WEBVTT - Credlin | 14 July

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Peedo Kredlin live on Sky News Australia.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, good evening and welcome to the show. Here's what's

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 2>coming up on credline. Fresh warnings tonight about the extent

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of alleged corruption on Victoria's big build sites, with revelations

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the Victorian labor government cave to union pressure on a

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 2>taxpayer funded project.

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 3>More on that shortly.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 2>More budget pressure for labor with calls to lift the

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>turnover ceiling and scrap a ten million dollar lifetime cap

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 2>as part of CGT carveouts for startups. Newpolling and Victoria

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>shows one nation ahead of the major parties. So what

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>does this mean for Premier Deciner Allen's leadership?

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 3>And President Donald Trump is vowing.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.639
<v Speaker 2>To charge fees to use the straight ofform moos, what

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>impact will this have on Australia.

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 4>I want to hear BURSA because we're protecting a very

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 4>rich portion of the world. We're spending money and so

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 4>what we've done is we are going to be reimbursed

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 4>for protection we're protecting by the countries that we're helping.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Today's housing headlines should concern every Australian, not just those

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 2>trying to buy a home, but anyone who already owns one.

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>The ripple effects of Labour's housing overhaul are becoming clearer

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>by the day. The government said the tax changes wouldn't

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>cause a dramatic fall in house prices.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Here is the Prime Minister.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Treasury has done modeling which shows that they'll still continue

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 5>to be an increase, but it will be smaller than

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 5>it would have been otherwise.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>But today's data tells a very different story.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Instead of simply growing more slowly, they're plummeting. According to Cotality,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>property prices in parts of Sydney fell close to ten

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 2>percent in just three months.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>For homeowners.

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 2>That means years of hard earned equity wiped away in

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a matter of months, and spare a thought for retirees

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 2>and downsizes, a group this government too often seems to forget.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 2>For many of them, the family home is their retirement plan.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 2>It's what they were counting on to fund the next

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>stage of their lives. But when property values fall, so

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>does their buying power. A retiree who could have sold

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 2>twelve months ago and comfortably moved into a smaller unit

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 2>may no longer be able to and the financial loss

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 2>is only part of it. A real estate agent in

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Greenwich says we need to be talking about the mental

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>health impacts of this downturn.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 6>We're not hearing a lot about the mental anguish, the

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 6>stress a distant causing on retirees, older people, and what's happening,

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 6>particularly on the Upper North Shore mark is twelve months

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 6>ago they may have been able to downsize if they

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 6>had a property worth three four million dollars. Now they're losing.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 6>They're not even getting two point nine two point five

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 6>for property, which is having a direct impact on their

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 6>ability to purchase a second hand or even a new unit,

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 6>a smaller unit perhaps with no stairs, level living. And

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 6>the mental anguish and the health concerns that's causing these people,

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 6>some of them are trying to get into nursing homes

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 6>is absolutely devastating.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>And the impacts don't end there.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 2>The Australian newspaper reports today that Australia's two point three

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 2>million property investors are rapidly changing strategy. Rather than buying

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>established homes, they're turning to new bills, creating a battle

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 2>for first home buyers. So Australians are once again asking

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>did the government understand the consequences of its own policy?

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>A buyer's agent explained to Mike Levy on two GB

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 2>why these changes could make it harder for young Australians

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to break into the market.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 7>Let's just be rich for a second. So I used

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 7>to buy two million dollar negatively get property, right, be

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 7>could I chunk take a bit chunk off my tax

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 7>bill and all elbows thrown a little spanner in for

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 7>negative gearing. So I'm still rich. I've still got money,

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 7>but the top end of the market doesn't.

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 8>Make sense anymore.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 7>So what we're seeing is people are now breaking that up.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 7>The rich people are breaking it up into three or

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 7>four affordable properties and then putting that money into the

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 7>area where all the first home buyers are. And all

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 7>of my rich mates they're all doing exactly the same thing.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 7>So right now we've got this bit of a lull

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 7>period where people are just scared of making decisions. And

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 7>then what's that doing to the affordable end. We've got

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 7>rents rising in Sydney for fifty dollars a week or

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 7>fifty dollars already units thirty dollars, So it's going to

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 7>then make it harder for the normal everyday Australian to save.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 2>The irony is hard to ignore. Labor wanted to discourage

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 2>property investors. Instead, many are simply turning their attention away

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 2>from established homes to new builds, putting them in direct

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 2>competition with first home buyers. Yet Housing Minister Clara O'Neil

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>insists changes will help out those first home buyers.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 5>What the budget changes do do is put first home

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 5>buyers on a level playing field for the first time.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 5>We've got home ownership rates for young people around this

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 5>country crashing through the floor, and our government is stepping

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 5>up and making real change to give first time buyers

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 5>a shot they deserve.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 2>But if the goal was to make housing more affordable,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>has it actually worked? House prices might be falling, but

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 2>affordability isn't just about the sticker price of a home.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>It's about whether Australians can actually save a deposit, get

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 2>a mortgage and compete in a market where demands still

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>far outweigh supply. Senator Andrew Bragg says that's exactly.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>What this debate is missing.

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 9>And now house prices are too high from a young

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 9>person's perspectively, no doubt about that. And all this is

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 9>going to do is highlight that young people can't afford

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 9>to buy these houses.

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 10>So ultimately you're satisfied in seeing house prices declining.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 9>If that's going to help young people get in, then

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 9>that's a good thing. But I make the point that

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 9>it's not about the actual price, it's about affordability, and

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 9>affordability has been smashed by this government because they've let

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 9>almost two million people into the country and they've only

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 9>built about six hundred thousand house It doesn't.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 3>And that's the reality.

