Speaker 1: On scolus Ostradio.
Speaker 2: This is the Reader Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Riata Panehy Show. Coming
Speaker 3: up tonight. Labor Minister's under fire after allegedly CosIng up
Speaker 3: to an activist group that doesn't consider her Mass a
Speaker 3: terrorist organization. A leading international security expert debunks the latest
Speaker 3: lies painting Donald Trump as some hitler, admiring military hating
Speaker 3: threat to democracy. Doctor Max Abrams will join me shortly.
Speaker 3: Also joining me tonight Kosher Gator, pri McSween and Kinsey Schofield,
Speaker 3: and an extended edition of Lefties Losing It?
Speaker 4: Do you think Donald Trump is a fascist? Yes? I do, Yes,
Speaker 4: I do.
Speaker 3: But first, the Australian Energy Market Operators Chief executive is
Speaker 3: undermined Labour's repeated claims that renewable energy is the cheapest
Speaker 3: form of energy. He made it clear to Matt Canavan
Speaker 3: incent Estimates yesterday that actually there isn't any guarantee that
Speaker 3: increasing the amount of renewables in the system will bring
Speaker 3: down prices. But you're saying you cannot guarantee that the
Speaker 3: current government policy settings which you model will deliver lower
Speaker 3: power process.
Speaker 5: I can't guarantee that, no, and what I would say
Speaker 5: is we would try to be quite clear about the
Speaker 5: communication of our message, which is that the integrated System Plan,
Speaker 5: which considers these things generation, storage and major transmission upgrades,
Speaker 5: is the lowest cost pathway. It doesn't refer to whether
Speaker 5: it's cheaper or more expensive for that wholesale component.
Speaker 3: It's a little wonder the alban Easy government hasn't been
Speaker 3: able to keep this election promise.
Speaker 6: We've released the most comprehensive economic modeling that any opposition
Speaker 6: has ever released about any policy ever in Australian history,
Speaker 6: and it showed reducing power prices by two hundred and
Speaker 6: seventy five dollars by twenty three. You stand by the
Speaker 6: modeling that we release pre election which informed that that
Speaker 6: statement two seventy five by twenty twenty five.
Speaker 3: We stand by that. Joining me now for more on
Speaker 3: this is Guy News contributor prou McSween. Prew what do
Speaker 3: you make of this latest development. I don't think many
Speaker 3: of us will be shocked because we have seen our
Speaker 3: energy costs go through the roof as we invest in
Speaker 3: one and more in renewables. But the fact that there
Speaker 3: isn't any light at the end of the tunnel, I
Speaker 3: think is a wake up call to many.
Speaker 4: It certainly is rita. Just looking at Chris Bowen talking
Speaker 4: about the comprehensive economic modeling that was done. I mean,
Speaker 4: the man is a blatant I'm going to say, liar,
Speaker 4: you know, false with the truth. It's part of his
Speaker 4: con job on this country and we have to certainly
Speaker 4: wake up to ourselves and understand that it's a myth.
Speaker 4: It's spin doctoring at its worst kind. And the point
Speaker 4: is that he's so stupid and deluded that we see
Speaker 4: it every time we get our energy bills. We know
Speaker 4: the truth of what's going on with our energy system
Speaker 4: and the fact that he keeps accusing the Libs of
Speaker 4: introducing nuclear that's going to cost so much more. We
Speaker 4: have not seen his comprehensive costings. We know that there
Speaker 4: is a hidden costs within his renewables modeling. We know
Speaker 4: that also the Libs need to shut him up and
Speaker 4: start bringing out their costings so that they can be
Speaker 4: laid on the table along with his. We need the
Speaker 4: truth and this Amo guy, you know, well, we build
Speaker 4: the cat. This bloke was president of a number of
Speaker 4: renewables organizations. Bowen, this government always plant people who are
Speaker 4: going to report their narrative.
Speaker 3: Well, yes, they're very good at a boosting like minded
Speaker 3: souls and I guess you can't blame them for that.
Speaker 3: They're using the power that they have when they're elected
Speaker 3: as opposed to the opposition the Coalition, who too often
Speaker 3: don't do that. They waste power. And I think you
Speaker 3: can't blame labor for appointing to these key positions people
Speaker 3: who are pushing their agenda. Now, the Australian Palestinian Advocacy Network,
Speaker 3: they revealed that they receive more than twenty two thousand
Speaker 3: dollars from the ALP and fifty thousand dollars from unions
Speaker 3: to pay for study tours to Gaza and the West Bank,
Speaker 3: attended by various Labor MPs, including Immigration Minister Tony Burke
Speaker 3: and Assistant Multicultural Minister Julian Hill. The Australian Palestine Advocacy Network,
Speaker 3: led by NASA Machini, has previously labeled Israel's anti terror
Speaker 3: operations as genocide and has called for her mass to
Speaker 3: be partially delisted as a terror organization shout so Home
Speaker 3: Affairs Minister James Patterson said NASA Massini's APAN's president has
Speaker 3: called for an end to the peace process and abandonment
Speaker 3: of a two state solution, as well as opposing the
Speaker 3: listing of her Master's a terrorist organization and added labor
Speaker 3: must be upfront about their funding of this group are
Speaker 3: But despite the funds from the Australian Labor Party being
Speaker 3: listed in APAN's annual report, a Labor spokesman has said
Speaker 3: that the ALP National Secretariat has not made any financial
Speaker 3: contribution to the Australia Palestine Advocacy Networker prue, what do
Speaker 3: you make of this relationship, particularly those ministers taking part
Speaker 3: in those trips?
