Speaker 1: This is the US Report with James Moroar.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the program. Here's what's coming
Speaker 2: up tonight. Democrats are attacking You'll never guess democracy in
Speaker 2: where else but Virginia.
Speaker 3: Plus over in New York it.
Speaker 2: Looks like zirod Moom Donnie voters are finally getting what
Speaker 2: they voted for. Oh, this one is delicious and is
Speaker 2: the Iran war in a stalemate? And what can break it?
Speaker 2: We'll talk to John fun to find out. But first, well, well, well, friends,
Speaker 2: have I got a story for you, and let me
Speaker 2: tell you you're going to love this one.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: Remember this the infamous white dashalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia
Speaker 2: in twenty seventeen, which was supposed to prove that in
Speaker 2: Donald Trump's America, racists and klansmen were emboldened to go
Speaker 2: out and shout Nazis slogans while carrying Yeah, I know
Speaker 2: this is really terrifying tiki torches from the local gardens
Speaker 2: supply shop. I mean this story, you'll remember it made
Speaker 2: headlines around the world. It was the source of the
Speaker 2: completely debunked very fine people hoaks. The left loved to
Speaker 2: push about Trump, claiming that the President called neo Nazis. Yes, indeed,
Speaker 2: very fine people. And this was to listen to Joe
Speaker 2: Biden tell it. Well, this was such an important event,
Speaker 2: this march. This was part of the reason why he
Speaker 2: ran for president in twenty twenty.
Speaker 4: I ran for president in twenty twenty because of what
Speaker 4: I saw in Charlottesville in August of twenty seventeen. Extremists
Speaker 4: coming out of the woods carried torches, they're vains bulging
Speaker 4: from their necks, carry Nazi swastikas and changing the same
Speaker 4: exact anti Semitic bile that was hurt in Germany in
Speaker 4: the early thirties.
Speaker 3: Well, guess what it looks like.
Speaker 2: The real hoax wasn't what Donald Trump said about the march,
Speaker 2: but instead the hoax was the march itself. According to
Speaker 2: an indictment just handed down by the US Department of
Speaker 2: Justice and a grand jury, the real instigators of the
Speaker 2: march were not neo Nazis, but people, some of them
Speaker 2: actual neo Nazis, paid for by an outfit called the
Speaker 2: Southern Poverty Law Center. Now this was once a proud
Speaker 2: civil rights organization, but in recent years it has become
Speaker 2: a massive race baiting grift designed simply to stir up trouble. Yes,
Speaker 2: you heard that right. A group dedicated to fighting racism
Speaker 2: in the United States found that there was so little
Speaker 2: overt real racial hatred in society that they had to
Speaker 2: go out and pay contractors or as they call them, informants,
Speaker 2: like there's some sort of law enforcement body to go
Speaker 2: out there and whip it up, thus giving the Southern
Speaker 2: Poverty Law Center a justification to campaign for more donations.
Speaker 5: The SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead
Speaker 5: manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources
Speaker 5: to stoke racial hatred. The indictment describes as conduct in detail,
Speaker 5: but one troubling example is that the SPLC was paying
Speaker 5: a member of the leadership group that planned the Unite
Speaker 5: the Right protests in Charlottesville, Virginia in twenty seventeen that
Speaker 5: resulted in the death of one person and injured dozens more.
Speaker 3: You mean the whole thing was fake.
Speaker 2: These are the depths the left will go to to
Speaker 2: just smearing conservatives and scaring in people into voting only
Speaker 2: for the left. I mean, look, I thought it was
Speaker 2: supposed to be the right that was always trying to
Speaker 2: divide America. But if these charges hold up, well, it
Speaker 2: looks like what we are seeing is at least a
Speaker 2: ten year long campaign pushed by the Southern Poverty Law
Speaker 2: Center and amplified through the media collapse as.
Speaker 3: A total fraud.
Speaker 2: And again, before anyone says that this is a political
Speaker 2: witch hunt by the Trump administration, remember this is not
Speaker 2: just the Department of Justice saying this, but this is
Speaker 2: a grand jury and it implicates a lot of people
Speaker 2: and institutions like the FBI under Joe Biden, which became
Speaker 2: little more than a crack squad of rent cops targeting
Speaker 2: the right.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, they.
Speaker 2: Had partnered with the SPLC, and according to the indictment,
Speaker 2: this is amazing. Between twenty fourteen and twenty three, twenty three,
Speaker 2: the SPLC secretly funneled more than three million dollars in
Speaker 2: donated funds to individuals associated with violent extremist groups, including
Speaker 2: the Ku Klux Klan, the United Clans of America Unite
Speaker 2: the Right, which was spoken about before, the National Alliance,
Speaker 2: the National Socialist Movement, the Aryan Nations affiliated Sidistic Souls
Speaker 2: Motorcycle Club, the National Socialist Party of America aka the
Speaker 2: American Nazi Party and the American Front. That's what the
Speaker 2: indictment says. And really, seriously, the Klan Nazis, the sidistic souls.
Speaker 2: I didn't even know they existed, but my god, millions
Speaker 2: of dollars sent in, much of it by Americans thinking
Speaker 2: they were doing the right things, standing up to hate,
Speaker 2: seeing their money being used to in fact stoke hate
Speaker 2: and run oh so very organic hate marches like this
Speaker 2: one when a Patriot Front group marched last year in Washington. Now,
Speaker 2: I remember when this happened, and everybody watched that footage
Speaker 2: and everybody assumed this was such a bit of gaslighting
Speaker 2: that it must have been an FBI false flag operation.
Speaker 2: Well turned out it was just one of the FBI's.
Speaker 3: Partners that was behind that one.
Speaker 2: Now there's a lot more in the allegations too, including
Speaker 2: claims of wire fraud, fake bank accounts, and all the
Speaker 2: other sort of things you'd expect. But meanwhile, it's important
Speaker 2: to note that the SPLC has over the years become
Speaker 2: a real clearing house for who are the goodies and
Speaker 2: who are the baddies in society as they see it
Speaker 2: as the progressive left.
Speaker 3: Season.
Speaker 2: One of the things that they did was maintain lists
Speaker 2: of hate groups, but weirdly, all the hate groups were
Speaker 2: always on the right, never on the left. And in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty two they teamed up with PayPal to determine
Speaker 2: which groups, again always groups on the right, should be
Speaker 2: denied service because they allegedly pedaled hate or some such. Now,
Speaker 2: all of this, again was happening while allegedly funding extremists.
