WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 8 September

0:00:02.370 --> 0:00:07.500
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you, Shari. G'day, mate.

0:00:07.540 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>He's standing, which means I have a News 24 pulse,

0:00:10.140 --> 0:00:12.660
<v Speaker 1>but that is not the only thing on tonight's show.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.140
<v Speaker 1>The Victorian leader of One Nation, Warren Pickering, exclusive. The

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 1>chat that he's having after that extraordinary press conference is

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>here in just a couple of minutes' time. The guy who...

0:00:23.950 --> 0:00:26.900
<v Speaker 1>was trying to campaign against all of those tax changes,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.780
<v Speaker 1>especially for small business. Well, he's played tennis with the

0:00:29.820 --> 0:00:33.020
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister today. He too will be joining us before

0:00:33.060 --> 0:00:36.830
<v Speaker 1>we are done on tonight's program. And the Reform Party

0:00:36.890 --> 0:00:41.170
<v Speaker 1>candidate who wants to fight crime in London... Layla Cunningham,

0:00:41.210 --> 0:00:43.260
<v Speaker 1>she joins us in a moment or two's time. But

0:00:43.620 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because I'm standing up, it means we've got some big news,

0:00:46.020 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is the very latest opinion poll from our

0:00:48.659 --> 0:00:51.580
<v Speaker 1>colleagues at YouGov. You can find the details right now

0:00:51.640 --> 0:01:03.300
<v Speaker 1>at news24. com. au. We call it the News 24 Pulse. This

0:01:03.410 --> 0:01:06.370
<v Speaker 1>is our bi-weekly look at Australian politics, not just about

0:01:06.390 --> 0:01:09.010
<v Speaker 1>the horse race, but about some significant issues and where

0:01:09.110 --> 0:01:12.850
<v Speaker 1>Australians are right now. The headline out of this one

0:01:13.010 --> 0:01:15.830
<v Speaker 1>is that One Nation is back on top as the

0:01:15.870 --> 0:01:19.209
<v Speaker 1>most popular political party in the country. There has been

0:01:19.310 --> 0:01:21.790
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of movement in the past two weeks.

0:01:21.830 --> 0:01:24.979
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a look here at the overall national primary vote.

0:01:25.780 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>One Nation, up 4% to 30%. Labor, down 3% to 26%.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.220
<v Speaker 1>So what was neck and neck where it was one

0:01:33.300 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>point either way, now a little bit of distance. 30%

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:41.540
<v Speaker 1>to 26%. The Coalition at 18%, down 3%. This is

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.270
<v Speaker 1>a number that is worse than the number just before

0:01:44.650 --> 0:01:48.750
<v Speaker 1>they made the change to Angus Taylor from Labour. Susan Lee. Alright,

0:01:48.830 --> 0:01:52.290
<v Speaker 1>as for the Prime Minister and the Prime Minister's ratings

0:01:52.410 --> 0:01:55.390
<v Speaker 1>in all of this, how do Australians feel? Well, they

0:01:55.470 --> 0:02:00.580
<v Speaker 1>remain deeply dissatisfied with the Prime Minister. 59%, almost 6

0:02:00.580 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>out of 10 voters have a problem with the way

0:02:02.460 --> 0:02:05.260
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister is running the country right now. 36%

0:02:05.260 --> 0:02:10.700
<v Speaker 1>are okay, the rest remain dissatisfied. undecided. In terms of

0:02:10.740 --> 0:02:13.820
<v Speaker 1>the overall race of who is the preferred Prime Minister, again,

0:02:13.980 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Angus Taylor versus Anthony Albanese. There is some data here

0:02:18.030 --> 0:02:19.930
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Pauline Hanson, but she's not running

0:02:19.950 --> 0:02:21.830
<v Speaker 1>in the lower house, so let's just keep it on

0:02:21.850 --> 0:02:25.730
<v Speaker 1>the headline number here, where Anthony Albanese is in front

0:02:25.790 --> 0:02:28.390
<v Speaker 1>of Angus Taylor, but Angus Taylor, despite the fact that

0:02:28.450 --> 0:02:32.690
<v Speaker 1>the Libs have gone backwards to virtually their worst position

0:02:32.990 --> 0:02:36.290
<v Speaker 1>that has been in the News 24 Pulse, that we've

0:02:36.310 --> 0:02:39.180
<v Speaker 1>been doing for several months now, he is within striking

0:02:39.190 --> 0:02:43.820
<v Speaker 1>distance in terms of Anthony Albanese at 43%. The don't

0:02:43.860 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>know factor, it is at 18 people right now. All right. Now,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>One Nation made its major announcement when it came to superannuation. Now,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>this was in anticipation of that announcement where people were asked,

0:02:57.540 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>do you oppose support or are you not sure about

0:02:59.660 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the superannuation plan? Again, details matter. Now, remember, the detail

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>here is that under the scheme that's been suggested by

0:03:08.260 --> 0:03:11.700
<v Speaker 1>One Nation, it's people who earn under $ 100, 000 being able

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to take out $ 2, 500 from their superannuation for three years

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:21.450
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Now, 47%, they oppose the idea. Well, again,

0:03:21.490 --> 0:03:24.590
<v Speaker 1>it's not compulsory. It's just an option for people who

0:03:24.630 --> 0:03:29.130
<v Speaker 1>may well want to access that superannuation. 33% support, so

0:03:29.190 --> 0:03:33.300
<v Speaker 1>very similar to One Nation's primary vote at 30%. And

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.500
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people still left undecided. Now, as I

0:03:35.540 --> 0:03:38.220
<v Speaker 1>always tell you about the undecided number, split it in

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>half and which way does it go? Well, that, of course,

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>puts the majority of people opposing the position. Early days,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.530
<v Speaker 1>we'll all see where that goes. What about housing? That,

0:03:47.550 --> 0:03:50.490
<v Speaker 1>of course, has been the total focus of the federal government,

0:03:50.530 --> 0:03:56.030
<v Speaker 1>or at least politically their focus, since the budget. Well, again...

0:03:56.390 --> 0:03:59.970
<v Speaker 1>Rental queues, they remain very difficult. Building houses not happening

0:04:00.030 --> 0:04:02.570
<v Speaker 1>fast enough and all of it is too expensive. So

0:04:02.850 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>what do people want? Well, number one answer, people want

0:04:05.940 --> 0:04:08.790
<v Speaker 1>more houses. 37% of people say it's time for the

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>government to do everything it can to build more houses,

0:04:12.220 --> 0:04:18.180
<v Speaker 1>followed by more public housing or low rent accommodation as well.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:23.419
<v Speaker 1>reducing the financial concessions for investors. 20% say that the

0:04:23.460 --> 0:04:25.900
<v Speaker 1>government should be going further than what they have in

0:04:25.940 --> 0:04:28.690
<v Speaker 1>the budget thus past. Leave it as is. All the

0:04:28.750 --> 0:04:32.650
<v Speaker 1>changes are enough. 9%, and then as you can see there,

0:04:32.710 --> 0:04:35.549
<v Speaker 1>people who believe that we should just literally, the solution

0:04:35.589 --> 0:04:38.350
<v Speaker 1>is to have as many people living... as close to

0:04:38.390 --> 0:04:41.690
<v Speaker 1>each other as possible, well, that also is 9%. The

0:04:41.750 --> 0:04:44.710
<v Speaker 1>ongoing issue in Australia is cost of living. The number two,

0:04:45.130 --> 0:04:48.940
<v Speaker 1>according to our poll, is immigration. It will not surprise

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you that when asked yet again, a huge amount of Australians,

0:04:51.900 --> 0:04:54.700
<v Speaker 1>more than six, almost seven out of ten, in the

0:04:54.720 --> 0:05:00.130
<v Speaker 1>brand new News 24 polls, say we need to decrease immigration. 27%

0:05:00.130 --> 0:05:03.850
<v Speaker 1>of people saying keep it as is. Increase is important. 7%,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.609
<v Speaker 1>the rest sits in the don't know category. Now, there

0:05:08.750 --> 0:05:11.730
<v Speaker 1>is a little more information inside of this. There I

0:05:11.770 --> 0:05:14.270
<v Speaker 1>say the Goldilocks number of just how much up, just

0:05:14.310 --> 0:05:19.909
<v Speaker 1>how much down. Well, unsurprisingly, 42% of people, so huge number,

0:05:19.930 --> 0:05:24.820
<v Speaker 1>60-something percent, 66% saying that they want a decrease in migration.

0:05:24.900 --> 0:05:27.780
<v Speaker 1>Of that, the biggest number is a big decrease. A

0:05:27.820 --> 0:05:31.260
<v Speaker 1>quarter of people say a small decrease. About a quarter

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of the country says, no, leave it pretty much where

0:05:33.620 --> 0:05:37.310
<v Speaker 1>it is. Then you have a scenario where the small

0:05:37.430 --> 0:05:41.670
<v Speaker 1>increase is 4%, a big increase is 3%. All of

0:05:41.710 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>this detail is up right now at news24. com. au, news24. com. au. This

0:05:45.460 --> 0:05:59.580
<v Speaker 1>is the News 24 Pulse. Now, of course, immigration remains

0:05:59.810 --> 0:06:03.490
<v Speaker 1>an absolute bedrock position when it comes to voters and

0:06:03.510 --> 0:06:06.390
<v Speaker 1>the party, as always, that is associated with it is

0:06:06.710 --> 0:06:07.210
<v Speaker 1>One Nation.

0:06:08.710 --> 0:06:10.730
<v Speaker 2>One that I've been very consistent with for the past

0:06:10.730 --> 0:06:14.250
<v Speaker 2>30 years is immigration. We have too many people coming

0:06:14.260 --> 0:06:16.770
<v Speaker 2>into the country. Cut back on the immigration. I'm selecting

0:06:16.790 --> 0:06:19.890
<v Speaker 2>to figure around about 130,000 people. You've still got to

0:06:19.910 --> 0:06:22.370
<v Speaker 2>allow those into the country because a lot of businesses

0:06:22.910 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and doctors and nurses that we need, you fill those

0:06:25.300 --> 0:06:28.300
<v Speaker 2>positions by all means. But cut back on the immigration

0:06:28.339 --> 0:06:32.060
<v Speaker 2>will actually address the housing issue that we have.

0:06:33.500 --> 0:06:35.340
<v Speaker 1>Now, to the rest of the day's news, including that

0:06:35.380 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party has been caught red-handed rorting with taxpayers' money.

0:06:40.020 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a news story. It's a news story today.

