WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 5 June

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>On scorn Lives Australia. This is the winder Panety Show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panehy Show coming

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 2>up tonight. The Treasurer backs the Greens and rejects offers

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>to negotiate supertax hikes with the Coalition. Climate change extremism

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 2>is leaving children traumatized. I'll speak to a leading child

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>psychologists about the impact global warming alarmism is having in

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Australian schools. The Great Josh Hammer will have the latest

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>from the US, including life Conservatives should not see the

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 2>linguistic battleground. He who controls the language controls the masses.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 2>And Megan Markle releases footage of her twerking before giving birth.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Celebrity and royal reporter Kinsey Scofield joins me later in

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the hour and Left is Losing. It features the Democrats

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>secret weapon to win back young male voters. I'm not

0:00:58.760 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>sure this is going to work.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm angry. But the ocean is on fire at three

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 3>different places, and we have billionaires who are racing to

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>see who can get to space faster.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>But first Treasurer Jim Chalmers has walked back comments from

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister indicating that Labor would be willing to

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 2>negotiate with a coalition on its plan to double the

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>tax rate on superbalances over three million dollars and introduce

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>unrealized capital gains taxes instead. Jim Chalmers has made it

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 2>clear he preferred to negotiate with the Radical Greens to

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>get the reforms past the Senate. Here's what he had

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 2>to say.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm not convinced that the coalition wants to have a

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 4>conversation about these changes. I'm not convinced that they are

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 4>fed income when it comes to bipartisanship. I don't think

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're being real about that. This is

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 4>a change which is modest, it is methodical, as I said,

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 4>it's been on the books for years now, and it

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 4>helps us fund some of our other priorities.

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now for more on this is mensi's Research

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Center Senior Fellow Nick Kata. Nick, we know the Greens

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 2>back this policy. They want to see it extended to

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>super balances over two million dollars. This policy is bad

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 2>enough in its current form, what's it going to look

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>like with the Greens input?

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 5>To think, don't you reta But the Greens, of course

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 5>are at one with Labor on this thing, at least

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 5>that both of them. Both of them think that people

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 5>who save for their own retirement are bad people, that

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 5>there's something disreputable about putting money aside over your working

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 5>life in order that you can pay your own way

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 5>when you retire. It is, and I'm not sure what

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Jim Charmers, what the priorities are that Jim Chalmers says

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 5>he's going to spend this money on. Because actually, the

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 5>best thing you can do is incentivize people to become

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 5>self funded in retirement, because that will save you about

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 5>half a million dollars over their lifetime of that person.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 5>If they're not blaming the public pension, you know, they're

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 5>probably claiming about it saving about another two hundred thousand

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 5>if they're on private edical insurance, as they probably most

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 5>likely are. So we should be encouraging people, surely RITA

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 5>to look after themselves in retirement if they can find

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 5>the means to do so, rather than this thing of

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 5>forcing everybody back into the benevolence of the state. That's

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.399
<v Speaker 5>why I think the liberals should have a fundamental objection

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 5>to this. There's no room for negotiation, and I'm glad

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 5>that Ted O'Brien has firmed up on that position.

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Now. Judith Sloan has written an excemplete piece in The

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Australian Today on Jim chalmers wishful analysis of yesterday's GDP figures.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 2>She writes, Jim Chalmers is living on another planet when

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 2>he tells us, with all the uncertainty in the world,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>any growth is a decent outcome. This is not a

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>decent outcome. Taking out the rise of GDP per capita

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 2>in the last December quarter, eight of the nine past

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>quarters have been negative GDP per capita a reasonable measure

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>of living standards, economy is on life support and it

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 2>would be better to recognize this. Nick is the treasurer

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 2>living in fantasy land. Surely he knows how grim these

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>figures are.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 5>There is really an outbreak of economic illiteracy in the

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 5>political class in this country, in the media class. I

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 5>fear that Jim Chalmers is suffering from it. Because you

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 5>know what is a per capita recession. It means that

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 5>families on average a poorer will be poorer next year

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 5>than they are this year. That's the reality of it.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 5>They'll have less money, less less wages, less money in

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 5>their pockets. And I'll tell you what read in some

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 5>of the places that I visited during the election out

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 5>in Western Sydney, it is biting. There are families out

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 5>of there that are really hurting, really badly hurting, that

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 5>are queuing up at food kitchens, the entire family to

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 5>get their dinner they need as none of that is

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 5>apparent the cause in the nice suburbs where people like

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 5>Jim Charmersiev, people are doing quite fine there. But this

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 5>is really causing a lot of pain and it's very

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 5>discriminatory in the pain it causes in that for the

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 5>poorest get hurt worse by a per capitary session. So

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 5>where this fits in with Labour's mantram no one left behind,

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm not really sure.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, as we predicted on this program, the leagues against

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Greenstern Labour senator during the Cox have begun in earnest.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>It was always going to happen after she defected from

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the Greens to Labor. We know more of the investigation

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>into allegations of workplace misconduct made against the senator by

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>former staffers, and now reports that Durnda Cox allegedly called

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 2>One Nation leader Pauline Hansen a effing retard in leaked

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>text messages. The Greens are understandably furious with Senator Cox

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 2>and we can probably expect to see more damaging leaks,

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 2>more damaging text messages.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 5>They're all class, aren't they, the Greens. When it comes

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 5>to their language, I mean things that you couldn't actually

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 5>say on this channel. They think that's okay to use

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 5>that kind of language. I'll tell you what, Pauline Hanson's

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 5>One Nation did considerably better in the last election in

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 5>terms of the votes increase than the Greens Party. So

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 5>perhaps they should be looking at paul In and asking

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 5>her what the secret if the secret, of course is

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 5>to actually get back with real people and real people's concerns.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 5>Not often in sort of activist fairy land, which is

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 5>where the Greens are now. People have been pointing out

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 5>that they're losing. You know, they're bit down on the

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 5>number of Aboriginal people represented in Parliament on behalf of

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 5>the Greens. I'll tell you what, they are over represented

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 5>in the two people with double barrel names. Have you

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 5>noticed that we've got handsome young wish will almond pain

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 5>and they generally might experience people that are a couple

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 5>of pretty privileged backgrounds, and that's where the Greens are.

