WEBVTT - Sharri | 11 July

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Line sharing. Thanks Andrew and welcome to the show.

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>The New South Wales state government today confirmed an inquiry

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>will be held into greyhound racing. Leah Drake, who was

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the inaugural Integrity Commissioner at the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>also served on the Fair Work Commission. She's been appointed

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Acting Commissioner of the New South Wales Greyhound Welfare and

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Integrity Commission known as g WICK and she will leave

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>this independent inquiry. Racing Minister David Harris confirmed the inquiry

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>would look into greyhound welfare and the care of greyhounds

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>by the governing body Greyhound Racing New South Wales, including

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>adoption and rehoming programs, the body's processes and management including

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>procurement and recruitment practices. It's reporting an accuracy in relation

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to greyhounds, and management's response to complaints or concerns about

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>organizational and workplace culture and conduct. Mister Harris said in

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a statement that he was absolutely committed to ensuring a competitive,

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>responsible and sustainable greyhound racing industry with the highest standards

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of animal sorry welfare and integrity. It's important that the

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>governing bodies and senior leadership of the racing codes meet

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>these standards. I take these various concerns about greyhound racing

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales very seriously and this inquiry, using the

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>full investigative powers of g WICK, will conduct a thorough

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and wide ranging review of all relevant issues. He also

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>had this to say at a press conference.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 3>What we need to do is let the inquiry look

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 3>into these issues and give recommendations back to the government

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 3>about how we can change the license conditions if necessary,

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 3>or implement improvements to ensure that we have best practice.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>No doubt many in the industry will be tonight worried

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>depending on the results of this inquiry that a ban

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>could well be back on the cards now. As I

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>said last night, the trigger for this is a letter

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 1>from the Greyhound Racing New South Wales former chief Vet,

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>which was sent to the governing body in June, claiming

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that rehoming rates had been inflated, dogs were racing too much,

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>causing too many injuries, and that they were left to

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>live out their miserable post racing lives in industrial kennels

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote. Some of the allegations, including those relating to

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>veterinary care, warranted further investigation. According to a response by

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>g Wick that was tabled in state parliament this week,

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but it also dismissed others as wrong, including that hundreds

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of dog deaths had been hidden. The chief executive of

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Greyhound Racing New South Wales also resigned this week. Now,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>while this investigation may focus on the governing body rather itself,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than the entire industry, here's what David Harris said

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>were in the terms of reference.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 4>The accuracy and reporting by Greyhound Racing New South Wales

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 4>in relation to Gris greyhounds and whether that reporting represents

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 4>the true state of the greyhound racing industry, including the

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 4>welfare of greyhounds and the state of related programs under

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Greyhound Racing New South Wales Control Awareness and Oversight.

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>That's despite Gwick already dismissing concerns about things like death

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers being wrong. And of course, if the investigation were

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to find that the governing body had covered things up,

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that would tend to suggest problems in the industry at

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>large that needed covering up, which may well open the

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>door to trouble for the entire industry and not just

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the governing body, and any sort of problems within the

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>post racing rehoming program could also be a trigger for

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>activists to pursue another ban. Whatever the inquiry uncovers, animal

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>activists will use what are most likely rare cases to

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>push for a ban on greyhound racing. And in a

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>six sort of way, these people actually want bad things

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to happen. They can help bolster their argument. The industry

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that I know has little to worry about in an inquiry,

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and anyone who does not take their responsibility towards their

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>animals seriously deserves to be named and shamed. Any kind

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of mismanagement or misbehavior deserves to be exposed for the

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>good of the sport and the welfare of the animals.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But you'd be foolish to think that activists with an

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>axe to grind will not try to hijack this inquiry.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>The Greens have a policy of banning all racing.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>If this inquiry uncovers any mistreatment or shoddy practices among

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a few bad apples, the Greens and their milk will

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly use it to push for a ban. These

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>activists peddle the lie that horses and dogs are just

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>disposable machines for the profit of owners. But I can

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.239
<v Speaker 1>assure you, as someone who owns both that I generally

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>spend much more than I make in prize money because

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>I love the sport and these marvelous athletic animals. As

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>to all the participants, I know they get into racing

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>because they love the sport and they love the animals. Now, yes,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>there will always be bad apples, but there are bad

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>apples everywhere. You cannot, on the basis of their behavior,

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>besmirch an entire industry. That's what the activists will try

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to do. Though New South Wales Premier Chris Mins yesterday

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>said that he would not ban greyhound racing and whatever

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the results of this inquiry, he has to stick to

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>his guns. The one insurance policy against a ban is

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that Mens isn't stupid and he'd well know, especially after

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>watching what happened to make Baird when he tried to

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>ban greyhound racing sorry in twenty sixteen, that a ban

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>would be electoral poison for labor in the regions. But

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the noise will be loud and the activists will fight hard. Now,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like many involved in racing, I welcome an inquiry, but

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we must be careful that it is used to improve

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the industry and not turned into a witch hunt. As

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I said last night, greyhound racing mightn't be as popular

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.239
<v Speaker 1>as horse racing, but that makes it an easy target

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>for activists and an easy sacrificial lamb for governments that

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>want to shut them up. Sacrificing the dogs would open

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a much, much bigger problem. Now, while we're on animals

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and activists, I have to tell you the curious story

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of Yarra Council in Melbourne, which probably would have to

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be one of the worker's councils anywhere in the world

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I reckon now. The council is this week unanimously voted

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for a climate emergency plan that said we need to

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>decolonize the landscape and outdoor spaces by using traditional Aboriginal

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>land management practices, which would apparently bring the area back

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>from quote unquote the precipice of climate and ecological collapse.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The plan says this means prioritizing climate resilient indigenous and

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:02.799
<v Speaker 1>native vegetation, including trees, grasses, and groundcovers, which will provide