Speaker 4: Well, reader, it's an uncomfortable truth, isn't it. The fact
Speaker 4: that this lot have gone over Now. You can call
Speaker 4: it what you like, but it's a grooming exercise, it's
Speaker 4: a brainwashing exercise. It's identy find sympathetic labor members who
Speaker 4: want to sprout the narrative of this organization. Did they
Speaker 4: ever bother to go to any of the Jewish, the
Speaker 4: Israeli Israeli authorities and say, we would like to understand
Speaker 4: your point of view? Of course not. It doesn't fit
Speaker 4: in with their narrative. We're all onto them. We know
Speaker 4: exactly why they're being sympathetic. Why they've left, They've invited
Speaker 4: three thousand potential We don't know heros how many amongst
Speaker 4: the Palestinians from Gaza are going to be in here.
Speaker 4: We're all onto the fact that labor is just interested
Speaker 4: in feathering its own nests and making sure it can
Speaker 4: protect the seats of key ministers. And they've sold us out.
Speaker 4: Our national security has been sold out, and generations to
Speaker 4: come will pay for this.
Speaker 3: We know that.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 3: We know that a large portion of the population of
Speaker 3: Gaza and the West Bank are sympathetic to her Mass.
Speaker 3: So whether they are terrorist or just sympathize with terrorist,
Speaker 3: I think is an enormous worry proof because how are
Speaker 3: they going to assimilate into Australian life holding those views.
Speaker 3: Thinking a group like her Mass are justified in doing
Speaker 3: what they did on October seven and countless other times
Speaker 3: are prim McSwain, thank you so much for your time
Speaker 3: this evening, really appreciate it. Joining me now is doctor
Speaker 3: Max Abrams, Professor of political science at Northeastern University, an
Speaker 3: author of Rules for Rebels, The Science of Victory in
Speaker 3: Military History. Max, let's start with the Democrats' latest desperate
Speaker 3: effort to paint Trump as some sort of a Hitler
Speaker 3: admiring threat to democracy who has a deep disdain for
Speaker 3: the military. A frankly ridiculous tale from the discredited Atlantic.
Speaker 3: It has to be said this was debunked almost immediately,
Speaker 3: but it's still being spread uncritically by large segments of
Speaker 3: the media, the usual suspects, including much of the media
Speaker 3: here in Australia, and of course Kamala Harris is key
Speaker 3: to capitalize on this latest manufactured outrighte Here she claims
Speaker 3: Donald Trump will use the military against PayPal for simply
Speaker 3: disagree with him.
Speaker 7: Anyone who refuses to bend a knee or dares to
Speaker 7: criticize him would qualify in his mind as the enemy within.
Speaker 7: Like judges, like journalists, like nonpartisan election officials. It is
Speaker 7: deeply troubling and incredibly dangerous that Donald Trump would invoke
Speaker 7: Adolf Hitler, the man who is responsible for the deaths
Speaker 7: of six million Jews and hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Speaker 7: All of this is further evidence for the American people
Speaker 7: of Hoddan Trump really is.
Speaker 8: Max.
Speaker 3: One could argue this is the sort of inflammatory ritrick
Speaker 3: that has seen two assassination attempts against Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they call that snochastic terrorism. When somebody says something
Speaker 2: publicly which essentially puts a mark on them, They don't
Speaker 2: explicitly call for a hit, but it signals to supporters
Speaker 2: that somebody needs to be taken out. There are a
Speaker 2: lot of ironies that we could unpack there in terms
Speaker 2: of what Kamala has done, But essentially she's accusing Trump
Speaker 2: of being a fascist and a Hitler supporter. In reality,
Speaker 2: she is the one who is trivializing the Holocaust by
Speaker 2: associating Donald Trump, who already was president for four years
Speaker 2: and America didn't turn into Natzi Germany. She is also
Speaker 2: using the military for her own personal gain. She is
Speaker 2: simply repeating the made up allegations of Trump's former chief
Speaker 2: of staff who comes from the military, and she's using
Speaker 2: the Atlantic for partisan purposes to thrust herself into the presidency,
Speaker 2: which hasn't come about democratically. You know, the manipulation of
Speaker 2: the media, the centralization including the military, the lying kind
Speaker 2: of hyping people up and generating false alarm about the
Speaker 2: potential stakes here, all of that is consistent with fascism.
Speaker 2: So she is not only a liar, but she's extraordinarily
Speaker 2: unself aware.
Speaker 3: Now This Atlantic story starts with the horrific murder of
Speaker 3: Army Private Vanessa Gulick Gulin, and it's about how Trump
Speaker 3: offered to pay for her funeral and then became enraged
Speaker 3: and refused to do so when he found out it
Speaker 3: was sixty thousand dollars the cost. And there's all sorts
Speaker 3: of allegations made there. It's written at length, very colorful.
Speaker 3: Only problem is it's not true. Her own family. This
Speaker 3: fallen soldier's own family dispute the report. They are outraged
Speaker 3: that The Atlantic would use their loved one to publish
Speaker 3: lies about Trump. Vanessa's sister posted this directly to The Atlantic, saying,
Speaker 3: I don't appreciate how you are exploiting my sister's death
Speaker 3: for politics. Hurtful and disrespectful to the important changes she
Speaker 3: made for service members. President Donald Trump did nothing but
Speaker 3: show respect to my family and Vanessa. In fact, I
Speaker 3: voted for President Trump today. The Atlantic claims the family
Speaker 3: his lawyer told the magazine that she sent the bill
Speaker 3: for the funeral to the White House, but no money
Speaker 3: was ever received from Donald Trump. But that lawyer, Natalie Kawam,
Speaker 3: has confirmed that The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg misrepresented their conversation
Speaker 3: and I quote outright lied in his sensational story. She
Speaker 3: also wrote, more importantly, he used and exploited my clients
Speaker 3: and Vanessa Gullian's murder for cheap political gain.
Speaker 8: Max.
Speaker 3: Given all this, how is this story still being so
Speaker 3: widely reported and reported uncritically?
