WEBVTT - Credlin | 15 July

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Petero Kredlin live on Sky News Australia.

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the show. Here's what's coming

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>up on Credline. The Prime Minister has outlined the national

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 2>approach to AI. What will they mean for Australian businesses, jobs,

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 2>and the future of the industry. Labor is back in

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the lead, according to the latest Sky News Pulse. So

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>has the coalition's attack on one nation paid off or

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>is labor reaping the benefits. A new report from the

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 2>CSIROW and the Australian Energy Market Operator projects the cost

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 2>of electricity will increase after twenty thirty as coal fired

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>power stations are replaced and university chiefs grilled out the

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Royal Commission into Anti Semitism. But is it a little

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>too late when it comes to the safety of Jewish students.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 3>I can see that our Jewish students and staff paid.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Price for that as the encampment dragged on, and I

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 4>am im.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Sorry to them that it took so long.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 5>For us to get it done well.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 2>AI will change our economy more than the Internet. The

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>question isn't whether it's coming, but instead will Australia lead

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>it or regulate it until the investment goes somewhere else.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 6>We want more Australian companies and global firms developing AI

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 6>here to boost our sovereign capability, to strengthen our national

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 6>security and build our economic resilience.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 2>But today's answer appears to be exactly what governments always

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 2>reach for, another office, more bureaucracy, and the Albernezi wants

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>an office of AI in the Prime Minister's department.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 4>His reactions should be to say, how do we help

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 4>small businesses to grow, to invest, to employ more people,

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 4>to drive up incomes and wages. That should be his reaction,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 4>But his first year reaction is always to increase the

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 4>bureaucracy in Canberra.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 3>That's not the answer.

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>In data center investment last year. And Anthropic wants to

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 2>spend another twenty one billion dollars here if they can

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>get policy certainty. And one of those sticking points is

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 2>copyright laws. The Prime Minister said today that creatives must

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>have control over how their product is used.

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 6>But let me make this crystal clear. Not everything produced

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 6>in Australia is up for grabs, not at all. Australian writers, musicians,

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 6>artists and journalists must retain ownership.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 7>And control of their work.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 6>Our laws will spell that out plane as day. An

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 6>artist creative endeavor is their work and their property. No

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 6>company should use Australian books, music, art or news to

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 6>build or train AI without the artist's control, and that

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 6>includes the artist's control of the price and value of

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 6>their work. Anything less is theft.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Mister Albinizi also outlined rules around the locations of data

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>centers and the energy that they use.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 6>Will create a legal obligation for the next generation of

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 6>large scale data centers to underwrite new power supply, to

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 6>pay their full share of grid connection so no costs

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 6>are passed on to homes or businesses, and to put

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 6>at least as much energy into our grid as they

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 6>take out of it. Australia is the sunniest continent on Earth,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 6>but we're also the drift, which is why our rules

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 6>will require data centers to minimize their water use, to

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 6>maximize the energy efficiency and pay for any additional water

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 6>infrastructure that is required.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Well. AI is the biggest economic opportunity of this generation.

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Deputy Leader Jane Hume said the concern is labor

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 2>will get stuck with union demands.

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 8>But my concern is more about whether labor stifles that

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 8>innovation that comes with AI rather than allowing it to flourish.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 8>One of the things that we have heard one of

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 8>the great inconsistencies that has come from labor in this

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 8>is whether unions should have a rite of veto over

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 8>whether private sector companies can adopt AI.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>And this isn't a theatrical risk. There are already examples

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 2>of unions demanding a say in how AI is implemented

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 2>in the workplace to ensure jobs aren't lost. Now call

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 2>me a cynic, but is the latest reform just another

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 2>way for alban easy to protect union jobs. Don't underestimate

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>the extent unions are going to try to control the

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 2>implementation of AI on top of their usual pay and

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 2>working hour demands. The countries that embrace AI will create jobs,

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>build the companies. Australia should absolutely have safeguards, but safeguards

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>should give investors confidence, not give them reasons to invest

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else. If we spend the next decade regulating AI

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 2>while the rest of the world is building it, we

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 2>won't just lose this race. We'll be watching it from

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the sidelines. The backbone of Australia's economy is breaking small

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 2>businesses are closing their doors at an alarming rate. Last

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>financial year, more than fourteen thousand went under. That's nearly

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty businesses every single day. Since Labor came to office

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two, insolvencies have soared by two hundred percent,

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>with more than forty seven thousand businesses going under. The

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 2>hardest hit the construction industry. For four straight years, about

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>one quarter of all corporate insolvencies have occurred in the

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>construction sector. The accommodation and hospitality sectors are next on

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the list. Businesses are being hit with higher costs, more regulation,

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 2>and even the prospect of higher taxes. Here was one

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 2>caller today on two GB's Mike Levy program, speaking from

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>the ground.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 9>We just lost another trains will cut in Litgo.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 9>I can't cam in on why they shut shot because

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 9>I don't know any of the details. But what I

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 9>can come in on he employed some may between ten

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 9>and twenty people. That's ten to twenty jobs. People have

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 9>got to go and find another one or just jobs gone.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 9>Small business is really struggling and has been marked for

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 9>a long time.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Mate, this is the opportunity for the Coalition to seize

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 2>and back small businesses. Opposition leader Angus Taylor wrote in

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Today's Daily Telegraph. The reality is simple. It is not

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the government that creates prosperity. It's the entrepreneurs, workers, farmers,

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>manufacturers and small businesses who take risks, invest, employ Australians

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 2>and build our economy and generate the prosperity that lifts

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 2>us all. Angus Taylor has said that a government he

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 2>leads will focus on small business.

