WEBVTT - Plundering the ASX: Is private equity a problem?

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm James Kirkby. Welcome aboard everybody.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>As a private investor in shares, you're probably already realized

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're at the back of the queue when things

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>go wrong, and I think we almost expect to be

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>dotted out of the best deals.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 2>In some ways. It's often been like that.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It's infuriating as well to watch really good stocks being

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>cherry picked, you know, by overseas takeover merchants as time

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>goes by. But something on a whole other level has

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been happening on the share market this year. It's what

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I would call the plundering of the ASX by private

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>equity groups and it's come to a head with this week.

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>There was a.

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Stock folks called health Scope, which was an extraordinary story,

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a small company that literally became a five million dollar

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>company and then it was taken over by private equity

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and this week it went into receivership. But thirty seven

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>hospitals might I add attached to that. Joining me on

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the show today is Eric Johnson. He's Associate editor Business

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on The Australian. He's been on the show before and

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he's been following this from the very beginning.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 3>Hawai, Eric, gooday, James, thanks for having me on.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Good to have you on.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We might briefly explain the importance of this story to

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>all our listeners because it's the backdrop here is about

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the share market we know in which we expect to

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>invest getting hollowed out right, and we mentioned a few

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>things there. Takeovers is one and great company has been

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>taken over. But could you explain to everyone just briefly

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>about health Scope, what's happened, where are we at there?

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 3>So the name Healthscope is probably not that widely known,

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>but people would know the local hospitals like a Knox

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 3>private hospital. There's a Sydney clinic and people would know that.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's a pretty important part of the health sector

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 3>in terms of it's the second largest private hospital operator

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 3>and it also operates the Northern Beaches Hospital that's relatively

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 3>new one up in Sydney as well. And it's a

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 3>really important part because it's a lot of the well

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>the elective surgery, so non critical stuff but still really important.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>So James, you'll get your hip operation done there or

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 3>your knee operation done there and other things that non

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 3>life you know, threatening but still pretty important for your

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 3>lifestyle now that it was listed on the AX. Previously

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 3>listed back in twenty nineteen, it was subject of a

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty aggressive takeover battle. Initially, Australian Super was part of

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 3>a consortium looking to buy it out. So Ossie Super

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 3>wanted to buy it and park it just seeing the

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>long term potential of this operator. However, they were edged

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 3>out by a Canadian company and we've heard of this

0:02:55.880 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 3>company before, called Brookfield, a huge asset manager in terms

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 3>of funds under management. Yes, so yes under management. Brookfield

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 3>were the ones making the chase for Origin Energy about

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 3>two or three years ago ago to and that was

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 3>ultimately unsuccessful. Ironically, it was Ozzie Super that blocked that

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 3>deal from going out here.

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 2>They blocked them. Yeah, so they often work in tandem.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 2>But so this company, like.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Health Scope, it was a big six billion dollar company.

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It owned hospitals and obviously these guys bolted because they

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>thought they could make more money out of it. Listeners

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 1>would know, like listed on the stock market still something

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like Ramsey Health, nothing like the company it was a

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, but still a big company, multi billion

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar company making you know, half a billion dollar profits.

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Those profits are arising, it can be done. So you

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>were onto this fairly early, and I remember reading, I

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe ten days ago you did a piece

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and you called the Brookfield people barbarians, and then you

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>said there was two sort of scenarios that were possible,

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you know one was receivership, and you said

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the most likely, and I remember thinking.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a bit strong, But it's come to passer.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>First of all, when you say barbarians, would you explain

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for people who aren't familiar, what is the's the game

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of these people in Brookfield?

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>What do they do?

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Why do they buy the companies in the first place.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>If it's ended up in receivership, something's gone terribly wrong.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.119
<v Speaker 1>What was their plan and what went wrong?

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 3>To be fair to the barbarians, they didn't plan for

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 3>it to blow up to the extent it did. But

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>remember these are meant to be the smartest people in

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 3>the room, and they enjoy telling everybody that they are.