Speaker 2: Well, not only is the story clearly false according to
Speaker 2: both the family member and the relevant lawyer, but it's
Speaker 2: also an extremely petty story. So Kamala heris give speech
Speaker 2: today and you would think that she was going to
Speaker 2: unveil some important initiative, She was going to really spell
Speaker 2: out important substantive differences. And yet you know, the team
Speaker 2: Kamala is leading with a story about whether Donald Trump
Speaker 2: paid for a funeral bill. And I really think that
Speaker 2: this gets to the shallowness of this presidential campaign. There's
Speaker 2: no meat on it. Everybody understands that Kamala Harris aspires
Speaker 2: to be president and she really can't run on her
Speaker 2: record as being vice president. She says that she's the
Speaker 2: change candidate, but in a way, she's already the incumbent.
Speaker 2: When asked what are the differences between her policies and Biden's,
Speaker 2: she says, there's no daylight at all. So it's really
Speaker 2: not even clear, according to Kamala Harris, why she's run.
Speaker 2: She was known for as a vice president who did
Speaker 2: not like to get into the weeds with respect to policy.
Speaker 2: On the policy issues where she has been vocal, she's
Speaker 2: been contradictory. She you know, famously asserted that a border
Speaker 2: wall was an American she suggested it was racist, and
Speaker 2: now she accuses Trump of being weak on the border.
Speaker 2: She's waffled over fracking. So the only policies she's really
Speaker 2: known for are the ones where she's drawn a lot
Speaker 2: of attention just for being inconsistent. And I think that
Speaker 2: she's trying to bury the lack of substance with an
Speaker 2: assault on Trump, even though it's not only false but
Speaker 2: petty and really absurd. But of course the media is
Speaker 2: playing law and they are you know, broadcasting and blasting
Speaker 2: this story as if we have found out something which
Speaker 2: is meaningful, but of course none of it is true.
Speaker 3: Well, that seems not to be much of a factor
Speaker 3: in the eyes of the leftist media. Former White House
Speaker 3: Chief of staffer Mark Meadows has also completely denied this
Speaker 3: story is accurate. Now let's go to a real scandal here,
Speaker 3: not a manufactured one. The US intelligence breach that saw
Speaker 3: Israel's plans to strike Iran leaked to Iran. What can
Speaker 3: you tell us about this Pentagon leak? This seems incredible.
Speaker 2: What we know is that it's very serious, that this
Speaker 2: is top secret information. There's essentially a war going on
Speaker 2: in the Middle East where everybody is waiting for Israel
Speaker 2: to respond to the October first ballistic missile attack, the
Speaker 2: largest ballistic missile attack ever, and we understand that the
Speaker 2: Israeli response is going to be significant, and we've also
Speaker 2: been told that it's going to be surprising. Well, you know,
Speaker 2: at this time, the last thing that you want is
Speaker 2: for intel to be leaked, you know, which could compromise
Speaker 2: the nature of the surprise. It could help, you know,
Speaker 2: the Islamic regime in Tehran, it could undermine Israel. And
Speaker 2: it's frankly an embarrassment that the United States cannot protect,
Speaker 2: you know, ut most secrets. It is good though, I
Speaker 2: think that Yahoo has had a distrust for the Biden administration,
Speaker 2: and so what has been disclosed are not the targets
Speaker 2: that Israel will strike, but some of the military preparations
Speaker 2: involved in the Israeli strike, the kinds of weapons that
Speaker 2: will be used, for example. But one of the consequences
Speaker 2: of what appear to be a leak from the US
Speaker 2: government is that the Israeli Prime Minister Ntayah who is
Speaker 2: going to trust the Biden administration even less and so
Speaker 2: there will be less collaboration, there will be less intel sharing.
Speaker 2: I think that the lesson here is that the Biden
Speaker 2: administration can't be trusted. And I do believe that Nitain
Speaker 2: Yahoo already knew that this is an administration that has
Speaker 2: a history of being implicated with arguably Iranian espionage at
Speaker 2: the very least mishandling of important documents by pro Iranian
Speaker 2: government officials, and so for a long time there have
Speaker 2: been calls to not just get rid of the Iran convoy,
Speaker 2: Rob Malley, but his associates and what them is actually
Speaker 2: the presumed national security advisor of Kamala hear Us. And
Speaker 2: so we don't know at this point right who the
Speaker 2: beaker is, but it could be an embarrassment not just
Speaker 2: for Biden, but for Kamala as well.
Speaker 3: Now you've written a piece for Newsweek explaining Kamala Harris's
Speaker 3: record on Israel. She has consistently well undermined. You could
Speaker 3: argue the only democracy in the Middle East called for
Speaker 3: weapons restrictions, voiced opposition to some of their counter terrorism offensives.
Speaker 3: You argue that American Jews should not be voting for
Speaker 3: the Democrats, but we know the majority of the Jewish
Speaker 3: community in America does. How can that be when you've
Speaker 3: got these leftist college campus protests, You've got the school
Speaker 3: odd within the Democrats, You've got just this anti Semitic,
Speaker 3: certainly anti Israel sentiment that's very strong in the left,
Speaker 3: and it has really institutional power. And yet you've got
Speaker 3: the American Jews, the majority of them is still backing
Speaker 3: the Democrats. This is something that I know is a
Speaker 3: topic of discussion amongst many in that community. Explain to
Speaker 3: me why you wrote the piece that you did for Newsweek.
Speaker 2: I didn't. Jews historically do not vote on Jewish topics.
