Speaker 1: On Scolus Ostrodia. This is the reader panehe show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Rita panahe Show. I'm
Speaker 2: Danikiti Giorgio. Coming up for Google.
Speaker 3: Seems to have omitted the assassination attempt.
Speaker 2: Of Donald Trump in search results favor a pro Karmala propaganda.
Speaker 3: Josh Hammer joins us for more.
Speaker 2: The BBC condemned for its reporting of the deadly Hesbela
Speaker 2: rocket attack in the glam Heights.
Speaker 3: More on this with Lauren bell Cross, Samara.
Speaker 2: Gill on why the eco zalots at just Stop Oil
Speaker 2: failed in their attempts to block airport departure gates, and
Speaker 2: of course Lefty is a losing it, including the Karens
Speaker 2: for Karmala Zoom call featuring white rich women.
Speaker 3: You won't want to miss this lunacy.
Speaker 4: As weight women, we need to use our privilege to
Speaker 4: make positive changes. If you find yourself talking over or
Speaker 4: speaking for bypark individuals, or god forbid, correcting them.
Speaker 3: Just take a bit.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is Herald's son columnist at Patrick Carly
Speaker 2: and Patrick, good to see you.
Speaker 3: Thanks for joining me now.
Speaker 2: Newly appointed Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has disputed claims
Speaker 2: that he's been given too many portfolios following Anthony Albanesi's
Speaker 2: cabinet reshuffle. Of course, now in addition to Home Affairs,
Speaker 2: he's been handed Immigration, Multicultural Affairs, cybersecurity and arts, while
Speaker 2: also retaining his position as Leader of the House. Patrick, honestly,
Speaker 2: was there nobody else capable?
Speaker 5: Well, they've just given him six jobs, haven't they meet it?
Speaker 5: And the bloke who had the Immigration minister job before
Speaker 5: him had one job and he couldn't do it very well.
Speaker 5: It doesn't instill confidence, and it sort of suggests that
Speaker 5: there might be a dearth of talent. I mean, why
Speaker 5: would you give one man so many jobs? It sort
Speaker 5: of it reminds me of a Simpsons episode way back
Speaker 5: where the family was poor and home and went and
Speaker 5: got three jobs and he came home five point fifty
Speaker 5: five am and set the alarm clock for six am
Speaker 5: in the morning. It's just too much for one person.
Speaker 5: And unless he's the world's greatest delegator, and he might be,
Speaker 5: sort of it. It really does not instill any confidence
Speaker 5: at all.
Speaker 2: No, it certainly doesn't, particularly given as you said, the
Speaker 2: immigration portfolio has been in such a mess. It actually
Speaker 2: requires a lot of attention, so stay tuned on that. Now,
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton is traveling to Israel to meet with senior
Speaker 2: government officials and members of the community who were impacted
Speaker 2: by the October seven Hamas attacks. Yet Patrick, the Prime Minister,
Speaker 2: still has not visited.
Speaker 3: What message does that send.
Speaker 1: It sends a terrible message.
Speaker 5: I mean people Australians were saying in the weeks after
Speaker 5: the massacre, you know, we'd like to see our prime
Speaker 5: minister there to show support for democracy that has been
Speaker 5: attacked by a terrorist organization. You had Penny Wong go
Speaker 5: over in January. She was considered sort of half harded
Speaker 5: of your life because she didn't actually get to the
Speaker 5: massacre site. She did meet me some survivors, but it
Speaker 5: seems a terrible message. It's like, well, you know, this
Speaker 5: is important. We have to stand by Israel in this
Speaker 5: in its need basically, and the fact that Albanezi has
Speaker 5: not got close or seemed to be getting close to
Speaker 5: go to Israel is a real oversight in what has
Speaker 5: been a very half hearted sort of effort against the
Speaker 5: rise of anti Semitism, certainly here in Australia. And he
Speaker 5: has sort of tried to address that in recent months,
Speaker 5: but it really does sort of feel like he's been
Speaker 5: very flat footed all the way through.
Speaker 1: And this is just another example.
Speaker 2: I absolutely agree with you, and you know, Olbow's trying
Speaker 2: to walk both lines of the equation, but what he's
Speaker 2: really doing is completely isolating one of Australia's great allies
Speaker 2: in Israel. At the same time, it's just extraordinary that
Speaker 2: he hasn't gone yet.
Speaker 3: Now, Patrick looked finally some hard.
Speaker 2: Truths from former ABC chair Ite butt Rows.
Speaker 3: She has warned that the ABC.
Speaker 2: Is too sense ti to criticism and its reporters should
Speaker 2: just give up if they cannot handle scrutiny. Is she right?
Speaker 5: Yes, Look, you would know yourself. I know, you write
Speaker 5: a column that people don't like you hear about it.
Speaker 5: It goes with the job. You go on air and
Speaker 5: say something people don't like it, they'll tell you all
Speaker 5: about it. What struck me about what Ida had to
Speaker 5: say there was that she was sort of saying, some
Speaker 5: of these presenters deliberately don't try and portray both sides
Speaker 5: or all sides of a story. And that sort of
Speaker 5: goes to this sort of question, can you be a
Speaker 5: professional journalist and do you want to be an activist
Speaker 5: at the same time, I would argue that you can't,
Speaker 5: and I think there are certainly examples from the ABC
Speaker 5: that have been worth scrutinizing very closely, where the activism
Speaker 5: seems to come before the journalism and the need for impartiality.
Speaker 3: No, I totally agree with you.
Speaker 2: I mean, you just can't have it both ways, particularly
Speaker 2: when you are working for a taxpayer funded broadcaster.
Speaker 3: It's as simple as that.
Speaker 2: Right now, this is fascinating to me, Patrick, because paras
Speaker 2: Olympic officials.
Speaker 3: Have been forced to order in more.
Speaker 2: Meat and eggs, I mean, growing criticism about their vegan
Speaker 2: focus at the athletes village. Now, before the games organizers
Speaker 2: had actually promised, would you believe sixty percent of food
Speaker 2: options in the athletes village would be plant based as
Speaker 2: part of their push to reduce emissions. I don't know
Speaker 2: what omissions have got to do with the Olympics, but Patrick,
Speaker 2: you know, give me a break. These are competing athletes, as.
Speaker 3: If they want vegan food to feel themselves.
Speaker 1: Well, they're hungry, aren't they.
Speaker 5: By definition, they're elite athletes, so training to the nth degree,
Speaker 5: they want to be able to eat and to impose
Speaker 5: those values you know. I think there's an Australian weightlifter
Speaker 5: who weighs one hundred and something in kilos and he
Speaker 5: was in the early days. He had two chop lamb
Speaker 5: chop limit what he could eat.
Speaker 1: A break as you say, I mean, that is ridiculous.
Speaker 5: You are speaking to somebody who likes to order a
Speaker 5: vegetarian pizza with ham and bacon because they taste really
Speaker 5: good and most people they should be allowed to eat whatever.
