WEBVTT - CHEAPIES: The best non-rookie bargains under $300K! | SuperCoach AFL: The Official Podcast 0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:08.559 Boxing Day, Black Friday Supercoach preseason. Everyone loves a bargain, 0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.760 especially here on the official Supercoach AFL show, and there 0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.760 are more bargains in Supercoach twenty twenty five than you 0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.040 can poke a stick at. We discussed a bunch of 0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.279 them a few days ago on our Mid Price Madness show. 0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.480 Go back and listen to that one if you missed it. That, 0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.560 of course, is anywhere you listen to your podcast, plus 0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.439 the Code Sports channel on YouTube you get all your 0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.600 Supercoach content. This season, we had to draw the line 0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:31.880 there somewhere for mid prices, and that was at three 0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.080 hundred thousand dollars, but the potential game changes that don't 0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.479 stop there. With a surprising list of experienced players available 0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.239 in the real bargain bin under three hundred k, and 0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.600 today we'll sort through those names and find the players 0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.040 who are viable options for our twenty twenty five Super 0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.280 Coach teams. I'm your host, Al Payton, and with me 0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.279 again is Dos Doskret to have you back with us 0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.160 to talk more Supercoach value. 0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.880 Yeah, can you get stuck in? Probably not as big 0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:59.800 big a pool we've got to pick from as we 0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.000 did in the mid Price Madness episode just the other day, 0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.240 But still keen to find those value picks that really 0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.800 could be some of the winning picks this year if 0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:09.440 we get it right. 0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.479 And Dan Banden joining us for the first time in 0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.959 this new Supercoach year. Dan, we know you're a real 0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.560 rookie guru, but this might be stretching your talents somewhat. 0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.240 Hopefully you've got some good names for us. 0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.200 Yeah, I've actually been a little bit out of the 0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.640 super Coach loop so far this season. We're focusing on 0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.280 super Coach BBO, which has been the band of my existence, 0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.000 all those laid out and things. But looking forward to 0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.520 jumping on and hopefully we can find a few value 0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.400 picks for those listening. 0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.720 And joining us. Today's special guests a longtime friend of 0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.639 the show, host of the Footy Mailbag podcast, Damo, Welcome aboard, 0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.760 and looking at that jumper in the background, Free, I 0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.960 might have a couple of juicy little bargains for us 0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:50.640 when we get to those during the show. 0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.160 Yeah, they might do. Thanks for having me, guys. Yeah, 0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.240 some nice cheap guys to have a look at in 0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:57.800 this episode. 0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:02.400 Hopefully absolutely so. The format here will be similar to 0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:03.680 what we did for our mid pressure a bit of 0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.280 a draft, going around the room calling out names that 0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.919 we want to discuss. Now, as I said, this isn't 0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.280 really about rookies as such, but I thought off the top, 0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:16.480 we might mention a few names potentially who are sort 0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.440 of older rookies that have been around for a few years. 0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:19.880 But we haven't really seen much of them, and they're 0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.440 still in the very very cheap bracket, so they won't 0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.480 be the main content of the show. But we'll mention 0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:25.880 a few names. And I mean, Dan, this is really 0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.359 your wheelhouse. So is there anybody there that you think 0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:30.560 could be a real option for us this season? 0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.000 I think the big one is probably Josh kibkiss Penny 0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:35.880 on his injury. He's been a rookie for us before 0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:37.960 and made a heap of cash and obviously a lot 0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.799 of us jumped on last year, and you know, we 0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:42.959 made the feel of pain when he suffered that injury 0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.440 so so early into the season. But if he Getty's 0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.120 body right, I think there's gonna be a lot of 0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:49.560 footy down there for the Tigers. 0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.200 So and he's intercep King, so I like him. 0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:53.919 He's still at a really good price at one fifty 0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.240 three K and he made about one hundred and fifty 0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.359 CAH on his starting price a few years ago when 0:02:58.360 --> 0:02:59.960 he was a rookie, so he's. 0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.760 Dead definitely one to consider. 