Speaker 1: On scoring in Zastrodya.
Speaker 2: This is the reader Panahe Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the reader Panahee Show. I'm
Speaker 3: Caroline Derusso.
Speaker 2: Coming up on the show tonight.
Speaker 3: And the new Coalition ministry has finally been announced and
Speaker 3: yes it has raised some eyebrows.
Speaker 2: We'll discuss that and much more with Angela.
Speaker 3: Mollard, including Independent Senator Fadam of Payman's bombshell allegations against
Speaker 3: colleague now Adam B.
Speaker 4: Coleman.
Speaker 3: He joins us to discuss the latest from the US,
Speaker 3: including a shocking undercover video from a Democrat insider and
Speaker 3: of course Left He's losing It, featuring Democrat Jasmine Crockett's
Speaker 3: dire warning about Trump.
Speaker 5: It is time for Republicans to starry calling him out
Speaker 5: and started questioning his mental acuity and whether or not
Speaker 5: he is equipped to serve mentally.
Speaker 4: But joining me now is newscot colonist Angela Mollard.
Speaker 3: Angela, after kicking the decision on the Northwest Shelf down
Speaker 3: the road until after the election, Labor has given it
Speaker 3: the green light.
Speaker 2: Thankfully.
Speaker 3: And obviously I'm from Western Australia, so I feel like
Speaker 3: I've got a bit of.
Speaker 2: Skin in the game in this decision.
Speaker 3: Do you think though, you know, was it a bit
Speaker 3: dangerous then politicizing that decision in that way.
Speaker 2: We've definitely seen them walk.
Speaker 3: Back their opposition to gas in recent months, we have,
Speaker 3: and I think there's a newfound pragmatism that they needed.
Speaker 6: You know, they've won the election, but they have to
Speaker 6: they have to make the country work now, and this
Speaker 6: is central to making the country work. This, of course
Speaker 6: took six and a half years of green tape. I
Speaker 6: think it's a bit of a shame that it didn't
Speaker 6: get through on pleverusx watch because of course she had,
Speaker 6: you know, walls put up.
Speaker 7: At every turn when she was Environment minister. Of course
Speaker 7: has come through Murray what.
Speaker 6: But it shows that the labor is prepared to look
Speaker 6: at the fact that if we are going to have
Speaker 6: productivity and we are going to energize this country, you know,
Speaker 6: both for industry and for individuals, that we need to
Speaker 6: look at diverse sources, not just fossil fuels. The only
Speaker 6: interesting thing I think though, is that what are the
Speaker 6: Greens going to think about in the future, Because of
Speaker 6: course they are in the Senate, they can block the
Speaker 6: sistance like this in the future. So it's a good
Speaker 6: it's a you know, it's front footed and it's smart
Speaker 6: for Labor.
Speaker 7: At this stage.
Speaker 6: But I'll be interested to see how it flows through
Speaker 6: on other projects.
Speaker 3: Do you think it could have potentially been different if
Speaker 3: Labor didn't have the majority that.
Speaker 7: They have, look hugely different.
Speaker 6: You possibly wouldn't have got that or you would have
Speaker 6: got blowback on it, of course, but you know, they
Speaker 6: have such a strong remit now and it'd be really
Speaker 6: interesting to see what they do. There's so many areas
Speaker 6: now they can push through because they have that majority.
Speaker 6: It's just really looking at what they choose and where
Speaker 6: they will see the greatest benefit both budge for the
Speaker 6: budget and for the populace.
Speaker 3: Now, Victoria doesn't seem to have got the memo on
Speaker 3: gas and the Santa CEO Kevin Gallagher, he's come out
Speaker 3: and basically compared Victoria to North Korea.
Speaker 2: So what's this all about?
Speaker 7: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 6: So he's at a conference since Brisbane, an oil and
Speaker 6: gas conference, and he has basically said that they are
Speaker 6: so back with they're so communist in their approach to
Speaker 6: things that they are not green lighting projects that help
Speaker 6: industry in that.
Speaker 7: State, and I think he's right.
Speaker 6: There is a real danger that Victoria is going to
Speaker 6: become forever more a loser state. I mean, you have
Speaker 6: to balance your socialist policies with your capitalist ones. Any
Speaker 6: government does, whatever government, you know, whatever party they represent,
Speaker 6: and you have to drive growth.
Speaker 7: You have to drive productivity.
Speaker 6: We have a massive productivity issue in this country nationally,
Speaker 6: and if a state is going to fall by the wayside.
Speaker 7: I also think it's really important.
Speaker 6: Just as it's important to have a strong opposition in
Speaker 6: government at a federal level, you also need strong parity
Speaker 6: within the state and territory governments so that they're looking
Speaker 6: at each other, that they're competing with each other, whether
Speaker 6: that's on education as a safe productivity, whether it's on
Speaker 6: environmental policies. By keeping an eye angel on each other
Speaker 6: and all staying strong, and there'll be areas where some
Speaker 6: have better resources than others.
Speaker 3: Competitive federalism doesn't exactly.
Speaker 6: If you've got to have that system, and a lot
Speaker 6: of us think it's a very you know, a bloated system,
Speaker 6: then it's got to be sharp, it's got to be
Speaker 6: rigorous and effective. And he's quite right and drawing attention
Speaker 6: to it and what's problematic about this by him declaring
Speaker 6: it is that other businesses that might consider setting up
Speaker 6: in Victoria will not.
Speaker 7: Do that now.
Speaker 6: So the effect on others looking at that, you know,
Speaker 6: we've already seen this massive move for a lot of
Speaker 6: businesses to Queensland, New South Wales other parts of the country.
Speaker 7: I mean, Victoria needs to watch itself.
Speaker 2: It really does.
Speaker 3: And I think this here is a real failure of
Speaker 3: state policy because if you are not going to develop
Speaker 3: your resources and have the benefit of your resources, you
Speaker 3: can't just put your hand out for more GST because
Speaker 3: you're failing to do the things that you should be
Speaker 3: doing in the first place.
Speaker 2: Onto the coalition and.
Speaker 3: They announcing you ministry or shadow ministry yesterday, what was
Speaker 3: most notable for you in.
Speaker 7: All of that.
Speaker 6: Look, I know there's been a lot of discussion around
Speaker 6: the demotion of women and the part of women and
Speaker 6: the party. I'm much more interested, actually less in the
Speaker 6: numbers than the portfolios, and the two portfolios that stand
Speaker 6: up to me. Where I think that Susan those made
Speaker 6: a mistake is obviously just into an ampership of price.
Speaker 6: She so owns that Indigenous conversation. She was brilliant after
Speaker 6: the Voice. Most Australians really care about how money is
Speaker 6: being spent on the Indigenous community and whether it's effective. Now,
Speaker 6: she just to drove through that idea that we should
Speaker 6: have an audit on where all that money is being spent.
Speaker 7: It's a brilliant idea.