Speaker 2: They like, absolutely agree with you. It's this green zealotry
Speaker 2: that's just plunged on us all the time.
Speaker 3: But I'm in that poor weightlifter.
Speaker 2: The guy is trying to trade and get fuel and
Speaker 2: he's been stuck with two chops.
Speaker 3: It's just outrageous. Really.
Speaker 2: Now, speaking of a mission Britain, it's like prison exactly.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: Look, speaking of emissions, Air New Zealand has become the
Speaker 2: first major airline to concede that ambitious carbon emissions reduction
Speaker 2: targets are simply unachievable by twenty thirty and has gone
Speaker 2: ahead and dumped them. Patrick, does this now set the
Speaker 2: tone for other airlines to follow suits?
Speaker 5: I look, it sounds like a real reality check for
Speaker 5: the airlines. I mean, I think those targets were sort
Speaker 5: of based on the use of sustainable aviation fuel as
Speaker 5: it's called, and that is not being produced at all
Speaker 5: enough to actually fuel these planes. I think it zero
Speaker 5: point five percent this year of all total aviation fuel production.
Speaker 5: And I think in New Zealand it is a symbol
Speaker 5: of just another sign that these targets they're sort of
Speaker 5: based on ideology. They sound good, but they're not really
Speaker 5: based in reality. And I think we're going to see
Speaker 5: that with renewable targets in other ways. Certainly in Australia,
Speaker 5: we've got these very ambitious targets for wind and sol
Speaker 5: they're not going to be achieved, and they've been driven
Speaker 5: by ideology.
Speaker 1: Reality is always going to catch up, isn't it.
Speaker 3: Well, that's it.
Speaker 2: I mean, look what happened as well in the last
Speaker 2: week with Andrew Forrest for example, and his green projects,
Speaker 2: and they're just that they're're not achieving these goals that
Speaker 2: they set out to achieve, and no wonder now look,
Speaker 2: a modest university project, which aims to counter the growth
Speaker 2: of toxic masculinity in Australian class rooms, has been slammed
Speaker 2: for failing to distinguish the views of Jordan Peterson and
Speaker 2: Andrew Tate to quite different men. Teachers are independent and
Speaker 2: Catholic schools will be given conversation guides and roleplay scripts
Speaker 2: as part of this project Patrick, which aims to identify
Speaker 2: and tackle the harms of online misogyny and gender based
Speaker 2: violence in schools. But Patrick this project specifically attributes these
Speaker 2: attitudes to both Tate and Peterson, describing them as notorious
Speaker 2: masculinity influences despite very clear differences and the views.
Speaker 3: That they promote. How do you feel about this?
Speaker 5: Oh, look, there's a real lack of intellectual rigor here.
Speaker 1: If you like, that's how I see it. I mean,
Speaker 1: Andrew Tate is revolting.
Speaker 5: I think ninety nine percent of the population would agree
Speaker 5: that he's totally revolting. Jordan Peterson should not be lumped
Speaker 5: together with somebody like Andrew Tate who is up on
Speaker 5: rate charges and human trafficking charges and believes that women
Speaker 5: should belong in the home and belong to the man.
Speaker 5: As he puts it, Jordan Peterson talks about relationships. He
Speaker 5: talks about commitment and growth. He might be a bit
Speaker 5: right of center for some people, but to just so
Speaker 5: lazily lump them together as if they're one and the same.
Speaker 5: Really shows to me it's really disappointing that this is
Speaker 5: going to go into schools of universities the way it is.
Speaker 1: They're not at all similar.
Speaker 3: No, that's it.
Speaker 2: They just obviously haven't even done their own research search
Speaker 2: into who these two men are, because, as you said,
Speaker 2: they're very different.
Speaker 3: Now let's look to the US.
Speaker 2: Now, Donald Trump has agreed to be interviewed by FBI
Speaker 2: investigators as they continue to probe the assassination attempt of
Speaker 2: the former president Patrick. It was interesting because when Donald
Speaker 2: Trump gave his speech at the Republican Convention, he was
Speaker 2: very kind toward the work of the Secret Service on
Speaker 2: the day that he was shot. But no doubt he's
Speaker 2: going to have a lot to say when he's actually
Speaker 2: interviewed formally about the catastrophic failures which occurred.
Speaker 1: Well, it's amazing.
Speaker 5: I mean, I've watched that footage probably twenty times, and
Speaker 5: the way those Secret Service agents sort of leaped to
Speaker 5: protect Donald Trump was really impressive.
Speaker 1: But against that since emerged, it's.
Speaker 5: Footage of the gunman on the roof, there's spectators telling
Speaker 5: police officers. Look, there's a bloke with a gun up there.
Speaker 5: This is a bloke who it sounds like he spent
Speaker 5: five minutes, ten minutes on the internet researching how to
Speaker 5: assassinate a president and then actually the fact you've got
Speaker 5: one shot off, much less five shots sort of shows
Speaker 5: and he was in plain sight just shows there were
Speaker 5: catastrophic failings in the preparation of the protection on that day.
Speaker 5: There are so many questions here, and I mean, hopefully
Speaker 5: some of them will get answered, and I'm sure Donald
Speaker 5: Trump will offer a few of them in that interview.
Speaker 3: I have no doubt that he will.
Speaker 2: As you said, they were just there's a lot of
Speaker 2: evidence and a lot of warning signs and the lead up,
Speaker 2: but yet it's still managed to happen. Patrick Carline, great
Speaker 2: to speak with you, thanks joining us. Joining me now
Speaker 2: all the way from Italy is commentator Samara gil Samara,
Speaker 2: thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 3: Let's start with Karmala Harris.
Speaker 2: She seems like she's desperately trying to get down with
Speaker 2: the cool kids and win over the gen Z vote.
Speaker 2: There is a new wave of so called karma love
Speaker 2: amid young people online. But will all those likes follows
Speaker 2: Karmela trends and memes actually translate to votes.
Speaker 6: Thank you for having me Danika.
Speaker 7: Yes, I mean, the short answer is no. But she
Speaker 7: has been crowned basically Brat by the gen zs, which
Speaker 7: apparently is the highest order these days of what we
Speaker 7: can give someone.
Speaker 6: It's kind of ridiculous. I looked up exactly.
Speaker 7: What bratt means, and it means someone who's defined by
Speaker 7: Charlie Xix the artist herself, messy, out of control, having
Speaker 7: a mental breakdown at any time, and unpredictable. Now, I
Speaker 7: don't know about you, but that's not exactly someone that
Speaker 7: I want running the free world.
Speaker 6: Tamala Harris.
Speaker 7: The team has been working completely over time since she
Speaker 7: got obviously, you know, given by Joe Biden, this new
Speaker 7: status of running for president. But what is actually ridiculous
Speaker 7: is that it's the same team that turned out all
Speaker 7: this content on TikTok about Joe being perfectly fine and
Speaker 7: stable to be the president of the United States. It
Speaker 7: is the same team that are running these ads that
Speaker 7: Kamila is apparently great and should be running the United
Speaker 7: States of America.