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>They badly misread what was happening, but also they undermined

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 3>their own business models. So they came in twenty nineteen,

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>overpaid for it, borrowed heavily, so leveraged up the business

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 3>borrowed heavily. Initially, they broke their business, the operating business

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>up from all the hospitals they're actually operated, So they

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 3>sold off the physical hospitals, so the building. So what

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 3>was left was a fairly asset like business with a

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of debt. So that sale or the hospital was

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 3>partly used to fund the acquisition, so some of that

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 3>distribution went well, that went back to shareholders that previously

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 3>owned it. However, as you know, it's always good to

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>have a strong balance sheet for unexpected and in health care.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.239
<v Speaker 3>Health care is a really complicated industry, and any happened

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 3>what happened a couple of months later, COVID hit and

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 3>all the private hospital sector shut down. Elective surgery effectively

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 3>stopped that starved off the funding the revenue stream, so

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 3>that was a crisis. Yet these hospitals still had to

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>pay rent for their overheads and so on.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Because these guys had leveraged it up right before the

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of calamity of COVID, they had no balance sheet

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>strength when things went wrong.

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, look and just to sort of finish that thought

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 3>as well, so they're also paying off debt, but then

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 3>coming out of COVID was another crist It says, we

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>all know for the health sectors, so staff shortages, wage inflation,

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and then also input costs, so spiraling costs for that. Sorry,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, there were people falling out of the system,

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>so you know, people paying more for wages. So there

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 3>was just huge pressure on their cost side. Yet the

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 3>revenue about getting from like if surgeries just wasn't covering

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>this new sort of real world.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>So everything went wrong and it's now in receivership. And

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I suppose to the people on the street are people

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.559
<v Speaker 1>who use the hospitals. It's pretty scary. So there's thirty

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>seven hospitals and anyone listening to the show will know

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>one of them for sure. When I looked at the

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>listener and I had been in two of them, and

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they're major hospitals in the cities. But the question it begs,

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, is to one extent, the wider market is

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to this sort of thing. You mentioned how Brookfields

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>when they came in, they geared up. They leveraged up

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet pretty fast. In some ways they used

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the asset they bought to finance the purchase that they did,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and that rings a bell for me, that reminds me

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of the buccaneers of yesterday, Alan Bond, Christophersquise, etc. It's

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>not exactly the same, but there's parallels, is there.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 3>And we spoke about it at the top about the barbarians.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>So that's not my term. It's not our term. It's

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>made famous by a book. A couple of former Wall

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Street Journal reporters wrote the book about Barbarians of the Gate.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>That was the US company KKR acquiring it's been to

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>acquire US food company conglomerate at a time called an

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Abisco and tracking that coming in, stripping the assets, selling

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 3>it off and leaving a very capital light business.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So this was the benchmark if you like this, when

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone's realized what the game was.

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 2>And KKR they're still around.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they have funds listed on our share market,

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and that might be listeners on the show that even

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have investments in them. So it's a two sided thing.

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to go to that just now.

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I just want to capture a few other things about this.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So for most people when they look at the share market,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>most of the intention and most of the action is

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in a small number of companies. The top fifty and

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we've seen is how private acuity

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>will come in. I think in our country or in

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>our market, the benchmark, the NJO and the.

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 2>BISCO of our area was Meyer.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Once upon a time, I think it was TPG if

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got that right, who came in and did an

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>amazing deal for themselves, and there was all sorts of

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>controversy later as to what they did and how they

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>did it. More recently, had Sydney Airport a beautiful stock,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a fabulous asset that investors loved, long term infrastructure play

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>again that was shipped off the market and that was

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>big super funds playing with private equity again, correct me

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong on this.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 2>And then this most recent one, this.

