WEBVTT - The Trial: Ballots and deliberations

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>After forty days, the jury in the trial of Aaron

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Patterson was ready to deliberate. But before that could happen,

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Associate to Justice Christopher Bill how a box over

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>his head. He shuffled some papers inside, pulled out two

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and read what was on them to the court. What

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>was on these papers were numbers.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Dura one oh five, Dura one oh six.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>These were the numbers of the two jurors who would

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>no longer be required. They handed in their court iPads

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and left. And with that the jury of seven men

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and five women retired to consider their verdicts, the fate

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of Aaron Patterson in their hands. I'm Brooke Greebert Craig,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is the Mushroom Cook. It's the start of

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>week ten of Aaron Patterson's murder trial, and once again

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by my colleague, court reporter Laura Plaseller, and.

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>We're coming to our listeners from our new podcast studio.

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 3>We had to shift Airbnbs, so we've set up in

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>a new place here, inter realgen So if we sound

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 3>a little bit different, that's why.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>It almost feels strange after forty episodes to be in

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a new place. But here we are and let's get started.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So listeners would have heard at the start of the

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>episode about the ballot process where fourteen jurors got cut

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to twelve, but we'll speak more on that a bit later.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>First up today, Justice Bill continued his charge to the

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>jury and returned to the topic of credit lies alleged

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>by the prosecution last week. He explained to the jury

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that credit lies can only be used to assess and

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>accuse credibility and cannot be used as evidence they committed

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the offenses.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Our listeners may remember that Justice Beal said last week

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 3>that there were four credit lies alleged by the prosecution.

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>The first was erin lying to police about being very

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>very helpful during the Department of Health investigation, and today

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 3>he touched on the remaining three. He said the prosecution

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>also alleged that Aaron lied about the reason she invited

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 3>her guests to the lunch, lied about what she said

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>at the lunch about ovarian cancer, and lied about planning

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 3>to undergo gastric bypass surgery at the Enrich Clinic in Melbourne.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Justice Bill then moved on to how the jury can

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>use the alleged credit lies if they find them to

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>be lies. He said, they can be used to determine

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>whether the other things Aaron said to other witnesses and

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>during her testimony were true. He warned the jury not

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to reason that simply because a person is shown to

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>have told lies, they must be guilty. After this, Justice

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Bill moved on to circumstantial or indirect evidence versus direct evidence.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>He said it was not safe in a criminal trial

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for a jury to engage in guesswork.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>He returned to the analogy used by the prosecution in

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 3>its close address in relation to thinking about the evidence

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 3>as puzzle pieces, but this was something that defense barrister

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Colin Mandy took some issue with in his own closing address,

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 3>so before reiterating the analogy, he actually said it was

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 3>at the risk of upsetting mister Mandy, which prompted some

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 3>laughs around the courtroom. This is more of what he said.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>These are his words, but not his voice.

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>While one piece may not be very helpful by itself,

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 2>when all the pieces are put together, the picture may

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>become clear. However, when putting all the pieces together, you

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>must take care not to jump to conclusions.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Justice Bill then reminded the jurors that they must be

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>satisfied that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt,

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 3>but he added that it was almost impossible to prove

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 3>anything with absolute certainty, and that was not what the

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>prosecution were being required to do.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>A reasonable doubt is not an imaginary or fanciful doubt

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>or an unrealistic possible. You cannot be satisfied that the

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>accused is guilty of an offense if you have a

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>reasonable doubt about whether she is guilty of the offense.

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Justice Spill then went on to speak about motive. He

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>reminded the jury that the prosecution does not need to

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>prove motive, only the elements of murder and attempted murder,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but he added that did not mean a lack of

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>evidence of motive is irrelevant. Here's what he said.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 2>It is a relevant consideration which you must take into

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 2>account in the accused's favor when weighing all the evidence

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in this case. Moreover, if you find the accused had

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>good reasons not to kill or attempt to kill her

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 2>lunch guests, in short, she had a motive not to

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>commit the alleged offenses, that is a significant consideration.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Justice Spill said to find Erring guilty of murder, her

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>conduct must have been conscious, voluntary, and deliberate.

