Speaker 1: Okay, it tell him it's it's Harps and Patrick. We
Speaker 1: are Sands, Tiff, You and I am just going to
Speaker 1: have to see how we go. Just us too, dummies, mate, Yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll be fine.
Speaker 2: You know. Testosterone's pumping.
Speaker 1: Did you go get some? I'm glad you got some.
Speaker 1: Where'd you get it? Did you get it on the
Speaker 1: black market or did you see the doc?
Speaker 2: Really?
Speaker 1: Do we have to go there already? No? I reckon.
Speaker 1: I actually think your testosterone levels would be probably above
Speaker 1: average for your age because of your health, your healthy lifestyle,
Speaker 1: et cetera.
Speaker 2: Does that make a big difference, does it?
Speaker 1: Oh? Of course? Yeah? Yeah, yeah, yeah. So if you
Speaker 1: if you beat your body up, you know, drink lots
Speaker 1: of booze, eat shit, don't exercise, you know, like literally
Speaker 1: lifting weights or in your case, doing tai chi or
Speaker 1: other kind of strength based stuff as well, increases testosterone production,
Speaker 1: you know. So yeah, being sedentary apart from the fact
Speaker 1: that it declines as men age and women as well,
Speaker 1: because women have testosterone and small amounts. But yes, so, oh,
Speaker 1: one hundred percent, like lifting weights increases test production and
Speaker 1: blah blah blah and all of that. But there's a
Speaker 1: lot of Yeah, it's a lot of things going on
Speaker 1: in that kind of endocrime space around male and female
Speaker 1: hormones and therapy. And it's for very a very long
Speaker 1: time talking about and I've spoken about too much on
Speaker 1: this show, but anything linked to testosterone and men is
Speaker 1: essentially associated with the drug cheating scandals of the eighties
Speaker 1: and nineties and everyone, like people don't understand that that
Speaker 1: testosterone does not equal steroids, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: And there's clinical applications we're talking about health and just
Speaker 1: like there are for ester own and estrogen for women.
Speaker 1: But enough of that boring conversation. Do you still have
Speaker 1: morning Wood? Patrick? That's that's my question. Do you still
Speaker 1: periodically have that? This is a consult now everyone, you're welcome.
Speaker 2: I feel like I'm damned if I do, if I
Speaker 2: damned if I don't. By answering that question.
Speaker 1: Well, do you know what's funny is like literally, but
Speaker 1: literally a doctor will ask you whether or not like
Speaker 1: I listen, have you heard of a speaking of tech?
Speaker 1: Have you heard of a guy called Brian Johnson? No,
Speaker 1: this is true, Okay, now I haven't come. So here's
Speaker 1: like this dude who spends two million dollars a.
Speaker 2: Year on reversing a Sorry, yes, of course I have.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, So one of the things that he talks about,
Speaker 1: and it's not haha, giggle, giggle. You know, schoolboy smut
Speaker 1: is like like with men, and this sounds funny, but
Speaker 1: one of the indicators of health is literally how many
Speaker 1: times and for how long a night men have an erection.
Speaker 1: And so in young, healthy males sometimes that happens somewhere
Speaker 1: around two to three hours a night, and it's not
Speaker 1: because they're sexually aroused, it's just what's happening in their body.
Speaker 1: And so this is an indicator of and yes, it
Speaker 1: sounds funny, but it's got to do with blood flow
Speaker 1: and testosterone production and cell health and all of these things.
Speaker 1: Whereas yeah, like guys who are fifty or sixty who
Speaker 1: can still do that or who still get you know,
Speaker 1: without too much trouble, they can get an erection. Sorry everyone,
Speaker 1: it's clinical. Yeah, it's a real indicator of health. And obviously,
Speaker 1: you know, every second dude in Australia, if not more
Speaker 1: past a certain age have a rectal dysfunction, which it's
Speaker 1: all haha, who you know what it actually correlates really
Speaker 1: strongly with overall well being. Just like when women's estrogen
Speaker 1: and progesterone levels drop, it equates to, among other things,
Speaker 1: perimenopause and menopause. And so there are these physiological consequences
Speaker 1: on both sides of the endocrime scale. But because we're
Speaker 1: so fucking stupid in our society at times where we
Speaker 1: just all, you know, but if we snigger at it
Speaker 1: or we think it's controversial. But if your hormones aren't working,
Speaker 1: including thyroid function and a bunch of other things, you're fucked.
Speaker 1: So that's why women go on HRT, and that's why
Speaker 1: we try to get the endocrime system working well, because
Speaker 1: if that's working well, you're literally winding back the clock biologically.
Speaker 2: At least now you eloquently pointed out or asked if
Speaker 2: I had morning, would which was really lovely way of
Speaker 2: putting it. Thanks, thank you very much for that.
Speaker 1: You're welcome.
Speaker 2: What I think I might do for the next two
Speaker 2: weeks before our next is I'll keep a diary for you,
Speaker 2: Craig yep, yep, yep. I'll make take note. I can't
Speaker 2: say that I do.
Speaker 1: You know what for for our seven male listeners that
Speaker 1: we have because I don't know why, but women love you.
Speaker 1: So many women I love Patrick. I'm like, you know,
Speaker 1: he likes I love him.
Speaker 2: I like too, but just not in that way.
Speaker 1: That's probably why they like you. They feel safe.
Speaker 2: Yeah you can, yeah, absolutely, yeah, yeah, yeah, you.
Speaker 1: Know, yes, go on.
Speaker 2: I want to keep onto this topic because I had
Speaker 2: a very interesting little.
Speaker 1: Careful Yeah, I'm worried now. I want to keep on
Speaker 1: the topic of erections because I had an interesting yet
Speaker 1: go on.
Speaker 2: Okay, So, over the age of fifty, males should get
Speaker 2: PSA tests done, which is a prostate specific atogen. And so,
Speaker 2: as you know, my twin brother had prostate cancer and
Speaker 2: is now going through that journey. In a big concern
Speaker 2: for me as well, obviously, because it increases the risk.
Speaker 2: If you're under the age of sixty, your siblings have
Speaker 2: a higher risk of prostate cancer. And so I've been
Speaker 2: tracking my PSAs and I did blood tests just recently
Speaker 2: because I like to get on your blood tests, particularly
Speaker 2: with my eating patterns and all that sort of stuff.
Speaker 2: And what I've been researching, and this doesn't get told
Speaker 2: very often, is that And again I'm trying to put
Speaker 2: this delicately, but if you act on that morning wood.
Speaker 1: Do you hang a towel on it or something and
Speaker 1: then stroll through the house.
Speaker 2: That's the right, Yeah, because you've got to fall suddenly.
Speaker 2: That can influence your pay levels levels within six hours,
Speaker 2: but up to twenty four to forty eight hours.
Speaker 1: Why are you doing this as you're he's holding out
Speaker 1: his hands like you know when you caught a fish. Yeah,
Speaker 1: go on, so say that again about the six hours
Speaker 1: I was obsessed with your hands?
Speaker 2: No, no, just PSA L I'm not going to sit
Speaker 2: on my hands now, so I don't move there.
