WEBVTT - Sharri | 26 June

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry Good evening Donald Trump's triumph at NATO

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>as the Albanezy government left out in the cold. Shadow

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Defense Minister Angus Taylor will join me live to reveal

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 2>how much he thinks we should be spending on our

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>military Wall Street is scrambling after socialist influencer ma'm darney

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>won the Democratic primary in New York. I'll discuss the

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>fallout with John Lee and Howard Melbourne's street sweeper won

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>a landmark case after he was sacked for objecting to

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 2>the Welcome to Country, Plus the mysterious case of the

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 2>missing Supreme Leader. Where is Iran's Iotola Kamani hiding. I'll

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>speak with human rights lawyer Arsenalstrowsky later on the show,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>but first tonight, Donald Trump has wrapped up a successful

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>whirlwind visit to NATO. And while the world is talking

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>about the NATO gen or secretary calling him daddy, and

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to that in a moment. The substance of

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the meeting was deeply significant. It was a broad commitment

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>from Europeans to lift defense spending to five percent of GDP,

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 2>such as the precarious position of global security that NATO

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>has reached this commitment. Zelenski's presence at NATO in a

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>suit no less underscored the grave threat that the access

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of evil poses to democracy, and the talks took place

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 2>in the shadow of America joining Israel to destroy Iran's

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>nuclear sites. The lesson is that peace cannot be taken

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>for granted. Protecting our sovereignty and guarding against aggressive enemies

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>takes work. It takes a rigorous defense of our values

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and ensuring we invest in our military. NATO agreeing to

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>increase defense spending to five percent under Article five the

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.279
<v Speaker 2>Collective Defense Treaty was a watershed moment.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 3>I've been asking them to go up to five percent

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 3>for a number of years and they're going up to

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 3>five percent. That's a big from two percent, and a

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of people didn't even prepare the two percent, So

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to be a very big news.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>NATO is going to become very strong with US.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 4>NATAL leaders agreed on the the Hague Defense Investment Plan

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 4>and this will fuel a quantum leap in our collective defense.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, while Australia isn't part of NATO, we are on

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the front line of an aggressive China and the expectation

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 2>is that Albin Ezy should be pulling his weight as well.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 2>It's only Australia and Spain failing to get on board

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 2>with a serious commitment to defense. And listen to how

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Trump threatened Spain if it doesn't come to the table.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 5>Of course, you know on a Spain.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Are you satisfied with today?

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 6>I think Spain's terrible what they've done.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I do.

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 6>They're the only country that won't pay the full up.

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 6>They want to stay at two percent. I think it's terrible.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 6>And you know, they're doing very well. The economy is

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 6>very well, and that economy could be blown right out

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 6>of the water with something bad happening. You know, Spain

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 6>is the only country that are you from Spain? Good congratulations.

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 6>You're the only country that is not paying. I don't

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 6>know what the problem is, it's I think it's too bad.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>So we'll make it up.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 6>You know what we're going to do. We're negotiating with

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 6>Spain on a trade deal. We're going to make them

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 6>pay twice as much. And I'm actually serious about that.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>And like Spain, Australia also only spans two percent of

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>our GDP on defense, so This would likely be how

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Trump speaks to alban Easy if he ever bothers to

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>meet with him. Now, at the very same time that

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the NATO summit was taking place in the Netherlands, Treasurer

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Jim Chalmers once again ruled out increase to defense spending.

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 7>We are actually already very substantially increasing our investment in defense.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 7>We've found room in tight budgets for an extra eleven

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars over the forward estimates and around fifty seven

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 7>and a half billion dollars over the course of the

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 7>next decade.

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 2>And Defense Minister Richard Miles, who actually was at NATO

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and yet he would only promise to assess and review

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Australia's needs going forward.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 8>We've gone through our own process of assessing our strategic landscape,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 8>assessing the threats that exist there and the kind of

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 8>defense force we need to build in order to meet

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 8>those threats, to meet the strategic moment, and will continue

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 8>to assess what our needs are going forward.

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>A whole lot of waffle and no firm commitments there now.

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 2>The Albanezy government insists it needs to be aligned with

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>international partners when it comes to climb change and foreign policy.

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 2>It's a point Albanezi has made over and over to

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 2>justify the rush to renewables.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 9>Both Australia and Canada also share views about climate change.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 9>Focus on going forward, including meeting our net zero targets,

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 9>how we can collaborate on the net zero transition. Our

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 9>national interest lies with continuing to take action on climate change,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 9>including through international accords.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 2>So apparently being aligned with the international community is vital

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to climate action, but apparently not for

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 2>defense spending. And this at a time when several international

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 2>leaders now admit they're unlikely to meet their net zero targets.

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 2>It's embarrassing how Australia is so completely out of step

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>on defense. We're investing just two percent of GDP while

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Europe is now at five percent. And by the way,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 2>the five percent is comprised of three and a half

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 2>percent on defense and an extra one and a half

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 2>percent on defense related infrastructure. And this is all within

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 2>ten years. The Trump administration has only asked for our

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>commitment to lift to three and a half percent, not five.

