WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 23 October

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>On scolds Australia.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 2>This is the Reader Panalty Show.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panney Show.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Coming up tonight, Melbourne labeled cold, broke and a terrible

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 4>place to invest.

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 3>I'll speak to Nick Kata about that.

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Shortly, Professor Ian Plymer on Matt Keane's latest.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Claims about nuclear energy.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 4>We'll also have the latest from the US with Army Horowitz,

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 4>including just how much more the Democrats are spending than

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 4>the Trump campaign and later in the hour he is

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 4>an absolute gem. We're thrilled to have Alex Epstein. He

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 4>had to fact check some of the boldest lies told

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 4>by mitzero activists and of course left he's losing it.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 5>What's more dangerous? Straight white conservative men or axe murderers?

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 3>A straight white conservative man?

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Why is he more dangerous?

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Because they're capable of doing anything.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 3>They're crazy.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 5>We'll make them crazy.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>They're wait.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 4>But first, King Charles and Queen Camilla's royal to where

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 4>of Australia has come to an end.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>They farewelled Sydney this morning.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 4>Crowds have flocked to us see the royal couple during

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 4>their visits to Canberra and Sydney. During their final full

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 4>day in Australia, the King and Queen took part in

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 4>a community barbecue in Parramatta before heading over to the

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 4>Sydney Opera House, where they were greeted by hundreds of fans.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 3>They observed a military display around Sydney.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Harbor, and after being on her feet for almost the

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 4>entire day, Queen Camilla was seen carrying her heels as

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 4>she returned to Admiralty House barefoot. You've got to love that.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 4>She should have stayed on for the Melbourne Cup. That's

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 4>what all the ladies do there. The visit, as we know,

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>was not without controversy. We'll discuss Lydia Thorpe a little

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 4>more later, but there was also that damage, and there

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 4>has been a development there with a man being charged

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 4>with malicious damage after Sydney's iconic Queen Victoria statue was

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 4>defaced with red pain.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's get a senior fellow.

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 4>At the Menzies Research Center, Nick Kater, into her discuss

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the latest news of the day.

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Nick.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Lydia Thorpe did certainly still many of the headlines during

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 4>this royal tour. What were your feelings about King Charles

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 4>and Queen Kimilla.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 6>I was smitten. I have to say, Rita, I was

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 6>in the crowd on Sunday looking at them from a

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 6>great distance. As close as I got. I didn't get

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 6>to meet the King or the Queen, but look, I

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 6>think it was terrific they were here. I mean for

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 6>those of us. In fact, I guess almost everybody who's

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 6>watching this program would only have known one monarch, and

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 6>that was Queen Elizabeth. And we all were nervous about

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 6>the transition of power, how that would go, because we've

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 6>never seen it before, but it's gone seamlessly. And to

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 6>have King here, the King here, was just to put

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 6>the stamp on that. So I'm very much grateful that

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 6>his Majesty came. And you're hearing from a convinced royalist.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 6>Jim mononkis chair, Rita, So I'm afraid that's about the

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 6>best I can say.

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, I'm interested in your thoughts on Senator Lydia

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Thorpe because her antics are still being debated and criticized,

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 4>as I her demands, because it wasn't just a stunt.

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 4>She does have a list.

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Of demands she once met.

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 4>And she has been criticized for being an enthusiastic participant

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 4>a beneficiary of the system she claims to hate. And

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 4>not only is she senator in the Australian Parliament on

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 4>her healthy salary, fantastic benefits, but she's also a regular

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 4>nick in the ultra exclusive quantus Chairman's Lounge. Now, how

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 4>does she reconcile that with her thoughts on Australia.

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 6>Well, you've got to remember, Rita that the Chairman's Club

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 6>always was and always will be ourboriginal land, sovereignty, never

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 6>seed it. So it's actually lucky that she.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 7>Lets the rest of us in it.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 6>Course. But look, I mean, I'm really astounded that the

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 6>Senate cannot get together and vote her out because she

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 6>did take a loyal oath when she came into office,

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 6>all bit through gritted teeth, to the Sovereign, to the Crown,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 6>and she's clearly disobeyed that and clearly shown that she

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 6>didn't mean that one inch by her outrageous behavior on

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 6>the in this week. I mean, this very unkempt, unprincipled

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 6>woman stands up and starts screaming senities at the King,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 6>and she is a member of our Parliament. I'm embarrassed

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 6>by that, quite frankly, and I think the Senate. I'm

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 6>surprised that the Senate doesn't seem to think it's got

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 6>the powers to actually get her out or make her

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 6>accountable for that, because they should.

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 4>I know she's got plenty of criticism, and rightly so,

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 4>but I do think she will see this week as

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 4>a win. She has had enormous coverage overseas, particularly in

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 4>the British media, and there'll be plenty of Republicans here

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 4>who might quietly agree with some of her points, which

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 4>tells you more about them. I guess now I'm going

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 4>to play some painful footage. Painful for Victorians.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Nick.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 4>Here are some folk in Glasgow telling Harold Sun reporter

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 4>knew he just how happy they are that long suffering

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 4>Victorian taxpayers are paying for their Commonwealth games.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 6>We've been executive the opportunity and how to develop the

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 6>people testity.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, together, it's give them the place a little buzz here.

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm really exciting to have something actually in Scotland than

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 4>something to travel elsewhere.

