WEBVTT - How to pick a suburb ripe for booming house prices

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Hi. I'm Julianne Sprague, Wealth editor at The Australian. I'm

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>filling in for James Kirby today, who is on a

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>very well deserved break and today we want to get

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stuck into how you can pick the right spot for

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>an investment property. You might want to buy an investment

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>property or add to your existing portfolio, but how do

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you get the spot that will deliver you the maximum return.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You might think that there's a city that you want

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to invest in, maybe it's a city that you live in,

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>but how do you get the right suburb the best suburb.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is Ben Kingsley. So Ben is the

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>chair of the Property Investors Council of Australia and he

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>has more than twenty five years of investing experience advising

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>people in property markets. He's also the co author of

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>two books with his fellow empower Wealth business partner Bryce Holdaway,

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and together they host the Property Couch podcast. But today

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Ben Kingsley is joining us right here on the Money

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle to share his top property investing tips. Ben, thank

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us on the Money Puzzle.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Delighted to be here, Julianne.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to have a chat to you because you've

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of experience in this area. All of

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the stories we are putting together at the moment appointing

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to property growth over the next twelve months. It just

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>seems that things have aligned, the property prices will go up,

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but not all property markets are created equal, and within

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>those there are little subsections. So I want to ask you, Ben,

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how do you determine where is the best place to

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>buy an investment property? What are the fundamentals you look to?

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so how long have we got? But we'll start

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>with the big ones. So absolutely there are markets within markets.

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 3>That is proven to be true that different property cycles

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>can occur in different markets, and there are different reasons

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>behind why those particular activities happen. So we break it

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>down into if you think about short term usually what

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about there is the sentiment, and you're also

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>looking at demand and supply, so you're looking at certain

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 3>variables that will determine, you know, whether a market is

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 3>in balance, in equilibrium, or whether it's out of balance.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 3>And of course you know in terms of a shortage

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 3>of supply does put pressure on capital growth over time.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 3>So supply is the enemy of capital growth is often

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 3>what you would say, and so when you're thinking about

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>it in the short term, you're looking for those variables,

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 3>so things like auction clearance rates, days.

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 2>On market, stock on market, and if your.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Days on market is coming down, that means that there's

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously a.

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Body of demand that's there.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 3>And so and then on the supply side, you're looking

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>at things like what is the you know, the future

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 3>building approvals and what commencement have started, and so then

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 3>you start to think about, you know, those markets in

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 3>terms of well, if I've got a lot of vacant

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 3>land around me, then potentially there is risk that there

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 3>will be future over supply and that might taper my

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>future capital growth. So short term, it's very much a

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>story of supply and demand and looking for those markets

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 3>where you know there might be an inbalance between.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Supply and demand.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 3>And then over the medium to longer term, it's absolutely

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 3>got everything to do with economic activity. And so what

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean by that is the economic activity is going

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 3>to drive that population story.

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>So if you think about a thriving city that needs.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Workers, those workers will arrive that would put pressure on

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 3>housing both from a rental point of view, but also

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 3>potentially from a future purchasing point of view. And so

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 3>that's why we see the capital growth in our major

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>capital centers usually performing quite strongly during times of economic

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>growth and strong population growth into those centers, and of

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>course we see the reverse when you know, if you're

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 3>as old as I am, you will know that during

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the sort of John Kurrent era, and we had some

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 3>failures in Melbourne in terms of the economic situation, we

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 3>had a lot of debt and the economy wasn't performing

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>very well and we see a lot of migration up

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 3>into Queensland, and the property markets suffered quite considerably during

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>that time because you know, we also had pyramid building

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>society and some banks failing, so it wasn't a good time.

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>So we do know that if there's no jobs here,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 3>we're not going to necessarily move that population here, and

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>that's not necessarily going to then bode well for that

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 3>population story and that demand story.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>If we look at the information at the moment, though,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it does seem we have a supply issue. There's just

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>not enough supply of housing across the country that's fed

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>into things. You know, we had thirteen interest rate rises

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and property prices didn't fall as a result, it didn't

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>do what typically property markets have done. And now we're

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in an easy cycle again, given how much property markets

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have risen and how much they are anticipated to keep going.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>What are the risks though for investors? How do you

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're not sort of getting caught out here

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're buying right at the top.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 3>That is a great question, and let's unpack. You know,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 3>traditionally you are right, higher interest rate thirteen rate rises,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 3>you would normally see a correction in the market. But

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 3>what we also saw during that time was the immigration program,

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 3>which delivered over sort of six hundred and seven hundred

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 3>thousand people, and over the sort of last two or

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 3>three years, we've got a minion extra people in this country.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 3>So that along with record low unemployment or record high employment,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 3>also meant that people could continue on with making their

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 3>plans for their lives, so buying their homes and so forth.

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 3>So that's why we can sort of say, okay, we

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 3>can make a case as to why property didn't normally

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 3>do what it normally does.

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>If those arrivals.

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Didn't come, and if unemployment had risen higher, then we

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have seen any sort of price growth during that

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>higher cost of doing business when it comes to the.

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Mortgages we have on our properties.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about today and what's going to be

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 3>the catalyst for that growth. So there's a couple of

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 3>things that are going to go on, and I want

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 3>to talk on the investor side.

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 2>We are seeing a lot of.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Animal spirits in the investment space at the moment, and

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 3>those animal spirits are potentially getting ahead of themselves in terms.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Of buying in the affordable quartile.

