WEBVTT - Reading Through Our Hate Comments 

0:00:03.090 --> 0:00:06.689
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to Outspoken Plus. It's your extra dose

0:00:06.790 --> 0:00:10.289
<v Speaker 1>of the hottest influencer and pop culture news. I'm Kate Torber.

0:00:10.530 --> 0:00:14.460
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Sophie Torber. And happy seventh birthday to us.

0:00:14.810 --> 0:00:18.459
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe that Outspoken is seven years old. I

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.540
<v Speaker 1>actually had to put it in my calendar because I

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>keep forgetting the day. I'm like, I know roughly we

0:00:23.020 --> 0:00:27.420
<v Speaker 1>started it in July 2019. But when the notification popped up,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.470
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wow. That's crazy. 2019 feels like a

0:00:31.550 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>long time ago now when you think about it. I mean,

0:00:34.490 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we hadn't even been through COVID. We were still in

0:00:36.580 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>our 20s. I remember I was freaking out about turning 30.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like we've really grown up on

0:00:41.740 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this podcast because yes, we were 29 when we started.

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>We had boyfriends at the time. I mean, you'd only

0:00:47.580 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>just started dating your partner, hadn't you, Kate? Yeah. Amy

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.769
<v Speaker 1>and I were living together and you had just moved out.

0:00:52.850 --> 0:00:55.070
<v Speaker 1>So Part of the reason why we started the podcast

0:00:55.090 --> 0:00:56.930
<v Speaker 1>was so we had time to actually hang out, like

0:00:56.970 --> 0:00:58.870
<v Speaker 1>an excuse to hang out. Yeah. I mean, I didn't

0:00:58.910 --> 0:01:01.350
<v Speaker 1>even have my dog Archie then. Like we didn't have

0:01:01.410 --> 0:01:04.390
<v Speaker 1>our kids. We hadn't bought our houses. We hadn't had

0:01:04.450 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>our weddings. Like I actually want to go back and

0:01:06.819 --> 0:01:08.900
<v Speaker 1>listen to some of our early episodes. I'll probably cringe

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:10.860
<v Speaker 1>because they're that bad. Yeah. I actually don't want to

0:01:10.900 --> 0:01:12.820
<v Speaker 1>do that to myself. And I'm annoyed that you've brought

0:01:12.860 --> 0:01:14.300
<v Speaker 1>it up because I don't want listeners to go back

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.300
<v Speaker 1>and listen either. Well, I'm almost having a bit of

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.740
<v Speaker 1>PTSD because I thought it would be fun to go

0:01:19.220 --> 0:01:21.090
<v Speaker 1>And have a look at some of the reviews we've

0:01:21.140 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>received over the past seven years. Everyone knows I'm the

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>queen of reviews. I always go and check them out.

0:01:26.380 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And you're not talking about nice reviews, because you don't

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>even notice those ones. You only hone in on the

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.380
<v Speaker 1>negative reviews. And for a long time, people have been

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.380
<v Speaker 1>asking us, oh, can you do a segment where you

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>read out your mean reviews, similar to that late night

0:01:38.420 --> 0:01:40.620
<v Speaker 1>show that did the celebrities reading the mean tweet. So

0:01:40.660 --> 0:01:42.660
<v Speaker 1>here it is today. Well, I actually feel like I'm

0:01:42.700 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>almost sweating a bit because I've gone back in time

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.770
<v Speaker 1>and I'm cringing thinking about Maybe these people had a point.

0:01:50.110 --> 0:01:52.610
<v Speaker 1>This is the tricky thing because there's three of us

0:01:52.690 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and we all have different opinions. Sometimes we get slammed

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.020
<v Speaker 1>for someone else's opinion and you're like, well, I don't

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>even agree with that. I'm getting these negative reviews about it. Also,

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.980
<v Speaker 1>over the seven years, as we've established, a lot of

0:02:03.020 --> 0:02:05.940
<v Speaker 1>things change in our lives. we grew up a lot

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.740
<v Speaker 1>and you also become better at what you do and

0:02:08.780 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to see all points of view. Well, you hope

0:02:11.060 --> 0:02:13.350
<v Speaker 1>you can become better. Well, I actually forgot. So when

0:02:13.389 --> 0:02:16.490
<v Speaker 1>we started, I think we had the tagline that we

0:02:16.530 --> 0:02:18.890
<v Speaker 1>have the opinion that most people won't say or something

0:02:18.930 --> 0:02:21.270
<v Speaker 1>like it was, do you remember what was it? We'll

0:02:21.290 --> 0:02:24.750
<v Speaker 1>say what you're thinking or something along those lines. And

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.100
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are like, wow, I wasn't thinking that.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.380
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, okay. It's also funny to think what

0:02:30.460 --> 0:02:33.460
<v Speaker 1>our relationship with influencers was like at the time because

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd say we were kind of fangirls and we were

0:02:36.100 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>big Sarah's Day fans. And being involved in the podcast

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and covering all of those controversies that she was involved

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.179
<v Speaker 1>in at the time, it was kind of like a

0:02:44.220 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>light bulb moment. I remember when that Moroccan pillow drama happened.

0:02:49.650 --> 0:02:51.930
<v Speaker 1>And I had to fight with you and Amy and

0:02:51.970 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>be like, no, this is how we're going to cover it.

0:02:54.710 --> 0:02:57.770
<v Speaker 1>You guys are being fangirls. You need to realize that

0:02:57.830 --> 0:03:00.350
<v Speaker 1>this was not a good thing. Oh, there's a couple

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.139
<v Speaker 1>of comments where they're like, I can't believe you guys

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are sticking up for Sarah's day. And I was like, oh,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.780
<v Speaker 1>it's funny how our views have evolved, as you say, Kate. Anyway,

0:03:07.220 --> 0:03:09.459
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually going to kick things off with a positive review.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.130
<v Speaker 1>And this is a shout out to OG. listener, Rodney.

0:03:13.450 --> 0:03:16.250
<v Speaker 1>So I smiled to myself because he was one of

0:03:16.290 --> 0:03:18.330
<v Speaker 1>the first people to leave us a review and he wrote,

0:03:18.669 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure 45 year old men are not the

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.100
<v Speaker 1>target demographic for this podcast, but for some reason I

0:03:24.139 --> 0:03:26.540
<v Speaker 1>keep tuning in for their take on current events and

0:03:26.580 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>some of their fun interviews. Well done on a thoughtful

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.019
<v Speaker 1>and entertaining podcast. So thank you. It's funny because as

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:37.530
<v Speaker 1>someone who is an avid viewer of our reviews, quite

0:03:37.690 --> 0:03:40.529
<v Speaker 1>often we're people go and change their review. So I'll

0:03:40.550 --> 0:03:42.850
<v Speaker 1>see it, the same name pop up over time and

0:03:43.010 --> 0:03:46.210
<v Speaker 1>they've suddenly decided to write another nasty one. But thank you, Rodney,

0:03:46.250 --> 0:03:49.870
<v Speaker 1>for keeping it nice. The same nice comment for six

0:03:49.910 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>years or seven years. Let's get into another comment. So

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the title is Basic. This podcast is try hard shameless,

0:03:57.940 --> 0:04:01.660
<v Speaker 1>except the hosts are bland, immature and boring. Honestly, their

0:04:01.740 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>attitudes remind me of high school level bullying. Definitely would

0:04:05.220 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>recommend to skip out of this podcast if you haven't

0:04:07.940 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>listened yet. It is insufferable content. When was that one written?

