Speaker 1: On scorn Lives Australia. This is the winder Panety Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panehy Show coming
Speaker 2: up tonight. The Treasurer backs the Greens and rejects offers
Speaker 2: to negotiate supertax hikes with the Coalition. Climate change extremism
Speaker 2: is leaving children traumatized. I'll speak to a leading child
Speaker 2: psychologists about the impact global warming alarmism is having in
Speaker 2: Australian schools. The Great Josh Hammer will have the latest
Speaker 2: from the US, including life Conservatives should not see the
Speaker 2: linguistic battleground. He who controls the language controls the masses.
Speaker 2: And Megan Markle releases footage of her twerking before giving birth.
Speaker 2: Celebrity and royal reporter Kinsey Scofield joins me later in
Speaker 2: the hour and Left is Losing. It features the Democrats
Speaker 2: secret weapon to win back young male voters. I'm not
Speaker 2: sure this is going to work.
Speaker 3: I'm angry. But the ocean is on fire at three
Speaker 3: different places, and we have billionaires who are racing to
Speaker 3: see who can get to space faster.
Speaker 2: But first Treasurer Jim Chalmers has walked back comments from
Speaker 2: the Prime Minister indicating that Labor would be willing to
Speaker 2: negotiate with a coalition on its plan to double the
Speaker 2: tax rate on superbalances over three million dollars and introduce
Speaker 2: unrealized capital gains taxes instead. Jim Chalmers has made it
Speaker 2: clear he preferred to negotiate with the Radical Greens to
Speaker 2: get the reforms past the Senate. Here's what he had
Speaker 2: to say.
Speaker 4: I'm not convinced that the coalition wants to have a
Speaker 4: conversation about these changes. I'm not convinced that they are
Speaker 4: fed income when it comes to bipartisanship. I don't think
Speaker 4: I don't think they're being real about that. This is
Speaker 4: a change which is modest, it is methodical, as I said,
Speaker 4: it's been on the books for years now, and it
Speaker 4: helps us fund some of our other priorities.
Speaker 2: Joining me now for more on this is mensi's Research
Speaker 2: Center Senior Fellow Nick Kata. Nick, we know the Greens
Speaker 2: back this policy. They want to see it extended to
Speaker 2: super balances over two million dollars. This policy is bad
Speaker 2: enough in its current form, what's it going to look
Speaker 2: like with the Greens input?
Speaker 5: To think, don't you reta But the Greens, of course
Speaker 5: are at one with Labor on this thing, at least
Speaker 5: that both of them. Both of them think that people
Speaker 5: who save for their own retirement are bad people, that
Speaker 5: there's something disreputable about putting money aside over your working
Speaker 5: life in order that you can pay your own way
Speaker 5: when you retire. It is, and I'm not sure what
Speaker 5: Jim Charmers, what the priorities are that Jim Chalmers says
Speaker 5: he's going to spend this money on. Because actually, the
Speaker 5: best thing you can do is incentivize people to become
Speaker 5: self funded in retirement, because that will save you about
Speaker 5: half a million dollars over their lifetime of that person.
Speaker 5: If they're not blaming the public pension, you know, they're
Speaker 5: probably claiming about it saving about another two hundred thousand
Speaker 5: if they're on private edical insurance, as they probably most
Speaker 5: likely are. So we should be encouraging people, surely RITA
Speaker 5: to look after themselves in retirement if they can find
Speaker 5: the means to do so, rather than this thing of
Speaker 5: forcing everybody back into the benevolence of the state. That's
Speaker 5: why I think the liberals should have a fundamental objection
Speaker 5: to this. There's no room for negotiation, and I'm glad
Speaker 5: that Ted O'Brien has firmed up on that position.
Speaker 2: Now. Judith Sloan has written an excemplete piece in The
Speaker 2: Australian Today on Jim chalmers wishful analysis of yesterday's GDP figures.
Speaker 2: She writes, Jim Chalmers is living on another planet when
Speaker 2: he tells us, with all the uncertainty in the world,
Speaker 2: any growth is a decent outcome. This is not a
Speaker 2: decent outcome. Taking out the rise of GDP per capita
Speaker 2: in the last December quarter, eight of the nine past
Speaker 2: quarters have been negative GDP per capita a reasonable measure
Speaker 2: of living standards, economy is on life support and it
Speaker 2: would be better to recognize this. Nick is the treasurer
Speaker 2: living in fantasy land. Surely he knows how grim these
Speaker 2: figures are.
Speaker 6: Well.
Speaker 5: There is really an outbreak of economic illiteracy in the
Speaker 5: political class in this country, in the media class. I
Speaker 5: fear that Jim Chalmers is suffering from it. Because you
Speaker 5: know what is a per capita recession. It means that
Speaker 5: families on average a poorer will be poorer next year
Speaker 5: than they are this year. That's the reality of it.
Speaker 5: They'll have less money, less less wages, less money in
Speaker 5: their pockets. And I'll tell you what read in some
Speaker 5: of the places that I visited during the election out
Speaker 5: in Western Sydney, it is biting. There are families out
Speaker 5: of there that are really hurting, really badly hurting, that
Speaker 5: are queuing up at food kitchens, the entire family to
Speaker 5: get their dinner they need as none of that is
Speaker 5: apparent the cause in the nice suburbs where people like
Speaker 5: Jim Charmersiev, people are doing quite fine there. But this
Speaker 5: is really causing a lot of pain and it's very
Speaker 5: discriminatory in the pain it causes in that for the
Speaker 5: poorest get hurt worse by a per capitary session. So
Speaker 5: where this fits in with Labour's mantram no one left behind,
Speaker 5: I'm not really sure.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, as we predicted on this program, the leagues against
Speaker 2: Greenstern Labour senator during the Cox have begun in earnest.
Speaker 2: It was always going to happen after she defected from
Speaker 2: the Greens to Labor. We know more of the investigation
Speaker 2: into allegations of workplace misconduct made against the senator by
Speaker 2: former staffers, and now reports that Durnda Cox allegedly called
Speaker 2: One Nation leader Pauline Hansen a effing retard in leaked
Speaker 2: text messages. The Greens are understandably furious with Senator Cox
Speaker 2: and we can probably expect to see more damaging leaks,
Speaker 2: more damaging text messages.