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 2>This should be an easily achievable commitment for Australia, especially

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>over a ten year period, Yet the Prime Minister refuses

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to do this all while wasting billions of dollars paying

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>off student hex debt, on the exploding NDIS, and sending

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 2>millions to Gaza. Alban Ezy's refusal to increase our defense

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>budget is stubborn, and we're already seeing the consequences of

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 2>being at odds with the international community. The President counseled

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 2>his meeting with Albenzi with an no phone call to

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 2>compensate like he had with other world leaders, and the

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>United States didn't inform Australia before the strikes against Iran

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>despite our role in the Five Eyes community. Albanesi's left

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 2>wing ideology and refusal to increase defense spending means that

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>we now could even risk losing orcus now. Albinizi already

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>had a reputation internationally for his center left woke government,

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>but now his reputation is sliding into irrelevance. He was

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>too scared to attend NATO and risk being left out

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>in the cold by Trump on a second occasion, and

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that's what would have happened. But this is all self

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>inflicted and it's a direct result of the hostile foreign

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 2>policy he and Petti Wong have pursued to Australia's own detriment.

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I've been making this point for a long time now

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>that even the Biden administration was disappointed in Albanesi and

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Wong's foreign policy. But now the sequences of this government's

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>actions are so obvious that they can't be ignored. Former

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.559
<v Speaker 2>Labor State Secretary Cameron Milner, our regular guest. He wrote

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 2>in The Nightly this week that Australia, under Wong and

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Albanezi continually wants to pick our enemies over our allies.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 2>He says Albanese and his government are now a serious

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>threat to Orcus and our role as a trusted partner

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>of world superpowers. And The Australian's Foreign editor Greg Sheridan

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 2>put it well when he wrote that it's difficult to

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>think of a time when Australia has been so inconsequential,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>so powerless, so much without influence, so incapable of affecting

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>its own destiny or anyone else's, as we have become

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>under the Albanesi government. And Sheridan writes that it's just

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>as well Alberzi didn't go to NATO. He says, imagine

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 2>trying to get an appointment with Trump so you can

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>whine about tariffs while all this is happening, And what

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>about the embarrassment that NATO now wants member states to

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 2>spend three and a half percent of GDP on defense

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 2>while we can't spend a pitiful two percent, He says,

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 2>nobody's saying could argue that the Albanese government is responding

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 2>effectively to the strategic challenges we face. So, while the

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 2>frosty relationship between Australia and the United States continues, it's

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 2>a new dawn for the Europeans and the president. The

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 2>NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutter has been fawning over Trump,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 2>with the President publishing the private text message he sent

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>him before the summit, and in it Mark said, you

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>are flying into another big success in the Hague this evening.

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>It was not easy, but we've got them all signed

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>onto five percent. Donald, you have driven us to a

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>really important moment for American and Europe and the world.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 2>You will achieve something no American president in debat could

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 2>get done. Europe is going to pay in a big

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>way as they should, and it will be your win.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's very true. No other president, as much as

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 2>they tried, could get this sort of five percent commitment

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 2>to defense at NATO. Now, unsurprisingly, Trump loved that message

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 2>private message, and he shared it on truth social This

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>seems to be becoming a trend, Trump sharing private correspondence publicly.

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>We presume he didn't ask for permission. Then, as we

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 2>saw last night, Mark was equally taken with Trump at

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the NATO press conference. He's a Dutch politician. He's been

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 2>in the role that NATO since last October. He seems

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 2>quite eccentric and fun and everybody has been captivated by

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the moment. He described Trump as daddy.

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 3>They've got a big fight, like two kids at a

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 3>school yard. You know, they fight like hell, you can't

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 3>stop them.

0:10:58.040 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 10>Let him fight for about two three minutes.

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 6>Then it's easy to staff up.

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 4>And then Debby has sometimes do strong language.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a joke, of course, but it's unusual language

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>for senior diplomat and the situation became even more surreal

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>when the President was asked about the comment at the

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 2>official NATO press conference. Mark Britter, the NATO chief, who

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 2>is your friend? He called you daddy earlier? Do you

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 2>regard your NATO allies as kind of children?

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 4>No, he likes me.

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he likes me.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 10>If he doesn't, I'll let you know.

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 2>I'll come back and I'll hit him hard. Okay, he did,

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>he did it.

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 6>Very affectionate.

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 11>Daddy, here, my daddy.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 2>That was a lighthearted moment during a pretty long forty

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 2>five minute press conference where Trump took questions from dozens

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 2>of international journalists, and he had an emotional moment with

0:11:55.360 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 2>BBC Ukraine correspondent Marislava Petza.

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 11>BBC News Ukrainian.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 6>Where are you from.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm from Ukraine.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 11>So my question to you is whether or not the

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 11>US is ready to sell anti air missile systems Patriot

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 11>to Ukraine. We know that Russia has been pound in

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 11>Ukraine really heavily. Right now, you're living yourself now and

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 11>you my husband is there and I.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 6>Can see you very you know, it's amazing.

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 11>And me with the kids. I'm in also actually because

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 11>he wanted me to be.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 6>Your husband, the soldier.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Now he's there now.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well that's rough stuff, right, that's tough, and you're

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 6>living here and you're a reporter.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I am good.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 6>So let me just tell you. They do want to

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 6>have the anti missile missiles, okay, as they call them,

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 6>the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 6>make some available.

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that amazing that Trump actually took the time to

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 2>ask about her husband and her family, where she lives,

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>in her job. He showed empathy and curiosity, and it

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 2>was genuine, seemed genuine. It's rare for a politician to

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 2>do that, to be genuinely interested in other people, not

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>just themselves. It was a beautiful and heartwarming interaction. And

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>so it was that NATO survived Trump. The war in

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Iran is over for the meantime, and Albinizi wakes up

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 2>to a new reality where Trump isn't a villain of

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the international community and it's Albanezi who's the one shunned

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and out of favor. All right, big show coming up,

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>But now let's bring in shadow Defense Minister Angus Taylor, Angus,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much for your time. Now, if you

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>were the defense minister, would you agree to lift our

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 2>defense spend to three and a half percent of GDP

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>within ten years?

