WEBVTT - Tracking lone killers:  Dr Nathan Brooks Pt.2

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Detective see aside of life the average person is never

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>exposed to. I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years I was catching killers.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to part two of my chat with forensic

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>psychologists Nathan Brooks. In part one, we talked about Nathan's work,

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the difference between serial killers and mass murderers, and the

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>emerging trend of loan actors who go on killing sprees.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>In part two, Nathan talks about the christ Church massacre,

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>where the actions of one man led to the death

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of fifty one people. Nathan breaks down how and why

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>this crime occurred and how we can try and prevent

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>these types of killings in the future. It was a

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and informative chat. Have a listened to what Nathan

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>has to say, Nathan Brooks or doctor Nathan Brooks, I

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>should say, welcome back to part two of I Catch Killers.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Gary.

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say I am finding this conversation fascinating

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and was working as a homicide detective. I found this

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>inside the mind of killers or all the type of

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>things that you're examining absolutely fascinating. I'm sure you're getting

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this all the time, but is that people are fascinating?

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I think unpacking what makes troubling and sometimes very violent

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>people tick is it is it's fascinating because most of

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>us can't understand it. And when we think about psychopaths,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 2>for instance, Yeah, they are the ones that think different

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and make different decisions, and we're often caught up in

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>our own emotions. But for some folks, like psychopathic folks,

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>that they're cool and calm under pressure, that they're not

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>burdened by the anxiety that we have, and that's hard

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>for everyday people to understand.

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I want to talk about the christ Church

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>massacre which is you know, I'm sure most people know it.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll just read out a summary of it, just so

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>people that haven't been aware of it they are aware

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of what happened. So two consecutive mass shootings took place

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in christ Church, New Zealand, on the fifteenth of March

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. They were committed during Friday prayer, first at

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Elnora Mosque at Rickiton at one forty pm, and

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>almost immediately after at Limbwood Islamic Center at one point

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty two. Altogether, fifty one people were killed and eighty

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>nine others were injured, including forty by gunfire. The perpetrator

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was an Australian man, Brenton Tarrant, then age twenty eight.

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Tarrant was arrested after his vehicles ran by a police

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>car as he was driving to a third mosque, nash Burton.

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>He live streamed the first shooting on Facebook, making the

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>first successful live stream far right terror attack, and had

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>published a manifesto online before the attack that just sort

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of sets the saying. I think anyone that recalls that

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>incident knows how horrifying it was. You've looked at it

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in depth, what's your take on what caused the lead

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>up to it and why did it get that dramatic

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And we touched on small parts of it in part one.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>If we could just deep dive into it now.

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So before we get into it, my caveat that

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm obviously with the New Zealand Police and this is

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 2>certainly my view on the situation. It's not at all

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 2>reflective of theirs. But it is a really complex case.

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I think when anyone carries out such a horrific mass

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>act of violence, there are many many layers and what

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>we saw in that incident and that tragic attack was

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that several years of build up went into it. It

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>wasn't something that just happened overnight. We know that Tarrent

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>moved to New Zealand with the intention of carrying out

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 2>a mass casualty attack, and that was his reason for

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>moving over there. I believe he cited the fact that

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>it was partly the ability to access the firearms that

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 2>was one of the primary factors, and shortly after getting

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>there he commenced training with firearms and acquiring tactical capabilities.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 2>But to understand him, we probably need to trace things

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 2>back to his childhood and he had in many ways,

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 2>probably something that hasn't garnered a lot of attention. Quite

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 2>a traumatic childhood we focused a lot, particularly, I think

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 2>the media courage has been a lot around his ideology.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>But there are a lot of puzzle pieces that were

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 2>there early on for him in his early years.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>What type of things were they.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things that we look at for

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 2>childhood is whether people experience trauma and the influence that

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 2>that can have on them as they develop and grow

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 2>into adults. And adverse childhood experiences is often a marker

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that we use to look at how bad that trauma

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 2>is or how much adversity your child has had in

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>their upbringing, And a lot of research would say around

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 2>four or five adverse experiences can have quite significant impact

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 2>on someone as they age and really shape who they become.

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 2>And we know Arran had a troubled upbringing. So his

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 2>parents separated, which I'll just run through some of it.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 2>So some of the adverse experiences are parental separation, parental

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>mental health, criminality, unstable housing, financial issues, drug use. So

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the tip things that we that we might expect. Yeah,

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 2>and so so Terence's parents obviously split up, so we

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>had the separation his mother then started dating a new

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>individual I believe it was an aboriginal fellow, and he

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 2>was reportedly violent towards Tarrant and his sister, and that

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 2>abuse continued over several years. Then we also had his

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>father who suffered from mental health difficulties and then also

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 2>developed cancer I believe for Mary and ultimately then committed

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>suicide as well. So there were some quite notable things there. Drama, yeah,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 2>and he also Terrant himself was struggled to fit in socially,

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 2>as we which touched on before. He was often bullied.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 2>He was considered to be quite overweight as well, and

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>then in his late teens he had a big transformation

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 2>and became quite fixated and about the gym and lost

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>quite a lot of weight.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it was in your book it was something

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like forty or fifty years huge, Yeah.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Quite remarkable. And also during that adolescence we see that

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 2>some early racist remarks were coming out in his school years,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 2>which suggests there's certainly, you know, some difficulties with how

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing the world and people and maybe even seeing

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>that there's certain people that are to blame or that

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>are causing hardships for him, and that might have been

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 2>reflective of what things were like on the home front,

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 2>with you know, with the physical abuse that was happening

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>at home, and from there as he aged. I think

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>he has spent a period being a personal trainer after

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>high school, and then he inherited a large sum of

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 2>money once his father passed away, and that basically funded

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 2>him to go and travel overseas for quite a few years.

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>And unfortunately, rather than taking inspiration from the the cultures

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and the different people, he became very cynical, and if

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>we look at the various accounts and things that have

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>been covered on the topic, his views were shaped in

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>a very negative manner. It did coincide with while he

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>was in Europe with some Islamic based attacks occurring, so

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>in Islamic most terrorist attacks at the time, and that

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>all sort of seemed to come together along with his

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>strong reliance on online groups in four chan and eight

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>chan and some of these other forums where he was

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>really fueling his beliefs about the world and having those

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 2>reciprocad back to him, and the classic sort of echo

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 2>chamber effects started to happen from there, where the ideology

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>really became perpetuated and continued to get reinforced.