Speaker 3: And the whole thing is so nuts.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you were to write this in a novel,
Speaker 2: people would say the editor would say, oh, not take
Speaker 2: it out. That's just too far out there. There's no
Speaker 2: way anyone would ever believe that. But of course, remember
Speaker 2: too that the SPLC also played really hardball politics. They
Speaker 2: tried to drive the Democrat Party agenda. In July twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four, they endorsed Kamala Harris for president, and not
Speaker 2: long after that Harris returned the favor.
Speaker 6: Let's remember Charlottesville where there was a mob of people
Speaker 6: carrying tiki torches spewing anti Semitic hate, and what did
Speaker 6: the president then at the time say, there were fine
Speaker 6: people on each side.
Speaker 2: Ah, yes, I don't know what's more ridiculous, the terrifying
Speaker 2: tiki torches or the Fine People hoax. Now, remember, if
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris had won that election, we would never have
Speaker 2: found out about any of this. Harris would still be
Speaker 2: repeating the hoax. The SPLC would still be gaslighting hate
Speaker 2: and helping to d bank and d platform conservatives while
Speaker 2: partnering with the FBI and neo Nasensen Klansmen. Well, they'd
Speaker 2: still be getting money to g up hate, where of
Speaker 2: course none existed. Okay, let's get straight into it with
Speaker 2: our first guest tonight, political journalist and great friend of
Speaker 2: the program, John Fund. John, Welcome to the US Report.
Speaker 2: We are talking about the war and Iran, how that's
Speaker 2: going about the latest John Fund.
Speaker 3: Give it to us straight. Has this thing reached a stalemate?
Speaker 7: It sure has the appearance of that book. The problem
Speaker 7: is this. The United States is a democracy and it
Speaker 7: responds to public opinion. Iran is a dictatorship and the
Speaker 7: worst thugs in the world, the International Revolutionary Guard, are
Speaker 7: in charge. They don't care about the people, they don't
Speaker 7: care about killing them, they don't care about their being bombed,
Speaker 7: and they have more staying power, at least in the
Speaker 7: short term, than the democratic forces in Israel or in
Speaker 7: the United States.
Speaker 2: So The question then becomes John, You know, Trump keeps
Speaker 2: talking about talking to people in Iran. He's talking to
Speaker 2: supposedly moderates. One question I have though, is if Trump
Speaker 2: is dealing with a moderate wing, the political wing, not
Speaker 2: the revolutionary wing of the government, does that risk that
Speaker 2: he might wind up giving up too many concessions to
Speaker 2: people who might not be actually in a position to
Speaker 2: give them over to him in any sort of ultimate settlement.
Speaker 7: Well, actually, I think we don't have a problem with
Speaker 7: that because look, the speaker of the Iranian Parliament resigned
Speaker 7: from their negotiating team today and the moderates have basically
Speaker 7: been pushed aside. There's no mystery to it. So the
Speaker 7: hardliners don't even want to talk to the United States.
Speaker 7: They want to weigh us out, and their friends in
Speaker 7: Somalia are now claiming that they're going to blockade the
Speaker 7: straits down there. So I have to tell you, I
Speaker 7: think this war is winnable, but it is a long
Speaker 7: slog because we frankly did not estimate properly, and I'm
Speaker 7: talking to you Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon did not
Speaker 7: estimate properly the ability of the Iranians to use the
Speaker 7: straits of Hormus and their leverage there over the world
Speaker 7: economy well.
Speaker 2: And so the question then becomes, you know, what does
Speaker 2: the administration do next? Because you can keep this sort
Speaker 2: of stalemate or semi stalemate running for a while. Everybody
Speaker 2: has to suffer through the oil prices, although I guess
Speaker 2: the US does well out of that as well as
Speaker 2: the other oil producing nations. But at some point does
Speaker 2: Trump say, look, we're going to do something kinetic again
Speaker 2: that whether it's carg Island or another round of targeted
Speaker 2: attacks on the leadership, Where is the next kind of
Speaker 2: military move do you think.
Speaker 7: Well, it's a big step the first one you take,
Speaker 7: because if you go to carg Island, that's putting boots
Speaker 7: on the ground, and from there you may be tempted
Speaker 7: or forced to by events to go further and to
Speaker 7: go on to the mainland to try to establish a
Speaker 7: cordon senetaire so that they can't mine the straits of Ramuz. Look,
Speaker 7: I'm not a military strategist. I'm glad I'm not a
Speaker 7: military strategist because right now there is no easy solution.
Speaker 7: There's just toughing it out, and that requires patients, which
Speaker 7: sometimes democracies or white houses don't have.
Speaker 2: Well, that's an interesting thing, you talk about patients and democracies.
Speaker 2: It strikes me that right now it seems like Trump
Speaker 2: has a higher tolerance for patients on this than a
Speaker 2: lot of the media and obviously the Democrats who want
Speaker 2: this whole thing to fail and for it to be
Speaker 2: a weapon that they can use against Trump in the
Speaker 2: middle terms. But earlier today Trump was talking about, Hey, look,
Speaker 2: World War II lasted, however long it lasts before five years.
Speaker 2: Vietnam lasted ten. Is it dangerous for Trump to start
Speaker 2: talking after having said this is going to be wrapped
Speaker 2: up in six weeks, to say, oh, look, this is
Speaker 2: still short by comparison to these other wars, which lasted,
Speaker 2: you know, five or ten years, and one of which
Speaker 2: ended rather ignominiously.
Speaker 7: Look, I'm generally in favor of the goals and the
Speaker 7: guidelines for this conflict. But let's be honest. Donald Trump
Speaker 7: has not been a good communicator with the American people.
Speaker 7: He has been contradictory. He has said there's good news today,
Speaker 7: then in a few hours later, there's bad news. He
Speaker 7: has not given any speech other than one brief one
Speaker 7: which I don't think moved the dial, and Donald Trump
Speaker 7: has not communicated the way that the commander in chief
Speaker 7: would if they wanted to carry a majority of the
Speaker 7: people behind him for an extended period of time.
Speaker 2: So, John, if you were in the White House right now,
Speaker 2: if you were his chief of staff, if you were
Speaker 2: his chief speech what would you tell him to be
Speaker 2: telling the American people and by extension of the world,
Speaker 2: get on TV? Do the big address behind the resolute desk?
Speaker 2: Is that what you'd be saying.
Speaker 7: Look, I think that time has passed temporarily, I would
Speaker 7: say talk less and let people who have more credibility
Speaker 7: and have not, shall we say, miscommunicated as much to
Speaker 7: take the lead. I'm looking at Marco Rubio, I'm looking
Speaker 7: at the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I'm
Speaker 7: looking at key senators who have credibility. Obviously, the president
Speaker 7: can step in if there's something important to announce or
Speaker 7: something important to convey, But I would say, right now,
Speaker 7: bring your best secondary messengers out and let them at
Speaker 7: least temporarily speak for your administration.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Finally, John, you know I mentioned how a lot of
Speaker 2: Democrats seem to be almost cheerleading a loss, but we
Speaker 2: had We had a terrible example of this week when
Speaker 2: Democrat Senator from Connecticut Chris Murphy, Well, he's come on
Speaker 2: a fire for a social media post which he called
Speaker 2: reports of Iranian ships slipping past the US naval black
Speaker 2: blockade quote awesome. Now he was pressed about this by
Speaker 2: Fox News and he said he didn't have any regrets.