Speaker 6: We can look at what's effective, we can look at
Speaker 6: what's working. She was well placed. It was also been
Speaker 6: really smart to have her alongside you. She's somebody that
Speaker 6: the population likes. She's great on media and you know
Speaker 6: a lot of the Liberal and National Party aren't great
Speaker 6: at that. So that's one thing where she made a mistake.
Speaker 6: I also think she made the same mistake with Sarah Henderson.
Speaker 6: There is a massive opportunity for the Coalition to make
Speaker 6: headways on education. It was completely undiscussed in the election.
Speaker 6: Henderson really complained about the fact that it was under
Speaker 6: the remit.
Speaker 7: You know, no one was talking about it.
Speaker 6: The New Zealand government, the Nationals in New Zealand won
Speaker 6: the election on their education mandate. We are in a
Speaker 6: crisis situation in education in this country.
Speaker 7: Our maths is appalling and the.
Speaker 6: Gratin In Institute has a plan for a ten year
Speaker 6: maths guarantee. The impact on productivity if we do not
Speaker 6: raise our standards is immense, And that is such an
Speaker 6: easy win you could have as the coalition appointed her.
Speaker 6: She's got a feet under the table, she knows the portfolio,
Speaker 6: and you could have started to make headways in a
Speaker 6: really good portfolio that most of the Electric parents, like myself,
Speaker 6: people across the board care about. It's not a niche interest,
Speaker 6: it's a mainstream one.
Speaker 7: And to now have.
Speaker 6: To have someone else in the portfolio learning about it
Speaker 6: when you could have got off to a good start
Speaker 6: is shortsighted as far.
Speaker 7: As I'm concerned. Okay, now bring your enemies close too,
Speaker 7: you know. But also people are really self oriented.
Speaker 6: If you're given something, you're given power to do it,
Speaker 6: you soon align with the person who's given you that power.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that is very interest.
Speaker 3: That's a reasonable point to make onto independent Senator fatom
Speaker 3: of Payment. And she's made some pretty bombshell allegations about
Speaker 3: behavior from a colleague.
Speaker 2: So what's the story here and here?
Speaker 3: And do we expect this to gain traction as similar
Speaker 3: stories have in the past.
Speaker 6: I'd be really interested to see because this is historical.
Speaker 6: I mean, it's only two hundred twenty twenty three. But
Speaker 6: what I'm interested about it and I do want to
Speaker 6: get this right. I do want to get her wording right,
Speaker 6: so Shor. What she's doing is she's claiming that a
Speaker 6: male colleague was drunk and pressed her at an event,
Speaker 6: saying let's get some wine into you and see you
Speaker 6: dance on the table. Now she's claiming sexual harassment and
Speaker 6: racial harassment.
Speaker 7: I'm not an expert.
Speaker 6: I don't pretend to know whether that is sexual or
Speaker 6: racial harassment. But to me, that's being a dickhead and
Speaker 6: it's being ugly. So call the dickhead policy. And this
Speaker 6: is what I want more women to do. She says
Speaker 6: she's raising this now because there's more young women in
Speaker 6: Parliament that are coming through. She wants them to be
Speaker 6: protected in that environment. I'm not sure that that's her
Speaker 6: motivation here. I think she's bringing attention back to herself.
Speaker 6: And look, if somebody feels uncomfortably racially, sexually, they have
Speaker 6: the remit and the right to talk about that.
Speaker 7: But I also want.
Speaker 6: Women to just stand up in the moment and turn
Speaker 6: around and go, don't be a dick Honestly, you're just ugly.
Speaker 6: Because most men or anybody any gender who says something
Speaker 6: stupid when questioned on it in the moment will usually
Speaker 6: come back you usually persolutely.
Speaker 3: Look, I'm all for I'm all for a formal nodheads policy.
Speaker 3: I think I think it is served various parts of
Speaker 3: the political and corporate world very well. And always the
Speaker 3: best time, if you feel like you're able to, is
Speaker 3: to deal with it in the moment, because that there
Speaker 3: is actually an empowering, empowering for you in that moment,
Speaker 3: rather than feeling terrible about something afterwards and maybe wishing
Speaker 3: you had have said.
Speaker 6: I love what you're saying there, because you're talking about
Speaker 6: agency and every time you grab your own agency.
Speaker 7: And you know, look, as a woman who's worked in
Speaker 7: the work, but you.
Speaker 6: Know a very long time, I was going to put
Speaker 6: a year number on yeh, but you know, I'm not
Speaker 6: pensionable yet.
Speaker 7: But I do.
Speaker 6: I really feel you're right on that, that you know,
Speaker 6: that being having some self determination. And here she looks
Speaker 6: she took it to the to the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service.
Speaker 6: We will I don't know if we'll find out what
Speaker 6: actually happened from that, but I you know, in all
Speaker 6: these cases, you know there are a lot like defamation.
Speaker 6: You need facts and clarity on them to fully understand
Speaker 6: the situation.
Speaker 3: Absolutely absolutely now onto the A and U and they
Speaker 3: have walked back.
Speaker 2: That they have walked back where they got to.
Speaker 3: On the definition of anti Semitism. It's been panned by
Speaker 3: Jewish groups as you would expect. So what has happened here?
Speaker 2: Why the walmbag?
Speaker 7: That's right.
Speaker 6: So most of the universities in the country have either
Speaker 6: signed up to the two definitions, and that's pretty similar
Speaker 6: on anti semitism, A and YOU hasn't. And there's been
Speaker 6: a lot of demonstrations and concerns around anti semitism and
Speaker 6: some issues. Look, there's some question about the factor leadership
Speaker 6: on holiday and I've been enjoying looking at.
Speaker 7: Julie Bishop's instagram on holiday. She seems to be having
Speaker 7: a jolly old time.
Speaker 6: Of course, Look the fact that they haven't done it yet,
Speaker 6: is it that they haven't pushed it through because they're
Speaker 6: still considering it and they want.
Speaker 2: Just sitting on it?
Speaker 7: Are they just sitting it on to the end of
Speaker 7: the year.
Speaker 6: At the end of the day, I think whether or
Speaker 6: not you have a definition or not, half the time
Speaker 6: we can't actually say what's sorracism?
Speaker 7: What is semitism? But we know when we see him,
Speaker 7: let's see it.
Speaker 6: And without having a definition doesn't mean they cannot prosecute
Speaker 6: or when there are instances where that occurs. And I
Speaker 6: think so, Yes, of course we need a framework, but
Speaker 6: we shouldn't be too overly concerned that this hasn't been
Speaker 6: pushed through yet. Better to do it properly and have
Speaker 6: something fair enough to do it once, exactly, measure twice,
Speaker 6: do it once.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the lady.
Speaker 4: Needs a holiday, Then the lady needs a holiday now.
Speaker 4: Very interesting piece about the changes to travel.
Speaker 2: Rules in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 4: I love to travel, but can you tell us what
Speaker 4: are the tricks and the.