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Out the time. I suppose what he's exposing himself too

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.359
<v Speaker 1>is only going to people people that share the same ideology,

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and that becomes that cycle. Yes, it reinforces his belief Yeah.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think the further down that rabbit hole that

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>you go, the more you find things that support those views.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 2>And you know, we get that the classic distortion aspect

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 2>happen where you look for things that are what you want,

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>you look for things that reinforce your beliefs, and then

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>you ignore anything that's contradictory. And that's what we find

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of ideological aspects is people cherry pick

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 2>what they focus on and they ignore the things that

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 2>are contradictory to that, and that of course can very

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>easily then start to lead to quite extreme beliefs when

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 2>you're only looking at a small fragment of an issue.

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So the build up would you describe as a perfect

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>storm in terms of what the build up before he

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>carried out this horrible act.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, there certainly, I think the cycle, logical makeup, the

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>psychological foundation was a big factor. So he had a

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of vulnerabilities. There clearly a lot of unresolved anger

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>that was never addressed, and then we had the Internet

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 2>peace on top of that, where he's engaging in various ideological,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 2>extreme right wing views that are being perpetuated and fueled.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>He's then quite financially well off as well, which gave

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>him access and capability factors, and then develops the plan

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>or the intent to carry out some sort of violence

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to avenge or seek justice for the injustice which he's

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>perceiving in the world. And then starts to begin planning

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 2>and moves to New Zealand with the intention of carrying

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 2>out a mass casualty attack, And a bit like with

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Anders Bravic in Norway, we see the culmination of factors

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 2>come together, along with the secrecy and the willingness to

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 2>dedicate a couple of years of your life to carrying

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>out such a horrific active violence. I mean that itself

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>is nearly unheard of and so remarkable that someone could

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>be so dedicated over that obsession to give their life

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 2>to that.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there were a number of inquiries that flowed on

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>from the event. Did anything jump out in the part

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>where it could have been I won't say prevented, because

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>as I keep saying that it's easy in hindsight, But

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is there any indicators or ways that it could have

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>been diffused? Do you think how could you approach it

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look back with the benefit of hindsight. Okay,

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>when he got to this point, there should have been

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>some intervention.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's again in hindsight. So there was a Royal

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>commission in New Zealand into Royal Commission of Inquiry into

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the attack and it's a nearly nine hundred page document

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 2>which reviewed it. Now, some of the interesting findings were

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 2>more around systems and processes rather than terror himself, so

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 2>it looked at, you know things. So he had a

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>gunshot wound in the months prior to the attack, and

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 2>at the time there were no mandatory reporting practices for

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 2>gunshot wounds. So that has since changed so that if

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 2>someone presents to hospital with a gunshot wound, that is

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 2>then passed on to police and then followed up. Firearm

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 2>register was something that wasn't strong and that's been completely

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 2>revamped to make access to firearms much more difficult and

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 2>mental health checks and interviews and those sorts of processes.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 2>So again another positive step that has been put in place. Yeah,

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and of course the access to guns has been reduced

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>as well, So some of those capability and incident reporting

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>systems have been improved, been a lot more funding as well.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>That's gone into violent extremism, and I think as well

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 2>that improved police practic and that's not being critical at

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 2>all of the police practices, but unfortunately when we have incidents,

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>of course that reviews, that leads.

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>To change and the improvements. Of course, when when it

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>gets that way not well, I suppose it's the magnitude

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of the crime that he created there required that review

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>lesser type of crimes. But one you and I spoke

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>off camera about it, and you are, you're over here

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to deliver a lecture on it. Stalking.

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Stalking to me is a major concern. What message have

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>you got or what have you learned about stalking people

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that are prepared to stalk? And over here in Australia

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and not just New South Wales, across the across the country,

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot of domestic violence where unfortunately it's

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>male partners invariably murdering female partners. And you look at

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it and I can virtually guarantee they'll be stalking involved

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and not accepting the relationship being over and different things

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. What's your your assessment of stalking?

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh, look, it's so it's so troubling. And one of

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the challenges we're stalking is that it exists on such

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 2>a spectrum from small unwanted acts, repeated contact that's unwanted,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>all the way through to very predatory and concerning behaviors,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, such as breaking into a house and going

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>through a person's underwear drawer and moving things around. So

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it is a type of offending that is so broad,

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>but we need to think about it, I think from

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>a from a couple of different lenses, and one is

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>how persistent is it? And then also how likely is

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>it to become severe and escalating nature. So stalking can

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 2>be very broad in motivation. So sometimes it's targeted because

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of you resentment towards an ex partner. Sometimes it's revenge

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>towards a workplace. Other times it might be because the

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>person's mentally unwell and they are constantly making unwanted contact

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>because of quite a distortion about the person of the targeting.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 2>And then other times it's very predatory and that can

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 2>often end up being quite significant violence or even sexual

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 2>offending towards a person so it's multifaceted and it exists

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>on a spectrum.

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Have you in your work with New Zealand Plece some

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have been involved in stalking cases and how they play

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that You don't have to identify the specific case, but

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>stalking cases are the vscalated. Yeah.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Look as both a consultant forensic psychologist and also working

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>in the police and a lot of the times it's

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>looking at it from a threat lens and how concerned

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 2>do we need to be about the case. And sometimes

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>it's about understanding the motivation and the functionality of the

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>stalking So what is it that the person's trying to

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>achieve here and why is it that they are failing

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>to understand that that behavior is unwanted and not reciprocated.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Often there's an educational component and then sometimes it's looking

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 2>at as well, is this going to persist or is

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 2>this going to escalate with the stalking case. Intimate partner

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 2>violence is another one that we sometimes become very concerned about.

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Often stalking will exist amongst a range of other forms

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of intimate partner violence, particularly coercive control, and we know

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that across cases of fatal intimate partner violence that around

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 2>about seventy five percent of those cases have stalking in them.

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>And often when a partner is killed or an ext

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>partner is killed, it's where there's been a high level

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of coercive control and the victim has tried to regain

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a level of independence and autonomy and that has been

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the final tipping point for the offender and they have

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>killed that person as that sort of final active trying

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to have dominance and control over their lives, which is

0:16:58.080 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 2>really quite horrific.

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, the scary part is a dangerous period is in

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>those domestic violent situations when the partner is trying to leave,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that's when they're at the greatest, greatest risk.