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 12>Well, Shari, thanks for having me, and we absolutely need

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 12>to increase our defense expenditure, and of course during the

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 12>election campaign we're now going to at least three percent

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 12>and we've recommitted to that, and we need to do

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 12>that because we're living in a dangerous and uncertain time

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 12>where authoritarian regimes are flexing their muscles, whether it's in Russia,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 12>whether it's Iran directly attacking Israel or through proxies of course,

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 12>or whether it's the military build up from the Chinese

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 12>Communist Party, and all of these things mean, in the

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 12>words of the Prime Minister Shari, that we are facing

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 12>the most uncertain time since Second World War and we

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 12>need to take appropriate action. Two percent of GDP is

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 12>simply not enough. The government's Zone Defense Strategic Review is

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 12>not properly funded. We need to make sure our submarines

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 12>are properly funded. We need to manufacture missiles here in Australia.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 12>We need to have investment in drone and anti drone

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 12>technology in the northern facilities that are so crucial at

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 12>this time in our p part of the world. All

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 12>of this needs investment. It's not getting the investment it deserves,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 12>and that's why we need to increase defense spending.

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 2>So you just said they're three percent, Pete hagseth Out

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the Shangrilai Dialogue put forward a figure of three and

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 2>a half percent. Is that something that you agree that

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>we do need to commit to and just remembering this

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 2>is a ten year window.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, of course three is a lot closer to three

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 12>and a half than two is. And the real problem

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 12>we've got to the moment is we're just way short

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 12>of the mark Shari. There's no question about that for

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 12>what we need to do. And as I say, the

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 12>government's own plan is not properly funded. So I mean

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 12>it's there and very clear that there needs to be

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 12>significant additional funding, and it's because we are facing this

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 12>uncertain time and the places that need the investment are

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 12>pretty clear. What's also clear is we need to make

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 12>sure that every dollar is invested well, Shari, and I

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 12>don't think all of the money invested into historically has

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 12>been invested as well as it needs to be, and

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 12>that's got to be a part of the focus as well.

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we've seen war played out in real time Russia,

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine as well in Iran, and we don't have the

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of anywhere near the sort of military equipment that

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>is being used routinely, drones being the most mean and

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>relatively inexpensive, we just don't have that capability automated drones.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yeah, you're absolutely right. I mean the drones is

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 12>a good example, and counter drone technology, of course, we're

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 12>seeing extraordinary advances on that in the Ukraine War. We

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 12>also saw it from Israel with extraordinary use of technology

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 12>by Israel in Iran very effective, and we've got to

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 12>learn from this. We've got to move much faster, we've

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 12>got to be way more agile, we've got to focus

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 12>on delivery, not just retric and we've got to make

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 12>sure that we are ultimately in control of our own

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 12>sovereignty shari A line. This are incredibly important. They are

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 12>unbelievably important. But you get good alliances because you're focused

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 12>on your own sovereignty and that means we've got to

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 12>manufacture our own missiles, for instance. So this is incredibly

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 12>important at a time like now, and it needs to

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 12>be a sharp focused for the government, and it.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Isn't Sadly, do you think Albanzi is trashing our alliance

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 2>with the United States, Well.

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 12>I think it's in real trouble. I mean, it's clear

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 12>this review of Orcas is proceeding at a time when

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 12>we haven't even managed to get a meeting between the

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 12>Prime Minister and the President. He seems more willing to

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 12>get a meeting with the president of China than the

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 12>president of the United States. And yet this is our

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 12>key strategic ally, the United States, of course, So look

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 12>that prime minister needs to get his gear together, that

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 12>it needs to get focused on the right things here

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 12>and most importantly needs to get a meeting with the

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 12>president and needs to get defense spending up.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, and in fact, you know, Albanesi could have a

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>fourth meeting with Chinese President Hijinping before he even has

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 2>his first one with Trump, who won the election in

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 2>November nearly eight months ago. It's extraordinary. Now Albanize failed

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 2>to come out and support America's strikes on Iran's nuclear

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>facilities on Sunday. Should he have done this straightway in

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 2>support of.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 12>Our ally, Yes, absolutely, I mean this was the right

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 12>thing for the United States to do. Israel was entirely

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 12>entitled to take action against Iran because there's an ongoing

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 12>existential threat for Israel created by Iran, and not just

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 12>through direct attacks but through proxies of course over a

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 12>long period of time. And so it was well within

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 12>the rights of Israel to do what it did, and

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 12>absolutely appropriate for the United States to support it, and

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 12>I think the United States has played a very deft

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 12>hand in the approach it's taken on this. So yes, Albanize,

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 12>he should have supported he didn't mean. What worries me here,

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 12>Shari is that there seems to be an anti US

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 12>alliance sentiment coming from Albanesi and others in the government,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 12>and I think that is very dangerous At a time

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 12>like this, these autocratic regimes are flexing their muscles. Democracies

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 12>and open societies like ours need to band together, and

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 12>we need to work together, and that's the only way

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 12>we're going to make sure that we're safe in a

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 12>difficult time.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely so refreshing to hear some common sense there now.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Just on another topic, there's been debate about quotas today.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Susan Lee has said she's open to them. You have

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 2>said you don't support them. But the key point is

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 2>having more women in politics, and there are now fewer

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>women in Shadow Cabinet under Susan Lee than there were

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 2>under Peter Dutton. Were you, Angus Taylor shocked to see

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>your colleagues Jane Hume, Sarah Henderson just sent it ow

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 2>bagmper Price and Claire Chandler dumped from Shadow cabinet.

