Speaker 1: From the Skying Center.
Speaker 2: This is Paul Murray Live.
Speaker 1: Get a mate where I fired up? I need four hours.
Speaker 1: I've got one, so I'm not going to waste your time.
Speaker 1: Massive one on the Telly Tonight, the great Nigel Ferras
Speaker 1: joins us exclusively only placed on AZI TV. You see
Speaker 1: him is here on a Tuesday night. He's up in
Speaker 1: a second. Wait till I show you the latest example
Speaker 1: of each way outbot this one? Dare I say his goal?
Speaker 1: And the lady who absolutely snuffed out Kamala Harris's chance
Speaker 1: of actually being the president four years ago is now
Speaker 1: all in on Trump. Plus, there is an awful lot
Speaker 1: today of intentional distractions trying to blow the media off course,
Speaker 1: a lot of that has worked today. It won't work tonight.
Speaker 1: It won't work here, It will not work with me.
Speaker 1: Latest opinion poll today printed in the Turbul Times shows
Speaker 1: us fifty two percent of Australians believe the country is
Speaker 1: headed in the wrong direction. This is a near record high.
Speaker 1: This is our after gost of living being the absolute
Speaker 1: front and center attention this year, last year, the year before, when,
Speaker 1: of course we all know it isn't it wasn't their
Speaker 1: own basic low road politics is where they are. And
Speaker 1: again I say much of the media today, if they
Speaker 1: fell for the distraction I mentioned last night.
Speaker 3: Leadership, which is destructive and divisive, is not really leadership
Speaker 3: at all.
Speaker 4: And that brings me to Peter Dutty.
Speaker 3: He is the most divisive leader of a major political
Speaker 3: party in Australia's modern history. He divides deliberately his divisiveness.
Speaker 3: He picks fights and stokes revision.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you've heard everyone else. I'm not going to be
Speaker 1: distracted by this. The reality of Australia and the leader
Speaker 1: that they have turned on is not Peter Dutton, it's
Speaker 1: Anthony Abneasy. Same poll from the freaking Guardian. It shows
Speaker 1: that the disapproval level of this Prime minister in the
Speaker 1: past twelve and a bit months has now hit fifty percent.
Speaker 1: Fifty two percent of the country say we're headed in
Speaker 1: the wrong direction. Fifty percent of people say they disapprove
Speaker 1: of the Prime Minister's leadership, fifty one percent in the
Speaker 1: Channel nine newspapers. Meantime, Peter Dutton, here's the facts. Now
Speaker 1: one brings this stuff to you. Do though, they all
Speaker 1: just fall for whatever the daily distraction is. Well, now
Speaker 1: more people approve than disapprove of Peter Dutton's leadership. This
Speaker 1: is in a poll in the Guardian. It shows forty
Speaker 1: two percent approve forty one percent disapproval. More importantly, put
Speaker 1: the two side by side, there's a nine point difference
Speaker 1: in disapproval. The Prime Minister is the one leading. Now. Also,
Speaker 1: when you have a look here about the don't know factor,
Speaker 1: Australians are making up their mind hard and fast, Aban
Speaker 1: Anthony Abernezi, just ten percent of people say they do
Speaker 1: not have an opinion about whether it is positive or
Speaker 1: negative or right now he is losing by a massive
Speaker 1: margin and already half of the country. So even if
Speaker 1: this ten percent swings in, well guess what, it would
Speaker 1: still be a negative territory. The same is not the
Speaker 1: case for Peter Dutton. He still has sixteen percent of
Speaker 1: people who have not had his leadership defined or they
Speaker 1: have not come to a conclusion about whether it's positive
Speaker 1: or negative. Now, this stuff is huge because remember what
Speaker 1: were we told for day after day after day, The
Speaker 1: same people who all fell for the distraction Today, not
Speaker 1: Jim Chalmers talking about the economy, not talking about cost
Speaker 1: of living, not talking about insurance, not talking about twelve
Speaker 1: interest rate rises. The reality is for the past two
Speaker 1: weeks there was one debate in the country and we
Speaker 1: were told it was toxic.
Speaker 3: And as we saw last week in the Parliament, his
Speaker 3: dog we saw only plays we hurt you.
Speaker 5: In silence and you can hear me in silence.
Speaker 1: Stop being raped again. These people creating carbon emissions by
Speaker 1: the moment as they blow it out their backside. Because
Speaker 1: have a look at this, same pole, same organization. Forty
Speaker 1: four percent of people agree with Dutton's position when it
Speaker 1: comes to the pause, but more importantly, the increase vetting
Speaker 1: about people out of GASA. The alternative is thirty That
Speaker 1: clearly is a big win. Now, by the way, when
Speaker 1: you start looking at this, this is not one of
Speaker 1: those things where young people are that they say let
Speaker 1: everyone in and older people say shut the game. Have
Speaker 1: a look now, Yes, people between eighteen and twenty four
Speaker 1: they do not share what has been stated, but not
Speaker 1: by some big margin. Instead, have a look at this
Speaker 1: forty three percent of people between the ages of thirty
Speaker 1: five fifty four. That's the sweet spot of the Australian
Speaker 1: swinging voter thirteen thirty five to forty four fifty five plus.
Speaker 1: It gets up as you can see there to fifty
Speaker 1: seven percent of people. So we were all told by
Speaker 1: the access media, by the narrative media, by the get
Speaker 1: Dutton media that the past two weeks were a disaster,
Speaker 1: that there was just an absolute bomb of hate that
Speaker 1: was coming his way. Well every time, every time, be
Speaker 1: at the rejection of the job summit, the rejection of
Speaker 1: the voice. Now this position, let alone the pausing of
Speaker 1: immigration into the country for people who would like to
Speaker 1: be able to buy a home, no foreign buyers for
Speaker 1: the first couple of years of a Dutton Prower prime ministership.