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 4>We talk today with these small business people here about

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 4>the way out, and there is a way out, and

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 4>that means acting Labour's toxic taxes and Labour's excessive red

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 4>tape that it's wrapping around every small business in this country,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 4>making it harder for them to invest, to grow, to

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 4>create jobs that take risks. And that's what we need

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 4>them to do. More of scrapping net zero and making

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 4>sure we have the affordable, abundant any we need in

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 4>this country.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Now one thing is becoming increasingly important, and that is

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>economic and real world experience. Just look at the coalition's

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>leadership team. Angus Taylor was a Rhodes Scholar in economics

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>at Oxford before a career in the private sector. Deputy

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Liberal leader Jane Hume spent years in financial services and

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 2>investment across multiple banks. National's leader Macanavan worked as an

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>economist with the Productivity Commission and KPMG. Deputy Nationals Leader

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Darren Chester ran his own small business. Now, let's compare

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>that with labor. Before entering Parliament in nineteen ninety six,

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Alberizi was a Labor machine man and staffer. He

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 2>has been on the board of South Sydney Rabbitdos and

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 2>the board of a Labor Party owned radio station. Treasurer

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Jim Chalmers well, his PhD isn't in economics, it's in

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Paul Keating. Before entering Parlamman in twenty thirteen, he worked

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 2>in the ALP National office, Wayne Swan's office and briefly

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 2>ran the Chiefly Research Center the Labor Parties Think Tank. Now,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 2>at a time when businesses are closing at a rate

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 2>of almost thirty a day, Australians have every right to

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>ask who is better equipped to understand what it takes

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>to build a business, create jobs and grow the economy.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Because right now businesses need a government that understands what

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>it's like to sign the front of a paycheck, not

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 2>just the back of one because if small business fails,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Australia fails. Well, let's head to Canbra Now. For tonight's

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 2>political headlines, we're Sky News political reporter cam Redden.

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 10>Having led the world with a social media ban, the

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 10>Prime Minister wants to do the same for artificial intelligence.

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 6>We can set a standard the chain years, the way

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 6>the world looks at an issue and deals with it.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 10>His government will develop a national regulatory framework alongside states

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 10>and territories, with a view to legislate it early next year.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 10>New rules of engagement would safeguard land for housing, with

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 10>greater community consultation, and strict energy requirements on data center

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 10>projects to.

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 6>Pay their full share of grid connection so no costs

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 6>are passed on to homes or businesses, and to put

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 6>at least as much energy into our grid as they

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 6>take out of it.

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 10>Australian creatives will be explicitly protected by banning the free

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 10>for all use of their work in the training of

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 10>AI models.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Australian writers, musicians, artists and journalists must retain ownership and.

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 7>Control of their work.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 6>Our laws will spell that out plane as day, and

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 6>that includes the artist's control of the price and value

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 6>of their work. Anything less is.

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 10>Theft News Corp Executive chair Michael Miller says the government

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 10>must now turn this framework into action to move fast

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 10>and deliver for the nation. The Prime Minister's vision would

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 10>be world leading, but as with all regulation in this area,

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 10>the hard part is to enforce it. Amidst all the

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 10>apocalyptic predictions about AI's impact on jobs, the environment and

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 10>the world, Anthony Alberaneesi is choosing to look on the

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 10>bright side now.

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 6>We should not treat AI as a threat to good jobs.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 6>We must use it as an instrument to help create.

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 10>Them, taking personal ownership. A new office of AI will

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 10>be set up in the Prime Minister's department.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 4>What he's announced is an office in an office inside

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 4>his own office. He's going to have another office.

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 10>A world leading attempt to fence in a world changing technology.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 10>Cameron Redden's Sky News Canberra.

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 2>All right more Now on the latest results from the

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 2>Sky News Pulse UGOV poll. Let's bring in chief political

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>analyst Tom Connell, who has done all the number crunching

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 2>for us. Tom welcome labor has clawed back that lead.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>What do you think this is the result of.

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 7>Well first and foremost When you look at the primary vault. Yes,

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 7>Labor is back in the lead. It's a three party

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 7>race really now, isn't it rather than a two party race?

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>But how's it done?

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 8>It?

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 7>It's one percentage point down. So what's really happened here

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 7>is the One Nation vote coming down from thirty to

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 7>twenty six now in one survey. That's a significant downward trend.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't mean this is down down down for One Nation.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 7>Last survey we did two weeks ago, they went up,

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 7>so this is not a set trend as yet, but

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 7>that's the main shift here. The One Nation party down

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 7>Coalition is well up now. Previously when we've seen One

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 7>Nation lose vote, it's mainly gone to Labor, so that

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 7>will cheer coalition hearts some. The gap between the Coalition

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 7>and One Nation was thirteen percent only last survey, and

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 7>this time at six now that is better. It's still

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 7>worth mentioning One Nation is a headed at coalition by

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 7>six percent. That's something we never thought we'd say even

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 7>a few months ago. But nonetheless there is that tightening

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 7>you can see as well, six percent there and the

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 7>Greens slightly down. We did also poll this new Community

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 7>Strong Party, which two teals have joined and they've started

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 7>on two percent, so no surprise, it's only two seats

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 7>they're in. But we'll just start that as a marker

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 7>is to see whether they go up or down that

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 7>Zalie Stegal and a Legra spender so far in that party.

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Tom What I find interesting about the results is that

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>more than half said the country has become weaker and

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>poorer since the election last year, and yet it just

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 2>amazes me that Labor still leads in the polls. That

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>they don't seem to have had any impact to the

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 2>budget or people feeling poorer. They continue to lead, I

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>know close, but they're still leading. Yeap.