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Yeah, ed is concerning and again education is quite important,

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 2>but the flip side of that is it's hard to

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>have that conversation with people as well, and should people

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 2>really have to be that well educated and informed? You know,

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 2>everyone has a right to safety in many ways, and

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately we still have huge concerns with people willing to

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 2>take matters into their own hands and become violent.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think and I'm talking New South Wales or

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Australia may be relevant to New Zealand whether the courts

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>fully appreciate the nature of it. If someone even the

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>public's perception that's almost a joke, like I've got a

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>stalker and we saw the laugh. Yeah, but I've had

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>so many people contact me when I was in the

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>police as police, but people contact me post police, reaching

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>out and they've got a stalker and no one seems

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to take it seriously and they're terrified. Do you think

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the courts take it and the police take it seriously

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>enough for stalking.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to give a blanket answer to that. But

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>with what you're saying, there are of course many cases

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>where people just go it's unwanted contact, they'll stop, or

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.479
<v Speaker 2>they just dismiss it. And that's where stalking becomes a problem,

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 2>because when we dismiss it, it keeps going, and we

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 2>need to make sure that we're putting the right level

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>of response to a situation. And the temptation is unfortunately

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 2>to water down the seriousness of it, and that of

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 2>course allows it to keep going, and then before you

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 2>know it, it's three months, then it's six months. We've

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 2>hit a year, and that's a really reinforced and ingrained

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>pattern and the person may or the offender may have

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 2>had quite a bit of feedback that this is a

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 2>successful way to keep that person in their life. By

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 2>that stage, well.

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, and this is when I'm giving people advice.

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>If they've got a stalk with if they make contact

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that does end up in court, their concern is that

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>brings this person back into my life. And so the

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>stalkers achieved what they want to achieve. So it's a

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>hard thing to police, but it's something that I've always thought.

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>They were red flags to me when I saw it

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>in any capacity of an investigation. If someone was stalking someone,

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the being told we don't want to speak to you,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>stay away from us, and they ignore that, that is

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a warning sign of I on the right track there,

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it's.

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, yeah. You look at things like approach behavior.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, how much are they prepared to or toward

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 2>extent are they prepared to approach the victim, to be

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 2>intrusive towards the victim? Are they engaging inst surveillance like behaviors,

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 2>are they entering the person's residence, And also factors such

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 2>as mental illness can play a role, personality disorders, and

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>we look at as well, you know, are they deterred

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 2>by things such as court orders. If it keeps going

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 2>after court orders again, that's very troubling.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've had people that the victims of the stalking

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that have come back to me when the courts haven't

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>gone hard on the stalker, the stalker comes back to

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>them just laughing, going, look the courts don't even care

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and empowers them on coercive control. Relatively recently had that

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>start to come into a play, legislation that come into play.

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it actually play out in court, so

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think a big part of it is going to

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be how the police uses as a tool. I think

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a powerful tool. Is coercive control legislative over in

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand? Is that something that's come into play over there?

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not legislated over there yet. And remarkably, we

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 2>don't actually have a stalking law or a stalking chargers yet.

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>So there's been talk that shouldn't say talk, it's probably

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a loose word for that, but there's been political movement

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>that legislation is going to be proposed quite soon and

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 2>then we will have a stalking law, but no coercive control.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 2>Over in Australia, here is a reasonably new charge in

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 2>a couple of states, so it'd be really interesting to

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 2>monitor how that goes. But the research on intimate partner

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>violence has certainly been the big reason that we're seeing

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 2>that law come in because it's been so prevalent but

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>also relevant to fatal cases.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, there's been to many of them in this country,

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. The interview room, Yes, you're working for

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand Police. Is that part of the role that

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you do help investigators prepare for an interview, to sit

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>down in the interview room.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. We've been doing quite a bit of work in

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that space of late over the last two years or so,

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>and it is one of the main things that we're

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 2>doing currently around how do we under stand the person

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 2>in front of us and how do we tailor our

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 2>response to ensure that we're meeting them at their level.

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I look, I find the interview room fascinating.

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>That was that was my happy place in policing. I

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>found it very stimulating to be in the interview room.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>A lot of pressure, a lot of build up and

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>all that, but the way that you approach and the investigation.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw a couple of things out just for a

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>point of discussion I learned from people that I looked

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>up to as interviewers, and I've sort of tried to

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>adopt the aspects of the way they approached the interview.

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But I also learned that you've got to be You've

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>got to be legitimate, like you've got to be yourself

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in the interview room. I've seen people try to I've

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>tried to mimic people the way they interview someone doesn't work.

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I've got to be myself. I've had other people try

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to mimic me the way I interview. It doesn't work.

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's something that you've got to build,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that rapport with someone in the interview room. Would you

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>agree agree with that?

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, spot on. I member poor has become arguably the

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 2>most crucial ingredient in an interview now, and we have

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 2>come a long way. It's hard to talk about what

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 2>current police practices are, but I dare say that across

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Australia and New Zealand there's an improved understanding that rapport

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 2>really is a cornerstone of the interview. So it's very

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 2>hard to have a serious major crime interview without rapport.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 2>We can't just get the person in now and go

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 2>straight into the offending straight into the issues that there's

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 2>got to be a build up to that because we

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 2>can't we can't expect someone to want to talk to

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 2>us if we're not establishing rapport with them.

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with that, and I people have said

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>characteristics of a good detective empathy empathy in the interview

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>room that you're sitting down and trying to understand where

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this person's coming from. It might discuss me where they're

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>coming from. I might agree with it, but I won't

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>show that on my face. That will be very much

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a poker face in what they're telling me, So there's

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>not judgment there to go with people. Again, I'll just

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>throw in some of my thoughts on the interview room

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>because I'm interested in getting getting your thoughts. Some people

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to the interview room and I would be

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>very professional. I'd deliberately present professionally because I thought that

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>was the best way to communicate. Otherwise I'd get in

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there and be very relaxed when we talk about rapport.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the type of thing I'm assessing the person in

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the way that I want to approach. Sarah Ure, the

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>forensic psychologists I work with a talk about the carrot

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or the stick, whether you're dangling something to them that

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they want or they're feeling. And we can't threaten people

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>in an interview room obviously stick figuratively, we don't go

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in there with a stick. What's your thoughts on different

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>approaches for different offenders, Like, there's not a one model

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>fits all, is there?

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 2>No? No, there's not, But I think there's some rules

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>of thumb that do hold up really well with with rapport.

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 2>So firstly, we need to foster commonality. So first principle

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>is if you're going in to interview someone, what is

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 2>it about you that's going to allow you to relate

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 2>to that person? What have you got in common? So

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 2>everyone should be able to find those things. Secondly, wein

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>look at our ability to compliment the person. And I

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 2>think when we say compliments, people think, oh, you know,

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 2>what are you on about? You're just basically trying to

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>praise them unnecessarily. But there's always things when we step

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 2>back and look at someone's life that we can acknowledge

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 2>and validate, and that is quite crucial that we still

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>do that we recognize them as individuals and as small

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 2>as that achievement may be, it may be significant for them,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 2>So where is this scope to compliment and validate that person?

