WEBVTT - Sharri | 6 August

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Why on Sky News.

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry Good Evening.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 3>We're coming up on tonight's show. The Boss of Azio

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 3>issues a rare rebuke to the Iranian ambassador. I'll bring

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 3>you this exclusive story and it comes as an Iranian

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 3>attack on Israel is imminent.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>The Macarata Commission.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Is the Albanezy government going to move forward with it

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>or not?

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Just Enterprise will join.

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 3>Me live for her take on the PM's latest blunder,

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 3>and we'll cross to the US where Kamala Harris is

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 3>attempting to undergo a major reinvention with ninety days to

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 3>spare until America votes. But first tonight, I want to

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>start with the economy. RBA Governor Michelle Bullock has ruled

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 3>out a rate cut in the next six months, saying

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 3>inflation has been more persistent than expected. In part, she

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 3>blamed high government spending and low productivity for the need

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 3>to keep rates higher for longer.

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 4>We're coming out of an extraordinary period of massive supply shocks,

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 4>a new zero cash rate back in twenty twenty two,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 4>massive physical support for the economy, all part of the

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 4>pandemic and the pandemic response. And it's not surprising really

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 4>that it's taking time for things to stabilize a bit.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 4>What we can say is that a near term reduction

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 4>in the cash rate doesn't align with the board's current thinking.

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Up until this week, the economic conversation has centered on

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the number of rate rises needed to curb inflation. But

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 3>now the very real risk of recession in the United

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 3>States has changed the debate from not only controlling inflation.

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>But to carefully avoiding a recession.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Treasurer Jim Chalmers has spoken for some time about the

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>narrow path between not crushing our economy whilst still bringing

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>inflation under control, and his want that the balance of

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>risk is shifting in our economy.

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 5>We've said around budget time, before that and since then,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 5>just how important it is that we recognize the balance

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 5>of risks in our economy, domestic and international, our growth

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 5>and inflation. And it's just as important now as it's

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 5>ever been.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, many economists locally have looked to the US for guidance,

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and they were highly critical of the IBA for not

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 3>tackling inflation fast enough with earlier rate hikes. Interest rates

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 3>in the US are higher than ours at five point

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>five percent compared to our four point three five percent,

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 3>so Australia took a less aggressive approach in curbing inflation

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 3>so as not to crush growth, and while the future

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 3>CPI data is.

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Uncertain, at the moment, it.

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 3>Looks like Australia's path out of the global inflation.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Crisis may have been better than in the US.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 3>The Treasurer today said that the concerns of a US

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 3>recession show that Australia's economic plan to fight inflation without

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 3>plunging US into recession is the more responsible path to

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>have taken.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 5>We are confident about the Australian economy. We are confident

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 5>we can continue to see inflation moderate. We're confident that

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 5>we can continue to grow. But this is a really

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 5>important warning against complacency.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 3>And Chalmers claimed his measures had in fact taken half

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 3>a percentage point of inflation. But Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>seized on the RBA's concerns about government spending and low productivity.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Our inflation is stuck at a persistent level around four percent,

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and as I said, the Reserve Bank is seeing that

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>inflation staying higher for longer than its previous forecasts back

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in May. It is clear that inflation is running the economy,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not the government.

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 3>So while the main discussion point has been whether rates

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>would have to rise this year, and some economists have

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>even predicted up to three rate hikes, it is possible

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 3>that the next move we see will be an interst

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 3>rate drop, and that's the prediction of Deloitte Access Economics

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>partner Stephen Smith. He said it is now looking increasingly

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>certain that the next move and the cash.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Rate will be down, not up, with the RBA.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 3>Clearly concerned that its quest to stamp out inflation might

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>derail an emerging recovery, he said, with inflation trending down

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 3>a week Australian economy and rising volatility in global markets,

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Australia needs an environment where business can invest for growth.

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Herald's Sun Business legend Terry mccran will be on tonight

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 3>just in a minute to break this down, but he

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 3>says the RBA shouldn't be raising rates and that today's

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 3>decision to hold was the right one. He says, yes,

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 3>our own jobless numbers and other indicators like those from

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 3>SEKH suggests our economy might be close to snapping and

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>there is absolutely no case, he says, for a rate hike. Well,

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 3>it's true the growth in our economy is weak and consumption.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Is down a little, but employment remains strong.

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>If we start to see weaker jobs numbers, then there

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>will be cause for alarm. And the inflation battle is

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 3>far from over, as Michelle Bullock stressed today, and even

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Charmers admits, inflation is persistent and stubborn. And inflation rose

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 3>one percent in the June quarter in Australia, but in

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the US it only went up by zero point two percent. Now,

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 3>this is all sparking a debate about migration.

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Internally, in the Labor Party, there's a.

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Big political push to slash the high migration number and

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 3>stop the government's big Australia, but those concerned about the

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 3>economy are unlikely to support a migration cut ahead of

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 3>what is looking like a dicey next twelve months in

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>the global economy. We are already in a per capita

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>recession in Australia and the reality is if the immigration

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>levels hadn't been so high, we would absolutely be in

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 3>a recession now.

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Internally in the.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party there's already some resistance to cutting the migration rate.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 3>This isn't about the cost of living crisis of costs

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>for Albanese.

