1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,120 Speaker 1: The big Footy issues from every angle, dissected by a 2 00:00:03,160 --> 00:00:06,400 Speaker 1: team that follows the game closer than anyone else wherever 3 00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:08,960 Speaker 1: you are around the planet. This is your ultimate guide 4 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:12,560 Speaker 1: to the AFL. This is the Fox Footy Podcast. 5 00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:18,799 Speaker 2: We are so back for an eleventh season of the 6 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:21,880 Speaker 2: Fox Footy Podcast, and with less than two weeks before 7 00:00:21,920 --> 00:00:25,200 Speaker 2: opening round or Round zero, as every single coach in 8 00:00:25,239 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 2: the league refers to it, the game's sharpest minds are 9 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 2: starting to piece together their predictions for the twenty twenty 10 00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:34,640 Speaker 2: sixth season. Will go inside the mind of our power 11 00:00:34,680 --> 00:00:39,199 Speaker 2: rankings expert ahead of a monster article release imminently and 12 00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:42,400 Speaker 2: off the back of nine match simulations, we will pull 13 00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:45,360 Speaker 2: out some almighty overreactions to get you in the hot 14 00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:48,240 Speaker 2: take mood ahead of another big year. On the Fox 15 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:51,080 Speaker 2: Footy Podcast, Ben Mordiweth with you, as is the Australian 16 00:00:51,159 --> 00:00:54,560 Speaker 2: Open Night our himself Max Lawton back for another season. 17 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:55,560 Speaker 2: Hello Maxie, So. 18 00:00:55,560 --> 00:00:58,440 Speaker 3: You say that, Ben? And then the one night. Basically 19 00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:01,560 Speaker 3: I didn't work the semi finals, which were the two 20 00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:04,240 Speaker 3: most epic matches of the entire tournament. I believe I 21 00:01:04,319 --> 00:01:08,000 Speaker 3: might have left someone on this call there instead. So 22 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:11,440 Speaker 3: it was an interesting tournament. Interesting time and I think 23 00:01:11,480 --> 00:01:13,839 Speaker 3: you know, I just want to say before we start, 24 00:01:13,880 --> 00:01:16,320 Speaker 3: ben there's a really big topic in footy that is 25 00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 3: close to my heart. It's going to impact tens of 26 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 3: thousands of footy fans and some of the biggest games 27 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,959 Speaker 3: of the year. This year, the trains to the MCG 28 00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:28,200 Speaker 3: have changed changed. If you're on the Packingham Cranbin line, 29 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:30,720 Speaker 3: you can't go to Richmond station anymore. 30 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 2: Because you have we're going through the. 31 00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:37,240 Speaker 3: Through the Metro tunnel, so you can't go to Richmond. 32 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:39,600 Speaker 3: So just I want to warn anyone listening you're going 33 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:41,400 Speaker 3: to learn this and opening round or round one, or 34 00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 3: whenever you go to your first game, you can't go 35 00:01:43,680 --> 00:01:46,399 Speaker 3: to Richmond. You go into Flinders and you're walking from there, 36 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 3: or if you're leaving, I recommend going to Jollymont and 37 00:01:48,840 --> 00:01:51,680 Speaker 3: getting a citybound train and then transferring at town Hall. 38 00:01:51,720 --> 00:01:53,480 Speaker 3: That's going to This's going to be a story. 39 00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,760 Speaker 2: Just you wait, right, I'll look forward to that. Five 40 00:01:56,760 --> 00:01:59,760 Speaker 2: Benning questions I reckon in the aftermath of that. Also, 41 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:02,400 Speaker 2: as he's the number one ticket holder on the Sam 42 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 2: Lawler bandwagon. Jack Joevenovski Hello JJ, Yes, Hello, that is me. 43 00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 4: Good to be here for the back of some really 44 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:13,880 Speaker 4: enthralling match sims across this last week, including my beloved 45 00:02:13,919 --> 00:02:14,639 Speaker 4: Tigers last night. 46 00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:16,600 Speaker 2: You match simmed out? 47 00:02:18,440 --> 00:02:20,839 Speaker 4: Yes or no? I mean it's good to happen back 48 00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 4: first and foremost. I think that's the main thing. It's 49 00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:25,800 Speaker 4: been a little bit of a while obviously without footy, 50 00:02:25,840 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 4: so it's good to. 51 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:26,720 Speaker 2: Have it back. 52 00:02:26,760 --> 00:02:30,280 Speaker 4: I think maybe after a week of community series games 53 00:02:30,280 --> 00:02:33,240 Speaker 4: he might be really ready for the real stuff. But 54 00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:35,680 Speaker 4: it was definitely good to get back into the swing 55 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:38,480 Speaker 4: of things. Good to cover all the games. There's obviously 56 00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:41,320 Speaker 4: a lot of interest with you know, who's going to 57 00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:43,760 Speaker 4: break into sites and who's who's sort of pressing their 58 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:45,640 Speaker 4: case and all the draft so it's a it's a 59 00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 4: fun time. 60 00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:49,800 Speaker 3: My girlfriend was very confused because she didn't think that 61 00:02:49,840 --> 00:02:52,840 Speaker 3: match simulations meant they actually played them. She thought that 62 00:02:52,880 --> 00:02:55,560 Speaker 3: they literally simulated the games when we wrote about them. 63 00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:58,239 Speaker 3: So still a lot to learn, I guess. 64 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:00,680 Speaker 2: Yes, good afternoon, the cat who know doubt we'll be 65 00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:03,000 Speaker 2: listening to this podcast. And just a couple of points 66 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:05,079 Speaker 2: of business. I did message you this during the summer. 67 00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:05,680 Speaker 3: We do. 68 00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:09,639 Speaker 2: Having We do have fans in very odd places, so 69 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:13,520 Speaker 2: my wife. My wife is part of a buy Nothing 70 00:03:13,600 --> 00:03:17,360 Speaker 2: Now group like a Facebook group. We essentially get picked 71 00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:19,520 Speaker 2: uff up for free and we get a lot of 72 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:21,400 Speaker 2: that through kids toys and that kind of stuff. So 73 00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:24,320 Speaker 2: we rocked up to a place in North Ringwood and 74 00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:26,320 Speaker 2: I said, oh, are here to pick up I think 75 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 2: it was some Thomas the Tank Engine tracks and this 76 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 2: guy goes, oh, hey, are you in the Fox Footy podcast? 77 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:35,040 Speaker 2: I recognize that voice. So you do get you do 78 00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:37,360 Speaker 2: get fans in very odd places. And the other point 79 00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:40,240 Speaker 2: of business I wanted to bring up MAXI is because 80 00:03:40,240 --> 00:03:42,960 Speaker 2: we've talked about the band twice a fair bit on 81 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 2: this podcast in the past. So in trying to improve 82 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 2: my running over the off sea over the off season, 83 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:53,520 Speaker 2: I've tried to quicken my cadence. So I listened to 84 00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:57,160 Speaker 2: a podcast with a cadence that is one hundred and 85 00:03:57,200 --> 00:03:59,360 Speaker 2: seventy to one hundred and seventy five beats per minute 86 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 2: and a lot of twice songs have randomly popped up 87 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:06,000 Speaker 2: in that and it's it's actually provided giving me some 88 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 2: good momentum through jogs. I've quite enjoyed it. 89 00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:11,200 Speaker 3: We're adapting you into a k pops and through running 90 00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:14,000 Speaker 3: the opposite of me because I don't move. Ever, that's 91 00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:14,600 Speaker 3: exciting thing. 92 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:18,119 Speaker 2: There was there's one song where the only English words 93 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:19,480 Speaker 2: I'm pretty sure is what is love? 94 00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:22,000 Speaker 3: What is love is a great song. I could speak 95 00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:24,559 Speaker 3: the Korean to you right now, I won't. 96 00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:30,000 Speaker 2: Time anyway. I felt like through through that, through running Max, 97 00:04:30,040 --> 00:04:32,760 Speaker 2: we've somehow become closer during the off season. 98 00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:33,280 Speaker 3: Beautiful. 99 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:36,039 Speaker 2: There you have it, hey, Well, an annual thing that 100 00:04:36,080 --> 00:04:37,800 Speaker 2: you do. Maxie on Fox Footy dot Com today he 101 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:41,400 Speaker 2: was put together a very in depth predicted ladder. So 102 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:45,000 Speaker 2: it's almost a taste of the the weekly power rankings 103 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:48,880 Speaker 2: article that comes out every week during the season. You've 104 00:04:48,880 --> 00:04:51,880 Speaker 2: been feverishly chipping away at it over the past couple 105 00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:53,880 Speaker 2: of weeks and it'll come out in the next seven 106 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:56,240 Speaker 2: days or so. Have you settled on it or you're 107 00:04:56,279 --> 00:04:58,720 Speaker 2: waiting for a bit of evidence via the community series 108 00:04:58,760 --> 00:05:01,040 Speaker 2: to put it like all down the line? 109 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:03,479 Speaker 3: Well, look here, anyone, If anyone big does their knee 110 00:05:03,520 --> 00:05:05,599 Speaker 3: in the community series, obviously they will impact things. So 111 00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:09,719 Speaker 3: Tom Green obviously impacting the Giants' fortunes already. But for 112 00:05:09,760 --> 00:05:11,960 Speaker 3: the most parts, I mean, I've written ten thousand words. 