WEBVTT - ROUND 19 REVIEW: 'BENJI DROVE LUAI OUT' — The real reason behind the Tigers  fallout.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to the Code NRL Podcast. I'm Dean Richie,

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>joined by Fatima Kado. How are you?

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm good, BOARDO are you?

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm very well. Let's trip straight into a Fatima. The

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>West Tigers on the ladder slippery slide. After such a

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>promising start of the season where they won five from seven,

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they've now lost eight from ten games. It's imploding at

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Concord and that's only been worsened by the news that's

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>coming out about Jerome Lewis. What do you make of it?

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's the Tigers are doing. You know,

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.959
<v Speaker 3>they're the ones who put the clauses in the contract,

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 3>and you know, Jerome Lway is really just exercising the

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 3>right that he has contractually to have tested the market.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 3>What has gone wrong from April where you know he's

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 3>decided to join the Chiefs. He said he's still got

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 3>eighteen months, he's locked in the next eighteen months. Ben

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>she seemed like he's on board, and all of a

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 3>sudden we hear that maybe things between him and Benji

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 3>haven't been great since that Pang decision, and it was

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Benji that drove, you know, the move to have him

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>leave the club at.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>The end of the wall. Why why do you think

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Benji's done this? Fatima?

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I say credit to Benji because if you look

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 3>back to the start of the year when the Tigers

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 3>released that documentary of a very sort of tough talking,

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 3>tough love Benji Marshall, who was laying down the law, saying,

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 3>if you know you're not buying into club standards.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>What we're trying to do here, here's the door. And

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the reality is, even though I think Romi is in.

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 3>His rights to do what he's done, the fact that

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 3>he didn't stay at Concord and decided to go with

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs shows he's probably not sold completely on the

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>vision at the Tigers. And it's a way, you know,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 3>if I'm Benji, I'm thinking, is he fully buying in here?

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>And then that becomes a roadblock to what Benji is

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>trying to do. So from a football point of view,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I understand it has something gone on outside of that,

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 3>who knows. There was a post on social media that

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Triple M had that said I think it was Danny

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Widelid that was suggesting that since the P and G move,

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 3>that the relationship between Romey and Benji maybe hasn't been

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:14.559
<v Speaker 3>as great and Romy's father liked that post.

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So Fatima, what what do we think the reason is?

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously they were tight. Yeah. Do you think

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it was just a P and G move? Do you

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's been an attitude change at Concord? And I

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>guess the question I really want to ask you is,

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>how will history remember Jerome Lewaite's stay at Concord. Has

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it been a success and has it lived up to

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the hype which we all thought and anticipated that we

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.399
<v Speaker 1>would have when he left Penrith for such a big move.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 3>This is a hard one because, like you said, they

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 3>started off the season doing pretty well, and then if

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 3>he had and if they kept on that trajectory and

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>he did still leave at the end of the season,

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 3>you'd say, Yep, you know it was a success. I

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>still think I absolutely, like you know, knowing Romy that

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 3>when people say that he's lifted the standards there, I

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 3>agree with that. Obviously he was a magnet for other

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 3>players to come there. So it just depends. If your

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>yardstick is finals footy, then you say, well, no, it

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been a success, and you think about how much

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 3>money it cost them. You at one point two million

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 3>dollars a season, and then you'd say, no, it hasn't

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 3>been a success. I don't know how it'll reflect on Romy.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 3>Romy is a guy, he's a leader. He's a guy

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 3>who can galvanize the group. Whether he can galvanize them

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of the season and somehow salvage something

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 3>from the season, then maybe that changes how he's remembered

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 3>it at the Tigers. But I wouldn't say it's been

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>a complete failure. But obviously on the footy fields so

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 3>far we haven't seen the results.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I still can't help but think though a team of that.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>This goes back to Shane Richardson, and Richard's well respected

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>throughout the game. We know that. But he decided in

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>his wisdom to get Jerome Louy to Concord, he had

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to include these clauses in his contract. And as you

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>said before, quite rightly, it allowed Jerome every year or

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>almost to go there and test the market. It must

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>have driven fans mad to think that their elite player

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>every year almost can go out there and see if

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone can do I will make a better offer for him.