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Health scope, which is when everything went wrong, is private

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>equity getting it wrong themselves, But it seems to be

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a process that's accelerating now. Is the ASEX particularly vulnerable

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to this? And as ordinary shareholders, how do we deal

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>with this fact that these marauding you know, global companies

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just cherry pick like this.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was just thinking, well, look there's phrase my

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 3>old economics teachers to drum into me. He said that

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 3>in order for someone to buy something. Someone has to

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>sell something. So if somebody is paying over the odds

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>for an asset, well you know that's they've got to

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 3>wear the risk. But it does come back to some

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 3>of the issues. I mean, can you know this is

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 3>a broader question. Can someone come in by a hospital

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 3>and sell off all the furniture and cut all the

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 3>stuff and then there's a lot of consequences around that too,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 3>because that ultimately puts pressure back onto the public system.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 3>And we don't have time to talk about all that

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 3>what's going on in there. But your earlier point about

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 3>these quality companies, I was just checking out a list,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 3>so you're right. Sydney Airport Minerals. These are companies that

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 3>have left the AX in the last few years. City Airport,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Odds Minerals. There were Spark Infrastructure, so that was a

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 3>pretty boring company that no one had ever heard about.

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Boring but nice, nice sort of yield stock. We've seen

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a whole bunch of holding out of industrials and through

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 3>other companies. This is not all private equity acquisitions. Borrel

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 3>CSR James Hardy. There's a drama about it.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Relocated builders, isn't it, Eric, That's the entire building materials sector.

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and of what was the a SX, which were.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 1>All Greek companies and popular with private investors up to

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the time they were taken US.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 3>So look, you know that happens, and as long as

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 3>there's stock markets, there's always acquisitions. Nothing wrong with acquisitions.

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 3>But what's the structural sort of issue that's been happening

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 3>is that Australia or the ASEX hasn't been able to

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 3>replenish the companies that are leaving the AX and that's

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 3>starting to become an issue. And that's why you're started

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 3>to see companies like CBA, you know, you know trading

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>at your that are wise sky high because it's just

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 3>not the man is just not the avenues to pack

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>your money.

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting, Yes, that is an interesting explanation of what's

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>going on. Look, take a short break because I want

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>to come back, and what I want to do is

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>try and guide our listeners to how to deal with

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this and particularly what's going to happen next in terms

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of private equity and takeover merchants on the ASEX and

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>how you play this. Hello, welcome back to The Australian's

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby talking to Eric Johnson,

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>my colleague on The Australian.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 2>He's been on the show before.

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>He's been covering this really interesting area of large Australian,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>famous Australian shares basically disappearing.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Off the market for one reason or another.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And this share markt is actually shrinking, that is, the

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>asex is shrinking. Now, if you are an investor to

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>some extent your interest here, as Eric said, do you

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>take the money and run? Why wouldn't you if someone

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>offers you, you know, forty percent more than they did

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the day before for a stock and why wouldn't you

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>take that cash? Each deal in and of itself is

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>logical at the time. I just wonder, Eric, particularly about

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>health Scope. You wonder, without getting into social or cultural conversation,

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>just strictly as an investment question, whether the troubles you know,

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in age care stocks which have been severe, health care

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>stocks which are exceptionally severe now with the receivership of

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a company that was once worth six billion dollars, You wonder,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>as an investor, is this area just too much trouble

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>as long term investment.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>It's a really difficult one because one of the big

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 3>themes that you speak to the likes of, you know,

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the global asset managers, you know, your black Rocks, your

0:12:55.480 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 3>black styles, saving macquaries and so on. The big several themes.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 3>They talk about digitization, they talk about technology and AI.

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Health and aging always comes up as a big theme

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>as an area to invest in. Yet the names that

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 3>you've sort of pointed out, and the sectors you pointed out,

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>they're really difficult. They're really difficult. They like it as

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a theme because we're all getting older.

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's top down, a top down thematic sounds good

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>right bottom.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Up, it sounds really good. But we are getting older

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 3>and we're demanding more services. However, we're not seeing private

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>organizations aren't seeing that. It's again, I think it's a

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>complicated because we're also confusing heavily regulated sector with you know,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 3>we're coming against regulation right rightly. So there should be regulation,

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 3>there should be minimum staffing in age care, there should

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 3>be certain standards and so on. That's a given. However,

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 3>where those themes are coming in, they're not sort of

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 3>compatible with that heavy re agent. So that's where it's going.