113 00:05:11,960 --> 00:05:14,039 Speaker 3: I don't want to have to change too many of them. 114 00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:16,400 Speaker 3: It would be a lot easier if I didn't. So yeah, 115 00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,279 Speaker 3: I've got a reasonably comfortable order and I think the 116 00:05:19,320 --> 00:05:22,320 Speaker 3: top two are pretty clear. Still, why would I go 117 00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:24,840 Speaker 3: past Brisbane and Geelong as the best two teams until 118 00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:26,320 Speaker 3: proven otherwise, right? 119 00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 2: Not the Suns, who a lot of people have them 120 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:30,599 Speaker 2: in second spot at the moment. 121 00:05:31,480 --> 00:05:33,680 Speaker 3: I mean, look, I could absolutely see it. You can 122 00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:36,520 Speaker 3: see it with a few teams, and honestly, I still think, 123 00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:38,280 Speaker 3: just think last year's top ten are still the ten 124 00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:41,000 Speaker 3: best teams is the biggest thing. I'm struggling to see 125 00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:42,839 Speaker 3: who breaks in. Like you can make a case for 126 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:45,120 Speaker 3: Saint Kilda if you really liked the recruiting, But I 127 00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:47,279 Speaker 3: don't think they were as good last year as everyone says, 128 00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:50,359 Speaker 3: where everyone thinks they had a lot of close wins 129 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:52,480 Speaker 3: right at the end to inflate their win loss record. 130 00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:54,640 Speaker 3: But no, you look at the Suns. I've got them 131 00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:57,080 Speaker 3: in my top four. But I am mindful that it 132 00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:00,279 Speaker 3: is still a reasonable climb from where they were bottom 133 00:06:00,279 --> 00:06:03,160 Speaker 3: half of the eight to genuine flag contention. And they 134 00:06:03,160 --> 00:06:04,919 Speaker 3: did get thumped by the Lions in that semi final. 135 00:06:04,960 --> 00:06:07,840 Speaker 3: They were pretty uncompetitive in that they were so like 136 00:06:07,920 --> 00:06:11,440 Speaker 3: they beat them very comfortably eight weeks before that, But 137 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:13,880 Speaker 3: that does show the gap between the two when the 138 00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:14,599 Speaker 3: whips are cracking. 139 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:19,480 Speaker 2: Is there's always we always talk about at the Fox 140 00:06:19,480 --> 00:06:23,240 Speaker 2: Footy office about one team going from the bottom half 141 00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:25,080 Speaker 2: of the eighth into the top four, and that has 142 00:06:25,120 --> 00:06:29,200 Speaker 2: consistently happened for it many years now. The Swans seem 143 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:34,080 Speaker 2: like the team most or best place to achieve that. 144 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:34,800 Speaker 2: Would that be fair? 145 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:36,840 Speaker 3: I think that's fair. I think they're going to be 146 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:40,480 Speaker 3: the most popular one and I am torn between them 147 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,040 Speaker 3: and the team that I for some reason become the 148 00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:45,280 Speaker 3: number one ticket holder of over the last eighteen months, 149 00:06:45,279 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 3: the Western Bulldogs. Bulldogs are still highly rate the Bulldogs. 150 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:51,480 Speaker 3: I think we forget very quickly that they were the 151 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:54,760 Speaker 3: best defense in the comp in twenty twenty four. Yes 152 00:06:54,800 --> 00:06:56,760 Speaker 3: they were not great last year. Yes they lost a 153 00:06:56,800 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 3: lot of games against the top eight. They were competitive 154 00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:01,800 Speaker 3: pretty mu every week and always in it, and I 155 00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:04,720 Speaker 3: just have some faith that they can. Even if they 156 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:07,840 Speaker 3: are as good as they were last year, they should 157 00:07:07,880 --> 00:07:10,800 Speaker 3: be definitely a top eight team and maybe for the 158 00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:12,360 Speaker 3: first time, a top four team. They do with the 159 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:14,680 Speaker 3: disadvantage of being a Marvel team. I don't think any 160 00:07:14,680 --> 00:07:17,520 Speaker 3: team who has its home games at Marvel has made 161 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:20,280 Speaker 3: the top four since twenty ten. It's pretty extraordinary. 162 00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:22,800 Speaker 2: So Jack, you watch both the Dogs and the Swans 163 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:25,680 Speaker 2: in the match, and we'll get into some matchim talking 164 00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:28,080 Speaker 2: points in the next little bit. But you watch the 165 00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 2: Dogs and the Swans go out at the ball, move 166 00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 2: reasonably freely. He wasn't necessarily a high scoring game, but 167 00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:36,280 Speaker 2: with Charlie Kurno, like a couple of times, Eryl Gordon 168 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:38,559 Speaker 2: hits up Charlie Curno and you think, oh my gosh, 169 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:40,800 Speaker 2: that is an exciting taste of things to come for 170 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:43,080 Speaker 2: the Swan's adding a bit of Logan McDonald in there, 171 00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:46,880 Speaker 2: and Kerno's ability to work with McDonald, who on talent 172 00:07:47,320 --> 00:07:50,560 Speaker 2: is better than McLean and Joela Marty, even though Amarti's 173 00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 2: had better output in recent years. McDonald gets some run 174 00:07:55,480 --> 00:07:58,800 Speaker 2: with injury. Were you buoyed by either of those two 175 00:07:58,840 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 2: sides after watching them on last Thursday? 176 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:04,960 Speaker 4: Yeah? More so, more so, Sidney, I think the Bulldogs 177 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:08,840 Speaker 4: are clearly quite undemanned given the players are missing from 178 00:08:09,080 --> 00:08:11,480 Speaker 4: who played in Origin. I think you take the more 179 00:08:11,480 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 4: away from the way Sidney played, I'd almost say, like 180 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:19,160 Speaker 4: you alluded to, just as probably more encouraging than how 181 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:24,680 Speaker 4: Curno himself looked, was how McDonald looked alongside him. I 182 00:08:24,720 --> 00:08:28,040 Speaker 4: think Kurno's presence is going to free him up a 183 00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 4: whole lot, And like you says, he's clearly the next 184 00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:36,560 Speaker 4: best based on talent, and I think it looks like 185 00:08:36,600 --> 00:08:39,360 Speaker 4: he's pretty primed for a big year. The other one 186 00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:44,120 Speaker 4: who was really impressive was Malcolm Roses, who I probably 187 00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:48,040 Speaker 4: personally didn't factor in too much when thinking about, you know, 188 00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:50,680 Speaker 4: some of their offseasonedition was, but clearly he's going to 189 00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:54,440 Speaker 4: be a pretty pretty key live while there next to 190 00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:58,920 Speaker 4: Tom Papley. And during during the broadcast, it was alludes 191 00:08:58,960 --> 00:09:01,040 Speaker 4: to by Dan Hannabry that happily hadn't had a player 192 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:04,599 Speaker 4: like Roses to play alongside in or sort of alleviate 193 00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:07,720 Speaker 4: some of that load in terms of small forward craft 194 00:09:07,800 --> 00:09:11,440 Speaker 4: inside fifty, So I think that's going to be really 195 00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:14,640 Speaker 4: important as well. Alongside Canada obviously looked really good. 196 00:09:15,360 --> 00:09:18,240 Speaker 2: Any what about teams that might or are in danger 197 00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:21,960 Speaker 2: of dropping out of that top rung of contention there, MAXI, 198 00:09:22,040 --> 00:09:24,720 Speaker 2: because I suppose we could throw the Cats in there 199 00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:26,760 Speaker 2: every year. We always think the cliff is coming, but 200 00:09:26,760 --> 00:09:28,360 Speaker 2: we know this is a different Gelong team and has 201 00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:31,199 Speaker 2: been for a number of years and now they've regenerated 202 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:35,360 Speaker 2: beautifully after that twenty twenty two premiership. Are there any 203 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:38,600 Speaker 2: teams in danger of dropping out from your perspective, Well, the. 204 00:09:38,600 --> 00:09:41,560 Speaker 3: Good thing is that with the expansion to a top ten, 205 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:44,079 Speaker 3: and let's be clear, it's not a wild card, it's 206 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:45,720 Speaker 3: just a top ten, we have a top ten finals. 