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 7>Labour's primary vote here twenty eight percent.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's remember at.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 7>The last election they were thirty four point five percent.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 7>That's a big amount of vote to lose to go

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 7>from thirty four point five. So the duel story is

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 7>Labor is undeniably less popular than it was a little

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 7>bit more than a year ago. The issue has been

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 7>the mix of vote there and how that turns into

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 7>two party preferred, which right now has Labor leading fifty

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 7>three against the coalition in fifty six against one nation.

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 7>But really that's theoretical, Jamie, because it would just be

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 7>a seat by seat battle. I think we have as

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 7>well the stronger questions which will bring up for our

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 7>viewers the information on that. So this is asking people

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 7>thinking about where the country was a year ago compared

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 7>to now. Is a stronger Is Australia a stronger place

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 7>and more prosperous? So you can see they're fifteen percent.

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 7>That's a small number, isn't it? Weaker and poorer? Fifty

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 7>one percent unchanged thirty four So clearly things have deteriorated. Now,

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 7>how on earth would a government not be outrageously unpopular

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 7>from this? Well, if you look at part of the

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 7>reason why we're poorer, clearly there's a factor from.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>The Iran war there.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 7>So voters might say, oh, we're poorer, not necessarily that

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 7>the government's fault.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 2>That's what some people would be saying.

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 7>Now others would say interest rates were already on the

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 7>way up. Will blame a mix of the RBA, the government,

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 7>whatever it might be. Clearly this if this doesn't improve

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 7>and through three years people feel as though the country

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 7>is largely weaker and poorer, well enough blame is going

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 7>to go to labor. But so far, given the impact

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 7>of the Iran war. It's a significant external fact to say, well,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 7>this has happened. Many or a decent number might say

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 7>it's not Labour's fault.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 2>And Tom tell us about the Prime minister's popularity that

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 2>he has gone up in terms of support for males,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>especially off the back of that podcast, but then he's

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 2>gone down a little bit in terms of the eyes

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 2>of women.

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and it's been shifting about in terms of that

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 7>support for Anthony Albanezi. One of the things on gender

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.479
<v Speaker 7>that came up a lot as well for the coalition

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 7>was initially that the female vote was down and then

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 7>after a bit while it was just both votes. I

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 7>think we've got as well Anthony Albanesi and a comparison

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 7>here with Pauline Hansen, which is a question we asked

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 7>for the first time only a few months ago. Again

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 7>something that would have been unthinkable preferred PM Anthony Albanesi

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.119
<v Speaker 7>versus Pauline Hanson. Now, Anthony Alberanzi started.

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 2>With a huge lead.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 7>Last survey it was down to just nine percent, so

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 7>he was ahead of Pauline Hanson only nine percent, which

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 7>considering she's in the Upper House, yes she can.

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Be Prime minister.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 7>It's a pretty difficult mechanism, Jamie, that that was pretty close.

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 7>In one survey you see Pauline Hanson going down by

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 7>five percent and Anthony Albanesi up, So the gap goes

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 7>from nine to nineteen. So we have seen one nation

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 7>overall lose support and Pauline Hanson lose personal support as well.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 7>As I've said last survey, only last survey there were

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 7>improvements for one nation. We're not calling it a trend yet,

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 7>but given the size of the drop, it's definitely a

0:16:58.240 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 7>watch for the next couple of poles.

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll certainly be keeping our eye very closely on

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 2>at Tom Connell. Thank you. Well, it's time to bring

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>in the panel now. Mensi's Research Center Executive Director Nick Kaida,

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 2>and there's Samuel Griffith Society Executive director Mia Schlickt. Welcome

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 2>to you both. Nick, I do want to start with

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 2>you Australian Defense Force troops who are training Ukrainians in Poland.

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 2>They've been warning that they're facing a serious shortage of

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 2>critical equipment and express quite a lot of frustration that

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of excess or old stock back home

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 2>in Australia which could make an immediate difference if it

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>was sent over to Ukraine. But despite these challenges, Ukraine

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>has reportedly carried out the world's first robotic amphibious assault,

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 2>deploying a robot from an uncruded boat, and the footage

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of this is incredible. How significant in your mind is

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 2>this when it comes to modern warfare?

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that this wararticularly the way Ukraine has adapted

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to this war, has changed the nature of warfare quite considerably.

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>We can see that they've had tremendous success in using

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>drones as far as Moscow, which is just incredible, and

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this too robotic technology of this sort. It worries me

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and mentally though, that Australian troops are complaining that they're

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not able to support the Ukrainians as best they can. One,

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>of course, because we should be given Ukraine every assistance

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>we can. But two, what does it say about the

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>state of our own readiness, Jamie? I mean, if we

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>were in a wartime situation, how ready would we be

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to compete? I don't think nearly as ready as the Ukrainians,

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, but so we really need to get up

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to scratch. And I think much of this is not

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>so much money. Although that's important. But administration and management, well, Nick.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 2>We've already provided one point seven billion dollars in support

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to Ukraine, and yet we're not providing something that could

0:18:59.920 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 2>be of immediate effect. So what does that say about

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 2>our spend? We must be sending and using it in

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>the wrong areas if they're still crying out for needing

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 2>just some of our old warfare.

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the old thing, isn't it. You know, we announced

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>big sums of money that we're going to send, were

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>going to apply to this problem or that problem. Money

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>so often is not The issue is spending it well.

