Speaker 1: This is the US Report with James Morrow.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the program. Here's what's coming
Speaker 2: up tonight. Donald Trump slams Australia. Is the Donald Albo
Speaker 2: bromance officially off? Plus have Democrats killed off? Butter id
Speaker 2: despite just att everyone outside of politics thinking this is
Speaker 2: a good idea And guess what I've got some Hollywood
Speaker 2: Hall of Fame hypocrisy. I just hope elitist Jimmy Kimmel
Speaker 2: never needs a plumber. I'll explain what that's all about
Speaker 2: a little bit later in the show, but first, I've
Speaker 2: got a riddle for you. When is a bad news
Speaker 2: story a good news story? Well, it's when even CNN
Speaker 2: has to admit that a Trump policy is not only working,
Speaker 2: but is loved by the public. And it's even worse
Speaker 2: than when that policy involves using Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Speaker 2: agents aka ICE officers, whom the Left has spent the
Speaker 2: past year demonizing as gestapo goons. First, a little background.
Speaker 2: Since mill of February there's been a government shutdown on
Speaker 2: that has affected the Department of Homeland Security in the US,
Speaker 2: which is in charge of the TSA, which, if you've
Speaker 2: ever traveled in the United States is one of the
Speaker 2: great all time handbrakes on a good time. As a result,
Speaker 2: security cues were stretching for hours at some airports, because
Speaker 2: of course, they've got to make sure every water bottle
Speaker 2: is emptied at every granny patted down. Not good. So
Speaker 2: enter Donald Trump, who, throwing the switch to solution mode,
Speaker 2: said Hey, I've got an idea. Let's send ICE Agency
Speaker 2: in demand the checkpoints. And well you'll never guess what
Speaker 2: happened next. Over to UCNN.
Speaker 3: The story right now, Sarah, quite honestly, is the fact
Speaker 3: that the lines have disappeared. We haven't seen this like
Speaker 3: in a week, so this is good news. If you
Speaker 3: have a flight to catch, you should know that you
Speaker 3: can probably maybe take a deep breath.
Speaker 4: At one point, this line stretched all the way down
Speaker 4: the hallway. This one has gone as well.
Speaker 2: Oh that must have hurt to put the air across
Speaker 2: the country. Travelers seemed pretty chufed with the arrangement. Actually,
Speaker 2: like this fellow, and you're not gonna believe it. He's
Speaker 2: from Brooklyn, did not bother nobody the one. They can
Speaker 2: check my bags and get me on my flight, and
Speaker 2: I'm good to go, right, I want to get I
Speaker 2: want to get to the Bahamas.
Speaker 5: I want out of here.
Speaker 2: These agents. Forget about it. And then there was this traveler.
Speaker 6: I wish you're happy with ICE.
Speaker 3: Yes, I like that, I happy with the ICE.
Speaker 2: Hang on a second, that guy spoke with a foreign accent,
Speaker 2: and according to the left, well shouldn't ICE agents have
Speaker 2: executed him by now? Seriously, though, the only people who
Speaker 2: don't seem happy about this are you guessed it, democrats.
Speaker 7: The last thing that the American people need are for
Speaker 7: untrained ICE agents to be deployed at airports all across
Speaker 7: the country, potentially to brutalize or in some instances kill them.
Speaker 2: Kill them. Meanwhile, in Philadelphia, the local district attorney that's
Speaker 2: a crown prosecutor to you and me, was threatening to
Speaker 2: jail ICE agents.
Speaker 8: The President cannot pardon you, and yes, I will put
Speaker 8: you in handcuffs, and I will put you in a courtroom,
Speaker 8: and if necessary, I will put you in a jail cell.
Speaker 9: If you decide to make the.
Speaker 8: Toronzo floor of this airport anything like what you did
Speaker 8: in the streets of Minneapolis, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I'm still stuck on the romance of the Toronto floors
Speaker 2: of the Philadelphia Airport. How a romantic and I guess
Speaker 2: I think we can guess how this traveler voted. So well,
Speaker 2: do everyone accept the haters? But there is, of course
Speaker 2: a bigger problem, and that's this. While it is fantastic
Speaker 2: that ICE is unjamming backlogs at airports, one of the
Speaker 2: greatest practical things that the Trump administration could do to
Speaker 2: make the lives of passengers more pleasant everywhere would be
Speaker 2: to simply wind up the Transportation Security Administration the TSA.
Speaker 2: Remember this was created as a knee jerk reaction to
Speaker 2: airline security after nine eleven, when there was an urgent
Speaker 2: called to do something to prevent another such mass casualty hijacking.
Speaker 2: And that was understandable. But in the twenty five years since, well,
Speaker 2: it's mostly been a disaster. It subjects travelers to invasive,
Speaker 2: time wasting, bureaucratic nightmares. In twenty fifteen, it was revealed
Speaker 2: that tsaaigents were missing ninety five percent of threats in tests.
Speaker 2: And guess what real evidence they've gotten any better. So,
Speaker 2: mister President, I know you're watching, I know you love
Speaker 2: the US report. Ditch the TSA and put airport security
Speaker 2: back in the hands of private security, which by the way,
Speaker 2: does a pretty good job here in Australia with one
Speaker 2: tenth the hassle. Not only will it make traveling easier,
Speaker 2: it means the nation's airports also cannot be held hostage
Speaker 2: by Democrats every time there's a fight over funding in Congress. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: amid all the talk of war and oil shocks and
Speaker 2: everything else, it is worth remembering that in just two
Speaker 2: years time we're going to be deep into the twenty
Speaker 2: twenty eight presidential primaries. And a warning about this next item.
Speaker 2: You might want to get your sick bags ready, because,
Speaker 2: according to this report in Axios, many of the Democrat
Speaker 2: hopefuls have decided that the road to the White House
Speaker 2: leads through the psycho Hiatrist's office. Yes, forget the strong,
Speaker 2: silent type. Democrats are now reportedly planning to lean into
Speaker 2: their childhood traumas in the quest for votes I know right.
Speaker 2: Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro has apparently written in his new
Speaker 2: memoir about his traumatic childhood. In it, he writes that
Speaker 2: his mother, Judy, could be unstable and said he and
Speaker 2: his siblings believed, quote, if we were good, we could
Speaker 2: stop the chaos and the yelling. Not sure if he
Speaker 2: also recounts his feelings about reports that the tolerant Democrat
Speaker 2: Party decided that his being Jewish was also a bit
Speaker 2: too much for him to be named Kamala Harris's running mate.