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 5>They really are people with luxury beliefs.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Nick, Yes, that is an interesting observation. Certainly in my electorate,

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I noticed a lot of the Greens, a lot of

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the tills were very white, very privileged, and of a

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>certain age demographic, older age demographic. It might be different

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>where you are.

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's move along to Greta Thunberg. Israel has threatened to

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>raid the boat she's on, which is currently en route

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to Gaza carrying her and a number of other leftist activists. Nika,

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>what does Greta and her feral mates what do they

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 2>hope to achieve with this activism going into a wall

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 2>zone and saying that they're going to bring love, humanitarian

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 2>aid and break the blockade.

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 5>I guess it's virtue signaling, although I don't know that

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 5>I'd be suggesting that a young lady does a virtue

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 5>signaling activity in somewhere where she's libral to get shot

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 5>or worse.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 7>So that's what it is.

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 5>But it just goes to the mind, doesn't it. Of

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 5>the extreme left, which is where she sits. They think

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 5>they know everything about everything, she thinks she knows everything

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 5>about climate science. For instance, she understands perfectly why the

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 5>weather warms and sometimes it calls. Now she thinks she

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 5>knows everything about the history of the Middle East and

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 5>who's on the right side of history and who's not.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 5>It's just the ignorance of these people that annoys me.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Read So they're allowed to have their opinion, Sure they

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 5>can make up their minds, but first they've got to

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 5>understand what they're talking about. And I think in Greta's case,

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 5>I think she's rather she would have spent been better

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 5>off spending more time in school and less time on protests, really,

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 5>because she might actually know something about what she's talking about.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Where there seems to be a lot of crossover with

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 2>these activist groups nixt the ones who are all about

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 2>climate change, the anti Israeli protesters, the race obsessed ones.

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty much the same mob, isn't it. And that's

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>why she has just effortlessly gone from climate change to

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>now this anti Israeli activism.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, of course, our Green Party has done exactly the

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 5>same thing. As we've commented before. This seems to be

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 5>a natural progression when they start losing traction on one issue.

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 5>I think they always look for another one to move

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 5>on to, so sooner or later they'll get bored with

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 5>the Palestinian cause and they'll find something else. I don't

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 5>know what it will be. But they always have to

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 5>be the sense for their own sense of righteousness. They

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 5>have to be one step ahead of everybody else and they.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>And it always has.

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 5>To be that, nothing more.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 2>And it's always catastrophe. It's just catastrophizing. Everything is about

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 2>to be the end of the world. It's a genocide.

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>It's the end of the world as we know it

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 2>with climate change and just doomsayers nick before you go.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>President Donald Trump has banned the citizens of twelve countries

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>from traveling to the US and introduced travel restrictions on

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>seven other countries. Some of the banned countries include Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan.

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear from the president early today.

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 8>The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado has underscored the

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 8>extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 8>foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 8>those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas.

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>We don't want them.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 8>In the twenty first century, we've seen one terror attack

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 8>after another carried out by foreign visa overstairs from dangerous

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 8>places all over the world.

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Nick, this is reminiscent of a similar ban in his

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 2>first term, and though that caused enormous angst in the media,

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 2>it was actually pretty popular with the punters. What do

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 2>you make of this latest span.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 5>Well, the first thing is, none of these trail countries

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 5>are on my bucket list, reader, I doubt they're on yours.

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 5>Either they are nasty places. There are places where either

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 5>they use terrorism, or they harbor terrorists to wage war

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 5>against United States, Israel and others, or they have uncontrolled crime,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 5>drug smuggling, etc. So it's just the hard lesson that

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 5>some countries don't seem to be able to learn that

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 5>people from these environments are likely to bring the same

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 5>lawlessness or the same political political views to your country

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 5>that they.

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Had in their Nikita. Thanks so much for your time tonight.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 9>Thank you.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is leading child psychollegest and a junct

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 2>fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs, Claire row Claire.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>You're behind a landmark research paper for the Institute of

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Public Affairs called climate change anxiety in pre adolescent children

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a neuroscientific and psychological perspective, and you've revealed an alarming

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 2>increase in climate anxiety among Australian children, which you found

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 2>is linked to the way that climate change education is

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>currently delivered in the national curriculum. Tell me why the

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>current approach is harmful?

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, thanks, Rita.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 10>It is a landmark study in that sense because any

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 10>research up to date has looked or assumed that the

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 10>rising climate anxiety with children is because children are exposed

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 10>to the direct effects of climate change, so rising sea

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 10>levels and bushfires, et cetera. But that's not the case

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 10>of what I'm seeing in my clinic right. I've got

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 10>nine and ten year olds in tiers. They're in the

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 10>middle of Sydney. They're not directly exposed to rising sea levels.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 10>And so this research went into the national curriculum for

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 10>primary school age students. That really pushes this idea of

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 10>sustainability as a priority across all subject areas. And I

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 10>think that parents don't even know that this stuff is

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 10>kind of been taught.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 7>From five years old. Reader.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 10>Kids have to learn about ways that they can personally

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 10>contribute to almost this idea of saving the planet, and

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 10>of course for a five, six seven year old.

