WEBVTT - ‘EELS FANS CAN HAVE A GO. I DON'T CARE!’: Bulldog slams Parramatta performance | ROUND 17 REVIEW

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, welcome back everyone to another edition of the Code

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>NRL Monday Podcast. You're in luck. It's going to be

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>me Alex also known as NRL Soapbock, going up against

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the Great Bulldog Dean Richie. How are you, mate, Champion.

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm well, I'm doing well. Yeah. They've cleared the room.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>No one else is in here, so we can go

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>right at it. There's been some huge talking points from

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. We're going to break down some of the

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>key results from the past round of NRL games, but

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got to talk about Origin Bulldog. What did you

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>make of Lori Daily's selections.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I liked it. I like the side. It's a

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 2>good looking team. I mean it's out there already, but

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean we've got Critter back. We'll just run through

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a couple. Yeah, Crichton's back, Bradman Best is in the side.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I was a little surprised Mitch Moses is there. I

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>thought you might have gone with Ethan Strange. I like

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the selection of Leam Martin. I think you'll go after Munster.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I love Hamoli being back. A bit surprised. I thought

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe Robson might have gone out and a Happy might

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>have stayed in fifty to fifty call, and of course

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Lucas is the other one to get the chop.

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Kohla goes back to the bench. Catoni Stags has

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>been dropped. Good looking team. I think they're trying to

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 2>score more points, but I do like.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>The credit selections.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you'll tightened up that right side where Queensland

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 2>went through. Obviously their left side down there in Melbourne

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 2>with considerable.

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Ease, so there's some reasonable decisions there. What do you

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>think about the controversial one of dropping Brian's tough call.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I think business form has been modest this year given

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 2>the level of expectation that we.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Have of Brian.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 2>He's played seventeen Origin games over the past five years,

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>so he's well established State of Origin player. But I

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>think in the air he's been caught out a few

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>times this year. It's funny it hasn't happened in the past,

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>but it seems of read up this year. So I

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>think Laurie's looking for a bit of size and the

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>wing hence Jack Bosstock one hundred and ninety four sims

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and that might well nullify the attacking bombs which went

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 2>to that edge last time an feel himself to be unlucky.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, a lot of people are already bagging the side.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>It's typical New South Wales. Let's tear each other down

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>straight away. That's just what we do down here. But

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, people demanded changes after Melbourne. They want to

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>change after Melbourne. Laurie makes five changes and what do

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 2>they do. They start winging and moaning again. You just

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>cannot win, all right, Bulldock. So I'm on your side

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 2>on the top o selection, right.

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's obviously probably one of the best wingers

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we've ever seen for New South Wales. He's been a

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>great servant for the game, but in this series he's

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>been the fifth best winger. Like he hasn't overperformed. In

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Game one he absolutely had a shocker. But when you

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>were great, you get the opportunity to come back and

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>look up and redeem what you've done. He was good,

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>he led meters and all that kind of stuff from yardage,

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't brilliant and he hasn't been brilliant in

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the season. So I can defend Laurie's decision there on. Hey,

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going for a different strategy obviously, Billy's trying to

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>exploit Toto's height in the air, So putting bosstoc In

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>makes sense where fans are still like and this is

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>where I feel like. I know you think that News

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>of Ours fans just rip in. We only rip in

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>when we're passionate before we go on.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's got a different side.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Everyone thinks that their team should be the one picked

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>next year. Guess what, he's got a different side as well.

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>But then it's not even a civilized debate.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It just turns to abuse.

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 3>And that's what annoying.

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>This is what pisses me off. Bull I'm trying to

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>find abuse. I'm trying to find abuse of Lorie Daily.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell me who's abused him.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I've just got on the Facebook the first coming I

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>sees that team. I mean, that's constructive, isn't it? And

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 2>what a crap side this is? I mean, what do

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>people want?

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Please tell me? But I don't tell me what do

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>they want?

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'll tell you without a doubt, this is what

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales fans want. They want Cam Murray to

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>start at Lock. That I reckon happened. Yeah, that's what

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I've heard. I've heard. I think of Maddie John's I

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>was listening all the way in said he reckons. It's

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a certainty that Daily's playing playing Ducks and Drakes and

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that Murray's going to start. So if that happens, I'm

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty happy with the team. Like I feel god bit.

