WEBVTT - The Media Show | 9 May

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Vice is the Media Show, with Jack outing Hello and

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the Media Show. Tonight we have the fallout

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>from the federal election, and later on in the show

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we discuss CNN sitting down with cartel members in a

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>wild attempt to humanize them. But first to the hush

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>money scandal engulfing the Nine network amid revelations of witness

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Ben Roberts Smith defamation case, was paid seven

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars to stop her for publicly accusing Nine

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of having access to the soldier's privileged legal strategy. Now

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Shari Markson, who broke the story, also aired this development

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Nine paid seven hundred thousand dollars hush money to silence

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>a witness who threatened to telecot judge that the media

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>company had been given unauthorized access to Ben Roberts Smith's

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.959
<v Speaker 2>emails during the war crimes trial. Well, tonight I can

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 2>reveal that reported Nick mackenzie told this Weekness that she

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 2>was causing him anxiety and he said he had to

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 2>cut her off. This is a woman nineclaimed had been

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 2>a victim of domestic violence, and they pressed her to

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 2>testify for them against Robert Smith.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And Somehow, this gets even stranger when you read Mackenzie's

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>letter to the witness.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>In a formal letter that we've obtained, Mackenzie said he

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>wasn't trying a victim blame, but said that her trauma

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 2>had caused him anxiety. He wrote, I also want to

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>explain why I no longer have contact with you due

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 2>to the deep distress you suffered. You contacted me very

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 2>often for a long time. I saw it as my

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 2>job to try to manage your stress and trauma. It

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>was very challenging. There were times I was so worried

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I notified your husband of concerns you might self harm.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 2>In time, I began to seek help about how to

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>manage dealing with a victim survive. I'm not blaming you

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>for a moment. I'm just explaining that it began to

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>take a significant.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Toll on me.

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, none of this is a great look for Nick McKenzie,

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>whose ethics and cavalier methods of dealing with sources have

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>been called into question during this sordid saga. Now, working

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a contact and building trust is one thing, but for

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>nine to pay her to hide pertinent information is completely unacceptable,

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and this goes far beyond McKenzie because Nine won't answer

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>questions on this, and they won't say who authorized the payment,

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>whether the board knew, and whether the newly minted Channel

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>nine chair Catherine West had personally signed off on the

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>extremely large payment. For Nine to dodge questions on this

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is unethical and for an organization which sends people tough

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>questions every single day, it is very problematic. Now Channel

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>seven had the same thoughts, so they sent cameras to

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>ask West in person, which created this damaging scene.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 4>So far, the chair of the nation's biggest media company,

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Nine Entertainments, Catherine West, continues to dodge the media.

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 5>Did you sign off on the seven hundred thousand hush

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 5>money payments?

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 6>And it's clear now silence is nine strategy.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Why would anyone respect this organization enough to answer questions

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>from them?

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 6>Ever?

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Again, the cowardly chair is completely in over her head

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and nine's large collection of newspapers and TV channels have

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>run dead on this story. No mention that we could

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>see of the hush money payment, and no coverage of

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>an incompetent chair hiding from cameras and refusing to answer

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>any questions. Now, keep in mind the City Morning Herald

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Age carry the OsO arrogant slogan independent always.

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Joining me this week to discuss is managing editor at

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>The Australian, Darren Davidson and two Double C host Stephen Senateempo.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining me, gentlemen. Well Darren, why don't we

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>start with you? Quite an incredible story and Shari Markson

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>has done some brilliant, quite ferocious reporting on this Channel

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Nine seems to have an issue with its chairs when

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>there's scrutiny, dodging some of those questions, and I know

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>your newspaper has had a bit of history with that.

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 7>We certainly have. This is I mean, it's turned into

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 7>Australia's most expensive defamation trial and it's not journalism. It

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:37.559
<v Speaker 7>looks like it's you know, corporate crisis style management dressed

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 7>up as kind of check book journalism.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 6>Great story by Shari.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 7>Well done to Shari for breaking this story. A very

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 7>significant development. It's very embarrassing for nine. As you've said,

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 7>they claim nitorial independence, but this kind of think sort

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 7>of kind of legal interference and you know, allegedly it

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 7>looks like they try to sort of rig this in

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 7>the background somehow, I think The other point I would

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 7>make is you mentioned there that the coverage from Channel

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 7>nine has been a bit muted. I would probably say

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 7>the same about the ABC. They haven't covered this, in

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 7>my opinion, in the way that they probably should, And

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 7>had this been Sky News or News Court, they would

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 7>have been calling for a royal commission by lunchtime. And

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 7>so it's but it's a very different approach when it's

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 7>Channel nine for some reason.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a good point, Steven.

