Speaker 1: Wait, welcome to the Lake deer Plase. Good evening and
Speaker 1: welcome to the show.
Speaker 2: I'm Liz Stora and joining me this evening is Joe
Speaker 2: Hildebrand and Gabriella Power for being here, guys, and thank
Speaker 2: you for being here. If it weren't for you, we
Speaker 2: wouldn't have a show, So you're the real MVPs. Coming
Speaker 2: up tonight, the Curious case continues for the man accused
Speaker 2: of convicted of I should say, killing George Floyd. The
Speaker 2: case is resumed with new bombshell reports. Will take you
Speaker 2: up to speed on that shortly. Secondly, a massive win
Speaker 2: for the Irish in the High Court regarding another another
Speaker 2: settlement of refugees. It's not going ahead and it's opened
Speaker 2: up a can of worms in the country.
Speaker 1: What's going to happen next?
Speaker 2: And if you're struggling to get into the Christmas spirit,
Speaker 2: We've got sixty seconds of bliss that I guarantee will
Speaker 2: have you feeling like Santa himself, So keep watching for that.
Speaker 2: But first tonight to the UK where people have gathered
Speaker 2: outside BBC headquarters to protest who they decided to give
Speaker 2: Woman Footballer of the Year Award two. Her name is
Speaker 2: Barbara Bander a twenty four year old who plays.
Speaker 1: In the UK, and she has been awarded this.
Speaker 2: Despite the fact that she was previously withdrawn from the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty two Women's Africa Cup of Nations over gender
Speaker 2: regulation concerns ie she had failed a sex test. Here's
Speaker 2: Barbara Banda on Tuesday receiving the award.
Speaker 1: Congratulations.
Speaker 2: Women's rights advocates have gotten quite a crowd outside of
Speaker 2: BBC headquarters to say, couldn't you just pick a woman
Speaker 2: who doesn't have these kinds of allegations surrounding her? Now,
Speaker 2: it's not known that Barbara is a trans woman. No,
Speaker 2: it's more likely that she falls under the category of
Speaker 2: having DSD, which is disorder of sex development, which you
Speaker 2: probably remember from the many conversations that were had around
Speaker 2: in Main Khalif following the big punch up pun intended
Speaker 2: at the French A limb picks Gabby.
Speaker 1: You'd think that this would just be straightforward by now.
Speaker 2: If you fail a sex test, there are real question
Speaker 2: marks over your eligibility receiving an award, especially from the
Speaker 2: national broadcaster that's supposed to be a.
Speaker 1: Woman's Footballer of the Year award. This one shouldn't be
Speaker 1: a hard one.
Speaker 3: I think it's a really bizarre choice from the BBC
Speaker 3: to award a Barbara Banda the Woman's Footballer of the Year.
Speaker 3: It's obviously going to spark controversy, especially that it was
Speaker 3: just two years ago that she failed to meet the
Speaker 3: gender eligibility rules to even compete because her levels of
Speaker 3: testosterone were just extraordinarily high. However, I do feel sorry
Speaker 3: for her in this case because it's not like she
Speaker 3: was born a male and she's changed her sex and
Speaker 3: she's wanting to compete.
Speaker 4: In female sports. I'm all for, you know, getting men
Speaker 4: out of female.
Speaker 3: Sports, keeping it safe, but it's not really her fault
Speaker 3: that she has this extraordinarily high level of testosterone. I
Speaker 3: do understand that she had the choice to take medication
Speaker 3: to bring the level of testosterone back down. She didn't
Speaker 3: want to do that for medical reasons or the risk
Speaker 3: of side effects, and that's her choice as well.
Speaker 4: But you know, if she's an athlete.
Speaker 3: She's obviously good at what she does and she wants
Speaker 3: to play.
Speaker 4: It's not her fault that the.
Speaker 3: Babe want to award her, you know, this award.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not.
Speaker 2: Joe, but it was just October this year that we're
Speaker 2: all talking about the fact that even the UN had
Speaker 2: handed down a report which found hundreds of women had
Speaker 2: missed out on heaps of medals. Over six hundred female
Speaker 2: athletes in more than four hundred competitions. This report said
Speaker 2: by the UN lost more than eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 2: medals in twenty nine different sports. And that's not just
Speaker 2: speaking of trans women competing with women. That is speaking
Speaker 2: of these athletes that do have an insane advantage over
Speaker 2: your average the capacity of an average sporting woman due
Speaker 2: to having DSD.
Speaker 5: Yeah, look, I get that, but I kind of think
Speaker 5: I'm a bit with Gab on this one. I mean,
Speaker 5: what she's supposed to do. It's the way that she
Speaker 5: was born. She's accepting the biology she was born with.
Speaker 1: It's a matter of fairness, But I mean, is it.
Speaker 5: I mean like some people get born and they're, you know,
Speaker 5: seven foot tall, and they make fantastic basketballers and they're
Speaker 5: going to kick my little white toush every time on them.
Speaker 2: No, I don't think anyone's arguing about Barbara's fault. I
Speaker 2: think the all eyes are on the national broadcast are
Speaker 2: saying why out of all the remarkable woman footballers we have.
Speaker 2: Would you choose someone who's failed a sex test?
Speaker 5: Well, I think we know why, and we're talking about it.
Speaker 5: I think they did it. They clearly did it deliberately
Speaker 5: to sort of show that they were like right on
Speaker 5: the cutting edge of you know, we're so gageous we
Speaker 5: are look how you know care weer And obviously, you know,
Speaker 5: the BBC would have known that this is after all,
Speaker 5: the media organization. They would have known that this would
Speaker 5: cause a bit of controversy. It gives a huge amount
Speaker 5: of publicity for their award and also makes them look
Speaker 5: like they're kind of, you know, at the vanguard of
Speaker 5: you know, trans inclusion or whatever. But again not, she's
Speaker 5: not even trans, So I don't really like, I don't
Speaker 5: understand what she's supposed to. So this is the thing
Speaker 5: that I don't mean it's on.
Speaker 2: Her at all, Like I say, it's no one's an
Speaker 2: actual But if she.
Speaker 5: Can compete, then she can get the award. Either she's not.
Speaker 2: Do you think that's fair that the BBC, the National
Speaker 2: broadcast had decided out of all the other females who
Speaker 2: would have to work twice as hard to compete as
Speaker 2: well as Barbara miss out on the.