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think anybody who's had any contact with our

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>defense department and would be concerned, to say the least

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>about their ability to respond in an efficient and agile

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>manner in the way that you expect a defense forced

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to respond in wartime. I'd really like more assurance that

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>they are on top of this.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Mia. I'd love to get your thoughts on this new

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 2>report from the CIRO and the Australian Energy Market Operator.

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 2>They're projecting that the cost of electricity generation is going

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>to increase after twenty thirty as coal fired power stations

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 2>are replaced. What did you make of the report. Well, Jamie, the.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 11>Numbers are concerning. Of course, it's a difficult reality for

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 11>Australians to have to realize, but unfortunately it's not shocking.

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 11>This is what energy experts and serious economic advisors have

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 11>been telling us for a number of years now. This

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 11>is the reality of what happens when we shift our

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 11>alliance away from baseload power like cold fire power stations

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 11>and to shift towards an energy grid that is run

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 11>by renewables. And unfortunately, moral grand standing has driven government

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 11>policy for a number of years now, but this is

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 11>the economic reality and it is mainstream Australians who are

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 11>going to have to pay the price for that. There

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 11>is a net zero economy, of course, which benefits a

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 11>number of insiders who would like us to continue down

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 11>this path of renewables. But if we do so, it

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 11>is electricity prices that we'll saw and unfortunately it will

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 11>be Australians who have to choose between heating and eating

0:20:58.040 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 11>and they'll be the ones most affected.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's turn our attention now to a piece that

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 2>was in the Daily Telegraph today and it was written

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 2>by former New South Wales Police minister David Elliott and

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>he's calling on the Prime Minister to crack down on

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>alict at tobacco, and he has said that this is

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>his great political regret that he failed to take action

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 2>when he was warned, and he also made this observation

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 2>on my show on Sunday Take a listen.

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 12>I'm embarrassed on this matter because as counter terrorism Minister

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 12>six years ago, the tobacco companies came to me and

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 12>predicted exactly what's happened, and I ignored it. And I'm

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 12>absolutely giving myself uppercuts. They said, this money is going

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 12>to be used in money launering, it's going to be

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 12>used by criminal gangs, is going to be used to

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 12>fund terrorism, and I suspect that's exactly what's happened.

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Nick. They were some pretty strong comments by David Elliott.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 2>What do you think.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I was definitely getting through the Sunday Telegraph Probably nearly twenty,

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>no more than twenty years ago, we were writing stories

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about the illegal tobacco which was openly on sale in

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>parts of Sydney. It's much much worse, of course now,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and we learn from the ABS statistics so that the

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>consumption nicotine has gone up forty percent because these things

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>are available for a little more than ten dollars a

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>packet and openly on sale. Number one. I just don't

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>know why our police forces can't get on top of this.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>I know it's resources that they could use elsewhere, but

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>this is a major problem. There's a lot of gang

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>related behavior going on. We've had, you know, tobacconists going

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>up in smoke as it were. But you know, number two,

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the federal government just needs to look at

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>the revenue issue. They've imposed a ridiculously huge tax on cigarettes.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's driving people to the illegal market and actually increasing

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount of cigarettes that are smoked. I just don't

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>get it. You know, it's completely countroductive, conductive policy that's

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>producing less and less money for the revenue for the

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>treasury every year. We've surely got to look at that.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, something that the government needs to really be focusing

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>on heading into both the next elections. But mia there's

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 2>fresh debate has erupted over whether avoiding the use of

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 2>gender stereotypes is actually helpful for children.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 2>This comes after some viral comments by a British YouTuber

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 2>and disability and LGBTQI advocate. Her name's Jessica kelgrin Fozard.

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Take a look at what she said.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 5>I think one of the most useful shifts we can

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 5>make is, rather than focusing on identity and trying to

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 5>win them an eat, gender move to a cultivating character instead.

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 2>You're so sweet, soul. That was a very thoughtful thing

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 2>to do.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 13>Sweat good girl, ful.

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 2>You worked really hard.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 5>You should feel proud of yourself.

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 2>What a brave boy.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 5>I saw how nervous you were, but you kept going

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 5>even though it was difficult. One describes who the child is,

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 5>the other notices what they choose to do.

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I gotta say, I always refer to my

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>children as good boys and well done guys, and that,

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 2>according to this woman, is a complete no no. Why

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 2>can't we just speak to genders of what they are? Oh, look,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I that granting.

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 11>Most parents have had enough of this. Just let parents

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 11>parent and let kids be kid. The thing I cannot

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 11>stand about these gender activists is that it doesn't make

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 11>sense because in one breath they'll talk about how important,

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 11>how important nuances, and that how much can affect a child.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 11>As to whether you call someone a good girl or

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 11>whether you say that action was a good one, they'll

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 11>emphasize that those small changes can really affect a child's development.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 11>But then in the other breath, they'll sit there and

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 11>they'll advocate for extremely age inappropriate content to be taught

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 11>to our children in schools as young as five years old,

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 11>being taught things about gender ideology and the fact they

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 11>might have been born in the wrong body and the

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 11>fact there's no such thing as two genders.

0:24:58.160 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 2>They think that.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 11>That's appropriate to teach child childre They won't acknowledge that

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 11>teaching children difficult concepts like that might affect their development. Well,

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 11>those two realities just can't be true. This movement is

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 11>completely hypocritical.

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>It's just nuts, Nick. Before I let you go, one

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>thing though, that is common sense, and I am very

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 2>very happy to see that it's been announced Cricket Australia.

