WEBVTT - Sharri | 1 July

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News. This is Shari.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the program. Caleb Bond in

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 2>for Sharry Marson all week, and congratulations to my colleague

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 2>James McPherson, who has just got engaged. He what's coming

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>up on the program tonight. The case against the Racial

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Discrimination Act. Today's judgment won't stop anti Semitism, but it

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>does expose some hard truths that we need to face.

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>My thoughts on this in just a moment. Plus, the

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 2>list of critics against Albanese's controversial supertax grows, with ACTU

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 2>boss Sally McManus slamming it today or in. Hogan will

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 2>be on to discuss later. And a new study suggests

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>that margarant mothers are more likely to give birth to

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 2>sons rather than daughters. A demographer will be on to

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>explain the impacts of this further on Now. The case

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 2>against Muslim preacher Wisdom Hadad. I'm sure you've seen. The

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Federal court today found that he breached section eighteen C

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>of the Racial Discrimination Act in the number of sermons

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>that were also posted online. Now, look, I don't think

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>that eighteen C should exist. I think it's a handbreak

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>on free speech. And that it has on many occasions

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 2>been weaponized against genuine debate in this country, just as

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>it was against our colleague here at Sky News, Andrew Bolt,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>fourteen years ago. I think it was ridiculous that Pauline

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Hanson was found to have breached the law when she

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>told Green Senator Marine Ferruki to pack her bags and

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 2>pisce off back to Pakistan. Other successful cases include a

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>counselor who made a joke about shooting Aboriginal people, one

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>against the Victorian government for referring to the Macedonian language

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the wrong way, and now did broadcast to Howard Satler

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>God Rest his Soul, who allowed callers to make jokes

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>about Aboriginal people and a sacred site. Now, any right

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>thinking person, including me, would find that kind of stuff

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to be offensive, insulting, humiliating or potentially intimidating, which is

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>what eighteen C covers. But my point is that it's

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>not the law's job to stop people from being racist,

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and it never will stop people from being racist, because

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 2>even if they stop staying stuff openly, they'll still say

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 2>it privately, and their garbage will simply go underground to

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 2>places where it's harder to detect. So I want to

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>make it clear I've always been opposed to eighteen C.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I still am opposed to eighteen C. And that doesn't

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>change because in this case, I'm more sympathetic to those

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>who took on an Islamic preacher. Having said that, I

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>understand why the Executive Council of Australian Jury ran this

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 2>case against Hadad, first because the law is available to them,

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 2>and second because things were said, in my view that

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 2>could incite violence or at least justified violence at some

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 2>point in time against Jews. Now, clearly the criminal law

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>as it stands doesn't agree with me on that, and

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Jewish Australians were sick of watching ramp and antisemitism go

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 2>on unchecked, so they launched this case. It got to

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the point where the criminal law hadn't dealt with anything,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 2>so they took the civil options that were available to them. Now,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>much of what Hadad said in his sermons business about

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Jews being descendants of pigs and apes, etc. Was found

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 2>to be wrong in theological fact. And I've read these

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 2>particular texts myself, and that is right. The Quran doesn't

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 2>refer to Jews in general as descendants of pigs and apes,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 2>but refers to particular Jews who were cursed by Allah

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and literally turned into apes. Most of the rest of

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>it this case I'm talking about, focused on age old

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anti Semitic tropes. But I would point out some interesting

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>parts from this judgment from the Federal court. One is

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 2>that the idea that Islam is not critical of Jews

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 2>as people, but.

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 3>The expert witnesses on Islamic theology from both sides agree

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 3>that neither the Qur'an nor the Hadith teach that Jews

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 3>have an inherent negative quality as a people. Ibrahim, the

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 3>respondents expert said that is does not encourage hatred towards Jews.

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I was not called on to decide whether religious belief

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>can ever be a justification for propagating racist, bigotry and hate.

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Now that may will be true, But I would then

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>ask the question, why does some Muslims, not all, but

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>certainly some seem to hate Jews. I mean, maybe their

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>texts don't specifically command them to hate Jews, but I

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 2>don't think you could argue that long historical conflicts between

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Jews and Muslims, including the one currently going on between

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Israel and Gaza, have been ethno religious And even with

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the judgment today, will it's stop anti semitism? I don't

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>think so. The law cannot retrospectively change people's beliefs. It

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 2>won't stop people from being racist, even if there are

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>some restrictions on what they can say in public. In fact,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a pretty good body of evidence to suggest that

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.119
<v Speaker 2>the more you tell people not to do or think things,

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 2>particularly where religion is involved, the more they dig their heat.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 4>And you have to.

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Consider how we got to this point. I said this

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 2>on air in February. We all know there are racist

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>people in the world, but even most people who are

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 2>racist don't feel comfortable talking publicly about how they really

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 2>feel because they fear the consequences of their speech. These

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>two clearly didn't fear the consequences of their speech. They

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't think they were doing anything wrong. And if you

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 2>look around the country its synagogue's being firebombed and vandalized,

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and homes being attacked, and a federal government that's tiptoed

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 2>around the issue for more than a year, that it's

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>not hard to understand how they might come to that conclusion.

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let's be clear, anti Semitism is not new.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 2>It has existed for a long time, and we've probably

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 2>imported more of it into this country. I'll get to

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>that in the moment. But a lot of anti Semites

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 2>or people with anti Semitic undertones who previously wouldn't have

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>said anything, now feel like they can because they think

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>their strength in numbers, and that's how you end up

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 2>with cases like Hadad. He may well have thought and

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 2>even been preaching stuff like this for a long time,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>but in the context of how things have gone in

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 2>the past couple of years, he felt comfortable not only

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 2>to preach that stuff at the Al Madina Duar Center,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 2>but to post it online. And Hadad has ten thousand

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>followers on Instagram, so he has a reasonable following. What

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>was dealt with today, of course, is the least of

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>our worries. Hadad and the Al Madeen Duar Center have

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 2>been accused of radicalizing young people.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 4>A todd Ez, you'll think you are in an Isol

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 4>camp in Syria or in Irak. The materials of ISOL videos,

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 4>the songs of Isols. They are aware about all this information.