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 3>So the bottom twenty five percent of properties are very

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 3>attractive to obviously first home buyers, but they're also very

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 3>attractive at the moment to investors, and investors are certainly

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 3>looking for that sort of classic recantile home that might

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 3>be an existing property.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Because back to your.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Point earlier, Julianne, in terms of this shortage of accommodation,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 3>since twenty nineteen, the cost of build a home has

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 3>basically gone up almost fifty percent being able to provide

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 3>new stock. So there's been a lot of pressure on

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>the existing stock market, and that's why we're seeing the

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 3>best performing market at the moment is that bottom twenty

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>five percent. The percentage price growth that we're seeing in

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 3>those areas are outstripping what we would call the middle

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 3>tier suburbs and certainly what we might judge as the

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 3>prime or the blue chip suburbs in our inner city

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>areas in most capital cities with the exemption of the Act,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>which is performing in a more natural way because unfortunately

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 3>that they policy settings are very anti investment at the moment,

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>so they're not getting that investment activity. All the other

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 3>states and territories are enjoying that, but they're certainly not.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that lower end of the market soon.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get your thoughts on what might

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>happen in that area given the expanded first home buyers

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>scheme from the federal government. But can we talk about

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>how you identify different areas of a market you've chosen

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So say, we published a story recently in The Australian

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>where there are a couple of experts that tipped Perth

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or Southeast Queensland as a sure bet for investors over

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the next twelve months. They are still bullish on Melbourne,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>but there are all the taxes and all the other

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>things going there. So to say, if you want a

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>sure thing pers or Southeast Queensland. Now say if you

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>take that proposition, go, Okay, I'm feeling good about either

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of those markets. How do you then zone in and

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>go which area of that particular market should I be

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>buying in? Because not all suburbs are created equal.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great question. So what we would then start to

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 3>do is as we go through the macro down into

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the micro, we're starting to then analyze the data that

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>we're collecting, and we usually collect that at the suburb level,

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>so we're able to get quite a lot of rich

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 3>data at the suburb level around those some of those

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 3>variables that we were talking before about. So we think

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>along the lines of auction clearance rates. If it's a

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 3>heavily concentrated auction market, they're not so good if it's

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 3>not a high concentration of auctions happening in that area.

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So just to drop in on that bit, but say,

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're going for auction clearance rates, what am I

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for? What exactly should I zone in on?

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So if it is a high area where you

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 3>do get lots of auctions and the clearance rate is

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 3>above seventy percent and moving into five eighty percent, that's

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 3>giving you an immediate market signal in that area. That

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 3>there's more buyers than there are sellers, and so that

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 3>is becoming a selling market and so that's going to put.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Pressure on prices. So if there is you know, four.

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Or five people or even six, seven, eight people competing

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 3>at auction, you're really clear in terms of you've got

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 3>a really strong signal that that's a market that's under

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 3>pressure in terms of demand, and so that's going to

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 3>potentially force prices higher as more of those people decide

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 3>that they want to get into that location.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>And then a market like Perth that doesn't really have auctions,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 1>is it a matter of do you sort of sort

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of rock up to some home opens and to see

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>how many people are trying to get in?

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>That's right, I mean, certainly that's another indicator in terms

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 3>of as you so you know, we don't know that

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 3>if we're if we're doing our research, you know, the

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 3>in our offices as opposed to being in the field.

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 3>The first things we start to look at is things

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 3>like stock on market and then days on market, So

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 3>how long is it taking for those properties to sell

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 3>over time? And if we're seeing the trend coming down,

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 3>and then we then go out and do our field research,

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and yes, to your point. We attend some of those opens,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 3>we will start to see the number of people going

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 3>through those particular properties. Then we're also tracking things like

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 3>number of offers, number of contracts that are being issued

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 3>on that particular property. So we're starting to get that

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 3>those signals, and those signals are stronger than the general

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 3>noise that we might see in other areas. And then

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 3>what you then do is you munge all of that

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 3>data together and you give certain wetings.

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>To some of those variables. So this is the demand

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 2>supply score or demand supply ratio. So you know, you might.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Measure eight, ten, twelve, fifteen variables and you're putting all

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 3>those together and you've got you've got a belief around.

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, if it is a high auction market and

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 3>you know where most properties are sold by auction, and

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing those high things, you'll give a.

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Higher weighting to that score.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 3>We score every property in Australia out of one hundred

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>and so if we basically then see high scores.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Then we know that there is an imbalance in that market.

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And then we go and validate that out in the

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 3>field to the research that we were just talking about,

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 3>which is how many people turned up to the open

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 3>for inspections, what number of contracts were issued, And we

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 3>know we're going to be in a competitive market, but

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>we're also then confident in that competitive market that the

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 3>level of demand, you know, in terms of the depth

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 3>of that demand is strong enough. And so that's that

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 3>supply demand story. Then we've got to lift our eyes

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 3>back to the question you asked earlier around say Southeast

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Queensland and Western Australia, namely Perth, but even some of

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the commutable areas of inter Perth they're also under good review.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Because that's when I come back to the whole story

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 3>about economic activity. You know, if you've got a strong

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 3>economy and that strong economy is driving the migration of

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 3>people into that market, then that's when you're going to

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 3>have longevity in regards.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>To your investment returns.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>And you mentioned really earlier when we started recording around

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 3>this idea is how do you know that's going to

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 3>be sustainable? Well, that's the whole you know, that's one

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 3>of the great messages I want the community to take

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 3>away today. If that's all been driven by investors and

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 3>investors only and there's no fundamentals underneath that then you're

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 3>going to be exposed and there's going to be risk

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>that you will be potentially buying at the top of

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 3>market and you may experience a downturn in property prices.

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 3>So you need to understand the short term drivers, which

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 3>is the supply demand and that economic stuff, and then

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>make sure that the economy is still strong, because if

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>it is going to be artificially inflated by investors who

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 3>are ill experienced, or they're being coached by enthusiastic buyers

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 3>agents who really don't know what they're doing, and they're

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 3>taking you into these regional markets or some of these

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 3>types of markets, you do run the risk of basically

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 3>buying into a dud market that will show its face

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 3>as the tide goes out over the next five years.

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you about buyers agents in the Sex But

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>just further on that, are you talking about the economy

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for the state or the city in question. Say you've

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>decided it's Southeast Queensland or state it's Perth, and you're

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>happy about the profile for the next whatever it might

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be five to ten years. I can imagine I wouldn't

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be the only person to think this, that you go

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>into a suburb and it's running hot, and I would

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>look left and right that there's some suburbs sort of

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>around the fringe and they look better value to me.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But what do I need to be careful about.

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's also introduce another concept which I think is

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a really important concept, and that is investors in residential

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 2>property shouldn't be the price maker, they should be the

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 2>price taker. So ultimately, what you're looking for there is

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 2>that the fundamentals are grounded in owner occupiers wanting to

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 2>live there. If you don't have that, again.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 3>You're giving yourself the risk of well, this has all

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 3>just been in speculative returns because someone picked a hot

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 3>spot and half a dozen buyers agents all agreed and

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>they all went in there and artificially inflated the price.

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 3>So it does come back to what you were saying before.