Speaker 6: It's ridiculous.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's just extraordinary.
Speaker 2: I don't quite understand the brat concept.
Speaker 3: Not sure how it's a compliment, but there you go.
Speaker 2: Now, look, we all remember this moment when Marmala was born, but.
Speaker 8: In our country, we need you to be Marmola of
Speaker 8: the country.
Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, like that's it's just so uncomfortable to
Speaker 2: watch out every single time. But look, Drew Barrymore's cringe
Speaker 2: interview techniques aka invading the personal space of celebrities, have
Speaker 2: come up again in a resurfaced video from February. This time,
Speaker 2: actor Austin Butler was the victim, with fans noticing just
Speaker 2: how close Drew was sitting next to him.
Speaker 9: You never keep eye contact with people in a scene,
Speaker 9: and I'm like, because it's so intimate.
Speaker 3: Should we make out while we're at it?
Speaker 10: Like I contact us insane?
Speaker 3: I see, I'm feeling the pressure, so I'm not taking
Speaker 3: my eyes up for.
Speaker 1: You right now.
Speaker 9: It's a very big dealer life I contact. I almost
Speaker 9: feel like it's a little invasive, and so I sort
Speaker 9: of shy away from it. But George helped me realize
Speaker 9: I should not do that.
Speaker 2: Samara, why is Drew Barrymore always basically sitting on her guests?
Speaker 7: I know, I feel like I've just watched a reel
Speaker 7: of assaults kind of going on on near assaults. I mean, honestly,
Speaker 7: I think that in the case of Austin Butler, I
Speaker 7: don't blame her too much, but when it comes when
Speaker 7: it comes to Kamela, I think that you know, that
Speaker 7: was one of the most awkward things I've ever seen,
Speaker 7: and I've watched it again and again and it doesn't
Speaker 7: get old. What I'd hate to think about, though, is
Speaker 7: if it was a male host that was exhibiting this
Speaker 7: type of behavior, what would our response be?
Speaker 6: Would it be completely fine?
Speaker 7: Drew's been able to get away with this behavior for
Speaker 7: so long. You can't find an interview where she isn't
Speaker 7: up in the face of her victim, and she sort
Speaker 7: of thinks a victim or interview. I don't know what
Speaker 7: to say now, because you know, when I'm watching these videos,
Speaker 7: it's very hard. I think she thinks that it's an
Speaker 7: interview tactic and it's a way to get close.
Speaker 6: But everyone is awkward.
Speaker 7: Everyone cannot actually understand why she's doing this. I just
Speaker 7: it perplexes me, and I just hate to think if
Speaker 7: the shoe was on the other foot and it was
Speaker 7: a different male host, what would actually the reaction be
Speaker 7: I think.
Speaker 3: That's a very good poin, But you're right.
Speaker 2: I mean she is just so cringe every clip of
Speaker 2: her interviewing people.
Speaker 3: I just shake my head. Now, the eco.
Speaker 2: Zealots at just Stop Oil have had their attempts to
Speaker 2: block the departure gates at Gatwick Airport foiled as passengers
Speaker 2: stepped over them.
Speaker 10: Have a look, I mean, good on them.
Speaker 3: They have to get through, they have to board their planes.
Speaker 2: But Samara, what do these activists actually think they will achieve?
Speaker 7: Yeah, I mean obviously I'm normally in London and they
Speaker 7: create absolute havac. Roger Hallam, who was actually the ringleader
Speaker 7: of this whole thing, he just got jailed for five years.
Speaker 7: So it was a real sense of relief to see
Speaker 7: at least someone, especially the ring leader, you know, face
Speaker 7: the consequences for their actions.
Speaker 6: I mean I heard.
Speaker 7: That basically, and just up Oil they have to pay
Speaker 7: their own legal fees.
Speaker 6: So I'm just wondering exactly.
Speaker 7: Who's got the time to be sitting at Gatwick Airport
Speaker 7: when there are.
Speaker 6: People who are just trying.
Speaker 7: They've saved up for this holiday, and Gatwick is you
Speaker 7: know where a lot of budget flights take off.
Speaker 6: You know, people really look forward to.
Speaker 7: This one break, and then they get someone called India
Speaker 7: or Mia from just up oil coming and basically sitting
Speaker 7: down and making sure that they can't enjoy that break
Speaker 7: that they've earned. It's just ridiculous, and they continue to
Speaker 7: do this. I really hope that the jail time of
Speaker 7: the ring leader is going to have some sort of consequence,
Speaker 7: but at the moment it seems like that's really not
Speaker 7: the case.
Speaker 2: Well, look, I agree with your fingers crossed. I mean,
Speaker 2: these people actually need a job, believe it or not.
Speaker 2: Let's turn out to the Royals. It's been thirteen years
Speaker 2: since the fairy tale wedding, of course of the Prince
Speaker 2: and Princess of Wales, but now a new book has
Speaker 2: lifted the lead on their early romance. Samara take us
Speaker 2: through the details.
Speaker 6: Yeah, this book's really interesting.
Speaker 7: It's obviously by a great royal biographer, Robert Jobson, but
Speaker 7: you know, he writes about the tumultuous early years between Kate.
Speaker 7: I don't exactly love how he's dragging up every single
Speaker 7: phone call that they had, every single little tiff that
Speaker 7: they might have had.
Speaker 6: At the beginning.
Speaker 7: Of course, you know, Prince William. He was a very
Speaker 7: smart future king. He chose Kate early on in university
Speaker 7: when they were both sort of at the same level.
Speaker 6: Of course, he was going to be the future King
Speaker 6: of England.
Speaker 7: But you know, he chose someone who was very much
Speaker 7: good stock and could you know, actually bring the royal
Speaker 7: family into a great place.
Speaker 6: And I think he knew that early on.
Speaker 7: But the issue is is that this book kind of
Speaker 7: drives up, you know, the thirty minute phone call that
Speaker 7: they had where he broke up with her while she
Speaker 7: was working as an accessories buyer at a clothing brand
Speaker 7: in London, and it sort of portrays their early romance
Speaker 7: is very rocky and tumultuous, which I don't think is
Speaker 7: the case. I think that William was taking his time
Speaker 7: he needed to. He saw what happened with his mother,
Speaker 7: He witnessed his parents' marriage, he saw exactly what it
Speaker 7: took to become obviously the future Queen of England, and
Speaker 7: he didn't want to just choose anyone. I mean Harry
Speaker 7: and Meghan, on the other hand, what did they wait
Speaker 7: about ten months before they started to make things official
Speaker 7: and start making arrangements for the wedding. And look how
Speaker 7: that ended that ended in a train wreck that destroyed
Speaker 7: every single family relationship that they had on both sides.
Speaker 7: So I actually don't blame William for waiting ten years.
Speaker 7: And I hope that this book doesn't sort of make
Speaker 7: it look like their marriage is any rockier than it is,
Speaker 7: because I think they're stronger than ever now.