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 12>Well, of course, that's an extraordinary group of very capable

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 12>women who I worked very closely with in the last

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 12>term of government, in many cases before that last term

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 12>of parliament sorry, and in many cases before that when

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 12>we were in government as well. And yeah, it was

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 12>disappointing not to see them in the cabinet. I am

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 12>confident they will all play an important role in public

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 12>life in the coming months and years, and we need

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 12>more women like them, Shari and I certainly hope and

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 12>encourage all of them and others to get on with it,

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 12>because we need women exactly like them.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 2>You'd have them back if you became leader in the future.

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 12>I'm not going to speculate on that. My focus is

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 12>on defense and becoming the Defense minister, that's the goal.

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 12>But what I would say is there an extraordinary group

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 12>of very capable women and we need more like them.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, all right, Angus Taylor, I really appreciate your time tonight.

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. Don't you wish the actual Defense

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 2>minister spoke like that? What we hear from miles and

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 2>is not even the worst of them. Pennywong and Alban Easy,

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 2>It's extraordinary. This is our government. Now. Victorian Liberals have

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>launched an eleventh hour legal bid this afternoon to block

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the one point five to five million dollar loan they

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 2>lent to former leader John Persuto to pay off his

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 2>debts to Moridemi, but clearly the movers divided the party.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Former Victorian Premier Jeff Kennett defended pursuito and the loan,

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 2>writing in The Australian Today that settling the case quickly

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 2>was in the party's best interests to resolve and put

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 2>this matter behind them in order to deliver on their

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 2>primary function, which is to be an effective opposition. Well,

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd say their primary function is to try and win government.

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 2>If they can do that, if they can get their

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 2>act together. Let's bring in tonight's panel WA Liberal leader

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Basil Zemplus and Stein New's host Taylor Bond. Welcome to

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 2>you both. Now, Basil, the legal bill obviously needs to

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>be paid. The question is whether the Liberals should be

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 2>footing the bill for John Pursuto when it's very unlikely

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 2>they would have done this if it had been my

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 2>redeeming's debt.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 10>What do you think possibly, yes, and then I accept

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 10>that point of view. What we do know is is

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 10>that more redeeming is owed an amount of money. She

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 10>should be paid that amount of money in full, as

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 10>it has been ruled by the courts. What's also then

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 10>important is that a by election is avoided. That's very

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 10>important for the Liberal Party in Victoria. And then, as

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 10>we've just heard, and as we've heard you phrase it

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 10>in a slightly different way, the Victorian opposition should get

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 10>on with its job of holding the Labor government to

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 10>account and trying to win the next election. They are

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 10>the three priorities and those three things should happen, and

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 10>happen as quickly as possible.

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Caleb, every time we think this matter is over,

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 2>there's another step. Now there's this challenge to the Liberal

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Party lending of loaning John Persuto the money. What do

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 2>you think should happen here?

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, artfully dodged the Abasil, well done, and moving from

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>their journalism to politics, you've fitted in really well set

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.479
<v Speaker 1>more complicated than the Liberal partner.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess cayleb.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Basil can take it, because I'll be feeling for you

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>next week.

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 2>I'll give it to it. And I should say that

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>normally Matt canavans here, but he's got a busted tire,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>he said, a photograph of the tire to prove it.

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 2>So it's not an execution. We're likely to have Caleb

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 2>on the desk tonight. That's already.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>It's friendly fire, which we enjoy him.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's a little more.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Complicated than Jeff Kennett made it sound in his column

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>today in The Australian, because he's essentially saying it should

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>be the same as if you're a minister of the

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Crown and you come into some legal trouble that would

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>be covered by the public, of course, the taxpayer. And

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he's saying that Pursuto was doing his job in the

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>course of his duties as an office bearer in the

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Liberal Party, and so the Liberal Party should indemnify him,

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>except for the fact that my redeeming offered to settle

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this matter, and it was Pursuito himself who elected not

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to settle and to carry this on eventually to court,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So that wasn't a decision of the Liberal Party. If

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>he was being indemnified by the Liberal Party, the party

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 1>should have been given the option to pay to settle

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way, all the way back then before all

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of this happened. The reason the Liberal Party is now

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>on the hook for this money. Is because of a

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>decision that John Pursuito made, after decisions he made as

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>an office bearer for the Liberal Party, he put himself

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 1>in this position. And I don't see why the members

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Liberal Party should have to stump up money

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for this loan that no one really quite knows how

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>it's going to work. It's a thirty year loan on

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial interest of about six percent to go and raise

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>money to try and pay it off.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 2>And not just members but donors, people who've worked hard

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>then given their money to try and beat the Alan

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>government and the Andrews government before it. So a lot

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 2>of questions over this now fineance. Minister Icadi Gallagher admitted

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 2>on ABC radio this morning that the Albanezy government actually

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 2>checked the legality of Trump's strikes and Iran's nuclear facilities.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Have a listen. Has advice been sought as to whether

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 2>these military actions are legal under international law?

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 8>Look, obviously advice has been sought by you know, I

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 8>mean in government.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 7>As we're working through some of these issues, we get

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 7>a whole lot of advice across the government.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Basil it gets worse and worse. Their support was late,

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 2>it was lackluster, given through gritted tweet teeth twenty four

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 2>hours after the factor, now we hear they had to

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 2>check whether it was legal first. This says everything we

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 2>need to know about this left wing government, doesn't it.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 10>Certainly late and certainly lackluster. Really, it was almost embarrassing.

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 10>It was as though they were very new parliamentarians having

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 10>to check with the Media office, what are the talking

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 10>points before we can go out and endorse this action

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 10>that had been endorsed of one of our strongest and

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 10>most steadfast allies, and check that it is okay to

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 10>say we support what they have done, even though universally

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 10>the other allies of the United States had done just that.