Speaker 1: Oh oh, clutcha pearls. Everyone's going to start fighting at auctions,
Speaker 1: people at the writers' festival or clap because Australia is
Speaker 1: a racist country. Again, stick it as far as you
Speaker 1: possibly can. I will not be distracted from the issue
Speaker 1: in the country that Australians are hurting. They are hurting
Speaker 1: more than other countries because of the arrogance and the
Speaker 1: politics and the distraction bombs of this government. I will
Speaker 1: not will not be distracted. We will stay on them
Speaker 1: like a laser. Meantime, the government again thought today they've
Speaker 1: got this wonderful free pass because a story appeared today
Speaker 1: in the Australian newspaper. The story suggested that the Coalition
Speaker 1: is looking at ways of being able to pay for
Speaker 1: their promises should they make it into government of this
Speaker 1: or the next election. The back of the envelope figure
Speaker 1: is apparently about one hundred billion dollars. They may well
Speaker 1: be able to move around in the budget. Now let's
Speaker 1: read here the Coalition will go to the next election
Speaker 1: with a budget and off budget savings of close to
Speaker 1: one hundred billion dollars. In back to bay inflation fighting agenda,
Speaker 1: there will see a raft of labor spending programs acts
Speaker 1: in a bid to arrest structural decline of the government
Speaker 1: balance sheet. Back to me facts, according to the Treasury
Speaker 1: and this Treasurer, the Intergenerational Report shows us that Australia
Speaker 1: will have budget deficits every single year from now till
Speaker 1: the mid twenty forties. Why because the way it is structured,
Speaker 1: the government spends more money than they get in. So
Speaker 1: in order to make sure that those deficits, which of
Speaker 1: course just get added on top of on top of
Speaker 1: on top of on top of so we get to
Speaker 1: on this government by the end of its first term
Speaker 1: one point two trillion dollars in debt, one point two
Speaker 1: trillion dollars of debt when it was about a trillion dollars. Oh,
Speaker 1: we have to change your government. Well, what do we
Speaker 1: do when it's one point two we have to change
Speaker 1: your government because there was one interest rate rise? What
Speaker 1: do we do after another twelve? Again?
Speaker 2: I will not be distracted.
Speaker 1: I will remain focused because normal people are hurting. Three
Speaker 1: point seven million people in Australia right now can't find food,
Speaker 1: can't put enough food on the table to feed their kids.
Speaker 1: This is not where Australia should be at record homelessness
Speaker 1: with a government that got kissed on the proverbial because
Speaker 1: of a couple of years of actually getting more money
Speaker 1: than they knew how to spend. But still this government
Speaker 1: has baked in billions and billions and billions and billions
Speaker 1: and billions of dollars in spending that only gets bigger
Speaker 1: as the years go on. And as I've told you before,
Speaker 1: the real scandal is the amount of money that's off budget,
Speaker 1: Like the tens of billions sixty billion dollars that's just
Speaker 1: sitting off budget. It's still borrowed, it doesn't come out
Speaker 1: to it's borrowed money sixty billion dollars off budget, so
Speaker 1: you don't read about it when it comes budget time
Speaker 1: and the budget deficit doesn't look as horrible as it
Speaker 1: actually is for a slush fund for people like Chris
Speaker 1: Bowen when it comes to the renewable energy projects and
Speaker 1: then they sign a deal with a company and then
Speaker 1: they say, we can't tell you how much it was
Speaker 1: because of commercial and confidence. Oh yeah, the transparent government.
Speaker 1: That's what this coalition is planning to try to start
Speaker 1: to unwind. They are not talking about cutting any deeper
Speaker 1: than what this government has added to the table. We continue.
Speaker 1: The coalition would not be abolishing indexation for welfare payments,
Speaker 1: meaning welfare payments when will go up if inflation keeps
Speaker 1: going up. That's what Labour's claiming. Why because as soon
Speaker 1: as they see any attempt for anyone anywhere to bring
Speaker 1: the budget back in the water, cuts cuts, cuts, cuts, cuts,
Speaker 1: Uga book of music, black and white images, fear, fear fear. Now.
Speaker 1: Of course the Prime Minister, after seeing the headline and
Speaker 1: not reading the article, thought how it's this, Let's get
Speaker 1: into the distraction game today. I will not have to
Speaker 1: be responsible for the decisions of my government. Instead, I'll
Speaker 1: try to make you scared of a potential other government,
Speaker 1: and the media just sat there and watched.
Speaker 6: In the last twenty four hours, we've seen examples of
Speaker 6: that with Angus Taylor announcing one hundred billion dollars of
Speaker 6: cuts on the agenda from the coalition government. It's up
Speaker 6: to the coalition to announce where those one hundred billion
Speaker 6: dollars of cuts will be. We know that Peter Dutt,
Speaker 6: unlike what will happen at this airport, he'll be a
Speaker 6: reverse thrust.
Speaker 2: On the economy.
Speaker 6: He will stifle the economy.
Speaker 1: This is the idiot who yesterday said that productivity will
Speaker 1: increase because the boss won't be able to call out
Speaker 1: of ours. Now, of course, productivity is not what happen
Speaker 1: out of ours, what happens while you're at work. He
Speaker 1: is part of a leftist mindset that believes borrowed money
Speaker 1: never has to be paid back because no one will
Speaker 1: ever call it in. He's the type of person who
Speaker 1: believes that if you just add money, or create a
Speaker 1: new authority, or pretend that there's a new department, then
Speaker 1: you're fixing Australia's problems. Now you are building a permanent empire.
Speaker 1: This is the front and center goal of center left
Speaker 1: and further left politics. You have seen it in Victoria
Speaker 1: and to this point, yes, it works electorally, but it's wrong,
Speaker 1: which is that the government grows so big that you
Speaker 1: either work for the government. This government has added more
Speaker 1: than thirty six thousand public servants. If you're in business,
Speaker 1: then your biggest client is the government. Look at the NDIS,
Speaker 1: or the percentage of people getting well, which has now
Speaker 1: grown to the biggest in our budget's history, at about
Speaker 1: twenty six percent of all of the money that the
Speaker 1: federal government spends it is spent on welfare. So you
Speaker 1: become dependent on the government. Those three groups push them together,
Speaker 1: you get the best part of what sixty sixty five
Speaker 1: percent guaranteed baked in political majorities. Well, I still live
Speaker 1: in the joint where you can say the government's wrong.
Speaker 1: Now I know the government's planning. Of course, this government
Speaker 1: is planning to censor the Internet where lefty think tanks,
Speaker 1: people who would hate me you this channel will say misinformation,
Speaker 1: and then the separate independent authority will turn around and
Speaker 1: say that the comments that we've shown based in data,
Speaker 1: based in fact misinformation. And if a social media company
Speaker 1: you posted, well, they would be fine millions of dollars
Speaker 1: for having that misinformation. And then eventually the social media
Speaker 1: company turns around says, we can't be bothered posting links
Speaker 1: from said business. I'm not into that country. You're not
Speaker 1: into that country. Do not be distracted by these people.
Speaker 1: You see, if Albanezi had actually read the article, and
Speaker 1: I know that two thirds of people are allegedly on
Speaker 1: Twitter only read the headline, he would have actually seen
Speaker 1: what are the potential areas coming for the opposition? Well
Speaker 1: here from Angus Taylor. First though about what he is
Speaker 1: talking about here. When they're saying all we're going to
Speaker 1: do is pull back on what labor has been spending
Speaker 1: since they came to government.