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 2>They're going to sing the national anthem on Australia Day

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 2>when the Big Bash Final is on. I've got to say,

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 2>well done, Cricket Australia. Common sense has prevailed.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Well done Cricket Australia. I mean, we can all unite

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>around the national anthem and the flag. Surely I only

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>give this one cheer, though, Jamie, because I still think

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm an old fashioned guy. I still think that Australia

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Day is the day for the Adelaide Test. It should

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>never have been taken away from Australia Day. And you know,

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Big Bash is all very well, but I think I

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>prefer cricket.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 2>You know what, it's the Big Bash final. Nick. We

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>can't have everything. At least you be able to watch

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>cricket on Australia Day and sing the national anthem, Nick

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 2>and miya. I will leave it there after the brig

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 2>will cross to the UK where Glasgow is one week

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 2>away from hosting the Commonwealth Games. The event Dan Andrews says,

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Victoria couldn't afford welcome back. It's great to have your

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>company coming up the Prime Minister's promise to get on

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 2>the front foot when it comes to AI. But now

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>let's head across to the UK where Glasgow is gearing

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 2>up for the Commonwealth Games that should have been hosted

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 2>by Victoria until the Andrews Labor government dramatically pulled the pin.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Here to discuss it and plenty more is Sky News

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 2>contributor and News Corp Australia's European correspondent, Sophie Ellsworth Sophie,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 2>it's great to see you. We will get to the

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Glasgow Games in a moment, but I do want to

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 2>get an update on this long farewell for Serkis starmer.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Andy Burnham looks set to secure the leadership, so how

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 2>long do you think this transition is going to take?

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 14>Great to be with you, Jamie. Yes, we are looking

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 14>to have our next Prime minister here in the UK

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 14>put into the plumb role on Monday without any contest

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 14>at all. Parliament also is due for a six week break,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 14>which means that Andy Burnham goes into ten Downing Street

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 14>without giving the country really any idea what he stands for,

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 14>and he won't be standing up in the House of

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 14>Commons before he is appointed to this role. Now he's

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 14>got the backing of about three hundred and fifty MPs.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 14>He's rolling into Downing Street uncontested and he just needs

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 14>a backing of three labor affiliated groups or unions, which

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 14>should occur. So we're looking to have a new prime

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 14>minister with little idea of what he will deliver the

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 14>country and then they go on this long recess. So

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 14>it's definitely an interesting time here in the UK having

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 14>a new leader without knowing a lot about what he

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 14>actually stands for.

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and especially fact that there's no contest around that either.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 2>For such a big role, I would have thought there

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 2>would have been other people put in the hand up,

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 2>but obviously not. But let's move on now to Andrew

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 2>mount Baton Windsor. It's back in the saddle. He's been

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 2>spotted riding for the first time since he was exiled

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 2>by the royal family. What can you tell us about this? Well,

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that's right.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 14>Overnight there's been images that have emerged of the format

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 14>Prince Andrew Andrew mount Baton Windsor riding on horseback around

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 14>marsh farming is Sandringham estate. Now we know in February

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 14>he was banned from riding horses. This is one of

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 14>the things he really does enjoy, given he hasn't got

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 14>a lot of enjoyment in his life because he's really

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 14>persona on grada up there at Sandringham. But he has

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 14>now been spotted riding horses which are up there for

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 14>a short period. There's been a lot of criticism obviously

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 14>and controversy surrounding out Andrew mount Baton Windsor. We know

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 14>he was arrested on his birth Dane February. He remains

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 14>under investigation by Metropolitan Police across the UK and the

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 14>investigations are ongoing into his role as former trade end

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 14>boy in the UK. So no charges for Andrew mount

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 14>Batten Windsor. He's always denied any wrongdoing in any regard.

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 14>But this story will not go away.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Now the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow are just a week away.

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 2>You're up there. I'm very jealous. Is the city ready?

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 14>Well, Jamie, it's really interesting walking around Glasgow because we're

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 14>a week out. There's not a lot of signage up

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 14>here in Glasgow yet there doesn't seem to be a

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 14>lot of enthusiasm. Now, look, this may all change in

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 14>this space of a week because it's due to start

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 14>here in Glasgow next Thursday. We know that Victorian taxpayers

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 14>have handed over about two hundred million dollars because debt.

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>We have lost Sophie Ellsworth there. We will move on

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 2>now to our next guest in Toby Walsh, and this

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 2>will be following on from the speech today from the

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister focusing on AI and its impact in Australia. Now,

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 2>there were some big promises and a bit of retrick

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and an opposition leader who says the government risks stifling

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 2>business opportunity. So let's now get the take on the

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister's proposals from the man who lost his gig

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 2>as a member of the government scrapped AI Advisory Body,

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Chief Scientists at the Unswai Institute, Toby Walsh, Professor. Welcome.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to get your initial response to this speech

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 2>when he heard it today, it did seem like there

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 2>were a lot of big statements about embracing AI, but

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 2>very little in the way of concrete action. Did you

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 2>hear anything that you thought will actually make a difference.

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>You're right, it was a good speech. Addressed the issues

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 3>troubling Australians, justifiably traveling Australians, the data centers being built

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 3>in our backyards, the impact that AI is starting to

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 3>have on people's jobs, the impact it's having on our

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 3>creative industry, the impact is having on our kids. So

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 3>he touched all of those significant concerns. It's great it's

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister. It's got to the top of government now,

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 3>and it's great that they've decided to put the decision

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 3>making all together in an office for AI in the

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Department of Prime misteric company. You don't get any higher

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 3>than that. So it's getting his attention. But as you say,

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 3>little short on details, short in investment. The great ambitions,

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 3>but are they're going to put the money behind to

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 3>succeed with these ambitions.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 2>And he did just make a good point that he

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 2>is now creating the AI Office within the Prime Minister's

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 2>wider department. The opposition have said this is now just

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be more bureaucracy. What do you think about that?