Speaker 2: They don't vote on international affairs, they don't vote on Israel,
Speaker 2: they don't vote on anti Semitism. Most Jews are pro choice,
Speaker 2: they support abortion. There are many issues in the Democratic
Speaker 2: Party that most American Jews. This election is a little
Speaker 2: bit different, though, and the reason is is that Israel
Speaker 2: has been struck by the worst attack on Jews since
Speaker 2: the Holocaust. And what was even scarier to international Jewry
Speaker 2: wasn't what happened on October seventh, but what we saw
Speaker 2: on October eighth, where it turns out that this terrorist
Speaker 2: attack against twelve hundred Israeli civilians, it turns out actually
Speaker 2: had quite a bit of popularity throughout Western countries. And
Speaker 2: so there was e merging here of international affairs in
Speaker 2: terms of the October seventh attack and the sense of
Speaker 2: Jewish insecurity at home all the way in the United States,
Speaker 2: and it is hard for Jews. Jews are reluctant to
Speaker 2: change parties. It's almost a part of their culture, particularly
Speaker 2: the more reform Jews, the more secular Jews. They are
Speaker 2: a very strong voting block historically for the Democratic Party,
Speaker 2: and I do predict that that will hold. The majority
Speaker 2: of American Jews will still vote Democrat because they always have. However,
Speaker 2: her share of the Jewish vote will be the smallest
Speaker 2: in modern American history, and the reason why is because
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris is seen as being pro Hamas, and she's
Speaker 2: seen as pro Hamas both in the Gaza strip as
Speaker 2: well as pro Hamas on American campuses and in American cities.
Speaker 2: With respect to Hamas and Gaza, Kamala Harris is constantly
Speaker 2: chiding Israel and criticizing Israel for its counter terrorism response.
Speaker 2: Since October seventh, her main focus has been to coerce
Speaker 2: Israel to stop the military campaign which would effectively preserve Hamas.
Speaker 2: She has even opposed Israeli operations which have been remarkably successful.
Speaker 2: For example, in taking out the leader of Hamas in Rafa,
Speaker 2: she told Israel very sanctimoniously that she had looked at
Speaker 2: the maps and it would be a big mistake to
Speaker 2: going into Rafam. And then at home, she has said
Speaker 2: very little about anti Semitism. She actually her campaign is
Speaker 2: receiving funds from Soros, who is one of the main
Speaker 2: funders of the anti foto movement in the United States.
Speaker 2: And you contrast Kamala Harris to Donald Trump. Trump has
Speaker 2: been a very strong supporter of Israel. He moved the
Speaker 2: embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He recognized Israeli rights
Speaker 2: in the Golan Heights, pushed forward the Ibraham Accords, which
Speaker 2: is very good for Israel and Arab countries. And at home,
Speaker 2: in the United States. He has said, if you're a
Speaker 2: foreigner in the United States and you know you're burning
Speaker 2: American flags and you're threatening a globalint your final violence,
Speaker 2: and you're anti Semitic, then there's no reason for you
Speaker 2: to be here at American universities.
Speaker 3: Mac and why it's so incredible that the very good
Speaker 3: reasons indeed, and yet you've got Trump is the one
Speaker 3: who's characterized as some sort of Hitler, the most pro
Speaker 3: Israel president that we have seen. It's just incredible, Doctor
Speaker 3: Max Abrams, thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 3: Really appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Thank you reader.
Speaker 3: Coming up your favorite segment, Lett is Losing It pass
Speaker 3: The Left ramps up its anti Trump smear campaign, but
Speaker 3: is it working?
Speaker 9: Kosher Gators by with the details.
Speaker 3: Welcome back. Now it's time for Left his losing it
Speaker 3: and gosh, the Democrats are getting desperate. They're conjuring up
Speaker 3: more fake news about Hitler, the military and sending out
Speaker 3: more celebrities.
Speaker 10: I also think that people shouldn't be afraid to express
Speaker 10: their opinions, and I don't think anyone wants in America
Speaker 10: where people are worried about retribution of what people will
Speaker 10: do if you make your opinion known. I think Vice
Speaker 10: President Harris supports a future for this country where these
Speaker 10: freedoms and many others will be protected and upheld.
Speaker 3: Just inspiring stuff there from Eminem. You probably didn't know
Speaker 3: was him because you can see his face. Yeah, the
Speaker 3: most anti free speech, pro censorship candidate is the one
Speaker 3: who's going to protect our free Well done, Eminem and
Speaker 3: his entire speech went for about a minute. I don't
Speaker 3: know why I even bother to show up, but it
Speaker 3: certainly got Baraque excited.
Speaker 9: I'm nervous, but normal, surface the calm and let it
Speaker 9: for dat bombs, but I keep bumb forget it.
Speaker 2: Dun dun du du d d d d dudu. I
Speaker 2: thought I know this Norman performed.
Speaker 11: I was gonna jump up.
Speaker 4: We love this.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, oh gosh. I should have given you
Speaker 3: a cringe warning before that clip. I do apologize as
Speaker 3: a big fan of Eminem. Really don't. The Democrats tell
Speaker 3: us words are violence and misogynistic. Violent lyrics about women
Speaker 3: are unacceptable, but they're happy with this.
Speaker 10: What does Schick's getting comment someone she gets kicked in
Speaker 10: the stormy.
Speaker 3: And talk about safety and security? Only do that.
Speaker 7: Let's also always remember the violence against women.
Speaker 2: You don't like it, and pillow woman on earth.
Speaker 11: Still I'm thinking thinking egg and this.
Speaker 7: Is women will endure almost any abuse.
Speaker 1: Tin of holes.
Speaker 2: And next it depends set up the cameras on a look.
Speaker 2: Tell people at time hot.
Speaker 10: Love me?
Speaker 3: No, no, no, you know what I used to love
Speaker 3: missm eminem two before he became so lame that he
Speaker 3: became a parody of himself, and not even a funny
Speaker 3: parody like this. I'm sorry they there, I've never meant
Speaker 3: to hurt you. Put your pride flags huts him was
Speaker 3: it's coming out the closet one more time, Superb. You
Speaker 3: must change all those lyrics and make them democrat friendly.
Speaker 3: Let's hear more from the Hangover gang doing Eminem. This
Speaker 3: looks like a job for me. I don't care about
Speaker 3: this kind of means.
Speaker 1: I'm a billionaire or so if you're me, it'll matter
Speaker 1: who winds the president.