Speaker 1: That looks worse, Yeah, go worse.
Speaker 2: Yeah, evidently this in reading, you know, doing research into
Speaker 2: two PSA levels because I'm obviously monitoring mine very closely.
Speaker 2: What can influence your PSAs is if you've if you've
Speaker 2: had yeah, you know you've jacked op lated, thank you,
Speaker 2: weed off, ejaculated right within six hours, but up to
Speaker 2: twenty four to forty eight hours. So I went monk
Speaker 2: for the last week before I had my blood test,
Speaker 2: and my PINS dropped by about ten percent.
Speaker 1: It dropped. So you're saying jacking off increases your PSA.
Speaker 2: Well, if it's just before you go for a blood test, Yeah,
Speaker 2: evidently because I got a GP friend of mine yesterday.
Speaker 2: We walk every week. I've got a few grints.
Speaker 1: Hang on, So what's the message? What's the And by
Speaker 1: the way, remember everyone, this is not this is the
Speaker 1: opposite of advice, So don't take any notice of what
Speaker 1: Patrick's jacking off regime really or any kind of medical
Speaker 1: conclusions he draws from that. Now you've hit up the computer, Well,
Speaker 1: how I don't trust you.
Speaker 2: The effect of ejaculation on serum prostate specific antigen level
Speaker 2: This is an article written in twenty thirteen from the
Speaker 2: National Institute of Health. So evidently it's it's known that
Speaker 2: that can impact your PSA levels, but.
Speaker 1: You haven't read out the rest. What's it say? The impact?
Speaker 2: Okay, ejaculation contemporarily temporarily increase serum prostate specific andigen's PSA levels,
Speaker 2: typically by five to ten percent, with the particlar bike
Speaker 2: lasting up to forty eight hours.
Speaker 1: Right, Well there you go. Yeah, so boys, Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: that's a tricky one, isn't it. You do a cost
Speaker 1: benefit analysis, You're like, how long is it elevated? Yeah?
Speaker 1: And what are we talking about? Now? Hey, well, you
Speaker 1: keep on keeping on. Thanks for eating a fourteen day
Speaker 1: would diary. We'll call it the E MW Early Morning
Speaker 1: Wood Diary.
Speaker 2: So Jake the PEG. What about you?
Speaker 1: Hey, I've had an direction since the eighties for you.
Speaker 2: I don't all right now there you're embarrassed?
Speaker 1: Is it hot in here? Is it hot in here?
Speaker 1: Stop it? Yeah? Well, well, I'll also keep a diary
Speaker 1: we compare. No, we won't everyone that's disgusting and for
Speaker 1: the one listener that remains, For the one listener, what
Speaker 1: is wrong with you? Why are you still here? Oh? God?
Speaker 1: Do you know? We do this every time where we
Speaker 1: talk about ship that's so unrelated, nothing to do with
Speaker 1: what we're meant to be talking about. And then there's
Speaker 1: this awkward, fucking segue. Let's talk about technology.
Speaker 2: Wait a minute, let's talk about porn, men, because there
Speaker 2: is a segment there is something that I want to
Speaker 2: talk about and relate to porn, because if you happen
Speaker 2: to be.
Speaker 1: I feel much better with that segue.
Speaker 2: Well, because if you wake up okay anywhere?
Speaker 1: All right, all right, let's talk about porn. Do we
Speaker 1: need to?
Speaker 2: But all right, well, no, it's just in relation to
Speaker 2: the government oversight and the fact that the Australian government
Speaker 2: is now limiting access to social media for children under
Speaker 2: the age of sixteen. They're also rolling out systems to
Speaker 2: be able to verify age with a lot of the
Speaker 2: major porn sites as well. That raises concerns and about
Speaker 2: the oversight of how they're going to verify that you
Speaker 2: are over a certain age. So, you know, for adults
Speaker 2: wanting to access porn in Australia, now you will have
Speaker 2: to prove your.
Speaker 1: Age, right, yeah, okay, And how do you do that?
Speaker 2: Well, there's number of different ways that can do it.
Speaker 2: One will be literally using a scanner on your phone,
Speaker 2: like the camera on your phone, to just take a
Speaker 2: photograph of yourself and then it will use an algorithm
Speaker 2: to to gauge whether or not you're old enough.
Speaker 1: That seems like then you're giving an image of yourself
Speaker 1: to the fucking Internet, not that you know. I don't
Speaker 1: know how porn works, but allegedly I don't. Yeah, let's
Speaker 1: stop now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was the only segue I could think of
Speaker 2: in relation to our conversation, Craig, Can we talk about
Speaker 2: something else?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Fuck please? Please? Let's talk about another bloody app
Speaker 1: from Patrick nearby Glasses. What does nearby Glasses by the way,
Speaker 1: everyone Patrick sends me a list of talking points, we
Speaker 1: generally don't get halfway through it. But tell me about
Speaker 1: your bloody app.
Speaker 2: Well, there's lots of concerns at the moment with all
Speaker 2: these smart glasses that are out and Meta, the company
Speaker 2: that owns Facebook has teamed up with a few glasses
Speaker 2: manufacturers and what you've got AI glasses that have cameras
Speaker 2: in them. You can record, you can take photos, but
Speaker 2: the eyeglasses can also see the world around them. And
Speaker 2: we were chatting earlier about how you and how I
Speaker 2: went to a concert in Melbourne this week and I
Speaker 2: was with a blind friend of mine who has you know,
Speaker 2: who has some smart glasses, and we were just talking
Speaker 2: about how useful they are for him to use those
Speaker 2: to be able to describe what is visually in front
Speaker 2: of him. So his wife bought them for him. Although
Speaker 2: he's really good with a cane and he's got a
Speaker 2: seeing eye dog, but he's been playing around with the
Speaker 2: new smart glasses. But there are privacy concerns about somebody
Speaker 2: walking around with cameras that are constantly recording or taking
Speaker 2: in the scenery around them. So this guy came out
Speaker 2: with an app called Nearby Glasses, and I tested it
Speaker 2: and I downloaded it onto my phone. It's really cool
Speaker 2: because when people use smart glasses, the glasses are basically
Speaker 2: connecting to your phone and that's how they're getting the
Speaker 2: information and how they're able to do all the amazing
Speaker 2: things that they're doing. But evidently there's a certain frequency
Speaker 2: range and without going into the technicals, effectively, this app
Speaker 2: will let you know if someone in your vicinity is
Speaker 2: dark glasses. Yeah, and potentially sporting. Yeah. I thought it
Speaker 2: was really good.