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 10>And it tells you something about the instincts, the political

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 10>and otherwise instincts of this labor government federally. It was appalling,

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 10>It was late, it was slow, It was embarrassing.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 2>No, absolutely completely agree, Caleb, I mean surely, I mean

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>this is just absurd. When you can't accept that destroying

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a nuclear site is the right thing to do straight away,

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 2>You've got to go get your bureaucrats to look up

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>if it's legal, as I said on your program last week,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 2>and I've repeated again on the channel throughout this week.

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the government has holed themselves up in

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>this position where we know where they've stood on the

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>war in Gaza, and so now they've convinced themselves that

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>there is nothing that can possibly done by Israel or

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>anything that's Israel adjacent that could be a good idea,

0:26:56.000 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>i e. Wiping out nuclear armory in Iran. So they've

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of decided they have to be so ideologically pure

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on this matter that obviously good things that the rest

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of the West that isn't bad.

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I ran good, Well.

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I know. It is so preposterous, isn't it The

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that they couldn't just come out and say it

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>straight away on Sunday and then to say, oh, well

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we put out a statement, sir. I mean a government

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>spokesman putting out a statement is not the same as

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the Prime minister saying, yes, what happened today was good

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for the world. It seems pretty simple.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 2>No, it does. Indeed. Now I just want to end

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>on this debate about quotas. Now, Basil, you're obviously the

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 2>liberal leader in way. Susan Lee has said she'd leave

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>it up to the state divisions to decide whether or

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>not they should have quotas to get more women into politics.

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you'd probably just like more of any Liberals

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 2>to join to get into parliament, doesn't matter their gender.

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 2>But nonetheless, what do you think about quotas?

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 10>Well, only seventeen of us here in the West Australian

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 10>Parliament after the most recent state election back in March.

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 10>But of those seventeen only for women. And the facts

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 10>are the facts, that is not enough women and the

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 10>Parliament of Western Australia, the Liberal Party that I lead,

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 10>does not have enough women. We have not appealed to

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 10>women enough in the community. And also you could say

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 10>the same thing about our appeal to younger voters. Now

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 10>I understand, as has been said by Simon Birmingham and others,

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 10>that quotas are unliberal like. However, sometimes you're going to

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 10>need a circuit breaker to get those numbers advanced. So

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 10>whether it is quotas or some other drastic measures to

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 10>move things along to get us to a point of

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 10>close to or better towards equilibrium, everything should be on

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 10>the table. And that's my position, everything whatever it is

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 10>that gets us there, because we need to represent the

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 10>community that we seek to serve with the same numbers

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 10>that are in that community, in the makeup of that community.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting because you know, if we have this debate

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 2>about quotas, probably the official Liberal party position would be

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>that there aren't quotas, and yet in reality there have

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 2>been we know it, many of the Liberal preselections before

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the last federal election, Caleb, they weren't pre selecting men.

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the seat said no, we need a woman,

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 2>we need a woman to run against a teal. So

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 2>in effect, there is a quota system.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I suppose there always has been in some

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>way or another on various different factors. But the point

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>should not be we need a woman. It should be

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>primarily we need the best person for the job. But

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get more women into politics, as

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Basil points out, the party's probably not done enough to

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>appeal to women. So saying oh, we'll have a quota,

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't fix that problem. It simply shoehorns people into

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>positions so you can make it look like you fix

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the problem. You haven't fixed the problem. If the root

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>issue is you haven't appealed to women enough, we'll fix

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that issue. Start getting on the phone to competent, capable,

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>higher ranking women in this country that we would like

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to see in politics, and saying I want you to

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>come and run for pre selection because you can't tell

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>me that the pre selectors of the Liberal Party, the

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>members of the Liberal Party are opposed to having women

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>as candidates. They're not.

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 2>They just have to be the best.

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>People for the job. If you can get good women

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to run, you'll get good women in parliament.

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And there was actually probably I don't have the exact

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 2>figures to hand, but there were a lot of women

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 2>who were running for the Liberal Party. They just voters

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>didn't vote them in, I mean, and it was an

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 2>agenda thing. Voters didn't vote many Liberals in it all.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 2>So there lies the problem. Calebon, Basil Zamplers and Basil,

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 2>you better watch out next Thursday, because Caleb's filling in

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 2>for me next week.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 11>I will, I will say out.

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 10>I was going to say, I can't get Mat Canavan

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 10>back here quickly enough tonight, will.

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I will say, having been the bad copy, it will

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be the good cop and say I love your tie.

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 2>To I love your tithes. Well, I never noticed men's ties,

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and I've been looking at yours. It is excellent. It

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 2>even looks like there's some Greek letters in that alphabet.

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that is that true?

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Spot on?

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Well done, cherry.

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 10>It is the Greek alphabet who, of course said the

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 10>Greek said the home of democracy. So how appropriate, right, I've.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Just come out of parliament.

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 2>There you go, all right, basil zembliskated bone. Great to

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 2>see you. All right, Still to come the landmark court

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 2>case where a council worker one after being sacked for

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 2>refusing to say the welcome to country. I'll get into

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 2>that and more with the Daily Telegraphs James Willis. Plus

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>what the latest intelligence says about whether Iran's nuclear sites

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 2>were in fact destroyed. That's next welcome back. Well, there's

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 2>intense debate about the level of damage done to Iran's

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 2>nuclear program. The CIA today says it does have credible

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 2>intelligence that the nuclear program was severely damaged by the bombs,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>and CIA director John Ratcliffe said their report includes new

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 2>intel from a historically reliable and accurate source method that

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 2>to be rebuilt over the course of years. To discuss

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 2>joining me now as senior fellow at the Hudson Institute,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 2>John Lee, John, great to see you again.