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And it yet again features each way elbow. Because when

0:06:46.940 --> 0:06:49.500
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister was the opposition leader and when there

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.930
<v Speaker 1>was the spreadsheet showing when previous Liberal governments were doling

0:06:52.970 --> 0:06:55.410
<v Speaker 1>out money, they knew which electorate it was going to,

0:06:55.690 --> 0:06:58.570
<v Speaker 1>be it a favourable one for them or a Labor

0:06:58.650 --> 0:07:02.130
<v Speaker 1>or Greens electorate, well, this was the reaction of the

0:07:02.150 --> 0:07:05.230
<v Speaker 1>now Prime Minister... but then opposition leader, as to why

0:07:05.290 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Australia needed to change the government because of this rorting.

0:07:10.780 --> 0:07:14.460
<v Speaker 3>Is there any aspect of this program that wasn't rorted?

0:07:14.820 --> 0:07:17.260
<v Speaker 4>A bit like sports should be and a bit like

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.180
<v Speaker 4>these grants should be, there's meant to be a level

0:07:20.220 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 4>playing field.

0:07:20.980 --> 0:07:25.090
<v Speaker 3>I think that the world can see that this appalling

0:07:25.130 --> 0:07:27.430
<v Speaker 3>scheme that ran in the lead-up to the last election

0:07:28.410 --> 0:07:30.890
<v Speaker 3>was a scheme where the Prime Minister and his office

0:07:30.910 --> 0:07:31.890
<v Speaker 3>were up to their neck in it.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, the sting in the tail, guess what? They've done

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.310
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same thing, but worse. Multiple stories broke this

0:07:39.430 --> 0:07:43.270
<v Speaker 1>afternoon after a major report belled the cat here that

0:07:43.310 --> 0:07:48.270
<v Speaker 1>Labor seats were receiving disproportionate amounts of taxpayer money as

0:07:48.330 --> 0:07:51.430
<v Speaker 1>decided by the Labor government. So much so that the

0:07:51.710 --> 0:07:54.710
<v Speaker 1>Audit Office is now being asked to have a look

0:07:54.730 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>at this to see whether all processes have been followed.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.100
<v Speaker 1>It's a major scandal and it is thanks to the

0:08:01.140 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>people of the Centre for Public Integrity. Now, this is

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a group, a non-partisan group that has called out previous

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.900
<v Speaker 1>Liberal governments that now is calling out the Labor Party.

0:08:11.940 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>This is made up of, among others, former judges. So

0:08:15.020 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking here Mickey Mouse. They found half a

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:26.260
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars was put into an invitation-only, non-competitive, one-off Commonwealth

0:08:26.460 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>grants program. Over 220 entries were invited to apply. So

0:08:33.300 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>let's be clear, taxpayers' money, not anyone who would like

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.650
<v Speaker 1>a project, put your hand up. Instead, you had to

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:45.410
<v Speaker 1>be invited by the government to actually apply. The grants

0:08:45.450 --> 0:08:52.110
<v Speaker 1>were heavily focused on notionally ALP seats. What a surprise. 73%

0:08:52.110 --> 0:08:56.810
<v Speaker 1>ended up in Labor seats or Labor-likely seats going into

0:08:56.830 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the last election. And, of course, they were able to

0:08:59.300 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>turn their majority into the mega majority based off, in part,

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the promises that were made because of this fund. Just 22.6%

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:13.030
<v Speaker 1>ended up in coalition seats. Marginal seats, which Labor was competitive,

0:09:13.150 --> 0:09:16.830
<v Speaker 1>also received disproportionate high funding. Let me show that to

0:09:16.850 --> 0:09:20.390
<v Speaker 1>you in graph form. If you're not paying attention to

0:09:20.410 --> 0:09:22.110
<v Speaker 1>the words and you just want to see the pretty pictures,

0:09:22.350 --> 0:09:32.330
<v Speaker 1>how non-pretty is this picture? $ 409 million, $ 409 million, invitation only,

0:09:32.910 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and handed out to people and projects in seats that

0:09:36.980 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party held or the Labor Party wanted to hold.

0:09:42.660 --> 0:09:45.950
<v Speaker 1>The 7.30 report this evening on the ABC, I apologise,

0:09:45.970 --> 0:09:46.410
<v Speaker 1>the 7.30 program, they.

0:09:48.070 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And we've got to give them credit here, they actually

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>dug into this information and spoke to two of the

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.190
<v Speaker 1>people who are from the centre that put the report together. Remember?

0:09:57.510 --> 0:10:01.940
<v Speaker 1>Half a billion dollars, and it was invitation only and

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:06.730
<v Speaker 1>it ended up going to Labor seats. This again, non-partisan group.

0:10:07.790 --> 0:10:11.429
<v Speaker 4>Prima facie, it looks like the misuse of public money

0:10:11.929 --> 0:10:14.530
<v Speaker 4>or serious pork barrelling as it's sometimes called.

0:10:14.750 --> 0:10:17.460
<v Speaker 1>For every dollar spent in a coalition seat.

0:10:17.460 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 6>$ 3. 20 was spent in a notionally ALP-held seat.

0:10:24.179 --> 0:10:27.979
<v Speaker 1>Now, perfect example. There's a golf club in Rutherglen, which

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.370
<v Speaker 1>is part of the electorate that Helen Haynes has, the

0:10:30.410 --> 0:10:34.050
<v Speaker 1>city of Indi, or the seat of Indi, which is

0:10:34.429 --> 0:10:38.809
<v Speaker 1>very close to the border in Victoria. 7.30 again went

0:10:38.850 --> 0:10:42.740
<v Speaker 1>and spoke to exactly the type of group who you

0:10:42.780 --> 0:10:45.740
<v Speaker 1>would think would have received this sort of money because

0:10:45.780 --> 0:10:48.500
<v Speaker 1>the money was there to, among other things, fix up

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>community and sporting infrastructure. But of course, Labor had no

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.580
<v Speaker 1>interest in that seat, so guess what happened?

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.620
<v Speaker 7>At the 100-year-old Rutherglen Golf Club, asbestos still lines the

0:11:00.660 --> 0:11:02.890
<v Speaker 7>walls and white ants gnaw at the wood.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.220
<v Speaker 5>We can't do anything because there's asbestos under here, so

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.060
<v Speaker 5>as soon as we start to take that off, that's

0:11:10.100 --> 0:11:11.810
<v Speaker 5>a major cost, major headache.

0:11:12.010 --> 0:11:14.970
<v Speaker 7>The club had reached out to local MP Helen Haynes

0:11:15.030 --> 0:11:17.730
<v Speaker 7>to ask how it could be considered for a grant

0:11:17.870 --> 0:11:18.650
<v Speaker 7>under the program.

0:11:18.670 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I had to say to them, I'm really sorry, but

0:11:22.140 --> 0:11:23.820
<v Speaker 2>you can't get an invitation to this one.

0:11:24.100 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 6>You had to be invited by the Labor government of

0:11:27.700 --> 0:11:28.020
<v Speaker 6>the day.

0:11:29.070 --> 0:11:32.030
<v Speaker 1>But of the half a billion dollars that was set aside,

0:11:32.070 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that was decided by the government, that $ 400 million ended

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.500
<v Speaker 1>up in Labor seats that they held or wanted to hold,

0:11:41.100 --> 0:11:43.060
<v Speaker 1>guess what would be an example of a golf club

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that did get the money?

0:11:46.260 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 7>Marrickville Golf Club in Anthony Albanese's electorate of Graindler is

0:11:50.540 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 7>getting a taxpayer-funded facelift, a $ 6 million renovation of a

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 7>club he feels a close connection to.

0:11:59.420 --> 0:12:04.490
<v Speaker 1>Extraordinary. Absolutely extraordinary. Now, again, everyone will say in opposition, oh,

0:12:04.530 --> 0:12:07.410
<v Speaker 1>pork barrelling, it's a disgrace. But these were people who

0:12:07.429 --> 0:12:09.650
<v Speaker 1>decided to make it a scandal so large that the

0:12:09.690 --> 0:12:12.699
<v Speaker 1>minister at the time had to resign because of the

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.380
<v Speaker 1>political nature of the money being handed out. Instead, you

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.460
<v Speaker 1>are seeing here not $ 100 million, not $ 50 million, but

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:26.250
<v Speaker 1>half a B4 billion that miraculously ends up In the

0:12:26.330 --> 0:12:29.530
<v Speaker 1>political advantage of the government, this is mega. This is

0:12:29.610 --> 0:12:33.339
<v Speaker 1>a mega story, a mega scandal. Of course, I'll talk

0:12:33.380 --> 0:12:35.140
<v Speaker 1>about it as the days roll on, but let's see

0:12:35.179 --> 0:12:39.929
<v Speaker 1>where this goes in Parliament when it resumes tomorrow. Of course,

0:12:39.970 --> 0:12:42.890
<v Speaker 1>the social media changes are on their way. The government

0:12:43.050 --> 0:12:46.170
<v Speaker 1>is pushing hard for what is called a duty of

0:12:46.270 --> 0:12:49.770
<v Speaker 1>care bill. Let me make this nice and simple. Basically,

0:12:49.950 --> 0:12:52.309
<v Speaker 1>they want to change the way social media works. Here

0:12:52.350 --> 0:12:55.929
<v Speaker 1>is the communications minister explaining how it would change if

0:12:56.050 --> 0:12:56.829
<v Speaker 1>the law passed.

0:12:58.010 --> 0:13:00.910
<v Speaker 8>This is about choice, the choice for an adult to

0:13:00.929 --> 0:13:03.850
<v Speaker 8>decide what their default feed will be, the algorithm or

0:13:03.870 --> 0:13:07.030
<v Speaker 8>their following feed, their friends and the content creators they've

0:13:07.130 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 8>chosen to follow.

0:13:09.010 --> 0:13:11.860
<v Speaker 1>So, again, You would only see the people that you follow.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.300
<v Speaker 1>There would be no suggestions of things that you might

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>like but don't follow. The argument here is that if

0:13:18.300 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got a collection of followers and then you start

0:13:21.020 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to get things that are suggested, it takes you off

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.780
<v Speaker 1>into the crazier parts of the internet faster. The Prime Minister, again,

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.210
<v Speaker 1>wants this piece of legislation passed in the next two weeks.