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 2>A new South Wales fan that's actually going to support

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the Blue.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I still want some justice for homoli Ola Kawatu, but

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>if we have Cam Murray at Lock, I do think

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>this sets up the new South Wales team to actually

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>look good. But I still think but I want to

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>press you on this. Facebook commanders don't count because we

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>know that they're the sk society.

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I get that, but they are still the fans. Yeah yeah,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 2>we ignore and turn our back on the fans. Yeah,

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 2>they're the lifeblood of the game. So I mean, I

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>just wish it could be a little bit more constructive.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 3>But look, I.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Said, there's a couple of weeks now it's getting very boring.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 2>But I must say, overall, Sophie, it's a good looking side.

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 3>I like Bradman best.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, he's strong, he's fast, he's been there before, he

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 2>is Aaron. Four twenty four we won the series up

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>there at ton Corpyn.

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 3>The decider.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 2>He's called a crucial try that night from memory. So look,

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 2>it's a totally different set of commodation. But I like

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 2>both of them.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind Bradman best. Do you think Tom Traboy,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>which is unlucky to not get that spot based on

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the ration now, being that Bradman's a proven winner two, I.

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't have picked Tom myself. I'm a massive fan of Tom.

0:04:58.240 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>We all are.

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 2>No one mislikes Tom Tramoy on or off the field.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I just think he still needs a couple more weeks.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say it looks a bit timid, but I

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 2>just think he needs to find a bit more confidence Tom.

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 2>And even Tom said himself last week, I'm probably not

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 2>ready for this just yet. So look, whether he was

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>considered I don't know, more than likely was. I guess

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the other one who might need himself a bit unlucky

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>was Victor the inflictor. Yeah, made an impact in game

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>one game two. Perhaps he's disciplined. Let him down a

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit. He's now become twentieth man, so he won't play.

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>So my I read on this pack that Laurie it

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>does feel like Laurie in the past was oscillating between

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>am I going to choose agile forwards or am I

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>going to choose a big pack. It feels like this

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>time he's decided I just want the big boys. Is

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that the right call?

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, We've got to go to war.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah stuff, everybody, Yeah, yeah, stuff, everybody.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to war, no holds barred.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's rip in when I say New South Wales we're

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>fierce underdogs.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 3>No one gives us a chance.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>This has got.

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Classic Airbush written all over it.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 2>And I am out of the utmost confidence that we

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>will go up there and that game, you know what,

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>because no one expects us to and the players have

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 2>had a gupful of the criticism, Laurie's had a gupful

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>of the criticism. I think it's going to be screw

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the everybody. We're going to go up there and we

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.679
<v Speaker 2>are going to go hell for leather from the start.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Will play eyes up footy and if it's on, it's on,

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>bring it on. The Blues are ready.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, I can see that happening if Cam Murray starts

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>at Lock. Otherwise I think Billy's got the game plan

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>sorted if he owes at Lock. So I am hoping

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that Laurie hasn't been deceptive yet, maybe he's maybe he's

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 1>playing us all and I really want that because Murray

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at Locke would make them really strong over to Queensland.

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to make many changes when you're winning,

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>you're sweet. What do you make of that? The couple

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of changes they made. I think Carrigan's back in.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Pat Carrigan's back in Jeremiah and I was there, and

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Corey Hallsborough is the new twentieth man. Lindsay

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Collins unavailable through concussion. Look, Pat Carrigan wasn't supposed to

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 2>come back. You will still supposed to be injured and unavailable,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 2>but he's come back a bit early, don't look. Clearly

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>he brings a bit of mongols to that coeens Land side.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.039
<v Speaker 2>So look, they're not major adjustments that didn't need to

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>They won by forty odd points in Melbourne or yeh,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>they scored forty so yeah, but.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 3>It's a good looking Queensland side.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Reece Woltz back in there as the eight eighth man,

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 2>so you know whether he gets the run or not.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, you look at the side.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 2>It's in front of me here, so biponger, cobo hammer

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>for feeder, monster walker.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 3>They've got points, yep, they've got points.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>They play eyes up footy and they're a pleasure to

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 2>watch when they're in full flight if you're a Queensland and.