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>suitable habitat for our native wildlife while minimizing resource intensive

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>maintenance practices. Simultaneously, decolonizing our outdoor spaces means ensuring that

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge and practices of the Warujuri woi Warang are

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>embedded into land management. There you go, climate change solved

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>by Yarra Council. It also said that residents should act

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on the climate emergency using public transport or walking or

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>riding a bike, consuming resources consciously whatever that means, and

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>move their banking and superannuation away from companies that invest

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in fossil fuels. But here's the real silver bullet. The

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>council recommended that residents adopt a vegetarian diet. Yes, your

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>council is telling you what you should and shouldn't eat.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And you'd expect then that Yarra Council had been leading

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>by example that they were all veo. So have a

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>guess what was served up to councilors and executive staff

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>before their meeting this week. Kinwa salad, perhaps maybe a

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>little mushroom risotto will No, it was roast beef. They

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>knocked down on roast beef and then walked into the

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>chamber to tell residents that they should be eating venjo

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to save the planet. One rule for thee another for me. Now,

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>they've generally offered beef, lamb or chicken dishes before their

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>meetings apparently so. Of course, the Herald's son asked the

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>council about this, and lo and behold, they came back

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon and said that meat will be off the

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>menu from now on and councilors and staff will be

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>subjected to plant based meals. Only one wonders whether if

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the Herald son hadn't asked that question, whether that would

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have ever happened, they would have just kept eating the

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>beef and the chicken and the lamb. But I also

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>wonder how many people will actually rock up to these

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>pre meeting dinners from now on. Also tonight, as the

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister insists that gas projects are the key to

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>our transition to net zero, Labour's own energy consultation paper

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>has rejected the gas industry. Plus the ghost of Prime

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Minister's past Malcolm Turbul, he resorts back to haunting his

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>former Liberal rivals, and one of them has hit back,

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Hollywood star slash mega Democrat funder who's turning

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 1>his back on Joe Biden like so many of them. Well,

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the Muslim vote in the UK election

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>last week has stirred speculation that this will drip feed

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>into our elections here in Australia. On the first of July,

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>this group called the Muslim Vote was established, and it's

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a group that, according to their website, is a movement

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that is alone capable of forcing the current government into

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>minority government. Well, the Daily Telegraph exclusively revealed today that

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a man named Mohammad Khanan is the sole director of

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this group, a man who said he had no previous

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>experience in politics or political campaigns for that matter. Joining

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>me now to discuss his commentator Jason Morrison and the

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Daily Telegraphs Federal Report political reporter, Sorry Angira barhard Waj Jason,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe that we have a situation here, of

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>course where and you've got this group funded by someone

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>who's never had an interest in politics before, sprung up

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere. They've worked out that maybe they've got

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of sway, now.

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Bit of sway.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 5>Look, they're a lobby group for the moment, but when

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 5>they become a political party, I'm looking forward to Labor

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 5>and the Coalition treating them like they've treated one nation forever,

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 5>because you've still got you Dimwitz and the Coalition that

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 5>want to put one nation last. Because it's such an

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 5>abhorrent political movement we can't deal with it.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 2>So you're going to deal with a.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 5>Mob, are you, Labor Party Greens that represents, at its

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 5>most radical fringe, some of the most atrocious and disgusting

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 5>things that it is abc use with the Australian culture.

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 5>That's not to say all Muslim culture is, but there's

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 5>a fraction of it that is. And I find it

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 5>staggering that this is being treated as, oh, well, it's

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 5>just another group out there. They will not be representing

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 5>the moderate view. They will be representing the extremist view.

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 5>And if the view of one nation is it's always

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 5>been about extremists and things like that, then treat this

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 5>mob the same and watch them have absolutely no political

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 5>influence in Australia.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 6>But they won't.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 5>Labor will trade with them, the Greens will endorse them

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 5>and back them and be partners with them, and you'll

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 5>have this sort of bizarre situation emerging, as you have

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 5>seen in the UK at the moment, where you actually

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 5>do have a thorough block of people who vote a

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 5>particular way based on religious and ethnic lines, and that's

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 5>not a good thing in this country.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and of course it may not all of them

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>may represent an extremist view and gear, but you know

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got a significant block here that says they're going

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to give it a serious go. How much of a

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>threat do you think is that it is really to

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Labor seats in Western Sydney.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 7>Look, Caleb, I think a lot of this depends on

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 7>the timing of the election and also what happens in

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 7>Gaza between now and a potential election. There have been

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 7>suggestions we might have an election as early as later

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 7>this year, so that would really change things because, as

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 7>it's clear the story in the Telegraph today, this movement

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 7>is really in its infancy. We have not seen it

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 7>get anywhere near as organized as it was in the UK,

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 7>so I think it's a bit of a case of

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 7>time will tell in terms of danger in a lot

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 7>of those Western Sydney seats. Labor sources have admitted to

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 7>me that Tony Burke's seat of Watson is one that

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 7>could be at risk. It does have a very high

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 7>Muslim population and people are there quite frustrated with Labour's response.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 7>But we do have a preference system that doesn't really

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 7>allow these movements to have the same impact as they

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 7>did in the UK.

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Now and Gira. We talked about this on the show

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>last night, but you revealed yesterday the Daily Telegraph that

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in the month of May this year you had more

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>than two thousand, three hundred asylum seekers that flew into

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Australia and that's the most popular way for quote unquote

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>asylum seekers to get into the country. Now, that was

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the highest month since Albanizi took office two years ago.

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Is the government concerned about the levels at which they're

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>coming in, particularly given that I think it's eleven people

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the eighty odd thousand that have flown into this

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>country have actually left.