Speaker 5: Awards both the BBC can it's their award, they can
Speaker 5: give it to whoever they want. I think the question
Speaker 5: the question is whether or not women with higher levels
Speaker 5: of testosterone should be able to play women's sport, And
Speaker 5: then the question becomes should women who were born biological
Speaker 5: males be allowed to play sport? And then the question comes,
Speaker 5: you know, is that does there have to be some
Speaker 5: kind of testosterone or estrogen level to be met?
Speaker 3: And the board as well, because she wasn't allowed to
Speaker 3: play in twenty twenty two. You know, that was when
Speaker 3: the standard was much higher than it is to even
Speaker 3: compete in the Olympics, so she was allowed to compete
Speaker 3: in the Olympics, so you know it should probably be
Speaker 3: it's the same.
Speaker 1: That's why has the standard dropped?
Speaker 2: Why is this UK and seen as something that ought
Speaker 2: to be celebrated. Yeah, it turns out all the best
Speaker 2: sports women are men or someone with DSD. I think
Speaker 2: JK Rolling, infamous women's rights advocate. I think she summed
Speaker 2: it up well in her tweet today she said presumably
Speaker 2: the BBC decided this was more time efficient than going
Speaker 2: door to door to spit directly in women's faces, well said,
Speaker 2: I say, staying in the UK.
Speaker 4: Now point rolling.
Speaker 3: I have to say I normally back her on most cases,
Speaker 3: especially when she gets hit by transactivists, you know, saying
Speaker 3: the most horrific, vicious things to try and take her down.
Speaker 3: So but on this case, I'm not one hundred percent
Speaker 3: sure I agree. But I think when people are trying
Speaker 3: to do so much to protect women in sports, it's
Speaker 3: just kind of a really prerocative choice, I guess by
Speaker 3: the BBC.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and I don't think it's fair whatsoever. Staying in
Speaker 2: the UK Now, a former Lib DEM candidate back in
Speaker 2: December twenty eighteen, was on her way to a Libdems
Speaker 2: meeting thinking it was just another day in paradise. It
Speaker 2: ain't Natalie Bird and she was told when she got
Speaker 2: there by the convener of the meeting that she had
Speaker 2: to leave immediately. Her crime she'd worn a T shirt
Speaker 2: defining what a woman is it's simply read adult human female.
Speaker 2: For this, she was ostracized for holding a view she
Speaker 2: has every right to hold by the party. She was
Speaker 2: suspended from the lib Dems and ban from standing as
Speaker 2: an MP for a decade. She's now Earlier this year
Speaker 2: decided to take them to court for this. Initially she
Speaker 2: was asking for ten thousand pounds for hurt feelings. I'm
Speaker 2: not exaggerating. The quote says for injury to feelings. End quote.
Speaker 2: But now she's decided she's after ninety k Joe. I
Speaker 2: was all for this woman. I thought, yes, fight, fight fights.
Speaker 2: This is abjectly unfair. And then I found out that
Speaker 2: now she's just up to the price by eighty thousand pounds.
Speaker 1: And I think she's taking the meeting, which is.
Speaker 5: A thing, right Like, she's complaining that. You know, the
Speaker 5: Lib Dems have banned her from going to any Liberal
Speaker 5: Democrat meetings, They've banned her from associating with Lib Dems.
Speaker 5: They've banned her for standing as a Libdem candidate. Where's
Speaker 5: the punishment you should be? You're so good to it.
Speaker 5: This is the best thing about this issue, right, This
Speaker 5: is the most fantastic thing about it, because it is
Speaker 5: tearing apart the inner city love is. It's tearing apart
Speaker 5: the inner city Left. It's tearing apart the Victorian Greens.
Speaker 5: Every single meeting that the Victorian Greens have, every single
Speaker 5: pre selection they have. Somehow this issue manages to creep
Speaker 5: into it and just explode them. It's either like a
Speaker 5: fight between people who think maybe we should just talk
Speaker 5: about anything other than trans rights for just like one minute,
Speaker 5: and they think that this is the new frontier. You know,
Speaker 5: we've got same sex marriage. Now we've got to get
Speaker 5: transit us over the line, and you have to throw
Speaker 5: everything at it. And then of course you've got at
Speaker 5: the same time the sort of radical feminists and the
Speaker 5: former you know almost like I don't know, you know,
Speaker 5: he would have lesbian separatists back in the day, you
Speaker 5: know that you know, all heterosexual sex is a violation
Speaker 5: and that women can only feel say around other women.
Speaker 5: And now you've got all these people who would have
Speaker 5: ended up in the Greens, and they are now the
Speaker 5: turfs who are being threatened, they think, by trans women.
Speaker 5: And so it is the ultimate left eating itself almost
Speaker 5: via you know, insertion of its own. You know, it
Speaker 5: is so far up itself that is actually just consuming
Speaker 5: itself within. It's like it's like it's like the human centipede.
Speaker 5: But there's just one.
Speaker 2: No reds to that was I don't know that she's
Speaker 2: going to get this payout though, Gabby, because as the
Speaker 2: party who of course fighting this tooth and now have
Speaker 2: pointed out much of the bullying that she's suing for
Speaker 2: was by activists, not by people within the party themselves.
Speaker 1: They of course had made this.
Speaker 2: Disciplinary measure for which they were happy to pay her
Speaker 2: ten thousand K.
Speaker 1: They owned it, they conceded.
Speaker 2: But now she's going for ninety K and they're like,
Speaker 2: we're not taking ability for things that activists.
Speaker 3: Then, as he said, taking the mickey on this one,
Speaker 3: I think as a big big red flag around at
Speaker 3: Natalie Bird. I was with you where you're going to.
Speaker 3: You see her coming out. She's wearing the so the
Speaker 3: T shirt that's so offensive, saying women are adult human females. Yes,
Speaker 3: I'm proud of her actually wearing something like that.
Speaker 4: She's absolutely entitled to.
Speaker 3: But when you start carrying on claiming to be a victim,
Speaker 3: and that's part of her claim is that she suffered
Speaker 3: a victimization. Any one of us can claim that they've
Speaker 3: been victimized over whatever reason, and you can. I think
Speaker 3: if you're chasing this party for money, as much money
Speaker 3: as she can, she's better off using her time doing
Speaker 3: something else. If she really cares about women's rights, what
Speaker 3: have issues that she wants to divide about she can
Speaker 3: do something proactive and trying to get ninety thousand dollars
Speaker 3: just seems absolutely outraged.