Speaker 2: That's a whole other story. Then there is the Patrick
Speaker 2: Bateman slick California Governor Gavin Newsom, who's gone public with
Speaker 2: his own Mommy Dearest story. In his new book, Newsom
Speaker 2: recounts that, despite a childhood of wealth and privilege, his
Speaker 2: own mother told him, amid apparent struggles with dyslexia, it's
Speaker 2: okay to be average. Gavin. Well, thank god he never
Speaker 2: used wire hangers. But white. There's more. Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker,
Speaker 2: himself from a family of literal billionaires and an heir
Speaker 2: to the Hyatt hotel fortune. Not that there's anything wrong
Speaker 2: with that. Just the other day did a big interview
Speaker 2: with The New York Times in which he went into
Speaker 2: great detail about his mother's alcoholism. Now, it's two points
Speaker 2: to make about this. Firstly, these stories confirm a theory
Speaker 2: I have long held that the best predictor of someone
Speaker 2: being a progressive liberal is unresolved childhood trauma. Paired with
Speaker 2: the rest in development, leading to an overwhelming desire to
Speaker 2: remake the world as the carrying safe space that they
Speaker 2: feel they were once denied. But secondly, it also suggests
Speaker 2: that when it comes down to it, the Democrats are
Speaker 2: in a bit of trouble here. They desperate, They're trying
Speaker 2: to make over the country, not win an Oscar. Yet,
Speaker 2: what have they got Trump derangement syndrome, Democrats, socialism, put
Speaker 2: America last, and all of this other stuff. No wonder
Speaker 2: they're already wearing their hearts on the sleeve because they
Speaker 2: don't have a lot going on in their heads. Now.
Speaker 2: Conservatives in the US are once again gathering for one
Speaker 2: of their largest annual conferences, Seapack USA is underway this
Speaker 2: week in Texas, and for the first time in a decade,
Speaker 2: President Donald Trump is skipping the event. I guess he's
Speaker 2: got a few things on at the moment, as discussions
Speaker 2: about the Iran War takes center stage. To join me
Speaker 2: now is retired US Army Infantry colonel author attorney Kurt Schlichter.
Speaker 2: He's in Texas for the conference and he joins me now. Kurt,
Speaker 2: welcome to the program. Tell us, first of all, what's
Speaker 2: having at SEAPAC this year's mood like, well, the mood
Speaker 2: is good.
Speaker 4: I mean, we obviously have challenges facing the midterms. The
Speaker 4: Iran Wars of course the topic of conversation, but you know,
Speaker 4: the conservatives are pumped and motivated. I did a panel
Speaker 4: today with Nick Shirley, who was exposing fraud in Minneapolis
Speaker 4: and California, that went over really well. I think there's
Speaker 4: a lot of optimism. You know, the regime media would
Speaker 4: like us to be pessimistic, it'd like us to be sad,
Speaker 4: it would like us to think that we're doomed. Well,
Speaker 4: we're not doomed. We're going to win.
Speaker 2: We're going to prevail.
Speaker 4: And that's the great part about Sea Package with a
Speaker 4: bunch of people who feel like you did.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I mean, you know, I've been to Sea
Speaker 2: Pack in Australia a number of times here and it's
Speaker 2: a fantastic event they do here. But the question of
Speaker 2: course right now is Iran and there's a lot of
Speaker 2: people in the press who are talking about, well, Maga
Speaker 2: is split. There's a lot of division over the Iran War.
Speaker 2: You hear some of this in the press. Are you
Speaker 2: hearing that on the ground there, or is the magabase
Speaker 2: the Trump base all in on epic fury.
Speaker 4: Look, the Mega base under stands that Iran is a
Speaker 4: generational enemy that for nearly fifty years has chanted death
Speaker 4: to America and then proceeded to carry it out, killing
Speaker 4: and maiming thousands of Americans since the Ayatola Coamani took over.
Speaker 4: And it's time to put this to an end. It's
Speaker 4: time to put this festering sore, you know, and lance
Speaker 4: the boil. And that's what we're doing. And we're you know,
Speaker 4: this is going to help redefine not just the Middle East,
Speaker 4: but the entire globe. When you look at Venezuela and Cuba,
Speaker 4: which are both both moving away from being you know,
Speaker 4: essentially communist states adversity the United States Iran moving and
Speaker 4: reconsidering our alliance in NATO in a more reasonable way
Speaker 4: where the NATO alliance picks up its own share of
Speaker 4: the weight. I think America is in the process of
Speaker 4: redefining the international system that's endured for about eighty years
Speaker 4: since World War Two.
Speaker 2: And I think that that system, Kurt had been dedicated
Speaker 2: on this idea of sort of managed American decline. And
Speaker 2: I think that's turning around. But you mentioned NATO, and
Speaker 2: I think that's really interesting because a little while ago,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump hit back at Germany's Defense chief Bars Pastorius,
Speaker 2: who earlier slammed the war on the Iranian regime. Here's
Speaker 2: what Trump had to say.
Speaker 10: When I heard the head of Germany say this is
Speaker 10: not our war about Iran, I said, well, Ukraine's not
Speaker 10: our war. We helped, but Ukraine not our I thought
Speaker 10: it was a very inappropriate statement to make.
Speaker 2: Kurt. I thought that was a fair point. And I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, why should Germany or for that matter, Australia
Speaker 2: expect American help in their fights our fights if they
Speaker 2: won't help America in something that they're trying to do
Speaker 2: to make civilizations safer everywhere.
Speaker 4: I don't think it's unreasonable to ask what's in it
Speaker 4: for us when it comes to an alliance. All Right,
Speaker 4: Nations have their own interests. They should pursue their own interests.
Speaker 4: A reasonable person expects a nation to pursue its own interests. Well,
Speaker 4: America has its own interests too, and perhaps some people
Speaker 4: don't like it. Perhaps some people would rather have America
Speaker 4: pursuing other people's interests. And for a long time we
Speaker 4: did do that, but that's over. Donald Trump is not
Speaker 4: that kind of leader, and there's certainly pushback. That's trying
Speaker 4: to get Americans to kind of re embrace a dying
Speaker 4: model and it's just not going to work any Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, just on that dying Moleald Trump also had some
Speaker 2: choice words for Australia a few hours ago. Have a
Speaker 2: look at this.
Speaker 10: I think he did something that was shocking. He didn't
Speaker 10: want to help us. Australia to Australia was not great.
Speaker 10: I'm a little surprised by Australia. We never really had
Speaker 10: very much support.