Speaker 5: They're all class, aren't they, the Greens. When it comes
Speaker 5: to their language, I mean things that you couldn't actually
Speaker 5: say on this channel. They think that's okay to use
Speaker 5: that kind of language. I'll tell you what, Pauline Hanson's
Speaker 5: One Nation did considerably better in the last election in
Speaker 5: terms of the votes increase than the Greens Party. So
Speaker 5: perhaps they should be looking at paul In and asking
Speaker 5: her what the secret if the secret, of course is
Speaker 5: to actually get back with real people and real people's concerns.
Speaker 5: Not often in sort of activist fairy land, which is
Speaker 5: where the Greens are now. People have been pointing out
Speaker 5: that they're losing. You know, they're bit down on the
Speaker 5: number of Aboriginal people represented in Parliament on behalf of
Speaker 5: the Greens. I'll tell you what, they are over represented
Speaker 5: in the two people with double barrel names. Have you
Speaker 5: noticed that we've got handsome young wish will almond pain
Speaker 5: and they generally might experience people that are a couple
Speaker 5: of pretty privileged backgrounds, and that's where the Greens are.
Speaker 5: They really are people with luxury beliefs.
Speaker 2: Nick, Yes, that is an interesting observation. Certainly in my electorate,
Speaker 2: I noticed a lot of the Greens, a lot of
Speaker 2: the tills were very white, very privileged, and of a
Speaker 2: certain age demographic, older age demographic. It might be different
Speaker 2: where you are.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 2: Let's move along to Greta Thunberg. Israel has threatened to
Speaker 2: raid the boat she's on, which is currently en route
Speaker 2: to Gaza carrying her and a number of other leftist activists. Nika,
Speaker 2: what does Greta and her feral mates what do they
Speaker 2: hope to achieve with this activism going into a wall
Speaker 2: zone and saying that they're going to bring love, humanitarian
Speaker 2: aid and break the blockade.
Speaker 5: I guess it's virtue signaling, although I don't know that
Speaker 5: I'd be suggesting that a young lady does a virtue
Speaker 5: signaling activity in somewhere where she's libral to get shot
Speaker 5: or worse.
Speaker 7: So that's what it is.
Speaker 5: But it just goes to the mind, doesn't it. Of
Speaker 5: the extreme left, which is where she sits. They think
Speaker 5: they know everything about everything, she thinks she knows everything
Speaker 5: about climate science. For instance, she understands perfectly why the
Speaker 5: weather warms and sometimes it calls. Now she thinks she
Speaker 5: knows everything about the history of the Middle East and
Speaker 5: who's on the right side of history and who's not.
Speaker 5: It's just the ignorance of these people that annoys me.
Speaker 5: Read So they're allowed to have their opinion, Sure they
Speaker 5: can make up their minds, but first they've got to
Speaker 5: understand what they're talking about. And I think in Greta's case,
Speaker 5: I think she's rather she would have spent been better
Speaker 5: off spending more time in school and less time on protests, really,
Speaker 5: because she might actually know something about what she's talking about.
Speaker 2: Where there seems to be a lot of crossover with
Speaker 2: these activist groups nixt the ones who are all about
Speaker 2: climate change, the anti Israeli protesters, the race obsessed ones.
Speaker 2: It's pretty much the same mob, isn't it. And that's
Speaker 2: why she has just effortlessly gone from climate change to
Speaker 2: now this anti Israeli activism.
Speaker 5: Yeah, of course, our Green Party has done exactly the
Speaker 5: same thing. As we've commented before. This seems to be
Speaker 5: a natural progression when they start losing traction on one issue.
Speaker 5: I think they always look for another one to move
Speaker 5: on to, so sooner or later they'll get bored with
Speaker 5: the Palestinian cause and they'll find something else. I don't
Speaker 5: know what it will be. But they always have to
Speaker 5: be the sense for their own sense of righteousness. They
Speaker 5: have to be one step ahead of everybody else and they.
Speaker 2: And it always has.
Speaker 5: To be that, nothing more.
Speaker 2: And it's always catastrophe. It's just catastrophizing. Everything is about
Speaker 2: to be the end of the world. It's a genocide.
Speaker 2: It's the end of the world as we know it
Speaker 2: with climate change and just doomsayers nick before you go.
Speaker 2: President Donald Trump has banned the citizens of twelve countries
Speaker 2: from traveling to the US and introduced travel restrictions on
Speaker 2: seven other countries. Some of the banned countries include Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan.
Speaker 2: Let's hear from the president early today.
Speaker 8: The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado has underscored the
Speaker 8: extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of
Speaker 8: foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as
Speaker 8: those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas.
Speaker 2: We don't want them.
Speaker 8: In the twenty first century, we've seen one terror attack
Speaker 8: after another carried out by foreign visa overstairs from dangerous
Speaker 8: places all over the world.
Speaker 2: Nick, this is reminiscent of a similar ban in his
Speaker 2: first term, and though that caused enormous angst in the media,
Speaker 2: it was actually pretty popular with the punters. What do
Speaker 2: you make of this latest span.
Speaker 5: Well, the first thing is, none of these trail countries
Speaker 5: are on my bucket list, reader, I doubt they're on yours.
Speaker 5: Either they are nasty places. There are places where either
Speaker 5: they use terrorism, or they harbor terrorists to wage war
Speaker 5: against United States, Israel and others, or they have uncontrolled crime,
Speaker 5: drug smuggling, etc. So it's just the hard lesson that
Speaker 5: some countries don't seem to be able to learn that
Speaker 5: people from these environments are likely to bring the same
Speaker 5: lawlessness or the same political political views to your country
Speaker 5: that they.
Speaker 2: Had in their Nikita. Thanks so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 9: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is leading child psychollegest and a junct
Speaker 2: fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs, Claire row Claire.
Speaker 2: You're behind a landmark research paper for the Institute of
Speaker 2: Public Affairs called climate change anxiety in pre adolescent children
Speaker 2: a neuroscientific and psychological perspective, and you've revealed an alarming
Speaker 2: increase in climate anxiety among Australian children, which you found
Speaker 2: is linked to the way that climate change education is
Speaker 2: currently delivered in the national curriculum. Tell me why the
Speaker 2: current approach is harmful?
Speaker 7: Yeah, thanks, Rita.
Speaker 10: It is a landmark study in that sense because any
Speaker 10: research up to date has looked or assumed that the
Speaker 10: rising climate anxiety with children is because children are exposed
Speaker 10: to the direct effects of climate change, so rising sea
Speaker 10: levels and bushfires, et cetera. But that's not the case
Speaker 10: of what I'm seeing in my clinic right. I've got
Speaker 10: nine and ten year olds in tiers. They're in the
Speaker 10: middle of Sydney. They're not directly exposed to rising sea levels.