Speaker 4: Look at it.
Speaker 5: She wants the ninety thousand dollars to buy ninety thousand
Speaker 5: new T shirts.
Speaker 2: I I can't imagine that the lib Dems have that
Speaker 2: kind of money anyway.
Speaker 1: So that's a very important thing to do, lady.
Speaker 2: Before you sue someone, you need to make sure that
Speaker 2: they have the money to cough up before you even bother.
Speaker 2: Back to Australia now, where we all know that Candace Owens,
Speaker 2: inarguably the most famous conservative female commentator on the face
Speaker 2: of the planet, has been denied a visa to Australia.
Speaker 2: Tony Burke is worried that she will well that she
Speaker 2: has the capacity to incite discord and quote we'll keep
Speaker 2: has challenged this in the High Court.
Speaker 1: She's saying this.
Speaker 2: Amounts to censorship and she's not wrong. This amounts to censorship.
Speaker 2: I won't stand for it. I'm going to take every
Speaker 2: avenue available to me to challenge this in justice. It's
Speaker 2: going to be a very interesting case. We saw very
Speaker 2: recently New Zealand overturned their initial ban on her visa,
Speaker 2: her doing a speaking tour there. It remains to be
Speaker 2: seen where whether Tony Burt's call will.
Speaker 1: Actually stand up in the High Court. I have a
Speaker 1: feeling it won't.
Speaker 4: Gabby, Yeah, I don't think that it will.
Speaker 3: I think this one's quite difficult because we've got a
Speaker 3: crisis at the moment right here with it with anti Semitism.
Speaker 3: We're seeing that play out. So I understand why the
Speaker 3: visa was denied. I suppose I think anything at the
Speaker 3: moment that could kind of make the social cohesion worse
Speaker 3: in Australia. We don't want to anyone here that is
Speaker 3: going to be sharing anti Semitic views. However, I also
Speaker 3: believe in the freedom of speech and I just don't
Speaker 3: think you can censor people.
Speaker 4: And thinking she already has a platform.
Speaker 3: We've got five million people following her on Instagram, We've
Speaker 3: got six million people following her on Twitter. If you're
Speaker 3: going to say she can't come to Australia, people that
Speaker 3: want to listen to her are going to find a way.
Speaker 4: To listen to her.
Speaker 3: You've actually so that's it, and it could even have
Speaker 3: the reverse effect. All of a sudden, you know, people
Speaker 3: are saying you can't listen to her and then all
Speaker 3: of a sudden her numbers go after.
Speaker 5: Have yes, yeah, that is certainly my normal rule of thumb,
Speaker 5: but I think in this case, at this time, it
Speaker 5: would be foolhardy to have her over.
Speaker 2: The freedom of speech is not when you feel like
Speaker 2: it is working democracy.
Speaker 5: If she was saying these things here and or someone
Speaker 5: else was saying these things here.
Speaker 2: And when we say these things. To be clear, she
Speaker 2: has been called anti semitic. However these days just speaking
Speaker 2: again certain things Israel's doing or opposing actions that Netanyahu
Speaker 2: has taken, that is being painted with this very broad
Speaker 2: brush of oh, it's anti semitic. As you and I
Speaker 2: have spoken about previously, you can oppose things that ISRAELI.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, I'll not be anti semitic.
Speaker 5: But clearly, but clearly, there is an outbreak of anti
Speaker 5: semitism in Australia, and her comments go beyond criticizing Israel and.
Speaker 1: Getting point to any of those comments, I think I.
Speaker 5: Don't have it. I don't have a comments in front
Speaker 5: of me. I remember reading them in the past and
Speaker 5: being surprised that she would say things like that. But
Speaker 5: my concern is that there is an epidemic of anti
Speaker 5: Semitism that is virulent in Australia at the moment. It
Speaker 5: is live, it is violent. We have seen cars properties
Speaker 5: being firebombed. And to bring someone over who is under
Speaker 5: a cloud of anti semitism in that environment, I think
Speaker 5: is too risky. And that is a different thing from
Speaker 5: one being able to say what she's saying here within viability.
Speaker 5: We don't even know what she's going to say here.
Speaker 5: And this is where I think I'm not sure how
Speaker 5: the High Court challenge is going to work. The High
Speaker 5: Court has previously found that there is an implied freedom
Speaker 5: of political expression in the constitution. That's as far as
Speaker 5: it goes. We don't have constitutionally protected free speech in
Speaker 5: Australia like America does. So she's free to say those
Speaker 5: things over here. Over Here, you might say, if she's
Speaker 5: talking about, you know, Jewish people having too much influence
Speaker 5: or whatever, that might be considered, and that might be considered.
Speaker 1: We've never done that.
Speaker 5: That might be considered an implied freedom of political expression.
Speaker 5: If she's talking about that sort of thing now, or
Speaker 5: maybe it's just out now, any semittism, they dismiss it.
Speaker 5: But the test by which someone can be denied a visa.
Speaker 5: Is I believe the Immigration Minister just being able to
Speaker 5: determine of his or her own accord whether or not
Speaker 5: they deem someone to be of good character. And so
Speaker 5: that's quite a subjective test that they clearly have the
Speaker 5: power to apply, whether it meets the threshold of implied
Speaker 5: freedom of expression in another jurisdiction where she's saying it,
Speaker 5: which the High Court has no jurisdiction of. Does that
Speaker 5: make sense?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Absolutely.
Speaker 2: One thing I will say from the Albany the government
Speaker 2: on this is that they're not playing favorites, because of
Speaker 2: course we know that they also denied a visa to
Speaker 2: a former Israeli minister who is a firebrand on the
Speaker 2: Israeli side. So at least we can give them that
Speaker 2: they're not playing favorites. They simply don't want a firebrand
Speaker 2: on either side visiting Australia at a time when let's
Speaker 2: face it, it's a tinderbox in here moving very very.
Speaker 1: Local for anyone in New South Wales.
Speaker 2: We learned today thanks to a freedom of information application
Speaker 2: by Liberal MP Matt Fox.
Speaker 1: Have I no cross, sorry, Matt Cross, that open cross.
Speaker 2: The state government, the men's government, Joe is going to
Speaker 2: hate this story because.
Speaker 1: We know so how much he loves mins.
Speaker 2: The Men's government has forked out a whopping five point
Speaker 2: four million dollars in taxpayer funds trying to review the
Speaker 2: toll system, which we know is extortionate.