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 7>Look, if they're not concerned, they really should be, because

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 7>this is an area where the Coalition has traditionally been

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 7>quite strong, and with an election coming up, it will

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 7>be an area that the Coalition and voters will be

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 7>watching closely. Now with two active wars around the world

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 7>right now, we can't really afford to have dodgy asylum

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 7>seekers trying to get into the country when we also

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 7>have people coming by boat. We did have a report

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 7>today about people from coming by Indonesia and having boats

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 7>turned away. So I would like to say, and I

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 7>would hope that The Labor government is.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Concerned about this.

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 7>They have put one hundred and sixty million dollars into

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 7>new programs to try and tackle this. But with the

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 7>numbers that we've been reporting in the Telegraph for a

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 7>little while and then again the month of May, it

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 7>doesn't seem like it's having an impact just yet. And

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 7>we've had twenty three hundred people come in May. That's

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 7>not that far off from the highest on record, which

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 7>was back in twenty eighteen, which was twenty eight hundred.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 7>So we're really heading into that direction where we could

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 7>be breaking an all time record.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And why wouldn't you give it a go, Jason, Why

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not give it a go. They get in and no

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>one seems to get rid of them.

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 5>There's a good track record, particularly with the mob running

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 5>the country at the moment, given that the Immigration Minister

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 5>used to be an activist lawyer acting for this corner

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 5>of migrant in Australia. And I think this is the

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 5>problem with this issue in the minds of a lot

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 5>of Australians. They look at the grand total immigration intake

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 5>and even though you could argue from a policy perspective,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 5>you shouldn't, a lot of Aussies are really frustrated with

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 5>what's going on in the country about how difficult life

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 5>is for them at the moment, a sense that their

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 5>government is not there for them at the second, and

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 5>to sort of see a little special treatment for a

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 5>little group here, you know, record immigration over here, and

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 5>you put all the things together and they become clouded

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 5>issues in the minds of a lot of people. And

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 5>I feel like saying, you know, this is a country.

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 5>I pay my way here and I get real nothing back.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 5>And there is that undertone that is there. This is

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 5>going to be a big political issue for Labor, and

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 5>I think their reaction to that Telegraph story tells you plenty.

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 5>They don't want to talk about it because they know

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 5>it's best not spoken about. Whereas once by a time,

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 5>Labor used to be the party that would say, yes,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 5>that's us, we let these people in here, damn good

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 5>are we. They're not saying that now because they know

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 5>that Australians at the second are really pissed off with

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 5>their government and their attitudes to immigration broadly speaking, and.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>They saw what happened last time, of course, when they

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>had an almost open border policy when it came to

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>both people in particular and it didn't end well for them.

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Now let's go to my favorite state of Victoria. Favorite

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>being a bit of an exaggeration, but their economy has

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>been absolutely destroyed, of course by successive leaders. Daniel Andrews

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>plunge the joint the economy into enormous step following COVID,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and they cannot get out of that. I mean, you

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the taxes that they're levying down there or

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not income tax. That's the I wish we Actually this

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is a different point. We should be able to give

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>income tax back to the states, but we'll get into

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that discussion another day. Lamb tax is what I was

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going for. But just inter Allen, Now, hundreds of government

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure projects not totally unusual, but the blowouts on hundreds

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of projects are going to go into millions and millions

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of dollars over budget. Now, as I say, Angira, look,

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you kind of expect that of government projects, but for

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a state that is so strapped for cash right now,

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the only person they can get it out of is

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the taxpayer. And if you're a Victorian taxpayer right now,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, get me out of here.

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is not the first time we've seen

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 7>cost blowouts with the Victorian government. We do know that

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 7>state premiers like Chris Minz and Jacinta Allen have been

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 7>lobbying CANBRA for more money for some of these infrastructure projects.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 7>I feel like a lot of these issues are not

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 7>going to go away anytime soon. I mean, the constraints

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 7>that we've seen in the construction industry are not going

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 7>to go away anytime soon. So Victoria's really going to

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 7>have to figure out a way to get their economy

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 7>in shape because these projects aren't going to pay for

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 7>themselves and there's only so much they can get out

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 7>of the Commonwealth.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, the most indebted jurisdiction in the country, and I

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>think Berg Capita they're actually one of the most indebted

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world. I mean, that sort of tells you

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>where things are, doesn't it.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>An unexpected article in The New York Times today, Hollywood

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>star George Clooney has weighed in on the electoral shambles

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US sorry he's urged President Biden to withdraw.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>He wrote, the Joe Biden I was with three weeks

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ago at a fundraiser was not the Joe big effing

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>deal Biden of twenty ten He wasn't even the Joe

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Biden of twenty twenty. He was the same man we

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>all witnessed at the debate. We are not going to

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>win in November with this president. This isn't only my opinion.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Opinion of every Senator and congress member and governor who

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I have spoken with in private, every single one, irrespective

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of what he or she is saying publicly. I mean,

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he's lost all his friends in the world. I've done now,

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the clooney factions.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Moved on him. He's done.

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a matter of time.

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Really. I mean, when you.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 5>Start losing the celebrities that bring you the doshi in

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 5>because their presence and their endorsement means a lot to

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 5>the imbeciles who think that celebrities matter in the United States,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 5>it's finished. And when I see that, I mean, if

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 5>those quotes are accurate, or the paraphrasing of them is

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 5>even slightly close to the.

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 8>Truth, that is damning.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Because he's been up the shirt with Biden for so long,

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 5>he has been so in the camp, and for him

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 5>to sort of be wavering is devastating.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Oh, most definitely, Angira. It's hard to see from

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>here with so many people within the party, his mates,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>his donors, saying sorry, mister Biden, you're not up for

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the job. For him to still be there in November

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>would be the most damaging thing he could do for

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>his own party, the Democrats.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 7>I completely agree, it would be the most damaging thing

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 7>he can do for the Democrats and also for his

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 7>own political legacy. I mean, when you've got people, like

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 7>Jason said, some of your biggest backers starting to say

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 7>it's time to go. We really hope that the people

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 7>around him, his family and his friends are advising him

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 7>to listen. The Democrats have relied on celebrities in the

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 7>past for their campaign, and to have someone like George

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 7>Clooney put it in such simple and such blunt terms

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 7>really should be sending alarm bells.

