WEBVTT - Die with zero: Why you should give it away sooner

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. What is the idea behind your investing? What's

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>your longtime idea? When you invest? We're going to assume

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that sooner or later, perhaps already you own your house,

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps already you have you actually have enough to retire.

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you don't think you do, but maybe you do.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So then the thing is, if you have a family,

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>your family, how are on earth are they going to

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>buy a house? You know, they've just put lending limits

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on home mortgages at six times for the banks for

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of their volume six times. No one's buying

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a house at six times in the major cities it's

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>eight times, nine times, ten times. Just gives you some

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of the cost the younger generation face. We've got

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of issues I want to talk about today,

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but the first thing I want to talk about with

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>my guest Will Hamilton, regular on the Show of Hamilton

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>were the partners and long term member of the Baron's

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Top one fifty distant in there again of course of late.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to him about a piece he

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>did recently on The Australian which sparked a lot of comment.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It was basically all about the notion of leaving nothing behind,

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 1>or as the Americans like to call it, die with zero.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>That's a book that's been a bestseller over there. How

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>are you well?

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Very well, James, Thank you very much for having me.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I was intrigued with quite a personal piece you did.

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Actually I thought on this, but it is something it's

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a paradox that a lot of people face,

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly I think property investors. You know, they are stretching themselves,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they are negatively gearing. They are they are taking lists,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they are going through the relatively mundane issues of running

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>investment properties, and they're doing it with mixed success, often

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so that they can help their kids buy a house.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>A kind of a circular kind of a provise circular situation.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So tell me about what this concept and your impressions

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 2>It's something we get into discussions with clients a lot,

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>and you know where wholesye license and our clients generally

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 2>have their in a fortunate position when we get into

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 2>a state planning and also planning for how they assist children.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 2>I often there's a bookshop up in the shopping center

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>above what we are dimicks. And I always say, on

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the way out, go and buy Bill Perkins, die with zero,

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 2>now is that right?

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>You don't really sell them. You didn't put a little

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>stack a reception and make a bit of marrid is.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's all relative. It doesn't mean die with zero.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 2>It's to give away to your children what an amount

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that you can afford. So you know, I had to

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>get a little lot of emails people, and thank you

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>very much giving me some advice on the article. But

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 2>one is to the extent you can afford it, and

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:09.839
<v Speaker 2>to help your children, because it's more important to help

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>your children while they're in their thirties and forties rather

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>than when you die and they're in their sixties, and

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 2>that's when they need it, especially with the housing differential

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>when I am just a baby boomer. But when we

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>went out there to buy houses and four to five

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>times at your income level versus as you rightly said,

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 2>you ten times plus today. And these are issues that

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 2>our children therefore need our assistance to the extent that

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>we can provide it. Now, there's only so much you

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>can say in nine hundred words. And you know again,

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>some people wrote in and one person was a little

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 2>bit emotional with respect to the fact that they'd done

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 2>this and then their children got divorced. So you do

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>need to get some advice. And what I'm saying is

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 2>general advice only, but you need to go and talk

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to your financial advisor about this, and then they're going

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>to put you in the direction of a family lawyer,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>be it loan agreements, be it financial agreements that you

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>may want to consider. And I think that's very important,

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>important so that you protect children with the assets that

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>they bring into a relationship.

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, you know, just that issue of I suppose

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the how it's the house prices, the level of house

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>prices that have sparked particular interest in this. It's always

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>been around as a concept, but it's got an edge now,

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you know. I was wanted up the old joke about

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>how do you buy a house for four hundred thousand

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in Sydney's North Shore? You buy it in nineteen seventy nine,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that's what you're saying, right. I don't know

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>how much you paid for your house or I paid

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for mine, but you know the figures are laughed at

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>by the people who are buying houses now, So let's

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>just keep it on that issue, and this is a

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>wider issue obviously, if this could be for any reason,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think obviously the core reason is very compelling.

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You know why, your son or daughter will probably be

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in their late sixties when they get your inheritance. Statistics

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>would suggest, and in their late sixties if they're the

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>type of people who are active investors, strivers, and they

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>listen to a show like this, chances are they've paid

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>their house off by then, and there was years where

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they had absolutely nothing, and maybe it wasn't necessary because

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you were accumulating at the same time. Now, the thing

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical about Will is this issue of financial agreements

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and loan agreements and sending people to the lawyers to

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>do this, I'm assumed. Tell me why you think this

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is necessary and is it about keeping it literally within bloodlines?