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring you in very awkward scenes I think for

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Kaftra and West when she's come out of her house

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, for the record, this is something that

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>her network does quite often. So my opinion fairs fair.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to be the chair of that organization

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and you've got those kind of current affairs shows doing

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of thing. It's awfully different when you're

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of those cameras, though, isn't it.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah it is.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 5>Look, I'm on the record of saying I don't like

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 5>this kind of journalism. I don't like the chasing people

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 5>down the street stuff. I don't like it in Channel nine.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't like it when people do to them. But

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 5>you're right, you know if the shoe fits, wear it,

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 5>But this is just a bad look in general. I mean,

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 5>at what point do we get back to the stage

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 5>where journalists tell the story in front of them, not

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 5>the story they want to tell. Now, it's all well

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 5>and good some of us, and I'm one of these people.

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 5>My job is to tell people what I think about

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 5>the news. But if you're going to report news, then

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 5>report it straight down the line. Don't try and create

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 5>a story around something that you've decided has to be

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 5>delivered to the general public. Because that's what this sounds

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 5>like now.

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 6>It's just the way the.

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 5>Media has treated some of our military personnel in recent

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 5>years has been nothing short of appalling. And if Ben

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 5>Robert Smith has done something wrong and has a case

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 5>to answer, so be it.

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 6>But that's to be played out.

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 5>In criminal courts, not in the court of public opinion

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 5>based on what a particular journalist or a particular news

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 5>outlet wants to push as the agenda. And that's what

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 5>really annoys me about this.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I guess the other side to it as well, Darren,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>is it's not even just you know, telling one side

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of the story, it's paying someone so that one side

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of the story doesn't surface, and that brings a whole

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>other ethical Now, yes, there is the legal implications, because

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the court probably would want to know that

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they allegedly had access to, or had the potential to

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>access the Ben Roberts Smith legal legally privileged strategy. But

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>then to pay someone so that that can't become public,

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole different game.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 6>Totally agree.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 7>It really does stink, and there are some big serious

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 7>questions now that need to be answered by Channel nine.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, he signed off on that payment, who authorized it,

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 7>and as you said at the beginning of the segment,

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean the char of Channel nine, Catherine West, she

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 7>really does need to suffront this up and answer some

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 7>big tough questions on this because the public and the

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 7>Channel nine viewers and the Channel nine newspaper readers and

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 7>subscribers that pay for that newspaper deserve to know completely.

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of those things it's how could she

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not have known? If she didn't, and if she did know,

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>what's the explanation, what is the shareholder obligation there to

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about this sort of thing. But moving on now

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to the election fallout, which has become the ultimate Russhack test,

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>where so called experts see exactly what they want to

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in the labor win. For labor loyalists, the thirty four

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>percent primary was seen as a validation that they had

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>won the culture wars.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 8>And from the oldest continuing civilization on that planet. And

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 8>I acknowledge the traditional owners, and I.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 9>Acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which we make,

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 9>and I pay my respects to elders past, present and

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 9>emerging today.

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 6>And every day and on seven.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It was Dutton's alleged links to Donald Trump that killed

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>his political career.

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 10>Links to Donald Trump cost him not only the federal

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 10>election but his own seat.

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And for some wet blanket and the Liberal Party, the

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 1>fault was with this network labeling us a puritanical litmus test.

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 10>A couple of former colleagues of mine say, you just

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 10>get what's on sky after dark quoted at you at

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 10>branch meetings.

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 6>Why aren't you doing this?

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 10>So and so in certain name of commentator says we're

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 10>not being hardline enough on ABC or D And the

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 10>Liberal Party is going to have to learn that is

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 10>not representative of where the electorate is and following down

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 10>that path will not lead you to will not lead

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 10>the Liberal Party to electoral success.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, but I think right now that out network, which

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>reaches millions and millions of Australians every single month, is

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a tad more representative of Australia than your dying political party,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Scott Ryan. And the mistake that Scott Ryan makes is

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a common one. Journalists are not there to sycophantically support

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>political parties. I'm proud of the fact that we point

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>out policy absurdities within the opposition which made it an

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>impotent nothing option to voters. And I'd challenge Ryan or

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>any expert to name these so called right wing policies

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that Sky News forced the Liberals to take to the election.