Speaker 2: I completely agree with you. They certainly seem like a
Speaker 2: solid force. Samara, Gil really appreciate your time.
Speaker 3: Thank you so much for joining us, Thank you for
Speaker 3: having me.
Speaker 2: Still to come Lefties Losing It and josh Hava joins
Speaker 2: me to discuss the nightmare inducing White.
Speaker 3: Women for Kamala Zoom call.
Speaker 2: Now it's time for lefties losing it, starting with the
Speaker 2: Karens for Kamala I kia a White Women for Kamala.
Speaker 3: Harris Zoom call.
Speaker 2: Almost two hundred thousand lefties, including celebrities, all dialing in
Speaker 2: to support the borders are at the morning. What you're
Speaker 2: about to see is a grade level lefty insanity.
Speaker 3: Karen's for Kamala I don't know.
Speaker 11: You will wonder who is in charge, and you will
Speaker 11: be desperate to talk to some kind of manager, and
Speaker 11: there will not be one, which honestly is still really a.
Speaker 6: Struggle for me.
Speaker 11: As white women, we are the ones that have the privilege,
Speaker 11: of course, as.
Speaker 4: A way to decenter the eurocentric and white voices that
Speaker 4: are often at the forefront of our history books and
Speaker 4: our media.
Speaker 11: I am here tonight embracing myself in your incredible prof
Speaker 11: bound white women midst.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 4: I feel like we all just went to collective therapy
Speaker 4: that was so beautiful and we needed that so much.
Speaker 2: Okay, I think we all need therapy after listening to that.
Speaker 2: I mean, this pep rally is truly the stuff of nightmares.
Speaker 2: A group of rich, white lunatic women telling other women, oh,
Speaker 2: they should give up their personal interests in favor of
Speaker 2: race based politics. And the clown show continued with alleged
Speaker 2: social media influencer Ariel Fador, who goes by the name
Speaker 2: Missus Frazzled by name and well by nature.
Speaker 3: It seems as she.
Speaker 2: Was introduced on the call of someone here to help
Speaker 2: gentle parent us through this selection.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Hi, everybody.
Speaker 4: I am so honored to speak today. I am like
Speaker 4: shaking to just be among such incredible company. We are
Speaker 4: here because as if you were here earlier, you've heard
Speaker 4: biparc women have tapped us in as white women to
Speaker 4: step up, listen and get involved the selection season. As
Speaker 4: white women, we need to use our privilege to make
Speaker 4: positive changes. If you find yourself talking over or speaking
Speaker 4: for bipop individuals, or god forbid, correcting them, just take
Speaker 4: a beat and instead we can put our listening ears on.
Speaker 4: So do learn from and amplify the voices of those
Speaker 4: who have been historically marginalized, and use the privilege you
Speaker 4: have in order to push for systemic change.
Speaker 2: I mean, what a patronizing pist is she trying to
Speaker 2: sell us away, whip out of white Ford and give
Speaker 2: us a hard cell.
Speaker 3: Seriously, go back to your knitting and it gets worse.
Speaker 3: Enter into the chat, what dudes for?
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris starting with his lefty, who says he cried
Speaker 2: after Hillary Clinton lost in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 12: I stood over my kid's bed and I wept.
Speaker 1: I wept because I felt like I let them down.
Speaker 3: HM, must be a very therapeutic male bonding session.
Speaker 13: You know, masculinity as a trope has been co opted
Speaker 13: by the magar right into something that feeds into and
Speaker 13: exacerbates the loneliness epidemic, as well as the mental health
Speaker 13: crisis that many face that end up leading to really
Speaker 13: disruptive behaviors.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's a cult, it's a lefty total freak show.
Speaker 2: And I'll give you an example of the real white
Speaker 2: dudes for Karmala from a pro Karmala pack, which has
Speaker 2: released a new add against Donald Trump depicting conservative men
Speaker 2: as pawn addicted.
Speaker 3: U smag a Republican's banned abortion. But that's just the
Speaker 3: Start's just the start.
Speaker 2: If Trump gets selected, we want the government involved in
Speaker 2: all aspects of your sex.
Speaker 10: Life, way more involved, way more involved.
Speaker 3: When you have sexual intercourse, it should be illegal. Choose contraception,
Speaker 3: no pills, no condom.
Speaker 5: Your genitalis are reserve for pro creation.
Speaker 13: If you freeze twelve eggs, you should be required to
Speaker 13: have twelve babies or else you're a serial killer.
Speaker 3: And I'm definitely not a serial killer.
Speaker 1: Are you?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 2: No, this is serious and these actors are Democrat voters.
Speaker 2: Ladies and gentlemen, say no more now to a regular lefty.
Speaker 3: Chelsea has been handler.
Speaker 2: The alleged comedian has been disturbingly triggered by those JD
Speaker 2: Van's comments about childless cat ladies, prompting this rather bizarre
Speaker 2: and nonsensical meltdown.
Speaker 14: No president in the history of the United States has
Speaker 14: ever been a mother. But maybe if she had five
Speaker 14: kids with three different men and a scandalous affair with
Speaker 14: a porn star and was convicted felon, that would be
Speaker 14: more palatable to Republican men.
Speaker 6: I mean, my god, are we tired?
Speaker 1: You?
Speaker 14: Sad diet, mountain dew drinking, couch humping, dolphin portante ficionado.
Speaker 14: All of us childless cat and dog ladies are going
Speaker 14: to go from childless and crushing it to childless and
Speaker 14: crushing you in November. And before you tell me he
Speaker 14: didn't really couch, spare me. I grew up in New
Speaker 14: Jersey in the eighties where everyone had a couch in
Speaker 14: their basement, and I know a couch when I see one.
Speaker 2: Yes, Chelsea, it's clear you've been deep in that basement
Speaker 2: many times doing God knows what brings a whole new
Speaker 2: meaning to crazy cat lady, as does this.
Speaker 15: See child free threatens the patriarchy.
Speaker 6: We don't need no, ma'am.
Speaker 3: We can do.
Speaker 6: Everything he can't. On the ball, Live.
Speaker 15: Taylors on my side, I'm a bull.
Speaker 3: Live Maga starts to cry.
Speaker 6: What I'm a bull live.
Speaker 15: And Taylor's on my side, Yes she is, I'm a
Speaker 15: bull live. Maga starts to cry.
Speaker 3: That catchy, isn't it.
Speaker 2: I mean, there's something very odd about those lefty DEI
Speaker 2: bold libs. And to the Olympics opening ceremony, which was
Speaker 2: universally condemned for mocking the world's two point four billion Christians.
Speaker 2: But guess what we found a megafan of the Freak Show,
Speaker 2: enter doctor Jill Biden.
Speaker 3: It was spectacular. The rain did not dampen our spirits.
Speaker 14: And Casey, honestly, every step of the way, I was
Speaker 14: thinking to myself, Oh.
Speaker 3: My god, oh my god, how are we going to
Speaker 3: top this? How are we going to top this?
