Speaker 1: On Scone Lives Ostrodia.
Speaker 2: This is the Weaker Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening, and welcome to the readA Panihy Show.
Speaker 4: Coming up tonight, Douglas Murray joins me to discuss everything
Speaker 4: from Robert de Niro's pitiful meltdown to.
Speaker 3: The growing Islamus threat in the West.
Speaker 4: Also joining me tonight Kosher Gator and Patrick Carline and
Speaker 4: a bumper edition of Lefties Losing It, where we learned
Speaker 4: that apparently men can lactate.
Speaker 5: Now normally getting pregnant with trigger milk production, but since
Speaker 5: trans women can't get pregnant, we must do it another way.
Speaker 5: Turns out this is not all that difficult to do.
Speaker 5: Just add a few extra hormones and supplements and pump
Speaker 5: your coconuts regularly and you will start producing milk.
Speaker 4: Let's bring in Harold Son, senior columnist Patrick Carline, Patrick,
Speaker 4: I want to ask you about lactation.
Speaker 3: Let's get onto more serious issues.
Speaker 4: The pressure on immigrat Minister Andrew Giles has intensified further.
Speaker 4: The Australian reports a serial rapist to attack twenty five
Speaker 4: women and a child kept his visa as a result
Speaker 4: of Andrew Giles's catastrophic push to give more leniency to
Speaker 4: foreign born criminals with ties to Australia. We know that
Speaker 4: Giles was warned his policy would lead to a significant
Speaker 4: jump in criminals dodging deportation. Among those who have beaten
Speaker 4: deportation thanks to the Immigration Minister's Direction ninety nine is
Speaker 4: a man who had some of the worst child abuse
Speaker 4: material in the world and a rapist to molested for children.
Speaker 4: And today the Prime Minister said the Government will reissue
Speaker 4: a revised order to replace Direction ninety nine.
Speaker 3: But Patrick, how long can Giles hold on to this
Speaker 3: crucial portfolio.
Speaker 4: Surely can be moved somewhere where he'll do less damage.
Speaker 6: Yes, Look, I think Jiles had to go late last
Speaker 6: year when the High Court decision came down. He was
Speaker 6: obviously caught out. It had made no preparations. I've never
Speaker 6: seen a government minister literally represent a menace to society
Speaker 6: the way that this man does, where people have been
Speaker 6: hurt literally physically because of his incompetence, and the Prime
Speaker 6: Minister is running a protection racket at the moment, which
Speaker 6: is as dreadful it is actually endangering Australians. I've never
Speaker 6: seen quite This isn't about political scalpes.
Speaker 2: This is about community safety.
Speaker 4: He has to go, he has to go, But so
Speaker 4: far the Prime Minister has given no indication that is
Speaker 4: open to that. And we've also learned this Direction ninety
Speaker 4: nine change that Giles has brought forward that's seen seventy
Speaker 4: five percent reduction in visa cancelations made on character grounds
Speaker 4: since twenty twenty. That's a significant stat there, and I
Speaker 4: think we're going to just keep hearing more of these.
Speaker 4: Whole ror story is these criminals who are guilty of
Speaker 4: just some of the worst offenses, imaginable dodging deportation. Now
Speaker 4: to Victorian just Into Allan's government is bringing in a
Speaker 4: nation first role a Parliamentary Secretary for Men's Behavior change
Speaker 4: MORTIALIC MP Tim Richardson is the proud inaugural title holder,
Speaker 4: but Patrick, how patronizing is this? Can you imagine if
Speaker 4: the same was done for women, if we had some
Speaker 4: sort of a Parliamentary Secretary for Ladies' behavior to make
Speaker 4: sure us ladies do not step out of bounds. Now,
Speaker 4: I know there's a significant issue with violence in the community,
Speaker 4: but this ain't the answer.
Speaker 2: Absolutely not.
Speaker 6: I mean, I think Jane Hume, the federal senator was
Speaker 6: talking earlier today on Sky and she called this window dressing.
Speaker 6: It was so important. Why why wasn't it a ministerial
Speaker 6: portfolio as opposed to a parliamentary coutry.
Speaker 7: Wrong.
Speaker 6: He's a state minister. He's going to look at social
Speaker 6: media and discourage social media. I'm not sure he's really
Speaker 6: going to do much. And this does actually demonize all men, doesn't.
Speaker 6: It sort of says all men have a problem, and
Speaker 6: that does upset decent men.
Speaker 4: Now this has got some attention online. I'm sure Tim
Speaker 4: will be monitoring these tweets. Billboard Chris said Tim was
Speaker 4: a humiliation fetishist for so willingly taking a role to
Speaker 4: demonize men and feminize the culture and women's rights campaign
Speaker 4: at Salgrove wrote, setting aside for a moment, how much
Speaker 4: of this sounds like a rejected draft of nineteen eighty
Speaker 4: four that even all well thought was too unbelievably dark.
Speaker 4: Your government doesn't actually know what a man is, so
Speaker 4: I can't fathom how.
Speaker 3: This will possibly work. That's a good point, because.
Speaker 4: This is a government where if you ask them what
Speaker 4: is a woman, they will consider that some sort of
Speaker 4: a bigoted gotcha question.
Speaker 6: That's right, Look, domestic violence and violence against women is
Speaker 6: a big issue at the moment. It's something that needs
Speaker 6: to be addressed. I think appointing somebody in this kind
Speaker 6: of role it really does. It's not going to progress
Speaker 6: the issue anywhere. It's not going to make women safer.
Speaker 6: It is a political stunt. I talk about nation first
Speaker 6: or whatever. It's a state government minister. I mean, this
Speaker 6: needs real change at a much higher level.
Speaker 3: Than the absolutely and staying in Victoria.
Speaker 4: Industry insiders tell The Herald's son Victorian businesses are facing
Speaker 4: another two years of pain as the state continues its
Speaker 4: post pandemic slide, with one industry leader warning a retail
Speaker 4: recession looms.
Speaker 3: More good news from.
Speaker 4: Victoria there, but it's predictable that, of course, you can't
Speaker 4: shut down society for as long as we did in
Speaker 4: this state and this city and not have some fairly
Speaker 4: dramatic consequences, pretty much all of them terrible.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 6: Look, we're looking at a recession. You've got all these
Speaker 6: health problems with kids, you know, with all sorts of
Speaker 6: issues that they had from being stuck inside, to say long,
Speaker 6: and being isolated and being vulnerable. I mean the legacy
Speaker 6: of those lockdowns. A recession is possibly one, but we're
Speaker 6: going to say more and more as time goes on.