Speaker 1: Anyone who has traveled on.
Speaker 2: Sydney roads knows that it's absolutely extortionate. But these people
Speaker 2: putting this review together have managed to blow five point
Speaker 2: four million dollars just on putting it together.
Speaker 1: Here's some of the money spent.
Speaker 2: One hundred and forty thousand, one hundred and forty five
Speaker 2: thousand dollars on flights and accommodation, two point eight million
Speaker 2: on staff, one point five million on other consultants. My goodness,
Speaker 2: have we've got consultants hiring consultants now? And fifty two thousand,
Speaker 2: two hundred and eight dollars on miscellaneous.
Speaker 1: That's a lot of pens and highlighters. My goodness, now
Speaker 1: this review miscellaneous one. She was very well off this review, Gabby.
Speaker 2: What cracked me up because I was like, Okay, what
Speaker 2: were the findings?
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, fix this? How are you five million dollars?
Speaker 1: What are you going to find? Expecting? Goal tier?
Speaker 2: The review recommends a new northbound toll on the Harbor
Speaker 2: Bridge and Tunnel as well as the Eastern distributor.
Speaker 1: The review argues that.
Speaker 2: The money raised would then be used to lower the
Speaker 2: costs of tolls across the network. So basically what we've
Speaker 2: got recommended for our five point four million dollars is
Speaker 2: more tolls which will overall make the tolls cheaper.
Speaker 3: What a good way to spend five million dollars to
Speaker 3: find something like that? But how infuriating is it for
Speaker 3: anyone living in Sydney in New Southwest and it just
Speaker 3: costs so much money to get from A to B.
Speaker 3: It's seven dollars just to go through one one tunnel
Speaker 3: another five dollars here before even factor in how much
Speaker 3: you're spending on fuel and the rest of it.
Speaker 4: But this in from the government on this one.
Speaker 3: When they were you are asked to provide a statement
Speaker 3: as to this report, they've said, oh, you know, the
Speaker 3: five million dollars pails in comparison to the one hundred
Speaker 3: and ninety five billion dollars at motorists will pay out
Speaker 3: to twenty sixty unless the new system is reformed. Are
Speaker 3: we supposed to be grateful that we are spending so
Speaker 3: much Sean tolls as it is, it's just getting higher,
Speaker 3: and that spending five million to find out absolutely nothing.
Speaker 5: Oh and it's a storm and to take up five million,
Speaker 5: they'll barely get your three toll gates on the m
Speaker 5: fire three times.
Speaker 1: I've got to come into it.
Speaker 5: I do love my boy, No, but he is. He
Speaker 5: is trying to fix the problem. So he is like, yes,
Speaker 5: the Telly is absolutely right, and nothing has actually happened yet,
Speaker 5: and yes there does.
Speaker 1: Appear to be Yes, there does appear to be nothing.
Speaker 5: At all. Love Alan Fells as well, big fan.
Speaker 2: Although it must be said it's not Fell's fault, as
Speaker 2: he pointed out my expenses. This is the guy who
Speaker 2: was in charge of doing the review. He headed the
Speaker 2: whole thing up. He simply pointed out, don't.
Speaker 1: Look at me. It was under the cap that the
Speaker 1: government gave me.
Speaker 5: One motel.
Speaker 1: Yeah, maybe say.
Speaker 2: So again the finger pointing comes straight back to your mate.
Speaker 5: Well, I think I think smaller someone gives you a
Speaker 5: cap doesn't mean you have to spend all of it.
Speaker 5: But again I suppose you know, is a very well
Speaker 5: respected competition azar and he knows what he's doing, and
Speaker 5: I think his his his recommendations actually make a huge
Speaker 5: amount of sense. So for people outside of Sydney. Obviously,
Speaker 5: the North Shore and the Eastern suburbs are the most
Speaker 5: affluent parts of Sydney, and yet owing to a quirk
Speaker 5: in history, you don't actually pay a toll going north
Speaker 5: on the Harbor Bridge of tunnel. You only pay it
Speaker 5: on the way back, so you only you're only basically
Speaker 5: getting a half you're getting you're only paying half price
Speaker 5: basically for use of the road. Whereas if you live
Speaker 5: in the Southwest with the M five, or in the
Speaker 5: West with the M four, or anywhere else you have
Speaker 5: to rely on toll roads, it's not like, oh no,
Speaker 5: you only get you know, you only have to pay
Speaker 5: you know, going west, you don't have to pay when
Speaker 5: you're coming back. So I actually think it makes perfect sense.
Speaker 5: It is you'll be pleased to know these, especially a
Speaker 5: redistribution of wealth. But the richest parts of Sydney have
Speaker 5: been getting literally a free ride like these are distributed.
Speaker 5: There's no tolls at all, whereas for poor people in
Speaker 5: the out of west, you know, people who rely on
Speaker 5: the M four, the M five, people in Cana.
Speaker 3: Trying to make it getting free rides anywhere. Sydney is
Speaker 3: so spread out, wherever you live, wherever you were, people
Speaker 3: have to cross all over to go see their family.
Speaker 3: I think no matter what part of Sydney you're in,
Speaker 3: you're coughing up for.
Speaker 2: Tollstly agree, if you're traveling anywhere in Sydney, you're gonna
Speaker 2: you've basically bought another car in the cost of tolls
Speaker 2: in the space of say a year. It's absolutely extortionate.
Speaker 2: To Canada, now, where we're still waiting, is Trudeau going
Speaker 2: to resign or not? We know that two of his
Speaker 2: ministers resigned within the same day. The vast majority of
Speaker 2: people want to see the back of this guy. He's
Speaker 2: clearly lost the confidence of his parliament and Heckler's are
Speaker 2: coming after him. Check out this guy who took him
Speaker 2: to task last night at a Liberal Party fundraiser at
Speaker 2: the Canadian Museum of History. This clip has gone viral,
Speaker 2: with many Canadians saying this man is fueling the rage.
Speaker 1: Of a nation.
Speaker 6: King Trudeau, what gives you the right to continue? What
Speaker 6: gives you the right to stay in office? You failed Canada,
Speaker 6: You've ruined our country. You're done, walk away. You don't
Speaker 6: have an ounce of your father's integrity. At least he
Speaker 6: walked in the snow.
Speaker 1: You've ruined.
Speaker 6: This country around you is running from you.
Speaker 5: They're abandoning you.
Speaker 6: Christian Friel and Sean Fraziers, they've all left you.
