1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:10,119 Speaker 1: Do you welcome again to the podcast. Mate. Here we 2 00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 1: are sitting here on a Friday afternoon, beautiful sunny day outside, 3 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:17,200 Speaker 1: and we're inside talking about the economy. 4 00:00:17,480 --> 00:00:19,599 Speaker 2: We're in here talking about the economy when it's sunny. 5 00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 2: Spring is here. I'm not sure whether spring is here 6 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:25,760 Speaker 2: for the economy though, because we're still going through this. 7 00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:28,960 Speaker 1: Are we in the winter of economics? 8 00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:31,320 Speaker 2: Well, I hope we're in the low point of economics. 9 00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:34,400 Speaker 2: I'm not quite sure yet, because the economy is still weak, 10 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:35,280 Speaker 2: no question. 11 00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:38,839 Speaker 1: Well, let's just talk about that first. What do you 12 00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:41,000 Speaker 1: make by economy? What are the markers? 13 00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:43,519 Speaker 2: Okay, there are a range of markers, and some of 14 00:00:43,520 --> 00:00:48,800 Speaker 2: them slightly overlap GDP Gross domestic product, The whole output 15 00:00:48,800 --> 00:00:51,639 Speaker 2: of goods and services in the economy only raised by 16 00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:55,040 Speaker 2: zero point two percent in the June quarter. That's really weak. 17 00:00:55,200 --> 00:00:57,920 Speaker 1: So what what would you like to see rise by normally? 18 00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:01,200 Speaker 2: Normally we get aero point seven or a point eight. 19 00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:03,920 Speaker 1: Which means the annual run rate is about two and 20 00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:05,440 Speaker 1: a half to three after three. 21 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:09,960 Speaker 2: Our angual run rates one currently. So it's saying that 22 00:01:09,959 --> 00:01:11,920 Speaker 2: the interest rate hikes that have been delivered from the 23 00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:15,280 Speaker 2: Reserve Bank since May twenty twenty two are working. 24 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:16,720 Speaker 1: Yeah, so you're not surprised. 25 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:20,080 Speaker 2: Not really. No, the rate hikes have done their job 26 00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:21,479 Speaker 2: in slowing the economy down. 27 00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:23,720 Speaker 1: Let's just stop on the GDP for a second, if 28 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 1: you don't mind. The GDP is a sum of a 29 00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:32,399 Speaker 1: number of outputs. So when you say that it's not 30 00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:34,959 Speaker 1: too bad, that's at point two, which is a run 31 00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 1: rate of one. You know, if you sort of want 32 00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:40,000 Speaker 1: to multiply point two by four, it's sort of, you know, 33 00:01:40,280 --> 00:01:44,759 Speaker 1: within the range of one percent prendum growth. But which 34 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:47,440 Speaker 1: parts of that DUTYP are growing and which parts are not? 35 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:51,760 Speaker 2: Oh, you've just opened up the can of worms. Because 36 00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:55,840 Speaker 2: the weakness, the unambiguous weakness, is us consumers, the household 37 00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:58,160 Speaker 2: consumption they call it, and that is the amount of 38 00:01:58,160 --> 00:02:02,240 Speaker 2: money that we can spend in the retail sector, the 39 00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:05,520 Speaker 2: amount of money we spend on insurance premiums, on dwelling rent. 40 00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 2: It's the amount of money that on a normal day, 41 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:10,200 Speaker 2: everybody listening to this will say, Oh, I go and 42 00:02:10,200 --> 00:02:12,359 Speaker 2: spend I buy a coffee, I pay my car regio, 43 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:15,160 Speaker 2: I do the grocery shopping. All of the things that 44 00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:20,240 Speaker 2: we buy has fallen in per capita terms for six 45 00:02:20,320 --> 00:02:24,280 Speaker 2: consecutive quarters. It's never done that before, and that's telling 46 00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 2: us that people are on what we call discretionary items, 47 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:30,400 Speaker 2: things that we like to have but don't have to have, 48 00:02:30,639 --> 00:02:35,040 Speaker 2: things like holidays, for example. Things like expensive items, we 49 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:37,720 Speaker 2: tend not to spend them when the economy's in trouble 50 00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:40,240 Speaker 2: or our personal finances are in trouble. That's where the 51 00:02:40,240 --> 00:02:43,680 Speaker 2: weakness has been the strength is and Treasurer Jim Charmers 52 00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:46,840 Speaker 2: has highlighted this. The reason why we didn't get negative 53 00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:52,600 Speaker 2: GDP and a genuine recession is the government spending lots 54 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 2: of money. It's hiring lots of people. 55 00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:57,720 Speaker 1: All gunmers do, by the way, you do not just federal. 56 00:02:57,440 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 2: Again this and this is not. This is not a 57 00:02:59,320 --> 00:03:01,880 Speaker 2: criticism because they're spending the money. And if you took 58 00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:03,360 Speaker 2: a step back to think, well, actually they're spending it 59 00:03:03,400 --> 00:03:06,639 Speaker 2: on age care nurses in age care facilities. They're spending 60 00:03:06,639 --> 00:03:09,680 Speaker 2: it on teachers so educating our kids. They're spending it 61 00:03:09,720 --> 00:03:12,800 Speaker 2: on infrastructure like the wonderful rail system that just opened 62 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,079 Speaker 2: up here in Sydney. You know that's government spending and 63 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:19,320 Speaker 2: it's not. And of course there's some ways you just 64 00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 2: have to look at money on the con games inficiency. 65 00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:25,680 Speaker 2: There's a lot of inefficiencies, but some of it's actually good. 66 00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 2: You know, I want my older Australians to be looked 67 00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:31,480 Speaker 2: after an age. I want them to be fed crap 68 00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:33,640 Speaker 2: food and not looked after. No, we're a good country. 69 00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:36,680 Speaker 2: We need to spend a bit of money. I'm not 70 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:39,440 Speaker 2: far behind, so, you know, so some of these things 71 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:42,360 Speaker 2: are good, and even things like defense expenditure. You know, 72 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 2: there's stuff going on in the geo political space around 73 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:48,160 Speaker 2: the world. We've just got to be very cautious. So 74 00:03:49,160 --> 00:03:51,520 Speaker 2: the question is what would you cut if you wanted 75 00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 2: to cut those things. It's pretty hard to find something. 76 00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:56,400 Speaker 2: But at the end of the day, the expenditure on 77 00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:59,840 Speaker 2: those things is money being put into the economy by 78 00:03:59,880 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 2: the government sector, and it's the one reason the one 79 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 2: growth area within our GDP numbers. So household consumption week, 80 00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 2: government spending strong. Business investment was broadly flat, so it 81 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:14,560 Speaker 2: was neither here nor there. It was pretty neutral. And 82 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:18,320 Speaker 2: then our net exports we're tending to start to weaken 83 00:04:18,360 --> 00:04:21,840 Speaker 2: because the Chinese economy is slowing down. They're buying less 84 00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:25,719 Speaker 2: of our raw materials iron or in particular, and so 85 00:04:25,839 --> 00:04:28,279 Speaker 2: that's where the weakness was. So we look at where 86 00:04:28,320 --> 00:04:32,000 Speaker 2: the most severe weakness was. It was in household consumption expended, 87 00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:34,400 Speaker 2: because that's over half of GDP. It's actually nearly two 88 00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:35,080 Speaker 2: thirds of GDP. 89 00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:39,240 Speaker 1: So if we took out the strong government expenditure in 90 00:04:39,320 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 1: the GDP number, we would be cooked. 91 00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:42,560 Speaker 2: We'd be cooked me a bit. I think it would 92 00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:45,120 Speaker 2: be about minus point three instead of plus point two. 93 00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:48,279 Speaker 1: So that's getting into a proper recession. 94 00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:51,040 Speaker 2: Feeding them recession. Which and so in a funny way, 95 00:04:51,080 --> 00:04:52,799 Speaker 2: the people who have got the jobs in the AHKF 96 00:04:52,839 --> 00:04:54,919 Speaker 2: sill is in education and health and all these other things. 97 00:04:55,160 --> 00:04:58,280 Speaker 2: They're the ones that are keeping the economy with its 98 00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:00,440 Speaker 2: head just above water. The other one that are sort 99 00:05:00,440 --> 00:05:02,880 Speaker 2: of getting a pay increase, and they're the ones that 100 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:05,000 Speaker 2: are sort of offsetting the weakness that we're seeing in 101 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:06,119 Speaker 2: private sector demand. 102 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,080 Speaker 1: And if I took out or if we took out 103 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:15,960 Speaker 1: the immigration build so you know, normally, so our population 104 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 1: growth organically that is people having kids, for example, I 105 00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:25,480 Speaker 1: think was about one hundred and twenty thousand last it's 106 00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:27,840 Speaker 1: a bit lower than normal, that's a bit lower, so 107 00:05:27,839 --> 00:05:30,000 Speaker 1: it runs about about one hundred and sixty thousand but it's. 108 00:05:29,839 --> 00:05:30,799 Speaker 2: A bit lower than normal. 109 00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:33,280 Speaker 1: But if you look at the immigration numbers, are were 110 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 1: quite high and they only come out of a couple 111 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:39,960 Speaker 1: of days ago. And so if you took that out, 112 00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:44,680 Speaker 1: the immigration, the extra immigration that we are seeing currently 113 00:05:44,800 --> 00:05:46,960 Speaker 1: relative to what we would ordinarily have, and it's around 114 00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:50,640 Speaker 1: about probably probably three hundred more than we would normally 115 00:05:50,640 --> 00:05:53,279 Speaker 1: get in a twel month period. And if you took 116 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 1: out the government spending, we probably would be in a 117 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:56,840 Speaker 1: fairly solid recession and. 118 00:05:56,800 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 2: Even a deeper recession. Yes, the population growth through immigrant 119 00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:07,320 Speaker 2: in quarterly terms, it's about zero point five or point six. 120 00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:10,280 Speaker 2: In terms of population growth, normally it's about point two, right, 121 00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 2: so if it's back to point two, you're losing point three. 122 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:17,440 Speaker 2: Let's be generous in our assessment, so on that score 123 00:06:17,440 --> 00:06:19,800 Speaker 2: would be at minus point one. So the fact that 124 00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:22,320 Speaker 2: we've got this very high level of immigration, immigrants do 125 00:06:22,440 --> 00:06:25,360 Speaker 2: spend money. They need a house, they need to eat, 126 00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:28,360 Speaker 2: they need to get a uber, they need to they 127 00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 2: spend money and they work too, so they're actually adding 128 00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:34,120 Speaker 2: to the economy. And that's another reason. The two reasons 129 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:39,760 Speaker 2: why we are not in in a deeper downturn, immigration 130 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:43,839 Speaker 2: and public sector spending and both of those things can't 131 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:44,480 Speaker 2: go on forever. 132 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:50,320 Speaker 1: No, well, especially politically. So okay, so you in terms 133 00:06:50,320 --> 00:06:55,760 Speaker 1: of your assessment of the economy, GDP is sort of 134 00:06:55,880 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 1: going okay, but is responding the way you would expel 135 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:03,080 Speaker 1: to respond given that we've had high interest rates for 136 00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:03,920 Speaker 1: quite a long time. 137 00:07:04,440 --> 00:07:06,760 Speaker 2: What else, it's weakening a lot o the markers, a 138 00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:10,200 Speaker 2: couple of other markers. We had the labor force numbers 139 00:07:10,280 --> 00:07:15,000 Speaker 2: just yesterday we had we're still getting really strong employment growth. 