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 5>The leader of the center, with some Hadad also known

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 5>as Abu Said, is a notorious hate preacher.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Are you suggesting he radicalized them. Yes, they became extremist

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 4>after they attended and Medina Dawa Centaur and been and

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 4>have been exposed to the speech and the listeners.

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>And sure Hadad has been dealt with in court today

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>for his preachings, But what about all the people who

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 2>go to his Islamic center. How many other people might

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>be preaching these sorts of things in Australia that we

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know about Islamic preachings such as this is incompatible

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>with Australian culture and values in our way of life.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 2>And I accept that the court today was dealing specifically

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>with Hadad and his preachings and his interpretations of Islam.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>But I ask this, where was the Australian National Imam's

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Council today? Did they condemn her Dad? No, they said nothing.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils said nothing today. The

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Lebanese Muslim Association so said nothing today. All of those

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>organizations have previously been given the opportunity to condemn the

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 2>preachings of Hadad and they have refused to do so.

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 2>The biggest Islamic representative bodies in this country will not

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>condemn the hate preaching of Hadad even after he's lost

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 2>in court. What does that tell you? Hadad even described

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>during the court case how shakh Shady Alissamaine, the president

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of the National m M's Council, was the man who

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>took him under his wing. He told the court shake

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Shady taught me through Islamic scripture and lessons that the

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 2>life I was living was spiritually wrong and that the

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 2>people I was affiliating myself with were not living in

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>accordance with the origins of Islam. Now I've extended the

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to the National Imam's Council to come on the

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>show and condemn Hadad or explain why they think he

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be condemned, and I hope they take it up.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>My door is open. We'll see tonight. And consider that

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 2>the Almadina Duas Center is in Bankstown. This is an

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>area where the top ancestry is Lebanese sixteen point eight

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 2>percent of the population compared to two point two percent

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>of the New South Wales population. Nearly two thirds of

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the population have two parents born Overseas sixty two point

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 2>nine percent. Less than a fifth have two parents born

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. The top religion is Islam twenty five point

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>six percent of the population, compared to four point three

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>percent of New South Wales. The top language spoken at

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>home other than English is Arabic twenty one point two

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>percent compared to two point eight percent of New South Wales. Now,

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that every Muslim or every Arab who

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 2>lives in Bankstown would agree with what Hadad has said,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 2>but I am saying we should be very careful about

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 2>importing cultures, people from cultures and religions who may sometimes

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 2>hold extremist views that are anathema to ours, and then

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 2>allowing them to flourish. When you have extremeistviews and tell

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 2>people they're free to express them here, then you end

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 2>up with division and disharmony. And that's how this ended

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>up in court. Well onto some of the other news

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>of the day. It was a busy morning for the

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister. He was on a media blitz and he

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 2>spent most of it defending his inability to snag a

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 2>meeting with Trump. Do you expect Pennywong to get you

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>a meeting with Trump while she's at the quad?

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 6>Wong's meeting is with foreign ministers. I expect her to

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 6>have a meeting with her co foreign ministers.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 7>The President was actually elected last November. You've had plenty

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 7>of time before our own election to actually visit him.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 7>Are you now looking at this and thinking it was

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 7>a mistake to leave it this late?

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>No? A little bit embarrassing, hasn't that pretty simple question?

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 4>When are you going to meet the Donald?

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 8>Look?

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 6>Where we'll meet when we meet in coming months. But

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 6>my priority has been on delivering for Australian.

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in my panel now, Former Liberal Senator Holly Hughes.

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel free? Holy? Today is the first day

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 2>outside of It's.

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 9>Really quite liberating. Where else would I want to be?

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 10>I'm here with you and with me later on.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>On the Late Debate, and of course is always on

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 2>a Tuesday form of Speaker of the House. Bronwin Bishop,

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 2>you escaped Parliament to quite some time ago, so you

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 2>must be feeling nice and.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 8>Relaxed, having spent thirty years there.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I think you would you have you would do for

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>a break this business with Paul Keating getting involved in

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 2>the supertax. You know that the architects only of course,

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 2>of compulsory superannuation and the Prime Minister's sort of dancing

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 2>around some of that stuff that the Trump stuff will

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 2>get to in a minute. But he couldn't answer straight

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 2>this morning what he felt about Keating's intervention.

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 9>No, and I think that was just the warm art

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 9>cat for Paul Keating. I think he's going to have

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 9>plenty more to say, as Paul Keating is wont to do.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 9>But I think it's interesting as well that saliment Manis

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 9>has now come out as well. So when you've got

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.239
<v Speaker 9>the head of the Unions, the architect of this superannuation

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 9>scheme in its entirety, condemning a labor government over its

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 9>plans and how unfair it is going to be, particularly

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 9>on younger Australians, and this government is so arrogant that

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 9>they're refusing to budge in any shape or form. I

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 9>think says an awful lot about them.

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, I'll talk to Warren Hogan about a bit more

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 2>about that later on the Trump stuff from one, I mean,

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 2>he was basically saying this morning, Ah, you know, there'll

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 2>be a meeting at some point, we'll get around to it.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't even seem to be interested.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 8>He's not, And to send Penny Wong there, she may

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 8>as well continue her journey and go to Beijing, because

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 8>basically what is happening is that under Alberanzi, a capital

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 8>s socialist, capital s socialist, he is moving us away

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 8>from our traditional alliance where we are totally dependent. At

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 8>the moment where he pretends to spend money on defense

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 8>and lies about it, he listens to Beijing when they say,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 8>don't spend any more money on defense. We like it

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 8>the way it is. That's the way he wants it.