207 00:09:45,720 --> 00:09:48,120 Speaker 3: Now I can keep last year's top ten. It's the 208 00:09:48,120 --> 00:09:50,520 Speaker 3: same top ten. And I feel bad because you usually 209 00:09:50,800 --> 00:09:53,520 Speaker 3: being that conservative in ladder predicting season is a folly. 210 00:09:53,559 --> 00:09:56,920 Speaker 3: But as I said, I don't see who's making that leap. 211 00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:00,120 Speaker 3: So I have Collingwood and GWS ninth and tenth. That 212 00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:03,560 Speaker 3: would still involve them getting into these wildcard finals, still 213 00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:05,959 Speaker 3: having a chance to make the elimination final, and you 214 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:07,719 Speaker 3: know you're not going to win five finals, but those 215 00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:10,760 Speaker 3: teams would be pretty good. So GWS is more an 216 00:10:10,840 --> 00:10:12,560 Speaker 3: injury thing. I already thought they were going to decline 217 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:14,240 Speaker 3: a little because you know, they didn't win a final 218 00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:18,239 Speaker 3: last year. They haven't won final in a little while. Actually, surprisingly, 219 00:10:18,280 --> 00:10:20,520 Speaker 3: despite all the hype, around them, but you know, Tom 220 00:10:20,559 --> 00:10:26,080 Speaker 3: Green is a massive blow. Sam Taylor injury this season 221 00:10:26,200 --> 00:10:28,480 Speaker 3: and there, yeah, they're the unlucky team and it feels 222 00:10:28,520 --> 00:10:31,480 Speaker 3: very Sydney last year. So Sydney last year. First half 223 00:10:31,480 --> 00:10:34,800 Speaker 3: of the season weren't themselves. Second half much better. Still 224 00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:37,600 Speaker 3: not a top four level team, but better. And I 225 00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 3: think the Giants could easily be that team where they 226 00:10:39,920 --> 00:10:43,080 Speaker 3: get going and they've got a kind of easy run. 227 00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:45,679 Speaker 3: The first month is tricky, but then they've got a 228 00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:47,480 Speaker 3: relatively easy draw the Giants, So if they get to 229 00:10:47,520 --> 00:10:50,080 Speaker 3: mid season and they're in the mix, they'll come home 230 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:53,560 Speaker 3: pretty well and should make the wild card spots as well. 231 00:10:53,920 --> 00:10:56,559 Speaker 3: And then just trying to find who would drop down, 232 00:10:57,240 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 3: it was more about I had more reasons to keep 233 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:02,080 Speaker 3: other teams up. They're not believing in Collingwood. I'm pretty 234 00:11:02,080 --> 00:11:04,760 Speaker 3: sure Collingwoods good. It is very easy for them to 235 00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 3: be mid table. Is the problem we saw in twenty 236 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:11,040 Speaker 3: twenty four. You get a bad run of injuries and 237 00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:13,360 Speaker 3: it hurts them quite a bit. And you know the 238 00:11:13,400 --> 00:11:16,920 Speaker 3: fact that you're relying on Pendlebury's side bottom how as 239 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:19,400 Speaker 3: much as you still are, is a little bit concerning, 240 00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:21,480 Speaker 3: because like Penerlebury and side Botom went to most center 241 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:23,440 Speaker 3: bounces last year. You know, they're still in a really 242 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 3: important part of that midfield. So I just don't have 243 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:27,720 Speaker 3: faith that they have the depth that they need to 244 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:31,120 Speaker 3: have because they're drafting outside of obviously Decos and Boone 245 00:11:31,240 --> 00:11:34,320 Speaker 3: McCreary over the last five years just hasn't been great. 246 00:11:34,600 --> 00:11:36,840 Speaker 3: So I just don't trust that they have the backups 247 00:11:36,920 --> 00:11:39,319 Speaker 3: if things go wrong, and at some point something will 248 00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:39,720 Speaker 3: go wrong. 249 00:11:40,080 --> 00:11:43,160 Speaker 2: Any teams Jack you're concerned about that might be in 250 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 2: danger of dropping out of that top rung there. 251 00:11:47,559 --> 00:11:50,280 Speaker 4: I tend to agree with Max. I think Collingwood's the 252 00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:52,120 Speaker 4: most obvious, when I think a lot of those other 253 00:11:52,160 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 4: teams around there are probably more ascending. I'm interested in Nomax. 254 00:11:57,080 --> 00:12:01,080 Speaker 4: In terms of the Giants, were you more to buy 255 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:03,680 Speaker 4: them because of the injury stuff is pre season or 256 00:12:03,679 --> 00:12:05,480 Speaker 4: were you already sort of thinking that a routine that 257 00:12:06,040 --> 00:12:07,240 Speaker 4: could possibly jog down? 258 00:12:08,080 --> 00:12:11,000 Speaker 3: I reckon, I had them eighth before the injuries, and 259 00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:13,160 Speaker 3: now I have them tenth, Like that's the sort of difference, 260 00:12:13,240 --> 00:12:16,640 Speaker 3: like I already thought they I mean, they've been doing 261 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:19,160 Speaker 3: crazy things on expected score for a few years anyway, 262 00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:20,760 Speaker 3: So a lot of it is just they're really good 263 00:12:20,760 --> 00:12:24,160 Speaker 3: at kicking straight, but their opponents have kicked the most 264 00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:26,920 Speaker 3: inaccurately over the last three years of any team in 265 00:12:26,920 --> 00:12:29,040 Speaker 3: the comp which they don't control. So they've had some 266 00:12:29,080 --> 00:12:31,439 Speaker 3: good fortune. They had some close games, particularly in the 267 00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:33,600 Speaker 3: middle of the season. Had that run like the Richmond game, 268 00:12:33,640 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 3: they should have lost the Geelong game relatively fortunate. I 269 00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:38,199 Speaker 3: think they beat Brisbane at the Gabba and been a 270 00:12:38,240 --> 00:12:41,760 Speaker 3: pretty fortunate circumstances. So just some funny stuff happened to 271 00:12:41,800 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 3: get them to fifteen odd wins. So I already thought 272 00:12:44,240 --> 00:12:46,120 Speaker 3: they'd take maybe a step back to twelve or thirteen, 273 00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:48,480 Speaker 3: and now you take into account those injuries, it just 274 00:12:48,520 --> 00:12:51,480 Speaker 3: takes out their top end potential. They're still pretty good. 275 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:54,480 Speaker 3: A little bit of depth could be exposed, and you 276 00:12:54,480 --> 00:12:56,439 Speaker 3: know they've got some really bad concentrated injuries. 277 00:12:57,000 --> 00:12:58,920 Speaker 2: What about down the bottom end of of the ladder. 278 00:12:59,120 --> 00:13:02,480 Speaker 2: I saw a prediction now Foxfordy colleague John Ralph today 279 00:13:02,559 --> 00:13:05,520 Speaker 2: saying that Richmond would win the Woodens win in inverted 280 00:13:05,520 --> 00:13:08,040 Speaker 2: commas the Wooden Spoon and the West Coast would be 281 00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:11,720 Speaker 2: finishing sixteenth. Again it's another West Coast, North Melbourne, Richmond 282 00:13:12,080 --> 00:13:15,000 Speaker 2: bottom three, but that was the order West Coast, Richmond, 283 00:13:15,520 --> 00:13:19,560 Speaker 2: West Coast, North Melbourne and Richmond sixteen seventeen eighteen after 284 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:21,320 Speaker 2: the one win season for the Eagles last year. 285 00:13:21,440 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 3: I mean, I didn't like our North Melbourne's defense looked 286 00:13:24,280 --> 00:13:27,000 Speaker 3: in the matchim against Melbourne. It looked like it had 287 00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:31,520 Speaker 3: somehow gotten worse, which seemed impossible. But look, I'm relatively 288 00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:37,480 Speaker 3: pessimistic on North. I don't see there is growth to 289 00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:40,400 Speaker 3: come in the midfield and the forward line. I think 290 00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:43,720 Speaker 3: at best there are poor Man's Bulldogs from last year 291 00:13:43,880 --> 00:13:46,240 Speaker 3: who can score really well but can't stop you, right, 292 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:49,000 Speaker 3: so maybe that takes you to mid table at best. 293 00:13:49,640 --> 00:13:52,040 Speaker 3: But the defense looks so flawed. We don't know as 294 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:54,520 Speaker 3: we're recording what's happening with Charlie Common if he's getting suspended, 295 00:13:55,320 --> 00:13:58,880 Speaker 3: but he needs a lot of help anyway. So I 296 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:02,960 Speaker 3: have North Melbourne still be sixteenth, partially because Melbourne. I 297 00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:04,040 Speaker 3: think a lot of people are going to have them 298 00:14:04,080 --> 00:14:05,840 Speaker 3: in the bottom four and I do as well. But 299 00:14:05,880 --> 00:14:07,440 Speaker 3: I think Melbourn are going to better than people think. 300 00:14:07,520 --> 00:14:09,440 Speaker 3: They were better than people thought last year. They had 301 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:12,120 Speaker 3: some really bad luck, which means they probably should have 302 00:14:12,120 --> 00:14:13,560 Speaker 3: been about of ten win team, So yes. 303 00:14:13,440 --> 00:14:15,000 Speaker 2: To PIFAG theory coming in as well. 304 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:17,000 Speaker 3: With a little bit, a little bit, they should have 305 00:14:17,040 --> 00:14:21,720 Speaker 3: won about three extra games based on PIFAG. Look, I 306 00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:24,200 Speaker 3: don't think they're going to improve because they have deliberately 307 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:26,440 Speaker 3: tried not to improve, which is what happens when you 308 00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:29,080 Speaker 3: trade out Petrarca and Oliver and all of their awards 309 00:14:29,080 --> 00:14:31,320 Speaker 3: that come with it. But they should still be more interesting, 310 00:14:31,400 --> 00:14:34,320 Speaker 3: more certainly more exciting to watch, which I mean, if 311 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:36,080 Speaker 3: you're going to be a Melbourne fan and they're going 312 00:14:36,120 --> 00:14:38,480 Speaker 3: to finish in the bottom six anyway, you'd rather they 313 00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:40,720 Speaker 3: at least be not boring as they have been in 314 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:41,480 Speaker 3: the past seasons. 