140 00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:15,840 Speaker 1: What is that? 141 00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:15,960 Speaker 2: Like? 142 00:07:15,960 --> 00:07:18,560 Speaker 1: I don't understand, Like, if the economy is sort of weak, 143 00:07:19,240 --> 00:07:21,440 Speaker 1: how are you still only at four point two unemployment? 144 00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:23,840 Speaker 1: Is there some some wrong with a calculation or what 145 00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:25,240 Speaker 1: there might be? 146 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:31,160 Speaker 2: But interestingly they're still going up because of the population growth. 147 00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:33,640 Speaker 2: But we have had an increase in the unemployment rate 148 00:07:33,640 --> 00:07:35,560 Speaker 2: from where we were a year ago. Yeah, month on month, 149 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:37,760 Speaker 2: These figures are all volatile. They're just a survey done 150 00:07:37,760 --> 00:07:42,280 Speaker 2: by the Bureau of Statistics. A year ago the unemployment 151 00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 2: rate was three point five percent. So we're now at 152 00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:45,800 Speaker 2: four point two. So it has crept up. You know, 153 00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:47,280 Speaker 2: It's been a few ups and a few downs, but 154 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:48,840 Speaker 2: generally there's it's. 155 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 1: Zigzagging upwards, so the trends up. 156 00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:52,600 Speaker 2: So the trend is up, there's no doubt about that. 157 00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 2: And when we look at things like job ads, job vacancies, 158 00:07:55,800 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 2: they're all tilting down and saying that. 159 00:07:57,480 --> 00:08:01,440 Speaker 1: The ages mate they had, it hasn't really reflected yet. 160 00:08:01,480 --> 00:08:03,320 Speaker 2: I mean it has a bit. No, it hasn't, not much, 161 00:08:03,400 --> 00:08:08,000 Speaker 2: not much, one thing. That one thing when the RBA governor, 162 00:08:08,040 --> 00:08:10,080 Speaker 2: so don't take my word for it, will take Michelle Bullock, 163 00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:12,400 Speaker 2: the RBA Governor, was asked this very question at her 164 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:15,320 Speaker 2: last press conference, and I'm sure on Tuesday at the 165 00:08:15,360 --> 00:08:18,600 Speaker 2: next board meeting she'll be asked about it again. She'll 166 00:08:18,640 --> 00:08:21,800 Speaker 2: be asked why is the labor market so resilient? Her 167 00:08:21,800 --> 00:08:24,200 Speaker 2: auntswer was actually really illustrated. I think it's something that 168 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:26,520 Speaker 2: we should consider and everybody listening to just. 169 00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:27,480 Speaker 1: Talk about it. 170 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 2: Then it was called the economic term is labor hoarding. 171 00:08:31,440 --> 00:08:34,600 Speaker 2: So it sounds like a strange thing for bosses to do, 172 00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 2: but it's a phenomenon that when the economy slows down. 173 00:08:38,679 --> 00:08:41,679 Speaker 2: If you're a business owner, your business is slowing down 174 00:08:41,720 --> 00:08:44,600 Speaker 2: as the economy weakens, You've got ten staff, for example, 175 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:46,720 Speaker 2: and you think, oh, gee, you know, I don't really 176 00:08:46,720 --> 00:08:49,720 Speaker 2: need these ten staff anymore. But I'm not going to 177 00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:51,720 Speaker 2: sack them yet because I'm not sure whether this downturn 178 00:08:51,760 --> 00:08:54,120 Speaker 2: is only temporary. And of course it costs a lot 179 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 2: to hire and fire people, so I'll just ask them 180 00:08:56,880 --> 00:08:59,280 Speaker 2: to work a few less hours, you know, no overtime, guys. 181 00:08:59,480 --> 00:09:01,440 Speaker 2: You know, it can just sort of take take you around. 182 00:09:01,480 --> 00:09:05,199 Speaker 2: You'll leave now, rise, no pay rise, just the things happens. 183 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:09,000 Speaker 2: So the firms hold on to their labor and only 184 00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:11,280 Speaker 2: sack people. Sounds very harsh thing to say, and the 185 00:09:11,360 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 2: unemployment then only goes up when they say, look, I 186 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:16,360 Speaker 2: can't afford to keep you anymore. I've got to sack 187 00:09:16,559 --> 00:09:17,440 Speaker 2: one or two people. 188 00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:19,640 Speaker 1: When do you get that? How do we know when 189 00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:23,160 Speaker 1: we're getting close to that point whereby we no longer 190 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:24,240 Speaker 1: hold our labor. 191 00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:28,559 Speaker 2: It's when there's a clear hit to company profits and 192 00:09:28,679 --> 00:09:31,560 Speaker 2: company profits because mining is not a very big employer 193 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:35,040 Speaker 2: of people. It's a very volatile part of the asx 194 00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:38,240 Speaker 2: the stock market, company profits are sort of trending down 195 00:09:38,360 --> 00:09:41,280 Speaker 2: a little bit because of the weakness in the economy. 196 00:09:41,280 --> 00:09:42,960 Speaker 2: Of course, so firms are not making as much money 197 00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:45,640 Speaker 2: as they were previously. If we were to get a 198 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:48,160 Speaker 2: further down draft in the next quarter or two, you'd 199 00:09:48,160 --> 00:09:50,040 Speaker 2: expect to see the unemployment rate to go up. So 200 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:52,920 Speaker 2: the Reserve Bank is forecasting un imployment rate to get 201 00:09:52,920 --> 00:09:55,520 Speaker 2: to four point four percent in the next couple of quarters. 202 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:58,960 Speaker 2: From four point two. It's huge. It's not we're almost there. 203 00:09:59,160 --> 00:10:02,520 Speaker 2: It's almost around area you'd say, yeah. Economics, the questions 204 00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:04,840 Speaker 2: will be will that be the peak? And a lot 205 00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:07,040 Speaker 2: of people out there. I look at all the market 206 00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:09,600 Speaker 2: economists that you know, very good people that the banks employ. 207 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 2: I think without exception that all sayings is going to 208 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:14,480 Speaker 2: go higher than four point four. 209 00:10:14,360 --> 00:10:16,560 Speaker 1: The general views and two point. 210 00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:19,920 Speaker 2: Seventy five, five, five and a quarter. As soon as 211 00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:23,560 Speaker 2: we get towards five, let alone hit five, let alone 212 00:10:23,640 --> 00:10:26,440 Speaker 2: exceed five. Then that's when the Reserve Bank has a 213 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:28,760 Speaker 2: real problem. That's when that's where we start getting serious 214 00:10:28,800 --> 00:10:30,559 Speaker 2: inter straight cuts. But we're not there yet. And I 215 00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 2: think that how. 216 00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 1: Many months of since it is? How many months is 217 00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:36,880 Speaker 1: it since our last rate rise? 218 00:10:36,960 --> 00:10:41,080 Speaker 2: It was in November last year, so it's up to ten. 219 00:10:40,559 --> 00:10:42,400 Speaker 1: Months, so we've had ten months of these. 220 00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:45,800 Speaker 2: Of no changing rates. That November they hiked them. 221 00:10:45,800 --> 00:10:47,840 Speaker 1: For the unemployment number still only four point two. 222 00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 2: Correct, Yes, correct. And the other thing that's sort. 223 00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:56,679 Speaker 1: Of perplexing me. It is perplexing because because we are 224 00:10:56,679 --> 00:10:59,760 Speaker 1: seeing the household consumption numbers come off quite dramatically, right. 225 00:10:59,640 --> 00:11:02,480 Speaker 2: And tail, which is a big employer of people, said, 226 00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:05,040 Speaker 2: mining doesn't employ a lot of people mining boom, and 227 00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:07,320 Speaker 2: a bus doesn't employ that many people. Retail, which is 228 00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:12,160 Speaker 2: really labor intensive. Retail includes your restaurants and cafes, the barista, 229 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:16,440 Speaker 2: the chef, the dish, pig washes, a lot of people 230 00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:18,800 Speaker 2: involved in that. That's where the weakness is beening. 231 00:11:19,040 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 1: And it's quite a big weakness. So I don't understand 232 00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:24,640 Speaker 1: why if they're a big employer, why are we still 233 00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:27,559 Speaker 1: at four point two and we had big and we've 234 00:11:27,559 --> 00:11:29,479 Speaker 1: had big immigration as well. 235 00:11:29,480 --> 00:11:31,040 Speaker 2: Mark, I'll come back to what we were saying a 236 00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:36,040 Speaker 2: couple of minutes ago. People are moving into age care, 237 00:11:36,920 --> 00:11:40,640 Speaker 2: right care education that if you look at. 238 00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:42,760 Speaker 1: The government's employing them, the government's employing them. 239 00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:46,040 Speaker 2: Correct. So, in fact, I think it might have been 240 00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:49,920 Speaker 2: Alex Joina, the fellow from IFM Investors Ye really good 241 00:11:49,920 --> 00:11:52,160 Speaker 2: econmis He pointed this out, so I'll give him the credit. 242 00:11:53,520 --> 00:11:56,320 Speaker 2: He pointed out that in the labor force release. What 243 00:11:56,679 --> 00:12:00,800 Speaker 2: was termed market based employment, which is basically private sector employment, 244 00:12:01,080 --> 00:12:03,240 Speaker 2: has only just crept up a little bit over the 245 00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:05,040 Speaker 2: last couple of years. So that's if that was the 246 00:12:05,040 --> 00:12:07,120 Speaker 2: only labor market indicator of the unemployt rate would be 247 00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:12,559 Speaker 2: at five percent already. Public sector employment, teachers, police, age care, 248 00:12:12,600 --> 00:12:16,360 Speaker 2: all those things that has been where I think I 249 00:12:16,400 --> 00:12:19,560 Speaker 2: don't want to misquote him, but my recollection is about 250 00:12:19,559 --> 00:12:21,840 Speaker 2: eighty percent of the new jobs that have been created 251 00:12:22,160 --> 00:12:26,440 Speaker 2: last year have been public sector. Normally, in normal times, 252 00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:29,440 Speaker 2: public sector creates about fifteen to twenty percent of all 253 00:12:29,440 --> 00:12:31,800 Speaker 2: the jobs that are created. So as the economy grows, 254 00:12:31,920 --> 00:12:33,560 Speaker 2: we do need a few more police, we do need 255 00:12:33,559 --> 00:12:36,559 Speaker 2: a few more teachers, fifteen to twenty percent. Now it's 256 00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:39,439 Speaker 2: eighty eight zero percent, and only twenty percent of the 257 00:12:39,480 --> 00:12:42,600 Speaker 2: jobs are coming from the private sector. And so yeah, 258 00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:45,600 Speaker 2: the public sector doesn't respond to interest rates at all. 259 00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:48,160 Speaker 2: It's the private sector that's get hits by interest rates. 260 00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:51,760 Speaker 2: So the reason why you're perplexed, and I'm perplexed about 261 00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:54,400 Speaker 2: a four point to unimploment rate is that the government 262 00:12:54,480 --> 00:12:59,800 Speaker 2: is employing the people who are leaving private sect employment 263 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:01,720 Speaker 2: and the retail trade in particular. 264 00:13:01,920 --> 00:13:06,160 Speaker 1: So maybe doctor Jim is a really good economist. 265 00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:09,760 Speaker 2: Well he's meeting this is the really interesting in the 266 00:13:09,880 --> 00:13:12,880 Speaker 2: unusual way. But he's meeting his election promises. Okay, we 267 00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:16,800 Speaker 2: are all critical of governments when they break their promises. 268 00:13:17,200 --> 00:13:19,080 Speaker 2: Fair enough, you go to election, you promise something, and 269 00:13:19,080 --> 00:13:20,920 Speaker 2: you break your promise, you deserve a kick in the tail, 270 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:25,800 Speaker 2: you know, fair enough. To their credit, they promised that 271 00:13:25,800 --> 00:13:27,680 Speaker 2: they would put a nurse in twenty four to seven 272 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:30,680 Speaker 2: into every age care facility, and they have That was, 273 00:13:30,760 --> 00:13:34,400 Speaker 2: if I remember correctly, forty or fifty thousand nurses that 274 00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:36,600 Speaker 2: had to be employed to meet that objective. So they 275 00:13:36,800 --> 00:13:40,559 Speaker 2: met their promise. Education, indis or these other things which 276 00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:43,599 Speaker 2: employ a lot of people. They're really labor intensive. Is 277 00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:45,520 Speaker 2: where a lot of the other employments come too. So 278 00:13:46,480 --> 00:13:49,440 Speaker 2: the question is, and this comes back to where you know, 279 00:13:49,480 --> 00:13:51,920 Speaker 2: the size of governments getting bigger. The budget which was 280 00:13:51,960 --> 00:13:54,360 Speaker 2: in surplus for two years is now in deficit this 281 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:57,720 Speaker 2: current year. If you want to get a balanced budget 282 00:13:57,800 --> 00:14:01,440 Speaker 2: and allow the rviator interest rates, because that's the other debate, 283 00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:04,480 Speaker 2: the only reason the RBA is not cutting like the Americans, 284 00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 2: like the Europeans and the new Zealanders and the Canadians. 