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 8>So we are in a very difficult position. He stands

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 8>there and we can laugh and say, oh, how ridiculous

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 8>he looks, how tongue tied, how stupid he looks. But

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 8>really it's far more serious than that. Our alliance has

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 8>been in solid shape for decades. We have been comrades

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 8>at arms, we have fought and bled together through wars.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 8>And yet this man, with his arrogance and his lies

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 8>and his socialist tendencies, wants to take away our freedoms

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 8>and we'll see this country a vassal state where we

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 8>pay homage. He has reduced this country to being just

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 8>a farm and a mine. We are the lowest manufacturing

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 8>nation in the OECD, and that is all because of

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 8>this man's policies. They are socialist policies and they are

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 8>destroying US.

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you mention Penny Wong in the US. She's just

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 2>gone off to Washington to meet with Kevin Rudd and

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>of course do the Quad all the foreign ministers. I mean,

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, she's taking happy snaps there with Rada. I'm

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>sure that makes her feel good. But as you point out, Bronwin,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, we are at one of the lowest points

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 2>we've probably ever had with the United States. So if

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Wong doesn't come home Holly with a meeting wind up

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 2>for alban Easy with Donald Trump, there was no point

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 2>of her going right, or.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 9>A tariff exemption, something else that could be discussed.

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 2>That's She's in the room with Marco Rubio, look, and.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 9>He has a very close relationship with Trump. And I

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 9>can't imagine Penny is going to do anything to further

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 9>and dear herself to the Americans, particularly with her very

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 9>weak stance and what's happened in Israel, what her performance

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 9>at the UN has been like, and what Australia has

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 9>voted in against the US there as well. I mean,

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 9>she is not in a position to go and demand anything.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 9>And I think think it's just a continuation. Bromwin is

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 9>one hundred percent right, but it's getting It's embarrassing, but

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 9>it's dangerous, incredibly dangerous. From a geographic perspective, we are

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 9>so isolated from the rest of the world, but strategically we're.

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 10>Very important for the US.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 9>Yet they are more fixated on focusing on China and

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 9>the relationship with China, and if they don't increase the

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 9>defense spending or they don't make some serious overtures in

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 9>that area. Again, to Bromin's point, it's just proof that

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 9>the Chinese ambassadors op ed was really their new white

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 9>paper for the defense.

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, in all your years in public life, Bronwin, did

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 2>you ever think we would get to a point like this?

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 8>No, I didn't. Then I never thought Albanese would ever

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 8>be leader and elected. I just feel that we are

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 8>we are rudderless with this.

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:56.479
<v Speaker 9>Unfortunately we're not ruddless. We've got run in throwing our relationship.

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 10>If only we were.

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 8>Ruddless, what a three albanezy wog and rug and you

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 8>expect to have a good relationship with the presidents in

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 8>the United States. Look, it is, as I said, it

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 8>is a far more serious matter than it is being taken.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 8>People laugh and say, oh, he's running around trying to

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 8>get a meeting and roadway and talk to him.

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 5>And it's far.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 8>More serious than that. And I want to hear the

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 8>opposition come out loudly and bulkling on this issue too,

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 8>because it is vital and the American people and the

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 8>President needs to know that there is a strong commitment

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 8>to our alliance, that the Australian people do want to

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 8>continue this strong alliance. And if there's no leadership being

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 8>given anywhere, then it starts to fall apart.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a very good point to quickly. Have had a

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 2>bit of good news meet in Livestock Australia, the representative

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 2>body for the red meat industry. They've dumped their net

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>zero by twenty thirty gold because cattle farmer is a

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 2>sick of being blamed for climate change because the cows

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 2>built and built elch and fart too much, and so

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 2>they've said we're doing away with a thirty seconds each. Holly, Finally,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 2>some common sense hasn't got People are starting to come

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>bring on.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 9>The ribbi And luckily for you, Caleber almost mastered the

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 9>burnet sauce. So next dinner party will be a cracker

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 9>full of redmade test. It's so sensible.

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 10>If only the.

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 9>Liberal Party could get itself together and start to look

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 9>at doing the same sort of thing.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is exactly the point. Right while they're going,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 2>oh will we won't will you? I mean they still

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 2>don't have any real policy agenda. You've got other people

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 2>saying look knit to it doesn't work, We're going to

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 2>walk away from it. Even Tony Blair says it.

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 8>For evens say Australia is so far behind when it

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 8>comes to these issues. The rest of the world is

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 8>walking away from the idiocy of this global warming religion,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 8>and yet we are still committed. Although I see mister

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 8>Bowman is now having to go back on these words

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 8>and say, oh we need guests after all, isn't it amazing?

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 8>So suddenly the Narrowboro guess was might take off. But

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 8>the whole point of it is is that we take

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 8>up technology quickly in this country somebody else's technology, but

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to making our own policy decisions and

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 8>our own stance. By saying we are the richest blessed

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 8>country with energy in the world and it is the

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 8>only competitive edch we have, the only one and we're

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 8>sending our own firms broke because of it. This then, seriously,

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 8>we have just got to say we're going to use

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 8>our own resources. And with regard to twenty fifty and

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 8>net zero, I'm going home to have a good steak.

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Heah here. I hope I'll be doing the same when

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I leave tonight too, probably with a nice bottle of red.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I think Ron within Bishop Holly Hughes will see you

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 2>again at ten pm hear me on the late debate.

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to both of you. Now, if you're in

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Sydney on New South Wales, you don't need me to

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 2>tell you. It's been cold and rainy today. But we've

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 2>apparently been hit by a bond cyclone which all sounds

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>a bit violent, but torrential run and damaging winds have

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 2>puneled parts of the steak. The latest details and warnings.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm joined now by reporter Crystal Wu who's in Woollongong Crystal.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Where has been affected today by this low precious system?