Speaker 6: It hasn't gone away, certainly not in Melbourne.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 4: The ABC is under five from some teachers for they
Speaker 4: woke behind the news program and one recent episode that
Speaker 4: featured content about the International Day against Homophobia, biphobia and transphobia,
Speaker 4: and it had the following content.
Speaker 7: I'm Alex, I use agents, him pronance, and i'm our agenda.
Speaker 8: I'm Ruby.
Speaker 9: I go by any pronouns just because I don't really care,
Speaker 9: and I think i'm araways.
Speaker 1: I don't really do the labeling thing.
Speaker 3: I just kind of describe it.
Speaker 5: I'm mischer, I use the pronouns, and I am a
Speaker 5: very proud lesbian.
Speaker 3: Now, Patrick, do you know what an arrow ace is?
Speaker 3: You're a worldly man.
Speaker 6: No, but I fear you're about to tell me.
Speaker 4: I am.
Speaker 3: I'm here to educate.
Speaker 4: Arrowace is short for a romantic or asexual is someone
Speaker 4: who feels little to no romantic.
Speaker 3: Nor sexual attraction.
Speaker 4: It's someone who identifies as a romantic or a sexual.
Speaker 4: This is just astonishing content for the ABC. I mean,
Speaker 4: these are children. We cover their faces. The ABC didn't.
Speaker 4: Why are we hearing about their sexual orientation or whether
Speaker 4: they have sexual or romantic feelings at all. How is
Speaker 4: this content that teachers are obliged to show their students
Speaker 4: or encouraged to show their students.
Speaker 2: This is dreadful.
Speaker 6: I mean, it's sort of normalizing the idea that kids
Speaker 6: need to decide what pronouns they are and talk about,
Speaker 6: you know, romantic or sexual type sort of feelings.
Speaker 3: Let them be kids.
Speaker 6: This is a lot of this stuff is totally especially
Speaker 6: a romantic type notions, is totally irrelevant to ninety nine
Speaker 6: percent of children. Why is it being force fed down
Speaker 6: there thrights?
Speaker 4: And why is it even part of that ever expanding umbrella,
Speaker 4: the LGBTQIA plus plus plus plus. If you don't have
Speaker 4: romantic feelings or if you're aseexual, how is that something
Speaker 4: that anybody needs to know about? How does that hold
Speaker 4: you back in society?
Speaker 2: Flag?
Speaker 4: I know they have a flag as the city of
Speaker 4: Yarra flies it once a year during a romantic week.
Speaker 4: I mean, I sometimes I think we just live in
Speaker 4: some sort of an asylum and people are just observing
Speaker 4: us for their own amusement.
Speaker 3: Now, the housing.
Speaker 4: Shortage, this is not an amusing issue at all, it's
Speaker 4: hitting the rental market hard. More and more investors are
Speaker 4: reconsidering investing in property with soaring state taxes, increasing interest
Speaker 4: rates and unreasonable renters' rights legislations being passed in a
Speaker 4: number of Labour Stone it's at the start of the pandemic.
Speaker 4: This is a story in the ABC forty three percent
Speaker 4: of Australia's rental properties cost less than four hundred a week.
Speaker 4: Now that figure is just ten percent, and it's even
Speaker 4: worse in metropolitan areas at five point nine percent. But
Speaker 4: this is an issue being felt across the country. Patrick
Speaker 4: and again, like the lockdowns and what's happened since this
Speaker 4: was predictable. You can't make it unattractive for mom and
Speaker 4: dad investors and then expect them to keep putting their
Speaker 4: money into property.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, Look, you can't have too many migrants and not
Speaker 6: enough houses. And then you throw in the cost of
Speaker 6: living costs for landlords as with everybody. I mean, that's
Speaker 6: going to be pushed onto rents. It is a landlord's
Speaker 6: market and I feel dreadfully sorry for these renters because
Speaker 6: it is just going up and up and up. They
Speaker 6: can't afford to move out, so they can't get anything cheaper,
Speaker 6: and it's.
Speaker 4: Harder to save because they're paying so much for rent,
Speaker 4: So entering the housing market becomes more difficult. But so
Speaker 4: many of these policies that are done supposedly to help
Speaker 4: help renters and to make it harder for investors has
Speaker 4: the absolute opposite effect.
Speaker 2: Well you look in Victoria.
Speaker 6: I mean, the land tax has just gone through the
Speaker 6: roof any any landlord, it's going to put that onto
Speaker 6: the rent and they're going to get They're going to
Speaker 6: find renters because they're desperate. I'm government are making it worse.
Speaker 3: And very Patrick Carline, thank you so much for your
Speaker 3: time this evening. Thanks for joining me now.
Speaker 4: Is the best selling author of groundbreaking books, including The
Speaker 4: War on the West, The Madness of Crowds, and The
Speaker 4: Strange Death of Europe.
Speaker 3: Douglas Murray.
Speaker 4: It's the Strange Death of Europe on to speak to
Speaker 4: you about. But first I need your take on what
Speaker 4: we saw today outside the New York court room where
Speaker 4: Donald Trump's trial is being conducted. We had Robert de
Speaker 4: Niro make an appearance with this important message, I.
Speaker 10: Don't mean to scare you, no, no way. Maybe I
Speaker 10: do mean to scare you. If Trump returns to the
Speaker 10: White House. You can kiss these freedoms goodbye that we
Speaker 10: all take for granted, and elections forget about it. That's over.
Speaker 10: That's done. If he gets in, I can tell you
Speaker 10: right now, he will never leave.
Speaker 11: He will never leave. You know that he will never leave.
Speaker 4: There you have it, elections, democracy, it's all over.
Speaker 3: If Trump wins. It got even worse than that, Douglas.
Speaker 4: I'll be featuring some of the lunacy later in the program.
Speaker 4: But what did you make of that? And will it
Speaker 4: have any impact on the voting public.