285 00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:10,040 Speaker 2: Is because government's spending so strong. What would you cut? 286 00:14:10,440 --> 00:14:13,360 Speaker 2: And I mean I mean that in a political sense. 287 00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:16,080 Speaker 2: Would you cut your defense spending? Maybe? Would you cut 288 00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:19,560 Speaker 2: your nursing and age cam maybe not? Would you hike taxes? Well, 289 00:14:19,560 --> 00:14:21,800 Speaker 2: nobody wants to pay more tax So this is where 290 00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:26,440 Speaker 2: the government's got a real dilemma politically explaining that to 291 00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:29,280 Speaker 2: the people. And that's why they're behind in the polls, 292 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:31,840 Speaker 2: to be frank, because that they haven't explained it terribly well, 293 00:14:31,840 --> 00:14:32,600 Speaker 2: to be honest. 294 00:14:32,720 --> 00:14:34,440 Speaker 1: And do you think they're behind the polls because of 295 00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:38,200 Speaker 1: the economic performances? Behind the polls for other reasons. Look, 296 00:14:38,640 --> 00:14:40,520 Speaker 1: I know it's a little bit outside of our amber, 297 00:14:40,600 --> 00:14:42,880 Speaker 1: but but I like you what you got to say. 298 00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:45,840 Speaker 2: Look, I think it's the weak economy. People get pissed off. 299 00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:47,640 Speaker 1: To be blunt, it is number one on the surveys 300 00:14:47,640 --> 00:14:49,080 Speaker 1: of the moment cost of. 301 00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:53,400 Speaker 2: Living and people and we consumers are smart. Australian consumers 302 00:14:53,440 --> 00:14:56,480 Speaker 2: are really smart. They're really savvy. They know when their 303 00:14:56,520 --> 00:14:59,880 Speaker 2: bank accounts under financial stress, either through rent coming up 304 00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:02,920 Speaker 2: or so much money being sucked out of their bank 305 00:15:02,960 --> 00:15:05,400 Speaker 2: account every month on their mortgagey payments as interest rates 306 00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:08,400 Speaker 2: have gone up, and they can see their electricity bill, 307 00:15:08,440 --> 00:15:10,880 Speaker 2: they can see their insurance bill, they can see the 308 00:15:10,920 --> 00:15:13,600 Speaker 2: cost of their grocery bill, which you know, that high 309 00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:16,000 Speaker 2: inflation problem was very much about that sort of stuff. 310 00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:20,320 Speaker 2: And the government, the incumbent government of the day, John 311 00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:23,400 Speaker 2: Howard found this out a few years back, whatever various 312 00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:26,440 Speaker 2: governments have found found this out. When the economy is 313 00:15:26,480 --> 00:15:30,920 Speaker 2: in trouble, people blame the government, whether it's their fault 314 00:15:31,000 --> 00:15:32,600 Speaker 2: or not. And I'm not saying it is or it 315 00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:35,160 Speaker 2: isn't at this stage, but they blame the government. So 316 00:15:35,200 --> 00:15:38,240 Speaker 2: that's what you know, Albow and Jim Charmers have got 317 00:15:38,280 --> 00:15:41,960 Speaker 2: to deal with politically, because even if some it's their 318 00:15:41,960 --> 00:15:44,320 Speaker 2: fold or not their fold, or Jim's a miracle worker 319 00:15:44,320 --> 00:15:49,080 Speaker 2: because he's employing all these public servants or public employees. 320 00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:52,400 Speaker 2: People at the end of the day thinking, God, my 321 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:55,360 Speaker 2: ingestrates are still really high. Oh when's this rate cut coming. 322 00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:57,360 Speaker 2: It hasn't come through it, Oh Rent, Oh my god, 323 00:15:57,400 --> 00:15:59,840 Speaker 2: I'm still paying so much. My insurance bill just came in, 324 00:16:00,080 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 2: giving me the a real pressure on my on my finances. 325 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:07,120 Speaker 2: Oh the bloody government. I'm going to blame them. 326 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:08,560 Speaker 1: But it's a bit of a catch twenty two though, 327 00:16:08,600 --> 00:16:12,800 Speaker 1: isn't it? Because the more you not you, but the 328 00:16:12,800 --> 00:16:16,160 Speaker 1: more the government looks after let's call it the public sector, 329 00:16:17,160 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 1: the public employees, and puts money into their hands and 330 00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:26,040 Speaker 1: they then go and spend in the economy, the more 331 00:16:27,480 --> 00:16:29,560 Speaker 1: they have to put interest rate or the longer we 332 00:16:29,640 --> 00:16:33,240 Speaker 1: have to hold interest rates high, because the economies tends 333 00:16:33,280 --> 00:16:36,120 Speaker 1: to perform better than it really is. 334 00:16:37,280 --> 00:16:38,880 Speaker 2: Yes, there's an element of truth in them. 335 00:16:38,880 --> 00:16:40,120 Speaker 1: And which one is it? Though? Which one? 336 00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:40,560 Speaker 2: Which one? 337 00:16:40,600 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 1: Which one? I've a behavioral economic sense? Which you're an economists? 338 00:16:45,360 --> 00:16:46,680 Speaker 1: Which one affects people more? 339 00:16:46,720 --> 00:16:46,920 Speaker 2: Is it? 340 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:48,640 Speaker 1: I feel really good because I've got a good job 341 00:16:48,680 --> 00:16:50,400 Speaker 1: and I'm working, you know, I've got good hours, and 342 00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:52,280 Speaker 1: I'm getting good pay, and I'm one of the few 343 00:16:52,320 --> 00:16:54,880 Speaker 1: because I'm in the public sector. I've got wage increases 344 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:56,760 Speaker 1: and one of the few people got a proper wage increase. 345 00:16:57,320 --> 00:16:59,920 Speaker 1: Is Is that prevail? Or does it? No? Hang on, 346 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 1: but my cost of living has gone crazy, and I've 347 00:17:04,040 --> 00:17:06,400 Speaker 1: got paying higher insurances on my house and my car 348 00:17:06,480 --> 00:17:08,959 Speaker 1: and everything else is going on around me, and everything 349 00:17:08,960 --> 00:17:11,160 Speaker 1: cost just my cost of living is much more expensive. 350 00:17:11,280 --> 00:17:15,119 Speaker 1: Which one prevails politically. I mean you're around the gates. 351 00:17:16,359 --> 00:17:19,840 Speaker 2: Living hits everybody, right, everybody, whether you're the public servant, 352 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:25,479 Speaker 2: the tradey, the shop owner, the high for louton whatever 353 00:17:26,760 --> 00:17:29,840 Speaker 2: lawyer you know, earning truckloads of money, the cost of 354 00:17:29,880 --> 00:17:33,480 Speaker 2: living still affects you. One hundred percent of the population 355 00:17:33,680 --> 00:17:37,120 Speaker 2: pay more for their insurance and school fees and all 356 00:17:37,160 --> 00:17:37,840 Speaker 2: these other things. 357 00:17:38,160 --> 00:17:40,159 Speaker 1: And by the way, I you've got more access more to. 358 00:17:40,400 --> 00:17:42,399 Speaker 2: Correct it's only ten percent or twenty percent of the population. 359 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:46,280 Speaker 2: I've got the the secure, safe job with the decent payerrise. 360 00:17:46,320 --> 00:17:49,400 Speaker 2: As you said, So the cost of living impacts one 361 00:17:49,440 --> 00:17:52,439 Speaker 2: hundred percent of the population. Pensioners, young folk, you know, 362 00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:54,520 Speaker 2: young people at UNI, you know, getting out of Yuni 363 00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:56,520 Speaker 2: with their hex stet and you know they're sort of thinking, 364 00:17:56,560 --> 00:17:59,040 Speaker 2: oh my god, you know rent's gone up there. It 365 00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:02,280 Speaker 2: hits everybody. Where's the job that you might get in 366 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:04,719 Speaker 2: an age caresully with a nice fifteen to twenty five 367 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:10,280 Speaker 2: percent pay increase. Great, there's not enough to offset the 368 00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:15,919 Speaker 2: fact that the cost of living hits everyone. And that's why, well, 369 00:18:16,119 --> 00:18:18,560 Speaker 2: apart from the Reserve Bank, the government's hoping and hoping 370 00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:21,119 Speaker 2: like hell that that inflation rate falls and falls quickly 371 00:18:21,400 --> 00:18:24,640 Speaker 2: because the election is only what seven eight months away now? 372 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:29,800 Speaker 1: Yes, So just on that, do you think the RBA 373 00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:32,920 Speaker 1: of the government current government is sitting there thinking, hoping 374 00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:37,520 Speaker 1: to themselves we need a rate reduction, an RBA rate 375 00:18:37,560 --> 00:18:39,520 Speaker 1: reduction before the next election. 376 00:18:40,600 --> 00:18:45,880 Speaker 2: They're hoping for it, yes, and do they need it? Well, well, 377 00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:49,880 Speaker 2: Jim Charmers to his credits. I'll give him credit for this. He, 378 00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:52,359 Speaker 2: since he's been treasured, has always said the RBA is independent. 379 00:18:53,200 --> 00:18:54,880 Speaker 2: Now there's a debate whether he's saying the right thing, 380 00:18:54,920 --> 00:18:57,239 Speaker 2: but you know he does not like Keathing said I've 381 00:18:57,240 --> 00:19:01,920 Speaker 2: got the RBA in my pocket, and you know whether 382 00:19:01,960 --> 00:19:03,800 Speaker 2: that was true or not with Bernie Fraser back in 383 00:19:03,800 --> 00:19:06,320 Speaker 2: the day, who knows. But Jim has said the RBA 384 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:09,159 Speaker 2: sets interest rates. They do their job. I do my 385 00:19:09,280 --> 00:19:11,960 Speaker 2: job on government taxing and spending. They do it on 386 00:19:12,000 --> 00:19:14,760 Speaker 2: interest rates. We talk as they should, you know, I 387 00:19:14,800 --> 00:19:17,720 Speaker 2: hope they do. Gosh. But at the end of the day, 388 00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:20,920 Speaker 2: the Labor Party would really love to see a couple 389 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:24,040 Speaker 2: of rate cuts before the election because it'll be this 390 00:19:24,119 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 2: sort of situation where rate cuts people think, oh, thank goodness, 391 00:19:27,560 --> 00:19:29,320 Speaker 2: I've got a couple hundred bucks off my month of 392 00:19:29,320 --> 00:19:32,080 Speaker 2: the repayments, and of course the discussion amongst us the 393 00:19:32,080 --> 00:19:34,479 Speaker 2: connels will be, oh, it's probably more to come. So 394 00:19:34,600 --> 00:19:36,159 Speaker 2: that because there's not only going to be one or 395 00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:38,639 Speaker 2: two cuts when the cutting cycle starts, there will be 396 00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:43,879 Speaker 2: multiple rate cuts coming through. And so politically, you know, 397 00:19:43,880 --> 00:19:46,560 Speaker 2: they could sort of get on their on their high 398 00:19:46,600 --> 00:19:48,480 Speaker 2: horse and say, look, we had a problem. We had 399 00:19:48,520 --> 00:19:51,080 Speaker 2: a high interestrates, we had high inflation. But look we've 400 00:19:51,080 --> 00:19:53,119 Speaker 2: got through that problem, so vote for us. 401 00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:55,359 Speaker 1: Yes, Well we're not as bad a manager of you 402 00:19:55,440 --> 00:19:56,640 Speaker 1: as you Yes, And. 403 00:19:56,600 --> 00:19:58,760 Speaker 2: In fact we've got and we've got through this difficult time, 404 00:19:58,960 --> 00:20:01,760 Speaker 2: you know. And whether that winds botes, I don't know. 405 00:20:01,800 --> 00:20:03,359 Speaker 2: I'm not into that space, but you know, you can 406 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:05,160 Speaker 2: sort of see what they're hoping to achieve. 407 00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:11,679 Speaker 1: So let's look at the apart from GDP and labor market, 408 00:20:11,720 --> 00:20:16,360 Speaker 1: which came out today. So GDP list. 409 00:20:16,240 --> 00:20:18,600 Speaker 2: Markets yesterday, yes, yes, So. 410 00:20:19,320 --> 00:20:22,160 Speaker 1: What are the markers, what are the bits of data? 411 00:20:22,200 --> 00:20:24,600 Speaker 1: Have we got that hanging around before the next meeting? 412 00:20:25,880 --> 00:20:28,719 Speaker 2: Inflation? Inflation? Inflation and come out? 413 00:20:28,720 --> 00:20:29,320 Speaker 1: When's the next one? 414 00:20:29,320 --> 00:20:31,160 Speaker 2: In fact, we got the next one out this Wednesday, the. 415 00:20:31,119 --> 00:20:33,160 Speaker 1: Month after she meets. 416 00:20:33,280 --> 00:20:37,560 Speaker 2: Correct after one, and the big one with the October 417 00:20:38,480 --> 00:20:42,720 Speaker 2: Board meeting will be the September Corter inflation numbers. 418 00:20:42,760 --> 00:20:47,479 Speaker 1: Now, so what's the talk now around Wednesday is inflation 419 00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:48,080 Speaker 1: umber supple. 