WEBVTT - Inside the mind of a serial killer: Dr. Ann Burgess Pt.2

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>detective sy aside of life. The average person is never

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>exposed her I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years I was catching killers.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to part two of my chat with doctor

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>an Bergers, who is a legend amongst law enforcement agencies

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>across the globe, particularly with those detectives responsible for investigating

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>murders and serial offenders. If you miss part one, we're

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about how doctor Burger's skills developed as a psychiatric

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>nurse and evolved into her working with the FBI, developing

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a process of understanding the mind of serial killers and

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>profiling criminals in order to understand and most importantly, catch killers.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Doctor an Burgers, Welcome.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Back, Welcome, glad to be back.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, At the risk of embarrassing myself, I'm going to

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>let you into a little little secret here. Early in

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>my career as a homicide detective, I'd read John Douglas's

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>book Mind Hunter, and quite often myself and my partner

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time, Paul Jacob, we'd be standing at murder

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>scenes going what would John Douglas do in this situation?

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>In that what I liked about it, and bearing in

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>mind we're talking thirty years ago. I'd read the book

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but what I took away from it was you've got

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to be proactive in the way that you approach an investigation.

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And I see failings of homicide investigations. I see where

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>people saw the stand, they gather the evidence, everyone's trying

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to solve the murder, but they're not proactive in their

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking and the way of initiating things happening in the

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>crime scene. And I remember, like John Douglas away that

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>or the things that I picked up from that book

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and other literature that i'd read at the time, was

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>about the strategy that's required when dealing with the media,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because most killers, and this is in my experience, do

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>listen to the media, and when they've committed a crime,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they're fascinated. And back in the day it was the

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>front page paper or the evening news when stories were broken,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they'd be fascinated by what the detectives were saying. And

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>my biggest criticism of police and the use of media

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>is where I see someone standing there at police officer,

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>usually a senior police officer, standing there going We've got

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>no idea what's happened. There's no witnesses, there's no forensic

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>evidence and whatever. And I'm thinking, if I was a crook,

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if I was a suss go, I'd be sitting there going, yes, great,

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>if I keep my mouth shut, I get away of it.

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your thoughts on strategies and the use of the

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>media when you're investigating investigating crimes.

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, we looked into this, and interestingly enough, when you

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 2>go way back to Jaker Hoover, who was one of

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the first directors of the FBI, one of the things

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 2>he felt very strongly that he wanted to make a

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>wanted to influence the media. He had several of his

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 2>agents assigned to that task, and what they would do

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 2>is to play to the media. They would send if

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 2>they knew a birthday or an anniversary, they'd send cards,

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 2>they said, always would say things. So they really use

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the media in a very positive way. And he knew

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 2>that the way that the media portrayed them had a

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 2>lot to do with their public approval, so that was

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>very useful. So that's where I would say that John

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Douglas really and Bob Rustler knew how to play the

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>media and felt that that was very important in any

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of a an investigation they were doing. That was

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 2>one I would say one of them, and John was

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 2>very good at being able to engage the media and

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to you know, get the information out, so the media

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>felt a part of it. It was really having them

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>work with them. They realized they couldn't catch suspects all

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 2>by themselves sometimes so that they had to that and

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 2>that John Joe Barcase was an excellent example of that,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 2>where they made it very clear that the community had

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>to all be on board to catch this this person.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's one of their story. I think that's one

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>of their strongest points that the two agents had and

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>they taught that to their junior ones coming along.

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I you said, I'm just trying to think

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of examples that used the media. And a high profile

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>case I was investigating, it's still unsolved and it basically

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>cost me my career was the abduction of three year

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>old William Tyrell, a young boy dressed in a spider

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Man suit, from his grandparents' house on a small rural

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>town dead end street ten years ago. This crime occurred

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>when I took over the investigation. This was sort of

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>five months after his disappearance. A couple of things that

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I did. I made a call that when I took

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it over, I said, it's a homicide lead investigation because

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there was speculation that was missing adventure. I wanted to

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on the perpetrator by it's homicide. Looking at

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it now, we're not looking at We're not going to

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>forget about this. And there weren't that many places in there,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So I said, anyone that was in a square kilometer

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and had a map of the area from where William

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>disappeared that now hasn't come forward, I'd be wondering why

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>you haven't come forward? Makes me very suspicious. Why you

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't come forward because we did canvases, door knocks and

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>public appeals and all that. The other strategy in that

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:12.239
<v Speaker 1>particular investigation, and this was in consultation with doctor Sarah

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Ull as well, we got a million dollar reward for

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone that had information. That was the first time a

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>million dollar reward had been announced. Would you agree with

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that type of approach? Do you see there's benefits in

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that type of approach.

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 2>I would agree with that. The other when you have

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a child. It reminds me of a case in which

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the wrestler did is he said, we need to talk

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 2>with the mother because maybe he felt the suspect was

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 2>going to get in touch with her. And he did,

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 2>and he tried to she's alive and I've taken her

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 2>here there and all that, And so the mother was

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>able to on the anniversary. This was the case that

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>really dragged out. Actually they thought that they knew who

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 2>it was, and she said, I've been waiting for you

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>to call and took such surprise, you know, in other words,

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>use the technique that she didn't know necessarily if it was,

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 2>but but just saying waiting for you to call with

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>a great statement to be able to say and that's

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>what Bob.