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 2>And then the other one is humor, and that probably

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 2>sounds like it doesn't belong in an interview room. But

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 2>how can we find moments of lightheartednessnst a really heavy

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 2>and serious conversation.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, I get where you're coming from. And that's

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>very much creating that relaxed environment where the conversation will

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>be for flowing. I think the way I approach interviews,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>some people are very specific, word orientated. Listening to your answer,

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what you exactly you said? I know, I've got that's

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>what comes down because the transcripts only reflects what you said.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm interviewing you in an interview room, in

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a tense interview, and this is one where it's not

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a lay down, as you haven't got all the evidence,

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot's going to depend on what the person of

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>interest that you're interviewing talks about. It's about creating that,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>creating that environment where they feel comfortable to talk. But

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching their body language like I might throw something

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit left field, a little bit strange.

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>See how you react, Which way do you lean to

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>within interviewing or is this coming down to I said

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>at the start that it's individual styles.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think of these individual styles and some people

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>naturally have a really good style and some can learn it.

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 2>There's the intrusiveness peace to an interview as well. So

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>when do you become intrusive about the content of that conversation.

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 2>And when I say intrusiveness, what I'm really talking about

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 2>is topics that are uncomfortable and maybe more confronting. So

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 2>you would want to start low and soft and easier

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 2>conversation piece topics in the early stages of the interview,

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and as the rapport develops, then you can become more

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>intrusive because there's a level of trust and respect understanding

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 2>developed between the interviewer and the interview we so you

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 2>can't go in too hot or too intrusive too early,

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 2>because you put yourself on the back foot and you

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 2>risk upsetting the person. So I think with the peace model,

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 2>which is widely used, you know, really in some ways

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 2>it's a bit like a five set tennis match where

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at the cumulative momentum over several hours and

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 2>it's going back and forth, and if you do enough,

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 2>thing's the right way, it tips in your favor.

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of the public's perception is that we've

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>got the right to interview people too, as in you're

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>obliged to answer questions. That's very much not the case,

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so they're well within their rights. I've also found, and

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about the characteristics of the people that

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>would buy into this, that I've sat down with people

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that have an arrogance about them and that's the very

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm going to exploit that, Like, they're dumb to

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sit down and have an interview with me, but they're

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>so arrogant they think they're going to it doesn't have

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to be me outsmart the police. I'm smarter than you,

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they can't resist themselves sitting down having

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>an interview. Do you see that type of personality.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's the tendency of people that believe that they

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>can control the situation and that they can talk their

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 2>way out of it, although they are the smartest person

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 2>in the room and that can sometimes bring them undone.

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>You A case over in New Zealand which has been

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 2>quite public and there's been a Netflix documentary on it

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 2>is Jesse Kimson and the Grace Malayan case and.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Your assessment on that.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's been a lot published and segments of the

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 2>interview that have been publicly put out there of Kimsen

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 2>during his interview, and we certainly saw that he started

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>off very calm and believed that he could talk his

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 2>way out of it during the first interview that ended

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 2>up bringing him undone during the second interview, where a

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of those stories were then able to be corroborated

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and that worked against him in the end. Yeah.

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it is interesting what may devates people to

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>sit down and participate in the interview. What about crime scenes?

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Your interpretation of crime scenes? And I think a discussion

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>initially when you came in here before on camera talking

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>about psychopaths how they can commit a horrendous crime and

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>not be rattled by it than leave. I would see

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>crime scenes where I would call it like a panic

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>crime scene. I don't think the person planned this, that

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>shocked them, that they've killed a person, and the crime

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>scene represents that. What's you're taken? What can you learn

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>from going to a crime scene?

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Crime scenes are so valuable from anyone in the operational spaces.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 2>You nearly need to see the crime scene or at

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 2>least have incredibly good photos of it to be able

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 2>to form any conclusions around it. But look, you look

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 2>for contradictions ultimately in the crime scene, don't you. And

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 2>sometimes chaotic crime scenes are stage crime scenes as well,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and then the absence of things that crime scenes can

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 2>also be very telling. So it's sometimes it's what's not

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>there that's important, and then the disarray as well can

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 2>also be quite telling. So I know that you know,

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 2>FBI would say that you study the work of the artists,

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 2>which is their crime scene, to try and understand them.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 2>But I think the crime scene gives us very good

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 2>insights into one how the crime has occurred, and then

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>why things may or may not be there that should

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 2>be there or have been removed from a scene. So

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 2>it really looks at, you know, three stages before the crime,

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>during the crime, and then after the crime, and that

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 2>can give us valuable information across those three and then

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 2>together you form whether it's a profile or a working

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 2>theory around the offender and how.

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>They breakdown in an example or give examples for those

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>three breakdowns all.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>So we go back to the Jesse Kimson case. So

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>it's been quite well publicized that he met Grace mulane

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 2>and then they went out for dinner, and then they

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 2>went back to his hotel room. Something transpired there which

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 2>resulted in Grace's death. It certainly seems like it was

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 2>probably unlikely that there was any intention to kill her.

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 2>But then when we look at post crime, we see

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that he was very methodical after the offense, and there

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of clean up. There was a lot

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of stages, it's been well documented around him. He moved

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 2>her body, went and buried the body, cleaned the scene,

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and there was quite a calmness in the chaos at

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the time. And that's rather unusual. You know, we think

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 2>about someone trying to recover from a horrific event. There's

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of anxiety and panic and concern. It's unusual

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to be quite methodical and calm.

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Very much so, and that was something I always look

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:56.479
<v Speaker 1>to exploit that mistakes made after that the murders occurred

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>or the crime has occurred. Little things like if a

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>murder weapon has been introduced to the crime soon, if

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>someone's bought, if it's a murder's happened in the house

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's the kitchen knife from the kitchen bench that's

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>been used as a murder weapon. That tells me it

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't intent at the time they're going there, something escalated,

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>something has happened at the time, so not the planning.

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>These are the type of things you look for as

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a forensic psychologist.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, you know, how prepared and planned was someone

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 2>prior to the crime And going back to is there

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 2>evidence of cleanup and have items been taken away from

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the scene, whether it's weapons or belongings of the victim.

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Has the body been moved? If the body is there,

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, is there a quite a bit of forensic

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 2>evidence it still remains. You know, often we think loosely

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 2>as a rule of thumb, you know, the less evidence

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 2>that's at the scene and the more that has been removed.