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 13>Good evening.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Now you what's your assessment of this intelligence? We've obviously

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 2>seen conflicting reports. The Defense Intelligence Agency had a leaked

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 2>report with an anti Trump journalist who said that the

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 2>sites were just damaged. Where do you think the truth lies?

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 13>Well, the fact is we don't know. A lot of

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 13>it will come from satellite photos, some of it will

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 13>come from signals, intelligence chatter in terms of what Iranians

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 13>are saying, and some of it will come from sources

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 13>on the ground that are informants. But until the inspectors

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 13>go in and actually have a look, we won't really

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 13>know for sure. So I think intelligence speak, you can

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 13>say it's credible, but you wouldn't say it's high confidence.

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 13>And the second thing I'd say is that we still

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 13>have to find out what happened to the plutonium, this

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 13>highly enriched sixty percent plutonium, because even if you destroyed

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 13>those facilities, the second part of it is what has

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 13>happened to that four hundred kilograms of plutonium?

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 2>And when some officials have been asked about this, and

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I know Rubio and others have made the point, I

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>think the ambassador as well. My Kakibir has made the

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 2>point that the conversion facilities were destroyed, So even if

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 2>that survived, and we don't know if it has, but

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the conversion facilities have been destroyed, so there's nothing that

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 2>could be done with it. Is that accurate?

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 13>Well, I mean technically it's accurate, but we need to

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 13>confirm the conversion facilities were destroyed. But the second element

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 13>is are there external players who may assist the Iranians

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 13>in making use of this plutonium? So the point story

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 13>remains that we can't really feel fully secure that Iran

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 13>won't you foreseeable future, have access to a nuclear device,

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 13>even a crude one, until we know where that plutonium is.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that defense intelligence report from CNN and the

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Washington Post that went global yesterday was actually a low

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 2>level assessment from one particular in an agency that was inconclusive,

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and it looks like it was misquoted in the report.

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>The journalist who published it is young, but has been

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 2>behind a lot of other anti Trump stories throughout her

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 2>career as well, So this looks like anti Trump stories

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 2>that were later proven to be wrong, I should say,

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 2>like Russia Gate. So this looks like it was a

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 2>part as an attack.

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 13>Unfortunately, in the American media environment now you have to

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 13>look at the media outlet to make a judgment, to

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 13>make a judgment about how reliable or what the motivation

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 13>might be. Unfortunately, I've spent all the time in the

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 13>United States. Unfortunately outlets like CNN President Trump is actually correct.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 13>Outlets like seen in New York Times, perhaps even a

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 13>Washington Post, once very credible August outlets, are now very politicized.

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 13>So when I see a supposed leak that early coming

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 13>just to these outlets, I was immediately quite suspicious.

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then you look at the journalist to her history,

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 2>and it makes human more suspicious. I mean, we need

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to know the truth. The world needs to know the

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 2>truth whether those sites were completely obliterated or how much

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 2>damage was done. So hopefully we will get that in

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the passage of time.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 13>And look, the reason why all these matters is because

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 13>the Uranians have been smashed, but their capacity has been smashed.

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 13>The intent hasn't changed. They still want a nuclear weapon,

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 13>they still want to threaten Israel, they still want to

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 13>threaten the Arab neighbors, and they still want a hegemony

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 13>over the Middle East, so until we can be absolutely

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 13>clear they cannot get a nuclear weapon. I personally don't

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 13>think President Trump should relax sanctions against Uranians or he

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 13>should use that as something to force the Uranians to

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 13>allow inspectors to clarify what has actually happened.

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that access to the IAEA. Do you agree that

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 2>this has been a very triumphant period for the president?

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean the successful strikes on Iran, this agreement at

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 2>NATO today historic, the five percent on both of those matters.

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>No other president was able to achieve this despite their

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 2>stated desire.

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.919
<v Speaker 13>Look, that's correct. I know a lot of people say

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 13>that the NATO General Secretary scene rather fawning or President Trump,

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 13>but he was actually correct. President Trump has achieved what

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 13>other presidents said they wanted to do, that is to

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 13>raise NATO defense spending in Europe, but failed to do so.

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 13>On the Iran issue, Trump took risk, There is no

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 13>doubt about that.

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 14>Look.

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 13>I would actually like to give far more credit to

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 13>the Israelis than Trump likes to do. They cleared the

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 13>way for Trump to do that. But nevertheless, there are

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 13>many presidents who I don't think would have done what

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 13>Trump did in terms of taking out the facilities or

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 13>using those bombs. When you take risk, it's high risk,

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 13>it's high reward.

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Just very quickly, we're out of time, but you do

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 2>spend a lot of time in Washington. You're at the

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Hudson Institute, which is US based. Is the alban Ezy

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 2>government increasingly irrelevant?

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 13>It hasn't been raised. And the anytime, YEO, when the

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.720
<v Speaker 13>easy government is raised is in a defense spending issue,

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 13>which you've spoken about previously in your programs. The point

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 13>is Australia is not raised as a can do nation

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 13>right now. Australia is raised as a laggard. And the

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 13>question I generally get to the extent that Albanezi government

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 13>and Australias raises, what is actually going on in your country?

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Indeed, what is going on in our country? Can

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 2>someone answer that? John Lee, thank you very much for

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 2>your time. Thank you now still to come around, Supreme Leader.