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a good idea. In fact, back in twenty nineteen,

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 3>I was asked to write a report for the Cabinet

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 3>made that very suggest this is a whole of economy

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 3>transition that we're going through. You need a whole of

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 3>government focus on all the different aspects. AI is going

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 3>to change, changes in our laws, changes in our employment,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 3>changes in our education. You need to think about this

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 3>in a big way. It's great it's got the Prime

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Minister on the case.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, he is looking to legislate Australian standards and really

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 2>clear rules for data centers. Now, I don't know if

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm being cynical, but this doesn't seem very groundbreaking. But

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>he did offer some hope with stronger copyright protection for

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Australian artists and the media. Do you think that that's

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>a good step forward.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 3>It is a good step toward. It was very pleased

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 3>to him reaffirming his commitment that he wasn't going to

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 3>weaken copyright laws. We should be we should be very

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 3>outraged that the tech companies have stolen all of that

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 3>intellectual property, have undermined perhaps the livelihood of our creatives,

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 3>not just because of the economic value that they've stolen,

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 3>but also for the cultural value that we value. Our

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 3>culture greatly value Australian authors, filmmakers and musicians and we

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 3>need to protect them. We don't need to sell them

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 3>out for big tech investment.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 2>But how can you see that working, because this is

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 2>a big beast that we need to tackle when it

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>comes to AI training their bots using artists material or journalists' work.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 2>How do you see that actually in the long run

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>facilitating with the Claude being happy with the copyright laws.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 3>You've got to realize that we're in a strong bargaining position.

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 3>We have the second largest pipeline of data centers to

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 3>being built here in Australia in the world. We're only

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 3>the twelfth largest economy, so there are ten much larger

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 3>economies which are less attractive in which to build data centers.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 3>So we've got plentiful reasons we want to build data

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 3>centers here. Very stable politics, very stable economy, plentiful land,

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 3>plentiful renewables, good submarine connections to the rest of the world.

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So there's no shortage of people wanting to build data

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 3>centers here. And it's not like that they can't actually

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 3>license the content and pay for the content. They've actually

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 3>done some big licensing deals already with nine Media with

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times, so they can actually pay for

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the content. You have to understand the reason they're arguing

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 3>so hard here in Australia is because they know that

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 3>we're going to set an important precedent for the rest

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 3>of the word. It's not because Australia matters so much

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 3>to them, but because they know that Australia leads the way.

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.280
<v Speaker 3>We had the first social media age band in the world.

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Fifteen countries now have got one. Even the European units

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 3>are discussing having a social media age bet, so they

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 3>know what we decide here is going to set a

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 3>standard for the rest of the world. That's why they're

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 3>playing such hardball.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Professor, I have to ask you about something that you

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 2>just said in your answer that Australia has the renewables

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 2>that would be able to power these data centers. Do

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you actually think that renewables is the solution to the

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 2>amount of energy that's going to be required by these centers.

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Should something like I know nuclear is no longer got

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 2>the moratorium on it, but should we be investing in

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>something like the small modular reactors to be able to

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 2>ensure that we have that reliable base load power or

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 2>do you think that renewables is enough to be able

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 2>to power these enormous centers.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great question. You've got to understand the size of

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 3>these data centers. The largest one that's being built at

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 3>the moment in Western Sydney, is going to be built

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 3>in Western Sydney. It's going to use five percent of

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Australia's electricity. It's going to use more electricity than Adelaide.

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 3>These are ginormous, great demands that we're looking at, and

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 3>you're right, renewables is not going to provide that in

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the short term. I'm confident that we could build the

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 3>renewables in the long term to be able to do that,

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.280
<v Speaker 3>but not in the short term, not at the speed

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 3>with which they want these data centers to be built.

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 3>That's the challenge we face here. It takes longer to

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 3>build renewables than it does to build data centers. That's

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 3>a difficult problem, and I've never seen you know, the

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister didn't have a good answer for how are

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 3>we going to square that circle.

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I know that's going to be a very interesting one

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 2>as we see the amount of energy use and water

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 2>use because we're not building any more dams. But before

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I let you go, you know, technology is always going

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 2>to be faster than the regulation. What do you think

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 2>is the answer here to ensure that we keep up

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 2>but we don't impact opportunity at the same time.

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, in fact, I think if we don't regulate ospit intelligence, well,

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 3>we will stifle innovation and we will repeat the mistakes

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 3>of social media. So I'm pleased to see that we're

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 3>a little more in front of the game here this

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 3>time with social media, that we won't necessarily have to

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 3>sacrifice the generation of young people to the harms that

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.479
<v Speaker 3>otherwise might come if we use it without any guard railers,

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 3>without any regulation. So I'm pleased that we're having these

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 3>conversations now, but we do have to be mindful that

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the tech companies have demonstrated frequently and as we put

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 3>rules in the place that they will behave in ways

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 3>that are harmful, harmful to young people, harmful to our society.

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 3>So we have to put those rules in place and

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 3>that will allow us to have the innovation that will

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 3>actually grow our economy.

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, Professor Toby Walsh, I appreciate your insights. After the break,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 2>more the outcomes from the Royal Commission into anti Semitism,

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 2>with university chiefs grilled over the lack of action on encampments.

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 2>That's next, welcome back. We still have words with Kel

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 2>to come up, so stay tuned. But now to the

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 2>antisemitism Royal Commission, which in the last two days has

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 2>heard confronting evidence of Jewish students and academics being harassed, assaulted,

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 2>and intimidated on university campuses, raising fresh questions about whether

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 2>universities have done enough to protect students and uphold free speech.