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 7>That's extremely overwhelming.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 10>And as a developed mental expert with children, I can

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 10>say they just do not have the cognitive capacity to

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 10>deal with concepts that are future focused like that probably stick.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 10>They're very concrete thinkers at that stage. And so for me,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 10>this has been happening now for quite a while, and

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 10>I've been seeing the direct effects of it with my

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 10>patients of kids absolutely paralyzed with anxiety and more than that,

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 10>have this kind of sense of earnest on them, more

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 10>guilt that they need to do something to solve the problem.

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just so troubling that we are inflicting this on children. Really,

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>it is child abuse in my eyes. Tell me about

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>some of the cases you're dealing with personally in your clinic,

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>where you've got kids who are traumatized and you need

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to help them feel safe again.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 10>So, for a while now in my clinic, and I've

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 10>spoken to a lot of colleagues child psychologists who are

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 10>reporting the same thing. Particularly over the last five years,

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing children come in who are in a bit

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 10>of a panic because they fundamentally believe that older generations

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 10>have failed them. They believe the gu moments a lot listening,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 10>and they believe that people don't care about their future.

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 10>And whilst we can all kind of have a giggle

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 10>at the gretit Thumberg's maybe and you know people feeling

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 10>like they're going to be extinct, that's actually the message

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 10>that some kids are internalizing.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 7>And that's really plain to see.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 10>When you understand developmental science with children, that tells us

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 10>the children under twelve are not equipped to process these

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 10>abstract issues global issues like climate change.

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 7>They're very based in the here and now.

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 10>And so when you give a message to a kid,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 10>and there are certainly worksheets in the you know that

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 10>teachers can access as part of their curriculum that say

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 10>things like the planet is sick, there is no planet b.

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 10>Kids internalize that young children as an immediate threat.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 7>So if they hear the.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 10>Message that sea levels are rising, they may think that

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 10>that's happening tweak down the road from them, and of

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 10>course what happens is they come back home. And a

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 10>lot of this stuff is trture kids and given ideas

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 10>to children about ways that they can modify their own

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 10>behavior and their families. So I've got kids who come

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 10>home to Mum and dad. We can't eat the meat

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 10>for dinner. We need to reduce meat consumption. We should

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 10>be driving the family car less. And of course a

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 10>six year old really doesn't have or shouldn't have control

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 10>over their household habits, and so they're imagine this kind

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 10>of really vicious cycle where they don't have the power

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 10>to change anything themselves, and they fundamentally think that people

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 10>around them don't care, and hence they're in this state

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 10>not just anxiety, but helplessness. They really don't think that

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 10>they have a future, which is awful.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Now your report recommends abolishing that cross curriculum priority

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 2>of sustainability and also delaying climate education until the kids

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>are old enough secondary school and focusing on the facts,

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 2>the scientific facts as oppose all this emotive, guilt ridden

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 2>narrative that is traumatizing the kids. If you could sit

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>down with the Prime Minister or the Education minister, what

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 2>would your advice to them be.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Well, as you mentioned, sustainability is what they call

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 10>a cross curriculum priority.

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 7>It means that they need to teach just are mandated

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 7>to put in the.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 10>Topic of sustainability across music lessons, geography, lessons, sports lessons,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 10>any lesson has to be fed in with this topic.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 7>So the first thing I'd say is.

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 10>What are the role what is the role of our

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 10>education system when we're talking about very young children and

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 10>it's getting the absolute fundamental academics down, which of course

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 10>we know that Australia is going backwards on a world

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 10>stage with. So the first thing I would love to

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 10>speak with the Prime Minister or the Education Minister about

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 10>is abolishing that cross curriculum priority.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 7>And I'd also like.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 10>To encourage parents to just have a little bit of

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 10>a look about what the kids are learning, because I

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 10>think a lot of parents aren't aware of it. And

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 10>if they are concerned about it, they can write to

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 10>their local minister or bring it up with the principal

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 10>and sit down and say, look, I'm a little bit

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 10>worried about this, or speak with other parents, because as

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 10>long as this goes on without parents knowing, I think

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 10>that that's a huge problem.

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, before you go, another finding you had was that

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 2>mental health professionals should be focused on resilience building rather

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>than distress validation, which you're just telling the kids how

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 2>they feel is valid. What does that look like? So

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 2>if You've got parents dealing with this, and their kids

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>are coming home and they are alarmed about climate change

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and all they've heard at school. How should parents handle that?

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, it's interesting. Here's the thing, reata.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 10>If we have climate change, as we're recognizing, you know,

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 10>an anxiety condition, these kids are coming with symptoms of anxiety.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 7>It is the only.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 10>Anxiety condition that psychologists and psychiatrists, by our bodies are

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 10>encouraged to validate their feelings and approach those symptoms as a.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 7>Realistic or you know, a valid response to what's going

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 7>on in the world.

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 10>Any other anxiety condition we would have cost challenge cognitively,

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 10>we would provide perspective, we would help rationalize those thoughts

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 10>in order to abolish the anxiety. However, this condition, it

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 10>seems that people like me are encouraged to lean into

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 10>it that.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 7>I've got concerns about.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 10>So for parents, I would say again, talk to the school,

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 10>but also with your child. It's not about going necessarily.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 7>Too far into the science of things. It's just to

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 7>try and give them some.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 10>Perspective and try and funnel for the environment back to

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 10>some basics like picking up rubbish, saving water, Like they're

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 10>all good.