Speaker 7: He's fighting the Reserve Bank, he's fighting the Productivity Commission,
Speaker 7: and he is fighting the laws of economics in this
Speaker 7: country because he thinks that the way to beat inflation
Speaker 7: is to throw more money at it. And that has
Speaker 7: never been true and never will be true. We know
Speaker 7: what the answer is to beat inflation. You've got to
Speaker 7: get back to basics. That does mean you've got to
Speaker 7: manage the growth in government spending, and that's why we've
Speaker 7: opposed over ninety two billion dollars of spending in our
Speaker 7: voting in the parliament.
Speaker 1: That's the whole point. Elections are about to be choices.
Speaker 1: They are meant to be about forks in the road.
Speaker 1: Labor and the left and their mates in the media
Speaker 1: arrogantly believe that unless you are in lockstep with them,
Speaker 1: then you are part of the problem. No, we just
Speaker 1: disagree with you. And by the way, if the Prime
Speaker 1: Minister had been bothered, or the reporters who did not
Speaker 1: question what he was saying today, or the analysts who
Speaker 1: did not question what was being said today, read the article.
Speaker 1: Because in the article, here's some of the stuff that
Speaker 1: gets you to the mythical one hundred billion dollars, the
Speaker 1: augur Booget number that will be shoved down your throat
Speaker 1: by the narrative makers in this country, by the advertising,
Speaker 1: by the black and white, by the scary music. They'll
Speaker 1: get rid of the ten billion dollar housing Future Fund.
Speaker 1: They'll get rid of twenty billion dollars for rewiring the nation.
Speaker 1: Why because there won't be a need to rewire the name,
Speaker 1: because there won't be a one hundred percent renewables policy,
Speaker 1: there will not be a fifteen billion dollar National Reconstruction Fund.
Speaker 1: There will not be a slash fund for the Prime
Speaker 1: Minister to dip into to hand out money to his
Speaker 1: mates like he has out of a Future Made in
Speaker 1: Australia fund that's even opposed by the Greens. They get
Speaker 1: rid of a scheme where the federal government goes in
Speaker 1: with you if you happen to qualify to buy a
Speaker 1: house and then when you sell it, you've still got
Speaker 1: to give money back to the government. That's another five
Speaker 1: billion dollars thirty six thousand. As I mentioned public servants.
Speaker 1: There'd also be another two point two billion that woud
Speaker 1: go why because they're not going to fund Melbourne Suburban
Speaker 1: Rail Link, the big build of the Andrews and now
Speaker 1: Allen governments together it's about eighty billion. Once you start
Speaker 1: to squeeze in a couple of other directions you get
Speaker 1: close to one hundred. That's the point. I am sick
Speaker 1: and tired in this country of the laziness of the
Speaker 1: people who claim to be proficient in the political conversation.
Speaker 1: You've got a call bs on these people. Now, there
Speaker 1: was plenty plenty about the previous government and Australia got
Speaker 1: it right because Australia always gets it right. If it
Speaker 1: was time for a change, we got to change. But
Speaker 1: what we got and what we have is a government
Speaker 1: that is a world away from what it promised two
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy five dollars power bills of But the
Speaker 1: modeling doesn't count. Media, nothing to see here. It is
Speaker 1: not a broken promise. If Toney Abbott had said, look,
Speaker 1: I know we said stop the boats, but the modeling's changed,
Speaker 1: they'd still be screaming about it. Cost of living will
Speaker 1: be better under a labor government. Pick anything in any
Speaker 1: aisle of any shop, anywhere it's more expensive. Oh we
Speaker 1: care about the little person. Twelve interest rate rises, let
Speaker 1: alone increasing petrol taxes, let alone insurance premiums going up
Speaker 1: through the roof. This mob they don't care because they
Speaker 1: give themselves pay rise. Oh sorry, completely separate independent, No
Speaker 1: wage freeze for them. They got three pay rises since
Speaker 1: the last election. Prom Minis has got two new private jets.
Speaker 1: The people who work for the politicians they get their
Speaker 1: highest pay rise in ten years. The public servants who
Speaker 1: advise the politicians, they get their biggest pay rise in
Speaker 1: ten years. Do I seem pissed off because I am
Speaker 1: I will not be blown off course by these people.
Speaker 1: They hate what we do here each and every night.
Speaker 1: So you've got to be here every night. You've got
Speaker 1: to serious link the show. You've got to share the
Speaker 1: videos on YouTube. You've got to find the link at
Speaker 1: sky news dot com. That au, you've got to get
Speaker 1: the podcast. You've got to make us too big to ignore.
Speaker 1: They will do everything they can to pretend that what
Speaker 1: we say here doesn't matter. But you and I know
Speaker 1: that we are the ones who were first to call
Speaker 1: them out, first to say that the Emperor has no clothes.
Speaker 1: Another example of that was something we saw during the
Speaker 1: election campaign, which was the world of each way elbow. Now,
Speaker 1: of course, when it comes to each way Albo, that's
Speaker 1: because says one thing and then does another, says one
Speaker 1: thing and then says another, often within the same week.
Speaker 1: But because much of the media is too busy licking
Speaker 1: the boots of this bloke, because he'll help tuck them
Speaker 1: in at night with a little text message or a
Speaker 1: couple of drinks of the lodge. And the last guy
Speaker 1: was so mean to us. A couple of people have
Speaker 1: already mentioned this, But how can I not the proposed
Speaker 1: gold mine in Blainey in New South Wales. Blainey just
Speaker 1: near Bathist, beautiful part of the world. The Chinese restaurant
Speaker 1: there in the main drag excellent, the pub next door,
Speaker 1: old school. I love their mayor and I love that
Speaker 1: part of Australia. Beautiful part of Australia. Shout out to
Speaker 1: everyone down the road, including my mate's cat and Dave
Speaker 1: in Bathist. Now you know last week the tailings of
Speaker 1: this gold mine were ruled to be something with indigenous
Speaker 1: heritage connections to it. So the people who ran the
Speaker 1: mind said, well, sorry, we can't tender it. We can't
Speaker 1: do this. It's gone, it's over. The indigenous leader came
Speaker 1: forward and again said that there was some sort of
Speaker 1: cultural connection to all of it. Tanya Plubisek made it
Speaker 1: very clear that she, as a representative of the Albernizi government,
Speaker 1: made the decision to give the mine the biscuit.
Speaker 5: Just to be very clear, I haven't blocked the gold mine.