Speaker 1: So now that is a good idea, Like, I think
Speaker 1: that's a good that's a great like. Yeah. And also
Speaker 1: I think I don't know why this jumped to mine,
Speaker 1: but I yes, I do. I was talking to one
Speaker 1: of the ladies who works at the gym i' go
Speaker 1: to and they were just talking about, you know, creeping
Speaker 1: creepster dudes who come into the gym and do you
Speaker 1: know what I mean, And it's like they're just it's
Speaker 1: clear that, you know, the twenty percent of their reason
Speaker 1: to be there as for training and eighty percent is
Speaker 1: for other things. So like the idea of girls being
Speaker 1: I don't really care so much. I don't want it,
Speaker 1: but it's not an issue. But yeah, like dudes being
Speaker 1: able to film women and stuff just by putting on glasses,
Speaker 1: that capacity should not be legal, like to be able
Speaker 1: to just imagine you wearing those in the gym and
Speaker 1: they're just filming everyone in the gym and then they
Speaker 1: go home and download that and that's creepy as fuck.
Speaker 2: Yeah, look, it's a real interesting one. As I said,
Speaker 2: my blind friend has been using them, and you can
Speaker 2: imagine for someone who's vision impaired, if you've got cameras
Speaker 2: and smart glasses that are constantly looking at the world
Speaker 2: around you, you could effectively go to the gym and
Speaker 2: look at what the weights are that you've set, You
Speaker 2: could describe the area. You could make enable people a
Speaker 2: lot more by using this technology. But of course it's
Speaker 2: like anything. It means that you know this. We're constantly
Speaker 2: being surveiled, and the question is where is that data going,
Speaker 2: who's monitoring it? And another concern is that meta at
Speaker 2: the company that makes a lot of the software and
Speaker 2: is powering the these smart glasses, they have oversight and
Speaker 2: they use humans for oversights, so AI is looking at
Speaker 2: what you're seeing, but they take snippets of the recordings
Speaker 2: and they use humans to be able to cross check
Speaker 2: and match with AI to help make AI more accurate.
Speaker 2: But these outsourced workers are now saying that they're capturing
Speaker 2: people going to the toilet, having sex, looking at passwords
Speaker 2: on their computer when they're typing stuff up. So the
Speaker 2: problem is if you start wearing these and they're there
Speaker 2: and they're part of your life all the time, everything
Speaker 2: you see, potentially they see. And that's why I thought
Speaker 2: this app is really good. It's a free app, and
Speaker 2: what I liked about it as well is it's been
Speaker 2: it's a guy who's kind of a Swiss psycho sociologist
Speaker 2: and he's a hobbyist coder, so's he's a bit of
Speaker 2: a nerd, and he invented the app. But what's really
Speaker 2: interesting is anytime you're wearing these smart glasses, they basically
Speaker 2: the app listens for a Bluetooth signal, and the Bluetooth
Speaker 2: signal basically has these data packets that fly forward and
Speaker 2: back to tell other devices what they are and what
Speaker 2: they're doing. So the way, so your phone knows to
Speaker 2: connect to the smart glasses because of the signal between them,
Speaker 2: and that's what this app is looking for because I've
Speaker 2: got a VR headset, and my VR headset uses the
Speaker 2: same sort of data packets. So as soon as I
Speaker 2: turned the VR headset on, my phone pinged to tell
Speaker 2: me that there was a recordable device or a smart
Speaker 2: device that was being used within my vicinity, so I
Speaker 2: could see that people would probably have them in the gym.
Speaker 2: You know, it's a free app. It's great.
Speaker 1: I thought it was fantastic. I wonder what you'd do
Speaker 1: with that, though. Let's say you've got it on and
Speaker 1: you're in the gym and at pings. What do you
Speaker 1: do then? Do you go up to the person that
Speaker 1: you because there might be ten people in the gym
Speaker 1: with glasses on? Do you go up to the person
Speaker 1: that you suspect and go e? Or do you just
Speaker 1: avoid that? Like? It's good, Like I think it's a
Speaker 1: great idea. And my question is and then what.
Speaker 2: Well, then you be you're more conscious of what you
Speaker 2: say and do and how you present yourself, because the
Speaker 2: thing is, if you're at a public place, for example, it's.
Speaker 1: No hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on? Why
Speaker 1: the fuck do I need to be more conscious of
Speaker 1: what I say and do and how I present myself?
Speaker 1: Because some fucking idiots wearing PERV glasses. I shouldn't have
Speaker 1: to adapt. They should fuck off, like you're no, no, no,
Speaker 1: But if you're hang on, hang on, I know you're
Speaker 1: a chatty kathy. Let me have a go, right, Like
Speaker 1: if I have to change because some blokes wearing glasses,
Speaker 1: that's not right, Like they shouldn't control the dynamics of
Speaker 1: that space. They shouldn't be allowed to wear those. If
Speaker 1: it has the capacity to record people who haven't consented
Speaker 1: to that, that I don't think that should be legal.
Speaker 1: And because that is what's happening, because they're recording people
Speaker 1: who have not consented to it, Like, how is that okay?
Speaker 2: It's not okay, And that's my point. And gyms need
Speaker 2: to have hard policies. So basically what you should be
Speaker 2: doing is going to the person who owns the gym
Speaker 2: and saying, well, maybe our policy should be anybody who
Speaker 2: is accessing the gym is not allowed to use any
Speaker 2: sort of recording device, and that you do. So I
Speaker 2: think it's incumbent on the venue to start to enforce that,
Speaker 2: because the thing is you don't want it to become
Speaker 2: the Spanish inquisition either. Imagine if you suddenly, you know,
Speaker 2: muscled up to some bloke and you find out, well,
Speaker 2: actually he's blind and he needs them, or they just
Speaker 2: have verything.
Speaker 1: I think that's going to be evident. I don't think
Speaker 1: anyone's that fucking stupid you think. And I just say,
Speaker 1: my friend Tony Doherty of Doughty's Gyms, the world famous
Speaker 1: Doughty Gyms, he he doesn't let people take because what's
Speaker 1: probably not in the land, but in a lot of
Speaker 1: gyms in Melbourne, people are constantly filming, constantly videoing and
Speaker 1: even taking in many of them tripods, So they're setting
Speaker 1: up try oh like a fucking studio. They're setting up
Speaker 1: iPods and filming themselves, but obviously they're capturing everyone who's
Speaker 1: in behind them, and he's just he's just he's like,
Speaker 1: fucks them off and he either kicks them out or
Speaker 1: he just tells them they can't do it. So there's
Speaker 1: no I don't know if there's Yeah, I think I'm
Speaker 1: pretty sure there's no videoing in his gyms at all.
Speaker 1: So who won't be putting up with these glasses? Is
Speaker 1: a big time good.
Speaker 2: On your tone? Yeah, the one thing that is the reality, unfortunately,
Speaker 2: not unfortunately, but in Australia, if you are in a
Speaker 2: public space, if you're walking down the street, if you're
Speaker 2: at a local festival, it legal too. You can take
Speaker 2: photographs of total strangers. It's creepy. I'm not saying that
Speaker 2: it's a good thing, but there is no law to
Speaker 2: say that you can't be filming or taking photos or
Speaker 2: recording video space. But when you're in a venue where
Speaker 2: there's a membership and you can control that, that's again
Speaker 2: where I'd be pushing for the owners of the gyms,
Speaker 2: and that's what i'd be doing. I'd be approaching and saying,
Speaker 2: you know, all the gym attendant and say, I'm not
Speaker 2: feeling comfortable as someone around here who's wearing the smart glasses.
