speaker 2: I learned a lot about it because I wrote four 69 00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:03,920 Speaker 2: book subsequently about the dismissal of the Whitlam government. It's 70 00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:07,360 Speaker 2: been something that I've followed for a lot of my life. 71 00:05:07,560 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 2: But No, I wasn't interested in kurs, drinking or anything 72 00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:14,279 Speaker 2: like that. The judgments I made were the way he 73 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:20,040 Speaker 2: conducted himself as Governor General, his use of the constitutional 74 00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:22,520 Speaker 2: powers he had. He had the power to dismiss the 75 00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:25,839 Speaker 2: Prime Minister, there was no question about that. But he 76 00:05:25,880 --> 00:05:28,840 Speaker 2: should not have dismissed the Prime minister. His obligation as 77 00:05:28,920 --> 00:05:34,080 Speaker 2: Governor General was to advise an war. He dismissed Whitlam 78 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:38,080 Speaker 2: in an ambush, an ambush that the Crown would never 79 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:42,520 Speaker 2: have engaged in. So yes, So the judgment I made 80 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:46,960 Speaker 2: was about the way he conducted his constitutional responsibilities. 81 00:05:48,440 --> 00:05:51,880 Speaker 1: Sometimes it's easier to just go along with the company line, 82 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 1: especially when you're young and in a job you're very 83 00:05:55,000 --> 00:05:55,719 Speaker 1: much enjoying. 84 00:05:56,839 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 2: There's only one rationale, there's only one for being in journalism, 85 00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:05,680 Speaker 2: and that is to make your assessment and situation, to 86 00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:11,080 Speaker 2: engage with the politicians gavern the facts. But then you're 87 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:15,200 Speaker 2: under an obligation to reach a conclusion which you think 88 00:06:15,320 --> 00:06:17,920 Speaker 2: is the correct conclusion in terms of making assessments of 89 00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:22,520 Speaker 2: the politicians. And this was the most important constitutional crisis 90 00:06:22,520 --> 00:06:25,200 Speaker 2: in the history of the country. I had very firm 91 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:28,400 Speaker 2: views about it, partly formed by my period as a 92 00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:31,960 Speaker 2: public servant, because when I was a public servant, we 93 00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:36,040 Speaker 2: serve as government house. I used prepared the Executive Council 94 00:06:36,120 --> 00:06:39,600 Speaker 2: documents for the Governor General, so I understood how the 95 00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:42,680 Speaker 2: Governor General functioned and operated. I was well aware of 96 00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:45,520 Speaker 2: the powers of the Crown, the powers of the Governor General, 97 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,839 Speaker 2: the relationship between the Prime Minister and the Governor General, 98 00:06:48,880 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 2: the relationship between the Palace and the Governor General. And 99 00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:56,480 Speaker 2: so I took this position. And that's what you do. 100 00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:00,320 Speaker 2: And if you've got political journalists so unprepared at the 101 00:07:00,400 --> 00:07:03,400 Speaker 2: end of the day to back their judgment, then they're 102 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:04,320 Speaker 2: not worth a bumper. 103 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:08,880 Speaker 1: By the mid eighties, Paul came back as National Affairs editor. 104 00:07:09,440 --> 00:07:11,680 Speaker 1: He covered all the big characters. 105 00:07:12,320 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 2: Golf was wonderful. The point about Golf was Golf was 106 00:07:16,640 --> 00:07:20,040 Speaker 2: a politician, but he was an actor. See if GoF 107 00:07:20,080 --> 00:07:23,480 Speaker 2: hadn't gone into politics, he would have gone onto the stage. 108 00:07:23,520 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 2: He would have made a brilliant actor all through the 109 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:28,960 Speaker 2: English speaking world. And so GoF was always playing at 110 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:32,640 Speaker 2: two games. He was the politician, but he was the actor. 111 00:07:33,360 --> 00:07:36,320 Speaker 2: I remember bucking into him one day in King's Hall 112 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:39,080 Speaker 2: when he was very angry with the Secretary of the 113 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:43,800 Speaker 2: Treasury for Frederick Wheeler, and he said to me, now, comrade, comrade, 114 00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:47,040 Speaker 2: I like your advice. I'd like your advice. Do you 115 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:51,640 Speaker 2: think I should sack that bastard Wheeler? And I said, oh, GoF, 116 00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:54,160 Speaker 2: you know, it would be most unlike you to act 117 00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:57,400 Speaker 2: so rashly. And he said, do you think do you think? 