Speaker 3: Traps for the intrepid Australians heading overseas.
Speaker 6: I need to bundle off home because my daughter's taken
Speaker 6: off in two weeks time and she's going to get
Speaker 6: stung for these fines. Okay, basically, Caroline, the whole of
Speaker 6: Europe seems to be looking at fining, probably us because
Speaker 6: where the people that go there, all our gap years
Speaker 6: and all our boomers who end up going over to
Speaker 6: the northern Hemisphere during the summertime. These are astonishing Portugal,
Speaker 6: for instance, they're going to have a three thousand dollar
Speaker 6: fine for being naked in public.
Speaker 7: Probably fair enough.
Speaker 6: The bikini fine, okay, if you don't wear a bikini,
Speaker 6: buy the pool or a beach, you're going to be fine.
Speaker 6: What's that two hundred and two five hundred dollars? You
Speaker 6: know in Manly where I live in New South Wales,
Speaker 6: you wouldn't have anyone in the supermarket get back bikinis.
Speaker 6: Lisbon's having a three five hundred dollar fine for being
Speaker 6: noisy and a quiet place.
Speaker 7: I was in Lisbon last year. The whole point of
Speaker 7: Lisbon is that it's noisy where you go there.
Speaker 6: Turkey, if you take your seatbelt off before the plane
Speaker 6: says you can, you're going to be fine.
Speaker 7: One hundred and four dollars.
Speaker 6: There's no pub crules, so like loads of places in
Speaker 6: Europe say, you know you can't go on a pub rule, Well,
Speaker 6: what defines a pub crule?
Speaker 7: Is that two pubs? Or is that six pubs?
Speaker 4: But you know what the great thing is, how many
Speaker 4: is a crawl?
Speaker 7: How is a what's a crawl?
Speaker 6: For you?
Speaker 7: Well? Three?
Speaker 4: IM a non drinker, so oh there you got there.
Speaker 4: I'm a little bit useless in this particulous circumstances.
Speaker 3: But you would you would think it would have to
Speaker 3: be at least three or four because you would always
Speaker 3: go somewhere before dinner, have dinner after dinner. So that's
Speaker 3: three that could technically I.
Speaker 2: Think to be four or more.
Speaker 6: Is that you know what the real opportunity here is
Speaker 6: for our tourism industry. We need to come up with
Speaker 6: a new campaign which is basically, come as you are,
Speaker 6: where your bikini in the supermarket, you can have as
Speaker 6: many go to as many pubs as you like. There's
Speaker 6: one there's one that says, you know how you have
Speaker 6: those all inclusive deals? Yes, well the all inclusive alcohol
Speaker 6: deal is now that you can only have maximum of
Speaker 6: six drinks.
Speaker 7: So who's going to police that?
Speaker 6: If you've got an all inclusive deal, who's counting your
Speaker 6: drinks as you're ordering them?
Speaker 7: Look, Europe's getting tough, we know Barcelona. There's the laura that.
Speaker 4: Means there's an opportunity here for us in Australia.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, we just sell it as that anything goes country
Speaker 6: absolutely a bit messy, it might be a bit noisy,
Speaker 6: there might be a few boobs hanging out.
Speaker 3: But you know, We've been that country in the past
Speaker 3: and I think we should celebrate it.
Speaker 4: But remember Caroline.
Speaker 6: When I lived in Britain back in the nineties, everyone
Speaker 6: had their boobs out on a beach, So I don't
Speaker 6: know what this about to.
Speaker 2: Had become prudes.
Speaker 3: As always, Thank you so much, Angela Molla, Thanks Carolyn.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is child and adolescent psychologist Clairo Claire.
Speaker 3: Thank you for coming to the show. Big Few or
Speaker 3: about Newington College going co ed. There were some legal
Speaker 3: proceedings they have failed. What's the reasoning behind this particular decision.
Speaker 8: Yeah, thanks Carolyn. Yeah, the decision from Newington, big private
Speaker 8: private boys' school soon to be co ed now in Sydney,
Speaker 8: and of course there was a big legal battle to
Speaker 8: try and stop that, mostly from the old boys of
Speaker 8: the school. That's fallen over basically with a judge ruling
Speaker 8: that you know, the constitution allows this of the school,
Speaker 8: that they have every right to go ahead with that plan,
Speaker 8: which I think is coming in with girls now in
Speaker 8: twenty thirty three. So it's a very disappointed people, I
Speaker 8: suppose with that decision that school Newington in Sydney, very
Speaker 8: prestigious private school, is one of a few now private
Speaker 8: boys schools.
Speaker 2: That are turning co ed.
Speaker 8: I would note it's never actually the girls' schools that
Speaker 8: welcome in the boys. It always seems to be the
Speaker 8: other way around. But there we go, and.
Speaker 3: Look that there was obviously legal proceedings and that was
Speaker 3: to do with the interpretation of that particular constitution. But
Speaker 3: onto the issue of single sex versus co ed education.
Speaker 3: What's your view on single sex schooling or co ed
Speaker 3: schooling and the impacts and potential impacts on child learning. Yeah,
Speaker 3: this topic comes around and it seems quite polarized, but
Speaker 3: I mean my take is there.
Speaker 8: Needs to be choice. It's not an either or approach.
Speaker 8: The outcomes on learning. Actually, there's no really conclusive research.
Speaker 8: There is some research to the shows, of course, that
Speaker 8: children come out with maybe some confidence and empathy and
Speaker 8: maybe some better communication skills with the opposite sex in
Speaker 8: coed education. Of course, the argument for coed education is
Speaker 8: that it mirrors the real world, so communities and workplaces
Speaker 8: and families aren't gender segregated. But then I would argue,
Speaker 8: there's a lot of kids who do really well in
Speaker 8: a single sex school, so this has to be about
Speaker 8: a parent's choice. There's a lot of your research that
Speaker 8: shows that some girls are less inhibited, they're less worried
Speaker 8: about their image. As you can imagine, without boys around,
Speaker 8: they're more likely to take up stem subjects. And I think,
Speaker 8: you know, sometimes culture and tradition is just more important
Speaker 8: to people, and that's okay. So I just think progression
Speaker 8: should be about choice for parents looking at their individual child.
Speaker 8: A child's like cologists. But I've got two kids, and
Speaker 8: I actually think i've got one of each. One will
Speaker 8: do really well in a single sex school. One probably
Speaker 8: co eds. So I just don't think that we can
Speaker 8: have progression if we're going to eliminate or minimize choice
Speaker 8: for parents.
Speaker 3: No fair enough, I went to a single sex school.
Speaker 3: I was a massive nerd, so I think it suited
Speaker 3: me really well.
Speaker 2: Actually.
Speaker 3: Now onto the perennial issue, unfortunately, of closing the gap,
Speaker 3: and again a big part of that is health and
Speaker 3: education outcomes for Indigenous kids. Have we made any progress
Speaker 3: recently and is there anything new that's proposed in that
Speaker 3: space which is likely to help those particular issues.