Speaker 7: The only impact that Robert de Niro and other celebrities
Speaker 7: have when they do this kind of thing is to
Speaker 7: encourage more voters to silently vote for Trump. First of all,
Speaker 7: I mean, what is somebody like de Niro thinking of
Speaker 7: who does.
Speaker 2: He think he is?
Speaker 7: What does he think his role is in society? I mean,
Speaker 7: he's an actor, and I think a very good one,
Speaker 7: which is one of the reasons I really dislike it
Speaker 7: when I see an actor like him do this, because
Speaker 7: afterwards you can't help but watch him in a role
Speaker 7: and then think, oh, there's that guy who's a rather
Speaker 7: tedious political bore. But it is tedious as he has
Speaker 7: no special insights, and so why is he standing in
Speaker 7: front of a bank of microphones offering his insights about Trump.
Speaker 7: I've always thought that this that this celebrity you know, endorsement,
Speaker 7: celebrity commenting thing backfires.
Speaker 1: On the people that they support.
Speaker 7: I think most ordinary Americans, like most ordinary Australians and Brits,
Speaker 7: we don't really like to be talked at by you know,
Speaker 7: megas celebrities who imagine they've got insights they just don't have.
Speaker 3: You're so right.
Speaker 4: I preferred when they just threatened to leave the country
Speaker 4: if someone got elected, and they never actually follow through
Speaker 4: with that either. Now, your good friend and courageous women's
Speaker 4: rights activist ion Hersey Ali was on the Trigonometry podcast
Speaker 4: this week and she noted that within three deck cades
Speaker 4: she's seen Europe start to resemble the Islamist country she fled.
Speaker 8: Many neighborhoods resemble where I left, and that just happened
Speaker 8: within three decades. So you can see when I talk
Speaker 8: about transformation, that it doesn't take that long. And so
Speaker 8: there were really some very serious scholars. They were all
Speaker 8: telling us back back in the day that if this
Speaker 8: demographic developments continue and we don't do anything about assimulation.
Speaker 8: There is going to be this flip in twenty to forty,
Speaker 8: twenty fifty.
Speaker 9: That's not too far away.
Speaker 4: It's not too far away, Douglas, which begs the question
Speaker 4: is it too late now to stop? Is flip this transformation,
Speaker 4: this strange death of Europe as we know it?
Speaker 7: I mean, I would say it's extremely difficult to know,
Speaker 7: because predictions are always.
Speaker 1: A tough rough on people.
Speaker 7: All you can do is base them on the evidence
Speaker 7: in front of your eyes. And I think that what
Speaker 7: iarn said there is completely true and indeed evident. It's
Speaker 7: evident because if population grows that is effectively in large
Speaker 7: part unassimilated or at least has views and the rest
Speaker 7: of the country finds abhorrent or just distasteful. If that
Speaker 7: particular demographic.
Speaker 1: Grows and grows and grows, of.
Speaker 7: Course they're going to have more and more impact, more
Speaker 7: and more presence. They'll be felt more and more in
Speaker 7: the country. When imm first arrived in the Netherlands as
Speaker 7: an assylum seeker, she as one of the pronegiates, among
Speaker 7: other things of the partition Fritz Borgstein, and he was
Speaker 7: warning about this in the nineteen nineties, and you know,
Speaker 7: others of us warned about it, and not only did
Speaker 7: governments not listen, they actually made the situation worse.
Speaker 2: I mean, look at the UK. In the UK, we
Speaker 2: have a.
Speaker 7: Conservative government about to leave office after fourteen years got
Speaker 7: into office saying that immigration would become tens of thousands
Speaker 7: of years of people a year rather than hundreds of
Speaker 7: thousands roughly back to nineteen nineties immigration and the Conservatives
Speaker 7: is going to leave office with net migration in the
Speaker 7: UK had almost a million are year.
Speaker 2: Why did these people not listen? Why did they never listen?
Speaker 7: Why did they never act on all of the warnings
Speaker 7: after warnings that people gave.
Speaker 1: So you ask, you know, is it going to happen?
Speaker 7: Yes, if we continue like this, and if we continue
Speaker 7: in this situation where the political class both accelerates immigration
Speaker 7: massively totally fails an integration, I mean, good luck with
Speaker 7: that older idea, and then tells the general public, as
Speaker 7: they do, that it's all the conspiracy theory that the
Speaker 7: immigration is happening at this pace, and it's all a
Speaker 7: great replacement conspiracy theory. So what you see for your
Speaker 7: eyes is a conspiracy theory. It'll happen if it goes on.
Speaker 4: Like that, for sure, And we have so many in
Speaker 4: the West who have no regard for the West. They
Speaker 4: don't want to assimilate, they're not called on to assimilate.
Speaker 4: They have no respect for Western civilization and the values
Speaker 4: we have. And that was apparent in the streets of
Speaker 4: London Las Vegas. Supporters of the Iranian regime clashed with
Speaker 4: anti regime protest.
Speaker 3: Douglas.
Speaker 4: The clash happened outside of venue where they were holding
Speaker 4: an event to mark the death of Ibraham Racy, the
Speaker 4: Iranian president, who died in a helicopter crash. Why is
Speaker 4: anyone who supports the brutal Islamist Iranian regime living in
Speaker 4: the UK?
Speaker 3: That to me is incredible.
Speaker 4: O are so many in the Middle East who would
Speaker 4: give their right arm to have the freedoms that we enjoy,
Speaker 4: and yet we have people accepted in as migrants, as residents,
Speaker 4: as citizens who obviously do not embrace Western values.
Speaker 7: Yes, I mean it's not just people like the thugs
Speaker 7: there the other night, as I think I've told you
Speaker 7: before returning. A former deputy Prime Minister of Iran, Mohadjirani,
Speaker 7: lives in Leafy Harrow in London got regime goons in
Speaker 7: the UK. Why have we got these people in the country.
Speaker 7: And again it goes back to the previous point Reta.
Speaker 7: You know, this is what happens if a government, if
Speaker 7: government after government completely loses control of migration and doesn't
Speaker 7: do anything about it. I think that these people, the
Speaker 7: people who are you know, mourning Raisi, mourning the butcher
Speaker 7: of Tehran.
Speaker 2: I don't think they should be in Britain. I don't
Speaker 2: think they should be there.