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Unless Australia builds enough homes to keep up with population growth,

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:24.239
<v Speaker 2>young Australians will still struggle to buy one. Housing isn't

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>just another political issue. It is the single biggest store

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 2>of wealth in this country. Around thirteen trillion dollars is

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 2>tied up in residential property. That's more than Australians hold

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in superannuation shares and commercial property combined. So when governments

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally change the housing market, the consequences don't stop at

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>home values.

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 3>It ripples through the entire economy.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 11>There's a reality here, and that is the wealth effect

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 11>of home prices. If home prices established, home prices are falling,

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 11>Australians spends They spend less on furniture, on cars, on

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 11>home renovations, on a whole range of things. Home Builders

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 11>don't build when home prices are falling, and the reason

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 11>is because there is no buying demand out there to

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 11>buy those times, and so therefore the impact on the

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 11>economy can be especially done.

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>That's why housing policy is too important to experiment with,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>because when governments get it wrong, Australians pay the price.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>What I'm about to discuss is deeply confronting. It involves

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 2>the alleged abuse of children in childcare centers. But it's

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a conversation. We must have today's headlines name another alleged

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>childcare offender. How was our system allowed this to potentially

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 2>happen again? Parents would have read these headlines today and

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>then done something almost imaginable. They still had to drop

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 2>their children at childcare and go to work because for

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>most Australian families today, two incomes aren't a luxury, it's

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 2>a necessity. Parents leave their children at childcare believing they're

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>in the safest possible hands.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 3>I know that feeling.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I've dropped my two boys at childcare in the past

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and had to drive to work. Every parent does that.

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>That trust is sacred, and when that trust is allegedly broken,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 2>the consequences last a lifetime. The man at the center

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 2>of today's headlines is facing more than three hundred and

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty charges over his alleged abuse.

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Of one hundred and fifty children.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Police say he worked at more than sixty childcare centers

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>during his career, with the alleged abuse occurring at ten

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 2>of those places.

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 12>The abuse of trust we alleged has occurred is devastating

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 12>and will have life long ramifications for victims and their families.

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 12>All I can say is we never gave up and

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 12>we never will.

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 2>But how does someone move through that many workplaces without

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the system stopping them? And this isn't the first time

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 2>serious questions have been raised about Australia's childcare system. Just

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>last week, another childcare worker was jailed for sexual offenses

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>against nine children, and we all remember the horrific allegations

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 2>that rocked Melbourne's childcare sector last year. At some point

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 2>we must stop simply reacting to these stories and start

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>fixing the system that allows them to happen. This tragedy

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 2>also exposes something else. Australia has become heavily reliant on

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 2>large childcare centers. Parents need more options for care, whether

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 2>that's nanny's, grandparents.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Or home based careers.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Governments must do more to give families choice rather than

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 2>forcing everyone into the same system. Childcare choice advocate von

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Hosking says the news is hard for parents.

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 13>This is one of the worst alleged childcare abuse cases

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 13>in Australia's history and it's a gut punch to every

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 13>single family who's had no option but to trust the system.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Parents to serve better.

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 13>Children deserve better.

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 3>And missus Hoskin is right.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 2>We must do everything possible to protect children because if

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:29.599
<v Speaker 2>we're not, then we cannot keep pretending this system is working.

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 14>Well.

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's said to Canberra Now.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 2>For tonight's political headlines were Sky Near's political reporter cam.

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 15>Redden Good Evening Opposition leader Angus Taylor says he's not

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 15>conflicted about whether to criticize one Nation, but is stopping

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 15>short of declaring outright war on the party.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 8>I say what I say about one nation with a

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 8>heavy heart. Frankly, I say it with a heavy heart.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 8>Why Well, the reason well, because I know many of

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 8>the good people I want voting for us I have,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 8>so you're inflicted when they're taking here I am. I

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 8>am not conflicted. They do not have a plan for

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 8>the future of this country.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 15>The Prime Minister will tomorrow deliver a landmark speech on

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 15>artificial intelligence. It's being billed as his most significant address

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 15>on the issue.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 16>One of the concerns I have is when the Prime

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 16>Minister makes his statement tomorrow, he'll move the country towards

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 16>too much regulation.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 15>The government has been facing calls from Australian creatives like

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 15>artists and musicians, who argue the big tech companies have

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 15>been ripping off their work to train AI models without

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 15>sufficient compensation.

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 5>The Abanez government is committed to the robust copyright framework

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 5>that Australia enjoys.

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 15>Cameron Reddin's Sky News Canberra.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Another busy week in news and who better to look

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 2>under the bonnet than Sky News political editor Andrew Clenell, Andrew,

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 2>great to see you.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's start now with the straight of horn.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Moves, because both the oppice position and the Government have

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>been very swift to pretty much condemn President Trump's idea

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 2>about this twenty percent levy on ships that are going

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 2>through the Strait of Horror moves. Dan teen has urged

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister to flag the concerns directly with the

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>White House. But when you hear comments like that, in

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 2>all honesty, would Donald Trump listened to anything that we

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 2>had to say when it came to a comment regarding

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 2>tariffs and levies in the strait of Horn moves?

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 17>Well, that's why I think, Anthony Albenize, you'll stay out

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 17>of it. But is it just an idle threat? I mean,

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 17>you've got to wonder that, especially when it's a social

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 17>media post by Donald Trump. He he throws these things

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 17>out there. You've got to take it a little less

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 17>literally than we're accustomed to in political reporting.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>I think, and I think it is just.