Speaker 3: You want to know why they're getting increasingly desperate with
Speaker 3: all these fake Hitler news and the celebrity endorsement. It's
Speaker 3: because they're losing, Yo, Kamala Tim come up here for
Speaker 3: this one. Two idiots doing around me outside, round me, outside,
Speaker 3: round me, outside. As for the woman herself, the VEEP
Speaker 3: is again engaging in the most reckless, inflammatory retrig about
Speaker 3: President Donald Trump, claiming that the most pro Israel president
Speaker 3: we've seen, the man who has a daughter and grandchildren
Speaker 3: who are Jewish, is some Hitler, admiring military, hating threat
Speaker 3: to democracy, who is going to use the military to
Speaker 3: go after anyone critical of him.
Speaker 7: He would use the United States military to go after
Speaker 7: American citizens. And let's be clear about who he considers
Speaker 7: to be the enemy from within. Anyone who refuses to
Speaker 7: bend a knee or dares to criticize him would qualify
Speaker 7: in his mind as the enemy within. Like judges, like journalists,
Speaker 7: like nonpartisan election officials. It is deeply troubling and incredibly
Speaker 7: dangerous that Donald Trump would invoke Adolf Hitler, the man
Speaker 7: who is responsible for the deaths of six million Jews
Speaker 7: and hundreds of thousands of Americans. All of this is
Speaker 7: further evidence for the American people of who Donald Trump
Speaker 7: really is.
Speaker 3: Yes, they are desperate, all right, and it shows his
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris earlier today on CINN saying she thinks Donald
Speaker 3: Trump is a fascist?
Speaker 4: Do you think Donald Trump is a fascist?
Speaker 1: Yes?
Speaker 7: I do yes, I do, and I also believe that
Speaker 7: the people who know him best on this subject should
Speaker 7: be trusted.
Speaker 3: Absolutely disgusting antiques there the people who know him best.
Speaker 3: What the handful of miscreants that were sacked is that
Speaker 3: what who's just talking about and continuing the fascist line
Speaker 3: here is Kreeen Jean Pierre also doing her bit to
Speaker 3: possibly incite the next leftist nutter to try to assassinate
Speaker 3: Donald Trump and to.
Speaker 2: Be praising Adolf Hitler.
Speaker 5: It's dangerous and it's also disgusting.
Speaker 8: So just to be here when you said, we do agree,
Speaker 8: President Biden believes that Donald Trump isn't.
Speaker 2: Actually I mean, yes, what you've said, he said himself.
Speaker 2: The former president has said.
Speaker 3: He is going to be a dictator on day one.
Speaker 3: You know, the Democrats and VP Harris seem to be
Speaker 3: devoid of joy these days. In fact, Kamala Harris is
Speaker 3: reminding me of someone second tired of the negatived by
Speaker 3: as to say that we.
Speaker 1: Are not going back.
Speaker 3: Oh dear, let's hear from a woman who is trying
Speaker 3: to inject some joy, some frivology into Kamala's rally, but
Speaker 3: all she ends up doing is treating the crowd like
Speaker 3: their simpletons. This is how you talk to toddlers, not adults.
Speaker 12: If you know it, I'm going to sing it bum bum.
Speaker 3: Hey, that's really good. Okay, let's try something different.
Speaker 13: That's three syllables, right, I've got another word with three syllables.
Speaker 12: It's uh muh lah.
Speaker 3: You want to try it? All right, let's go bump bump. Come,
Speaker 3: oh dear. I could not stand that. I would I
Speaker 3: would lose my mind having to listen to that for
Speaker 3: any longer than we just heard. Now, let's go to
Speaker 3: MSNBC and watch what happens when a panelist says something
Speaker 3: actually truthful about the economy. Watch the panic and the
Speaker 3: guess lodging that followed.
Speaker 8: The contrast could not be more stark. Yes, we have
Speaker 8: a dismal economy, but we are also facing the prospect
Speaker 8: of fascism. And actually the economy isn't even that dismal,
Speaker 8: and like things are rebounding. But everyone is talking about
Speaker 8: the economy, but in fact we are actually facing the
Speaker 8: real premise inspector of fascism.
Speaker 11: I think on the economy too, all the data suggests
Speaker 11: that that's not the case. But there's a feels issue
Speaker 11: with the economy. The vivings feel expensive. People feel bad
Speaker 11: about it, and even if they don't feel bad about
Speaker 11: their personal economy, they feel bad or worry about their kids,
Speaker 11: or their neighbors or others. And yes, that is throughout
Speaker 11: history Angelo a ripe climate for an autocrat, which is
Speaker 11: exactly what Project twenty twenty five ushers in.
Speaker 3: It just feels expensive, folks. The economy is great. You're
Speaker 3: not really struggling to pay your bills. It's just the
Speaker 3: it's the fields. But MSNBC got a shock when they
Speaker 3: spoke to Arab Americans about who they're backing. No one
Speaker 3: put up their hand for Kamala.
Speaker 13: Who's voting for Kamala Harris here, Absolutely no, no, not possible.
Speaker 3: There's nothing she can do or say for us to
Speaker 3: change our mind. And he is an unhinged academic saying
Speaker 3: men who don't vote for Kamala must be sexist and
Speaker 3: should be shot.
Speaker 14: There are going to be some males in our society
Speaker 14: that will refuse to vote for a potential female president
Speaker 14: because they don't think females are smart enough to be president.
Speaker 14: We can line all those guys up and shoot them.
Speaker 14: And they clearly don't understand the way the world works.
Speaker 14: Did I say that it scratch that from the recording.
Speaker 14: I don't want the Deans hearing that I said that.
Speaker 3: Let's bring in Sky News contributor Kosha Gaeta for the
Speaker 3: latest from the US Kosher Let's start with that, and
Speaker 3: then town hall with Kamala Harris called Donald Trump a fascist.