Speaker 10: And so this research went into the national curriculum for
Speaker 10: primary school age students. That really pushes this idea of
Speaker 10: sustainability as a priority across all subject areas. And I
Speaker 10: think that parents don't even know that this stuff is
Speaker 10: kind of been taught.
Speaker 7: From five years old. Reader.
Speaker 10: Kids have to learn about ways that they can personally
Speaker 10: contribute to almost this idea of saving the planet, and
Speaker 10: of course for a five, six seven year old.
Speaker 7: That's extremely overwhelming.
Speaker 10: And as a developed mental expert with children, I can
Speaker 10: say they just do not have the cognitive capacity to
Speaker 10: deal with concepts that are future focused like that probably stick.
Speaker 10: They're very concrete thinkers at that stage. And so for me,
Speaker 10: this has been happening now for quite a while, and
Speaker 10: I've been seeing the direct effects of it with my
Speaker 10: patients of kids absolutely paralyzed with anxiety and more than that,
Speaker 10: have this kind of sense of earnest on them, more
Speaker 10: guilt that they need to do something to solve the problem.
Speaker 2: It's just so troubling that we are inflicting this on children. Really,
Speaker 2: it is child abuse in my eyes. Tell me about
Speaker 2: some of the cases you're dealing with personally in your clinic,
Speaker 2: where you've got kids who are traumatized and you need
Speaker 2: to help them feel safe again.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 10: So, for a while now in my clinic, and I've
Speaker 10: spoken to a lot of colleagues child psychologists who are
Speaker 10: reporting the same thing. Particularly over the last five years,
Speaker 10: we're seeing children come in who are in a bit
Speaker 10: of a panic because they fundamentally believe that older generations
Speaker 10: have failed them. They believe the gu moments a lot listening,
Speaker 10: and they believe that people don't care about their future.
Speaker 10: And whilst we can all kind of have a giggle
Speaker 10: at the gretit Thumberg's maybe and you know people feeling
Speaker 10: like they're going to be extinct, that's actually the message
Speaker 10: that some kids are internalizing.
Speaker 7: And that's really plain to see.
Speaker 10: When you understand developmental science with children, that tells us
Speaker 10: the children under twelve are not equipped to process these
Speaker 10: abstract issues global issues like climate change.
Speaker 7: They're very based in the here and now.
Speaker 10: And so when you give a message to a kid,
Speaker 10: and there are certainly worksheets in the you know that
Speaker 10: teachers can access as part of their curriculum that say
Speaker 10: things like the planet is sick, there is no planet b.
Speaker 10: Kids internalize that young children as an immediate threat.
Speaker 7: So if they hear the.
Speaker 10: Message that sea levels are rising, they may think that
Speaker 10: that's happening tweak down the road from them, and of
Speaker 10: course what happens is they come back home. And a
Speaker 10: lot of this stuff is trture kids and given ideas
Speaker 10: to children about ways that they can modify their own
Speaker 10: behavior and their families. So I've got kids who come
Speaker 10: home to Mum and dad. We can't eat the meat
Speaker 10: for dinner. We need to reduce meat consumption. We should
Speaker 10: be driving the family car less. And of course a
Speaker 10: six year old really doesn't have or shouldn't have control
Speaker 10: over their household habits, and so they're imagine this kind
Speaker 10: of really vicious cycle where they don't have the power
Speaker 10: to change anything themselves, and they fundamentally think that people
Speaker 10: around them don't care, and hence they're in this state
Speaker 10: not just anxiety, but helplessness. They really don't think that
Speaker 10: they have a future, which is awful.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. Now your report recommends abolishing that cross curriculum priority
Speaker 2: of sustainability and also delaying climate education until the kids
Speaker 2: are old enough secondary school and focusing on the facts,
Speaker 2: the scientific facts as oppose all this emotive, guilt ridden
Speaker 2: narrative that is traumatizing the kids. If you could sit
Speaker 2: down with the Prime Minister or the Education minister, what
Speaker 2: would your advice to them be.
Speaker 10: Yeah, Well, as you mentioned, sustainability is what they call
Speaker 10: a cross curriculum priority.
Speaker 7: It means that they need to teach just are mandated
Speaker 7: to put in the.
Speaker 10: Topic of sustainability across music lessons, geography, lessons, sports lessons,
Speaker 10: any lesson has to be fed in with this topic.
Speaker 7: So the first thing I'd say is.
Speaker 10: What are the role what is the role of our
Speaker 10: education system when we're talking about very young children and
Speaker 10: it's getting the absolute fundamental academics down, which of course
Speaker 10: we know that Australia is going backwards on a world
Speaker 10: stage with. So the first thing I would love to
Speaker 10: speak with the Prime Minister or the Education Minister about
Speaker 10: is abolishing that cross curriculum priority.
Speaker 7: And I'd also like.
Speaker 10: To encourage parents to just have a little bit of
Speaker 10: a look about what the kids are learning, because I
Speaker 10: think a lot of parents aren't aware of it. And
Speaker 10: if they are concerned about it, they can write to
Speaker 10: their local minister or bring it up with the principal
Speaker 10: and sit down and say, look, I'm a little bit
Speaker 10: worried about this, or speak with other parents, because as
Speaker 10: long as this goes on without parents knowing, I think
Speaker 10: that that's a huge problem.
Speaker 2: Now, before you go, another finding you had was that
Speaker 2: mental health professionals should be focused on resilience building rather
Speaker 2: than distress validation, which you're just telling the kids how
Speaker 2: they feel is valid. What does that look like? So
Speaker 2: if You've got parents dealing with this, and their kids
Speaker 2: are coming home and they are alarmed about climate change
Speaker 2: and all they've heard at school. How should parents handle that?
Speaker 7: Yeah, well, it's interesting. Here's the thing, reata.
Speaker 10: If we have climate change, as we're recognizing, you know,
Speaker 10: an anxiety condition, these kids are coming with symptoms of anxiety.
Speaker 7: It is the only.
Speaker 10: Anxiety condition that psychologists and psychiatrists, by our bodies are
Speaker 10: encouraged to validate their feelings and approach those symptoms as a.
Speaker 7: Realistic or you know, a valid response to what's going
Speaker 7: on in the world.