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 2>What sort of rainfalls have we.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 11>Seen right along the coast, Caleb, It's affected the central

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 11>coast and right down here in Wollongong Jervis Bay, about

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 11>three hours south of Sydney saw more than two hundred

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 11>millimes of rain, but the SES has issued four emergency

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 11>warnings to the Central Coast due to a coastal erosion.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 11>So many people who live near the beach have been

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 11>told to evacuate. We saw massive swells along multiple beaches today.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 11>Sydney also impacted by these. Travelers have been their flights

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 11>have been delayed. They're feeling very frustrated. We know twenty

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 11>two flights coming out of Sydney domestically have been canceled.

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 11>Thirty two coming in have also been canceled. This strong

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 11>destructive winds have also damaged power lines. So there was

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 11>a gum tree that fell down on a power line

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 11>north of Sydney earlier today that created power outages across

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 11>hundreds of homes.

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 2>Here in Wollongong.

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 11>It hasn't stopped raining since last night. I can feel

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 11>damaging winds expected to continue right throughout the night.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 2>What should we expect for the rest of the week.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Have we seen the worst of it yet?

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 11>We haven't yet, Caleb. We've seen around fifty to one

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.719
<v Speaker 11>hundred and fifty millimeters of rain across parts of the States.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 11>Some isolated areas could see up to two hundred millimeters

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 11>of rain, strong wind gusts, as you can properly see

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.479
<v Speaker 11>behind me, big droplets of rain, wind gusts of up

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 11>to one hundred and twenty five kilometers an hour. And

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 11>this is all due to a low pressure system forming

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 11>along the coast. It is expected to remain active until Thursday.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 11>So until then, Caleb, residents have been told to stay

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 11>at home and avoid driving through floodwaters.

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 2>That's really important, Caleb, Crystal, thank you for your time.

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>As my grandmother always says, as long as you're not

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 2>in the firing line for any damage, good for the garden.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 12>Now.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I talked last night about Paul Keating's first public intervention

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 2>over Labour's super Text, because he pointed out that the

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 2>average worker will now be on the road to three

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 2>million dollars in super and there was more this morning,

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 2>this time ACTU boss Sally McManus, who agrees that the

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 2>unrealized capital gains tax should be indexed over time.

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 13>I do think it's got to be indexed, and because

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 13>you've got to make sure eventually people don't end up there,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 13>but that's a very long time in the future. I

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 13>think that asking you know, those people not to get

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 13>you know, Super isn't there to be a tax fraud.

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 13>It's there to make sure you've got a dignified retirement.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 2>The PM was asked about Keating's veiled message this morning.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 2>This was his lily livid response.

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 6>Well, there's are very modest changes discussed where we are right,

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 6>we are right. Well, good on you. You stay on Paul.

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 6>I'll stay on superannuation.

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Because he's wrong.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 6>No, I'm talking about superannuation.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 2>With me now, as Judo Bank chief economist Warren Hogan,

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Warren welcome. It's a pretty weak response from the Prime Minister.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 2>He's been called out by the man who was the

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 2>architect of this system. He can see that his legacy

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 2>may well be destroyed here. But it's about more than

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 2>just Paul Keating's legacy. He designed this for a reason.

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>He's watching it be destroyed by his own party.

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think taylb there's a little bit of

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>necessity to this. Super isn't delivering what was promised thirty

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>odd years ago. It's proving to be a lot more

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive than we thought. It's cost as well above what

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the pension would have been, and that of course is

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>what it was there to help sort of offset from

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this aging population we've got. And of course the real

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>issue for the government and why they're doing this is

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it you know, they need money. They're spending is obviously

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>growing rapidly, both in just growth terms as well as

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a share of the economy, and of course the tax

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>burden is increasingly being borne by everyday Australian's income tax payers,

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and they need to find other sources of income or

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>even take some pressure off other income payers. So this

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is a necessity, partly because the system isn't turning out

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as expected, and partly because the government's spending and they

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>need more taxation revenue. So the issue of indexation is critical.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Though it's a moral issue in my view, particularly in

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>relation to a new tax, because as we've just seen

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in the last three years, inflation is hard to predict,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course that's when you don't index it, that's

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going to determine the actual tax burden for future Australians.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>But when you do indexit, at least people have a

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sense of what they're going to have to pay because

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they can see or have visibility of how the tax

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>will go up and in line with their income and

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>inflation broadly is the idea. So there's a lot to this.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>It's important, but of course there's the government sticking to

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>its guns. It's not a good tax.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is the argument of Keating and to some

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>degree Sally McManus as well, that if you don't index

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 2>that three million dollars, which is of course what the

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 2>government wants, Greens want two million, and of course they

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>have absolute balance of power in the Senate now, so

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 2>we'll keep an eye on that. But if you don't

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 2>index that number, you risk eventually superannuation becoming something only

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>for low to middle income earners. And if you get

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>to that point, you might start to lose some political

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>support for superannuation, which could eventually lead to the destruction

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 2>of compulsory superannuation, which would hurt the balances of those small,

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 2>low to middle income owners.

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think really what you're alluding to there

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>is that these changes, because they're the first substantial changes

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to the tax benefit or the tax rate, are really

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>opening Pandora's box on this. If my judgment is right,

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the tax or this supersystem isn't turning out as as

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>promised or as expected thirty years ago, then of course,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>once you open Pandora's box, it's going to be at

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the whim of the sort of political wins of the day,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and who knows. And of course what we've got to

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not forget and all of this is that this is

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>one particular part of our economic life, that is saving

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for retirement, that is super sensitive to our expectations of

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the long term. You want as much certainty as possible

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>for Australians to understand what they need to do now

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to get to a point in the future. And of

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>course indexation is just one component of it. But of

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>course chopping and changing the policy at the whim of

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>any given parliament means that people just give up on

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of certainty, and that will just make

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Australian save more now. And whether or not that's deemed

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a good thing or not, we do know that that

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>means that there'll be less money going into spending in

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, and of course today is the beginning of the

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 2>new financial years, so that means a raft of new

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 2>policies introduced by state and federal governments have come into effect.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>And I suppose the key change is to note are

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the minimum wage that's gone up three and a half

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 2>percent to twenty four bucks and ninety five cents an hour,

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 2>and the superannuation guarantee has gone from eleven and a

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 2>half to twelve percent, which is what prompted Paul Keating

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to come out yesterday. But because none of this stuff

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>happens in a vacuum, there will be ripple effects. We've

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 2>had concerns, of course about inflation. What kind of difference

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 2>will this make?