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 7>Things and we can stick to that.

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>That are the real things you can do. And perhaps

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, look at some of those predictions from

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 2>twenty years ago, thirty years ago, mainteen years ago that

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 2>have been absolutely wrong, wildly wrong. And just so the

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 2>kids know, some of these doomsay predictions are not going

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>to eventuate. Clairo, thank you so much.

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 7>For your time tonight, Thanks Rache.

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Still to come, Left is Losing It, plus the latest

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 2>from the US, including why conservatives should not see the

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>linguistic battleground. Josh Hammer joins me. Next, you're watching the

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Reader Panny Show and it's time for lefties using it,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 2>and we've got some gems for you tonight. Let's start

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 2>with the Democrats finally realizing they have a problem with

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 2>young men. Yes, young men have abandoned the part, he droves,

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and the Dems think they have just the woman to

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>lure them back.

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 11>As the saying goes, if you're not at the table,

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 11>you're on the menu.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's Democrat operative influencer Olivia Juliana. And she loves

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 2>young men. She loves the frat boys, and she thinks

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 2>she understands them and how to bring them back to

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 11>It's been a lifetime on college campuses and I speak

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 11>a lot of I love young men, I love frat guys,

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 11>and in that I've realized like even the ones that

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 11>identify as conservative are almost always pro choice, They're almost

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 11>always pro gay marriage. You'd be surprised at the number

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 11>of them who support a Black Lives Matter.

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm sure conservative young men are huge backers of

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the Marxist anti American, anti police movement known as BLM,

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure this will see them return to the

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Democrats in huge numbers.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm angry that the ocean is on fire at three

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 3>different places, and we have billionaires who are racing to

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 3>see who can get to space faster. The same billionaires

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 3>who don't pay their workers fairly, the same billionaires who

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 3>don't pay their fair share in taxes.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that ain't gonna work. Now Here is a law

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>professor and wife of MSNBC host Chris Hayes, Kate Shuw

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 2>who decided to lie, or at least miss Lee is

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 2>Senator John Kennedy from the great State of Louisiana. And

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 2>that was a mistake, big mistake.

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 12>Huge. You said there are some members of the Supreme

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 12>Court that are evil? Which justices were you talking about?

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 7>I'll take it your a centator.

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 13>I don't recall it using that word, but.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 12>All right, here's what you said. You were talking about

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 12>the majority opinion in Mauldrove v. City of Saint Louis.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 12>She said, quote Justice Kagan, I mean, will she be

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 12>able to control the opinion's future distortion by her evil colleagues?

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 12>Probably not end quote Who are you talking about, sir?

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 7>I am very skeptical. There's a transcription. It was probably

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 7>a transcription error. I do not think I said.

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 12>No, you said it once. You own up to it.

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 12>Which you call some members of the Supreme Court evil?

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 12>Which ones do you think of evil?

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 7>I would have to refresh my recollection.

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I've been very critical Paris.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 12>Of the Supreme courtist statement, aren't you.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 13>I'm an officer.

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't sound like something that I.

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 12>Want to say, Parish at that you're teaching our kids.

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 13>I don't refer to Supreme Court justices as evil in

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 13>the classroom on.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 12>The podcast in April twenty second, twenty twenty four, Okay, well,

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 12>big as Dallas, and you're an officer of the Court

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 12>and you're here advising us to be respectful of federal judges,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 12>and you say they're evil members of the United States

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 12>Supreme Court.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 14>Gag me with a spoon.

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Gag me with a spoon. Indeed, how many times does

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 2>she lie or mislead their claiming She never said it.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 2>It was a transcription error. It's not language should use well,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Professor Shaw. As the kids say, here is the receipt.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, she said this only last year.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 13>The result definitely constructed opinion by Justice Kegan.

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 15>I mean, will she be able to control its potential

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 15>future distortion by your evil colleagues.

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Now, this is how you handle the leftist activist media.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 2>You do not allow them to play linguistic games. Don't

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 2>allow them to obscure the truth by using their preferred

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 2>terms that are inaccurate and designed to manipulate. Watch Stephen

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Miller on CNN give a master class on how you

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 2>handle these activists.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>An undocumented migrant sent a letter of threatening to kill

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the president, promising to self support after the assassination. Seen

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in reporting shows that investigators believe the migrant.

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 7>Was set up.

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>It was a victim of a setup.

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 13>What is the administration going to do now?

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>And this is an undocumented immigrant. I do want to

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>note that, but this was someone who came forward, was

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a victim of a crime, and now law enforcement believes

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>he was set up.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 16>Go ahead, well, I want to clarify what you mean.

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 16>So we're talking about the same thing. Are you saying

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 16>this this immigrant was here illegally?

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 7>Yes, but I am. And that's why I said that.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 16>I clarify them said I just said undocumented, and I

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 16>wasn't clear what that means. I'm assuming they have a

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 16>fake ID and if you assuming they have a section

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 16>that's curiod.

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>That's neither here from their questions, Steve, I want, I

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>want this to be, and call me naive, a good

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>faith discussion about what's happening right now.