Speaker 1: It's time for you to go.
Speaker 6: It's time for Canada to have an election. You're not
Speaker 6: the king.
Speaker 5: See this is what I don't understand. Why is he
Speaker 5: so upset about Justin Trudeau not being the king. Canada
Speaker 5: is not even a republic. You actually have a king.
Speaker 5: So you're just saying you're not king, Charles. I think
Speaker 5: this guy's in the wrong country.
Speaker 1: We're simply saying that you can.
Speaker 2: Be deposed unlike kings, really unless you kill him.
Speaker 5: Let's have a look sadly for Justin Trudeau and got
Speaker 5: the French. Bloody French every time, isn't it. They just
Speaker 5: screw you over to the last.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Anyway, Now, sadly for Justin Trudeau was not the end
Speaker 5: of it. Another heckler came out him and said that
Speaker 5: he sold Canada out.
Speaker 7: No, you've sold us out to globalism. You are not
Speaker 7: working for Canada, you are working for your globalist partners.
Speaker 7: I wonder how much they're paying you to be tree Canada.
Speaker 7: What do we do with traders in Canada, mister Trudeau.
Speaker 7: We used to hang them, hang them for.
Speaker 1: Treason, and you're doing that very same thing to us.
Speaker 5: Now, okay, now I'm not that if I quite agree
Speaker 5: with the whole.
Speaker 1: Agree. Oh no, no, no, not.
Speaker 5: That hanging paper.
Speaker 2: But that was a historical fact which he's pointed.
Speaker 1: Out, that Canada used to hang people for treason. Don't
Speaker 1: you do it?
Speaker 5: That, doesn't you do it?
Speaker 2: Of that clip which you have artfully evaded, is the
Speaker 2: fact that this guy was trained by the World Economic Forum.
Speaker 2: He is on the World Economic Forum website, is one
Speaker 2: of the young leaders that they are so proud of,
Speaker 2: and he has absolutely ruined his country. The one guy
Speaker 2: who can save it though, Leader of the opposition, Pierre Polivier,
Speaker 2: he took to his socials yesterday to explain the situation
Speaker 2: that there was only one man still keeping him Trudeau
Speaker 2: in power, and would that man agree to withdraw his support.
Speaker 8: Mister Trudeau is being held in office by one man,
Speaker 8: jag Meat saying eighty percent of Canadians have lost confidence
Speaker 8: in this Prime minister. So why is jag Meet saying
Speaker 8: making the entire country wait for him to get his pension.
Speaker 5: Yeah. See, that's all well and good, but you know
Speaker 5: you're really in trouble when your own people, the people
Speaker 5: you are actually in coalition with, the people who are
Speaker 5: your governing partners, are also calling for you to reside.
Speaker 5: And that is exactly what Jack Mete seeing from the
Speaker 5: New Democrats, is saying, he listen.
Speaker 9: And instead of dealing with issues that are important for Canadians,
Speaker 9: the Prime minister is dealing with fighting in his own party.
Speaker 9: It's clear that the Prime minister cannot continue. Will he
Speaker 9: resign today?
Speaker 5: Yes or no?
Speaker 2: So the day after Pierre said, Jack mut saying you've
Speaker 2: got to pull the plug on this guy. There he
Speaker 2: is saying, okay, Trudeau, it's time to say goodbye. I
Speaker 2: am loving the momentum. This is getting gabby. But Trudeau,
Speaker 2: while saying that he's currently considering his options, has yet
Speaker 2: to do anything comprehensive.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I've been waiting for it, haven't we.
Speaker 3: But you know, it's clear that his time is up.
Speaker 3: It's not new that politicians. He's not the first one
Speaker 3: to get heckled. I remember being in Melbourne and going
Speaker 3: to down Andrews Press conferences, and during the COVID years
Speaker 3: he was getting heckled when he was outside that stadium
Speaker 3: as well. But you know, Canada, it just needs to
Speaker 3: reform its economic policies. It's you know, the Canadians are
Speaker 3: absolutely fed up with it, with the cost of living crisis,
Speaker 3: the immigration crisis, and now just seeing so much online
Speaker 3: of just people being so disappointed by him.
Speaker 5: It is one of those things, isn't it, where everyone
Speaker 5: loves the progressive work, touchy feely agenda everything when everything's
Speaker 5: going well or everything. As soon as there is a
Speaker 5: cost of living pressure, everything just evaporates instantly, including you
Speaker 5: know actual you know, serious things like long term things though,
Speaker 5: like climate train and stuff like that, which I know
Speaker 5: is a government conspiracy is But I dare say we've
Speaker 5: gone from karme lamentum to justin true demented.
Speaker 1: How much work did you put into that?
Speaker 5: I spent.
Speaker 2: That.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that was absolutely incredible.
Speaker 5: It really disturbs me though, that Justin Trudeau has French
Speaker 5: heritage and that France hate the French is next to Germany.
Speaker 2: About Pierre then because he has a French last name,
Speaker 2: because he's set to become the next PMS.
Speaker 5: I heard them all. I heard them all, Quebec.
Speaker 1: You can't keep this guy happy.
Speaker 2: I think the Canadians should just start a petition like
Speaker 2: everyone in the UK did, where they were like, we
Speaker 2: want another general election. Two point nine million people jumped
Speaker 2: on the UK Parliament's website and sign that petition, saying
Speaker 2: we know kiss Dama is only a few months old,
Speaker 2: but we want another trip around the mulberry Bush. Please,
Speaker 2: Canadians get on it. You've already seen it done. You
Speaker 2: guys can pull it off as well. To Germany now,
Speaker 2: where just a week after we saw similar scenes in France,
Speaker 2: they've decided to go to a snap election.
Speaker 1: Get this.
Speaker 2: Chancellor Olaf Schultz has lost confidence vote, but he put
Speaker 2: it up himself. He took it to the lower House saying, look,
Speaker 2: please just vote me out so we can get on
Speaker 2: with having an earlier election. He required three hundred and
Speaker 2: sixty seven votes of no confidence to get it across
Speaker 2: the line and to succeed in his aim. Three hundred
Speaker 2: and ninety four MPs obliged shim.
Speaker 1: And said, yes, we're kicking you to the curb. Goodbye, buddy.
Speaker 2: Germany is now going to an election in February, nine
Speaker 2: months before it was scheduled. This is really interesting, Gabby,
Speaker 2: because these guys know better than anyone that in September
Speaker 2: of this year, the AfD, which is called the far
Speaker 2: right party in Germany, won the state election. And I
Speaker 2: think this can be summed up in one word immigration.