Speaker 2: Now, coming back to the nightmare fuel inducing Karen's for
Speaker 2: Kamla zoom call, as.
Speaker 4: White women, we need to use our privilege to make
Speaker 4: positive changes. If you find yourself talking over or speaking
Speaker 4: for bipark individuals, or god forbid, correcting them, just take
Speaker 4: a beat.
Speaker 2: At the term BIPOC, by the way, stands for black
Speaker 2: Indigenous people of color. And I mean, can you imagine
Speaker 2: the outrage if it was whites against Kamla or white
Speaker 2: men against Trump.
Speaker 3: But it's okay if it's the.
Speaker 2: Crazy far left lunatic liberal women, and here is more
Speaker 2: of the person they chose to gentle parent them through
Speaker 2: the election, also known on social media as missus.
Speaker 4: Frazzle's no catch your bubble, uncle, noran I think you
Speaker 4: said an inside thought out loud huh. Is him wearing nail.
Speaker 6: Polish a big problem or.
Speaker 3: A little problem? Oh no? Does it hurt your body
Speaker 3: or your heart? Hi?
Speaker 4: Friends, it's time to share the Arctic. Now your turn
Speaker 4: is all done?
Speaker 6: Got it?
Speaker 1: Got it?
Speaker 4: I know you like when people share with you, Well,
Speaker 4: you need to share the earth with everyone, plants, animals,
Speaker 4: and people.
Speaker 2: I mean, this woman is seriously insufferable. It is a
Speaker 2: grade level insanity and step aside. Kamala Karen's The identity
Speaker 2: politics continues with white dudes for Harris who even have
Speaker 2: mocked up what looks like official merchandise. Take a look
Speaker 2: at this white dudes the Harris cap Join to be
Speaker 2: dowt to unpack all of this is Newsweek Senior editor
Speaker 2: at Large and Article three Projects Senior Counsel Josh Hammer.
Speaker 3: Josh, good to see you.
Speaker 2: Look, let's start with this Karens for Kamala White Women's
Speaker 2: zoom call.
Speaker 3: Is this the stuff of nightmares?
Speaker 16: Well, you know, look, I can definitely tell you that
Speaker 16: I am not a white dude for Harris, and I
Speaker 16: will not be personally investing in one of those godforsaken
Speaker 16: trucker hats that I guess they're trying to gin up
Speaker 16: some enthusiasm for in the campaign. Look, this is what
Speaker 16: happens when you have a political party and a political movement,
Speaker 16: and that's the Democratic Party and contemporary American leftism that
Speaker 16: is just obsessed, obsessed with race.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 16: You know, Look, America has a complicated history with race.
Speaker 16: I'm born in Abraham Lincoln's birthday. Lincoln, of course, won
Speaker 16: the Civil War here in the US. He freed the
Speaker 16: slaves and so forth. There The point, though, The point though,
Speaker 16: is that through the Civil War and through these civil
Speaker 16: rights statutes that America passed sixty years ago, we moved
Speaker 16: past race, or so we thought, Why do these people
Speaker 16: want to bring it back to the forefront of our consciousness.
Speaker 16: We literally have fought wars, hundreds and hundreds of thousands
Speaker 16: of Americans died in the Civil War to try to
Speaker 16: erase race consciousness from the American broader conscience. And now
Speaker 16: this party in the year twenty twenty four is trying
Speaker 16: to bring it back. I think it's absolutely disgusting. I
Speaker 16: for one, continue to see my fellow Americans not in
Speaker 16: terms of race, but based on the merits of their ideas,
Speaker 16: and on their political ideologies, and on actual substance, not
Speaker 16: on arbitrary characteristics. Unfortunately, the Democratic Party of the year
Speaker 16: twenty twenty four, when it comes to elevating race consciousness
Speaker 16: to the forefront of the political conversation, sounds suspiciously like
Speaker 16: the Democratic Party of the eighteen forties eighteen fifties, pre
Speaker 16: American Civil War, when race consciousness was at the center
Speaker 16: in a very very different manner.
Speaker 2: Actually, And you know, imagine, Josh, if this was what
Speaker 2: men for Trump, can you imagine the outrage then?
Speaker 16: No, I mean, I mean, could you possibly imagine to
Speaker 16: your question, I mean, I have plenty of white friends
Speaker 16: who are supporting Donald Trump and like the thought of
Speaker 16: you know, if they band together and form some sort
Speaker 16: some sort of Instagram group or you know, God help us,
Speaker 16: some sort of TikTok video. You know, if TikTok isn't
Speaker 16: banned here in the US and the near future, which
Speaker 16: in my opinion, actually should be. But I mean, people
Speaker 16: would freak out. It would be coast to coast coverage.
Speaker 16: It would it would literally dominate cable news here on MSNBC,
Speaker 16: on CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post editorial boards,
Speaker 16: but would write up a lengthy editorial condemning this patriarchal
Speaker 16: white supremacy, this act of fascism, insurrection, jingoism, chauvinism, all
Speaker 16: these various isms that their just repeated false use has
Speaker 16: totally deprived the meaning of it. Again, this is what
Speaker 16: happens when you have a party in a movement to
Speaker 16: EGA that is just obs sessed with Reese. And again
Speaker 16: I plead to my fellow American then, really, just to
Speaker 16: Westerners all across the world, can we stop thinking so
Speaker 16: much about reefs and focus a little bit more on
Speaker 16: policies and ideas than that which really matters.
Speaker 2: You'd think so, right, I mean, there's that meant to
Speaker 2: be the heart.
Speaker 3: Of politics, but clearly not in this day and age.
Speaker 2: Now, Look, the Democrats are desperately trying to rebrand Karmala
Speaker 2: Harris lying about her previous comments. So here is Pete
Speaker 2: Burdajig making it very clear that Karmala Harris was not
Speaker 2: in charge of the border.
Speaker 4: Let's be very clear about this, because there has been
Speaker 4: a lot of mischaracterization.
Speaker 1: She was not in charge of the border.
Speaker 8: The Homeland Security Department is in charge of the border.
Speaker 2: Even though we know it was widely reported that she
Speaker 2: was in fact put in charge of the border.
Speaker 3: The headlines are there to prove it.
Speaker 2: And here is the Hill today reporting that Harris does
Speaker 2: not support a fracking band. That's the latest headline. They
Speaker 2: think that we forgot about these comments.
Speaker 12: I am committed to passing a green New Deal, creating
Speaker 12: clean jobs, and finally putting an end to fracking once
Speaker 12: and for all.
Speaker 3: There's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking. Josh,
Speaker 3: what are the dams trying to achieve here?