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very good for the city. Most of

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 2>that quet number of people about to visit the city.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty bringing for an income.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm sure it'll be great for them.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure it'll be fantastic to have all the tourists

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 4>and the locals enjoying the Commonwealth.

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Games that we've paid for.

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Victorians have played around six hundred million in total, and

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 4>around two hundred million of that going to Glasgow to

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 4>actually hold the games.

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 3>The state's not in a good place, Nick.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 6>No, it's not, you said the introduction of the show's

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 6>cold and broke and unbankable, and it's certainly cold. I

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 6>always find it cold, and I was either whether not

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 6>being too kind you down there at the moment. And

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 6>it's got one hundred and fifty six billion dollars state

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 6>debt and that's going to rise to almost one hundred

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 6>and ninety billion by twenty twenty eight. And no wonder

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 6>because they keep throwing money around like confetti and then

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 6>end up you know, oh they decided they didn't want

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 6>the games after all, but they've still got to pay

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 6>money to Scotland. It's disgraceful. And you know, Dan Andrews

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 6>is the mystery to me is anybody ever voted for him?

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.799
<v Speaker 6>But plainly people down there there did. Perhaps the cold

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 6>gets to their heads or something. But you know, he

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 6>is what he is and I just think that which

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 6>is desperate for an opposition that can turn itself open

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 6>to a government, well, I.

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Think you just hit the nail on the head.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 4>Then he got re elected, not only because he was

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 4>a skillful politician, but he had no opposition. And I

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 4>think people look at Victorians like were some sort of

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 4>a freak show.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 3>But when you've got a.

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Completely spineless, principleless hopeless opposition, then you do have the

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 4>other side elected quite easily. Now, one of Australia's top

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 4>property developers, him Gerner, has weighed in on Victoria's housing

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 4>crisis and the dire state of Melbourne. He told the

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Australian Financial Review that the strong consensus in other states

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 4>is that Victoria is broke, it's cold, and your property

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 4>prices don't go up.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 3>While would you invest in Melbourne when there's been next.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 4>To zero capital growth and the state has a massive

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>debt problem. But Nick Gernar is supportive of the stamp

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 4>duty discount being offered by the just to Alan government,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 4>saying it'd give investors a reason to consider the city again.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 4>But I've got to say I'm going to disagree. I

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 4>think this is an absolute travesty. I wrote about this

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 4>in Today's Herald's Son The entire scheme seems to be

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 4>hair braining these towers that are going to be building

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 4>along train stations, but just on this stamp duty discount.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 3>It's just so unfair.

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 4>On the face of it, a family buying a brand new,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 4>modestly priced house and land package out in the suburbs

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 4>to live in white qualify for that discount. But you

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 4>might have someone who's buying a penthouse off the plan

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 4>for three million dollars that they plan to rent out

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 4>and they will qualify for the discounts. It seems to

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 4>be designed just to entice people to buy off the

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 4>plan apartments, something that hasn't been a fantastic investment in

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 4>recent years.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Nick, Yeah, yeah, I mean that's right. Land Act is

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 6>incredibly unfair form of taxation. All forms of taxation are

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 6>unfair in my view, but this is particularly unfair because

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 6>you're taxing people on unrealized capital gains essentially, and as

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 6>you're right in saying that if you build a sixty

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 6>story tail block, if you were to build such a

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 6>thing in Melbourne and stick lots of apartments in there,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 6>the land tax per unit to be relatively low. But

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 6>if you've got an elderly person who's living in the

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 6>family home or they've got a boarder investment property out

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 6>there in the suburbs on a quarter acre block of land,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 6>then they're in for real, real trouble. And it does

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 6>punish people very hard, people that have script and saved

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 6>to pay off them more it is get themselves a

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 6>property or investment property. They're the ones being punished by this,

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 6>and it's just a very unfair way of doing it.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 6>Stamp duty is not great, by the way, but this

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 6>is not the way to get rid of stamp duty.

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 4>This is just a scheme that they're introducing to make

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 4>it more attractive to buy of the plan, but it

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 4>doesn't extend to buying off the plan for a house.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 4>It's only really for units apartments. And they're going to

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 4>nick by building these towers on train stations across Melbourne

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 4>without consultation, without much of a planning process, so they're

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 4>going to completely change the character of those suburbs. And

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 4>the locals have invested and have got their home as

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 4>their biggest investment or obviously fairly irate about that. And

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 4>it's not a surprise most of those train stations are

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 4>in liberal areas, not that there's that many of them

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 4>left in the city.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Now. I'm interested in a piece.

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 4>You wrote for The Australian newspaper about the real reasons

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 4>behind Australia's declining birth rate. Australian National University demographer Is

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Alan told the Sydney Morning Herald that it's housing affordability,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 4>economic insecurity, gender inequality and climate boiling. That's the reason.

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 4>But you point the birth rate has been falling since

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 4>nineteen fifty nine, when the average house in Sydney was

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 4>less than ten thousand dollars in today's money one hundred

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 4>and eighty two thousand dollars in today's money ten thousand

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 4>dollars back then. So what is the real reason behind

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 4>our birth rate plumbating?

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, serious democracies really can't tell you because there's so

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 6>many factors here. It is possible that housing may deter

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 6>people to some extent from having children, but it's far

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 6>from the only reason, because when you look at it,

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 6>this is a trend that's been going on since the

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 6>late fifties early sixties in the entire world. Right even

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 6>in places like Thailand, they are now way below our

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 6>birth rate and way below replacement level, even though they

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 6>had a birth rate of six in the nineteen sixties.