0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.280 I've been down at Gelong training a bit for my 0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.960 role at a Gelong Advertiser and Mitch Never is looking good. 0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.160 I think he pumped out about a two hundred and 0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.800 ten score and in the last VFL game of the 0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.960 season he's at one hundred and forty nine K. As 0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:20.120 a midfielder, he's you know, even Dansfield said during the 0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.400 preseason at the beginning of the preseason sort of tipped 0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.840 him to be a part of that midfield group to 0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.280 start the season he was playing more inside than outside 0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:31.280 in the VFL. 0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.360 So he's another to look at. Zach Reid. He's he's 0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.000 just a perennial rookie, isn't he. 0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.120 You know, he's made a paper But you know, at 0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.400 that price, if he is playing, you'd think surely if 0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:45.480 he's fit, he's. 0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:46.840 Playing in that essenonce side. 0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.360 Another bomber as well, in a Lijah status was an 0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.680 absolutely ball magnet at junior level and a VFL level 0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:54.200 as well. 0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:56.840 Just whether he gets that midfield role. 0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.520 That's probably the only question mark because you can certainly 0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.560 find the footy and Neil Erasmus as well from the Dockers, 0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:10.600 one of Demo's men over there Ford midfielder and at 0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.560 a pretty good price as well. Just be whether it 0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.880 can squeeze into that pretty stacked free O midfield. 0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:17.599 Yeah, I was going to throw it to Demo on 0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.160 that one. I mean, he's been putting up some big 0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.279 numbers in the Waffle. I know the Phantom is a 0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.520 big fan, but yeah, can you see a spot for 0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.680 him in the best twenty three or twenty two of 0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:26.200 the Dockers. 0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.760 Well, with Fife and Welters going under the knife to 0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.480 fix up, to fix up their knees, maybe he might 0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.240 get a role to start the season and be a 0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.719 good money maker over the first six or seven weeks 0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.359 and someone we can jump off pretty quickly, but someone 0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.040 we can start with to get a nice run of 0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:43.960 scores from. 0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:45.960 And yes, Dan mentioned the fact that he's a forward 0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.440 mid two. That helps because we need some players for 0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.080 our forward bench. Is another one in that category. Dos 0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.320 over in the Eagles, which I know you're watching very closely. 0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.680 Elijah Hewitt, how is he shaping up this prison, but 0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.240 we actually get a chance to see how good the 0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:02.440 Eagles think he can be. 0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.200 Well, I hope so yeah, I think from you know, 0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.680 I haven't seen too much yet coming out of Eagles, 0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.720 but I think, yeah, if we get a good look 0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.239 at him in the preseason, there's nothing like he should 0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.160 be basically in every team. I think. You know, it 0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.520 was a highly touted pick, could play through the midfield, 0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.960 even had some bursts through the midfield in his rookie year, 0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.680 but then missed the entirety of last season. So he's 0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.000 coming into basement price, you know, heading into that third season. 0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:27.760 I think it's kind of a no brainer pick if 0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.280 he does, if his body does hold up in the preseason. 0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.279 Yeah, nice. All right, Well, we'll get now into the 0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:35.880 really interesting names, which is going to be a bit 0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:37.359 more fun, I think, and especially when we get to 0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.240 some of these late picks. I reckon we'll be coming 0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.480 up with some pretty juicy ones. But what was the 0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:43.760 draft order that we came up with. I think I'm 0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:44.719 running last again. 0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.560 So yeah, the draft order we have today, which I 0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.840 did sort of have to make some shuffles for a 0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.840 few laid outs here, but Dan's coming up with the 0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:54.839 number one pick. 0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:55.960 Al, you're coming. 0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.279 Second today, Oh, ok, not too far down. Then it's 0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.160 me and then we've stitched our guests up the final 0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.920 spot in the draft. As we know, we're not doing 0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.479 a snake draft. This isn't really a draft in terms 0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.000 of who you'd pick first, who you'd pick last in 0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.560 this sort of positions. It's just more your gut feel 0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:13.920 who you want to pick and who you want to 0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.640 talk about in these under three hundred k brackets. So 0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:18.760 we're not talking about it as a draft. It's just 0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.000 sort of to get just to have a bit of 0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.279 fun with this episode out. 0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.800 Yeah, absolutely, so Dan over to you. We'll call it 0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.839 the number one pick. You're on the clock. 0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.520 I'm going to take a bit of a cop out 0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.839 and it's probably going to take me about ten seconds 0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:38.080 to lodge this pick in this bracket. Caleb Daniel, he's 0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:42.679 priced at fifty average, which is just insane for someone 0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.800 who's all Australian in the past, and someone who's been 0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.440 a pretty consistent super coach scorer when he's had the role. 0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.640 He hasn't had the role of the past couple of years. 0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.440 Was the sub eight times last season when he got 0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.800 absolutely bevoed but scored ninety seven one hundred in his 0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:06.520 last two games for the Bulldogs. And you know, even 0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:12.320 his manager was saying when he got traded to North 0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.880 Melbourne that he wanted to be happy and free and 0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:20.480 obviously spoke about that that half back role, and yeah, 0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.040 I think it's a nice fit there for North Melbourn. 