Speaker 3: That's after she claimed he admires Hitler. What do you
Speaker 3: make of these tactics so close to November five?
Speaker 1: She seems to have chosen her closing argument In her
Speaker 1: ninety day sprint. She toured with sort of an economic message,
Speaker 1: a couple of other things, and now she's coming back
Speaker 1: to the tried and tested he's Hitler, He's a fascist,
Speaker 1: and that whole argument. I don't think it's going to
Speaker 1: make a difference, number one, to the everyday working class
Speaker 1: people and middle class people in the electorate who don't
Speaker 1: care about that. We've seen this movie before. It's also
Speaker 1: very irresponsible. Many people have been saying that given that
Speaker 1: the man has literally dodged two assassination attempts and the
Speaker 1: media swept it under the rug, and here we are
Speaker 1: back to this rhetoric.
Speaker 3: It's incredible that they would go down this road. As
Speaker 3: you said, with two assassination attempts in this many months,
Speaker 3: and it's the boy who cried wolf. We've heard this
Speaker 3: hysteria hyperbole from them over and over again. No one's
Speaker 3: buying it other than that voter block that's going to
Speaker 3: vote for her anyway. Yeah, it's going to be interesting
Speaker 3: to see if it has any impact. Now, let's look
Speaker 3: at a hilarious self own here from the Washington Post,
Speaker 3: which has gone Trump derangement crazy. They did some polling,
Speaker 3: They commissioned some polling and found that voters trust Donald
Speaker 3: Trump to protect American democracy more than they took Kamala Harris,
Speaker 3: despite the retoric they've been hearing from the Washington Post
Speaker 3: and others. When asked which of the two candidates would
Speaker 3: do a better job of defending against threats to democracy,
Speaker 3: forty three percent picked Trump and only forty percent picked Harris.
Speaker 3: And this was from a sample of just over five
Speaker 3: thousand registered voters in the swing states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada,
Speaker 3: North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. And this is the same paper,
Speaker 3: Kosher that is just pushing those Democrats talking points endlessly
Speaker 3: about Trump being a threat to democracy.
Speaker 1: So funny, you know, they have just been framed as
Speaker 1: this abstract idea threat to democracy. I don't think they
Speaker 1: even know what it means necessarily, and the only concrete
Speaker 1: thing they point to is J six. On the other side,
Speaker 1: what's a threat to democracy? Do you trust if the
Speaker 1: elections are being conducted fairly and properly and seventy percent
Speaker 1: of Republicans and forty percent of all Americans don't think
Speaker 1: that's the case. Do you think you have a border,
Speaker 1: because without a border you can to have a country.
Speaker 1: We all know where the country sees either party on
Speaker 1: that issue and other things too, like the criminal justice system.
Speaker 1: Do you think it's fair or is it applying different
Speaker 1: justice standards to different people? Case in point Trump himself,
Speaker 1: so on all those issues, demonstrably the other side has
Speaker 1: really kind of given away the high ground on being
Speaker 1: preservers of democracy, yet the packaging of it is something
Speaker 1: that they can't seem to get away from.
Speaker 3: Now, former Democrat Telsey Gabbat, she was the Hawaiian congresswoman
Speaker 3: for many years, is officially joined the Republican Party. She
Speaker 3: now the move onstage at a Trump rally in North Carolina.
Speaker 12: It is because of my love for our country and
Speaker 12: specifically because of the leadership that President Trump has brought
Speaker 12: to transform the Republican Party and bring it back to
Speaker 12: the Party of the People and the Party of Peace.
Speaker 12: That I'm proud to stand here with you today, President
Speaker 12: Trump and announce that I'm joining the Republican Party.
Speaker 3: Kosher, I can't believe that. I mean, it was a
Speaker 3: few years ago she ended Kamala's campaign to be president.
Speaker 3: That was brutal, she took her down systematically, and now
Speaker 3: she's a Republican.
Speaker 1: It really is a remarkable evolution. You know, she came
Speaker 1: on the political scene, everybody loved her. On the other side,
Speaker 1: she talks about how she grew up a lifelong Democrat.
Speaker 1: She's a woman, she served an act of combat. She's young,
Speaker 1: you know, good, very articular communicator. The Democrats loved her
Speaker 1: and very quickly when she arrived as a freshman congresswoman
Speaker 1: there gave her prominent positions in the DNC and all
Speaker 1: sorts of things. And then one she talks about this
Speaker 1: that at some point when she was first to pape
Speaker 1: up and speak about the fact that she actually is
Speaker 1: anti war and doesn't agree with the foreign interventionalism. That's
Speaker 1: taken hold of both parties in recent years. They swept
Speaker 1: Lee promptly moved to you know, sweep her away, and
Speaker 1: she tangled with Hillary Clinton, she tangled with Karma. Then
Speaker 1: she declared herself an independent. And now she's completing her
Speaker 1: journey and coming on as a guope. And it's quite remarkable.
Speaker 3: And she says they've abandoned their values. She hasn't left them.
Speaker 3: They've left the values that they once embraced. And there
Speaker 3: really is no choice if you don't want to have war,
Speaker 3: if you value free speech, free expression, there's really only
Speaker 3: one side of the major parties that you can sit with.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 3: The Democrats are in panic mode. We've seen all the
Speaker 3: Hitler talk, all the fascist talk, and Kamala Harris is
Speaker 3: instead of being in the swing states, she's in Texas
Speaker 3: talking about abortion. I mean, what is the strategy here?
Speaker 3: Why would she waste any time in a state where
Speaker 3: she's got zero chats.
Speaker 1: So there's only two scenarios in which a candidate would
Speaker 1: do this. One is they have a complete lock on
Speaker 1: all the battleground states. They've got it in the bag
Speaker 1: and they're trying to expand the battlefield and no indication,
Speaker 1: So far suggests that's at all the case with her.