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it is. Well, not that he's listening to them,

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure it's sending a live mappey to someone.

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I hope he doesn't listen to them.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't it be magnificent? It will be magnificent A way

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch the way it all unfolds. Jason Morrison and

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Yira Baradwaj, thank you so much for joining me tonight.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Well as I'm sure you know. World leaders are in

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Washington for NATO's seventy fifth annual Summit, and Ukraine is

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest topics being discussed. Joe Biden announced

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that NATO would be committing five new strategic air defense

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>systems to Ukraine, and they've now brought China into the mix,

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>labeling it a decisive enabler of Russia's war against Ukraine.

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>NATO's Secretary General John Stoltenberg said that the message sent

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>from NATO from this summit is very strong and very clear,

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and we are clearly defining China's responsibility when it comes

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to enabling Russia's war. NATO leaders urged China to cease

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>all material and political support to Russia's war. Joining me

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>now is Liberal MP Andrew Wallace, Andrew, thank you for

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>joining me. Look, something tells me that China ain't going

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to take too much notice of what NATO tells them.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, look, Caleb, thanks for having me on

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 8>the show.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 9>But it's incredibly important that the world leaders, like leaders

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 9>from NATO, are pressing the case against China's involvement in

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 9>the Ukraine war. Now it is very clear that China

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 9>is acting as a decisive enabler in providing assistance to Ukraine,

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 9>both in military support and in also in their supply

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 9>chains for re ements. So that's a real concern and

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 9>it's something that NATO is very very clearly pushing back

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 9>on today.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Well they should be, but I suppose the question is

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>how much can you expect any of this to change.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>China and Russia have been soling up to each other

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and as much as we or

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the more that we rightly push back against Russia, it

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>only sort of tends to embolden the two countries. I mean,

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you tell China or Russia what to do, they tend

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to do the exact opposite. That's not to say that

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't be speaking out, but it feels a bit

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>like you're whistling in the wind sometimes.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean, it's very important that Western countries are

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 9>defending the rules based order. We know that the United Kingdom,

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 9>European countries, and of course the United States are providing

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 9>material support to Ukraine, whilst the Australian government's support of

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 9>Ukraine has to be said, has been utterly disappointing since

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 9>Labor came to power. Now when the Coalision was in government,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 9>we were the largest non NATO contributor to the Ukraine

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 9>War offort. And since then the Australian government has dropped

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 9>right down that ladder board in their support. You know, effectively,

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 9>what we've been doing since the change of government is,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, Richard Marles has been going out the back

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 9>into the back garage and seeing what sort of surplus

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 9>stock the ADF has got and then offering it to Ukraine.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 8>It's really been utterly pathetic.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 9>As pathetic as it has been in relation to pushing

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 9>back against the Hooties and the Red Sea, where we

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 9>haven't even sent a ship.

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 8>All we did was send six ADF officers.

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know why we didn't send a ship

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Red Seeds because we don't have one to

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>send basically, which is an indust.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 2>We do.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 6>We just chose not to.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 9>It's not a matter of us not having a surface

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 9>ship to be able to send. The decision was made

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 9>not to send one. And that's perhaps even more telling.

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Why do you believe that Labor has reduced its support

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for Ukraine.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean, look, that's a question that you'd probably

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 9>be best to ask the Prime Minister. It absolutely beggars

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 9>belief why Anthony Albanizi has not demonstrated greater support for Ukraine.

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 9>You know, we've seen absolute utter weakness from this Prime

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 9>ministry in relation.

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 8>To the war in the Middle East, in the.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 9>Support for Israel as a result of what happened on

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 9>October seven. But what's happening also, you know, the world's

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 9>attention has been drawn into the Middle East, and I

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 9>understand that, but we can't forget what's happening in Europe.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 9>It's the first land based war in Europe since the Balkans,

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 9>and certainly one of the most serious since the end

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 9>of World War Two. So you know, we've got a

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 9>wark in chew Gum here. At the same time, we

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 9>have a very very serious conflict in Europe, we have

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 9>a an emerging greater conflict in the Middle East, particularly

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 9>in the north of Israel and Lebanon, and of course

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 9>the tensions are continuing to rise in the South China

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 9>Sea and in and around Taiwan. We've seen once again

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 9>People's Liberation Army Air Force taking.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 8>Belligerent action in the Taiwan and he's straight just very recently.

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, Andrew Wallace, thank you for your time well coming up.

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Economists are at odds over the RBA's next move. Plus

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dutton responds to Malcolm Turnbull labeling him a thug.

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>All of that after the break, Welcome back Caleb Bond

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>in for Shari this week. Well, we're fewer than four

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks away from the Reserve banks next rates announcement. Of

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>course people are hanging on for that. The federal Government's

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely hanging on for it. But economists are at odds

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>over whether the RBA should increase the cash rate, and

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>given Australia is the only G ten nation or inflation

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>has increased since December, one view further interest rate hikes

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is a real possibility. Joining me now to discuss is

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Judo Bank's chief economic advisor, Warren Hogan warrant. Which side

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 1>of the fence do you fall on? We need it

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>or we don't need it? And then after that, will

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we get it or won't we get it?