420 00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:50,800 Speaker 2: Even this monthly one is really interesting because I get 421 00:20:50,840 --> 00:20:53,679 Speaker 2: all the banks research and I really value it. They're smart, 422 00:20:53,960 --> 00:20:57,040 Speaker 2: smart economists in the in the financial markets. But just 423 00:20:57,160 --> 00:20:59,120 Speaker 2: the two that I that struck me, we're both west 424 00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:02,720 Speaker 2: Pack and Commwalf banking economists their economics teams. They're saying 425 00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:08,160 Speaker 2: that the effect of this subsidy on electricity prices, that's 426 00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:10,560 Speaker 2: seventy five dollars a quarter that came through in our 427 00:21:10,600 --> 00:21:11,879 Speaker 2: bills this quarter. 428 00:21:12,240 --> 00:21:14,119 Speaker 1: I can post the last budget YEP. 429 00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:16,760 Speaker 2: Which was a government policy initiative and plain and simple 430 00:21:16,800 --> 00:21:19,880 Speaker 2: to these cost of living pressures, is going to see 431 00:21:19,920 --> 00:21:24,200 Speaker 2: electricity prices dropped sixteen percent in the in the month. 432 00:21:25,080 --> 00:21:28,520 Speaker 2: That will shave at least point five point six off 433 00:21:28,560 --> 00:21:30,000 Speaker 2: your monthly inflation. 434 00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:30,520 Speaker 1: Rate by for the month. 435 00:21:30,760 --> 00:21:33,800 Speaker 2: For the month only, we've got a point six dropping 436 00:21:33,800 --> 00:21:35,840 Speaker 2: out of the run rate from a year ago. So 437 00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:38,879 Speaker 2: the annual figure is going to be hold onto your 438 00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:40,360 Speaker 2: hat two point. 439 00:21:40,119 --> 00:21:44,440 Speaker 1: Seven ye three pot eight down market. That's that's the. 440 00:21:44,800 --> 00:21:48,400 Speaker 2: Heads distorted, but the headline will be distorted. It will 441 00:21:48,440 --> 00:21:53,240 Speaker 2: be distorted by that insurance. So the electricity subsidy that's 442 00:21:53,240 --> 00:21:56,440 Speaker 2: coming through, but that for the month, for the month, 443 00:21:56,680 --> 00:21:59,520 Speaker 2: and it'll continue for twelve months until that subsidy disappears 444 00:21:59,640 --> 00:22:02,120 Speaker 2: in one July twenty twenty five. 445 00:22:02,240 --> 00:22:04,199 Speaker 1: That's but that's not that's not a quarterly. That's not 446 00:22:04,200 --> 00:22:06,240 Speaker 1: going to contribute too much to the quarterly run rate. 447 00:22:06,800 --> 00:22:08,719 Speaker 2: It'll help, it'll help the it'll help drop the run 448 00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:11,520 Speaker 2: rate down to under three. We'll have a headline figure 449 00:22:11,560 --> 00:22:13,959 Speaker 2: under three. Now, the question is I think we discussed 450 00:22:14,000 --> 00:22:16,960 Speaker 2: this last time, Is that the RBA know that it's 451 00:22:16,960 --> 00:22:23,680 Speaker 2: a distortion and I'm I'm sixty forty on it. Yes, 452 00:22:23,720 --> 00:22:25,680 Speaker 2: it's a lower cost of living. It's a good thing 453 00:22:25,920 --> 00:22:29,399 Speaker 2: in that people are paying less for electricity. If the 454 00:22:29,440 --> 00:22:31,920 Speaker 2: inflation rate comes at two point seven for the month 455 00:22:31,960 --> 00:22:34,280 Speaker 2: and for the quarter wages at three and a half, 456 00:22:34,520 --> 00:22:36,359 Speaker 2: it is a true cost of living measure because I'm 457 00:22:36,359 --> 00:22:39,080 Speaker 2: not paying as much from electricity because of this subsidy. Fine, 458 00:22:39,760 --> 00:22:42,080 Speaker 2: But from the RBA's perspective, and this is where there's 459 00:22:42,280 --> 00:22:45,480 Speaker 2: an element of strong element of truth, is that the 460 00:22:45,600 --> 00:22:49,199 Speaker 2: RBA is setting interest rates to adjust how much you 461 00:22:49,280 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 2: and I and everybody listening spends in the economy. They 462 00:22:52,600 --> 00:22:56,920 Speaker 2: want us to trim our spending so that businesses don't 463 00:22:56,920 --> 00:23:00,400 Speaker 2: increase their prices, maybe lower them so that it inflation 464 00:23:00,520 --> 00:23:03,920 Speaker 2: comes back under control. Yeah, the government could do all 465 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:06,720 Speaker 2: sorts of things on beer exercise and petro excise and 466 00:23:06,720 --> 00:23:10,800 Speaker 2: get inflation down. That's not how you do it. You 467 00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:15,359 Speaker 2: manage demand spending in the economy to meet inflation. And 468 00:23:15,400 --> 00:23:17,040 Speaker 2: that's why the Reserve Bank will look at what we 469 00:23:17,080 --> 00:23:21,560 Speaker 2: call the trimmed mean inflation rate, which takes out the 470 00:23:21,600 --> 00:23:24,879 Speaker 2: extremely volatile items, and of course electricity will be minus 471 00:23:24,880 --> 00:23:27,840 Speaker 2: sixteen percent, very volatile item, and they'll look at this 472 00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:31,520 Speaker 2: underlying or core inflation rate, and that's probably still going 473 00:23:31,600 --> 00:23:33,760 Speaker 2: to be in the low threes. Three and a quarter 474 00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:36,400 Speaker 2: three point four three still an improvement, though on improvement, 475 00:23:36,560 --> 00:23:41,120 Speaker 2: it's trending down, as Michelle Bullock I'm sure say it's 476 00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:44,280 Speaker 2: trending down, but we'd like it to fall faster. Yeah, 477 00:23:44,840 --> 00:23:47,000 Speaker 2: we'd like it to fall more and quicker and sooner, 478 00:23:47,720 --> 00:23:49,080 Speaker 2: and until it does, we're on hold. 479 00:23:49,560 --> 00:23:53,879 Speaker 1: So CBA was predicting a rate reduction this year. I 480 00:23:53,880 --> 00:23:56,560 Speaker 1: think they're the only bank out of all the majors 481 00:23:57,400 --> 00:24:00,800 Speaker 1: predictaous are they still at that territory saying November. 482 00:24:00,800 --> 00:24:05,680 Speaker 2: But Garth Aired, who's the chief Aussie economist, excellent too, 483 00:24:05,720 --> 00:24:08,240 Speaker 2: by the way, soorry to give all my economists mates 484 00:24:08,440 --> 00:24:11,960 Speaker 2: an uptick. But they're good. They pushed it out to December, right, 485 00:24:12,119 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 2: they're saying Novembers too soon. The reason why they've moved 486 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:16,119 Speaker 2: it to December. 487 00:24:16,440 --> 00:24:17,160 Speaker 1: Meeting in December. 488 00:24:17,359 --> 00:24:19,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, about the seventh eighth of December. There's only three more. 489 00:24:19,720 --> 00:24:23,160 Speaker 2: There's one twenty fourth of September, there's one late October, 490 00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:24,159 Speaker 2: this last one in December. 491 00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:27,040 Speaker 1: So we don't have the Melbourne Cup day meetings anymore, 492 00:24:27,040 --> 00:24:27,280 Speaker 1: do we? 493 00:24:27,960 --> 00:24:29,760 Speaker 2: No? I think all this one might be about Melbourne 494 00:24:29,760 --> 00:24:32,840 Speaker 2: Cup dates in early November. Don't don't hold. 495 00:24:32,880 --> 00:24:35,080 Speaker 1: One on the second in November, the first Tuesday November 496 00:24:35,080 --> 00:24:35,480 Speaker 1: every year. 497 00:24:35,560 --> 00:24:38,119 Speaker 2: Yeah, we used to because that was. 498 00:24:38,080 --> 00:24:40,080 Speaker 1: Alway an important because they always either put rates uple 499 00:24:40,160 --> 00:24:40,760 Speaker 1: down like. 500 00:24:41,160 --> 00:24:42,680 Speaker 2: They almost always did it always. 501 00:24:42,960 --> 00:24:45,040 Speaker 1: I don't know why, but they just generally speaking do 502 00:24:45,119 --> 00:24:45,760 Speaker 1: something usual. 503 00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:48,960 Speaker 2: Because they've got the quarterly CPI a week beforehand. 504 00:24:48,440 --> 00:24:54,800 Speaker 1: And we'll just check it without production. So this fifth 505 00:24:54,800 --> 00:24:57,160 Speaker 1: of November cover day, great. 506 00:24:57,000 --> 00:25:01,719 Speaker 2: So so anyway, CBI pushed it back one meeting, right 507 00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:07,280 Speaker 2: because they're of the view that resilience in the labor 508 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:09,119 Speaker 2: market that we were talking about a minute ago was 509 00:25:09,160 --> 00:25:12,600 Speaker 2: important to them and that maybe, just maybe some of 510 00:25:12,640 --> 00:25:15,560 Speaker 2: these measures of income tax cuts might be having a 511 00:25:15,600 --> 00:25:18,760 Speaker 2: lag deffect in terms of spending the electricity subsets that 512 00:25:18,800 --> 00:25:20,960 Speaker 2: we're mentioning in terms of the CPI, that's seventy five 513 00:25:21,000 --> 00:25:24,680 Speaker 2: bucks in people's pockets that they may spend. So it's 514 00:25:24,680 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 2: not saying that the economy is still weak, but the 515 00:25:26,760 --> 00:25:30,240 Speaker 2: RBA want to be rolled gold certain that that weakness 516 00:25:30,280 --> 00:25:34,480 Speaker 2: is continuing, that the inflation rate's falling. In December, they'll 517 00:25:34,520 --> 00:25:38,720 Speaker 2: have the next quarterly GDP number, as you were just saying, 518 00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:41,600 Speaker 2: it was only point two last quarter, too early to 519 00:25:41,600 --> 00:25:43,280 Speaker 2: make a forecast and what it might be this time, 520 00:25:43,320 --> 00:25:45,480 Speaker 2: but it's not going to be strong. Retail sales are 521 00:25:45,480 --> 00:25:49,000 Speaker 2: still pretty sluggish, building approvals are still pretty ordinary. Might 522 00:25:49,080 --> 00:25:51,720 Speaker 2: just be saved again by government demand, but we. 523 00:25:51,720 --> 00:25:57,600 Speaker 1: Might also get the Black Friday finals. Yes, there are 524 00:25:57,960 --> 00:26:02,040 Speaker 1: few weird phenomenous that exist around it, which which sort 525 00:26:02,040 --> 00:26:04,320 Speaker 1: of skew the skew the numbers of it, particularly retail 526 00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:04,680 Speaker 1: and they did. 527 00:26:04,720 --> 00:26:07,000 Speaker 2: Last year too. That's why they rate hike in November, 528 00:26:07,040 --> 00:26:11,359 Speaker 2: because they saw the Black Friday consumers come back my 529 00:26:11,480 --> 00:26:11,840 Speaker 2: rates again. 530 00:26:11,880 --> 00:26:14,760 Speaker 3: We become like the Christmas Day shopping days. Christmas forward 531 00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:17,280 Speaker 3: about six or eight weeks. Yeah, so it's really interesting. 532 00:26:17,320 --> 00:26:19,639 Speaker 3: And by the way, by then, of course they have 533 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:21,879 Speaker 3: a lot more information what's happening globally. You know, the 534 00:26:21,880 --> 00:26:24,879 Speaker 3: Americans only cut rates this week half a percentage point. 535 00:26:25,240 --> 00:26:27,280 Speaker 3: There are more cuts priced in, so I dare say 536 00:26:27,280 --> 00:26:29,679 Speaker 3: the RBA would love to see, you know, they're going 537 00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:32,760 Speaker 3: to cut another couple of times. Bank of England were 538 00:26:32,800 --> 00:26:35,520 Speaker 3: on hold this week even though they've cut previously. So 539 00:26:35,880 --> 00:26:39,959 Speaker 3: will they resume their cutting cycle again? European European Canada 540 00:26:40,200 --> 00:26:42,760 Speaker 3: kiwis they have all cut rates at least once. 541 00:26:42,760 --> 00:26:43,880 Speaker 1: Are they still cutting though? 542 00:26:43,960 --> 00:26:47,800 Speaker 2: I can't. They're still cutting, but they're they're talking of pauses. 543 00:26:47,840 --> 00:26:49,439 Speaker 2: In most of them. There's just one or two cuts, 544 00:26:49,480 --> 00:26:53,119 Speaker 2: just as what we might call insurance rate cuts against 545 00:26:53,119 --> 00:26:56,720 Speaker 2: the hard landing. So they want, like our own Reserve Bank, 546 00:26:56,800 --> 00:26:59,440 Speaker 2: here's a couple of rate cuts just to take a 547 00:26:59,480 --> 00:27:01,960 Speaker 2: bit of pre off the economy. But we're going to 548 00:27:01,960 --> 00:27:05,199 Speaker 2: pause now until we get absolute confirmation that inflations back 549 00:27:05,280 --> 00:27:05,800 Speaker 2: under control. 550 00:27:05,920 --> 00:27:08,200 Speaker 1: So, just just in terms of summary that, I think 551 00:27:08,240 --> 00:27:11,400 Speaker 1: that that's a really important point you just made. Using 552 00:27:11,400 --> 00:27:13,840 Speaker 1: the word hard landing. I think it's fair to say 553 00:27:13,880 --> 00:27:18,240 Speaker 1: that no government wants to see a disaster, so they're 554 00:27:18,240 --> 00:27:20,880 Speaker 1: not exactly sure what that means or how that occurs. 555 00:27:20,880 --> 00:27:22,920 Speaker 1: So they're saying, in the case of the US, we'll 556 00:27:22,960 --> 00:27:25,240 Speaker 1: give it a half a point trim, half a percentage, 557 00:27:26,320 --> 00:27:28,680 Speaker 1: fifty base point trim. I should say we'll give it 558 00:27:28,680 --> 00:27:31,120 Speaker 1: a fifty base point trim, which is a pretty good 559 00:27:31,160 --> 00:27:33,280 Speaker 1: as a good whack that gives buy some bit of 560 00:27:33,320 --> 00:27:36,719 Speaker 1: insurance before they're trying to buy insurance against the economy 561 00:27:36,720 --> 00:27:39,320 Speaker 1: getting out of control. We're going growing too hard. Now 562 00:27:39,359 --> 00:27:42,000 Speaker 1: they're trying to buy insurance for making sure it doesn't 563 00:27:42,000 --> 00:27:43,080 Speaker 1: get too weak. 564 00:27:43,440 --> 00:27:43,760 Speaker 2: Correct. 565 00:27:44,080 --> 00:27:52,600 Speaker 1: And it looks like UK, ECB, European Union and Canada went, 566 00:27:53,160 --> 00:27:56,240 Speaker 1: and it's morey about New Zealand. New Zealand they did 567 00:27:56,240 --> 00:27:58,600 Speaker 1: as well, but they all went way ahead of the USA. 568 00:27:59,000 --> 00:28:00,560 Speaker 2: Do you think it has gone three times? 569 00:28:00,560 --> 00:28:03,040 Speaker 1: By the way, and do you expect do you expect 570 00:28:03,080 --> 00:28:07,359 Speaker 1: that that's how she would react when the time comes? 571 00:28:07,560 --> 00:28:09,480 Speaker 2: I think so too, And that's and that's the really 572 00:28:09,520 --> 00:28:13,800 Speaker 2: interesting thing about some of these rate cuts. And remember 573 00:28:13,800 --> 00:28:15,600 Speaker 2: the fifty basis point from the FED was from a 574 00:28:15,680 --> 00:28:17,639 Speaker 2: five point five percent starting point. We're not at two 575 00:28:17,680 --> 00:28:19,520 Speaker 2: and cutting to one and a half, So you know, 576 00:28:19,560 --> 00:28:21,159 Speaker 2: there's a bit of fat there if you like, for 577 00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:24,200 Speaker 2: the first couple of rate cuts. But again, we've had 578 00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:26,320 Speaker 2: this discussion before. I'm pretty sure we talked about this 579 00:28:26,400 --> 00:28:30,320 Speaker 2: last time in the discussion about rate cuts around the world, 580 00:28:30,359 --> 00:28:34,119 Speaker 2: including here in Australia. Do not think that we're going 581 00:28:34,160 --> 00:28:36,840 Speaker 2: to go back to where rates were. We are not 582 00:28:38,040 --> 00:28:39,640 Speaker 2: this debate about rate cuts up. 583 00:28:39,560 --> 00:28:42,320 Speaker 1: Down, And by the way, said exactly correct. 