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the economic activity that's happening in that center.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 3>So if I'm buying in Perth, well, the economy, it's

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the best economy in the country. The government's got very

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 3>low debt in comparison to other states and territories.

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>The incomes enjoyed there are the second highest across the country.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Per capita, and the livability of living in a city

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 3>like Perth is very high. So you've got and you're

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 3>starting to see a stronger diversified economy, and the icing

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 3>on the cake, their cost of electricity through their gas

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and their cost of gas and all of those inputs

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 3>is also at record low levels.

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But it has been boom bust Perth. People were listening

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to this sound. That's all very well and good that

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it sounds good now, but you know.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Perth's already had a double digit run and it's probably

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 3>moved about thirty or forty percent as is already, and

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 3>then everyone's sort of saying Perth done well. It's still

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 3>performing in the top two. Darwin is the number one

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 3>capital city at the moment, but Perth's a strong second.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's because again they didn't look and lift their eyes.

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 3>These runs can go seventy eighty percent in some cases,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and that's because the fundamentals are good.

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if I.

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Take an example of maybe Townsill, Okay, which is a

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 3>regional town, there's no easy to commute down into Brisbane

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>for a job. You can't commute there for the day,

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 3>so you've got to then start to say, well, what's

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>happening in towns will from an economic perspective, because if

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I've only gone in there because I've been told that

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 3>rents are really high, and so I'll go in there

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 3>and compete against all the other investors who are.

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Going in there, what's the fundamentals.

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Like if you don't have that economic activity, well, where

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 3>are your renters going to come from? And what if

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 3>they don't have the jobs, why are they going to

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>stay there? They'll just relocate to another town. So that's

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 3>why it really is critical that you need to understand

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 3>what are those medium to long term drivers to get

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 3>into those markets.

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Now back to Perth, you.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Were saying, Yep, it's a you know, it's basically a

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 3>one trick pony town being a mining town. All the

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 3>reality is is, you know, that's not necessarily the case.

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>We've got the Orchest deal coming in there.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 3>We've got shipbuilding, we've got industry that's running at a

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 3>competitive advantage compared to the East Coast, and so if

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm the multinational and I want to potentially set up there,

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the conditions are better in Perth than they certainly are

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 3>in Melbourne. An ex example in terms of attracting me

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 3>to want to set and make that investment up and

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 3>then to basically bring the jobs into that particular market.

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 3>So now the fundamentals economically for Perth are really sound,

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 3>at least for the next five or ten years.

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>For anyone listening, I promise I haven't paid ben to Perth.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It is my favorite city. It is the city I'm based.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 2>And I love it and world champion and I live

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>in Melbourne.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got to head to a break soon. But I

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do want to get that sense of whether you should

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>be looking at the suburbs across that are cheaper or

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if you run the risk. It's our idea of if

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you're buying an investment property you want to maximize your dollar.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there any risk to that or is it actually

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a smart strategy to say this suburb is on fire

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but you just sort of look, you know, I don't

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>know as five case circumference or something. What's the metrics

0:16:58.800 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that you would use.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 3>The land is what we're trying to hold long term.

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 3>That's where the appreciation happened. It's not in the buildings,

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 3>it's in the land. And so let me introduce you

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 3>to other concepts, which is human interest in human behavior.

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>So in some respects, a lot of the land carry status.

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 3>One of the interesting things about property in the way

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 3>always say it's why it's owner occupier appeal because they

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 3>buy where their heart's not their heads.

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>So the reality is.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 3>When you find those blue chip locations, that is all

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 3>about my success and showcasing my success. So how do

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>we show off, you know, aspiration, We show it off

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 3>in the houses that we own, the cars that we drive,

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 3>the jewelry, et cetera. And so you do have this

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 3>aspirational element of living in the best suburbs around that

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 3>and so ultimately those suburbs come at a premium because

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 3>there's exclusivity, and that's where that land value appreciates over time.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 3>So if you're in a fortunate position where you can

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 3>potentially buy and hold and investment property in those higher markets,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 3>you are going to pretendctually see strong the land appreciation

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 3>because ultimately that is all about how humans activate in

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the ecology of their lives and the biology of who

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 3>we are as living in villages. So that is true

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 3>if your budget doesn't allow for that, and the income

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 3>off the rental needs to be an important part of

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 3>sustaining the holding of that property, then you're going to

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 3>move out to the mid tier suburbs or into the

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of outer fringes of the market. And that's how

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 3>the land is priced. It's ultimately priced from a ripple

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 3>effect where the most expensive land is located closer in,

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 3>and so it's looking at that land and looking at

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 3>its future productive use in terms of what it can do.

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 3>A single home can potentially be a duplex in the future,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 3>or it could even be a block of flat or

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 3>some townhousers. So that future productive use of that land

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 3>in that more exclusive area is potentially going to generate

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 3>you a longer term return over the decades. But of course,

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 3>if you want to invest, it's around your budget. So

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 3>if your budget allows you to take you into the

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 3>outer suburbs, then we still want to make sure that

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 3>there's low scarcity in terms of not a lot of

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 3>vacant land around you.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good tips, all right, Ben. When we come back

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>from the break, we'll have a chat about what you

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>think will happen to the market now that the government

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>is expanding the first Home Buyer scheme. I'll get your

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>top tips where you think the best property investments will

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>be over the next year. And also I wouldn't mind

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on some of the common mistakes people make

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>with property investing. We'll have that chat when we come back.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining me on the money Puzzle. I'm your

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>host Julianne Sprague, a wealth editor at The Australian, filling

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in for James Kirby, who's on a well deserved break.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm chatting with Benett Kingsley, a property expert. You can

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>find him at Empower Wealth and at the Property Couch podcast.

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Ben is joining me. We're having a chat about how

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you can pick a great place to buy investment property.

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>And then we spoke earlier about that lower end of

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the market and how it is quite hot at the moment.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>The federal government's expanding the First Home Buyers Scheme. Today,

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of measures have been sort of dropped, if

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>you like, or widened. More people will have access to

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this scheme. What is it going to do for property markets?