Speaker 7: I don't think there's any reason why the average British
Speaker 7: person needs to live alongside somebody who's mourning an Islamist
Speaker 7: goon and monster, and let alone breaking out fights in
Speaker 7: protests that anyone disliking the I mean, it's preposterous. I've
Speaker 7: said for years, you know, if you import the world's people,
Speaker 7: if import all the world's people, you import all of
Speaker 7: the world's problems. And once again we see that problems
Speaker 7: in the Middle East now play out on the streets
Speaker 7: of London as they do on the streets of Sydney
Speaker 7: and New York.
Speaker 1: And everywhere else.
Speaker 4: Anyways, saw the regime goons there push a woman to
Speaker 4: the ground and kick her. So the fact that they
Speaker 4: feel embolden to do that in the UK, says plenty.
Speaker 4: Now we are all looking forward to the Biden Trump
Speaker 4: presidential debates. You've written in the New York Post that
Speaker 4: if Trump wants to prevail in these debates, all he
Speaker 4: has to do is shut up and let Biden speak,
Speaker 4: or at least try to speak. You wrote that even
Speaker 4: the best zinger of the line from Trump cannot do
Speaker 4: more harm to Biden than Biden can do to Biden.
Speaker 3: He does have a.
Speaker 4: Knack of just saying outrageous lies, isn't he? But will
Speaker 4: Trump take your advice? Will he be able to control himself?
Speaker 7: Well, it's a really key test for Trump. I mean
Speaker 7: the last election. You remember, of the two debates, the
Speaker 7: polls all showed the voters did not like Donald Trump
Speaker 7: in the first debate, and they liked him slightly more
Speaker 7: in the second. And the reason is that he just
Speaker 7: didn't allow Biden to speak in the first debate. He
Speaker 7: was too aggressive. He just kept interrupting. Even if you
Speaker 7: support a particular candidate or person, one rule of television
Speaker 7: is just you know, if you keep interrupting and interrupting.
Speaker 1: Everyone thinks you know, they just get fed up of you.
Speaker 7: And Donald Trump calls a TV star before he was president,
Speaker 7: and he should know that you can sort of irritate
Speaker 7: the viewer. And I think he did that in the
Speaker 7: first debate last time. And the key thing is, I
Speaker 7: me that piece is that, you know, Biden trips himself
Speaker 7: up all the time.
Speaker 2: Just let the man.
Speaker 7: Speak, watch any speech of his, and the minute he
Speaker 7: has to go off script such as it is, he
Speaker 7: just he loses train of thought. It again the other
Speaker 7: day just kind of says, oh, well, anyway, I was
Speaker 7: going to say, but well, anyway, I don't need to
Speaker 7: tell you that.
Speaker 2: And he hasn't said anything yet.
Speaker 7: And I think that if Trump just lets Biden speak,
Speaker 7: it will show a lot of viewers and a lot
Speaker 7: of voters that the commander in chief, you know, for
Speaker 7: whatever his virtues in the past, is a rather sad
Speaker 7: reflection of that.
Speaker 1: At the moment.
Speaker 2: And that and that the America.
Speaker 7: Needs the next four years a president who is as
Speaker 7: sprightly incapable as possible. And I think that there's only
Speaker 7: one way to show that, as I say, that's that's for.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump to shut up. But is that an easy
Speaker 2: piece of advice to him to take? Had has said not.
Speaker 3: I don't think.
Speaker 4: I think you're right there, that the temptation will be
Speaker 4: too too big for him, and if he's going to
Speaker 4: play its smart, he will also draw out the nasty Biden,
Speaker 4: because one certainly exists, and that could be a powerful
Speaker 4: thing as well, Douglas, if Trump can goad him into
Speaker 4: showing that side of himself.
Speaker 7: Yes, I mean, I mean Biden showed that side of
Speaker 7: himself just the other day at the commencement address he
Speaker 7: gave and in the US and that it was a
Speaker 7: really it was a bitter, unpleasant, ugly message and also means.
Speaker 1: Of communication that Biden did.
Speaker 7: He basically told all these black students that you know,
Speaker 7: the country was against them. I mean it was really
Speaker 7: it was very sad actually, but sad that these black
Speaker 7: students that commencement should get this advice. I mean, at
Speaker 7: the same time, Donald Trump was in New Jersey telling
Speaker 7: everyone didn't matter what.
Speaker 1: Color they were, what color your skin is.
Speaker 7: You know, you're all American. But Biden was doing this
Speaker 7: very mean speech and he looked mean, doing it really
Speaker 7: mean and angry, and he didn't think he starts to shout.
Speaker 7: I think that stuff goes across very badly. I mean,
Speaker 7: everyone says, you know, it's Trump with the female voters
Speaker 7: who goes over badly. But I think some of that
Speaker 7: with Biden goes over with female voters, and others just
Speaker 7: just not that well.
Speaker 3: I think you're one hundred percent right. Actually, let's just
Speaker 3: have a quick look at what you've.
Speaker 4: Just spoken about. Firstly, let's have a look at Trump.
Speaker 4: When he gave that speech in the Bronx. It was
Speaker 4: one of unity and a largely positive message.
Speaker 12: Whatever the hell color you are, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 6: We are all Americans and we're going to pull together
Speaker 6: as Americans.
Speaker 4: And you contrast that with a speech you mentioned, the
Speaker 4: one President Biden gave at a historically black college the
Speaker 4: previous week.
Speaker 3: Very different.
Speaker 13: You missed your high school graduation, you start a college
Speaker 13: just as George Floyd was murdered, and there was a
Speaker 13: reckoning on race. It's natural to wonder the democracy you
Speaker 13: hear about actually works for you. What is democracy? The
Speaker 13: black matter being killed in the street? What is democracy?
Speaker 13: Portrayal of broken promises, slow leave black communities behind? What
Speaker 13: is democracy? You have to be ten times better than
Speaker 13: anyone else to get a fair shot.
Speaker 4: Doubles very different approaches there Biden's speech seemed to be
Speaker 4: obsessed about racial division and victimhood and this message that
Speaker 4: you need to be as black Americans ten times better
Speaker 4: than non black Americans to do as well.
Speaker 3: Who is he speaking to with that kind of rehtoric.
Speaker 2: It's faircy know.
Speaker 7: Biden came in with the idea that he was as
Speaker 7: a great uniter, that he'd be the sort of father
Speaker 7: or perhaps grandfather figure of the nation.