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 2>It's about politics.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 3>If the US plunges into a recession, an Australia manages

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 3>to avoid one thanks to the narrow path Jim Chalmers

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 3>is taking along with the high migration numbers.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, this will be good.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 3>News for the Albanese government ahead of an election. A

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>rate cut early next year would be the prime minister's

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 3>dream ahead of an election campaign that could kick off

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>in early April.

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Well for more.

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Expert analysis on this now, I'm joined by business columnist

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.559
<v Speaker 3>Terry mccran. Terry, great to see you again and thanks

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>for joining US. Economists have been pushing for an interest

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 3>to rate cut. We've heard many call for that, but

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Michelle Bullock today made it absolutely clear that a cut

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 3>isn't on the cards anytime soon. No time in the

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 3>next six months, which probably puts the first potential rate

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 3>cut in the first quarter of next year.

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 7>Which might work out quite well for the government if

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 7>it has an election in the normal course. Sherry, But

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 7>I thought, looking at Jim Chalmers's comments today, I thought

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 7>I saw signs of fear in those eyes of his

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 7>where he really thought that there's a prospect that rather

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 7>than get a rate cut, as you move into the

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 7>election campaign, you might actually face a rate high. I think, Chris,

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 7>I think we can be very thankful to Michelle Bollock.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 7>She was absolutely crystal clear in describing the state of play,

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 7>and that was inflation is too high. There was absolutely

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 7>no prospect of a rate cut anytime soon, and the

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 7>Reserve Bank was looking seriously at hiking rates today and

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 7>we'll keep that possibility on the table going forward. Now

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 7>there anything that's going to save us from a ray hike.

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 7>Charity is if the economy does go over that cliff,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 7>and that's not exactly an attractive prospect.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, no, absolutely, Look, we heard the

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Treasurer today.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I argue that he's.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Successfully walking this narrow path avoiding a recession, unlike the

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 3>very real risk in the US at the moment.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you give him credit for this?

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 7>I give him zero credit for a shary because and

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 7>I think the Reserve Bank hit has quite a moment,

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 7>so we'll also give him zero credit for it because

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 7>the government is the one that's causing the difficulties. The

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 7>government the one, as you've indicated, Cherry, with that massive

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 7>immigration program, which is force you up rents, forcing up

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 7>the cost of living, putting great stress on Australian families.

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 7>What the government's done with energy prices. Everybody understand what's

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 7>happening as a consequence of that, what it's done in

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 7>the industrial relations space, where it's making very hard to

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 7>get productivity improvements. All those things are not only making

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 7>life tough for Australians and for business, it's also making

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 7>it tough for the Reserve Bank to think about cutting

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 7>rates anytime soon. So the buck stops precisely at Jim

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 7>Chalmers's desk. He's not the guy that's delivering some sort

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 7>of benefit. He's making life tough for everyone.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 3>What did you think about the IBA governor's comments when

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 3>she spoke about government spending being an issue. I mean,

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 3>that's quite rare for her to say that, isn't it.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 7>Well absolutely, I mean it's because it's just the basic

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 7>reality cherry that the numb if the government is adding

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 7>to demand, and demand is the problem. There's too much

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 7>demand chasing what's produced in the economy. That's what causes inflation. Well,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 7>then you know the government is part of that problem,

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 7>but that's only a small part of it. And she

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 7>didn't want to get into a direct assault on the government,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 7>and she doesn't want it, certainly doesn't want to get

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 7>you a situation where she's got to put up rates

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 7>precisely because the government is creating the problem.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, Terry mccran, you always are spot on and

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 3>have such brilliant analysis. We appreciate you joining us on

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 3>your show and look forward to reading more in the

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Herald Sign tomorrow. Now, AZO Boss Mike Burgess has entered

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the debate about the Iranian ambassador's offensive tweet.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Now just to recap.

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>In a post on x, Iran's ambassador, Ahmed Sadagi, referred

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to Israel as a Zionist plague that he said should

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 3>be wiped out by Hamas.

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Have a look at his comments.

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Here they are, he said, the late leader of Hamas

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Resistant Movement rectified, wiping out the Zionus plague of the

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Holy Lance. Now, the alban Eezy government has admitted that

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 3>these comments are unacceptable and yes they hold in the ambassador,

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 3>but not at the ministerial level.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Have a look.

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 6>We have called in the Iranian ambassador to the Department

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 6>of Foreign Afairs and Trade. Is the protocol when something

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 6>like this happens. There's no place for the sword of

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 6>comments that were made online in social media by the

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 6>Iranian ambassador. They're a born and they are hateful, they

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 6>are any Semitic and they have no place.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Would shadow.

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Home Affairs Minister James Patterson said today that if the

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister and Penny Wong was serious about this, they

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 3>could take stronger action, have.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 8>A look and so if the government is really concerned

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 8>about what the ambassador has said, then there are powers

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 8>of rble to the Minister for Foreign Affairs to make

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 8>an ambassador persona on Grada and send them home. And

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 8>it's up to the government and the Foreign Minister to

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 8>explain if she's not going to use those powers. If

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 8>she's not going to do so, why isn't she and

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 8>how bad would it have to get What could they

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 8>say that would cause her to use that option of

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 8>able to.

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Now you might think, oh, it's just a social media post,

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>what's the big deal. Well, the AZO Director General, Mike

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Burgess told me today just how dangerous this type of

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 3>language from.

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 2>The Iranian ambassador is.

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>These are exclusive comments, and he told me the comments

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 3>were disgraceful and given the current security climate, deeply unhelpful.