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 6>Mean.

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Was it slightly cheaper petrol is filling up your car

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>now an activityological resistance? Was it right wing to propose

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>giving a one off, one two hundred dollars tax offset

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to low and middlecome income earners, or was it the

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>proposition that Australian should pay a higher personal income tax now?

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>None of those headline policies seem inherently conservative or right

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>wing to me, and you can see how absurd this

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>whole debate has truly become. People see in it what

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to see. And it is hilarious that anyone

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>at the Liberal Party would blame the media for their

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>humiliating loss when this is the sort of advertising they

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>were running at the time.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 6>Please vote for.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 11>Me, screamed Dame bard Albanesi in a desperate attempt Clutcher

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 11>dub in the last four days of the Fortnite election.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 11>Despite his best efforts to cap his way to victory,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 11>the players in the lobby knew his time was for

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 11>the last three seasons of an easy at promised the

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 11>cheaper item shop, but the price for the battle pass

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 11>kept rising and causing many players to crash out. The

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 11>rage continue this album as he hosted a mini event

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 11>on the island where he spent four hundred and fifty

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 11>million taxpayer v bucks on a voice referendum. And now

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 11>with the storm closing in, the choice is clear, a

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 11>capping default or duntan who will clutch up and get

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 11>the dub for ossis.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>As I said last week, if you publish that sort

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of garbage, you deserve to lose everything. And it has

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nothing to do with ideology. Well, Steven, let's bring

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you in here, really interesting debate. I think that's breaking

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>out in the media, and I use example of a

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>rawshacked test because what I'm seeing is everybody, for their

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>own game, is dissecting this loss with the prone spin

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for their own narrative. So the left is looking at

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it through the prism of how the left does, and

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>then conservatives are looking at it through that lens. But

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in reality, it was just a poorly run election and

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the advertising was terrible. There's all these other features that

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the media is missing.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 6>What's your take, though, Yeah, I think you're right.

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, there's a bit to unpack at her that

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 5>the media is no doubt complicit in some of the

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 5>way this election campaign went. But you can only, as

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 5>I was talking about with the Channel nine story, you

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 5>can only report what's in front of you. And when

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 5>you talk about I think we're going to stop using

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 5>the words conservative and progressive altogether because it's pretty clear

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 5>nobody understands what they mean anymore, and particularly people on

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 5>the conservative side who think they're conservative and they're not.

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 5>They're a right lunatics in a lot of cases. But

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 5>the reality is that what went wrong here was the

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 5>Liberal Party didn't have a platform and they didn't prosecute

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 5>what little platform they did have. And then when the

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 5>Labor Party came out and used a scare campaigneries of lies,

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 5>they didn't call them out. And speaking of blaming the media, here,

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 5>I saw David Little proud do that saying, well, why

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 5>aren't you calling out the lies? And my question is

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 5>why aren't you calling out the lies? You know, at

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 5>some point somebody's got to take responsibility for their own actions,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 5>and whether that's us in the media or the politicians themselves,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 5>we're all responsible for our own actions. So look, it's

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 5>a very very big problem. Yes, the media is part

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 5>of the problem. Yes, some people on Sky are part

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 5>of the problem. I'm happy to admit that too. But

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day, as you say, and look,

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 5>and I don't buy into the liberal parties dying. I

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 5>think the pendulum will swing back the other way because

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Labor only got thirty four percent of the primary vote.

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 5>And I was only looking at the seat count earlier

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 5>this morning, and there's probably twenty six seats that are

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 5>in striking distance at the next election. Now that's not

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 5>enough to get the coalition back into power, but it's

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 5>going to make it a very very different situation. But

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 5>we need to start calling out talking about facts rather

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 5>than just trying to push our own, whether they're ideological, philosophical,

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 5>or per and the legenders, because that's what's happened all

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 5>the way through this campaign, not only from media commentators

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 5>but also from the politicians themselves about how bad they

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 5>handled their own part of the problem.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and look, I guess when I say that it's dying,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying it's dead for three to six years, and

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it is dead. They can't do anything, they can't block anything.

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>They're going to have to rethink their policy platform.

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 6>Darren.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the points that I find it hilarious, you know,

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the likes of you know, Amy Ramikus, who's now kind

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of a lobbyist in her own way writing for the

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>new Daily blaming Sky News. I'm struggling to figure out

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>what these evil right wing policies are that Dutton took

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to the election.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 6>I can't think of one.