Speaker 5: What I've said is that they need to relocate the
Speaker 5: tailings dam. It's an area that's associated with two very
Speaker 5: important creation stories.
Speaker 1: If you have watched Ossie gold Hunters, you would know
Speaker 1: no tailing, no mine. That's the reality. Oh, we could
Speaker 1: just move things out of here if the people who
Speaker 1: run the gold mine, who would stand to make a
Speaker 1: pretty profit out of it, say they can't move it
Speaker 1: and this is the only option. And guess what, it's
Speaker 1: the only option. You pretending you're pro the mind. But
Speaker 1: this one little thing that clearly that people running the
Speaker 1: mind won't move means you killed the project. And amazingly
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister comes out today and says I'm pro
Speaker 1: the mine. Well, could you tell your minister who last
Speaker 1: time I checked works for you to double check her
Speaker 1: decision making process? Talk about each way Albo his government
Speaker 1: bans of mine. Oh, but he's still for her.
Speaker 6: Chris Minz would like it to go ahead. I'd like
Speaker 6: to go ahead too. There's nothing to stop it. There
Speaker 6: are other options that the company put forward on the
Speaker 6: tailing step.
Speaker 1: Yes there is. It's called the Australian Federal Government. Nothing
Speaker 1: standing in its way. Now we know this Prime Minister
Speaker 1: loves being surrounded by the lovies who will one day
Speaker 1: call him Man of the Year or put him in
Speaker 1: the InStyle magazine and oh, pretty boy in China. All
Speaker 1: the rest of this crap crap that we've had to
Speaker 1: put up with, including the love life. I don't care,
Speaker 1: I don't care. Wish you well personally, but I do
Speaker 1: not care well. Today the CFMU they took the streets
Speaker 1: and f Albow was what they were screaming. And this
Speaker 1: was the bloke who they helped bully into the Prime
Speaker 1: minister ship. But now it's f Albow because, as you know,
Speaker 1: the CFMU has been put into administration. Why because in
Speaker 1: part of the reporting of Nick McKenzie and sixty minutes
Speaker 1: where they had cold on tape examples of the CFMU
Speaker 1: at its worst. Here's some of the blow up today.
Speaker 2: This is our union.
Speaker 8: We get to choose who we want to run it,
Speaker 8: not the government.
Speaker 6: We fight for these rights and we will continue to
Speaker 6: fight for these rights.
Speaker 8: When they want to have a go at ass, they're
Speaker 8: having to go on all of us, not just the leadership.
Speaker 8: Because it's our union. We pay the fees. We should
Speaker 8: be the ones who elect on who we want to elect.
Speaker 8: It's not up to them. We had no consultation.
Speaker 1: This union. They want to carry on like it's still
Speaker 1: Eureka Stockade time. This is a union that has run
Speaker 1: out of things to fight for that it fights for
Speaker 1: a two hundred thousand dollars salary for stopg people. Okay,
Speaker 1: two hundred thousand dollars now, Amazingly, it was the revelations
Speaker 1: on sixty Minutes that made the government move its hand.
Speaker 1: But it's not the first time we've heard about potential
Speaker 1: illegalities in and around this union. In fact, let's go
Speaker 1: to taxpayer funded internet to tell us that the CFMU
Speaker 1: broke the law. This is story from just a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks ago, two six hundred times according to the
Speaker 1: Fair Work Commission. Repeat, the CFMU was broke the law
Speaker 1: two thousand, six hundred times. Gourding the financial Review. The
Speaker 1: CFMU treats nineteen million dollars in fines as a cost
Speaker 1: of doing business. They don't care about the rules. They
Speaker 1: do not care about the rules, which brings us to
Speaker 1: the people who are looking to suck up to the CFMU.
Speaker 1: Regardless of what is caught on tape, what is admitted
Speaker 1: all ruled by a commission or a court, and that
Speaker 1: is of course the Greens. The Greens want the muscle,
Speaker 1: the Greens want the money, and the Greens were there
Speaker 1: today telling the CFMU what it wanted. In the Brisbane rally,
Speaker 1: all of.
Speaker 9: You today organized in this powerful union in the CFMU.
Speaker 9: Your union has saved vibes. Your union means that every
Speaker 9: worker with an EBA and negotiated by the CFMU means
Speaker 9: fair wages, means safe conditions. It means a good light
Speaker 9: for you because you are the ones building the wealth
Speaker 9: in this country.
Speaker 1: What do I keep talking about this because it's going
Speaker 1: to happen. It's very obviously going to happen. Because the
Speaker 1: Greens think that they have got a path to winning
Speaker 1: more seats, particularly in Southeast Queensland. The problem is they've
Speaker 1: won most of the rich areas, so now they have
Speaker 1: to start to move their way towards the suburbs. And
Speaker 1: it's going to help if they can have the help
Speaker 1: of the CFMU to knock on a door or to
Speaker 1: donate money. Now, the idea that the Labor Party is
Speaker 1: allegedly at war with the Union, that it's always ignored
Speaker 1: its problems in the past, but it'll help the Greens,
Speaker 1: who for once may actually outpoll Labor. Yet of course
Speaker 1: they will continue to keep preferencing the Greens because they'd
Speaker 1: be afraid of them at a federal election. Watch this space.
Speaker 1: There is a lot and I mean a lot more
Speaker 1: to come in all of this. Now, of course, Airbus
Speaker 1: Albo about to take back to these skies, because that's
Speaker 1: part of the distraction. Remember when he's overseas, I can't
Speaker 1: possibly answer any questions about Australian issues or what inflation.
Speaker 1: Oh no, c't sorry. I can only answer questions about
Speaker 1: the Pacific Islands for them, because that's where I am
Speaker 1: right now. I'll work on it, but I can't do
Speaker 1: the full danger Dan for you. But here's the thing.
Speaker 1: The Pacific Islands Forum, and this is important. A straight
Speaker 1: is to be there where the big dog in the
Speaker 1: region we represent so much help support and who doesn't
Speaker 1: love the people of the Pacific Islands. We all want
Speaker 1: to take care of them. But one of the people
Speaker 1: who's going to be there at the Pacific Islands Forum
Speaker 1: when the abous Albo h sorry, Toto touches down, will
Speaker 1: be Toto too, because it's a new one four hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty million dollars for those two planes.
Speaker 2: Nothing to see, just fine, you and me.
Speaker 1: Well, the boss of the United Nations, mister Katis, he
Speaker 1: will kind of tries to outdo himself about global warming.
Speaker 1: That then became this.