Speaker 2: Well, we're not making.
Speaker 8: Much progress as far as I can see. The latest
Speaker 8: report shows that four out of seventeen objective outcomes for
Speaker 8: the Closing the Gap policy are on track only four
Speaker 8: out of the seventeen, so no, we're not doing much.
Speaker 8: And the latest proposal is that, oh, you know, need
Speaker 8: to include decision making with communities and indigenous voices, and
Speaker 8: of course we should. That makes sense and I think
Speaker 8: that most Australians recognize that we don't need a third
Speaker 8: chamber of Parliament to do that. We don't need to
Speaker 8: mess around with changing the constitution.
Speaker 2: We just need to get on and do it.
Speaker 8: As you said, you know, a lot of this comes
Speaker 8: down to health and education, but across the board, I
Speaker 8: think one hundred percent of Australians are ashamed and appalled
Speaker 8: at the developmental outcomes of Indigenous kids, who by four
Speaker 8: and five years old are absolutely you know, delayed developmentally
Speaker 8: compared to non Indigenous kids. So I think, like in
Speaker 8: most areas, it's just about more action, isn't it, and
Speaker 8: it's less policy making. And from an education point of view,
Speaker 8: I actually think that we need to come to this
Speaker 8: from the point of view of not significantly lowering our
Speaker 8: expectations for Indigenous kids, like we kind of think they're indigenous,
Speaker 8: so you know, they're not going to attend school and
Speaker 8: that's okay, that's not okay, because that's how we set
Speaker 8: them up for a better life in the future, is
Speaker 8: through education. So we need to hold the same standard
Speaker 8: for these Indigenous kids and these expectations for them as
Speaker 8: we would other Aussie kids.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and they still they deserve to be able to achieve,
Speaker 3: just like any other child in the country. Now onto
Speaker 3: youth crime, and I think it's pretty fair to say
Speaker 3: that it's a bit out.
Speaker 2: Of control in Victoria.
Speaker 3: There's now been an immediate ban on the selling of machetes.
Speaker 3: Why is the government in Victoria so obsessed We're treating
Speaker 3: the symptom and not treating the problem.
Speaker 8: Yeah, well, I mean, on one hand, there was an
Speaker 8: immediate ban. On the other hand, the other government gave
Speaker 8: forty eight hours to retailers. So one could argue we're
Speaker 8: safer now with less machetes on the street. But I
Speaker 8: don't know if we are safer. I think there's more
Speaker 8: machetes because of the fire sale that happened in the
Speaker 8: last forty eight hours. They've all sold out. So you know,
Speaker 8: it's just the same thing with Alan government of reactive
Speaker 8: policy and a really short term look at things. Research
Speaker 8: by the IPA into youth crime has shown actually the
Speaker 8: biggest to turrent of youth crime is not actually things
Speaker 8: like the severity of the punishment. Youth criminals are not
Speaker 8: thinking about that. The biggest to turrent is whether in
Speaker 8: the moment they're going to be caught or not. So
Speaker 8: that's a pretty cost benefit shallow analysis, but that's the
Speaker 8: reality of it. So I think if the Allen government
Speaker 8: was really serious about cracking down on this, they would
Speaker 8: put their funding and support into the police and have
Speaker 8: them more visible. And if mashety attacks are happening in
Speaker 8: shopping centers, there needs to be police and shopping centers.
Speaker 8: At the end of the day, that's no different to
Speaker 8: the primary school yard, is it? Where you know, troublesome
Speaker 8: kind of kids don't act out when the teachers on duty.
Speaker 8: And that's what the IPA research says. I think that
Speaker 8: that's where we need to look at things. But at
Speaker 8: the end of the day, I think all the policies
Speaker 8: and ideas come out to really fringe and around the edges,
Speaker 8: bail reforms and things like that. But actually that's how
Speaker 8: youth criminals decite in the moment impulsively whether they're going
Speaker 8: to act out or not.
Speaker 3: No fair enough. Now, lastly, and I've only got about
Speaker 3: a minute yet left, but a Canadian university has launched
Speaker 3: an adulting one to one course to teach basic life skills.
Speaker 4: Now, Claire, isn't this just the mother.
Speaker 3: Of all indictments that we've failed our children on development?
Speaker 8: Yes, this university cause is proposing to do things like
Speaker 8: teaching not kids, twenty year olds how to put the
Speaker 8: washing on and how to do the super much shopping.
Speaker 8: This is the job of parents. And I've always said,
Speaker 8: you know, we completely overprotect our kids in the real world.
Speaker 2: We underprotect them in the online world.
Speaker 8: But kids need to be able to by the time
Speaker 8: they're in primary school walk into a shop and buy something.
Speaker 8: We absolutely need to be teaching life skills.
Speaker 2: It's not enough just.
Speaker 8: To house your here and feed them. You need to
Speaker 8: be parenting them. You've got eighteen years to turn out
Speaker 8: a fully functioning human in society. It's a lot longer
Speaker 8: than most mammals get and we're failing that and we've
Speaker 8: got universities teaching it, which just seems bizarre.
Speaker 2: It seems totally.
Speaker 3: Bizarre given some of the other things we worry about.
Speaker 3: Our universities you think your kids would be better off
Speaker 3: learning those life skills at home. But as always, Clairot,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for joining the show.
Speaker 8: Thanks a lot still to come.
Speaker 3: Lefties Losing It, Plus shocking footage has emerged of a
Speaker 3: Democrat insider exposing Joe Biden's inner circle.
Speaker 2: Adam B.
Speaker 3: Coleman joins me next with the details. Welcome back to
Speaker 3: the show, and now it's time for Lefties Losing It
Speaker 3: and Democrat Representative Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 4: Well, she is back in the headlines. You right, Remember
Speaker 4: when she ridiculed Texas Governor Greg.
Speaker 3: Abbott for being in a wheelchair, calling him the governor
Speaker 3: hot wheels.
Speaker 5: We in these hot ass Texas streets, Honey, y'all know
Speaker 5: we got governor hot.
Speaker 8: Wheels down there.
Speaker 9: Come on now, and the only thing hot about him
Speaker 9: is that he is a hot ass mass honey.
Speaker 3: Or perhaps the time she admitted that she was only
Speaker 3: hired because she was black.
Speaker 9: When I first became a public defender, I had no
Speaker 9: criminal defense experience and I walked in and I told
Speaker 9: my boss, Charlie, I said, listen, you should hire me.
Speaker 9: He said why, I said, because I'm black.
Speaker 3: Well, now she's come out swinging, calling for Republicans to
Speaker 3: question President Trump's mental acuity.
Speaker 5: It is time for Republicans to start calling him out
Speaker 5: and started questioning his mental acuity and whether or not
Speaker 5: he is equipped to serve mentally.