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 17>A threat out there, you know, kind of a flash

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.719
<v Speaker 17>in his head saying that. I mean, it's exactly what

0:12:55.760 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 17>Iram was condemned for suggesting a similar proposal. So the

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 17>international community is not going to cop that. But it

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 17>illustrates the mess that the situation's created. I mean, we

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 17>were in a situation where we kind of thought the

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 17>petrol prices are going to come down, the XIS cut

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 17>can come off. The government kept it halfway because they said,

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 17>you know, this thing might not be over yet. And

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 17>sure enough at eight and you know, the suspicion is

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 17>now it could still go for another few months. So

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 17>perhaps we all celebrated early on the war to concern.

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, the government has said that we shouldn't worry when

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>it comes to fuel. What are some of the things

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 2>that you're hearing? Are they quietly a lot more concerned

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to Bowen and out fuel resources and imports.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 17>I think it's one of those things where they've done

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 17>the work, so for three months it's okay. After that though,

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 17>surely they're worried. So that's that's kind of what we're

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 17>looking at. And so you know it can't go on forever.

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 17>But I think if it goes on another two or

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 17>three months, were okay, But gee, it's a locker room

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 17>situation than it was a week ago, that's for sure.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Well let's come to some domestic issue now, and one

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>in particular, Andrew.

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 3>We are still talking about this budget and it is

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 3>now months on the latest.

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Is Labor now under pressure to dramatically lift the turnover

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>ceiling and scrap the ten million lifetime cap and this

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 2>is around its capital gains tax carve.

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Out for startups?

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>What are you hearing when it comes to this and

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 2>are they likely to do more changes as well.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that will do more changes, And I think it's.

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 17>A it's messy because it should be sort of by

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 17>now you've had legislation through.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Now they sort of put out this options paper.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 17>I mean, it all feels a bit us about, if

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 17>I can use that term, really, I mean, this is

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 17>why traditionally, you like John Howard did a big GST

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 17>lock up, then he did a budget. You know, they say, well,

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 17>a lot of changes made to the GST, but these

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 17>seem somewhat more significant. And then we had the Henry

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 17>Tax review. You've got that proposals all out there and open,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 17>and during that period people can come up with holes

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 17>in it, you know. But if you sort of have

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 17>just a few little leaks come out and then whack

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 17>it in a budget on budget night, this is fact,

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 17>this is happening, that's where you get issues. And it

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 17>did appear like until there was stories a couple of

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 17>days before the budget, they hadn't really thought of startups

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 17>because they changed the capital gains system so you can

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 17>claim indexation, but startups start from zero. It has no

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 17>value to start with, so they can't claim indexation. And

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 17>that was always a problem. So then oh, okay, we're

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 17>going to exempt startups. But then all these conditions and

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 17>they're very contentious, So I mean, you know, we know

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 17>one thing for sure, people are going to lose out.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 17>Business is going to lose out. That's probably not good

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 17>for the economy. It does make you sort of wonder

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 17>would they have been better off just doing the negative

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 17>gearing change, not the capital gains change? Have they bitten

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 17>off more than they can chew with capital gains tax

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 17>because it doesn't just affect property because of rate rises,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 17>the property markets on the way down anyway. That's good

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 17>for first time buyers, but it's not going to be

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 17>popular with many Australians or for homeowners.

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>It does appear messy.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 17>But despite this, largely because the opposition isn't performing that

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 17>well and one nation's threatening them, the government's still in front.

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 17>So I feel like they will feel that they've got

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 17>away with it to some extent.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what I find fascinating right now when we

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 2>look at polling.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 18>Now.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I know this is obviously you don't take everything as

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>biblical when you see different.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Poles, but I find it's so.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Interesting that labour doesn't really seem to be too scathed

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>by what's going on at the moment. Let's not forget

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister lied repeatedly about these tax changes and

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>he seems to just be going on untouched and one

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 2>of these unforeseen consequences. I think of what's coming with

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 2>this budget. You just mentioned, house price is going down.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 2>The first home buyers aren't getting into the market like

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister said that they would. Do you think

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>that they would be looking at changing some of the

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>aspects when it comes to housing because of the collapse

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing, or they'll just sit back and let

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the market, to their point, correct itself.

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Yes, or they have to step in.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 17>I think they'll do that, and I think that they

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 17>look quite cleverly really at the political cycle and they'll

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 17>know it's two years out, so they'll just hope that

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 17>their hope is it's all forgotten by them and as possible,

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 17>other issues will take over. You may have that slump

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 17>and then you may have rates go down as they

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 17>started to do before the last election. They may time

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 17>it perfectly and then prices go up, so they may

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 17>have some luck on that front. It's a gamble and

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 17>I don't think it's been handled smoothly at all. You

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 17>see that from the back down and now all this

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 17>messy stuff that's occurring. But I think they could well

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 17>get away with it, particularly unless the opposition lifts its game.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 17>And I think this is you know, they say governments

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 17>lose elections, oppositions don't win them, but I think this

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 17>puts the to that because it shows that you know,

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 17>you're never going to look as good as the incumbent.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 17>There's a massive advantage with incumbency, but you've got to

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 17>present as something that does capture the imagination of people.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 17>And that's Angus Taylor's challenge. It's a big challenge for him,

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 17>particularly with Andrew Hasty breathing down his.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Neck, and also to your point, reminding voters leading into

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.959
<v Speaker 2>the next election about the promises that were broken so

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that these this period is not forgotten. Before I let

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 2>you go, I do want to get your thoughts about

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 2>this scathing attack that was in the paper today by

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>National's federal president Andrew Fraser.

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 3>So he's pretty much.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Declared war on Barnaby Joyce and he's labeled Barnaby as

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>disgusting and warned the party will win against one nation. Now,

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>is this just political retric or. Is this a legitimate

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 2>warning from the NATS.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 17>Well, if you went out there and asked your viewers,

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 17>who's Andrew Fraser and who's Barnaby Joyce, Barnaby Joyce is

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 17>going to win that hands down. Andrew Fraser was the

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 17>stadium p for Coss Harbor for me years. He was

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 17>famous for chasing Joe Tripodi around the chamber and trying

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 17>to strangle him. He said I've only had a couple

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 17>of wines and said he wanted to be breath tested. So,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 17>I mean Andrew Fraser fair enough, he's had a crack.