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're a Queenslander, that's right. Where do you think

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales break this team down? It's a good question.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>We going to certainly tidy up that right hand side,

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>which we've done last time. I think our ford is

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be more aggressive. I think we've got to

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>be more physical. I think New South Wales have got

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>to take a little bit away from what Queensland did

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 2>where Harry goes down the short side, Munster throws overhead passes.

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Just things are a little bit out of the box,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 2>out of the square.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Just playing.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Constructed footy where you complete your sets, get to your kick.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I know that that's going to win. We need to

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 3>come in that process.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I think we need to score twenty to twenty five points. Yeah,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have any che of winning this guard

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales. I've got to be more chaotic in

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 2>their attack. They've got to be a bit more spontaneous.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's two things they must do, and

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm nervous this should work. If you're picking big boys,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 2>big boys in the pack, this is what should happen.

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>They should be slowing down the ruck. I think Queens

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and have been taking advantage of the liberal application of

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that the ruck biastic client. They've been taking advantage of it,

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and we've been playing too studiously and diligently. We've just

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>got to slow that ruck down a little bit because

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not getting the opportunity for those eyes up plays.

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Here's my question, how many minutes should Reese Robson play

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>compared to Blake Brawley.

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Good question.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I'd say probably play the first thirty yeah, roughly, Yeah,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and i'd have that same time frame for Liam Martin

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 2>on the inside knowledge there. Look, Robson might come back

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 2>later on, but certainly Bradley gives us some creativity.

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 2>I think Reese has probably been just pulled back a

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 2>little bit in that area, as I said at the

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>start of the show. So that's why I would have

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Happy there. Yeah, because happy he does. Yeah, yeah, he's

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>greatly says. But I think Brayley can do that.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I think if New South Wales get Brayley on, I

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>think a huge criticism from last game was not having

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>upy on at all. If we can get Brayley on,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>then there's a really great opportunity to actually do something

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>dynamic in attack and take advantage of a slower rouxpeed

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and do something. So Reese Robson, I'm with you. I

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>would think twenty to thirty and then let's see what

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Brayley can do.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Nathan's interesting too when you think about it, Like he

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 2>was good in the second half of Sydney.

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it wasn't great in Melbourne and in fact, pretty

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>order was it. Let's be honest. Yeah, he missed eleven tackles.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Even his self approval at full time was that he

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 2>was embarrassed. I don't think Nathan Cleary could possibly play

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 2>any worse. Yeah, So you get the feeling that Nathan

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 2>is ready to go to another level.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a great contest mate.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>And Mitchell moses another one. You know, he's been not

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 2>criticized but questioned around He spot Laurie's showing faith there.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 3>I think Mitchell probably owes Laurie a little bit as well.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am skeptical. I think Strange is built for it.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how strange gets on the field, if

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>with the bench that Laurie has, so I hope that

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Mitch's bit ready. He did not put in a good

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>audition on the weekend Bulldog. I think a lot of

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>fans are thinking, I was pool, what's going on while

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we chosen Mitch when he really did have a rough game.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that Laurie is stuck with Mitch

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>more Well, I think you're.

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Going to break it down so by and look, sometimes

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>one game before in Origin shouldn't be the defining factor

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>in whether you're picked. If you're an elite player who's

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 2>been at the top of your game for what Mitchell

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 2>moses seven, eight, nine years now, I don't think one

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>game should be the contributing factor, as do whether you

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 2>play or not.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he does, but it was a poor game. Yeah,

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't played the issue. He just hasn't played.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just that correct, he hadn't had a

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>couple It's like he hasn't played any games and the

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>game that he's had back at Clubland was.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Pretty defensively, he was poor.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Well, mate, it could be it could be a great contest.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I really hope. I generally feel like news should be.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You're going to disagree with this, but we should be

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>buoying if Murray plays lock. If not, I think we're

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>very vulnerable. Let's we our attention to the weekend's results.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>The Parameter Eels will once again stumble and falter in

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a pretty abysmal performance. I think it was in their

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>second I think it was their second half completion rate

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight percent? Bulldog. What's happening with Paramount?