Speaker 3: Well, that's all very interesting because where was she when
Speaker 3: people were questioning Joe Biden's mental acuity?
Speaker 5: People tried to talk about the mental acuity of Joe Biden,
Speaker 5: and as someone who was able to interact with him,
Speaker 5: I never questioned his acuity.
Speaker 3: And if that isn't enough, Jasmine Crockett cringe for one day,
Speaker 3: enjoy this short clip that she shared on her social media. Yes,
Speaker 3: she actually thought this was something worth sharing.
Speaker 10: Jasmine Crocking, she rises with the dum fighting for justice.
Speaker 1: I will never be gone.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 3: See here none other than Hollywood action star Chuck Norris. Well,
Speaker 3: he explains why he left the Democrats and became a Republican.
Speaker 2: I used to be a Democrat, but unfortunately the Democrats
Speaker 2: went too far to the left, and the Republicans moved
Speaker 2: into their position that the.
Speaker 4: Democrats were forty years ago.
Speaker 2: Yes to see, and so the what the Democrats.
Speaker 6: Believed forty years ago, the Republicans believed today.
Speaker 10: And so I realized that I had to go.
Speaker 4: To a Republican because the Democrats has got to for
Speaker 4: oft off the trail.
Speaker 3: And it's not at all hard to see what Chuck
Speaker 3: is talking about.
Speaker 2: Look at this new.
Speaker 3: Poll which indicates that AOC best represents the Democratic Party values.
Speaker 11: Who is in fact the leader of the Democratic Party.
Speaker 11: And a recent poll showed Congresswoman Alexandria Casio Cortez topping
Speaker 11: the list of Democrats who best represent the party's values.
Speaker 2: That should terrify every Democrat.
Speaker 3: Yes, that's the same AOC, who, when she isn't pretending
Speaker 3: to be a fashion model, is telling people to ignore
Speaker 3: the rule of law.
Speaker 12: They believe that the Biden demonistration should ignore this ruling.
Speaker 12: I think that we know the courts have the legitimacy
Speaker 12: and they rely on the legitimacy of their rulings.
Speaker 3: Classy with a capital K joining me now is political
Speaker 3: commentator and author of The Children We Left Behind.
Speaker 2: Adam B. Coleman.
Speaker 3: Adam an allegation was made some months back about the
Speaker 3: use of autopen during the Biden administration, and then obviously
Speaker 3: consequently questions over who was pulling the strings if the
Speaker 3: former president wasn't where in signing things himself.
Speaker 4: So, what's the latest with this auto pen situation.
Speaker 13: Yeah, the latest with the autopen situation is that the
Speaker 13: GOP is now starting to do investigations. They're making claims
Speaker 13: about staffers being the ones who are actually making decisions
Speaker 13: as to what is actually being signed supposedly by the president.
Speaker 13: And coincidentally, you have some Democrats, some of them are
Speaker 13: media personalities like Jake Tapper, who are coming out and
Speaker 13: saying that Joe Biden's cognitive ability was declining. The thing
Speaker 13: that we all could tell, you know, if we're just
Speaker 13: being honest and paying attention, and that puts into question
Speaker 13: was he aware of all the things that are happening
Speaker 13: in the White House? And if he wasn't, who was
Speaker 13: behind it? So it's less about the autopen because even
Speaker 13: Trump has used autopen, but he's aware that it's being used,
Speaker 13: he's given the authorization for being used. But if Joe
Speaker 13: Biden is sleeping all day and someone else is turning
Speaker 13: on the autopan function and pardoning people just because the
Speaker 13: occurring favors, that's a massive issue.
Speaker 2: Yeah, potentially a huge issue.
Speaker 3: Now some big admissions from a Democrat insider. Now there
Speaker 3: was an undercover video from Project Veritash showing DNC Vice
Speaker 3: chair David Hogg revealing that Jill Biden's chief of staff
Speaker 3: allegedly held a lot of power.
Speaker 1: The bigger issue was like the inner circle that was
Speaker 1: about Biden.
Speaker 7: That's it, and I keep stressing, I keep strengths to
Speaker 7: you another Jill Biden's chief of.
Speaker 8: Staff, like had an enormous amount of hour Jill Biden,
Speaker 8: Jill Biden's chief That was like an open secrett of
Speaker 8: like I would avoid you.
Speaker 6: You was scary.
Speaker 10: What was the thing? Anthony Flord, Now.
Speaker 3: This is something that you know a number of people
Speaker 3: were speculating about for some times, and this revelation really
Speaker 3: puts moments like this inter question.
Speaker 14: We're grateful and Jill is here today, heard that clapping.
Speaker 14: It wasn't for me. Today at the Top four meeting,
Speaker 14: Jill's going to give an update on the House Initiative,
Speaker 14: White House Audition.
Speaker 3: Adam, what impact does this have on people's trusting institutions?
Speaker 13: Well, it's and this is having a massive impact. You know,
Speaker 13: even Democrats are questioning their entire party. They're questioning, how
Speaker 13: did this man even end up in the position of power.
Speaker 13: Speaking for myself, personally as a former Democrat. When I
Speaker 13: saw him running for office, I asked the question as
Speaker 13: to why, what is the motive behind all of this,
Speaker 13: because it was very clear that he was falling apart.
Speaker 13: It was very clear who's belligerent. And it's also clear
Speaker 13: that the reason they wanted him is because he was controllable.
Speaker 13: They were able to push all types of agendas without
Speaker 13: any sort of fight from him, And he got to
Speaker 13: have the title as President, and Joe Biden got to
Speaker 13: be the first Lady, and.
Speaker 10: So everyone was wielding power around him.
Speaker 13: But no one was actually thinking about the American people
Speaker 13: and what was actually happening.
Speaker 10: So no, a lot of people are not having.
Speaker 13: Trust in institutions insanely that they did a decade ago
Speaker 13: at Lease.
Speaker 3: Yeah, fair enough, And look, you can understand when those
Speaker 3: sorts of allegations are made that people really question even
Speaker 3: the most basic of institutions. Functions now onto a Colorado
Speaker 3: sports brand and it's found it'sself in some trouble with
Speaker 3: the state's anti discrimination law.
Speaker 2: What's the story here?
Speaker 13: Essentially, their new law is an antidiscriminatory law, but it's
Speaker 13: a very progressive antidiscriminatory law, and Essentially, it's trying to
Speaker 13: cldify that if you use certain language in advertising, that
Speaker 13: it can be seen as discriminatory, and that every person
Speaker 13: in Colorado supposed to have some sort of right to
Speaker 13: non discriminatory advertising. So, if you're someone who is transgender
Speaker 13: and believes that even though you're a biological man, you're
Speaker 13: actually a woman, someone saying that trans women are men
Speaker 13: is someone that is being offensive to you, and so
Speaker 13: that could lead to all different types of lawsuits and
Speaker 13: things of that nature. So XXXY assuming because they're putting
Speaker 13: their business in jeopardy by saying biological truths that biological
Speaker 13: men are men, regardless if they were addressed or not.