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Inflamed language can inflame emotions an inflame action, he said,

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I again call on all parties to reflect on the

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 3>words they use and the impacts they can have. So

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>those exclusive comments from the Boss of ASIO, the top

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 3>spy agency about the Iranian ambassador, let's bring in now

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 3>our Tuesday panel former Speaker of the House Bronwin Bishop

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 3>and Shadow Housing Minister Michael Sooker.

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to you both.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Michael, that is a rare rebuke of an ambassador from

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 3>ASIO from.

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>The Boss of Aisio. Do you agree with James Patterson.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you think Penny Wong and ALBINIZI should have perhaps

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>expelled the Iranian ambassador over these remarks?

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, of course I agree with James Patterson, and one

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 9>I think can reflect on this, And I suspect one

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 9>of the motivations for the ambassador on this is that

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 9>he knows how weak Anthony Albanesi and this government is.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 9>The probably made a calculated decision that he would get

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 9>away with it because they are so weak, as weak

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 9>as water, And you know, diplomats like that generally make

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 9>very calculated statements. And I suspect he knew that he

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 9>would get not so much as a wrap over the knuckle.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 9>He got caught into the Department for a cup of tea.

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 9>Albanezy is so weak and every single day he seems

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 9>to exceed himself as to how weak he can possibly be.

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 9>I think this is a clear cutcase. I think, as

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 9>Simon Birmingham has said, this could amount to incitement under

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 9>our criminal Code and those are the sorts of things

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 9>that someone like Mike Burgess doesn't weigh into lightly. And

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 9>I spect that Mike Burgess has waited into that because

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 9>he has seen how weak the government's response has been run.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>What do you think on this?

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean Mike Burgess's intervention here comes when he just

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 3>yesterday raised the terror threat level to probable. We just

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 3>heard from Michael Silk of the suggestion that this could

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 3>be incitement to violence?

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this is that dangerous language?

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely? But the thing that gets me where is this

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 10>royal we come from? I am ashamed to have such

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 10>a coward from our Prime minister at Penny One's way.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 10>He should call in the ambassador. He should have been

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 10>absolutely had the stripped words to him saying you are

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 10>no longer acceptable in this country. What that man was saying,

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 10>that ambassador was calling for the genocide of the Jewish nation.

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 10>That's what he was calling through and you could see

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 10>Hitler could smile from his grave that he's passed on

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 10>such hatred. And to think that we get, oh, we

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 10>called him in to talk to the department, is just appalling.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 10>It's just appalling and quite unacceptable is a word that

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 10>I'm beginning to turn off greatly because it's been robbed

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 10>of any meaning. What happened today is cowardice, nothing short

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 10>of the government. And Michael's quite right when he says

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 10>that the ambassador made a calculated decision that nothing would

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 10>happen to him and his confreres and the people of Homas,

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 10>they would laugh.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 3>No, indeed, I think your remarks about the Hitler comparison,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, spot on.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 3>We all knew this already about the era employees, but

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 3>big news today because the United Nations officially came out

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 3>and said that nine employees of UNRA were likely involved

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 3>in the October seven attacks. United Nations held a press

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 3>conference but said it had no idea where those nine

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>UNRA staff involved in the October seven attacks are now.

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Have a look, are any of them in Israeli custody?

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Where are they? Are you there?

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 11>I don't have a case by case amount of information.

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 11>I believe that they're not. I believe that they're not

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 11>people who are currently in custody.

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the UN supposedly all concerned about justice, Well

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>where is the justice? Why aren't these people facing a court?

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 3>They absolutely should well. The Opposition leader Peter Dutton today

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 3>called on the Albanese government to stop funding this group.

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 12>It should cause the Aurbanzi government to reconsider their involvement

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 12>to their engagement, their funding of UNRA. It's completely an

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 12>utterly unacceptable that a UN agency would have employees involved

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 12>in or alleged to have been involved in the October

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 12>seventh tragedy.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 3>And these revelations are just the tip of the iceberg.

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 3>As we've spoken about on this show before, the links

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 3>between ANRA and terrorism and extremism and in doctor tranation

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 3>of children are extensive and date back years.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Michael Sika, what do you.

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Think it says about the Albanzi government that this has

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 3>emerged big press conference and they're still happy to send

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 3>millions and millions and millions and millions of our hard earned,

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 3>taxpaid dollars to this group that has been linked to terrorism.

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 9>It's disgusting it's beyond belief. You know, weakness is a

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 9>theme I think tonight in critiquing the governments. How weak

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 9>is Anthony Albanesi and this government? And it's disgusting because

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 9>we've sent sixty million dollars of Australian taxpayers money over

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 9>there that he's funding. Quite frankly people who have been

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 9>terrorists and presumably have only we're only able to participate

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 9>in terrorist as because they are on the under a

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 9>payroll and sadly Australian taxpayers dollars have contributed to that organization.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 9>So Anthony ll needs he's asking Australians to get up

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 9>every morning, work hard, take more of their paypacket in

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 9>order to ship it over to NRA so they can

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 9>employ people to be part of a terrorist organization. It

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 9>is just beyond belief. You almost laugh if it wasn't

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 9>such a serious topic, because this is a clear cutcase

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 9>as the US is quite rightly done where you cut

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 9>off the funding. Now Anthony Alberanezi needs to explain what

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 9>does he know that the United States doesn't know? What's

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 9>his intelligence that the United States doesn't have because they've

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 9>cut off the funding, He's reinstated the funding and let's

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 9>always remember Shari, this is not Anthony Albanese's money. He's

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 9>using Australia as taxpayers money. It's in our name money

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 9>being sent over to anra who I think, in the

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 9>full light of day, will be shown to have employed

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 9>people who were up to their necks in this absolute atrocity.