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about a plan and prepared offender. Go back

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 2>to the classic FBI organized disorganized profile, which looked at

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 2>that the organized fellows tend to come to the scene

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 2>prepared and take things away and leave limited forensic evidence.

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 2>That disorganized Often there's a lot of forensic evidence. Things

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 2>are in disarray. There can be a scrambled a tempt

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 2>to cover the crime up and make it look like

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>something else.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I take a lot away from the way the

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>bodies are disposed of to and you can almost see

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the panic in the way some bodies are disposed of,

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>or you can see the planning and the time. So

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that's all very telling, isn't it.

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so some of them are quite superficially disposed of

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 2>essentially it's the first opportunity, or they're buried very.

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Basically get this body.

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Away from me here, and then others are you know,

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 2>take much longer and much more time.

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Without going into methodology, is this the type of thing

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 1>you sit down with police New Zealand Police like, they'll

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>come to you, there's been a crime, the body has

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>been found, they contact you and this is how you

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>work work with the police.

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, absolutely so. It could be in avariety of stages.

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 2>It could be the homicides just happened and we're trying

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to understand the crime scene and the behavior that's happened

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and insights into the offender. It could be that we're

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 2>four weeks on and things have hit a wall and

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 2>leads have run dry, and will review the crime and

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 2>look at trying to generate new lines of inquiry.

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, we spoke in part one about serial killers or

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the demise of serial killers, which is a pretty good

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>way of saying that that's good that they're reducing that

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>serial sex offenders, but yeah, I've worked serial sex crimes.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Have they reduced serial killing? So the same things that

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>are reducing serial murderers reducing serial sex offenders or is

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it still Yeah?

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 2>The big one would be our intrue to rapists and

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>it is rare for us to get a series of

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 2>those these days. I think that's true across Australia and

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand. We still get lots of touch based offenses

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 2>towards strangers, bus stops, those sorts of public public areas,

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 2>but you know, the rapist that's targeting strangers or going

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 2>in to homes is it's much less common. That doesn't

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 2>mean that they don't happen those offenses, but it's rare

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that they are a series. Now they are often caught

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 2>much quicker, and again that's because of all the improvements

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 2>in technology that we.

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Have and just a sharing of information too. I think

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a big part because before we would often be

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for an offender that's got a certain type of

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 1>characteristic about characteristics about the way he commits a crime.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Someone else in the neighboring lac might be doing the

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>same thing. In the old days, it wasn't a case

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that would be sharing the information, But we've to waken

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>up to that.

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Now and see New Zealand runs by Class which catalogs

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 2>all the stranger sex offenses across the country. So our

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 2>behavioral science unit is keeping a data lot of over

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 2>a decade and more of all the stranger six crimes.

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 2>So if we do have something that comes up, we're

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 2>able to draw on more than eight to nine thousand

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 2>cases and look at what we know about something of

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 2>a similar nature with a similar type of offending pattern.

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 2>And of course if we do get something, we could

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 2>also look back at whether it is linked to any

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 2>other crimes as well.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, again, excuse me from jumping from point to point,

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm finding the whole chat very interesting. Mental health

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>what part does that play? And I've got some stats

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>here that I pulled out of your book, so I'm

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>hoping they're correct that seventeen and fifty percent of loane

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>actors are suffering from a mental illness at the time

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of offending. Two thirds of perpetrators experiencing mental health concerns

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in the period leading up to their attack. So look,

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the specifics of the stats, it's saying that

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>mental health is a big thing in loan actors. What

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 1>type of mental health issues are we looking at them?

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's the catch twenty two, isn't it?

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 2>In many ways of mental health, because again it's on

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 2>a spectrum, and it can be all the way from

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 2>psychotic based presentations where someone has completely lost touch with

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 2>reality and they are unaware and they don't have sound

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 2>mind with what they're doing. And it seems as though

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 2>that is a good example of the bond dijunction with

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 2>attack with Joel Kuchi, that he was schizophrenic for a

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 2>long period of time and psychotic at the time.

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>How much did you know about that particular case.

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's still emerging. I know there was

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the recent inquiry and the results haven't been published, but

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the psychotic aspect and his long term schizophrenic diagnosis seems

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 2>to be quite central.

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's already been mentioned in the public

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and would have been mentioned that the inquest. But the

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>parents had concerns about him with his fascination with knives

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and different things.

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's where where mental health is tricky because

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 2>there are so many people with mental health difficulties or

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 2>mental illness or psychosis or schizophrenia that aren't ever violent,

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 2>So that is quite important to put into context. But

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to add layers to the mental health that

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 2>then add to the potential then to be violent. So yeah,

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 2>the various issues with grievances in life, very very very

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 2>much violent interests or things like that can then be

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 2>exacerbators for the mental illness. But then we can also

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 2>have things like depression that can be a catalyst for

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 2>then developing a grievance and affixation, and that can then

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 2>perpetuate and grow from there. So I think mental health

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 2>can be a causal factor or an indirect factor as well,

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:52.720
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes as well. We also say that there's subclinical

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 2>things that are not really at the diagnostic threshold which

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 2>drive behavior. It might be that someone the struggles with

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 2>shame and envy of others, and it's very likely to

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 2>get quite jealous, and they've got a personality that makes

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 2>them prone to collecting grievances or feeling like they've been wronged,

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 2>and that then walks them down that path to violence.

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>That's sitting here talking to you, I'm getting an appreciation

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.439
<v Speaker 1>of how complicated it is. If you see Sarah you're

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>at the conference, apologize to her. I expected too much

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>from her. There are so many layers and variables, isn't it.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So I can see why you try to structure things

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>as best you can. It's not foolproof, but yeah, here's

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>some indicators. This might be the way we prevent this.

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we need to be careful that as psychologists,

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>we're not always trying to come up with an explanation.

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's over complicated, but loosely, I always go how

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 2>dyed up? Or are the dials for the persons or

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 2>how intense are things? Then we can also think about

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 2>how frequent is the symptoms or the traits, and then

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 2>what's the severity of it as well, So we need

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 2>to look at it through frameworks that make it understandable.

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And a framework makes it as understandable as best you

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>can hope for. Leading into the use of AI, do

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you see that as something that's going to be very

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>much in the forefront of criminal investigation.

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 2>It's hard. I mean, in terms of the mass casualty

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 2>space we've already seen over in the US that people

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 2>have had AI right plans around how to carry out

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a mass casualty attack.

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>For I was thinking from the good guys, you're looking

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>from the bad guys.

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Offender capability enhancement aspect, and we know that that's happening already.