Speaker 10: The era of global warming has ended the idea. The
Speaker 10: here of global boiling has arrived. The air is unbreathable,
Speaker 10: the hit is unbearable, and the level of fossil full
Speaker 10: profits and climacy in action is unacceptable.
Speaker 1: Okay, now the United Nations boss will be there and
Speaker 1: he will be, among other things, saying that Australia needs
Speaker 1: to move away from fossil fuels because Australia is one
Speaker 1: percent of the global problem. Does this floke ever ever
Speaker 1: use the same bellocoast language? Or you must act yesterday
Speaker 1: to the world's biggest polluter because that's China under a
Speaker 1: UN deal that the world signed signed up to and
Speaker 1: put a hand behind its back the Western world. Will
Speaker 1: they get measured off their CO two output from two
Speaker 1: thousand and five China two thousand and thirty China compared
Speaker 1: to the rest of the world latest numbers twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: While Australia produces one repeat one percent of global problems
Speaker 1: when it comes to CO two, you can see China
Speaker 1: there more than thirty percent, literally more than thirty times
Speaker 1: what Australia does. So I'm so pleased that he's going
Speaker 1: to wave the finger at us. How many times are
Speaker 1: you going to do it in Beijing, Shanghai or anywhere
Speaker 1: else over there. Of course, the Third World or what
Speaker 1: do they call it now, the Global South, that's another
Speaker 1: twenty percent, Russia, India, all of those way bigger problems.
Speaker 1: The United States, Well, if Harris gets in who knows
Speaker 1: what's going to happen there. If Trump's going to get
Speaker 1: in there, he'll yank Paris and tear it apart. But
Speaker 1: Australian needs to change everything because we're one percent of
Speaker 1: the problem. What about the joint that's currently thirty thirty
Speaker 1: percent of the problem staying in the United States. We
Speaker 1: are yet to see exactly what the pole bandsy is
Speaker 1: for Kamala Harris coming out of the Democratic National Convention.
Speaker 1: The assumption is that you get abounts. Why and why
Speaker 1: wouldn't you four days of fawning and sucky coverage all
Speaker 1: over the media. But clearly there is a problem that
Speaker 1: is now starting to develop for Kamala Harris, and much
Speaker 1: of the media doesn't want to talk about it. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm about to you see, Kamala Harris is a fake
Speaker 1: you know that because of what she allegedly stands for. Literally,
Speaker 1: there is a story tonight in the United States, and
Speaker 1: the lady who previously had called the border wall reprehensible, unconstitutional,
Speaker 1: now claims she's going to build the wall. Seriously, if
Speaker 1: you're stupid enough to fall for this, well, good luck
Speaker 1: to you. I've got a bridge to sell you. For
Speaker 1: everyone else, they say this for the fakery that it
Speaker 1: is four years ago, Donald Trump, worst thing of all time,
Speaker 1: kids in cages, all of this business four years lady,
Speaker 1: you want to pretend you're going to do all the
Speaker 1: same things. Please, We all know that she's never going
Speaker 1: to do any of that stuff whatsoever. Little cosmetic here
Speaker 1: in there, but what garbage. But we also know she's
Speaker 1: terrible when she doesn't have a script. In fact, the
Speaker 1: script she is so loyal to that she uses the
Speaker 1: same words every time no matter where she is.
Speaker 2: It really is.
Speaker 11: Good to be back in wiscons But it is so
Speaker 11: good to be back in Michigan. Listen, let me tell you,
Speaker 11: I am clear, the path to the White House runs
Speaker 11: right through this state unless and I am clear, the
Speaker 11: path to the White House runs right through this state.
Speaker 11: Tim has an incredible record as governor of the great
Speaker 11: state of Minnesota, and as you just heard, he has
Speaker 11: an incredible record as governor of the Great State of Minnesota,
Speaker 11: and to his former high school football players he was
Speaker 11: coach and to his former high school football players he
Speaker 11: was coach. I took on perpetrators of all kinds. I
Speaker 11: took on perpetrators of all kinds and had a summer
Speaker 11: job at McDonald's. I had a summer job at McDonald's.
Speaker 1: Blah blah blah blah blah. But another perfect example about
Speaker 1: how the media who are desperate to cover everything. I mean,
Speaker 1: they are literally cheering on a person who doesn't want
Speaker 1: to talk to them. That's how out of their mind
Speaker 1: these people are. That's how in the tank they are.
Speaker 1: Because you said, Kamala Harris has this little trick when
Speaker 1: she flies around in the plane.
Speaker 2: She may get.
Speaker 1: Interviews to any of the reporters, but she goes back
Speaker 1: and apparently sits with the reporters, so they all feel
Speaker 1: like they're on the inside of a journey. They're all
Speaker 1: going to be able to write a book after she
Speaker 1: becomes president, but they won't do anything to prevent her
Speaker 1: being president by you know, asking her a question. Well, today,
Speaker 1: the media, of course played along with the Democrats game
Speaker 1: that it's all Donald Trump's fault that apparently the setting
Speaker 1: stone deals and rules in and around a presidential debate. Well,
Speaker 1: she can renegotiate them. He can't.
Speaker 12: Tonight, the status of the presidential debate is up in
Speaker 12: the air, with the two campaigns at odds over whether
Speaker 12: the candidate's microphones should be muted when the other isn't speaking.
Speaker 13: The Harris campaign wants, and that's for microphones to stay
Speaker 13: on during the debate.
Speaker 1: They want the mics to remain open, in part because
Speaker 1: some believe that it would highlight Trump's habit of interrupting.
Speaker 1: This is garbage. This is garbage. The actual thing Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris's people want is for her to be able to
Speaker 1: take notes with her, to have cheat sheets, to have
Speaker 1: lines written down, to have facts and figures that she
Speaker 1: can't remember so she can look them up during the debate.
Speaker 1: Here's what the Trump campaign said about that exact thing.
Speaker 1: Enough of the games. We accepted the ABC debate under
Speaker 1: the exact same rules of the CE and N debate.
Speaker 1: The Harris camp, after already agreeing to the C and
Speaker 1: N rules, asked for a seated debate with notes. She
Speaker 1: can't speak off the top of her head with any confidence,
Speaker 1: so They want you to believe it's completely okay for
Speaker 1: her to sit there with cheat sheets notes and continue
Speaker 1: to be the empty pants suit. Not Obama in a
Speaker 1: pantsuit because he could talk until we all fell asleep.
Speaker 1: But she is the empty pantsuit who wants briefing notes.
Speaker 1: And by the way, if you think I'm making it up,
Speaker 1: this is what she's like if she doesn't have a script.
Speaker 8: We've been to the border.