584 00:28:42,600 --> 00:28:45,520 Speaker 2: Correct. Everybody, every central banker who's spoken about rate cuts 585 00:28:45,520 --> 00:28:48,640 Speaker 2: has said the same thing. So all we are talking 586 00:28:48,720 --> 00:28:52,520 Speaker 2: about in this rate cutting cycle is whether we cut 587 00:28:53,040 --> 00:28:57,840 Speaker 2: this is in total one hundred one fifty basis points 588 00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:00,560 Speaker 2: two hundred if things are worse than expect. But that's it. 589 00:29:00,680 --> 00:29:03,600 Speaker 2: So the case in Australia if and it's a big 590 00:29:03,640 --> 00:29:06,160 Speaker 2: if we've got one hundred and fifty rate basic points 591 00:29:06,200 --> 00:29:09,120 Speaker 2: of rate cuts over the next twelve or eighty months, 592 00:29:09,200 --> 00:29:12,160 Speaker 2: we'd be what down at two point eighty five percent? 593 00:29:12,560 --> 00:29:14,120 Speaker 1: Two. I just can't see it. 594 00:29:14,640 --> 00:29:16,120 Speaker 2: We might only get one hundred, so we're down a 595 00:29:16,120 --> 00:29:19,120 Speaker 2: three point three five. That's we're not talking more rate 596 00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:23,280 Speaker 2: cuts because the structure of the economy, the structure which 597 00:29:23,360 --> 00:29:27,280 Speaker 2: is driving inflation, and even this lower inflation great news. 598 00:29:27,320 --> 00:29:29,480 Speaker 2: I'm delighted to see inflation coming down and all the 599 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:32,240 Speaker 2: rest of it. But we're not going to be moving 600 00:29:32,240 --> 00:29:34,880 Speaker 2: to one percent or zero percent inflation. We'll be hitting 601 00:29:34,920 --> 00:29:38,640 Speaker 2: the targets. That's great, but not massively overshooting that we 602 00:29:38,760 --> 00:29:43,040 Speaker 2: require cut after cut after cut to get inflation back up. 603 00:29:43,280 --> 00:29:45,160 Speaker 2: We're gonna hit the targets. They're gonna cut, they're gonna hold, 604 00:29:45,160 --> 00:29:47,600 Speaker 2: they're gonna pause, you know. So all we are talking 605 00:29:47,640 --> 00:29:50,520 Speaker 2: about with this rate cutting cycle around the world, but 606 00:29:50,640 --> 00:29:54,400 Speaker 2: also here is yeah, one hundred points and maybe a 607 00:29:54,440 --> 00:29:56,280 Speaker 2: smidge more if something goes wrong. 608 00:29:56,440 --> 00:29:58,600 Speaker 1: So I'd like to refer to this as the interest 609 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:02,000 Speaker 1: rate tango. You know, it's sort of a little move here, 610 00:30:02,080 --> 00:30:04,200 Speaker 1: then we stop and have a look at each other's eyes, 611 00:30:04,280 --> 00:30:07,080 Speaker 1: and then we have another move over here, because it 612 00:30:07,160 --> 00:30:09,280 Speaker 1: really music stops, and it's going to be like an 613 00:30:09,320 --> 00:30:10,800 Speaker 1: interest rate tangle. It's going to be like a tanger. 614 00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:14,560 Speaker 2: Oh and I think the other thing. Mark. We remember this. 615 00:30:14,640 --> 00:30:17,640 Speaker 2: It's important that everybody listening remembers this too. That the 616 00:30:17,680 --> 00:30:21,440 Speaker 2: COVID period and the period after the COVID lockdowns and 617 00:30:21,480 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 2: those all those rate hikes, that's not usually how central 618 00:30:24,480 --> 00:30:28,160 Speaker 2: banks move into If you look at the period, you know, 619 00:30:28,480 --> 00:30:31,480 Speaker 2: I'll even talk about a nineteen year period from the 620 00:30:31,560 --> 00:30:35,560 Speaker 2: year twenty to twenty nineteen. Go to the RBA web page. 621 00:30:35,560 --> 00:30:37,520 Speaker 2: You look at the number of times rates go up 622 00:30:37,640 --> 00:30:41,520 Speaker 2: or down versus the number of times they're steady. We 623 00:30:41,600 --> 00:30:45,080 Speaker 2: often go a year or two with one or two moves. 624 00:30:45,480 --> 00:30:47,760 Speaker 2: Whether it's up or down doesn't matter. The Reserve Bank 625 00:30:47,800 --> 00:30:50,960 Speaker 2: does not like to adjust interest rates. They only do 626 00:30:51,000 --> 00:30:53,360 Speaker 2: it when they have to, and when they have to 627 00:30:53,360 --> 00:30:54,960 Speaker 2: be fine, they'll do it. They'll cut, they'll hike, they'll 628 00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:57,120 Speaker 2: do whatever they do. Normally, they do two or three 629 00:30:57,160 --> 00:30:59,800 Speaker 2: and then they'll pause for a year. So your tango analogy, 630 00:31:00,240 --> 00:31:03,120 Speaker 2: we've done a couple. Let's just sit back and see 631 00:31:03,200 --> 00:31:05,160 Speaker 2: how they are working. You know, let's just see if 632 00:31:05,160 --> 00:31:09,120 Speaker 2: this is enough medicine to meet our growth target, our 633 00:31:09,200 --> 00:31:14,000 Speaker 2: unemployment target, and our inflation target. And if they find out, 634 00:31:14,040 --> 00:31:15,960 Speaker 2: oh gee, we haven't done enough, they'll do another couple 635 00:31:16,000 --> 00:31:19,160 Speaker 2: more in a year's time. And so that's why I 636 00:31:19,160 --> 00:31:20,840 Speaker 2: think we're getting you know, we're saying before that the 637 00:31:20,880 --> 00:31:23,520 Speaker 2: last move in Australia was November last year. So what's 638 00:31:23,560 --> 00:31:24,160 Speaker 2: that ten. 639 00:31:24,000 --> 00:31:27,360 Speaker 1: Months there was Melbourne Cup Day last year. 640 00:31:27,480 --> 00:31:29,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, we could well go another couple of months before 641 00:31:29,520 --> 00:31:33,120 Speaker 2: we get our first cut here, you know whatever, and 642 00:31:33,160 --> 00:31:35,480 Speaker 2: then we might get a couple and then nothing through 643 00:31:35,480 --> 00:31:37,840 Speaker 2: the remainder of twenty five twenty six. We'll see what happens, 644 00:31:37,840 --> 00:31:40,440 Speaker 2: you know, double be forecast that too far out, but 645 00:31:40,480 --> 00:31:44,880 Speaker 2: we're not going to well, barring some awful event or 646 00:31:44,960 --> 00:31:48,080 Speaker 2: something strange happening in the economy or geopolitical event, they're 647 00:31:48,080 --> 00:31:51,040 Speaker 2: just going to tweak them down, hold them. They prefer 648 00:31:51,080 --> 00:31:53,240 Speaker 2: to keep rates steady then to put them up or down. 649 00:31:53,760 --> 00:31:57,720 Speaker 1: So how important then, is the Jerome power Fed reserve 650 00:31:58,600 --> 00:32:03,360 Speaker 1: fifty base of points reduction of their interust rates last week? 651 00:32:04,040 --> 00:32:05,800 Speaker 2: It's important for US? 652 00:32:05,960 --> 00:32:07,880 Speaker 1: Yeah? How important? Though? I mean, what do they do? 653 00:32:08,280 --> 00:32:09,960 Speaker 2: It's not the dominant thing. Look, we don't move rates 654 00:32:10,000 --> 00:32:12,440 Speaker 2: in lockstep with the US, no, but and it's a 655 00:32:12,520 --> 00:32:16,040 Speaker 2: really important butt if the US is cutting inter strates 656 00:32:16,120 --> 00:32:19,240 Speaker 2: using this example, now, it's because the economy is slowing down, 657 00:32:19,280 --> 00:32:22,560 Speaker 2: inflation's falling, they're worried about the labor market and dry 658 00:32:22,600 --> 00:32:26,080 Speaker 2: and Powell, the FED chairperson, said this quite explicitly. We're 659 00:32:26,120 --> 00:32:28,560 Speaker 2: doing this to make sure that the unemployment rate doesn't 660 00:32:28,560 --> 00:32:31,400 Speaker 2: go up too much in twenty twenty five. We're starting 661 00:32:31,440 --> 00:32:35,040 Speaker 2: now with a fifty point move to make sure that 662 00:32:35,200 --> 00:32:39,200 Speaker 2: the economy is not even weaker next year. The US 663 00:32:39,280 --> 00:32:42,960 Speaker 2: is still the world's biggest economy, still bigger than China using. 664 00:32:42,760 --> 00:32:44,800 Speaker 1: Different measures, but especially at the moment. 665 00:32:44,680 --> 00:32:48,320 Speaker 2: And it's a dominant part of global capital markets, stock markets, 666 00:32:48,320 --> 00:32:51,560 Speaker 2: bond markets, everything. It's while we wake up in the morning, 667 00:32:51,760 --> 00:32:53,360 Speaker 2: what happened to the US stock market? What happened to 668 00:32:53,360 --> 00:32:55,800 Speaker 2: the US bond market? It matters. It's not just for 669 00:32:55,840 --> 00:32:59,200 Speaker 2: fun that we do that. If they go barey up, 670 00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:03,000 Speaker 2: it's it's a disaster. If they go well, we get 671 00:33:03,080 --> 00:33:05,920 Speaker 2: dragged along on the coattails. So Jerome Powell and the 672 00:33:05,960 --> 00:33:11,360 Speaker 2: FED cutting fifty is big news. It's saying that the 673 00:33:11,400 --> 00:33:15,280 Speaker 2: FED is willing to be pretty aggressive because it was 674 00:33:15,320 --> 00:33:16,840 Speaker 2: not the consensus. For you, by the way, they only 675 00:33:16,840 --> 00:33:19,920 Speaker 2: thought they'd cut twenty five the Wall Street economists, I 676 00:33:19,920 --> 00:33:22,400 Speaker 2: think the vast majority said twenty five, and we'll see 677 00:33:22,440 --> 00:33:25,680 Speaker 2: how they go. But they went fifty. And it's saying 678 00:33:25,720 --> 00:33:31,720 Speaker 2: that the US economy, if it weakens, will have big 679 00:33:31,720 --> 00:33:34,360 Speaker 2: implications for the global economy. And of course we've got 680 00:33:34,400 --> 00:33:36,560 Speaker 2: the US presidential election to throw into that mix. To 681 00:33:36,640 --> 00:33:39,680 Speaker 2: heaven forbid, who knows what happens there, but the US 682 00:33:39,720 --> 00:33:42,720 Speaker 2: economy by taking this pro growth stance, and that's what 683 00:33:42,760 --> 00:33:46,480 Speaker 2: it is. Aggressive rate cuts are beneficial for the economy 684 00:33:46,520 --> 00:33:49,200 Speaker 2: in six to twelve months time. And if the FED 685 00:33:49,200 --> 00:33:51,240 Speaker 2: cuts a couple more times late this year and in 686 00:33:51,240 --> 00:33:53,600 Speaker 2: the first half of next year, the US economy be 687 00:33:53,680 --> 00:33:57,840 Speaker 2: very strong in twenty twenty five twenty six. Economy is strong, 688 00:33:58,600 --> 00:34:03,680 Speaker 2: huge driver of demand for or consumer goods, huge driver 689 00:34:03,720 --> 00:34:09,080 Speaker 2: of demand for metals and materials and energy, and that 690 00:34:09,160 --> 00:34:12,640 Speaker 2: helps the global economy, helps the Australian economy. So again 691 00:34:12,680 --> 00:34:15,440 Speaker 2: we don't move in lockstep. But if they keep cutting 692 00:34:15,440 --> 00:34:17,200 Speaker 2: and cutting and cutting over the next three or four 693 00:34:17,200 --> 00:34:20,479 Speaker 2: months and we don't, something's gone out out of whack. 694 00:34:20,680 --> 00:34:24,200 Speaker 1: So if the US Federal Reserve has which they have, 695 00:34:24,200 --> 00:34:28,399 Speaker 1: they've cut the industrates in response to where inflation is, 696 00:34:29,960 --> 00:34:32,279 Speaker 1: how important is that to us in terms of our 697 00:34:32,320 --> 00:34:34,640 Speaker 1: important inflation into Australia. 698 00:34:36,680 --> 00:34:38,920 Speaker 2: When we look back at our inflation problem was that, 699 00:34:39,120 --> 00:34:41,560 Speaker 2: but that a lot of that was imported items. The 700 00:34:41,640 --> 00:34:44,839 Speaker 2: supply chain problems, the price of timber and oil and 701 00:34:44,920 --> 00:34:48,400 Speaker 2: all this stuff when it was freight shipping costs nothing 702 00:34:48,440 --> 00:34:49,440 Speaker 2: really to do with Australia. 703 00:34:49,440 --> 00:34:52,680 Speaker 1: I'm Bill Evan saying. We talked about the cost of 704 00:34:52,760 --> 00:34:53,560 Speaker 1: timber imports. 705 00:34:53,640 --> 00:34:56,000 Speaker 2: Yes, it was extraordinary. That's why the building costs went up, 706 00:34:56,040 --> 00:34:58,520 Speaker 2: the cost of construction and items went up in Australia, 707 00:34:58,960 --> 00:35:01,000 Speaker 2: and that was nothing to do with the Ah. It 708 00:35:01,120 --> 00:35:03,239 Speaker 2: was so we imported it. So on the way down 709 00:35:03,560 --> 00:35:07,920 Speaker 2: we import forlly inflation good. Yes, And the interesting thing 710 00:35:07,920 --> 00:35:10,000 Speaker 2: about that market, just in the last day or two 711 00:35:10,040 --> 00:35:13,600 Speaker 2: or three, the Osie dolls back above sixty sixty eight cents, 712 00:35:13,640 --> 00:35:17,320 Speaker 2: i should say, which also adds to the downside risks 713 00:35:17,320 --> 00:35:19,640 Speaker 2: to inflation because everything we import will be a little 714 00:35:19,640 --> 00:35:22,120 Speaker 2: bit cheaper as the OI dollar goes up. So that's 715 00:35:22,160 --> 00:35:25,040 Speaker 2: an important part of our path to lower inflation, if 716 00:35:25,080 --> 00:35:27,000 Speaker 2: you like. And Okay, it's only been a couple of days. 717 00:35:27,000 --> 00:35:28,600 Speaker 2: It's got to stay there for a period of time 718 00:35:28,640 --> 00:35:31,640 Speaker 2: for it to really impact on what importers pay for 719 00:35:31,640 --> 00:35:35,440 Speaker 2: them for their goods and services. But this whole process 720 00:35:35,640 --> 00:35:41,360 Speaker 2: of the FED cutting of US inflation rate tracking lower 721 00:35:42,120 --> 00:35:45,759 Speaker 2: in line with Chinese inflation tracking lower, and inflation around 722 00:35:45,800 --> 00:35:48,239 Speaker 2: the world. You know, the oil prices where commodity prices down. 723 00:35:48,440 --> 00:35:51,080 Speaker 2: Iron ore, which was one hundred and forty US dollars 724 00:35:51,160 --> 00:35:54,319 Speaker 2: a ton, a really important export issue for Australia, is 725 00:35:54,360 --> 00:35:58,040 Speaker 2: now ninety US dollars a ton, So the iron ore 726 00:35:58,040 --> 00:36:00,520 Speaker 2: producers still making money, but not as much. That has 727 00:36:00,560 --> 00:36:03,480 Speaker 2: implications on tax re seats for the government, implications on 728 00:36:03,560 --> 00:36:05,319 Speaker 2: national income. So if you're a shareholder and a big 729 00:36:05,360 --> 00:36:07,160 Speaker 2: iron or producer, you've lost money. 730 00:36:06,960 --> 00:36:08,880 Speaker 1: This last and you're going to get less of dividend, 731 00:36:08,920 --> 00:36:10,760 Speaker 1: which means you've got to explain to spend correct. 732 00:36:10,800 --> 00:36:13,080 Speaker 2: So it does matter all these things. So gosh, the 733 00:36:13,120 --> 00:36:15,400 Speaker 2: economy is one of these amazing So that's why we 734 00:36:15,440 --> 00:36:18,760 Speaker 2: talk for so long every time we get together. There's 735 00:36:18,840 --> 00:36:23,000 Speaker 2: so many moving parts to this economy. It's nice to 736 00:36:23,080 --> 00:36:25,920 Speaker 2: keep it simple, but occasionally things pop up. And you know, 737 00:36:25,960 --> 00:36:27,880 Speaker 2: the US doesn't cut fifty basis points every day of 738 00:36:27,920 --> 00:36:30,359 Speaker 2: the week. In fact, by the way, that was the 739 00:36:30,400 --> 00:36:33,320 Speaker 2: first fifty point cut. They've done a few hikes of 740 00:36:33,360 --> 00:36:37,080 Speaker 2: fifty in sixteen years. Wow, people don't realize. I didn't 741 00:36:37,080 --> 00:36:37,759 Speaker 2: realize until I. 742 00:36:38,800 --> 00:36:42,040 Speaker 1: Know that either. I mean, for some reason I thought they. 743 00:36:41,400 --> 00:36:44,200 Speaker 2: They've cut twenty fives, they've hiked a couple of fifties, 744 00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:48,400 Speaker 2: But it's the first fifty point cut in sixteen years. 