118 00:07:57,440 --> 00:07:59,880 Speaker 2: Do you think I'm a rash person? And so we 119 00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:03,760 Speaker 2: had this extraordinary conversation, which was all a joke. Of course. 120 00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:09,480 Speaker 2: That was sort of Goff's personality as the actor rather 121 00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 2: than the series politician. He fluctuated between the two The 122 00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:18,160 Speaker 2: most extraordinary politician I dealt with was Rex Connor, who 123 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:21,560 Speaker 2: was the Minister for Minerals and Energy in the Whitlam government, 124 00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:25,720 Speaker 2: who was the architect of the great Kam Laney Loane. 125 00:08:26,520 --> 00:08:28,880 Speaker 2: I was very young. He took a shine to me 126 00:08:30,080 --> 00:08:32,280 Speaker 2: and I used to go down and see him, and 127 00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:35,720 Speaker 2: he locked the door so I couldn't get out, and 128 00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:38,480 Speaker 2: we talked for about two or three hours, and eventually 129 00:08:38,480 --> 00:08:41,600 Speaker 2: I'd say, mister Connor, look, it's been wonderful talking to you. 130 00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 2: I've really loved it. But I've got to leave. I've 131 00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:47,640 Speaker 2: got to go upstairs and do some work. I've got 132 00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:49,200 Speaker 2: a file for tomorrow's paper. 133 00:08:49,920 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 1: Was his nickname Buckets. 134 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:54,160 Speaker 2: His nickname was the Strangler. 135 00:08:56,880 --> 00:08:59,800 Speaker 1: In the nineteen nineties, Paul became editor in chief. 136 00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:06,560 Speaker 2: I've been through two fundamental technological revolutions in journalism. Before 137 00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:10,520 Speaker 2: these revolutions, we were told, we were briefed about how 138 00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:13,360 Speaker 2: it would work out, what the consequences would be. All 139 00:09:13,400 --> 00:09:16,960 Speaker 2: the briefs were completely wrong. It's almost impossible when you 140 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:21,200 Speaker 2: get big technological changes at the start before the change, 141 00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:25,040 Speaker 2: for people to accurately assess what it's going to be. 142 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:32,960 Speaker 1: This chat with Paul was recorded at a recent life 143 00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:36,360 Speaker 1: gathering of The Australians subscribers. It's part of the deal 144 00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:39,480 Speaker 1: when you subscribe. Every so often we hold a party 145 00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:43,560 Speaker 1: for our readers with drinks, cannaps and some great insights 146 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:47,000 Speaker 1: into journalism, plus a chance to meet the country's most 147 00:09:47,080 --> 00:09:51,439 Speaker 1: experienced and respected journalists. Check us out at the Australian 148 00:09:51,559 --> 00:10:12,200 Speaker 1: dot com dot au. What's the cliche of a journo 149 00:10:12,840 --> 00:10:16,720 Speaker 1: A bit disheveled, a bit beery, a bit smoky pie 150 00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 1: crumbs down the front of his tie. If you can't 151 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:23,079 Speaker 1: find him shouting questions at a politician, he's probably sinking 152 00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:26,320 Speaker 1: beers at the pub. Now, that's not really a fair 153 00:10:26,440 --> 00:10:30,080 Speaker 1: representation of journalism in twenty twenty four, but it was 154 00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:33,120 Speaker 1: the real deal when Paul Kelly was first working in 155 00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:34,319 Speaker 1: the Canberra Press Gallery. 156 00:10:36,000 --> 00:10:39,000 Speaker 2: Look, when I started a political journalism, it was a 157 00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:43,439 Speaker 2: dangerous and cutthroat business. It was incredibly competitive in the 158 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:46,240 Speaker 2: press Gallery was a much larger press gallery. It was 159 00:10:46,280 --> 00:10:50,440 Speaker 2: a stronger media. The Press Gallery was a beast. It 160 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:54,040 Speaker 2: was like being in a Catholic seminary. Inasmuch as there 161 00:10:54,040 --> 00:10:56,720 Speaker 2: are about one hundred and forty journalists and how many 162 00:10:56,800 --> 00:11:01,239 Speaker 2: women two two Michelle n and Gay Davidson. 163 00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:04,720 Speaker 1: Alcohol was all part of a gig. 164 00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 2: We all drank of a knight if Foster's was compulsory. 