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Julian Lisa is the Shadow Minister for Education and joins

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 2>me now. Julian, thank you for coming on Ha's Australia's

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 2>university sector fundamentally failed Jewish students.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 15>Yes, Jamie, they've not only failed Jewish students, they've failed

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 15>all Australian students because they've effectively taught Australian students a lesson,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 15>basically said to Australian students by their actions and lack

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 15>of actions, that when someone's being intimidated and harassed, don't

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 15>stand up for them, just let it go on. When

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 15>there's a group of people who you want to get

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 15>off your campus, don't stand up to them and be

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 15>strong roll over to them, especially if they're a hate

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 15>group that wants to run their ruler over all.

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Your defense contracts.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 15>And when your academic colleagues are being harassed by masked

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 15>people coming into their room, by people urinating on their desks,

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 15>downplay the significance. I think they've taught Australians a terrible lesson.

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 15>It's why I've called our university leaders weaken, spineless, and

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 15>why I've been calling since the end of twenty twenty

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 15>three for some sort of royal commission, some sort of

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 15>judicial inquiry into the anti Semitism that's been on our campuses.

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 15>Long before October seven.

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Julian, I'm about to play you a grab from the

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 2>University of Sydney Vice Chancellor Mark Scott. But just on

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 2>all of those incidents that you just labeled as what's

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.760
<v Speaker 2>been going on in universities, can't help but think these

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 2>are our future leaders and this is what they have

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 2>been allowing to happen. And if we say that that's okay,

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I just hate to think what our future is going

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 2>to look like with these sort of people getting away

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 2>with this sort of behavior.

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly the point, Jamie.

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 15>I mean, I think universities are life changing experiences at

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 15>their best, they're the place that the next generation of

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 15>leaders go to be formed. But the example that's been

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 15>given to the next generation by the conduct of university

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 15>leaders about how we treat our fellow Australians is a

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 15>very dark one indeed, and sets us up for a

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 15>country where some people get stood up for and other

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 15>people are just othered. And that's not something I want

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 15>to see my children or anyone's children learn. That's not

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 15>a positive future for this country.

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 2>So Mark Scott is the University of Sydney vice chancellor.

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Now this is what he said at the Royal Commission

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 2>about the Pro Palestine student encampment.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Will believe the pursuit of the peaceable.

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Resolution of the encampment was very important and to the

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 4>long term benefit of the university.

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 3>But I can see that our.

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 12>Jewish students and staff paid a price for that as

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 12>the encampment.

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Dragged on, and I am I am.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 12>Sorry to them that it took so long for us

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 12>to get it done, and I'm.

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 6>Sorry we did not keep them more closely engaged.

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Julian, when you hear that, what's your response to those comments?

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 15>Well, look, it's good to hear that Mark Scott has

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 15>owned up to the failures of his own university, as

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 15>to some extent did Glenn Davis, the Vice Chancellor of

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 15>the University of Melbourne today. But it's one thing when

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 15>you've got half a dozen of Australia's top silks glaring

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 15>at you and you're sitting before a retired High Court

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 15>judge to be contricte. The real test for university vice

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 15>chancellors now is will they properly adopt the University definition,

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 15>the International Cost Remembrance Alliance definition that I wrote to

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 15>them about back in twenty twenty two alongside Labor MP

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 15>Josh Burns and tiarmp Alegraspender and five universities said.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 3>They'd adopted it.

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 15>But as I've talked to vice chancellors as the shadow

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 15>Education Minister, too many of them say, oh, we don't

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 15>have a problem, why would we adopt it. Others say

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 15>we don't want to adopt it, just legislate it. We

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 15>can't take the fight, and others pretend they've adopted it

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 15>but really haven't done anything at all. And there's a

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 15>scathing report by one of their own, Greg Craven, a

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 15>former vice chancellor, who finds not one single university in

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 15>this country has properly adopted a definition, even a definition

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 15>they themselves came up with eighteen months ago. So the

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 15>time for mucking around is well and truly over fifteen

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 15>people are dead at Bondi. They must adopt the International

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 15>Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition in full, and it must be

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 15>adopted without without any further delay.

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 2>It does seem, though, Julian, is that enough to adopt

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 2>these definitions? Should there also be things like financial consequences

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 2>for universities that fail to protect students. It just seems

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 2>like we need something a lot more serious as a

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 2>consequence for what's been happening.

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 15>I couldn't agree more Jamie. But at the very first point,

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.879
<v Speaker 15>if you can't define what antisemitism is, you can't ever

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 15>deal with it promptly. But I agree with you in

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 15>relation to penalties for universities. It's why in December last year,

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 15>the recommendation of the Special Endvy on Antisemitism, we put

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 15>forward a proposal to basically make it a provider condition

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 15>for a university to call itself a university that it

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 15>properly deals with antisemitism.

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 3>We'd look at the end that the.

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:47.800
<v Speaker 15>Special Invoice proposals to remove funding from academics who engaged

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 15>anti Semitism and universities who continued to condain antisemitism. There

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 15>do need to be financial penalties. And I make no

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 15>apology for taking a tough stand and being prepared to

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 15>exercise powers to bring the universities to heal on this issue.

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 2>And Julian, just quickly before I let you go, you

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 2>were with Opposition leader Angus Taylor today talking with small businesses.

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 2>What are some of the things that you're hearing in

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 2>your community.