Speaker 3: Have a look.
Speaker 8: Twitter has become kind of obsessfool. I probably should give
Speaker 8: up on sarcasm on Twitter.
Speaker 1: Obviously.
Speaker 8: Anybody that's seen anything that I have said about Trump's
Speaker 8: war knows that I think it's bungled, mismanaged. You should
Speaker 8: end it as quickly as possible. But sarcasm is not
Speaker 8: something I guess that's allowed on Twitter any longer.
Speaker 3: Do you regret the post?
Speaker 1: Are you planning on taking it down?
Speaker 8: I mean, I guess I just have to be more
Speaker 8: careful about sarcasmn on Twitter.
Speaker 2: I don't know, John, I'm not sure it was really sarcasm.
Speaker 2: There was your take on that.
Speaker 7: My take is that Trump derangement syndrome is understandable for
Speaker 7: some people, but what it verges into American derangement syndrome,
Speaker 7: which is effectively and indirectly wishing American armed forces and
Speaker 7: American military operations ill. Well, that is a peculiar form
Speaker 7: of mental illness, which I didn't expect.
Speaker 2: And finally, John, I just want to ask about the
Speaker 2: latest two on the Lebanon Israel cease fire. We see
Speaker 2: that that's been extended three weeks here that part of
Speaker 2: this whole operation does look fairly promising, or that there
Speaker 2: could be some good results out of this. Finally, what's
Speaker 2: your take on that.
Speaker 7: Well, it's good news, but that's primarily affecting Israel, and
Speaker 7: it's not affecting twenty percent of the world's oil supply,
Speaker 7: which goes through this strait of our moves. So yes,
Speaker 7: Libranon is good news, but it's a sideshow. It's not
Speaker 7: the main event.
Speaker 2: John, fun thanks so much, Thank you. Okay, let's move
Speaker 2: on to Virginia. Now, this is a wild story where
Speaker 2: Democrat governor, the new Democrat governor of Virginia, Abigail Spanberger,
Speaker 2: has already gone back on her earlier promise not to
Speaker 2: redraw the congressional districts in that state to the Democrats'
Speaker 2: advantage here she.
Speaker 3: Was last year.
Speaker 9: Certainly, Virginia, by constitutional amendment, has a new redistricting effort
Speaker 9: that was put in place and first utilized after the
Speaker 9: in the twenty twenty one redistricting. Certainly, I've been watching
Speaker 9: with interest what other states are doing, but I have
Speaker 9: no plans to redistrict Virginia.
Speaker 2: Well, as Maury Povich once said, that was a lie,
Speaker 2: And they held a referendum this week instead in Virginia
Speaker 2: to give the state a new map, a new congressional
Speaker 2: map that would wildly disadvantage Republicans, possibly shifting the balance
Speaker 2: of their eleven congressional seats from six to five in
Speaker 2: favor of the Democrats to ten to one. This all
Speaker 2: has a huge implication for the midterm elections. In House
Speaker 2: Minority Leader Hakim Jeffries was gloating about the result last night.
Speaker 10: Was a big victory for the people of Virginia, a
Speaker 10: big victory for America, and a big victory democracy. Donald
Speaker 10: Trump and Republicans launched this gerrymandering war, and we've made
Speaker 10: claire as Democrats that we're going to finish it.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 2: Ask for Donald Trump, he's called it rigged, and not
Speaker 2: for the first time he's used that word. Let's bring
Speaker 2: in to talk about this and a lot more. The
Speaker 2: New York Post Editor at Large Kelly, Jane Towards Kelly,
Speaker 2: thanks so much for coming on. What is your reaction
Speaker 2: to this incredible story out of Virginia. I couldn't believe
Speaker 2: it that they were going to try this, and I
Speaker 2: can't believe that they managed to get away with it.
Speaker 3: Tell us about it, well.
Speaker 11: I always great to be here, James, thanks for having
Speaker 11: me on. Uh, they barely did it. You know, this
Speaker 11: referendum wand fifty one point five percent. It was extremely close,
Speaker 11: and not nearly as close as that twenty twenty when
Speaker 11: they put it to the people in a Virginia in
Speaker 11: twenty twenty asking them what a constitutional amendment to get
Speaker 11: partisanship out of redistrict thing that passed with two thirds
Speaker 11: of Virginians voting in favor. So clearly, you know, when
Speaker 11: Hakeem Jeffrey says this is victory for America, for Virginians,
Speaker 11: for democracy, it was not a victory for any of
Speaker 11: those things. And in fact, it was horrible for all
Speaker 11: of those things. And it's just incredible that you know,
Speaker 11: you had it on tape. You know the governor now
Speaker 11: governor said I have no plans to well, I guess
Speaker 11: you have to worry when a politics because they have
Speaker 11: no plan, because they're not actually saying I'm definitely not
Speaker 11: going to it's like I'm thinking about it. Maybe I will.
Speaker 11: But now this is just outrageous, James. And it's amazing
Speaker 11: because right now, you know, Virginia is actually a purple state.
Speaker 11: It's not you know, blue or red anymore, and it's
Speaker 11: it's you know, make up reflects that it's got eleven seats,
Speaker 11: you know, five for one party, six for the other. Well,
Speaker 11: this redistricting would give them ten give Democrats, of course,
Speaker 11: ten out of eleven, so clearly not at all democracy.
Speaker 11: It has nothing to do with restoring fairness to Virginia,
Speaker 11: which was some of the language used in the amendment
Speaker 11: that they just voted on. They actually had the words
Speaker 11: restore fairness, which obviously it wasn't. But you know, you
Speaker 11: can fool you know, a voter anytime, I guess, and
Speaker 11: it's certainly when Donald Trump's in the White House it
Speaker 11: becomes much important to try to fool the voters.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, I think you know, we all know
Speaker 2: that Trump can speak in hyperboles sometimes. I think he
Speaker 2: is right when he called this read because it really
Speaker 2: does stink to high heaven. Hey, let's go to the
Speaker 2: other side of the country, to California, where the race
Speaker 2: for governor is really heating up. Now, it'd be hard
Speaker 2: for whoever takes a job to do worse than Gavin Newsom,
Speaker 2: but some people think it could be done.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: I did notice one interesting endorsement though, for the current
Speaker 2: front runner, and by the way, billionaire Tom Steyer from
Speaker 2: the anti billionaire progressive group Our Revolution. This is well,
Speaker 2: I mean, who says already is dead? But this really
Speaker 2: sums up California. The billionaire being endorsed by the anti
Speaker 2: billionaire politicians group.