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 16>When we use language that's designed to obscure the truth,

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 16>that's not good faith and legal alien. They're not an undocumented.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's fine, Yes, that is fine. Don't let the

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>lift play these word games to deliberately conceal the truth

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to manipulate. Remember, he who controls the language controls the masses.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't be controlled. And the law Fair with the Democrats

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 2>has never stopped. It didn't ultimately work in stopping President

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump from being re elected, but now that he

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 2>is in power, the Democrats are again using and misusing

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 2>the courts and Democrat appointed judges to undermine the President's

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 2>power and to usurp the will of the American people.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Here is Democrat Rep. Laura Friedman explaining it all.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 15>Every single week, we have a Litigation working Group. We're

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 15>a large group of us and I'm talking there's maybe

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 15>seventy five members of the House sit down every single

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 15>week with the AGS to talk about legal strategy. This

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 15>is all going on every single week.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 7>Behind the scenes.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 15>It is NonStop, NonStop talk, NonStop introduction of bills and legislation.

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is Newsweek's senior editor at Large and

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Article three Projects Senior Council Josh Hammer. Josh, you coined

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the judicial insurrection, and we see examples of it almost

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 2>on a weekly basis.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, the Democrats read, apparently are not content to throw

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 14>out hundreds and hundreds of years of precedents about not

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 14>prosecuting your political enemies, at least in these United States.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 14>Who knows where they will stomp at this point there.

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 14>But you know, we frankly have not taken a full

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 14>societal reckoning here in the United States of exactly what

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 14>the Democratic Party and what the Democrat lawfare complex, as

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 14>I've called it, as to what exactly they have put

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 14>us through for the past few years. Thank goodness readA

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 14>thank goodness For so many reasons, Donald Trump defeated Kamala

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 14>Harris in the twenty twenty fourth election. But among those

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 14>reasons that we should be grateful that he won is

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 14>that in the alternative hypothetical universe, if he had lost

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 14>that election, there is a very very very real chance

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 14>that he would not only not be sitting at the

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 14>White House right now, he would actually be in jail.

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 14>That was literally the stakes. I mean, when Americans went

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 14>to vote there in November, they were actually voting on that.

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 7>I don't know when.

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 14>Democrats are going to give this up? Sometimes, Riata, I think,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 14>what is it actually going to take this party to

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 14>stop carping about these eighty twenty issues on the wrong

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 14>side there? What percentage of American people actually support of

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 14>this as opposed to focusing on oh, I don't know,

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 14>economic issues, bread and butter issues, pocketbook issues, immigration, crime,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 14>basic lifestyle issues. Democrats, that is the reason that your

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 14>party's approval ratings and Favorbuilary rings are in the freaking

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 14>toilet right now. You want to get back in fair position.

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 14>Stop focusing on this, focusing on what your voters actually

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 14>care about.

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, so much of the trouble the far left activism

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>we see is financed well financed by various groups. And

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.479
<v Speaker 2>on that. Let's have a look at this New Yorker

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 2>fluff piece featuring Alex Souris, who the New Yorker describes

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 2>as an investor and philanthropist, same way they described his father,

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 2>billionaire George Sorris. Here is with a political operative and

0:28:54.040 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Hillary's bff, Humor Aberdeen. Interesting image, Josh, what sort of

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>influence is he exerting right now?

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 13>Oh, Rita.

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 14>He's one of the most powerful men, not just in America,

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 14>you could argue in the world. I mean he's the

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 14>inheritor of George soros empire. I mean he is the

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 14>globalist of all globalists. So you're looking at the heir

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 14>to the throne, Alex Soros right there with Huma Abboten,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 14>Hillary Clinton's old pal there. I mean, this guy is

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 14>funding all sorts of of the very worst causes. Again,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 14>not just here in the United States, but in Europe,

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 14>increasingly throughout the other countries of the Western hemisphere trying

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 14>to sow the seeds of discord in Central America and

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 14>South America. They are the Middle East there. I mean,

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 14>God knows what he wants to do when it comes

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 14>to the issue of Israel and Hamas. This guy's money

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 14>flows everywhere. He at this point Rita is hands down

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 14>one of the most dangerous men in the entire world.

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 14>There and frankly, the fact that he ended up with

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 14>an old Clinton hand, you know, Anthony Wiener's ex wife,

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 14>Huma Abbiting there, it's really kind of just the cherry

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 14>on the cake.

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 17>iSER.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm going to ask you about alon masks attacks

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 2>against the so called big beautiful Bill Short, but just first,

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>here is a lot of mask on how the likes

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 2>of George Soros can take a relatively small amount of

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 2>money and use it to exert enormous influence for what

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 2>uya NGOs.

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 9>It's kind of a hack to the system where you know,

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 9>someone can get an NGO stood up for a fairly

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 9>small amount of money, Like George Sorris was really good

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 9>at this, Like he really George Soros is like a

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 9>system hacker, Like he figured out how to hack the

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 9>system He figured out that you could leverage a small

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 9>amount of money to create a nonprofit, then lobby for

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 9>the politicians to send a ton of money to that nonprofit,

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 9>so you can take what might be, you know, a

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 9>ten million dollar donation to a nonprofit to create a

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 9>nonprofit and leverage that into a billion dollar NGO. A

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 9>nonprofit is a weird word. It's just a non governmental organization, Josh.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>She went on to explain these angos often have fluffy,

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 2>nice sounding names, and every year the governments will write

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>them a big fat check, so our taxes from this activism.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Is that what was really uncovered when the USAID program

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 2>was properly scrutinized.

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 14>Yes, that was exactly what happened there. And by the way,

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 14>USAID remains to this day. One of Elon Muskin Doze's

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 14>greatest success is arguably their single greatest success here in

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 14>the United States. Wasn't covering the NGO rots inside of USAID.