0:04:11.660 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It says six years ago, but I actually think these

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to say seven years ago. Oh, I'm glad

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.030
<v Speaker 1>it's not a recent one. But I mean, these are

0:04:19.070 --> 0:04:21.150
<v Speaker 1>all from the archives. The ones I've started to read

0:04:21.290 --> 0:04:23.650
<v Speaker 1>out are the ones from 2019. I mean, that was

0:04:23.770 --> 0:04:27.830
<v Speaker 1>quite a common thread that people would compare us to Shameless.

0:04:27.850 --> 0:04:30.390
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, we were pretty incomparable at the time. I mean,

0:04:30.410 --> 0:04:34.099
<v Speaker 1>Shameless were massive they had honed their craft. And yes,

0:04:34.150 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we weren't as good as Shameless. Yeah, there were also

0:04:36.620 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reviews referring to Shameless because we decided

0:04:39.380 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to critique Shameless and the way that they evolved as

0:04:43.140 --> 0:04:45.609
<v Speaker 1>a podcast and how they stopped talking about influencer culture.

0:04:45.930 --> 0:04:48.490
<v Speaker 1>So here is another review. This is a copycat of

0:04:48.529 --> 0:04:51.950
<v Speaker 1>Shameless without the intelligence of the Shameless host. The critique

0:04:52.010 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>in the recent episode of Shameless was really tactless and

0:04:54.620 --> 0:04:57.180
<v Speaker 1>shows how much less grace and nuance the hosts have.

0:04:57.540 --> 0:05:03.310
<v Speaker 1>Compared to Shameless. Unsurprising how unsuccessful this podcast is. What

0:05:03.930 --> 0:05:06.490
<v Speaker 1>I don't get is at the time, we literally had

0:05:06.550 --> 0:05:11.030
<v Speaker 1>like 500 to 1,000 people listening. And even though we

0:05:11.070 --> 0:05:14.370
<v Speaker 1>were the underdogs, people were really mad at us for

0:05:14.410 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that take on Shameless. But also in saying that, I

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>think it kind of put us on the map. And

0:05:19.820 --> 0:05:21.740
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who agreed with us at the

0:05:21.779 --> 0:05:25.020
<v Speaker 1>time became longtime listeners of the show. And we've noticed

0:05:25.060 --> 0:05:28.210
<v Speaker 1>that as a thread. Over the years, we've ruffled feathers

0:05:28.230 --> 0:05:30.570
<v Speaker 1>with influencers and they might have called us out on

0:05:30.610 --> 0:05:34.130
<v Speaker 1>their platforms. But funnily enough, that's actually really beneficial for

0:05:34.190 --> 0:05:35.990
<v Speaker 1>us because a lot of the people that follow them

0:05:36.070 --> 0:05:39.610
<v Speaker 1>that are probably hate following the influencers then come across

0:05:39.830 --> 0:05:43.030
<v Speaker 1>and start being avid listeners of our podcast. Yeah, I

0:05:43.170 --> 0:05:44.589
<v Speaker 1>do want to point out that a lot of people

0:05:44.730 --> 0:05:48.349
<v Speaker 1>were actually applauding our episode on the Shameless podcast and

0:05:48.390 --> 0:05:51.650
<v Speaker 1>saying that we were bang on. So the next review says,

0:05:51.750 --> 0:05:54.589
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's possible to find anything more irritating than

0:05:54.610 --> 0:05:58.390
<v Speaker 1>three adult, in capitals, women talking about their boyfriends that

0:05:58.410 --> 0:06:02.500
<v Speaker 1>we don't know for an entire episode and bickering like schoolgirls.

0:06:02.740 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back and listen to this episode.

0:06:04.339 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't even remember what we said. Even hearing the

0:06:07.220 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>word boyfriend, that was what made me be like, oh, wow, like,

0:06:10.900 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>they were only our boyfriends then. It's interesting because as

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you've mentioned, we started Outspoken when we were 29 and

0:06:16.900 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of emphasis on the fact that

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:20.930
<v Speaker 1>we were turning 30 soon and kind of freaking out

0:06:20.990 --> 0:06:25.550
<v Speaker 1>about it. And I actually think even being so young

0:06:25.610 --> 0:06:27.830
<v Speaker 1>and 29 and 30, that there was a lot of

0:06:28.029 --> 0:06:31.010
<v Speaker 1>age shaming going on in our comment section. It was like, oh,

0:06:31.070 --> 0:06:35.950
<v Speaker 1>how dare these 29 year old ancient women have a

0:06:35.990 --> 0:06:38.229
<v Speaker 1>podcast and an opinion on things. Like now that we're 37,

0:06:38.230 --> 0:06:41.470
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, we were absolute babies. I know. Now

0:06:41.490 --> 0:06:44.850
<v Speaker 1>we've moved into 2020. This one is entitled Pathetic. This

0:06:44.910 --> 0:06:48.210
<v Speaker 1>is really disappointing. You girls seem to thrive off negativity

0:06:48.310 --> 0:06:51.730
<v Speaker 1>and genuinely enjoy downgrading other people. This is the first

0:06:51.830 --> 0:06:55.710
<v Speaker 1>episode I'm listening to and it's just outright rude. Another said,

0:06:55.810 --> 0:06:58.140
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing to listen to. If you want to listen to

0:06:58.180 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>three girls tearing down other women who are successful, then

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>backing it up with, we are journalists, that's why we

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:08.270
<v Speaker 1>do it, Go ahead. Cringe, embarrassing and hateful podcast. This

0:07:08.290 --> 0:07:11.690
<v Speaker 1>has been a common theme. If you're a female and

0:07:11.710 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a podcast and you talk about another woman's actions,

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you're always accused of tearing other women down. And it

0:07:18.620 --> 0:07:20.900
<v Speaker 1>just annoys me. It's like, oh, okay, because we're all female.

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.870
<v Speaker 1>We're not allowed to critique someone who is also female. Secondly...

0:07:24.870 --> 0:07:27.270
<v Speaker 1>If that's what the person believes, then why are they

0:07:27.290 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>tearing us down in our reviews? Like, isn't that hypocritical?