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>That's yeah, that subtleness of it, but yeah, very powerful,

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>powerful way of encouraging.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's another way that you can use media. You

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>can find out, especially when you have a child that

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>you've got access to to a grantic and you know,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>trying to and if you engage them and say this

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>is the way that we can, you can you can

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>help us. In other words, you can can and that

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>empowers them to be able to want to work with

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you rather than fight you or you know how sometimes

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 2>people get annoyed with the media and so forth. You

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 2>don't want that. So and and they they played it

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 2>along and it got so that he actually broke down

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>with This was the I think this is the Meyerhoff case,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the early cases that Bob worked on that worked.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 2>That works in another one they were able to they

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>couldn't figure out where the suspect would know about. It

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>was a missing teenager, I think, And it turned out

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 2>that it was the man that was babysitting the house

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>or watching the house, and he had written down a note.

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 2>They looked at the paper and realized there's indentation on

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>it and were able to get phone number. And that's

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 2>how they tracked them down, so that was another contact.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>So there are all these little techniques that media is.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>If you don't have any other suspects media, you've got

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>to try media or try some of these other strategies.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because I bought into that, and I can

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.719
<v Speaker 1>attribute it back to reading John Douglas's book about the

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>use of the media, and there's other places that know,

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to use the media, and I just say,

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a tool. There was another interesting case. I wasn't

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>involved in it, but friends of mine were involved in.

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It was a ripe in a very violent rape in

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>a small country town. Talking to a couple of hundred people.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>They put a question there out in the town and

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on what do you think should happen to the person

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>if we catch this person? There was yeah, two hundred

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and ninety nine responses going, you know, you should be

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>doing time, blah blah blah. And there was one response, well,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone makes mistakes and get reguards and guess who the

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>person was. Oh look, oh look something standing out there

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>right right?

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, well we're using social media.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Now, yeah, well you'll have to buy into that, yes, yep, Now.

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 2>That's really important and I saw. I have my undergraduate

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 2>students watching the social media and especially if they get

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>a suspect that we try to right away get the

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 2>information and run it through AI to see if we

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 2>can learn something. Because it's pretty clear that they have

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 2>to tell someone and they can brag about it, there

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 2>is that need to not keep it so secret, and

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>so they do social media. That's a new technique. I

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>think that's very, very useful.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's something that we've got to got to adopt

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>now because the power of the media is shifting to

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that social media side, isn't it to get to get

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>that message out. It's definitely something that we've got to embrace.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And I want to talk about AI. But a little

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later, if we could crime scenes? What

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the what the crime scenes to you? Because I find

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that another fascinating part of being a detective, interpreting the

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.719
<v Speaker 1>crime scene, taking your time to really taking what you're

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing and get a sense of what we're what we're

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing with here.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Right Well, the crime scene, of course, is I think

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely critical. So you can get you can certainly

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 2>get evidence. Douglas was very good at just going to

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>a crime scene and getting a feel as he would

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 2>say about what happened and what he would he would say,

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>you have to walk in the shoes of the killer

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>to really understand it. And I think that's true because

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 2>you get so familiar with cases and so just looking

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 2>at it that it's where they will take time just

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 2>to try to think of where was he? Where was

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the victim? Because you do have a victim. That's why

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the victimology is so critical. And what position is she

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and what what might she be saying? Did she struggle?

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Was there? You know, how was she located? How was

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 2>she targeted? Where did they encounter each other? Just a

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions, So get in the line of the

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 2>investigator how this happened and why it happened, Why was

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 2>she targeted? Why did she become a victim? And I

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>think that's a one eighty degree turned from the way

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>it used to be. Where, Oh, she shouldn't have been there,

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 2>she shouldn't have been out walking. What does she think

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>was going to? You know, the blaming of the victim?

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately a lot of it started. You got to go

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>back to say where was he or where was the killer?

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 2>You know, what was he doing?

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And on that blame blaming the victim. And I'm sure

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you again, probably the work that you did change that

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking too that yeah, it's and I think society has

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>moved on and we understand better, not just law enforcement,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know the comments, well, she shouldn't have been

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>out late at night and those and the impact that

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that has on victims, making them feel like they're they're

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to blame for the crime. And you would have seen

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>it as I saw it, dealing with victims where no

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>matter the circumstances, it always crosses their mind that they're

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>at fault, or even the families of murdered victims are

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>blaming themselves should have done something. And I'm always at

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>pain to explain, no, you're the victim here, you're you're

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>not not the offender. Don't blame lay the blame there.

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Linking crimes. So, and we talked in Part one a

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that and experiences I've had over here

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in New South Wales. The courts we've got tendency and

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>coincidence evidence. So if we're trying to if there's a

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>serial rapists, we're looking at tendency and coincidence evidence. If

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a certain type of crime, the mannerisms in which that

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>crime has been committed and then put that person before court.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Instead of charging the person with perhaps five offenses, we

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>might put ten offenses on him because the other crimes

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>are so strikingly similar. Can you talk us your understanding

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and your knowledge of what you look for when you're

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to determine if crimes are linked.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, the linking of crimes was something that I remember

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Bary Hazel would spend a lot of time on looking.

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 2>He would take he had to have a case where

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 2>there are at least ten crimes, and he would look

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>at the first, the middle, and the last crime and

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 2>see what were the common themes there. And that's what

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of his research was because he was interested

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in Sometimes it changed, as I said before, the m

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 2>OL change, the method of operation change, but not necessarily

0:13:55.280 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 2>the signature. So the linkage part sick is the age?

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 2>What is there a certain age? Is a certain gender?

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>You know? Is it a child? Is it an adolescent?