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 6>So everywhere except Sub Saharan Africa, birth rates have fall

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 6>and off a cliff and are continuing to fall. And

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 6>so contrary to what the environmentalists have been telling us

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 6>for the last fifty years that were in trouble because

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 6>there's too many people, the fact is there's too few people.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 6>That's a real problem. And there's a problem with obviously

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 6>assuredage of labor around the world, not just here. And

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 6>it seems to me extraordinary that so few serious politicians

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 6>or policymakers have even mentioned this, let alone worked out

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 6>what we do about it, because we have got to

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 6>do something about it, sooner or later. We can't keep

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 6>making up for it in immigration.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, that seems to be the fix, isn't it. That's

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 4>the band Aida method that they have used. We did

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 4>have that have a baby for the country under the

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 4>Howard government, didn't we We had the baby bonus and Peter

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Costello remember that work picture with him with all the

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 4>newborn babies that did work.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 3>We saw a bit of a spike there they were.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 7>I do like it.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 6>Hung Yeah, a spike that came off at about twenty

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 6>ten it started to decline again.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's it. I do like Hungry's approach.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 4>They give a massive lifetime discount to mothers for the

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 4>number of babies that have So if you have one child,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 4>twenty five percent discount of your income tax for life.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 4>If you have four, forget about income tax, you're not

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 4>paying it. And that's seen their birth rate at skyrockett.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 4>They've got a few other measures to boost it as well.

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 4>So yes, something to think about. Nikata, Thanks so much

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 4>for your time tonight, Thank you.

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 8>Rider.

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 4>Joining me now is leading geologist and author Professor Ian Plymer,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 4>and let's start with Prime Minister Anthony Albernizi and Foreign

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Minister Pennywong.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 3>They're heading off to.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Samoa for the twenty twenty four Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting,

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 4>which King Charles will also be attending. And it seems

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 4>Australia is about to experience another climate shakedown with Pacific

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 4>nations putting pressure on Australia over fossil fuel exports.

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 3>How much is this trip going to cost us, Professor, Well.

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 8>It's going to cost us a huge amount of money. Secondly,

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 8>it's going to cost us a lot of credibility.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 7>Here.

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 8>We have two people from the Australian government and they're

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 8>entourage who are flying there now unless they're going to

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 8>swim from Manly Beach across this somehow, and they're going

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 8>to be using a lot of fossil fuels.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>To get there.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 8>And these fossil fuels, some of the South Pacific Island

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 8>islanders claim putting carbon dioxide.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 3>In the air.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 8>This is warming the climate and the sea level is rising. Well,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 8>that's contrary to data that we've had since eighteen forty

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 8>two on this part of the world. It's contrary to

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 8>what we know about carbon dioxide. So I think this

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 8>is yet again a massive display of hypocrisy, and yet

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 8>again our Prime Minister running away from problems in Australia

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 8>and gallivanting somewhere else around the world.

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 4>And I fear that the checkbook will come out at

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 4>some point during this trip. So let's just brace ourselves

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 4>for that now. The chair of Labour's Climate Change Authority,

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Matt Keane for Liberal Treasure of New South Wales, has

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 4>lashed out at nuclear energy advocates, accusing them of being

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 4>delay mongers who are trying to prevent renewables from succeeding.

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 4>He labeled a push for nuclear and more gas as

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 4>and I quote, an illiberal drive to intervene in the

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 4>market led energy transition. And he also went on to

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 4>say that the delay mongers have latched onto nuclear power

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 4>despite the overwhelming evidence that he can only drive up

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 4>energy bills, can only be more expensive, and can only

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 4>take too long to build. This in a cost of

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 4>living crisis. It seems to me that people calling for

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 4>gas to be included in the capacity investment scheme are

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 4>trying to stop renewables in are very very interested in

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 4>your response to Matt Keane's claims.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 8>There, Well, this is just Sheer's stupidity. Mister Keane should

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 8>know that when Finland put in its reactions the latest reactors,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 8>the cost of electricity went down and the retailer and

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 8>the wholesaler also had lower costs. So we have evidence.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 8>Very recently, we've just had the Page Research Center do

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 8>a study on the cost of energy. This was done

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 8>by Gerrard Holland, and he looked at solar and wind,

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 8>he looked at nuclear, looked at gas, and looked at coal.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 8>By far the most expensive energy in Australia. Is solar

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 8>and wind. This is when you look at the total costs,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 8>the land use changes, the putting in the new power lines,

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 8>et cetera, Nuclear is quite cheap compared with that, Gas

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 8>is also cheap, as his coal coals the cheapest, and

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 8>that's because we already have the infrastructure for coal. Now,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 8>what mister Keane doesn't say is that sol and wind

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 8>are not reliable, whereas nuclear, gas and coal are reliable.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 8>What he doesn't say is that sol and wind have

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 8>a very short life, less than twenty years, whereas nuclear

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 8>is at least sixty years for a nuclear power plant.