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I think the problem for me, or the

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>problem this presents, is you're going to be putting more

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>pressure on business costs, and that is the crunch point

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in the economy right now. So the three and a

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>half wages from the Fair Work Commission, and if that's

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>what's happening more broadly, that's not too bad. But in

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the context of very little productivity growth, if not productivity

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>going backwards, that's meaning the cost for business of labor

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is actually higher than that, and then the souper is

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>just another cost of business bear. And of course what

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the last year is the business costs

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have not fallen much. They're still running around five percent

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>or higher. But of course inflations come down at the

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>expense of business. Margins. That is, business haven't been able

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to pass on these costs. So the question is are

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>these increased costs for business in the form of higher

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>wages and super going to be able to be passed on?

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And if the answer is no, that's going to hurt

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>business profitability and eventually investment and therefore our future. Or

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the answer is yes, and therefore inflation is probably going

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to stop falling and start picking up again, and the

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>RBA will have a thing or two to think about there.

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know, this is a critical junction for the

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Australian economy and these costs are going to hit businesses

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're the ones who are under pressure right now.

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, and of course when businesses go backward, so do's employment.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Warren Hogan, thank you for joining me. Still to come,

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 2>David Adler will join me to discuss the hate preacher

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 2>who today was found guilty of breaching racial discrimination laws.

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 2>That soon, but first the News South Wales tobacco wars,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the Daily Telegraphs James Willis knows more about them than

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 2>anyone else I know. He'll join me on the Dickson

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>at the desk. Sorry next now you know as well

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 2>as I that elicit tobacco's a scourge across the country

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 2>thanks to the ridiculously high cigarette tax, and so the

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>states are scrambling to do something about all these shops

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>popping up, and I feel sorry for them. I mean,

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 2>the Fed's created this problem. Of course, the states are

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 2>responsible for police and the like. So in New South

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Wales the opposition has proposed rules to shut down dodgy

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>shops for a month and give landlords the right to

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>evict them. The Premier, Chris Min's told to gb yesterday

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 2>he was open to tougher penalties.

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 12>I had to think about it overnight and I think

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 12>she makes some really good points and we'd be silly

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 12>to just reject an idea because it comes from the opposition.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 12>You'd also know, Ben I would have prefer to do this,

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 12>have a new regime, a tougher approach to illegal tobacco,

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 12>alongside what I would regard as a common sense approach

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 12>from the Commonwealth where they dropped the excise well.

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>The Men's government announced today that they'll set up a

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>major task force that will include police, health, fear trading,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 2>liquor and gaming, and the Department of Communities and Justice

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and journalist James Willis at the Daily Telegraph. He's been

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 2>following these criminal tobacco gangs for a long time now,

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>he's been breaking these exclusive stories all week and he

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 2>joins me here at the desk. James, I'm glad I've

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 2>got a kindred spirit in this matter because I've been

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 2>banging on about it for so long and it's got

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 2>to the point now where it's you know, you just

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 2>can't deny there is a massive issue. Everyone can see it.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>So the Men's government says we'll set up this task force.

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>What's it going to look like.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 14>Well, for the next few months they'll have a look

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 14>at how the new licensing policy is working, which began today.

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 10>Caleb.

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 14>We've allowed up until now business is to just sell

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 14>tobacco without having to apply for a license, which is.

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 10>Really a dumb way of doing things.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 14>The number of tobaccosts in New South Wales or tobacco businesses.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 10>Is now at twenty thousand.

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 14>It's grown by twenty five percent in the last five years.

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 14>And so this is going to have a look at

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 14>where the laws can be tightened. Critically, it involves police

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 14>now where there is still a to and fro, and

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 14>I think as much as I do feel sorry for

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 14>the States, and I'm the number one supporter of police,

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 14>I do wonder whether there is going to be a

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 14>time when police do have to get down and dirty

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 14>and get involved in this with a day to day

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 14>compliance we know that the presence of police in a

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 14>pub or in a venue tends to have people sort

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 14>of stand up and do the right thing. There's an

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 14>argument to say that that could happen here. At the

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 14>moment's left up to health bureaucrats. They're doing their best,

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 14>but ultimately you're dealing with criminal gangs, which at one

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 14>level leads to some of the baddest people in this

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 14>country and overseas.

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 10>And so therefore, why wouldn't law enforcement be more involved?

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I guess they'll have to be. And the

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 2>point that Chris Mince has been trying to make is

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 2>that this isn't a situation of his making. This is

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 2>essentially a situation of the federal government's making. With the

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 2>stupidly high tobacco tech that is now in place, and

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a dollar forty seven a cigarette or something stupid

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.479
<v Speaker 2>like that, right, And so it was fun to have

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>compliance officers previously because they were able to deal with

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>the problems that existed, Tex goes up. Problem becomes much bigger.