Speaker 2: And whenever he does.
Speaker 7: This this kind of speech, something, do you remember what
Speaker 7: you said you'd be Do you remember that you said
Speaker 7: you'd try to unite the nation?
Speaker 2: What are you doing here?
Speaker 7: And why are you demotivating black students and actually lying
Speaker 7: to them.
Speaker 2: The country is against them?
Speaker 7: And that to pick up that phrase, black men are
Speaker 7: just being murdered in the streets. I mean, it's true
Speaker 7: that quite a lot of black men are murdered in
Speaker 7: the streets, and they're murdered by other black men in
Speaker 7: the cities like Chicago in terrible gun violence that goes
Speaker 7: on all the time. But Biden wasn't talking about that.
Speaker 7: He talked about George Floyd and then went straight on
Speaker 7: this idea that I mean, basically, the cops and goodness notes,
Speaker 7: who I was just kill black men all the time.
Speaker 7: That's not true, but it is the sort of rhetoric
Speaker 7: and the ideas.
Speaker 2: That you would imagine you would.
Speaker 7: Expect to hear from somebody wanting to whip up a
Speaker 7: certain base on ethnic lines and racial lines. And that's
Speaker 7: clearly what Biden was doing in that speech. But it's
Speaker 7: really ugly, and it feels to me at any point,
Speaker 7: at any rate, like a rhetoric of the past in America,
Speaker 7: describing at the best the past in America.
Speaker 4: Now, let's talk about Prince Harry and the saga with
Speaker 4: his visa papers. The court case over the Duke of
Speaker 4: Sussex's US visa is still going on.
Speaker 3: We still don't know whether Harry.
Speaker 4: Was honest about his past drug use, as revealed in
Speaker 4: his memoir Spare. The White House is pleaded with the
Speaker 4: court to keep the documents confidential. Douglas, lawyers for the
Speaker 4: Department of Homeland Security, argued that releasing the.
Speaker 3: Papers would create a stigma.
Speaker 4: The Heritage Foundation is the one that's filed a freedom
Speaker 4: of information request to access the records related to Harry's
Speaker 4: March twenty twenty visa. Douglas, this story does tickle me
Speaker 4: because Trump has been open to deporting Harry if he's elected,
Speaker 4: and it's revealed that Harry lied.
Speaker 3: On his official document.
Speaker 7: Yes, I know, I'm not wild about this because I
Speaker 7: actually this is one that makes me feel rather sorry
Speaker 7: for Prince Harry, and it takes a bit for me
Speaker 7: to do that. I mean, this is his sort of
Speaker 7: person and all, you know, immigrations situation as story.
Speaker 4: And I think the one who wrote he told us
Speaker 4: about his drug use in that book. I mean, if
Speaker 4: he's in this situation, it's completely self inflicted.
Speaker 7: Well, I agree with that. I mean there was no need.
Speaker 7: First of all, there was no need for him to
Speaker 7: write the book. And secondly, it certainly wasn't any need
Speaker 7: for him to write a book in which he said
Speaker 7: things that would then get him into trouble with immigration
Speaker 7: authorities in the years immediately ahead. And it's very unwise.
Speaker 7: But then at the same everything to do with that
Speaker 7: was unwise. I mean, it's very unwise to spill secrets
Speaker 7: about your family in public, not least because you might
Speaker 7: then discover that your family aren't wild about speaking to
Speaker 7: you in private, knowing that it's all going to be
Speaker 7: made public. I mean it's a terrible.
Speaker 1: Misjudgment by him.
Speaker 7: I just think, I say, I sort of feel vaguely
Speaker 7: sorry for him about some of this, because you know,
Speaker 7: he's clearly badly advised, he's clearly done't think very far
Speaker 7: ahead for himself, and anyway, I mean, that's the only
Speaker 7: time you'll get a granting of pity for the spare prints.
Speaker 2: For me.
Speaker 4: Well, I think his advisor, his chief advisor, is one
Speaker 4: of Megan Markle. So if he's getting bad advice, I
Speaker 4: think we can guess where it's coming from.
Speaker 3: But I mean, the man's forty years old. He's not
Speaker 3: a kid anymore.
Speaker 4: And these decisions that he's making, I've got to say,
Speaker 4: I think would be hilarious if he's deported from the US,
Speaker 4: and what would the reception be in the UK, presumably
Speaker 4: if he goes back there. I want to see that happen.
Speaker 4: I know it's a little bit evil, but it would
Speaker 4: tickle me no end and we need a few laughs
Speaker 4: in this world. At Douglas Murray, thank you so much
Speaker 4: for your time this evening, to appreciate.
Speaker 7: It, great pleasure.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Still to come left.
Speaker 4: He's Losing It, starring Robert DeNiro and kosher Gator joins me.
Speaker 3: With the latest from the US and the UK. Don't
Speaker 3: want to miss that. Welcome back.
Speaker 4: Now it's time for lefties losing it and we're going
Speaker 4: to get to a Robert de Niro extravaganza shortly, because
Speaker 4: my word, no man has humiliated himself so badly in
Speaker 4: twenty twenty four. What we saw today was a lefty
Speaker 4: losing it off epic proportions, a favorite actor reduced to
Speaker 4: a pitofall confused, raging, lefty lunatic. But first let's check
Speaker 4: in with a regular contributor to this segment, a man
Speaker 4: who has gone viral several times for trying to get
Speaker 4: waiters fired.
Speaker 3: For misgendering him. Now is going to give us some
Speaker 3: science advice. This should be good.
Speaker 5: No, it sounds crazy, but trans women can produce.
Speaker 1: Milk to feed a baby. Here's how.
Speaker 3: Step one.
Speaker 5: You must grow your coconuts about three to five years
Speaker 5: of estrogen. You will have fully functional milk ducts from
Speaker 5: which you can feed a baby. So once your coconuts
Speaker 5: are grown, it is time to start producing milk. Now, normally,
Speaker 5: getting pregnant with trigger milk production, but since trans women
Speaker 5: can't get pregnant, we must do it another way. Turns
Speaker 5: out this is not all that difficult to do. Just
Speaker 5: add a few extra hormones and supplements and pump your
Speaker 5: coconuts regularly.
Speaker 3: There you go.