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Just as we've been on air, he's broken his silence

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 2>after a week in hiding. Will tell you what he said.

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Plus Donald Trump's new nickname and the Welcome to Country debate.

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>James Willis would join me on the desk to discuss

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 2>all of that and more after this quick break. All right,

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 2>plenty more news today, so let's get straight into it

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 2>with the Daily Telegraphs James Willis, James, great to see

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 2>you again.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Hello.

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, this is a big story. This Melbourne street sweeper

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 2>has won his unfair dismissal case after a notoriously left

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 2>wing council fired him when he objected to saying the

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 2>welcome to country before a weekly toolbox meeting. Now, James,

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 2>this is going to raise interesting dilemmas for politically correct organizations.

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, can they order someone to say the welcome

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>to country according to this ruling?

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 9>No?

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, And the first thing on the unfair dismissal decision,

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Sorry shery, early knock one.

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 2>As they said in Regularlygue.

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:44.439
<v Speaker 5>There's a story that's come out in the last half

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 5>an hour that the council claimed that this worker had

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 5>done his online training modules, including the racism one, but

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 5>it turns out his boss had done them for them.

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 5>He was playing golf at the time, and the council

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 5>tried to argue in this case that he had done

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 5>the racism module and the other workplace modules, they were

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 5>completed by his boss, who was sick of getting the

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 5>illerse case. No, the same case. This is the same case,

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 5>so exactly yes, and he was basically the council tried

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 5>to argue that he knew about the racism training and

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 5>everything else, complete fabrication. It is one of the worst

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 5>unfair dismissial cases we've seen. But it's another example of

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:23.879
<v Speaker 5>what we've seen with Welcome to Country, which is when

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 5>it's done well, when it's done at the appropriate occasion,

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 5>it can be a fantastic part of an event, and

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 5>I think sporting events would be one key example of that.

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 5>But when you've got workplaces that have ten workers in

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:38.760
<v Speaker 5>the room, I hear stories all the time about zoom

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 5>meetings where someone does an acknowledgment of country before they start.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 5>People are so frozen about what to do now that

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 5>they just feel like they should do it anyway. And ultimately,

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 5>we're not improving the lives of Indigenous people. We're not

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 5>closing the gap. People think it's a box ticking exercise,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 5>and there are people starting to get fed up with it,

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 5>which is what this worker did. He stood up for himself.

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.240
<v Speaker 5>He got sacked about what he knew about workplace training,

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 5>and there's now grounds for him to be returned to

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 5>his job, and that's what he wants. Remarkably, he wants

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 5>to go back to.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 2>The council exactly. But I think it should be a

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 2>reflection on councils more generally. They're getting into all this ideology,

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 2>even foreign policy councils. Just take away the rubbish, clean

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 2>the streets, do your job and stop with all the ideology.

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 2>It's just not their job.

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 5>Why do they have to be passing votes on the

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Middle East and standing out for Gaza and all that

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 5>sort of stuff them in for God's sakes, while raising

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 5>rates at the same time.

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.720
<v Speaker 2>It's just insulting not paying them for that. Now, James,

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you've written a concerning piece about the ad of control

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 2>black market and you've done an interview with a global

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 2>tobacco executive who said that Australia is alongside the South

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Africa and Malaysia as having the highest illicit market in

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the world.

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Is this a direct result of the Albanese government's

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 2>tax policy?

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, it is firstly, but it's the result of the

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 5>tax policy that goes back probably fifteen years in this country,

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 5>where the exercise is been allowed to just spiral, reaching

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 5>a high of sixteen billion dollars for tax pays in

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 5>twenty nineteen twenty twenty now literally less than half of that.

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Look, it was a.

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Tricky interview to do because people go, why would you

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 5>interview someone from big tobacco. We know that product unequivocally

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.360
<v Speaker 5>does kill people. But when you have a black market

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 5>that is estimated to be more than half of the

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 5>Australian cigarettes and vapes that are sold across this country, well,

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 5>it's better in my view to be talking to the

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 5>devil that you know, rather than the illicit market, which

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 5>is the criminal gangs. And so basically we're in a

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 5>situation now where yes, the exercise is too high, it's tanked,

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 5>it's not earning the money it should for tax pays.

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 5>But also it's the local enforcement and by the day,

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 5>there is a growing argument here Sharry for the police

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 5>to be getting involved in this. I'm not saying load

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:51.399
<v Speaker 5>the police up, but it's that day to day compliance.

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 5>In the same way we saw with tattoo parlors, we

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 5>see with firearms. There's certain things that police can check

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 5>licenses and there's an argument to say that should happen

0:41:59.680 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 5>here as well.

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 2>And we know that the new Southernwised Premier Chris Mins

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 2>has been very vocal on this, calling for the federal

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 2>government to make changes as well, which they're refusing to do. Now,

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 2>just finally, I want to come back to the topic

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 2>of the week. It's been. You know, Donald Trump has

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 2>dominated the news agenda every day this week. There was

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 2>first the strikes in Iran, then he was swearing at

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Israel and Iran. Now at NATO. It's not so much

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the five percent of GDP, although I've covered that heavily tonight,

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 2>but the fact that the NATO Secretary General described him

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 2>as daddy. That's had the whole world talking. I mean,

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump is in the prime of his presidency at

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the moment, it's before the midterms. He seems to be

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 2>taking it all in his stride. He's doing quite well.