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>To be brutal about it.

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that depending on the age of a child,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 2>line agreements something you should consider now whilst the house

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>price goes up and as I said, you're protecting what

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 2>they bring in. I think financial agreements are a very

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 2>personal thing, and we've got clients that insist on them,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 2>and we've got clients that there is no way I

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 2>would ask my children to sign that, So I'm not

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>making it. It's a judgmental call, and I'm not making

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a call either way. I think you need to discuss

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 2>it and make a decision based on something that's right

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>for you and your family on a lone agreement. I

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>think that's a very different matter. That they're not even

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a thousand dollars for a family lawyer to prepare, and

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>you can actually provide something which I think is a

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 2>safe thing to.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Do, but if it's a lot of agreement, you're not

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>giving it to them.

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Correct, Well, that's on the depending of the structure that

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 2>it's in and how it's done. That loan can then

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.559
<v Speaker 2>be forgone on your death.

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I see, I see all right, So what is the

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>overarching sort of logic of these greens. It's to protect

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>your children from unexpected events in the future, such as divorce.

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Am I close?

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Correct? I think what the logic of these And if

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you speak to a family lawyer, they'll say, you can protect

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 2>what you bring into a relationship. You can't protect what

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you create in a relationship. That's openslaver and so it

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 2>should be not saying that's you should protect against that

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you can't. You shouldn't.

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder why people don't do it.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think a lot of people don't know about it.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Thinking of an email that I got from one person.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 2>It was, you know, as I said, quite emotional about

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>that because this is what happened. They gave some money

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and then child got divorced. I was wondering, well, did

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 2>you know about this? And that's why sometimes you should.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>You should go and get advice, and your financial advisor

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 2>discusses that with you, and then push and then put

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>will introduce you into a family lawyer that can have

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a further discussion and then not expend financial agreements. That's

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>a different matter altogether.

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we see just this morning the usual here

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we go again, the annual sort of aspa. They all

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>How much you should have to you know, be comfortable

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in a retirement, et cetera. And it should be seventy

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a year for a couple, and that means

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you need to have well, you certainly want to have

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a million, you know, officially it's something like one point

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>six one point seven million, depending on the degree of

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>risk of which you take. But the point I'm leading

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to is that at a certain point we clear off

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>are at a certain point we say, okay, the house

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>is paid off. And many investors once they have a

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>certain number, a certain figure in super and maybe they

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>keep working so this figure doesn't have to be anything

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>as high as these calculators say, and many it listens

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to the show, will have much more than that. But

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I wonder is this concern about not having enough in

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 1>retirement an issue that stops people doing it even if

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>they have plenty, because they say, look, if the world collapses,

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there's the markets collapse, If I'm stuck on cash rates,

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>if the banks collapse, how am I going to survive?

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>All my retirement money is at risk. Yes, you say

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot, but maybe I don't really have

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot because it's all at risk, and so I

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>can't hand it over just yet, because I worry still

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know how much I'm going to cost

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in the fullness of time. And let's say the nightmare

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>scenario where a couple are both in some sort of

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>elaborate age care with multiple medical bills for years and years,

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>whether they could rack up a hell of a lot

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>of bills. The point I'm making is do you think

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's actually stopping people too.

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that it is. As I said, everything's

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>relative and it it's personal. So I'm not saying you

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 2>must do this, that you do it to the extent

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>you can afford to do it. That's the first thing.

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>And I also I think it's generational.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>No tell me about that your concept of it being

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>general intergenerational.

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 2>So well, first of all, I write this because I

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I do believes in and there's intergenerational inequality. And you

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>said that created discussion through the comment section. A lot

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 2>of people didn't agree on that point.

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the degree if they were perhaps under thirty.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Though, yeah, correct, So they didn't agree on intergenerational inequality,

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>which I do believe there is. So that's where I'm

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 2>coming from, and that's what I discussed with people. But

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I know my parents. There is no way my parents

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>would consider this because of a lot of the points

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>you brought up. My mother's in her nineties and she's worried,

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 2>very worried about the cost of age care and her

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 2>own health. And I think that you're at a point

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 2>in time when you can look at this and you

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>can look at it objectively. There's other things where there's

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>other points in your life when you're focused on other things.

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>And as I stress, to the extent that you can

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 2>afford it, And I understand some people can afford to

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>a far greater degree than others.