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 2>What it means for police investigations, it's really hard to say.

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 2>It'll make some of them more boring tasks of writing

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:53.359
<v Speaker 2>up things easier, but you know, facial recognition and those

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 2>sorts of things I think will transform as well, So

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to anticipate where it will go.

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking like by class you talk about like if

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you had an AI component of assessing all the information,

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that might make it even more readily about I think.

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 2>The ability to analyze mass amounts of data or information

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 2>will greatly improve, but it will still require the human

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 2>analysts to develop the right meaning and interpretation of that.

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at getting back to and prevention is the

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>key of hopefully what you're achieving. And I've got a

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of headings here, but fixated thread assessments, fixated persons, unit,

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>need for information sharing. So three main points. So if

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about preventing these type of loan actor attacks.

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Breaking down those three headings like fixated threat assessments, how

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>do they play a part? And I know we've touched

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on it, but just breaking it down again.

0:42:56.000 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>So, fixated threat assessments really are police and mental health

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>specialists working together to make decisions about a person of concern,

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and that starts by information coming in about a person

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and then doing a screening judgment to look at, Okay,

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 2>do we need to be concerned about this based on

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the information? Do we need to dig more? We might

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 2>find that once we dig that it is concerning, then

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 2>you would go through the process of doing a more

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 2>rigorous assessment. Then you might look to engage with the

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:32.959
<v Speaker 2>person to understand things further, and then if you're still

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 2>concern then it would be going, okay, let's put some

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 2>wrap around support towards the person, and then you'd monitor,

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 2>you'd review, and if it's still not improving, that might

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 2>be then when there's more targeted responses that could emerge.

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a multi agency, isn't it. It's very much. It's

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not just the police, it's mental health, the health system,

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of things.

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and in this space we've realized that it is

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 2>multi agency that we need to be very careful of

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 2>silos of information being held and locked down and not

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 2>being shared. Man around Monus was probably a good example

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.720
<v Speaker 2>of that. That information needs to flow to the right people,

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 2>and then those reviews and those assessments then need to

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 2>go back to other people in return, so we can't

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 2>be locking down on things. We need to be very

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 2>mindful of gaps in practice where we don't have knowledge

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 2>disconnects between agencies as well, And I'd probably also say

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 2>that a couple of other things around bunkers. So not

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 2>just doing an assessment on someone and going, oh, you know,

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 2>look that low concern. We'll just put the paperwork in

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the file and we're done with that, and two weeks

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:50.720
<v Speaker 2>later there's an incident. So we can't necessarily be reassured

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:53.479
<v Speaker 2>by the fact that we've done an assessment and go okay,

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>we can wash our hands of that. And then the

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 2>last one really is myopia, where we simply lose focus

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 2>because we're looking at this too much, or we're not

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 2>getting an outside perspective, so too much group think, well,

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 2>whatever it might be, where it causes us just to

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 2>not to see that this has changed. And probably I

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 2>think in the lone actor space that the myopia aspect

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 2>is where we may come undone again in the future

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 2>because we're seeing more and more young people now presenting

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 2>with risk factors and concerning behaviors that if someone had

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 2>said that to you a decade ago, you would have

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 2>been horrified and you would have hit the panic button.

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Now that our tolerance.

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>For that we've become desensitizes.

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 2>So you know, people with very violent ideations and purchasing

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>of weapons and engagement in quite extreme goal and extremist

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 2>material that are very young. It's become commonplace is not

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 2>the right word, but in the work that we do,

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a little bit more commonplace now that that is

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 2>the type of person of concerned that you're seeing. And

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 2>the worry then is that we go, Okay, well, we're

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:08.479
<v Speaker 2>so used to that now and we've seen so many

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 2>of them that don't do anything, but we need to

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 2>be very rigorous and understand that that could change and

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>that could escalate.

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I could see people dropping their guard down because we've

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>seen this and there's one hundred people that are like that,

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Why are we worried about this person? But that could

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>be the one person.

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And I think in Australia as well. You know,

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 2>we had a good probably wake up call last last

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 2>year in twenty twenty four. So obviously we had the

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Bondi Junction attack, which was sort of separate in some ways,

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 2>but then there was the good chaper Church. A couple

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 2>of weeks later, there was a young sixteen year old

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 2>over in Western Australia that stabbed someone at Bunnings and

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.400
<v Speaker 2>then was killed by police. And then about six or

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 2>seven weeks later it was either was it Paramatter or Newcastle,

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember. Young person with a go pro tactical

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 2>vest walked in with a couple of knives into politician's

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 2>office and fortunately they didn't go through with the attack.

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know, within that space of two months, that

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:16.760
<v Speaker 2>potentially could have been four very serious mass casualty attacks.

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Young males involved in it too. What there's a reason

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so many young males seem to be the ones that

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>do these things that can be influenced.

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's it is very concerning, and I think there's

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 2>been a lot spoken about men and masculinity and where

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 2>men at at the at the moment, a lot of

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 2>them are searching for identity and their their place in

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:49.760
<v Speaker 2>society and for me, when they are struggling and can't

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 2>find a way to connect, or can't have an intimate relationship,

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 2>or are unsure how to cope with their mental health,

0:47:57.120 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 2>they're not they don't know how to communicate, can take

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 2>a troubling turn. And there's a lot of work I

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 2>think for men to do and to find pro social

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 2>outlets to express their challenges in the right way, because

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 2>it's easy to turn to blame and frustration and also

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 2>believe that you know others are others are responsible for

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 2>what's happening to you, for your shortcomings and difficulties. So

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I think there's so much that we need to be

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:32.240
<v Speaker 2>doing with men to help them improve how they handle

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 2>stresses and problems in their life.

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's in the nature of men that

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they internalize too and not creating an environment where they

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>can express their feelings. And yeah, I think most men

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 1>understand this. If you're going through an issue and your

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 1>mate says how you go, and you say good, and

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that's oh, that's good, mate, I was worried about you.

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you move on from the conversation where if

0:48:55.200 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it's and this is probably been too harsh a comparison,

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and then with females it might be they talk. I

0:49:05.640 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can put my hand up. I know my partners know

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>more about my friendships and life than I do. Like

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>your best mates just had a baby? Did he? Who've

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>told you that? Oh, Susan told me that or something

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. So we need to communicate a little bit better,

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>don't we.

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Males? Unfortunately, they disproportionately make up the statistics for suicide, yeah,

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and disproportionately make up the statistics for violent offenses. Yeah.