Speaker 11: Talk about a revolution. James, Yeah, and it's it's funny
Speaker 11: because you know, actually, at one point Bernie Sanders was
Speaker 11: railing against both millionaires and billionaires. But then Bernie Sanders
Speaker 11: became a millionaire thanks in part to a best selling book,
Speaker 11: and now you only hear complain about billionaires. But yes,
Speaker 11: there the irony is just you know, it's all over
Speaker 11: the place. And of course, this guy Tom Sperry uses
Speaker 11: his billions to try to influence politics here in America's
Speaker 11: been doing it for years, funding a lot of outside groups,
Speaker 11: funding outside protesters at a lot of events. So it's
Speaker 11: quite amazing for you know, the Bernie Sanders progressive movement
Speaker 11: to be putting their arms around this fellow who is
Speaker 11: you know, represents everything they hate normally.
Speaker 2: Well yeah, I mean, you know, billionaires. I thought they
Speaker 2: were the enemy, but apparently not. But I'm glad you
Speaker 2: mentioned fundraising because there's another story this week that really
Speaker 2: shocked me. There's a group called Act Blue and for
Speaker 2: probably about twenty years now, they have been raising what
Speaker 2: would amount to billions of dollars.
Speaker 3: Since two thousand and four.
Speaker 2: They are now under investigation for alleged donor fraud, and
Speaker 2: it's been revealed that in depositions with congressional committees investigating this,
Speaker 2: every hect Blue employee who they questioned invoked their Fifth
Speaker 2: Amendment right a total of one hundred and forty six times,
Speaker 2: protecting themselves from self incrimination. Kelly, we've spoken about this
Speaker 2: group before. I think on this program, it really does
Speaker 2: stink to high heaven, this, doesn't it.
Speaker 11: It's amazing, James, that they've gotten away from away with this,
Speaker 11: and you know, their own lawyers told them, you know,
Speaker 11: it appears that you have been violating the law. Now
Speaker 11: the big thing, of course, is that you cannot accept
Speaker 11: foreim donations in elections in the United States. But hey,
Speaker 11: you know, for the Democrats, it's I mean remember Bill Clinton,
Speaker 11: you know, selling access to the Lincoln Bedroom, you know,
Speaker 11: which some cases taking Chinese money. It was alleged and
Speaker 11: pretty strong evidence for it. So it's just incredible, like
Speaker 11: they actually made you know, their their standards lower because
Speaker 11: they wanted this money and you know, didn't investigate. People
Speaker 11: have investigations using fake identities, as I think the New
Speaker 11: York Times did, and we're able to donate without problems.
Speaker 11: They don't check their actual donors' identities, and of course
Speaker 11: this is a big no no under federal law. So
Speaker 11: I'm anxious to see if they'll actually get punished for it,
Speaker 11: because you know, as we know, a lot of this
Speaker 11: stuff happens and it ends up going unpunished. So but
Speaker 11: you know, when you when you evoke the Fifth Amendment
Speaker 11: one hundred and forty six times, which is of course
Speaker 11: you know right not to self incriminate, there's something going
Speaker 11: on there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, there is a bit of a perception
Speaker 2: that there might be something untoward happening there in act
Speaker 2: Blue because as we're talking about we're talking billions of
Speaker 2: times being funnled to Democrats from god knows where into
Speaker 2: these campaigns, and people need to know where that money
Speaker 2: comes from. Hey, before I'll let you go, I've got
Speaker 2: to let get your thoughts on this shocking story out
Speaker 2: of your haul of ye former home New York City.
Speaker 2: Now we know about Zaaron mom Donnie. Last month, he
Speaker 2: announced the move of the city's largest homeless shelter for
Speaker 2: men to the East Village, a very hip neighborhood, after
Speaker 2: it fell into severe disrepair.
Speaker 3: Now locals have lost their.
Speaker 2: Minds about this because they say it's going to lead
Speaker 2: to dangerous men drinking and taking drugs and doing all
Speaker 2: sorts of things in their neighborhood, which is what actually
Speaker 2: I think a lot of people do with the East
Speaker 2: Village anyway. But they're suing Mom Donnie. And the thing
Speaker 2: that I love about this is the East Village voted
Speaker 2: seventy percent. As you see on the screen there, seventy
Speaker 2: percent the local booths were for Mom Donnie. This is
Speaker 2: menkin here that democracy is getting what you want and
Speaker 2: getting good and hard, don't.
Speaker 11: You think exactly? James and I have to say, welcome
Speaker 11: to my world. I actually live a few blocks from
Speaker 11: that shelter, and it is notorious. It's been on the
Speaker 11: front page of the New York Post more than once.
Speaker 11: Was you know, practically ryts broke out when migrants started,
Speaker 11: you know, being housed there because they were having fights
Speaker 11: with the Native New Yorkers who felt that it was
Speaker 11: their shelter. You know, there was somebody who was living
Speaker 11: in that shelter who went, you know, a couple of
Speaker 11: years ago on a knife rampage. You know, it was
Speaker 11: knife to a bunch of people in the neighborhood. Again, that's
Speaker 11: my neighborhood, and I can tell that my neighborhood is
Speaker 11: now filled with people who stand around doing no good.
Speaker 11: And so I can see why the East villagers don't
Speaker 11: want it in their neighborhood. But where is it supposed
Speaker 11: to go? It has to go somewhere. And the fact is,
Speaker 11: as you said, they voted for Mom, Donnie. This is
Speaker 11: what they voted for. And he says, this shelter isn't
Speaker 11: up to the right standard for almost men to be
Speaker 11: living in. And it's an intake shelter, by the way,
Speaker 11: So it's it's the first shelter that you know, if
Speaker 11: you're a single man or. You know, a couple and
Speaker 11: only the single ones are going to East Village. But
Speaker 11: that's the first place you go if you're getting a
Speaker 11: shelter spot in New York City. So I certainly know
Speaker 11: well what it means. Good luck to these villagers. But again,
Speaker 11: you know you were going to get when you voted
Speaker 11: for this guy. He wants to have nicer shelters for
Speaker 11: people who want to make money.
Speaker 2: As the saying goes, you buy the ticket, you take
Speaker 2: the ride.
Speaker 3: Kelly J.