Speaker 10: Any other anxiety condition we would have cost challenge cognitively,
Speaker 10: we would provide perspective, we would help rationalize those thoughts
Speaker 10: in order to abolish the anxiety. However, this condition, it
Speaker 10: seems that people like me are encouraged to lean into
Speaker 10: it that.
Speaker 7: I've got concerns about.
Speaker 10: So for parents, I would say again, talk to the school,
Speaker 10: but also with your child. It's not about going necessarily.
Speaker 7: Too far into the science of things. It's just to
Speaker 7: try and give them some.
Speaker 10: Perspective and try and funnel for the environment back to
Speaker 10: some basics like picking up rubbish, saving water, Like they're
Speaker 10: all good.
Speaker 7: Things and we can stick to that.
Speaker 2: That are the real things you can do. And perhaps
Speaker 2: I don't know, look at some of those predictions from
Speaker 2: twenty years ago, thirty years ago, mainteen years ago that
Speaker 2: have been absolutely wrong, wildly wrong. And just so the
Speaker 2: kids know, some of these doomsay predictions are not going
Speaker 2: to eventuate. Clairo, thank you so much.
Speaker 7: For your time tonight, Thanks Rache.
Speaker 2: Still to come, Left is Losing It, plus the latest
Speaker 2: from the US, including why conservatives should not see the
Speaker 2: linguistic battleground. Josh Hammer joins me. Next, you're watching the
Speaker 2: Reader Panny Show and it's time for lefties using it,
Speaker 2: and we've got some gems for you tonight. Let's start
Speaker 2: with the Democrats finally realizing they have a problem with
Speaker 2: young men. Yes, young men have abandoned the part, he droves,
Speaker 2: and the Dems think they have just the woman to
Speaker 2: lure them back.
Speaker 11: As the saying goes, if you're not at the table,
Speaker 11: you're on the menu.
Speaker 2: Yes, that's Democrat operative influencer Olivia Juliana. And she loves
Speaker 2: young men. She loves the frat boys, and she thinks
Speaker 2: she understands them and how to bring them back to
Speaker 2: the Democrats.
Speaker 11: It's been a lifetime on college campuses and I speak
Speaker 11: a lot of I love young men, I love frat guys,
Speaker 11: and in that I've realized like even the ones that
Speaker 11: identify as conservative are almost always pro choice, They're almost
Speaker 11: always pro gay marriage. You'd be surprised at the number
Speaker 11: of them who support a Black Lives Matter.
Speaker 2: Yes, I'm sure conservative young men are huge backers of
Speaker 2: the Marxist anti American, anti police movement known as BLM,
Speaker 2: and I'm sure this will see them return to the
Speaker 2: Democrats in huge numbers.
Speaker 3: I'm angry that the ocean is on fire at three
Speaker 3: different places, and we have billionaires who are racing to
Speaker 3: see who can get to space faster. The same billionaires
Speaker 3: who don't pay their workers fairly, the same billionaires who
Speaker 3: don't pay their fair share in taxes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that ain't gonna work. Now Here is a law
Speaker 2: professor and wife of MSNBC host Chris Hayes, Kate Shuw
Speaker 2: who decided to lie, or at least miss Lee is
Speaker 2: Senator John Kennedy from the great State of Louisiana. And
Speaker 2: that was a mistake, big mistake.
Speaker 12: Huge. You said there are some members of the Supreme
Speaker 12: Court that are evil? Which justices were you talking about?
Speaker 7: I'll take it your a centator.
Speaker 13: I don't recall it using that word, but.
Speaker 12: All right, here's what you said. You were talking about
Speaker 12: the majority opinion in Mauldrove v. City of Saint Louis.
Speaker 12: She said, quote Justice Kagan, I mean, will she be
Speaker 12: able to control the opinion's future distortion by her evil colleagues?
Speaker 12: Probably not end quote Who are you talking about, sir?
Speaker 7: I am very skeptical. There's a transcription. It was probably
Speaker 7: a transcription error. I do not think I said.
Speaker 12: No, you said it once. You own up to it.
Speaker 12: Which you call some members of the Supreme Court evil?
Speaker 12: Which ones do you think of evil?
Speaker 7: I would have to refresh my recollection.
Speaker 2: I've been very critical Paris.
Speaker 12: Of the Supreme courtist statement, aren't you.
Speaker 13: I'm an officer.
Speaker 7: It doesn't sound like something that I.
Speaker 12: Want to say, Parish at that you're teaching our kids.
Speaker 13: I don't refer to Supreme Court justices as evil in
Speaker 13: the classroom on.
Speaker 12: The podcast in April twenty second, twenty twenty four, Okay, well,
Speaker 12: big as Dallas, and you're an officer of the Court
Speaker 12: and you're here advising us to be respectful of federal judges,
Speaker 12: and you say they're evil members of the United States
Speaker 12: Supreme Court.
Speaker 14: Gag me with a spoon.
Speaker 2: Gag me with a spoon. Indeed, how many times does
Speaker 2: she lie or mislead their claiming She never said it.
Speaker 2: It was a transcription error. It's not language should use well,
Speaker 2: Professor Shaw. As the kids say, here is the receipt.
Speaker 2: And by the way, she said this only last year.
Speaker 13: The result definitely constructed opinion by Justice Kegan.
Speaker 15: I mean, will she be able to control its potential
Speaker 15: future distortion by your evil colleagues.
Speaker 2: Now, this is how you handle the leftist activist media.
Speaker 2: You do not allow them to play linguistic games. Don't
Speaker 2: allow them to obscure the truth by using their preferred
Speaker 2: terms that are inaccurate and designed to manipulate. Watch Stephen
Speaker 2: Miller on CNN give a master class on how you
Speaker 2: handle these activists.
Speaker 1: An undocumented migrant sent a letter of threatening to kill
Speaker 1: the president, promising to self support after the assassination. Seen
Speaker 1: in reporting shows that investigators believe the migrant.
Speaker 7: Was set up.
Speaker 2: It was a victim of a setup.
Speaker 13: What is the administration going to do now?
Speaker 1: And this is an undocumented immigrant. I do want to
Speaker 1: note that, but this was someone who came forward, was
Speaker 1: a victim of a crime, and now law enforcement believes
Speaker 1: he was set up.
Speaker 16: Go ahead, well, I want to clarify what you mean.
Speaker 16: So we're talking about the same thing. Are you saying
Speaker 16: this this immigrant was here illegally?