315 00:14:41,840 --> 00:14:44,320 Speaker 2: Just from a well, I'm just looking back at an 316 00:14:44,360 --> 00:14:46,680 Speaker 2: article that we did back in November written by Jack 317 00:14:47,160 --> 00:14:51,040 Speaker 2: that was the coaching pressure gag gauge for twenty twenty five. 318 00:14:51,440 --> 00:14:55,480 Speaker 2: Klyako comes in at number three because it is very 319 00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:57,760 Speaker 2: much a year of note and we're starting to get 320 00:14:57,760 --> 00:15:00,320 Speaker 2: towards the back end of that contract that he's armen 321 00:15:00,360 --> 00:15:03,040 Speaker 2: he first joined North Melbourne only just a long view 322 00:15:03,120 --> 00:15:07,680 Speaker 2: from the Dockers and Michael Voss from Carlton are ahead 323 00:15:07,680 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 2: of him. It is a big year though for clarko 324 00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:14,080 Speaker 2: Jack considering, I think I wrote yesterday that North Melbourne 325 00:15:14,080 --> 00:15:17,120 Speaker 2: has been in the bottom three teams every season since 326 00:15:17,480 --> 00:15:20,480 Speaker 2: twenty twenty, and they are some seriously fed up fans. 327 00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:22,000 Speaker 2: That has to be said. 328 00:15:22,920 --> 00:15:27,240 Speaker 4: Yeah, it's clearly a massive year. I think the improvement 329 00:15:27,280 --> 00:15:31,320 Speaker 4: has to come from defense more than anywhere else. I 330 00:15:31,320 --> 00:15:34,720 Speaker 4: think they've got a good mix of midfielders now and 331 00:15:35,040 --> 00:15:39,800 Speaker 4: some decently good offensively minded back half rebound as you 332 00:15:39,840 --> 00:15:42,520 Speaker 4: look at mckircher and Hardeman and those sorts of guys. 333 00:15:42,560 --> 00:15:46,360 Speaker 4: But in terms of team defense and how easily they're 334 00:15:46,400 --> 00:15:51,440 Speaker 4: exploited in transition and the lack of I guess you know, 335 00:15:53,480 --> 00:15:56,040 Speaker 4: top half of the league Keith Benners and you look 336 00:15:56,040 --> 00:15:59,240 Speaker 4: at Toby Pink and Griffin Logan Combin is the one 337 00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:00,920 Speaker 4: guy there who who you probably have a lot of 338 00:16:00,920 --> 00:16:03,160 Speaker 4: faith in, But aside from that, there's not a whole 339 00:16:03,160 --> 00:16:05,520 Speaker 4: lot back there, and you just sort of worry about 340 00:16:05,560 --> 00:16:09,800 Speaker 4: their ability to stop teams coming the other way. I think, 341 00:16:10,320 --> 00:16:12,360 Speaker 4: you know, someone like Kipper Trembarth could be a decent 342 00:16:12,400 --> 00:16:15,600 Speaker 4: second option next to Nick Clark, you think this year, 343 00:16:15,600 --> 00:16:18,760 Speaker 4: and obviously they've added Dumbeston in the Cord line too, 344 00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 4: So I think they've got in terms of the midfield 345 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:23,800 Speaker 4: and forward line, they've got enough there to sort of 346 00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:27,680 Speaker 4: make some stuff work. But in terms of the back line, 347 00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:29,840 Speaker 4: I think that's really where they're going to struggle. And 348 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:32,280 Speaker 4: if they do get really belted a number of times 349 00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:34,680 Speaker 4: this year, then obviously the pressure is really going to 350 00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:35,200 Speaker 4: be on Parco. 351 00:16:35,720 --> 00:16:37,800 Speaker 2: What about the Blues, MAXI before we move on to 352 00:16:37,800 --> 00:16:40,840 Speaker 2: some matchim talking points, and the Blues beat the reigning premiers, 353 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:44,320 Speaker 2: has to be said in the MATSim Michael Voss heading 354 00:16:44,320 --> 00:16:46,800 Speaker 2: into a year where he's out of contract at the 355 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:48,200 Speaker 2: end of it, bring. 356 00:16:48,040 --> 00:16:50,640 Speaker 3: Out the Wizard Cups, the Precession Champs. Well, I think 357 00:16:50,680 --> 00:16:53,240 Speaker 3: se Kilda actually won the match simms if you did 358 00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:55,880 Speaker 3: a ladder based on those one game, So congratulations with 359 00:16:55,920 --> 00:17:00,840 Speaker 3: the Saints they did. They were pretty good against the Suns. Yeah, 360 00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:05,320 Speaker 3: the positive case scenario of the Carlton I can see 361 00:17:05,440 --> 00:17:08,960 Speaker 3: mid table during the wild card sort of area because 362 00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:12,080 Speaker 3: the forward line was so one note in terms of 363 00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:15,520 Speaker 3: targeting Charlie Kurno and now you are effectively forced to change, 364 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:17,399 Speaker 3: which could be a really good thing for them. And 365 00:17:17,440 --> 00:17:19,199 Speaker 3: it's not like they've got nobody's back and they've got 366 00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:21,400 Speaker 3: a bunch of draft picks, and you know this positivity 367 00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:24,159 Speaker 3: around Jacosmith of course, which it could be one of 368 00:17:24,160 --> 00:17:26,440 Speaker 3: their better players in his first real season of footy, 369 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:29,320 Speaker 3: which is exciting. But I just don't think that they 370 00:17:29,359 --> 00:17:31,880 Speaker 3: are built to contend right now. It's this weird thing 371 00:17:31,920 --> 00:17:35,679 Speaker 3: where trading out Kerno was the best thing for the club, 372 00:17:36,119 --> 00:17:39,399 Speaker 3: it was probably the worst thing for Voss and the 373 00:17:39,400 --> 00:17:42,640 Speaker 3: people around him who are coaching and working to keep 374 00:17:42,680 --> 00:17:45,440 Speaker 3: their jobs. So I could understand if he was a 375 00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:47,560 Speaker 3: bit reticent than that. So look, if everything goes right, 376 00:17:47,640 --> 00:17:50,719 Speaker 3: sure they've certainly got talent through the spine and all 377 00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:53,120 Speaker 3: of the stuff that we've talked about for five years now, 378 00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:54,800 Speaker 3: but it feels like they've gone out of a window 379 00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:58,040 Speaker 3: and are dipping a little bit now to hopefully peek 380 00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:00,480 Speaker 3: back up in a couple of years time. I just 381 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:02,119 Speaker 3: think the dip is going to be so low that 382 00:18:02,200 --> 00:18:04,480 Speaker 3: it's not going to be Michael Voss who gets to 383 00:18:04,680 --> 00:18:06,080 Speaker 3: enjoy the fruits of that labor. 384 00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:09,320 Speaker 2: Let's just quickly reflect on the match sims. So we 385 00:18:09,359 --> 00:18:12,120 Speaker 2: had nine match sims that went from last Monday through 386 00:18:12,320 --> 00:18:15,399 Speaker 2: the Saturday. Well, the one thing that stood out to 387 00:18:15,480 --> 00:18:18,600 Speaker 2: me watching the match sims and when you're trying to 388 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:21,200 Speaker 2: put together the predicted teams, jack is is the ruck 389 00:18:21,280 --> 00:18:25,560 Speaker 2: situation in particular. So we know two really important tweaks 390 00:18:25,560 --> 00:18:28,159 Speaker 2: heating into twenty twenty six surrounding the rucks. One is 391 00:18:28,520 --> 00:18:30,879 Speaker 2: the extended bench, so we go from four in a 392 00:18:30,920 --> 00:18:35,000 Speaker 2: sub to a five player bench, and the early speculation, 393 00:18:35,160 --> 00:18:37,720 Speaker 2: way before these match sims and way before origin, was 394 00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:42,840 Speaker 2: that that would lend itself to clubs playing an extra ruck. 395 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:46,960 Speaker 2: What also on top of that, though, is that some 396 00:18:47,040 --> 00:18:50,680 Speaker 2: there are some new rock rules, essentially driven by Greg 397 00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:54,960 Speaker 2: Swam at the AFL to bring back the jumping ruck. 398 00:18:55,359 --> 00:18:58,240 Speaker 2: Means that players now have to start from behind their 399 00:18:58,280 --> 00:19:03,399 Speaker 2: design in their half heading into the ball up, and 400 00:19:03,440 --> 00:19:05,480 Speaker 2: that's another one. A third one is there's now a 401 00:19:05,520 --> 00:19:10,400 Speaker 2: ball up instead of a center bounce. So I found 402 00:19:10,400 --> 00:19:12,959 Speaker 2: it fascinating that this is going to be a genuine 403 00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:16,960 Speaker 2: year where some rucks could be made and some rucks 404 00:19:16,960 --> 00:19:19,320 Speaker 2: could be broken, a genuine make or break year. So 405 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:21,760 Speaker 2: if you look at I think there'll be more clubs 406 00:19:21,880 --> 00:19:25,160 Speaker 2: this year using two rucks. So there's a good chance 407 00:19:25,160 --> 00:19:27,520 Speaker 2: that Max Gorn and Max Heith playing the same side 408 00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:30,840 Speaker 2: for Melbourn this year, which you'd never think imagine if 409 00:19:30,840 --> 00:19:33,120 Speaker 2: the Rock rules where these Rock rules were in place. 410 00:19:33,119 --> 00:19:35,480 Speaker 2: So when Brodie Grunny was with Max Gorn all those 411 00:19:35,800 --> 00:19:39,639 Speaker 2: years ago, we'll see maybe even Lochlan macandre and Toby Murray, 412 00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:42,760 Speaker 2: two players we wouldn't have talked much about twelve months ago. 413 00:19:42,760 --> 00:19:45,919 Speaker 2: At Adelaide, they could team up. Riley Philthope plays as 414 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:48,359 Speaker 2: the genuine forward and Riley O'Brien even can't get a 415 00:19:48,359 --> 00:19:50,159 Speaker 2: gig at the moment, the guy who's held down that 416 00:19:50,240 --> 00:19:53,080 Speaker 2: ruck position for many, many years at the Crows, Ned 417 00:19:53,119 --> 00:19:55,879 Speaker 2: Moyle finally actually might get some AFL games under his belt, 418 00:19:56,200 --> 00:20:00,879 Speaker 2: him and Jared Witz teaming up for essentially the first 419 00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:03,359 Speaker 2: time really in the same game. So how do you 420 00:20:03,400 --> 00:20:06,879 Speaker 2: read that? Jack as fretty niche as it is, it 421 00:20:06,920 --> 00:20:10,760 Speaker 2: does feel extremely significant for the game heading forward. 