Speaker 16: What they're trying to achieve is nothing less than a
Speaker 16: full throttle, you know, essentially an unprecedented gas lighting operation
Speaker 16: on the American people. That is really what they are
Speaker 16: trying to do. They're trying to make you forget your
Speaker 16: lying eyes and to not believe your lying ears.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 16: Look, this was not that long ago. Kamala Harris ran
Speaker 16: for president in the twenty twenty Democratic Party presidential primary
Speaker 16: in fact, her campaign was so terrible that she bowed
Speaker 16: out in December twenty nineteen, about a month before the
Speaker 16: first primary votes were cast in the Iowa caucuses, and
Speaker 16: back then because she was trying to compete with Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 16: Elizabeth Warren in various other far left hacks in the
Speaker 16: socialist wing of the Democratic Party. She took a lot
Speaker 16: of very very far left stand so she came out
Speaker 16: in favor of a total ban on phracky. She came
Speaker 16: out in favor of a total ban on offshore drilling,
Speaker 16: and she supported the Green New Deal. She supports massive
Speaker 16: crushing electric vehicle mandates, which would essentially destroy the American
Speaker 16: auto industry, which is already being crushed by various other
Speaker 16: green mandates. She's trying to make a legal immigration for
Speaker 16: those coming across the US Mexico border, not a crime,
Speaker 16: but just a near fine or god forbid, a slap
Speaker 16: on the list. You know, back during the Black Lives Manner,
Speaker 16: Antifa riots, the anarchy that was destroying America's urban corridors
Speaker 16: in the summer of twenty twenty, after the death of
Speaker 16: our great martyr Saint George Floyd, you know, Kamala Harris
Speaker 16: linked to a Black Lives Matter bail fund on her
Speaker 16: social media trying to bail out the rioters who were
Speaker 16: looting and vandalizing destroying property. By the way, insurance estimates
Speaker 16: of that Summer of Love total roughly two billion dollars
Speaker 16: in assess property damage. She's been on the wrong side
Speaker 16: of basically every single political issue that I have been
Speaker 16: aware of. And it's not just that they're trying to
Speaker 16: retcon her path and to make her out to be
Speaker 16: something that she's not. It's not a have to do
Speaker 16: it because her popularity is in the toilet, you know.
Speaker 16: NBC News last summer actually did an in depth analysis
Speaker 16: where they looked at the favorable unfavorable splits of every
Speaker 16: vice president in American history, or at least that which
Speaker 16: for which we have polling data. She was the number
Speaker 16: one least popular vice president ever, seventeen points underwater. And
Speaker 16: I think it was roughly twenty nine percent of Democrats
Speaker 16: in a poll that I saw a month or two ago,
Speaker 16: only twenty nine percent said that they wanted her to
Speaker 16: be the nominee if Joe Biden drops out. It frankly
Speaker 16: was not that long ago that the conversation was how
Speaker 16: Joe Biden can dump Kamala Harris. They were trying to
Speaker 16: find someone slightly more palatable, more popular. So, you know,
Speaker 16: I'm getting so much whiplash from the media. Is just
Speaker 16: constant jerking around here. Fortunately, I at least have some
Speaker 16: faith that the American people are fully capable of seeing
Speaker 16: through this outrageous gas lining.
Speaker 2: Well, fingers crossed, but you're right, there's so much towing
Speaker 2: and frowing it's impossible to cape up.
Speaker 3: Right now, now, I have a look at this Google
Speaker 3: has I.
Speaker 2: Made to the assassination attempt of Donald Trump in search results,
Speaker 2: And it has also been reported that if you actually
Speaker 2: look up, if you Google Donald Trump, users were only
Speaker 2: getting news.
Speaker 3: About Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: So look, I decided to try it out for myself
Speaker 2: this morning to test this theory. And what do you know,
Speaker 2: It turns out that these reports are indeed accurate. I
Speaker 2: just find this astonishing. Josh, what's going on here?
Speaker 16: Well, I'll tell you exactly what is going on here.
Speaker 16: What is going on here is that Google and the
Speaker 16: various other Silicon Valley big tech oligarchs are putting an
Speaker 16: unapologetic thumb on the scale in favor of their candidate
Speaker 16: who is the candidate of the uniparty of the regime,
Speaker 16: that is Kamala Harris, and against the candidate who is
Speaker 16: challenging the regime uniparty status quo, which is Donald Trump.
Speaker 16: We have seen this time and time again. In fact,
Speaker 16: Google really started to first flex its muscle, so to speak,
Speaker 16: during the twenty sixteen presidential election when Donald Trump eked
Speaker 16: out of victory over Hillary Clinton. Actually, if you go
Speaker 16: back then, so there was a PhD. A doctor by
Speaker 16: the name of Robert Epstein, who's a sociologist. He studied
Speaker 16: statistics when it comes to kind of shifting public preferences.
Speaker 16: He testified in the United States Senate in twenty seventeen,
Speaker 16: a year after the twenty sixteen election, that Google Google
Speaker 16: was single handly responsible for shifting upwards of three million
Speaker 16: votes from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton back in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 16: By the way, doctor Epstein who testified, there was a
Speaker 16: Hillary Clinton voter. So it's not like he had any
Speaker 16: skin in the game, so to speak.
Speaker 13: There.
Speaker 16: You know, this is one of the many reasons why
Speaker 16: I've been passionate over the years that America's massive tech
Speaker 16: companies Google probably first and foremost, with other companies like Meta, Facebook,
Speaker 16: Instagram really have to be regulated as common carriers in
Speaker 16: the Anglo American common law tradition, the same way that ISPs,
Speaker 16: internet service providers, telephone providers at and T rising. Here
Speaker 16: in the US, we have to regulate these companies the
Speaker 16: exact same way, because otherwise you're literally giving the power
Speaker 16: to actually decide elections, to shift election outcomes to unaccountable
Speaker 16: Birkenstock wearing Silicon Valley weaves with PhDs from calib Berkeley
Speaker 16: and Stanford, rather than holding the actual people accountable as
Speaker 16: we the people are charged with doing under our American
Speaker 16: constitutional order.
Speaker 2: I like that description absolutely, spot on it. It is frightening,
Speaker 2: to be quite honest. Now, let's take a look at
Speaker 2: the latest polling. According to Polling Market, Donald Trump is
Speaker 2: sitting at sixty one percent compared to Kamala Harris at
Speaker 2: thirty seven. Now, Josh, this is a little bit different
Speaker 2: to some other polling we've seen recently where it shows.
Speaker 3: The pair a bit more at neck and neck. What
Speaker 3: does this suggest in your view? Look, I think that.
Speaker 16: Donald Trump continues to be the favorite to win the election. Now,
Speaker 16: I am not guaranteeing a victory or anything like that.
Speaker 16: It's going to be close. It's definitely going to be close.
Speaker 16: But here's my rationale here. Look, if Biden was going
Speaker 16: to drop out of the race, obviously whoever replaced him
Speaker 16: was going to get an immediate and thy usiasm boost
Speaker 16: in the polls. Democrats were desperate for Joe Biden to
Speaker 16: thee out of their race. The media, which pretended to
Speaker 16: be doing an earnest job of trying to hold accountable
Speaker 16: the governments for about a month, you know, immediately turned
Speaker 16: on a don They snapped their fingers, and now they're
Speaker 16: in full scale apology of propagandamode again. But here is
Speaker 16: why I takes some solace in that from a conservative perspective. Here,
Speaker 16: I take some solace in that because even now, after
Speaker 16: that bump and after that high water mark, so to speak,
Speaker 16: Kamala Harris still trails Trump in most head to head
Speaker 16: polling on a national level, She still trails Donald Trump
Speaker 16: in most swing state polling. Now, admittedly it's closer. The
Speaker 16: point is this should be a real high watermark for her.