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 3>And Bronwin, you know what's even work is that initially

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the government paused funding, but they didn't even wait for

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the investigation before recommencing it again.

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, Pennywong has showed herself to have made some made

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 10>decision on which side she backs, and she's backing the

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 10>Palestinians and she doesn't care about what happens to the

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 10>Israeli citizens, Otherwise she would cut the funding. America has

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 10>ensured that the funding is not being renewed. But honestly

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 10>and truly, when you see that the United Nations has

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 10>become so self righteous about so many issues, why aren't

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 10>these nine people being referred to the International Criminal Court?

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 10>Why aren't they being prosecuted?

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Exactly?

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 10>Why aren't they being hearded up and kept I mean,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 10>it just makes a joke of it.

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Where are they now? Are they in Gaza? Are they

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 3>still working with harms. I mean there's a lot you'll

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>need to know about.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 10>This well, and look at the amount of money that's

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 10>at stake. It is said that agency has thirty thousand

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 10>employees doing what doing good?

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Question? Good question?

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 3>Now a bit of a change of pace now the

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 3>New South Wales and Victorian governments are at odds over

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 3>whether public service employees should.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Be forced back into the office.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 3>New South I was Premier Chris Mins publicly said today

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 3>that he thought it was bizarre Victoria wasn't asking their

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 3>employees to get back to work after what were quite

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 3>extreme COVID restrictions.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Have a look, I've seen the Victorian government, not New

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>South Wales for this change.

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 2>We're not for changing.

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 3>We think it's important for the public service in New

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>South Wales.

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:44.479
<v Speaker 8>And at the end of the day, frankly, with all

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 8>of the lockdowns.

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>In Melbourne, I would have thought a lot of people

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in Victoria would be desperate to get out of the house.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 3>The Allen government in Victoria said that any public servants

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 3>from New South Wales who wanted workplace flexibility should move

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 3>to Victoria. Michael Suko, you know you live in Melbourne.

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 2>What did you think of this response from Victoria, Well.

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 9>There were smart alic words from a premier who's basically

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 9>running an insolvent government. Let's be frankier, and the premier

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 9>has been a part of every single decision, wayful decision

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 9>that has led Victoria to the position wherein now I

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 9>think the Premier of New South Wales has made a

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 9>pretty self evident call today in many respects that follows

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 9>what the corporate world is already doing. And I think

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 9>the truth is of public servants, they are there to

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 9>serve the public good and the vast majority of them

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 9>want to do so, but they need some leadership. And

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 9>this sort of smart alec line from the Victorian premier,

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 9>I mean they are the worst performing government in this

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 9>country behind Anthony Albanese's government. So she doesn't exactly have

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 9>a place occupy a place where she should be giving

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 9>advice to any other state, let alone sort of smart

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 9>lines like that. This is sadly Victoria a government that's

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 9>seeing business leave our state, investment leave our state, and

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 9>on so many metrics, Victoria which occupied and I'm a

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 9>very parochial Victorian, but Victoria which occupied the upper echelon

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 9>of virtually every single economic statistic in this country is

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 9>now right at the bottom of the ladder, and I

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 9>would have thought someone like the Victorian premier will try

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 9>and take some advice and look at what other states

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 9>are doing. Quite frankly, other states that are doing much

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 9>better than Victoria and are not in the parlas financial

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 9>situation that we're in, which is basically bankrupt.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Look aside from the budget bottom line run when I

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 3>think Chris Men's is showing time and time again that

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 3>he is the model of what a centrist lay politician

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 3>should look like. I mean, whatever the issue is, he

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 3>mostly takes a very mainstream, sensible standpoint.

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 10>I don't think I can endorse him on everything, but

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 10>I can certainly do so on this issue. I think

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 10>he's realized there is no productivity growth that he's decided

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 10>that he's going to insist there be some. And Michael,

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 10>I feel very sorry for you down there with Victoria

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 10>having to live there appalling government. It's a basket case.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>And everyone watching who's in Melbourne.

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 10>And everyone watching indeed indeed, and you don't deserve it,

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 10>but you really have to vote them out to get

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 10>a change. But if you go back to this question

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 10>of productivity, generally there is none while there's work from home.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 10>He's become such a norm. People say, oh, you can't

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 10>go back, Well, yes you can, and indeed peritate today

0:24:51.680 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 10>coming out and saying that mandatory vaccinations were wrong. Finally

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 10>a mission about how we're induced into the myths that

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 10>has followed COVID. We're still not over it, we're still

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 10>suffering from it.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 2>He didn't come out and publicly say that, of course

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>at the time. We're not at the time.

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 3>You said it today the day indeed, all right, Michael Silko,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Brahma Bishop.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you both on the show. Thank you.

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Coming up after the break, just Center Price will join

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 3>us live to unload on alban Easy's Macarata confession plus

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Facebook censorship of the now famous photograph of Donald Trump

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 3>right after the assassination attempt.

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 2>You won't believe Meta's excuse.