0:13:32.850 --> 0:13:37.410
<v Speaker 4>This is not about giving government control. It's about giving

0:13:37.530 --> 0:13:41.660
<v Speaker 4>people control. It's about putting choice back into the hands

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 4>of Australians online. Through our digital duty of care, we

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 4>will require platforms to protect children from harmful content, including

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:58.300
<v Speaker 4>content that promotes eating disorders, misogynistic content, pornography and content

0:13:58.340 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 4>that glorifies crime.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, the opposition doesn't know exactly where we're going to

0:14:03.300 --> 0:14:05.620
<v Speaker 1>land on this because in the past there have been

0:14:05.660 --> 0:14:09.730
<v Speaker 1>attempts by this government to censor the information via the

0:14:09.910 --> 0:14:13.929
<v Speaker 1>idea of misinformation. We'll wait and see what the legislation says,

0:14:13.970 --> 0:14:17.210
<v Speaker 1>but if the legislation essentially means that it'll be your

0:14:17.290 --> 0:14:19.570
<v Speaker 1>choice whether the only things you see on social media

0:14:19.590 --> 0:14:22.430
<v Speaker 1>are the people you are already following or you want

0:14:22.470 --> 0:14:24.609
<v Speaker 1>to jump into the one where random stuff turns up

0:14:24.650 --> 0:14:26.790
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the night, well, that seems to

0:14:26.860 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>be a significant change but not one that would go

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near potential censorship. That said, I'm with Andrew Hastie

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.580
<v Speaker 1>on this, is that I understand the importance and if

0:14:37.620 --> 0:14:40.180
<v Speaker 1>it is as simple as it is presented, I get it,

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:41.300
<v Speaker 1>but why the rush?

0:14:42.590 --> 0:14:44.870
<v Speaker 9>We're about to embark on the Joint Select Committee for

0:14:44.910 --> 0:14:48.370
<v Speaker 9>Artificial Intelligence. It's a two month committee process. And I

0:14:48.390 --> 0:14:50.430
<v Speaker 9>don't see the rush here from the government to bring

0:14:50.470 --> 0:14:54.090
<v Speaker 9>in legislation before we've had a chance with people from

0:14:54.110 --> 0:14:58.370
<v Speaker 9>across the parliament, both houses, to examine artificial intelligence and

0:14:58.550 --> 0:15:00.850
<v Speaker 9>all the other issues bound up with it through the

0:15:00.870 --> 0:15:02.580
<v Speaker 9>committee process. And at the end of that, we'll have

0:15:02.620 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 9>a better idea of what we're talking about when we're

0:15:04.340 --> 0:15:07.820
<v Speaker 9>talking about algorithms, how they work, how big tech operates

0:15:07.900 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 9>and designs its programs. We're going to examine all of

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 9>this in detail. So I think the government can pump

0:15:13.300 --> 0:15:16.030
<v Speaker 9>the brakes here, let the committee do its work, and

0:15:16.070 --> 0:15:18.150
<v Speaker 9>then we may have a better understanding of what's at

0:15:18.170 --> 0:15:18.570
<v Speaker 9>stake here.

0:15:19.730 --> 0:15:22.370
<v Speaker 1>This week and today, two big anniversaries. There was a

0:15:22.410 --> 0:15:25.230
<v Speaker 1>time when Australia wasn't as nuts as it is right now,

0:15:25.310 --> 0:15:28.370
<v Speaker 1>and I can take you back just 13 years. That is,

0:15:28.410 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, on this week is when Tony Abbott had

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>his landslide win, more than 90 seats, a forever change

0:15:36.140 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to Australian politics. One that, of course, was broken a

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.660
<v Speaker 1>couple of years later when Malcolm Turnbull brought down that

0:15:42.700 --> 0:15:45.260
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister, ruined the libs, and we are where we

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.460
<v Speaker 1>are today. The second is a little more personal to

0:15:48.500 --> 0:15:52.140
<v Speaker 1>me as a lifetime fan of the great Peter Brock. Today,

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.380
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, 20 years to the day since

0:15:54.420 --> 0:15:58.030
<v Speaker 1>the great man died, we all remember where we were

0:15:58.070 --> 0:16:00.190
<v Speaker 1>when we heard the news that he died in a

0:16:00.270 --> 0:16:04.090
<v Speaker 1>rallying accident in Western Australia. He, of course, won Bathurst

0:16:04.350 --> 0:16:08.410
<v Speaker 1>nine times and won He's as good as it gets

0:16:08.450 --> 0:16:10.830
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Australia and peak Australia of the

0:16:11.190 --> 0:16:14.190
<v Speaker 1>1970s and the 1980s. Just to relive a moment of

0:16:14.210 --> 0:16:16.460
<v Speaker 1>the magic before we get back to the news, here

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he is going around Mount Panorama.

0:16:19.980 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 5>I used top gear here because it saves the engine

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 5>a bit. Then back to third here for this corner.

0:16:25.420 --> 0:16:28.490
<v Speaker 5>It's a very tricky one. Now, I brake very late here.

0:16:28.570 --> 0:16:30.630
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of time debate up just here. Touch

0:16:30.670 --> 0:16:33.410
<v Speaker 5>the accelerator there and just sort of back to third

0:16:33.450 --> 0:16:35.609
<v Speaker 5>just before I get to this earth bank. Keep it

0:16:35.650 --> 0:16:39.810
<v Speaker 5>very close there. Cross the dipper and boot it down here.

0:16:40.070 --> 0:16:42.430
<v Speaker 5>Keep it flat in third. A lot of people use

0:16:42.470 --> 0:16:42.890
<v Speaker 5>second there.

0:16:42.910 --> 0:16:43.090
<v Speaker 10>I don't.

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I could watch it all day, but back to the

0:16:46.060 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>day job right now. So let's talk to Warren Pickering,

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.989
<v Speaker 1>the One Nation leader in Victoria. Now, past couple of days,

0:16:52.140 --> 0:16:55.410
<v Speaker 1>stories have appeared via the Australian newspaper with some pretty

0:16:55.450 --> 0:17:00.270
<v Speaker 1>wild allegations about his past. Well, today he decided to

0:17:00.430 --> 0:17:04.570
<v Speaker 1>confront those in a Answer Anything press conference. He was

0:17:04.630 --> 0:17:08.450
<v Speaker 1>even there with his stepson and his delightful daughter. We've

0:17:08.470 --> 0:17:10.650
<v Speaker 1>met Warren in the past, but it was big news.

0:17:10.750 --> 0:17:13.470
<v Speaker 1>Lead story all over Victoria tonight.

0:17:14.780 --> 0:17:18.660
<v Speaker 6>Fronting the cameras with his daughter and stepson in support,

0:17:18.740 --> 0:17:22.790
<v Speaker 6>the man leading One Nation's run in Victoria, confessing to

0:17:22.850 --> 0:17:27.430
<v Speaker 6>drug use up until his mid-20s. Flanked by his daughter

0:17:27.530 --> 0:17:32.490
<v Speaker 6>and stepson, Victoria's new One Nation leader makes an extraordinary admission.

0:17:33.590 --> 0:17:37.750
<v Speaker 1>Warren joins us now from Melbourne. Warren, emotionally, what's this

0:17:37.790 --> 0:17:41.030
<v Speaker 1>week been like for you as the things that are

0:17:41.070 --> 0:17:43.770
<v Speaker 1>true and untrue about your past seem to be fair

0:17:43.810 --> 0:17:46.340
<v Speaker 1>game for a very significant part of the media?

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.100
<v Speaker 11>Thanks, Paul, and good evening to your viewers. It has

0:17:51.140 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 11>been a very emotional few days, not just for me,

0:17:53.580 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 11>more so for my daughter.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And her brothers.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.020
<v Speaker 11>We know in politics nothing's off limits. However, you would

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 11>hope that a lot of the more reputable media outlets

0:18:04.980 --> 0:18:08.970
<v Speaker 11>would use a little bit more critical discernment before dragging

0:18:09.030 --> 0:18:13.169
<v Speaker 11>families into things. For me, it's been very overwhelming to

0:18:13.190 --> 0:18:15.450
<v Speaker 11>have the support not only of the party but a

0:18:15.510 --> 0:18:20.020
<v Speaker 11>lot of the broader community and my family get right

0:18:20.060 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 11>behind me 100%. It wasn't something that I anticipated I

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.939
<v Speaker 11>would have so much support to be honest, mate, but

0:18:26.980 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 11>we have to be authentic on these things, don't we?

0:18:29.140 --> 0:18:31.340
<v Speaker 11>If it comes out, we have to own it.

0:18:31.609 --> 0:18:35.370
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to be sensitive to your former partner

0:18:36.150 --> 0:18:40.530
<v Speaker 1>because there's a whole series of issues that she's dealing with,

0:18:40.590 --> 0:18:45.590
<v Speaker 1>but obviously the decision to take this from the internet

0:18:45.710 --> 0:18:51.169
<v Speaker 1>to the mainstream is why you've had to respond. Again,

0:18:51.950 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you had a life and it was a life that

0:18:56.420 --> 0:18:59.619
<v Speaker 1>wasn't perfect and wasn't going well a lifetime ago. But

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.380
<v Speaker 1>the thing that I find curious about all of this

0:19:03.460 --> 0:19:06.450
<v Speaker 1>story and about why this story deserves another go around

0:19:06.530 --> 0:19:09.050
<v Speaker 1>now is that you've had a transformative moment and that

0:19:09.090 --> 0:19:12.430
<v Speaker 1>was your service for Australia in the Defence Force. Now, again,

0:19:12.450 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the experimentation and the poor choices of your 20s were

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.620
<v Speaker 1>replaced with national service and you've come out the other

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>end as an example of a changed human being, haven't you?

0:19:26.550 --> 0:19:29.670
<v Speaker 11>I absolutely have. I think that's an important one to note.

0:19:30.130 --> 0:19:33.260
<v Speaker 11>I want that to be something that people can point to,

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 11>people that maybe are struggling with similar circumstances in their

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 11>younger years and have aspirations to be a part of

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.489
<v Speaker 11>their community or provide service in a different way. It's

0:19:45.530 --> 0:19:47.989
<v Speaker 11>never too late. I think that's the message there. It's

0:19:48.030 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 11>truly never too late. And whereas Australians are forgiving people.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:57.939
<v Speaker 11>You know, if you're community-oriented and you're prepared to apply

0:19:57.980 --> 0:20:03.220
<v Speaker 11>yourself to the benefit of others, I think sky's the limit.

0:20:04.220 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Watching that press conference today, as people did either live

0:20:06.940 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>or they've heard about it since, there's... not one that

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>immediately comes to mind, and I've been watching this pretty

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.700
<v Speaker 1>closely for a very long time, about openness and honesty.

0:20:15.500 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>The idea that your family was there to back you

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.260
<v Speaker 1>up as strongly as they did when, of course, they

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.460
<v Speaker 1>know the circumstances, they know the backstory, they know the

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.590
<v Speaker 1>current story. Can I just ask, as a dad, how

0:20:29.619 --> 0:20:34.470
<v Speaker 1>did you feel having your daughter there and your stepson

0:20:35.010 --> 0:20:37.190
<v Speaker 1>and them to have the courage to stand in front

0:20:37.250 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of a media pack? Because That's something normal people would

0:20:40.420 --> 0:20:43.699
<v Speaker 1>be absolutely bowled over by, let alone people who are

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.859
<v Speaker 1>talking about the most private parts of their mum and dad.