Speaker 16: Republicans have barely begun to fight back. They haven't really
Speaker 16: started to carpet bomb the airwaves, reminding her as you
Speaker 16: and I have already discussed here about her radical, far
Speaker 16: left record when it comes to energy policies, the environment,
Speaker 16: the war on cops, the legal immigration, healthcare, electric vehicles,
Speaker 16: you name it.
Speaker 3: There she has a horrible, horrible, horrible.
Speaker 16: Record, which is why she's never been a particularly successful politician.
Speaker 16: Again for presidential bidwa and absolutely nowhere when the voters
Speaker 16: actually learn about Kamala Harris, and frankly that when they
Speaker 16: hear her open her mouth, because she's not exactly the
Speaker 16: most eloquent woman in the world. You know, when all
Speaker 16: of these things get exposed for the masses, the American
Speaker 16: people kind of cringe and try to look the other
Speaker 16: direction there. So again, it's going.
Speaker 3: To be close.
Speaker 16: America's elections typically these days are close. But I continue
Speaker 16: to think that Donald Trump is more likely than not
Speaker 16: to win this election.
Speaker 2: Yeah, look, fingers crossed, we're watching that polling closely now.
Speaker 3: Joe Biden has proposed.
Speaker 2: Sweeping reforms to the Supreme Court, including term limits and
Speaker 2: abiding binding code of conduct for its nine justices. Josh, look,
Speaker 2: let's be honest, Kamla Harris will do the exact same
Speaker 2: thing and declare.
Speaker 3: War on the Court. Why are they looking to undermine
Speaker 3: the rule of law.
Speaker 16: Well, Kamla Harris has actually already came out and said
Speaker 16: that she supports what Joe Biden's doing here. So they're
Speaker 16: basically attached at the hip those two, which, by the way,
Speaker 16: is kind of one of the problems of trying to
Speaker 16: run a presidential bid while you're the sitting vice president,
Speaker 16: because you can you can only be your own thinker.
Speaker 16: So much so they're very much on the same page here. Look,
Speaker 16: Joe Biden, first of all, is a galling hypocrite on this.
Speaker 16: You know, I wrote a column on this few years ago. Actually,
Speaker 16: Joe Biden rose to the floor of the United States
Speaker 16: Senate in two thousand and five to applaud the Senate
Speaker 16: Judiciary Democrats back in nineteen thirty seven who overwhelmingly rejected
Speaker 16: Democratic President FDR's infamous court packing the scheme back during
Speaker 16: the New Deal of the nineteen thirties. Joe Biden in
Speaker 16: two thousand and five was singing their praises for rejecting
Speaker 16: this idea that we would overthrow our established, inherited traditions
Speaker 16: and somehow tried to tried to run roughshot over a
Speaker 16: coordinate branch government. Here we are nineteen years later. He's
Speaker 16: mentally and physically deficient at this point, in the throes
Speaker 16: of a palpable senessence. And sure enough, at this point
Speaker 16: he has an empty vessel for the Democratic Party to
Speaker 16: just kind of project whatever they want onto him. So
Speaker 16: I'm not surprised that he comes out in favor of this,
Speaker 16: saying that he was dead, he would have been dedaposed
Speaker 16: to twenty years ago. Fortunately for Republicans. One, what Joe
Speaker 16: Biden's talking about is not popular. Two, more accurately, it's
Speaker 16: actually outright. So you cannot statutorily provide term limits for
Speaker 16: the justice because the Constitution very clearly provides an Article three,
Speaker 16: Section one, Clause one that justices shall serve quote during
Speaker 16: good behavior, which has been unanimously interpreted to mean life tenure.
Speaker 16: So to overrule that you need a constitutional amendment. You
Speaker 16: can't do a bi congressional statute. Same thing for this
Speaker 16: so called ethics proposal.
Speaker 1: There.
Speaker 16: You know, if you're trying to tell them when they
Speaker 16: can or cannot recuse themselves from cases, you can't do
Speaker 16: that either, because that's part of the quote judicial power,
Speaker 16: which Article three of the Constitutions speak. So these things
Speaker 16: are actually in the Constitution, you can't just pass a
Speaker 16: congressional statute to overrule it. Ultimately, what's going on here,
Speaker 16: I think, and this is really kind of the main
Speaker 16: thrust of the points here. What's ultimately going on here
Speaker 16: is that the left in America cannot stand the fact
Speaker 16: that the United States Supreme Court is maybe the only
Speaker 16: institution of major political, legal, cultural, or civilizational salients in
Speaker 16: this country that is not entirely controlled by the left.
Speaker 16: It is not a hard right court. It is a
Speaker 16: center right court, but it is not a left wing court.
Speaker 16: And for that reason, and that reason alone, left is
Speaker 16: trying to destroy it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's very clear. Good luck to them. I can't
Speaker 2: see this getting up. Josh Hammer, thank you so much
Speaker 2: for joining.
Speaker 3: Us on the show.
Speaker 16: Always a pleasure.
Speaker 13: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Still to come, we cross to the UK, where another
Speaker 2: Tory has thrown.
Speaker 3: Their hat in the ring for party leadership.
Speaker 2: And tensions between Israel and Lebanon are dangerously close to
Speaker 2: reaching boiling points. Joining me now from London is political
Speaker 2: correspondent for the Jewish Chronicle, Lauren bell Cross. Lauren, thank
Speaker 2: you so much for joining us. Let's start with UK politics.
Speaker 2: Six candidates have now put their hand up to become
Speaker 2: touring leader. Kemmy Badendock the latest. Now she's pledging a
Speaker 2: complete renewal of the party. How do you see this
Speaker 2: playing out? Who is actually in with a chance here?
Speaker 1: Well, thank you for having me.
Speaker 12: Yeah, as you say, there's six candidates, so Kevin Badnock
Speaker 12: I think is the bookmaker's faces. Other candidates also include
Speaker 12: James Cleverly, the former Foreign Secretary and Home Secretary Pretty
Speaker 12: Patel another for Home Secretary, Robert Jenrick, the former Immigration
Speaker 12: minister who resigned over the government's controversial Ruanda legislation he
Speaker 12: said it didn't go far enough, former Working Pension Secretary
Speaker 12: Nel Stride, and the former Security Minister Tom Tougan hat
Speaker 12: In terms of this is going to be quite a
Speaker 12: long contest, so they've got basically from now until the
Speaker 12: second of November to whittle down the candidates. I think
Speaker 12: by about October they're going to whittle it down to
Speaker 12: two candidates. We will then go through to the full
Speaker 12: ballot of Conservative Party members. But up until that point,
Speaker 12: it's up to the Parliamentary Party and there's around just
Speaker 12: over one hundred and twenty odd Conservative MPs still hanging
Speaker 12: around because of the scale of their defeat at the
Speaker 12: last general election, so it's going to be very interesting
Speaker 12: to see how those MP's Conservative MP's whittle it down
Speaker 12: and allow the members the final say. So, even though
Speaker 12: coming bad might be the favorite, it'll be interesting to
Speaker 12: see how much support she has within the co Conservative
Speaker 12: Parliamentary Party and whether she's going to be able to
Speaker 12: maintain that throughout going forward to eventually get to the members.