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 17>But I think all it shows is how fearful they

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 17>are of losing their seats to Barnaby Joyce in one

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 17>nation and with some justification.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's kind of where I see it. It's

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a real challenge.

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 19>For the NATS.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 17>They probably picked the best person they could in Canavan

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 17>as someone who can who's got a bit of charisma

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 17>and can get stuck in. But there's something about Joyce

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 17>I've got. Even even when he stuffs up when you

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 17>interview him, he's just got He just talks outside the

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 17>talking points, and this is what Canavan's trying to do.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>To and to some effect.

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 17>But Joyce just has terms of phrase that the kind

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 17>of people like, and he doesn't have the responsibility. Now

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 17>he's got to be an alternative government.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 3>So and he's entertaining, he's entertaining.

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>He's getting the attention, so's Pauline.

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 17>The challenges you know, can Angus Taylor be spotted in

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 17>a lineup or even Matt Canavan And that's the challenge

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 17>for them over the next six to twelve months because

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 17>one Nation has the jump on them there. One Nation's

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 17>problems more is they're going to make political mistakes which

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 17>are going to have people scratching their heads and going

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 17>maybe not, but they are getting the attention that the

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 17>Liberals and Nationals so desperately craven need.

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's why I think the Coalition need to not

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 2>attack one nation. Just let them stand back and one

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Nation make the mistakes and they can be out there

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and do it and the Coalition can just stand there

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and prove why they are the stronger opposition.

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Andrew clen now, thank you so much for your time tonight.

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to head down now to Victoria.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 2>And while there was news of a dip in support

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>for One Nation, federally yesterday. It's not reflected in the

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Garden State, with another new poll showing the minor Party

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>is ahead of Labor and the Coalition.

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 3>A poll of six thousand, five.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Hundred Victorians conducted over the past fortnite found One Nation

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 2>leading both major parties on a statewide primary vote of

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven percent. Labor and the Coalition were tired at

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 2>twenty six percent, with the Greens on twelve percent and

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 2>other parties on eight. Here to offer us his insights

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 2>is Victorian political editor for The Australian Anthony Galloway. Anthony, welcome.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 2>There's certainly been plenty of talk around the easing of

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 2>that popularity surge towards One Nation, but it doesn't appear

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to be happening in Victoria.

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 3>But the clock is ticking. You're at the coal face here.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 2>You've spoken to insiders from both sides of the chamber.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 3>What are you hearing?

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 16>Oh, you're right, it's I mean One Nation at twenty

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 16>seven percent and the two majors at twenty six percent.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 16>A massive sample size of six thousand, five hundred which

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 16>the poll. Interestingly, the poll was commissioned by Victorian tra

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 16>Ads Hall Council which is the peak union body in Victoria,

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 16>and union chiefs were all brought in to Trades Hall

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 16>today and they were briefed on the results. Given the

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 16>sample size, there was quite a significant what's called an

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 16>MRP which goes into predicting the result in individual seats

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 16>based off preference flows. I understand for Labor it was

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 16>quite dire in Melbourne's eastern suburbs. It's in the Eastern

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 16>suburbs and the kind of sand belt of Melbourne where

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 16>most of the Labor health seats are that the Coalition

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 16>need to win at the November election. But the coalition's

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 16>primary at twenty six percent is still too low to

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 16>form majority government. But looking at it, there's no way

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 16>Labour can form any kind of government on a statewide

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 16>primary of twenty six percent. The coalition can because the

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 16>preferences from one nation are likely going to float their way.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 16>Labour needs a primary of at least thirty percent. I'm

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 16>told by both sides to have any chance of holding

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 16>on to government.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's go to justinter Allen's leadership. And there's certainly

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot of speculation around her at the moment, and

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>one of those is that she's being propped up and

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>protected by powerful Union figures. Now, obviously Labor will deny this,

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>but just how tangible is the Union's influence over the government.

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 16>Well, I think you're referring to an interesting Herald Sun

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 16>piece this week on the ETU in Victoria and the

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 16>State Secretary Troy Gray, who's a significant part of Justinter

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 16>Allen's power base. I mean, you don't. You can't get

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 16>the leadership of the Labor Party state or federal without

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 16>having some kind of power base within the Union movement.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 16>It's important to note Justinter Allen came into State Parliament

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 16>in nineteen ninety nine with the support of the ETU.

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 16>She is an ETU MP. I'm told the ETU in

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 16>Victoria and Troy Gray will go down with just Cintra Allen,

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 16>even if the party room decide to roll the premiere,

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 16>which I think is still a possibility when Parliament returns

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 16>later this month and next month. I think I'm told

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 16>the ETU will go down with Alan. She is one

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 16>of their MPs. She's really delivered for the ETU. She

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 16>didn't ban duck hunting, which the e TOU didn't want.

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 16>She didn't go ahead with a gun guy gun buyback

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.719
<v Speaker 16>which was really important to EU members. And at the

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:39.959
<v Speaker 16>recent state conference she announced two thousand more electrical apprenticeships

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 16>for this state Electrical Commission. So that's basically two thousand

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 16>extra ETU members. So she's delivered for them. They'll all

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 16>in all likelihood go down with her if need be.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>And Anthony, how much do you think these allegations though

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 2>that are surrounding justinter Allen is impacting her within her party,

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 2>but also are just amongst voters. When you're out around

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 2>talking to different people, what are you hearing?