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 3>That's all coming up, Welcome back with the Prime Minister

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 3>has been accused of backtracking on an election promise to

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>create a Macarata commission, one of the key pillars of

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 3>the earliery statement from the heart. The confusion came after

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>this awkward response on the ABC over the weekend.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 12>One of the architects of the Ularuz Statement.

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 13>Pat Anderson says that you should be embarking on a

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 13>truth and justice.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 8>Commission and you're saying it's not that.

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 14>That's not what you're going to do.

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's not what we have proposed. What we're proposed

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 6>is Makarada just being the idea of coming together.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 2>So it's talking about that's what we want to do.

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 2>We're engaging.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 6>Being here is a starting point.

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 3>And it's made the news eversets over the years. Albanezi

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 3>has been adamant that his government will commit to the

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 3>statement in full.

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 6>And on behalf of the Australian Labor Party, I commit

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 6>to the Ularus Statement from the heart and whole, and

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 6>I recommit on behalf of the government that I proudly

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 6>lead to the implementation of the Ularuz Statement from the

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 6>heart in full. And I'm proud to lead a government

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 6>that's committed to implementing the ULARUS Statement from the heart

0:26:58.480 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 6>in full.

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 3>And Shadow Minister for Indigenous Australians just Enterprice joins us.

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, just great to see you.

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Look do you think this was an unclear answer of

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Albernizi's odd Do you think it is a broken promise.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 15>Oh look, it's absolutely a broken promise from Anthony Alberzi.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 15>He's demonstrated many broken promises over and over again. You know,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 15>he's quite competent at breaking promises, it seems. But look,

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 15>I mean he's at odds with his Minister for Indigenous Australians,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 15>who I know at the last Senate estimates told us

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 15>that they would be pursuing makarata form of truth telling commission.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 15>She also said that recently. So I'm not sure who

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 15>he thinks is running the portfolio, whether it's himself or

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 15>it's the Minister herself. But again, this is our prime

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 15>minister unclear on many things.

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 3>And do you personally think that there is a case

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 3>for a Macaraatei commission?

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And if not, what do you think the issues are?

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 15>Look, the term macarata, and that's another thing. The Prime

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.719
<v Speaker 15>Minister has to get that right. The term macarata actually

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 15>means it's.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 2>A form of payback. It's a spearing in the leg.

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 15>It's not a coming together as he likes to suggest

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 15>it is. So I don't like the concept behind it,

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 15>which tells me, you know, is this a commission that

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 15>will would be set up by the Labor government to

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 15>again hold responsible non Indigenous Australians for our country's history.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not interested in that. I'm interested in real.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 15>Educational outcomes for all of Australia's young people. And if

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 15>that means teaching history in its entirety, the good, the bad,

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 15>the ugly, everything, not for the purposes of weaponizing it

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 15>against our country, but to have a better understanding of

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 15>who we are, I'm all for that, But I'm not

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 15>up for this commission that they're suggesting.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you get this and so that the Prime

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Minister has all but abandoned Indigenous policy after the failure

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 3>of the Voice. He doesn't speak about it anymore. He

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 3>spoke about it virtually every day for the best part

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 3>of the year, and now it does seem like his

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 3>lost interest.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 15>Look, the Prime Minister has failed miserably when it's come

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 15>to addressing the needs of our most disadvantaged.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 2>He didn't have any ideas to begin with.

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 15>He put all these eggs in one basket and the

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 15>very expensive referendum that he could have invested where it

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 15>is needed. He talks about touching down and listening. Well,

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 15>he's got to get out of Gama. He's got to

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 15>get out of Ulara. When he visits Ulara, he's got

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 15>to go out to remote communities. He should come back

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 15>to Alice Springs and go to some town camps. The

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 15>situation has not improved on the ground, but he goes

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 15>to where it's easy for him to grandstand, which is

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 15>Gama every year and do very little. But he knows

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 15>he'll get very little pushback from those that are ten Garma.

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're coming up to an election probably in

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the next nine or ten months. If you were Indigenous

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Affairs minister, what are the first thing you do from

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 3>a policy perspective.

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 15>Well, several times already I've attempted to pass a motion

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 15>in the Senate to launch an inquiry into land councils

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 15>and statutory authorities, those who are funded who have the

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 15>responsibility to improve the lives of our most marginalized, so

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 15>that we can better know where the money is being misspent,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 15>you know, where it's not actually providing outcomes.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 2>And each time we've.

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 15>Put this motion up, the Labor Government and the Greens

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 15>have voted it down for what reason, I do not know,

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 15>And if Minister Melanderry McCarthy is serious about taking a

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 15>bipartisan position, then she would support efforts to vote in

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 15>favor of an inquiry to begin with, so we know

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 15>where to invest money that will actually produce outcomes.

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 2>But we also need a rural.

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 15>Commission into the sexual abuse of Indigenous children.

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, we talk about.

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 15>High rates of youth incarceration, of incarceration. The reason we've

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 15>got that is because our kids experience the highest rates

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 15>of sexual abuse and neglecting the country. And if we

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 15>don't address that, we're not going to get further upstream

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 15>and reduce rates of incarceration, suicide and everything else.

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Whether the gap is greatest a.

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Lot to do for sure, if you do get the

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to be Indigenous Affairs Minister Disent Deprice.

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you on the show again. Thank you.

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Now still to come Keir Starmer facing accusations of hypocrisy

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>over the riots that have rocked the UK and why

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>did Facebook censor the photograph of the Donald Trump assassination attempt?