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Is it a because that will give you some idea

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>of what age you're looking for. Also, race is important

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>because more likely than not it's going to be same race.

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 2>It's it doesn't have to be, but if you want

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 2>just more than fifty percent it's going to be that.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 2>So that can give you that the age of the

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>person you're looking for, the gender, the race. Then then

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 2>you would look if you're at the crime scene, then

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be able to look and see what

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>was the weapon. But weapon doesn't weapon. They can use

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 2>multiple weapons, so weapon isn't always a good indicator, but

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>it will tell you if it was hands, you know,

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 2>blunt force trauma, or whether it was gone or a knife.

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Certain cultural groups tend to, you know, use we always

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 2>go back to the Mad Bomber. I don't know that

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>case anyway that profile that it would because he would

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>be Middle Eastern because they tended to use bombs, and

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 2>this was now bomber. Obviously he was in New York

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 2>City buying, so sometimes that he would even be able

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>to be that precise, and then the personality features. Isn't

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>that clean? Crimes in the deep pickup thing nick it

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the way that kind of thing.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I would look at the crime scenes, including where the body,

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes the body is not where the actual murder

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>has occurred, but whether a weapon was introduced, if it

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>was brought there, or there's some planning that's gone into it.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>The way the body is disposed of. Quite often that

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily have to be a serial killing, but

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I can see where there's a panic in the way

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that the body's been disposed of. So the crime that's

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>telling me that the crime it wasn't planned, it escalated.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>So you're looking for something that triggered that and the

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>way that the body has been disposed of, because quite

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>often that's that's the unraveling of the offender, because it's

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they leave a trial like tracking an elephant through the

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>snowl What what do you look at in terms of

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the way the body is disposed of and the injuries

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to the body. So digging deep into that, what type

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of thing are you looking at to there?

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that any bruising that you see, it's

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be anger. I mean I something has triggered

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>either it's somebody else and he's using this as what

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 2>we call a displacement. He's angry why it's then so

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 2>he takes it out on this other person. Elderly victims

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>are often being a substitute for somebody that they knew

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>in their childhood. That's an unusual Although there's a lot

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>of crime against the elderly physical. I think the other

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>important factor is that you mentioned is whether the body

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>was moved, how long did they spend with the body?

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 2>That's important, and that's going to give you a lot

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 2>of the fantasy and that you can pretty much figure

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 2>out what is going on in the mind. If you

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 2>think it's a fantasy, usually it is and a sexual homicide.

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 2>He's acting out something's not over and over, So that's important.

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>What else, let's see whether it's been is it posed

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 2>as the body posed? The other thing is is it

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 2>just discarded? Is it just dumped as a word that

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 2>they said, just by the side of the road, in

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 2>other words, just discarded to no emotional attachment of any

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 2>kind is there? And or is that just showing what

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 2>he thinks of that type of person. I'm just going

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 2>to give you an example that I thought in determining

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the size, the size of the offender, if he's big, tall, whatever.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>And then on the Joe Bet case, the first boy

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.479
<v Speaker 2>was just left right kind of off the road. The

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 2>second body was found inside the forest and woods. And

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 2>what was important there is there are two footprints going

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 2>set of footprints going in, only one coming back. So

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 2>what that said, Yeah, so what that said is that

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 2>he was not able to carry the victim in, so

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>he marched him in, did what he did to him,

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and then came up.

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I like that again, good detective work. Yeah, it seems simple,

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>but these are the little things that can be missed.

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think I spent some time in the early

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>hours of the morning with someone trying to show me

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>where he disposed of a body ten years before. And

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we pulled up there. It's dark, it was in the

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>National Park, and he walked in a certain distance and

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>he walked hundreds of meters or one hundred and fifty meters,

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a long way to carry a body. He was, genuinely,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe, trying to tell us where he disposed of

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the body in a shallow grave. We had no success.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>We searched the area that he indicated, and then we

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>tried something. We put him in the actual car that

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>he was driving at the time. We managed to get

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>access to that at the time he was disposing of

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the body, and we put a manequin. The rescue squad

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>uses eighty kilos. It's the weight of a body, a

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>limp body, put it in the boot of the car,

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>drove down to the location and then said to him, look,

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we've got something in the boot. You show us how

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you where you think you took this body in the dark,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in the bush, and how difficult it was, And that

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>made him sort of rethink about the distance in which

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>he carried it and it was in fact not one

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred meters in from the road, that was only about

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty five meters in from the road.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, very good.

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I look at homicide. Some homicides are very simple

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to solve. The more difficult ones. I look at opportunity, capability,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and motive. There are three factors that I fit him

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>got You might have literally hundreds of persons of interest,

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and I look at opportunity, I can tick that off

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy. If the person's in prison, they haven't committed

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that crime, right. Capability looking at is this person capable

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>physically capable of committing the crime? Or does this person

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>have access to the type of weapons? So that's sort

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of a little bit more subjective. That motive is always.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Motive is the one that is always. I think motive

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>points you in the direction when you're looking for a suspect.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>What's your thoughts on motive, Because if one person understands motive,

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it would be you.

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean that that's crucial. Now you don't

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 2>have to prove it in court, but they always want

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you to, right.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, they want the faction in the narrative. Yeah.