0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.160 They need someone to you know, to use the ball. Well, 0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:28.880 they had Zack. 0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.760 Fisher, you know, for crying out loud, that's who they 0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.760 turned too off half back. So I think he's one 0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.680 who's going to take all those points. You know, even 0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.040 mckirche does he move more into the midfield in twenty 0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.000 twenty five, I think it's only a matter of time 0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:42.800 until he does. 0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.880 So, yeah, Caleb Daniels just yeah, you know, throw away 0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:47.679 the key. I think. 0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.160 Anyone wan who think of a reason not to pick 0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:52.560 Caleb daniel like I haven't got. 0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:58.679 Any, seems pretty straightforward there because average ninety three hundred 0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:00.640 and one and ninety nine at the in the three 0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.640 seasons that he was playing that role. So even if 0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.720 he only replicates that the ninety three, that's still a 0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.080 good selection at two sixty nine k yeah. 0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:08.560 One percent. 0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.640 I mean He's one that you could imagine being a 0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.240 season long keeper for two hundred and fifty ode thousand. 0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.080 So yeah, pretty hard to overlook that we jumped straight 0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.440 to the second pick then, And I've got a few 0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:19.960 names I must sleep, but I better go with the 0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.800 guy before anybody else picks him, and that is Tom 0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.360 Lynch at the Tigers one hundred and eighty three thousand, 0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.520 which is an equivalent of a thirty five average. That's 0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.760 really rookie level. And you know, we've talked about Tom 0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.400 a bit on some of our pods already because obviously 0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.440 I'm a big fan as a Richmond manon just desperate 0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.160 to see him get back out there. He only played 0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.000 four games in each of the last two seasons, hasn't 0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.520 played a full season since twenty nineteen, so he's always 0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.120 got those issues with his body, and that's obviously the 0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.040 big red flag on him and the watchover preseason. But 0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.360 touch Wood at the moment, he's looking pretty good. Went 0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.160 down U Punt Road just before Christmas and he was 0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.360 looking absolutely ripped. Took part in some of the matches 0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.920 him was moving nicely. So I just hope he gets 0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.800 through to least round one and hopefully enough into the 0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.960 season to at least make us some money. Obviously, key 0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.080 forward's always a bit of a lottery, and you know, 0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.600 playing key forward for Richmond is probably not going to 0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:12.920 be the most lucrative role he could imagine. I mean, 0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.200 you go back to that twenty twenty two season when 0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.840 he averaged ninety four for the year, and he finished 0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.679 the season with some really high school I think he 0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.000 had a purple patch in the middle of the year 0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.080 where he went one sixty seven point eight four one 0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.559 seventy seven in a three week patch. So that'll be amazing. 0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.640 But I'm not expecting anything like that. But if he 0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.360 can just grab a bag of three or four a 0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.360 couple of times Spikey price, that might be enough for 0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.120 us to just make a quick hundred hundred and fifty 0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.160 k out of him and trade him on. But no 0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.160 early buy for the Tigers. They played their first game 0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.240 in Round one, So if he's named in that team, 0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:44.480 I think he's going to be in more super coos team, 0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.440 maybe on the field or on the bench. You could 0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:47.880 probably put him on the bench with the emergency, but 0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:49.760 that's that's getting a bit ahead of ourselves. But yeah, 0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.480 obviously I'm a big Tom Lynch fan, So am I 0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.959 am I just blinked by my Tiger supporting views or 0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.440 is there something genuine there? Does he? 0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.320 I mean at his price and given you know he's 0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.520 a veteran of the game, if he gets on the park, 0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.840 he's should be value. But I don't know if I 0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.520 can bring myself to bring in a key forward at 0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:19.000 Richmond season. So I think you're guaranteed to use a trade. 0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.880 And if we see an injury, which you know, unfortunately 0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.880 has plagued his career late in his career, you're just 0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.240 going to waste the trade. And does he even go 0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.839 up that much in value, I might just start with 0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.640 someone that is the basement type. If we do get 0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.120 those players named round one before the game open, like 0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.240 when round one begins, I might be tempted to just 0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.720 save that cash. And you know he's if he's going 0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.160 ballistic in the first couple, I might be happy to trade, 0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.319 say a failed mid price it down to a Tom 0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.360 Lynch rather than to start with him personally. But you know, 0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.000 you talk about his history and he should be under 0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.040 price based on that. But I think I'd be happy 0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.200 starting with someone a little bit cheaper and banking, say 0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.560 sixty K to spend elsewhere to stuff the season. 