Speaker 13: So this is essentially why they're trying to fight back
Speaker 13: against the state.
Speaker 10: And I hope they do.
Speaker 3: Well well and we will say how that goes. But
Speaker 3: I mean, this year is not a situation in isolation.
Speaker 3: Trump's threat to cut federal funding over the mission of
Speaker 3: trans athletes in women's sport has prompted a rule change
Speaker 3: in California.
Speaker 2: What's happened here? What's the latest with these.
Speaker 13: Yeah, essentially they're reacting to Trump, but they're giving a
Speaker 13: lukewarm response.
Speaker 10: So the championships that they have.
Speaker 13: Obviously they are trans athletes who are competing, and it's
Speaker 13: of course biological men always competing in women's games. So
Speaker 13: what they did was for the spots that the trans
Speaker 13: athletes were taking up, they added additional spots for the
Speaker 13: women who lost their spots because of the trans men
Speaker 13: being there, which is superficially fine, but at the same time,
Speaker 13: it doesn't remove these trans athletes who have a disadvantage
Speaker 13: or who have an advantage over the women.
Speaker 10: It doesn't remove.
Speaker 13: Them from actually winning, so they can still take medals.
Speaker 13: They still can win these competitions.
Speaker 10: So it's a moot point.
Speaker 13: It's like, okay, sure we'll have more women be involved
Speaker 13: as they lose, Like, that's not any sort of fairness.
Speaker 13: And for them to think that this actually abides by
Speaker 13: what Trump is actually wanting, I think is far fetched.
Speaker 10: But we'll see what happened. I think that there's more
Speaker 10: changes that are coming down the pipe. But if they
Speaker 10: think this is it, this is definitely not the solution.
Speaker 3: Well, there really is a big difference between participation and competition.
Speaker 3: So I take your point there that it is a point.
Speaker 3: Now our next story is almost amusing because when you
Speaker 3: think of the US Secret Service, you think of you
Speaker 3: think of discipline, But a couple of officers have found
Speaker 3: themselves suspended this waking well, what I would say, is
Speaker 3: a rather unusual set of circumstances.
Speaker 13: Yes, it's an unusual set of circumstances when it comes
Speaker 13: to two Secret Service members fighting each other and there
Speaker 13: being caught on camera outside of Obama's location. But it
Speaker 13: just goes to show you the level of this array
Speaker 13: that is stemming from the federal government and especially coming
Speaker 13: from the Biden administration.
Speaker 10: And I would wager that.
Speaker 13: Some of these people, I don't know these particular agents
Speaker 13: if they were hired during the Biden administration, but.
Speaker 10: There is a lot of chaos that was happening.
Speaker 13: We can also look at what happened with Donald Trump
Speaker 13: and the assassination attempt and the failures of the Secret
Speaker 13: Service that led for him to be even shot in
Speaker 13: the first place.
Speaker 10: So none of this shocks me.
Speaker 13: But the Secret Service has a little bit of tumultuous history.
Speaker 13: We've heard, you know, situations of them getting prostitutes and
Speaker 13: foreign nations and things like that, So this doesn't strike
Speaker 13: me as completely abnormal.
Speaker 3: Maybe they're not as disciplined as we all give.
Speaker 2: Them credit for.
Speaker 3: Now, we've also learned that the FBI is revisiting a
Speaker 3: few things.
Speaker 4: Which might have potentially fallen off there.
Speaker 3: To do list like the White House cocaine find what's
Speaker 3: this all about?
Speaker 2: And should we speak expecting any action here?
Speaker 13: Personally, I don't think there's going to be any sort
Speaker 13: of action. You know, we're talking a small amount of cocaine,
Speaker 13: not that there should be any cocaine in the White House,
Speaker 13: but it was very clear that the Biden administration wasn't
Speaker 13: going to take this particular situation seriously. For all I know,
Speaker 13: it could have been a staffer who left some sort
Speaker 13: of cocaine at in the White House. I don't know
Speaker 13: if this is that big of a deal. You know,
Speaker 13: if it was a lot of cocaine, if it was
Speaker 13: a large mountain of cocaine, then it would be a
Speaker 13: different story. But it looks like it was for a
Speaker 13: personal usage. They can do their investigation, but I don't
Speaker 13: think much will come from it.
Speaker 3: Now on to Democratic Senator Michael Bennett, and he's at
Speaker 3: a crack at his own party or his party's brand,
Speaker 3: I should say, And I'm sure there's some truth in it.
Speaker 2: But shouldn't they be concerned.
Speaker 3: Shouldn't these concerns be raised and dealt with internally?
Speaker 10: No, I actually like it that it's public.
Speaker 13: It shows that it tells the American public that they're
Speaker 13: finally waking.
Speaker 10: Up just a little bit.
Speaker 13: There's a little bit of glimpse, a little bit of
Speaker 13: a hope, but then realizing that Democratic Party is lost,
Speaker 13: and they finally recognize that they're a bit lost. And
Speaker 13: some of especially the blue dog Democrats, are getting fed
Speaker 13: up of the progressives who've taken over, who've led this
Speaker 13: charge of being anti male and talking about patriarchy and
Speaker 13: everything is oppressive. So yeah, there's a bit of disgust,
Speaker 13: and I'm glad it's finally happening. I am one of
Speaker 13: those Democrats who walked away and became an independent because
Speaker 13: of this very thing. It is a party that is
Speaker 13: not appealing anymore. It doesn't speak to the majority of
Speaker 13: the American population. They cater to a niche audience of
Speaker 13: typically wealth the elitists, coastal elitists, and they don't speak
Speaker 13: the same language I do.
Speaker 10: They don't have the same concerns that I have.
Speaker 13: So I'm glad that he's actually being public about it
Speaker 13: because while they're you know the reason for him saying
Speaker 13: this is because he's anti Trump whatever, but he is
Speaker 13: speaking some truth that their brand is actually terrible.
Speaker 3: And I suppose for people out there, you know, like you,
Speaker 3: who are worried about the brand, you're hoping that they
Speaker 3: maybe have just worked it all out. Now, the US's
Speaker 3: enemies have criticized Donald Trump's proposed one hundred and seventy
Speaker 3: five billion dollar Golden Dome missile shield. Is this meant
Speaker 3: to be a joke.
Speaker 10: No, Actually, he's very serious about it.
Speaker 13: Believes during Trump's the first administration where space force was
Speaker 13: brought about, So he's very serious about reinforcing space, you know,
Speaker 13: having some sort of space command looking out for the
Speaker 13: America's interests when it comes to space as well. Of course,
Speaker 13: North Korea and Russia aren't going to like it, trust
Speaker 13: and belief. If they're the ones doing it, they wouldn't
Speaker 13: be complaining.
Speaker 10: So you know, they're.