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose the imperative that drives people to make

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>money was in conflict with the different dynamic of giving

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it away in many cases. Whereas will that be relevant

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>apart from homebuying?

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Was I said in the article, and this again, I

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 2>believe in it a lot of the things Bill Perkins said,

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>But I just want to stress in the book I

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>was zero, But I do want to stress in the

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 2>book he's obviously a very wealthy man and that comes

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>across so you have to adjust for that. And he's American,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>so we have to bring it into a cultural perspective.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 2>But I also think the thing on creating experiences to

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 2>again the extent you can afford it. So if you

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 2>can afford to create experiences with children and grandchildren and memories,

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 2>as he says, memories really important. So those experiences lead

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 2>to memories, you know, because the one reality is we're

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>not going to be here one day. And I think

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>that's I thought that was a really lovely thing, and

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was it really resonated with me. And

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the other thing is again and some people don't agree

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 2>with private school education as well, and that came back

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 2>in the feedback I got. But if it is important,

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, education is you know, there's nothing more in

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 2>a chance life is education, be it secondary education or

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 2>tertiary education. And I know one of our clients is

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 2>very philanthropic in ensuring that those that wouldn't ordinarily be

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 2>able to go to university can and he gives through

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne University on that and I think he's it's lovely

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 2>what he does.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So typically this would end up being not it's obviously

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>two days anyway for some investors to pay for their

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>own children. By the time they get to the position

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, their children will have had their school experience,

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever that might have been, and however that much that

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>might have cast. So we're talking about grandchildren often. And

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. We've got a question coming up at the

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>breakfromt Sandral exactly about this, but on that one, is

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there any guidance you can give on that you mentioned

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about long agreements with lawyers for buying homes or perhaps

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>assisting with the Dan Holmes I am actually, which is

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>typically that someone pays ten percent of what the house

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. How about on the schools on

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>the ideas on that.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>One, someone once said to me, if you can find

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>an investment that's linked to the CPI of school, phees,

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>go for it.

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>CPI of school is an illegal zone.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Because exactly that. So, yeah, it's a friend of mine

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 2>and Sydney and he once said that to me, and

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I always laughed, and I've quoted that often what he said.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It's more relevant every year.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>So there are bonds or education bonds and things like

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 2>that which you can buy or you can just put

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 2>something away, depending on again, to the extent that you

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 2>can afford it. And that's what these are, the sum

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>of things which I think you can consider. I'm not

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 2>saying you should, but you can.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Just one last thing on this before the break. We've

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of people on the show skeptical of

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>education bonds. I am too, You are too, okay, So

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>your point is perhaps to have a saving sphere correct

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that is focused on this issue, but it does not

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to be an education bond. And the fint

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I always make on the show folks. Is they called

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>education bonds but they are nothing to do with education

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>per sale. They are marketed as such, and it's a scheme,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't designed for paying school fees. It has

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>been adopted as such, but that was not its core.

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, really interesting. I've got some really good questions

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to and I've kept them for Will,

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>who is a regular on the show and a lot

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners are keen obviously to get items in

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>front of him. So back in a moment, Hello, and

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. James Kirby

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>talking to Will Hamilton as I'm going to do this

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>question second into two parts, folks, because there's two different

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>themes that i want to pick up on. But just quickly,

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I had a question which came in later actually, and

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's from Lily who says I can't keep up with

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the number of grants for first home buyers. But I

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>see now that the latest grant for shared equity has

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>come out, but of course it has been surpassed by

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the first home buyers scheme. At the same time, we've

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>seen lending limits imposed by the banks in the same

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>area what gives. Yeah, thank you Lily.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So they're putting lending limits exactly on the same people

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to buy a house, because the ones

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>who need to go over five or six times income

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>will substantially be made up of first home buyers. And

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>then they're rolling out grants a universal first home deposit scheme,

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>which is going so hot, folks, it's going so hot

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that the banks are putting over they're doing overtime in

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the departments of the banks trying to fill this out.

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And we're getting a super hot segment of the market,

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>which ironically is the exact same market they're throwing the

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>grand set.