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 10>I think we do need it because the risk here

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 10>is that we let inflation get away from us. So

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 10>we do not want to get into a situation in

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 10>the next couple of years like we did in the

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 10>late eighties where we're chasing it and rates have to

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.479
<v Speaker 10>go up a lot. We know where that ends, and

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 10>that is in a genuine bad recession. So it's all

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 10>about insurance. And the reality is, although we have seen

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 10>a lot of increases in interest rates four hundred and

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 10>twenty five basis points, the real interest rate interest rate

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 10>minus inflation is only just above zero. You know, we've

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 10>only just got that cash rate above the inflation rate,

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 10>and history shows that not only is that level probably

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 10>inflationary in itself, it certainly doesn't get rid of inflation.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 10>So we're running a lot of risk, and the result

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 10>Bank knows it. But they were hoping that that big

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 10>lift in the cash right would have such a big

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 10>effect on all these variable mortgage rates and really hurt

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 10>the economy that they would get the job done. But

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 10>now we're two years down the track. The economy is

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 10>a lot softer, the consumers a lot softer, but the

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 10>economy is actually holding up pretty well. So we've got

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 10>to address that risk. In my view, I think it's

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 10>just too much risk to bear because one thing we've

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 10>got to avoid it all costs is that interest rate

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 10>going up towards six percent, because we're not going to

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 10>get anyhere any of the seventeen percent of the late

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 10>eighty yeh. But we've got to not let that thing

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 10>get away from us because that will be really disruptive.

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>How do you actually sell that message to homeowners and

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>investors though, because I mean, you know a lot of

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>people are really feeling the pinch right now, and it's like, well,

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you need another interest rate rise and potentially another one

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>after that. People don't want to swallow it, and the

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>federal government's crossing all of its appendages that doesn't happen.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 10>So the federal government, I think the problem has been

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 10>that they, like many people, have underestimated the strength of

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 10>the economy and.

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 6>The severity of the inflation.

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 10>So if they don't know on this two years ago,

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 10>they might have had different tactics and strategies, particularly this

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 10>fiscal stimulus that we've seen this year. In terms of

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 10>the broader community that.

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 6>We can't get away from it. I mean, always low.

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 10>Income earners or first time buyers to get hit when

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 10>rates go up, But we've got a new cohort, which

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 10>is people who actually have pretty good incomes, probably two

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 10>of them, but they've got massive mortgages and they took

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.719
<v Speaker 10>those out when rates were low, and we thought, on

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 10>guidance from the RBA, that they'd stay low. And they're

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 10>the ones, I think, who are the new sort of

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 10>part of this that are really screaming blue murder because

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 10>they're up for thousands a month. So the reality is

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 10>we cannot set our monetary policy for a few people,

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 10>and whenever we take them all weage do any financial obligation.

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 10>We've got to sort of understand the risk.

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 10>Sure, no one could have seen the biggest inflation in

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 10>fifty years after the lowest interest rates.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 6>Ever, but that's a reality we have to bear.

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 10>And if we try and shirk that and get away

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 10>from that, then we're going to just create a bigger

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 10>problem for the whole place.

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>What's the risk of recession do you think? I mean,

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the numbers, it's hard to come

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion that if it weren't for high levels

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of migration, we would effectively be in recession. We are

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>effectively in recession. We're just propping the numbers up to

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>make the economy look better.

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well it's not propping it up, but it is

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 10>exactly right. I mean, it's real, it's out there, the

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 10>people are here, it's causing housing shortages and all sorts

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 10>of things.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 6>So I mean, the reality is the idea.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 10>Of recession being two quarters of negative GDP is very

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 10>likely because we're at capacity. We can't actually grow that much.

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 10>We've got super low unemployment. But a technical recession isn't

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 10>there to be fit. I mean, America had a technical

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 10>recession eight eight months ago, but it was never recorded

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 10>as a recession because they're more sophisticated in the way.

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 6>They think about it.

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 10>So politically it's a nightmare because those two quarters will

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 10>still register on the front pages. But what we really

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 10>need to be worried about, as I said, is the

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 10>bad recession. And I think the two rate hikes that

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 10>I'm forecasting is all about keeping us on a sustainable

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 10>path and avoiding that bad recession. And the problem or

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 10>the fear I have is we sort of get scared

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 10>of a little recession or a technical recession, but we

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 10>create the situation we get a bad one. So look,

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 10>is we're going to get a technical I think there's

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 10>a it's fifty to fifty in the next twelve months.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 10>But are we going to get a bad recession? I

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 10>don't think we are, because we do have the population,

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.239
<v Speaker 10>we're actually a pretty solid economy and as long as

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 10>we don't let this inflation get away from us, and

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 10>I think we can avoid that.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing, of course, on people's income

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>their minds at the moment is income right, And it's

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>an interesting study by the Productivity Commission out now that's

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>showing that Australians have had an easier time moving up

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the income ladder than people in the US and France

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and the UK, et cetera. What's the go there.

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 10>So this is a great report. I haven't read it

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 10>in detail, confairso we'll try to that. They do great work,

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 10>and this looks like a piece of good work, and

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 10>it's all about what this country is. We try to

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 10>get away from that British class system and give people mobility,

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 10>and we largely did that in the last hundred years.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 10>And this is showing that that over the last fifty years,

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 10>each generation can not only improve on their parents, but

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 10>also if you come from low income, there's a chance

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 10>you can get out of it, and so on and

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 10>so forth. But the warning sign here is that more

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 10>recently that's not showing up as much. And of course

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 10>we all know, right now there's a massive intergenerational issue

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 10>and it's actually not about income. It's about the balance

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 10>between income and assets on residential property housing. So I

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 10>think this is a really important topic.

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 6>And we've got to think about it broadly. But it's

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 6>a real stress point.

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 10>The system will sort itself out, but we're already seeing,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 10>you know, typically how do you deal with any generation.