Speaker 6: I again read aright that there is no request being
Speaker 6: made to Australia that has not been agreed to. President
Speaker 6: Trump is up to him to explain his comments. But
Speaker 6: of course I make the point as well that Australia
Speaker 6: wasn't consulted before this action was undertaken, and I respect
Speaker 6: that that's a metaphor of the United States.
Speaker 2: We've spoken before about the close bond between our two
Speaker 2: nations here before, but it does seem that given Australia's
Speaker 2: inability to field any sort of aid for this or
Speaker 2: other missions, does he have a bit of a point.
Speaker 4: Well, while he does. You know, of course I started
Speaker 4: on the military during the Cold War, when most of
Speaker 4: our allied nations had considerable military forces of their own.
Speaker 4: The question now isn't so much if our allies are
Speaker 4: going to help, But you know, name the ship and
Speaker 4: the type of ship that can deploy in seven days
Speaker 4: and actually contribute in the Persian Gulf, and I think
Speaker 4: most of our allies would be hard pressed.
Speaker 7: To do that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, certainly Australia showing itself fairly unable to do
Speaker 2: that sort of thing here. But meanwhile, there's also been
Speaker 2: plenty of scrutiny around the mainstream media and their reporting
Speaker 2: of the war. But I want to draw your attention
Speaker 2: to our old friends at CNN, who incredibly confirmed that
Speaker 2: their own reporting, at least one instance, was total nonsense
Speaker 2: when they accused Trump of lying about Iran talks. How
Speaker 2: a look at this? Are there as.
Speaker 5: Important breaking news coming into the situation room.
Speaker 4: We're now learning from a senior Iranian source that there
Speaker 4: has been an outreach between the US and Iran.
Speaker 11: The source tells CNN that this was initiated by.
Speaker 2: Washington and this was after, of course, CNN had run
Speaker 2: down the whole idea that there were any talks taking
Speaker 2: place at all. They pivoted on dime. They did a
Speaker 2: full one eighty. Any wonder if people don't trust this
Speaker 2: stuff anymore.
Speaker 4: No, there's no wonder. Look, you can't believe anything the
Speaker 4: regime media tells you. Why when your source is Iran?
Speaker 4: You know that's already the problem, man, I I You know.
Speaker 4: The beautiful thing about Trump, and the thing that a
Speaker 4: lot of foreigners don't understand about Trump is Trump is
Speaker 4: out to pursue America's interest and frankly, for a long
Speaker 4: time in America has not purely promoted its own interests. Well,
Speaker 4: it's kind of doing that now, and a lot of
Speaker 4: other countries are upset by it. Remember, the only thing
Speaker 4: that constrains America is America. You can't force America to
Speaker 4: do anything. You can try to talk America into doing something,
Speaker 4: and for a long time that succeeded. Well, you can't
Speaker 4: talk Trump into a bad deal. He's not going to
Speaker 4: do it. And Trump represents a significant portion of the
Speaker 4: American public, not all of us. There are a lot
Speaker 4: of people who have kind of globalist, leftist mindset, but
Speaker 4: most Americans think that the United States primary interest should
Speaker 4: be the United States, And frankly, I don't think that's unreasonable.
Speaker 2: Kurtz Schlicker couldn't say it better myself. Thanks so much
Speaker 2: for coming on the program. Really appreciate your insights.
Speaker 4: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 2: Now moving on to a subject we've spoken about an
Speaker 2: awful lot over the last few weeks. The Save Act,
Speaker 2: which would, among other things, force voters to show ID
Speaker 2: when they go to vote in a US election. Pretty
Speaker 2: civil stuff, right acceptance, having a hard time getting through
Speaker 2: the Senate, with even Republicans helping to stall it earlier. Today,
Speaker 2: senators block the proposal in a fifty three to forty
Speaker 2: seven vote. But I want to show you a clip
Speaker 2: which has resurfaced this week from twenty twenty four, where
Speaker 2: a senior Democrat gives away I think the game about
Speaker 2: why they don't want to support this at all.
Speaker 4: Have a look the negotiation didn't have a path of citizenship.
Speaker 1: It was entirely on their terms in order to get
Speaker 1: Ukraine funding. Right.
Speaker 5: Well, I mean, Chris, that's been a failed play for
Speaker 5: twenty years, So you are right. That has been the
Speaker 5: Democratic strategy for thirty years maybe, and it has failed
Speaker 5: to deliver.
Speaker 2: For the people.
Speaker 5: We care about most the undocumented Americans that are in
Speaker 5: this country.
Speaker 2: I loved that little moment there when he stopped himself
Speaker 2: and he said, undocumented Americans. Yeah, just trying to fix
Speaker 2: that one up. But you heard it right. The people
Speaker 2: that Democrats care most about are undocumented. Let's bring in
Speaker 2: to talk about this. Former Republican National Committee spokeswoman Elizabeth Pipco. Elizabeth,
Speaker 2: thanks so much for coming on the program here. I
Speaker 2: just feel like the Democrats have showed their hand so
Speaker 2: much with this Save Act. Everybody in normal world thinks
Speaker 2: this is a good idea, and yet they don't want
Speaker 2: this to happen, and you can only think of some
Speaker 2: pretty sinister reasons why they don't.
Speaker 11: I completely agree. It's great to be back with you here. Look,
Speaker 11: I think for the average American they're actually surprised if
Speaker 11: they're following this because very often you see Paul Titians
Speaker 11: talk as if they know what they're rallying for, they
Speaker 11: know what it is that the people want, and very
Speaker 11: often they fall in line with what polling shows because
Speaker 11: that's what they have to do as elected officials. And
Speaker 11: yet with the say BacT, when you look at polling
Speaker 11: and you look at the fact that nearly eighty percent
Speaker 11: or more of Americans in every single poll or survey
Speaker 11: that you look at, agree that they want voter ID
Speaker 11: to be a requirement when going to place that vote.
Speaker 11: And it doesn't make any sense that Democrats are pretending
Speaker 11: this is some kind of sinister idea, pretending it's going
Speaker 11: to hurt black Americans or married women or anything else.
Speaker 11: I think the whole thing is embarrassing. I think if
Speaker 11: you look across the world, you see how many people
Speaker 11: realize it's important to bring an idea when they vote
Speaker 11: in their national elections. I think it's embarrassing again to
Speaker 11: try to pretend that Americans are too stupid to get
Speaker 11: a birth certificate or sign up online to get new
Speaker 11: paperwork or whatever it is that they're claiming people aren't
Speaker 11: unable to do. And again, whether they're wrong or they're right,
Speaker 11: if the majority of Americans want something done, that's what
Speaker 11: elected officials are in place to do.