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 2>All of that coming up next. Welcome back.

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's turn to the UK now, which is still

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 3>in the throes of deep social unrest and violent anti

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 3>immigration riots that have rocked parts of England.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 2>For the past week.

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 3>The protests have provided a major challenge to the new

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister, Kiir Starmer, who has called on a standing

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 3>army of police.

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 2>To deal with the disorder.

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.239
<v Speaker 3>Things have got so extreme that even Australians have been

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 3>advised to exercise a high degree of caution in the

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 3>UK due to the threat of terrorism. Well, I'm joined

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 3>now by Tom Slater, editor of Spiked. Tom, thank you

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 3>very much for your time. Look, these riots were sparked

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 3>in part by the horrific stabbing of three young girls.

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 2>How have they taken off since then?

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 14>Well, as you say, that was the thing that lit

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 14>the flame, I think that was the excuse that a

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 14>lot of these thugs chose to use, chose to jump on,

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 14>to commit the carnage that we've seen across the country.

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 14>But it's spread very organically, very alarmingly, first across the

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 14>North and the Midlands, now parts of the South well,

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 14>and it's something that quite clearly the authorities don't really

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 14>have a handle on. I think Kir Starmer's most to

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 14>make a horrendous situation much worse. He's managed to essentially

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 14>fuel the kind of the narrative put out by a

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 14>lot of the hard right agitators that this is two

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 14>tier policing, that they are coming down hard on protesters

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 14>but not on counter protests and so on, when it

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 14>would have been so easy for him to make clear

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 14>that all forms of crime and disorder would be condemned.

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 14>And I think that's the real, really disheartening thing in

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 14>the UK at the moment, is there's no clear sense

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 14>that anyone is really in control at this point.

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Look, initially we were seeing you know, fire right anti

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 3>immigration protesters leading the social mayhem and the violence here,

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 3>but we've also been seeing footage of other groups joining

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 3>in the violence, you know, pro Palestinians and others in masks.

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Bolt played some of that footage a bit earlier.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 3>So it seems like this is just complete social line

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 3>that's now breaking loose on the street. Is that an

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 3>accurate depiction of what's happening in the UK?

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely? And of course the kind of response that we've

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 14>seen from groups of British Muslims, Islamist activists and so

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 14>on has been nowhere near the same scale. I mean

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 14>of what the kind of racist writing that we've seen,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 14>which has been targeting migrant hotels, has been smashing up

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 14>minority businesses has been a costing ethnic minorities in the street.

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 14>We've seen nothing on the scale of that. But what

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 14>we saw in say Birmingham last night when you had

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 14>groups of young Muslim youth wearing balaclava's harassing, intimidating press.

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 14>They chase an LBC journalists out of the area, They

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 14>tried to slash the tires of a Sky News UK crew.

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 14>There was also footage of them beating up someone outside

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 14>of a pub, which kind of community elders have since

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 14>apologized for. And even though as I say, it is

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 14>on a smaller scale, it shows that things are spinning

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 14>out of control and worse still, there's a sense that

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 14>from the Labor Party they struggled to condemn or take

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 14>seriously that behavior, which again fuels this narrative that this

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 14>is a two tier policing. We even saw the local

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 14>Birmingham Labor MP there effectively tried to basically talk down

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 14>what been going on there last night. So, as you say,

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 14>what's things aren't on the same scale of the racist

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 14>writing that we've seen. It's a sign that British societies

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 14>is threatening to kind of come apart, not just in

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 14>one area or one community.

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Across many Yeah, look the violence is shocking and terrifying

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and even a travel warning to Australians. Tom Slater, thank

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 3>you very much for your time. Now, Facebook has come

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 3>out of fire for censoring the now iconic photograph our

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 3>former president Donald Trump right after the assassination attempt. Users

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 3>were complaining that their Facebook accounts were categorizing the image

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 3>as altered, with an explanation then saying independent fact checkers

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 3>reviewed a similar photo and said it was altered in

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 3>a way that could mislead people, and Meta has tried

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 3>to defend this well. To discuss, let's bring in now

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the CEO of Libernette, Andrew Lowenthal. Andrew, great to have

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 3>you in Australia once again. So look, we are seeing

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the odd censorship and it does seem to be growing

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 3>of big tech over Donald Trump. What was Facebook's response

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 3>to this censoring of the most iconic photograph to come

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 3>out of what was now a very historic event.

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 16>Sure well, apparently there was another photograph that was circulating

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 16>that was doctored, and the AI system and other systems

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 16>they were using to identify what they've considered false information

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 16>flag this one up as well. Obviously, this image is

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 16>so iconic now that you would probably expect, kind of

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 16>with the resources that a Facebook has for them to

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 16>be much more on top of this kind of thing.

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 16>And given the lack of trust that has developed through

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 16>things that have been exposed through the Twitter files or

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 16>other kind of investigations that you know, big tech is considered,

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 16>you know, or seen by many many people as been

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 16>really quite quite partisanates. So you don't really want to

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 16>kind of be messing this level of stuff.

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 3>And I should have mentioned to everyone that you were

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 3>part of the Twitter files. You were part of the

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 3>investigative investigative journalists along with Michael Schallenberger and Barryweese who

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 3>went into Twitter and uncovered the evidence of what they'd

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 3>been censoring right after Elon Musk brought it, So I

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 3>should have mentioned that.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 2>But we've also seen.