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they don't want you going the course. I don't

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 2>any idea why he did this. I mean, that's the

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>last thing that you want to say. You want to

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 2>have some idea or at least have some what we

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 2>call hypotheses that are that are going to be plausible

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 2>that or he will understand. Yeah, because a lot of

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>times they may say this is just a horrible murder

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 2>because maybe there's been dismemberment. Dismemberment can sometimes be because

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 2>they can't carry the body, they can't get it to

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 2>another place. And that's so it's it's more of a

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 2>practical motive, if you will, of why that happened, rather

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 2>than any deep seated psychological rationale. Because I did a

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 2>case like that where he it was he had really

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 2>cut the body up and he just left he just

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 2>left it all because he couldn't. He tried putting him

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 2>in bags, and I mean it was so I always

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>remember that to say, don't go beyond any un reasonable

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 2>explanation kind of thing. So I think that that's really

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 2>really important as a motive, is that we have four

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>categories of motive. The first one is criminal enterprise. Is

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>this something that like a hit or an insurance killing,

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 2>or something that's going to be more gun weapon kind

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 2>of thing, or is it The biggest category is more

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 2>the personal cause, in other words, is this personal to

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 2>the person. They are about fourteen categories there of whether

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 2>it's vene or whether it's not sexual, sexual as a whole,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 2>separate unit. And then the fourth is group cause. But

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 2>the personal cause, as I said, we have about twelve

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 2>or fourteen categories that to the person, and I think

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 2>they make sense. It could be domestic, it could be

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 2>a variety of others. But that's why we do the

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 2>studies we're doing. We're doing one now on Indigenous murdered

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>and missing men and comparing them to a group we've

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 2>done on women. Why did they do this in their culture?

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 2>So I do think that that's something that's really important

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 2>to do to get that motive.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's interesting and the understanding that you're given

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and people quite often they want it all tied up

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in a bow. This is what's happened, and this is

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the motive. And again I learned a lot from dealings

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>with Sarah Yule in that and even reference to the

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>William Tyrell case that she said, the person that's committed

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this crime mightn't even know why they've committed this crime. So,

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's really hard to nail down the motive

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>on the crime like that a three year old child.

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The public wanted all to be a pedophile, a scary person.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>That seems to be what the public perceived if a

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>three year old child's disappeared. But Sarah was always at

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>pains to point out to me when we're working the

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>case that the person responsible for the case mightn't even

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>know why.

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 2>They may not know why. That was in mind Hunter,

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 2>that was one of the cases that they did and

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Mighty Russell. They so they said, we're here to study

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 2>men and why they do what they do. And he says,

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 2>I hope you can tell me why I did what

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I did. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's great, very honest.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, you get you sit down in an interview room

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're interviewing someone and they've got all the detail

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and why did you do it? I'm not really sure

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, fascinating, fascinating, fascinating will serial killing and mass

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>killings I'm thinking here and I haven't got the facts

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and figures in front of me, but mass killing seem

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>to be more prominent than serial killing in current current times.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you is that something that you're a trend that

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you've seen or.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's what I said. You're right that serial killings.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 2>That's why I think we don't hear about them. I

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>don't think they're being done as much as that more

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>people are moving into mass shootings, especially shootings, which makes

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 2>every bit at risk. You know, you can be out

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 2>of the grocery store, or you could be in the

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 2>mall and you've got mass shooting and everybody gets hit.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's I think it's it's a very much more

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 2>fearful for the average person than the cereal Most people think, well,

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think any I'm going to encounter or any

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 2>serial killer, because they usually try to get some kind

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>of conversation going, you know, and some kind of relationship,

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 2>whereas a mass shooting doesn't. It's all very impersonal.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And what in the work that you can do, like

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I know over here for that type of the lone

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>wolf situation ideology where there's ideology crossing too, you know action,

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what type of views do you have on the prevention

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of that type of crime.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, right now you're venturing into an area we're looking

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 2>at and that's a school shooter. We're having a terrible

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 2>school shooter, and so we almost think that's a separate

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 2>We're looking at a whole data set to see if

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 2>we can justify that the it's separate from a weight

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 2>supremist or an extremist or an insult that there's something

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>unique there. So we've got about thirty cases we're going

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to look at and run through AI to see if

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 2>we can come up with something because I think you're

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>onto something and we're onto it too.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that would be interesting if you see a pattern

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 1>emerging and you look back when the crime's being committed,

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and you look back and you think red flag, red flag,

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>red flag. But to stop that happening, we've got to

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>identify the seriousness of the offense of I think Laura

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Richard's made the point with stalking. If someone's been in

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>a relationship and he's being stalked by a person that

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they've been in an intimate relationship with and that person

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>then makes a threat to kill that person. There's a

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>fifty to fifty chance that'll be carried out, so we

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>look at yes. So I always thought stalking was a

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>really dangerous crime that we didn't jump on with the

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>full weight of the law that needed or given the importance,

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>because I think it tells me something about the mindset

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>of a person that's prepared to stalk another person.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's very dangerous, and I'm doing a case right now.

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Quadruple killing horrible. And it was so clear it was

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 2>sexual jealousy that we're not sure was even possible that

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 2>she We haven't had any confirmation and we won't because

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 2>of course she was murdered. But this whole matter, when

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 2>you look at a pattern that's a common pattern in

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 2>these domestic killings, that it's it's a paranoia, is suspicious

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>that the partner is having, you know, some kind of

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 2>affair with somebody else. So that is really I would

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 2>agree that it's very and it's hard to stop. You

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 2>can't stop it. The only way you stop it is

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>you can't in any way encourage it, and you have

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to almost disappear. In that particular case, he had done

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>that to an earlier partner, and she were two years,

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 2>went underground nobody, she gave her information out, didn't let

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 2>anybody know where she was. That's what it took for her.