Speaker 2: Well. Yeah, I mean, I thought Elizabeth that was left
Speaker 2: that was all about defending democracy, and I thought democracy
Speaker 2: was about listening to the will of the people. But
Speaker 2: this vote here that just happened, this fifty three forty
Speaker 2: seven vote. My understanding. Tell me if I'm wrong, is
Speaker 2: that this was for a stripped down proposal that would
Speaker 2: just be about you know, voters have to show an
Speaker 2: ID a driver's license, not even proving their citizenship. Now
Speaker 2: you go to America, a lot of places you've got
Speaker 2: to show an ID to get on a plane, to
Speaker 2: buy a six pack of beer, to buy a deck
Speaker 2: of smokes, to get into some office buildings. Are they
Speaker 2: saying that there's some segregation in America where African Americans
Speaker 2: where married women who have changed the names, they're barred
Speaker 2: from all of these activities.
Speaker 11: That is apparently what they want all of us to believe. Look,
Speaker 11: I have to be honest. I didn't even know that
Speaker 11: there were options to go and vote without that ID.
Speaker 11: And like you said, it's not about a birth certificate,
Speaker 11: it's literally just about a driver's license. I didn't know
Speaker 11: until I went to college, when I got my school ID.
Speaker 11: I can tell you in Pennsylvania in graduate school and
Speaker 11: I was told of that school ID, which many members
Speaker 11: of my class who were not American citizens also had.
Speaker 11: We were all told as a group that you could
Speaker 11: use that school ID to go vote in elections in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 11: That's how I learned that this was an issue, and
Speaker 11: when I look into it, I realized how many states
Speaker 11: have those very same laws. And again, it's not about
Speaker 11: a birth certificate, it's not about any kind of complicated materials.
Speaker 11: It is a basic license, basic ID card without which
Speaker 11: you cannot go to a doctor's appointment, or buy alcohol
Speaker 11: or drive your car. It's something that most Americans have,
Speaker 11: and also at something most Americans should be able to
Speaker 11: prove that they can get in order to participate in
Speaker 11: the privilege that we have here in voting in these elections.
Speaker 2: It just seems like the simplest stuff and the only
Speaker 2: explanations why they don't want this, I think a pretty
Speaker 2: sinister But I also want to talk to about a
Speaker 2: really shocking and distressing story out of Chicago, where we've
Speaker 2: seen a lot of controracy around this shooting of a
Speaker 2: young woman, a student at a school there. Prominent democrat
Speaker 2: Maria had and is under fire for suggesting that this student,
Speaker 2: eighteen year old Sheridan Gorman, she was shot and killed
Speaker 2: near her college campus, allegedly by an illegal Venezuelan migrant. Well,
Speaker 2: they said that she was just in the wrong place
Speaker 2: at the wrong time and This is something that we're
Speaker 2: hearing from an awful lot of Democrats who seem to
Speaker 2: be saying, Hey, what's the big deal here, It doesn't
Speaker 2: matter they were illegal or not. Tell us about this case,
Speaker 2: because it's really grim.
Speaker 11: It is atrocious, truly. Look you look at our country's history,
Speaker 11: you look at what's happened the last few years, You
Speaker 11: look at how our country nearly shut down over the
Speaker 11: murder of George Floyd, and then you wonder why there's
Speaker 11: not less of a response, but basically no response. This
Speaker 11: innocent girl, as you mentioned, Sheridan Gorman, who was eighteen
Speaker 11: years old, had her entire life ahead of her, and
Speaker 11: it should be an easy thing for Democrats, Republicans, anybody
Speaker 11: to condemn. Again, I don't care how you feel about
Speaker 11: Donald Trump. I don't care if you associate with Republicans
Speaker 11: or Democrats or anyone in between. I think we can
Speaker 11: all agree when something like this happens, we should come
Speaker 11: together as a nation and warn this poor girl's life
Speaker 11: and try to be there for her and for her family.
Speaker 11: And yet we're making this political. You're saying that it
Speaker 11: was this innocent girl that was at fault at President Trump,
Speaker 11: who was at fault.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I'll mean, like, look at Illinois Governor Pritzker,
Speaker 2: who is a potential candidate for president. Well, he's turned
Speaker 2: this around to be all about Donald trumplely this.
Speaker 12: There have been real failures. Those failures, of course, extend
Speaker 12: beyond the borders of Illinois. That's their national failures of
Speaker 12: failure to have comprehensive immigration reform, a failure of the
Speaker 12: president to follow.
Speaker 2: His own edict to go after the worst of the worst.
Speaker 9: An illegal immigrant has been charged with murdering a college
Speaker 9: student in Chicago last week. To House Democrats believe if
Speaker 9: he's convicted, he's someone who should be deported.
Speaker 7: I'll look into the case.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, so this is now Donald Trump's fault, that
Speaker 2: this young woman was killed allegedly by this Venezuelan who
Speaker 2: shouldn't have been in the country in the first place.
Speaker 2: Now I get it.
Speaker 11: I'm glad it all makes sense. Now, look again, when
Speaker 11: someone dies in this manner, it should not matter if
Speaker 11: you want to run for president. It should not matter
Speaker 11: how you feel about the person currently in the oval office.
Speaker 11: You should be mourning with the family and with the
Speaker 11: rest of our country. That's all that you should be doing.
Speaker 11: And the fact that they are politicizing this and blaming
Speaker 11: Republicans who again have said four years that we should
Speaker 11: close our border and make sure that those that have
Speaker 11: any kind of criminal records are deported immediately. The fact
Speaker 11: that that's where your mind goes really proves how unfortunately
Speaker 11: politicized and polarized our democracy at this point.
Speaker 3: Is.
Speaker 11: Look, this is not the America that I grew up in,
Speaker 11: where when someone died in this tragic of a way,
Speaker 11: we would come together with our neighbors, regardless of how
Speaker 11: they voted, and be there for that family, be there
Speaker 11: as a nation. This is the absolute opposite of that.
Speaker 11: I don't care who's in the White House. This is
Speaker 11: the exact opposite of the nation that I know in.