Speaker 11: We've been to the border. You haven't been to the border,
Speaker 11: and I haven't been to Europe. Ukraine is a country
Speaker 11: in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia.
Speaker 11: Russia is a bigger country, Russia is a powerful country.
Speaker 1: Russia decided to invade.
Speaker 11: A smaller country called Ukraine.
Speaker 2: So basically that's wrong.
Speaker 1: Now. Of course, the debate about the debate lovely distractions
Speaker 1: from her actual policy or lack of policy, or flip
Speaker 1: flop policy or outright lies. The other one is the
Speaker 1: story about the story of when she will or won't
Speaker 1: sit down and do an interview. The media have completely accepted. Oh,
Speaker 1: before the end of the month, well, guess what dull
Speaker 1: time is teaking. So we learned via NBC News that
Speaker 1: there is a plan for her to have a interview,
Speaker 1: But how's this? Her running mate Tim Waltz will be
Speaker 1: sitting beside her, So as soon as she starts to
Speaker 1: go off to the word salad, he turns around and says,
Speaker 1: have a look at this steak, baby, and saves her
Speaker 1: from herself. This is not real life. There is no
Speaker 1: teleprompter in the oval office. I've been there. There is
Speaker 1: no script in the situation room. There is no pre
Speaker 1: ordained as Meghan Kelly says, emotional support governor, who can
Speaker 1: help you through the process. Now, we just went through
Speaker 1: four days where she's the second coming and the greatest
Speaker 1: and the smartest and the most amazing. So how comes
Speaker 1: you can't do in an interview by herself? Why can't
Speaker 1: she answer questions by herself? Why can't she debate without notes?
Speaker 1: Because all of that is bullshit. This is marketing, This
Speaker 1: is a brand and it might be winning. But in
Speaker 1: the end, will people really choose a fake like her?
Speaker 1: We'll debate that and a lot more in a moment
Speaker 1: or two time. Looking forward to a conversation with Joe Hildebrand,
Speaker 1: James Morrow, Nigel Faras. Just getting started here we go
Speaker 1: tonight on pul Marie Life by our goods This the
Speaker 1: Titans are here on Tuesday night Morrow from Sky News
Speaker 1: and the Daily Telegraph. And similarly of both parishes, none
Speaker 1: other than although well both and both will somehow get
Speaker 1: Elbow's call return quicker.
Speaker 4: Jacob Jade and I always end up agreeing with each other.
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's see last night on Channel two. I tried
Speaker 1: not to talk about the show that who cares any more?
Speaker 1: But still a question from a lady of a certain
Speaker 1: age and a certain cultural background, we got the internet.
Speaker 2: Very pissed.
Speaker 14: My children, now almost thirty and thirty four, went to
Speaker 14: the local state public school and were dictated to that
Speaker 14: multi culturalism is a great thing. I don't believe it is,
Speaker 14: as I feel that the culture of the original British
Speaker 14: slash Irish majority has been demonized constantly for the last
Speaker 14: three decades. Case in point, frequent vandalism of memorials to
Speaker 14: Captain Cook. How does this? How does democracy fit into
Speaker 14: this atmosphere of beat up the white guy?
Speaker 1: Well that was a very hot pepper, achieve Jimes, You
Speaker 1: quite correctly push back online today about just like okay,
Speaker 1: there is a certain world view of a certain series
Speaker 1: of people form a certain period of time that they're
Speaker 1: allowed to speak. Yeah. Well, I mean, this is the
Speaker 1: whole thing.
Speaker 15: And you know, if we look around the world right now, Paul,
Speaker 15: there's this massive push against free speech, and a big
Speaker 15: part of that is saying, don't talk about things around immigration, diversity, multiculturalism,
Speaker 15: you know, because if you do your alt right, you're
Speaker 15: hard right. And what happens is you don't talk about
Speaker 15: the problems that also come with multiculturalism. You know, it's
Speaker 15: not just all great restaurants and you know diversity and
Speaker 15: you know, different skin colors. It's actually there can be
Speaker 15: cultural classes, there'll be a lot of other things. You
Speaker 15: need to talk about them, you need to work them through.
Speaker 15: And a couple of points that I'm making it's in
Speaker 15: Tomorrow's Daily Telegraph, is that you know, you can say
Speaker 15: multiculture society is great, but there's also research that says
Speaker 15: it fragments people and that it actually leads to lower
Speaker 15: civic trust. And you know, the other thing too, is
Speaker 15: that when you don't talk about these things, the pressure
Speaker 15: is build up. You get things like those terrible riots
Speaker 15: in Britain, and once you know, you see you can't
Speaker 15: talk about this, well then things explode.
Speaker 1: Well, also, you know, Joe, to me, it is completely
Speaker 1: acceptable that anyone from everywhere is affectionate about how they
Speaker 1: grew up. Yeah, of course, regardless of regardless of whether
Speaker 1: it is you know, the place you're watching us right
Speaker 1: now or the other side of the world. So I've
Speaker 1: got no problem with people being affectionate about the way
Speaker 1: things used to be. That's just the way naturally human
Speaker 1: beings are. What I do have a problem with is
Speaker 1: when somebody, even in artfully starts to say, well have
Speaker 1: we changed for the better or have we changed for
Speaker 1: the worse? That you can't even ask that fork in
Speaker 1: the road question because there's a whole series of verbal landmines.
Speaker 1: What's your sense about some of the overright?
Speaker 4: I completely agree. I think there's well, there's two questions here.
Speaker 4: One is you know, is she actually right? Well, from
Speaker 4: her point of view, obviously she is. I'm a huge
Speaker 4: support of multiculturalism, and I don't think so. But more
Speaker 4: to the point, should she be able to express that
Speaker 4: and not be being liable to racist?
Speaker 2: Absolutely, of course you should. It is obscene.
Speaker 4: And not only is it obscene to call someone a
Speaker 4: racist when they might just be a bit old fashioned
Speaker 4: or pining for a world they knew before, nostalgic about
Speaker 4: and why.
Speaker 9: They go up.
Speaker 4: But it is exactly that sort of attitude that makes
Speaker 4: people like this feel that their culture or that their
Speaker 4: freedoms are under threats. So you're actually confirming the exact
Speaker 4: same fears that they're expressing, and it is idiotic and
Speaker 4: it is also moral.
Speaker 15: Sorry, James, no, I was going to say that, Joe,
Speaker 15: what you just said that gets in to this point
Speaker 15: that I also bring up. You know, they talk about
Speaker 15: this thing called asymmetric multiculturalism, and that's where we celebrate
Speaker 15: every other culture, but the dominant Antlo culture that has
Speaker 15: to be you know, knocked down. We see that all
Speaker 15: the time, the debates of Australia, the Captain cook stuff,
Speaker 15: anybody who's had a kid go through preschool even and
Speaker 15: seeing how they teach the kids everything about how the
Speaker 15: land there on belongs to an average rub But it's
Speaker 15: nothing about Australian civics or anything like that.