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 16>I think the CFM you construction scandal, the the infiltration

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 16>of organized crime and biking gangs on big build taxpayer

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 16>funded projects has really started filtering through to the average Victorian.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 16>It's something that's just anecdotally mentioned by voters now both

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 16>sides tell me in focus groups it's you know, the

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 16>words corruption and CFME you and now are now being

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 16>raised unprompted by by swinging voters. Labor knows it's a

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 16>huge issue.

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 16>The biggest probably probably the biggest issue for the premier

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 16>is infrastructure spending used to be Victorian Labour's biggest asset

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 16>that built a lot of things, whether it's roads, rail hospitals. Uh,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 16>you know, no one can deny that that has been

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 16>an asset for Daniel Andrews and then Jacina Allen. They

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 16>can't talk about the big build program anymore because of

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 16>this Union corruption scandal and Anthony.

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Just quickly before I let you go, Jess Wilson has

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 2>been on a regional tour. But how much work do

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.479
<v Speaker 2>the Libs really need to do to be able to

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 2>win in November?

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 16>Well, I mean, based on the polling, they would be

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 16>winning in minority government at the moment. So I think

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 16>the challenge for Jess Wilson is to get that primary

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 16>from twenty let's take this Red Bridge Pole as fact,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 16>twenty six percent. It needs to get to at least

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 16>thirty percent and beyond to be in any kind of

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 16>position to be forming majority government. I'm told Jess Wilson

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 16>is a real asset. Wherever she goes in the state,

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 16>people like her, voters like her. She's doing some really

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 16>interesting things on social media. But this kind of surge

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 16>of one Nation, which is really a national problem that

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 16>has just kind of hit Jess Wilson through no fauld

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 16>of her own, has really complicated her path to majority government.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll certainly be watching very closely in the lead

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 2>up to November. Anthony, thank you for your time tonight

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 2>after the break distressing news in the childcare sector as

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a worker is charged with alleged three hundred and twenty offenses.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 2>But what's been the response from the government and universities

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 2>will face the Royal Commission tomorrow to look at their

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 2>impact on the rise of anti Semitism in Australia.

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 2>It's great to have your company coming up, the warning

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 2>from business CEOs over Victoria's looming.

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Work from home legislation.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 2>But now to the renewed fears around the impact of

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 2>the re escalation of the war in the Middle East

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and what it could mean for everyday Australians.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm joined by.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Deputy leader and Victorian Senator Jane Hume.

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Jane, it's great to see you, dear, is you t

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 3>as well?

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 2>We will touch on ARAM briefly, but I do want

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 2>to start with the CFMU and some of the reports

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 2>that are coming out today, and in particular it was

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 2>around a former senior official who oversaw the redevelopment of

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Victorian Hospital. Now this person says the State Labor government

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 2>intervened in the taxpayer funded project to pressure public servants

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 2>to sack a company that attracted the disapproval of the CFMU. Now,

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I know this is predominantly a state based issue, but

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>as a Victorian senator, how deep does this alleged corruption go.

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 20>Well, this is the problem, Jamie. It's not just a

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 20>state based issue. It was only two weeks ago that

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 20>the Prime Minister was.

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 19>Asked whether any Commonwealth.

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 20>Taxpayer money had gone to projects that had then been

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 20>passed on to criminals, and he said that he had

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 20>sought assurances from Premier Justinto Allen that that was the case.

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 19>Of course, he said, of course I have.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 20>Now the problem is every single day we have a

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 20>new allegation of corruption, and Labour simply shrugs its shoulders

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 20>and said there's nothing to see here. Today's revelations are

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 20>quite extraordinary.

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 19>This is a senior bureaucrat in a.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 20>Victorian health building authority that says that he was pressured

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 20>by the government to remove a subcontractor from a site

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 20>because that subcontractor was in some sort of dispute with

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 20>the CFMU. So the government was actually actively involved in

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 20>that decision making and pressuring a bureaucrat to make a decision.

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 20>It's quite extraordinary, and this bureaucrat has said that he's

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 20>happy to testify that that's the case. Now when asked

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 20>about it, Premier de cinter Allen has said, oh, actually, no,

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 20>that's not the case.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 19>There's no basis for that claim.

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 20>However, her own Health Infrastructure Minister clearly isn't satisfied with that,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 20>because she's gone on now to write a letter to

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 20>that authority to seek assurances that corrupt behavior is not

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 20>continuing and that the government is not involved. So there's

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 20>the left hand isn't talking to the right hand, or

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 20>the left faction isn't talking to the right faction in

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 20>the Victorian Labor Party, because clearly the government has been

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 20>involved in this process, in this corruption that is so

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 20>deep seated, so deep rooted in construction in Victoria, and

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 20>it's all tax pays, not just Victorian tax pays that

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 20>are paying the price because that site received Commonwealth funds,

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 20>which is completely different to the assurances that apparently the

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 20>Prime Minister has received from cinter Allen.

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 3>No wonder.

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Jess Wilson and the Coalition in Victoria calling for a

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Royal commission into some of these projects of what's going on,

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>just to get some answers and see where there was

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 2>any of this election CROs.

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 20>It seems that in Victoria a royal commission really is

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 20>the only appropriate solution. Now some states have taken control

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 20>of this. Queensland is a very good sample. They have

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 20>a Commission of Inquiry that's going on up there. And

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 20>even today we heard allegations that the Master Builder's former

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 20>Marchter Builders CEO had been so intimidated by the CFMU

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 20>that he had considered taking his own life that they

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 20>were camping outside his office with you know, people dressed

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 20>up as the Grim Reaper, fake coffins. I mean, this

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 20>is the kind of bullying and intimidation that just simply

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 20>can't be allowed on work sites. And at the same time,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 20>we're now you know, it's taxpayers that end up paying

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 20>the price for this. We are paying over the odds

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 20>for this corrupt union to be on infrastructure sites that

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 20>are building buildings, that are building bridges, that are building

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 20>roads that Australia needs. But we simply can't allow it

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 20>to continue. Now, my colleague Senator Maria Kovacic has put

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 20>out a petition to suggest that perhaps at a federal level.