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 2>And then of course he then gets into this other

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 2>relationship and he ends up killing and killing anybody that

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 2>was guarding her. That was you know, she had a

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>detective order out. I mean, she did everything that she

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 2>possibly could.

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I look, we've had a spate of domestic related murders,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and quite often it's that jilted lover or jilted partner

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and ends up in someone being killed. We've had a

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>real spade of them at the moment in this country.

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think we've got to start. We're changing. We're

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>bought in new legislation coercive control, which I think is

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a step in the right direction. And that's because police

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>hands were tied in that you'd turn up to a

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>domestic situation where there hasn't been the physical assault. What

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>can we charge this person with now? Coercive control because

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>again indicators that lead up to the eventual act, which

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>tends to be a very violent, violent crime.

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure. Well, the other thing, just to go back to

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 2>that case, that I'm working on now. Sheeve was so

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 2>scared she wanted to carry a little knife to protect herself,

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 2>and because she was on probation for another matter, they said, no,

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 2>you can't have it. She might have been able to

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 2>have protected herself when he comes in because he changes weapons,

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>he changes from gun to knife, so the personal the

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 2>use of a knife is so much more personal, and

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 2>you might have been able to pull that in and

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 2>saved herself. So it's awful.

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Another question I want I want to ask you that

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I get asked a lot, and I think you've got

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot more you know, understanding of it than myself.

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Nature or nurture, like people often often raise that with me,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.479
<v Speaker 1>is a homicide to take the Do you think it

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was the environment or do you think that will bone that? Why? What?

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>What's your what's your type natural nurture.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that it's genetic. I don't that there's

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 2>any genetic link. But they've grown up in an atmosphere.

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 2>If they've grown up in an atmosphere where there is

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 2>role modeling, if you will uh that that can be

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 2>very dangerous and that they can they can learn, you know,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 2>it's what we kind of call from a learning if

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 2>they've been abuse, say, our father can be very aggressive

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 2>and very physically damaging to his son, and especially if

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 2>he's targeted as the favored child, not favor necessarily positively

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that I think environment is very very important. As to

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the nature part, I think not so much. But they've

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 2>never had I've never seen any studies that have compermed it.

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 2>It's a very would be very hard to do that.

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 2>So I'm much more that the environment, environment, and especially

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the people that they are around. Yeah, and that they

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 2>themselves have been traumatized in some way that has stuck

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 2>with them. Don't forget. We use the theory that it's

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 2>a fantasy that gets nurtured and kind of acted out

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's got to come from somewhere, and that it

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 2>could come from something that happened to them, and that

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that's a way that they're expressing it.

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I had I'm not sure if you're familiar with

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the work of James Fallon, the neuroscientists that did pet

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>scans of the people that were considered psychopaths, including some

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>serial killers. He made the observation he did pet scans

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>on the brains and the frontal cortex or whatever and

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly I'm not a brain expert, but said there was

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a pattern that he would see in people that have

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>been identified as psycho paths, and he needed something to

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>cross reference the study, so he got a PET scan

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>done of his own brain and other people he knew

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>he had the same predisposition of some of the psychopaths

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that whose brains that pet scan was done on. But

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he came to the conclusion. I found this interesting. He

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>came to the conclusion that his environment that he grew

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>up in those nurturing years from birth to the age

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of three, those crucial years, was in a loving, caring environment.

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And then he's looking at these other ones that have

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>acted out as a psychopath as he would think and

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>turned into the trust killers have grown up in that

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>traumatic environment when there wasn't love, there wasn't nurturing and

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>all that. And so that his take on it was

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>almost like a combination, and it seemed to make sense

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>what he was saying there, and it ties into what

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you're saying about the environment having a part in.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 2>It, right right. I just think it's critical, and the

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 2>trauma piece is critical too. But I think that if

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 2>he's got some good research that you can't ignore it.

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 2>That's really good. That's an addition to the feit.

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, well it was. It was interesting. You've mentioned

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a AI a lot, and yeah, I'd like to think

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I embraced technology. I'm coming along to that thinking I've

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>recently started to delve into AI and a lot of

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I'm doing, and I keep reflecting back, and

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been out of the police for four or so

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>years and I'm reflecting back. How handy that would be.

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You've referenced a lot. Can you just talk to us

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>about how you're using AI and what you're seeing in

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>contemporary law enforcement, how they're using AI these days.

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're using it, mister Whitskoll, machine learning because it

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>is the machine computer is a machine and we're looking

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 2>at what we call topic modeling that when you enter,

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 2>you put in the data, you're going to get patterns

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 2>that come out. Now, we talked, we've talked about a

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 2>lot patterned. But this doesn't like in five minutes where

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 2>we might have taken five years. We did that a

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 2>comparison with a group out in Kansas, and we said,

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 2>you send us and we do this for a threat assessment,

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, Leice will get in somebody saying I'm going

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to blow up a building or I'm going to kill somebody,

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's really scary and they have to decide. So

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I said, send us a case as much data as

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you can, and we'll run it through our algorithm. And

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 2>they did, and it took fifteen minutes. We sent back back.

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 2>What we found as terms of this is it was

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 2>a serious case where they weren't sure if this guy

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 2>was crazy quote quote or whether he was really going

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 2>to kill somebody, and they had decided that it was

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 2>not a threat, so we ran it took fifteen minutes.

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 2>They had taken almost fifteen months to look at it.