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 3>I think health scope and this is all private hospitals too,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 3>facing another challenge in that when even back in twenty

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 3>nineteen or twenty seventeen, or you know last decade, when

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 3>you went in for your knee repair, James, so you

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 3>could play football on the weekend, you were in usually

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 3>for about four or five days. You're in, you stayed

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 3>in and your health insurer, because you have the Gold coverage,

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 3>was paying it all. However, today you go in the

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 3>morning and you're out by three pm in the afternoon.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 3>You're playing footy on the weekend too, And that's the

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>advance of changes in technology.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, productivity inside healthcare has had the surprise I'll come

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's just explaining for my that's a problem financially.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Well because then me as health Scope, I own this heavy,

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>huge hospital that is no longer in full demand all

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 3>the time. So there's another area like also, surgeons are

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 3>not tied to specific hospitals. As you know, you went

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 3>to your surgeon to get your knee fixed, he referred

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 3>you to this day to a day care clinic down

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 3>the road, so that you're not even going to the

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 3>health hospital. So they're sitting there with empty rooms and

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 3>empty beds, still paying their debt and their bills.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>That also happened, So that came on the back of

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>post COVID almost or at least the same time.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>So you have those two things working against them.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I suppos a big question then, Eric is from again

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>from an investment perspective, Maybe an investor can simply choose

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to play the other side. You mentioned KK or you

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>can now invest in they all have, all the big

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>players have ASX listed funds. And in recent times by

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that I mean the last two years, there's been a

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>really big push by private equity funds to the average

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>retail investor, to mom and dad, and to say, look,

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>your super fund has always been in here, They've done

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>really wear private equity come and join us, and you

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>can just simply buy, you know whatever, a thousand dollars

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>both of private equity fund number one, two or three.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>They're very common. They health scope crisis facing brook Field

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is that What does that tell us about private equity

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>funds and the risks that they might put in front

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of the average investor that aren't so obvious.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Look for the average investor, the punter, the retail investor.

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 3>As you always to your listeners, you have a broad mix,

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 3>you have your low risk, you have your mid risk

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 3>and maybe just a fraction too of higher risk, and

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 3>private equity as an asset class is expensive. It's high cost,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 3>but it promises higher return.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, high risk hy return or at least they're

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>elevated risk elevator return.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and for every sort of health scope, which is

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 3>a spectacular disaster, and even Maya and there's a lot

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 3>of high profile Dick Smith was another that was a

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 3>disaster for private equity. There's probably about one hundred little

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 3>no name companies that are actually that are actually that

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 3>actually works, and these aren't necessarily listed companies. And private

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 3>equity it does have a role, and we can't say

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>as a rule private equity is all bad. It does

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 3>provide funding at funding source and alternat funding source and

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 3>potentially a pathway for a more established and sophisticated sort

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 3>of investment case. Where it does go bad is when

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 3>they come in they sell off all the furniture and

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 3>leave a very light, heavily leveraged business. And look, that's

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 3>really short term. That's a really short term model. And

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>if you keep doing that, you're going to run out

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 3>of run away pretty quickly.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 2>Which seems to be exactly what happened at the school.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Tell me the big super funds, what are they good

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>guys or bad guys here depending on.

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 2>The day I'd see of the day.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Really so like some of that list that we spoke about,

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>so Spark and Sydney Airport, I mean that they were

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 3>super fun led acquisition, so they're buyouts. Their investment horizon

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 3>is different, so generally it looks to like three to

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 3>five year turnaround case. Another one with Virgin Australia at

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the airline was on the cusp of listings that was

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 3>brought from administration where no one wanted to touch it by

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 3>private equity and it's held onto it for now. What

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 3>is it about five years? Bang on at times times

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 3>spot on. I don't think that the great guys they've

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 3>made it. They've made an absolute windfall on the back

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 3>of this, but they took the risk. They took the

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 3>risk when no one wanted to.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 2>That was an example where it brooks really nicely.

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean we get to retain a second major airline

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>domestically and investors took the risk, as you see, and anyone.