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 3>From Google, you know, a censoring of the search results

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 3>for the Donald Trump assassination attempt as well. So do

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 3>you think this is part of that same pattern that

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 3>you saw when you went into Twitter?

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 16>Oh, I mean, obviously we don't one hundred percent no,

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 16>because there's no kind of specific receipts to explain to

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 16>us why that has happened there's a certain level of

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 16>plausible deniability, but again, the trust is broken down so much,

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 16>I think by a huge way of not just the

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 16>American public, but the public at large in you know,

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 16>are these big tear companies really properly managing what is

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 16>now essentially the public square. It seems they're doing really

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 16>quiet a bad job of it, and a lot of

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 16>people feel censored because there really was quite a lot

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 16>of censorship going on and still is really so there

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 16>needs to be a lot more alternatives. There needs to

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 16>be a lot more accountability for big tech to make

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 16>sure that they're you know, if they're going to have

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 16>this much power, they need to have a lot more accountability.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting because in Australia there is a push by

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 3>our government to make big tech accountable, but not from

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, the aspect of censoring one side of politics,

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 3>but from misinformation. And there's this very controversial misinformation bill.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 3>You've looked at it in some detail and you've even

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 3>made a submission to the Communications Minister Michelle Roland. What

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 3>do you think the main problems are with formalizing misinformation

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 3>in legislation?

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 16>Well, one is do you trust politicians to be the

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 16>arbatas or bureaucrats to be the arbators of truth. I

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 16>think most people would put them absolutely, very very low

0:38:55.200 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 16>down in trustworthyness. The other is that you know who's

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 16>actually getting policed. So think that we've seen that the

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 16>people who get of policed online tend to be at

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 16>the bottom of the food chain, and they don't they're

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 16>not the people at the top of the food chain.

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 16>That the kind of if you want to police missing

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 16>disinformation or hate speech as well, you should be looking

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 16>at the government, politicians, corporations, etc. Who have the most

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 16>power and the most capacity to spread misleading claims.

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 3>And we saw during the COVID pandemic, and this was

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 3>under a coalition government by the way, that the Home

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Affairs Department was centering about four thousand posts where people

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 3>had been critical of mask mandates COVID vaccines. So none

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 3>of that freedom of speech was allowed during the COVID pandemic.

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 16>Well exactly, so they flagged four thousand Twitter didn't necessarily

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 16>take all of them down. That was the freedom of

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 16>information requests. In the Twitter files we found two hundred

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 16>or so of the content of those requests.

0:39:56.800 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 2>But in Australia at in Australia.

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 16>In Australian Twitter files that I worked on that showed

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:06.479
<v Speaker 16>they were flagging you know, jokes about Dan Andrews, jokes

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 16>about how long you'd have to wait in the car

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 16>for a PCR test accounts with this few of twenty followers,

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 16>which makes you wonder, what is the Department of Home

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 16>Affairs doing following accounts with only twenty people on it

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 16>when you know they're tasked with quite serious, quite serious

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 16>remit in terms of public safety and terrorism and other issues.

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.240
<v Speaker 16>So it's really this again, this problem where you're policing

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 16>the people at the bottom and saying you're the baddies,

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 16>whereas actually the people who do need watching, which is

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 16>the role of the media and should be a role

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 16>for anti disinformation campaigns if you're going to have a

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 16>field that that is that large is concentrated on the

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:47.399
<v Speaker 16>people with the most power, not on.

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 2>The people on the street.

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 3>We've also got an e Safety Commissioner who's spoken out

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 3>about missing disinformation. She previously was you know, a woke

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley involve you know, an executive, and now she's

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 3>come to Australia. Originally appointed to the role by former

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, but it is still in the

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 3>role under the Labor government. So this again says something

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.720
<v Speaker 3>about where Australia is headed well totally.

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 16>And again to go back to the point that I've

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.439
<v Speaker 16>made a few times, is you were doing a story

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.959
<v Speaker 16>earlier about the tweet from the Ranian ambassador. Yeah, so

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:28.280
<v Speaker 16>there's no comment that I've seen so far from E safety.

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that issue good point.

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 16>E safety would be all over or manner of kind

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 16>of issues of you know, the kind of general person

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 16>might be saying, and here you have something really at

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 16>scale that would be much more concerning. I'm not sure

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 16>that I would be one hundred percent backing kind of

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 16>censorship there or not. But it's interesting that if you're

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:49.280
<v Speaker 16>going to apply the rules, you know, then you should

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 16>you have to apply them fairly across the board, and

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:56.800
<v Speaker 16>that based on her rules and her very strict system

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 16>that she currently has in place, that tweet would probably

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 16>come within them.

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 3>It is incitement to violence, So there is an argument

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 3>for censoring.

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you.

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know whether you'd want it censored or you

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 3>want to see what the Iranian ambassador is actually saying.

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 2>I'd follow on the.

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Free speech side in this particular case. But agreed, right,

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Lowenthal, Thank you very much for your time.

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 16>Thank you.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, we've still got a lot to come.

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 3>We've got Facebook admitting the mistake in censoring Donald Trump.

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>We've just covered that.

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 3>But after the break, we are going to cross live

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 3>to the US where Kamala Harris is experiencing the mother

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 3>of all makeovers.

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Will it work well? The Democrats, sure hope, So stay

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 2>tuned after the break. Welcome back.