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I can maybe see some credence in nuclear but if

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you look globally, that doesn't seem to be an ideological issue.

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>It just seems to be a mechanical and engineering issue.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you think of anything that these journalists are correct

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in that it was this left v right contest.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 7>No, look, I agree with what you've said there. I

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 7>sort of slightly agree with disagree with Steve and I

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 7>you didn't come up with those rubbish policies around tax

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 7>and fuel that the Liberals were running that failed to

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 7>gain any traction. I think Stephen is right about the seats.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean they were helped by the Greens as well

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 7>and the collapse of that party Labor. I think the

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 7>Trump factor is massively overstated. Personally, I think the Liberals

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 7>campaign was badly conceived, badly executed. I don't think Labour

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 7>did win the culture War. I think the Liberals just

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 7>failed to kind of contest it with any real conviction

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 7>and stay true to their values and the broad Church.

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 7>As Paul Kelly wrote in The Australian this week, brilliant

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 7>piece and brilliant video as well, if if you've got

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 7>a moment to watch that. I think he summed it

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 7>up quite well and ultimately Labor didn't you know, their

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 7>campaign was scarcely brilliant and Alberniz he has hardly got

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 7>the charisma of Bob Porp, So you know, I think

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 7>there's a lot of post Wartem stuff going on here.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 7>That's not quite right, but I certainly don't believe that

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 7>made the media is to blame. It's funny how it's

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, the failing MPs always blame the media and

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 7>not themselves, and I think pine Lange media did pretty

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 7>good job of covering what was a challenging election and

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 7>at times a slightly uninspired election as well.

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well hang on, can I got to cut in

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 5>there because I mean we saw, you know, questions asked

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 5>of the Prime Minister about his football team, about it,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, whether or how much Veggie might he puts

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 5>on his toast, these kind of things. The media is

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 5>complicit in that when there were fair income questions that

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 5>needed to be asked, there was a lot of very

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 5>very soft press conferences that the Prime Minister got to

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 5>stand in front of. Peter Dutton didn't get that same opportunity.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 5>So in that case, we do need to we need

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 5>to take a look at a hard look at ourselves

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 5>for not calling out a lot of this stuff when

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 5>it happened.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Darren, thank you so much for your time and

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>your insights. I really appreciate it. We're going to take

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a quick break, but up next, Bernie Sanders defends his

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>use of a private jet to campaign against the rich

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and see and then sits down with the Mexican cartel

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in a wild interview. Welcome to Stars and Gripes, and

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden is back in the media, this time sitting

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>down with the BBC to remind the world just how

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>successful he was.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 12>Did you leave it too late? Should you have withdrawn earlier?

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 12>Given someone else a big a job?

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 13>I don't think it would have mattered and become so

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 13>successful our agenda. It was hard to say now I'm

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 13>going to stop now. Things move so quickly that it

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 13>made it difficult to walk away ticket. And it was a.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 12>It was a hard decision, but regrets.

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 13>No.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 12>I think it was the right decision. I think that

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 12>the well, it was just a difficult decision.

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden struggled in this interview, but I genuinely believe he

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks the campaign was going well up until that infamous debate.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>That's because journalists and his own team told him it

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>was going well. There was a collective lie being told,

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't disappear until these journalists realized it was

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>no longer advantageous to lie, and that must really have

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>confused Biden. When the entire machine turned on him overnight. Well,

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>joining me now for more on this is author and

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>commentator Shamika. Michelle Shamika, thank you so much for joining

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>me for your first time on this show. Really interesting

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>interview with the BBC, and obviously we saw the same

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>hallmarks of a Joe Biden who was a bit sluggish

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and not quite there. But as we played in that clip,

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the thing that was really interesting was that he seemed

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to think everything was going well up until it wasn't.

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 14>Yes, it was hilarious, by the way, thanks for having

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 14>me on. I thought it was hilarious when he said

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 14>it was hard to walk away. Well, we know it

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 14>was hard for him to walk away because we saw

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 14>how much he fell. You know, I think that Joe

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 14>Biden should really just take this time out to retire.

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 14>The fact that he actually believes things were going well

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 14>at any point just shows us that he's not quite

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 14>with us.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 3>He's not completely.