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>What do you think will It's like, look got enough.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 2>It still exists, but I haven't looked at it. But

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago, the Victorian pite government gave

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>stamp duty real life up to six hundred thousand dollars,

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and the minuteure went over six hundred thousand dollars, you

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>had to pay the full stamp duty. So thing you

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 2>give when you don't give, And yeah, this is I

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>do believe the federal government's latest equity share scheme that's

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>absolutely pushed housing prices up. It can't not have the

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>way they've structured it up to a million dollars and

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 2>you shared equity. That's with a five percent deposit down.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 2>That's simple as it was only going to do that.

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing I worry about too is that

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like it overheats that particular secret action. Not only that,

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but like the whole market gets skewed to that segment,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to this economic theory of push to price.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 2>You know that they actually it's misthought. It was a

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>thought bubble during the election that they've had to rolla

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>leading into the election.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Hm hm, okay, well, Lily, I hope that's useful to you.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>All those grants are there. And by the way, there's

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>also the first Home super Service scheme, which I think

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this government are very keen to to not advertise because

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't like it. I don't think they like it all.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Right now, listen, folks, we got to hear. I want

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you to listen to this very carefully, right because it's

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>come up again and again from listeners, and it's about

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>super annuation caps and how much you can have and

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>at what point various taxes kick in, like the new

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>super at the new super tax at fifteen percent above

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>three million. But here's David. This is what he says.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Someone on the show mentioned that, based on current legislation,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount in the pension account can increase tax free

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>without limit. I want to know, is he right? If

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I retire at sixty and I transfer two million into

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>my pension account, and assuming this balance grows yearly, the

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>full amount in the pension account will always be tax free.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>The fifteen percent tax coming in at division two nine

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>six does not apply to this the pension amount. Okay,

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>just to reiterate, the day you retire, if you have

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>up to two million, that once it's in the box, basically,

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>once it's in the can inside the supersystem the TBC.

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>To be precise, it won't be taxed even if it

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>grows to three million, four million, yep? Right or wrong?

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Right? In fact, Thomas asks a question where he answers.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 2>He answers it in his question itself and that that's interesting,

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 2>And he says, Jim Chalmers, I only talked about division

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>two nine six, which is fifteen percent on tesB more

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 2>than three million. The situation of between two and three

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 2>million appears been overinterpreted. So if I have two point

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 2>four million in super phase I transfer two million into

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 2>account based pension at the age of sixty five, I

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 2>will have to leave four hundred into the accumulation phase. Correct,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 2>that's if you convinced on that. But my two million

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 2>retirement phase can grow to organically, he says two point

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 2>four million, and the earnings is tax free, not fifteen percent. Correct. Correct.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that's just a final word on that, folks. Okay,

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that's how it works. The fifteen percent tax, the new

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>one is on amounts above three million. And so for instance,

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>how that might occur is, for instance, if you had

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>three million this, if you had four million the day

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you retire, well that only two of that would go

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.239
<v Speaker 1>into that can grow forever and never be taxes. That's right.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you got to an accumulation phase and.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>The other two well, you can do what you like

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>with it. You're probably going to let it fall into

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>accumulation because it's it becomes fifteen and that's hard to beat. Okay,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. Of course, there are people who also have

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>more than two million, and they haven't even retired. They're

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>relevant two. So we try to cover all angles here.

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>This is easier sometimes, folks, to pin down in in

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>print than it is when we're talking. Because it's a print.

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>J Obvis is more precise. All right. I have very

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting question from Sandra which is on the theme that

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll started with, so we'll come back to that one second.

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast.

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby talking to Will Hamilton. Okay, Will, question from

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Sandro which does kind of correspond or echo some of

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the issues we talked about at the start of the

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>show about leaving the extreme version of dying with zero.

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's not, of course dying with zero. It's about

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking about whether you should help people in your life

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier rather than later. Sandro, I want to invest for

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>my grandchildren. My initial thoughts are to add approximately two

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand per child annually on their birthday into the ASX

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and etf. I suppose that is or something

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>similar and this should compound to something significant in twenty

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>years when they go to buy a house. I'm interested

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in some ideas and strategies on how to set this

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>up the most cost effective and today who was named

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>should be in most tax effective way, et cetera. Any

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>information would be much appreciated. Okay, sandral not you say

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you will.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So first of all, Sandra, go and talk to

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 2>an accountant. I presume they might to ask you to

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 2>set this up in your name, in the parents' name,

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 2>as in trust for the children. That's the first thing.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 2>So just otherwise that there is tax at the full

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 2>marginal rate for children, so you might just want to

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 2>get some tax advice on that. First of all. The

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>second thing is I wouldn't put it into an Australian ETF.