Speaker 2: I wouldn't challenge someone directly. I would get one of
Speaker 2: the attendants or the owners to challenge them. Yeah, good
Speaker 2: luck with that.
Speaker 1: Have you been in a gym lately? I want to
Speaker 1: do two. So the next one I want to do
Speaker 1: is which we've spoken about the potential impact of AI
Speaker 1: on a lot of industries. I don't want to go
Speaker 1: into AI much today other than this one, but I
Speaker 1: find it interesting. So the third one on your list,
Speaker 1: so AI generated film at Trotfest twenty twenty six, which
Speaker 1: is a kind of a film festival, sparks filmmaker backlash.
Speaker 1: I mean, the inevitability of AI films with no actual
Speaker 1: actors is a foregone conclusion. I don't know what the
Speaker 1: timeline is. It's probably Oh, I think it has already happened.
Speaker 2: Tell us about So trop Fest is pretty exciting because
Speaker 2: the festival, it's an Australian festival that's launched some amazing
Speaker 2: careers because it's been around for a long time, but
Speaker 2: COVID kind of pulled the pin on it, so it
Speaker 2: hasn't been around for six years. So they have trop
Speaker 2: Fest this year and one of the finalists was a
Speaker 2: film called Sid Confidential. I watched it before the show.
Speaker 2: I just thought, I figured I'll have a bit of
Speaker 2: a watch to see what I think of it. It
Speaker 2: was one of those kind of detective noir kind of
Speaker 2: semi cartoon three D cartoons, so oh yeah, it was
Speaker 2: an ark and stormy night and I was yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: guys over there, look I watched it.
Speaker 1: It was Can I just say that's why you and
Speaker 1: I are not actors?
Speaker 2: It was Yeah, it was very terrible. It was moderately entertaining. Visually,
Speaker 2: I kept seeing AI glitches, like at one point the
Speaker 2: guy goes to jump on a tram and it says
Speaker 2: Sydney on the tram at the front of the tram,
Speaker 2: and then the frame flips and it says this garbled
Speaker 2: junk or whatever. So there's little and it's fun to watch,
Speaker 2: even to look for all the mistakes. It was. It
Speaker 2: was entertaining. But I think the big argument from all
Speaker 2: the filmmakers who spend hundreds and hundreds of hours mapping
Speaker 2: out stories and then filming and editing and doing all
Speaker 2: the work they do because trop Fest is very high standard,
Speaker 2: and I think that's where people have, you know, things
Speaker 2: have come unstuck. There should be a separate category for AI,
Speaker 2: and that's the way you get around it.
Speaker 1: So category can I ask, So does it it looks
Speaker 1: more cartoonish than real right.
Speaker 2: Well in this instance because that was the style that
Speaker 2: they were going for. I mean, you can go for
Speaker 2: super ultra realistic, and you know, we've seen examples I
Speaker 2: guess all over the internet with the likes of famous actors,
Speaker 2: and you know, it's been phenomenal. The quality is unbelievably good.
Speaker 2: But in this case, they've gone from a kind of
Speaker 2: three dimensional cartoon representation. It was kind of fun. It
Speaker 2: was a bit of a homage to to trop Fest
Speaker 2: itself off. If you watch it, it only goes from
Speaker 2: about fifteen minutes or so. So well, it was an
Speaker 2: interesting watch. But I certainly wouldn't have shortlisted it because
Speaker 2: I think that's a bit of a and a lot
Speaker 2: of the you know, of all the seven hundred entriest
Speaker 2: of all, why would you choose an AI over the
Speaker 2: human made and sweat it over. I'm not to say
Speaker 2: that the person who produced it didn't actually put some
Speaker 2: effort into it, but as the majority of it was AI,
Speaker 2: then you've got to ask yourself, you know, what's the standard.
Speaker 2: We want to make sure that we keep that separate
Speaker 2: from everyday average people who want to try to launch
Speaker 2: a career or who're passionate about their hobby.
Speaker 1: Do you have Netflix? You probably don't or do you? Yeah?
Speaker 2: I just don't watch it. I keep thinking I should
Speaker 2: just cancel my membership.
Speaker 1: Before you do. There's a little like I never you know,
Speaker 1: those short films that day like you're just talking about,
Speaker 1: but that like this thing came up the other day.
Speaker 1: I went to bed and I normally go, I'm going
Speaker 1: to watch whatever, and then seven minutes later, I'm a
Speaker 1: sleeper by cup at two and what's that and Robots? No,
Speaker 1: it's called The Singers. Okay, the Singers and it goes
Speaker 1: for I think eighteen minutes and it's not on Netflix,
Speaker 1: and I'd like you to watch it and then message
Speaker 1: me and any of our listeners too. I watched it
Speaker 1: and I'm like, I kind of loved it and hated it,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, it's very different. Don't look it up now?
Speaker 2: No, No, I was actually looking up Love Death and Robots,
Speaker 2: which is something I think you should watch. So I'll
Speaker 2: watch The Singers and you watch Okay, how.
Speaker 1: Long does Love Death and Robots go? For?
Speaker 2: The little clips? They're all little mini video clips, different things.
Speaker 2: Where do I get that Netflix as well?
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, now I want to jump ship and
Speaker 1: talk about something that's more in my lane your car
Speaker 1: not really? Yeah, well, but you know what's interesting is
Speaker 1: by D, which I'm sure most of our listeners know
Speaker 1: by now as a Chinese brand, and it's so funny
Speaker 1: the psychology and the kind of the I guess, the
Speaker 1: feeling attitude that people have about Chinese cars are shifting
Speaker 1: because you know, there was a point in time when
Speaker 1: the Chinese cars in Australia were very agricultural and very
Speaker 1: low quality. But that is definitely not the case. And
Speaker 1: I'm not endorsing or supporting. I'm just saying, what is
Speaker 1: a few my cars? A few my cars, few my
Speaker 1: friends have got Chinese cars, and some of them are
Speaker 1: fucking amazing. But anyway, anyway, b y D has just
Speaker 1: produced the world's longest range EV with a monster six
Speaker 1: hundred and forty four miles, which is given or take
Speaker 1: a thousand case between charges.
Speaker 2: One.
Speaker 1: That's a that's a game changer.
Speaker 2: That's massive because it is has been a big factor
Speaker 2: in Australia. Range anxiety is a big thing for a
Speaker 2: lot of people, and if you particularly live in a
Speaker 2: rural area. I know when I bought my car that
Speaker 2: I did the hybrid version, but the battery powered the
Speaker 2: EV version was only two kilometers and to me, living
Speaker 2: an hour from Melbourne, I thought a two hundred ks
Speaker 2: is not a lot. So you know, a thousand kilometers, Wow,
Speaker 2: that's that's amazing. You know you're driving.
Speaker 1: That's definitely a game changer. So it'll be interesting to
Speaker 1: see how that goes.