0:20:51.369 --> 0:20:55.350
<v Speaker 11>It absolutely, it blew me over, to be honest, Paul.

0:20:55.430 --> 0:20:57.790
<v Speaker 11>It's very difficult to do these things, as you know,

0:20:57.810 --> 0:21:01.670
<v Speaker 11>as I know. I didn't ask them to support me

0:21:01.690 --> 0:21:04.570
<v Speaker 11>in that respect. They chose, they asked to come along

0:21:04.609 --> 0:21:08.090
<v Speaker 11>and be a part of that process. So look, I'm

0:21:08.109 --> 0:21:10.710
<v Speaker 11>incredibly proud of how brave they've been. I think it

0:21:10.750 --> 0:21:12.650
<v Speaker 11>gave them an opportunity to get some things off their

0:21:12.710 --> 0:21:14.810
<v Speaker 11>chest as well that they maybe wouldn't have any other way.

0:21:15.609 --> 0:21:19.450
<v Speaker 11>But look, I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Absolutely not. Look,

0:21:19.990 --> 0:21:27.270
<v Speaker 11>it's disappointing for me that, again, reputable media sources didn't

0:21:27.330 --> 0:21:29.469
<v Speaker 11>look at this story and think that that's maybe not

0:21:29.490 --> 0:21:31.889
<v Speaker 11>for public viewing, that that's maybe something that should be

0:21:32.390 --> 0:21:35.690
<v Speaker 11>should be left alone rather than allowing someone a soapbox

0:21:35.770 --> 0:21:37.090
<v Speaker 11>to gaslight effectively.

0:21:37.510 --> 0:21:39.730
<v Speaker 1>Last question here to the people of Victoria who are

0:21:39.770 --> 0:21:42.470
<v Speaker 1>considering supporting you, or according to the polls, many who

0:21:42.510 --> 0:21:45.830
<v Speaker 1>already are. What can you say to them about how

0:21:45.950 --> 0:21:48.810
<v Speaker 1>mistakes in the past are in the past? And in

0:21:48.850 --> 0:21:52.730
<v Speaker 1>an extreme question, would you be willing to do a

0:21:52.950 --> 0:21:55.780
<v Speaker 1>random drug test at any point between now and the election?

0:21:57.300 --> 0:22:00.580
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, absolutely. Look, I've actually made that suggestion. But to

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.580
<v Speaker 11>your first point, It pays for people to remember. You

0:22:04.619 --> 0:22:07.500
<v Speaker 11>do not have to be a victim of your previous circumstances.

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 11>You do not have to be a perpetual victim of

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 11>your past forevermore. In fact, I think everybody should aspire

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.070
<v Speaker 11>to move beyond that and take those as a lesson

0:22:17.590 --> 0:22:22.570
<v Speaker 11>and develop as a person as a result. I've absolutely,

0:22:22.730 --> 0:22:26.170
<v Speaker 11>I've actually put that submission forward earlier today to say,

0:22:26.190 --> 0:22:28.130
<v Speaker 11>you know what, I think I probably should do.

0:22:28.050 --> 0:22:28.810
<v Speaker 12>That for the party.

0:22:28.869 --> 0:22:31.700
<v Speaker 11>I'd take it a step further too, I think, Paul.

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.260
<v Speaker 11>I think I've make the request of the Victorian people

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 11>to demand the same of every candidate in this Victorian

0:22:36.580 --> 0:22:41.530
<v Speaker 11>state election, including those incumbents that intend to re-elect. We

0:22:41.570 --> 0:22:46.010
<v Speaker 11>talk about, you know, operating heavy vehicles and machinery under

0:22:46.030 --> 0:22:49.470
<v Speaker 11>the influence. What about those ministers that make decisions on

0:22:49.490 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 11>the daily that affect the lives of 6.5 million Victorians?

0:22:52.260 --> 0:22:52.860
<v Speaker 1>It will be a fascinating.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 11>I think Victorians deserve to know that those people are

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.090
<v Speaker 11>of sound... Sound mind.

0:22:56.210 --> 0:22:58.409
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it'll be a fascinating start to every candidate forum

0:22:58.430 --> 0:23:00.370
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll see what happens when the results kick

0:23:00.410 --> 0:23:02.210
<v Speaker 1>in an hour later. Thank you very much, Warren. Again,

0:23:02.270 --> 0:23:04.830
<v Speaker 1>very difficult day, but I do appreciate the conversation. Thank

0:23:04.850 --> 0:23:05.310
<v Speaker 1>you very much.

0:23:06.390 --> 0:23:07.210
<v Speaker 11>Thanks for your time, Paul.

0:23:07.530 --> 0:23:09.310
<v Speaker 1>Good on you, Warren. Warren, of course, is the leader

0:23:09.330 --> 0:23:12.689
<v Speaker 1>of One Nation in Victoria. All right. Now, there was

0:23:12.710 --> 0:23:14.930
<v Speaker 1>a bloke who decided, you know what, he's going to

0:23:14.950 --> 0:23:16.590
<v Speaker 1>put his money where his mouth is and he was

0:23:16.609 --> 0:23:19.850
<v Speaker 1>trying to fight the changes when it came to the budget. And,

0:23:19.869 --> 0:23:23.710
<v Speaker 1>of course, those taxation changes, we spoke to him recently

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>When it was just a campaign, well, at the Midwinter Ball,

0:23:27.580 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>as they were raising money for charity, he decided to

0:23:29.900 --> 0:23:31.990
<v Speaker 1>put his hand up and was the highest bidder to

0:23:32.010 --> 0:23:35.950
<v Speaker 1>be able to play tennis with the Prime Minister. Joseph

0:23:36.010 --> 0:23:39.689
<v Speaker 1>Tadoud is the man. He was. Heavy training and he

0:23:39.730 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>got all the attention before the game. He joins us

0:23:42.619 --> 0:23:46.740
<v Speaker 1>now straight after it. Joseph, how was tennis with the

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:47.420
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister?

0:23:49.060 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 10>Oh, mate, I'll be honest with you. It was a

0:23:51.700 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 10>great experience, but yet again, just like this budget, we

0:23:54.900 --> 0:23:57.010
<v Speaker 10>saw the Prime Minister serve up a double fault and

0:23:57.030 --> 0:24:01.610
<v Speaker 10>give himself a point afterwards. Never said it before. You know,

0:24:01.790 --> 0:24:05.290
<v Speaker 10>it's a very abnormal thing, but unfortunately it is something

0:24:05.330 --> 0:24:06.650
<v Speaker 10>that has occurred and.

0:24:07.310 --> 0:24:09.890
<v Speaker 1>So, hang on, let's be clear here. As the allegation

0:24:09.950 --> 0:24:12.450
<v Speaker 1>is that Donald Trump cheats at golf, you are saying

0:24:12.490 --> 0:24:14.290
<v Speaker 1>that the Prime Minister has cheated at tennis?

0:24:15.590 --> 0:24:18.889
<v Speaker 10>Mate, I'm not making any allegations. I'm just very, very

0:24:18.950 --> 0:24:21.770
<v Speaker 10>confused as to how somebody could hit the net and

0:24:21.810 --> 0:24:23.929
<v Speaker 10>then I turn around to the umpire and go, was

0:24:23.970 --> 0:24:26.490
<v Speaker 10>that in or out? Because the first time you called

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.690
<v Speaker 10>that in, it was just a very strange thing.

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, Paul? I walked out of there.

0:24:32.140 --> 0:24:35.139
<v Speaker 10>I was very, very grateful towards the Prime Minister. I

0:24:35.180 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 10>was very, very courteous. But then I just... I saw

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 10>a bunch of other things that came out and I

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.780
<v Speaker 10>was like, you know what, I'm going to tell everybody.

0:24:43.420 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>About how he hit the.

0:24:45.820 --> 0:24:47.460
<v Speaker 10>Ball out and gave himself a point, how he served

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 10>a double fault and gave himself a point, and how

0:24:49.420 --> 0:24:52.020
<v Speaker 10>he took a 15-minute tinkle when I tied up the score.

0:24:52.060 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That was a nice one too. Oh, he's got all

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:58.580
<v Speaker 1>the games. He's doing the full Djokovic. All right. Obviously,

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.100
<v Speaker 1>you had a chance to talk either during the game,

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>after it. He knows that you bid as part of

0:25:05.140 --> 0:25:07.460
<v Speaker 1>the stitch-up, but it's all for charity, et cetera, et cetera.

0:25:07.810 --> 0:25:09.340
<v Speaker 1>Did you get a chance to talk to him and

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.260
<v Speaker 1>what did he say about it? This isn't a stitch-up.

0:25:12.300 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 10>This was about taking the concerns of everyday Australians to

0:25:15.260 --> 0:25:17.940
<v Speaker 10>the Prime Minister. We had a single mother that actually

0:25:18.020 --> 0:25:20.420
<v Speaker 10>broke down crying to the Prime Minister, telling the Prime

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 10>Minister about how she is struggling to get ahead and

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.710
<v Speaker 10>she has tried to build her cleaning business. We had

0:25:26.970 --> 0:25:31.150
<v Speaker 10>an individual that assists everyday Australians, public servants with their

0:25:31.450 --> 0:25:35.210
<v Speaker 10>SMSFs and their retirement funds, helping them purchase properties in

0:25:35.230 --> 0:25:38.330
<v Speaker 10>the future. They basically had no consultation, had their business

0:25:38.369 --> 0:25:40.470
<v Speaker 10>ripped away from them in 48 hours. And we had

0:25:40.510 --> 0:25:45.300
<v Speaker 10>someone that actually, that recently migrated to Australia for a

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 10>better way of life.

0:25:46.300 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And they're kind of looking around and going, Can't really

0:25:48.540 --> 0:25:49.180
<v Speaker 1>get ahead here.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.540
<v Speaker 10>So we are very happy that we were able to

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 10>have some consultation with the Prime Minister, but truthfully speaking,

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.660
<v Speaker 10>we just hope that it didn't fall on deaf ears.

0:25:59.100 --> 0:26:02.150
<v Speaker 1>So obviously, by what you've just told me, you were

0:26:02.210 --> 0:26:04.070
<v Speaker 1>able to bring other people with you and you brought

0:26:04.109 --> 0:26:05.449
<v Speaker 1>those business people with you.