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, and here's the thing.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 3>At the time, the Tigers had one three wooden spoons.

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 3>So I understand from an administrative point of view, from

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Richer's point of view, why those clauses might have felt necessary.

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's maybe that last you know, dangling that

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 3>character get him like.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 2>Over the line.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 3>But the problem for Tigers fans is, like you said,

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>then they had to live through the headlines.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Is he staying? Is he going?

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 3>He only ever really half you know, would commit publicly

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 3>that he was all in and then he wasn't. At

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, he's clearly not buying in

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 3>into whatever the vision is. And you know, good on

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Benji for saying we need to move forward.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Eight out of ten in terms of losses, most people

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.559
<v Speaker 1>think they're gone. Are you a believer that they can

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>pull out a miracle and make the fin or is

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it curtains for the sixteenth consecutive year.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they can make the finals. And what

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 3>we haven't said in all of this is, yes, you

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 3>can coincide Romey's decision with their slide on the ladder.

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, too, they've been without Adam

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Deuey for periods. They've been without Samuel la Fanu, who

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I reckon was probably the form player before he got

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 3>injured at pic Corrisale wasn't there for a couple of weeks,

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 3>so they've had excuses as to.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Why they haven't performed.

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to think that Benji is the kind of

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 3>coach that can galvanize this script to the rest of

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 3>the season so it doesn't completely fall apart. But I

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's going to be enough for them to

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 3>make a final.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's stay in Western Sydney and I want to ask

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you about Paramatta because they look like they are going

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to sign Jerome lit White to a one year contract.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Now Paramatta has gone down this path with Jonah Peasant

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and even if you want to go back to Zach Lomax,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they signed him for four years and after one year

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>he left. The club is becoming a transit lounge. And

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>do you think Paramounta is wise to sign Louife for

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>such a small amount of time, not forgetting for team

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of the World Cup is on as well, so the

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>time Jerome gets there and then leaves, it's only about

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>nine months.

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Really, it is an interesting one because if you take

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the Jonah Pezet situation, you would say that that was

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 3>an experiment that failed didn't really work out as they

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 3>would have hoped. It makes me wonder. And I know

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 3>the Knights offer Dylan Brown a ten year deal and

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 3>that's you know, that blows them completely out of the water.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 3>But I wonder how much now, reflecting on how well

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Dylan Brown's doing at the Knights, if they've fumbled that

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit because I haven't been able to find

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a replacement for him, would I sign Luai for a year?

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>It just depends on what roles as plan is. And

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 3>we could have an answer on Lui in the next

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 3>couple of days. It's looking like And obviously the Bears

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 3>are sort of going to have a guy at him

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 3>as well, but is it one year so they can

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 3>have a go at Burden potentially maybe Cameron Monster if

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 3>the storm to lock him in before November one and

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>he's got that relationship with Jason Roles from the time

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 3>of Roles is in Melbourne as an assistant, or Lorenzo Talentina,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 3>who's a talented twenty year old half back that they've

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 3>coming through. Is that giving him one more year of development?

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 3>So it just depends on what Rauls is thinking, you know,

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 3>and look, he will make their team better and with

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 3>due respect to peasant, romy still is a full time

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Premiership winner. He's one on origin with Mitch Moses, so

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 3>he will improve their roster. But I think the bigger

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 3>problem for Ills fans is they still don't really know

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>what Roles's plans for the halves are moving forward.

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Simply a bit confused at Paramount. A lot of the

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>fans certainly are in terms of where their future is,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what path they're taking, and how are they going to

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>get to this promised land which we've been waiting forty

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Considering what you know we've seen from Jerome at the Tigers,

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 3>do you think gets the right move for Roles try

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 3>and get him.

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>In for one year.