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Look, I'm pleased with the initiative because it will allow

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 3>people to get into the market, but of course it

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 3>falls on the demand side, so that's doing to potentially

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 3>create an additional set of demand for first time buyers

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 3>to get into the market. So the question for us,

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 3>and this is one is really hard to analyze, is

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 3>where is that concentration is. If it's going to be concentrated,

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 3>then that's going to sharpen the data really quickly and

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see price spikes, you know, as that

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 3>then sort of then becomes the norm in the market.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 3>My interesting observation here is that because it's lifted the

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 3>entry level price is allowing for people to get into

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the sort of middle tier markets. Hopefully that spread will

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily see it being such a high concentrated into

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the absolute entry level of the market. So I'm hoping

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to continue to inflate that price area

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>because there's already enough you know, sort of government policy

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 3>that's pushing a lot of people into that potential entry

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 3>level market.

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 2>And I'll give you a couple of examples. We're seeing a.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Lot of spooking property spooking around setting up trusts and

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 3>buying residential property and trusts, and I'm concerned about that

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 3>heavily because that's also pushing a lot of people into

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 3>those entry level markets. And there's more and more social

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 3>media marketing around that and also setting up self managed

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 3>super funds.

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And why do you think that's flourishing. What's the pitch

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there that's hooking people?

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm in You know if you go on to

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 3>social media and you look at the property spookers talking

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>about making sixty percent gains in twelve months, and you know,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>there's that human nature that basically drives people in that

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 3>they want to They want to know your investor, you

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 3>want to get that quick win, you know, like I

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 3>want to be bragging about that, almost like a stock pick.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 2>That's sort of what's happening.

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 3>So I am worried about that, and I've spoken publicly

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 3>about that recently, and so that's already driving people into

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 3>that entry level area. The other thing that's also of

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 3>the interest is appras three percent buffer rate. So that

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 3>puts a throttle on what both investors and owner occupiers

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 3>can borrow. And so that means putting that throttling on

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 3>means that you've got to gain concentration of demand in

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 3>that sort.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Of bottom quarto of the market.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 3>And so that in itself is seeing We said it

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 3>earlier in the podcast that that's why that end of

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 3>the market is performing better because unfortunately all the demands

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 3>being pushed into that particular area.

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But do you then think it's overheated that market because

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>you're funneling, You're pushing everyone into there. So there's the

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>appra measure shore. Now we've got the expanded first home

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bias scheme. If so much demand is funbling, there is

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>at risk of a bit of a bubble.

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>The short answer that is potentially, and I would say

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>in some of the regional towns, I can't support the

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 3>fundamental valuations in terms of what those property prices are

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 3>selling for right now, because you know, the data is

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 3>suggesting that the vast majority of those buyers are investors,

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 3>so they are artificially pushing the market up.

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And I've seen.

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Those markets are a lot more volatile after the end

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 3>of these sort of get rich quick type promotions that

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 3>happen into these particular areas.

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>This could be devastating for first home buyers though, couldn't it.

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean investors that sort of buyer beware. But we're

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>also pulling in first home buyers into this market, and

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>they could be in negative equity territory pretty quickly.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 2>They could, And that's why I'm worried about it.

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>That's why I've written to all of the trade associations

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 3>to say, hey, it's all being led by this social

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 3>media marketing push and they're talking about, you know, if

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 3>you can't buy it in your personal name, go on,

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 3>buy two or three in trusts and then buy them

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 3>in yourself many superfund So I've got real problems with that,

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 3>and I've got real problems and the fact that it's

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 3>being generated by mortgage brokers and buy as agents and

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 3>property investment advisors who aren't licensed to give financial product advice,

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 3>which is self managed super funds or trust lending.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 2>That's a real problem for me.

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 3>And yes, it does have consequences, and the same sort

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 3>of consequences too.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 2>You know, they're getting on there.

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I've bought my fifth I bought my eighth, I bought

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 3>my tenth property in three years using all of these

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 3>trust structures. That's that's unsustainable to your point around getting

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 3>first home buyers into the market if they're if you know,

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 3>for every ten offers on a property, if nine of

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 3>them are from investors and only one owner occupier, that's

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 3>that's not where we want to be. That's not not

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's no social contract for investors to have

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 3>that right to be able to do.

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 2>That, and it's going to end badly.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.239
<v Speaker 3>So I'm trying to get in front of, you know,

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 3>the potential risk here because I'm seeing it as an

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 3>emergent risk. Also for the financial stability of the market

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 3>as well, because at the end of the day, if

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 3>you think about property, property underpins the wealth in this country,

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, and so you do then have obviously financial risk.

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 3>And I don't want to be scaring people, but the

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 3>reality here is that we've got some settings that are

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 3>wrong and we need to We need to tighten them

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 3>up in terms of getting easy access to credit for

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 3>trust lending or for self managed super fund lending.

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 2>So we need to tighten that up.

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 3>And we need to get the balance back to the

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 3>seventy thirty seventy percent owner occupy thirty percent investor. If

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing that move outer kilter, we're going to have

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 3>some problems. And to your point, those first home buyers

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 3>who got in might think great, property price has gone

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>up twenty percent, but if they then correct by thirty percent,

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 3>then ultimately they could be in some negative equity area.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 3>First for home buyers, look, they're playing in the decades game.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 3>They're not necessarily playing in, you know, buyer property and

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 3>turn it into a commodity and trade it, because we

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 3>don't want trading in property either. You know, it's unsustainable

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 3>if we have speculation in residential property. So what I'm

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>hoping is that you know, those first home buyers can

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 3>get in the market, can hold onto their property for

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 3>a long period of time, and enjoy some capital growth,

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 3>which will obviously help them in the future as well.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>You think, you think governments need to have a bit

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of a crackdown on those other areas of the market.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's all very well and good to offer these

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>incentives and these schemes and do what they can to

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>help first home buyers. But if there are these other

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>schemes flourishing that it is just sucking in more investors

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that's pushing out first home buyers. That they've got to

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>act on that and do that soon.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent, Julian, it is. I mean, it's just logical, right,

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 3>Like it might feel great that you're an investor and

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 3>you've just made a quick thirty percent return, but at

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, investing in property, you're running

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 3>a private.

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Rental accommodation business.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 3>And that should be something that you think about that

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be doing for ten, fifteen, twenty years, right,

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 3>and enjoy the spoils of that long term. If we

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>turn property into a speculative asset and it becomes a

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 3>tradable commodity, no politician, no government is going to on

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 3>either side of politics, is going to want to be responsible.