Speaker 4: Just add more hormones and you'll be lactating like a
Speaker 4: natural born woman in no time.
Speaker 3: What could possibly go wrong?
Speaker 4: I'm just shocked to acknowledge that trans women can't get pregnant.
Speaker 3: I thought he'd say they can.
Speaker 4: Now, let's get more science the advice from our favorite
Speaker 4: trans educator.
Speaker 5: Now I can already see the criticisms, the comments coming through.
Speaker 5: There's no way this milk is safe to drink for
Speaker 5: nutritious or healthy, but it is scientifically proven.
Speaker 3: To be Ah.
Speaker 4: No, it has not been scientifically proven to be safe
Speaker 4: and healthy.
Speaker 3: For one, consider powerful cocktail of drugs that.
Speaker 4: A man must take to secrete any milky substance. Do
Speaker 4: you really want a baby to consume that? But forget
Speaker 4: about the welfare of the child. This is all about
Speaker 4: affirming the trans woman who wants to believe he can
Speaker 4: breastfeed just like a mom.
Speaker 5: Ultimately, the act of feeding your child yourself is affirming
Speaker 5: to anyone, not just trans people. It also helps the
Speaker 5: child form a secure attachment to their parents.
Speaker 4: Now to a celebrity who had an almighty meltdown in
Speaker 4: front of a sea of cameras and has forever trashed
Speaker 4: his own reputation in the eyes of all at least
Speaker 4: half of his countrymen. Gosh, I think even the lefties
Speaker 4: are a little embarrassed by Robert de Niro's latest antics.
Speaker 10: I mean, this is really even these people over here
Speaker 10: a kind of it's kind of crazy.
Speaker 1: It's really crazy.
Speaker 2: And this.
Speaker 10: Thing Donald Trump has created.
Speaker 2: This He should be telling.
Speaker 10: Them not to do this, but he's just.
Speaker 12: He wants to total he wants to sew total chaos,
Speaker 12: which he's succeeding in.
Speaker 4: Now what's here as he claims that if Trump wins,
Speaker 4: there'll be no more elections, and note that he's reading
Speaker 4: this demented diatribe. He wrote all this down and decided
Speaker 4: it was a totally sane and rational thing to say
Speaker 4: out loud.
Speaker 10: Under Trump, this kind of government will perish from the earth.
Speaker 10: I don't mean to scare you. No, no, wait, maybe
Speaker 10: I do mean to scare you. If Trump returns to
Speaker 10: the White House, you can kiss these freedoms goodbye that
Speaker 10: we all take for granted and elections. Forget about it.
Speaker 10: That's over, that's done. If he gets in, I can
Speaker 10: tell you right now, he.
Speaker 11: Will never leave. He will never leave. You know that
Speaker 11: he will never leave.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 4: He had a couple of the Democrats' favorites behind him
Speaker 4: the January sixth cops, they've tried to portray as heroes.
Speaker 4: That narrative has collapsed somewhat in the past year or two. Sadly,
Speaker 4: no one told Bob they are the true heroes.
Speaker 2: Are the true heroes.
Speaker 10: They stood and put their lives on the line, put
Speaker 10: the blue lives, put true They.
Speaker 7: Lied on the roll light one tell you don't care?
Speaker 10: Excuse me, don't find the light under roll?
Speaker 2: What are you saying?
Speaker 3: What are you saying? What are you trying to tell me?
Speaker 3: Only got worse for DeNiro.
Speaker 4: He can play a gangster beautifully, but without a good script,
Speaker 4: he is just an angry, confused old man Democratic. You're
Speaker 4: now you know the Democrats are getting desperate when we
Speaker 4: see these sort of stunts and look at these pole numbers.
Speaker 4: This is what the numbers were at the start of
Speaker 4: this sham trial, Trump having just a one percent lead,
Speaker 4: and let's look at where they are today. Biden has
Speaker 4: dropped dramatically, and those numbers have all gone to Trump.
Speaker 4: ARRFK has gone from three percent to two percent. The
Speaker 4: lead now is nineteen percent. Guess what, that third world
Speaker 4: banana republic weaponizing of the justice system to try to
Speaker 4: jail your political opponent has backfired badly. So let's roll
Speaker 4: out a broken down actor to say some crazy crap
Speaker 4: in front of the courthouse where you are prosecuting, persecuting
Speaker 4: the man. Poulsey will be the next president. I mean,
Speaker 4: who is coming up with this?
Speaker 3: And look at de Niro there in his outdoors.
Speaker 4: It's twenty twenty four and he's got a mask on,
Speaker 4: but he's been demented for some time. Trump derangement syndrome
Speaker 4: is real, and I fear there is no cure. Here
Speaker 4: is old Bob with another teds sufferer, Bill Maher.
Speaker 12: If he is he wins the election, you won't be
Speaker 12: on the show anymore. He'll come looking for me. Well,
Speaker 12: there'll be things that happen that none of us can imagine.
Speaker 12: That's what happens in that kind of a dictatorship, which
Speaker 12: is what he says. Let's believe him take him at
Speaker 12: his word.
Speaker 1: I did from the beginning.
Speaker 13: Yeah, I mean, I said, from the very beginning, this
Speaker 13: guy is never going to concede power.
Speaker 4: Oh dear, even the audience is laughing at the paranoid
Speaker 4: fantasies of these two old fools. And for DeNiro, the
Speaker 4: paranoia setting early here he is with human potato Brian
Speaker 4: Stelter on sin and back in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 12: He is the big worst than I ever could have imagined.
Speaker 2: And what is at the heart of that?
Speaker 11: What is the primary critique or complaint for objection?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 12: I think part of I think he's crazy in a way,
Speaker 12: part of him was just crazy. I mean, if it
Speaker 12: wasn't for you, CNNMSNBC and some other outlets, The New
Speaker 12: York Times, the Washington Policy, I mean, where are we?
Speaker 3: And plenty more left is losing it for you.
Speaker 4: In this next segment, let's start with the Trump hush
Speaker 4: money case in New York. It's almost over with the
Speaker 4: New York Post saying the prosecutor's case.
Speaker 3: Is nothing to brag about. Get it because his name's Bragg.