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 20>If the government doesn't want a royal commission, Okay, we'll

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 20>have a Senate inquiry into corruption the construction and building industry.

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 20>And I think that's perfectly fair and reasonable. Yes, she's

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 20>had fifty thousand people signed that petition, fifty thousand, which

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 20>is quite extraordinary because people know when corruption exists, it's taxpayers.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 19>That end up putting the bill. But the government is resisting.

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to move on now to there's a few

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 2>other issues I want to get through with you, just

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 2>very briefly. Obviously, the war in Iran has teed off again,

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 2>and we're hearing reports that President Donald Trump wants to

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 2>now put in a levee for ships to be able

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 2>to go.

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Through the Strait of hor Moves.

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 2>But the government has said that we don't need to

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 2>worry that our stocks and are all fine.

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 19>What do you think, Well, we're not hearing that from farmers.

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 20>They're very concerned with September plantings coming up, that they

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 20>won't have the fuel and.

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 19>Fertilizer that they need.

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 20>We always knew that this was going to be a

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 20>fragile piece, but at the same time, we don't support

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 20>a President Trump's idea of a tariff or a levee

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 20>on the passage through the straits of the Moose. We

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 20>would like to see peace talks continue. We would like

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 20>to see an end to hostilities, but of course that's

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 20>really in Iran's court now they have the ability to

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 20>bring all hostilities to an end, but and open up

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 20>the straits of a moose.

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 19>That's what we would like to see.

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Or if Albo and Donald Trump had a better relationship,

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you might better pick up the phone.

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 20>And he isn't it I mean, wouldn't we like to

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 20>know exactly what you what representations have been made by

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 20>the government to their US counterparts.

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 19>This is a big deal.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 20>We want to make sure that we don't add costs

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 20>to shipping. We wanted to remove costs to shipping, which

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 20>is why we want the straits open in the first place.

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, Senator, I want to talk to you about a

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 2>distressing headline today that really hit me and I found

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 2>myself actually feeling really sad and distressed when I was

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 2>reading about it.

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 3>And it is the childcare.

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Sector where another worker has been charged with more than

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and twenty alleged defenses. Now, obviously that matter

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>will be left with the court to resolve.

0:33:58.440 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 3>But I couldn't help.

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 2>But think it's like this where a parent read that

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 2>headline and had to put their kids in the car

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and drop them at childcare and go off to work

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 2>and just hope that they were being in well looked after.

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 2>And I just thought, we're in Australia in twenty twenty

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 2>six and families still just don't have any choices when

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 2>it comes to care.

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 3>And I know that the coalition.

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 2>Created that role choice for childcare, but what will a

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 2>coalition government do to help with this situation?

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, this really is every parent's worst nightmarre, isn't it.

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 20>I feel for the families that are involved. Obviously it's

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 20>got a long way to play out. But from a

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 20>government's perspective, there's probably two issues. One is how we

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 20>can create an environment where we know that children are

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 20>safe in care, whether it be at childcare, whether it

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 20>be whether you leave your child with at a childcare

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 20>center or another form of family day care, whatever it

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 20>might be, that parents can be confident that their children

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 20>have been well looked after, appropriately looked after.

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 19>That's probably number one.

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 20>But we also want to make sure that children that

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 20>parents have the opportunity to choose the right form of

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 20>childcare for their family. There are lots of different kinds

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 20>of childcare. This one size fits all of the government

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 20>really isn't working. I'm not saying that all children are

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 20>at risk there, don't get me wrong, but this simply

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 20>isn't a model that suits every family that we're now

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 20>seeing childcare deserts. There are towns that simply can't get

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 20>access to childcare. Something's got to give. It's also hugely expensive.

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 20>It's one of the fastest growing expenditures on the budget

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 20>bottom line.

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 19>So we want to see more choice in childcare.

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 20>That's something that the culture have been talking about internally

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 20>for some time.

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 19>We do.

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 20>You're right, have a shadow Minister for choice in childcare.

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.879
<v Speaker 20>I think that's really important. There's one more aspect though

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 20>that I think has been missed in all of this,

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 20>and that's the industrial relations aspect, which falls under my portfolio.

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 20>There was a Senate inquiry recently into quality and safety

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 20>in childcare after some of the original allegations of a

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:06.439
<v Speaker 20>similar situation in Melbourne, and one of the findings of

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 20>that inquiry was that childcare centers that might have suspected

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 20>a worker of inappropriate behavior feared dismissing those workers in

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 20>case there was an unfair dismissal allegation or they breached

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 20>some fair work protections.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 19>Now that's a.

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 20>Genuine concern because what you then find is potentially a

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 20>childcare worker gets moved between sites rather than removed from

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 20>the system entirely, and that puts children at risks. We

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 20>want to make sure that our industrial relation settings work

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 20>in conjunction with child safety obligations.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 2>It's something that really needs to have a focus on.

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 2>So this is something a good opportunity for the Coalition

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I think to come out with some strong policies around it.

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Senator, thank you so much for your time tonight.

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 19>I really appreciate it.

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Well after the break backlash from the business sector around

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Premier just inter work from home laws. Well, coming up

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 2>the US Congress will vote on whether to make daylight

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 2>savings permanent.

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Is this something Australia should also do? But now to the.