745 00:36:48,400 --> 00:36:49,640 Speaker 1: Which is that sort of India. 746 00:36:49,760 --> 00:36:52,360 Speaker 2: That's the global financial crisis. Of course, Steven Brothers was 747 00:36:52,400 --> 00:36:52,759 Speaker 2: going back. 748 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:58,280 Speaker 1: It doesn't indicate to you they know something about inflation 749 00:36:58,360 --> 00:36:59,120 Speaker 1: that we don't know. 750 00:37:00,080 --> 00:37:03,239 Speaker 2: That's the implication. Yes, and may they and maybe they do. 751 00:37:03,360 --> 00:37:05,520 Speaker 2: You know, they've the FED in the US is very 752 00:37:05,520 --> 00:37:12,160 Speaker 2: different to our RBA. They've got really active state federal reserves. 753 00:37:13,040 --> 00:37:16,879 Speaker 2: There's a St. Louis FAED and you know the Kansas FED. 754 00:37:16,880 --> 00:37:21,280 Speaker 2: They've all got they've got central bank operations or subsets 755 00:37:21,320 --> 00:37:24,080 Speaker 2: or subdivisions whatever in all of the other states, and 756 00:37:24,120 --> 00:37:27,360 Speaker 2: they all monitor that. They don't control interest rates, but 757 00:37:27,440 --> 00:37:30,320 Speaker 2: they monitor how's my state going. So it's a bit 758 00:37:30,520 --> 00:37:32,680 Speaker 2: like having the Reserve Bank of New South Wales. YEA 759 00:37:33,080 --> 00:37:36,200 Speaker 2: just pretend and they wouldn't send instrates, but what they 760 00:37:36,239 --> 00:37:39,319 Speaker 2: would do would be monitoring the economy. What are the 761 00:37:39,360 --> 00:37:42,880 Speaker 2: big New South Wales small companies in New South Wales 762 00:37:42,920 --> 00:37:47,560 Speaker 2: telling us about labor costs, about prices, about economic activity, 763 00:37:47,640 --> 00:37:50,279 Speaker 2: forward orders, all this sort of stuff. And that's where 764 00:37:50,320 --> 00:37:52,319 Speaker 2: we get this thing in the US gosh, without getting 765 00:37:52,320 --> 00:37:55,719 Speaker 2: too too much detail, called the Beige Book, where all 766 00:37:55,760 --> 00:38:02,080 Speaker 2: these state federal reserves report into the central body every month. 767 00:38:02,120 --> 00:38:04,200 Speaker 2: I think it is, how's the economy game? What's this 768 00:38:04,360 --> 00:38:07,239 Speaker 2: bagebok saying, oh, economictavity is weak in the south of 769 00:38:07,280 --> 00:38:10,320 Speaker 2: the US, and it's strolling California, and it's weak everywhere, 770 00:38:10,440 --> 00:38:14,120 Speaker 2: or inflation's coming. So they bring together anecdotes, so in 771 00:38:14,200 --> 00:38:18,000 Speaker 2: a funny way, it doesn't get the attention that other 772 00:38:18,040 --> 00:38:20,440 Speaker 2: economic data does because it's a bit touchy feely. It's 773 00:38:20,440 --> 00:38:22,600 Speaker 2: sort of like it's not hard. I can't say there's 774 00:38:22,640 --> 00:38:25,840 Speaker 2: a fact that the inflation rates falling. They'll report the 775 00:38:25,880 --> 00:38:29,280 Speaker 2: fact that the bulk of companies are telling us price 776 00:38:29,360 --> 00:38:32,760 Speaker 2: pressures are easing. They can't say that the inflation rates falling. 777 00:38:32,840 --> 00:38:35,440 Speaker 2: So it's not a hard number, like an official inflation 778 00:38:35,520 --> 00:38:38,680 Speaker 2: number two point five percent, that's a hard number versus 779 00:38:38,680 --> 00:38:39,760 Speaker 2: the anecdotal evidence. 780 00:38:40,239 --> 00:38:42,440 Speaker 1: But that's interesting, is I know, I just got a 781 00:38:42,520 --> 00:38:44,239 Speaker 1: little bit suspicious when I saw it. 782 00:38:44,520 --> 00:38:46,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, I thought it was. 783 00:38:47,160 --> 00:38:49,160 Speaker 1: I thought it was because I didn't realize it was 784 00:38:49,160 --> 00:38:50,719 Speaker 1: sixteen years, but I knew it was a long time, 785 00:38:51,120 --> 00:38:54,080 Speaker 1: and I thought that's a pretty big number du to 786 00:38:54,680 --> 00:38:57,200 Speaker 1: kick off with. I mean, it's a very big bet. 787 00:38:57,360 --> 00:38:59,960 Speaker 2: And when the inflation rates still. 788 00:38:59,800 --> 00:39:03,319 Speaker 3: Agree towards it, So don't give me there's not one 789 00:39:03,360 --> 00:39:03,839 Speaker 3: point five. 790 00:39:04,080 --> 00:39:08,520 Speaker 2: No, no, no, it's not quite there. And the unemployment rate 791 00:39:08,560 --> 00:39:12,160 Speaker 2: the same as Australiat four point two's gone up a 792 00:39:12,160 --> 00:39:13,759 Speaker 2: bit but not much. 793 00:39:13,920 --> 00:39:15,719 Speaker 1: It's not only unemployment of six or. 794 00:39:17,440 --> 00:39:19,560 Speaker 2: And Europe, which which is why they've cut more than 795 00:39:20,280 --> 00:39:24,399 Speaker 2: the America. Yeah, so it's saying it's a bold move. 796 00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:27,319 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's well, if nothing else is a bold move, 797 00:39:27,800 --> 00:39:31,719 Speaker 1: it may well be indicative of something worse than we 798 00:39:31,719 --> 00:39:34,200 Speaker 1: would otherwise expect. But I guess we're never going to 799 00:39:34,200 --> 00:39:36,600 Speaker 1: know until we until they have the next meeting. When 800 00:39:36,600 --> 00:39:37,120 Speaker 1: do they meet? 801 00:39:37,600 --> 00:39:43,360 Speaker 2: The next meetings in middle of middle to late late October? Right, Okay, 802 00:39:43,440 --> 00:39:45,799 Speaker 2: so it's about seven weeks from the meeting this week, 803 00:39:45,840 --> 00:39:46,920 Speaker 2: so it's late October. 804 00:39:47,000 --> 00:39:52,560 Speaker 1: And how important is our Australian dollar being relatively speaking 805 00:39:53,080 --> 00:39:56,560 Speaker 1: stronger relative to the US dollar. How important is that 806 00:39:56,800 --> 00:39:58,919 Speaker 1: for us in terms of our inflation control. 807 00:39:59,320 --> 00:40:03,120 Speaker 2: It's I wouldn't want to overstate it. There's a couple 808 00:40:03,160 --> 00:40:04,400 Speaker 2: of things that it has to be there and be 809 00:40:04,440 --> 00:40:07,399 Speaker 2: there for a long time. A spike up, just say 810 00:40:07,400 --> 00:40:09,480 Speaker 2: we got to seventy cents in the next couple of weeks. 811 00:40:09,680 --> 00:40:11,319 Speaker 2: If it goes in then comes back to sixty eight 812 00:40:11,400 --> 00:40:14,200 Speaker 2: has no effect. It's got to go up and stay up. 813 00:40:15,160 --> 00:40:17,160 Speaker 2: If you're lucky enough to have done your trade at 814 00:40:17,200 --> 00:40:19,359 Speaker 2: seventy cents, half you luck. It's got to stay there 815 00:40:19,760 --> 00:40:23,719 Speaker 2: to embed the lower cost of imports. So it's not 816 00:40:23,800 --> 00:40:26,319 Speaker 2: just a one off, one hit. Wonder if it gets 817 00:40:26,360 --> 00:40:29,440 Speaker 2: to seventy seventy two, seventy four whatever, you know, not 818 00:40:29,520 --> 00:40:31,360 Speaker 2: my forecast, by the way, but if it were to 819 00:40:31,400 --> 00:40:34,640 Speaker 2: do that it would have important implications. But the fact 820 00:40:34,680 --> 00:40:36,840 Speaker 2: that it's now breaking out of this range. Yeah, the 821 00:40:36,840 --> 00:40:40,160 Speaker 2: Ausis dollar until now has been remarkably stable. It's been 822 00:40:40,200 --> 00:40:43,000 Speaker 2: sixty three sixty or sixty five sixty six now through 823 00:40:43,040 --> 00:40:48,320 Speaker 2: sixty eight. And the discussion is that if the FED 824 00:40:48,400 --> 00:40:51,120 Speaker 2: does cut more and the RBA is stubborn in its 825 00:40:51,320 --> 00:40:54,080 Speaker 2: decision on interest rates, and a few other things happen. 826 00:40:54,440 --> 00:40:56,960 Speaker 2: You know, the Chinese stimulus gives a perception that China's 827 00:40:57,000 --> 00:40:59,399 Speaker 2: going to recover next year or whatever. We could easily 828 00:40:59,400 --> 00:41:01,080 Speaker 2: be at seventy sense for the first time in a 829 00:41:01,080 --> 00:41:03,240 Speaker 2: couple of years, and that would and that would start 830 00:41:03,280 --> 00:41:05,480 Speaker 2: to have implications for what the reserve back would be thinking. 831 00:41:05,960 --> 00:41:09,200 Speaker 1: Right, mate, Well, let's look at our board go through it, 832 00:41:10,280 --> 00:41:12,920 Speaker 1: because I think we've pretty much done done the job. 833 00:41:12,920 --> 00:41:15,800 Speaker 1: But let's go through a gin vision quite quickly. 834 00:41:16,360 --> 00:41:19,040 Speaker 2: Radio mark this for the checklist. I'm going to be 835 00:41:19,040 --> 00:41:23,840 Speaker 2: putting a number of these markers way over to the 836 00:41:23,920 --> 00:41:25,400 Speaker 2: right hand side, which is neutral. 837 00:41:26,360 --> 00:41:27,520 Speaker 1: I'm looking forward to that. 838 00:41:28,560 --> 00:41:32,080 Speaker 2: One percent annual GDP zero point two percent quarterly GDP 839 00:41:32,600 --> 00:41:34,960 Speaker 2: not good enough. I'm sorry, we should be growing stronger 840 00:41:35,000 --> 00:41:39,319 Speaker 2: than that. Inflation. I'm already putting to neutral because we 841 00:41:39,400 --> 00:41:42,200 Speaker 2: do know that that headline versus underlying thing that we 842 00:41:42,280 --> 00:41:46,319 Speaker 2: spoke about. Headline inflation is great. Underlying still stubborn, but 843 00:41:46,360 --> 00:41:48,359 Speaker 2: it's neutral. It doesn't mean we have to hike again 844 00:41:48,560 --> 00:41:51,919 Speaker 2: the time time in a couple of years. 845 00:41:52,239 --> 00:41:53,640 Speaker 1: That's the first time I've seen it over there for 846 00:41:53,719 --> 00:41:54,560 Speaker 1: a long long time. 847 00:41:55,120 --> 00:41:58,040 Speaker 2: Labor market, I'm going to keep in neutral. I think 848 00:41:58,120 --> 00:41:59,960 Speaker 2: last time I moved a little bit more towards these, 849 00:42:00,160 --> 00:42:03,480 Speaker 2: but we've had that resilience in employment growth. It's certainly 850 00:42:03,520 --> 00:42:05,600 Speaker 2: not tightening because we know that job ads are falling 851 00:42:05,640 --> 00:42:09,439 Speaker 2: and there's probably more weakness out there, but it's just neutral. 852 00:42:10,120 --> 00:42:14,719 Speaker 2: Wages neutral again quarterly wages. In fact, next in the 853 00:42:14,719 --> 00:42:16,320 Speaker 2: next two or three weeks we get the next wages, 854 00:42:16,600 --> 00:42:19,480 Speaker 2: but really important, but wages growth is already starting just 855 00:42:19,520 --> 00:42:22,479 Speaker 2: to come down a bit as the economy weakens again. 856 00:42:22,520 --> 00:42:25,440 Speaker 2: We're not going back to where we were pre pandemic 857 00:42:25,440 --> 00:42:28,000 Speaker 2: with two percent wages growth, but more instead of four 858 00:42:28,000 --> 00:42:29,600 Speaker 2: to four and a half three, three and a half, 859 00:42:29,640 --> 00:42:32,799 Speaker 2: three points something. So that's the Goldie locks. Not too hot, 860 00:42:32,960 --> 00:42:36,799 Speaker 2: not too cold, just right. International economy, I'm putting that 861 00:42:36,840 --> 00:42:38,759 Speaker 2: at easy. We just rattle off all those countries and 862 00:42:38,760 --> 00:42:41,160 Speaker 2: the cutting grates. They're not cutting greats because their economies 863 00:42:41,160 --> 00:42:43,120 Speaker 2: are strong. They're coming because they're And. 864 00:42:43,120 --> 00:42:45,960 Speaker 1: What's interesting, but this is the first time we've been 865 00:42:46,000 --> 00:42:49,160 Speaker 1: able to say that the US is cutting yep. And 866 00:42:49,239 --> 00:42:54,280 Speaker 1: that's that, and that means everyone's in alignment correct Europe, UK, Canada, 867 00:42:54,680 --> 00:42:57,719 Speaker 1: the United States and China. Animates and news. 868 00:42:57,920 --> 00:42:59,960 Speaker 2: It makes in key we land house prices, we hadn't 869 00:43:00,000 --> 00:43:04,560 Speaker 2: discussed them for at lot. They're cooling. You know, Melbourne, Hobart, 870 00:43:04,800 --> 00:43:07,960 Speaker 2: darn and Canberra are really weak. Sydney slowing down. There's 871 00:43:07,960 --> 00:43:11,560 Speaker 2: a lot more listings coming on board. Adelaide, Perth and 872 00:43:11,680 --> 00:43:14,239 Speaker 2: Brisbane is still strong, but even in the rate of 873 00:43:14,280 --> 00:43:17,160 Speaker 2: increases just starting to come off. But you know, the 874 00:43:17,239 --> 00:43:19,320 Speaker 2: RBA would not be worried about house prices on the 875 00:43:19,440 --> 00:43:23,480 Speaker 2: upside or the downside, so neutral retail sales. We mentioned 876 00:43:23,760 --> 00:43:30,160 Speaker 2: shocking their household spending. We mentioned dismal consumer sentiments, weak 877 00:43:30,239 --> 00:43:34,000 Speaker 2: as water, building approvals, we are not building enough houses marketing. 878 00:43:34,400 --> 00:43:37,160 Speaker 2: We've had this discussion for years, you know what I mean, 879 00:43:37,640 --> 00:43:41,200 Speaker 2: even decade ago. We need to build more bloody houses 880 00:43:41,560 --> 00:43:45,040 Speaker 2: and we're having trouble getting counsels to approve the land 881 00:43:45,239 --> 00:43:47,839 Speaker 2: builders to build them. The government's struggling to get Oh, 882 00:43:48,840 --> 00:43:51,440 Speaker 2: don't talk to me about the Greens blocking this project 883 00:43:51,440 --> 00:43:54,080 Speaker 2: in the Senate. Okay, it wasn't the magic wand that 884 00:43:54,160 --> 00:43:55,600 Speaker 2: was going to fix housing, but it was with another 885 00:43:55,680 --> 00:43:59,680 Speaker 2: forty thousand dwellings. Now the housing crisis isn't going to 886 00:43:59,719 --> 00:44:00,160 Speaker 2: be fixed. 887 00:44:00,080 --> 00:44:02,000 Speaker 3: With one single and it's not just here by the way, 888 00:44:02,040 --> 00:44:03,400 Speaker 3: It'll be a number of issues. 889 00:44:03,520 --> 00:44:04,520 Speaker 1: Same in America. 890 00:44:04,600 --> 00:44:06,480 Speaker 2: It's extraordinary, it's very poor. 891 00:44:06,600 --> 00:44:08,560 Speaker 1: It seems to me that there is a phenomenon that 892 00:44:08,600 --> 00:44:11,399 Speaker 1: exists nearly around most of the developed world right now. 893 00:44:11,640 --> 00:44:14,040 Speaker 2: It is we've got a shortage of housing, correct, yep, 894 00:44:14,239 --> 00:44:16,120 Speaker 2: your manage shortage everywhere we need to build. 895 00:44:16,520 --> 00:44:21,040 Speaker 1: Not just because of immigration, we have a shortage of housing, personalhold. 896 00:44:20,520 --> 00:44:23,760 Speaker 2: Household formation as well as part of the issue business investments. Okay, 897 00:44:24,920 --> 00:44:27,440 Speaker 2: not again, that's in the groove. So there's a bit 898 00:44:27,440 --> 00:44:29,600 Speaker 2: of cape's going on. So it's not in the easing column, 899 00:44:29,800 --> 00:44:30,840 Speaker 2: certainly not in the titan. 900 00:44:30,880 --> 00:44:32,440 Speaker 1: But it's not decisive one way or the other. 901 00:44:32,600 --> 00:44:35,720 Speaker 2: Business the RBA would look at it and think, that's okay, 902 00:44:36,120 --> 00:44:39,080 Speaker 2: what are we worried about? Yeah, business confidence, I'm wouldn't 903 00:44:39,080 --> 00:44:42,080 Speaker 2: get to slightly easy because the NAB survey came out 904 00:44:42,400 --> 00:44:45,840 Speaker 2: a couple of weeks ago. Business conditions and business confidence 905 00:44:45,960 --> 00:44:50,840 Speaker 2: tilting down again. Profit expectations we're talking about profits before 906 00:44:51,000 --> 00:44:54,359 Speaker 2: tilting a little bit lower. So just starting to get 907 00:44:54,360 --> 00:44:58,720 Speaker 2: a little bit of a hint on business confidence softening 908 00:44:58,760 --> 00:44:59,839 Speaker 2: a bit too much. 909 00:45:00,360 --> 00:45:03,200 Speaker 1: What's crazy about that is that the stock market's on fire. 910 00:45:03,280 --> 00:45:06,719 Speaker 2: Stock markers at a record high. Isn't that crazy anyway? 