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 2>For robbing the Great Australian dream from people.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 3>So it's clear to me that the animal spirits that

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 3>we're currently seeing which is driving a lot of this

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 3>price growth at the moment, because if you just look

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 3>at the last quarter of data around investment lending versus

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 3>owner occupied lending, it's clear investment lending is growing at

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 3>three to four times greater than owner occupied lending at

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 3>the moment. What does that tell you about the market mechanisms?

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 3>And APRA is sort of aware of this, they're flagged

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 3>something to say, you know, they may potentially put some

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 3>other macro credential throttles in place, and I'm sort of saying, well,

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 3>here's something that the regulators can do. Just ban trust

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 3>lending and have a look at self managed super funds

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 3>in terms of who's giving the advice. Because the advice

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 3>is being started by the property sprewkers and then ultimately

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 3>then you go off and see your financial planner and

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 3>then they set you up, you know, in your account

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 3>and sets you up. But it's not the traditional way

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 3>in which that should work. It should be if I've

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 3>done my own personal research and I've gone to speak

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 3>to a financial planner or I've gone to speak to

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 3>my accountant to learn about No, it doesn't feel like that.

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 2>What it feels like is, yes, that these.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Buyers agents, mortgage brokers and property investment advisors who are

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 3>self interest. There's all self interest here, and make no

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 3>mistake about that. And I'm also putting my hand up.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 3>I run a business in this space, and I've been

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 3>running that business for almost twenty years, so you know,

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking down you know, a marketplace that obviously I

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 3>get to benefit from. So that's how concerned I am

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 3>about the sustainability of the market. It's just not where

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 3>it needs to be in terms of that particular story.

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 3>So there is an emerging story here and I'm trying

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 3>to get that message out there.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Then you mentioned a few times about buyers agents, and

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's coming across our desks quite often to a lot

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of people are using buyers agents. It used to be

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of, I don't know, an for very wealthy people,

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and now it seems to be trickling down to all

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>facets of the market. Do people need a buyers agent?

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 2>All disclosure. I run a buyers agency business, so.

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 3>As part of our empower wealth business, we have a

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 3>full suite of services including mortgage broken, buyers aid, and

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 3>property advice, et cetera. So I want to make sure

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the public understands that. So what does a buyer's agent do.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 3>The buyer's agent works on behalf of the buyer to

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 3>effectively find, assess, negotiate and secure the property on behalf

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>of their client.

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So they work for the buyer obviously, and they are

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 2>a licensed real estate agent.

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 3>As opposed to the current way in which we potentially

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 3>see the mainstream of real estate agents. They work on

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 3>behalf of the vendor and their job is to obviously

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 3>get the best result for their client.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 2>So each of the parties are working on behalf of

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 2>their clients to try and get an outcome for those times.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's what they do. There absolutely has been an

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 3>explosion of buyers agents wanting it into the market. I

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 3>mean property, property is our favorite barbecue topic. What and

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 3>if I can go and earn a commission on helping

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 3>someone else buy a property, how.

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I almost might do that in my spare time quite frankly.

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Then it's like it's so I really love watching the

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>property watch this stite go to home opens. I'm not

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>even in the market to buy home.

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 3>There you go, so and it's being promoted is that

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 3>that it's like a side hustle that you can be

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 3>a buyers agent part time, and so we're worried about

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the quality of buyers agents. You know, they want to

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 3>do the right thing, and so I might refer to

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 3>them as enthusiastic amateurs. They don't really understand that if

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 3>they're doing it for investment, they really probably don't understand

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 3>how financial services work. They certainly aren't a clued up

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the Regulatory Corporations Act around what you

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 3>can talk about what you can't talk about from.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 2>An advice point of view.

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 3>So there is definitely a knowledge gap that a lot

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 3>of them have, and that's also leading to potentially bad

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 3>outcomes for their clients if they're buying the wrong investment

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 3>property in the wrong location, if they're not doing their

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 3>due diligence properly, and give you here's a good example.

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 3>We've got interstate buyers agents who will buy a property

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 3>based on what they see on the on the search

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 3>portals and then the video walk.

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Through from the selling agent. So do you think the selling.

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Agent is agent is going to show the structural problems

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 3>or the cracks in the brick work, or the missing

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 3>thing here or the broken thing there. No, they're doing

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 3>a quick walkthrough, and then that buyers agent in a

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 3>state is not sending their own independent well they're not

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 3>turning up That has problems everywhere in terms of conflicts

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 3>of interest and basically outcomes for those customers. So I'm

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 3>worried about again these animal spirits and these enthusiastic amateurs

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 3>who are currently operating in our space.

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just on that. So we talked about Person earlier,

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and it is a fantastic place to live. But if

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not living in Person, you think that's the market

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to go and buy in. It is a

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a distance. It is an airfare. I mean,

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do you recommend people actually going physically look at the

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>property themselves or is it about finding a really good

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>buyers agent in that area, and then maybe you can

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>document what are the red flags want to look out

0:31:59.160 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for and how to.

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about the three types of buyers agents.

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 3>There is the local buyers agent who might be you

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 3>know what they might refer to as their local expert

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 3>in terms of their pocket of the market, similar to

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the way in which is selling agent might operate that way.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Then you've got what we call the boardless property and

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 3>buyers agent, and so they're helping clients potentially in other states,

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 3>and then they often fly into those locations or they

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 3>have what we refer to as inspectors or spotters on

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 3>the ground.

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I can do that. Can I be someone's spotter who.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 2>You can go and walk through properties and inspect them? So, yes,

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 2>that can.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 3>And usually they might be say retired or part time

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 3>real estate agents or whatever, you know, former property managers,

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 3>or they could be the property manager that's working on

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 3>behalf of that group. All of those things can be

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 3>true in terms of how they do that. But and

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 3>then of course no property should ever be bought without

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 3>a building and pest inspection, so and now they are

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously independent. They will come in and do that building

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 3>and pest inspection. So yes, you will see more and

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 3>more investors who are buying in their mind sight unseen

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 3>in terms of their eyes. But they are absolutely relying

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 3>on quality of the buyers agents to do that due

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 3>diligence work. And so we're concerned about the corners that

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 3>are being cut by certain buyers agents in the market

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 3>at the moment.