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 15>Well, we had Angus Taylor and Jane Hume visit for

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:19.240
<v Speaker 15>a special small business roundtable in my electric this morning,

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 15>over one hundred and fifty small business people talking about

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 15>the adverse effect of Labour's toxic taxes, taxes that the

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.240
<v Speaker 15>Prime Minister promised fifty times you wouldn't bring in taxes

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 15>Labour took to the election in twenty nineteen and were

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 15>roundly defeated on We've heard about the effect of those

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 15>taxes on businesses in my electorate. We've heard about the

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 15>burgeoning red tape burden across all sectors of the economy

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 15>on businesses in the electorate. And we've also heard particular

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 15>concerns about the coming taxes on trusts and the effect

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:52.240
<v Speaker 15>that that will have on small businesses even being prepared

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 15>to have a go in the first place.

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, Julian, I think this is an opportunity for the

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Coalition to really show that you've got the backs of

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 2>small business, says thank you for your time tonight. After

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the break Words Matter with Kel Richards, welcome back and

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.320
<v Speaker 2>joining the program as he always does on a Wednesday,

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 2>is wordsmith and broadcaster Kel Richards and Kell, You've got

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 2>some great words tonight. Let's start with offside. So this

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 2>has come from Daryl who's asked for the origin of

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 2>offside and onside in sport, I.

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 13>Suspect he's been watching much too much of the World Cup.

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 13>Offside is recorded eighteen thirty three, and it comes from

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 13>rugby football as played at Rugby School, where they invented

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 13>it and where the name comes from. And the original

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 13>version of the expression was off your side, meaning out

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 13>of the place where you're meant to be, and that

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 13>full expression off your side is found in Tom Brown's

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:55.879
<v Speaker 13>school days, which is said in Rugby Rugby school. Then

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 13>it got shorten to just offside. The one thing I

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 13>can't give you is a precise definite, because it's different

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 13>in every sport being offside and net ball is different

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 13>from being offside in soccer. But it was originally just

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 13>out of your place, off your side, offside.

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:13.720
<v Speaker 2>What about this one from Donner? The meaning of bald

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 2>as a badger.

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 13>This is fascinating. It means totally really hairless. But badgers

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 13>are not more right, they're covered in fur. I've come

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.320
<v Speaker 13>across two theories, both of which I think are rubbish.

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 13>The first one says the bald in that statement is

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 13>a contraction of piebald, which is a very old word

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 13>meaning multicolored, and badgers are mainly dark gray, but they've

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 13>got the big white streak from their nose to their neck.

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 13>But somehow that's not very convincing and it doesn't seem

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 13>to fit in time wise. The other theory turned up

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 13>in the eighteen hundreds, and it was because barbers used

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 13>shaving brushes made out of badger fur. Now I can't

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 13>see that generating bald as a badger either, So I'm sorry.

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I think both of you if you could, because you

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 2>would put the shaving cream on the head and.

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:57.919
<v Speaker 13>Shave that large you don't shave your head.

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I do people shave their head?

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 13>They do, Yeah, they do these days, I'm not sure.

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 13>In the hundreds they did a lot. Look my best

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 13>guess is I think it was actually coined and it

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.720
<v Speaker 13>caught on because of the alliteration between the two bees

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 13>in balden badger. That works in the English language. And

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 13>it would be interesting if it was more profound and

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 13>there was a good story, But I think that's it.

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 2>What about from Angela? Every dog has his day?

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 13>This is a really nice one. It means everyone has

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 13>an opportunity just because acceeded sometimes And this one was

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 13>coined by Shakespeare, and he coined it in Hamlet at five,

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 13>Scene one, and the English language is packed full of

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 13>bits from Hamlet. There are lots of bits of I

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 13>shuffle off this mortal coil. There are more things in

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 13>heaven and Earth than a dreamt of in your philosophy.

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 13>Things are rotten in the state of Denmark. For some reason.

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 13>Hamlet is packedful of these expressions which have caught on

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:56.400
<v Speaker 13>and have become part of the language. Someone complained, the

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 13>problem with Hamlet is it's full of quotations.

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 2>I love it. Now there's two more that both I

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 2>think are ones that I've always used and never actually

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 2>thought too much into rhyme or reason. So this one's

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:11.800
<v Speaker 2>come from John, just asking what does the rhyme part

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 2>refer to?

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 13>It originally did refer to poetry. Rhyme or reason just

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 13>means when you say there's no rhyme or reason, you're

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 13>just saying it means nothing. It's it's rubbish. Comes into

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 13>English about fourteen sixty. If you trace it back through

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 13>the levels from where it came, it seems to go

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 13>back to an old Latin expression. A single statement in

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 13>Latin which I won't quote because I can't remember it

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 13>which said poetry should have rhyme and meter or modulation,

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 13>which in Latin was called reason. So it was originally

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 13>identifying rubbish poetry, and then in English the expression gradually

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 13>broadened to identify any utterance which was complete rubbish, So

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 13>the rhyme was originally poetry.

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, Cay, we've got thirty seconds. Touch wood? What's its origin?

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 13>Very old superstition that said trees were inhabited by spirits

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 13>back a long way for the ancient Greeks. I think

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 13>they call them diads living in trees, and every different

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 13>mythology had its own name for them. Touching the wood

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:11.319
<v Speaker 13>was getting the support of the spirit in the tree

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 13>to look after you.

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I love it because I touch wood all the time,

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 2>so I don't jinx myself. Does it work?

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 13>Does it work?

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:17.359
<v Speaker 8>Ah?

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I think so. Cal thank you and thank you for

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 2>your company. Tonight. You'll see me again tomorrow night at

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 2>six o'clock. The Bolt report is next.