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 2>They the poor woman that collapse you' I can't believe

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you did in fifteen minutes, but came up with many

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>of you. I felt badly for her, but it came

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 2>with the other kinds of things that they hadn't thought of.

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 2>So we sent it back to them and said, maybe

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:21.399
<v Speaker 2>you better keep this and if he gives you another threat,

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 2>because he had given the multiple threats, this wasn't just

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 2>slated one, that maybe you should take it seriously and

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 2>let us know if there's anything. So that was just

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 2>an example of how fast we were able to drub

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the material that they had taken so long. So it's

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 2>wonderful if you've got a large amount of data that

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 2>you want to look at very quickly and if you

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 2>get the right algorithm, I mean that that's your key.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 2>You've got to have that, and then it just whips

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 2>through the data. So we've looked at twenty three murderers manifestos,

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 2>some of them you know Rogers, any of the they're

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 2>on the lists. And now when we get a case,

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 2>we could run the single case as comparison to the

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 2>thirty twenty three that we have, and that will tell

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 2>us what we're looking for. The whole thing is are

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 2>they telling the truth? That's our next step is when

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 2>we get data or they do an interview, are they

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 2>telling us the truth? They're version of the truth. That's

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 2>our next step. We have to come up with the algorithm. There.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 2>We're going to take some court testimony that was done

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 2>under oath. People'll start with the Menendez case and see

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 2>whether they were the truth kind of thing. So that's

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 2>where it's going.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It's something that we have to doing. Bryce, isn't I

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>started in homicide and it was CODs that was. Yeah,

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>there was CODs that we alphabetically the suspects information and

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>all that and where we've got to now.

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, we have to go with it. I don't

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 2>think we can ignore it. I mean, everybody is into

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 2>it so and it's it should be not fun, but

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 2>it should be looked at as just another tool, another technique,

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and we shouldn't say have going to do it.

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it make sense reflecting on your career, some

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of the people that you've come into contact with, and

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>there was I had a quote losing the paperwork here,

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 1>but I had a quote from when you first started

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>hearing the interviews that John Douglas and the team we're

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>doing with some of the nia notorious serial killers, like

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>eavesdropping on the rawest fringes of humanity. What can you

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that would have been fascinating. What are

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the people that or some of the cases

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you've looked at that you you just you think memorable,

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>not for any particular reason, but just things that have

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>stood that to you in the time that you've been

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 1>working in the field, that you have.

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's one of the things I always wondered about,

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 2>but maybe I shouldn't is. And again I go back

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 2>to Joe Bart. He was classic for that. He was

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 2>one of our first is. They would do the horrendous

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 2>killing and then they might go and have dinner, or

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 2>have breakfast, or go to sleep. You know, it was like,

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 2>oh nothing, It didn't seem to impact on them. And

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 2>I remember Joe Bert saying in the interview we did

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 2>with him, he said, you know, that's what the prosecutor said,

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 2>is how callous could it be? And he said it

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 2>was so they admitted. I think that gets to your

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 2>point about the psychopathic quality that they don't have any empathy.

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 2>They're unable. So is that something that is genetic nature

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 2>versus do they just learn it or do they so

0:38:56.040 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 2>cold to it? But that's what Kemper'd say, that they

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 2>would go home and sleep, I remember, or they would

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 2>talk about how hard it was to kill someone, that

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 2>that it took a lot of energy. Oh yeah, no,

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean we have a horrible case here up in

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Idaho Univerversity where this one person killed four young women,

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:24.439
<v Speaker 2>three women and a man. He did it all within

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 2>a very short time. I mean that took a lot

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of They haven't had the trial yet. They have a suspect,

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 2>but that takes a lot of energy and a lot

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 2>of time, and I don't think we think in those

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 2>terms that we should be more just very very logical

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 2>about it and how can they do that? You know,

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 2>that's always been when you say, what would surprise me?

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 2>That that that is, that's that did, what they would

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 2>do afterwards, or that how they would keep the souvenirs

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and what they would do with them, And it was

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 2>just no can of what that meant to the family

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 2>or what that meant, you know, it did that was

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 2>used to that.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 1>The bt K killer. What were you dealings or understanding

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we've that particular case and that particular person.

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, it was needing to know that. I needed

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>to know that. And when and doing other interviews, we

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 2>would ask the same thing, what did you do right after?

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 2>That was a new question. A lot of times they

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 2>weren't thinking about that. Obviously, they were thinking about was

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 2>there any evidence left or something to make their case.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 2>But this is a more human kind of psychological thing

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 2>of what kind of behavior do they show and then

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 2>how fast would they do another crime? Because we were

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 2>looking at cases and the escalation is clearly there. I

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 2>think That's another major point that we found is that

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 2>how fast the escalation when was one victim not enough?

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 2>I think the other thing is when there would be

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 2>multiple victims at the same time, How did that happen?

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Number one case, two little girls or two seven year

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 2>old girls and they're both dead and post how did

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 2>one person do it? It turned out, and it took

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 2>a long time. He did two more murders before able

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 2>to finally. He would always read first until finally one

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 2>read victim survived, and that's how they're able to get.

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>The nature of the crimes that seen in your time.

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I was always at pains without understanding

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the depth of the psychology of it than the mindset

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of the people as you do. But I was always

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at pains when I'm doing briefings on murder investigations and

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>people would go, but why would you do this if

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you've done that? And I would say, you're trying to

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>put a rational thought into an irrational action or an

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>irrational mindset, because because I used to get frustrated where

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you talk about hypothesis and you're sitting around the briefing

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 1>room and you're going, Okay, maybe this happened, but I

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.479
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have because he made a phone call ten minutes later.