Speaker 4: They say that he hasn't that and even accurately named
Speaker 4: what crimes Donald Trump is alleged to have committed. Professor
Speaker 4: at George Washington University Law School. Jonathan Turl rites in
Speaker 4: the New York Post a classic closing pitch by lawyers
Speaker 4: is to use a physical object, like a three legged stool.
Speaker 4: If any leg is missing, the stool collapses. Even a
Speaker 4: cursory review of the evidence. This case does not have
Speaker 4: a leg to stand on. The question is whether hatred
Speaker 4: for this man is enough to ignore the obvious injustice
Speaker 4: in this case. In the end, we are all standing
Speaker 4: on that wobbly stool when the government seeks to convict
Speaker 4: people without evidence or even a clear crime.
Speaker 3: If we allow a conviction.
Speaker 4: It is more than a stool that will collapse in
Speaker 4: this Manhattan courtroom. Let's bring in Sky newest contributor, Kosher Gata, Kosher.
Speaker 3: Strong words there.
Speaker 4: De Trump has faced an incredible assault from multiple prosecutors.
Speaker 4: This is a criminal case, though, so it's got added weight.
Speaker 4: How do you think this is going to unfold? So
Speaker 4: many illegal experts are saying the cases is worse than wobbly.
Speaker 4: There is no case, but we're talking about a Manhattan jury.
Speaker 4: We know where that jury pool is drawn from. We've
Speaker 4: seen the conduct of the judge. My feeling is there's
Speaker 4: going to be a conviction here.
Speaker 9: It seems to be where the smart money says this
Speaker 9: is going to end up and will know, I think
Speaker 9: in short order, in a matter of a week or
Speaker 9: two or even less. I think the biggest thing on
Speaker 9: trial here actually on the world stage is the justice system,
Speaker 9: and the New York justice system in particular for all
Speaker 9: the reasons you mentioned with this case as well as
Speaker 9: the civil cases where he has that five hundred million
Speaker 9: dollar plus find ticking away one hundred thousand dollars a
Speaker 9: day in interest payments. So it's not a good look
Speaker 9: for New York. And I say that as somebody who
Speaker 9: lived there for sixteen years. It's quite embarrassing actually for
Speaker 9: many people, regardless what you think about Trump, but your
Speaker 9: a question about what it'll do. That is one thing
Speaker 9: that even if legally it's on shaky ground, if a
Speaker 9: conviction happens, which is what the smart money says, it
Speaker 9: is that indict of the New York justice system that
Speaker 9: it is not a fair and impartial jury. And then politically,
Speaker 9: I think the other issue is that's the other piece
Speaker 9: of this, because it's not just any defendant. All calculations
Speaker 9: are there's two opposing forces that will this make him
Speaker 9: more of a martyr, which it has been doing, and
Speaker 9: all the polls, people are really galvanizing around him, or
Speaker 9: are there some swats We've talked about this before, suburban
Speaker 9: moms and others who just won't be able to look
Speaker 9: past the convicted felon label and that will hurt him,
Speaker 9: And that's the calculation.
Speaker 3: The time will reveal.
Speaker 4: Well, you would think there would be a fake chunk
Speaker 4: of the country that is not that politically engaged, that
Speaker 4: just reads the headlines. And you've got a presidential candidate
Speaker 4: who's got a criminal conviction.
Speaker 3: Surely that has to have a negative impact.
Speaker 4: But thus far in the polls, that hasn't been the way.
Speaker 4: When this trial started he's leading. The polls was very small,
Speaker 4: it was round one percent, and now he's got a
Speaker 4: significant lead. And part of that success is because he's
Speaker 4: getting a lot of support from non white voters, Asians, Hispanics,
Speaker 4: and even black folk. And that was evident with the
Speaker 4: Bronx rally that Trump held recently. Let's just have a
Speaker 4: look at that.
Speaker 14: Where you're from the Bronx.
Speaker 8: Actually, I'm originally from the Bronx and from New York.
Speaker 3: I'm from the Bronx, right, here in the Bronx, New York.
Speaker 8: This is home right here.
Speaker 14: AOC says, if you're not a Democrat, you don't belong.
Speaker 1: Here in the Bronx.
Speaker 2: What do you say?
Speaker 4: I disagree with that.
Speaker 2: I don't think she.
Speaker 7: Should be here in the Bronx.
Speaker 4: I actually don't know any Democrats sitting in the Bronx.
Speaker 6: Look AOC, look at the tremendous support for mister Donald J.
Speaker 2: Trump.
Speaker 8: You need to tell herd in she needs to stay
Speaker 8: out the Bronx because look at.
Speaker 2: All the people around.
Speaker 3: Everybody say for Trump. I am a Democrat and I
Speaker 3: belong here.
Speaker 1: And who you're voted for?
Speaker 3: Donald J.
Speaker 2: Trump?
Speaker 7: What is AOC done.
Speaker 1: For the Bronx. She's done nothing for the Bronx. Nothing,
Speaker 1: nothing's changed, nothing's gone any better, nothing, absolutely nothing.
Speaker 3: Don't come to the Bronxa, Loha, come among us. People
Speaker 3: got struggle. She doesn't even know what struggle is.
Speaker 4: Kosher I should have had a trigger warning for any
Speaker 4: lefties watching before the that grabbed that compilation.
Speaker 3: It was quite devastating. Let's see it now.
Speaker 4: From Madeline Brand, national crimes victim rights advocate, who was
Speaker 4: on stage for this Bronx rally, and she had some
Speaker 4: strong words for the crowd as well.
Speaker 14: Don't we have the illegals flooding our borders, coming into
Speaker 14: our communities, sucking up the resources that we already that
Speaker 14: we barely had. Why why should we allow this to happen?
Speaker 14: Every last person here needs to rise up and get
Speaker 14: fighting mad, get fighting mad, and make sure that you're
Speaker 14: registered to vote and go out there and you vote
Speaker 14: up and down the line, not just the presidency.
Speaker 4: Kosher, That's not something I thought i'd ever see a
Speaker 4: Trump rally in the Bronx.
Speaker 3: In the Wood. It was one of the worst parts
Speaker 3: of the Bronx.
Speaker 9: I'm told it was South Bronx. He has been confined
Speaker 9: to New York City because of that trial we just discussed,
Speaker 9: and you know, he did what he does best, which
Speaker 9: is make lemonade out of lemons. He goes in there.