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Now they have to get the coppers in. But the

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 2>coppers have much preferred to be investigating domestic violence, murder

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and other much more serious crimes than someone flogging a

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 2>packet of cigarettes for ten dollars. But what's min supposed

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:16.959
<v Speaker 2>to do about it? He's not getting any support from

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the FED.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 14>Well, this is a complete failure in public policy from

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 14>the Albanezi government. This problem has spiral out of control

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 14>under the last few years under Mark Butler's Health Minister

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 14>Jim Chalmers now has a tax which was worth sixteen

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 14>billion dollars in twenty nineteen twenty twenty. And look, even

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 14>if you don't smoke, you've never had a cigarette. You're saying, oh,

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 14>look if people want to smoke stuff and I don't care,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 14>you should care about the tax. Jim Charmers at the

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 14>moment is having a look around the cup tray and

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 14>the car trying to find a dollar. This is nine

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 14>or at least eight billion dollars a year we're missing

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 14>out on because people aren't buying legal cigarettes. Now, if

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 14>the number of people smoking had fallen off a Cliff.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 14>You'd say, well, we've won the war against big tobacco,

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 14>but that's not the case. These tobaccos are the only

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 14>business that are doing well in town. They're popping up

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 14>on every street corner. They're selling ten dollars smokes compared

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 14>to fifty or sixty dollars legal cigarettes. So no wonder

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 14>people are picking the cheaper option. So you'd have to

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 14>lower the excise dramatically to even get that price under control.

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 14>But it has to start at the border and the

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 14>government for everything. Mark Butler said about we've spent more

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 14>money on compliance. It's garbage when you actually break it down,

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 14>what the states get individually to help them in.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 10>This war is very little.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Most of it goes to the bureaucracy.

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 10>So it must start in Canberra, just very quickly.

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 2>We've only got a minute. But I read a report

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 2>the other day that in fact, people who smoke elicit cigarettes,

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm more likely to smoke more cigarettes. I think it's

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 2>four more a day, is what the reports is. Because

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 2>of course they're cheapest, so they sort of feel encouraged

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to do so. This would have to be one of

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the biggest failues of public health policy in a long time.

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>You deal with people in and around this stuff every day.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>What's your feeling about why the federal government won't move.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 14>I think they are convinced that if they can run

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 14>big tobacco out of town, the big guys and they

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 14>will be a win and then they can deal with

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 14>the rest of the market. So they've got two wars

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 14>going on. One against the criminal syndicates which they largely

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 14>created or helped flourish because of the excise and then

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 14>you've got big tobacco, and they be happy for big

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 14>tobacco to leave Australia and then deal with the rest.

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the problem is that just doesn't work, and so.

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>That report is right.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 14>The other issue entirely is vapes, which has hooked kids.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 10>More than anyone else.

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 14>And so you've got this whole generation of people that

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 14>you know, we've just stuffed this up so badly, and

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 14>as I say, it is a complete failure of public policy.

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 14>Mark Butler, Anthony Albanezi, Jim Chalmers, you've got a lot to.

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Answer for them. Vapes another thing they refuse to regulate.

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Probably you know better the devil, you know, I think, James,

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining me now more on

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 2>that huge win in the Federal Court. Today we're a

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 2>judge rule that a g hardy hate preacher was hadad

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 2>for each racial discrimination laws and a series of sermons

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and lectures.

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 3>The imputations include age all tropes against Jewish people that

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 3>are mentally racist and anti Semitic. They make perverse generalizations

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 3>against Jewish people as a group. Jews in Australia in

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 3>November twenty twenty three and thereafter would experience them to

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 3>be harassing and intimidating.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Joining me on the desk for more. And the result

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 2>is Australian Jewish Association President David Adler. David, I imagine

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you were pleased with this judgment today.

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 15>Yes, it'd be much better than the alternative, and we

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 15>are pleased that this particular type of hate preaching can't

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 15>hide from the law calling on Islamic radical ideology. So

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 15>from that point of view, it's good to be perfectly honest.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 15>I'm not a great fan.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Of eighteen norm I talked about that at the top

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 2>of the show.

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 15>And I don't see it as curing anti Semitism, where

0:34:56.840 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 15>we think that there are some bigger issues that need

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 15>to be addressed. But here's a win. Let's bet it

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 15>down and make sure that this particular brand of incitement

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:12.760
<v Speaker 15>should cease.

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 2>And that was my point is that the reason as

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 2>much as I don't agree with eighteen C, and in

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 2>an ideal world, I don't think it would be possible

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 2>to run a case like this because eighteen C wouldn't exist.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>But the reason this case was run is because the

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 2>criminal element of the law didn't deal with what I

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 2>thought were issues that could potentially lead to or were

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 2>advocating for, elements of violence against Jewish people, and the

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 2>parts of the judgment today.

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 10>Do talk about that.

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 2>That's why this case was run because seemingly the criminal

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 2>law is too weak to deal with those matters.

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 15>There are a couple of lessons that come out of

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:56.439
<v Speaker 15>this Caleb, and the failure to use the criminal law

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 15>is a really important one. We have been very, very

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 15>very disappointed by the week leadership politically on anti Semitism

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 15>and frankly the failure of our law enforcement authorities, beginning

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 15>on October eight, when we had Islamic preachers in the

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 15>street of Sydney celebrating the massacres of Jews in Israel.

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 15>October nine, at the Opera House with the riots and

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:27.760
<v Speaker 15>a number of laws were broken on both those days,

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 15>and yet no consequences. And this is what's opened the

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 15>opportunity for the hate preachers to be more and more emboldened.

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:44.240
<v Speaker 15>So our lessons here are that, yes, you can't hide

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 15>behind the extremist religious ideology. Secondly, that the authorities have

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 15>been ineffective, demonstrably ineffective.

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot more to be done.

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.879
<v Speaker 15>Alluded to incitement of violence when we hear them talk

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 15>about inter Farder, that is an incitement to violence, is

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 15>a violent uprising involving terrorism and the murder of Jews.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 15>No action when they chant all Zionists are terrorists. Zionism

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 15>is simply recognizing the right of Jewish people to have

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 15>self determination in their biblical homeland, nothing more than that.