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking, you're giving the rational thought to a

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>totally irrational act or crime. Do you subscribe to my

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 1>thought process there?

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 2>And absolutely you said it perfectly, You absolutely did. Is

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that How can we in our logic make sense out

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:31.879
<v Speaker 2>of it?

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 2>You can't. That's why we've got to get into what

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 2>is driving that thought? What is driving it? Because the

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 2>thought is what drives the behavior. So we have to

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>get into the thought. Not that we know what he did, right,

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 2>We know what he did, we know the act, but

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 2>we don't know the thought.

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Interesting, Interesting, getting how do we get to that? Interesting?

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Getting your take on it. The other thing that's come up,

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>or two things I'll just a touch on these. A

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:06.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people that you've dealt with, and I've

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>seen it in my own investigation career, that upbringing in

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the resentment to the mother, the bond between what turns

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>out to be this killer and what's taken place with

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the mother. It seems to come up time and time again.

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Thoughts on that situation, well, the mother.

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And the father, the whole issue of parenting. It was

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 2>interesting in the study, you know, we did thirty six

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 2>serial killers. But what we found is that very often

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the family would disrupt around when the boy was around

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 2>adolescent and at a very critical time, I think for

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 2>not only boys, girls too, And so they would always

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 2>complain about the mother and they had always wanted to

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 2>be with the father. Well, the problem was the father

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 2>deserted them, right, he was the absent father. So then

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 2>they only have the mother to blame. So I would

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 2>often get annoyed early on. We would talk about the

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Domino mothers. Well, she was the only parent. She had

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 2>to be both mother and father and discipline. And I said,

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 2>they have no appreciation.

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense, you know.

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think we I wanted people to be a

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 2>little careful about what they said about the bad mother,

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 2>because I think it was unfair in some cases. No,

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe not all cases, but certainly in some cases. And

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 2>some mothers tried to do the right thing. They saw

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 2>their son having this odd behavior and they would take

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 2>them to the psychiatrists, and a psychiatrist would say, oh,

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 2>he'll grow out of it, he's just it's just that

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>lesson thing. Well that's no help, you know, And and

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 2>so what would I try to do? This is the

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 2>other area that I think we have to pay more

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 2>attention to is how to help people who get these cases,

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 2>whether they're clinicians or social workers, whatever they are, is

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to pay attention to it and get some consultation. In

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 2>other words, if you can't answer, and you really think

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 2>that this is odd, but you don't know what to say,

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 2>there are plenty of people that will be happy to

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 2>do a consult you know, I do them all the

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 2>time to help people, just to you know, this is

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 2>this bad behavior, is this dangerous behavior, or is this

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:19.240
<v Speaker 2>behavior that will resolve, you know, by the next couple

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 2>of years. Well, that's really important because people don't know

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 2>to how to handle the young adolescent. The emerging adult,

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 2>I think is the correct term we should use now.

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, and you quite rightly identified that that's such

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a crucial stage in development, isn't it where life can

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:39.959
<v Speaker 1>go off in different directions that that lescence stage.

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 2>And hormones are changing. We cannot deny that fast grown

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 2>is going certainly for the young male. And that's that's

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 2>that which is aggression, right, It's normal, So we shouldn't

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 2>be afraid of it. If it gets off on the

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 2>wrong track, we better be careful. We have a lot

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>of cases here in the States where the parents and

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the schools get concerned and they won't do anything. They've

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 2>got to do something. They can't put guns, give their

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:10.439
<v Speaker 2>kids guns.

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I really because we're watching from this country and

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we're just horrified with the school shooting. So I think

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's fantastic that you're looking into that aspect of it,

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's just got it's got to stop. It's horrendous,

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 1>such a horrendous, horrendous crime. The people that ingratiate themselves

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>into investigations, that's another thing that I've seen, whether it's

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>a murder investigation or it could be something at a

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>lower level. People that and I've always thought it's just

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a curiosity they want to know what's in or they're

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>reflecting on their crime. Look at all the drama I've cause,

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>did you encounter that a lot during during your studies

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and your work.

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Trying to think of whether there certainly was a great

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 2>deal of what we call narcissism, kind of taking pride

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 2>in these horrible things that they were doing. So I

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 2>think that that plays a bril in it that I

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know how much that plays into their denial. You

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 2>know how many chapels say, oh, I don't know why

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 2>I did what I did. Well, yeah, maybe you do

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 2>know what you did and you're just saying that that's

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 2>what we have to get at. But I do think

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 2>that there is the narcissism that they I can think

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 2>of a number of cases where they did it because

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 2>they felt they were entitled to be able to do

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 2>it and get away with it. I think the boldness.

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I've had a couple of cases, just in rape cases

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 2>where the boldness has astounded me that they felt they

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 2>could just get away with it.

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:46.399
<v Speaker 1>They didn't what was that base on the tournament or

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 1>just they.

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 2>We had we had a case where the the it

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 2>was a rape and he liked elderly women. He went

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 2>into a hospital and he went on the eighth floor.

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 2>He got a victim and when the nurse came and

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 2>said who are you and he said, I'm a nursing student.

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he lied, And then he goes to the

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 2>seventh floor and that time he says that he's a

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:15.799
<v Speaker 2>family member. This is like one in the morning, so yeah,

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 2>very quiet, and he gets to the sixth floor before

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 2>finally security comes, and what does he do with security.