0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.720 Yeah, it's an interesting point. Whether you could afford to 0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:05.760 just watch him for a couple of weeks. His price 0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.280 isn't going to move, and then yeah, if you feel 0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.160 like there is something there that you need that you 0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.640 can maybe move a few deck chairs and try and 0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.240 get him in. Although that price might be a little 0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.280 bit awkward, but yeah, given that the risk that comes 0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.320 with him, that probably is a sensible way to attack it. 0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.400 But Danny, do you like Tom Lynch and who you 0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.160 got for us with your pick? He already done, I've 0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.480 already picked out. It's not Richmond at the draft. I 0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.360 don't have every pick in the top ten. But I 0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:34.400 don't know about Lynch. 0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:35.760 But I think I was one of the ones who 0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.960 didn't pick Joey Danaher when he was cut price, and yeah, 0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:41.840 I was really made to pay out. I sort of 0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.600 had that attitude of oh, ja, he's a key forward. 0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:46.680 He could really stink it up. But I think even 0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.160 Charlie Kerno as well that year I passed on him, 0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.520 And yeah, he ended up firing, not so much at 0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.720 the start of the season, but ended up, you know, 0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.760 making a fair bit of cash. So yeah, he's on 0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.600 the park. Yeah, he'll definitely be in calculation. But I 0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.320 think the other thing as well is there's just so 0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.120 much value in the forward line, and so you know, 0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.920 it's type for spots. So he's probably going to need 0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.960 to be showing a bit in the preseason to justify 0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.320 its selecting him, especially if. 0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.560 There's a few rookies, cheaper rookies around as well. 0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:18.880 Yeah, yeah, for your point, I think Oscar Allen's another 0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.920 one who's shown that key forwards can be money makers, 0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:23.959 but you sort of have to ride the rollercoaster a 0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.000 bit with him. Now we'll get to Demo. Sorry, but 0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.840 that I've maked w the order already, so I'm terrible 0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.920 at this. Whoever's big it's supposed to be, now, feel 0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:33.920 free to jump in. 0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.520 I'll jump in because I really want this guy. And 0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.320 we did stitch up Damo, so I'm hoping that this 0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.200 wasn't your first pick. Demos did stitch up. But my 0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.800 man Taylor made for a second year breakout ari show 0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:52.040 and maker at two one hundred and seventy five hundred dollars. 0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.959 Haven't heard his name too much this preseason, but only 0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.920 played the four games last year average sixty four super 0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.360 Coach points. We still saw some impressive highlights though, with 0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.440 that booming left peg and elite disposal. The thing that 0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.360 I really like about him this year, there's no Josh Battle. 0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.959 He's off to the Hawks. There's no Riley Bonner who 0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.480 was delisted. That's twenty three games and nineteen games from 0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.440 their defense gone this season. Ari's going to come in 0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.280 there and mop up all that. All those possessions took 0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.640 kickins last year, even with guys like Jack Sinclair and 0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.439 Asia Wanganeen Miller in the side, had a massive kick 0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.520 to handball ratio in those in those four games, four 0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.680 point twenty seven kick to handball ratio in the AFL. 0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.920 That was twelfth overall of all players, and among defenders 0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.600 the guys above him was only people like Luke Ryan, 0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.320 Steven May and Econo McKenna randomly as well in there. 0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.480 But for me, you know, last year, this time last year, 0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.439 he was doing conditioning blocks in January February last year 0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.600 to get up to AFL standard and was even made 0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.720 to do some VFL training at this time last year. 0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.400 So from what we've seen, he's training with the main 0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.760 team he's my man for a big, big breakout in 0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.440 year two, and at two hundred and seventy k, you 0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.320 know you can just slot him in defense. Got a 0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.080 great buy as well, had some massive NFL numbers, so 0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.880 Ari shall make it. I'm big on in this price bracket. 0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.040 I did own him late last year and he is 0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.320 very fun to own because every time he kicks it, 0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.480 it's always fifty five to a contest, and he did 0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.640 have a couple of bigger games. The one I guess 0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:33.760 counterpoint is Toby Trevalia coming in. Does he take those points? 