Speaker 2: And The BBC has been condemned for its reporting of
Speaker 2: the weekends deadly Hesbela rocket attack in the Golan Heights.
Speaker 3: The BBC's article about the attack was headlined eleven dead in.
Speaker 2: Rocket attack on Israeli occupied Golan Lauren. The headline, which
Speaker 2: was altered after a few hours, did not refer to Hesbela,
Speaker 2: the Druze community, or that.
Speaker 3: The rocket struck children playing football.
Speaker 2: Why is the BBC trying to conceal the key facts?
Speaker 12: I mean, I wish I could say it was just
Speaker 12: the BBC, but I think much of the international media's
Speaker 12: coverage of this horrific incident has just been absolutely outrageous.
Speaker 12: One news outlet described Hesbela as the partners of the
Speaker 12: level government rather than an Iranian proxy militia which is
Speaker 12: holding the country of Lebin and effectively hostage. It also
Speaker 12: went on to describe Israeli lust for vengeance. Similarly, the
Speaker 12: front page of the Washington Post had something like about
Speaker 12: a strike in southern Israel and Israel strikes Lebanon, rather
Speaker 12: than a depiction of what went on, which is a
Speaker 12: Hesbla missile killed twelve children playing football. I mean, it's
Speaker 12: absolutely scandalous. This is the same BBC that has refused
Speaker 12: to in the Parst cale hamas a terrorist organization, even
Speaker 12: though it is a prescribed terrorist organization by the UK government.
Speaker 12: I don't recall them having similar difficulties when it came
Speaker 12: to Isis for example. But I think you know, this
Speaker 12: is an ongoing issue and has been so since the
Speaker 12: seventh of October, and it's something that they've come in
Speaker 12: for a lot of criticism for.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and well deserved criticism as well. It's just extraordinary.
Speaker 2: And Lauren, since the attack by Hesblad the weakend, there
Speaker 2: are now real fears of a broad a conflict in
Speaker 2: the region.
Speaker 3: How do you say this playing out now?
Speaker 12: Well, the truth of the matter is what's gone hugely
Speaker 12: underreported in so much of the media coverage of the
Speaker 12: conflict in Israel is that effectively, since the seventh of October,
Speaker 12: Hezblah has been indiscriminately shelling Israel and the north of Israel.
Speaker 12: They're around an estimated sixty thousand people that have been
Speaker 12: displaced internally displaced within Israel because that it is not
Speaker 12: safe for them to live in their communities along the
Speaker 12: Lebanon border. And I think one has to ask oneself
Speaker 12: what country on Earth would tolerate a reality in which
Speaker 12: sixty thousand of their citizens had to be displaced because
Speaker 12: of rocket attacks from a terrorist organization. And this is
Speaker 12: the huge dynama. Of course, there is now questions about
Speaker 12: whether any kind of escalation is going to happen and
Speaker 12: what kind of response Israel is going to come up with,
Speaker 12: because I think a lot of you know, even a
Speaker 12: lot of the Druiz community are saying, why, you know,
Speaker 12: what are you going to do about this? You can't
Speaker 12: let this stand. So it's not just a question of
Speaker 12: Israel aggression. It's a lot of the Jewish community, sorry,
Speaker 12: a lot of the Druze community is demanding action on
Speaker 12: this what they see as a horrific well, what is
Speaker 12: a horrific killing of twelve children playing football by a
Speaker 12: terrorist organization.
Speaker 2: It's absolutely terrible. Now, I want to get your thoughts
Speaker 2: on this. A judo competitor representing Tajikistan in the Olympics
Speaker 2: has refused to shake his Israeli opponent's hand and instead said,
Speaker 2: aluakba Lauren. What happened to the spirit of the games
Speaker 2: being about good sportsmanship?
Speaker 12: Well, indeed, I think it's just absolutely wrong that this
Speaker 12: kind of thing happens and goes unpunished, although some have
Speaker 12: some commentators have said that he got what was described
Speaker 12: as calmo in the end because in a later fight
Speaker 12: against a Japanese contender he got absolutely slammed to the
Speaker 12: ground and dislocated his shoulder and started crying from the pain,
Speaker 12: which you know wouldn't wish on anyone. But some commentators said, well,
Speaker 12: you know, that's your karma for your unsportmanly conduct in
Speaker 12: an earlier round against an Israelikan sender.
Speaker 3: Now let's talk about the US now.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump has called Karmala Harris's statement on the Gaza
Speaker 2: war disrespectful.
Speaker 3: Of course, the Vice.
Speaker 2: President marked a very change of tone on the war
Speaker 2: last week. She declared she would not be silent about Palestinians,
Speaker 2: but also announced a ceasefire with droll plan. Lauren Trump
Speaker 2: has said, I don't know how a person who is
Speaker 2: Jewish could actually vote for her. But what does Middle
Speaker 2: East policy look like under a possible Karmala Harris presidency?
Speaker 12: Do you think I can't see it being hugely different
Speaker 12: to the similar approach undertake approach is taken by Biseruro
Speaker 12: or Obama, so broadly supportive of Israel, but with frustrations
Speaker 12: and clashes with Israel's Prime minister in particular when it
Speaker 12: comes to Iran. So I think Iran is going to
Speaker 12: be the big issue which is going to be a
Speaker 12: big stick and point of contention between Israel and a
Speaker 12: potential Harris presidency. I think a lot of Israelis across
Speaker 12: the political spectrum, that is, don't think the Democrats get
Speaker 12: the issue and get how much of a security threat
Speaker 12: Iran is to Israel, both in terms of its role
Speaker 12: destabilizing the wider Middle East, supporting groups like Bahuthis, various
Speaker 12: militias in Iraq and Hez Belauri Lebanon, this kind of
Speaker 12: what's called the Shea Crescent across the Middle East of
Speaker 12: just destabilizing existing regimes there and so in chaos. And
Speaker 12: of course you've now got the added complication that they've
Speaker 12: apparently on the break of getting a nuclear weapon or
Speaker 12: capacity for the weapons, which is going to add some
Speaker 12: tensions to an already pretty tense region.
Speaker 2: Very concerning in Dave, Lauren bell Cross. We have to lay,
Speaker 2: but they really appreciate your time. Thank you so much
Speaker 2: for joining.
Speaker 12: Us, Thank you for having me.
Speaker 3: That's it from me. Up next is News Night, Good Night,