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, so here we go again, isn't it.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I hate to bring up Paramuna because every time I

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 2>bagged them, I get absolutely lynched and condemned all in

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the one motion. But look they were poor again. Look

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>they've had a lot of injuries. But I can't just

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 2>continue to use that as an excuse. This is now

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 2>forty years. We are being told every year that something

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>different is going to happen. Nothing's happening. They've won five

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>from fifteen. Yeah, they're not playing finals footy again. No,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 2>they're gone, They're gone, they're running. I mean it's second

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>last Jason Rawles era.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Again. I've questioned it before I got held down. We're

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 3>back to where we were again last year.

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>They're not playing finals footy I'm repeating myself, you know

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>why because of.

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 3>The fact, and it's something that paramount of fans cannot.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Expl PARA furious, aren't they? Yeah, and they should be

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely furious, like why is this team continually underperforming? When

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I've analyzed it, I think the key area is, yes,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you can say injuries, but it also reflects what they

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>on with their recruitment. They keep missing out on great players.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Bronson Cherry was in the in the market for them

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to them. They can't sign great talent. Their

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>only marquee talent right now is Mitch Moses. To be

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>any sort of competitive team, you need at least three

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.719
<v Speaker 1>marquee players. So as much as the we should be

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>asking question marks about the Paramatter performance the Jason Rowles

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is coaching, there needs to be much more scrutiny on

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>Paramatter's recruitment.

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you're right, one hundred percent. It's it's a how

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 2>would I describe their roster without being held down? It's

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 2>above average, but it's not elite.

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Isn't It's now where your elite?

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 2>You look at that side and you think they're not

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 2>playing Vinyls footy, and you're right with the Marque players

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>they need another one or two. But it's a bit

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>of a vicious cycle. We go to Paramata when you're

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna go to a side that struggling every year.

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 3>But look it's a tough one.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 2>But look they've got a multitude of problems out there

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>at Paramatta and at the moment, we're just going to

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>be on this rotating cycle where we just soon to

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 2>be let down every single year and Parafans can get

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the ships if they want. I don't really care, because

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>they'd be the one to jump out now, not me.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they do have the shits. I mean, they're

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>still gonna have the shits at you, bulldog, but they

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the team is underperforming. The only promising side is there

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is some exciting youth coming through, but they still haven't

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>shown themselves to be excellent first graders yet. And I

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>know it takes time, but Paramounta just look like a

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>team that, like you, should be doing better. And there

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>were times where they actually play fantastically. They follow the

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>coach's game plan, they're disciplined in the defense, they're exciting

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in attack, but they are not consistent enough. So I

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>generally think they've just got to get some star power.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they do it.

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 3>We'll move on all positive. I thought they were really good.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 3>We won't go too much of that match because a

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 3>few days ago now, but I thought that well.

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that Sour Sydney are one of only four

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 2>or five that can really win this Premiership. You throw

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Latrol back into that side, yeah, maybe you throw Jack

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Whitten back into that side.

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>You've got a bloody good football side.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And I think Jack Watten's are missing piece in

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that puzzle for them. He really brings a steadiness in

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>their defense, so they do have a chance. I've actually

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>tipped them though, to be the team that falls out.

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know South. Things injuries just come for them

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like no other team. But they were looking fantastic on

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, and Cody Walker absolutely stood up Mitch Moses.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So South fans can feel much more encouraged this time

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>last year to compared to this time last year, whereas

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Paramatta fans find themselves in the same agonizing position. Let's

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>move on to the Titans Bulldogs game. The Bulldogs are

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>finally scoring some tries. A lot of people are saying

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it's because of that movement in the spine with Stephen

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Crichton going into five eight, which most people think is

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>actually just playing like a halfback. They're looking excited, they're

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>scoring tries, they're breaking down. There's still the short ball

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to a second roller to break the line, but at

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>least they're looking to score points. What did you make

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Bulldogs?

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Mate? They were good again Again, I'm not convinced.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>When I look at Camry, I don't see a side

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 2>that's going to threaten the premiership. Yeah, I don't see

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 2>a side that's going to make the top four. I

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>think there's still four points outside of the top layes.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>That's sound about right. Yeah, they're still a long way

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 2>to go to it. I said it the other day, Sophi,

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and I'll say it again. Apart from that Round six

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 2>game against Penrith, I'm still for a statement victory where

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I go, holy moly, Yeah, this team is actually a

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>fairly side. Yeah, I'm not seeing it. No, he mainly

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say they were lucky.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>They were lucky.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 2>All went their way and yeah they're winning games and

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 2>that's all you can ask. Yeah, that's still not seeing

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>a side that I think can compete with the elite.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, well let me throw this theory at you.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think the Bulldog's attack has ever been

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that good. To be honest, I think they've actually provided

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves on being a defense first team. So here's what

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I was doing a bit of study of, like, how

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>have the Bulldogs started to get some form because they're

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>now four from five? How have they done that? Well?