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 14>There, and it's really sad that they're continuing to put

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 14>him in front of the camera. Listen, He's served his time.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 14>He was in political office for decades. It's time for

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 14>him to just rest and relax and stop having to

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 14>go through the daily grind of being the so called,

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 14>you know, former president. It's time for Joe to relax

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 14>because this isn't looking good. A lot of us here

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 14>believe that his wife is behind all of this, doctor

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 14>Gill Biden, and she constantly keeps putting him in front

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 14>of the camera.

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>It is not a good look.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 14>And we saw exactly what happened on the stage when

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 14>he had to debate Trump, and they could no longer

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 14>hide it anymore. They continue to try and lie to

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 14>the American people until they just couldn't lie.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 6>Anymore, well said.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Moving on Champagne, socialist Bernie Sanders has given an awkward

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>interview to Fox News. Now he's doing this stunt called

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>fighting Oligaky, which is essentially him flying around America on

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a private jet to protest to the rich and what

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he calls the corporate oligaky.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 15>Whence the last time you saw Donald Trump during a

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 15>campaign mode at National Airport?

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 6>No, no, no, it doesn't. But he's also not fighting

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 6>the oligarchy.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 16>No.

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 15>And you run a campaign and you do three or

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 15>four or five rallies in a week, the only way

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 15>you can go around to talk to thirty thousand people,

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 15>think I'm going to be sitting on a wedding line

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 15>at United waiting. You know what, thirty thousand people are waiting.

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 15>That's the only way you can get around. No apologies

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 15>for that. That's what campaign travel is about. We've done

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 15>it in the past, We're going to do it in

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 15>the future.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So Bernie, man of the People, thinks he is too

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>special to sit in line at an airport. Now he

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>says this with a straight face. Now this stuff isn't cheap.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And don't even get me started on the climate change

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>talking points these people spew when they're willing to do this.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But in the first quarter of the year, Bernie's campaign

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>spent more than two hundred and twenty one thousand dollars

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on private jet travel. Let's bring Shamikha back in. Now,

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this is I mean that figure, two hundred and twenty

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>one thousand dollars for somebody who's taking on the oligarchy

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and the rich and the you know, the whatever he

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to call his kind of propaganda tour. The thing

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that was really telling for me in that in that

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>interview was that he just sees it so beneath him

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to travel domestically, to travel the normal way that everyone

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>else has to travel. He just scenes that's so far

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>beneath him from a class perspective.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's clear that the only person Bernie Sanders has

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 14>ever lifted out of poverty was himself spending that.

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Type of money. And we're only in May.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 14>That is absolutely ridiculous, And it's He's funny to me

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 14>because he reminds me. I'm not sure if you're familiar

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 14>with the Muppet Show, but he reminds me of the

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 14>characters Statler and Waldorf. It's like they come to life,

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 14>and we're so over Bernie Sanders. He's another one that

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 14>it's time for him to retire. I don't understand why

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 14>these people stay in position until they absolutely just can't

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 14>do any other thing.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>He's another one that.

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 14>Needs to just clock out and go enjoy his retirement.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I love Howard's defense is, well, Donald Trump did it,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>so therefore be able to do it, which seems like

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that should be against his whole talking point. But moving on,

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>MSNBC is regularly featured on this program for some of

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the ridiculous content that it puts to air, but this

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>week they broadcast an absolute shoka.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 6>What do you make of that?

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 17>That he's just been a little less visible than I

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 17>think a lot of people Trump observers expected he would be.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 18>Well, reportedly he's been visible at nightclubs far more than

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 18>he has been on the seventh floor of the Hoover Building,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 18>and there are reports that daily briefings to him have

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 18>been changed from every day to maybe twice weekly.

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 17>Frankfurt Glusey was on that morning during this hour discussing

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 17>the work of administration officials.

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 6>At the end of that.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 17>Segment, for Glucy said that FBI Director Cash Bettel has

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 17>reportedly been more visible at nightclubs than at his office

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 17>at FBI headquarters.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 6>This was a misstatement. We have not verified that claim.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 6>We will be right back.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, the slur by former FBIS system director should have

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>been pushed back on hard immediately, and in my opinion,

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the vague disclaim a backstep after the fact was insufficient

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>when you have no evidence to back up the assertion. Now, Schmikh,

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>let's get your opinion on this, because yes, television is

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly live television.