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we are fast running out of time then, and

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I do want to make sure we cover off what

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you think are the top markets for property investing. So

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to buy an investment property in the

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>next let's just say six months, shall we say you're

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market, you're on the hunt, you want to

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>buy one, where are you buying?

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 3>So at the start of the year I said Darwin

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 3>would be the number one performing market.

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And have you got the stats to hand? Ben, Now

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you got what's darting up about? Is it seventeen percent

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>or something? It's definitely I think seventeen percent was the

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>stat I heard, which includes rental yield, But anyway, maybe

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's true.

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 3>No, there's every chance that it's over twenty by the time,

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 3>because what the data you're looking at is lag data.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>So if you actually look at what the rolling three

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 2>month trend is. It's definitely in the twenties plus. Now.

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 3>It's moving very quickly and it's a pretty logical thing.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 3>There's only about one hundred and twenty to one hundred

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 3>and thirty listed properties in Darwin, the entire market. So

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 3>you talk about that supply demand imbalance.

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that why you tipped it at the beginning of

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the year you saw the imbalance or was there some

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>other economic activity?

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it's definitely not economic activity.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Look, you've got a new government in power there, the

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Liberal National Party, and they are very pro business and

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 3>so they're very pro economy. So that was the first

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 3>That was the first cod that needed to go into

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 3>that wheel. Then you start to have a look at

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the yield story. And also there's no land tacks in Darwin,

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.439
<v Speaker 3>so you've got really strong yields. And then the third

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 3>one was it's been dormant for almost fifteen years, right,

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 3>it is again in a boombust. And so off the

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 3>back of that, I've said to people, look, if you're

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 3>going to go into Darwin, you're only going to be

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 3>in that market for maybe five to seven years and

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 3>then you'll probably get out. And then with all of

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 3>this trust lending and self manitude fund lending where they

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 3>really do rely on really high rents. That was the

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 3>final straw, so that one was always going to take off,

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 3>and it's done that.

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 2>So the next one was Perth and Melbourne. I had

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 2>them side by side.

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 3>I really love Perth in the sense that fundamental are

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 3>so good economic activity, so good liveability scores off the charts,

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 3>so you know, job opportunities and all that, so I

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 3>think the economy will run strong, so that one will

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 3>continue to perform well. I had Melbourne in that sort

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 3>of mix through probably more so around sentiment everyone you know,

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately a lot.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Of investors aren't. They aren't doing a lot of research

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 2>on this.

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 3>So if there's a view that it's affordable and that's

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.439
<v Speaker 3>where I need to buy, I'll go down and buy

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 3>in Melbourne. So we're seeing a lot of that borderless

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 3>investing coming into Melbourne.

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's probably.

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>People like myself. Obviously I'm no expert, but when you

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>have a look at the charts, Melbourne has deviated from

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Sydney prices in a way that just doesn't seem normal,

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that just can't sustain itself forever. We know that the

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Victorian government has left all the taxes on, so we

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>know sort of the background story. But it does seem

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>remarkable that Sydney's me in house price can be so

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>much moigher than Melbourne.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 3>Correct especially given obviously now Victoria has just moved over

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 3>seven million people in the state and Melbourne is continued

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to attract its high share of immigration. It's losing a

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 3>small portion of interstate migrants who are probably moving up

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 3>to Southeast Queensland, but that's its superpower. Melbourne's multicultural attraction

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 3>tool is its superpower. But it's underperformed purely off the

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 3>back of the economic performance of the state. It's got

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the highest level of unemployment across the capital cities. It's

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 3>got a debt story that's going to be a massive

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.919
<v Speaker 3>problem for future state government, so that's holding it back.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 3>But if you think that will be rectified over the

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 3>period of time, the regression to the means should kick

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 3>back in and you'll start to see probably prices move

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 3>high there. The one that surprised me the most has

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 3>probably been Southeast Queensland, namely Brisbane, is that it's had

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 3>a terrific run and that run has been going for

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 3>a good period of time, but the fundamentals and the

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 3>affordability story is now starting to taper that out, but

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 3>it's performing still quite strongly.

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Then I had Adelaide.

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 3>It's had a sort of strong run for five to

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 3>seven years, so I suspect that will settle down and

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 3>there's a good amount of supply that's about to write

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 3>into Adelaide over the next sort of twelve to eighteen months.

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 3>Looking at the forwards, then I had Canberra, more so

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 3>because the labor governor in power and so all of

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the public servants an't going to lose their job, so

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 3>that will keep that sort of population and growth going.

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Then I had Sydney In terms of in that mix,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 3>Sydney is an interesting one. It's dynamic city, it's our

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 3>financial capital market, it's our international city. There's prestige associated

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 3>with living in but it's still very much unaffordable, so

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 3>from an investment point of view, it's a challenging market

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 3>to get into it. And then finally I had Hobart

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 3>at the bottom of the market. Purely on the back

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of Hobart. In the last results of population growth, it

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 3>had about one hundred and sixty two people increased population growth,

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 3>so it's really stagnating. It needs to get its economy

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 3>working otherwise it'll lose its knowledge base and its youth.

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 2>And if that youth moves out into Victoria or other markets,

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 2>that market's going to be challenged.

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 3>If it's only going to be reliant on retirees moving

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 3>down into that market who don't have the incomes or

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the borrowing powers, price is higher.

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you're buying today or sometime over the next

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>six months based on that list, is it So Darwin

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is where you're buying.

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Darwin want to be I need to sort of precursor Darwin.

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a speculative buy. It's not something that I would

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 3>sit back. So fundamentally, I'm a long term investor, so

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I want to invest for the decades.

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to trade property.

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 3>So if I'm buying in my individual name to run

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 3>my private rental accommodation business, I wouldn't necessarily be jumping

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 3>into Darwin, you know. But if I was buying in

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 3>a self managed super fund where I have better tax arrangements,

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to give advice to anyone in it.

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Please don't take this as advice. It's not advice. But ultimately,

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, Darwin does provide that sort of ability to

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 3>get into the market and then potentially trade out of

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 3>that market at its peak.

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean if you're doing a long term

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>traditional investing its perse second on the list, Perth.