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Survey which has exposed a major backlash from Victorian businesses

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.720
<v Speaker 2>over the Allen Government's work from home laws, with almost

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 2>half warning they'll take their investment into state. Tim Piper

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 2>is the head of Australian industry groups, confectionery sector, and

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>part of coalition of Peak employer groups which launched a

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 2>ten point plan they believe will make the legislation more workable,

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 2>and he joins me. Now, Tim, welcome, let's start with

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 2>this survey that shows almost half of businesses say they're

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 2>going to likely invest outside of Victoria. This seriously undermines

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 2>jobs and economic growth in the state, doesn't.

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 18>It, Well, Jamie, Big and small companies want to be

0:37:57.920 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 18>welcome in their state and they want to be involved

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 18>in whatever economic activity there is. But if you are

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 18>discouraging investment, and you're discouraging people from the next stage

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 18>of anything they want to do with their business, then

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 18>that can't be good for us. But what really means

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 18>is that companies are going to stay in Victoria. I mean,

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 18>they're ensconced here. They've got a lot of investment here,

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 18>so they don't really want to move. But it's the

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 18>next stage. It's the next level of investment that they

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 18>might be making. And if they need to have projects

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 18>done where they need to have somebody working five days

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 18>a week for four weeks or six weeks or ten weeks,

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 18>whatever it might be, this legislation won't enable them to

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 18>do that. So what we're concerned about is that the

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 18>companies just won't feel that they're welcome and they'll be

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 18>looking elsewhere. And the other alternative that we worry about

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 18>is not just interstate workers getting more work than we

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 18>do in Victoria, but also the possibility of them looking overseas,

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 18>because I guess if you can work from home from Victoria,

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 18>you can work from home from overseas. And companies are

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 18>already looking at ways that they can reduce the costs

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 18>to themselves.

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a very good point, Tim, And I guess another

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 2>aspect of this is the premiers said legislating this work

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 2>from home is going to boost productivity. But if businesses

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 2>are already offering flexible arrangements voluntarily, shouldn't the government just

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 2>back off and just leave it up to the employers

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 2>of what suits their business the.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 18>Best, Jamie. We think that most employers now are already

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 18>providing that flexibility to employees. In fact, we think about

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:30.439
<v Speaker 18>eight out of ten of those that can reasonably get

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 18>this flexibility are already getting it. And in many circumstances

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 18>we're finding, you know, there contracts that have already been

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 18>drawn up, agreements where you get one, two, even three

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 18>days working from home each week, which enables people to

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 18>have that flexibility. I guess that's the point we're making.

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 18>We're trying to get amendments to this bill. The bill

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 18>at the moment is really troubling us and we think

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 18>will cause enormous problems for employers. For example, at the moment,

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 18>if you've got a contract with an employee, it might

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 18>be that they have two days working from home, it

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 18>could be that that could be stacked on top of

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 18>the legislation, so not just having two days working from home,

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 18>they could have the two days agreed best part of

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 18>the agreement with the employer, plus two days as part

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 18>of the legislation, So they could be having four days

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 18>working from home as a result of this legislation, which

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 18>we don't think is good. Obviously, we don't think that

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 18>that is what is intended. It's certainly not good for

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 18>the economy and employees absolutely don't want that.

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And another element to this too, and warnings are rising

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 2>about it, is that these laws are going to make

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 2>employers less likely to hire the young and inexperienced workers

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 2>who actually need face to face mentoring. Has that been

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.439
<v Speaker 2>factored into just inter Allen's decision at.

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 18>All, having those young people and any any of us,

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 18>but the young people in particular need to be working

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 18>face to face very much in their early stages, so

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 18>they can look at us all. They can see what

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 18>managing people's like. They can see the good, the bad,

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 18>and the ugly and then decide for themselves how they're

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 18>going to operate. I think the bosses will be looking

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 18>for those people that are under their nose, if you like,

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 18>that are working from the office, working from wherever they

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 18>can be on the employment site, and the bosses are

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 18>going to be looking to them to be showing their

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 18>wares to be able to progress, to.

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Be able to get promotion.

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 18>And the more often that you're with people that have

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 18>that opportunity to promote you, the more likely you are

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 18>to be So I want the young workers to be

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 18>able to benefit from having a couple of days at home,

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 18>perhaps or a day a week from home, but spending

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 18>most of their time in the office where they actually

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 18>get a feel of what it's like being in the workforce.

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 18>And I think into the future, the ability to manage

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 18>people is going to be a significant factor that bosses

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 18>are going to be looking for for their people when

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 18>they're promoting and when they're looking for other people to employ.

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 18>So I think it's benefits all the employees to be

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 18>actually in the office to a very great extent. That

0:41:58.239 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 18>might mean they have a day or two at home

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 18>working from home, but nothing more than that. And that's

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 18>what we're really concerned about. Making sure the amendments that

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 18>can be created, not the change the bill, not to

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 18>stop the legislation going through, just make it sensible so

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 18>it's workable for both employers and employees.

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, Tim Piper, you speak a lot of sense. I

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 2>hope the Allen government is paying attention. Thank you for

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 2>coming on. Well, coming up, the E Safety Commission says

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 2>tech giants have allowed gaps in detecting and preventing child

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 2>sexual exploitation and abuse and should the anthem be played

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 2>on Australia day before the Big Bash Final.

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 3>That's next. Oh, welcome back.

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 2>It's time to bring in tonight's panel, political commentator Roe

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Knox and New South Wales Independent MP Tanya Mahileek.

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Welcome ladies, it's great to see you both. Let's start

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 3>with today's polling that's come out of Victoria and.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 2>It does show one Nation, ahead of both the Labor

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and the Coalition. But the interesting element of this, though,

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 2>is the preferred premiere response now just Cinter Allen is

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 2>crashing down at twenty four percent, with Jess Wilson up

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 2>around the past the forty percent mark.

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Tanya, when do you think.