0:07:29.700 --> 0:07:32.020
<v Speaker 1>You know what? I mean, I was piecing things together

0:07:32.060 --> 0:07:34.700
<v Speaker 1>looking at these ones from 2020 and it was when

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we focused, I think we had a segment on influencer

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.580
<v Speaker 1>Madison Bulley. So I think a lot of these comments

0:07:39.620 --> 0:07:42.150
<v Speaker 1>came from her friends because another one said, outright bullying,

0:07:42.190 --> 0:07:44.310
<v Speaker 1>find a better hobby than talking about people you do

0:07:44.370 --> 0:07:47.430
<v Speaker 1>not know. This one made me laugh. These three sounded

0:07:47.470 --> 0:07:49.770
<v Speaker 1>like jealous women who were still not over the fact

0:07:49.810 --> 0:07:53.900
<v Speaker 1>that they attended public schools, unlike some influencers. I've never

0:07:53.940 --> 0:07:56.860
<v Speaker 1>been a fan of influencer culture. However, their podcast comes

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.460
<v Speaker 1>across as nasty, tone deaf and bullying in nature. Yuck. Yeah,

0:08:01.500 --> 0:08:03.170
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty proud that I went to a public school,

0:08:03.210 --> 0:08:06.450
<v Speaker 1>to be honest. Public and proud. Clearly written by someone

0:08:06.470 --> 0:08:08.170
<v Speaker 1>who went to a private school and thinks they're better

0:08:08.190 --> 0:08:11.170
<v Speaker 1>than everyone because they did so. Well, this was now

0:08:11.230 --> 0:08:13.570
<v Speaker 1>a critique about editing, which I probably had to tend

0:08:13.590 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to agree with at the time. Someone wrote, lately, the

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.060
<v Speaker 1>edits have been horrendous. Double takes left in ads that

0:08:19.100 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>just cut in over the top of a conversation. Also,

0:08:21.740 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there is a depth of knowledge around

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.260
<v Speaker 1>topics that are very important to be clear on. A

0:08:27.300 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, we had a lot of negative

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.950
<v Speaker 1>reviews because there was this ad that was voiced by

0:08:33.130 --> 0:08:37.140
<v Speaker 1>Art Simon, who's a drag performer. And basically there was

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:42.230
<v Speaker 1>an error on our network's behalf where it just kept playing.

0:08:42.450 --> 0:08:44.630
<v Speaker 1>Like we actually didn't get paid anything for it. It

0:08:44.650 --> 0:08:47.849
<v Speaker 1>was a full mistake. And just like out of nowhere,

0:08:47.890 --> 0:08:49.510
<v Speaker 1>this fucking ad would cut in and I was like,

0:08:49.670 --> 0:08:52.210
<v Speaker 1>I am Art Simone. And everyone was just like, could

0:08:52.230 --> 0:08:55.010
<v Speaker 1>you stop playing that fucking ad? And we're like, I

0:08:55.050 --> 0:08:57.490
<v Speaker 1>didn't even know what's happening here. Like we were like,

0:08:57.610 --> 0:08:59.970
<v Speaker 1>surely that ad's run out by now. But yeah, I mean-

0:09:00.550 --> 0:09:02.069
<v Speaker 1>I think we should have got paid for that because,

0:09:02.429 --> 0:09:04.230
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it clearly got in people's heads. I mean,

0:09:04.270 --> 0:09:06.730
<v Speaker 1>I felt like we were owed something because we got

0:09:06.770 --> 0:09:08.950
<v Speaker 1>all these negative reviews and it was not our fault

0:09:09.090 --> 0:09:12.290
<v Speaker 1>at all. Someone else wrote, such a bittersweet love of

0:09:12.350 --> 0:09:15.610
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Love some topics covered and just general opinions

0:09:15.650 --> 0:09:18.890
<v Speaker 1>about social media. Hate that sometimes the girls just ramble

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.100
<v Speaker 1>on such annoying topics and go on real tangents. Also

0:09:22.150 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>find myself skipping through a lot of the episodes. Please

0:09:24.700 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>start timestamping. Please. I mean, we still don't timestamp, do we?

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Spotify now do it automatically. So it's very

0:09:30.940 --> 0:09:32.500
<v Speaker 1>helpful for people who don't want to listen to us

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>rambling on. I've now skipped forward to 2021. Now someone

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.250
<v Speaker 1>suggested to skip the pit and peak segment that we

0:09:38.300 --> 0:09:40.829
<v Speaker 1>used to have. They said, not interested. Listen for the

0:09:40.910 --> 0:09:44.130
<v Speaker 1>influencer slash pop culture updates, not for personal stories. Now

0:09:44.429 --> 0:09:46.270
<v Speaker 1>that really did play on our mind because we ended

0:09:46.330 --> 0:09:48.950
<v Speaker 1>up getting rid of our intro for quite some time

0:09:48.990 --> 0:09:50.770
<v Speaker 1>at the start because we would usually catch up on

0:09:50.809 --> 0:09:52.709
<v Speaker 1>what we'd been up to. Yeah, this has been a

0:09:52.730 --> 0:09:55.710
<v Speaker 1>bone of contention because when I listen to podcasts, I

0:09:55.750 --> 0:09:59.910
<v Speaker 1>actually am interested in the host's personal lives And I always.

0:09:59.950 --> 0:10:02.050
<v Speaker 1>think it's good to include little bits here and there.

0:10:02.110 --> 0:10:04.569
<v Speaker 1>That's why we moved that segment or that style of

0:10:04.610 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>segment to the end of our Friday shows. And then

0:10:07.620 --> 0:10:10.099
<v Speaker 1>we ended up getting rid of it completely. But it

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting to know if people actually do enjoy

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.540
<v Speaker 1>hearing a little bit of an update. I've just found

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>another one. I've never written a podcast review and don't

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:18.660
<v Speaker 1>want to be brutal, but I think there needs to

0:10:18.700 --> 0:10:21.580
<v Speaker 1>be less talking about the girl's own mundane life problem

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.579
<v Speaker 1>slash boring chat at the beginning. We heard about Easter eggs,

0:10:24.660 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Christmas decorations and now losing keys. If the episodes jumped

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.550
<v Speaker 1>straight into the stories, it would be so much better. See,

0:10:30.690 --> 0:10:33.330
<v Speaker 1>this just plays on my own fears that I have

0:10:33.370 --> 0:10:35.990
<v Speaker 1>boring stories to tell. Because whenever we're in a phase

0:10:36.030 --> 0:10:38.390
<v Speaker 1>where we're like, oh yeah, we should bring up personal updates.

0:10:38.429 --> 0:10:40.530
<v Speaker 1>Whenever I bring something up, you and Amy are like, no,

0:10:40.550 --> 0:10:42.770
<v Speaker 1>that's so fucking boring. Don't say it. I mean, we

0:10:42.830 --> 0:10:45.710
<v Speaker 1>had more interesting lives back then because we were childless.