Speaker 2: We've seen successive parties throughout Europe doing really well when
Speaker 2: they take a hard line on immigration, and it's the
Speaker 2: AfD who have said the immediate expulsion of all illegal
Speaker 2: immigrants is going to be their number one priority should
Speaker 2: they take power. I think obviously the incumbent government has
Speaker 2: realized they are on the nose to the extent that
Speaker 2: they're literally bowing out at this point.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, they've now got to care to hear government until
Speaker 3: February and that, as you say, too much immigration has
Speaker 3: really been the issue here as well as the economy.
Speaker 3: I're looking at the economy. It hasn't grown in five years.
Speaker 3: And you know, it's the same kind of in countries
Speaker 3: that we've seen like in America where you've got the
Speaker 3: cost of living crisis, the immigration crisis, but the border
Speaker 3: over their high fuel and that what's happening is the
Speaker 3: Trump effects. People are saying no, they're voting with their
Speaker 3: with their pockets as they typically do, and now people
Speaker 3: are going to the right and this is what's happening
Speaker 3: in Germany.
Speaker 5: Again. It's the same thing, isn't it. When economics are good,
Speaker 5: when economic growth is strong, when unemployment is low and
Speaker 5: everyone's got a well paying job, everyone is open hearted
Speaker 5: and wants people to come in and don't have a problem.
Speaker 5: The minute a crisis hits, suddenly people I look around
Speaker 5: for someone to blame, but all they care about is
Speaker 5: that economic stuff. And I think the problem here is AfD.
Speaker 5: They are a bad bunch of dudes. They are nasty,
Speaker 5: nasty people, and they are unlike other populist right parties
Speaker 5: in Europe. They have seriously concerning links and similarities to
Speaker 5: the Nazi Party.
Speaker 1: I know what you're.
Speaker 2: Referring to, Joe, but they are not the party of
Speaker 2: nineteen forty five.
Speaker 5: They have well I would hope not, but they But they.
Speaker 2: Have, and they have expelled people who spouse those values.
Speaker 5: Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah. But the fact the fact that
Speaker 5: they're in there, and the fact that they're in there
Speaker 5: in the first place, and the fact that they're spouting
Speaker 5: those things. They have the slogans that are similar to
Speaker 5: ones used in Nazi Germany, and so these are.
Speaker 1: Bad, bad, bad, Like what can you quote any.
Speaker 5: I think it's Deutschland, US in the German which is
Speaker 5: Dutch Land, or Germany over all, which is.
Speaker 1: Which that is just like America.
Speaker 5: First, it's not it has very strong Nazi connotations. So anyway,
Speaker 5: this is recent you're saying, yep, yep, this is the
Speaker 5: last few years. So these again, these guys are bad news.
Speaker 5: Do not defend them, do not. But again, this is
Speaker 5: what happens if center right parties or indeed center left
Speaker 5: parties failed to control immigration and there are open borders
Speaker 5: and people do feel overwhelmed, then parties like this will
Speaker 5: rise up. So in a sense, it's incumbent on mainstream
Speaker 5: parties to almost do their dirty work for them, to
Speaker 5: make sure that you don't end up being so incomfident
Speaker 5: that you're swept away and that these parties come in
Speaker 5: because it is it is very scary. And the other
Speaker 5: thing is that German germanness, if you like. And again
Speaker 5: this was especially under the Nazis, was not something that
Speaker 5: was seen as being conferred by citizenship. It was very
Speaker 5: much seen as something that was conferred by blood, that
Speaker 5: you were born a German, and that being a German
Speaker 5: had certain racial characteristics. So again, when they talk about
Speaker 5: expelling all illegal immigrants or foreigners or whatever.
Speaker 2: I think that's perfectly fair, he said.
Speaker 5: I know, but it has what country.
Speaker 2: Wouldn't love to be rid of all illegal immigrants some
Speaker 2: parts sort of.
Speaker 5: That sort of stuff has a particular resonance in Germany
Speaker 5: that is far more scary than saying it over all.
Speaker 5: But you're not talking, you know, Germany, until just a
Speaker 5: few decades ago, in the reconstruction of post war the
Speaker 5: German identity was one of a racially pure aryan German,
Speaker 5: not someone who had a German passport.
Speaker 2: We know this, but I do think it is a
Speaker 2: stretch to say that this is essentially the same party.
Speaker 1: They're just kind of going out.
Speaker 5: It's the very they have links and they have similar
Speaker 5: rhetoric to a party that emerged in Germany not so
Speaker 5: long ago.
Speaker 1: It was a very long time ago.
Speaker 2: Actually, I don't think you can tire people with a
Speaker 2: brush from nineteen forty five.
Speaker 5: Well, the founder of IFDA left it because he was
Speaker 5: so concerned about the elements.
Speaker 2: Like I say, they have expelled members who espouse the
Speaker 2: values that you're hearkening back.
Speaker 1: They're clearly a very different party.
Speaker 2: Maybe they should rebrand, just rebrand, it's way too.
Speaker 5: Controversial, not the Nazi Party.
Speaker 2: To Ireland now where speaking of immigration, people in the town.
Speaker 1: Of ath Loun has had a huge win.
Speaker 2: You may be aware of these massive refugee accommodations popping
Speaker 2: up in towns all over Ireland.
Speaker 1: If I had a dollar for.
Speaker 2: Every time I've seen a community of everyday Irish people
Speaker 2: begging police, do not empty your buses here, do not
Speaker 2: do this. They are not welcome here. These are illegals.
Speaker 2: We do not want them in our country town. I
Speaker 2: would never have to work again in my entire life.
Speaker 2: So these guys in af Lound decided, you know what,
Speaker 2: We're going to take this to the High Court. We
Speaker 2: do not want more refugee accommodation in our patch and
Speaker 2: get this the state folded.
Speaker 1: They won. Of course, what this sets.
Speaker 2: Is a really interesting precedent for all the other down
Speaker 2: to undoubtedly are sitting up taking note and saying, mmmm.
Speaker 1: Where now to for us?
Speaker 2: Here's a short video of those in a flown celebrating
Speaker 2: the win.
Speaker 1: Now while they're being flooded with immigrants.
Speaker 2: You'd think that surely these refugees would be so grateful
Speaker 2: to be there at least, But if this lady is
Speaker 2: anything to go by, no they're not.