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Melbourne would probably be the markets that I would be

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 3>playing in at the moment, and I'd be looking at

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 3>freestanding houses that have a really good proportion of land

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 3>to asset ratio. So the land needs to be the

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 3>minimum of sixty percent of the value of the overall

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 3>asset that you're buying.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good tip to know, Ben. When we come back,

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we've got some readers, readers, We've got some listeners. You

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>can tell I'm a newspaper, Janelis, can't you. We've got

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>some listeners who have sent through some questions. I'll put

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>them to you. And also we just might get that

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>one one mistake, one common mistake people make when investing

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.439
<v Speaker 1>in property. We'll have a chat when we come back.

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining me on the money Puzzle. I'm your host.

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Julianne Sprague, Wealth editor at The Australian, filling in for

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Ben Kingsley from Empower Wealth is joining me

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to talk all things at property. We've got some top

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>tips so far, We've got some listener questions to get to.

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>But first Ben, I just want to get to your

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>insights on Is there one thing that you see ze

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>happens quite frequently when it comes to property investing. The

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing that people get wrong or overlook.

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 3>The tip I'm going to give here is over extending themselves.

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 3>Property investments should be a long term investment, and you're

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 3>taking on debt. What I often see is potentially people

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 3>aren't thinking about their cash flows in the short.

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 2>To medium term. So let me give you an example.

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I buy an investment property and then we decide to

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 3>have a second child or whatever that may look like,

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden, now we're really tight in

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 3>regards to our cash flows, and so I haven't let

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 3>that property breathe enough in terms of mature enough. So

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 3>with my high cost of getting into that particular market

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 3>through stem duty and also the selling costs associated with

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 3>that in the interest that I had over that time,

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people don't necessarily break even if they're

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 3>held that property for a short period of time. So

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm always about make sure you have a plan. Make

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 3>sure you understand what your future cash flow impacts are

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be around that plane. Because it's a high

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 3>cost investment property. We're not buying five thousand dollars worth

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 3>of shees heer. We're potentially buying half a million dollar

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 3>towards a million dollar asset. So if we get it wrong,

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 3>it will put us back for years and so it

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 3>really is important to know that we can buy and

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 3>hold and sustain that property for the medium to longer term.

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we've got some people who are looking at investment

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>properties as we speak, Ben and I kid you not.

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>We have two questions from two listeners. They're both called Ben.

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm chatting to Ben Kingsley, so this should make it

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>easy for me not to stuff up people's names. So

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Ben has emailed the show and if you'd like to email,

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you can email the Money Puzzle at the Australian dot

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>com dot au. But Ben says, my wife and I

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.399
<v Speaker 1>are thinking of selling our first home, which is now

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>an investment property. They purchased it in twenty sixteen and

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>has been rented out since twenty twenty one. We want

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to cash out to help knock down their existing mortgage

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and reallo our investments, and we're hoping to use my

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>wife's lower income during maternity leave to our advantage for

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 1>capital gains tax. And so Ben says, if we apply

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the six year rule to avoid capital gains tax on

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the sale of our investment property, are we just pushing

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the tax liability down the road to our current home.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Both have had similar capital gains, saying about two hundred

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and forty thousand in game for the investment property versus

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred and eighty thousand for the current home.

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Ben Kingsley, these are tax questions, and there's some tax impacts.

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 3>I need to put my hand up and say I'm

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 3>not a tax agent. I'm not a qualified tax agent.

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 3>So I'll talk in statements of fact to sort of

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 3>help being on this particular story. So, yes, it's true

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 3>that if you have owned a property that was your

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 3>principal place of residence from twenty twenty one, I think

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 3>was said you have up to six years in which

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 3>you can declare that your principal place of residence. Now,

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 3>if you're owning two properties and you're in another property,

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 3>that obviously means that capital gain in that second property

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 3>will actually be taxable because you can only ever have

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 3>one principal place of residence at one time, so you

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 3>can only have one exemption at one time. So what

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Ben would need to do is go and speak to

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 3>his trusted accountant and they would need to do the

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 3>math in terms of what has been the gain over

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 3>that period of time versus if they've moved into a

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 3>new owner occupied property, what has been the gain on

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 3>that property over that same period of time, and then

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 3>do the calculation in terms of which is better for

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 3>them in regards to the sale of that asset. Benning

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:39.439
<v Speaker 3>is also right technically again statement of fact that the

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 3>income that you will learn as a capital income is

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 3>assessed as income for that tax year. So income for

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 3>that tax year then is a calculation. So if your

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 3>wife is on maternity leave, then you have lower income.

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.240
<v Speaker 3>That means that potentially, now it's all based on ownership,

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.479
<v Speaker 3>So if it's a fifty to fifty ownership, that still

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 3>means that Ben can't allocate a higher portion of that

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 3>income again to his wife.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 2>That's not possible.

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Half of it can go across, that's right.

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 3>And if that means that you know Ben's wife is

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 3>on a lower marginal tax rate at that time, then

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 3>ultimately that could there could be some tax savings there.

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 3>But again, if the intention is all about minimizing your tax,

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 3>be very careful. That's why it's always important to go

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 3>and seek proper tax advice before you take any decisions.

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Ben, it sounds like Ben has he says he has

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 1>got some advice, but he's always keen for more opinions

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 1>than just is there any real benefit to the strategy

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>besides getting more cash?

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 3>Now, Yeah, I would always try And you know, if

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:45.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm in conversations with clients, I'm always looking at what's

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 3>what is our end goal and what's.

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Our lifestyle by design look like?

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 3>And am I putting the big rocks in the jar

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 3>making sure that you know, like, at the end of

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 3>the day, money is important, it is, you know, but

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't by happiness. And so what are the goals

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 3>that you're trying to achieve and how does the decisions

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 3>that you may compliment those goals? And if you can

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 3>align it that way, you're going to live a more

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 3>meaningful and purposeful life number one. But two, you're then

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 3>going to not necessarily get hung up just on how

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 3>much tax I'm paying or what you know, how much

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 3>money I've got in my bank account.

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 2>The bragging rights.

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 3>No one sees those bragging rights in the cemetery like,

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 3>so ultimately live now.

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 2>And make sure you're doing those decisions.

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 3>So it sounds like they're going to build their dream home,

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 3>and if this decision is around selling that property so

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 3>they'll have a better dream home and lower non deductible

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 3>debt on their family home, that's not a bad that's

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 3>not a bad idea.

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for getting in touch.

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Ben.