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Who was in on that did very well well.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>This is to some extent dependent on the flat what

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>would happen soon enough, you would expect if they got

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>their docks in a role there, haven't they?

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? And look, you know, is to the original question

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 3>about is superis of the bad guys? So their investment

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 3>horizon that they buy and hold for the long term

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 3>ten ten to twenty years. So if Ozzie Super came in,

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 3>they did team up with a private equity fund and

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 3>in doing that there aim was to be patient capital.

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 3>We're going to buy this thing and hold on to it.

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 3>So they probably wouldn't have flogged the assets to the

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 3>extent it did.

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>They probably mentioned in your piece that they did intervene

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>one time and save what's it origin from?

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, and that that's a really interesting sceory. And

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 3>that was a case of where investors, Australia investors, some

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 3>Australia investors. I was in Super and there was a

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 3>couple others behind it stood up and said no. Because

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 3>often when private equity comes in and offers that forty

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 3>percent premium for something, it's not doing it in our

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 3>the goodness of its heart and often jumps on companies

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 3>when they're trading at cyclical lows or you know they've

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 3>had they've made some bad calls or something. So so

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 3>there's shares a way off, so footy percent premium looks

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 3>pretty healthy to to where it is today, but it

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 3>looks pretty ordinary to where it was five years ago.

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 3>So so in that case, Brookfield did come up its

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 3>plan for Origin, big energy company. The plan was to

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 3>buy it and carve it up and flip it into

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 3>several funds. Ironically, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Corney was was

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the face, the friendly face of one of these funds,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and he was he was leading the acquisition. So that

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Bank of England, Bank of England, that's right, I see. However,

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Australian Super stood up and said, look what you're offering

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 3>is I was it was around about nine dollars mark

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 3>what you're offering for Origin. We think over the long

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 3>term Origin is worth a lot more. It has these

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 3>key key quality assets, key quality attributes about it. I was.

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 3>He Super had it it was able to to sort

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>of and asked what's called a blocking the stake just

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 3>under it, and had a couple other friends. It was determined,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>we're not interested in negotiating. We think this business is

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 3>great for we're buying and holding, so see you later.

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 3>And Brookfield tried everything and tried every trick in the book,

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 3>but ultimately had to take its bat and ball and

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 3>go home. It could not buy it.

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, Interesting, So they can the big super funds can

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>exercise enormous power obviously in these situations and the episodes

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>where they were very useful to the local market.

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>And the postcript to that is that Ossie Super was

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 3>right that the shares ultimately increased over the offer price

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 3>over time. It didn't happen straight away, but it gradually

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 3>stopped having that direction.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the ultimate test, isn't it really? Very interesting? Very interesting? Okay,

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So Origin is an example. Really, Origin Energy is an example.

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Folks for private equity might have done awfully well and

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in some extent plunder the AESX. Again, in that case,

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Australia Super came in and saved the day. We now

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>know because of the movement and price since that time.

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So interesting, two says to every story. All right, we'd

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:07.479
<v Speaker 1>be back in a moment. We have some really good

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>questions from David and Neil and Trevor. Hello, welcome back

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to The Australian's Money Puzzled podcast. James Kirby here talking

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to Eric Johnson. We've been talking about something I think

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is really was really worth looking.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>At today, which is what's going on big picture.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>If you like on the AX, where we depend so

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>much on a couple of dozen companies and they are vulnerable.

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>It's the very open market, and that's all fine, but

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we as individual shareholders, we do lose. Right, So

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Sydney Airport whipped away from under our eyes, and everyone

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I think regrets that health scope of five billion dollar

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>company was also whipped away from under our eyes, and

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we might have been better off because it turns out

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that it's in receivership, so we're are that five billion

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars go?

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, individual shareholders didn't lose it. At least that's useful.