Speaker 13: Saying that this might turn into another space race or
Speaker 13: arms race or some sort of race. But I don't
Speaker 13: really care what Russia or North Korea thinks about this.
Speaker 13: What I do care about is actually how much is
Speaker 13: it really going to cost. Some estimates are saying that
Speaker 13: his numbers are very conservative.
Speaker 10: For the real.
Speaker 13: Estimates maybe or times the amount that he's claiming.
Speaker 10: So is this worth it? And actually, how long is
Speaker 10: it going to take?
Speaker 13: This is just going to be more government blow and
Speaker 13: that's the thing that we should be concerned with.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that is a definite question that the American people,
Speaker 3: I'm sure are very interested in.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 3: MPR is suing the government over Trump's executive order, obviously,
Speaker 3: which was aimed at the public media. What's the claim
Speaker 3: and does it have any merit?
Speaker 13: Yeah, their claim is that Donald Trump is impeding on
Speaker 13: their First Amendment, right, but he's not. The reality is
Speaker 13: that Empire's budget is about one percent coming from the
Speaker 13: federal government, even if it was fifteen or fifty percent.
Speaker 13: MPR is a private organization and they're not entitled to
Speaker 13: federal funding. And that's the biggest problem when it comes
Speaker 13: to MPR. They believe that they're entitled to the consistent,
Speaker 13: the status quo of receiving money from the federal government,
Speaker 13: just like much of the federal government or much of
Speaker 13: the apparatus that's attached to the federal government around DC especially,
Speaker 13: So no, you're not entitled to our tax money. It's
Speaker 13: not Trump's money, it's my money too. So if there
Speaker 13: are questions about your conduct as a private organization, the
Speaker 13: federal government doesn't have to fund you. And so very
Speaker 13: clearly ninety nine percent of your budget comes from elsewhere.
Speaker 10: Fill in the gap.
Speaker 2: Yeah, totally.
Speaker 3: He's not stopping them from saying what they're saying. He's
Speaker 3: just saying that the American people aren't going to pay
Speaker 3: for it. The two totally different things. Now once at
Speaker 3: the US university scene, and Trump has suggested that Harvard
Speaker 3: cut its international student intake to fifteen percent. Now, he's
Speaker 3: gone pretty hard on the Ivy League universities.
Speaker 2: What's this latest barb what's the pose of it?
Speaker 13: Yeah, when it comes to Harvard, they're once again upset
Speaker 13: that the gravy train is ending when it comes to
Speaker 13: federal funding. Even though they have over fifty billion dollars
Speaker 13: in endowment they and they're essentially a mid tier hedge fund,
Speaker 13: they still think that they should get as much money
Speaker 13: as they possibly can from the federal government. And they
Speaker 13: especially don't like it that Trump is calling into question
Speaker 13: how many foreign students that they bring in and for
Speaker 13: what reason?
Speaker 10: And it's very clear. I mean it's an open secret.
Speaker 10: You charge a.
Speaker 13: Crazy amount for a crazy amount of money for foreign
Speaker 13: students to come into your school. You make a lot
Speaker 13: of money that way, so you just keep increasing the
Speaker 13: amount of foreign students who can come through.
Speaker 10: And so they're calling into.
Speaker 13: Question the quality of students are coming in, the reasons
Speaker 13: for taking in all these foreign students, And you know what,
Speaker 13: I'm all for it. I'm all for them looking out
Speaker 13: for because very clearly they're not very good at delegating
Speaker 13: how many I don't know, terrorist sympathetic students who are
Speaker 13: coming through, who aren't here for the American experience, who
Speaker 13: are here to alter our society to some degree. And
Speaker 13: granted that's not all of them, but they're obviously not
Speaker 13: taking Trump's threats seriously, and so he's exercising what he
Speaker 13: is saying.
Speaker 3: Oh, he is absolutely exercising what he is saying. Adam Coleman,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 2: Still to come.
Speaker 3: And Megan Michael thinks her next venture will make her
Speaker 3: a billionaire.
Speaker 2: But she also feels guilty about being rich.
Speaker 4: Kinsey Schofield joins me next.
Speaker 2: To discuss that and much much more.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, to the show, and joining me now is
Speaker 3: celebrity and oral reporter Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey Megan Michael thinks
Speaker 3: her latest adventure is going to make her a billionaire,
Speaker 3: and yet she feels guilty about having money.
Speaker 2: I mean, honestly, this is really getting.
Speaker 15: Tysome Lemonada's ad partner is Gretchen Ruben Media, and they
Speaker 15: generally pay between twenty five to fifty dollars per one
Speaker 15: thousand downloads. Megan would get the high end of that
Speaker 15: because of name recognition, but based on the analytics provided
Speaker 15: by Fast Company magazine this week, Meghan's made approximately forty
Speaker 15: thousand dollars for season one of Confessions of a Female Founder,
Speaker 15: not exactly Spotify money. And if she's trying to be
Speaker 15: a billionaire, I think she's going to have to hustle
Speaker 15: a little bit harder in the jam and the podcasting space.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, But why talk about feeling guilty about having money?
Speaker 4: I mean, we all know that they have it. Why
Speaker 4: are you talking about it?
Speaker 3: It's really quite ghost, isn't it.
Speaker 2: It is?
Speaker 15: But that's not the line that I took away from it.
Speaker 15: She talked about a scarcity mindset, and I feel like
Speaker 15: that is such a reflection of the chaos we see
Speaker 15: in her unleashing all of these brands, this relentless promotion.
Speaker 15: It's the fear of not having enough money that I
Speaker 15: really took away.
Speaker 1: From that conversation.
Speaker 3: Very interesting now speaking about one of those one of
Speaker 3: those projects, and that's her lifestyle brand as Ever. Now
Speaker 3: there's rumor she won't be restocking some of her products,
Speaker 3: including her Jam. We have been talking about this for
Speaker 3: so long, this can't actually be serious.
Speaker 15: Yeah, she said that she's going to take a step
Speaker 15: back and kind of try to reevaluate the as Ever
Speaker 15: brand until twenty twenty six.
Speaker 1: She told this to Fast Company magazine.
Speaker 15: Constant reinvention breeds skepticism. One minute, she's a podcast host,
Speaker 15: the next a lifestyle guru, then a children's book author,
Speaker 15: now a Jam entrepreneur. Reinvention isn't inherently bad, but without
Speaker 15: follow through or success in any one domain, it's to
Speaker 15: look like flailing, not versatility. And this inconsistency makes it
Speaker 15: hard for anyone to invest emotionally or financially in Megan
Speaker 15: Markle's ventures.
Speaker 3: And onto that investment. And that is a really important
Speaker 3: point that you make there. Do you think that her
Speaker 3: well in your view, I hed.
Speaker 2: Back is getting banged for back.
Speaker 3: Are they starting to lose patients like at some point
Speaker 3: pick something and stick with it.
Speaker 15: Yeah, I'm sure that there is a lot of frustration.