422 00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:14,359 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think clearly in terms of the jumping. The 423 00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:17,880 Speaker 4: jumping sort of rucks. The new rules favor those sort 424 00:20:17,920 --> 00:20:20,600 Speaker 4: of more athletic types. And if you're not or if 425 00:20:20,640 --> 00:20:23,320 Speaker 4: you're an older recommended, I'm looking at guys like you know, 426 00:20:23,359 --> 00:20:26,800 Speaker 4: Euryal O'Brien's your Tabey Nanker as Joan Wittz guys who 427 00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:31,840 Speaker 4: I guess thrive more these days from the previous rules 428 00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:34,920 Speaker 4: where you're able to sort of guard and almost shepherd 429 00:20:35,040 --> 00:20:37,800 Speaker 4: in the ruck contest. So I mean it goes out 430 00:20:37,840 --> 00:20:39,560 Speaker 4: saying one where that it's going to bathe the more 431 00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:43,240 Speaker 4: athletic types I'm interested to see in terms of the 432 00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:47,399 Speaker 4: sort of less over rule. And I guess the having less. 433 00:20:49,119 --> 00:20:53,399 Speaker 5: I guess around the ground because of the between the 434 00:20:53,480 --> 00:20:57,000 Speaker 5: arcs rules, whether I guess the lack of or the 435 00:20:57,400 --> 00:21:01,320 Speaker 5: reduction in ruck contests really makes much of a difference. 436 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:04,760 Speaker 4: And then I guess in turn would effect whether two 437 00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:07,080 Speaker 4: rucks are needed. I just think it's interesting. I think 438 00:21:07,080 --> 00:21:09,439 Speaker 4: for a team like Richmond, for example, you've got Nan 439 00:21:09,560 --> 00:21:12,320 Speaker 4: Curvis and you've not got that much else in terms 440 00:21:12,320 --> 00:21:15,480 Speaker 4: of like a second ruck. Ever since they let Ivan 441 00:21:15,520 --> 00:21:20,000 Speaker 4: solo goes, for certain teams, it's going to be a 442 00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:23,399 Speaker 4: season long puzzle to sort of work out amongst them. 443 00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:26,240 Speaker 4: And obviously, like you say, a lot of these types, 444 00:21:26,320 --> 00:21:29,080 Speaker 4: you aren't as well known that clubs are going to 445 00:21:29,119 --> 00:21:29,439 Speaker 4: get a go. 446 00:21:30,240 --> 00:21:34,080 Speaker 3: If this becomes a big thing and actually really impacts 447 00:21:34,119 --> 00:21:35,720 Speaker 3: the season, this would be one of the reasons in 448 00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:36,879 Speaker 3: Kilda makes finals. 449 00:21:37,240 --> 00:21:40,879 Speaker 2: I think Marshall did look good on Wednesday night. 450 00:21:40,840 --> 00:21:43,600 Speaker 3: And Deconic is perfect for this as the athletic guy, 451 00:21:43,800 --> 00:21:45,800 Speaker 3: and Marshall we know he works well on the two 452 00:21:45,840 --> 00:21:48,520 Speaker 3: rucks set up. Last finals win came in the year 453 00:21:48,520 --> 00:21:50,160 Speaker 3: when Paddy Ryder was there with him and that worked 454 00:21:50,160 --> 00:21:52,080 Speaker 3: really well for them too in twenty twenty. So I 455 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:55,320 Speaker 3: can absolutely see that bigger reason the Saints surprising people. 456 00:21:55,520 --> 00:21:58,600 Speaker 4: And even Marshall, he's those slouch in terms of athleticism, 457 00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:01,560 Speaker 4: like he can really get up. I completely agree. I 458 00:22:01,600 --> 00:22:02,800 Speaker 4: think they're really well placed there. 459 00:22:03,680 --> 00:22:07,040 Speaker 2: I was just taken aback by the pickets and during 460 00:22:07,080 --> 00:22:09,600 Speaker 2: this Friday Matt Sinemer and I understand it was an 461 00:22:09,640 --> 00:22:12,360 Speaker 2: eighty point win for the D's and we don't read 462 00:22:12,880 --> 00:22:15,960 Speaker 2: massively into it. You know, North Melbourne was poor and 463 00:22:16,000 --> 00:22:18,919 Speaker 2: Michael Barlow said said as much in the aftermath in 464 00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:21,439 Speaker 2: his press conference. The North Melbourn assistant coach and the 465 00:22:21,520 --> 00:22:22,960 Speaker 2: D's are not going to be beating too many teams 466 00:22:23,000 --> 00:22:26,119 Speaker 2: by eighty points this season, but there is a genuine 467 00:22:26,160 --> 00:22:28,960 Speaker 2: exciting I was trying to think of the most exciting 468 00:22:29,040 --> 00:22:32,720 Speaker 2: family duo in the same team in recent times, and 469 00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:37,439 Speaker 2: I think the Pickets are as the most exciting family 470 00:22:37,560 --> 00:22:40,120 Speaker 2: duo in the same team since the Burgoyns Peter Berger 471 00:22:40,240 --> 00:22:43,000 Speaker 2: and Sean bergo And were racking up the footy back 472 00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:46,800 Speaker 2: in the golden era of Port Adelaide. But there is 473 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:50,320 Speaker 2: something seriously special about the Latrell Pickett joining kase I 474 00:22:50,400 --> 00:22:51,600 Speaker 2: Picket in the same Melbourne side. 475 00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:57,720 Speaker 3: Maxie harsh On camon Zach Guthrie clearly very exciting for 476 00:22:57,760 --> 00:23:00,680 Speaker 3: Melbourne and Pickett is I think you and a grader 477 00:23:00,720 --> 00:23:04,119 Speaker 3: based on what he showed last year, proper full time midfielder, 478 00:23:04,840 --> 00:23:08,000 Speaker 3: probably maybe Melbourne's best player if Max Gorn takes any 479 00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:10,560 Speaker 3: sort of step back, So that's very exciting, and I 480 00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:13,919 Speaker 3: think he had already resigned, but you know, adding Latrell 481 00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:17,159 Speaker 3: doesn't hurt. I saw Latroll Mitchell actually saw that Latroll 482 00:23:17,160 --> 00:23:19,359 Speaker 3: Pickett was playing for the d s now got around 483 00:23:19,440 --> 00:23:21,640 Speaker 3: him on social media. That's a nice cross coat. Fund 484 00:23:22,240 --> 00:23:24,840 Speaker 3: very exciting for them, and that's the sort of thing 485 00:23:24,880 --> 00:23:28,800 Speaker 3: that Melbourne needs to have reasons to believe and this 486 00:23:29,280 --> 00:23:31,120 Speaker 3: different game, so they're going to have under Stephen King, 487 00:23:31,840 --> 00:23:33,240 Speaker 3: they need to be more exciting, they need to be 488 00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:36,000 Speaker 3: more fast, and players like Cozi are the ones they 489 00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:37,760 Speaker 3: need to build that team around, so it makes all 490 00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:38,840 Speaker 3: the sense in the world. 491 00:23:39,840 --> 00:23:44,440 Speaker 2: What about from a you obviously had a close eye 492 00:23:44,600 --> 00:23:47,840 Speaker 2: JJ on the Essendon Richmond game. A lot of eyebrows 493 00:23:48,320 --> 00:23:51,920 Speaker 2: were raised were raised rather when Elijah Statis was left 494 00:23:51,960 --> 00:23:56,800 Speaker 2: out of the thirty player squad for Essendon, and Ben Jacobs, 495 00:23:56,840 --> 00:24:00,000 Speaker 2: assistant coach postgame explained that he'd had a bit of 496 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:03,200 Speaker 2: a setback in recent times and the timing of that 497 00:24:03,400 --> 00:24:06,160 Speaker 2: setback in terms of being unable to play a lot 498 00:24:06,200 --> 00:24:09,040 Speaker 2: of the minutes that he was after in match play 499 00:24:10,119 --> 00:24:12,440 Speaker 2: didn't sort of line up with getting an AFL gig 500 00:24:13,359 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 2: for the game against Richmond, and they instead of manage 501 00:24:16,359 --> 00:24:18,159 Speaker 2: minutes in the AFL gig, they sort of gave him 502 00:24:18,160 --> 00:24:20,439 Speaker 2: a full game in the VFL. But it just it 503 00:24:20,520 --> 00:24:24,440 Speaker 2: just sort of continues this. It's an unfortunate continuation of 504 00:24:24,720 --> 00:24:28,800 Speaker 2: for a larger stardust and an inability to get consistency 505 00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:31,919 Speaker 2: at AFL level as well. Because the Dons have just 506 00:24:31,960 --> 00:24:37,000 Speaker 2: brought in three top three first round picks and their 507 00:24:37,119 --> 00:24:40,800 Speaker 2: NBA graduate, Elachka is a good chance to play in 508 00:24:40,800 --> 00:24:42,639 Speaker 2: in round one as well. Looks like he's got a 509 00:24:42,640 --> 00:24:45,000 Speaker 2: little bit of a little bit going for him in 510 00:24:45,080 --> 00:24:47,399 Speaker 2: terms of a senior early senior opportunity. So it just 511 00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:51,000 Speaker 2: wasn't ideal timing from a sartist perspective, No, it definitely 512 00:24:51,040 --> 00:24:53,840 Speaker 2: wasn't and I was her recall last year he had 513 00:24:54,160 --> 00:24:55,880 Speaker 2: one or two solid outings. 514 00:24:55,760 --> 00:24:57,960 Speaker 4: In the preseason that sort of gave hope that he 515 00:24:58,000 --> 00:25:01,200 Speaker 4: could come on last year. And obviously the opportunities last 516 00:25:01,280 --> 00:25:03,560 Speaker 4: year innocedence team without decimat that they were for it 517 00:25:03,760 --> 00:25:07,199 Speaker 4: to go, and that didn't, you know, obviously eventuate, And 518 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:11,679 Speaker 4: now obviously you almost hope it's you almost hope the 519 00:25:11,680 --> 00:25:14,480 Speaker 4: reason he didn't play he was for the reasons they're 520 00:25:14,480 --> 00:25:16,560 Speaker 4: saying in terms of you might have been impacted by 521 00:25:16,920 --> 00:25:18,840 Speaker 4: you know, you might have had some interruption throughout the 522 00:25:18,880 --> 00:25:23,040 Speaker 4: preseason that many couldn't play a certain amount of minutes 523 00:25:23,200 --> 00:25:26,560 Speaker 4: against AFL bodies. But it is a bit disappointing, but 524 00:25:28,040 --> 00:25:30,120 Speaker 4: you hope that he can maybe get some game time 525 00:25:30,960 --> 00:25:33,600 Speaker 4: in their in their Amy Series match. But I guess 526 00:25:33,600 --> 00:25:36,520 Speaker 4: for the Bombers, it was really pleasing from a midfield 527 00:25:36,560 --> 00:25:40,439 Speaker 4: perspective to see Darcy Parrish sort of getting close to 528 00:25:40,480 --> 00:25:43,840 Speaker 4: being at full flight again after having all of last 529 00:25:43,920 --> 00:25:47,480 Speaker 4: year scrapped and Archie Roberts had to go for the midfield. Obviously, 530 00:25:47,600 --> 00:25:51,320 Speaker 4: Dyson sharp looks like he might get an early go 531 00:25:51,480 --> 00:25:55,119 Speaker 4: and yeah, Alachka really put his best foot forward in 532 00:25:55,160 --> 00:25:56,720 Speaker 4: more ways than the one. I mean, he's obviously a 533 00:25:56,720 --> 00:26:00,159 Speaker 4: live wife forward as an attacker, but he applied I 534 00:26:00,240 --> 00:26:03,200 Speaker 4: love that Ford half pressure. That's really key in terms 535 00:26:03,240 --> 00:26:05,600 Speaker 4: of playing a FOURD half game. And alongside I was like, CaCO, 536 00:26:05,680 --> 00:26:09,480 Speaker 4: you figure they're gonna have a pretty good little small 537 00:26:09,520 --> 00:26:12,119 Speaker 4: forward line there when you've got the big Nat Caddy 538 00:26:12,200 --> 00:26:13,400 Speaker 4: control on the airways. 