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 8>It's more than forty years for gas, more than fifty

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 8>years for coal. What he doesn't say is that our

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 8>future demands for energy are going to increase enormously. We're

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 8>already using ten percent of energy for data centers with AI,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be a lot higher. And what he's

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 8>really saying is that the practical economics of the nuclear

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 8>lobby groups are starting to frighten people. The practical economics

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 8>of the gas groups are starting to frighten the wind

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 8>and solar people. These are the cheapest and most reliable

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 8>and best forms of energy we can have in a

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 8>country like Australia. And so we've got all these foreign

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 8>corporations who are running the solar and running the wind,

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 8>who are lining up for their subsidies, and the subsidies

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 8>make the energy renewable. The subsidies say keep getting renewed.

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 8>And he's getting worried that the whistle's going to get

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 8>blown on this. And we can see around the world

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 8>that we can have cheap, reliable energy for very long

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 8>periods of time from nuclear. So I recommend that viewers

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 8>look at Gerard Holland's report from the Page Research Center.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 8>He aired these findings at the AIC conference on Tuesday,

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 8>and these are showing that we are going down the

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 8>wrong path. We've got far too many vested interests who

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 8>are whisperinging mister Keynes here. He doesn't understand the fundamentals

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 8>of energy generation, and he doesn't understand the fundamental weaknesses

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 8>of solar and wind.

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 4>And I do love the comment he has here about

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 4>the illiberal drive to intervene in the market led energy transition.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>But what do they do so much exactly?

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 4>There has been so much market manipulation subsidies to pretend

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 4>that this is something that's being led by the market,

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 4>it's purely organic, is just wishful thinking. I've got an

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 4>early Lefty losing it for you. It's from the New

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Zealand Greens.

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 6>Coal, don't dig it, live in the ground, get with it.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what to say, But what do you

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 4>say to the New Zealand Greens this, Prefessor Pliman.

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 8>I think they've been taking some of Kamala House scripts

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 8>and talking from them. I have no idea what they're

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 8>talking about. But what we do know is that the

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 8>New Zealand coals on the west coast of South Island

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 8>exceptionally clean, very high calorific value, very low ash and

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 8>upprised coals. New Zealand does have energy from other sources

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 8>from oil and gas in the Taranaki base, and some

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 8>get thermal energy. That the New Zealand colls are some

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 8>of the best in the world. I have no idea

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 8>what they're trying to say, except that perhaps they want

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 8>New Zealand to become even more backward.

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 4>I think that would actually enjoy that very much, Professor

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 4>im Plymer, thank you so much for your time this evening.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Thank you still to came a bumper edition of Lefties

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 4>Losing It and Army. Horowetz joins me with these laters

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 4>from the US, including just how much more are the

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Democrats spending compared to Donald Trump?

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back. Now it's time for lefties losing it.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 4>And here is some great advice from Kamala Harris telling

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 4>US supporters to be just like Jimmy Carter go out

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 4>and vote early, followed by mad cackling naturally.

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 3>So look, it's Jimmy Carter. You can vote early. You

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 3>can do. Jimmy Carter voted early.

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 4>We did have the Washington Post claiming he's very excited

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 4>about Kamala.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Let's check in on Jimmy Carter.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 4>This is the former president on his one hundredth birthday,

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 4>just a few weeks ago, enjoying, hopefully enjoying a military flyover.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, really, shame on his family for putting him

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 4>on display in that state. Whatever you think of Emi

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 4>was a former president, he deserves a little dignity. You

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 4>think his family would be watching out for him. Joe

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Biden's family has been accused of elder abuse over.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 3>The years, but then you hear a speech like this.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 4>From Joe and you suddenly stop feeling sorry for him.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.239
<v Speaker 4>Before the cognitive decline. He was a dishonest scrote and

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 4>he's still a dishonest scrote. Here he is earlier today

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 4>expressing a desire to lock up Donald Trump.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 9>He means it.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 3>This is not a joke.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 9>This the guy who also wants to replace every civil servant,

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 9>every single one. Thinks he has a raton of the

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 9>Supreme Court ruling on immunity to be able to need

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 9>me if it was the case to actually eliminate physically eliminate,

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 9>should kill someone who is he needs to be a

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 9>threat to him. I mean, so, I know this sounds bizarre.

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 9>It sounds like I said this five years ago. You

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 9>locked me up. We gotta like him up.

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 4>If you like him. Did he just claim that Donald

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Trump wants to shoot and kill someone he.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 3>Perceives as a threat.

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Joe Biden is again inciting violence again, President Trump, and

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 4>after two assassination attempts in two months, appalling.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 3>And now let's check in on the man.

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Who some various stuede observers believe has been the one

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 4>pulling their puppet strings throughout the Biden Harris Administration's rain

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 4>old mate Barack Obama just.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Can't understand how we got so toxic.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand how we got so toxic and just

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 2>so divide and so better.

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 3>And I get why sometimes people just don't want to

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 3>pay attention to.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 4>The hoodspa of that man never fails to astoud. It's

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 4>like an arsonist holding a match saying I don't understand

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 4>why it's hot all of a sudden, where these flames

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 4>come from?

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 3>Look in the mirror, champ. Okay, I've tried to.

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Avoid this for as long as I can, but here

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 4>is some local lefties losing it content Senator Lydia Thorpe

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 4>launching into an unhinged tirade against King Charles.

0:23:58.880 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 9>Aside.

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 7>Again something people do, not our land, that give us

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 7>one this style from us.

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Our bones, our scar, our baby, our people.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 3>He's out that we want to training in this country here.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 7>This is not your lab, this is not your la.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm not.