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>What I reckon there's a key change in how the

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>officiating's been executed and the Bulldog's success. So get this

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>stat for your Bulldog. Set restarts for the Bulldogs that

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they've conceded is down fifty percent in their last five

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>games compared to the first ten of the season, and

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>down thirty percent for penalties conceded. So the point I'm

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to make here is that the Bulldogs, when the

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>game was chaotic and there were so many set restarts

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they pride themselves in defense, they couldn't actually execute that.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So now that the game's a little slower, they can

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>control them momentum a little more. I think that's why

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>they're winning. And it's to your point. I'm actually backing

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>up your point here. Their attack still isn't going to

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>win them games. It's only going to be their defense.

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So my question to you is, though, if the game

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is and we're seeing this across the board fewer set restarts,

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>if there's going to be fewer set restarts, doesn't that

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that the Bulldogs are a really good chance of

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>making the eight because they can defend.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, they're a good side. Cameron Cirello is a defensive coach.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>You're right with what you say, but that's Ciro's hallmarks

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 2>that he is a defensive coach.

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>But that's not going to get to there.

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think, yeah, you need points to points.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that sounds very simplicity thing to say,

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>but the way they're attacking, yes, it's all right. Critic

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>has made a bit of a difference. I think a

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 2>lucky Galvin has been good. He's taking them all line.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought he's trying desperately hard. But there's just something

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 2>about the Dogs I just can't warm to.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 3>And I don't mean that.

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>In a because I hate them bulldog, just say it.

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 3>What's my nickname?

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? For that reason?

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, But look, as I said, I need to up

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the big wins over a bit of scalps and some

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 2>really comprehensive fast footing up tempo upbeat, eyes up and

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll go you know what, this side is now serious.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Footage fair enough for Bulldogs fans will be upset about that.

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth worthy of respect to get four

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>from five. Do think the defense is going to help

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>them out and that they they're probably not the team

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to make the eight, but at least they're playing better

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>footed than they've been playing. So there's a hope for

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you Bulldogs fans. Onto the Broncos and the Roosters. And

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>have you ever seen a Premier defense go like this?

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>They are playing terribly. They're now onto seven losses in

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a row. This is this going to be? Is this

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the worst title defense you've ever seen? Bulldogs?

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I've called it insipid, insipid, and I will stick with insipid.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a good word.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like a mate, and.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 2>It's been Yeah, it's been soulless. Effort areas have been poor.

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Does bring me to ask the question they won the

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 2>comp last year, rightly, so they were the best side

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 2>in the finals, but they weren't the best side through

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>that whole year. Yeah, So yeah, as premiers, they've got

0:17:58.720 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the right to be premiers.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 3>They want the final, But were they Worthy Premiers.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, mate, no okay, no no, no, no, no no no.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a mac and I'm a Michael McGuire apologist. I

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>thought it was bullshit how much heat he copped three

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>rounds into the season when they lost their first three games.

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Winners win, If you win, you get respect, and I

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like he got anywhere near the same amount

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of respect that anyone else did. I honestly feel like

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that season ended, the new season started and Ricky Stewart

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>had more respect than Michael McGuire. And Ricky Stewart's team

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>has absolutely plummeted it down the table as well. When

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>you win, I think I genuinely believe that means you

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>secure your position for two more years now. Absolutely, this

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>year it's been terrible. They've played badly, but there has

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>been significant disruptions. We've had the painhas story, We've had

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Ben TiO leaving, We've had a bunch of injuries. There's

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly been reasons why the team hasn't performed that well.

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But on the same level, insipid is the right word.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>You cannot lose The Brisbane Broncos should never lose seven

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>games in a row. So what is going on is

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the rumor or the theory or the hypothesis is the

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>players are off Madge. But I just feel like that's

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>too convenient. It just feeds into the convenient narrative that's

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>been around him.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Look, it seems to have been doue from the start

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>with what you said with Pain, Betty.