539 00:26:13,440 --> 00:26:17,200 Speaker 3: Just while while we're on Essendon, shouldn't they be alright? 540 00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:20,280 Speaker 3: This year? Like we saw the second half of last 541 00:26:20,359 --> 00:26:22,439 Speaker 3: year was basically just a VFL team that they were 542 00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:27,200 Speaker 3: playing with Zack Merritt in it as well. Despite te chagrin, 543 00:26:27,240 --> 00:26:31,040 Speaker 3: I would add from since Brad's got took over from 544 00:26:31,119 --> 00:26:33,240 Speaker 3: round one to twenty twenty three to about the midpoint 545 00:26:33,280 --> 00:26:36,960 Speaker 3: of last year, Essendon won twenty eight games, lost twenty 546 00:26:37,000 --> 00:26:40,760 Speaker 3: seven and drew one. They were average as possible. They 547 00:26:40,800 --> 00:26:42,520 Speaker 3: were a bit lucky to win some of those games, 548 00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:44,840 Speaker 3: a lot of close wins over bad teams in there, 549 00:26:45,280 --> 00:26:47,520 Speaker 3: but their record over two and a half years was 550 00:26:48,320 --> 00:26:52,240 Speaker 3: average and eleven win pace why can't they be that? 551 00:26:52,400 --> 00:26:55,800 Speaker 3: And wouldn't it be the most scripted thing possible for 552 00:26:55,880 --> 00:26:58,520 Speaker 3: the first year of the wild Card to involve Essendon 553 00:26:58,600 --> 00:27:01,440 Speaker 3: winning a quote un quote final that everyone gets to 554 00:27:01,480 --> 00:27:04,159 Speaker 3: dispute forever because no one believes it's a real final. 555 00:27:04,359 --> 00:27:05,960 Speaker 3: Doesn't that make all the sense of the world? 556 00:27:06,200 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 2: Well, I suppose. So what was the trend though, of 557 00:27:10,040 --> 00:27:13,640 Speaker 2: those of that twenty eight twenty seven to one record? 558 00:27:13,760 --> 00:27:15,280 Speaker 2: What was the trend of that? 559 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:18,479 Speaker 3: No trend? They were They were, They were mid. They 560 00:27:18,480 --> 00:27:20,439 Speaker 3: were the most mid team possible. I think they were 561 00:27:20,480 --> 00:27:22,400 Speaker 3: six and four at one point last year when they 562 00:27:22,640 --> 00:27:24,439 Speaker 3: lost thirteen in a row to end the year. So 563 00:27:25,680 --> 00:27:27,520 Speaker 3: it's really hard to evaluate them because yes, they were 564 00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:30,199 Speaker 3: absolutely horrific for most of that season, but that just 565 00:27:30,320 --> 00:27:32,880 Speaker 3: wasn't that team when fit. So they have any sort 566 00:27:32,920 --> 00:27:34,679 Speaker 3: of normal run and they should be at least what 567 00:27:34,800 --> 00:27:37,440 Speaker 3: a nine or ten win team and you probably only 568 00:27:37,480 --> 00:27:40,000 Speaker 3: need eleven wins to make the play in the wild Card? 569 00:27:40,200 --> 00:27:42,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, or are you going to start throwing around the 570 00:27:42,080 --> 00:27:42,600 Speaker 2: plane turns? 571 00:27:42,600 --> 00:27:46,199 Speaker 3: Well, that's what they're trying to evoke, isn't it with 572 00:27:46,240 --> 00:27:47,000 Speaker 3: the NBA stuff? 573 00:27:47,000 --> 00:27:50,679 Speaker 2: I suppose. So for mine Essendon, they are they're the 574 00:27:50,760 --> 00:27:54,440 Speaker 2: second youngest list in the competition this season and the 575 00:27:54,480 --> 00:27:58,840 Speaker 2: third least experienced, which I don't I don't think necessarily. 576 00:27:59,480 --> 00:28:01,560 Speaker 2: I think Bridge been in recent times. It's been a 577 00:28:01,119 --> 00:28:05,000 Speaker 2: bit of an exception in this in terms of when 578 00:28:05,000 --> 00:28:08,119 Speaker 2: they started building they were making finals with a very 579 00:28:08,200 --> 00:28:11,720 Speaker 2: very young list, but I don't think Essendon's in that ballpark. 580 00:28:11,920 --> 00:28:18,480 Speaker 2: The lack of continuity last year with amid that injury crisis, 581 00:28:18,520 --> 00:28:20,800 Speaker 2: I think will make it very very difficult for them 582 00:28:20,800 --> 00:28:24,040 Speaker 2: to hit the ground running and go from there. They Yeah, 583 00:28:24,600 --> 00:28:27,560 Speaker 2: they are going to be very young, and I just 584 00:28:27,600 --> 00:28:31,600 Speaker 2: think is still missing gosh. I think they're very glad 585 00:28:31,600 --> 00:28:33,359 Speaker 2: they kept Zach Mehra, but I still think they're missing 586 00:28:33,760 --> 00:28:36,399 Speaker 2: a few big names. And we know that a few 587 00:28:36,800 --> 00:28:38,960 Speaker 2: sort of star players in certain positions. But we know 588 00:28:39,000 --> 00:28:41,160 Speaker 2: that Brad Scott, and he preached this on AFL three 589 00:28:41,280 --> 00:28:44,800 Speaker 2: sixty a few rounds into last season, loves to build 590 00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:47,520 Speaker 2: from the draft and that's exactly what they've done. Over 591 00:28:49,080 --> 00:28:51,360 Speaker 2: in November last year when they had three first round 592 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:55,640 Speaker 2: picks and they picked up their NGA graduate in Alaska 593 00:28:55,640 --> 00:28:58,720 Speaker 2: who we mentioned before, or if Sullivan Roby who did 594 00:28:58,760 --> 00:29:03,720 Speaker 2: it back just a week into his Essenon stint was 595 00:29:03,720 --> 00:29:06,000 Speaker 2: fit to but it was fit and firing. I've got 596 00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:08,120 Speaker 2: no doubt that he had the body and the temperament 597 00:29:08,120 --> 00:29:10,760 Speaker 2: to play very early, as early as round one if 598 00:29:10,840 --> 00:29:13,760 Speaker 2: injury hadn't gotten the way. So they're building from the 599 00:29:13,800 --> 00:29:17,520 Speaker 2: bottom here. I just can't see Essenon making an indent 600 00:29:18,320 --> 00:29:20,640 Speaker 2: out of that bottom or outside the bottom four this 601 00:29:20,760 --> 00:29:22,520 Speaker 2: year at this stage. 602 00:29:23,360 --> 00:29:27,440 Speaker 4: Yeah, it's interesting. I mean, like, I think they've got 603 00:29:27,480 --> 00:29:29,400 Speaker 4: a lot. They've actually got a decent munt of talent 604 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:32,880 Speaker 4: on paper. I think the continuity piece is going to 605 00:29:32,920 --> 00:29:35,640 Speaker 4: be big, Like you mentioned, like having not had their 606 00:29:35,680 --> 00:29:38,680 Speaker 4: best team together in you know, more than a year, 607 00:29:38,720 --> 00:29:40,719 Speaker 4: and it's obviously not going to happen this year, at 608 00:29:40,760 --> 00:29:42,400 Speaker 4: least with a couple of players. When you think about 609 00:29:43,200 --> 00:29:44,600 Speaker 4: like a Nick Bryan is going to miss some time 610 00:29:44,640 --> 00:29:46,280 Speaker 4: of a scene, Nick Martin's I'm going to play the 611 00:29:46,280 --> 00:29:49,280 Speaker 4: whole year. But they've got a decent little midfield of 612 00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:52,840 Speaker 4: rotation when you think about Merrett, Caldwell, Durham and Parish. 613 00:29:52,840 --> 00:29:54,600 Speaker 4: If those four guys can stay healthy, I think it's 614 00:29:54,640 --> 00:29:57,680 Speaker 4: a pretty strong midfield. And really if the back line 615 00:29:57,720 --> 00:29:59,720 Speaker 4: can stand up, which they haven't been able to in 616 00:29:59,720 --> 00:30:03,640 Speaker 4: pass seasons. That's going to be the big one. I 617 00:30:03,720 --> 00:30:06,480 Speaker 4: mean really now has obviously had another set back, and 618 00:30:06,480 --> 00:30:09,120 Speaker 4: I think it's going to be crucial that at least 619 00:30:09,280 --> 00:30:12,400 Speaker 4: both of Reid and Mkaia can stay out in the 620 00:30:12,400 --> 00:30:13,840 Speaker 4: park and if you have read men out there, I 621 00:30:13,880 --> 00:30:16,960 Speaker 4: think they can stand up. It's more about like if 622 00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:20,280 Speaker 4: Farrow and Roberts across halfback, her just getting you know, 623 00:30:20,360 --> 00:30:23,840 Speaker 4: finding those ball users to create a link up chains 624 00:30:23,880 --> 00:30:25,720 Speaker 4: because they really had you know issues moving the ball 625 00:30:25,800 --> 00:30:28,320 Speaker 4: last year. So that's going to be interesting watch. And 626 00:30:28,600 --> 00:30:30,720 Speaker 4: I tend to agree. I don't think they're going to 627 00:30:30,760 --> 00:30:32,680 Speaker 4: be a playing team. I think there might be enough 628 00:30:32,720 --> 00:30:36,600 Speaker 4: games to be in that sort of conversation, but I 629 00:30:36,640 --> 00:30:39,120 Speaker 4: think they're going to end up losing quite a big too. 630 00:30:39,520 --> 00:30:42,000 Speaker 3: This is the thing, right, So if you think Essendon 631 00:30:42,160 --> 00:30:45,680 Speaker 3: is a six or worse win team, sure bottom four 632 00:30:46,080 --> 00:30:48,520 Speaker 3: there anything more than that. They're going to be in 633 00:30:48,520 --> 00:30:51,120 Speaker 3: the conversation for the world card with like a month 634 00:30:51,200 --> 00:30:53,280 Speaker 3: left in the season. This is the new reality we're 635 00:30:53,280 --> 00:30:56,280 Speaker 3: going to get used to come July and August. I 636 00:30:56,800 --> 00:30:59,160 Speaker 3: absolutely think don't print in the paper that I think, 637 00:30:59,200 --> 00:31:01,520 Speaker 3: Yesdon is good, not the guessing is good, but I 638 00:31:01,520 --> 00:31:04,920 Speaker 3: think everything can be fine and fine is now good 639 00:31:05,000 --> 00:31:07,040 Speaker 3: enough to make the finals if everything goes your way. 640 00:31:07,640 --> 00:31:10,200 Speaker 2: I can see Jay Z picking up those quotes, Maxian 641 00:31:10,400 --> 00:31:13,000 Speaker 2: popping it in his first edition of the Tackle for 642 00:31:13,280 --> 00:31:16,520 Speaker 2: twenty twenty six. It's now time for the return again 643 00:31:16,880 --> 00:31:20,040 Speaker 2: for another season of Australia's Favorite segment, and now on. 644 00:31:20,000 --> 00:31:24,160 Speaker 6: The Box Footy Podcast, another strong edition of Australia's Favorite segment, 645 00:31:24,520 --> 00:31:26,880 Speaker 6: Fair or Fast and we begin. 646 00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:30,520 Speaker 2: With JJ only a week. It's over a week on 647 00:31:30,760 --> 00:31:35,120 Speaker 2: from AFL Origin in Perth. JJ. We should play AFL 648 00:31:35,160 --> 00:31:42,600 Speaker 2: Origin every year. Fair or Fast well good one. It 649 00:31:42,680 --> 00:31:44,720 Speaker 2: depends on the format. 650 00:31:45,960 --> 00:31:48,360 Speaker 4: I think if you have rotating teams, you can do 651 00:31:48,400 --> 00:31:50,960 Speaker 4: it every year, or at least a system where the 652 00:31:50,960 --> 00:31:53,320 Speaker 4: team that wins stays on the next tiear against the 653 00:31:53,320 --> 00:31:57,240 Speaker 4: different opponent. I think there's viability in that. I think 654 00:31:57,360 --> 00:32:01,240 Speaker 4: if you're going to have a pretty consistent matchup, then 655 00:32:01,320 --> 00:32:04,160 Speaker 4: it might be once every few years. I also don't 656 00:32:04,200 --> 00:32:08,440 Speaker 4: mind the idea where you have Origin once every maybe 657 00:32:08,440 --> 00:32:12,120 Speaker 4: three or four years, and it means there's if you 658 00:32:12,200 --> 00:32:14,280 Speaker 4: make an Origin team more than once in your career, 659 00:32:14,280 --> 00:32:19,440 Speaker 4: as a higher sort of prestige to that achievement. I 660 00:32:19,440 --> 00:32:24,400 Speaker 4: think it really depends on the format. I think it's fair, 661 00:32:24,440 --> 00:32:26,200 Speaker 4: though I think it's fair to play it every year. 662 00:32:26,240 --> 00:32:28,240 Speaker 4: I think it would just depend on the format. 