Speaker 7: Yes, but I am. And that's why I said that.
Speaker 16: I clarify them said I just said undocumented, and I
Speaker 16: wasn't clear what that means. I'm assuming they have a
Speaker 16: fake ID and if you assuming they have a section
Speaker 16: that's curiod.
Speaker 1: That's neither here from their questions, Steve, I want, I
Speaker 1: want this to be, and call me naive, a good
Speaker 1: faith discussion about what's happening right now.
Speaker 16: When we use language that's designed to obscure the truth,
Speaker 16: that's not good faith and legal alien. They're not an undocumented.
Speaker 2: Okay, that's fine, Yes, that is fine. Don't let the
Speaker 2: lift play these word games to deliberately conceal the truth
Speaker 2: to manipulate. Remember, he who controls the language controls the masses.
Speaker 2: Don't be controlled. And the law Fair with the Democrats
Speaker 2: has never stopped. It didn't ultimately work in stopping President
Speaker 2: Donald Trump from being re elected, but now that he
Speaker 2: is in power, the Democrats are again using and misusing
Speaker 2: the courts and Democrat appointed judges to undermine the President's
Speaker 2: power and to usurp the will of the American people.
Speaker 2: Here is Democrat Rep. Laura Friedman explaining it all.
Speaker 15: Every single week, we have a Litigation working Group. We're
Speaker 15: a large group of us and I'm talking there's maybe
Speaker 15: seventy five members of the House sit down every single
Speaker 15: week with the AGS to talk about legal strategy. This
Speaker 15: is all going on every single week.
Speaker 7: Behind the scenes.
Speaker 15: It is NonStop, NonStop talk, NonStop introduction of bills and legislation.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is Newsweek's senior editor at Large and
Speaker 2: Article three Projects Senior Council Josh Hammer. Josh, you coined
Speaker 2: the judicial insurrection, and we see examples of it almost
Speaker 2: on a weekly basis.
Speaker 14: Yeah, the Democrats read, apparently are not content to throw
Speaker 14: out hundreds and hundreds of years of precedents about not
Speaker 14: prosecuting your political enemies, at least in these United States.
Speaker 14: Who knows where they will stomp at this point there.
Speaker 14: But you know, we frankly have not taken a full
Speaker 14: societal reckoning here in the United States of exactly what
Speaker 14: the Democratic Party and what the Democrat lawfare complex, as
Speaker 14: I've called it, as to what exactly they have put
Speaker 14: us through for the past few years. Thank goodness readA
Speaker 14: thank goodness For so many reasons, Donald Trump defeated Kamala
Speaker 14: Harris in the twenty twenty fourth election. But among those
Speaker 14: reasons that we should be grateful that he won is
Speaker 14: that in the alternative hypothetical universe, if he had lost
Speaker 14: that election, there is a very very very real chance
Speaker 14: that he would not only not be sitting at the
Speaker 14: White House right now, he would actually be in jail.
Speaker 14: That was literally the stakes. I mean, when Americans went
Speaker 14: to vote there in November, they were actually voting on that.
Speaker 7: I don't know when.
Speaker 14: Democrats are going to give this up? Sometimes, Riata, I think,
Speaker 14: what is it actually going to take this party to
Speaker 14: stop carping about these eighty twenty issues on the wrong
Speaker 14: side there? What percentage of American people actually support of
Speaker 14: this as opposed to focusing on oh, I don't know,
Speaker 14: economic issues, bread and butter issues, pocketbook issues, immigration, crime,
Speaker 14: basic lifestyle issues. Democrats, that is the reason that your
Speaker 14: party's approval ratings and Favorbuilary rings are in the freaking
Speaker 14: toilet right now. You want to get back in fair position.
Speaker 14: Stop focusing on this, focusing on what your voters actually
Speaker 14: care about.
Speaker 2: Well, so much of the trouble the far left activism
Speaker 2: we see is financed well financed by various groups. And
Speaker 2: on that. Let's have a look at this New Yorker
Speaker 2: fluff piece featuring Alex Souris, who the New Yorker describes
Speaker 2: as an investor and philanthropist, same way they described his father,
Speaker 2: billionaire George Sorris. Here is with a political operative and
Speaker 2: Hillary's bff, Humor Aberdeen. Interesting image, Josh, what sort of
Speaker 2: influence is he exerting right now?
Speaker 13: Oh, Rita.
Speaker 14: He's one of the most powerful men, not just in America,
Speaker 14: you could argue in the world. I mean he's the
Speaker 14: inheritor of George soros empire. I mean he is the
Speaker 14: globalist of all globalists. So you're looking at the heir
Speaker 14: to the throne, Alex Soros right there with Huma Abboten,
Speaker 14: Hillary Clinton's old pal there. I mean, this guy is
Speaker 14: funding all sorts of of the very worst causes. Again,
Speaker 14: not just here in the United States, but in Europe,
Speaker 14: increasingly throughout the other countries of the Western hemisphere trying
Speaker 14: to sow the seeds of discord in Central America and
Speaker 14: South America. They are the Middle East there. I mean,
Speaker 14: God knows what he wants to do when it comes
Speaker 14: to the issue of Israel and Hamas. This guy's money
Speaker 14: flows everywhere. He at this point Rita is hands down
Speaker 14: one of the most dangerous men in the entire world.
Speaker 14: There and frankly, the fact that he ended up with
Speaker 14: an old Clinton hand, you know, Anthony Wiener's ex wife,
Speaker 14: Huma Abbiting there, it's really kind of just the cherry
Speaker 14: on the cake.
Speaker 17: iSER.
Speaker 2: Now, I'm going to ask you about alon masks attacks
Speaker 2: against the so called big beautiful Bill Short, but just first,
Speaker 2: here is a lot of mask on how the likes
Speaker 2: of George Soros can take a relatively small amount of
Speaker 2: money and use it to exert enormous influence for what
Speaker 2: uya NGOs.
Speaker 9: It's kind of a hack to the system where you know,
Speaker 9: someone can get an NGO stood up for a fairly
Speaker 9: small amount of money, Like George Sorris was really good
Speaker 9: at this, Like he really George Soros is like a
Speaker 9: system hacker, Like he figured out how to hack the
Speaker 9: system He figured out that you could leverage a small
Speaker 9: amount of money to create a nonprofit, then lobby for
Speaker 9: the politicians to send a ton of money to that nonprofit,
Speaker 9: so you can take what might be, you know, a
Speaker 9: ten million dollar donation to a nonprofit to create a
Speaker 9: nonprofit and leverage that into a billion dollar NGO. A
Speaker 9: nonprofit is a weird word. It's just a non governmental organization, Josh.