Speaker 2: It's called the Z nine GT if anybody's interested, because
Speaker 2: they have I didn't realize this, but by D has
Speaker 2: a luxury brand as well, called Denza, So it's this brand. Yah,
Speaker 2: I didn't realize. It's like Lexus and Toyota, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Yes, so exactly, and hid I have one what's it
Speaker 1: called Genesis? Yeah? They have Genesis, which is where's now?
Speaker 1: I've now, I've lost all your notes. There we are
Speaker 1: now I'm back. But will your next car be an EV?
Speaker 2: Probably will be. I would think I have solar power,
Speaker 2: and I all think that if I could use my
Speaker 2: soul that to charge the car during the day, all
Speaker 2: that sort of stuff. But I think I haven't got
Speaker 2: soular batteries. I haven't got batteries rather for my solar
Speaker 2: system yet. And I know there's a government initiative at
Speaker 2: the moment. But there are a small number of EV
Speaker 2: cars that can be used in reverse to power the
Speaker 2: house if the power goes out. So I think the
Speaker 2: Nissan Leaf is one of those. So I can't remember
Speaker 2: the technical term, but basically you plug it in, but
Speaker 2: if the power drops, it acts as a battery. Because
Speaker 2: the cars, the batteries in cars are a lot more
Speaker 2: powerful than the batteries that people get to power their
Speaker 2: houses for the most part.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, there's a huge demand on those batteries propelling
Speaker 1: a two ton vehicle out one hundred kilometers an hour
Speaker 1: for extended periods of time on a highway. What does
Speaker 1: fake content of occupation is not educational? What does that mean?
Speaker 1: I don't even know what that means. Fake content of occupational? Yeah,
Speaker 1: what is that?
Speaker 2: So? Yeah, the occupation of Are you familiar with the
Speaker 2: little island of Guernsey off Yes? Yeah, okay, so it's
Speaker 2: kind of closer to I think it's closer to France
Speaker 2: than it is to the UK. But it's the furthest
Speaker 2: most you know, island of the group of UK islands.
Speaker 2: And it wasated by so it was German. It was
Speaker 2: occupied by German troops in nineteen forty or so. And
Speaker 2: what's been happening is a lot of people have been
Speaker 2: uploading photos of the occupation but they're ai generated, right.
Speaker 2: Historian has come out and said, you know, because people
Speaker 2: are trying to get clicks, so they're looking to make
Speaker 2: you know, sensationalist photos or they're animating photos. So you've
Speaker 2: got a still image of troops and then you animate
Speaker 2: it and that's the soldiers walking down the street. But
Speaker 2: it's not historically accurate. And that's this is a real
Speaker 2: concern because there's this professor of it's actually an interesting title,
Speaker 2: Professor of Conflict Archaeology and Holocaust Heritage at the University
Speaker 2: of Cambridge. His name is doctor Gillie Carr, and he
Speaker 2: says this has really become troubling because the occupation in
Speaker 2: particular is the one that he highlighted, and he said,
Speaker 2: there's lots of AI generated images and they're being shared
Speaker 2: on social media all the time because there's been a
Speaker 2: real resurgence in interest in the World War and what
Speaker 2: happened there. And he's saying, well, the problem is none
Speaker 2: of us is actually accurate. It's not scientifically, it's not
Speaker 2: historically accurate. And this is the concern and this is
Speaker 2: going to be you know, a worrisome for us moving forward,
Speaker 2: whether you're flicking through your reels on YouTube or Instagram
Speaker 2: and what's real and what isn't real And.
Speaker 1: That's already happening, like because a lot of my shit
Speaker 1: is research based where it's just because a lot of
Speaker 1: my fear his nutrition and training and science. And then
Speaker 1: it's like, oh, groundbreaking research reveals and it's like from
Speaker 1: science blah blah, and it's it looks one hundred percent
Speaker 1: legit and it's complete fiction. Like it's just it's it's
Speaker 1: a total fiction created to get clicks and numbers. And
Speaker 1: then you I saw Jordan Peterson, who we all know
Speaker 1: who he is anyway, he said that there was some
Speaker 1: quote from him. There's a picture of him in a
Speaker 1: chair on a stage making some profound fucking thing. I'm like, what,
Speaker 1: And I chucked it into Claude or chat Jo, but
Speaker 1: I'm like, is this legit? And they're like, nah, he
Speaker 1: never said that. That's not true. That's a complete fabrication.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, that's the thing. You don't you don't know,
Speaker 1: and you also, I think you have to. Like I
Speaker 1: put up a post before on Insta and it's like
Speaker 1: there's a sentence that's you know when people go are
Speaker 1: the best way to get in shape is? And I wrote,
Speaker 1: so I put that as a standaline sentence in quotation marks,
Speaker 1: and I wrote after that, whatever comes next is bullshit,
Speaker 1: because there is no best way for all these different
Speaker 1: bodies and people with different backgrounds and genetics and ages
Speaker 1: and injuries and medical challenges, and you know, there's no
Speaker 1: best program but people all the time. Again, this is
Speaker 1: the best way to do this. No, it's not because
Speaker 1: you go the best way for who, the best way
Speaker 1: for Patrick or Craig or my mum or the thirty
Speaker 1: year old elite athlete or Yeah. So I think I
Speaker 1: think it's getting worse and worse, and I think it's
Speaker 1: going to be well with some stuff anyway, and that
Speaker 1: you know that instagramy, Facebook y, you know, when stuff's
Speaker 1: getting pumped out, which is allegedly some information source. I
Speaker 1: think most of it isn't. I think most of it
Speaker 1: is now somewhere between somewhat accurate and complete bullshit.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think more than fifty one percent of all
Speaker 2: content now being generated on the internet video still the
Speaker 2: whole lot, Yeah, AI generated, which is a frightening thought.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's not a useful tool, but it also
Speaker 2: means I worry about election time. You know what happened.
Speaker 2: That's election time, by the way. Not going back to
Speaker 2: our first topic.
Speaker 1: When we have a state that's with an E, not
Speaker 1: an L, not an R. Yeah, when we have.
Speaker 2: A state or federal election. How do we know that
Speaker 2: the video we're seeing isn't propaganda that's been generated by AI.
Speaker 2: We know that that's been influence heavily influenced in previous
Speaker 2: elections in other countries. Yes, as you say, you can
Speaker 2: fake it so well now. And if you're in one
Speaker 2: of those blinker visions where your algorithm is pulling up
Speaker 2: far left, far right, middle middle, but someone's going for
Speaker 2: clicks and they're looking for propaganda, it's getting really difficult
Speaker 2: to know what's right and what's not right. And we're
Speaker 2: all being challenged to try to work out, you know,
Speaker 2: whether we jump one way or the other. And I
Speaker 2: don't know is there going to be a pushback. I
Speaker 2: mean it's certainly with a lot of younger people. I
Speaker 2: see people wearing headphones with cables on them. Now they're
Speaker 2: not wearing you know, yeah, yeah bones.