0:10:45.750 --> 0:10:47.350
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? Like we were out and about,

0:10:47.390 --> 0:10:48.910
<v Speaker 1>like we were... I mean, I was going to say

0:10:48.950 --> 0:10:51.070
<v Speaker 1>whining and dining, but not as such. But I mean,

0:10:51.110 --> 0:10:53.609
<v Speaker 1>even this one, update, please stop discussing your weddings. I

0:10:53.690 --> 0:10:56.250
<v Speaker 1>understand it's important to you. Everyone who gets married or

0:10:56.290 --> 0:10:59.030
<v Speaker 1>has a baby feels exactly the same way. But honestly,

0:10:59.150 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>as a listener, it's a grueling, boring experience. Otherwise, love you.

0:11:03.179 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And the below review applies. So they had left a

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.340
<v Speaker 1>nicer review before that. It's so funny perspective because now

0:11:08.380 --> 0:11:10.380
<v Speaker 1>that our weddings were like, yours was two years ago,

0:11:10.460 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>mine was three years ago. And now that I'm out

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.420
<v Speaker 1>of that bride phase, I completely agree with that review. Like,

0:11:15.620 --> 0:11:18.179
<v Speaker 1>I do find it boring hearing about other people's weddings.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.180
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sorry that everyone had to put up with that. Yeah,

0:11:21.230 --> 0:11:22.670
<v Speaker 1>but then there were some people who were like, oh,

0:11:22.710 --> 0:11:24.630
<v Speaker 1>tell us more. We want to know everything. So, I mean,

0:11:24.650 --> 0:11:26.910
<v Speaker 1>you can't keep everyone happy. Oh, this is one that

0:11:26.929 --> 0:11:30.130
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about when we kept apparently pronouncing Kayla Itzenis'

0:11:30.190 --> 0:11:33.890
<v Speaker 1>name wrong. Someone said your Friday episode included multiple incorrect

0:11:33.910 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>pronunciations of Kayla Itzenis' name. It's seriously not that hard, girls. Dot, dot, dot. Again...

0:11:42.110 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Having the last name Torba, it does piss me off

0:11:44.340 --> 0:11:47.580
<v Speaker 1>when people pronounce it wrong. So, you know. This one

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.220
<v Speaker 1>was quite funny. Try hard wannabe C-grade celebs bagging out

0:11:51.380 --> 0:11:54.270
<v Speaker 1>actual C-grade celebs. That one actually irritates me because it

0:11:54.330 --> 0:11:58.350
<v Speaker 1>is so far from the truth. Like. Whenever we have

0:11:58.490 --> 0:12:00.490
<v Speaker 1>anyone come up to us and say, oh, I listened

0:12:00.510 --> 0:12:02.510
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast, I actually thank them for listening because

0:12:02.530 --> 0:12:04.290
<v Speaker 1>I just can't believe people even listen to it. And

0:12:04.410 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>often when I'm out and people come up to me,

0:12:06.410 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 1>I am looking like absolute shit. And there's a part

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of me that's like offended that they've actually recognized me

0:12:11.179 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>as the same person on our artwork because obviously I

0:12:13.380 --> 0:12:15.579
<v Speaker 1>look much more polished in that. Do you know what?

0:12:15.620 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>This is actually making me realize that the reviews have

0:12:19.220 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>been quite kind to us lately because some people have

0:12:21.970 --> 0:12:24.929
<v Speaker 1>gone absolute ham. So I'm now in, I think, 2022

0:12:24.929 --> 0:12:29.070
<v Speaker 1>and Again, they're playing on the fact that we're in

0:12:29.130 --> 0:12:32.130
<v Speaker 1>our 30s. Weirdly immature for 30 plus. I enjoy some

0:12:32.150 --> 0:12:35.130
<v Speaker 1>of the topics you speak about and enjoy the influencer content.

0:12:35.429 --> 0:12:37.660
<v Speaker 1>But when you discuss your personal lives, I can't seem

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to shake the vision that you three would be the

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.020
<v Speaker 1>types to tell the teacher they hadn't checked homework or

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.540
<v Speaker 1>give me dibba-dobba energy, a bit too straight-edged and PG

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.580
<v Speaker 1>for my taste, in comparison to other podcasts who seem

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.729
<v Speaker 1>mature and are a lot younger, e.g. Shameless. Bet you're

0:12:52.770 --> 0:12:56.949
<v Speaker 1>fun at parties. Another person said... Seriously impossible to listen

0:12:56.990 --> 0:13:00.420
<v Speaker 1>to now. Obviously a group of girls lacking life experience.

0:13:00.780 --> 0:13:02.940
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to believe they are in their 30s. All

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>their commentary is rude and closed-minded at times. Even to

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.830
<v Speaker 1>extremes I cannot comprehend. That first one kind of hit

0:13:10.870 --> 0:13:13.790
<v Speaker 1>a nerve because I don't think I am someone that

0:13:13.830 --> 0:13:16.750
<v Speaker 1>is fun at a party and also we really were

0:13:16.790 --> 0:13:19.410
<v Speaker 1>tipper-doppers at primary school. How did they know? Was this

0:13:19.429 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>someone who went to school with us? I wouldn't say

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that we're boring. I'm sorry, but if we were allowed

0:13:24.700 --> 0:13:26.709
<v Speaker 1>to share some of the shit that we've been going through,

0:13:26.750 --> 0:13:29.610
<v Speaker 1>particularly back then, my God, they would have been great stories.

0:13:29.890 --> 0:13:31.689
<v Speaker 1>People used to come up to us and say, your

0:13:31.730 --> 0:13:34.309
<v Speaker 1>life is like a reality show. That is the downside

0:13:34.570 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of your podcast getting bigger because people you know start listening.

0:13:38.770 --> 0:13:42.090
<v Speaker 1>Because originally when you start a podcast- People kind of

0:13:42.309 --> 0:13:44.630
<v Speaker 1>like when you tell them you're doing a podcast, there's

0:13:44.650 --> 0:13:46.670
<v Speaker 1>this like pity that comes across their face. And I

0:13:46.750 --> 0:13:49.030
<v Speaker 1>even get it now. And I'm sometimes embarrassed to say

0:13:49.100 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that's what I do because I feel like every man

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.540
<v Speaker 1>and their dog has a podcast. But then when it

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>gets to a stage where people realize that it has

0:13:56.020 --> 0:13:59.180
<v Speaker 1>got a listenership, then they start tuning in. And then

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.490
<v Speaker 1>you have to filter the stories that you tell in

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.530
<v Speaker 1>case said person listens or someone tells the person that

0:14:05.550 --> 0:14:09.210
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. So it gets really annoying because you're like, oh,

0:14:09.290 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I would love to tell that story. That story is