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 14>I mean, who in the world thought that the US

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 14>taxpayer was what was underwriting so called NGOs to promote

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 14>things like so called gender affirming care surgeries. In the

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 14>Democratic Republic of the Congo or DEI in Malaysia, or

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 14>Burma there. I mean, look, Rita, I already had a

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 14>pretty low expectation, a pretty low baseline as to what I,

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 14>as a US taxpayer, was subsized in there. I don't

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 14>think I, frankly knew the half of it until I

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 14>saw some of the stuff that Elon Musk and his

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 14>Dose team were trying to get out there at USAID

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 14>in particular. So, yes, that is exactly what he's taught

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 14>talk amount in this club there. He's talking about these

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 14>so called NGO's Soros happens to run one of the

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 14>most infamous of them, the so called Open Society Foundation.

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 14>But there are so so many, there are more than

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 14>one can count. The real key here, though, is that

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 14>the USAID cust the doge coust there. Congress has to

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 14>actually get that into law. They're not part of the

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 14>so called Big Beautiful Bill. God willing, we'll be signed

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 14>that into law sometime sooner rather than later, though.

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Well. Elon Musk has expressed his deep dissatisfaction with the

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Big Beautiful Bill, as Trump calls that he posted this massive,

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>outrageous pork field Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Shame on those who voted for it. House Speaker Mike

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Johnson called Mask's criticism disappointing. But are the Republicans, Josh.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I know there's a couple who've spoken publicly against this bill,

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 2>but are there more who are privately troubled by it

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>as well?

0:32:58.560 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 14>Read I have to say that the breakoff of the

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 14>Trump Musk romance is probably the most easily predictable thing

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 14>of my entire adult lifetime. I mean, you have in

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 14>one hand Donald J. Trump, probably the single most famous

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 14>person literally number one, the entire world, and on the

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 14>other hand, you have the wealthiest guy in the entire

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 14>world of theirs. But you have these two just utterly

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 14>larger than life personalities there. I mean, it's kind of

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 14>only a matter of time until there ends up being

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 14>some sort of unraveling. But there's also a little bit

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 14>of an ideological difference between Elon Musk. Elon Musk is

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 14>essentially coming from a small government, shall we say, twenty

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 14>ten tea party era starting place.

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 12>There.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 14>He's a guy who's taking that proverbial chainsaw as the

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 14>doge master, trying to basically cut the excesses of government there.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 14>But Donald Trump, the whole point of magnet America first

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 14>is to ditch the old school libertarian inspired stuff and

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 14>to bring in this new nationalist populous coalition there. So

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 14>I'm not the least bit surprised that they've found a

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 14>major issue when it comes to the budget to disagree on.

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 14>But yes, I do think that there, frankly are more

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 14>Republicans who who probably held their noses to vote for

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 14>this bill. By the way, that's not that said that

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 14>the bill is a bad bill. I also would have

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 14>voted for it, but frankly as the least bad option.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 14>I'm still hoping Rita that the Senate can actually improve.

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 14>There's a lot of stuff I think the Senate can

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 14>do to improve this bill and then send it back

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 14>to the House to finalize the version there. But yes,

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 14>it's definitely not a perfect bill. Elon Musk is right.

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>About that, Josh. I want to play you an interview

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:28.280
<v Speaker 2>that was on SINN recently featuring an Israeli hostage held

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 2>by her mass for five hundred and five days. This

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 2>is Omar shem Tov and he explains here that her

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 2>mask wanted Kamala Harris to win the election.

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 17>Yes, it seems he got me out.

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 7>He got the.

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 17>Hostages out before we felt like nothing is happening, you know,

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 17>and I remember there for me there. Ever, since he

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 17>came into the road, they were very scared of him. Yeah,

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 17>they wanted to terrorist.

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 12>We're afraid of Trump.

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, they wanted Kamala to be chosen.

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 2>You talked to politics with them.

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, yeah, yeah, they wanted Kamala to be elected. When

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 17>Trump came into became president, Yeah, the way they treated

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 17>us changed.

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Josh explained in that interview how after Trump's win they

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:28.720
<v Speaker 2>treated him differently. They treated him better, abused him less,

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:33.479
<v Speaker 2>fed him more. And it just shows Trump's peace through

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 2>strength strategy works. But on this conflict, it's still not over.

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Will this war continue until her Mass is no more?

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 2>And is that realistic now, because are they going to

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 2>We're just going to have another variation of her Mass

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 2>under a different name pop up almost immediately.

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 7>So Rider.

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 14>The latest scuttle butt that I am hearing is that

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 14>a lot of high ranking Israelies are quite serious about

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 14>actually annexing, retaking over whatever word you want to use,

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 14>half to potentially seventy five percent of the Gaza strip

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 14>and essentially getting a massive security buffer for the rest

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 14>of the Palestine Arabs there, whether or not that happens,

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 14>I don't know. The thing with the Israelis RITA is

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 14>you hear a lot of tough talk a lot of

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 14>these Israeli officials. They talk about raining fire and fire

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 14>and brimstone. Then oftentimes the walk is not where the

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 14>talk is there. So I personally am kind of I

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 14>will believe it when I see it kind of guy

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 14>when it comes to this, I think that the most

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 14>palatable option in the mid to long term RITA is

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 14>to get some more moderate Arab coalition of Saudis, Egyptians,

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.879
<v Speaker 14>Emiratis there to essentially run the strip in a non

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 14>Islas fashion with Israeli military secure control of the actual

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 14>physical borders. That is probably the sweet spot at where

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 14>this ends up there. But as of now, the Israelitis

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 14>are talking a tough game. We'll see if they live

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 14>up to it.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, we've seen recruitment numbers for the Army source since November,

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 2>since the election years old, and we had a new

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 2>ad featuring Pete Hegseeth and Donald Trump a drop recently

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 2>and the Marine Corps. They've also have released a new

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 2>ad featuring a former veteran Vice president JD. Vance, Let's

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 2>have a quick look.