Speaker 10: These are one of the women that we were moved
Speaker 10: from siri Ac to this assolated dump in Dendrum Tipaw.
Speaker 10: We had to clean our houses first before moving in
Speaker 10: their houses as good spader worms.
Speaker 4: It was very dating.
Speaker 10: There's no gate, as you can see the Secure Infrastructure
Speaker 10: Bill to keep herself. There are no buses to travel
Speaker 10: to shops or to the nearby our town. There's no
Speaker 10: school to accommodates of our children, and schools are opening
Speaker 10: soon now we must be on the waiting list. There's
Speaker 10: no employment situated in the area for assisting us with employment.
Speaker 1: How's that for gratitude.
Speaker 2: You come here with nothing, You have a roof over
Speaker 2: your head, you are provided for, and all you can
Speaker 2: do is complain, if not.
Speaker 5: Even run someone out of town these days without them
Speaker 5: be chicken mudy.
Speaker 2: Is it any wonder that Adlund's like, you know what,
Speaker 2: We're just not putting you up. You're not even happy
Speaker 2: to be here. We've got to go to an ad
Speaker 2: break now. But when we come back, this amazing case
Speaker 2: regarding the convicted killer of George Floyd's continues with bombshell new.
Speaker 1: Revelations, Will we ride back? Welcome back? Well.
Speaker 2: The case of Derek Chauvin, the man convicted of killing
Speaker 2: George Floyd, has now resumed after a judge has decided
Speaker 2: that his team can look into the medical records of
Speaker 2: George Floyd. The questions now being asked pertain to a
Speaker 2: heart condition that George Floyd may have had, which may
Speaker 2: have aggravated been aggravated by.
Speaker 1: A rare tumor he had.
Speaker 2: Therefore, did he actually die of asphyxiation due to the
Speaker 2: pressure Derek Chauvin, the police officer.
Speaker 1: Had applied to the back of his neck.
Speaker 2: Here is Liz Colin talking to Jack Prosbec explaining the situation.
Speaker 11: This is a federal judge who has finally come back
Speaker 11: approving this motion that has been in the works four
Speaker 11: months to examine heart tissue in George Floyd and also
Speaker 11: some fluids from George Floyd's.
Speaker 1: Body as well well.
Speaker 11: And basically this is related to what's called a periganglioma.
Speaker 11: This was discussed in the Fall of Minneapolis. Some doctors
Speaker 11: came forward during Derek Chauvin's case to say, why wasn't
Speaker 11: this tumor tested in George Floyd. In many cases it
Speaker 11: can lead to sudden cardiac death. They brought this information forward,
Speaker 11: his attorney at the time did not act upon this information,
Speaker 11: according to court documents, and also the judge, Judge Peter Cahill,
Speaker 11: ignored it as well. So in this motion, the judge
Speaker 11: has now said that this testing can take place.
Speaker 2: How would you feel if you were Derek Chauvin? So
Speaker 2: the judges dismiss this. Initially, Derek pleaded guilty because he
Speaker 2: wanted to reduce sentence. Who wouldn't under the circumstances. The
Speaker 2: other part of this bombshell news is that it's found
Speaker 2: that George Floyd wasn't actually dead until at least an
Speaker 2: hour after Derek Chauvin was seen on the pavement applying
Speaker 2: the pressure.
Speaker 1: To the back of his neck.
Speaker 2: We know this because in the autopsy report, it shows
Speaker 2: that an anti morton blood was collected by the HHC
Speaker 2: at least an hour after he was taken into care.
Speaker 2: George Floyd that was taken into care.
Speaker 1: Now, anti morton.
Speaker 2: Blood is the opposite of post mortem anything. This means
Speaker 2: that George was still alive while receiving this medical attention.
Speaker 2: It's going to be very interesting, Gabby, to see where
Speaker 2: this case goes from here.
Speaker 3: Yeah, thank goodness this case is being reopened because it
Speaker 3: really appears that Derek Chauvin's lawyer has completely mucked up
Speaker 3: his defense.
Speaker 4: CAPTI.
Speaker 3: You know, Chauvin claims that if he knew that this
Speaker 3: evidence could have been tested in trial, then he wouldn't
Speaker 3: have pleaded guilty, you know, And I think it sounds
Speaker 3: pretty critical that it does get tested, that it's he
Speaker 3: was a lie for an hour.
Speaker 4: It's very hospital.
Speaker 5: This is this is a pathologist who came forward unsolicited
Speaker 5: to Chauvin's lawyer and the lawyer and the lawyer just said,
Speaker 5: so he could just be a crank, Like it's good
Speaker 5: that they're reopening, but I wouldn't be if I was
Speaker 5: Derek Chauvin, I wouldn't be pinning my hopes. I wouldn't
Speaker 5: be packing my suit case.
Speaker 1: But this is the autopsy report.
Speaker 5: But clearly if you were directions, that's the autopsy report
Speaker 5: that shows you would because he didn't finally die until
Speaker 5: an hour afterwards, but he could well like the thing
Speaker 5: that killed That doesn't make that he had.
Speaker 2: This aggregating factor in the form of this tumor.
Speaker 5: That's right, And but the fact that the pathologist was
Speaker 5: not involved in the case came forward unsolicited off this.
Speaker 5: Maybe he's brilliant, maybe he's got it, but he may very.
Speaker 1: Well just be passionate about justice because the.
Speaker 2: Very old facts by both Chauvin's lawyer previously.
Speaker 5: Even to even make it to the judge.
Speaker 1: The Liz Colin said there that both of them dismissed it.
Speaker 5: But I don't think the lawyer even brought it as
Speaker 5: part of the evidence.
Speaker 1: Derek wasn't aware even.
Speaker 4: It seems like that the lawyer's kind of stuff.
Speaker 5: That's the lawyer has obviously thought this is just not credible.
Speaker 5: This is not going to help our case, and we're
Speaker 5: better off just taking the plea buget. Maybe he was
Speaker 5: just feeling lazy it wanted to knock off early, or
Speaker 5: maybe he just thought this is just totally genial. But anyway,
Speaker 5: let's hear it out. Let's see if it is. And
Speaker 5: let's see if Derek Chauvin thought he killed George Floyd
Speaker 5: but then found out afterwards that maybe he hadn't.