0:26:06.940 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 10>I was only able to bring them along with me

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.699
<v Speaker 10>after the tennis had occurred. When the tennis match was on,

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 10>it was just me, the Prime Minister and his staff.

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.570
<v Speaker 10>And then my guests were able to join me afterwards

0:26:17.630 --> 0:26:20.650
<v Speaker 10>for some, put this down, refreshments.

0:26:22.850 --> 0:26:25.730
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to know what they were. But again, when

0:26:25.750 --> 0:26:28.820
<v Speaker 1>you had that moment and when somebody who's cleaning business

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.820
<v Speaker 1>is where it is, right, these people are in, major

0:26:32.859 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>problems major pain the idea about small business is that

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.380
<v Speaker 1>you go without to eventually grow it to be big

0:26:38.420 --> 0:26:41.380
<v Speaker 1>enough that when it's sold that there is some money

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>left over but of course the tax changes really are

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:48.100
<v Speaker 1>changing uh that what did he say when you were

0:26:48.140 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>confronting him with the case with the reason why you

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.229
<v Speaker 1>have gone to the effort to fight for small business

0:26:55.270 --> 0:26:55.950
<v Speaker 1>like you have.

0:26:57.100 --> 0:26:59.340
<v Speaker 10>Mate, I turned around and I said to him, I

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 10>legitimately said, these laws came in. We were trying to

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 10>get the opinions of everyday Australians heard. I understand you

0:27:06.369 --> 0:27:07.869
<v Speaker 10>don't like the fact that I won this match.

0:27:08.050 --> 0:27:08.650
<v Speaker 1>I get it, mate.

0:27:08.810 --> 0:27:09.169
<v Speaker 12>I get it.

0:27:09.450 --> 0:27:12.290
<v Speaker 10>You know, I was very, I completely understand the position

0:27:12.330 --> 0:27:14.169
<v Speaker 10>I was in. But when he said to me, oh,

0:27:15.210 --> 0:27:18.350
<v Speaker 10>the law doesn't really come into effect until July 1, 2027.

0:27:18.350 --> 0:27:20.810
<v Speaker 10>That's when I was like, okay, so our concerns still

0:27:20.930 --> 0:27:25.790
<v Speaker 10>aren't being heard. And truthfully speaking, we're not being listened to.

0:27:25.830 --> 0:27:29.190
<v Speaker 10>So guess what? Mate, we're going to keep going and

0:27:29.210 --> 0:27:30.859
<v Speaker 10>we're going to keep being loud about this because we

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.740
<v Speaker 10>don't think these tax changes were very fair to the

0:27:33.780 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 10>everyday Australian.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, again, perfect idea. You know, his experience in

0:27:37.740 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the private sector one year as a bank teller in

0:27:39.500 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the early 1980s, right? Oh, it all kicks in next year. Well,

0:27:42.100 --> 0:27:44.180
<v Speaker 1>guess what? I'm not planning to sell the business until

0:27:44.180 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>10 years, 15 years, 20 years from now. All right,

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>last one here. Where does the campaign go from here?

0:27:51.470 --> 0:27:54.010
<v Speaker 10>Mate, honestly, I cannot wait to get back to work.

0:27:54.150 --> 0:27:58.050
<v Speaker 10>But if the Prime Minister really is about helping the

0:27:58.109 --> 0:28:00.610
<v Speaker 10>everyday punter and he really wants to raise more money

0:28:00.630 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 10>for charity, maybe the next tennis match he will actually

0:28:04.500 --> 0:28:07.060
<v Speaker 10>allow my guests to come along and he will allow

0:28:07.100 --> 0:28:09.619
<v Speaker 10>the Australian public to watch it because everybody wanted to

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 10>see his returned serve and I don't think it was

0:28:12.900 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 10>as good as he's going to claim it was.

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Shots fired. Good on you, Joseph. Thank you very much, man.

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.690
<v Speaker 1>I do appreciate the conversation. I just want a fair match, Paul.

0:28:20.910 --> 0:28:24.270
<v Speaker 1>I just want a fair match. So a double fault.

0:28:24.790 --> 0:28:28.710
<v Speaker 1>Point scored for him. And for some reason, you know,

0:28:28.730 --> 0:28:31.229
<v Speaker 1>we deuced it up. Bathroom break. I'm just sitting there.

0:28:31.250 --> 0:28:33.449
<v Speaker 1>I'm going, what is going on here? Well, sorry. I'm

0:28:33.470 --> 0:28:35.770
<v Speaker 1>being asked in my ear the quite correct question. In

0:28:35.810 --> 0:28:38.170
<v Speaker 1>the overall match, who won the match in the end?

0:28:39.410 --> 0:28:42.710
<v Speaker 10>Mate, how can you call the score for a rigged match?

0:28:42.990 --> 0:28:45.980
<v Speaker 1>That's all I want to say. Thank you, mate. Appreciate it.

0:28:45.990 --> 0:28:47.290
<v Speaker 1>Manufactured score right there.

0:28:47.310 --> 0:28:48.670
<v Speaker 10>That's all I'm going to say to you right now.

0:28:48.930 --> 0:28:51.050
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Joseph. It's a manufactured score. All right. Royal

0:28:51.070 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Commission on its way. Thank you, Joseph. All right. Keep

0:28:53.100 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>following me on social media. All right. Quick break. Back

0:28:55.460 --> 0:28:59.340
<v Speaker 1>with more. Lots to discuss, including this red-hot new scandal.

0:29:00.100 --> 0:29:03.260
<v Speaker 1>Half a billion dollars. Not a small amount of money,

0:29:03.300 --> 0:29:05.660
<v Speaker 1>half a billion dollars, $ 400 million of which just happens

0:29:05.700 --> 0:29:08.270
<v Speaker 1>to go where the Labor Party wanted it politically. This

0:29:08.330 --> 0:29:10.190
<v Speaker 1>was a hanging offence when it was the Libs. What

0:29:10.210 --> 0:29:12.570
<v Speaker 1>happens for Labor? Well, each way our bow. Of course,

0:29:12.590 --> 0:29:14.470
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. More in a sec here on Paul

0:29:14.490 --> 0:29:22.410
<v Speaker 1>Murray Live. Thanks for watching. Oh, how busy is tonight's show?

0:29:22.450 --> 0:29:25.190
<v Speaker 1>It's wonderful. Let's keep up a cracking pace with Stephen Conroy,

0:29:25.230 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>always just here to help. Labor to his bootstraps. He

0:29:27.380 --> 0:29:29.340
<v Speaker 1>joins us now from Melbourne. He's dressed up all nice

0:29:29.380 --> 0:29:31.220
<v Speaker 1>and fancy because the NFL's in town and he thinks

0:29:31.260 --> 0:29:34.740
<v Speaker 1>there might be a free ticket somewhere. I understand. Jamie Johnson,

0:29:34.770 --> 0:29:36.890
<v Speaker 1>of course. She's part of the J &amp; J podcast

0:29:36.910 --> 0:29:38.860
<v Speaker 1>with Jamie Rogers. But you've got to follow on social

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>media because she's the lady who took the piss out

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of Annika Wells with the Ooshies I loved it I

0:29:42.540 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>loved it so welcome you qualified to be here I

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>love it all right so News 24 Pulse that's just

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:51.100
<v Speaker 1>dropped this evening One Nation up four points now again

0:29:51.260 --> 0:29:53.090
<v Speaker 1>as I told you before when it's one point here

0:29:53.110 --> 0:29:56.770
<v Speaker 1>or one point there it's a level of statistical noise Again,

0:29:56.830 --> 0:29:58.630
<v Speaker 1>these things can change in a couple of weeks' time.

0:29:58.730 --> 0:30:00.830
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting it all down to Ooshie Gate, that Labor,

0:30:00.850 --> 0:30:03.860
<v Speaker 1>of course, fell by three. But the question here is

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.220
<v Speaker 1>the coalition. We'll get to that, which is that number

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.380
<v Speaker 1>is worse than the number just before they got rid

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:12.540
<v Speaker 1>of Susan Lee. So first up, Jamie, as our new

0:30:12.580 --> 0:30:13.980
<v Speaker 1>person in the room, I'll ask you, what do you

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think about what's going on with this poll?

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:17.380
<v Speaker 13>I'm not at all surprised by it.

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.959
<v Speaker 8>I said recently to somebody I was speaking to that

0:30:21.570 --> 0:30:24.730
<v Speaker 8>I think Angus Taylor is a great, hardworking man, as

0:30:25.010 --> 0:30:26.390
<v Speaker 8>many of the MPs are.

0:30:27.340 --> 0:30:28.020
<v Speaker 13>I think the.

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 8>Liberals are out there slogging it away on the road,

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 8>but at the moment they can't sell a gold brick

0:30:31.780 --> 0:30:36.420
<v Speaker 8>for a dollar. I think that the public are seeing

0:30:36.540 --> 0:30:40.900
<v Speaker 8>through what they now are calling the uniparty, looking back

0:30:40.940 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 8>at the last 20 years and kind of going, hang

0:30:43.060 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 8>on a minute, we went, you know, Liberal, Labor, Labor, Liberal, Liberal, Labor.

0:30:47.460 --> 0:30:50.260
<v Speaker 13>And they're just saying, well, you all stood for the

0:30:50.300 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 13>same things, really.

0:30:51.860 --> 0:30:52.540
<v Speaker 1>Correct, correct.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 13>And so now, you know, I think with all.

0:30:54.610 --> 0:30:57.210
<v Speaker 8>The controversy you see with One Nation, nothing's going to

0:30:57.270 --> 0:30:58.810
<v Speaker 8>pull people off them.

0:30:59.070 --> 0:31:00.930
<v Speaker 13>No, that's... I think it's a very loyal following.

0:31:00.970 --> 0:31:03.110
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because Samaras, of course, at Redbridge, he said that

0:31:03.150 --> 0:31:06.910
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that 20% of that whatever higher than 20

0:31:06.910 --> 0:31:10.650
<v Speaker 1>is is now locked in. Remember, if everything fell apart

0:31:10.710 --> 0:31:13.270
<v Speaker 1>and they fell down to 15%, that'd be a senator

0:31:13.330 --> 0:31:18.010
<v Speaker 1>in every state. So the picture still changes Australian politics. Yes,

0:31:18.050 --> 0:31:19.670
<v Speaker 1>does it come at the expense of the National Party?

0:31:19.710 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Does it come at the expense of the Coalition? Sure.

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.020
<v Speaker 1>But the upper end might come at the expense and

0:31:25.060 --> 0:31:27.850
<v Speaker 1>be the difference between majority and minority government for Labor.