165 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:12,160 Speaker 2: If he went into Lorry Oak's office, he had a 166 00:11:12,280 --> 00:11:18,280 Speaker 2: very large blue circular ash tray and at the end 167 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:21,120 Speaker 2: of the night, when Laurie left, there were about fifty 168 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:26,920 Speaker 2: or sixty cigarette butts in that ashtray. So that was 169 00:11:26,960 --> 00:11:35,559 Speaker 2: Australia in the early nineteen seventies. People have no idea 170 00:11:35,679 --> 00:11:37,960 Speaker 2: what sort of workplace it was because it was not 171 00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:43,240 Speaker 2: subject to any industrial relations laws. We occupied the top 172 00:11:43,320 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 2: floor of Parliament House. We had our own rules, we 173 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:50,920 Speaker 2: had our own operation, and there were very few politicians 174 00:11:50,960 --> 00:11:54,960 Speaker 2: actually game enough to walk up that final flight of 175 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:58,120 Speaker 2: stairs to the press gallery. A few did, but a 176 00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:01,800 Speaker 2: lot didn't they were too terrified. So we actually ran 177 00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:04,480 Speaker 2: that press gallery according to our own rules. 178 00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:10,560 Speaker 1: Things are of course a bit different today. Every industry 179 00:12:10,559 --> 00:12:14,360 Speaker 1: in Australia has changed and grown. In journalism, we've seen 180 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:16,960 Speaker 1: the demise of the office bar fridge and of rigid 181 00:12:17,000 --> 00:12:20,400 Speaker 1: newspaper deadlines, and the advent of dynamic twenty four to 182 00:12:20,440 --> 00:12:24,760 Speaker 1: seven publishing on app, web, video, and right here in audio. 183 00:12:25,160 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 1: We've seen our journalism aggregated and commodified by giant tech platforms, 184 00:12:30,400 --> 00:12:33,480 Speaker 1: and now we're dealing with the rise of generative artificial 185 00:12:33,480 --> 00:12:37,280 Speaker 1: intelligence and what that will mean for our beloved craft. 186 00:12:40,600 --> 00:12:45,679 Speaker 2: The skill and art of journalism is eternal, so the 187 00:12:45,760 --> 00:12:49,400 Speaker 2: method will remain. And what's the method, Well, the method 188 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:54,960 Speaker 2: is engagement with people, engagement with institutions, attempting to find 189 00:12:55,000 --> 00:13:00,880 Speaker 2: out what's happening, reporting analysis, so that will continue. What 190 00:13:01,000 --> 00:13:05,960 Speaker 2: will change is the transmission mechanism. How will the copy 191 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:09,640 Speaker 2: be delivered to the individual. So that's where we'll see 192 00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:14,160 Speaker 2: more and more changes. And of course the method of 193 00:13:14,240 --> 00:13:19,880 Speaker 2: delivery and the transmission will put pressure on journalism. There's 194 00:13:19,920 --> 00:13:22,880 Speaker 2: absolutely no doubt about that. I mean, we are now 195 00:13:22,920 --> 00:13:27,440 Speaker 2: moving into video big time, so again there's going to 196 00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:31,240 Speaker 2: be all sorts of innovations that we see. The way 197 00:13:31,280 --> 00:13:33,880 Speaker 2: to think about it, and this is optimistic, I know, 198 00:13:33,960 --> 00:13:36,840 Speaker 2: but the way to think about it is that the 199 00:13:36,960 --> 00:13:42,280 Speaker 2: journalistic skill and art stays. The journalists are going to 200 00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:47,080 Speaker 2: be required to learn more, think more about how they 201 00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:52,360 Speaker 2: deliver copy, about how they deliver the information about words 202 00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:56,760 Speaker 2: as well as video. But I think that transmission will 203 00:13:56,800 --> 00:13:58,400 Speaker 2: continue to see a lot of changes. 204 00:14:00,040 --> 00:14:03,920 Speaker 1: Any old journals are resistant to change. They bang on 205 00:14:04,000 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 1: about how things were much better in the good old days. 206 00:14:07,440 --> 00:14:09,680 Speaker 1: Paul isn't like that, no. 207 00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:11,719 Speaker 2: I think one of the points about journalism is that 208 00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:14,240 Speaker 2: you're on the cutting edge of changed the entire time. 209 00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:18,839 Speaker 2: All the time you are dealing with the big issues, 210 00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:23,600 Speaker 2: but it's a changing agenda. So I think journalists, in 211 00:14:23,680 --> 00:14:26,000 Speaker 2: terms of the way they think, in terms of their culture, 212 00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:28,640 Speaker 2: they're alert to that. I mean, if you've got someone 213 00:14:28,720 --> 00:14:32,600 Speaker 2: in journalism and they can't stand change, well they're not 214 00:14:32,640 --> 00:14:33,880 Speaker 2: going to be much good. 215 00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 1: You can read all Paul Kelly's journalism and the rest 216 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:47,560 Speaker 1: of the nation's best news, business, sport and commentary right 217 00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:50,240 Speaker 1: now at the Australian dot com dot au