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 4>This left is losing its segment gets millions of views

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 4>every week around the world. We have a massive audience

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 4>overseas and they'll be shocked to learn that Lydia Thorpius,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 4>the screaming banshee just saw, is a senator in the

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Australian Parliament.

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I will not.

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 4>Stand for racist racism in my workplace.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 3>You are not helping the situation. And the Prime Minister

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 3>knows exactly what he's doing. He wants that's just to

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 3>come out and get me.

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>So where is my apart?

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Fuck you?

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Finally, here is Senator Olivia Thorpe doing some of her

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 4>best work outside a strip club in Melbourne.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 3>This was just last year.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 8>To you and you man that stands with what like that?

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Someone get in Parliament, press and you you. She seems

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 4>like a good time but sadly, Senatoralia Thorpe received a

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 4>lifetime ban from that particular establishment. Maxine's Gentleman's Club in

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Brunswick will no longer allow her entry. Sad Okay, let's

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 4>go back to laughing at lefties losing it overseas. Here

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 4>is a racist lefty in America. You know how she's voting.

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 5>What's more dangerous? Straight white conservative men or axe murderers?

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 3>A straight white conservative man?

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Why is he more dangerous?

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Because they're capable of doing anything.

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 3>They're crazy.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 5>We'll make them crazy.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 3>They're white.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 5>You don't think that's racist at all?

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 4>No, And here is another woman back in Kamala because

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 4>she thinks Donald Trump will take her birth control away.

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 7>If you were to vote for anybody in twenty twenty four,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 7>who is it going to be?

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris?

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Why is that?

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Because I like having rates, having rights.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm gay and I enjoy being able to marry who

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I want, be open about that at work.

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm also a woman. I take birth control. I like

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 3>being able to do that.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Just exactly what rights did a gay women lose under

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump's administration? And why would he want her to

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 4>stop taking birth control? She's a lesbian, Why is she

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 4>taking birth control? The whole thing is confusing me. Now,

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 4>this lady has really isolated the most important thing in

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 4>this campaign. You better listen to her, you pack of

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 4>sexist pigs.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Regardless of who you're voting for. Stop referring to our

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate as just Kamala. It's Kamala Harris. We do

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>not talk about the other person running and say Donald, right,

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't just say Donald. Maybe we should, maybe we

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.479
<v Speaker 1>should start calling him Donnie. But up until this point,

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>people have only felt comfortable referring to women in power

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>by just their first names because they do not respect

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>women in power. They did the same exact thing to Clinton.

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you have an ounce of feminism in your

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>body at the very least, say Kamala Harris.

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Ah dear.

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't it just fill you with warmth and confidence knowing

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 4>that folks like that vote. Here is a couple wanting

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 4>to send conservatives to re education camp. Just feel the

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 4>tolerance and empathy here.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 5>We're trying to send conservatives to re education camps to

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 5>be more accepting.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah, oh, elliot, all.

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Right, So you would support take their rights away and

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 5>sending them to the camps forcefully? Would you be in

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 5>support of banning conservatives from voting?

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 3>I feel like everyone is to vote.

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh, you're taking the rights away to a re education camp.

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 8>That is true.

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Now, this next clip may have a little creative input.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 4>We will check in with the lip readers on what

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 4>was actually said, but I like to think it was

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 4>something like this.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 9>So is Kamala doing Okay, Nope, she's down Joe.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Now we're basically Trump is killing us at the pole.

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 8>So yes, we're gonna lose.

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 2>Joe, damn it.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 9>Wait, wait, what if I come back to run again

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 9>as candidate?

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, uh.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>No, job man, You're not going back.

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Shot.

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's let it all play out.

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's just we'll talk later.

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Joe.

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 7>Okay, women looking fine up in here.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Now, let's bring in documentary filmmaker and commentator Army Horoid's Army.

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 3>A lipreada engaged by The New.

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 4>York Post has deciphered what really occurred during that exchange

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 4>between Joe Biden and Barack Obama at Ethel Kennedy's funeral.

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 4>While caught on camera, the conversation was drowned out by

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 4>the organ music, but professional lip reader Jeremy Freeman. Freeman,

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 4>who's got sixteen years of experience, thinks this is what

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 4>was said. She's not as strong as me, said Biden,

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 4>and then Obama replies, I know that's true.

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 3>We have time.

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 4>And then Biden comes back with, yeah, we'll get it

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 4>in time.

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about all that army? Are they right?

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Do they have time?

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? The New York Post doesn't have to hire a

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 7>lip reader to hear me say this. No, they do

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 7>not have time. Look, there's two weeks left in the

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 7>election and they are down badly. All the momentum is

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 7>moving toward Trump. He's literally the lat the RC people. Look,

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 7>I'm a maniac, I'm a lunatic. I checked the polls,

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 7>every morning and a couple times a day. He's down

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 7>in every single swing state, every single one, count them

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 7>all seven. Look they just said the quiet part. Quietly.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 7>She is a terrible candidate and terrible at everything else.

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 7>This is why she's down. And by the way, Liz

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 7>Cheney is not gonna save your election. Look the word

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 7>shot in freud. Okay, this is a German word shot

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 7>in which means which means harm and damage and freud,

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 7>which means joy literally taking comfort and joy in the

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 7>harm of others. That word was literally created to define

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 7>the state of Joe Biden's being. Right now, he is

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 7>living shot in freud, okay. I mean, look, Brutus and

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 7>Cassius have nothing on how Kamala and a Democratic Party

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 7>did Uncle Joe dirty. Right, he is going to reach

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 7>out from beyond the grave with the ultimate I told

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 7>you so and a middle finger to the entire Democratic Party.