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I would look as a global equity one. For instance,

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>we're now one point six percent of the MSCI aqui

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>that is Australia to invest in the other ninety eight

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>point four percent not necessarily, just one point six percent

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 2>of global equity markets. And yeah, this strange share market

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to close out effectively square this year as

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>against global markets because it's the global markets. They've got

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 2>growth in other parts. So that's the second thing I

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>would do is just make sure you invest globally rather

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>than just domestically.

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very good, and of course not advice Candra, just

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to information only, but those global indusies they're easy to

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>get to. Just remember, and when we talks about MSCI,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the Morgan, Sandy, Capitol, International, Indicies and a lot

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>of the global ets run off that as they should.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But also keep in mind that what's the number now,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty four percent or so? Oh yeah, it's actually US, yes, yeah, yeah.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>So you know the fact is you're the majority of

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>your money will be on Wall Street, but that varies

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>over the year central and there's times for that's been

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>an undred and fifty percent, but in recent times it

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>has absolutely just mushroomed inside the global markets to some

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>extent that reflects a certain dullness in Japan, Australia, even

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>that Europe over various years as the US and the

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies just went through the roof and still

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>do with the AI boom. All right. Now, on question

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is from shown but the shau n I wonder could

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you consider doing a segment giving all the accounting maneuvers

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and profit shifting that companies use, why don't governments consider

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>replacing corporate tax within universal revenue tax. That way, the

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>economic activity that takes place within Australia It's borders will

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be taxed here, not when the company chooses to record

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>its profits something I mean, obviously, the sentiment is a

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>noble sentiment there shown, and in fact, a lot of

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>economists wouldn't have a problem with your concept, And indeed,

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Productivity Commission has recently put out something similar to that,

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>which is a sort of is it a cashflow tax?

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that the idea will that they would.

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that's Look. I think what Sean said has some merit,

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 2>but the reality is that unless you get both sides

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 2>of politics together, we're not going to tackle the inequity

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that there is in a tax system. And one of

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 2>the big things that we need to tackle in this

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 2>tax system is the paya and the hYP percentage of

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 2>total taxation rays through that which is not indexed, unlike

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 2>in some countries, and therefore we have bracket creep as

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 2>well as a major issue. So look, a whole tax system.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 2>The taxac was written in nineteen thirty six. I think

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 2>that says it all, and both sides of politics should

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>get together on a bipartisan basis and tackle this.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And we're inordinately tax taxing people. Correct, individuals get taxed.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>They carry the whole system, which is of course working individuals.

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>That is which brings us back to the very notion

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the show. About inequity and how

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>even inside SUPER like people say, oh super is all

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>about you know, it's unfair because of the tax breaks

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for older people. But it's unfair even inside the system

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>because the concession of tax breaks for contributing to SUPER

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are they are low and they have moved for years. Meanwhile,

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the amount you can have gets in mixed all the time,

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>not to mention the pension which gets index twice a year.

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So there is plenty of inequity even within SUPER and

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>intergeneration in equity at that. But in your case, folks,

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think if you've been listening to the show today,

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a really interesting notion there and

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>something that's really worth considering. And honestly, even on a

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>more pragmatic basi as well, what is the point in

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>hanging on to your investment property for three more years

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>if the money is supposed to go to your adult

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>children who are trying to buy a house. That would

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be at that would be in sort of microcosm, wouldn't

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it really?

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 2>And as I say to people, it's the pleasure of

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 2>giving as well when you can, you know, and want

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 2>to stress if you can afford it, that pleasure of

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 2>helping and giving and saying that reaction and that the

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>gratitude from giving, and you know, it was a very

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 2>big discussion. I talked about the fact that intergenerationally, those

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>that are of an older generation, this is far more difficult.

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 2>And I actually talked to a woman in the late

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 2>eighties to do this, and I said, look, you've got

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 2>no gratitude personally from it when you're dead, why don't

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 2>you do it now? And as I said in the article,

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>some of the grandchildren were in tears and she got

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 2>incredible satisfaction from that.

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's interesting, isn't it. As you say, there's no

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>point letting them know that you were really okay when

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gone. Okay, thank you very much. Well, great show,

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you James, great discussion. As always, I'd like to

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>know what you think of that, folks, I really would.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's hear from you the money Puzzle at

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the Australian dot com dot au. Talk you soon.