Speaker 1: The other reason is you're kind of on some level
Speaker 1: throwing in the towel where you know that the battlefield
Speaker 1: is shrinking and you want to throw your support behind
Speaker 1: the downstream, the down ballot candidates a Senate and congressional leaders,
Speaker 1: because sort of the writing might be on the wall
Speaker 1: for the national and that's why she's doing that. There's
Speaker 1: a tight race there with Senator Cruz and his opponent,
Speaker 1: and maybe she's throwing.
Speaker 3: In there so they don't want to lose all three
Speaker 3: that they want to have something, so the Republicans.
Speaker 1: Throw her support exactly to do that so that it
Speaker 1: leads yet for them. I mean, it's very tight, but
Speaker 1: it is an interesting tell. It is an interesting talent.
Speaker 1: It's either one where she's got the whole thing in
Speaker 1: the bag and we're all going to be because that's
Speaker 1: not what the paulling or anything indicates, or it's the
Speaker 1: other that she's kind of given up and she's.
Speaker 3: Helping the lower Now, former Republican Liz Cheney is back
Speaker 3: in the Harris Walls team, and it's rumored that she
Speaker 3: is now in the running for a critical position within
Speaker 3: the administration if they were to get up a cabinet post,
Speaker 3: no less, is this something that could unify the left
Speaker 3: and the right? I asked this knowing the answer, But
Speaker 3: I know there's a lot of people on the left,
Speaker 3: a lot of people in the media who see this
Speaker 3: as a win for the Democrats. How do you see it?
Speaker 1: In a way, it's no surprise, and it does point
Speaker 1: to maybe personal career ambition as coloring Liz chiny throwing
Speaker 1: down with kamaheras on top of her ideological alignment. It
Speaker 1: also again shows that point about how the two parties
Speaker 1: have really converged in the last forty years in being
Speaker 1: the party of war and foreign adventurers and all of that,
Speaker 1: and for her to be in a cabinet position just
Speaker 1: really underlines that point, which doesn't bold well with the raide.
Speaker 1: She's probably become one of the most heated figures on
Speaker 1: the raid, and as evidenced by her loss and.
Speaker 3: I reckon, Kamala is more popular amongst Republicans, and.
Speaker 1: She's viewed as almost sort of homeless and aware, like
Speaker 1: a puppet or a pond as opposed to Liz Cheney
Speaker 1: is a little bit more.
Speaker 3: I think she's seen as a traitor, So I think
Speaker 3: as someone who has pretended to be on your side
Speaker 3: and turns out to be anything. But there's more venom
Speaker 3: for that that sort of person, And I think there's
Speaker 3: people within you. Look at how Robert F. Kennedy Junior
Speaker 3: is being treated. There's probably more venom for him than
Speaker 3: there is for a lot of and Telsa.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Absolutely. Now, the son of George Soros, Alex Soros, continues
Speaker 3: to post pictures of himself with leading Democrats. Often they
Speaker 3: are visiting him in his apartment. Tell me Kosher about
Speaker 3: the influence of Soros and his many found on the
Speaker 3: American political life. He has been enormously successful in influencing
Speaker 3: the US justice system, for example, And I would argue
Speaker 3: for the worse, but this is something I think that
Speaker 3: doesn't get spoken about enough. And a lot of money,
Speaker 3: a lot of effort goes into extending this influence.
Speaker 1: Yep. And he's flexing obviously, because he loves to show
Speaker 1: those photos of rubbing shoulders with prominent Democrats, and he's
Speaker 1: flexing that his multi billion dollars. He's taking over the
Speaker 1: mantle of his father, George Rows is very very elderly,
Speaker 1: and he's going to carry on the family business, if
Speaker 1: you will, which is, as you say, they're very rich,
Speaker 1: so they can just throw money at different causes and
Speaker 1: lobby but they've also been very insidiously effective at influencing
Speaker 1: local politics and throwing money into racist that people don't
Speaker 1: pay attention to, like the local district attorney, local prosecutors,
Speaker 1: but that actually really do affect the American way of life.
Speaker 1: And we've seen that in places like California and Chicago
Speaker 1: and elsewhere where. They have criminalize things and you know,
Speaker 1: don't hold people accountable, don't enforce the law, and just
Speaker 1: all the medium that that unleashes. They have a lot
Speaker 1: of those fingerprints lead back to the Soros family.
Speaker 3: Well, New York Posts has done some fantastic reporting on
Speaker 3: just how far and wide this influence has spread. But
Speaker 3: you're right, those DA races may not seem significant when
Speaker 3: you're thinking about who's going to be president, but they
Speaker 3: have enormous power. And this two tier justice system, the
Speaker 3: crime rate, all those sort of issues we talk about
Speaker 3: emanate from that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a big prou because I people don't enforce
Speaker 1: the law, prosecute bad wrongdoing, you see crime increase, and
Speaker 1: then people of a point to El Salvador as an
Speaker 1: example where you go the other direction and pretty quickly
Speaker 1: you can see crime decrease. And both George Soros and
Speaker 1: Alex Oros have been on the first side of that occuation.
Speaker 3: As we say, elections have consequences. Vote accordingly, Koshigata, thanks
Speaker 3: for your time. Tonight still to come. Leonardo DiCaprio are
Speaker 3: heackled in Paris over his links to be did Kinsey's
Speaker 3: Scofield joins me next welcome back, joining me now celebrity
Speaker 3: and royal reporter Kinsey Schofield Kinsey, lan Ardo DiCaprio has
Speaker 3: been heckled in Paris. He's been a question about his
Speaker 3: attendance at a Didty party.
Speaker 4: And you don't.
Speaker 3: You, friend, He's not used to that. I've got to
Speaker 3: say it looks ridiculous. Kinsey is wearing a mask in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four. He should be heckled for that.
Speaker 13: Uh.