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 7>You screwed me over and look what happened. This is

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 7>what's going down. Look, they even have there obviously damage

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 7>control going on now. And remember the Obama administration were spying.

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 7>The New York Post said that doesn't sound like Joe Biden,

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 7>really it doesn't. Oh yeah, it does. The maightiness is awesome.

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 7>I love it.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh absolutely, it sounds like Joe Biden. Just have a

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 4>look at his form there is from the early days,

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 4>he's been bragging about himself. Remember when he was bragging

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 4>about what great Marxi was getting at university. That was

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 4>lying about all that, but he was bragging. Nonetheless, now

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 4>the Democrats to have an enormous advantage. They've got the

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 4>bulk of the mainstream media. They've got pretty much most

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 4>of the popular culture, from Hollywood to music industry to.

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Fashion, the whole lot.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:10.239
<v Speaker 4>The polls are tied despite the Democrats having all that

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 4>and also outspending the Trump campaign. Kamala spent two hundred

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 4>and seventy million in September compared to Trump's seventy eight million.

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think enough is said about this disparity and

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the spending army. If Trump had anywhere near.

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 4>The money the Democrats have to spend on his campaign,

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 4>it would be all over.

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 3>You could be winning New York.

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, this election would not be as close as it is.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 7>Trump would actually be running away this election. If he

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 7>was just doing basic election blocking and tackling. He simply isn't.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 7>That's just the reality of the situation. Look, Kamala Harris

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 7>is running a very traditional ground campaign. Okay, Right, they

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 7>have four times the amount of staffers than Trump does. Okay,

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 7>that's a massive number and a massive advice. Trump was

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 7>running a cult of personality campaign. Now he thinks he's

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 7>winning because of that. That's not actually true. He's winning

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 7>because he happens to be on the right side of

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 7>all the issues. He was winning because we had four

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 7>years of a horrible presidency by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Look,

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 7>he ran a cult of person out a campaign four

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 7>years ago. He lost. Okay, Look, his unconventional perform, the

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 7>unconventional preparation for the debate, which means he didn't prepare

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 7>for it. He lost the debate. He's winning because he

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 7>happens to be on the right side of all these issues,

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 7>and the momentum is on his side.

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem.

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 7>He has not been spending the time and money. Look,

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 7>she has raised billions from small dealers. She's spending time

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 7>raising money. He's spending time and money on his legal affairs.

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 7>This is a huge disadvantage for him, But ultimately he's

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 7>going to win because everything is flowing in his direction,

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 7>and he is coming after a company that nobody likes.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, you just casually announced it. There, it's all over.

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 4>He's going to win. But that's part of the lawfare,

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 4>wasn't it. The law fair was designed not just to

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 4>further blacken his name in the eyes of the American public,

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 4>to have him as a convicted felon, but also to

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 4>distract him, to have him focused elsewhere, spending money elsewhere

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 4>instead of campaigning.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 7>Question about Look, and by the way, to be clear,

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 7>I called this election last week. Now I didn't call

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 7>this week. I already called it last week. No, he

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 7>is got about that. That is actually part of their strategy,

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 7>no question about it. And to a certain extent, it's working.

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 4>It is absolutely Now President Joe Biden has once again

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 4>ignored his own advice. Remember he said this following the

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 4>first assassination attempt on Donald Trump.

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 9>Fellow Americans, when I was speaking to night about the

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 9>need for us to lower the temperature in our politics.

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 3>But now is at it again.

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.439
<v Speaker 4>He claims that Trump is so dangerous that he ordered

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 4>to be locked up.

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 9>Thinks he has a reader of the Supreme Ruling on

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 9>immunity to be able to need me if it was

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 9>the case to actually eliminate physically, eliminate, should kill someone

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.439
<v Speaker 9>who is he needs to be a threat to him.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 9>I mean, so, I know this sounds bizarre. It sounds

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 9>like I said this five years ago. You'd like me up.

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 9>We gotta like him up him.

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 8>Dear.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 4>He tried to rectify some of the damage there and

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 4>say lock him up politically, but please, he just claimed

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 4>right there, army, that Trump wants to shoot and kill people.

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 4>It's just an extraordinary way for the Democrats to tackle

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 4>this campaign.

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 3>They have not.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 4>Stopped that reckless retrick against Trump one. They continue to

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 4>call him a threat to democracy, likening him to the

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 4>likes to Hitler.

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 7>They're doing it all the live long day, Rita. No,

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 7>there was an assassination attent, and of course everyone said,

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 7>let's lower the temperature, let's reduce the rhetoric. But you

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.919
<v Speaker 7>know what, the next day he was on television doing

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 7>all the threat to democracy garbage. The next day then

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 7>there's a second assassination attent.

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 2>You think anything changed.

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 7>No, he's still a fascist, still a threat to our

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 7>way of life, right, still, comparing him to Hitler and

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 7>Mao and Mussolini, These are all the comparison they're making,

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 7>And of course this comports with him saying, let's lock

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 7>them up. Look the same democracy crowd, right, this is

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 7>the Democratic Party. These are people who've been trying to

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:55.479
<v Speaker 7>subvert democracy in both deed and in word. Right, they

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 7>have let's not forget, not to just forget to lock

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 7>it up stuff. They've been using lawfare like we talked about,

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 7>to try to get him off his game on the campaign.