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 3>The rebranding of Kamala Harris is well underway, and it's extraordinary.

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 3>As Jared Baker writes in The Wall Street Journal, can

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats and a collaborative media pull off? They're recasting

0:42:56.680 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 3>a vice president Kamala Harris from the verbally malley, politically

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:06.399
<v Speaker 3>inept ruinous policy espousing electoral dud we have all seen

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 3>over the past five years, into the holy trinity of

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Joan of Arc, Harriet Tubman and Margaret Thatcher we have

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 3>been presented with in the past two weeks.

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 2>He says time all.

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 3>The lack of it is the key to the operation's success.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I say ninety days, but in practice they need to

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 3>keep the hype show.

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 2>On the road.

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 3>For just two months after in August of jubilees. Well,

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 3>the left media and the Democratic spin doctors do seem

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 3>to be pulling this off, despite old clips like this

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 3>that keep popping up.

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 12>And as a woman, there is a balance to be

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 12>struck between being tough.

0:43:49.840 --> 0:44:07.919
<v Speaker 2>And being a turn that off, and there's so much

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 2>of that.

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's bring in now Fox News contributor political podcaster

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Brad Palambo.

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Brad, thank you very much for joining us.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Look, this transformation is quite stunning, really because Kamala Harris

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 3>was considered pretty much incompetent vice president and suddenly she's

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the new Obama.

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:30.399
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, even a couple months ago before this all went

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 13>down and she became the nominee, the New York Times

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.839
<v Speaker 13>as writers they ranked her as the least electable of

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 13>the possible Biden replacements. But now because the switch has

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 13>been made, they all flipped on a dime. And you

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:44.879
<v Speaker 13>got to give the mainstream media credit for one thing.

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 13>It's message and discipline control. But look, they're going to

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 13>have to shelter her because she is a gaff machine.

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 13>She is cringe personified. So what they're going to have

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 13>to do is try to keep her away. She still

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 13>has not done an interview or a press con since

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 13>becoming the nominee, and it's been more than two weeks.

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 13>They're going to have to try to hide her away

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 13>until now an election day and hope that just their

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 13>heavily filtered media coverage is all people will be exposed to,

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 13>or her edited TikTok videos, which I will admit are

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 13>well done. But because if she's actually scrutinized for all

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 13>her flip flops, for the Biden administration's many failures and calamities,

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 13>then I think Americans will really lose a lot. The

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 13>shine will come off, they'll really see what's there, and

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 13>they won't be so interested. But if they can successfully

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 13>pull a Joe Biden in twenty twenty and just campaign

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 13>from the basement, it might just work out for them,

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 13>but it is kind of a sham for the democratic process.

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Or she is on show, she's doing events, just not

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 3>rigorous interviews or press conferences, but at least she is

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 3>out of the proverbial basement.

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 2>But Brad, you know, this strategy is clearly.

0:45:56.520 --> 0:46:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Working because the polls are showing that she's now catching

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 3>up to Trump. But it is becoming a major news story.

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 3>That she hasn't done an interview in fifteen days, So

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 3>how long is she is Kamala Harrison the Democratic Party

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 3>actually going to be able to stick with this strategy

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 3>of not sitting down with a serious, tough journalist.

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 13>Well, unfortunately, you know, people in right of center media,

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 13>Fox News or the Wall Street Journal they're not going

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 13>to listen to us, right, It's going to have to

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 13>come from the New York Times. It's going to have

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 13>to come from the liberal media establishment actually sticking to

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 13>their journalistic principles rather than their rank partisan bias and

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 13>calling her out and saying, listen, you're running for president

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 13>of the United States. You've got to do actual interviews,

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 13>not just fan service, not just events with celebrities. You've

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:49.919
<v Speaker 13>got to sit down and be held to account because

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 13>she has flip flopped on everything under the sun just

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 13>in the last few weeks, from healthcare policy to fracking

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 13>to so many other things. She's done a complete eighty

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 13>not really explained any of it. Plus, there's so much

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 13>she needs to answer for from this administration's record, from

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 13>the inflation and the policies they had that contributed it

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 13>to the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan that left many US

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 13>service members dead unnecessarily, that could have been avoided so

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 13>many things. But if they just want to try, what

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 13>the campaign wants to do is just avoid all that

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 13>and just do like cooking videos with celebrities between now

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 13>and November. So you will come down to the liberal

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 13>media establishment. Are they going to actually stick up for

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 13>journalism and demand that Kamala does some interviews? She will

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 13>listen if they do. Are they just going to keep

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 13>their democratic partisan hats on and go along till now

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:43.240
<v Speaker 13>in November?

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just quickly before you go, We've had the big

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 3>news that there could be a recession in the United

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 3>States precisely the same time that Kamala Harris has claimed

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 3>the economy is in top shape in the US. You've

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 3>got about thirty seconds. But this is now going to

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 3>be a big problem for her ahead.

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Of the election.

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:04.799
<v Speaker 13>It has and it will be a problem because it

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 13>has been a problem. They keep bragging about Bidenomics when

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 13>Americans cannot afford groceries. So now if we do end

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 13>up going into a recession, they're talking points on the

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 13>economic agenda will only ring even more empty.

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, it will Brad Plumboth thank you very much for

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts tonight, and thanks everyone for your company and

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 3>for watching this evening, so we've got time for I'll

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 3>be back tomorrow at eight. And right now, here's Paul Murray.