Speaker 2: Torrens, thank you so much for joining me. Everybody check
Speaker 2: out her stuff in the New York Post. Now we're
Speaker 2: gonna check take a quick break. But when we come back,
Speaker 2: a Virginia farmer who thinks he's got the solution to
Speaker 2: the energy crisis. But first, hey, Siri, what is the
Speaker 2: cringiest thing?
Speaker 3: Why?
Speaker 2: It's US Senate candidate Mallory McMorrow, no relations, thankfully entering
Speaker 2: that state's Democrat Party convention. Who boy, can we get
Speaker 2: the theater kids out of polats please? I mean, seriously,
Speaker 2: what's worse than a celebrity politician? A politician trying to
Speaker 2: pretend they're a celebrity. That was just horrific. And jen
Speaker 2: Z You've got a lot to answer for anyway, Let's
Speaker 2: fix the fuel crisis. After the break, welcome back to
Speaker 2: the program. Well, I want to bring in someone new
Speaker 2: for you tonight. Here a Virginia farmer by the name
Speaker 2: of Daniel Turner. He's part of an energy campaign called
Speaker 2: Power the Future. He's written a fascinating column on the
Speaker 2: Fox News website in which he makes the argument that
Speaker 2: with the fuel crisis and the situation in the Middle East,
Speaker 2: the left have all of a sudden gone quite remarkably
Speaker 2: quiet on the need to save the planet by using
Speaker 2: renewable energy and instead are opting with getting oil wherever
Speaker 2: they can, however they can. We've seen that here in Australia,
Speaker 2: and Daniel Turner joins me from the US to talk
Speaker 2: more about this phenomenon. Daniel, first of all, what about you.
Speaker 2: A Happy Earth Day? I think I missed it this year,
Speaker 2: but then again I missed the probably for the last
Speaker 2: twenty or thirty years. Here tell us more about what
Speaker 2: you have found and what your campaign about energy in
Speaker 2: the future is all about.
Speaker 12: So I started Power of the Future to advocate for
Speaker 12: rural energy workers. I'm very close to coal country West Virginia,
Speaker 12: and the climate movement has this placed hundreds of thousands
Speaker 12: of coal workers. It's plunged them into poverty. It's ruined
Speaker 12: their towns and their neighborhoods and their culture. And there's
Speaker 12: the energy component, there's the national security component. Right, we
Speaker 12: pay more for electricity. We are dependent upon communist China
Speaker 12: for these crappy solar panels and wind turbines from Scandinavia.
Speaker 12: But the real purpose of it is that these communities
Speaker 12: across America that provided a product that we need have
Speaker 12: been decimated by the radical climate left and we're just
Speaker 12: completely worse off for it. And you mentioned Earth Day.
Speaker 12: This is their high holiday. I don't know what it
Speaker 12: was in Australia, but in America no one celebrated it
Speaker 12: because the climate.
Speaker 1: Movement's been proven to be a total.
Speaker 12: Fraud, total failure, total liars, and their policies have been
Speaker 12: detrimental to world peace. And so you know, they are
Speaker 12: all hiding their heads until they get another Joe Biden
Speaker 12: in office, when they can come back out of the
Speaker 12: hell hole they've created for us.
Speaker 2: And Daniel, I mean, you know, you talk about this
Speaker 2: huge movement, this environmental movement. You mentioned China, there Where
Speaker 2: is the money coming from that had been pushing this
Speaker 2: up until you know, very very recently, is it coming
Speaker 2: from China?
Speaker 3: Who's behind this?
Speaker 13: Oh?
Speaker 12: Absolutely, mostly from communist China. You know, America has these
Speaker 12: awful laws that you're allowed to hide money in offshore
Speaker 12: accounts and then wire it to your quote unquote nonprofit
Speaker 12: and you don't have to disclose where the money comes from.
Speaker 12: And China is smart to use these rules to their advantage.
Speaker 12: China is very craft right, and they have fomented this
Speaker 12: huge climate movement in the United States because what is
Speaker 12: the result of it. The result is that you get
Speaker 12: people like Joe Biden who shut down American coal, shut
Speaker 12: down American oil and gas, and buy these crappy products
Speaker 12: from China. Forget about the slave labor component, right, forget
Speaker 12: about the human rights violation.
Speaker 1: And the fostering of communism. Right. They just don't work.
Speaker 12: They're intermittent, they're expensive, they're detrimental to the environment. They're
Speaker 12: made with slave labor camps. So China loves the climate
Speaker 12: movement because it silences the opposition. If people like you, know,
Speaker 12: you and I try to speak about it, what do
Speaker 12: they do with your denier right they're closet climate deniers
Speaker 12: and they throw paint at our houses, and so it's
Speaker 12: brilliant move on China. But the evil left is always brilliant, right.
Speaker 12: They're evil, they're bad people, but they are definitely crafty
Speaker 12: and smart.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, look just on that China issue too.
Speaker 2: One of the things that I've noticed about the movement
Speaker 2: is that so much of the what's called for is
Speaker 2: actually just winding up being a wealth transfer from Western
Speaker 2: countries like the US and Australia to China. And a
Speaker 2: big component of that is EV's has all of this
Speaker 2: energy crisis, though people are now saying, oh, maybe people
Speaker 2: should be getting into electric vehicles now again with the
Speaker 2: oil shock.
Speaker 3: What's your response to that.
Speaker 12: This is the first point I make in the op
Speaker 12: ed that you referenced tonight. I very much appreciate you
Speaker 12: referencing and coming on to talk about it. But the
Speaker 12: first proof I have that the climate movement is dying
Speaker 12: is the EV markets. Because as soon as government stepped
Speaker 12: out of the equation, when the government mandates disappeared because
Speaker 12: President Trump won re election, so the government mandates to
Speaker 12: purchase an EV disappeared, the government subsidies for EV's disappeared. Right,
Speaker 12: we were giving Americans seventy five hundred dollars to buy
Speaker 12: an electric vehicle. Why, because Joe Biden thought it was
Speaker 12: a good idea. We were subsidizing companies like Ford and
Speaker 12: Stilantis and General Motors to build these crappy evs.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: And so once that equation disappeared.
Speaker 12: The government mandate, the government subsidies, the market dried up.
Speaker 12: And it's terrible that people have lost their job in
Speaker 12: EV markets.
Speaker 1: Don't get me wrong.
Speaker 12: There are thousands of Americans who are out of work
Speaker 12: because we have stopped subsidizing this economy. And I don't
Speaker 12: rejoice in that, but goodness gracious, we have to ask
Speaker 12: why the hell was the government subsidizing this market to
Speaker 12: begin with. Right, We're not Keynesians. We can't operate in
Speaker 12: a way that government decides winners and losers and what
Speaker 12: markets deserve to thrive.
Speaker 1: So the first example that the EV market.
Speaker 12: Is total bogus, total nonsense, is that once government was
Speaker 12: out of the equation, no one wanted to buy this product.