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 2>LABEL will get to the point where they think, all right,

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 2>we need to replace Jacinta going into November or it's

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:16.919
<v Speaker 2>going to be a blood bath.

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, you never know with Labor.

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 14>When they replaced Gillard with Kevin Rudd, that was ten

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:29.959
<v Speaker 14>weeks before federal election, So you never say never with Labor.

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 14>But I've got to say I think they're pretty much

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 14>stuck with the center Allan at this stage. I think

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 14>with four months left to the election, it would be

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 14>very bad form at this point to try and move

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 14>her on. But also she's a member of the Socialist

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 14>Left and she controls the numbers the Socialists Left control

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 14>Victoria Labor, and I can't see who would try and

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 14>oust her. It won't be somebody within her own faction.

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 14>And in the end, unless she falls on a sord

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 14>and decides to go herself, I don't think there'll be

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 14>any appetite within the Labor circles of Victoria to try

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 14>and actually move her on, so they'll just live with her.

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:09.760
<v Speaker 3>In reality, I think a year.

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 14>Ago there was talk and lots of sort of discussion

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 14>about her going back then and they decided not to

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 14>do that. They've stuck with her despite the toxicity that

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 14>surrounds Allen and her government. In the end, you've got

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 14>Premier Chris Mins and his cabinet essentially have an unwritten

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 14>rule where they don't do any collaboration or any work

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 14>with Victoria Labor. They sort of bypassed Victoria and head

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 14>over to Malanascas and South Australia whenever they want to

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 14>do a media op. And recently Alberanizi has now sort

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 14>of seems to have walked away from just sent to Allen.

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 14>So I think Victoria Labor is unfortunately in a position

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 14>where they've come to the reality that they'll have to

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 14>stick with her. What's given them some hope and interesting

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.439
<v Speaker 14>you mentioned one nation is the fact that one nation

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 14>polling is rising Victoria, and what Labor is hoping for

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 14>is for the right to divide in Victoria, for the

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 14>coalition and for one nation to divide and Labor you

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 14>know scraped through in the middle.

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, Rotania does make a good point because this

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:16.439
<v Speaker 2>is the constant discussion, isn't it about that fractured right

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 2>side of the vote? Jess Wilson, I think is incredibly impressive.

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 2>But do you think she just needs to work out

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 2>a deal. I don't know who with because there is

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 2>no one nation Victorian leader. But what do you think

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 2>the solution is here?

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 10>So, I mean, Jesse is obviously an absolute sleepstar. She's

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:36.879
<v Speaker 10>such a clear leader. She's working so hard, She's going

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 10>the length and breadth of the state of Victoria. The

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 10>issue she has is she's got to hold on to

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 10>the twenty nine seats that she has at the moment,

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 10>and then she needs an additional sixteen. And the concern

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 10>about formalizing a relationship with one nation this far out

0:45:56.960 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 10>when they jammy, as you said, they don't have a

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 10>leader in Victoria yet they only have one candidate in

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 10>the field, might be very risky in those twenty nine

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 10>seats she's trying to hold, and even in her own

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 10>seat of Q SO, I think she's doing a very

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 10>good job of not denigrading one nation because when you

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 10>do that, you're also denigrating all the voters, and we

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.359
<v Speaker 10>saw from that polling that are all looking at one nation.

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:28.280
<v Speaker 10>And she's also doing a good job of not formalizing

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 10>anything until she knows what she has on her hands.

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I want to move on now to this E Safety

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Commissioner because Julian mcgrant has come out saying companies like Apple, Discord, Google, Meta,

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft WhatsApp have continued to allowed gaps when it's come

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 2>to detecting and prevent her in child sexual exploitation on

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 2>their platforms. But does it show, though, that the commissioner

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:52.919
<v Speaker 2>still doesn't have the powers to actually hold these tech

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 2>giants to account.

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 14>How do you think you can give all the powers

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 14>you want to the Safety commissioner. How do you hold

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 14>the massive, huge tech to heint's accountable. I think it's

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 14>almost impossible. I think that a lot of these companies

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 14>play us for fools. Really, they know that they're not

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 14>integrating any of the legislation that's been moved in the

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 14>last twelve months federally in relation to E safety. And

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 14>no matter what money you pour into the Safety Commissioner

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 14>or whatever type of resources or legislative changes that you make,

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 14>I think ultimately the tech giants will just do whatever

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 14>they see fit.

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Bro An interesting vote is going on in the US

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Congress about whether to make daylight savings a permanent fixture,

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:40.959
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like that's always debated here.

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:42.720
<v Speaker 3>What do you think should we be following suit?

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 10>Yes, I mean, obviously this is a constant debate in

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:49.280
<v Speaker 10>the US. I actually liked I think there's one senator

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 10>who's proposing a sort of middle ground where you have

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:56.760
<v Speaker 10>a standard time, which is essentially a balance between daylight

0:47:56.800 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 10>savings and non daylight savings. So it means you have

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 10>less day less nighttime hours, but you also don't have

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 10>some parts of the country which would be without daylight

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 10>savings that would have kids going to school in the dark.

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 10>So I think they'll probably end up with some sort

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 10>of compromised position. But they had this argument I think

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty two they continually have it.

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 3>It's the same as US.

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 2>And just very quickly before I let you both go,

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 2>black tie and a wedding. Apparently it's no longer the

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 2>done deal thing anymore.

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Cocktail never seen one.

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 14>Everyone no black tie out in southwest western Sydney.

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 15>Guys.

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, Broh, you and I both had black tie both

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 2>we can't be in this conversation. I appreciate you both

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 2>coming in tonight, and thank you for your company this evening.

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 2>You'll see me again here tomorrow at six o'clock. The

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:46.280
<v Speaker 2>bolt report is up next