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 6>It's fast and you're moving quickly.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But I feel the most networks if there was an

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>allegation that basically somebody's a drunk at a nightclub and

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not rocking up to work. And that person is

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, the head of the FBI. You would think

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that a journalist would challenge that, but at MSNBC, they

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>just they let these people just go on with these slurs.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 14>This is why Trump referred to them as ms DNC

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 14>because we know that they only work for the Democrat.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 14>This is what they do, and they get on TV

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 14>every chance they get and just tell things that are

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 14>not true, and we will never see them push back.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 3>And of course it's always easier.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 14>To come back and say, oh, you know, this wasn't

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 14>true or this wasn't verified, because the lie has already.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Gotten out there and people are running with it.

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 14>They're not going to come back to say, oh, let's

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 14>see if ms d n C retracted their statement.

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 3>That just usually doesn't happen.

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 14>But this, this is who they are, this is the network.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, moving on, because there was an extraordinary moment of

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>television which went to air on CNN, which is being

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>described as an attempt to humanize the cartel.

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 16>According to the Trump administration, you are a terrorist. The

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 16>cartils have been labeled foreign terrorist organization.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 12>What do you make of that.

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 16>What's your message to Donald Trump if he's watching.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 6>This, sais coming, Shamika.

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Everybody is always thinking about these families ravaged by drugs,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but no one is thinking about the poor cartel members.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>No one's thinking that they too have to wait. It's

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing an entre winner here.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 14>This was the wildest thing I have ever seen. I

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 14>can't believe that someone would want to own Trump so

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 14>bad that they would stoop to such low levels.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 3>I was actually shocked. Even for CNN.

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 14>This was really bad television and I'm appalled and.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe this. This is where we are that.

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 14>People hate Trump so much that they would do something

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 14>like this to to try and bring empathy or sympathy

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 14>for a drug cartel.

0:26:57.960 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 3>This is low even for CNN.

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, really weird stuff now, Shamikha Michelle, thank you so

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 6>Really appreciate it.

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take a quick break, but when we return,

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>we speak to Jared Henderson about some new appointments the ABC.

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back and joining me as he does each and

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>every week as Sky News Australia's media watchdog columnists. Jared Henderson, Jared,

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, pleasure joining us. Now there's been

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>some developments at the ABC and there's been some high

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>profile movements.

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 6>Tell me a little bit about Laura Tingle.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 19>Well, Laura Tingle announced the other day that she's stepping

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 19>down from their role at seven thirty. And she did

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 19>become Global Affairs Editor, which is a terrific job because

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 19>you can travel large parts of the world. She won't

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 19>be overseas all the time. She'll be ABC's a fair

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 19>bit of the time. Great perks, big a big job.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 19>But in a sense, I mean, has she earned it.

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 19>I mean, it's not so long ago that she was

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 19>counseled by ABC management for calling Australia racist country. She's

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 19>on record as having said that the Coalition government under

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 19>Scott Morrison was into ideological bastardree. So if you behave

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 19>unprofessionally and she's also on the ABC board, but if

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 19>you behave unprofessionally like that and you get canceled, you

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 19>get a big promotion.

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 6>I forgot that she was also on the board, but.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 19>Also with John Lyon to see because he was criticized

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 19>by a former ABC board member for his for his

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 19>reporting on Israel and his hostility to part large parts

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 19>of the Jewish community in Australia, So what happened. He

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 19>was then Global Affairs editor, but they probably wanted to

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 19>get him away from Israel, so then he went off

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 19>to Washington as Editor Americas. So the two very senior

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 19>journalists at the ABC who have been causing management problems

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 19>have got substantial promotions and great gigs overseas for a

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 19>large part of the year.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And I just kind of help but think that surely

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>has to be somebody that's better qualified than somebody that

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was reprimanded only twelve months ago.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 19>And there are a lot of young people who give

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 19>a go to as well. I mean, Laura Ting's been

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 19>around for a long time. John Lyons has been around

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 19>for a long time. The ABC's always banging on about

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 19>giving young people to go even in comedy, for example,

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 19>but they never do. I mean some of their comedians

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 19>are sort of sort of heading towards Methusel's age, you know.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 19>I mean, I shouldn't talk, but then I'm not employed

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 19>by the ABC, you see.

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think they would be considering us for

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the role. Now you've got another one for us. Sarah

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>ferguson interviewing just into Nepuchin for price. Now let's have

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a listen to the grab.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 20>Peter Dutton tonight has lost his seat with your embrace

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 20>of Donald Trump make Australia great again. Are you part

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 20>of the reason for that loss?