0:14:11.980 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>so entertaining. But you don't want to invade other people's

0:14:15.500 --> 0:14:18.860
<v Speaker 1>privacy or getting back to them. No, it's really difficult.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.050
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes the people that you don't expect to listen

0:14:22.070 --> 0:14:23.850
<v Speaker 1>are the ones who end up listening. And that's also

0:14:23.890 --> 0:14:27.370
<v Speaker 1>why sometimes I feel more comfortable telling stories on our

0:14:27.410 --> 0:14:29.730
<v Speaker 1>subs channel because I'm like, well, I know that they're

0:14:29.750 --> 0:14:32.500
<v Speaker 1>not going as far as paying for this. Some people

0:14:32.580 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>brought up our arguing on Mike. Now that's actually quite

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.950
<v Speaker 1>funny because on Friday night I reshared a video. I

0:14:41.110 --> 0:14:44.550
<v Speaker 1>think it was from three years ago when we were

0:14:44.570 --> 0:14:47.330
<v Speaker 1>starting to try and film episodes and it popped up

0:14:47.390 --> 0:14:49.110
<v Speaker 1>as a memory on my phone and I was like, oh,

0:14:49.150 --> 0:14:52.250
<v Speaker 1>what's this? I clicked on it straight away. It was

0:14:52.650 --> 0:14:55.470
<v Speaker 1>fuck you and like go fuck yourself and all this.

0:14:55.490 --> 0:14:56.990
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, oh, I've got to put this up.

0:14:57.030 --> 0:14:59.290
<v Speaker 1>This is so funny. I begged you not to share it.

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:01.780
<v Speaker 1>And at the time, I didn't even know it was

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.660
<v Speaker 1>me that was being the realist on there. I was like, oh,

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell if that's me or Amy. But then

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>when you uploaded it, and originally you said you were

0:15:08.620 --> 0:15:12.380
<v Speaker 1>only uploading it to stories. So I was like, oh, okay, whatever,

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.270
<v Speaker 1>it will disappear. But no, you put it on the grid.

0:15:15.410 --> 0:15:18.110
<v Speaker 1>Like it's there. It's permanent. Well, at least you're not

0:15:18.170 --> 0:15:20.290
<v Speaker 1>in it. It's only my face looking very nonchalant at

0:15:20.330 --> 0:15:23.250
<v Speaker 1>being yelled at. always throws me under the bus. She

0:15:23.290 --> 0:15:26.530
<v Speaker 1>then tags like, oh, Kate Torber going off. And it's like,

0:15:27.010 --> 0:15:29.609
<v Speaker 1>hang on a second. I have that many videos of

0:15:29.670 --> 0:15:32.090
<v Speaker 1>Amy absolutely losing her shit, but they're so bad that

0:15:32.530 --> 0:15:34.910
<v Speaker 1>like maybe we need a compilation video for the past

0:15:34.950 --> 0:15:37.570
<v Speaker 1>seven years. That would be funny. I was actually thinking,

0:15:37.690 --> 0:15:40.670
<v Speaker 1>I wish that we had archived all the arguments that

0:15:40.690 --> 0:15:43.860
<v Speaker 1>we had and we could have made some compilation episode

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>because normally once we're done, we just delete the audio file.

0:15:47.170 --> 0:15:48.890
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because people seem to enjoy it. They're like,

0:15:48.930 --> 0:15:50.380
<v Speaker 1>we want more of this. But some people in the

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>reviews didn't. One person wrote, their content is good, but

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.340
<v Speaker 1>the hosts are constantly yelling over each other and disagreeing,

0:15:56.380 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>which is hard to listen to. Another said, great content,

0:15:59.380 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but the shouting and fighting is really hard to listen to.

0:16:02.020 --> 0:16:05.050
<v Speaker 1>I get that. So you've got to be selective with

0:16:05.070 --> 0:16:07.350
<v Speaker 1>the fights that you share because you've got to pick

0:16:07.470 --> 0:16:10.930
<v Speaker 1>one that at least we can look back and laugh.

0:16:10.950 --> 0:16:12.630
<v Speaker 1>Like some of them you'll send me and I'm like,

0:16:12.670 --> 0:16:14.430
<v Speaker 1>I can't even watch it. It's so awful. Yeah, that's

0:16:14.460 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>just vile. Like I actually went back to look at

0:16:17.300 --> 0:16:20.100
<v Speaker 1>more videos from that day and I'd set up my

0:16:20.140 --> 0:16:22.300
<v Speaker 1>camera and I'd gone to the bathroom and it was

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>actually just Amy bitching about me behind my back saying, oh,

0:16:25.740 --> 0:16:28.730
<v Speaker 1>she's so arrogant and she's just getting upset because there's

0:16:28.850 --> 0:16:31.390
<v Speaker 1>lines on her face and she doesn't like the lighting.

0:16:31.410 --> 0:16:33.310
<v Speaker 1>And I was like– This is very mean, but I

0:16:33.330 --> 0:16:36.530
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't share this again. I'm now up to two

0:16:36.570 --> 0:16:39.970
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So someone said, not terrible, but the constant

0:16:40.010 --> 0:16:44.770
<v Speaker 1>mispronunciation of words. For example, especially, I actually did used

0:16:44.810 --> 0:16:47.270
<v Speaker 1>to say that. I'm sorry. Aren't you all journalists and

0:16:47.290 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>mispronunciation of people's names and places? Also, what is the

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.260
<v Speaker 1>constant obsession with obscure UK influencers like Molly May? And

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>they spelt Molly May incorrectly. I'm sorry. She's not an

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.730
<v Speaker 1>obscure influencer. She's the fucking biggest influence in the UK.

0:17:00.990 --> 0:17:03.130
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because when we started the podcast, the whole

0:17:03.170 --> 0:17:04.890
<v Speaker 1>premise was that we were going to talk about things

0:17:04.930 --> 0:17:07.100
<v Speaker 1>that we want to talk about. So Yeah, we will

0:17:07.140 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about UK influencers who we follow and a lot

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.270
<v Speaker 1>of people may not follow them. And it's funny because

0:17:12.290 --> 0:17:14.870
<v Speaker 1>the influencer space has changed that much over the last

0:17:14.910 --> 0:17:18.050
<v Speaker 1>seven years that there is just a saturation of influencers.

0:17:18.690 --> 0:17:21.670
<v Speaker 1>So more likely than not, we're going to start talking

0:17:21.690 --> 0:17:23.930
<v Speaker 1>about people that you may not follow. But I think

0:17:23.950 --> 0:17:27.270
<v Speaker 1>that was back when there was just the core OG influencers.

0:17:27.310 --> 0:17:30.330
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we also get criticized for talking about the

0:17:30.369 --> 0:17:33.270
<v Speaker 1>same people. So you can't win, can you? No, you can't.