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 3>When running through the elements of murder, he started with

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 3>consciousness and said that this element excludes the acts of

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>an unconscious person, for example, someone who was sleepwalking. He

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 3>then moved on to voluntariness. He said this excluded conduct

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>where someone was not in control of their own actions.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Turning to deliberateness, he said this element means that the

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 3>accused conduct cannot be an accident. It was at this

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 3>point that he reminded the jury that the defense claim

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 3>that this was the element that had not been satisfied.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 3>They say that Aaron added the death cut mushrooms into

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 3>the meal by accident.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Turning to the final element, which was intention, Justice spil

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>said the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that at

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the time Aaron served up Beef Wellington's she intended to

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>kill her guests or cause them really serious injury.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>The prosecution contends that you should infer from the evidence

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that Aaron Patterson had the appropriate state of minds at

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 2>the relevant time.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 3>He reminded the jury that this was also an element

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 3>that the defense says has not been so satisfied. They

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 3>say that Aaron did not have an intention to kill,

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 3>but rather she actually had a motive to keep these

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 3>people in her life. Justice Bill explained that a person's

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>intention can be inferred from what they said and what

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>they did, as well as what they failed to say

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 3>and failed to do. He told the jury that they

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 3>can consider Erin's actions both before, at the time of

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 3>and after the lunch, but he said if they had

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 3>any doubts, the benefit of those doubts must be given

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 3>to the accused. I will note at this point Brook

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 3>that the jury was not instructed by Justice Biale to

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 3>consider the alternate charge of manslaughder, meaning that in this

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 3>case they will only be able to return a guilty

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 3>or not guilty verdict in relation to the charge of

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>murder and attempted murder.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>On that topic of attempted murder, Justice Spiel said the

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>alleged conduct must have been more than merely preparatory immediately

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and not remotely connected with Ian Wilkinson's illness, and then

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>must been an intention to kill.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Justice phil said it was not in dispute that Ian

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 3>came very close to dying, and that Aaron's conduct in

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>serving him a poisoned beef Wellington was more than merely

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>preparatory and not remotely connected to causing his illness. He

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 3>added that for an attempted murder charge, the intention, unlike murder,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 3>is nothing less than an intention to kill. Intent to

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 3>cause really serious injury is not enough, he explained.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Justice Bill then turned to summarizing the issues in the

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>case and the related evidence. He said the first issue

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 1>related to whether Aaron had good reasons to not kill

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>her lunch guests in.

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 3>A similar fashion to what he did last week. Justice

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Bill took the jury back to the evidence. He reminded

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 3>them of the Facebook messages Aaron sent her online friends

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>about her in laws in December twenty twenty two. As

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure our listeners remember, these messages included the phrases

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>this family, I swear to God and at LA least

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I know they are a lost cause. Turning to the

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>prosecution argument, Justice Bill said that Crown Prosecutor Nnette Rodgers

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 3>argued that sometimes the internal motivations for murders are only

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 3>known to the murderer themselves. Using her words, he told

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>the jury, you don't have to know why a person

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 3>does something in order to know they did it. On

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the other hand, Justice Bill said the defense questioned why

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Aaron would want to kill her in laws, giving they

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>were her children's only grandparents.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 2>He said.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 3>They also questioned why Aaron would commit murder when she

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 3>was in a good place at the time in July

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three and would have surely known that suspicion

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 3>would fall on her as the cook of the meal.

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Justice Bill said the second issue related to Aaron's tendency

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to forage for mushrooms, referring the jury to the directions

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he gave them on this topic last week. He then

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>moved on to the third issue, related to why Aaron

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>cooked individual beef Wellington's. Here reminded the Jews that Aaron

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>said she used a best selling recipe Tin Eats cookbook

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>that called for a beef wellington log, but he.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Told the jury that Aaron testified that she deviated from

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 3>this recipe because she could not find a beef tenderloin

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 3>or a log in her local area. Turning to the arguments,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 3>he said the prosecution claimed that Aaron cooked individual beef

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Wellington's because it was critical for her to maintain control

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 3>over the meal and to make sure she did not

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 3>consume a serve laced with death caps. He said. The

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 3>prosecution also questioned why she would deviate from a recipe

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 3>she had never cooked before. He then flagged that the

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 3>defense did not discuss this topic in its closing address.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Justice Bill then turned to the fourth issue, related to

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>whether Aaron served the lunch on different colored plates. He