Speaker 2: She went on to explain these angos often have fluffy,
Speaker 2: nice sounding names, and every year the governments will write
Speaker 2: them a big fat check, so our taxes from this activism.
Speaker 2: Is that what was really uncovered when the USAID program
Speaker 2: was properly scrutinized.
Speaker 14: Yes, that was exactly what happened there. And by the way,
Speaker 14: USAID remains to this day. One of Elon Muskin Doze's
Speaker 14: greatest success is arguably their single greatest success here in
Speaker 14: the United States. Wasn't covering the NGO rots inside of USAID.
Speaker 14: I mean, who in the world thought that the US
Speaker 14: taxpayer was what was underwriting so called NGOs to promote
Speaker 14: things like so called gender affirming care surgeries. In the
Speaker 14: Democratic Republic of the Congo or DEI in Malaysia, or
Speaker 14: Burma there. I mean, look, Rita, I already had a
Speaker 14: pretty low expectation, a pretty low baseline as to what I,
Speaker 14: as a US taxpayer, was subsized in there. I don't
Speaker 14: think I, frankly knew the half of it until I
Speaker 14: saw some of the stuff that Elon Musk and his
Speaker 14: Dose team were trying to get out there at USAID
Speaker 14: in particular. So, yes, that is exactly what he's taught
Speaker 14: talk amount in this club there. He's talking about these
Speaker 14: so called NGO's Soros happens to run one of the
Speaker 14: most infamous of them, the so called Open Society Foundation.
Speaker 14: But there are so so many, there are more than
Speaker 14: one can count. The real key here, though, is that
Speaker 14: the USAID cust the doge coust there. Congress has to
Speaker 14: actually get that into law. They're not part of the
Speaker 14: so called Big Beautiful Bill. God willing, we'll be signed
Speaker 14: that into law sometime sooner rather than later, though.
Speaker 2: Well. Elon Musk has expressed his deep dissatisfaction with the
Speaker 2: Big Beautiful Bill, as Trump calls that he posted this massive,
Speaker 2: outrageous pork field Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.
Speaker 2: Shame on those who voted for it. House Speaker Mike
Speaker 2: Johnson called Mask's criticism disappointing. But are the Republicans, Josh.
Speaker 2: I know there's a couple who've spoken publicly against this bill,
Speaker 2: but are there more who are privately troubled by it
Speaker 2: as well?
Speaker 7: Well?
Speaker 14: Read I have to say that the breakoff of the
Speaker 14: Trump Musk romance is probably the most easily predictable thing
Speaker 14: of my entire adult lifetime. I mean, you have in
Speaker 14: one hand Donald J. Trump, probably the single most famous
Speaker 14: person literally number one, the entire world, and on the
Speaker 14: other hand, you have the wealthiest guy in the entire
Speaker 14: world of theirs. But you have these two just utterly
Speaker 14: larger than life personalities there. I mean, it's kind of
Speaker 14: only a matter of time until there ends up being
Speaker 14: some sort of unraveling. But there's also a little bit
Speaker 14: of an ideological difference between Elon Musk. Elon Musk is
Speaker 14: essentially coming from a small government, shall we say, twenty
Speaker 14: ten tea party era starting place.
Speaker 12: There.
Speaker 14: He's a guy who's taking that proverbial chainsaw as the
Speaker 14: doge master, trying to basically cut the excesses of government there.
Speaker 14: But Donald Trump, the whole point of magnet America first
Speaker 14: is to ditch the old school libertarian inspired stuff and
Speaker 14: to bring in this new nationalist populous coalition there. So
Speaker 14: I'm not the least bit surprised that they've found a
Speaker 14: major issue when it comes to the budget to disagree on.
Speaker 14: But yes, I do think that there, frankly are more
Speaker 14: Republicans who who probably held their noses to vote for
Speaker 14: this bill. By the way, that's not that said that
Speaker 14: the bill is a bad bill. I also would have
Speaker 14: voted for it, but frankly as the least bad option.
Speaker 14: I'm still hoping Rita that the Senate can actually improve.
Speaker 14: There's a lot of stuff I think the Senate can
Speaker 14: do to improve this bill and then send it back
Speaker 14: to the House to finalize the version there. But yes,
Speaker 14: it's definitely not a perfect bill. Elon Musk is right.
Speaker 2: About that, Josh. I want to play you an interview
Speaker 2: that was on SINN recently featuring an Israeli hostage held
Speaker 2: by her mass for five hundred and five days. This
Speaker 2: is Omar shem Tov and he explains here that her
Speaker 2: mask wanted Kamala Harris to win the election.
Speaker 17: Yes, it seems he got me out.
Speaker 7: He got the.
Speaker 17: Hostages out before we felt like nothing is happening, you know,
Speaker 17: and I remember there for me there. Ever, since he
Speaker 17: came into the road, they were very scared of him. Yeah,
Speaker 17: they wanted to terrorist.
Speaker 12: We're afraid of Trump.
Speaker 17: Yeah, they wanted Kamala to be chosen.
Speaker 2: You talked to politics with them.
Speaker 17: Yeah, yeah, yeah, they wanted Kamala to be elected. When
Speaker 17: Trump came into became president, Yeah, the way they treated
Speaker 17: us changed.
Speaker 2: Josh explained in that interview how after Trump's win they
Speaker 2: treated him differently. They treated him better, abused him less,
Speaker 2: fed him more. And it just shows Trump's peace through
Speaker 2: strength strategy works. But on this conflict, it's still not over.
Speaker 2: Will this war continue until her Mass is no more?
Speaker 2: And is that realistic now, because are they going to
Speaker 2: We're just going to have another variation of her Mass
Speaker 2: under a different name pop up almost immediately.
Speaker 7: So Rider.