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think some people need to pull their heads

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 5>in with their criticism of Donald Trump. It's blind hatred

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 5>and it's driven by things that he said previously, things

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 5>that he's done, and if they're going to continue like

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 5>that for the next three years, going to look very

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 5>very silly. Look, that comment in isolation is a bit unfortunate,

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 5>but you would have seen the whole clip the daddy King,

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 5>but you know correct, and Donald Trump had said two

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 5>kids that were fighting, and then he said it as

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 5>a result. But all the left wing meetia is focusing

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 5>on the daddy Trump as kind of him being the

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 5>sort of.

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Boss, which is ridiculous. Look, what he has.

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 5>Achieved in a short space of time is incredible, and

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 5>I think these live updates are so unique, the way

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 5>that he's sort of discussing what's happening with military and

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 5>with his action on these things. But look, I think

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 5>it's very, very silly to mock him and to say

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.399
<v Speaker 5>that he's not up to this job. What he can

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 5>achieve in this space would be completely beyond what Joe

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Biden was capable of doing.

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 2>A lot of these leaders.

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 5>They need someone tough to stand up to them, to

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 5>stand up and say I'm the boss, and he's done

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 5>that in spade so far.

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's true. I mean, the diplomacy style is highly unorthodox,

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 2>and it's sometimes uncomfortable to watch when you know, when

0:43:56.760 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 2>he criticized Israel just after joining them in this formidable partnership,

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and then the next day he goes back and says

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 2>he's proud of them. The swearing the live commentary on truth,

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 2>social calling reporters scum that kind of language, even if

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 2>they are, you know, objectionable or publishing things out of context.

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, it is so difficult for the president of

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the free world. But as you say, what he's actually

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 2>achieved here, the five percent commitment from NATO countries. You

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 2>know Obama would have loved to achieve that, Joe Biden

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.399
<v Speaker 2>would have loved to achieve that. None of them could

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 2>get that serious defense commitment. And when you look at

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 2>the world at the moment and the precarious situation wherein

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 2>how emboldened the so called access of evil is. You know,

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 2>we need that sort of commitment to defense. We're not

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 2>getting it from our government.

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 5>And I'm loving by the way the press conferences midair

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 5>on Air Force One. I think they are hilarious when

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 5>he's sort of talking through the shutter and taking a

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 5>few questions and then going away. But look, he is

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 5>the complete opposite of every president, every politician we've most

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 5>probably ever seen.

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 2>It's refreshing.

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 5>And the problem is this hatred of him blurs people's opinions.

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 5>But what he will be able to do in this

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 5>space in terms of national security and world safety will

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 5>be significant, I think in the next three years and.

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Already has all right, James Will, it's great to see you,

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:21.720
<v Speaker 2>good to see you. All right, coming up around, Supreme

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Leader breaks his silence. That's after the break. Welcome back,

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and let's bring in now international human rights lawyer Arson

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Ostrovsky Arson. The Supreme Leader Ali Kamani has not been

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 2>heard from for nearly two weeks, and then just in

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the past hour he's uploaded a series of social media posts.

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 2>What's he saying?

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 14>Well, thank you chef for having me on. Look, it's

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:55.839
<v Speaker 14>been two weeks since we heard from Iatola has been

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 14>missing an action much like the Iran's nuclear weapon sites.

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.799
<v Speaker 14>And he took him two weeks. Say something now, and

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 14>he proceeded with a tire rate about how how the

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 14>Iranian regime delta crushing defeat to the zionistentity and that

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 14>it was a glorious victory. That, of course, is utterly delusional.

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 14>It perhaps symbolic of someone who may himself have had

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 14>a concussion during the during the blows in the last

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 14>two weeks. The reality is that Iran under his leadership

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 14>suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of Israel. And

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 14>with the support crucial support of the United States, the

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 14>nuclear sites were obliterated. As the White House themselves said

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 14>just the other day, Israel had total control of the

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:47.280
<v Speaker 14>Iranian airspace. The Runian military chiefs of staff leadership were

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 14>taken out at will, one by one, and even the

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 14>Iranian terror proxy's masses bullers, I mean, you had the hooties.

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 14>They all failed to come to the Ruanian regime's rescue,

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 14>which was really quite and embarrassing for the Iola. At

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:03.760
<v Speaker 14>the end of the day, this was no crushing defeat

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 14>at all for Israel. On the contrary, this was a

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 14>devastating victory for Israel, for the free world, for the Nates.

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 14>That really just exposed that Iran as the paper tiger

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 14>that it really is.

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, and of course he's always going to present this

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 2>to the Iranians, and many of them don't have independent media.

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 2>And now President Trump stepped in to defend his lady

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Benjamin Nettanna, who in a glowing social media

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 2>post this morning, and he described Nadiya, who is a

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>warrior like perhaps no other warrior in the history of

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Israel arsen why did he need to do this?

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 14>Look, that's a good question. The President and Promise and Sienna,

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 14>who enjoy a very close relationship and they have for

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 14>many years, that's no secret. And the President has been

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 14>very happy with Israel's conduct and the Prime Minister's conduct

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 14>throughout this campaign, and we saw that obviously with America's

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 14>entry with the B two bombers as well. And I

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 14>think despite some colorful language perhaps one way to express

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 14>it by the President a few days ago, he's really

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 14>been consistent his support for his role for the Prime minister.

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 14>And again just yesterday at the NATO meeting in Europe.

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.280
<v Speaker 14>Why he said what he said here, that's a good question.

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 14>The President is not short of a legal drumons perhaps

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 14>is looking at do a favor for as a friend,

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 14>but I don't know if it'll make any your knows

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 14>already support the Prime minis right.

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Got to go Aarsen. Great to see you as always,

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. Now I'm off next week on holidays.

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's hope World War three does an unfold and I

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't joke about that, but I'll see you the week after.

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Just off next week, back the week after. Here's Paul

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Murray