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 18>We care about excellence, and we care about patriotism, and

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 18>if you are awesome and you are a patriotic marine,

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 18>that we are going to do everything that we can

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 18>to make you.

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 2>It's the most.

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 18>Lethal fighting for us the world has ever seen. And

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 18>that is what we're doing every single day. No more quotas,

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 18>no more ridiculous mumbo jumbo, no more diversity training. We

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 18>believe the real strength and the real diversity in the

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 18>United States Marine Corps is that.

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 12>You all come from every walk of life, come from

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 12>every quarter of America.

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Josh Moraley's our recruitment numbers are certainly out. It seems

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the media's relentless negative campaign against administration isn't having the

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 2>desire to impact, certainly not with those who are choosing

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to serve their country.

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 14>You know, I kind of got chills down my spine

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.320
<v Speaker 14>watching that ad just now. Actually, I mean, how wonderful

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 14>is this? I mean, turning around the military's recruitment crisis

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 14>is one of the number one top goals in all

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 14>of American foreign policy, domestic policy, whatever you want to

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 14>call it.

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:18.959
<v Speaker 7>JD.

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 14>Vance, by the way, as a former Marine himself, one

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 14>of the highest ranking former Marines, former military combat veterans

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 14>in American history. There, he's the perfect person to read

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 14>an ad like this. So, by the way, is Pete

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 14>hegg Sat. I mean, one of the reasons, reader, that

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 14>I was so bullish on Pete hegg Sat as America's

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 14>Defense secretary is that he's a young, telligenic, well spoken

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 14>guy who has fought in numerous numerous post nine to

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 14>eleven wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and so forth.

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 11>There.

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 2>So, when you have JD.

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 14>Vance there in the vice presidential suite, when you have

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 14>Pete Heggs at the Pentagon there, this is going to

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 14>inspire morale. Get rid of the DEI, get rid of

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 14>the wokeism there. Just make the military the world's single

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 14>most ruthless efficient, the full fighting force. That's all these

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 14>young recruits wants, and thank god, that's what they're getting.

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, the numbers speak for themselves. We saw this enormous

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 2>surge right after the election result, and the numbers have

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 2>stayed up ever since.

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Josh I played a clip of Stephen Miller earlier in

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the program refusing to accept in an interview with CNN

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:28.439
<v Speaker 2>the anchors use of incorrect terms like undocumented migrant as

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.879
<v Speaker 2>opposed to illegal alien or illegal immigrant. You've had some

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on this, I know you wrote about this for

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 2>news Week. Why is it so important that conservatives push

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 2>back when the left tries to use their preferred terms.

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.919
<v Speaker 14>So I love Stean Miller. I am a long time

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 14>unabashed at Stephen Miller fan I love the fact that

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 14>he is wielding so much power in the Donald Trump

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 14>White House. There, but this particular fight readA is deeply important.

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 14>For literally decades, has understood what both George Orwell and

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 14>Saul Alinsky, the great left wing Chicago community organizer, They

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 14>both preached a very similar message, which is that he

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:12.760
<v Speaker 14>who controls the language necessarily controls the discourse. You control

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 14>the discourse, You control people's minds, You control how they

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 14>deal and how they interpret and process reality. There, But

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 14>the left uses all sorts of ridiculous euphemistic language so

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 14>called gender affirming care when it comes to physical or

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 14>chemical castration undocumented immigrants for illegal aliens there. You know,

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 14>body the autonomy when it comes to stuhing out even

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 14>a third trimester onborn child in the moom I go

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 14>on and on on, essentially no matter what issue you

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 14>look at. There, the left here in America has mastered

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 14>the arts of the euphemistic imperative, and Stephen Miller, I

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 14>think is lean is charged to fight back against it.

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 14>But the onus now is on everyone else to continue

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 14>this there. You cannot left the left control the terms

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 14>of a discourse because when you allow them to do that,

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 14>they're ultimately going to set themselves off a victory in

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 14>our great cold Royal and civil war in this country.

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely is so important you do not see linguistic territory

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 2>to the radical left, and I think conservatives have been

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 2>guilty of doing that for a long time. Josh Hammah,

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for your time tonight. Thank you

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 2>d still to come. Meghan Markel releases footage of her

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 2>twerking before giving birth. Kinsey Schofield has the details Welcome

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 2>back joining me now celebrity and royal commentator Kinseyscofield Kinsey.

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Meghan Markle has posted a video on her Instagram account

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 2>showing her and Harry dancing in the delivery room prior

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 2>to her giving birth to Lily Bet four years ago.

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 2>If you ever wanted to see a heavily pregnant woman twerk,

0:41:52.000 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 2>then sit back and enjoy. Down Da Mama went uput

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 2>down the path one month tuma, Yeah, pregnant airpen can

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 2>see what's been the reaction to this very uh personal

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 2>look inside the birthing unit of Harry and Meghan.

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 6>Rita lyrics like prego, but I'm still doing moves like Beyonce. Yeah,

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 6>I said I'm pregnant, get the child support and pay

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 6>my rent.