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 3>They lost the World Club Challenge, but.

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 2>It seemed to be that the rumor mill, whether it

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 2>be right or wrong, was in full swing against Madge.

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 3>From the very start. And I'm thinking, hang on, what

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 3>am I missing here?

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 2>That's just won a premiership. Even to this point now

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>people are saying will he be there next year? Well,

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 2>of course he'll be there next year, killing me that

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 2>he won a cop last year. Since when does an

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 2>incumbent premiership winning coach have his credentials? What eight months

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.479
<v Speaker 2>in the following year. He'll be there next year. I've

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 2>got absolutely no doubt. But look, things are going wrong

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>up there. Look Pain, I don't think what's to be there.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 2>Let's be honest. Renold's retiring, They've resigned Ben Hunt at

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>an age. Yeah, they've signed Dame gay Guy at an age. Look,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not inside those four walls. I don't know whether

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 2>morale is down or not. I think though it's an

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 2>easy outclause for the media myself included to go back

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 2>to the cliche of Madges lost the dressing room. It's

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 2>because it's what's happened at Souse and the Tigers, and

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 2>we're going at all those places. It's just an easy

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 2>excuse to go, what's wrong with the broncos he's.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Lost happen but we don't know.

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just a cliche and I'm not saying it's wrong, no, sure,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 2>But what I am saying is we don't know whether

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 2>that's the case, and if you believe Madge, it's bollocks.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and winners get respect. So the other part of

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the narrative that's not being talked about is Madge keeps

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>winning premiership. So he's obviously a very good coach. And

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually feel for pay haas I think he's the

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>only player truly trying, Like, of course every pro gets

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on there and they're trying to win for their team,

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but he's the only player who's actually looking dominant, looking

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like I'm going to carry this team. But you can't

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just have one player. They just look cooked. It's disappointing.

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>And and at this point though, even though it's offended

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Madge a lot, there should be scrutiny. You shouldn't lose

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>seven games and fans will say, oh they've had injuries,

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>not seven games in a row. A lot of losses

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>had injuries.

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you another bloke strugglers is Walshy. He's been poor.

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Some of these effort areas again of the weekend were

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>just average.

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Now I don't know what's happening there.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Eight He was the the Pinup Boys League last year,

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 2>went on the Kangaroo to a pinup boy there.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just been a full It's a four from Grace.

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's be honest to you. I know he's still in

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 3>the Queensland side.

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So he's not the champion player. He's still a brilliant player.

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 2>I just think there's something wrong with Roes Walsh at

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos. It's just not putting into the levels that

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 2>he did last year.

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so, I and he was very much one of

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the key reasons that they did that massive run to

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>make the finals. So they've got to fix something the

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Broncos because it's just not working and there absolutely should

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>be getting criticized for it. So there's one key topic.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to Bulldog on this episode on

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the fans and just getting a bit of

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>an insight into rugby league and the machinations behind the scenes.

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But before we do that, just a quick recap of

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>some amazing results. The Cowboys have upset the Panthers. They

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>did it for JT. It was amazing. Well done to

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. They're a team that could very much make

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it into the eight. That should be some question marks

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>asked for the Panthers losing the Titans and the Cowboys.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>We can I can celebrate as a Manly fan that

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we absolutely monstered the Melbourne Storm. No bias here, that's

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>just what happened. They were absolutely monstered. And you haven't

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly I don't mind, man. Guess what, Manly hates you too.

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 1>And then we won't even talk about the Raiders Dragons

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Knights Tigers because they were two pretty poor games filled

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for Dragons fans. Mate, God, I've got to win.

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 3>That's a bit out lucky actually won that game. But

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 3>that's what happens when you're running last yep, I think

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 3>goes your way.

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, Bulldog, I want to I want to talk

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to you, So I've been told to sit straight. Okay,

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.959
<v Speaker 1>So Bulldog, I want to talk to you about a

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>story that broke this week that you were connected to

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago. So we've it's now been reported

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that Bronson Cherry has signed a three year deal with

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Melbourne Storm commiserations to paramatter. I know that they

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have put their hand up and really wanted to sign him.