911 00:45:07,080 --> 00:45:10,719 Speaker 2: Anomalies commodity prices. I'm putting that in easing. Look at 912 00:45:10,719 --> 00:45:12,960 Speaker 2: the oil price. Everybody filling out your car this weekend 913 00:45:13,040 --> 00:45:15,959 Speaker 2: or next weekend. It's good, you know, depending which city 914 00:45:15,960 --> 00:45:18,560 Speaker 2: you're in and which suburb you're in. The oil price 915 00:45:18,640 --> 00:45:21,040 Speaker 2: is a bit fickle, but you know, oil prices down, 916 00:45:21,160 --> 00:45:24,560 Speaker 2: iron ore prices down, copper prices down. It's like something 917 00:45:24,640 --> 00:45:27,680 Speaker 2: you mentioned, stocks booming. I'm putting that the RBA doesn't 918 00:45:27,719 --> 00:45:29,879 Speaker 2: target stock market fact that we're a record high. They'll 919 00:45:29,880 --> 00:45:32,759 Speaker 2: be thinking, well, wealth effect, Oh, yes, unless it's a 920 00:45:33,200 --> 00:45:35,160 Speaker 2: it's more when there's a crash. They look at it. 921 00:45:35,360 --> 00:45:37,160 Speaker 2: If it sort of grinds up a couple of percent 922 00:45:37,200 --> 00:45:39,200 Speaker 2: every couple of months, they'll be happy because there is 923 00:45:39,200 --> 00:45:39,640 Speaker 2: a wealth. 924 00:45:39,480 --> 00:45:42,799 Speaker 1: Effect, Yes, but probably not enough because it's sitting in 925 00:45:42,840 --> 00:45:45,560 Speaker 1: super so it's probably not enough to drive the economy correct. 926 00:45:45,560 --> 00:45:46,600 Speaker 2: A lot of us can't get their hands on it. 927 00:45:46,800 --> 00:45:49,680 Speaker 2: Stuck in our superannuation accounts and current rates. I'm putting 928 00:45:49,719 --> 00:45:52,120 Speaker 2: them in easy because they are restricted. The RBA even 929 00:45:52,160 --> 00:45:54,960 Speaker 2: acknowledges that four point three to five is restrictive. We're 930 00:45:54,960 --> 00:45:57,040 Speaker 2: not talking about an interesstrate discussion where the cash rates 931 00:45:57,120 --> 00:45:59,759 Speaker 2: zero point one, it's already four point three five. So 932 00:45:59,800 --> 00:46:01,560 Speaker 2: you'll look at our scorecard. 933 00:46:01,040 --> 00:46:04,280 Speaker 1: Here seven seven in the easing and six in the 934 00:46:04,320 --> 00:46:05,480 Speaker 1: hold and. 935 00:46:05,400 --> 00:46:09,600 Speaker 2: None in the titan. And I defy anybody to send 936 00:46:09,640 --> 00:46:13,759 Speaker 2: in to the to you guys on the podcast. 937 00:46:13,239 --> 00:46:15,239 Speaker 1: Whatever, Warren Hogan, Warren. 938 00:46:15,239 --> 00:46:17,400 Speaker 2: What is in the tightening category? 939 00:46:17,600 --> 00:46:18,120 Speaker 1: Which one? 940 00:46:18,840 --> 00:46:19,439 Speaker 2: Which part? 941 00:46:19,520 --> 00:46:22,680 Speaker 1: Which which one do we need to tip you over 942 00:46:22,719 --> 00:46:24,880 Speaker 1: into easing? Which one? 943 00:46:25,680 --> 00:46:29,440 Speaker 2: It has to be inflation has to be confirmed lower, 944 00:46:29,960 --> 00:46:32,600 Speaker 2: but with a very close watch on the labor market. 945 00:46:32,960 --> 00:46:35,439 Speaker 1: So if labor market goes to four point four, let's 946 00:46:35,520 --> 00:46:36,520 Speaker 1: just put what we do. 947 00:46:37,120 --> 00:46:39,600 Speaker 2: If we come back in two months, we've got two 948 00:46:39,640 --> 00:46:41,879 Speaker 2: more readings on the labor market numbers and one more 949 00:46:41,880 --> 00:46:43,880 Speaker 2: reading on inflation. If we're at four point four, I 950 00:46:43,920 --> 00:46:47,759 Speaker 2: would be putting that in the easing column column the 951 00:46:47,800 --> 00:46:51,319 Speaker 2: inflation two point seven. Yeah, it'd sort of be. It'll 952 00:46:51,360 --> 00:46:52,520 Speaker 2: be gravitating that way. 953 00:46:52,719 --> 00:46:55,239 Speaker 1: So but do you think inflation Newsy are down to two? 954 00:46:56,040 --> 00:46:56,400 Speaker 2: No? 955 00:46:56,400 --> 00:46:58,880 Speaker 1: No, no, no, So I forgets in a two point five 956 00:47:00,080 --> 00:47:01,480 Speaker 1: line headline headline. 957 00:47:01,880 --> 00:47:04,040 Speaker 2: The RBA will be thrilled with that. They'll be looking 958 00:47:04,080 --> 00:47:06,440 Speaker 2: at the trimm to mean, if the trim main gets 959 00:47:06,480 --> 00:47:10,160 Speaker 2: to three point zero at the same time headlines at 960 00:47:10,160 --> 00:47:13,640 Speaker 2: two point five with the unemploment rate at four point four, 961 00:47:14,040 --> 00:47:19,240 Speaker 2: that's the rate cut. That's goldilocks, that's that's the target 962 00:47:19,400 --> 00:47:22,759 Speaker 2: being hit. I don't want to say mission accomplished, but 963 00:47:22,800 --> 00:47:25,239 Speaker 2: it'll be mission accomplished for the RBA. We can trim 964 00:47:25,320 --> 00:47:27,759 Speaker 2: rates a little again. You heard it to be to them. 965 00:47:27,760 --> 00:47:29,680 Speaker 2: We're not talking mass rate cuts. See, we're only talking 966 00:47:29,719 --> 00:47:32,600 Speaker 2: a couple and to just take some of the some 967 00:47:32,719 --> 00:47:34,280 Speaker 2: of the pressure off the economy. 968 00:47:34,320 --> 00:47:36,880 Speaker 1: Do you think they're able to go ten bases points 969 00:47:36,960 --> 00:47:38,440 Speaker 1: or something like that. Do you think they could do 970 00:47:38,480 --> 00:47:39,920 Speaker 1: something like that or do you think they're just going 971 00:47:39,920 --> 00:47:41,520 Speaker 1: to get back to the traditional. 972 00:47:41,160 --> 00:47:43,600 Speaker 2: I think we just do twenty five. Yeah. Look, I 973 00:47:43,719 --> 00:47:46,920 Speaker 2: like the concept of a ten yeah, just as a signal. 974 00:47:47,080 --> 00:47:51,200 Speaker 2: And maybe this is for the next time we get together, 975 00:47:51,640 --> 00:47:55,319 Speaker 2: because we know this. I've observed this in a lot 976 00:47:55,320 --> 00:47:57,279 Speaker 2: of the stuff that I've done. A lot of the 977 00:47:57,360 --> 00:48:00,680 Speaker 2: monetary policy and interest rate issue is not so much 978 00:48:00,719 --> 00:48:02,640 Speaker 2: the cash flow effect of a rate move. 979 00:48:03,000 --> 00:48:07,240 Speaker 1: It's psychology the move. They've cut rates, the move itself. 980 00:48:07,040 --> 00:48:08,960 Speaker 2: And that's the headline. You spoken about in the media 981 00:48:09,040 --> 00:48:10,960 Speaker 2: for days and weeks, and that's other cut rates. They 982 00:48:11,040 --> 00:48:13,480 Speaker 2: cut rates so that what do we call animal spirits? 983 00:48:13,520 --> 00:48:16,040 Speaker 2: I think John Maynard Canes used to call it. It's 984 00:48:16,040 --> 00:48:17,879 Speaker 2: not just the cash, okay, saying you even the money 985 00:48:17,880 --> 00:48:20,840 Speaker 2: on the rate, Cat's fine. But what are they saying? 986 00:48:21,440 --> 00:48:23,839 Speaker 2: How do I feel, Oh, there's a rate cut few 987 00:48:24,280 --> 00:48:27,399 Speaker 2: even though it might only be a few bucks a month, Yeah, 988 00:48:28,280 --> 00:48:30,919 Speaker 2: ten paces points, that'd be worse thing that we'll. 989 00:48:30,840 --> 00:48:33,440 Speaker 1: Get it at four twenty five. You know what I'm saying. 990 00:48:33,480 --> 00:48:35,200 Speaker 2: I quite like that. I like it too. 991 00:48:35,280 --> 00:48:36,759 Speaker 1: I don't know what it is. I don't like the 992 00:48:36,800 --> 00:48:40,239 Speaker 1: four thirty five and forget it like I don't know 993 00:48:40,400 --> 00:48:42,080 Speaker 1: like and it gets us back into some sort of 994 00:48:42,160 --> 00:48:45,480 Speaker 1: better cadence. I don't know why. It's just mathematically seems 995 00:48:45,520 --> 00:48:49,680 Speaker 1: right to me. Well, mate, so the meeting on tomorrow, 996 00:48:49,960 --> 00:48:51,120 Speaker 1: what do you think is going to happen? 997 00:48:51,200 --> 00:48:54,560 Speaker 2: Make no change? You're going to say one hundred percent certain, 998 00:48:54,560 --> 00:48:56,520 Speaker 2: but they're not going to change. It's what she says, 999 00:48:56,560 --> 00:48:57,680 Speaker 2: that's what the change. 1000 00:48:57,800 --> 00:49:00,440 Speaker 1: What are you looking for her to say that? Are 1001 00:49:00,480 --> 00:49:01,239 Speaker 1: we going to hang off? 1002 00:49:01,680 --> 00:49:05,200 Speaker 2: I'm looking for her to soften her views about a 1003 00:49:05,280 --> 00:49:07,560 Speaker 2: rate hike. I think she can come out and say, 1004 00:49:07,560 --> 00:49:10,080 Speaker 2: we are not going to hike. Remember the last statement, Oh, 1005 00:49:10,160 --> 00:49:12,720 Speaker 2: we did discuss rates on hold, and we also discussed 1006 00:49:12,719 --> 00:49:16,920 Speaker 2: the possibility, however remote, of a rate hike. I think 1007 00:49:16,960 --> 00:49:19,960 Speaker 2: she'll get rid of that and acknowledge that since that 1008 00:49:20,080 --> 00:49:23,319 Speaker 2: last meeting that we've had the world economy US in 1009 00:49:23,360 --> 00:49:27,480 Speaker 2: particular slowing down, that we've had a disappointing response to 1010 00:49:27,520 --> 00:49:30,200 Speaker 2: the tax cuts, with the retail sales numbers and consumers sentiment, 1011 00:49:30,239 --> 00:49:35,000 Speaker 2: consumer spending still being as weak as water. They'll come out, 1012 00:49:35,080 --> 00:49:36,800 Speaker 2: or she'll come out and say, look, we're confident that 1013 00:49:36,880 --> 00:49:39,920 Speaker 2: headline inflation will be lower, and we welcome that, but 1014 00:49:39,960 --> 00:49:42,040 Speaker 2: we are going to look at trim Demean. We're not 1015 00:49:42,040 --> 00:49:45,200 Speaker 2: ready to adjust interest rates yet, but we're watching the 1016 00:49:45,360 --> 00:49:49,279 Speaker 2: trim Demean inflation rate and the unemployment rate for the 1017 00:49:49,320 --> 00:49:51,120 Speaker 2: signal on our next move. 1018 00:49:51,200 --> 00:49:53,799 Speaker 1: And what are the money Marc is betting money. 1019 00:49:53,520 --> 00:49:56,640 Speaker 2: Marks are betting a very small possibility of a move tomorrow. 1020 00:49:57,520 --> 00:50:00,239 Speaker 2: They're betting about a sixty percent chance of a cut 1021 00:50:00,239 --> 00:50:04,120 Speaker 2: before Christmas. Still, it got to about eighty eighty five 1022 00:50:04,200 --> 00:50:07,439 Speaker 2: percent a couple of about a week ago. It's come 1023 00:50:07,440 --> 00:50:09,520 Speaker 2: off a bit as the bond market's sold off just 1024 00:50:09,520 --> 00:50:12,279 Speaker 2: just in recent times, but it's still about yeah, about 1025 00:50:12,280 --> 00:50:14,720 Speaker 2: a sixty percent chance of a cut at one twenty 1026 00:50:14,719 --> 00:50:18,000 Speaker 2: five point cut in December. Then through twenty twenty five, 1027 00:50:18,040 --> 00:50:21,919 Speaker 2: we've got a round it. It's about one hundred points 1028 00:50:21,920 --> 00:50:24,560 Speaker 2: of rate cuts through twenty twenty five. So will the 1029 00:50:24,680 --> 00:50:27,919 Speaker 2: ending if the market's correct, at the end of twenty 1030 00:50:28,000 --> 00:50:30,480 Speaker 2: twenty five, will have a cash rate at three point 1031 00:50:30,520 --> 00:50:32,760 Speaker 2: three five percent, one hundred bases of points lower than today. 1032 00:50:32,840 --> 00:50:35,799 Speaker 1: Well, sitting here today and you can't you know, like 1033 00:50:35,880 --> 00:50:37,800 Speaker 1: it could be completely different in two months time, but 1034 00:50:37,880 --> 00:50:41,520 Speaker 1: sitting here today it would be. It's never it's never 1035 00:50:41,640 --> 00:50:47,360 Speaker 1: wise for anyone to bet against the market. It's tough 1036 00:50:48,760 --> 00:50:51,399 Speaker 1: because they got the best information as of today, and. 1037 00:50:51,360 --> 00:50:55,040 Speaker 2: The markets are involving investors with billions of dollars buying, 1038 00:50:55,120 --> 00:50:56,799 Speaker 2: selling bank bills and bonds, and. 1039 00:50:56,719 --> 00:50:59,040 Speaker 1: They more information than anybody correct anybody. 1040 00:50:59,680 --> 00:51:02,600 Speaker 2: The markets can change their mind too, you know that I'm. 1041 00:51:02,480 --> 00:51:05,560 Speaker 1: Saying today though I'm saying today, yes, the money market's 1042 00:51:05,600 --> 00:51:07,520 Speaker 1: saying what you just said then that we're looking at 1043 00:51:07,560 --> 00:51:09,680 Speaker 1: perhaps one hundred base points over the next twelve months. 1044 00:51:11,680 --> 00:51:14,800 Speaker 1: When Michelle Bulloch gets out there and says he doesn't 1045 00:51:14,800 --> 00:51:17,440 Speaker 1: say anything, and actually fact sort of says, you know, 1046 00:51:18,520 --> 00:51:20,760 Speaker 1: Lasia said the last meeting, we were sort of considered 1047 00:51:20,800 --> 00:51:23,239 Speaker 1: putting rates up or leaving them the same said nothing 1048 00:51:23,239 --> 00:51:27,000 Speaker 1: about putting rates down. Is that? Do you think that 1049 00:51:27,080 --> 00:51:29,440 Speaker 1: they take the same view as we would take. You 1050 00:51:29,480 --> 00:51:31,239 Speaker 1: don't bet against the money markets. The last time that 1051 00:51:31,280 --> 00:51:33,320 Speaker 1: happened was our previous governor bet against the markets. And 1052 00:51:33,400 --> 00:51:36,960 Speaker 1: he've got an extraordinarily wrong in terms of his narry 1053 00:51:37,040 --> 00:51:39,160 Speaker 1: no rate hikes till twenty three four years, his narrative 1054 00:51:39,280 --> 00:51:41,479 Speaker 1: like you know, because he would over with the money market, 1055 00:51:41,480 --> 00:51:44,359 Speaker 1: saying you it's a dangerous thing for the Reserve bank. 1056 00:51:44,960 --> 00:51:46,640 Speaker 1: It's a dangerous thing for the Reserve bank to bet 1057 00:51:46,680 --> 00:51:47,560 Speaker 1: against the money markets. 1058 00:51:47,640 --> 00:51:50,000 Speaker 2: I think it is they should pay a lot of 1059 00:51:50,040 --> 00:51:52,640 Speaker 2: attention and not be beholding to the money. 1060 00:51:52,880 --> 00:51:54,960 Speaker 1: No, no, no, different, but just sort. 1061 00:51:54,760 --> 00:51:57,239 Speaker 2: Of saying, well, what And this is the thing that 1062 00:51:57,320 --> 00:51:59,399 Speaker 2: I often find you say, Yeah, I'm an economist, Mark, 1063 00:51:59,400 --> 00:52:01,680 Speaker 2: and I often look at the economy to work out 1064 00:52:01,719 --> 00:52:04,080 Speaker 2: what's going to happen with interestrates. Every now and then, 1065 00:52:04,160 --> 00:52:06,759 Speaker 2: in fact more frequently as I'm getting older, I take 1066 00:52:06,760 --> 00:52:09,360 Speaker 2: a step back and say what are the markets telling 1067 00:52:09,560 --> 00:52:12,800 Speaker 2: me about the economy? Why is the AX at a 1068 00:52:12,840 --> 00:52:16,680 Speaker 2: record high today? What's it seeing that I can't see 1069 00:52:16,680 --> 00:52:19,440 Speaker 2: when I'm saying, gee, the economy's week, what's the bond 1070 00:52:19,480 --> 00:52:22,319 Speaker 2: market telling me that they've got four rate cuts priced in? 1071 00:52:23,040 --> 00:52:24,799 Speaker 2: When Michelle Bullock saying, oh, we're not going to cut 1072 00:52:24,880 --> 00:52:28,920 Speaker 2: rates anytime soon? What is happening? And that causes me 1073 00:52:28,960 --> 00:52:33,000 Speaker 2: to reflect on errors in my analysis or changes or 1074 00:52:33,040 --> 00:52:35,520 Speaker 2: something that I've overlooked. Don't you know this? Oh goodness, 1075 00:52:35,520 --> 00:52:38,080 Speaker 2: I forgot about that particular aspect. So I often look 1076 00:52:38,120 --> 00:52:39,480 Speaker 2: at them, and I think the Reserve Bank would be 1077 00:52:39,480 --> 00:52:42,200 Speaker 2: wise to do the same. Not all the markets are wrong, 1078 00:52:42,280 --> 00:52:45,000 Speaker 2: you know, but to say, well, what's the market saying 1079 00:52:46,360 --> 00:52:49,359 Speaker 2: about the economy that we are missing when we are 1080 00:52:49,480 --> 00:52:51,480 Speaker 2: so dogmatic that we're not going to cut rates. 