0:31:28.170 --> 0:31:31.770
<v Speaker 1>And that, again, there was some other analysis around that today, Stephen, where, again,

0:31:31.790 --> 0:31:34.140
<v Speaker 1>and we're all... A long way out, but again, current

0:31:34.180 --> 0:31:37.650
<v Speaker 1>modelling would suggest government gets back. It'll get back with

0:31:37.690 --> 0:31:39.610
<v Speaker 1>the support of the crossbench, but it wouldn't be a

0:31:39.650 --> 0:31:43.070
<v Speaker 1>majority in its own right. Big change from the mid-90s here.

0:31:43.330 --> 0:31:45.070
<v Speaker 1>Do you put it all down to Ooshie Gate like

0:31:45.190 --> 0:31:45.540
<v Speaker 1>I have?

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 12>No, I think that one hasn't quite... penetrated the political

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:55.500
<v Speaker 12>consciousness across the country yet. But there's no question... Jamie disagrees.

0:31:55.540 --> 0:31:57.860
<v Speaker 1>Hundreds of thousands have seen it. Keep going.

0:31:58.620 --> 0:31:59.750
<v Speaker 13>As long as Annika's seen it.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.150
<v Speaker 8>As long as she's seen it, I'm happy.

0:32:03.630 --> 0:32:05.610
<v Speaker 1>Believe me, it's been shown. Hi, Annika.

0:32:05.770 --> 0:32:06.930
<v Speaker 13>How you doing?

0:32:07.250 --> 0:32:08.730
<v Speaker 1>All right, Stephen, the poll.

0:32:09.430 --> 0:32:13.430
<v Speaker 12>So, for those who want to think that One Nation's

0:32:13.510 --> 0:32:17.050
<v Speaker 12>voter is going to fritter away, just every single poll

0:32:17.790 --> 0:32:22.180
<v Speaker 12>suggests that You know, 20% to 25% may be absolutely

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.420
<v Speaker 12>rock solid locked in. And that will, as you say,

0:32:26.500 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 12>change the face of politics. It'll change the conservative side

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 12>of politics more than Labor's side. But as you've just said,

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 12>that analysis shows that Labor could be forced into minority

0:32:36.220 --> 0:32:39.420
<v Speaker 12>government from a record majority that it's ever had before.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.140
<v Speaker 12>So I don't think that anyone on Labor's side will

0:32:43.180 --> 0:32:46.740
<v Speaker 12>be cheering. And to win a majority government from 26% is...

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.310
<v Speaker 12>polls shows is very, very hard. Labor needs to be

0:32:52.380 --> 0:32:56.870
<v Speaker 12>back around 30, 31, 32, to be confident of, you know,

0:32:56.870 --> 0:33:01.989
<v Speaker 12>80 seats, 76, 74 being the target, but 76 when

0:33:02.030 --> 0:33:03.510
<v Speaker 12>you put in the speaker, but you need a few

0:33:03.530 --> 0:33:07.170
<v Speaker 12>more than that. So to be wanting to be 80 seats,

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.700
<v Speaker 12>there's a lot of hard work to be done by

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:12.500
<v Speaker 12>the Labor government.

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:14.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, during the break, we were talking about this social

0:33:14.990 --> 0:33:17.970
<v Speaker 1>media stuff that's about to make its way through the parliament. Jamie,

0:33:17.990 --> 0:33:20.310
<v Speaker 1>you made a very interesting observation, right, which is as

0:33:20.350 --> 0:33:23.390
<v Speaker 1>a person who is a digital creator, the way that

0:33:23.730 --> 0:33:26.250
<v Speaker 1>you are able to grow your following, which of course

0:33:26.290 --> 0:33:28.710
<v Speaker 1>potentially can be to grow your business, is that you

0:33:28.750 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>need people to see your stuff that aren't already following you. Otherwise,

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:35.390
<v Speaker 1>it just becomes, you know, there's this... echo chamber of

0:33:35.570 --> 0:33:38.990
<v Speaker 1>the thousands of people that are already following you. So

0:33:39.670 --> 0:33:42.420
<v Speaker 1>that could still happen if people decide that they're happy

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with the system as it currently is and they don't

0:33:44.220 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>opt out of the system. But what's your thoughts of

0:33:47.180 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>this potential button that will say, hey, when it comes

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.860
<v Speaker 1>to Insta, I'm only going to look at the people

0:33:51.900 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that I follow versus I'd love to see if somebody

0:33:54.380 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>like a Jamie's out there.

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:56.860
<v Speaker 13>I think it's scary.

0:33:57.140 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 8>Never in my life did I think that we here

0:33:59.700 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 8>in Australia would be discussing something like this. Like the

0:34:03.140 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 8>level of control this could be, you know, Stephen just

0:34:05.940 --> 0:34:07.740
<v Speaker 8>made a very good point about the fact that Labor

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:08.439
<v Speaker 8>need to be up.

0:34:08.340 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 13>32% or more.

0:34:10.060 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 8>So what do they need to control the algorithm to

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 8>ensure that happens?

0:34:13.300 --> 0:34:16.779
<v Speaker 13>I mean, let's be honest here. I think I had

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 13>a look today at a lot of the comments.

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.460
<v Speaker 8>When I see things on social media, people putting out

0:34:21.540 --> 0:34:24.259
<v Speaker 8>reels or comments that have been made, whether it be

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.990
<v Speaker 8>interviews on the ABC, things like that, I always read

0:34:27.010 --> 0:34:30.350
<v Speaker 8>the comments. And, man, 80% and 90% of the comments

0:34:30.410 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 8>out there that I read are the public saying control, control, control.

0:34:33.900 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 8>This is nothing short of control.

0:34:36.500 --> 0:34:38.410
<v Speaker 1>Well, the funny thing that I'm waiting for, Stephen, which

0:34:38.469 --> 0:34:41.029
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, everything from do not call registers

0:34:41.130 --> 0:34:43.529
<v Speaker 1>to truth in advertising, it always has just a little

0:34:43.570 --> 0:34:46.150
<v Speaker 1>asterisk at the bottom, which is doesn't apply to politicians, right?

0:34:46.370 --> 0:34:48.210
<v Speaker 1>And we certainly know that on this program, I've spent

0:34:48.230 --> 0:34:50.770
<v Speaker 1>plenty of time talking about the idiocy of how social

0:34:50.810 --> 0:34:53.380
<v Speaker 1>media is used. But, of course, the reality of it

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.779
<v Speaker 1>in 2026 is that it is very much the town

0:34:56.820 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>square for politics. So... Is it... We'll find out with

0:35:02.140 --> 0:35:04.700
<v Speaker 1>the legislation about whether it doesn't apply to politicians and

0:35:04.739 --> 0:35:07.140
<v Speaker 1>somehow they'll still be able to shove into your feed.

0:35:07.420 --> 0:35:10.380
<v Speaker 1>But if it is as is presented, what do you

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:12.450
<v Speaker 1>think of it as a former communications minister?

0:35:13.510 --> 0:35:16.969
<v Speaker 12>Look, I'm not a strong supporter of what ANACA is

0:35:17.130 --> 0:35:19.150
<v Speaker 12>trying to achieve, just like I'm a strong supporter of

0:35:19.190 --> 0:35:23.370
<v Speaker 12>what Daniel Molina is achieving by making big tech pay

0:35:23.810 --> 0:35:27.890
<v Speaker 12>tax in this country rather than shifting profits offshore to

0:35:27.930 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 12>avoid Australia's taxes. And I am bemused by this idea

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 12>of government control, giving the Australian public the choice to

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 12>turn the algorithm off. How that is somehow being portrayed

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.220
<v Speaker 12>as the government trying to control what you see when

0:35:46.260 --> 0:35:51.049
<v Speaker 12>it's the exact reverse. It allows Australians to decide they

0:35:51.110 --> 0:35:55.550
<v Speaker 12>don't want to be captive of big tech algorithms forcing

0:35:55.610 --> 0:36:00.580
<v Speaker 12>things down their throat. So giving Australians a choice about

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 12>whether they want big tech to control what they see

0:36:03.739 --> 0:36:07.500
<v Speaker 12>or they get to control what they see, I'm bemused

0:36:07.660 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 12>how people can try and build this conspiracy that it's

0:36:10.300 --> 0:36:11.380
<v Speaker 12>all about government control.

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:12.569
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go all the way down the

0:36:12.610 --> 0:36:14.610
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole, and he's so well-dressed, but that's not going

0:36:14.750 --> 0:36:17.190
<v Speaker 1>to save him when it comes to this rort stuff

0:36:17.210 --> 0:36:18.970
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get to in a moment or two's time. But, Jamie,

0:36:19.190 --> 0:36:22.669
<v Speaker 1>what is your point or fear when you invoke things

0:36:22.710 --> 0:36:23.629
<v Speaker 1>like that word? OK, so.

0:36:24.510 --> 0:36:27.030
<v Speaker 8>You're talking about you don't see how this is censorship

0:36:27.070 --> 0:36:27.570
<v Speaker 8>or control.

0:36:27.610 --> 0:36:29.689
<v Speaker 13>What about what the Greens have to say about it, though?

0:36:30.070 --> 0:36:33.030
<v Speaker 8>Because we've just seen recently that Labor need the Greens'

0:36:33.050 --> 0:36:35.710
<v Speaker 8>support to get things through. And just today it was

0:36:35.750 --> 0:36:38.090
<v Speaker 8>announced in The Australian that the Greens are wanting to

0:36:38.170 --> 0:36:41.589
<v Speaker 8>push Labor much harder on this. The Greens are wanting

0:36:41.670 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 8>to put time limits on your doom-scrolling, you know, and

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.339
<v Speaker 8>control how long... I mean, if I want to be

0:36:48.460 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 8>in my bedroom doom-scrolling on whatever I want for however

0:36:52.340 --> 0:36:55.009
<v Speaker 8>long I want on my time, that is my business.

0:36:55.180 --> 0:36:56.930
<v Speaker 1>Same as if I want to binge an entire season

0:36:56.950 --> 0:36:57.210
<v Speaker 1>of television.

0:36:57.250 --> 0:36:58.469
<v Speaker 13>That is exactly right.

0:36:58.650 --> 0:37:00.210
<v Speaker 1>All right, see, this is, by the way, Stephen, this

0:37:00.250 --> 0:37:02.350
<v Speaker 1>is where you and I, right, welcome to the new world, right?

0:37:02.430 --> 0:37:05.089
<v Speaker 1>Jamie working in reels. She can get the point out

0:37:05.130 --> 0:37:07.370
<v Speaker 1>in five seconds, right? Just gets the point out in

0:37:07.390 --> 0:37:10.820
<v Speaker 1>five seconds. No building to the crescendo like those of

0:37:10.900 --> 0:37:12.460
<v Speaker 1>us that are used to a little more time or,

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>dare I say, running down the clock in the Senate.