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 10>It's the point of death, I inheritance, but we're looking

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 10>at it happening earlier, banker, mum and dad, all sorts

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 10>of things.

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 6>So it's a.

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 10>Really important social and economic issue because there's a huge

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 10>amount of our wealth sitting with people over sixty years old, correct,

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 10>And there's a lot of people over sixty years old.

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Now and more of them coming along as well. Yeah,

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Larren Hogan, thank you so much for your time.

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 6>Thank you well.

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, the senior labor in p's calling out their

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>own for lashing the coalition's nuclear plan, but the Work

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Council encouraging his residents to become vegetarians. I told you

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>about it before. We'll get into it a little further

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>all after the break, Ah, dearie me. He's the ghost

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of Prime Minister's past almost six years after he left office,

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm turnb but of course still harping on about his

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>political enemies, sledging as we saw earlier this week his

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>former Liberal rivals.

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 11>What sort of prime minister will Peter Dutton make.

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>If he wins?

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 5>I think that's something we should contemplate with dread.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Really, Folly's a thug.

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You can just feel the venom that he's spitting, can't you. Well.

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Speaking to Radio Today, Peter Dutton gracefully brushed off the comment,

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that the former Prime minister was only diminishing his

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>own legacy.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 8>I just think people can see through it and I

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 8>wish him the best. I think he diminishes himself by

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 8>making his comments. Malcolm, he's got an act to grind.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 8>I think it's sad joining.

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Me now our National Senator Matt Kennavan and Scarne News

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>contributor Gary Hardgrave. Matt, why is Malcolm still in the party.

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 12>Well, look, it's a matter for the news of Osibral party.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 12>I think through Malcolm's actions it's almost like he wants

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 12>them to kick him out, and so maybe it's best

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 12>not to give him what he wants right now. Look,

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 12>I don't think it matters all that much. I don't

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 12>think the views of Malcolm Turnbull about the colleagues that

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 12>he has a lot of bitterness about changes anyone's votes

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 12>or thoughts about Australian politics. It is I think Peter

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 12>Dutton summed it up very correctly. It is all just

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 12>a little sad and perhaps just a lesson for the

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 12>rest of us how not to get consumed by bitterness

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 12>in life. And I'm sure all of us have had

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 12>things done wrong to us over time. And the best

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 12>lesson when you compare people like Malcolm chewed up by

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 12>business and others that get over it. The best lisson

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 12>is to get over it, learn to forgive and get

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 12>on with your life.

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>And of course the funniest thing Gary is that two

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>was Turnbull himself who once described Tony Ebbitt and Kevin

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>radd as miserable ghosts. I mean he embodies the term.

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, I guess so, but look I declare I'm fully

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 11>on team Dutton.

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Dutton.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 11>Peter Dutton is a proper Mensian liberal. He believes in

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 11>having a full range of people there. But you know,

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 11>the right to speak out often comes with the responsibility

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 11>of taking actions for it. I remember when Malcolm came

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 11>into the party room for the very first time in

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 11>twenty oh four. He got up in the party room

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 11>and said, I don't need a government provided car, a

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 11>parliamentary provided car, because I have nine cars. So can

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 11>we have taxi vouchers instead? So he cashed in his

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 11>electric car for taxi vouchers. Now, I think this is

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 11>a story not often told. I've breached the sanctity of

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 11>the Liberal Party Federal Parliamentary room.

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless, that's what he.

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 11>Said, and that left the last thing impression on me.

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 11>And I don't think Malcolm's left the lasting impression. That's

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 11>positive with many other people. But anyway, good luck there.

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 11>I'm with Matt. Can I have you a bitiness, Malcolm

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 11>and enjoy your investments and get on with life?

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, nine cars aren't that much used to

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you when you've been on the sauce? Are they? But

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>cap judges, though they're very good after a long lunch. Now,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>we saw the reaction of some labor MPs after, of course,

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>some Dutton unveiled his nuclear policy, all these three eyed koalas,

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>all this this weird sort of stuff. And there are

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>some senior labor MP's that are doing what they can

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to keep their party from going astray. They've been urging

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>their colleagues to keep the focus on the cost of

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>living and not get caught up in these silly scare campaigns,

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>all these memes that we saw as a few of

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>them on the screen. There now Graham Perrot and he

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.439
<v Speaker 1>hit back. He said, it's not something to joke about,

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because I think you can't be serious about cost of

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>living if you're joking about nuclear power. Power is a

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>serious issue for people. Another MP Labor in p said,

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one of those who's running the scare campaign

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>against it. I'm not doing any of the silly Facebook

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff or anything like that. It's a matter of respect.

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>People want to have a sensible discussion about it. Well,

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's quite right, Matt. But many of course

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>in the opposition just leaped to the opportunity to make

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>fun of it all. There's no better way, I think,

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to actually convince people that nuclear energy is good than

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep running the three yard Koala line. Clearly some

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:32.840
<v Speaker 1>people in the Labor Party understand that.

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 12>Look, I mean, I'm I like to have a laugh

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 12>and I think life's too short not to laugh. So

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 12>I'm not against some sort of humor. I kind of

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 12>love memes online that they're very funny sometimes, But that's

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 12>my problem with these ones.

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 2>They're not funny.

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 12>The nineteen nineties wants their jokes back, right, These were

0:36:55.600 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 12>microwaved jokes. Come from the symptoms in the nineteen nineties

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 12>and get some original material, guys.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem with them.