Speaker 2: Love one hundred percent. It is really griv and it
Speaker 2: just tells you what's at stake at these midterms and
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty eight here. But also, you know, beyond
Speaker 2: these sorts of crimes we're talking about, there's also a
Speaker 2: those issue around fraud and health secret Robert Kenny has
Speaker 2: made headlines this week after we went on a podcast
Speaker 2: and claimed that former President Joe Biden's administration ordered the
Speaker 2: Health Department to ignore fraud and focus on enrolling as
Speaker 2: many people on welfare as possible, whether they were in
Speaker 2: the country legally or shouldn't have been there at all.
Speaker 2: Have a look at this.
Speaker 13: One of the things that I've found out from people
Speaker 13: in my agency was they were ordered or by the
Speaker 13: Biden White House not to do program integrity, in other words,
Speaker 13: not to enforce against fraud. And they said they were told,
Speaker 13: we want to focus on only enrollment and getting more
Speaker 13: and more people into the system.
Speaker 2: This is just huge if this is true.
Speaker 11: Look, I'm sure it's true, and it's also not a
Speaker 11: surprise if you look at the basically fraud I would
Speaker 11: call it that happened at our southern border. It kind
Speaker 11: of makes everything make sense, right, because if you're allowing
Speaker 11: millions of people unvetted into our country, then have to
Speaker 11: continue to commit fraud. You have to continue to turn
Speaker 11: away from American citizens and basically go against you your
Speaker 11: own rules to make sure that these people have benefits
Speaker 11: in our country. Right, There's a system in place for
Speaker 11: a reason, and when you break part one, it doesn't
Speaker 11: just end there. You have to continue to vouch for
Speaker 11: these people. That's again why Democrats want to allow these
Speaker 11: people to vote, because when they come into your country,
Speaker 11: you can't just forget that you let them in here.
Speaker 11: You have to take care of them in a certain way.
Speaker 11: You have to let them be a part of society.
Speaker 11: You have to excuse it when they murder Americans, you
Speaker 11: have to excuse it when they want to vote in
Speaker 11: your elections, And you have to excuse it when you
Speaker 11: use your own system that was built to cater to
Speaker 11: American citizens when it's used against American citizens and for
Speaker 11: those that don't deserve these benefits. I am confident there
Speaker 11: was more fraud than just this, and I wish we
Speaker 11: could all come together again like we couldn't do in
Speaker 11: Minnesota when we found out about fraud a couple of
Speaker 11: months ago. I wish we could come together and realize
Speaker 11: that broad hurts all Americans again, regardless whether they vote
Speaker 11: Republican or Democrat.
Speaker 2: And Elizabeth, I just don't think we're ever getting get
Speaker 2: to the bottom of just how deep all of these
Speaker 2: scandals go. Thank you so much for your time, as always,
Speaker 2: love having you here on the program. Now, don't go away,
Speaker 2: because when do you come back to the show, We're
Speaker 2: going to be talking about how the war is hitting
Speaker 2: fuel prices in America and Democrats are squealing about it,
Speaker 2: which is funny because in the past they've done everything
Speaker 2: in their power to make fuel more expensive. Funny that
Speaker 2: we'll find out what's going on with Republican strategist Ronnering.
Speaker 2: But first, hey, this is kind of odd. Trump's been
Speaker 2: busy fighting the war. And look who Milania Trump is
Speaker 2: hanging out with. Is that Joe Biden? Oh sorry, no, no,
Speaker 2: that's just apparently some new robot. The first lady said
Speaker 2: this was the first American made humanoid robot guest in
Speaker 2: the White House. But again it sounds like she's describing Biden.
Speaker 2: We're on the home front after the break, Welcome back
Speaker 2: to the program. Well, petrol prices or gas prices if
Speaker 2: you will, are starting to bite in the US, just
Speaker 2: as they are in Australia, just not quite as much
Speaker 2: because well, America decided some time ago that they were
Speaker 2: going to become energy independent quite literally, so they did
Speaker 2: not need to worry so much about a bunch of
Speaker 2: bad mullas closing the Strait of Hormuz. Democrats are rushing
Speaker 2: still to make political hay of it and blame Donald
Speaker 2: Trump for the pain at the pump. But hang on
Speaker 2: a second, I thought Democrats loved the idea of high
Speaker 2: fuel prices. I mean, remember when Joe Biden brought in
Speaker 2: a top economist onto his team who said gas prices
Speaker 2: were too low, Or when Bloomberg News wrote that the
Speaker 2: Earth wanted to keep gas prices high. By the way,
Speaker 2: when the war in question was Ukraine struggled against Russia,
Speaker 2: Democrats were happy to say prices would stay high until
Speaker 2: Peutin was defeated. That was a good thing. And expensive
Speaker 2: gas has long been a lefty talking point. Why in
Speaker 2: two thousand and eight, the Los Angeles Times praised the
Speaker 2: joy of eight dollar gas. That's eight dollars a gallon,
Speaker 2: by the way, which is still cheaper than what we
Speaker 2: pay here in Australia per liter. And then there was
Speaker 2: the time Barack Obaba's energy secretary said he wanted to
Speaker 2: push the price of gas north so that Americans were
Speaker 2: forced to pay what they do in Europe. Huh okay.
Speaker 2: Well to talk about all this and more is Republican
Speaker 2: strategist and former spokesman Ted Cruz Ron naring Ron. Welcome
Speaker 2: to the program. And you know, right now I'm seeing
Speaker 2: Politico and many other news outlets saying that gas prices
Speaker 2: are really starting to bite into wallets as well as
Speaker 2: into support for Donald Trump. Are they right or are
Speaker 2: the Democrats actually being quite hypocritical about this, because as
Speaker 2: I say plenty of times in the past, they've been
Speaker 2: very happy for petrol and gas prices to be high.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're spot on. The Democrats for the longest time
Speaker 3: have been saying that they need gas prices to be
Speaker 3: higher in order to try to coerce more people into
Speaker 3: evs and other forms of fuel other than petrol. And
Speaker 3: so if you take a look at the state like California,
Speaker 3: gas prices in the Democratic People's Republic of California are
Speaker 3: double what they are in Texas. And so for the
Speaker 3: Democrats to say that all of a sudden now they
Speaker 3: want lower fuel prices, it does look hypocritical and it
Speaker 3: provides an opportunity for Republicans to highlight their terrible, miserable
Speaker 3: record in constantly pushing for higher fuel prices.
Speaker 2: Yeah, ed Ron, tell me about why those prices are
Speaker 2: higher in California. Have they been shutting down infrastructure like
Speaker 2: refineries or is it just a matter of tax and regulation?
Speaker 2: Because I'll tell you what this is a discussion that
Speaker 2: has a lot of poignancy here in Australia, where we
Speaker 2: shut down a number of refineries years ago and are
Speaker 2: paying the price.