1081 00:52:51,280 --> 00:52:51,959 Speaker 1: In terms of data? 1082 00:52:52,000 --> 00:52:53,399 Speaker 2: I agree in terms of data yet yeah. 1083 00:52:53,440 --> 00:52:56,480 Speaker 1: And then we also know that money markets review their 1084 00:52:56,960 --> 00:52:59,399 Speaker 1: talk anyway, because money markets, if you remember, this time 1085 00:52:59,480 --> 00:53:01,400 Speaker 1: last year, was saying we're going to get ray cuts 1086 00:53:01,400 --> 00:53:04,200 Speaker 1: in June, and in fact West pag was saying seven 1087 00:53:04,320 --> 00:53:07,440 Speaker 1: rate reductions. That's right, Yes, this time last year they 1088 00:53:07,480 --> 00:53:10,200 Speaker 1: were for twenty twenty four yep and. 1089 00:53:10,680 --> 00:53:13,040 Speaker 2: So, and that was broadly priced into markets where I 1090 00:53:13,040 --> 00:53:15,759 Speaker 2: remember correctly it was markets changed the way, and they 1091 00:53:15,880 --> 00:53:18,399 Speaker 2: change on every snippet of news. So I can't remember 1092 00:53:18,400 --> 00:53:19,920 Speaker 2: what data's out in the US to night. But when 1093 00:53:19,920 --> 00:53:22,520 Speaker 2: the US has a you know, a non farm payrolls 1094 00:53:22,600 --> 00:53:26,200 Speaker 2: number or initial jobless claims and the US markets move, 1095 00:53:26,960 --> 00:53:32,080 Speaker 2: they're repricing on new information. Again another Canes gap. When 1096 00:53:32,080 --> 00:53:33,520 Speaker 2: the information changes, what do you do? 1097 00:53:33,640 --> 00:53:35,880 Speaker 1: I changed my mind, which is by the way, this 1098 00:53:35,960 --> 00:53:37,560 Speaker 1: had the mIRC works. So anyone who thinks are getting 1099 00:53:37,560 --> 00:53:40,600 Speaker 1: brain damageter from all this sort of stuff. That's the 1100 00:53:40,600 --> 00:53:42,680 Speaker 1: purpose of what we do is actually to bring up 1101 00:53:42,719 --> 00:53:46,439 Speaker 1: to day to today, not beyond today. We can only 1102 00:53:46,480 --> 00:53:49,319 Speaker 1: talk about it in the Reserve Bank only opines on 1103 00:53:49,400 --> 00:53:51,920 Speaker 1: what they know as of the day of their decision. 1104 00:53:52,239 --> 00:53:55,239 Speaker 1: Correct and they probably would well accept them, maybe never 1105 00:53:55,280 --> 00:53:57,880 Speaker 1: say it, but if it dramatically trained change the next thing, 1106 00:53:57,880 --> 00:53:59,480 Speaker 1: they would dramatically change their position. 1107 00:54:00,120 --> 00:54:03,000 Speaker 2: To finish up on this one mark, I remember Glenn Stevens, 1108 00:54:03,080 --> 00:54:05,600 Speaker 2: the XRBA governor when the global financial is one of 1109 00:54:05,600 --> 00:54:06,840 Speaker 2: the best. He was great. 1110 00:54:07,320 --> 00:54:08,319 Speaker 1: I think he was one of the best. 1111 00:54:08,360 --> 00:54:11,600 Speaker 2: I agree in the early stages of the global financial 1112 00:54:11,640 --> 00:54:17,080 Speaker 2: crisis in two thousand and seven. Eight that period, he 1113 00:54:17,520 --> 00:54:19,920 Speaker 2: gave a speech saying, oh, inflation, and that's when inflation 1114 00:54:20,000 --> 00:54:22,319 Speaker 2: was a little elevated, and yeah, they had hiking rates, 1115 00:54:22,320 --> 00:54:23,719 Speaker 2: so we're going to have to hike interstrates again. 1116 00:54:23,719 --> 00:54:25,680 Speaker 1: It is the beginning of two thousand and eight, rates 1117 00:54:25,680 --> 00:54:26,279 Speaker 1: were quite high. 1118 00:54:26,320 --> 00:54:30,400 Speaker 2: Two months later after that really hawkish view on the economy, August, 1119 00:54:31,080 --> 00:54:33,880 Speaker 2: the shit hit the fan in the global financial crisis. 1120 00:54:34,080 --> 00:54:37,200 Speaker 2: The wheels fell on August. I remember data was falling, 1121 00:54:37,280 --> 00:54:40,239 Speaker 2: banks were going belly up. He cut fifty bases. Well, 1122 00:54:40,320 --> 00:54:42,279 Speaker 2: he said, I'm reacting to the new news. Yeah. No 1123 00:54:42,320 --> 00:54:45,520 Speaker 2: one said, oh, you were wrong, because he acted so 1124 00:54:45,680 --> 00:54:49,440 Speaker 2: quickly and he was transparent about it. Yeah, he built 1125 00:54:49,480 --> 00:54:51,840 Speaker 2: his credibility. And I agree with you as one of 1126 00:54:51,840 --> 00:54:54,040 Speaker 2: the best central bankers Australia has had. 1127 00:54:54,120 --> 00:54:57,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, I totally koogie. Thanks very much, mate. I'm getting excited. 1128 00:54:57,600 --> 00:55:00,000 Speaker 1: I just got a feeling of rate reductions. But anyway, 1129 00:55:00,080 --> 00:55:02,759 Speaker 1: I'm not off for this meeting. I'm coming up and 1130 00:55:02,800 --> 00:55:05,919 Speaker 1: I think it's gonna be twenty twenty five anyway. Look, 1131 00:55:06,080 --> 00:55:10,480 Speaker 1: even if even if the money markets are corrected sixty percent, 1132 00:55:10,560 --> 00:55:16,200 Speaker 1: chance before Christmas and even if CBA is right twenty 1133 00:55:16,200 --> 00:55:20,279 Speaker 1: five base point reduction in December this year, I think 1134 00:55:20,320 --> 00:55:22,920 Speaker 1: the RBA has gone so far into LIMBA making so 1135 00:55:23,000 --> 00:55:25,560 Speaker 1: clear that they're not going to reduce rates this year. 1136 00:55:26,719 --> 00:55:29,719 Speaker 1: It'll be a very big call for her to turn 1137 00:55:29,800 --> 00:55:31,680 Speaker 1: back on that statement that she's already made. 1138 00:55:31,560 --> 00:55:33,799 Speaker 2: Correct unless they get one shock number and we haven't 1139 00:55:33,800 --> 00:55:34,040 Speaker 2: had that. 1140 00:55:34,239 --> 00:55:36,440 Speaker 1: I don't think that. That's my view. I don't think. 1141 00:55:36,960 --> 00:55:40,000 Speaker 1: And you just said something very interesting about Glenn Stevens. 1142 00:55:40,320 --> 00:55:41,920 Speaker 1: We had the shock number we did. 1143 00:55:41,920 --> 00:55:45,640 Speaker 2: Oh yes, yes, Lehman Brothers was Yeah. There was catastrophe 1144 00:55:45,680 --> 00:55:50,719 Speaker 2: in global markets and the market said, thank goodness, you're listening. Yeah, yeah, 1145 00:55:50,760 --> 00:55:53,359 Speaker 2: yeah that the markets were so happy rather than him 1146 00:55:53,360 --> 00:55:56,800 Speaker 2: being dogmatic and I'm not going to change my mind, 1147 00:55:57,040 --> 00:56:00,360 Speaker 2: Holy smokes. He changed his mind when the facts change 1148 00:56:00,520 --> 00:56:03,799 Speaker 2: for the worst. And we got through that, and I 1149 00:56:03,840 --> 00:56:06,600 Speaker 2: think in our painless but we got through it. 1150 00:56:06,719 --> 00:56:08,840 Speaker 1: During the COVID period. I think that's sort of our 1151 00:56:09,360 --> 00:56:11,560 Speaker 1: previous governor. He sort of did the same thing too. 1152 00:56:11,719 --> 00:56:14,960 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah. The way that policy and even Josh 1153 00:56:15,000 --> 00:56:20,080 Speaker 2: Rodenberg with is some of the fiscal similar measures at 1154 00:56:20,120 --> 00:56:23,000 Speaker 2: the time when we thought unemployment was going to fifteen percent. 1155 00:56:23,040 --> 00:56:24,960 Speaker 2: We thought we were in the worst GDP since the 1156 00:56:24,960 --> 00:56:28,000 Speaker 2: Great Depression of the nineteen thirties. I don't think there 1157 00:56:28,040 --> 00:56:30,200 Speaker 2: was a policy mistake in hindsight saying oh, maybe they 1158 00:56:30,200 --> 00:56:32,680 Speaker 2: shouldn't have done this. No, at the time, it's a 1159 00:56:32,719 --> 00:56:34,880 Speaker 2: bit like fighting a fire. Should I really use all 1160 00:56:34,920 --> 00:56:36,920 Speaker 2: this water? Should I save water? Now? You put out 1161 00:56:36,960 --> 00:56:39,480 Speaker 2: the bloody fire and then worry about it. So both 1162 00:56:39,800 --> 00:56:43,520 Speaker 2: Philip Light, the RBA, Josh Rodenberger's treasurer at the time, 1163 00:56:43,600 --> 00:56:46,880 Speaker 2: during the glow, during the COVID pandemic, through the kitchen 1164 00:56:46,960 --> 00:56:50,120 Speaker 2: sink at the problem. We got out of it, thank goodness, 1165 00:56:50,160 --> 00:56:51,800 Speaker 2: you know, we got out of it in really good shape. 1166 00:56:51,880 --> 00:56:57,040 Speaker 2: The economy, that is. Maybe. But at the end of 1167 00:56:57,080 --> 00:56:59,400 Speaker 2: the day, I think what they did was broadly correct. 1168 00:57:00,000 --> 00:57:02,839 Speaker 2: That's correct. That was correct, you know. And if they 1169 00:57:02,840 --> 00:57:05,400 Speaker 2: spent a dollar too much, so be it. Take it 1170 00:57:05,440 --> 00:57:08,160 Speaker 2: back now. And if they cut too much, we'll hike 1171 00:57:08,239 --> 00:57:10,240 Speaker 2: a bit more, which is what they did, of course. 1172 00:57:10,040 --> 00:57:11,920 Speaker 1: Which is what we've all got to be cognizant of. 1173 00:57:13,040 --> 00:57:17,640 Speaker 1: We are now still paying for the reactions and the 1174 00:57:17,680 --> 00:57:22,040 Speaker 1: overreaction as a result of the reactions to COVID. I mean, 1175 00:57:22,080 --> 00:57:23,720 Speaker 1: like that was an extraordinary period. 1176 00:57:24,000 --> 00:57:26,640 Speaker 2: We don't often. In fact, a lot of the analysis 1177 00:57:26,680 --> 00:57:28,800 Speaker 2: today doesn't actually refer back to that, and in fact, 1178 00:57:28,800 --> 00:57:31,680 Speaker 2: a lot of the hangover of COVID, both in terms 1179 00:57:31,720 --> 00:57:36,520 Speaker 2: of the inflation pressures not just globally inflation pressures, skills shortages, 1180 00:57:36,960 --> 00:57:39,400 Speaker 2: the current budget positions, all that sort of stuff is 1181 00:57:39,440 --> 00:57:42,440 Speaker 2: still being repaired, if that's the right word, from what 1182 00:57:42,680 --> 00:57:46,120 Speaker 2: was the medicine that was sort of dished out during 1183 00:57:46,120 --> 00:57:49,200 Speaker 2: the COVID pandemic to the economy, And that'll take another 1184 00:57:49,200 --> 00:57:51,200 Speaker 2: couple of years to sort of completely wash out of 1185 00:57:51,240 --> 00:57:52,840 Speaker 2: the system and we'll get back onto an even gain. 1186 00:57:52,880 --> 00:57:54,800 Speaker 1: I think we're ever going to get back to, you know, 1187 00:57:54,800 --> 00:57:57,400 Speaker 1: because we've suffered two sort of structural changes, which is 1188 00:57:57,640 --> 00:57:59,600 Speaker 1: one was COVID, but prior to that was GFC. But 1189 00:57:59,680 --> 00:58:01,080 Speaker 1: you ever think we'll get back to the days when 1190 00:58:01,120 --> 00:58:03,160 Speaker 1: you and I first met each other, when we know 1191 00:58:03,200 --> 00:58:06,120 Speaker 1: we would have five rate rises, five rate reductions over 1192 00:58:06,160 --> 00:58:08,840 Speaker 1: the night long period. Then you know, then you have 1193 00:58:08,920 --> 00:58:11,560 Speaker 1: a loll and have a six up, six down, five up, 1194 00:58:11,600 --> 00:58:14,439 Speaker 1: five six down. You know, we it was so sort 1195 00:58:14,440 --> 00:58:17,480 Speaker 1: of easy to predict, and we always had inflation around 1196 00:58:17,480 --> 00:58:18,200 Speaker 1: two to three He. 1197 00:58:18,240 --> 00:58:20,120 Speaker 2: Got to three point one and went to two point five. 1198 00:58:20,320 --> 00:58:23,880 Speaker 1: Was always in the from ninety six it was extraordinary 1199 00:58:23,960 --> 00:58:27,320 Speaker 1: right to extraordinary twenty twenty sort of thing. 1200 00:58:27,680 --> 00:58:31,720 Speaker 2: It was a little odd blippe up and down whatever, 1201 00:58:31,760 --> 00:58:32,720 Speaker 2: but it was remarkable. 1202 00:58:32,720 --> 00:58:34,320 Speaker 1: Do you think we'll ever get back to those sort 1203 00:58:34,360 --> 00:58:35,840 Speaker 1: of that that that's that rhythm. 1204 00:58:36,040 --> 00:58:40,040 Speaker 2: Look, you're reminded me of a speech that the former 1205 00:58:40,080 --> 00:58:42,480 Speaker 2: governor Philip Low gave a very good, really good speech 1206 00:58:43,120 --> 00:58:47,040 Speaker 2: where he said that the nature of economy economies now, 1207 00:58:47,800 --> 00:58:52,480 Speaker 2: artificial intelligence, technology and even things like climate change are 1208 00:58:52,480 --> 00:58:55,240 Speaker 2: going to make the economy more volatile. So if you 1209 00:58:55,240 --> 00:58:58,880 Speaker 2: get another flood that washes out cabbages and lettuces and 1210 00:58:58,920 --> 00:59:00,840 Speaker 2: the price spikes up, you do about it. Then you 1211 00:59:00,840 --> 00:59:03,960 Speaker 2: get insurance premiums going up because the cost of ensuring 1212 00:59:04,480 --> 00:59:06,960 Speaker 2: you know, property in Lismo is unaffordable now on the 1213 00:59:06,960 --> 00:59:09,920 Speaker 2: floodplains and all this sort of stuff. So I'm wondering 1214 00:59:10,240 --> 00:59:14,680 Speaker 2: that maybe we won't. Maybe we'll have like more intense 1215 00:59:14,840 --> 00:59:18,120 Speaker 2: moves up and down according to these shock events that 1216 00:59:18,160 --> 00:59:19,160 Speaker 2: come along every now and then. 1217 00:59:19,240 --> 00:59:22,720 Speaker 1: Below the weather yeap, yep, everything's more extreme ye and 1218 00:59:23,600 --> 00:59:25,040 Speaker 1: cold window storm out. 1219 00:59:25,200 --> 00:59:27,360 Speaker 2: The one thing that we should never get is geopolitics 1220 00:59:27,360 --> 00:59:29,520 Speaker 2: that you know, the events that are going on in 1221 00:59:29,800 --> 00:59:33,200 Speaker 2: Russia and Ukraine and the Middle East now and the China. 1222 00:59:33,320 --> 00:59:36,440 Speaker 2: The China one's still there. We've got the US presidential election. 1223 00:59:37,440 --> 00:59:41,200 Speaker 2: I don't know what's happening there other than it could 1224 00:59:41,200 --> 00:59:43,280 Speaker 2: be big. No, you're right, and I don't even know 1225 00:59:43,320 --> 00:59:43,760 Speaker 2: what direction. 1226 00:59:43,920 --> 00:59:46,919 Speaker 1: We've never seen any US presidential elections being like this either. 1227 00:59:47,040 --> 00:59:49,040 Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is like this is this 1228 00:59:49,120 --> 00:59:52,720 Speaker 1: is sort of a bit mental and it's sort of like, 1229 00:59:53,960 --> 00:59:58,280 Speaker 1: you know, the two extremes, two extreme individuals, totally different, 1230 00:59:59,160 --> 01:00:02,400 Speaker 1: and either one is probably not a good outcome. I'm 1231 01:00:02,440 --> 01:00:05,240 Speaker 1: just talking about economically, probably not a good outcome either way. 1232 01:00:05,480 --> 01:00:07,760 Speaker 1: And by the way, no one can predict what the 1233 01:00:07,800 --> 01:00:09,560 Speaker 1: net effects is going to be. It's quite interesting. The 1234 01:00:09,560 --> 01:00:12,480 Speaker 1: world has changed, mate, So maybe answer that. My question is, no, 1235 01:00:12,520 --> 01:00:14,560 Speaker 1: we won't. It's not going to come back that way. 1236 01:00:14,640 --> 01:00:16,640 Speaker 1: We're not going to have that lack of We never 1237 01:00:16,680 --> 01:00:17,760 Speaker 1: had volatility before. 1238 01:00:17,880 --> 01:00:21,760 Speaker 2: No, it's been a phenomenon since the GFC and then COVID. 1239 01:00:21,920 --> 01:00:24,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's amazing, thanks mate, talk so thanks Mark. 1240 01:00:24,520 --> 01:00:24,880 Speaker 2: See it