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.210
<v Speaker 1>So I love it. I love it. Thank you, Jamie.

0:37:16.610 --> 0:37:18.910
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let's get to this Rort stuff, OK?

0:37:19.989 --> 0:37:23.910
<v Speaker 1>Half a billion dollars, the government sets up a fund that, surprise, surprise,

0:37:23.950 --> 0:37:25.989
<v Speaker 1>ends up going to the majority of the seats where

0:37:26.010 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the government want it to go. This was a hanging

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.540
<v Speaker 1>offence when it was the Libs. Why is it not

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for Labor, Stephen?

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, firstly, I mean, Bridget McKenzie lost a job on

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 12>the claim that she was in conflict with the gun

0:37:41.540 --> 0:37:43.100
<v Speaker 12>club and she gave money to the gun club, OK?

0:37:43.219 --> 0:37:43.299
<v Speaker 10>Yes.

0:37:43.620 --> 0:37:47.190
<v Speaker 12>That was an obfuscation. for what was going on. But

0:37:47.570 --> 0:37:51.859
<v Speaker 12>you will not find a colour-coded chart anywhere. We don't

0:37:51.890 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 12>need one, it's all red. The PM's office at the

0:37:57.820 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 12>time and the minister's office and the staffers going through,

0:38:00.940 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 12>here's the seats. Labor made a string of election commitments

0:38:05.860 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 12>going into the election. Now, Paul, you've got to make

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 12>a choice here. Either you want to criticise them for

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 12>delivering on their election commitments Or you want to criticise

0:38:14.219 --> 0:38:17.100
<v Speaker 12>them for breaking their promises. Well, I'm happy to take

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:21.529
<v Speaker 12>the criticism because they delivered on their election promises. So

0:38:21.550 --> 0:38:26.590
<v Speaker 12>they made public commitments and they've delivered on their public commitments.

0:38:26.989 --> 0:38:27.230
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:38:27.370 --> 0:38:27.970
<v Speaker 12>End of story.

0:38:28.130 --> 0:38:30.069
<v Speaker 8>What about them having a go at the coalition for

0:38:30.110 --> 0:38:33.070
<v Speaker 8>doing the same thing then, saying that they will court barely?

0:38:33.989 --> 0:38:38.100
<v Speaker 12>Well, the coalition set up a scheme. With a colour-coded map.

0:38:38.140 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 12>I invite you to Google it.

0:38:39.260 --> 0:38:41.750
<v Speaker 1>But that's the allegation... And look it up... from the

0:38:41.790 --> 0:38:45.270
<v Speaker 1>Centre for Public Integrity is that they're saying that when

0:38:45.310 --> 0:38:48.290
<v Speaker 1>given the choice and it all ends up in Labor's hands,

0:38:49.150 --> 0:38:51.370
<v Speaker 1>it's not 151 seats. We made election commitments.

0:38:52.370 --> 0:38:55.569
<v Speaker 12>We didn't make election commitments in 151 seats.

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 8>Should we list the other commitments that were made?

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 13>I can think of a few broken promises.

0:39:00.620 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, if you want to criticise Labor for breaking promises...

0:39:04.690 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 12>go your hardest. But in this particular instance, Labor kept

0:39:08.739 --> 0:39:13.380
<v Speaker 12>its election commitments and they have kept them. And you

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 12>should actually be going, yay, Labor kept a commitment because

0:39:16.739 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 12>you like to go shocking when Labor don't keep an

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:23.050
<v Speaker 12>election commitment. These were election commitments and they delivered.

0:39:23.410 --> 0:39:25.410
<v Speaker 1>All right. Before we go off to the UK, Jamie,

0:39:25.430 --> 0:39:28.250
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on Warren Pickering? I'll give my thought in

0:39:28.310 --> 0:39:30.299
<v Speaker 1>a second here. But again, what he's been through. how

0:39:30.340 --> 0:39:31.940
<v Speaker 1>he handled it today. What do you think?

0:39:32.780 --> 0:39:35.589
<v Speaker 13>Do you know what? I saw James Ashby. I think

0:39:35.650 --> 0:39:35.930
<v Speaker 13>he was.

0:39:36.469 --> 0:39:38.830
<v Speaker 8>perhaps on Credlin last night, and he said, one nation

0:39:38.850 --> 0:39:41.850
<v Speaker 8>or the party are fessing up. And I thought that

0:39:41.890 --> 0:39:44.310
<v Speaker 8>was such a great statement to make because just like

0:39:44.350 --> 0:39:46.379
<v Speaker 8>we said before in the polls, this.

0:39:46.300 --> 0:39:47.620
<v Speaker 13>Isn't going to affect anything.

0:39:47.780 --> 0:39:48.299
<v Speaker 1>Not one.

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:49.219
<v Speaker 13>I think you've got a.

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.060
<v Speaker 8>Mass amount of like the public out there that are saying, well,

0:39:53.100 --> 0:39:55.180
<v Speaker 8>hang on a minute. I've got heaps of friends that

0:39:55.219 --> 0:39:57.980
<v Speaker 8>did X, Y, Z back in the day. I understand

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.740
<v Speaker 8>we want an increase of integrity in our parliament.

0:40:00.820 --> 0:40:01.980
<v Speaker 13>I totally support that.

0:40:02.890 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 8>But I'm thinking, you know, this wasn't 20 days ago

0:40:05.340 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 8>or 20 weeks ago or even 20 months ago. We're

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:11.940
<v Speaker 8>talking about something that happened perhaps 20 years ago and,

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 8>goodness me, the.

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.950
<v Speaker 13>Man's turned his life around. So I'm about redemption.

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:18.750
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you too. Stephen, I saw you speaking

0:40:18.770 --> 0:40:21.190
<v Speaker 1>with James on the Bolt Report last night and quite

0:40:21.210 --> 0:40:22.850
<v Speaker 1>correctly you were saying, look, if it's his handwriting, you

0:40:22.910 --> 0:40:24.330
<v Speaker 1>own up to it, all the rest of it. Again,

0:40:24.790 --> 0:40:28.580
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's around the corner, right? I don't

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>know what gets alleged. I don't know. what of the

0:40:31.620 --> 0:40:37.180
<v Speaker 1>allegation from the former partner. But obviously families are really difficult, right,

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:41.540
<v Speaker 1>and especially families that have had a lot of broken

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.820
<v Speaker 1>glass in and around them, right? I think that you know,

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you keep your kids out of the game,

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.610
<v Speaker 1>but the kids wanted to stand there today not to

0:40:51.650 --> 0:40:53.890
<v Speaker 1>be running for One Nation, not to say vote One Dad,

0:40:54.190 --> 0:40:57.670
<v Speaker 1>but to basically say, look, I am from the past

0:40:57.690 --> 0:41:01.510
<v Speaker 1>and I know the past and this is a good man.

0:41:01.850 --> 0:41:03.790
<v Speaker 1>What did you think of the way it was handled today?

0:41:03.830 --> 0:41:06.610
<v Speaker 1>And again, who knows where tomorrow is, but my expectation

0:41:06.670 --> 0:41:09.030
<v Speaker 1>is that I think we saw something pretty special today,

0:41:09.390 --> 0:41:11.589
<v Speaker 1>but that's me and, you know, I'm a lot more

0:41:11.630 --> 0:41:12.430
<v Speaker 1>orange than you are.

0:41:14.180 --> 0:41:18.280
<v Speaker 12>So I think last night I said, if it's your handwriting,

0:41:18.580 --> 0:41:21.140
<v Speaker 12>own up. Just own up. The cover-up's always worse than

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:24.660
<v Speaker 12>the actual crime. And to his credit, he did. I

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 12>think the one outstanding issue, which I don't know how

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 12>he addresses, is the stat deck from somebody who's not

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.069
<v Speaker 12>named saying I witnessed it. So a third party to

0:41:34.110 --> 0:41:38.150
<v Speaker 12>just the wife has made a stat deck to the Australian.

0:41:38.530 --> 0:41:40.930
<v Speaker 12>No one knows who it is. So it's very hard

0:41:40.989 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 12>for him to be able to rebut it because no

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 12>one knows who it is. So that's one tiny one

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:51.420
<v Speaker 12>that lingers, but credit to him for fessing up. He

0:41:51.460 --> 0:41:55.050
<v Speaker 12>did exactly what I said and the reaction has been, okay,

0:41:55.230 --> 0:41:58.950
<v Speaker 12>he's fessed up. And he is a redemption story.

0:41:59.150 --> 0:42:02.009
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. And, again, look, he's the one saying, look,

0:42:02.050 --> 0:42:04.090
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a test any time. Everyone can take the test.

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:06.980
<v Speaker 1>He's confident that he'd be able to pass it. And, again,

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that because there's that delineating line of the service, right,

0:42:10.620 --> 0:42:14.339
<v Speaker 1>the delineating time in the ADF, to me, I think

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:16.620
<v Speaker 1>most people, the way they watch this tonight, based off

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.930
<v Speaker 1>everything that they see, they see a guy who has

0:42:19.969 --> 0:42:22.669
<v Speaker 1>changed his life. And, again, not two weeks ago, not

0:42:22.710 --> 0:42:24.989
<v Speaker 1>two months ago. All right. Going to take a quick break.

0:42:25.010 --> 0:42:26.649
<v Speaker 1>I'll go into overtime with you guys in a moment

0:42:26.690 --> 0:42:29.009
<v Speaker 1>or two's time and then our special guest from London.

0:42:29.340 --> 0:42:31.260
<v Speaker 1>More in a second here on Paul Murray Live, including

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a little discussion about One Nation and superannuation. I'm sure

0:42:34.180 --> 0:42:36.540
<v Speaker 1>Stephen's going to give it three massive ticks. More with

0:42:36.580 --> 0:42:43.110
<v Speaker 1>Jamie and Stephen in a second. We're here with Jamie Johnson.

0:42:43.130 --> 0:42:45.710
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you can find her online. It is

0:42:45.969 --> 0:42:48.770
<v Speaker 1>at justjamiej, is the way you can find her on Instagram,

0:42:48.790 --> 0:42:50.629
<v Speaker 1>where you can find her taking the piss out of others,

0:42:50.830 --> 0:42:53.899
<v Speaker 1>including Annika Wells, but making good points about politics too.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:55.540
<v Speaker 1>Share it with your mates while you can. And the

0:42:55.580 --> 0:43:00.500
<v Speaker 1>JJ podcast, where you can hear her regular postings. Stephen Conroy,

0:43:00.540 --> 0:43:03.230
<v Speaker 1>of course, is here from Melbourne. And our dear friend,

0:43:03.250 --> 0:43:05.110
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, she sent me a text before that I

0:43:05.130 --> 0:43:07.250
<v Speaker 1>let you off the hook. when we're talking about censoring

0:43:07.270 --> 0:43:09.989
<v Speaker 1>the internet, because you and the Gillard government, you and

0:43:10.010 --> 0:43:13.170
<v Speaker 1>the Gillard government tried to introduce six different bills to

0:43:13.270 --> 0:43:14.950
<v Speaker 1>regulate the media, remember?