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 7>Do we forget? They try to get him off of

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 7>the ballots. They try to take Trump off of the

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 7>ballots in different states. This is democracy. This is the

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 7>same democracy crowd. Then, the rhetoric has included calling the

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:21.800
<v Speaker 7>Supreme Court illegitimate. They have called for the taking down

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 7>the Electoral College. These are people are saying, hey, in

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 7>my city of New York, let's have nonsenizens vote. You

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 7>tell me who is pro democracy? Who is anti democracy?

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 2>This is crazy?

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 7>Am I taking crazy bells? What's going on? Now?

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 3>You're one hundred percent right?

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 4>And don't forget installing Kamala Harris in validating fourteen million votes.

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Biden actually went through a process.

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 4>He was supposed to be the nominee, and suddenly we've

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 4>got someone who nobody appeared to vote for, who is

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 4>now their candidate, and again they talk about norms and

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 4>threats to democracy in Horowitz, Thank you so much for

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 4>your time this evening.

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh is your pleasure still to come?

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Energy expert Alex Epstein joins me to expose the boldest.

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 3>Lies of net zero activists.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 4>You're watching the Reader Paney Show and joining me now

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 4>is best selling author of Fossil Future. While global human

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 4>flourishing requires more oil, coal and natural gas, not less.

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 4>Energy expert Alex Epstein alex is she.

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:37.919
<v Speaker 3>Or isn't she?

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 4>This is the question we're facing. We know where Donald

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Trump's energy policy lies.

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 3>He's crystal clear about what he wants to do.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 4>But with Kamala Harris's position, well, it remains murky. She's

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 4>long said that she wants to ban fracking. She promised

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 4>to do that when she was a Democratic presidential nominee

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:01.399
<v Speaker 4>back in twenty nineteen. She said she banfracking on day one.

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 4>Now she says she doesn't want to do that. It

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 4>would certainly ender her chances in a state like Pennsylvania

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 4>if she had that policy these days, But really, where

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 4>does she sit on this crucial issue?

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.359
<v Speaker 10>I think it's actually just really clear. I mean, her

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 10>position is net zero by twenty fifty, which basically means

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 10>banded fossil fuel used by twenty fifty, and she supports

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 10>steps to get there. And whether you ban fracking outright

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 10>or just destroy fracking through a series of irrational regulations

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 10>doesn't really matter.

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 2>The goal is to destroy fossil fuel.

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 10>So one way to think of it is you can

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 10>destroy fracking without banning fracking, just as Obama pledged to

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 10>destroy the call industry and largely succeeded without banning call.

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 10>You just pass other regulations that make it impossible.

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Now, the Biden Harris administration did straightaway block the Keystone pipeline.

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 3>What's been the packed off that decision.

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 10>This is one of the most damaging things because if

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 10>you think about the situation with Canada, Canada just has enormous,

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 10>enormous what's called proven oil reserves. They have way more

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 10>than we have in the United States. They have huge

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 10>amounts of untapped production that could be a great source

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 10>of oil for us in the US, very well suited

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 10>to our refineries, as well as oil that could supply

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 10>the free world, which we need now more than ever.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 10>Because we have a lot of hostile people with a

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 10>lot of oil, and instead of taking a step toward

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 10>more energy trade with Canada, and we should be doing

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 10>a lot more, they just destroyed it.

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 2>And they destroyed it on a whim.

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 10>They basically just got the State Department to destroy it

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 10>after over ten years of investment in planning. And so

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 10>this not only just totally sabotaged a lot of our

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 10>potential with Canada, it told everyone in industry you're you know,

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 10>you could be on the chopping block at any moment,

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 10>and so that does insignidvize investment. It creates fear, and

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 10>so we haven't even started to experience the full consequences

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 10>of stopping Keystone.

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Now, Alex, let's have a look at this lotust a

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 4>peace published by Monash University right here in Melbourne, Australia.

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 4>They claim that Hurricane Milton and Hurricane Helene serve as

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 4>a stark example of how climate change is influencing storm dynamics.

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 3>They also say it demonstrates.

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 4>How warmer ocean temperatures and shifting weather patterns can lead

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 4>to severe damage in both coastal and inland communities.

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 3>And they also wrote.

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Recent extreme weather events, including devastating tropical cyclones, underscore the

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 4>critical need for global corporation and decisive action, and that

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:44.240
<v Speaker 4>it highlights a disturbing trend. Storms are becoming more impactful

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 4>closer to the coast. Alex care to respond to what

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 4>you've just.

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 10>Heard, and this is really damaging because the overall message

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:56.919
<v Speaker 10>here is let's get rid.

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Of fossil fuels.

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 10>Fossil fuels are making the climate more dangerous. We get

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 10>rid of fossil fuels, then we're going to be safer

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 10>from climate.

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 2>But if you just think for a.