Speaker 3: Well, there are two things. One is that the price
Speaker 3: on petrol is set globally, and that's why what's happening
Speaker 3: in the Middle East is affecting global prices and including
Speaker 3: in the United States. But in California particular, we have
Speaker 3: a cap and trade or a cap and tax system
Speaker 3: because the Democrats in California have long believed that California
Speaker 3: alone is going to be able to change the climate
Speaker 3: of planet Earth, and consequently you have a number of
Speaker 3: other fees that are built in there. California also requires
Speaker 3: a very exotic blend of fuel, which drives the prices
Speaker 3: up higher, and the Democrats have been pushing to close
Speaker 3: refining capacity in California, and you can now see how
Speaker 3: much of a mistake that is. But one positive thing
Speaker 3: about America is that we have the refining capacity and
Speaker 3: we have the oil. So you're not going to see
Speaker 3: gas stations closed in the United States like you have
Speaker 3: seen in Australia and elsewhere due to lack of fuel.
Speaker 3: The supply is there, but the price is high, but
Speaker 3: especially in Democrat control states like New York and California
Speaker 3: because of these exotic environmental rules, which of course will
Speaker 3: have no impact on the climate to the planet whatsoever.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I hope some policymakers here in Australia are
Speaker 2: listening to that, because that is spot on. But I
Speaker 2: want to talk also ron about some of these elections
Speaker 2: that are going on, some of these special elections happening
Speaker 2: in the United States, because people here might not be
Speaker 2: tuned into some of these. There was a big surprise
Speaker 2: this week in Florida when Democrat Emily Gregory won a
Speaker 2: Florida state seat District eighty seven, which includes Donald Trump's
Speaker 2: Mara Lago compound. Now, the result is a big swing
Speaker 2: away from twenty twenty four when a Republican won the
Speaker 2: district by nineteen points. Is there any sort of broader
Speaker 2: message that we can take from this. We've seen quite
Speaker 2: a few of these special elections fall the Democrats way.
Speaker 2: My question is are these just one offs or is
Speaker 2: there a bigger trend a concern that Republicans need to
Speaker 2: be very much mindful of coming into the midterms.
Speaker 3: Well as my old boss, Senator Ted krus has pointed
Speaker 3: out that this is a very competitive political environment and
Speaker 3: Republicans have to take it very, very seriously. There's been
Speaker 3: a number of special elections of what you would call
Speaker 3: by elections, which have been favorable for the Democrats. Others
Speaker 3: have gone the Republicans' way. I don't think it's an
Speaker 3: overwhelming trend, but there's a phenomenon called the six year itch,
Speaker 3: and that is in the second mid term of an
Speaker 3: incumbent president, the opposition party tends to do unusually well.
Speaker 3: The only challenge for the Democrats is there is so
Speaker 3: much out of position to be able to take advantage
Speaker 3: of that. The Democratic National Committee is financially underwater. Republicans
Speaker 3: are very well funded. The Democrats have a problem with
Speaker 3: the quality of the candidates and an ur US system.
Speaker 3: We're a candidate centric system, not like Australia, which is
Speaker 3: a party centric system. So the quality of the candidates
Speaker 3: matters even more in the United States, and they just
Speaker 3: have not been nominating good candidates. So the Democrats would
Speaker 3: be in a much better position if they could get
Speaker 3: their act together, but there's no indication that they're in
Speaker 3: a position to do that, and so as a result,
Speaker 3: I think it's a very competitive political environment. Republicans have
Speaker 3: to focus on bringing down the cost of living and
Speaker 3: maximizing affordability in terms of fuel prices, taxes, and other
Speaker 3: matters as well.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean this is a big question here because
Speaker 2: you know, obviously there's people who are very plugged into
Speaker 2: the news, but there's a lot of voters who aren't
Speaker 2: plugged into the news but just kind of get a
Speaker 2: vague sense of what's going on, and maybe they feel
Speaker 2: things wrong with the cost of living or what a
Speaker 2: cost to fill up their car. At the same time,
Speaker 2: they're not thrilled about you know, people who are plugged
Speaker 2: in with the Democrats drift to the hard left. Who
Speaker 2: does this sort of environment then favor going into November?
Speaker 2: I mean, do the Republicans have some secret advantage that
Speaker 2: hasn't quite shown itself yet in these polls.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think the biggest advantage to Republicans is how
Speaker 3: far away from the mainstream the Democratic Party has moved
Speaker 3: in recent years. There was a time when that blue collar,
Speaker 3: non college educated voter trade by your vernacular and so on,
Speaker 3: would be lock step voting for the Democrats. But Republicans
Speaker 3: have won those voters over part because the Democrats have
Speaker 3: moved so far on these urban, cosmopolitan issues that really
Speaker 3: only are of interest to a small niche of the
Speaker 3: Democratic Party. But that's the tail that's wagging the dog,
Speaker 3: and so that's left them so far out of position
Speaker 3: in suburban areas and particularly in the South to be
Speaker 3: able to win back seats, which in the patent not
Speaker 3: so distant past, they were winning. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean we've talked on this show about that
Speaker 2: tatar Rico fellow that're running down in Texas. He's pretty entertaining.
Speaker 2: But you know, another thing that's also I think probably
Speaker 2: people are seeing is this DHS shutdown. And I talked
Speaker 2: about earlier about how ICE agents are now helping to
Speaker 2: clear security blockages at the airport. It seems to be
Speaker 2: working pretty well. But I want to dive some more
Speaker 2: into what this shutdown is all about. And well, it
Speaker 2: seems to be that Democrats are really just pushing this
Speaker 2: shutdown because they want to protect illegal aliens from deportation.
Speaker 2: I kind of thought that they were supposed to be
Speaker 2: protecting American citizens, or maybe I'm just being a bit
Speaker 2: naive here.
Speaker 3: Well, it's all on who you define the victim to be,
Speaker 3: and very often the Democrats have reversed who the criminal
Speaker 3: is and who the victim is. For example, when they
Speaker 3: talk about having sanctuary cities, who do sanctuary cities protect.