Speaker 14: The latest scuttle butt that I am hearing is that
Speaker 14: a lot of high ranking Israelies are quite serious about
Speaker 14: actually annexing, retaking over whatever word you want to use,
Speaker 14: half to potentially seventy five percent of the Gaza strip
Speaker 14: and essentially getting a massive security buffer for the rest
Speaker 14: of the Palestine Arabs there, whether or not that happens,
Speaker 14: I don't know. The thing with the Israelis RITA is
Speaker 14: you hear a lot of tough talk a lot of
Speaker 14: these Israeli officials. They talk about raining fire and fire
Speaker 14: and brimstone. Then oftentimes the walk is not where the
Speaker 14: talk is there. So I personally am kind of I
Speaker 14: will believe it when I see it kind of guy
Speaker 14: when it comes to this, I think that the most
Speaker 14: palatable option in the mid to long term RITA is
Speaker 14: to get some more moderate Arab coalition of Saudis, Egyptians,
Speaker 14: Emiratis there to essentially run the strip in a non
Speaker 14: Islas fashion with Israeli military secure control of the actual
Speaker 14: physical borders. That is probably the sweet spot at where
Speaker 14: this ends up there. But as of now, the Israelitis
Speaker 14: are talking a tough game. We'll see if they live
Speaker 14: up to it.
Speaker 2: Now, we've seen recruitment numbers for the Army source since November,
Speaker 2: since the election years old, and we had a new
Speaker 2: ad featuring Pete Hegseeth and Donald Trump a drop recently
Speaker 2: and the Marine Corps. They've also have released a new
Speaker 2: ad featuring a former veteran Vice president JD. Vance, Let's
Speaker 2: have a quick look.
Speaker 18: We care about excellence, and we care about patriotism, and
Speaker 18: if you are awesome and you are a patriotic marine,
Speaker 18: that we are going to do everything that we can
Speaker 18: to make you.
Speaker 2: It's the most.
Speaker 18: Lethal fighting for us the world has ever seen. And
Speaker 18: that is what we're doing every single day. No more quotas,
Speaker 18: no more ridiculous mumbo jumbo, no more diversity training. We
Speaker 18: believe the real strength and the real diversity in the
Speaker 18: United States Marine Corps is that.
Speaker 12: You all come from every walk of life, come from
Speaker 12: every quarter of America.
Speaker 2: Josh Moraley's our recruitment numbers are certainly out. It seems
Speaker 2: the media's relentless negative campaign against administration isn't having the
Speaker 2: desire to impact, certainly not with those who are choosing
Speaker 2: to serve their country.
Speaker 14: You know, I kind of got chills down my spine
Speaker 14: watching that ad just now. Actually, I mean, how wonderful
Speaker 14: is this? I mean, turning around the military's recruitment crisis
Speaker 14: is one of the number one top goals in all
Speaker 14: of American foreign policy, domestic policy, whatever you want to
Speaker 14: call it.
Speaker 7: JD.
Speaker 14: Vance, by the way, as a former Marine himself, one
Speaker 14: of the highest ranking former Marines, former military combat veterans
Speaker 14: in American history. There, he's the perfect person to read
Speaker 14: an ad like this. So, by the way, is Pete
Speaker 14: hegg Sat. I mean, one of the reasons, reader, that
Speaker 14: I was so bullish on Pete hegg Sat as America's
Speaker 14: Defense secretary is that he's a young, telligenic, well spoken
Speaker 14: guy who has fought in numerous numerous post nine to
Speaker 14: eleven wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and so forth.
Speaker 11: There.
Speaker 2: So, when you have JD.
Speaker 14: Vance there in the vice presidential suite, when you have
Speaker 14: Pete Heggs at the Pentagon there, this is going to
Speaker 14: inspire morale. Get rid of the DEI, get rid of
Speaker 14: the wokeism there. Just make the military the world's single
Speaker 14: most ruthless efficient, the full fighting force. That's all these
Speaker 14: young recruits wants, and thank god, that's what they're getting.
Speaker 2: Well, the numbers speak for themselves. We saw this enormous
Speaker 2: surge right after the election result, and the numbers have
Speaker 2: stayed up ever since.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 2: Josh I played a clip of Stephen Miller earlier in
Speaker 2: the program refusing to accept in an interview with CNN
Speaker 2: the anchors use of incorrect terms like undocumented migrant as
Speaker 2: opposed to illegal alien or illegal immigrant. You've had some
Speaker 2: thoughts on this, I know you wrote about this for
Speaker 2: news Week. Why is it so important that conservatives push
Speaker 2: back when the left tries to use their preferred terms.
Speaker 14: So I love Stean Miller. I am a long time
Speaker 14: unabashed at Stephen Miller fan I love the fact that
Speaker 14: he is wielding so much power in the Donald Trump
Speaker 14: White House. There, but this particular fight readA is deeply important.
Speaker 14: For literally decades, has understood what both George Orwell and
Speaker 14: Saul Alinsky, the great left wing Chicago community organizer, They
Speaker 14: both preached a very similar message, which is that he
Speaker 14: who controls the language necessarily controls the discourse. You control
Speaker 14: the discourse, You control people's minds, You control how they
Speaker 14: deal and how they interpret and process reality. There, But
Speaker 14: the left uses all sorts of ridiculous euphemistic language so
Speaker 14: called gender affirming care when it comes to physical or
Speaker 14: chemical castration undocumented immigrants for illegal aliens there. You know,
Speaker 14: body the autonomy when it comes to stuhing out even
Speaker 14: a third trimester onborn child in the moom I go
Speaker 14: on and on on, essentially no matter what issue you
Speaker 14: look at. There, the left here in America has mastered
Speaker 14: the arts of the euphemistic imperative, and Stephen Miller, I
Speaker 14: think is lean is charged to fight back against it.
Speaker 14: But the onus now is on everyone else to continue
Speaker 14: this there. You cannot left the left control the terms
Speaker 14: of a discourse because when you allow them to do that,
Speaker 14: they're ultimately going to set themselves off a victory in
Speaker 14: our great cold Royal and civil war in this country.
Speaker 2: Absolutely is so important you do not see linguistic territory
Speaker 2: to the radical left, and I think conservatives have been
Speaker 2: guilty of doing that for a long time. Josh Hammah,
Speaker 2: thank you so much for your time tonight. Thank you
Speaker 2: d still to come. Meghan Markel releases footage of her
Speaker 2: twerking before giving birth. Kinsey Schofield has the details Welcome
Speaker 2: back joining me now celebrity and royal commentator Kinseyscofield Kinsey.
Speaker 2: Meghan Markle has posted a video on her Instagram account
Speaker 2: showing her and Harry dancing in the delivery room prior
Speaker 2: to her giving birth to Lily Bet four years ago.