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>No, I wouldn't do that. I think these quick fixes

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in regular league don't work. I wouldn't get him in

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there for one year. I think they've got to look

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to ParaMed I've got to instilled in their jersey, in

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that logo which was so special in the nineteen eighties,

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>what it means to play for PARAMATTERA, not just short

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>term fixes. They don't always work. Getting a player in

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for one year I think sends a bad signal. It's

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a sign that the club is unstable and they don't

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>know where they're going, and they're just trying to find

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>anyone to stick a band aid over the problem which

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>have been looming out there for years. Jason Rowls is

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a good coach, there's no doubt about it. But his

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>tenure at Paramatta has not been a success. There's no

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>sugarcoating that, and I think they've got to start to

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>look for going out in the market and trying to

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>buy some players that they can get for two, three

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>four years, not just sort of sugar hit where it's

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>for nine months. Look, it may well work. I don't know.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Jerames is a very good player, but I think for

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the culture of the club, for the future of the club,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they should look elsewhere. Talking of the Bulldogs, what do

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you make of that? Because they got flogged by the

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>canber Raiders in the weekend. That had a bit of

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a period there where there was some success, but we've

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>gone right back to where we are now. And again

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I asked you about the finals before the Tigers. I

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Dogs can get there now thoughts.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 3>I think they're in a I know they got powered

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 3>up by Canberra, but also can I just say as

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 3>a camera fan. That was a very frustrating game because

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I sat there going where was this like fifteen weeks ago? Anyway,

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I think they look like a more improved team Canterbury.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 3>What worried me was before Stephen Crichton was stretched off

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 3>with that neck nerve injury, so that the attack started

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 3>to look a bit pedestrian again. And then Sean O'Sullivan

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 3>comes in, who really is their only genuine half back,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 3>straightens the attack and has a hand in there.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Too late tries.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 3>So I just think, you know, and I feel like

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 3>Galvin has been unfairly targeted for all their attacking this year.

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's the problem. I just think they

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 3>don't have a number seven. It'll be interesting to see

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 3>what Siro does this week with Stephen Crichton. We are

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 3>hearing that his injury is not as bad as suspected.

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>There is even a small chance he might play this weekend,

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 3>whether he goes back to burden at number six, moves

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 3>him into this from the centers into number six, or

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 3>whether he you know, gives Sewn O'Sullivan a crack. So look,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't there's such a log jam between those six,

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 3>seven and all the way down to you know, thirteen fourteen,

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 3>so they do have a difficulty run home, but yeah,

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. They're another one who might miss the

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 3>finals like Canberra. You know, Canber's no.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Chance as I wrote, and Bulldogs by today, Fatima. Some

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of those Western Sydney clubs are really in porch shape.

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And I mentioned the Eels, Dogs and Tigers, three issues

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we've just discussed. Thank goodness for the Penrith Panthers. They're

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>saving the vast Western Sydney from NRL embarrassment.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 2>With the new South Wales Blues.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 3>They defied all the odds going up to sun Corp

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 3>winning the decider.

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Laurie Daily easily, you.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Know, the most underseieged man in rugby league at the time. Bulldog,

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 3>you were there, you're his really close mate. Before we

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 3>talk about the Blues, let's talk about Lorrie. He was

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 3>so he was emotional. As soon as full time went,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 3>he saw him waving to the crowd. They were cheering him.

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 3>He had tears in his eyes. I bet you're pretty

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 3>happy for him and proud of your close mate.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely. He was under a lot of scrutiny, some

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of it fair, some of it unfair. A lot of

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it was personal, which I thought was unfair. Look, we

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in the media have an obligation to query, scrutinize and debate.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the arm, some of the flack

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>flung at Lorrie I thought was unfair. And in the end, Fatima,

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to sound like a smart ass, but

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he who laughs last laughs loudest, and Lourie has given

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>it to his critics, each and every one of them,

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with one of the most comprehensive Blues victories I can

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>remember in recent years. And it was justification for Lorry

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his selections, in terms of his tactics,

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his ability to lift the side, in

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of the criticism directed him him, in terms of

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>them being such heavy underdogs. No one gave the Blues

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a chance. No one gave them a chance. And I