Speaker 3: They protect people who are in the country illegally who
Speaker 3: have committed other crimes. That's who it's protecting. And by
Speaker 3: protecting those people and allowing those criminals to be back
Speaker 3: into the street, it creates only more victims, and so
Speaker 3: the Democrats have a completely reverse It's exactly the type
Speaker 3: of phenomenon which means that they're out of position to
Speaker 3: be able to take advantage of other trends which are
Speaker 3: working in their favor. The bottom line is that we
Speaker 3: have these lines at airports today because the Democratic Party
Speaker 3: insists that the Trump administration stop enforcing the law and
Speaker 3: allow more criminal aliens who are in the country to
Speaker 3: be able to continue to roam free and commit crime.
Speaker 2: Ron Narn, thanks so much for your insight. As always,
Speaker 2: always pleasure to have you on the program. Things so
Speaker 2: much Now, stick around because we're going to hit a
Speaker 2: short break. But when we come back, the Great Brand
Speaker 2: Alignment joins me with the most jaw dropping bit of
Speaker 2: Hollywood elitism I've seen in a long time. But first
Speaker 2: A lot of stuff came out of that latest Trump
Speaker 2: press conference today, But as someone who's seen journalists ask
Speaker 2: some pretty silly questions at these things, I had to
Speaker 2: appreciate how the President batted away this question about US
Speaker 2: troops going into seas Iran's uranium?
Speaker 14: Are you going to go in for the uranium?
Speaker 15: Like?
Speaker 14: How do you secure ron? And let's assume I was
Speaker 14: or I wasn't.
Speaker 10: Why would I ever answer your question? What kind of
Speaker 10: a question am I going to go in for?
Speaker 2: They?
Speaker 10: Oh you haven't gone. We're going tomorrow at three o'clock.
Speaker 10: How could you possibly ask a question like that and
Speaker 10: expect an answer?
Speaker 9: I don't know, but I don't know.
Speaker 3: I think you're a friendly person too.
Speaker 10: It's just such a ridiculous question.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Look, here are the war plans that got
Speaker 2: them right here? Looks. You know, I've all for transparentcy here,
Speaker 2: but gosh, anyway, stick around because we're gonna talking about
Speaker 2: how Hollywood hates normal people like you and me. After
Speaker 2: the break, welcome back to the program. Well, big news
Speaker 2: in Los Angeles, where a jury has headed down a
Speaker 2: shock win for a young woman who sued YouTube and Meta,
Speaker 2: which owns Instagram and Facebook over her childhood addiction to
Speaker 2: social media. Jurors found the firm's intentionally built addictive social
Speaker 2: media platforms that harmed the twenty year old's mental health.
Speaker 2: The woman known as Kaylee was awarded around eight point
Speaker 2: five million Australian dollars in damages.
Speaker 1: I feel like we're about something that is incredibly socially
Speaker 1: important and responsible, and I feel like we've.
Speaker 4: Made a great step forward.
Speaker 1: If the jury had returned to know, the Champagne Court
Speaker 1: would be popping in the boardrooms of Google and Meta,
Speaker 1: But instead Mark Zuckerberg has to take a phone call
Speaker 1: and the only thing he's waiting for now is to
Speaker 1: find out if there are going to be punishment damages.
Speaker 2: Well, joining me now to discuss this and a whole
Speaker 2: lot more is elections correspondent at The Federalist Brianna Alive
Speaker 2: And Brianna, thanks so much for coming on here. This
Speaker 2: is a fascinating case to me because it dealt with
Speaker 2: social media addiction. But one of the things we've also
Speaker 2: seen is since Facebook and these social media giants have
Speaker 2: come on the scene, a big push of young people
Speaker 2: turning to the left, being pushed very much by social
Speaker 2: media algorithms. What do you make of this decision and
Speaker 2: the impact that these social media platforms are having on
Speaker 2: the young, particularly when it comes to politics.
Speaker 15: Yeah, I think you make a great point that there
Speaker 15: are people who are ten twelve years old and they
Speaker 15: are getting inundated with left wing liberal messaging. And as
Speaker 15: a ten year old, you know, when I was ten,
Speaker 15: I didn't even have a cell phone, right, And I
Speaker 15: think what was interesting about this case is this young
Speaker 15: woman says she was six years old when she got
Speaker 15: one platform, and then ten years old when she got another.
Speaker 15: And to me, that sounds a lot more like bad parenting.
Speaker 15: My parents would have never allowed me to be on
Speaker 15: social media. I wasn't even allowed to watch TV that often.
Speaker 15: So I think with this case shows this is two things. One,
Speaker 15: there's a problem in families where the parents just do
Speaker 15: not have enough control over their children. They let their
Speaker 15: do what they want, including you some social media, to
Speaker 15: whatever extent the child sees fit, instead of the parent
Speaker 15: kind of bringing them in. And two, to your point,
Speaker 15: the benefit of this ruling is that there are a
Speaker 15: lot of people and parents and I think companies saying
Speaker 15: you know what, I'm not going to take this risk
Speaker 15: if you're under let's say, thirteen years old, you can't
Speaker 15: be on the platform. And that will give kids the
Speaker 15: time to develop one their own childhood, but two not
Speaker 15: to be inundated with adult you know, real world politics.
Speaker 2: Yeah no, I think that's a very good point, Brianna.
Speaker 2: But I want to move on too, because, you know,
Speaker 2: speaking of the culture here, there's elitism in left wing
Speaker 2: snobbery all over the place, but it's particularly present in Hollywood.
Speaker 2: But I was amazed by this. Canceled and then uncanceled
Speaker 2: host Jimmy Kibble came under fire this week because he
Speaker 2: attacked Homeland Security Secretary of the New One, Mark Wayne Mullen.
Speaker 2: Have a look at this, Joel Warring.
Speaker 9: Trumb's got a whole new generation of thinkers lined up,
Speaker 9: including his newly confirmed Secretary of Homeland Security, Mark Wayne, Chuck,
Speaker 9: Mike Bruce, Dave, meet Mullen.
Speaker 2: Maybe Mellon's better.
Speaker 4: He is the now former Senator of Oklahoma.
Speaker 9: Before he was elected to the Senate, Mark Wayne Mullen
Speaker 9: was a low level MMA fighter and a plumber.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 9: We have a plumber protecting us from terrorism now, Brianna.
Speaker 2: I mean, I where to begin his life? Story involves
Speaker 2: actually something much more complicated than that. But I hope
Speaker 2: Jimmy Kibble never needs a plumber.
Speaker 15: Yeah, it's this thelitiest mentality that the average American is
Speaker 15: not qualified to rule himselt He.
Speaker 14: Mocks is for being a plumber.