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 10>Second, have fossil fuels made us more endangered by climate

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 10>or safer from climate? You just think, what was a

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 10>hurricane like one hundred years ago, fifty years ago, even

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 10>twenty five years ago compared to today, And it's obvious

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.439
<v Speaker 10>and the data bear this out that we're much much

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 10>safer from hurricanes and other forms of extreme weather. And

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 10>fossil fuels are huge reason why. They keep us incredibly

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 10>resilient through things like heating and air conditioning, storm warning systems,

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 10>evacuation systems, building sturdy buildings, et cetera, et cetera. So

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 10>we've become incredibly resilient to climate thanks to fossil fuels,

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 10>and whatever climate affects fossil fuels have had are very

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 10>hard to detect.

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Particularly with storms.

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 10>This is why there's no strong trend with hurricane frequency

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 10>or intensity. And so they're really just trying to make

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 10>stuff up, saying like, oh it was it develops faster

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 10>here and there. Just the big picture as fossil fuels

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 10>are making us safer than ever from extreme weather, and

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 10>so if you're manipulating science to tell us to get

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 10>rid of fossil fuels, you're going to make make us

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 10>far more in danger from extreme weather.

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 2>And you're I mean, if you did it, literally, you.

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 10>Just destroyed the whole country because the grid can't work

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.439
<v Speaker 10>without fossil fuels. I mean, imagine Australia without Call. That's

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 10>over half your grid. So you know, you get rid

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 10>of Call really quickly, a huge percentage of the population dies,

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 10>the grid doesn't function, you have civil war. Like these

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 10>guys are not at all thinking through what they're advocating,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 10>or they are and they just really hate humans.

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's at the heart of a lot

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:31.319
<v Speaker 4>of the activism we see in this area. And one

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 4>of the claims we hear over and over again in

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 4>this country, and I'm sure elsewhere is that renewables are cheaper,

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 4>that they actually lower energy costs, But the reality seems

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 4>to be fairly different to that. Take me through this

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 4>graph you recently shed. It seems to show that places

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 4>with the highest percentage of renewable use seem to be

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 4>paying more for energy.

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean that's a good description of what that shows.

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 10>And we see this around the world, and Rita, let's

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 10>just I think it should be pretty obvious to somebody,

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:06.359
<v Speaker 10>like imagine I said, hey, Rita, I've got something that's

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 10>better and cheaper than the iPhone. But I'm not just

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 10>gonna make it and compete with the iPhone. I need

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 10>you to ban the iPhone and then give me a

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 10>couple of trillion dollars in subsidies, and then I promise

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.720
<v Speaker 10>it'll be cheaper than the iPhone. Well, if it were cheaper,

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 10>then you wouldn't need to ban the competition and you

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 10>wouldn't need subsidies. So obviously it's an inferior thing, and

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 10>they're just issuing press releases with lies. So if you're

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 10>actually better, then compete with fossil fuels on providing reliable

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:37.959
<v Speaker 10>electricity and other forms of energy, and they're not willing

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:40.479
<v Speaker 10>to do that because the technology and economics aren't there.

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 10>And really, what this whole renewable is cheaper thing for

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 10>it's just a cover for the to pretend that we're

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:50.240
<v Speaker 10>not going to experience extreme suffering from banning fossil fuels.

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 10>And what we've seen in Europe is just even with

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 10>a little bit of restriction of fossil fuels, it creates

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 10>a total energy crisis. So they should learn their lesson

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 10>and if renewables so what are actually cheaper, can become cheaper,

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 10>then let them compete on a real market to provide

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:07.720
<v Speaker 10>reliable energy. Otherwise it's obviously just a lie.

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 4>Now you've highlighted more catastrophizing by the climate activists. It's

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:16.399
<v Speaker 4>something that we hear daily and it's not new. Let's

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 4>go back twenty years to this from the Guardian in

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and four where they claim that climate change

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 4>over the next twenty years could result in a global catastrophe,

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 4>costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters. Once again, Alex,

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 4>that claim has not aged too well.

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, if we actually had news it would

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 10>just constantly be telling us, guess what, life is better

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 10>than ever. We're safer than ever from climate. Thank you

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 10>fossil fuels. Let's give the fossil fuel industry a metal,

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:53.399
<v Speaker 10>like that's all we would be talking about, because we're

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 10>obviously safer from hurricanes, we're much safer from drought, we're

0:45:57.200 --> 0:46:01.439
<v Speaker 10>saved from temperature extremes, like we should be celebrating. We've

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 10>become incredibly resilient to climate, and whatever climate changes occurred

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 10>hasn't mattered that much, and we shouldn't expect it.

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 2>To matter that much.

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 10>Why would one or two degrees change on the Earth

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 10>overwhelm the most adaptable species in the history of the

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:19.760
<v Speaker 10>planet that's increasingly getting better at being resilient from climate.

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.439
<v Speaker 10>So people are just they're thinking about climate like it's

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 10>the year thirteen hundred and just a drought is going

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 10>to be a problem versus No, this is we're in

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 10>the twenty first century. We're really good at dealing with climate.

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 10>We're safer than ever from climate. We're in a climate renaissance.

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:36.479
<v Speaker 10>Let's keep getting better at dealing with climate, and let's

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 10>keep being freer and energizing the whole world and deal

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 10>with real things like three people use three billion people

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 10>using less electricity than a typical US refrigerator.

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Like that's a real problem, not the weather.

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Alex Epstein said beautifully, thank you so much for a

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 4>time this evening.

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 4>That's it from a opnek Is news not I'll see

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 4>you at eleven tomorrow.

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 6>Mm hmm