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, David asks, I was interested in your recent episode

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on gold. Your guest quoted some interesting figures for returns.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Who didn't mention the digital gold bitcoin. I've owned both

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for years, and bitcoin outperforms gold. And then David says,

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I asked chat GPT to perform an analysis. I don't

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>know if I completely agree with that term, and it

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 1>said bitcoin has delivered significantly higher returns over the past

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>decade compared to gold. That is, but gold has been

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>more stable surely this would have been worth a mention,

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>says David, given the assertion that gold is the hot

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>investment product. It's just plain wrong. Okay, David, never advice

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>information only. They're both pretty good, first of all. And

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>if bitcoin at a certain point in time has delivered

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>more on a ten year basis than gold, I don't

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>deny that for a moment, So put that on the table.

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just a question of your choice. Really, I think

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the more interesting part of the question is using AI

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to get some steer. Look, I don't think there's anything

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>wrong with it. I just I would just say to

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>David and all the debts out there, it's it's uninterpreted information.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>It's information. It's uninterpreted. That's why we have short like this,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'd be careful how far you go with AI.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Aren't testing your investment hypothesis in real life?

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 3>What do you think, Eric, Yeah, I look one hundred

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 3>percent on that, and it's a it's about garbage in

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 3>and garbage out in terms of the algorithm, and sometimes

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 3>it's quality of stuff. But you just don't know what

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 3>what ingredients been put in there, So so use it

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 3>for for something, don't rely on it. Becoin. It's really interesting.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 3>It's a it's a trying to find a correlation to bigcoin,

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 3>and that's been the big struggle. So, so is it

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 3>a global economic trend?

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Just you might just explain what you mean by that.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 3>So, so how does it move? So does it? So?

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Why does it move? I think that So does it

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 3>move when the economy is booming, doesn't move when the

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 3>economy is slow. So we think about gold. So whenever

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 3>there's inflation explosion, gold goes up. Everyone rushes. Gold is

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 3>a hedge against inflation. And we've also seen that recently

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 3>with gold with uncertainty about the US US bonds and

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 3>the US treasuries as a store of As a store

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 3>of value, bitcoin struggles a bit. There is a thread

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 3>that when there's an excess of money in the financial

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 3>system that actually booms. So you know, I've got to

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 3>spare whatever I can't invest that and that then that

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 3>supports it. But again it comes back to demand now

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>and we're increasingly saying obviously when Trump came in, we

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 3>saw a big jump in bitcoin because Trumps saying we're

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 3>gonna We're going.

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>To Yeah, more than that, he's very keen, he's very

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>keen altogether.

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Is he launching his own coins?

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Correct, So so that that's the type of thing,

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 3>so you know, whatever it is comes to Also, like gold,

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin doesn't pay yield and it depends what you It

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't pay an income, so it's like buying them debartwork

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 3>and hanging on the wall.

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that gold as what has the history

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that we know has repeatedly proven itself to be a

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>useful non correlated asset in that when the market's going down,

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>gold should go up. But bitcoin it's unclear whether it's

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>unclear still.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the trend, like the history isn't there, and the

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 3>liquidity isn't there, and it will become and it will

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 3>become a lot clearer over time. And I think it

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 3>is it's a legitimate asset class today because of the

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 3>sheep value of it.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting and it's suggesting you say that. Okay, very interesting.

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope that was useful to you, David from Neil,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 1>which is my question could be a podcast topic. What

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is productivity? How is it measured? What does the productivity

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Commission do? And why does it matter to invest us?

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question. Neil always comes up doesn't it,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think does economic explanation, which is it's not

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>rocket science, yes, would be boy efficiency.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 2>But for investors, why does it matter? I think that's

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the interesting one. Eric.

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>How would it reveal it if a company was productive?

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>How would it reveal itself as a listed stock? Would

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there be some numbers that would be obvious?

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it just profit? Is it simply more profitable or

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 2>what we were to play in?

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So when you know what the top of that

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>question about what does it look like and what does

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 3>it do? It reminds me of a very famous newspaper cartoonist,

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Bruce Petty based in Melbourne, and he used to draw

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>these amazing images about the economy and what the economy

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 3>looked like, all these crazy machines that no one really

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 3>knew what they look like or what they were, but

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 3>they did something. That's the economy. Productivity is much like this,

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 3>much the same, but productivity, And it was talked about

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 3>why does it matter? Because it matters. Everything matters, and

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 3>it all comes back to productivity. So how what makes

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 3>a productive company? So there's a couple of measures. Obviously

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 3>you compare like for like apples for apples. So we're

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 3>very lucky in Australia that we have the big four banks,

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 3>we could relatively vanilla, relatively comparable. So cost to income

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 3>ratio would be one fact.