Speaker 9: It's remarkable because he is on offense that I don't
Speaker 9: think Republican Canada has been there in forty years. And
Speaker 9: his message seems to be resonating with that group in particular.
Speaker 9: So it's fascinating.
Speaker 3: Stuff still to come.
Speaker 4: More from the US with Kosher Gaida, and we'll also
Speaker 4: cover Rishie's soon.
Speaker 15: Naxt pledged to scrap pointless university degrees.
Speaker 4: Welcome back to the Rita Panhisha. I'm here with kosher
Speaker 4: Gaida and let's talk about this story from the Daily Mail.
Speaker 4: Joe Biden's son Hunter used an appearance at a Sandy
Speaker 4: Hook memorial service to arrange a meeting between his dad
Speaker 4: and his Chinese business partners. Is according to new texts
Speaker 4: from a fresh batch of documents released by Congress this way,
Speaker 4: the meeting was part of an alleged ten million dollar
Speaker 4: deal between the Biden family and the Chinese government linked
Speaker 4: to oil company CEFC. Sounds completely kosher, doesn't it kosher?
Speaker 9: Sure, it sure does. And I think you know this
Speaker 9: is just one more detail trickling out in the story,
Speaker 9: and there's three aspects to it. So one as it
Speaker 9: goes to character doing these kinds of things with the
Speaker 9: Sandy Hook issue as the backdrop is not a good look,
Speaker 9: and goes to how much do they care? But also
Speaker 9: just the broader character of getting involved in these things,
Speaker 9: The fact that the president was allowing his son, who's
Speaker 9: clearly troubled had drug issues. We know that that's not
Speaker 9: disputed even by them sitting on boards and doing business
Speaker 9: deals there's something to that that I think is not
Speaker 9: reflecting well. The secondest corruption, it's two toire justice system.
Speaker 9: Like we're discussing, the media had no interest in investigating
Speaker 9: these things before the last election. All of this was
Speaker 9: actually out in the public domain by then. But the
Speaker 9: third one, which is perhaps the most damning is did
Speaker 9: it impact and impact and does it still impact foreign
Speaker 9: policy in the US that if they're commercially invested in
Speaker 9: or they have financial interests with these different countries, is
Speaker 9: that actually affecting Ukraine policy, China policy, and other policies.
Speaker 9: And I think all of that we're just scroutching the iceberg,
Speaker 9: and as it gets more and more into the public domain,
Speaker 9: hopefully people are paying attention.
Speaker 4: And you mentioned the media that they are absolutely shameful
Speaker 4: in their conduct yet because for four years we had
Speaker 4: the Russian collusion conspiracies.
Speaker 3: That had no foundation.
Speaker 4: Ed and investigated and given legitimacy before they were debunked.
Speaker 4: And here we've got actual concrete evidence of what looks
Speaker 4: like some very questionable business dealings between the Biden family
Speaker 4: and foreign governments or foreign connected individuals, and there's just
Speaker 4: no curiosity, there's no effort to actually figure out, So
Speaker 4: I see what happened?
Speaker 3: Was there a quid pro quote? Was their pay for access?
Speaker 4: Because it looks increasing like Hunter wasn't the bad egg.
Speaker 4: It's Joe Biden who is the product that they were selling?
Speaker 9: Right? That is ultimately the thing that's most troubling to people.
Speaker 9: Not so much Hunter. That's one thing. It's been easy
Speaker 9: to expose that, but it's really about ultimately the big
Speaker 9: guy in the ten percent for the big guy.
Speaker 3: That was the big guy exactly to the UK.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 4: Richie Sunak has surprised political pundits by closing the gap
Speaker 4: between his Tories and Labor in recent polls. It's been
Speaker 4: on a weekend campaign blitz. Labor still well in front,
Speaker 4: though the gap between them and the Conservatives has shrunk
Speaker 4: to twelve points from eighteen points in March. Sunak's recent
Speaker 4: policy of compulsory national servers has been widely mocked, but
Speaker 4: perhaps there's people out there who do like it. But
Speaker 4: it seems to be shying away Kosher from the big issues,
Speaker 4: things like energy policy, net zero immigration. But he does
Speaker 4: have one new policy that is again gaining support. He
Speaker 4: wants to get rid of these mickey mouse degrees from universities.
Speaker 4: These are the ripoff degrees, like gender studies, social studies,
Speaker 4: media studies, anything that ends in studies.
Speaker 3: You've got a.
Speaker 4: Question, and they charge students of fortune. That costs the
Speaker 4: taxpayer of fortune. They're selling false hope. Often the student
Speaker 4: doesn't have any prospect of getting a decent job afterwards,
Speaker 4: and he wants to put that money instead into creating
Speaker 4: extra one hundred thousand apprenticeships.
Speaker 3: That seems like a pretty common sense policy.
Speaker 9: It's a great common sense policy. It's one that the
Speaker 9: right side of the ile keeps toying with there and
Speaker 9: in the US and media here as well, and they
Speaker 9: never actually seem to push it forward. We can fill
Speaker 9: in the blanks for why. It's an obvious one for
Speaker 9: many reasons. One is the economic one. As you mentioned,
Speaker 9: the taxpayers are subsidizing these universities for products that don't
Speaker 9: actually have market value if you judge market value based
Speaker 9: on the earning potential, which is ultimately what a degree
Speaker 9: should be about. Two is they just have no skin
Speaker 9: in the game, So the universities get paid either way,
Speaker 9: whether the end product is used or not. It wouldn't
Speaker 9: work that way in any other business. And three, there
Speaker 9: is the ideological cultural issue where academia is so far
Speaker 9: to the left, so you would think that the right
Speaker 9: side of politics would do something about it because they
Speaker 9: also are adversaries, and we could say it's a little
Speaker 9: bit too late, too little, too late, or we could
Speaker 9: say better late than never more, to be gracious and
Speaker 9: do something about it now.
Speaker 4: Well, his needs to act like a Tory because we've
Speaker 4: had just successive Tory Prime ministers who could have been
Speaker 4: from the Labor Party the way they have behaved in power.
Speaker 3: Koshergaita, thank you so much for your time tonight. That's
Speaker 3: it for me. Tonight. Up next is news Night. I'll
Speaker 3: see you Friday. For Left, he's losing it at nine thirty.
Speaker 3: Good night,