0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:34.680 Does he take the role? 0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:35.280 Yeah? 0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.160 If I think Ari his kicking is a huge plus 0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.880 because he can kick it sixty on a bad day 0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.520 and really, you know, with his penetrating kick really set 0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.160 it up for defense. But yeah, it would be interesting 0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.160 to see if his role, if he is a lock 0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.120 in there and if he is that number one distributor 0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:54.600 from the Saints defense. 0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.520 Yeah, no, he's a good PI. I don't know if 0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.320 he quite fits the criteria for this is his second 0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.440 year rookie. I've really been looking. 0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.280 At Okay though, that's that's smoky. 0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:04.960 I reckon that calls that counts. 0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:10.160 Let it, Damo we've finally get to you who we 0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:11.840 haven't taken all the guys you had in mind. 0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:17.320 No, luckily not. I'm I'm looking at Tom Douday at 0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.440 two hundred and fifty six K, so he's priced at 0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.240 forty nine. He averaged seventies and eighties at the Crows, 0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.680 but in twenty twenty one he finished with an eighty 0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.520 five point four average for the year. But first nine 0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.560 games average ninety two point three and then the last 0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.400 five games average ninety point two. And we know what 0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.840 the Crows, they didn't always have the most conventional key 0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.040 defender setup, so when he had his low games, that's 0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.800 probably when he had to be stationed back in a 0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.800 lockdown role. But now is at Brisbane obviously a year 0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.360 out of the system with the ACL, but I don't 0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.560 think he plays too much lockdown with Stacevich, Payne and 0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.120 Andrews all down there, and his high ceiling games came 0:15:58.160 --> 0:15:59.880 when he was able to roam up to the wing 0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.880 and go across half back and intercept and distribute a 0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.360 bit more. So two fifty six K even if he 0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.240 only gets up to his eighties average, he's still going 0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:09.840 to make a bit of money for us. 0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:11.800 Yeah, I must have been when I looked up some 0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:13.640 isn't them as I was a bit surprised by some 0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.120 of those eighties and scores and above that which I 0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.440 thought he was a real lockdown, fullback kind of guy. 0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.240 But yeah, obviously he has the potential to score a bit. 0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.680 But hasn't been much news around him over the summer. 0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:26.520 Do we know if he's how he's tracking on that 0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:27.880 sort of injury comeback. 0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.400 I don't think it was a like a full tear 0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.760 that he did of his ACL when he did it, 0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.120 so I don't think they were worried about him being 0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.440 out for any proportion of this season. But I don't 0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.360 know if he's in full training yet. But we saw 0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.160 how good Will Ashcroft was after his recovery, so we 0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.920 know that Brisbane know the you know, the steps to 0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.080 make their players return in the best possible condition. 0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.080 Yeah, I definitely want to put on the radar. So 0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:00.920 I think now we go back around to it is 0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.480 your turn again, Dan, right as you say with the Times. 0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.160 But yeah, we got got another name we can put 0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:09.000 on our watch list. 0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.840 Yeah, I'm going another line. I'm surprised is slid this far? 0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:17.760 What an absolute slide? Are Kitty Coleman at two sixty 0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.840 nine K a little bit out of sight, out of mind, 0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.080 but at that price, it's it's hard to miss him 0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.360 when you're scrolling down the list trying to look at 0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:34.520 defender options to seventy K. Obviously suffered that that acl 0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:39.280 in in the first round of last season, but you 0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.960 look at you know what sticks in my mind is 0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.760 that twenty twenty three Final Series. He pumped out of 0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.760 one twenty seven in the prelium against the Blues and 0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.119 then it was pretty much best on ground in the 0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.959 first half of that Grand Final against Collingwood with a 0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.880 he had twenty six disposals, six tackles, eight marks, seven 0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.800 rebound fifties, one hundred twenty seven super Coach points again, 0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.679 so that's back to back one twenty sevens from his 0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.879 last three, last two completed games, and you think that 0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:13.000 he's got a pretty defined role there for the Lions. 0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:17.400 So yeah, I think he's quite a good pick there 0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.040 in defense with there's obviously a few other options like 0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.000 Callum Mills and think that sort of cheaper sort of 0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.639 a price range, but yeah, I think he's probably going 0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.240 to be in my team. 0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:30.919 I would have thought and you're. 0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.000 I guess the one question mark maybe is does he 0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:38.040 take kick ins? But you know, I'm probably getting Kitty 0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:45.520