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Now to another Ben who has emailed the program and says,

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a mate who is starting a side hustle

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of buying a rundown house, fixing it up and flipping

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it in six uch. You would have heard about this

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Thankingsley with lots of people will go

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>get that door upper. I will not lie to you.

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I once tried to convince my husband we should buy

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a house across the road. It a dump, and I

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>had all sorts of visions we would become amazing block

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:04.760
<v Speaker 1>contestants or something.

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:05.760
<v Speaker 2>You're not alone.

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Thankfully he was the smarter of us too and said

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing that. Yeah. Anyway, So Ben says, it

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 1>made me wonder if this is actually put into the

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 1>house price statistics. So he's having to think about this.

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Major takes a rundown house, does it up, flips it,

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and obviously the property value has gone up quite a bit.

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So he says, does this then impact property markets? He

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 1>hasn't got much work to do with Mayde reckons this

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to fix up the floorboards, fix the garden, repaint,

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>clean it anyway, they flip it. I guess Benn's wondering,

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>is it a big issue or is it just a

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>tiny problem if people are coming into these suburbs doing

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>up the market and then you might see property prices

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:40.720
<v Speaker 1>have jumped.

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So he raises a really poignant point around measuring

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:46.439
<v Speaker 3>median house price.

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, a meetian is the midpoint.

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 3>So if you've got five property sales, then you know

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the midpoint is the third sale of those five, right,

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:55.959
<v Speaker 3>And so that's how the market is reported on through

0:46:55.960 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 3>totality and through other research area. So if you've got

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 3>a suburb where there's a new development going in a

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:06.959
<v Speaker 3>thirty year old subdivision that's already there, you will see

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:11.280
<v Speaker 3>that suburb reporting really strong price growth. But the reality

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 3>is there hasn't really been any price growth at all

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 3>all that's basically happened is the more expensive properties have

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 3>been sold, and so that's artificially manipulating the median price

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 3>in that particular area.

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>The older properties would still be worth less. The're not

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 1>going to trade up to those higher prices.

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 3>Right, yes, but over time the land value of those

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 3>older properties would have potentially enjoyed the fact that all

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 3>this extra investment has been put into this new area.

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 3>But it just goes to show you that the susceptibility

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 3>of the data that we work with more generally when

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 3>we're educating people around property is that data is it's

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.800
<v Speaker 3>a good indicator, but it's certainly not a great indicator.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 3>So that's just one thing we need to understand about

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 3>how we report property data. It's not ideal, but it's

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:56.720
<v Speaker 3>the mechanisms that we use onto the question of buying

0:47:56.800 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 3>worshouse in the bestreet and doing it up. I love

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 3>that idea for the first time by I love that

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 3>idea for anyone who's trying to get on the property ladder.

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 3>More broadly, I think it's an excellent way if you

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 3>do your numbers correctly, that you can potentially harvest equity and.

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Bring that property back up to its original quality.

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 3>So I like that in terms of flipping property and

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 3>trading property, there are some costs and challenges around that,

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 3>and in a lot of cases, I think flippers don't

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 3>necessarily do their numbers correctly in their due diligence well,

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.279
<v Speaker 3>and so a lot of them can potentially spend six

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 3>to twelve months and break even and jot it down

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:31.799
<v Speaker 3>as a learning experience.

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 2>But I would say that the other thing that they

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 2>also need.

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 3>To be aware of, and this is the whole political

0:48:37.080 --> 0:48:39.840
<v Speaker 3>thing that we're getting into here now, is that the

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:43.240
<v Speaker 3>governments are definitely looking at negative gearing and capital gains

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 3>tax exemptions. Those conversations aren't going away, so that the

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:51.320
<v Speaker 3>moment you get a fifty percent exemption based on holding

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 3>theirsset for twelve months a longer. So if you're going

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 3>to flipping and you're going to flip that property inside

0:48:57.880 --> 0:49:01.279
<v Speaker 3>six months, then you're paying one hundred percent of your

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 3>marginal tax rate in tax on that particular property in

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 3>terms of the profits that it makes. So you've got

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 3>to then decide whether it's worth going into the business

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 3>of doing this or whether it's you know, this is

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 3>just a one off thing that I'm going to do.

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's a game.

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Where I would say, go and speak to your accountant

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 3>about your ideas in this particular space and try and

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:22.799
<v Speaker 3>get an account And Neo's had some experience in this

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 3>area might also be helpful for you because it sounds sexy.

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, when I watched the block and that's all

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 3>summarized into a thirty minute or a sixty minute episode,

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 3>you don't know what's going on in the background.

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 2>You don't know how much work's gone into.

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 3>It, or what cost blowouts they've had and all of

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 3>those profits. I mean, at the end of the day,

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 3>they're selling it to a national audience, so that you know,

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen you know, there's plenty of articles on

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 3>the research in terms of how all those properties performed

0:49:50.480 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 3>after that first sale. The reality is that those properties

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 3>were bought at extended prices, and it does they weren't

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 3>really you know, fair market value at that time.

0:50:00.520 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, this will test my husband if he's listening to

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Honey, you're right about that one.

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.360
<v Speaker 4>But if it's across the road to your point, Julian,

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 4>I'll just finish off that, like, if you can get

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 4>easy and quick access to it, and you're prepared to

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 4>do elbow grease and that type thing, but take a

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 4>longer term view and then rent that out.

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 2>That could be a sensible thing, right, do you know

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 2>what I mean? Like, like, here's the tips. Paint, do your.

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Flooring, don't do anything structural, and make sure you work

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 3>on a dollar in for two dollars back. And if

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the numbers don't stack up, just off that. Some people

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 3>do a one for three, but I think if it's

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 3>one for two. But be prepared that this is not investing.

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 3>This is active investing. Like it's not passive investing. You're

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:41.399
<v Speaker 3>going to have to put the elbow grease in because

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 3>if you get too many trades in, there's going to

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 3>be no profit at the end of the end of

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the outcome.

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>One dollar in two dollars back. Okay, I'll use That's

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a nice mat truck to use. Ben Kingsley, thank you

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us on the Money Puzzle. It's

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 1>been a pleasure.

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you very much for the opportunity.

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Ben Kingsley from in Power. Well, then you can also

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:00.839
<v Speaker 1>catch him at the Property Couch podcast. We'll be back

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Friday for another episode of the Money Puzzle.