0:17:33.730 --> 0:17:35.990
<v Speaker 1>This one made me laugh. It's been left by someone

0:17:36.010 --> 0:17:40.030
<v Speaker 1>called Krispy Kreme Donuts. And it just says, just sad

0:17:40.070 --> 0:17:42.590
<v Speaker 1>how three women can be so sad. Get a life

0:17:42.650 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and stop talking rubbish. I mean, your name's fucking Krispy Kreme.

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.699
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where are the sad ones? I do have

0:17:50.740 --> 0:17:53.260
<v Speaker 1>a bone to pick with Apple. I feel like if

0:17:53.340 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to leave a review... then there should be firstly,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>right of reply. And secondly, the person should have to

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:03.750
<v Speaker 1>leave their actual name. I agree. I mean, on Spotify,

0:18:03.790 --> 0:18:07.330
<v Speaker 1>there's a right of reply because these people write these

0:18:07.450 --> 0:18:12.830
<v Speaker 1>downright nasty, abusive things. And it's just up there as verbatim. Like,

0:18:12.850 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone calls you a bully and you're not

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>even allowed to defend yourself. See, one of my favorite

0:18:17.100 --> 0:18:20.179
<v Speaker 1>pastimes is actually reading other people's podcast reviews because it

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel better about our own. And my God,

0:18:23.340 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the reviews on Mamma Mia and Shameless, which

0:18:25.980 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are arguably, well, they factually are the top podcast, the

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>top female podcast in Australia, are incredibly mean. And I'm like,

0:18:35.940 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>so is it kind of good if you've got mean reviews? Like,

0:18:38.380 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>does that mean you've made it? See, I'm feeling like

0:18:40.500 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of irrelevant because, I mean, I feel like

0:18:42.460 --> 0:18:44.420
<v Speaker 1>we were copying so many nasty reviews a couple of

0:18:44.460 --> 0:18:45.939
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Now we don't get many. I mean, we're

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:47.700
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start talking about ourselves again because

0:18:47.740 --> 0:18:50.889
<v Speaker 1>it clearly riles people up. This one was funny. I

0:18:50.970 --> 0:18:54.740
<v Speaker 1>find this podcast so awful. I love pop culture podcasts,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but this one is a miss. The hosts have nothing

0:18:57.140 --> 0:19:00.660
<v Speaker 1>intelligent to say. The topic slash people discussed is so

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.020
<v Speaker 1>unimportant and boring. I just listened to a segment about

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>an influencer who drinks flat soft drink. What? I feel

0:19:08.660 --> 0:19:10.500
<v Speaker 1>like that was a topic Amy brought to the podcast.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>That was about Georgia Richards who opens up Pepsi's when

0:19:14.220 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they're fresh from the shop and then leaves them in

0:19:16.980 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the fridge for a day to get flat. Then it continues.

0:19:20.060 --> 0:19:22.580
<v Speaker 1>The three sisters all convince each other that feedback or

0:19:22.619 --> 0:19:25.740
<v Speaker 1>criticism they get from people is wrong. Dot, dot, dot. Guys, honestly,

0:19:25.780 --> 0:19:29.260
<v Speaker 1>your content is not good. You lack nuance. You don't

0:19:29.300 --> 0:19:32.350
<v Speaker 1>sound like journalists. You claim to be. Don't waste your time.

0:19:33.990 --> 0:19:36.650
<v Speaker 1>The fact that we refer to ourselves as journalists really

0:19:36.690 --> 0:19:38.669
<v Speaker 1>seems to piss people off. It's like, I'm sorry, but

0:19:38.690 --> 0:19:40.970
<v Speaker 1>we do have a journalism degree and we've got a

0:19:41.010 --> 0:19:44.390
<v Speaker 1>master's in journalism. Okay, stop, stop. They're going to leave

0:19:44.430 --> 0:19:46.689
<v Speaker 1>more nasty comments. Well, isn't that what you want? That's

0:19:46.710 --> 0:19:50.260
<v Speaker 1>what you said you wanted. Wow, true. Someone was really upset.

0:19:50.300 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a year ago for me criticising Bali. I

0:19:54.260 --> 0:19:56.330
<v Speaker 1>think that that was when I was trying to work

0:19:56.380 --> 0:19:59.390
<v Speaker 1>out where to go on a honeymoon and I went

0:19:59.430 --> 0:20:00.869
<v Speaker 1>to Port Douglas and I said I didn't really want

0:20:00.910 --> 0:20:03.030
<v Speaker 1>to go to Bali because it's a bit full on.

0:20:03.070 --> 0:20:06.490
<v Speaker 1>Someone's like, lost me after bad-mouthing Bali. Here right now

0:20:06.590 --> 0:20:10.500
<v Speaker 1>and it's amazing. Weather divine. And by the way, get educated.

0:20:10.580 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Hospitals are now world-class in Bali. Oh, that's good to know.

0:20:13.740 --> 0:20:15.699
<v Speaker 1>I tend to agree. I love Bali. Like I had

0:20:15.740 --> 0:20:18.369
<v Speaker 1>my honeymoon there. We went there for our 30th. I

0:20:18.420 --> 0:20:20.590
<v Speaker 1>won't hear you say a bad thing about Bali, Sophie.

0:20:20.930 --> 0:20:23.710
<v Speaker 1>What about that review? I think it was like last

0:20:23.790 --> 0:20:26.730
<v Speaker 1>year where someone said that Amy and I were mean

0:20:26.770 --> 0:20:28.810
<v Speaker 1>to you. Do you remember that? No, that wasn't a review.

0:20:28.850 --> 0:20:32.109
<v Speaker 1>That was actually a DM that someone sent me. And

0:20:32.130 --> 0:20:34.050
<v Speaker 1>they said that they felt really bad for me because

0:20:34.090 --> 0:20:35.990
<v Speaker 1>you guys always pick on me and that I'm their

0:20:36.060 --> 0:20:38.939
<v Speaker 1>favorite and they relate to me. I mean, maybe this

0:20:38.980 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>person has a point. Sick of hearing about the same

0:20:41.180 --> 0:20:44.580
<v Speaker 1>people over and over again. Cover some different people instead

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.260
<v Speaker 1>of Indie, Sarah's Day and Molly May. Spell incorrectly again, please.

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because over the last year or so, that's

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>now changed to people begging us to stop talking about

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.590
<v Speaker 1>Tammy Hembrough. And it's like, well, we could, but she

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:02.670
<v Speaker 1>continues to deliver. Like her life is just so incredibly interesting.