Speaker 1: I bought some the other day because yeah, I'm like,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure. And I also think another thing, Mate,
Speaker 1: is just the gap between what is happening in well,
Speaker 1: let's stay in this space, but in AI and social
Speaker 1: media and the stuff that's being because everything on social
Speaker 1: media is with one objective or a couple, but the
Speaker 1: immediate objective is to get your attention and keep your
Speaker 1: attention for as long as possible. And then I think
Speaker 1: the gap between people's actual understanding of what's going on
Speaker 1: and what's actually going on, you know, this awareness around
Speaker 1: like every time I look at something, unless it's literally
Speaker 1: a you know, I see something that you put up
Speaker 1: on social media, well, I go, well, that's him, and
Speaker 1: that's Brits and that's the fucking that's his morning, you know,
Speaker 1: I know, but most things, I'm like, I don't know
Speaker 1: if this is true, even if it looks true, and
Speaker 1: I think trying to understand. I think I spoke to
Speaker 1: Melissa earlier and I said, when I'm finished my current study,
Speaker 1: even though I don't really I'm not excited about it,
Speaker 1: but I feel like I need to do a little
Speaker 1: bit of a Craig version of a deep dive into AI,
Speaker 1: just so that I can start to speak the language.
Speaker 1: You know, there ain't too many sixty year olds that
Speaker 1: are all over AI and understandably, or fifty or forty
Speaker 1: year olds for that matter. But I don't want to
Speaker 1: get to the point where I don't understand what the
Speaker 1: fuck's going on, and so I want to become not
Speaker 1: because I want to become a coder or write this
Speaker 1: or that or you know, but I just want to
Speaker 1: understand what is possible, what is happening, what is real?
Speaker 1: What is bullshit? Of course, how do I take advantage
Speaker 1: of in an intelligent way? How do I take advantage
Speaker 1: of what's possible and available for my business and for
Speaker 1: my career? And like, you can go the super long way,
Speaker 1: or you can get the same outcome like I can.
Speaker 1: I can literally get AI to check my entire paper
Speaker 1: that I wrote that took a year and a half.
Speaker 1: It can check it. I'm not talking about rewrite it
Speaker 1: or change it. I'm just find any mistakes in three
Speaker 1: minutes that would take me half a day of sitting
Speaker 1: and reading. Why wouldn't you do that? Like find the mistakes,
Speaker 1: find them grammatical? Is there too much repetition? What does
Speaker 1: it flow? You know? And that's not using AI to
Speaker 1: you know, obviously all my workers self generated because I
Speaker 1: ran independent studies and collected all the data. But for
Speaker 1: things like that, and even I mean, I know this
Speaker 1: is a very low level use based on what's actually possible. Now,
Speaker 1: but the idea that I'm not going to inter or
Speaker 1: interact with AI as some people like fuck AI. I'm like, yeah,
Speaker 1: good luck with that. You're not. It's going to be
Speaker 1: in your life whether or not you want it, So
Speaker 1: you might need to get a little bit kind of
Speaker 1: you know, aware, and what's the word being able to
Speaker 1: speak the language somewhat?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think understanding the lingo is really important. But
Speaker 2: at what point do we deep dive to the point
Speaker 2: where you know, I don't know exactly how my phone works,
Speaker 2: but I use it every day, and you know, there's
Speaker 2: only so many things you can do. But I think
Speaker 2: from a safety perspective, or at least from a you know,
Speaker 2: keeping yourself informed, knowing more about AI is really important.
Speaker 2: I did a little interesting exercise the other day with
Speaker 2: che chpt I just I threw a lot of my
Speaker 2: financial information in there about how much money I had,
Speaker 2: what my superannuation was currently at, you know, what my
Speaker 2: cash flow was, and I had a really interesting conversation,
Speaker 2: you know, theoretical of when could I retire, how much
Speaker 2: what I need? But it was pulling in data from
Speaker 2: the Australian government website looking at pensions what you could
Speaker 2: do to supplement that if you were self funded retiree.
Speaker 2: It was really interesting because it was drawing all the
Speaker 2: sources from the internet that were government related, so the
Speaker 2: information really seemed quite accurate. You know, you could do
Speaker 2: this and then you could supplement your pension by doing this,
Speaker 2: and if you have this much, it was phenomenal. You know,
Speaker 2: you have a conversation after conversation with a financial advisor.
Speaker 2: I'm not suggesting that you exclusively go to AI as
Speaker 2: a financial advisor, but as a starting point, it's great.
Speaker 2: It's an amazing tool.
Speaker 1: I Yeah, I think that too. I think I think
Speaker 1: I was talking to somebody the other day about just
Speaker 1: a little They asked me something, and it's like we
Speaker 1: were talking about how when they get emotional, they can't
Speaker 1: think clearly, they don't make great decisions, you know, they
Speaker 1: don't respond well in all of that. And anyway, I
Speaker 1: was trying to explain on a pretty basic level. So
Speaker 1: bits of your brains do different things. You've got this
Speaker 1: thing called an amigdela, which is like the emotional epicenter
Speaker 1: of your brain. You've got a thing called a prefrontal
Speaker 1: cortex which makes decisions. All of that, and I go
Speaker 1: sometimes that bit overtakes that bit and like, how do
Speaker 1: you how do you know this? I goble, I study it,
Speaker 1: but I go, do you know what? You could literally
Speaker 1: go into chat GPT and go break down the bits
Speaker 1: of the brain, like what are they called and what
Speaker 1: do they do? You know? And it's I came back
Speaker 1: and I thought, how does that?
Speaker 2: Like?
Speaker 1: Was that a good idea? And I said, literally, tell
Speaker 1: me all the main bits because there's a fucking lot,
Speaker 1: but the main bits of the brain and what those
Speaker 1: bits of the brain do for us. And it's really
Speaker 1: like people could learn a basic understanding of how their
Speaker 1: brain works, or at least what the bits of their
Speaker 1: brain do in an hour if they want, and you know,
Speaker 1: take it's like, it is so incredible what's available now
Speaker 1: and how help Like that's just a real practical use.
Speaker 1: It's not steering you in a direction, it's giving you
Speaker 1: and the stuff that it spewed out. And I wrote,
Speaker 1: you know, basically word it so that it's it's user
Speaker 1: friendly for a lay person, and it was brilliant.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, treat me like I'm you know, a year
Speaker 2: seven student, or treat me like yeah. I used another
Speaker 2: little interesting use. I had an awkward situation with a
Speaker 2: colleague slash friend and I had to send an email,
Speaker 2: but I had to word it delicately because I didn't
Speaker 2: want it to be one of those email trails where
Speaker 2: I said this, then you said that, and I said
Speaker 2: said that. So I asked chat GPT. I want to
Speaker 2: send this. I don't want to offend the person, but
Speaker 2: I also want to shut down the conversation so it
Speaker 2: doesn't go any further. And it was great advice.
Speaker 1: Really, this is really good.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because I, you know, I don't want to offend people,
Speaker 2: and I find that you know, not that I'm overtly
Speaker 2: a people pleaser, but I think that you and I
Speaker 2: are very similar in that way. You know, we like
Speaker 2: to be liked. And so I really wanted to handle
Speaker 2: this delicately, but I just didn't. I kept rewriting the
Speaker 2: same email. I rewrote it, and rewrote it, and rewrote it.