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 16>Oh that's a big call, don't you think. I mean,

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 16>you sling enough mud in an election, it sticks. And

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 16>we did see a prime minister who absolutely misled the

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 16>Australian people all the way through and was rarely called

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 16>out for his conduct. And I think that's absolutely deceitful.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 20>Let's just talk about this. Let's just talk about this seriously.

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 20>At a time when Donald Trump was sending shop.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 16>I'm around your worst seriously you.

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 20>Well, it's not a smear campaign. I just want I

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 20>want you to address him seriously, dissenter at the time

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 20>that Donald Trump was sending shock waves around the world disturbing,

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 20>so disturbing.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 16>Don't think if you don't think that I'm if you

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 16>don't think that I'm addressing this seriously, I am addressing

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 16>this deadly seriously.

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 6>Now that is extraordinary.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 19>Well, when Michael Suker was on and we discussed it

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 19>here with Sarah Ferguson, she said to him, when you

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.239
<v Speaker 19>did one interjection to Clara O'Neil. She said to him,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 19>what would your mother say? So you wonder looking at that,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 19>The first thing I thought was what would Sarah Ferguson's

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 19>late mother say? I mean, what what what would she says?

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 19>But so there's one test. I mean, there's a mother

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 19>test for someone that you don't particularly like, like Michael Suka.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 19>And there's another, but it doesn't apply with disinenterprises.

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 6>Dog get anger to it as well.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think you can have a disagreement and have it,

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, professionally, and be courtious with it. But she's

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>really no, you answer this story. I mean she is answering,

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>just not in the exact way that Sarah Ferguson wants it.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 19>And what she's saying, which is the Senator Price picked

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 19>it up. What she's saying is the Senator Price isn't serious. Now,

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 19>whatever you say about Senator Price, she's certainly serious. But

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 19>to Sarah Ferguson, because she doesn't agree with her, therefore

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 19>she can't be serious. So she interrupts her and tell it,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 19>tells her to get serious.

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really, they're also the editorial assertions. They're observations

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that Sarah's making she's not reporting or having a conversation.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>She is asserting to her, and she's not asserting to

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>her with the hypothetical of someone else's perspective. She stated

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that she was pro Donald Trump and then asked her

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to explain why that had cost the coalition the election.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 19>And there's no evidence that it did. I mean, the

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 19>many other factors. But even today on ABC online, they're

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 19>calling Senator Price for Us a firebrand. Now that's an opinion.

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 19>There's not a fact. She has a title, she's a senator,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 19>she has a first name and a second name. They

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 19>call her a firebrand. You know.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well that's incredibly inappropriate as well, and that is

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt the ABC if they don't.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 6>Fix that sort. So I have to fix it.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>That's something that chu Mars is going to have to

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>come in there and look at and say that it's

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>not a professional way to conduct it. Now, David mar

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>calls a younger man rather aged.

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 6>Should we have a listen to this.

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Grace, Well, they do tend to be white men, and

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 4>they do tend to be rather aged, but some of

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 4>them can write terrific rhetoric. Laura, and you mustn't you

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 4>mustn't disparage them for that. I mean, there was Alexander

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Dhana condemning the fantasy of changing the weather.

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 19>Unpacked this one for me, Jared Well, David Marr's four

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 19>years older than Alexander Downer. There's David Maher, with the

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 19>support of Laura Tingle, worrying about people who are rather

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 19>aged on his program I reckon The average age on

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 19>that program that night among Laura Tingle, Nicki Saba, David Mara.

0:32:58.000 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 19>It was a sort of a left wing hangout group

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 19>and Nola Green with each other. The average age was

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 19>seventy four. But we don't actually know Nikki Saba's age

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 19>because it's apparently is a state secret. But I first

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 19>met her in Parliament House in January nineteen seventy six,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 19>which would give you some idea. She was a journalist then,

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 19>so she's not particularly young. So there's David mah banging

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 19>on about people at a certain age and suggesting a

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 19>negative way, in a negative way, and sort of laughing

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 19>the saying that talking about climate change in a negative

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 19>way to Darner, But he didn't sort of notice that

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 19>he's older than him.

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps he's only as old as he feels.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 19>Well, our money as old as I feel, and I

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 19>feel one hundred and seventeen.

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 7>So there you go.

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 6>Well I think we all are now.

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Jared Henderson, thank you so much, really appreciate it as always.

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Now that's all the time we have for this evening,

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but up next is Newsnight.