Speaker 2: If you ever wanted to see a heavily pregnant woman twerk,
Speaker 2: then sit back and enjoy. Down Da Mama went uput
Speaker 2: down the path one month tuma, Yeah, pregnant airpen can
Speaker 2: see what's been the reaction to this very uh personal
Speaker 2: look inside the birthing unit of Harry and Meghan.
Speaker 6: Rita lyrics like prego, but I'm still doing moves like Beyonce. Yeah,
Speaker 6: I said I'm pregnant, get the child support and pay
Speaker 6: my rent.
Speaker 13: Your opinion is irrelevant because I'm a baby mama. I
Speaker 13: can do what I wanna. I mean, reaction has been wild.
Speaker 6: Meghan wasn't working, she was shaking loose what little class
Speaker 6: she had left, and rumor has it Lily came out
Speaker 6: holding a ring light and a non disclosure agreement. I've
Speaker 6: seen more dignity in a Real Housewives reunion brawl. This
Speaker 6: is literally South Park's worldwide Privacy Tour come to life
Speaker 6: delivery room, Meghan dropping it's hot.
Speaker 2: It is so you know what I thought of South
Speaker 2: Park as soon as I saw it, Because how much
Speaker 2: more intimated they want to be? How much more do
Speaker 2: they want to show us? So we're going to see
Speaker 2: videos of their wedding night next Because I wouldn't have
Speaker 2: an issue with this except they fled the country to
Speaker 2: protect their privacy. They've winched and whined incessantly about the
Speaker 2: media intrusion, and then they do this for attention. Now,
Speaker 2: Magan Mikel's not going to be attending the King's birthday
Speaker 2: celebrations next week. Highly unlikely that she would have had
Speaker 2: any official invitation, but she was. Kinsey going to be
Speaker 2: speaking as a guest of honor at a glitzy gala event.
Speaker 2: Tell me about this.
Speaker 6: Yeah, so she's speaking as the guest of honor for
Speaker 6: her work in championing women and underserved communities at the
Speaker 6: National History Museum of Los Angeles County next Saturday.
Speaker 13: This is the Native Wonder Gala.
Speaker 6: Maybe she's going to show them her dance moves on
Speaker 6: the let's fingers cry we get some more Toerking videos. However,
Speaker 6: like you said, on the same day, and King will
Speaker 6: celebrate his official birthday parade in London joined by the
Speaker 6: rest of the royal family. We're going to get those
Speaker 6: gorgeous shots on the balcony. This is Megan accepting another
Speaker 6: award for her favorite kind of service, self service. She
Speaker 6: left the Royal family for privacy, like you said, but
Speaker 6: manages to time every pr move around royal milestones like
Speaker 6: it's her job.
Speaker 13: It's become the one thing she is consistent with.
Speaker 2: Yes, wild coincidence that she has another event to coincide
Speaker 2: with an official royal engagement. Now and Insider has told
Speaker 2: The Daily Mouth that Blake Lively's text, messages, emails, phone
Speaker 2: calls to Taylor Swift are all going unanswered amid her
Speaker 2: legal battle with Justin Baldoni. What more can you tell
Speaker 2: us about this?
Speaker 13: That's right?
Speaker 6: This report says that Blake is one ignored message away
Speaker 6: from a carrier pigeon. There's so much desperation involved. She calls,
Speaker 6: she leaves voicemails, she texts, and she's sent these really,
Speaker 6: I mean they say she sent these long, groveling emails
Speaker 6: trying to explain herself to Taylor Swift.
Speaker 13: I mean, can you blame Taylor?
Speaker 6: I think that she recognizes a toxic relationship when she
Speaker 6: sees one, and she knows when.
Speaker 13: I mean, I think I've said this to you before.
Speaker 6: Taylor's been the villain, remember the Kanye and Kim versus
Speaker 6: Taylor Swift. She sees Blake in this and she wants
Speaker 6: no association. On top of that, we've recently reported that
Speaker 6: it was Taylor's father that leaked to the media that
Speaker 6: Blake had threatened to release some personal messages. You know,
Speaker 6: Taylor is trying to just cut this off before it
Speaker 6: gets worse.
Speaker 2: I can't wait until she writes an album all about
Speaker 2: Blake because this is what she does with her personal comments.
Speaker 2: It takes too Yeah, I forget about Travis because he
Speaker 2: seems to be hanging around. I was waiting for that album,
Speaker 2: but now we're going to get a BFF Gone Wrong
Speaker 2: album that'll be even better. Meanwhile, her NFL boyfriend, Travis
Speaker 2: kelce he's been accused of looking fat, but he's been
Speaker 2: on a health kick, Kinsey, this could be his last
Speaker 2: year of football.
Speaker 6: Yeah, Travis Kelcey isn't fat, He's just football feck. He's
Speaker 6: one proneteage shake away from starring in Magic Offensive Line Edition,
Speaker 6: and knowing Travis, that could actually be in the cards.
Speaker 6: Unfortunately for us, we might see that. So I feel
Speaker 6: sorry for him, And this is the kind of attention
Speaker 6: you attract when you're dating the biggest pop star in
Speaker 6: the world. But he Yeah, like you said, he's just
Speaker 6: preparing for football season.
Speaker 2: Now, let's talk about Gail King Oprah's bff. She's seventy
Speaker 2: years old, and she's revealed that she's got a renewed
Speaker 2: interest in dating, and she wants to date someone younger.
Speaker 2: I've got a say, king, See, she looks amazing for seventy.
Speaker 2: I reckon she could be dating men as young as forty?
Speaker 2: Is that too much?
Speaker 13: I mean, I bet her love life is out of
Speaker 13: this world. It's hard to date.
Speaker 6: When you tell TV cameras that you're only willing to
Speaker 6: engage with other people that have been in space, that
Speaker 6: really limits your opportunities when you say, don't bother talking
Speaker 6: to me unless you two have been to space.
Speaker 13: I don't know what forty year old.
Speaker 6: Men would have in common with this woman who's in
Speaker 6: the VIP section with Tayler Perry at Beyonce and is
Speaker 6: always hanging out with Jeff Bezos and his crew, hangs
Speaker 6: out with Oprah and Steadman. But I mean, maybe she
Speaker 6: could be somebody's sugar mama.
Speaker 13: I could see that. I could see the opportunities there.
Speaker 2: Why not? You know what is that? She's an astronaut?
Speaker 2: Just ask her Cansi Scofield, thank you so much for
Speaker 2: your time tonight. And that's it from me up. Next
Speaker 2: is news not I'll see you tomorrow night for lifties
Speaker 2: losing it at nine