0:43:17.980 --> 0:43:21.219
<v Speaker 12>If only people had taken a stand about freedom of

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.820
<v Speaker 12>the press and some accountability a long time ago, it

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:26.460
<v Speaker 12>would be a better place.

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:28.390
<v Speaker 1>And as for.

0:43:29.370 --> 0:43:33.410
<v Speaker 12>for wanting to express our digital sovereignty over the big

0:43:33.450 --> 0:43:36.969
<v Speaker 12>tech gurus who now want to run the world with

0:43:36.989 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 12>their algorithms. Well, look, it'd be a different world right now.

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:44.100
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, Peter. There you go.

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 12>It was not about regulating the press. It was about

0:43:46.140 --> 0:43:50.140
<v Speaker 12>giving the press council powers to ensure that we actually

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 12>had some fair and true media.

0:43:53.180 --> 0:43:55.109
<v Speaker 1>See, I had an idea for a podcast once which

0:43:55.140 --> 0:43:57.070
<v Speaker 1>was called The History Wars where you just take a

0:43:57.110 --> 0:43:59.190
<v Speaker 1>moment like the regulation of the media and, you know,

0:43:59.510 --> 0:44:01.569
<v Speaker 1>the early 2010s and you get the two people to

0:44:01.610 --> 0:44:05.690
<v Speaker 1>still argue and whether the person has flipped at any time. Anyway,

0:44:05.750 --> 0:44:07.850
<v Speaker 1>an idea for another time. All right, now, let's keep

0:44:07.890 --> 0:44:12.210
<v Speaker 1>going here. One Nation in their superannuation position. Again, the

0:44:12.250 --> 0:44:15.529
<v Speaker 1>way Labor have automatically screamed at this is that somehow

0:44:15.570 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the $ 4 trillion that is there for the collective savings

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.460
<v Speaker 1>of the individuals is about to be piddled up against

0:44:20.500 --> 0:44:24.870
<v Speaker 1>the wall. Not true, again. the one nation system is

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're earning a hundred thousand dollars it's two and

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:29.980
<v Speaker 1>a half thousand dollars per year for three years now

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:32.839
<v Speaker 1>obviously the less you earn the less you have in

0:44:33.140 --> 0:44:36.739
<v Speaker 1>uh in super meaning that the consequences of pulling out

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:39.149
<v Speaker 1>two thousand dollars is a lot different for somebody who's

0:44:39.170 --> 0:44:41.750
<v Speaker 1>been earning seventy or eighty thousand dollars than somebody who's

0:44:41.770 --> 0:44:46.620
<v Speaker 1>been earning a hundred or two hundred thousand dollars um Jamie, again,

0:44:46.980 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Sky News Pulse, the majority of people or

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the biggest sample don't like the idea. But what do

0:44:53.219 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you think?

0:44:53.739 --> 0:44:57.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, I was very surprised by those numbers, to be honest, because, again,

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.950
<v Speaker 8>when I've seen anything mentioned about this online and I've

0:45:00.989 --> 0:45:03.210
<v Speaker 8>gone and read through the comments, everyone I can see

0:45:03.270 --> 0:45:05.970
<v Speaker 8>is saying whether or not you want to is your choice,

0:45:06.070 --> 0:45:09.190
<v Speaker 8>but people want the choice. So a lot of people

0:45:09.250 --> 0:45:12.090
<v Speaker 8>are saying it's my money and if I need help now,

0:45:12.190 --> 0:45:14.270
<v Speaker 8>here and now, to pay rent or to help people..

0:45:14.310 --> 0:45:16.320
<v Speaker 8>with a mortgage repayment or to put food on the table,

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:18.940
<v Speaker 8>then it's my choice. The other thing is, you've just

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:21.580
<v Speaker 8>said the numbers, if you're earning $ 90, 000 or $ 100, 000 a year,

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:23.780
<v Speaker 8>you're talking about a couple of thousand dollars a year.

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:24.250
<v Speaker 1>Very funny.

0:45:24.270 --> 0:45:26.870
<v Speaker 8>You know, and during COVID, the Coalition allowed people to

0:45:26.910 --> 0:45:29.989
<v Speaker 8>pull out $ 10, 000... Well, and as Stephen's about to say,

0:45:30.010 --> 0:45:31.390
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people spend it on gambling.

0:45:31.550 --> 0:45:33.049
<v Speaker 13>Well, OK, you can argue that.

0:45:33.070 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Because, sadly, that's what they did. But, yes, he knows.

0:45:35.420 --> 0:45:36.140
<v Speaker 12>It's a fact.

0:45:36.700 --> 0:45:37.180
<v Speaker 1>OK.

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.030
<v Speaker 8>But what I'm saying is that, you know, it's your

0:45:40.090 --> 0:45:42.230
<v Speaker 8>money to spend and if people need that in a

0:45:42.270 --> 0:45:44.489
<v Speaker 8>time of hardship, which, obviously, there was a lot of

0:45:44.530 --> 0:45:48.290
<v Speaker 8>cash flow issues during COVID... It's our money to have

0:45:48.450 --> 0:45:49.450
<v Speaker 8>access to.

0:45:49.570 --> 0:45:49.930
<v Speaker 1>Well, again.

0:45:49.950 --> 0:45:52.549
<v Speaker 8>So I think I'm all for freedom of people doing

0:45:52.590 --> 0:45:53.969
<v Speaker 8>what they want with their money.

0:45:53.989 --> 0:45:56.259
<v Speaker 1>I love the contradiction here, Stephen, from the government. You're

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.620
<v Speaker 1>adult enough to decide what should be in your social

0:45:58.660 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 1>media feed, but you're not adult enough to decide what

0:46:00.500 --> 0:46:01.959
<v Speaker 1>you should do with your own superannuation.

0:46:03.140 --> 0:46:06.320
<v Speaker 12>Now, look, the decision that people have to make, and

0:46:06.340 --> 0:46:07.940
<v Speaker 12>they need to be fully informed to make a decision,

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:10.149
<v Speaker 12>is what the questions you're going to say is, would

0:46:10.170 --> 0:46:12.810
<v Speaker 12>you like to live on half the level of today's

0:46:12.930 --> 0:46:17.500
<v Speaker 12>pension when you retire in 20 years' time? because the

0:46:17.780 --> 0:46:21.910
<v Speaker 12>core reason behind the policy that was put in place

0:46:21.969 --> 0:46:25.630
<v Speaker 12>back in 92, 93 was that the growth in pensions

0:46:25.730 --> 0:46:29.450
<v Speaker 12>over time with the baby boomers coming through meant that

0:46:29.750 --> 0:46:33.930
<v Speaker 12>the sustainability of the pension was under serious threat. In

0:46:33.950 --> 0:46:37.529
<v Speaker 12>other words, people thought that the government would have to

0:46:37.610 --> 0:46:41.230
<v Speaker 12>cut the pension sometime in the future or freeze it.

0:46:42.210 --> 0:46:45.270
<v Speaker 12>So the real choice is do you want to be

0:46:45.469 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 12>able to live on half the pension in the future?

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:53.580
<v Speaker 12>Or do you want a savings scheme that gets preferential

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:56.500
<v Speaker 12>tax treatments that will ensure that you don't need to

0:46:56.540 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 12>rely on the government in the future? That's the choice

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 12>that you need to explain to the Australian public that

0:47:02.620 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 12>they're going to make. Because any politician who wants to

0:47:05.020 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 12>look 20 years in the future and say, yeah, no, no,

0:47:07.140 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 12>the pension will keep going up, the pension will keep

0:47:09.060 --> 0:47:12.220
<v Speaker 12>going up, they're having a lend of you. Because That

0:47:12.410 --> 0:47:15.009
<v Speaker 12>those are the real choices. So that's why it was

0:47:15.070 --> 0:47:18.690
<v Speaker 12>introduced as compulsory, because we know that prior to making

0:47:18.730 --> 0:47:24.469
<v Speaker 12>it compulsory, the majority of Australians didn't have any superannuation.

0:47:24.770 --> 0:47:28.510
<v Speaker 12>So when there was the choice, they didn't have superannuation.

0:47:29.070 --> 0:47:31.580
<v Speaker 12>So they were going to rely on the pension in

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:36.060
<v Speaker 12>the future. So we've already had a test about would

0:47:36.100 --> 0:47:39.910
<v Speaker 12>people provide for their own retirement? And there was a

0:47:40.250 --> 0:47:44.530
<v Speaker 12>clear position for 50 years where they didn't. They relied

0:47:44.570 --> 0:47:48.490
<v Speaker 12>on the government. And just like the test. So Jamie's

0:47:48.610 --> 0:47:52.270
<v Speaker 12>absolutely right. There was an absolute test of the one

0:47:52.310 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 12>nation policy and 40 odd billion dollars came out of

0:47:56.340 --> 0:47:58.500
<v Speaker 12>the system. And you can look at what they spent

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.660
<v Speaker 12>it on. And yes, Jamie, unfortunately, the third largest spend

0:48:02.190 --> 0:48:04.850
<v Speaker 12>in all of the looking at it was on gambling.

0:48:05.050 --> 0:48:07.859
<v Speaker 12>And the first two weren't that flash either. I mean,

0:48:07.890 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 12>people literally lied on their form when they applied for

0:48:12.260 --> 0:48:14.180
<v Speaker 12>it about what they were going to spend it on.

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:16.739
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you, everyone. Put in your overtime sheets. I

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>do appreciate it. Thank you, Jamie. Thank you, Stephen. I

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:21.420
<v Speaker 1>think we'll be doing this again. Now, by the way,

0:48:21.460 --> 0:48:23.620
<v Speaker 1>my apologies for mentioning the Scottish play. Of course, it

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is News 24 Pulse. News 24 Pulse. News 24 Pulse.

0:48:28.310 --> 0:48:31.969
<v Speaker 1>The idiot social media efforts of government MPs. Next in

0:48:32.010 --> 0:48:38.819
<v Speaker 1>While You Were Working. Big busy show, so no time

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:40.879
<v Speaker 1>for the social media stuff. So here is the late debate.

0:48:40.900 --> 0:48:42.189
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you tomorrow with Megan Kelly.