Speaker 2: And look at a quick tip for all you email
Speaker 2: people out there who want to send an email and
Speaker 2: they're a bit angry or they're a bit emotional, don't
Speaker 2: put the person's name in the two yet. Write the
Speaker 2: email first and then put the name in. That way,
Speaker 2: you can't accidentally send it or write it in something else.
Speaker 1: First, yeah, did you find it up?
Speaker 2: No? No, No, I didn't. I didn't. I make sure
Speaker 2: so even if i'm replying, when I hit the reply,
Speaker 2: I take their email address out so I don't accidentally
Speaker 2: send it.
Speaker 1: But that is a really interesting thing because you think
Speaker 1: about and this is heading a bit more into psych
Speaker 1: and sociology, but still related to what we're talking about.
Speaker 1: You know those those times when you just know you're
Speaker 1: having a pointless conversation or you feel like with some
Speaker 1: people and I'm not saying I'm never the problem. I
Speaker 1: definitely am at times, but you're like, fuck this person.
Speaker 1: I have had this conversation seventy three times and you
Speaker 1: know it's like going or when you're in the middle
Speaker 1: of it, you're like, God, I just want this to
Speaker 1: end because you know it's not fixing or changing or
Speaker 1: improving anything. What are you laughing at.
Speaker 2: I'm laughing because I'm thinking about our podcasts.
Speaker 1: This is this is fucking ground breaking. People love this shit,
Speaker 1: both of them. Both of our listeners love this. Shout
Speaker 1: out to Arnie Marget's all right, let's do you pick
Speaker 1: another couple pick which my point is, well, I just
Speaker 1: fucking said to you fucking stop picking on me. You're
Speaker 1: a bully. You're a bully from Bland. My point is
Speaker 1: that sometimes you like, there are these pointless, groundhole day
Speaker 1: conversations that we keep kind of involving ourselves in rather
Speaker 1: than going the last time I spoke to this person
Speaker 1: about this thing, it didn't work, that was not fruitful
Speaker 1: or productive. So we either don't talk about it or
Speaker 1: talk about it in a different way, you know, because
Speaker 1: it's like I have wasted so much. I'll give you
Speaker 1: an example. So, and I've had this at least thirty
Speaker 1: I was going to say a hundred, not one hundred,
Speaker 1: but at least thirty times with friends of mine where
Speaker 1: they go, oh, I just want to pick your brain
Speaker 1: for a minute. I just want to talk to you
Speaker 1: about so food and I go, nah, nah, I go.
Speaker 1: You and I have had this chat thirty five times
Speaker 1: and you never do anything with the information that I
Speaker 1: give you. And twenty years down the track, you're still
Speaker 1: looking for a quick fix, a magic pill or a
Speaker 1: fucking shortcut. And you want to know if I think
Speaker 1: ozepic is a great idea for you? Not having that chat,
Speaker 1: how about this eat less shit? Move more? And just
Speaker 1: fucking stop asking me oh, you know, but that's not
Speaker 1: what they want to hear. So some of my friends,
Speaker 1: I go, do not talk to me about your body fitness, health, nutrition,
Speaker 1: exercise program until you're actually in the middle of doing it.
Speaker 2: That's actually a healthy thing for conversations and friends. I've
Speaker 2: got one of my dearest friends. She is quite religious,
Speaker 2: very very religious, and whenever we get into or over
Speaker 2: the years previously we'd get into quite intense debates. And
Speaker 2: at one point we were talking about Bible references and
Speaker 2: she called me ignorant, and I took quite offense to that.
Speaker 2: So we decided that we just will never discuss religion
Speaker 2: ever because she has very strong opinions and I have
Speaker 2: very strong alter opinions, and it was actually damaging to
Speaker 2: our relationship that we were getting because we both headstrong,
Speaker 2: we both like to argue and debate points. But we
Speaker 2: just found that there's so many other things that we
Speaker 2: can talk about and we care about and love each
Speaker 2: other a lot, that we decided that that's just off
Speaker 2: the table, never ever ever talk about religion.
Speaker 1: But see, yeah, that's not a bad idea, but I
Speaker 1: think the problem with that is you truly think that
Speaker 1: you're right and there's no chance that you're wrong, as
Speaker 1: does she Yeah, exactly. That's a level of arrogance. And
Speaker 1: it's like I've realized over the years, and I'm not
Speaker 1: fucking mother Teresa or whatever, but yeah, like all the
Speaker 1: stuff you remember, how emphatic and how like, Now, what
Speaker 1: do I think? I think? I actually don't know. I
Speaker 1: have certain beliefs, but I don't know. I could be wrong.
Speaker 1: You don't know. You don't know if the Bible is
Speaker 1: real or bullshit, or you know, you don't know. You
Speaker 1: think you know. I don't know. None of us really know,
Speaker 1: like with many many things. And I think the irony
Speaker 1: is that we're talking about you know, spiritual religious god
Speaker 1: things or non things. And I find that, like twice
Speaker 1: in the last two days I've read somebody put a
Speaker 1: thing on Facebook and that was this big proclamation about
Speaker 1: shit and at the end they said, if you disagree
Speaker 1: with me, unfriend me. And I'm like, that is so hilarious.
Speaker 1: You're literally saying I only want to surround myself with
Speaker 1: people who agree with me. I want your endorsement. If
Speaker 1: you don't endorse or agree, fuck off. I want to
Speaker 1: live in an echo chamber. Whereas the healthiest way is now,
Speaker 1: because if you and I think something different on different things,
Speaker 1: that's fine. Doesn't affect our friendship or how much I
Speaker 1: love you or want you to be fucking great and healthy.
Speaker 1: Right if you think A and I think B, nothing
Speaker 1: in me wants to convince you of B. I'm like, cool,
Speaker 1: you know, and there are even and I think the
Speaker 1: thing is when you so emphatically believe that you're right
Speaker 1: about something for which you actually can't prove because there's
Speaker 1: no data in this and even like what people call data.
Speaker 1: You go back and you go, well, you know, there
Speaker 1: are even in science. There's so much science that isn't
Speaker 1: really science. It's like it's it's in somebody's interpretation of
Speaker 1: a thing. So then you go, well, who designed the study,
Speaker 1: A person who interpreted the study? A person like And
Speaker 1: when you think about I'm digressing here, but that you know,
Speaker 1: because people are so self righteous and adamant about this
Speaker 1: is science. And then you go, so, do you know
Speaker 1: how much of science is funded by private organizations who
Speaker 1: have a vested interest in the results of the science.
Speaker 1: It's about eighty percent. It's seventy five percent, I think,
Speaker 1: you know, And the rest is generally government or often government.
Speaker 1: And so when somebody has essentially responsibility to the person
Speaker 1: funding their research, or they're at least somewhat encouraged to
Speaker 1: produce certain data which is of value to then it's
Speaker 1: not honest. It's not real, it's not independent. You know,
Speaker 1: most real science is out that what you hypothesized is
Speaker 1: fucking wrong and going hey everyone, I got it wrong.