Speaker 1: So it's it's it's a you can see.
Speaker 4: Where, but it's the same thing exactly right. And the
Speaker 4: worst thing you can do to destroy a harmonious multicultural
Speaker 4: society is to say that the dominant culture is illegitimate.
Speaker 4: Or to vandalize Captain Cook, or to spray paint on
Speaker 4: the Australian War Memorial, or dare I say, to block
Speaker 4: one billion dollar gold mine on.
Speaker 2: Heritage?
Speaker 1: But again, that is the.
Speaker 4: Minute that you were saying, okay, here high multiculture. Now
Speaker 4: and you the sort of dominant culture that.
Speaker 2: You know you're now illegitimate?
Speaker 4: Well, what of course that is going to make that
Speaker 4: dominant culture less accepting of other cultures.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's a circle exists. Yeah, maybe it's a circles
Speaker 1: that I roll in. But tim cost still significant anti
Speaker 1: gambling person has turned around and has said that the
Speaker 1: challenge facing the Abana government around advertising of gambling is
Speaker 1: similar to the challenge of Howard taking on guns post
Speaker 1: Port Arthur. Now, again, as I said, I might be
Speaker 1: living in the slightly separate world. I very occasionally bet
Speaker 1: and lose on these apps. You know, I'm a poke's man.
Speaker 1: But the sort of puritanical screaming about this issue, does
Speaker 1: anyone really think that this moment in time is the
Speaker 1: same as the days after Port Arthur James? Well, you
Speaker 1: know it's funny.
Speaker 15: I like, I mean, I wasn't here for Port Arthur,
Speaker 15: although I do remember it when it happened and it
Speaker 15: was reported all over the world. It's a very big deal.
Speaker 15: But you know, the thinging point there, there's a puritanical
Speaker 15: edge to all of this, and it's like, let's just
Speaker 15: move systematically through every vice and eventually we're going to
Speaker 15: get to yours.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 15: Well they've gone to yours, you know already. And you know, like,
Speaker 15: I'm not a gambler. I don't bet. I don't really
Speaker 15: like the bet. I do like to go to the
Speaker 15: horses a couple of times here. That's always fun. Also
Speaker 15: lose a bunch of money, never mind. But there's this
Speaker 15: sort of thing where it's like everything that people enjoy
Speaker 15: has got to have some externality to it. And the
Speaker 15: thing is, if you ben all of these apps, you
Speaker 15: know they're already the corps in Sydney are reading illegal
Speaker 15: casinos again like the head back of the sixties and seventy.
Speaker 1: I will say, it's a perfect example about this stuff
Speaker 1: right around around draconian this is okay, this is okay.
Speaker 1: The amount of illegal tobacco and who brings it into
Speaker 1: the country and all the problems that have come with
Speaker 1: it directly linked to the policy of making legal tobacco
Speaker 1: as expensive as possible to get right, that's not an
Speaker 1: argument to say no taxation whatever. But once you start
Speaker 1: to move in one direction, the market always finds a.
Speaker 4: Difference, and as it does overwhelmingly to vaping as well,
Speaker 4: which of course the government is now saying the lad.
Speaker 1: Are we at elbows port Arthur moment.
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 4: In Tim Cassell, I quite liked him, and in his defense,
Speaker 4: he is actually quite literally a Puritan and he's a
Speaker 4: Baptist minister, so he's allowed to be apprited. But I
Speaker 4: think the and this is his you know, his absolute cause,
Speaker 4: is the thing he's been obsessed with his entire life.
Speaker 4: I think that there are I think the problem is firstly,
Speaker 4: the pokem machines are the real problem. I don't think
Speaker 4: the sports betting is a real problem. I mean, you
Speaker 4: can manage to lose a lot of money betting.
Speaker 2: On sports, and a lot of people do both.
Speaker 4: But it strikes me the poker machines are the real
Speaker 4: ones that just over up all your cash, So maybe
Speaker 4: focus on that. And secondly, I'm just not sure that
Speaker 4: it's the right time. And I don't think you boys
Speaker 4: make a direct comparison to port Arth and saying this
Speaker 4: is as bad as guns or a killings, where you're
Speaker 4: saying that every once in a while it has to
Speaker 4: make a moral stand, you know, regardless of the sort
Speaker 4: of politics of it.
Speaker 1: I think that is standing there.
Speaker 4: I was going to say, I would say very immorally
Speaker 4: that the time to make a moral stand is not now.
Speaker 1: So look at you, Look at you. All right, thank you,
Speaker 1: Let's do appreciable read you will watch you, We love you,
Speaker 1: We'll see you all very soon. Thank you. Don't forget
Speaker 1: us report Fridays here on Sky News. All right, quick
Speaker 1: break back with more lots to talk about with Nigel Faraj,
Speaker 1: including Kamala wants to bring It's to a debate. I say,
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't have to turn up and debate somebody who
Speaker 1: wants to bring notes more than a second Nigel Farage
Speaker 1: standing by right now for us in London. There is
Speaker 1: so much to get to and I'm so pleased where
Speaker 1: the show that he chooses to appear on each and
Speaker 1: every week because mate Mate Mate Mate Kamala Harris. So
Speaker 1: apparently if she's going to do an interview before the
Speaker 1: end of the month, she's going to have as Meghan
Speaker 1: Kelly says her emotional support governor with her. But more importantly,
Speaker 1: this whole thing about the debates, all right, I get
Speaker 1: the distraction because the real thing is three since the
Speaker 1: horror of Afghanistan. But she wants notes like, honestly, this
Speaker 1: is a person who for a whole week last week
Speaker 1: was the Second Coming and was so smart and so
Speaker 1: brave and so strong. Then why does she need notes
Speaker 1: at a debate and a minder in an interview?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 13: Truly, there's of course, as soon as she's off script
Speaker 13: on subjects like economics, she just flaps and flounders around
Speaker 13: because she clearly hasn't got a blooming clue. Now, the
Speaker 13: rules of these debates were, of course between Biden and Trump.
Speaker 13: All the Trump team are saying is the same rules
Speaker 13: should apply. And I think in America, in Britain and elsewhere,
Speaker 13: I see too many of these big political programs where
Speaker 13: leading figures are allowed to go in with a big
Speaker 13: crib sheet thick of notes turned to the subject and
Speaker 13: read it out. I think broadcasters need to be much
Speaker 13: much tougher on our leaders have a pencil.