Speaker 2: Well, he didn't really have much of a case left
Speaker 2: they'd fought it to the nth degree, and it was
Speaker 2: kind of like, well, you have to be responsible, so
Speaker 2: either you get a really big sentence or you just
Speaker 2: plead guilty. So naturally he took the most obvious road,
Speaker 2: and now it's.
Speaker 5: I can't breathe, I can't breathe.
Speaker 1: Well, new evidence reports that he may yet get off.
Speaker 1: Who knows. It's just very interesting.
Speaker 2: Given this, of course was the case. This was the
Speaker 2: death that sparked the BLM riots that burnt entire cities
Speaker 2: to the ground, most notably Minneapolis, and really helped the
Speaker 2: Democrats in the.
Speaker 1: Twenty twenty election.
Speaker 2: Staying in the US, now, the New York state mandates
Speaker 2: the removal of all indigenous imagery that has anything to
Speaker 2: do with school sporting teams. Yes, it's more woke nonsense.
Speaker 2: So the state of New York has followed up on
Speaker 2: schools using any kind of indigenous imagery linked to their
Speaker 2: school teams.
Speaker 1: So here's a list.
Speaker 2: Of before and after name changes. The Raiders are going
Speaker 2: to be called the wolf Pack. Indians are going to
Speaker 2: be called the Ravens. Chiefs will now be the Cougars Raiders.
Speaker 1: How is red raiders bad? Is now red in green.
Speaker 2: Those are just two colors. It's not a very compelling
Speaker 2: name change. And thunderbirds now eagles.
Speaker 1: I mean, the would.
Speaker 2: Whose quality of life has been improved by this helped
Speaker 2: me out?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, the students, how how are the students really
Speaker 3: benefiting from this?
Speaker 4: I was looking at some of the reaction to this.
Speaker 3: Online and people were saying, what a waste of taxpayer funds?
Speaker 4: Can you can teachers get back to teaching.
Speaker 3: Can the focus be on actually what they're learning at
Speaker 3: schools instead of this woke nonsense.
Speaker 5: I don't understand, like the chiefs, like they could be fire.
Speaker 1: Chiefs, they could be any kind of chief.
Speaker 4: And schools don't have a choice here.
Speaker 1: Why can they do this?
Speaker 5: Why can't they just haven't changed red Raiders to raiders
Speaker 5: because the La Raiders.
Speaker 1: They were no longer Red Raiders, just.
Speaker 5: Raiders and the whites Bread. So there's now a school
Speaker 5: that is in the process of also changing its nickname,
Speaker 5: the Whitespread Central School, that is the whitesp Warriors. Even
Speaker 5: warriors has to go because they are indigen.
Speaker 2: But again, just like cheefs, you can be any kind
Speaker 2: of warriors.
Speaker 1: It's not exactly.
Speaker 5: Also, why is it bad to be warrior, Like, isn't
Speaker 5: that part of your culture that you should be celebrated? Like, yeah,
Speaker 5: we're fears.
Speaker 1: I would have feel worried.
Speaker 2: It seems you can't kill one's faces because if nobody's
Speaker 2: named in the names, then they're like, there's not enough representation.
Speaker 1: So people do these kinds of things.
Speaker 2: And then they're like, how dare you represent us?
Speaker 1: This is cultural appropriation. We've got to go to a
Speaker 1: break now.
Speaker 2: But when we come back, if you're struggling with Christmas cheer,
Speaker 2: I've got sixty seconds for you that I guarantee will
Speaker 2: get you in the mood the front. Imagine you're in
Speaker 2: your eighties and you see one of Elon Musk's Tesla
Speaker 2: cyber trucks drive by. Can you imagine what an otherworldly
Speaker 2: experience you'd be having. Gabby, this lady, this grandma in
Speaker 2: the US, cannot believe her.
Speaker 3: I oh, I love the reaction from this grandmother because
Speaker 3: we've seen those these Tesla cyber trucks hitting at the
Speaker 3: road and they've been getting mixed reaction.
Speaker 4: Many people love them.
Speaker 3: I know there's a big waiting list for them, but
Speaker 3: just check out how this grandmother responded.
Speaker 7: That thing behind guys, it's out of Star Wars?
Speaker 1: What is there?
Speaker 9: What kind of care is there that is a Tesla sub? Why?
Speaker 1: God, wow, this is recidulous. How about word?
Speaker 2: It does look like it's out of Star Wars, like
Speaker 2: one of the spaceships.
Speaker 1: By god, who would drive that?
Speaker 4: Oh my god, that is so brue.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 4: The funny thing is Elon Musk is going to see
Speaker 4: that it's going viral on titter, so he's going to
Speaker 4: see that reaction.
Speaker 3: It's pretty good and looks she's probably not the target market.
Speaker 4: If she's thinking that hipping cool, then you.
Speaker 5: Know Grandy's getting an That's what I think.
Speaker 1: How much do they set you back as well?
Speaker 2: Like you've got to pay a lot for the privilege.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you know, I wonder I want if I'm going
Speaker 5: to have to drive an electric car. I wan an
Speaker 5: electric car that looks like the biggest gas guzzler, the
Speaker 5: biggest petrol inhaling monster truck.
Speaker 2: Well, just so you're going to offend all the lefties anyway,
Speaker 2: I'm just because it looks.
Speaker 5: Good like that does like I'm with the Grandma. It
Speaker 5: does kind of just look weird. It looks like, oh no,
Speaker 5: it does.
Speaker 2: It looks like something out of Star Wars, exactly like
Speaker 2: she said. But I promised you sixty seconds to get
Speaker 2: you into the Christmas spirit.
Speaker 1: If you're feeling more stress than blessed.
Speaker 2: Right now, let this choir of beautiful boys remind you
Speaker 2: it's Christmas time.
Speaker 5: I could have done better.
Speaker 1: Heavenly gotta give that girl's bunks. I absolutely love it.
Speaker 5: I think that fourth kid from the left up the
Speaker 5: back was a little bit off.
Speaker 2: Just doesn't it just show up gabbing all the like
Speaker 2: modern jingle bell, jingle bell that is utterly heavenly.
Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely transit.
Speaker 3: I saw someone say, you know, bring back modern Christmas music,
Speaker 3: and everyone are saying no, and it's Merry Christmas.
Speaker 4: By the way, their voices are so beautiful.
Speaker 2: Please there's no competition. That's a wrap from us. We'll
Speaker 2: be back tomorrow. Coming up next. Sky News documentary m
Speaker 2: H three seven zero ten years on