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.760
<v Speaker 12>It's not cutting edge, it's not original, and they didn't

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 12>add anything. A funny political cartoon or meme can add

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 12>something to the debate. A picture tells a thousand words,

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 12>but these didn't. These didn't. They were hopeless and it

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 12>just but maybe that does show how empty the Labor

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 12>Party's arguments against nuclear are we are getting and the

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:29.760
<v Speaker 12>new Labor Party is supporting the provision of multiple nuclear submarines,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 12>nuclear powered submarines, but then at the same time saying

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 12>or trying to say that having the same type of

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 12>reactors on shore is going to lead to death and

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 12>destruction is absolutely absurd, and that's why their jokes fell flat.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's that's the point, Gary, is that

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the reason there's nothing new in these these silly memes

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and jokes is because they don't have anything. They don't

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>have an argument.

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 2>They know it's all pretty lazy politics.

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 11>But look, let's face it, all of our swimmers and

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 11>athletes are about the head to Paris to Peter and Olympics.

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Paris is powered by nucleus.

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 11>Seventy percent of its electricity comes from there. And I

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 11>don't know about three eyed Frenchmen, but they're pretty one

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 11>eyed the French. And I've got to say to you

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 11>that the Labor Party's sense of humor is juvenile. It's

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 11>the sort of stuff you would expect from university politics.

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 11>And unfortunately, too many in politics these days are people

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 11>who haven't graduated in an emotional sense from the stupid

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 11>things they did at university.

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going to say that's in both Team Blue

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:29.959
<v Speaker 2>and Team Red.

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 11>There's too many people who practice juvenile university style politics.

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 2>They think it's funny. Well, going to amuse yourself.

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 11>In another way, Australians are suffering right now that heat

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 11>or eat question, many older Australians in particular, asking they

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 11>want a solution to it, and so the idea of

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 11>nuclear power. Nineteen out of the twenty countries in the

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 11>G twenty have got it. I can't see why Australia

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 11>can't have it. Is it going to happen tomorrow? No,

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 11>but I think it's going to be part of the

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:00.320
<v Speaker 11>mix and it's a sensible conversation. Peter Dutton's promoted. The

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 11>Labor Party hasn't met it with a sensible response.

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, maybe we'll have some three ied Olympians when they

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>come back, all the better to see you with. I

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>suppose we've just what we're on energy and power. So

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got this green rating system that's been designed by

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the government. You know it will help us reach net zero,

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to reject the gas industry. Here was

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister's response today. What we've announced is a

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>future gas strategy.

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, we think that gas has an important role to

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 3>play in firming capacity for renewables.

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing?

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Matter?

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Because the PM said that gas is really important to

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>get to net zero and then they put out a

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 1>document saying gas not so good after all.

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 12>Well, it just shows that the joke's on us. The

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 12>joke is all on us with our higher power prices

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.720
<v Speaker 12>and also with this evening's news that three thousand jobs

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 12>are being lost in our nickel into because we are not,

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 12>because we are denying ourselves the use of cheap energy sources.

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 12>We are losing those three thousand jobs to Indonesia, who

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 12>over the last two years has increased their use of

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 12>coal fired power by fifty seven percent. In two years,

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 12>it's gone up fifty seven percent, and they're using that

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 12>cul fired power to undercut our nickel industry go at

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 12>lower prices, and now jobs are being lost in this country.

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's about time we.

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 12>Get off this net zero chain, that train that clearly

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 12>Indonesia's not on. They're not doing that, China's not doing that.

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 12>Indonesia's not doing that. We're bat time we protect our

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 12>own jobs and protect our own country and also get

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 12>power process down for strains we should be using gas,

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 12>should be using cold too, and of course uranium. Use

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 12>it all to bring down power process.

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, Gary before we go, I talked at the top

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>of the show about the fact that our council in

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne has put out this climate change plan thing and

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they're pushing their residents to switch to a vegetarian diet,

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 1>even though at the meeting before they all voted unanimously

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>just bought this thing. They all ate to roast beef,

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean Gary, for heaven's sake, whatever happened to Rhodes

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>rates and rubbish? Now they say all the residents have to.

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 11>Go then Joe, Yeah, Look they're just obviously run out

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 11>of things to do. And if you live in your

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 11>a council, good luck. I say something to chew over there.

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 11>But look, these people have really lost the plot every

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 11>time they raised this sort of stuff. You know, the

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 11>reality is Australian farmers, the food and fiber we produce,

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 11>we feed you know, a couple of hundred million people

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 11>a year from our production if we took the price,

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 11>the costs structures out of it, and those three thousand

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 11>jobs being lost out of the nickel industry also as

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 11>a result of all the forms and fees and processes

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 11>and all the silvy requirements that the green, the green

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 11>woke international elites have imposed upon us. I think I

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 11>heard Gena Rehnhardt say last year four nine hundred and

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 11>fifty forms they had to fill in to open up

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 11>that massive roy Hill iron ore mine, the biggest iron

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 11>ore state of Australia. We are killing ourselves on paperwork.

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 11>We're killing ourselves and all this woke rubbish and the

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 11>Era Council will conceit itself. But if I was living

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 11>in the Ara Council, I'd move to the next one.

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Well, if I was living in the Arra Council,

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I'd be going to buy the biggest stake I could find.

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Eric and Gary Hardgrave, Matt Canaban facing so much for

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 1>your time, dear in me all right. Coming up after

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the break, we'll talk to Dave Sharma about the troubling

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>calls from a prominent activist that's seen him referred to

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a state and federal police, plus the Prime Minister's tactics

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>exposed as he enters campaign mode. Is he going to

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>call an early election? That's up for the break. Well, exclusive

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>yarn from our own Caroline Marcus, who I can see

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.919
<v Speaker 1>sitting just across the way here join her on Paul

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Murray Live. Shortly, a leading pro Palestinian activist has been

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>referred to both federal and state police after calling for

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>an armed resistance death to America outside the US consulate

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in Melbourne on the fourth of July, which of course

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is Independence Day in the US. Sky News exclusively obtained

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>fresh vision of the incident.

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 2>We believe in the resistance.