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>kept saying to people, without saying like a dickhead in hindsight,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I kept saying, it's one all, get it through your heads,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's one to one. We have not lost this series.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And I had it in a gut feeling word from

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the start, I should say that the Blues would go

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>up there and they'd put on a master class, and

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the performance in Melbourne was a poor one. It was

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>always going to be better than that, and everything Laurie

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>touched that game turned to gold and all the critics

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>can now eat humble pie and coins that can go

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>away and sook for a year because New South Wales

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>now are the supreme nation or stuff, I should say

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of state of Origin.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I must admit after that game too, I do remember thinking,

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>why does it feel like the Blues have lost a

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 3>series and there was still a game to go? So

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 3>I do agree there was a bit of that, you know,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 3>and you are right there were things, especially after the

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 3>first two game that you could criticize Laurie for the

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>selectors for. But you know, but even going into game three,

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 3>you know Leah mardin coming into the side. I know

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 3>people say, oh, there's guys that are just made for Origin,

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 3>and he's one of those guys. He wasn't playing really

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 3>good at all. He paid four games, he was a

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit underwhelming. Bradman Best had only just come back

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 3>from a hamstring injury, and even though to me the

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>side looked well balanced, I still worried a little bit

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>that maybe he wasn't making the right calls. But you

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 3>know Bradman best does a repeat of twenty twenty four

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 3>and the decider Leah Mardin for me is probably one

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 3>of the well paynhats was incredible in that game as well,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 3>but one of the best forwards on the field.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I.

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Think what it does too. I think we can now

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>finally and emphatically put to bed any debate about Nathan

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Cleary's greatness. I said before State of Origin, Nathan Cleary

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is a great who is heading headfirst toward regular league immortality.

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he particularly needed to win the decider

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for that to happen, but he's won it. He had

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>three cracks at it before. It was almost like the

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>last frontier that he hadn't quite conquered. He now conquered unbelievably.

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Two tries set up another one, and Nathan's performance in

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Game three up there at Hostile Sun Corpse Stadium proved

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>once and for all that he is one of the

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>all time greats, and certainly the greatest of the modern era.

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And for Nathan's detractors, I think that can now just

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>squirrel away and hide under a rock, because Nathan's done it.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>He's done it well. Some of the names. I want

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to mention Hudson, Young Layer, Martin, the Bash Brothers. They

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>were unbelievable in that game. Paynehas's first half was out

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of this world. He is just a machine. Payeharp I

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>thought Mitchell Moses' kicking game was unbelievable. His general play

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't brilliant, but his kicking game was.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>His long kicking game was.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Out of this world. You mentioned Bradman Best. There wasn't

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a bad player in that blue side, and for them

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to go up there and not only win but win, well, look,

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>there's an elephant in the room. We should touch on it.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>There was the Bradman Best dry which replays him indicated

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>did flick Jack Bosstok's finger and went forward. But crime

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>me a river, Crime me a river. We've been on

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of so many dug decisions over so many years.

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Queensland get one that goes against them and the tears

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>start flowing across from col and Gata into tweed heads. Well,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't particularly care. Look at the scoreboard. It's two

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to one. Queensland's now lost two of the last three series.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Billy Slater's won four of his last ten, so we'ren't

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we going to start to question Billy Slater as Queensland

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>coach when.

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, probably not straight away because that's not what Queenslanders do.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 3>But speaking of coaching features, everyone seems to suspect that,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 3>reading between the lines of what Lurie's been saying since origin,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 3>that he's not going to coach next year.

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 2>If anyone would know, it's your bulled on what do

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 2>you know?