Speaker 1: Here's the information. That's science, you know. But it's like
Speaker 1: we are so emotional that we don't want to be
Speaker 1: we don't want to be wrong. And it's like, well
Speaker 1: that's arrogance, you like, you're going to get shit wrong constantly. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's like even when we go we're talking about stuff,
Speaker 1: I go, hey, everyone, do not take any of this
Speaker 1: as of advice, because this is the two fucking dickheads
Speaker 1: on a Friday chatting.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm very passionate about veganism, but I will go
Speaker 2: to dinner with people and they can have a stake.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to get offended by that. I'm not
Speaker 2: going to change someone's opinions overnight. And you know, ultimately,
Speaker 2: and whether it's faith, belief or whatever, the belief system
Speaker 2: you have, you can't really control that you know, if you,
Speaker 2: in your heart believe that there is a God and
Speaker 2: that when you die you're going to go to heaven,
Speaker 2: that's lovely that you feel good and comfortable in that sense.
Speaker 1: Patronizing that's lovely.
Speaker 2: Well, it is great because I've seen Look, a really
Speaker 2: good friend of mine, her husband made a ner own disease,
Speaker 2: and you know, he chose what he wanted to pass
Speaker 2: and it was and I spent you know, a whole
Speaker 2: afternoon with him three days before he died, reading from
Speaker 2: his favorite book, and it was the emotional thing of
Speaker 2: my life. And what I drew a lot of comfort
Speaker 2: from was I knew how spiritual and how religious he was.
Speaker 2: Then he really didn't fear death and he got a
Speaker 2: lot from that. That was great for me to see
Speaker 2: that in him, knowing that he chose the time he
Speaker 2: was going to die, That was phenomenal to be a
Speaker 2: part of that. And I feel really really lucky to
Speaker 2: have spent that time with him, you know, holding his hand,
Speaker 2: reading a book, and that was an experience that is profound.
Speaker 2: And so ultimately, if you have a core belief, now
Speaker 2: one's going to change that. And all you can do
Speaker 2: is basically say, well, this is me, this is you,
Speaker 2: This is why I believe what I believe. And you
Speaker 2: can take that on board and not take it on board.
Speaker 1: Look at us getting deep in philosophical on the home straight.
Speaker 1: Have you got a two minute one, because I've got
Speaker 1: to be out in two minutes.
Speaker 2: There is one that I was really surprised about, and
Speaker 2: I was surprised and not so surprised that women are
Speaker 2: often an afterthought in terms of product design and implementation
Speaker 2: of public spaces. Okay, so in the nineteen seventies, this
Speaker 2: is a great article I was reading. There was a
Speaker 2: thing called reference man. Effectively referenced man in the seventies
Speaker 2: was a white male twenty five to thirty five ways,
Speaker 2: about seventy kilos and about one hundred and seventy seventy
Speaker 2: centimeters tall, which, ironically, I'm just under seventy kilos and
Speaker 2: I'm one hundred and sixty nine centimeters tall.
Speaker 1: Average person through seventies, you're the prototype.
Speaker 2: Well yes and no, because I did a bit of
Speaker 2: a googling on this one, and evidently the average height
Speaker 2: has increased in Australia by about six or seven centimeters,
Speaker 2: so that's now wrong anyway. But what it related to
Speaker 2: is the fact that this reference. Now, there's an interesting
Speaker 2: professor at monash Uni called Nicole Carm's and she was talking.
Speaker 2: She runs a lab called monash x YX Lab. I
Speaker 2: don't know if you've heard of that one, Craigo.
Speaker 1: But have not.
Speaker 2: But anyway, so what she's saying is one of the
Speaker 2: problem is problems is that everything's gender specific. So if
Speaker 2: you think about standing on a tram and reaching up
Speaker 2: and grabbing the handle, well, someone has decided that the
Speaker 2: handle should be at a certain height. And so everything
Speaker 2: is based on a lot of research or a lot
Speaker 2: of the RND and the development of products and spaces,
Speaker 2: whether it's sitting on a bench or something like that,
Speaker 2: is still based on reference. Man, the white male from Wow,
Speaker 2: isn't that fascinating?
Speaker 1: That is fascinating. It doesn't surprise me. But I will
Speaker 1: say I totally agree with well, it's nothing to agree
Speaker 1: or dis I find that interesting and believe it. But
Speaker 1: I think there are a huge amount of products now
Speaker 1: that women are at the forefront of because women spend
Speaker 1: so much like and I mean that in a nice way.
Speaker 1: It's like especially around I guess like fashion and all
Speaker 1: of those things. I think generally speaking, women are more
Speaker 1: interested in you know, well, maybe I'm not. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: definitely not typical, but I think it goes both ways.
Speaker 1: It's like there are probably certain you know, whether and
Speaker 1: some women absolutely love cars, some don't. They're just like, oh,
Speaker 1: it gets me from A to B and it's you know,
Speaker 1: and some are all over it, and then other blokes
Speaker 1: are not, you know, or blow you know. But I
Speaker 1: think there's I think you'd find with a lot of
Speaker 1: products that there's a real leaning one way or the other,
Speaker 1: male or female around who's more you know, predisposed to
Speaker 1: kind of be interested in that. But I do find
Speaker 1: that interesting. Look, I think back then, when did you say,
Speaker 1: the fifties or sixties and seventies, Yeah, well fifty I
Speaker 1: mean that's fifty years ago now, and it's like, oh everything,
Speaker 1: I agree. The world was so fucking geared towards men
Speaker 1: and what men want and men need, and yeah, it
Speaker 1: had to change, and thankfully it's changing. But you and
Speaker 1: Tiff both kind of straddle that man woman kind of
Speaker 1: you know, like you to blur the lines a little bit.
Speaker 2: Well. The thing that she did bring up, though, is
Speaker 2: that women quite often aren't in the data, so you know,
Speaker 2: when you think about it, it's half the population. But
Speaker 2: historically they've been excluded from that data set because it
Speaker 2: is based on it's so male centric.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's ridiculous, Patrick. Where can people connect with you?
Speaker 1: Find you, do yoga with you, meet Fritz and come
Speaker 1: and stay thousand dollars a night in Milan for the weekend.
Speaker 2: Oh that'd be good, wouldn't it. Websites noow dot com
Speaker 2: dot au if you want to chat about like I
Speaker 2: don't know websites figure, but if you want to check
Speaker 2: out and do some Tai chee with Fritz and I
Speaker 2: tie chee at home dot com dot au, but send
Speaker 2: us a message, or if you want to trig about
Speaker 2: something and not talk about male ejaculation.
Speaker 1: Pat, see, you brought it right back up. It was
Speaker 1: the furthest thing from anyone's mind. M Patrick sent me
Speaker 1: a photo just before the show, every one of Fritz
Speaker 1: wearing headphones and a little mouth talking piece like an
Speaker 1: amy lady on the ads, and he said, we're ready.
Speaker 1: Sadly Fritz hasn't made an appearance. Thank you, mate. I
Speaker 1: will say goodbye affair, but for the minute, have a
Speaker 1: good Friday chatting