Speaker 1: Buy what you want.
Speaker 12: I'm not anti EV, I would never drive on, but
Speaker 12: buy what you want. But goodness gracious, keep the government
Speaker 12: out of the picture.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, Daniel here in Australia, I like to
Speaker 2: call EV's cold powered cars, because most of the electricity
Speaker 2: they get for them comes actually steal from cold But
Speaker 2: before even this energy crisis developed out of the Middle East,
Speaker 2: we were already noticing here that suddenly the talk about
Speaker 2: the need for massive mass of energy to power data
Speaker 2: centers for AI had suddenly made people like Bill Gates
Speaker 2: at all of these other sort of big corporate climate
Speaker 2: catastropharians very very wary about talking about this all of
Speaker 2: a sudden.
Speaker 3: Have you noticed this as well?
Speaker 13: Well?
Speaker 12: Bill Gates was pretty in much of the news at
Speaker 12: the end of last year because he had a big
Speaker 12: retraction of climate hysteria and said, ah, the world's not
Speaker 12: going to end. Yes, we need to worry about the environment,
Speaker 12: but it's not as bad as people say. And simultaneously
Speaker 12: Microsoft was opening up a nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania
Speaker 12: for their data centers. Now, I think this is great, right,
Speaker 12: I want reliable power. I want more baseload power. We
Speaker 12: should be building coal and natural gas and nuclear plants.
Speaker 12: But notice where Bill Gates put Microsoft's money, right, where
Speaker 12: Microsoft put its corporate profits.
Speaker 1: They didn't build a wind farm.
Speaker 12: They didn't go to Scandinavia and asked them to build
Speaker 12: one of those stupid wind farms in the middle of
Speaker 12: the Atlantic.
Speaker 1: They opening a nuclear plant.
Speaker 12: Right when it comes to their corporate profits, they want
Speaker 12: what works regardless of the weather, and that will be
Speaker 12: cost efficient. And I just want the same for the
Speaker 12: American people, right, I don't want to be stuck with crappy,
Speaker 12: inferior wind or solar intermittent prices through the roof when
Speaker 12: Bill Gates gets to have nuclear power for his flat,
Speaker 12: and that's where we are. This is the level of
Speaker 12: corporatism that we're at. That corporations now are getting better
Speaker 12: deals on electricity and the American people are getting saddled
Speaker 12: with this crappy wind and solar.
Speaker 2: And Daniel of course, now with energy prices going up
Speaker 2: quite substantially, at least as far as the price of
Speaker 2: a barrel of oil goes with horror moves, how does
Speaker 2: your campaign break down between you know, the benefits to
Speaker 2: consumers for having fossil fuels and you know, reliable power
Speaker 2: of your own but also, I guess even if there's
Speaker 2: higher prices there, there's also benefits for the energy industry.
Speaker 2: I suppose whether the prices are higher tell us about
Speaker 2: just how the Straight of Horbe moves factors into this campaign.
Speaker 1: Definitely, I don't like the high prices.
Speaker 12: I don't want to see American families or Australian families,
Speaker 12: and I had my in laws are Australian, right.
Speaker 1: I don't want to see anyone.
Speaker 12: Paying higher prices because of what's happening in Iran, and
Speaker 12: I want that to come to an end in prices
Speaker 12: to return to normal.
Speaker 1: But you know, this is a much part, a.
Speaker 12: Part of a much larger equation, and I think the
Speaker 12: President sees oil and gas as this global hedge against evil.
Speaker 12: And what we've done for the last fifty years is
Speaker 12: we've allowed awful regimes to harness petro dollars to produce
Speaker 12: oil and gas. They sell it to the rest of
Speaker 12: the world, they become rich and powerful, and then they
Speaker 12: turn to usually America, and then America turns to Australian
Speaker 12: says come help, and they say, hey, fight.
Speaker 1: Our war for us.
Speaker 14: Right.
Speaker 12: What happened when Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, They turned to
Speaker 12: America and said you all need to step up and
Speaker 12: solve this problem. Right, we told them before the President
Speaker 12: Trump told the European Union before you have to stop
Speaker 12: buying Russian oil and gas. You're making this guy rich
Speaker 12: and powerful. Is that famous photo of him seated kind
Speaker 12: of defiantly at the table with Angela Merkel and Manuel
Speaker 12: Macran wagging a finger at him and yelling, this is
Speaker 12: what he told them. And what happened? Russia got rich
Speaker 12: and powerful and they declared war. What happened when Iran
Speaker 12: got rich and powerful? When the stupid Biden administration removed
Speaker 12: all their sanctions October seventh and they went after Israel? Right,
Speaker 12: what did Venezuela do? They fomented communism all through South America.
Speaker 12: So President Trump Sey's oil and gas is the ultimate
Speaker 12: world domination and says if America controls this as a
Speaker 12: force for good, then we decide who gets to become
Speaker 12: rich and powerful.
Speaker 1: And maybe we'll stop having more dictators.
Speaker 12: Maybe we'll stop having more Ayatolas and more Putins and
Speaker 12: more Maduro's.
Speaker 2: Well, Daniel, we can only hope. Thank you so much
Speaker 2: for your time in telling us all about your campaign.
Speaker 2: Power of the Future. Check that out. Everybody's really really
Speaker 2: interesting stuff. Now stick around because after the break, a
Speaker 2: congresswoman for Mogadishu. Elan Omar is not happy that people
Speaker 2: are questioning her financial dealings. Want to miss this, but
Speaker 2: first let's ride the rurer coaster of decline in Democrats cities.
Speaker 2: Here's the latest from Detroit where they are now stealing.
Speaker 3: Well, I'll let the mayor explain.
Speaker 15: It's not only the theft to the fire hydrant, but
Speaker 15: it's a theft to our citizens, our residents, our firefighters,
Speaker 15: and in public safety in general.
Speaker 3: It's totally unacceptable.
Speaker 15: Fire hydrants are a very important part of our infrastructure,
Speaker 15: and no matter how fast we get to a fire,
Speaker 15: if we don't have an operable fire hydrant, it takes
Speaker 15: seconds and even minutes away from us.
Speaker 1: Maybe save in live.
Speaker 16: The problem is, whoever's doing this is doing multiple hydrants
Speaker 16: in a row, so when DFD shows up, they're not
Speaker 16: going to have a hydrant within six hundred or nine
Speaker 16: hundred feet, which puts people's.
Speaker 1: Lives at this.