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Look, I don't think Laurie will coach next year. No,

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's mcgart feeling. Look, I haven't Laurie hasn't come

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>out and said it publicly. So until Laurie says it publicly,

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess we're all guessing a fraction. But I'd be

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>stunned if Lurie's back next year. And it does leave

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting proposition for the new South Walge Rugby League

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>because we all seem to think that Ivan Cleary will

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>coach the Blues from twenty twenty eight. Of course, it

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>leaves a gap year of twenty twenty seven. Look, I'm

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sure Dave Trodden at the new South Iage Ruge League

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>would love Larry to come back for one more year,

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think Lorry's days are done in charge of

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Blues. I think if he had any England to

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>come back, I think victory almost ended up the Deemer.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a beautiful way to Lauriy to

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>go out an amazing win, a win which will go

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>down in Origin Flare go down in Origin history, one

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest upsets we've seen in Origin. What better

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>way if Lorrie does pull a pin for him to

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>leave the Origin arena, If it is just.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>For one year until Ivan Cleary can come in in

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty eight, who do you think?

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>It is a hard one year? Yeah, it is just

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a year, And I think it's going to be very

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell a coach for a team that you've

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>got one year. What happens Hypothetically if that coach wins

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>three mil do you then say sorry, you're out. It's

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very difficult one. Look on face value,

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you think that King would be favorite. That King was

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the other candidate with Lori for this tenure, So you

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>think King, you would come in for a year. Look,

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is there a possibility that maybe I've in coaches Origin

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>next year and that allows Peter Wallace to take over

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the Reins mid season. That would obviously help him snowball

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>into twenty twenty eight when he's full time coach. Just

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of options to throw out there. I don't

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>know the answer. No one does at the moment because

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Lourie hasn't formally stood down. But if Lurie does, I

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think they'll go with.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Matt King, yeah, which you know, and there are a

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 3>couple of other sort of He's got some really good

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 3>assistant coaches, Laurie Daily, so and you know, if I'm

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Matt King, I know Matt King has NRL head coaching ambitions,

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 3>But you know, you take over for one year and

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 3>then maybe you then have to take a step back

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 3>to Ivan Cleary. But that's you're taking a step back

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 3>to Ivan Cleary. Like imagine as a coach in waiting,

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 3>what you learn from a guy who's won four premierships

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe five premierships by the time he finishes. So it's

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>not actually a bad deal for an up and coming coach.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump back to Queens that, okay, because I want

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about this was an unlosable series if

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Laurie lost the unlosable last year, which I don't think

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>unlosable is a right term because I don't think any

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>origin is unlosable because every game is different. But if

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Billy did lose the unlosable this year, is he under pressure?

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Should he be under pressure? And yeah, is Billy safe

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for next year? Sorry for Tim, Let's be honest. If

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>we cut to the chaser, Queensland choked. They choke And

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a very difficult word to spit out for Tima

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's a very heavy handed word, but they choked

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and froze under the pressure of expectation and being favorites.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And that was a very poor performance from a side

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone thought had these lofty standards and they were had

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>their pants pulled down early by the Blues and they

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 1>kept their decks around their ankles for the whole game.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Well they were absolutely ambushed, you know, And I think

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 3>they were ambushed by the intensity by the Blues energy.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 3>How they would not expect that the Blues would come out,

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, with that sort of fire in the belly

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 3>really surprised me. I thought, you know, Billy Slater probably

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 3>could have done a better job in preparing them mentally

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 3>for that one. It was almost like they were a

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit clocked off mentally. The Moraines and you don't

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 3>normally say that about the Moraines at sun Corp, especially

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 3>in a decider. Look, I think you know Billy Slater too.

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.959
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he said he's a bit like Laurie,

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 3>but as Billy probably wants to coach more than what

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Laurie does. But it has been quite coy about his

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:02.719
<v Speaker 3>future when he's been asked about it.

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the qr L will.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Be tapping him on the shoulder though, whether they should

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 3>be or not it's probably a different story. But I

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 3>don't think I can't see them doing that.

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I've got no problem with that. I don't think Billy

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>deserves to be putted either. My only query in all

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this is if that was a new South Wales coach

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you'd lost two out of three, he would be under

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>amazing pressure to survive well, as this lovely shirt says,

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>no BS. So this is our new segment and you

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>can ask questions whatever you like and we'll do our

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>best to answer them. It's called the BS Messages of

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the Week and you can flick those questions into code

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sports dot com dot au for team Are you ready?