0:21:03.230 --> 0:21:06.210
<v Speaker 1>And secondly... As a business, we look at the analytics

0:21:06.270 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and every time Tammy Hembrough is mentioned in the title

0:21:09.210 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of our podcast, we get way more downloads. We're now

0:21:12.900 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>catching up to current day. This one's from November 2025.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.500
<v Speaker 1>This is utter mindless rubbish. You can almost feel brain

0:21:19.540 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 1>cells dying as the minutes crawl by. Just stop. You're

0:21:22.900 --> 0:21:26.139
<v Speaker 1>not creative, interesting or clever. Get an actual job for

0:21:26.180 --> 0:21:29.140
<v Speaker 1>pity's sake. It's funny how the go-to is like, get

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a real job. It's like, we do. We've been working

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in the media industry for since we were like 21.

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And for the majority of the time the podcast has

0:21:39.140 --> 0:21:42.139
<v Speaker 1>been airing, we worked a nine to five. Like it

0:21:42.180 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>was only a couple of years ago that I went

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.530
<v Speaker 1>full time with the podcast because the demand was just

0:21:47.570 --> 0:21:50.290
<v Speaker 1>so great. And I think people forget that, you know,

0:21:50.310 --> 0:21:52.659
<v Speaker 1>it's not just setting up a microphone and talking into it.

0:21:52.670 --> 0:21:54.690
<v Speaker 1>Like there is a real business aspect to it. We've

0:21:54.710 --> 0:21:58.169
<v Speaker 1>got to do the accounts, the partnerships, all of the

0:21:58.510 --> 0:22:01.260
<v Speaker 1>run sheet, the producing, the editing, like we are a

0:22:01.300 --> 0:22:03.380
<v Speaker 1>team of just the three of us. Well, also Amy

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.580
<v Speaker 1>and I still run our public relations firm up until

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.340
<v Speaker 1>this point. As I mentioned on an episode this week,

0:22:09.380 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we have scaled back since having our children. I mean,

0:22:12.530 --> 0:22:15.590
<v Speaker 1>and we are full-time mums. So I'm working harder than

0:22:15.609 --> 0:22:17.210
<v Speaker 1>I've ever worked in my whole fucking life, working my

0:22:17.310 --> 0:22:18.909
<v Speaker 1>ass off at the moment. I mean, Amy's not in

0:22:18.970 --> 0:22:22.970
<v Speaker 1>this episode because she's that fucking exhausted. But anyway, Kate,

0:22:23.010 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you were actually correct. I found the reviews. So it's

0:22:25.980 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>called Be Nicer to Sophie. While I do really enjoy

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the content, I do find that Sophie gets treated less

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.100
<v Speaker 1>nicely than the other two girls treat each other, which

0:22:35.140 --> 0:22:37.790
<v Speaker 1>feels icky when listening. Even when she's not there and

0:22:37.830 --> 0:22:40.530
<v Speaker 1>referred to, there's a vibe, mainly more so by one

0:22:40.550 --> 0:22:43.689
<v Speaker 1>than the other, aka you, Kate. I actually find Sophie

0:22:43.710 --> 0:22:48.270
<v Speaker 1>the most likable. Maybe that's why, though. Thank you. That

0:22:48.290 --> 0:22:49.810
<v Speaker 1>was lovely. And hold on, can I point out, she

0:22:49.850 --> 0:22:51.810
<v Speaker 1>also left a four-star review instead of giving us a

0:22:51.850 --> 0:22:55.260
<v Speaker 1>nasty review. I think that listeners need to leave some

0:22:55.300 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>reviews saying that you and Amy have been nasty to me,

0:22:58.100 --> 0:23:00.970
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the subs episode, the one in question where

0:23:01.010 --> 0:23:03.230
<v Speaker 1>you guys went rogue. We weren't even rude to you.

0:23:03.250 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You were, Sophie. Who said? No one kicked up a

0:23:07.580 --> 0:23:09.690
<v Speaker 1>stink about it. Anyone who thinks she was rude, leave

0:23:09.890 --> 0:23:12.380
<v Speaker 1>a review, please. All right, cool. It's like the fucking

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>carpet cleaner incident. That was a low. That was a

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:17.460
<v Speaker 1>real low. We probably shouldn't even bring that one up.

0:23:17.460 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But that was on the subs, wasn't it? You didn't

0:23:19.420 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>return my carpet cleaner for like two years and then

0:23:21.460 --> 0:23:23.900
<v Speaker 1>you said you couldn't return it because you had a child.

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.060
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even going into that. All right. Because it

0:23:26.100 --> 0:23:28.270
<v Speaker 1>makes me too mad. All right. And apparently people don't

0:23:28.310 --> 0:23:31.129
<v Speaker 1>like us arguing on here. Now, well, again, are we

0:23:31.170 --> 0:23:33.170
<v Speaker 1>rage baiting because we want negative reviews? Oh, I want

0:23:33.210 --> 0:23:36.050
<v Speaker 1>positive reviews. Anyway. This one is really up to date.

0:23:36.090 --> 0:23:38.449
<v Speaker 1>This is the 14th of April. Stop saying kick to

0:23:38.470 --> 0:23:41.450
<v Speaker 1>the dick in capitals, please. It's so gross to hear.

0:23:41.470 --> 0:23:43.710
<v Speaker 1>That just shows you can't keep everyone happy. And I

0:23:43.730 --> 0:23:46.419
<v Speaker 1>think that is the moral of today's episode because we

0:23:46.460 --> 0:23:49.060
<v Speaker 1>have had an influx of people asking us to put

0:23:49.100 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>kick in the dick on merchandise. What do you think

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>our overall rating is? So we have had 2,179 reviews

0:23:57.420 --> 0:23:59.860
<v Speaker 1>over the seven years. So what do you think that

0:24:00.060 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>our overall number equates to? Out of five. Are those

0:24:04.340 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>written reviews or they're like people just putting the stars?

0:24:06.940 --> 0:24:10.060
<v Speaker 1>They're just people putting the stars. Oh, I know that

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of five stars and a lot

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>of one star. So I think overall it's like a three.

0:24:15.530 --> 0:24:19.090
<v Speaker 1>It's a 3.7, which actually isn't that bad. We're back, baby.

0:24:19.170 --> 0:24:21.770
<v Speaker 1>It's climbing up. I want to check Spotify now. What

0:24:21.790 --> 0:24:24.990
<v Speaker 1>was it on Spotify? Not the comments, obviously, because they

0:24:25.030 --> 0:24:28.110
<v Speaker 1>don't allow comments except on particular episodes. Isn't that right?

0:24:28.740 --> 0:24:30.990
<v Speaker 1>There's still mean ones on there. Oh, yes. But I mean,

0:24:31.090 --> 0:24:33.590
<v Speaker 1>like you have the right of reply at least. I mean,

0:24:33.830 --> 0:24:35.790
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. Like I don't expect everyone to listen

0:24:35.810 --> 0:24:37.429
<v Speaker 1>to this podcast to be like, oh my God, this

0:24:37.490 --> 0:24:39.490
<v Speaker 1>is the best thing I've ever listened to. And over

0:24:39.550 --> 0:24:42.490
<v Speaker 1>the years, some of the criticism has been valid and

0:24:42.670 --> 0:24:45.889
<v Speaker 1>we have learned from it. But I just think sometimes

0:24:47.130 --> 0:24:50.350
<v Speaker 1>some of it isn't warranted. I'm looking at Spotify now.