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 15>So the vast majority of Jewish people in this country

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 15>a Zionists doing that sort of smear is outrageous and

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 15>again no action. And the final observation that I'd make

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 15>is that because eighteen C was used as the legal instrument,

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 15>the consequences of very minor. All he's had to do

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 15>is pulled down the offending material and promise not to

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 15>do it again. We have seen in Europe, in Italy

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 15>and France in particular, that if these hate preachers are foreignness,

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 15>if they've got citizens, and in fact, in some cases

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 15>if they're dual citizens, their centers can be closed down

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 15>and they're deported, and that is the sort of action

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:23.760
<v Speaker 15>that we.

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Need in Australia.

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 15>It is a big deal, and I'm not smearing all Muslims,

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 15>of course, but we have to recognize and have a

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 15>discussion concerning immigration policy the sort of people we want

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 15>in this country. These are discussions which have been avoided.

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 15>And if you look at the census data over the

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 15>last few decades, the growth rate of the Muslim population

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 15>is four times the general population. And we have been

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 15>importing people from Gaza in their thousands, which is an

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 15>area that is substantially inspire the Muslim brotherhood. So all

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 15>these big issues are being ignored. We welcome the win today,

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 15>it's important, but we want our authorities, to our political

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 15>leadership to deal with the really big problems.

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, David Adler, thank you so much for joining me tonight.

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Coming up after the break, a demographer will unpack this

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 2>interesting new study on why Margaret mothers are giving birth

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to more boys than girls. And the answer will shock you.

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 2>He'll be with me soon, Mark McCrindle coming up and

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll discuss all things defense with my panel GXO Strategies

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Director Cameron Milner and former Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Chair Michael Danby. Don't go away, Let's jump straight into

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>it with my next panel, GXO Strategies Director Cameron Milner

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and the former chair of Parliament's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee,

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Michael Danby. Jans welcome shocking reports coming out today that

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Defense Minister Richard Marles has been left out of the

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 2>loop on formal updates on Australia's military readiness for two

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and a half years. I mean the AFR reports that

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 2>escape Order to General's report found that in twenty twenty

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 2>three and twenty four Defense stopped giving Marles six monthly

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>preparedness reports that outlined what units and platforms such as ships,

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 2>submarines and aircraft were ready to be deployed into conflict

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 2>or natural disaster zone. So, Cameron, if they're not keeping

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the Defense Minister up to date on this stuff, A,

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to ask why. But B surely it underlines

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 2>the point that if we were, for whatever reason to

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 2>end up in a conflict that unfortunately were stuffed.

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 16>Well that's right, what a disgrace, when absolute disgrace. The

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 16>Defense Minister wasn't being told and didn't even think to ask.

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 16>Caleb didn't think to ask for where the six month

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 16>report was. Look, the reality is that Males is a

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 16>defense diletant.

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 2>This is bloke.

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 16>He used raft jets as an uber service to get

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 16>him home in time. From camera, he packs his golf

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 16>clubs and gets raft people to put them on the

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 16>plane when he goes overseas. I mean, defense is not

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 16>Richard Marles strong suit. And it shows and the defense

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 16>establishment knows that too. The whole thing with this alberdis government, Caleb,

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 16>the Alberti's government wants dialogue over direct hits on Aram's

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 16>n clear facilities. They want fillerbusters rather than Trump's bunker busters.

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 16>I meant this labor party is all over the shop

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 16>on defense, all over all over the shop on defense, Caleb,

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 16>and it just shows and reports like this are going

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 16>to be one of many I suspect with what's happening

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 16>with his labor administration.

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.399
<v Speaker 2>You're on fire tonight, Cameron, Michael. What does it say

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 2>about the relationship between the minister and the department.

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 17>Well, first of all, at Echo Cameron's point, this is

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 17>a dereliction of duty by the Defense Minister himself, you know,

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 17>going off and playing golf. You know, he was known

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 17>the right of the Labor Party as being lazy. But

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 17>this is even beyond that. We need a general raising

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 17>Cane like Trump got himself after Caine destroyed Isis. One

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 17>of the worst decisions Miles made was to reappoint all

0:41:55.080 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 17>of those military dilettants who've got us no equipment, no missiles,

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 17>have stripped out the core of the defense forces in

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 17>order to pay for the subs. I mean, Israel spends

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 17>more on defense in one year than we do with

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 17>a country population a third of our size. I mean

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 17>it's and we have no bank for the buck like

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 17>they do. So I just think it's hopeless, hopeless minister,

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 17>hopeless military leadership.

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 2>They should all go well, that would be helpful, but

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to happen, unfortunately, Michael. There are also

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 2>concerns that Australia may miss out on critical missiles from

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the US, obviously due to Alberanezi's refusal to boost spending

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the hours for three and a half percent. We're not

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 2>coming to the table on that because the White House

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 2>still needs to approve a seven billion dollar order we

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 2>made last year, and sources have told the odds that

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 2>they could be redirected to countries who are willing to

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:53.879
<v Speaker 2>play ball. I mean, Michael, we're just doing this to ourselves.

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 2>It's insane.

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.720
<v Speaker 17>If you watch that very emotional press conference that Trump

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 17>had NATO, you would have seen the Polish Ukrainian journalists

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 17>leading from Kiev to get Patriot missiles. Now they're going

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:07.919
<v Speaker 17>to go ahead of the queue in front of us.

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 17>They're willing to pay for them. They're willing to pay

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 17>for their defense. We just can't stick with this some

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 17>you know, we'll pay for the subs on them never never,

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 17>And what we do is strip back and cut back,

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 17>you know, mind sweepers. The Chinese don't have to be geniuses.

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 17>They just have to read the media to note that

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.399
<v Speaker 17>all of our defense bases are naked. We have no

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 17>air defense thanks to the dilettants in the military leadership.

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:36.439
<v Speaker 17>And our dilettant minister and his predecessor was as bad too,

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 17>so I should be fed him.