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah okay, and then the one that has the what

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>are you looking for, the one with the lowest.

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, one lower, And this measure would generally move around

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 3>if you're so you're the amount of revenue that comes

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 3>in and compared to the amount of your cost base.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 3>So for example, you know, West west Pac runs around

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 3>about sort of mid forties cost to income ratio, whereas

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Common Bank runs is sort of like a high thirties.

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's a much better ratio because the lower the better,

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a much bigger bank where big.

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Go Combank is No, but that means Combank is more efficient.

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So the LA what I said, yeah, come make is

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>more efficient even though it's bigger. So that's your That's

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>how it translates to in a stock how productivity kicks

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in as a useful measure for a listed.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Company, and so retailing and is another area. So you

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 3>tend to look at profit margin, your net margin or

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 3>your gross margin, and so that's the amount of profit

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 3>relative that you're making. And so we're looking at Maya

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 3>this week, and that's quite interesting. So it's it runs

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 3>a margin of about two percent, So so from everything

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 3>it's selling roughly, the profit it's making on that is

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.479
<v Speaker 3>about two percent. Where whereas it, as you know, recently

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 3>bought the Solomon lose A Power Brands business and the

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 3>profit margins that's making is around nine percent. So every

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 3>pair of genes it sells and just gens is making

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 3>around nine percent. So my wants to get a bit

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 3>of that margin, and a little bit of that increase

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 3>in margin will translate to a big change in headline profit.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 3>In fact, my was promising if you can lift its

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 3>margin by just one percent on that two percent, that

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 3>translated to a thirty three million dollar EBIT of earnings increase.

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So a street mathematical. If the margin's improved, the profits improve,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the share place of improve.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but here it goes and look in the big

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 3>structural thing that's coming around, you can't go. You can't

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 3>see any company briefing today without a CEO getting up

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and talking about AI and the prospect. So look, it

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 3>is coming. It is real. It's not here in a

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 3>big way yet, but it is here a way, and

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 3>companies are just flexing it and starting to figure out.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 3>And we heard the Teltra boss Vicky Brady this week

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 3>at a strategy briefing. She was quite open about it.

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 3>She said, look, by the end of the decade, the

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 3>way the Telterra looks, it will employ less people from

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 3>what it does today. And that was the basis that

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 3>AI will do a lot of work that is done

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 3>manually today. So that's one aspect that we will start

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 3>seeing an impact on the cost space.

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So neil big issue at the moment is AI on

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the basis that obviously if someone can do what they

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>used to do in six hours in two hours or

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>two minutes, depending on what the promise is for MEI

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you can see how to cut straight through to profits.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think when Neil would be really good

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 3>exercise for Neil is if he want to get ahead

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 3>of the pack on it is to have a look

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 3>at the big companies that are and how they're talking

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 3>about their use of AI and how they're applying AI

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 3>today because that may not translate to something today, but

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 3>in two or three is time, it may translate to

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 3>something pretty significant. Right.

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, those who master AI will master the universe. Okay, terrific.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>We may we've just went out of time, so I

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think we might just leave it there for today. Great

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to have you on, Eric Johnson, associated is a bus

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that's from the Australian.

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Thanks James, nice to be here.

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanks very much for coming on the show. And let's

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 2>have some more correspondents. And usually we'll call out this

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 2>week in that I have lots of emails flowing in,

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 2>but you know what, folks, some questions.

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>That aren't about the supertax would be particularly welcome because

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a flooding the inbox.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>And we will cover them. As you know, we've covered

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>them in special shows and there's more to come. I'm

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>sure on that one.

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But there are other issues too, So let's hear from

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you the money Puzzle at the Australian dot com dot au.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Talk to you soon,