663 00:32:28,520 --> 00:32:31,440 Speaker 2: The Olympic style is set up there, MAXI, where you 664 00:32:31,520 --> 00:32:34,520 Speaker 2: do every once every four years. It felt like watching 665 00:32:34,560 --> 00:32:38,160 Speaker 2: the watching the game, the hype around it, it took 666 00:32:38,200 --> 00:32:41,280 Speaker 2: a while to build outside of w way from my understanding, 667 00:32:41,960 --> 00:32:45,920 Speaker 2: but from after that, in the immediate lead up to it, 668 00:32:45,960 --> 00:32:48,600 Speaker 2: in the days leading up to it, and then the 669 00:32:48,880 --> 00:32:51,400 Speaker 2: actual game and the aftermath. Out of the talking points 670 00:32:51,400 --> 00:32:54,320 Speaker 2: that we put together, it just did feel like the 671 00:32:54,400 --> 00:32:57,800 Speaker 2: AFL found a nice balance between competitiveness but also not 672 00:32:57,960 --> 00:33:01,880 Speaker 2: going massively where we saw some well we did see 673 00:33:02,720 --> 00:33:05,320 Speaker 2: some pretty bad injuries out of it, and Jacob readings 674 00:33:05,480 --> 00:33:06,720 Speaker 2: in doubt, but it just felt like there was a 675 00:33:06,800 --> 00:33:07,960 Speaker 2: nice balance to the whole event. 676 00:33:08,680 --> 00:33:11,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, I thought Origin was better than really anyone anticipated. 677 00:33:11,640 --> 00:33:15,000 Speaker 3: Like the players cared was the biggest thing, and that's 678 00:33:15,040 --> 00:33:18,200 Speaker 3: what matters. Also that the fans cared, because the old 679 00:33:18,200 --> 00:33:20,840 Speaker 3: Origins would have died off because people stopped caring about it, 680 00:33:20,840 --> 00:33:22,200 Speaker 3: But that's because it'd been going on for a while. 681 00:33:22,280 --> 00:33:25,200 Speaker 3: And I think in this environment where the AFL is 682 00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:27,280 Speaker 3: trying to take over the entire calendar year as much 683 00:33:27,280 --> 00:33:29,800 Speaker 3: as possible. It makes all the sense of the world 684 00:33:29,800 --> 00:33:32,520 Speaker 3: to have ventize things like this. I think the format 685 00:33:32,560 --> 00:33:35,200 Speaker 3: is really important. I think it only needs to be 686 00:33:35,800 --> 00:33:39,600 Speaker 3: WA South Australia and Victoria. I'm sorry to the Allies 687 00:33:39,680 --> 00:33:41,800 Speaker 3: fans out there. If you wanted to do in New 688 00:33:41,840 --> 00:33:44,320 Speaker 3: South Wales versus Queensland at some point, I wouldn't be 689 00:33:44,360 --> 00:33:46,040 Speaker 3: against that, but they are just not going to be 690 00:33:46,080 --> 00:33:49,640 Speaker 3: competitive with the three traditional footy states. Queensland participation is 691 00:33:49,840 --> 00:33:52,040 Speaker 3: catching up. I think as might have passed essay, but 692 00:33:52,080 --> 00:33:54,160 Speaker 3: not yet. I've only got like forty players to choose 693 00:33:54,160 --> 00:33:56,280 Speaker 3: from for an entire squad, and that's not going to work. 694 00:33:56,840 --> 00:33:58,600 Speaker 3: But you do those three teams, you have the winner 695 00:33:58,640 --> 00:34:02,240 Speaker 3: staying on. Ideally, you probably just have WA Andsa hosting 696 00:34:02,280 --> 00:34:04,920 Speaker 3: it every time because Victoria as the bad guy is 697 00:34:04,960 --> 00:34:07,320 Speaker 3: what makes Origin work. Victoria is always going to be 698 00:34:07,320 --> 00:34:10,200 Speaker 3: the favorite and it's always going to matter more when 699 00:34:10,280 --> 00:34:13,200 Speaker 3: Victoria loses than when Victoria wins. So if you do 700 00:34:13,239 --> 00:34:15,040 Speaker 3: it every year for five years, it's at some point 701 00:34:15,239 --> 00:34:18,439 Speaker 3: it'll happen. WA got reasonably close in the first one 702 00:34:18,440 --> 00:34:20,600 Speaker 3: this year. And I think it can happen and make 703 00:34:20,680 --> 00:34:23,680 Speaker 3: a pretty good spectacle of things. And as a part 704 00:34:23,719 --> 00:34:25,680 Speaker 3: of that as well, the other part of my proposal 705 00:34:25,719 --> 00:34:28,160 Speaker 3: which I tweeted on the night, I want to see 706 00:34:28,200 --> 00:34:31,320 Speaker 3: Origin jumpers handed out every year, even if you're not playing. 707 00:34:31,880 --> 00:34:34,399 Speaker 3: It should be a yearly honor where you get Hey, 708 00:34:34,440 --> 00:34:36,959 Speaker 3: I'm a seven time Origin selection. I was that good. 709 00:34:37,320 --> 00:34:39,239 Speaker 3: And it can tie into the All Australian where if 710 00:34:39,239 --> 00:34:41,279 Speaker 3: you're in those states and you want to be in 711 00:34:41,320 --> 00:34:43,440 Speaker 3: the All Laws team, you've got to make your states 712 00:34:43,440 --> 00:34:46,160 Speaker 3: team first, because realistically, if you're not part of your 713 00:34:46,200 --> 00:34:48,560 Speaker 3: best state team, you're not better part of the best 714 00:34:48,640 --> 00:34:50,720 Speaker 3: national team. I think that's a great way to expand upon. 715 00:34:50,600 --> 00:34:53,160 Speaker 2: It wouldn't be overkill on top of the All Ows. 716 00:34:53,640 --> 00:34:55,520 Speaker 3: You only play one game a year, and I don't 717 00:34:55,520 --> 00:34:57,600 Speaker 3: think it'll be overkilled because I think that it's a 718 00:34:57,719 --> 00:35:02,920 Speaker 3: secondary honor to all Os. It just helps cement Origin 719 00:35:03,040 --> 00:35:04,920 Speaker 3: in the minds of everyone throughout the year, and I 720 00:35:04,960 --> 00:35:06,359 Speaker 3: think that matters as well. 721 00:35:07,200 --> 00:35:12,240 Speaker 2: MAXI. The off season issues at Brisbane could derail their 722 00:35:12,320 --> 00:35:14,560 Speaker 2: three peat hopes. Fair or fast. 723 00:35:14,760 --> 00:35:19,520 Speaker 3: Now fast they're too good. They've had off field funny 724 00:35:19,520 --> 00:35:23,200 Speaker 3: buggers before with the wasn't even Las Vegas story? Was 725 00:35:23,239 --> 00:35:27,200 Speaker 3: it in the end? Was it that was so weirdly understood? 726 00:35:27,800 --> 00:35:29,640 Speaker 3: But they had that and won a flag despite it. 727 00:35:30,239 --> 00:35:33,520 Speaker 3: I think it would be ideal if the dual Brownlow Medalist, 728 00:35:33,640 --> 00:35:36,799 Speaker 3: former capital of your club wasn't going through all of this. 729 00:35:37,280 --> 00:35:39,480 Speaker 3: But I also don't think it matters as much as 730 00:35:39,719 --> 00:35:43,080 Speaker 3: a lot of people think. And Brisbane has an absurd 731 00:35:43,080 --> 00:35:47,799 Speaker 3: amount of talent and admittedly weren't amazing through the home 732 00:35:47,800 --> 00:35:49,600 Speaker 3: and away season last year, but they played their I 733 00:35:49,600 --> 00:35:53,720 Speaker 3: think their best three games in arguably the three biggest 734 00:35:53,719 --> 00:35:57,120 Speaker 3: games of the year, so they know how to play 735 00:35:57,160 --> 00:35:59,440 Speaker 3: when it matters. They're still getting players back, They're just 736 00:35:59,440 --> 00:36:02,279 Speaker 3: going to be so good. So locking eel you know, 737 00:36:02,840 --> 00:36:05,120 Speaker 3: sorry that you've got to have all that media attention, 738 00:36:05,239 --> 00:36:07,400 Speaker 3: but you know it wasn't an ideal situation, was it. 739 00:36:08,360 --> 00:36:12,360 Speaker 2: Say the least, JJ the abolishment of the three or nothing, 740 00:36:12,719 --> 00:36:17,200 Speaker 2: Mr loophole will bring great relief to the entire footing industry. 741 00:36:17,400 --> 00:36:23,399 Speaker 4: Fair or fast, Yeah, I think that's fair. I think 742 00:36:23,440 --> 00:36:28,440 Speaker 4: there's going to be, you know, disagreement regardless of whichever 743 00:36:28,520 --> 00:36:32,240 Speaker 4: way they went, but I think to give some leeway 744 00:36:32,360 --> 00:36:36,879 Speaker 4: or at least so some regal room to I guess, 745 00:36:37,080 --> 00:36:41,040 Speaker 4: make calls out of some of the more contentious incidents. 746 00:36:41,080 --> 00:36:44,160 Speaker 4: I think makes complete sense. You're never going to get 747 00:36:44,320 --> 00:36:46,880 Speaker 4: complete agreement with any of this sort of stuff, but 748 00:36:46,960 --> 00:36:51,160 Speaker 4: I think yeah, like the three or nothing stuff was 749 00:36:51,160 --> 00:36:53,600 Speaker 4: was clearly a bit of a blight on a few 750 00:36:53,760 --> 00:36:59,279 Speaker 4: instances last year. So to get to eliminate some of 751 00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:01,880 Speaker 4: the some of the back that would have never inevitably 752 00:37:01,920 --> 00:37:04,960 Speaker 4: come this year for similar incidents, I think makes sense. 753 00:37:05,400 --> 00:37:09,480 Speaker 2: We recording this before the MRO hands down a verdict 754 00:37:09,480 --> 00:37:13,120 Speaker 2: on Charlie Combon as afarementioned in the first segment there, MAXI, 755 00:37:13,239 --> 00:37:17,600 Speaker 2: but if it is deemed that the Brody my check 756 00:37:17,760 --> 00:37:20,279 Speaker 2: was concussed because of that tackle, and there is some 757 00:37:20,360 --> 00:37:23,799 Speaker 2: reporting around at the moment that the concussion might not 758 00:37:23,920 --> 00:37:26,759 Speaker 2: have necessarily have been a result of the tackle that 759 00:37:26,800 --> 00:37:29,880 Speaker 2: Combon laid. But if that is the case that the 760 00:37:29,920 --> 00:37:33,240 Speaker 2: tackle did concuss my check, this is probably the first 761 00:37:33,320 --> 00:37:37,040 Speaker 2: test case of the new three or nothing loophole being closed. 762 00:37:37,239 --> 00:37:39,560 Speaker 3: No, this is perfect, this is it's not a three 763 00:37:39,600 --> 00:37:42,400 Speaker 3: week worthy act. But there was a concussion in it, 764 00:37:42,480 --> 00:37:45,080 Speaker 3: and so the more levers you can give the MRO 765 00:37:45,239 --> 00:37:48,400 Speaker 3: to pull the better, So I would suspect it to 766 00:37:48,520 --> 00:37:51,359 Speaker 3: the nothing or like a one or probably not even 767 00:37:51,360 --> 00:37:53,719 Speaker 3: two nothing or one, and that sounds about. 768 00:37:53,520 --> 00:37:56,400 Speaker 2: Right, MAXI. Cooper Hodge is about to get caught up 769 00:37:56,400 --> 00:37:59,320 Speaker 2: in one seriously contentious AFL situation. 770 00:37:59,520 --> 00:38:03,520 Speaker 3: Fair off, fair, we have to talk about the Hodges again. Fantastic. 771 00:38:05,040 --> 00:38:08,520 Speaker 3: So Cooper Hodge is, of course Luke's son living in 772 00:38:08,600 --> 00:38:11,040 Speaker 3: Queensland because of Luke's decision to move up to the 773 00:38:11,040 --> 00:38:13,279 Speaker 3: Brisbane lines and finish his career there, which is still 774 00:38:13,280 --> 00:38:16,239 Speaker 3: really weird. But because he's up there, he's part of 775 00:38:16,239 --> 00:38:18,560 Speaker 3: the Brisbane academy and he could just join the Lions 776 00:38:18,600 --> 00:38:21,719 Speaker 3: as an academy kid, which is the definition, even though 777 00:38:21,719 --> 00:38:23,799 Speaker 3: we've had it before with like the Blakis of a 778 00:38:23,800 --> 00:38:26,440 Speaker 3: player who did not need the academy system to be 779 00:38:26,480 --> 00:38:29,799 Speaker 3: made aware of football. You imagine Cooper Hodge knew what 780 00:38:29,800 --> 00:38:31,440 Speaker 3: a foot he was when he was growing up. So 781 00:38:31,680 --> 00:38:33,759 Speaker 3: it's very stupid that he could possibly be a Lion. 782 00:38:33,840 --> 00:38:37,000 Speaker 3: And I think really really silly if that happens, not 783 00:38:37,120 --> 00:38:39,120 Speaker 3: just because the Lions are good, but that doesn't help either. 