0:24:50.790 --> 0:24:55.130
<v Speaker 1>We have a 4.1 star rating and have had 1.7

0:24:55.130 --> 0:24:59.980
<v Speaker 1>thousand reviews. So that's better. Yeah. The thing is, when

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.100
<v Speaker 1>you go and find a podcast to listen to, do

0:25:03.140 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you actually ever look at the reviews? I only look

0:25:05.700 --> 0:25:08.020
<v Speaker 1>at the reviews of podcasts that I listen to from

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:12.859
<v Speaker 1>a pure perspective of knowing that we receive bad reviews

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.220
<v Speaker 1>and wanting to see what people say about a podcast

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.350
<v Speaker 1>that I like to make myself feel better. As a consumer, though,

0:25:18.369 --> 0:25:20.109
<v Speaker 1>I never go and look at them. If I hear

0:25:20.130 --> 0:25:21.770
<v Speaker 1>about a new podcast, I just listen to it. I

0:25:21.810 --> 0:25:23.290
<v Speaker 1>don't go and bother and look at the reviews and

0:25:23.310 --> 0:25:25.010
<v Speaker 1>see what people say because I always know that it's

0:25:25.030 --> 0:25:27.460
<v Speaker 1>just crap. It's interesting, though, because when I'm a fan

0:25:27.500 --> 0:25:31.189
<v Speaker 1>of a podcast and maybe a topic irritates me or

0:25:31.609 --> 0:25:34.570
<v Speaker 1>something one of the hosts says, you know, doesn't land

0:25:34.630 --> 0:25:37.270
<v Speaker 1>with me or maybe it's been feeling a bit off,

0:25:37.430 --> 0:25:39.750
<v Speaker 1>I will go look at the comments and see if

0:25:39.830 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone feels the same way as me. So maybe it's

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>more of a place where listeners can go to be

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.830
<v Speaker 1>validated on how they're feeling. Do you think that podcasters

0:25:49.890 --> 0:25:52.970
<v Speaker 1>should actually read the reviews and listen to the feedback? Look,

0:25:52.990 --> 0:25:56.750
<v Speaker 1>listeners will know that I am very anti-reading the negative reviews.

0:25:56.790 --> 0:25:58.090
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know we've read them now for a

0:25:58.109 --> 0:26:01.530
<v Speaker 1>bit of fun, but I find it detrimental to my

0:26:01.590 --> 0:26:03.970
<v Speaker 1>own mental health if I go and check the reviews

0:26:04.109 --> 0:26:08.050
<v Speaker 1>every day and I find it impacts negatively on the

0:26:08.090 --> 0:26:11.010
<v Speaker 1>podcast because then I'll be second guessing everything I say

0:26:11.030 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and how it's said or what we're reporting on. Because

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>as much as I do think constructive criticism is helpful,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>when it's coming from anonymous people who you don't know

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.100
<v Speaker 1>what their intentions are, like there could be people that

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.420
<v Speaker 1>don't like you that know you in your personal life

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>or people that you've spoken about on the podcast that

0:26:27.980 --> 0:26:30.379
<v Speaker 1>have a vendetta, like you don't actually know who's writing

0:26:30.420 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the reviews. I take constructive criticism on board when it's

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:39.060
<v Speaker 1>actually emailed to us directly from listeners who put their

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.850
<v Speaker 1>names and faces to it and actually write presenter in

0:26:43.030 --> 0:26:46.050
<v Speaker 1>a constructive way other than, oh, you guys are fucking

0:26:46.050 --> 0:26:48.369
<v Speaker 1>30 and old and boring. It has been a bit

0:26:48.410 --> 0:26:51.010
<v Speaker 1>of a wild ride looking back at some of these reviews.

0:26:51.270 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And for some reason, it's made me feel nostalgic, which

0:26:53.820 --> 0:26:56.500
<v Speaker 1>is kind of funny. But you're just looking at them,

0:26:56.540 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you remember the different stories that you were talking about.

0:26:59.260 --> 0:27:02.460
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that excites me is it's been seven years,

0:27:02.500 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just as excited to get on the microphone

0:27:04.780 --> 0:27:08.619
<v Speaker 1>and discuss pop culture and discuss the influencer world. I

0:27:08.660 --> 0:27:11.459
<v Speaker 1>just love it so much. We're just so honored that

0:27:11.500 --> 0:27:13.459
<v Speaker 1>so many of you enjoy what we speak about. I mean,

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>as we've touched on, some people haven't enjoyed it, but

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>those of you who are paid subscribers, we love every

0:27:19.020 --> 0:27:20.740
<v Speaker 1>single one of you and just thank you so much

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.570
<v Speaker 1>for the support. It's funny because we often get asked like, oh,

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>do you ever run out of things to speak about?

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.780
<v Speaker 1>And it's like seven years in, no. If anything, the

0:27:28.820 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>volume of stories has increased. I think when we reach

0:27:31.790 --> 0:27:33.689
<v Speaker 1>our 10 year anniversary, we've got to go back and

0:27:33.730 --> 0:27:37.770
<v Speaker 1>find our top favorite stories and revisit them because there

0:27:37.810 --> 0:27:42.020
<v Speaker 1>are some absolutely hilarious ones. The Olivia White, body shaped

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>glasses springs to mind. Like I want to listen to

0:27:44.540 --> 0:27:47.310
<v Speaker 1>the Moroccan pillows. I want to go and find the

0:27:47.410 --> 0:27:50.250
<v Speaker 1>episode when I got Archie. And because I remember my

0:27:50.290 --> 0:27:54.250
<v Speaker 1>voice was so croaky and I was just exhausted. And

0:27:54.470 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>also the episode where I secretly filmed Brandon's reaction to

0:27:57.990 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Archie being shaved and him losing it. He still does

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.050
<v Speaker 1>not know about that. Don't bring that up tonight. I won't.

0:28:04.170 --> 0:28:05.830
<v Speaker 1>I won't. We've got family dinner tonight, so I'll keep

0:28:05.890 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that one under wraps. But thank you so much for

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>those listeners who have been along for the ride for

0:28:11.180 --> 0:28:13.900
<v Speaker 1>the last seven years with us, the OGs. We really

0:28:13.940 --> 0:28:16.620
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. And everyone that we've picked up along the way.

0:28:16.980 --> 0:28:19.770
<v Speaker 1>This episode was recorded on the traditional land of the

0:28:19.810 --> 0:28:22.490
<v Speaker 1>Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains. We pay respect to

0:28:22.570 --> 0:28:23.649
<v Speaker 1>elders past and present.