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm ready.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>This comes in from Greg Abraham out there at Lovely

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Saint Clair, Okay, New South Wales, Bradman Best's try it

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>was a knock on. Why can't we see the video

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that the bunker sees from the corner post A good question.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 3>So the NROL bunker sees all of angles, and sometimes

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 3>the angle that is used by the bunker to determine

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 3>a decision isn't always the one that is played in

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 3>the broadcast. My understanding that the NRL said the angles

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 3>used to determine that in the high ball contest was

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 3>actually broadcast.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>The issue isn't necessary with this one. For me, it's

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 2>not about angles.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 3>It's the fact that you could see he touched the

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 3>ball from all the angles that were shown anyway. So yeah,

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 3>it's like I said, I'm not going to complain too

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 3>much about it. I'm a blue I'm glad it went

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 3>in our way. But it was one of those things.

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I know, we're talking about angles, cornerpost angles, what's being broadcast,

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 3>what's not being broadcast? But in multiple angles that we

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 3>saw in the broadcast, we could sort of see Bostock's

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 3>fingers sort of bend back a little bit when it

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 3>touches the ball.

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So look, the bunker's a big part of our game.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't always like the bunker because I think they stick.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.959
<v Speaker 1>There'd be being far too much. But yeah, it's not

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>infallible either, yep. Yeah, I think they Their success rate

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is in the ninety percent, so it doesn't attire there.

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, sometimes they might get one wrong. It just happens.

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's still a human being who's controlling the bunker, yep,

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So it happens.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, speaking of yeah it is, it is tough.

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 3>But one weird one I'm speaking of camera angles was

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>actually from the Canberra Bulldogs game where the Cannabury challenged

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>of forty twenty. Condor Tracy was adamant that it wasn't

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 3>a forty twenty and somehow remarkably, even though it's trying

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 3>to determine whether where a ball went out over the sideline,

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 3>they didn't have that camerangle. So yeah, I don't know.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 3>It can be very messy sometimes. I think the Jack

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Bosta one was just a human error.

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Bulldog Blair from GIMPI says in the middle of a

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>club crisis, the Broncos response was to strip Gordon Tallis's

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>name off the conference wall bs exclamation line.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it was bs absolutely yes in capital letters. Yeah,

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a ridiculous. I thought it was petty.

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Tallis has been one of the greatest players the

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Broncos have ever had. It won multiple premierships there. He

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>represented Queensland and Australia from the Broncos and Gordy has

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a right in the media to question every single club.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what we do in the media. We scrutinize and

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if the Broncos can't handle that, well then I think

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they have become far too thin skinned. So to do

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that to Gordon Tallis, I thought it was poor form.

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought it embarrassed Gordon. I thought it was unnecessary

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think in due course down the track, don't

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if that decision is reversed.

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 3>What annoyed me about it was it dragged Ali Brigganshaw

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 3>into something that wasn't It wasn't her fault, It wasn't

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 3>her fault, It had nothing to do with her.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 2>And it's one of those things too.

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 3>It's that you could find a way to honor Ali

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Brickntrol without doing that to Gordon as well. So yeah, anyway, yeah,

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 3>there the Broncos, you know, we spoke about Canterbury and

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 3>the Western Sydney teams and crisis.

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>The Broncos are in a similar boat.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Mark Waters from Umina Beach says col Reid Marni's try

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 3>a double movement and then called Jack Howarth tried.

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Not a double movement. I call BS.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm both YEA agreed it was BS on both. I

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>saw the Jack House try and it was a double

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>movement every day o the week. I don't know what

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the eneral of going to say when they have to

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>be queried on that decision. He was brought down shore

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of the line, his momentum was stopped, and then he

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>went again. It's a double movement every day other week.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how they got that one so

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>badly wrong, but they did. And I thought the Red

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Marney tried down there at brook Fail was a try.

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Similar situation. He reached out, but I know he reached

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>out for Tim, but his momentum also reached him out,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>so he just plumped the ball down on the line.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think Mark got both these right. I think

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Reads was a try and Jack House wasn't a try.

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I agree both of them were bs.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>We agree