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>The reason what I wanted to talk to you about

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this is that, and I think fans will be really

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>interested in how this all works. So about three months ago,

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you broke a story that Bronson Cherry was on his

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>way out or exploring his options, he'd been dropped and

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was looking at new clubs. And then that was immediately

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>denied by Phil Gould, who is the general manager for

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>football at the Bulldogs. And I put up a post

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of like someone here is telling Fibbs. I don't know who,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but it can only be one story or the other.

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Either Cherry's leaving and Gus is telling Fibbs, or he's

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not and Bulldogs telling fibbs, or he's had a bad male.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>When that story broke, it was very much denied. Now

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>three months later something was clearly right because Ronson Cherry's

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not only been signed for three years with a Storm,

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>but he's about he may even move on before June thirty.

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>When a storyline that breaks, you report it, it gets denied.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I think fans will be really interested to know what happens,

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like what happens with how clubs or players kind of

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>obfuscate the truth in these kind of stories.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Good question. How do I answer that one? Okay, let

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 2>me start from the beginning. To be fair, Cameron Cirello

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 2>didn't deny the story.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Cam Cerrello, it's not true.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Cam did go public and I spoke to Camp privately,

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 2>and he knew the story was right. So in Cameron's

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Ralo's defense, he did come out and say, look, Bronson

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been good, he's got challenges ahead. He might not

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 2>have said he wanted to leave, but he dodged around

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 2>it and to make the story almost well confirm. Look,

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I knew the story was right. It came from sources

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 2>that were spot on, and I wouldn't have gone to

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 2>print with it if I knew it was wrong. It's

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 2>too much to damage your reputation of a reputation that is.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 2>But look it happens all the time clubs Tonight. You

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>have to stand by your story. What can happen, though, SAPE,

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 2>is that you can write a story and then it

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 2>can change four hours later, and then they go the

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 2>story is never right. You know that story was right,

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>but it might change. I knew Bronson was unsettled. I

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 2>knew he wanted to go. He was talking to people

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 2>who were talking straight to me. So it was a

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 2>simple equation of just writing it. His camp wanted me

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to write the story, so it was coming inadvertently through

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 2>a third party by Bronson wanted it written. Yeah, so

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 2>I knew that it was sweet to run with it,

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 2>and as soon as Gus and ied it, I thought

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 2>fair enough not worries. So Gus got involved talk Bronson

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 2>out of leaving, and he stayed. But you knew straightaway

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>that there was major problems there, and even a month

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 2>after that he still wanted to leave. Yeah, but it

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 2>got talked down a bit, and then Bronson did get

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 2>picked again and seemed to be happy.

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Now it's sort of all gone.

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>So why doesn't like Why doesn't Agenda like you when

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you get that denial, But you know you've got good mail.

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember you going back again at Gus. What's

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the what happens now?

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember. I didn't, but I normally would. I'd

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 2>always stand by my story. If that's family a story,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you're not a good journal Yeah. So, okay, I think

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 2>I was on radio saying okay, it was right. I

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 2>think I was on TV. I can't remember exactly I say,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 2>but I'm sure I wouldn't have.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I would have.

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Rather sure, There's no way I just cowed how if

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I knew the story was right. So look, in the end,

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>it was always right. It was always going to be right.

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps it came a little bit later than what we thought,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 2>but Bronson's on the move and certainly with him next year.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>And Jermaina Sarka Melbourne suddenly got a lot of strikeout.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, I can't believe the Dolphins have let Thesako go.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious though, so it's a great signing for the storm,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but they were also it's been reported that their shoulders

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>they've tapped on the shoulder Jack Howorth that he can

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>look for other options. Is this a worthy exchange? Like,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't how with a great center? Why bring him?

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 2>A bit surprised because how if only last he was

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 2>being talked about as a possible stack for orogin player.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 2>So look, I'm a little bit surprised, but look, maybe

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that's the brilliance of Craig Bellamy. He keeps rotating that

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 2>roster year on year and no one gets stale. I'm

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>a bit surprised, but cherry for howarth I can live

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 2>with that?

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Were you go? Well, well, don Bulldog, I thought you

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>might have been telling FIBs about the cherry story, but

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>you were right mate, Thanks so much for tuning in.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Folks won't say go manly because this isn't my podcast.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll just say that there's been a great great to

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have you with us year, and we'll see you next week.