Speaker 2: And blank sheet of paper by all means.
Speaker 13: But Team Trump are absolutely right to say no notes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is my thing. It's not about microphones, because
Speaker 1: we all know the microphone thing is who just turning
Speaker 1: around going I'm speaking, I'm speaking. Who cares right, No
Speaker 1: one cares about that. It's about the notes because this
Speaker 1: is meant to be a mental test because people are
Speaker 1: busy and they go, Okay, what are you like for
Speaker 1: an hour? How do you go? We saw what happened
Speaker 1: with Biden, and I think I think Harris is going
Speaker 1: to get her on sugar hit in the past. But
Speaker 1: I think she's trouble when they can't put her out there.
Speaker 1: It's not because they're trying to be scarce with her.
Speaker 1: You can't be scarce in an election. I mean, you
Speaker 1: were able to get millions of votes because you were everywhere.
Speaker 1: You can't hide, can you make.
Speaker 10: No?
Speaker 13: I mean Biden got away with it in twenty twenty
Speaker 13: because of the pandemic. They sort of locked him in
Speaker 13: his bunker in Delaware and used the pandemic as cover. Now,
Speaker 13: I mean, look, she has not given a single major
Speaker 13: press conference, a single major television.
Speaker 2: Or radio interview.
Speaker 13: She gets up on stage, she reads off an auto
Speaker 13: Q and as soon as she goes off that she
Speaker 13: is literally clueless. And so the point about not having
Speaker 13: notes is you're testing mental acuity, yes, but you're also
Speaker 13: testing instinct. You know, a question may come up that
Speaker 13: you hadn't necessarily thought would. It's how do you instinctively
Speaker 13: deal with that? And so often with politicians like Kamala Harris,
Speaker 13: one senses there is a that much instinct there. The
Speaker 13: job is all about reaching you know, you know, a title, position, rank, respectability.
Speaker 13: It's more about that than what the person actually believes in.
Speaker 13: So this debate on Matepha September, it is crucial. We
Speaker 13: need to see these two people had to hand and
Speaker 13: I'm sure after negotiations, I'm sure it will happen. But
Speaker 13: she can't be allowed to go in with a crib sheet.
Speaker 1: By the way, you know, in fairness, a couple of
Speaker 1: weeks ago, we're talking about the need for Trump to
Speaker 1: tighten up well don't know any and everyone who's making
Speaker 1: some of the decisions around him. The RFK endorsement incredible.
Speaker 1: It moves votes, it moves states. Hence why they're all
Speaker 1: going crazy at the moment trying to push back. Secondly,
Speaker 1: the tighter use of language is better. But today today
Speaker 1: he was invited by families to lay a wreath on
Speaker 1: the third anniversary of the horrors of thirteen people being
Speaker 1: killed as they just cut and run from Afghanistan. Then
Speaker 1: he goes to a Vietnamese restaurant. Then he goes to
Speaker 1: the National Garden gives a speech where Tossi Gabbard besimy, like,
Speaker 1: the bloke's working for it. That's the guy who can win. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I mean Trump is a workaholic.
Speaker 13: He is extraordinary, you know, you know those big rallies
Speaker 13: where he gets up and he speaks for eighteen ninety minutes.
Speaker 13: At the end of that last campaign in twenty twenty,
Speaker 13: I think thing. But day before the election he did
Speaker 13: four or five of those massive speeches all over America.
Speaker 13: I mean, you're right, he's working for it, He's going
Speaker 13: for it. I have to say I thought that the
Speaker 13: Kennedy endorsement was not just very graceful, but I thought
Speaker 13: that the words that we used were also incredibly powerful.
Speaker 13: And I quite like the idea of make America healthy again,
Speaker 13: you know, get people off prescription drugs, get them away
Speaker 13: from too much youngk food.
Speaker 2: I thought all of that was okay.
Speaker 13: You can say that Kennedy is a bit out there,
Speaker 13: but I just felt it was a very very powerful endorsement.
Speaker 13: And it's not that the wheels are coming off, Kamala,
Speaker 13: It's just that people are now seeing Trump for what
Speaker 13: he really is.
Speaker 2: There's no doubt.
Speaker 13: You know, when I spoke to you last week, I
Speaker 13: said to you that I felt he was going off course,
Speaker 13: he wasn't really on target. He was obsessing with Biden.
Speaker 13: I think since then he's now back doing all the
Speaker 13: right things.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, also the other thing with the
Speaker 1: make America healthy and firstly, don't touch the orange cheese, right,
Speaker 1: it is awesome and as a big boy, I do
Speaker 1: like that. But and Mozzarella steaks all of those things. However,
Speaker 1: it reminds me of when Drain the Swamp was first introduced,
Speaker 1: because no one ever talks about permanent Washington the bureaucracy, right,
Speaker 1: and this was this huge strain of yeah, we've got
Speaker 1: a problem there. You've now got a strain of people saying,
Speaker 1: do we have a problem with our health? I mean,
Speaker 1: look at us compared to everyone else around the world.
Speaker 1: I think this is one of those things. And Meghan
Speaker 1: Kelly's talked about it. That is a really rich vein
Speaker 1: of people who may vote every now and then or go.
Speaker 1: You know what, I don't really care about economic policy.
Speaker 1: I care about this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm an amazing to think.
Speaker 13: Isn't it that America which progressively gets.
Speaker 2: Richer than all the rest of us?
Speaker 13: I mean amazing to think America's GDP is now double
Speaker 13: the European unions and it was equal to it.
Speaker 2: In two thousand and eight. Think about that.
Speaker 13: So America gets richer and richer, and yet life expectancy
Speaker 13: in America has fallen quite sharply over the course of
Speaker 13: the last few years.
Speaker 2: And that is diet in his exercise, but it's also endless, endless.
Speaker 13: Prescription drugs, and so I think this could be a
Speaker 13: very rich sem, a very rich sem.
Speaker 1: Indeed, good man, Thank you, Nige, we'll see you again
Speaker 1: next week.
Speaker 2: Thank you all of.
Speaker 1: It's nager Faraj that you can see your show on
Speaker 1: YouTube and certainly on flash as well, which of course
Speaker 1: is called Faraj. And by the way, before we go,
Speaker 1: thank you to everyone who was such a law of
Speaker 1: view of the program. But one in particular deserves a
Speaker 1: happy birthday, Christine. She turned twenty one on the weekend.
Speaker 1: All of this from her family and I placed. You
Speaker 1: and her are Heroach and every night at Ceine tomorrow