Speaker 15: And I would remind Jimmy kim All that Henry Knox,
Speaker 15: who delivered word Washington the artillery needed to run the
Speaker 15: British out of Boston, was a bookseller. Okay, So you
Speaker 15: don't have to have this elite experience to be good
Speaker 15: at what you're trying to do. And we've seen Democrats'
Speaker 15: choice for you know, Department of Home and Security, Allejandra Mayorgus,
Speaker 15: the impeached Alajandre Majorca has destroyed our southern border and
Speaker 15: he was an elite with all that experience. So experience
Speaker 15: in politics doesn't mean you're actually qualified to get the
Speaker 15: job done. And I'm hopeful that Mark Wrene Bullen is
Speaker 15: going to continue to work on deportations and keeping our
Speaker 15: border clothes.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean bring out of his story is quite
Speaker 2: remarkable too. He had to I think, drop out of college,
Speaker 2: build a plumbing business, up all of this stuff, and
Speaker 2: do we need more normal people? Like that you've had
Speaker 2: real life experiences beyond going to law school in American politics.
Speaker 15: Oh absolutely. You know, the entire thought process of the
Speaker 15: founders is that people would role themselves. I mean, you're
Speaker 15: going to have teachers, plumbers, carpenters, people who are doing
Speaker 15: average jobs, but jobs that.
Speaker 14: Actually make America go round.
Speaker 15: And there's this liberal worldview and it's not just cinema
Speaker 15: kits everywhere, that the elites are smarter and they get
Speaker 15: to govern you.
Speaker 14: You need the experts governing you.
Speaker 15: If you have an expert class governing, you are not
Speaker 15: run by the people, and then America doesn't exist as
Speaker 15: it's supposed to.
Speaker 2: Well, I think that's a great point about the expert class.
Speaker 2: By the way. You know who I think needs some
Speaker 2: experts are some of these delivery robots. I just want
Speaker 2: to bring this up because I saw some footage this
Speaker 2: week and I wanted to get your take on it.
Speaker 2: Some of this technology is getting out of hand. We've
Speaker 2: seen rogue delivery robots replacing delivery drivers, causing chaos. Here's
Speaker 2: one at work in Chicago smashing up a bus shelter.
Speaker 4: Don't come at me, don't.
Speaker 2: Come at me, coming right at me.
Speaker 14: For back off. I'm a movie.
Speaker 2: I'm I moving. You have to come right at me.
Speaker 14: You have your side right there, I'm on my side.
Speaker 3: I don't care. I'll stay right here.
Speaker 2: Now that's right.
Speaker 3: Now, yeah, back up, don't you dare say hello, I
Speaker 3: don't care.
Speaker 13: Back up there, you go back up?
Speaker 2: Now, go around, you go around. That's right, yourself pressing yourself.
Speaker 2: Oh that's right. You don't have fingers.
Speaker 4: You got the green light, but you can't go because
Speaker 4: you don't have the walk signal. But you don't walk,
Speaker 4: you roll.
Speaker 2: Now. We don't have these things in Australia, thankfully. We've
Speaker 2: got to dodge real life human uber each drivers, which
Speaker 2: is a lot more fun. What do you make of
Speaker 2: these things? Is this future technology just to fail?
Speaker 14: I think it's dangerous. It's not just these weird robots.
Speaker 15: You also see Malania and Trump debuted a full human
Speaker 15: sized robot in the White House just this week, saying
Speaker 15: that they could possibly one day become that's scary. You've
Speaker 15: seen Tesla's who can self drive, or those ever self
Speaker 15: driving cars actually crash right and cast serious harm. And
Speaker 15: one instance, ave woman and her child almost went off
Speaker 15: the side of the road because the card it was
Speaker 15: self driving. So I think as we grow with technology,
Speaker 15: we're not going to get rid of it, but we
Speaker 15: need to learn one how to better adapt.
Speaker 14: It and make policies that keep robots off the streets.
Speaker 2: In my opinion, I tell you what, Brianna, every day
Speaker 2: I want to join that Amish community more and more
Speaker 2: when I see things like that. Thank you so much, Breanna,
Speaker 2: for your health, for your time. This evening really appreciates
Speaker 2: you next time. Now, stick around because we're going to
Speaker 2: hit the beaches with Only in America shortly. But first
Speaker 2: let's check in on our friends in the faculty lounge
Speaker 2: and California State University professor Jamie O'Quinn with some shall
Speaker 2: we say, novel series about men and women and sex
Speaker 2: and how all that business works.
Speaker 16: The idea that I have to get up here and
Speaker 16: say that trans women are women and that's what I
Speaker 16: have to use my time to do is absurd. Shame
Speaker 16: on you, Shame on all of you, and shame on
Speaker 16: you for using lesbian pologe as a front for your transphobia.
Speaker 16: Because this lesbian has had plenty of girlfriends with penises.
Speaker 2: The science has settled to leave it there. Only in
Speaker 2: America's coming at you after the break. Welcome back to
Speaker 2: the program. And now it's time for a little segment
Speaker 2: we like to call only in America. Well, it's spring
Speaker 2: break in the US, which means it's time for fresh faced, innocent,
Speaker 2: university going youth from around the country to gather on
Speaker 2: the beaches of Florida to discuss all they've been learning
Speaker 2: and studying. And it really looks like America's higher education
Speaker 2: institutions are doing a great job teaching about things like
Speaker 2: the late Roman Empire, German philosophy, and quantum physics. Our
Speaker 2: friends of Fox News bring us this report.
Speaker 4: Spring Break twenty six. What is the game plan?
Speaker 7: Drinking blackout with my rock out?
Speaker 1: If my mom is watching, I'm sorry, Mom, but I've
Speaker 1: been getting pretty drunk.
Speaker 2: Hook up with some girls.
Speaker 7: Get with as many girls as we can.
Speaker 4: Foot issue facing America is the most important to you.
Speaker 14: What bikini I'm gonna wear? Nex Obesity is terrible.
Speaker 9: Ice, Uh not personally, I'm legal getting a.
Speaker 2: Tan on the beach.
Speaker 14: That's the most important thing in my life right now.
Speaker 14: I'm thinking about Starbucks. To be honest, I'm thinking about Starbucks.
Speaker 11: What I'm gonna get for today?
Speaker 14: Gulf of America. That's the last thing I kept up
Speaker 14: with for going to war with Iraq. That's been crazy.
Speaker 2: Ah what was it? Oscar Wilde said, youth is wasted
Speaker 2: on the young. Anyway, that's all the time we've got
Speaker 2: for this week. See you next time for more US
Speaker 2: Report and Sunday Morning for Outsiders. Bye bye,