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 1>It's not good with the work that you're doing with

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand Police. Can you see down the track where

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:44.919
<v Speaker 1>more attention will be given to the type of work

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that you do, because quite frankly, listening to you talk

0:49:47.920 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 1>about your risk assessments and different things, there is so much.

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Work to do.

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Are we probably? I think policing. Then you don't have

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to comment because you're still employed by police. But I

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>thought we fell behind the forensic science field in that

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with DNA and all that, we didn't have the capability

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of properly examining a crime scene. We didn't properly resource

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it with INTEL. Probably not properly resourced in your field,

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 1>forensic psychology do you think police are starting to understand

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the benefits as a whole.

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I've got very complimentary things to say about

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:21.720
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand place.

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're clever that your employees.

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course they're my employer. But look, I think

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand's running a really good model which is very

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:35.240
<v Speaker 2>positive for bringing expertise in. So they have a fixated

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Threat Assessment Center over there as well, which but that's

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:42.800
<v Speaker 2>purely for politicians, so politicians that are subject to threats

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and being targeted. But we have our Behavioral Science Unit

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 2>which is very much bring specialists in for operational support.

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:53.960
<v Speaker 2>So the model over there is really strong and there's

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 2>a recognition that for major crimes, the input or experts

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 2>or specialists is really one of the tools that we

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:07.759
<v Speaker 2>need to solve in these. In Australia, unfortunately it has

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:10.319
<v Speaker 2>fawned by the way. So we had that, but many

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 2>of the units have closed down.

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Fixated Persons unit that in my experience notoriously under resource,

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but it was something a need that we just didn't

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:23.760
<v Speaker 1>have it. We had intel officers attached to major crime

0:51:23.800 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>squads and that, but we really needed someone with the

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>expertise for specifically fixated persons and being able to assess

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 1>them properly.

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, and I think it will come back again

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 2>because sometimes, as in policing, its money and resources that

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 2>dictate where things go. And look Victoria, New South Wales,

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I think Western Australia, they all had specialist operational psychology

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 2>arms to them. It's only Queensland Police now that still

0:51:55.560 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 2>have it that I'm aware of.

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>How do we go backwards in a progressive field?

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 2>It is, yeah, because I look over in the UK

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 2>they have behavioral investigative advisors over there, so they've got

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:11.320
<v Speaker 2>specialists that are recognized and they've done some great work.

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Over in the Canada, Royal Canadian amount of Police they've

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:19.240
<v Speaker 2>got a specialist behavioral unit as well. It's a mixture

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 2>of psychologists and psychiatrists providing operational support. FBI have four

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:33.000
<v Speaker 2>dedicated units towards bringing specialty expertise in and then you

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 2>look across all the different US states they've got specialized

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 2>threat teams and things. So look, it is the model

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 2>for dealing with challenging and difficult cases in policing.

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And UK and Canada. I've worked in both those eras

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 1>in policing. Inquiries from New South Wales and they're set

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>up very similar to what we've got here in Australia.

0:52:55.920 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand's are same and they're all moving forward with

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:00.479
<v Speaker 1>it and we're moving backwards. Yeah.

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:02.520
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that's interesting with New Zealand is

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:06.320
<v Speaker 2>it is a small place, but there's one police service

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 2>for the country, so it's just one national unit. And

0:53:09.880 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 2>obviously Australia has some of the challenges on a smaller

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 2>scale to the US with the states at the federal level,

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and when it's one unit or one force for the country,

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 2>then you can be a little bit more focused with

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 2>what you're doing.

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And we're not too bad in this country compared to America.

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 1>We had someone I forget who it was, that his

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 1>first assignment as a police officer, there was twelve people

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in the police forces is in America and he had

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy his own gun. But that was I remember

0:53:44.400 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>who it was. It was Steve Murphy from the Netflix

0:53:48.120 --> 0:53:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Nacos series that took down Pablo Escobart and that was

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:56.279
<v Speaker 1>his first star first police force. One of the other

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 1>points and we talked on fixated Persons Unit, the fixated

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>threat assessments, need for information sharing. We talked about within organizations,

0:54:05.680 --> 0:54:09.400
<v Speaker 1>government organizations, law enforcement agencies. But what about the public.

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 1>What part can the public play in the role of

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:14.600
<v Speaker 1>making sure we identify these loan actors?

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's some ways. It's the bystander challenges that we

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 2>have with crime, that people are aware of something happening,

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 2>but for whatever reason, it might be their own self doubt,

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 2>it might be that they minimize it, but they don't

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:34.720
<v Speaker 2>always report really valuable information. And ultimately preventing loan actor

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 2>attacks or mass casualty events is it's about information flowing

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:42.040
<v Speaker 2>from members of the community through to police or that

0:54:42.120 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 2>police are then able to look over it, assess it,

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 2>and make sense of that information. And a lot of

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 2>policing is about information gathering and the public are a

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 2>crucial part of that. So whether it is anything from

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 2>unusual activities such as suddenly being into in firearms or

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:04.200
<v Speaker 2>trying to collect knives, and also at the same time,

0:55:04.239 --> 0:55:06.760
<v Speaker 2>they might be saying that they're very angry with someone

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 2>or they've got a particular problem with this person or

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 2>an organization, all the way through to knowing maybe that

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:19.319
<v Speaker 2>your child is viewing some problematic and unhealthy content. So

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 2>may not be always going to the police, But of

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 2>course it's important that that information is shared with someone

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 2>it might be a school counselor, but sharing the information

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 2>so that it's not siloed and not pocketed and allowing

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:35.279
<v Speaker 2>some other eyeballs to get across that to make more

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 2>informed judgments about that, and then if it needs to

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 2>be escalated and passed on, then hopefully it does get

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 2>to the police.

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, we do need to share that because quite often

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 1>when you hear of an incident and men, yeah, the

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:50.520
<v Speaker 1>media have done their a bit and everyone's talking about, oh,

0:55:50.560 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that person was always strange, it was strange ever since

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that he went to kindergarten. All these people come out

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and identify with that. That's the type of information that

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going who has got to get across absolutely because

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it's sharing that information. We touched on the media and

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the copycat type situation and also about the media giving

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>too high a profile to the people that carry out

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:20.719
<v Speaker 1>these crimes. I've thought for a long time, and it's

0:56:20.760 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 1>hard because there's an inquiry in mind. People want to

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 1>find out and there's a benefit by putting the name

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:29.239
<v Speaker 1>out because if it's someone man Mimus, other people might

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:31.440
<v Speaker 1>come forward and say, well he did this and did that,

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so you find out more information about it, but you

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:36.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want them to be put up there on a pedestal.