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>once again returned to Ian Wilkinson's evidence about the colored plates,

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>where Ian told the jury that the guests ate from

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>larger gray plates while Aaron herself ate from a smaller

0:09:58.800 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>orange tan plate.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Justice Beale, so the prosecution argued that Ian was a

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 3>compelling and reliable witness who had no doubt about what

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 3>he had seen, he said. The prosecution also argued that

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Heather backed up Ian's claim when she told Simon that

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 3>she remembered Erin serving the meal on different colored plates.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, Justice Bill said that the defense

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 3>argued that it would have been smarter for Erin if

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 3>she was planning to commit a murder to mark the

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 3>pastry of the non poisonous beef Wellington before putting them

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 3>all in the oven. Justice Bill added that the defense

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 3>also said that on her evidence, Erin didn't own any

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 3>gray plates and also said she didn't own a matching

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 3>set of plates.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Justice Bill then spoke about the fifth issue, related to

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>whether Aaron allocated the plates.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 3>He said the prosecution argued that she allocated her own

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 3>plate by picking it up and carrying it to the

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 3>table on Ian's evidence, but the defense argued that without

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>being told, Gail and Heather picked up two plates EA

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and carried them to the table in accordance with Aaron's testimony.

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>He said the sixth and final issue related to whether

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Aaron engaged in incriminating conduct, referring the jury to the

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>directions he gave them on this topic last week. Soon after,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Justice Bilm moved onto the final topic of his charge,

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the verdict. He told the jurors their decision must be unanimous.

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>He said, all twelve jurors must agree on each of

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the four separate charges that Aaron is guilty or not guilty.

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Justice Bill then said, the jury will be sequestered to

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a hotel.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>While you are sequestered, locked up. You'll deliberate Mondays to

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Saturdays here at the court in the privacy of the

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 2>jury room. You will not deliberate on Sundays, but you'll

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 2>still be sequested. You don't get to go home on Sundays.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry.

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Justice Bill explained that once they reach their verdicts, they

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 3>can push a buzzer in the jury room and all

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the parties, include the prosecution and defense, will be notified

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 3>to return to court.

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It was then time for the ballot. As our listeners

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>will remember, there were fifteen jurors at the start of

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the trial. Then one got dismissed, so fourteen jurors came

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>into court today. That that was cut to twelve because

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in trials only twelve jurors decide the fate of the accused.

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Before the two jurors were balloted off, Justice Bill thanked them.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he said.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Can I say a very warm thank you to those

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 2>two people who will be balloted off. I don't know

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 2>if you'll feel relieved or frustrated, but be assured you

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 2>have made an important contribution to the administration of justice

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 2>through your service.

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 3>As our listeners heard at the top of the episode,

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the associate to Justice Beal then rose to his feet

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 3>with that box with everyone's number inside before he called

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>out for during number one hundred and five and number

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and six. These were two male jurors. They

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 3>stood up made their way up out of the jury box,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 3>handed in their jury iPads, and then they were escorted

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 3>out of the courtroom. The remainder of the jurors then

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 3>took an oath or an affirmation to not discuss the

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 3>case with anyone else. It was at this point that

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>they retired to consider their verdicts. So the ballot took

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 3>place at one pm. Justice Bill told the jury that

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 3>they had lunch waiting for them in the jury room.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 3>After that the weight really began. Two hours went by

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 3>and by the time it got to four pm no

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 3>verdict had been reached. The jury were brought back into

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 3>the courtroom, where Justice Beal wished them a pleasant break

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 3>tonight after a long day. The juriors all brought their

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 3>luggage to court today and after Justice Beal bid them farewell.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 3>They would have been busted to the local hotel where

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 3>they're staying at and will spend the night together, but

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 3>he gave them very strict instructions that they should not

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 3>be deliberating or discussing the case while they're at the hotel.

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Those discussions are meant for the jury room. They will

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 3>returned to court tomorrow before ten thirty am to recommence

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 3>their deliberations.

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.479
<v Speaker 1>So now it's really just a waiting game, isn't it, Laura.

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 3>It really is. We have no idea how long it

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 3>will take this jury to reach their

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Verdicts, and while we wait, we will flag that we

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know when our next episode will be, So make

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>sure you follow the show wherever you are listening to

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the podcast