Speaker 3: His personal life has been in the spotlight for a
Speaker 3: number of years now, Kinsey, but his proximity to this
Speaker 3: Diddy gandal surely can only hurt his image.
Speaker 13: Yeah, I'm going to give him credit here because he's
Speaker 13: one of the few celebrities that has actually tried to
Speaker 13: distance himself from the allegations, unlike everyone else who's just
Speaker 13: keeping their head down. A source close to Leonardo said
Speaker 13: that he hadn't had anything to do with Diddy for years.
Speaker 13: He never attended a freak off. So they specifically said,
Speaker 13: he never attended a freak off and has nothing to
Speaker 13: do with this case. And the last known photo of
Speaker 13: them together is from twenty nineteen, So you know, where's
Speaker 13: j Loo where you know where are all of these
Speaker 13: other people? At least Leonardo is like, Nope, not me,
Speaker 13: I don't want anything to do with this.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, there were a lot of celebrities, a lot
Speaker 3: of A listers who've been at these parties over the
Speaker 3: years and who've been pictured, So you're right, he's hardly
Speaker 3: alone there and has at least made some sort of
Speaker 3: a public statement. Now let's go to Harry and Meghan,
Speaker 3: particularly Harry for this particular story, because there's still mystery
Speaker 3: surrounding whether he lawfully obtained a US visa after he
Speaker 3: admitted in his book Spare that he had used drugs,
Speaker 3: something that could disqualify an applicant from obtaining a visa.
Speaker 3: The issues yet to be put to bed after a
Speaker 3: case brought against the Biden administration by the think tank
Speaker 3: the Heritage Foundation, was quashed. The court ruled in favor
Speaker 3: of the Biden administration, stating that Harry's Department of Homeland
Speaker 3: Security records should not be released in order to maintain
Speaker 3: his privacy. However, the Heritage Foundation lawyers have now asked
Speaker 3: the court to vacate that ruling and allowed the release
Speaker 3: of private correspondence between the DHS and the judge. Kinsey,
Speaker 3: what else can you tell us about this?
Speaker 12: Well, that's the story.
Speaker 13: You gave me everything I got. The judge at some
Speaker 13: point received private information, a private documentation from the Biden administration,
Speaker 13: and the Heritage Foundation is saying making that documentation private
Speaker 13: doesn't allow us to represent ourselves appropriately. It doesn't get
Speaker 13: you know, that secrecy did not allow us to fight
Speaker 13: this case fairly. So they want to vacate that judgment,
Speaker 13: that prior judgment, and they want access to those documents.
Speaker 13: What did the Biden administration hand this judge that potentially made,
Speaker 13: you know, helped him steer him in the direction of
Speaker 13: the decision he made, which was in their favor.
Speaker 4: Well, I don't.
Speaker 3: Understand how the court could have ruled in favor of
Speaker 3: the Biden administration about we can't release these Department of
Speaker 3: Homeland Security documents that might breach Prince Harry's privacy. He
Speaker 3: wrote about all this nonsense in his own memoir. He
Speaker 3: has talked about it in these Tell All interviews. What
Speaker 3: privacy are they protecting here? That in itself just seems
Speaker 3: absurd to me? But let's get back to Diddy. According
Speaker 3: to complaint filed in February by Rodney Little Rod Jones,
Speaker 3: Sean Ditty Combs reportedly mandated that all these staff carried
Speaker 3: pink cocaine, the drug found in one direction member leam
Speaker 3: Pain's body after his death, and in some cases they
Speaker 3: were also ordered Kinsey to or Carrie ecstasy marijuana gummies.
Speaker 4: GHB.
Speaker 3: What's the latest on the growing case against Ditty?
Speaker 13: I mean, do you remember when they originally carried out
Speaker 13: these reds. Ditty was traveling and they approached Ditty. I mean,
Speaker 13: the officers found Ditty. He was not arrested, but someone
Speaker 13: in his entourage was arrested for having drugs on them.
Speaker 13: So you hear this story, This is coming from Little Ride.
Speaker 13: This is one of the civil cases against him. You
Speaker 13: hear the story and then you kind of put two
Speaker 13: and two together and realize one individual rest that was
Speaker 13: that you were in transit where for having drugs on them.
Speaker 13: This potentially is true. Unlimited amount of civil cases, over
Speaker 13: one hundred civil cases, some miners, boys and girls. The
Speaker 13: story keeps getting more horrific, and I don't think it's
Speaker 13: going to slow down anytime soon.
Speaker 3: Now, one of the young people that did he allegedly
Speaker 3: groomed is Justin Bieber, and he is reportedly considering a
Speaker 3: lawsuit against his business managers for mismanaging his money, squandering
Speaker 3: a large part of his three hundred million dollar fortune.
Speaker 3: Surely Biber isn't broke a Kinsey would have made.
Speaker 4: Fortune.
Speaker 3: Three hundred million is not a small amount.
Speaker 13: Yeah, I mean he just sold his music catalog for
Speaker 13: two hundred million dollars. You know, his adversaries will likely
Speaker 13: argue that there will be that there was a period
Speaker 13: in his life where he was irresponsible with his money
Speaker 13: and that he is to blame for where he's at.
Speaker 13: And there are reports that there's infighting within his team
Speaker 13: whether to file a lawsuit or not. His current team split.
Speaker 13: Some members want him to sue, others are advising him
Speaker 13: against it. I think that he's just kind of and
Speaker 13: maybe the diddy thing has something.
Speaker 8: To do with it.
Speaker 13: He's wondering who was ever on his side, who really
Speaker 13: truly have my best interest at heart?
Speaker 3: Might be reevaluating you feel You feel so bad because
Speaker 3: you look at some of these songs, some of his performances,
Speaker 3: and it was like he was crying out for help.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Kinsey Schofield. And that's it for me tonight.
Speaker 3: I'll see you tomorrow. At nine point thirty four left,
Speaker 3: he's losing it up. Next, is Nis not