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 10>We're going to start the arm resistance, and we've got

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 10>to go.

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Back and celebrate the fair of dark colony.

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 6>It's our lie very will never.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 2>Believed their resistance.

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Joining me now to discuss Liberal Senator Dave Sharma. Dave,

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is what happens when you have a

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>weak response from the government and everyone else. We shouldn't

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>be surprised.

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 13>No, we shouldn't be, Caleb. It's unfortunate, but that's a

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 13>very true statement. I mean, this individual, you know, calling

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 13>for armed resistance, protesting outside the US consulate, involved in

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 13>some of the university encampments, involved in other matters of

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 13>interest to the courts and the police. You know, we

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 13>should not be tolerating this in Australia. And it's been

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 13>allowed to go on for far too long since the

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 13>seventh of October. A climate of permissiveness, a free license

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 13>given to people who are calling for death to other

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 13>people calling for armed resistance, calling for violent struggle, calling

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.800
<v Speaker 13>for gad whatever it might be, it has no place

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 13>in Australia.

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course we had the announcement this week of

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a Special Envoy on anti Semitism, and I mean, you know, great,

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's come along some nine months after the war between

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Israel and Gaza started. But you know how much would

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that have done to stop something like this? I don't know.

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think, you know, I welcome the appointment of

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 13>a special envoy, and I think it's come far too late,

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 13>as you point out, but it can't be used as

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 13>an excuse for the advocation of leadership by Prime Minister

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 13>Anthony Albanesi and his senior ministers. And too often we've

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 13>seen from them, and from Albanesi and from his senior

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 13>leadership team, an attempt to sort of speak out of

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:59.280
<v Speaker 13>both sides of their mouth on this issue. We've had

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 13>you know, Ja Sinclaire saying that phrasers like from the

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 13>river to the sea mean different things to different people. No,

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 13>they don't. The meaning of that is very clear. We've

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 13>had other senior labor front benches dog whistling about genocide

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 13>and war crimes and things like that. You know, this

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 13>government has really tried to be all things to warll

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:20.919
<v Speaker 13>people on this issue, rather than taking a clear moral stand,

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 13>rather than standing up for Australian values, and in many respects,

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 13>I mean, their own internal divisions show that they're reaping

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 13>what they saw from that approach that they've taken.

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Now the federal government, the Labor parties ramping up campaigning

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in Queensland at the moment you saw the Prime Minister

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 1>out and about today making some candidate announcements etc. But

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting if you have a look at some of

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the colors you see there of what they've put on

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>social media, that there's just curiously no sign of red anywhere.

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the colors that they using, yellow and blue

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>are used by the LNP in Queensland. Strange, isn't it, Dave.

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I was struck by that. I mean, there's no

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 13>Labor logo, there's no signature Labor red. The colors that

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 13>are being used are a sort of royal blue, which

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:12.879
<v Speaker 13>is the traditional liberal color, and then an orange which

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 13>is part of the LMP color kit in Queensland. It's

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 13>almost as if they don't want a campaign as Labor candidates.

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 13>Is quite an odd choice of colors and branding, and

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 13>it suggests to me that at least in Queensland, they

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 13>know that the Labor brand is very much on the

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 13>nose and they're trying to distance themselves and the candidates

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 13>probably are as much as possible I mean, we may

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 13>well never see these candidates photograph with Anthony Albanesi. Again,

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 13>we should save this one for the archive.

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what I was going to say. It's interesting

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 1>that they've sort of distanced themselves from the Labor branding,

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but they've actually chosen to get the Prime Minister involved.

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:50.920
<v Speaker 1>They must think that some kind of positive I'm somewhat

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>surprised by that.

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.359
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think they're probably getting the obligatory photo now

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 13>early before a campaign's underway. If the question is asked,

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 13>why is Anthony Albanize, he not campaigned for you, I

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 13>can say he was here several months ago, but I

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 13>suspect we won't see him in much campaign material or

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 13>campaign footage once the election proper is ontway. This is

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 13>a well known inoculation tactic.

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Wham bam, thank you, ma'am. Now, I spoke about this

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the program. But Labor is becoming, of course,

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>increasingly worried about a likely surge of Muslim votes, particularly

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:30.879
<v Speaker 1>in Western Sydney, independent candidates threatening key seats. You've got this,

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the Muslim vote group that has set up. We tooked

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>about that earlier in the program. How much of a

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>threat do you think that actually is and is it

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>possible that that could sway labor policy in any way.

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:50.240
<v Speaker 13>Look, I'd say two things about this. Firstly, the idea

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 13>of a political party that represents a religious community is not,

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 13>in and of itself necessarily novel. But the idea that

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 13>political party would campaign on only one issue, which is

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 13>a foreign policy issue and which is about changing Australia's

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 13>foreign policy, I think is unprecedented. And I think if

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 13>we had any other component of Australian society setting up

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:15.319
<v Speaker 13>a political party to campaign not to look after the

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 13>interests of that community in Australia, not to look after

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 13>their welfare or their access to opportunity or their equality

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 13>before the law, but to campaign for a foreign policy change,

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 13>I think we take a pretty skeptical and suspicious view

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:31.959
<v Speaker 13>of it, and I worry about that this is what

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 13>this party is seeking to do. I think for labor,

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I think, look what it does. And I

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.280
<v Speaker 13>don't want to be a commentator on their own internal politics,

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 13>but I think it shows you that their attempts to

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 13>straddle these divisions rather than taking a clear position on

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 13>the basis of morality. After the seventh of October, terrorist

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:52.840
<v Speaker 13>attacks and frankly on the basis of Australia.

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, David, I'm cutting. I'm cutting into James Morrow's

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>time here, Dave Shama, thank you for joining me, Thank

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you for joining me this week. Up next James Morrow

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 1>with Paul Murray Life