784 00:38:39,200 --> 00:38:41,200 Speaker 3: So he can be a Hawthorne father son. I think 785 00:38:41,239 --> 00:38:44,279 Speaker 3: that's the romantic path that pretty much everyone's outside of 786 00:38:44,800 --> 00:38:47,520 Speaker 3: Lion's head office wants him to take. We'll see what 787 00:38:47,719 --> 00:38:48,879 Speaker 3: develops over the year. 788 00:38:48,920 --> 00:38:49,279 Speaker 4: He was. 789 00:38:49,360 --> 00:38:51,759 Speaker 3: I think he's trained with both clubs he has in 790 00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:54,440 Speaker 3: the process, so he's under sixteen's and this isn't a 791 00:38:54,440 --> 00:38:56,239 Speaker 3: guy who's like a top five, top ten pick. He's 792 00:38:56,239 --> 00:38:57,440 Speaker 3: maybe not even a first rounder. 793 00:38:57,560 --> 00:38:59,520 Speaker 2: He'd be out of the top twenty. I think. Is 794 00:38:59,560 --> 00:39:01,520 Speaker 2: this sort of from what I understand. I haven't seen 795 00:39:01,520 --> 00:39:04,279 Speaker 2: a lot of Cooper play yet, but he did play 796 00:39:04,280 --> 00:39:06,879 Speaker 2: some VFL footy as a seventeen year old last year, 797 00:39:07,040 --> 00:39:11,000 Speaker 2: very impressive in the Coats League. For the Lions academy, 798 00:39:11,160 --> 00:39:14,000 Speaker 2: it's a different situation. So we talk about the sons 799 00:39:14,040 --> 00:39:18,200 Speaker 2: who have had ten academy bids matched or they've matched 800 00:39:18,239 --> 00:39:21,759 Speaker 2: ten academy bids in the past three drafts. Five last year, 801 00:39:22,080 --> 00:39:25,120 Speaker 2: Leo Lombard the year before, and then for the year 802 00:39:25,120 --> 00:39:28,280 Speaker 2: before that, So that was some serious top end talent. 803 00:39:28,480 --> 00:39:30,560 Speaker 2: This is a bit of a different one though, in 804 00:39:30,640 --> 00:39:33,440 Speaker 2: terms of the whole academy debate, because this, again it's 805 00:39:33,480 --> 00:39:38,400 Speaker 2: the Nick Blakey situation, where you've got a dad, a 806 00:39:38,480 --> 00:39:42,800 Speaker 2: genuine legend of the game, a four time Premiership player 807 00:39:42,920 --> 00:39:47,160 Speaker 2: Jill norm Smith medallist three hundred and five games at 808 00:39:47,160 --> 00:39:49,960 Speaker 2: the Hawks and did obviously go to Brisbane right at 809 00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:53,680 Speaker 2: the end, but Luke Coge is remembered as a Hawthorne 810 00:39:53,760 --> 00:39:56,200 Speaker 2: legend and because he moved up to the Brisbane for 811 00:39:56,200 --> 00:39:59,000 Speaker 2: those last couple of years, and because of where he 812 00:39:59,080 --> 00:40:02,239 Speaker 2: lives now, it could be a Brisbane line and for 813 00:40:02,600 --> 00:40:06,120 Speaker 2: men it would be an easy move because he already 814 00:40:06,280 --> 00:40:09,439 Speaker 2: lives there and again he's part of a successful team. 815 00:40:09,440 --> 00:40:12,640 Speaker 2: So he's going to be a contentious talking point throughout 816 00:40:12,640 --> 00:40:15,319 Speaker 2: the year. He hasn't made a decision yet and as 817 00:40:15,440 --> 00:40:19,200 Speaker 2: Luke mentioned to Pete Ryan in the Age that he 818 00:40:19,280 --> 00:40:22,799 Speaker 2: needs to actually prove himself Cooper to both clubs that 819 00:40:22,880 --> 00:40:27,000 Speaker 2: he's a fool draftable at this stage. So there's a 820 00:40:27,040 --> 00:40:28,920 Speaker 2: little bit of water to pla to go into the 821 00:40:28,960 --> 00:40:31,600 Speaker 2: bridge from that perspective, but it's going to be a 822 00:40:31,600 --> 00:40:36,720 Speaker 2: big talking point throughout the year to be juicy. JJ 823 00:40:37,200 --> 00:40:40,600 Speaker 2: Collingwood is kidding itself if it really thinks Zach Butters 824 00:40:40,680 --> 00:40:44,319 Speaker 2: will strongly consider joining the Pie is fair or fat? 825 00:40:45,000 --> 00:40:50,799 Speaker 4: That's very clearly a fast I mean Collingwood is I mean, 826 00:40:50,840 --> 00:40:53,360 Speaker 4: I say arguably, but I think's pretty clearly the biggest 827 00:40:53,360 --> 00:40:57,000 Speaker 4: club in the land. And I think if he were 828 00:40:57,360 --> 00:41:00,400 Speaker 4: in a midfield with Nickdakos, say instantly rocket back into 829 00:41:01,120 --> 00:41:06,279 Speaker 4: genuine Premiership contention. So I don't see why, I mean 830 00:41:06,360 --> 00:41:10,520 Speaker 4: he could still he could still. I understand that his 831 00:41:10,680 --> 00:41:14,080 Speaker 4: family out in Dai, which is yeah, pretty. 832 00:41:13,840 --> 00:41:16,320 Speaker 2: That's Aaron Cadman territory, sort of on the way to 833 00:41:16,360 --> 00:41:17,480 Speaker 2: Ballarat kind of areas. 834 00:41:17,680 --> 00:41:21,440 Speaker 4: Yeah, Like I understand why the Bulldogs, Bombers and Cats 835 00:41:21,560 --> 00:41:24,600 Speaker 4: might be might be in the front seat. But I think, 836 00:41:25,800 --> 00:41:28,759 Speaker 4: I mean, I think if he were, if he were 837 00:41:28,800 --> 00:41:31,680 Speaker 4: to go to collin Wood, he wouldn't have any any 838 00:41:31,719 --> 00:41:35,480 Speaker 4: real more issue with being near a family than he 839 00:41:35,480 --> 00:41:37,280 Speaker 4: would if you're at the Bulldogs Bombers. 840 00:41:37,960 --> 00:41:40,080 Speaker 3: I don't know. The traffic's pretty bad. You've got to 841 00:41:40,080 --> 00:41:41,839 Speaker 3: go in Taller, you've got to go in the city. 842 00:41:41,880 --> 00:41:43,480 Speaker 3: You got to figure out how you're getting through the city. 843 00:41:43,640 --> 00:41:45,279 Speaker 3: Like if you're going at peak out it could be 844 00:41:45,320 --> 00:41:45,920 Speaker 3: really difficult. 845 00:41:46,960 --> 00:41:48,120 Speaker 2: Are you using the metro tunnel? 846 00:41:48,160 --> 00:41:50,239 Speaker 3: This is so true. I wouldn't play for Collingwood just 847 00:41:50,280 --> 00:41:52,799 Speaker 3: for those reasons, and I'd personally just say go to 848 00:41:52,840 --> 00:41:55,759 Speaker 3: Geelong ZAC. That's clearly the most reasonable thing to do, 849 00:41:55,840 --> 00:41:57,919 Speaker 3: because then to avoid the city entirely. 850 00:41:57,960 --> 00:42:00,320 Speaker 2: While we're on the Magpie is MAXI let's finish with you. 851 00:42:00,360 --> 00:42:04,480 Speaker 2: Collingwood's bequest service letter to older members was a step 852 00:42:04,520 --> 00:42:06,000 Speaker 2: too far, fair or fast. 853 00:42:06,200 --> 00:42:10,000 Speaker 4: This is a tea up, so look air. 854 00:42:10,520 --> 00:42:13,320 Speaker 3: It was. But this was also a case where somehow 855 00:42:13,320 --> 00:42:15,960 Speaker 3: I found myself defending Collingwood, which is not a place 856 00:42:16,000 --> 00:42:18,279 Speaker 3: I usually like to be in, but here we are 857 00:42:19,239 --> 00:42:23,120 Speaker 3: a lot of places do this they and this is 858 00:42:23,320 --> 00:42:25,960 Speaker 3: more of a problem with capitalism than with football itself. 859 00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:29,000 Speaker 3: You know, if you're a charity, if you're a school 860 00:42:29,000 --> 00:42:32,040 Speaker 3: with a lot of older alumni, you may reach out 861 00:42:32,080 --> 00:42:34,000 Speaker 3: and say, hey, you know, you can contribute in your 862 00:42:34,040 --> 00:42:36,640 Speaker 3: will to us and it'll help us out. It's something 863 00:42:36,680 --> 00:42:38,520 Speaker 3: that was a big part of your life, and certainly 864 00:42:38,560 --> 00:42:41,000 Speaker 3: football clubs are a big part of people's lives. It 865 00:42:41,080 --> 00:42:43,480 Speaker 3: was just a rather coarse way of doing it, sending 866 00:42:43,480 --> 00:42:46,440 Speaker 3: out letters to pretty much all over fifties. I think 867 00:42:47,120 --> 00:42:49,560 Speaker 3: I believe Pete Ryan wrote about it in the Age Today, 868 00:42:49,600 --> 00:42:51,919 Speaker 3: actually that his father, who has passed a few years ago, 869 00:42:52,080 --> 00:42:57,600 Speaker 3: got a letter. So that's not ideal. So they've done 870 00:42:57,600 --> 00:43:03,240 Speaker 3: this poorly. But every club also has a bequesting a system, 871 00:43:03,280 --> 00:43:04,799 Speaker 3: a way that you can give back to the club. 872 00:43:04,840 --> 00:43:06,400 Speaker 3: And it's not like you're just doing it for the 873 00:43:06,440 --> 00:43:08,719 Speaker 3: sake of giving the money please give us money. You 874 00:43:08,800 --> 00:43:11,160 Speaker 3: basically get like a it's a special membership and you 875 00:43:11,200 --> 00:43:13,239 Speaker 3: get to special events and things like that while you're 876 00:43:13,239 --> 00:43:15,560 Speaker 3: still alive so you can enjoy it, which is a 877 00:43:15,880 --> 00:43:18,680 Speaker 3: nice little reward. So look, yeah, a course way of 878 00:43:18,719 --> 00:43:20,720 Speaker 3: doing it and a chance for everyone to pot Collingwood 879 00:43:20,760 --> 00:43:22,279 Speaker 3: that people were going to take it a quiet part 880 00:43:22,320 --> 00:43:27,160 Speaker 3: of the year, but not a disastrous, disgraceful and horrific 881 00:43:27,200 --> 00:43:28,880 Speaker 3: thing to do outside of that. 882 00:43:29,280 --> 00:43:32,759 Speaker 2: No, as you mentioned, all eighteen clubs have some kind 883 00:43:32,800 --> 00:43:36,600 Speaker 2: of service in terms of giving back to the club, 884 00:43:37,040 --> 00:43:39,759 Speaker 2: but I can't think of too many that have been 885 00:43:39,800 --> 00:43:43,640 Speaker 2: pretty bold in using and using the posts so aggressively here. 886 00:43:43,719 --> 00:43:46,200 Speaker 3: No, you don't generally reach out actively. It's more a 887 00:43:46,239 --> 00:43:48,160 Speaker 3: thing that you hear about it when you're getting older 888 00:43:48,160 --> 00:43:50,000 Speaker 3: and because you'd be talking to your older mates who 889 00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:52,279 Speaker 3: are also members and you know it comes up. I 890 00:43:52,320 --> 00:43:55,480 Speaker 3: think like the Ron Barrassi there's a club at Melbourne, 891 00:43:55,480 --> 00:43:58,520 Speaker 3: the rom Barrassi Bequeathment Society, and Barras is actually in it. Yeah, 892 00:43:58,520 --> 00:44:00,000 Speaker 3: stuff like that. It just happened. 893 00:44:00,920 --> 00:44:03,319 Speaker 2: It's going to be chatting footy again. We're less than 894 00:44:03,360 --> 00:44:05,759 Speaker 2: as we record this on a Monday, we are less 895 00:44:05,800 --> 00:44:07,400 Speaker 2: than two weeks away, where we're a week and a 896 00:44:07,400 --> 00:44:10,120 Speaker 2: half away from Opening Round. It has come up very 897 00:44:10,200 --> 00:44:13,000 Speaker 2: very quickly. But we'll be all over it of course 898 00:44:13,040 --> 00:44:15,839 Speaker 2: at Fox Footy. So all the Amy Community Series games 899 00:44:15,840 --> 00:44:19,480 Speaker 2: will be live on Fox Footy, Viko and Foxtel and 900 00:44:19,520 --> 00:44:22,720 Speaker 2: then it all begins with Sydney and Carlton on opening Round. 901 00:44:22,760 --> 00:44:25,240 Speaker 2: Maxy Jack look forward to chatting to you right throughout 902 00:44:25,280 --> 00:44:28,200 Speaker 2: the season and for all the best news and information, 903 00:44:28,320 --> 00:44:31,080 Speaker 2: keep looking back to Foxfooty dot com dot au. 904 00:44:31,400 --> 00:44:34,319 Speaker 6: Thanks for listening to the Fox Footy podcast. Like what 905 00:44:34,440 --> 00:44:37,040 Speaker 6: you hear, Hit subscribe and rate us on your preferred 906 00:44:37,040 --> 00:44:40,280 Speaker 6: podcast platform. And for the best footy news and views, 907 00:44:40,360 --> 00:44:43,680 Speaker 6: catch Fox Footy on channel five oh four. Keep clicking 908 00:44:43,719 --> 00:44:46,080 Speaker 6: back to Foxfoody dot com dot Au.