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:40.000
<v Speaker 1>What way do you think the media should treat someone

0:56:40.120 --> 0:56:41.919
<v Speaker 1>like what happened in christ Church.

0:56:42.840 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I think uniform policies would be ideal.

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>So they're not competing against each other.

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Especially across the trans Tasmin. I think we could get

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:55.319
<v Speaker 2>uniform policies that would be achievable. Where we need to

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:59.399
<v Speaker 2>make a decision around what we will and won't publish. Now,

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:04.160
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand made a really interesting decision to not publish

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Terrence's name was he is and will be forever known

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:11.240
<v Speaker 2>as the terrorist, so he wasn't named in New Zealand.

0:57:11.239 --> 0:57:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Obviously it's very different within Australia. But that certainly I

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 2>think took the sting out of it and the power

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 2>of his actions and that he didn't receive the notoriety

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 2>and it was very much victim lens focus and that

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 2>is important the narratives and the survival stories of victims

0:57:32.400 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 2>is it's probably what we want to come out of

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 2>these attacks rather than it being about the perpetrator. Now

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 2>that's chicky because talking about the perpetrator does as you say,

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:47.280
<v Speaker 2>serve some purposes where there's an understanding that we do

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 2>need and it generates more information. But we don't want

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 2>to sensationalize that. And that's a tricky point. But I

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 2>think if we make it heavily victim focused, with basic

0:57:59.360 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 2>details about the person rather than writing at length about

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:08.080
<v Speaker 2>their motivations or their ideology, then that's a nice balance.

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Point we might finish up here. I reckon we could

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:15.280
<v Speaker 1>talk all day. I just you're a wealth of knowledge

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and you've taken me back into a world that make

0:58:18.760 --> 0:58:22.919
<v Speaker 1>me appreciate how complicated it is what you're doing. You're

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:25.720
<v Speaker 1>over here in Australia. Are you talking at some conferences?

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm at the New South Wales Correction Conference which

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 2>is on and also we're also running a stalking symposium

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 2>with a host of guests in Melbourne as well.

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, you work with corrective services. I haven't really touched

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:43.920
<v Speaker 1>on that. But what can you learn from people in prison?

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh? An enormous amount. I mean, we have individuals that

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 2>are there for lengthy stints in custody and there's always

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the temptation to go, let's just lock them up, forget

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 2>about them and not go and talk to them. And

0:58:58.960 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 2>by talking to them and in engaging with them, first

0:59:01.680 --> 0:59:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of all, we gain a rich amount of insight from

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 2>their stories and their motivations and their reasons and their

0:59:10.880 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 2>pathways to carrying out their active violence. We think can

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 2>then improve our responses by learning about that. Now, the

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 2>other side, of course, is rehabilitating them as well. Do

0:59:22.040 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 2>we want to put the time and resources into them?

0:59:24.640 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's somewhat negligent if we don't go

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 2>through the process of at least trying, and certainly in

0:59:30.720 --> 0:59:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the lone active space, we've seen where some things have

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 2>gone wrong for various reasons, that people have been held

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 2>on remand for long periods and they haven't had treatment,

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and then they've come out and they've committed a mass attack.

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:47.439
<v Speaker 2>So that's a whole different landscape. But probably my key

0:59:47.480 --> 0:59:50.560
<v Speaker 2>takeaway is that we shouldn't just lock people up and

0:59:50.560 --> 0:59:53.960
<v Speaker 2>forget that they're there. There's a lot of value for

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 2>various reasons to engage with them.

0:59:57.520 --> 1:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. Can we do radicalized people like young people?

1:00:02.760 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't have to be age based, but can you

1:00:06.080 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>deradicalize someone with the proper proper work.

1:00:08.920 --> 1:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>You think de radicalization is an interesting one. It's topical

1:00:14.000 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 2>and controversial. The UK has probably had the most challenging

1:00:22.240 --> 1:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>implications of that. So there was big efforts to deradicalize

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:27.520
<v Speaker 2>people in the UK and a lot of the de

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 2>radicalization programs were emerged from there and they made their

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 2>way over to Australia and New Zealand and we've kind

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of learned that de radicalization programs don't work right. But

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:41.840
<v Speaker 2>part of that is they were brought out during a

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>time when it was all Islamic inspired violence or Gihardi

1:00:45.240 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>inspired violence. A couple of years later it had evolved

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and then it was right wing violence, and then it

1:00:51.120 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>was grievance based violence. So the fundamentals of a lot

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of the de radicalization process assume that it was just

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>ideology that was causing violence, when actually maybe ideology was

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:06.440
<v Speaker 2>only the top layer of the problem and it didn't

1:01:06.520 --> 1:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>get to the core reasons that the person was becoming violent.

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think we need to take a few steps

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 2>back and ask the questions of really around you know,

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>why was violence a solution for this person? How did

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>they start on the pathway to violence? So try and

1:01:22.480 --> 1:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>get to some of the core things rather than going okay,

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:30.360
<v Speaker 2>they just need to deradicalize and change these unhealthy and

1:01:30.400 --> 1:01:31.440
<v Speaker 2>problematic beliefs.

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, you haven't disappointed me, because like every psychologist I

1:01:38.160 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>speak to, there's always an if or but or maybe

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, that's I bring it back to Sarah. She

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>would always yeah, that might be the case, but it

1:01:48.080 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>could be this, and just can you give me a

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>yes or not? No, I can't give you a yes

1:01:51.520 --> 1:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>or note. But I like the way you mind thinks

1:01:54.880 --> 1:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and the work you're doing, and I think it's important work.

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And I thank you so much for taking time out

1:02:01.440 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of your busy schedule to come into the studio and

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to us today. And I thoroughly recommend your book

1:02:07.240 --> 1:02:11.439
<v Speaker 1>mass Casually The Rise of Loan Actors so interesting. Really,

1:02:11.480 --> 1:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>where can people get it if they want it?

1:02:13.080 --> 1:02:17.000
<v Speaker 2>So? It's available obviously on Amazon and online bookstores. It'll

1:02:17.040 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 2>be Barnes and Noble overseas and shortly in bookstores here

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and also on the publisher's website, Groundproof Forensics dot com.

1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Very good if people want to get in contact with you,

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have to answer this because you might

1:02:33.040 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>get inundated, But if people wanted to reach out to

1:02:36.040 --> 1:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>how could they reach out?

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>There? So I do private consulting works so doctor Nathan

1:02:40.800 --> 1:02:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Brooks dot com as well.

1:02:42.840 --> 1:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, thanks very much for coming on. I've enjoyed the chat.

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me Gary. Cheers