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 13>Your opinion is irrelevant because I'm a baby mama. I

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 13>can do what I wanna. I mean, reaction has been wild.

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 6>Meghan wasn't working, she was shaking loose what little class

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 6>she had left, and rumor has it Lily came out

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 6>holding a ring light and a non disclosure agreement. I've

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 6>seen more dignity in a Real Housewives reunion brawl. This

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 6>is literally South Park's worldwide Privacy Tour come to life

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 6>delivery room, Meghan dropping it's hot.

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 2>It is so you know what I thought of South

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Park as soon as I saw it, Because how much

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 2>more intimated they want to be? How much more do

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:06.439
<v Speaker 2>they want to show us? So we're going to see

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 2>videos of their wedding night next Because I wouldn't have

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 2>an issue with this except they fled the country to

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 2>protect their privacy. They've winched and whined incessantly about the

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 2>media intrusion, and then they do this for attention. Now,

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Magan Mikel's not going to be attending the King's birthday

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 2>celebrations next week. Highly unlikely that she would have had

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 2>any official invitation, but she was. Kinsey going to be

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 2>speaking as a guest of honor at a glitzy gala event.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about this.

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so she's speaking as the guest of honor for

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 6>her work in championing women and underserved communities at the

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 6>National History Museum of Los Angeles County next Saturday.

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 13>This is the Native Wonder Gala.

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 6>Maybe she's going to show them her dance moves on

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 6>the let's fingers cry we get some more Toerking videos. However,

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 6>like you said, on the same day, and King will

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 6>celebrate his official birthday parade in London joined by the

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 6>rest of the royal family. We're going to get those

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 6>gorgeous shots on the balcony. This is Megan accepting another

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 6>award for her favorite kind of service, self service. She

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 6>left the Royal family for privacy, like you said, but

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 6>manages to time every pr move around royal milestones like

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 6>it's her job.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 13>It's become the one thing she is consistent with.

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, wild coincidence that she has another event to coincide

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 2>with an official royal engagement. Now and Insider has told

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 2>The Daily Mouth that Blake Lively's text, messages, emails, phone

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 2>calls to Taylor Swift are all going unanswered amid her

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 2>legal battle with Justin Baldoni. What more can you tell

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 2>us about this?

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 13>That's right?

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 6>This report says that Blake is one ignored message away

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 6>from a carrier pigeon. There's so much desperation involved. She calls,

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 6>she leaves voicemails, she texts, and she's sent these really,

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 6>I mean they say she sent these long, groveling emails

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 6>trying to explain herself to Taylor Swift.

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 13>I mean, can you blame Taylor?

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:20.359
<v Speaker 6>I think that she recognizes a toxic relationship when she

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:22.959
<v Speaker 6>sees one, and she knows when.

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I think I've said this to you before.

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:29.720
<v Speaker 6>Taylor's been the villain, remember the Kanye and Kim versus

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 6>Taylor Swift. She sees Blake in this and she wants

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 6>no association. On top of that, we've recently reported that

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 6>it was Taylor's father that leaked to the media that

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 6>Blake had threatened to release some personal messages. You know,

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 6>Taylor is trying to just cut this off before it

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 6>gets worse.

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait until she writes an album all about

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Blake because this is what she does with her personal comments.

0:45:55.160 --> 0:46:00.360
<v Speaker 2>It takes too Yeah, I forget about Travis because he

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:02.800
<v Speaker 2>seems to be hanging around. I was waiting for that album,

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:06.919
<v Speaker 2>but now we're going to get a BFF Gone Wrong

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:11.800
<v Speaker 2>album that'll be even better. Meanwhile, her NFL boyfriend, Travis

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 2>kelce he's been accused of looking fat, but he's been

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.879
<v Speaker 2>on a health kick, Kinsey, this could be his last

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 2>year of football.

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Travis Kelcey isn't fat, He's just football feck. He's

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 6>one proneteage shake away from starring in Magic Offensive Line Edition,

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 6>and knowing Travis, that could actually be in the cards.

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately for us, we might see that. So I feel

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 6>sorry for him, And this is the kind of attention

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 6>you attract when you're dating the biggest pop star in

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 6>the world. But he Yeah, like you said, he's just

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 6>preparing for football season.

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's talk about Gail King Oprah's bff. She's seventy

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 2>years old, and she's revealed that she's got a renewed

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 2>interest in dating, and she wants to date someone younger.

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I've got a say, king, See, she looks amazing for seventy.

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I reckon she could be dating men as young as forty?

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Is that too much?

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I bet her love life is out of

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 13>this world. It's hard to date.

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 6>When you tell TV cameras that you're only willing to

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 6>engage with other people that have been in space, that

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:22.800
<v Speaker 6>really limits your opportunities when you say, don't bother talking

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:25.760
<v Speaker 6>to me unless you two have been to space.

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:27.439
<v Speaker 13>I don't know what forty year old.

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 6>Men would have in common with this woman who's in

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:32.800
<v Speaker 6>the VIP section with Tayler Perry at Beyonce and is

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 6>always hanging out with Jeff Bezos and his crew, hangs

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 6>out with Oprah and Steadman. But I mean, maybe she

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 6>could be somebody's sugar mama.

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 13>I could see that. I could see the opportunities there.

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Why not? You know what is that? She's an astronaut?

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Just ask her Cansi Scofield, thank you so much for

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:56.240
<v Speaker 2>your time tonight. And that's it from me up. Next

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:59.280
<v Speaker 2>is news not I'll see you tomorrow night for lifties

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 2>losing it at nine