Speaker 15: I think that we saw it on full display with Spotify.
Speaker 15: They just weren't as secretive as everybody else has been,
Speaker 15: or they haven't had as much patience as everyone else
Speaker 15: has been. Ted Sarandos still trying to tell us that
Speaker 15: he thinks Megan Markle has this big cultural impact that
Speaker 15: I'm patiently waiting to see exactly what is definition of
Speaker 15: cultural impact means. But there has to be a lot
Speaker 15: of frustration, especially just with the constant rebranding Love and
Speaker 15: New that their new micro or Timu Royal Court that
Speaker 15: they've created, and eleven new members that are going to help.
Speaker 1: Rehabilitate their image.
Speaker 15: It has to be exhausting for the people that have
Speaker 15: invested in them to say everything seems so aimless.
Speaker 1: Can you just focus.
Speaker 3: Now onto the more celeb scene rather than Royal So
Speaker 3: Lindsay Lowan, well, she's been part of the celebrity scene
Speaker 3: for a very long time, but some recent rumors apparently
Speaker 3: about her changing face.
Speaker 2: What's the speculation here.
Speaker 15: But she's had a facelift, and you know what, Lindsay
Speaker 15: Lohan is refusing to admit that she allegedly went under
Speaker 15: the knife and claims her new face is thanks to
Speaker 15: listen to me when I tell you ice cold water
Speaker 15: splashes to the face and drinking juice every morning like carrot, ginger,
Speaker 15: lemon and apple. Oh and she's a big pickled beats person.
Speaker 15: She claims she's all natur l that's not a face,
Speaker 15: it's a group project.
Speaker 1: But god, lover, she looks amazing.
Speaker 4: She does look amazing, and god, we wish it was
Speaker 4: all that simple.
Speaker 3: Now to the Australian celebrity scene and debor a Furness
Speaker 3: Hugh Jackson, Hugh Jackman's extrange wife. Well, she has broken
Speaker 3: her silence and what is a catalyst for this?
Speaker 1: Okay?
Speaker 15: So while they split in twenty twenty three, she finally
Speaker 15: officially filed for divorce this week.
Speaker 1: I think it's after these photos surfaced of.
Speaker 15: Hugh Jackman moving his current girlfriend in and Devor spoke
Speaker 15: about the traumatic journey of betrayal and a lengthy statement.
Speaker 1: She told The Daily Mail on Tuesday that they're split is.
Speaker 15: A profound wound that cuts deep and without naming her
Speaker 15: famous husband or his girlfriend s like subtly confirmed this affair,
Speaker 15: and insiders say that Hugh Jackman is extremely disappointed and blindsided.
Speaker 15: He believed they had an understanding that they would not
Speaker 15: publicly discuss one another. He is dodging so much negative
Speaker 15: press right now because of his association with Ryan Reynolds
Speaker 15: and Blake Lively. He's worried both scandals will really negatively
Speaker 15: impact his popularity.
Speaker 2: That's a very very interesting point, isn't it.
Speaker 3: But now want to some happier news, I suppose, and
Speaker 3: some recent business news for Haley Beber.
Speaker 2: What's the latest with her beauty brand?
Speaker 15: Yeah, she's officially joined the coveted billionaires club. She probably
Speaker 15: Megan Markle's probably calling her up right now, but she
Speaker 15: her Road beauty brand reportedly has signed a deal with
Speaker 15: Elf Cosmetics that's worth about one million dollars, while her husband,
Speaker 15: Justin Bieber reportedly grapples with financial troubles. It was Wednesday
Speaker 15: that they announced a definitive agreement.
Speaker 1: Haley's latest milestone.
Speaker 15: Fallows reports that her husband is facing financial difficulties. For
Speaker 15: months now, the pop star has allegedly been dealing with
Speaker 15: debt linked to has canceled twenty twenty two Justice Tour,
Speaker 15: So she's the breadwinner today.
Speaker 3: But I also think it's a great story from an entrepreneurship.
Speaker 2: Point of view.
Speaker 3: And you know, we were talking about Megan Markel earlier, but
Speaker 3: he is someone who started approaching and went on to
Speaker 3: be successful with it. And I think that that shows
Speaker 3: real paradox, don't you.
Speaker 1: Three years, this has existed for three years, and she
Speaker 1: was so savvy.
Speaker 15: The phone case that holds the lip glass, the lip
Speaker 15: glass that's the exact shape of hers. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 15: and she's utilized the influencer title to actually generate an
Speaker 15: incredible revenue and an incredible product. I have two of
Speaker 15: her lip glasses in my makeup bag right now. So
Speaker 15: it is an exciting project. And she is torn apart
Speaker 15: on the internet regularly. There are a lot of similarities
Speaker 15: between her and Megan Markle. So Meghan might want to
Speaker 15: pick up the phone and say, do you mind mentoring
Speaker 15: me a little bit here?
Speaker 3: Yeah, that might be the very good point, Absolutely an
Speaker 3: excellent point. Now, so much in the news about brigetting
Speaker 3: Emmanuel mccronin whatever that particular incident was, but a lip
Speaker 3: reader has weighed in on it. So what did they
Speaker 3: have to say about what was said during this incident?
Speaker 1: I cannot get enough of this story.
Speaker 15: After the incident, a lipreader claims things turn icy again
Speaker 15: once the couple start down the stairs to the tarmac.
Speaker 15: The president offers his arm to his wife. She ignores it,
Speaker 15: clinging to the railing instead, and the lip reader claims as.
Speaker 1: She passes, she appears to mutter, stay away, you lose her.
Speaker 15: Emanuel apparently replied to her by saying, let's try please
Speaker 15: to what she allegedly answered no, And the expert described
Speaker 15: it as a rare, unguarded exchange that hints at deeper
Speaker 15: tensions between the couple.
Speaker 3: Now you've said that there's nothing that you don't love
Speaker 3: about this story, So what I mean, Look, we all
Speaker 3: saw it, and it was it was really quite. It
Speaker 3: was quite bruising in a I suppose a figurative as
Speaker 3: well as a literal sense. But we don't often get
Speaker 3: to say these sorts of things. What were the things
Speaker 3: that were notable that really stood out to you.
Speaker 7: In this.
Speaker 15: But you know Emmanuel saying we were just being playful,
Speaker 15: I mean to me, we were just being playful.
Speaker 1: It wasn't anything you're jumping to conclusions.
Speaker 15: That's why I hope I'm not being insensitive when I
Speaker 15: say I love everything about this story. But it was
Speaker 15: just such a voyeuristic moment, and I hope they were
Speaker 15: just being playful. But the story just seems to have
Speaker 15: so much meat that we have yet to get to.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and I think there's probably I think you're quite right.
Speaker 3: I think there's probably a bit more to that. Kinsey Schofield,
Speaker 3: thank you so much, thank you, And that's it for
Speaker 3: me tonight up next to his Newsnight, good Night,