Speaker 2: Yep, that's right there, stealing the fire hydrants. Apparently there's
Speaker 2: lots of brass fittings in there they can sell. But
Speaker 2: imagine the more than sixty years of bad policy and
Speaker 2: decisions that God did Troit to this point. Well done,
Speaker 2: to all involved. Stick around. Ilhan Omar's money meltdowns coming
Speaker 2: at you after the break. Welcome back to the program now,
Speaker 2: Democrat Congresswoman for Minnesota, I mean Mogadishu or whatever it is.
Speaker 2: Ilhan Omar has been avoiding questions about alleged accounting errors
Speaker 2: that had previously inflated her reported net wealth by millions
Speaker 2: of dollars, But now congressional disclosures and new ones indicate
Speaker 2: that her wealth is apparently just somewhere between eighteen and
Speaker 2: ninety five thousand dollars, a far cry from previous reports
Speaker 2: that had put her net wealth between six and thirty
Speaker 2: million dollars. Not bad on a congressional salary, is that?
Speaker 2: But she's not all that keen to explain what's been
Speaker 2: going on.
Speaker 13: The Last time I said to you that, you said
Speaker 13: that I was stupid for asking about your financial disposure.
Speaker 11: But there's some discrepancies on there. Would you like to
Speaker 11: explain that?
Speaker 12: How?
Speaker 11: Which makes still calmly? Still you much super for asking
Speaker 11: me anything I have? What about the American people who
Speaker 11: are wondering? Who needs to be to explain it to
Speaker 11: the American people?
Speaker 1: What's the explanation I have given them? The explanation.
Speaker 13: Do you want to tell our viewers.
Speaker 11: Because I don't want to tell you Jack, how about that? Okay, okay,
Speaker 11: how do you do?
Speaker 13: Thank yous?
Speaker 3: Wow? What a charmer she is.
Speaker 2: Anyway to discuss this and a lot more, let's bring
Speaker 2: in our final guests for the evening, former Republican National
Speaker 2: Committee spokeswoman Elizabeth Pipco. Elizabeth, Welcome to the program. This
Speaker 2: is some pretty bizarre behavior by ilhan Omar. How do
Speaker 2: we account for her fluctuating net worth? I mean, it
Speaker 2: can't just be the bumpy ride on the stock market.
Speaker 13: No, it's a really cannot be Look, I don't think
Speaker 13: there's much to account for right I think the reality
Speaker 13: is exactly what we're seeing right now. The Democrats think
Speaker 13: that they can get away with anything at all. Let's
Speaker 13: be honest, James. I'm pretty sure as had happened to
Speaker 13: Donald Trump, he'd already be in the middle of an
Speaker 13: impeachment hearing. We know exactly what happens when Democrats make
Speaker 13: these kind of mistakes. The answer is nothing. They can
Speaker 13: say what they want, they can do what they want.
Speaker 13: They feel they owe the American people no explanation whatsoever.
Speaker 13: And I promise you this is probably the last time
Speaker 13: the story will ever be spoken about in the media.
Speaker 2: Again, well, that's why we've got the US Report, so
Speaker 2: that we can bring these stories to light, even if
Speaker 2: we have to shine the light all the way from Australia. Hey,
Speaker 2: I want to talk about another really interesting story that
Speaker 2: came out this week.
Speaker 3: The Department of.
Speaker 2: Justice has apparently reclassified cannabis, you know, the wacky tobaccy,
Speaker 2: the Devil's cabbage, the jazz cigarettes as being less dangerous
Speaker 2: than they said it used to be. They're going to
Speaker 2: move from being a Schedule one narcotic in the same
Speaker 2: class as heroin to a Schedule three drug, which puts
Speaker 2: it on par with titled al paracetamol en coding. And
Speaker 2: there's going to also be more hearings on this. Apparently
Speaker 2: it's to increase access in research of the drug. But
Speaker 2: what is your reaction to making marijuana potentially more available?
Speaker 2: Because when I go back to the United States, a
Speaker 2: lot of the cities they stink.
Speaker 3: I don't think, is that right?
Speaker 13: You know? I agree with you on the smell life.
Speaker 13: To be honest, I'm from New York City and every
Speaker 13: time I go home, which is every few weeks. I
Speaker 13: call my mom and I say, you will never believe
Speaker 13: what it smells like in our city. It has absolutely
Speaker 13: taken over. At the same time, regardless of what the
Speaker 13: federal government does when it comes to marijuana, this has
Speaker 13: already taken over most of our major cities. It actually
Speaker 13: has nothing to do with that because these states have very,
Speaker 13: very different policies.
Speaker 3: I have to be.
Speaker 13: Perfectly honest with you. I have never tried it. I
Speaker 13: have no idea what the appeal is, but I have
Speaker 13: heard a lot of people trying to rally the government
Speaker 13: to make some kind of changes on this. I know
Speaker 13: that it is helpful to a lot of people who
Speaker 13: are suffering from some kind of condition or pain. I
Speaker 13: know a lot of people who take it for medical reasons.
Speaker 13: I am very curious about the hearings and what we
Speaker 13: can learn about this, but I agree with you. Unfortunately,
Speaker 13: this strug or at least the smell that comes with it,
Speaker 13: has already taken out over most of our major city.
Speaker 3: Well, Elizabeth, as I look at what the President had
Speaker 3: to say about all this, we have.
Speaker 17: People begging for me to do There's people that are
Speaker 17: in great pain. I want to emphasize that the order
Speaker 17: I am about to sign is not the legalization or
Speaker 17: does it legalize marijuana in any way, shape or form,
Speaker 17: And in no way sanctions it's used as a recreational drug,
Speaker 17: has nothing to do with it.
Speaker 2: And do you think the President has gone far enough
Speaker 2: there to put down concerns that this might be kind
Speaker 2: of a free for all and you turned, you know,
Speaker 2: the USA into Amsterdam.
Speaker 13: Well, God for BD that happened. Look, the President said
Speaker 13: it right there. He has no interest in fully legalizing
Speaker 13: the drug. He wants people to understand that he's doing
Speaker 13: this because so many Americans are in pain and if
Speaker 13: this is something that can help them and not actually
Speaker 13: be a danger, I think it's a that we be
Speaker 13: open minded and allowed that kind of access. He's right.
Speaker 13: I have heard people try to lobby him about this
Speaker 13: since I've been involved working for him in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 13: It's been really ten years of folks telling me this
Speaker 13: is the kind of information I should get to him. Again,
Speaker 13: I don't understand it. I have not tried it, but
Speaker 13: I can tell you a lot a lot of people
Speaker 13: are happy about this. They believe they'll be in less
Speaker 13: pain because of this decision, and that's probably a good thing.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, look, that's always a good thing. But hey,
Speaker 2: look what do we want to another story that fascinated me.