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 2>He said, he drives a hit him. He have saltson.

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I mean that.

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 2>That boldness, isn't it in the hospital.

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, you've touched on one of our states most notorious

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>serial killers, and a lot of people that I worked

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.280
<v Speaker 1>with worked the case was the granny killer and murdered

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>six women and all elderly ladies living in a certain

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 1>area in Sydney, a fairly affluent area in Sydney. And

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he was They got on to him because he was

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 1>a pie salesman and he went to a nursing home

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and was sexually assaulted one of the elderly victims. And

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that sort of a lot more layers to it than that,

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:08.919
<v Speaker 1>but that led it led it to tracking him down.

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>But he had issues with his mother that her promiscurity,

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was. And the ladies that he attacked,

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>he would pull their underwear down and display them in

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable positions and leave their bodies their And yeah, I

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think that changed the way because that would have it

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was during the eighties. The way that we approach the

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>criminal investigation taught us how to investigate serial killing because

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it was happening so frequently and it was just a

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 1>hop profile situation. I want to ask you mindful of

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the time, but I just want to wrap up with

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the type of work that you've done and not done

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you're still doing clearly and full credit to you. It's

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 1>been an absolutely amazing career. How do you keep your

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>faith in humanity? Because sitting down and chatting to you, you

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:06.280
<v Speaker 1>come across like you can laugh, you can smile, you've

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>look like you've you're enjoying life. And how have you

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:15.640
<v Speaker 1>managed to step away or not be destroyed by the

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 1>evil darkness that you've seen during your career.

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 2>No, that's a very fair question, but I think that

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 2>as a nurse we're trained to separate ourselves from terrible situations.

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, we see all disease and sadness and so forth.

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 2>So you have to be able to separate out and

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 2>not let it that. That said doesn't mean that you

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.359
<v Speaker 2>don't think about the cases. Certainly I do, and some

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 2>of them, really child cases really are are hard to take.

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 2>But I think that that's where you have to be trained.

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 2>You have to be able to separate well you yourself

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 2>as a you can't go taking your cases home at

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:02.919
<v Speaker 2>night or you'd be sleeping much so I think that

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 2>that's something you have to learn and you have to

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 2>be trained for, and that's what I do. The other

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 2>thing is I do teaching. I try to translate what

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing for younger generations to be able to carry

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 2>on and to understand so we can stamp out some

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 2>of this. That's where I get most of my uh,

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 2>that's where I think that. I like to think that

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:28.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing something really good.

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I get that, and it's nourishing, nourishing for you because

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:36.359
<v Speaker 1>it is a dark world, but you can you can

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>work it and come out come out relatively unscathed. I

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>found that that you can correct me if I'm wrong.

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 1>But I read somewhere that you had some of the

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 1>notorious serial killers sending you Christmas.

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Cards Easter cards too.

0:51:54.480 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad they didn't forget Easter bizarre. Well, how did

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you feel about that?

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'd like to think that they, you know, they

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 2>appreciated something for out of Mind Hunter or something like that.

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 2>But it was pretty funny.

0:52:17.040 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It is funny, and I've had situations, situations like that

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've just got to got to laugh about it.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 2>And I knew that I knew where they were. They

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:27.280
<v Speaker 2>were Cecily locked up, so I wasn't worried.

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, that makes you a bit tougher and a

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>bit braver if you know they're they're locked up. But

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the things that you've accomplished in your career and whining

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in the back, I'm focusing on the homicide, the stuff

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that you've done in nursing, and the role model that

0:52:41.880 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you've been for women in law enforcement and nursing. Full

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 1>credit to you, and I mean that with the utmost

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 1>honestly and respect. And I think it's really funny that

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys wouldn't even appreciate how much respect you got

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>over here with what I call the true homicide detectives

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that understand the of the work that you're doing. So

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 1>full credit to you and getting you on eye catch Killers.

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't explain how excited I was getting you on

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 1>so well.

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 2>I've certainly enjoyed it. You're wonderful to talk with. I

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 2>enjoy it very much.

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, Thank you, Thank you very much. One question, because

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the listeners will criticize me if I don't ask the

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:27.240
<v Speaker 1>character that you based loosely on you in Mind Hunters,

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Dr Wendy Carr, do you like they do you like

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the portrayal. She seems like a pretty cool lady to me,

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:35.439
<v Speaker 1>and what I've seen on the show.

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 2>I loved her as an actress. I thought she did

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:39.920
<v Speaker 2>a great job and she did the case as well,

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 2>but I didn't like about her background. And the other

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 2>two is they got it so wrong that and they

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 2>must they did not consult with John about all that

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff. They had all of our material, but

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I and I know it was just for Hollingwood that

0:53:55.880 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to get a wider audience. But dogs are

0:54:02.080 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 2>my favorite cat. Sorry, well remember she with the cat,

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Remember she had the cat.

0:54:11.760 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, as you said, it's for Hollywood, but look the

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 1>way the way it's betrayed. And I've got to say

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:19.359
<v Speaker 1>on the on the show, I like the way they

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 1>approach interviews. I like the the edginess of taking like

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the person sitting there expecting they're going to get a

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:27.760
<v Speaker 1>standard question and then they go off on the tangent.

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I love that aspect of it.

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 2>But look, it's very good.

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, look all the best for all the best for

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the future. Thank you so much for your time, and

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 1>our listeners are going to absolutely love love this chat

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and the stuff that you talk about such an interesting,

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:44.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting era.

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you for your coming words. I appreciate it.