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now that that's correct. And speaking of China, their ambassador,

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 2>of course to Australia, intervened in our national security this

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 2>week wrote in the OS that against Canberra boosting the

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 2>defense spending, and Cameron, You've written a brilliant piece in

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 2>The Nightly saying that Albanesi was already doing exactly what

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 2>China needed. Now he'll have to react in the opposite

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 2>direction to say any face. But what's the likelihood of that, Gameran, Well,

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 2>let's see.

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 16>I mean, what a shocking situation where you have a

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 16>Chinese ambassador telling weak albow to make Australia even weaker in.

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:14.240
<v Speaker 2>His likeness so to speak.

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 16>No, I think this will have the opposite reaction. I mean,

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 16>Albo and one were doing their very best to shred

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:21.720
<v Speaker 16>our relationship with the US, shred our relationship with Trump

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 16>and our allies like Israel and the UK, all by

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 16>their lonesome, but by China calling for us to be

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 16>even weaker again, I think Australians will actually have a

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 16>wake up moment and actually say, hang on a moment, Albo,

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 16>why would we be backing in China over our allies.

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a good point and we've run out of

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 2>time unfortunately. But there was a great piece in the

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 2>OS from Henry Ergus talking about defense spending between Australia

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and Israel, and it turns out that between twenty twenty

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 2>and twenty twenty three Australia spent fifty billion dollars more

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 2>than Israel did. And yet I don't think you could

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 2>argue that we could achieve a fraction of what Israel

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 2>has been able to achieve in the last couple of years. Actually,

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 2>it tells you everything about where we are. Cameron, Michael,

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for your time, both of you.

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, coming up after the break, Hold, take a

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 2>look at that new study which is suggesting that migrant

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 2>women are aborting daughters at higher rates than sons. Demographer

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Mark McCrindle will be with me next. Really interesting piece

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 2>in the odds this morning about how Chinese, Indian and

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Lebanese immigrants in Australia are having more sons than daughters

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 2>who study from Edith Cown University suggests that women from

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.439
<v Speaker 2>these countries were more likely to abort girls, possibly over

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 2>cultural differences which places higher value on having sons. It says,

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 2>quote Indian and Chinese mothers had much higher induced abortion

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 2>rates and early pregnancy than their Australian counterparts, which coincided

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 2>with the introduction of non invasive prenatal testing. Joining me

0:45:57.560 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 2>now demographer Mark krindle Mark. They found that for people

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 2>born in Australia, the UK, New Zealand, the birth rate

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 2>was around one hundred and five boys for every hundred girls,

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 2>But for Indians it goes to one hundred and nine

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 2>boys for the second child, one hundred and eighteen for

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the third, one hundred and fifteen for the fourth. Chinese

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 2>have one hundred and fifteen for the third, one hundred

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 2>and eleven for the fourth, Lebanese have one hundred and

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 2>sixteen boys for every hundred girls for the fourth. This

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 2>is really worrying the idea that this sort of sex

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:28.479
<v Speaker 2>selective abortion, which we know goes on overseas, is going

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 2>on here in Australia.

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's the inference made through this data. And we

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 5>know from fifty years of analyzing Australian birth data those

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 5>sex ratios of babies born it sticks at one hundred

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 5>and five boys for every one hundred girls born. That's,

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 5>in fact, just to show how little it changes. The

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 5>lowest in fifty years got to one oh four point

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 5>nine and the highest is one oh six, so it

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 5>hardly changes out of that one oh five ratio, and

0:46:57.000 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 5>anything much beyond that shows that there's other factors at play.

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:04.280
<v Speaker 5>And we know that on the global data, the ratio

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 5>of boys to girls born in China currently is one

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 5>hundred and eleven, in India at t one hundred and

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 5>nine for every hundred girls, and by the way, in

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:17.280
<v Speaker 5>India nineteen seventy, before there was the technologies for sex

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 5>determining and before there was legal abortion, it was one

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 5>hundred and five. So anything beyond one hundred and five

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 5>or much more shows something going on in the fact

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 5>that this peer reviewed published paper in the Global Public

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 5>Health Journal of the Review of two point two million

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 5>berths in New South Wales and WA for twenty years,

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 5>all of the births pretty much in those two states

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 5>over twenty years, shows that based on the birth country

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 5>of mother, you get some of these ratios blowing out.

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 5>Should cause us to have a deeper look at what's

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 5>going on well.

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Study also sees this study provides is quoting from the

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 2>study provides the most compelling observational evidence to date of

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 2>mail by six ratio at birth among overseas born mothers,

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:06.280
<v Speaker 2>which appears to be attributed to prenatal six determination followed

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 2>by a selective abortion of females, which is what we're

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about. And if you follow this to its logical conclusion,

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 2>what does it mean for the demography of Australia. You

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 2>end up with far more men than you do women.

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:22.359
<v Speaker 5>Well exactly, and we see that large at a global level.

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 5>At a country level, you've got the missing millions in

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 5>China and India as well, and the social problems, but

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 5>just of course the basic moral outrage that you can

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:40.360
<v Speaker 5>have a society and large proportions say we value boys

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 5>more than girls. We meen need to make it clear

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 5>at Australia that baby girls are as valued and have

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 5>all the rights of protections as baby boys, and that

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.839
<v Speaker 5>needs to be made very clear. And even with the

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 5>new South Wales Abortion Law Reform Act of twenty nineteen

0:48:56.120 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 5>that increased access to abortions, it makes it explicitly clear

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:04.800
<v Speaker 5>that abortion should not be performed solely on the basis

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 5>of sex selections, so as well.

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 2>It should be And I just can't believe that this

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 2>is going on at the rate obviously as we've run

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 2>at a time macro quindled thank you for joining me,

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 2>And here's Paul Murray, hopefully with a bit of slim

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 2>dusty again tonight.