Speaker 2: It just broke a little while ago. A reporter and
Speaker 2: writer for New Yorker and Conde Nast Publications, and she
Speaker 2: owns a million dollar house in Brooklyn. Well, she is
Speaker 2: now proudly admitting to shoplifting from big stores because she
Speaker 2: believes it's not morally wrong to steal from corporations. New
Speaker 2: York contributor Gia Tolentino said stealing food from Whole Foods
Speaker 2: Market is not significant because the supermarket owned by Amazon
Speaker 2: leian Ard Jeff Bezos Kenna for the loss. Now, she
Speaker 2: said this on this Hassan Piker Chuckleheads podcast. Here is
Speaker 2: this the new kind of you know, hip rebellion for
Speaker 2: the very rich and well off to go and just
Speaker 2: do a spot of shoplifting. It seems bizarre to me.
Speaker 13: It is more than bizarre. However, unfortunately, this is not
Speaker 13: the worst thing I've heard this week said by some
Speaker 13: of these really proud socialists you mentioned. Hassan Piker, That's
Speaker 13: who show she was on. He actually this week came
Speaker 13: out and defended the guy who murdered the United Healthcare CEO.
Speaker 13: He said he understands why many people were supportive of
Speaker 13: that decision. He has also said some other horrific things,
Speaker 13: including that America deserved nine to eleven. So I have
Speaker 13: to tell you at this point, I'm pretty relieved when
Speaker 13: all I hear them talking about is shoplifting. However, I
Speaker 13: am curious in New York, considering we have a fantastic
Speaker 13: new mayor and zorn Mom Donald, I'm wondering if she
Speaker 13: still believes that shoplifting is okay when we have a
Speaker 13: full government run supermarkets. That's what I'll be curious about.
Speaker 13: I want to know how her mind might shift around
Speaker 13: that in the future.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well that's a pretty interesting idea. Maybe you're just
Speaker 2: getting some of your tax dollars back if you go
Speaker 2: and lift something out of the mom, Donnie Marsh. But
Speaker 2: you know, it is really interesting you mentioned the killing
Speaker 2: of the United Healthcare CEO. Is the Left now just
Speaker 2: falling into this kind of bizarre, very hip chic lawlessness
Speaker 2: and what does that portend for American society as the
Speaker 2: Left tries to gain control back in the political sphere.
Speaker 2: If they don't, are they just going to get worse
Speaker 2: like this?
Speaker 13: Well, I hope that they don't get worse. Obviously, just
Speaker 13: because I love my country, I would love for Republicans
Speaker 13: who dominate in every single election. But at the same time,
Speaker 13: it's hard to be too happy when a good chunk
Speaker 13: of your fellow Americans believe that communism and Marxism and
Speaker 13: socialism are the ideas of the future, and that those
Speaker 13: of course come with you know, being okay with shoplifting
Speaker 13: and apparently murdered as well. We have warned four years
Speaker 13: that the party is being taken over by the fringe.
Speaker 13: The fringe on the left at this point are just
Speaker 13: proud communists. These are folks that say that there is
Speaker 13: an excuse for ever it's okay to murder individuals if
Speaker 13: you believe it's the right thing to do. We've obviously
Speaker 13: seen how communism has worked so so well over the
Speaker 13: past how many years that it's been tried. I fear
Speaker 13: that it's coming to America because so many refuse to
Speaker 13: read a history book and understand what actually comes with communism.
Speaker 13: But I do believe the American people know what's right
Speaker 13: for them. This country stans against all of those horrific beliefs,
Speaker 13: and I think Democrats are going to learn the hard way.
Speaker 13: This is not what the American people want. But in
Speaker 13: the process, we're going to have to educate a lot
Speaker 13: a lot of people about the dangers.
Speaker 3: Of this rheter Elizabeth, I'm afraid you're right.
Speaker 2: And you know, the thing I'm more concerned about is
Speaker 2: not the ones who didn't read the books, but the
Speaker 2: ones who did and took all the wrong lessons. Elizabeth, Pipco,
Speaker 2: thank you so much time as always. Now, don't go
Speaker 2: away because it's all those time for Only in America
Speaker 2: that's coming up next. But first, well, the Democrats are
Speaker 2: I hate to tell you this, I regret to inform
Speaker 2: you they are singing again and well, frankly, this is
Speaker 2: more frightening than any far right red sponsored by the
Speaker 2: Southern Poverty Law Center. I'm sorry I saw it. You
Speaker 2: had to see it too. That's the way it works. Anyway,
Speaker 2: these guys reckon, they're going to win the midterms. Maybe
Speaker 2: just don't count Donald Trump out just yet. Anyway, stick around,
Speaker 2: Only in America coming at you next. Welcome back to.
Speaker 3: The program, and now it's time for a little segment
Speaker 3: we like to call Only America.
Speaker 2: Well today, let's take to the streets with social media
Speaker 2: personality Caitlin Bennett, who's reading out some Donald Trump quotes
Speaker 2: about I read to Democrats, or at.
Speaker 3: Least she says there Donald Trump quotes Iran is.
Speaker 14: A destabilizing, dangerous force in the Middle East? Do you
Speaker 14: agree with him on that?
Speaker 3: At least?
Speaker 14: No, we would be able to totally obliterate them. That's
Speaker 14: a terrible thing to say. But those people who run
Speaker 14: Iran need to understand that. What do you think he
Speaker 14: meant by saying those people?
Speaker 3: Why his supremacy his subhuman people?
Speaker 12: He's becoming very delusional and honestly showing a little bit
Speaker 12: of signs of dementia.
Speaker 14: Is this something someone with dementia would say?
Speaker 3: Absolutely? Ah, but wait, here's time for the big reveal.
Speaker 14: Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris said all of that, not
Speaker 14: Donald Trump.
Speaker 15: Really?
Speaker 9: Yes, that makes me very sad.
Speaker 8: Are you serious they or not?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 15: They are?
Speaker 1: That's ridiculous.
Speaker 14: Yeah, no, yeah, that's gotcha.
Speaker 3: Good for you.
Speaker 14: You never heard them say this though, No I haven't.
Speaker 14: That was a quote from two thousand and eight right
Speaker 14: here to it.
Speaker 3: I don't you know what?
Speaker 15: Who will who believe what we read?
Speaker 14: Did you go to the cops about me.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I just wanted to see if you needed a permit.
Speaker 14: Didn't mean to make you cry.
Speaker 3: Crying, but it's shameful.
Speaker 14: What's shameful about it? There's nothing.
Speaker 2: She took that well, didn't she. It's almost like they're
Speaker 2: not in favor of policies. They just want to hate
Speaker 2: on the Orange Man. Anyway, that's all the time we
Speaker 2: have for this week. See you next time, and I'll
Speaker 2: see bright and early Sunday morning for outsiders.
Speaker 3: Bye bye,