WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 16 May

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:04.439
<v Speaker 1>On Scaring Wilds Australia.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the winder Panety Show. Good evening and welcome

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 2>to the reader. Panicky Show coming up tonight. Further fractures

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>in the Albanesi government with a Labor senator defying the

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister with inflammatory comments about the Israel Hamas War.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Douglas Murray joins me shortly to discuss migration rates and

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>why the will of the majority is consistently ignored. Hollywood

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>A listers come out in support for canceled Oscar winner

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Spacey. I'll speak to Kinsey Schofield about that shortly

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and what is the most powerful interest group we've seen

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>in this country. Nick Kata will join me to discuss that.

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's time to bring in Sky News contributor Kosher

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Gata for the day's big stories. Kosher Albia talking to

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Douglas Murray shortly about migration numbers. It's a massive issue

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>across Europe, in the US, here in Australia and the

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>ob and Easy government is under intense pressure to drastically

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 2>cut net overseas migration from the record five hundred and

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight thousand we had last year to a promise

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and sixty thousand next year. But as Pauline

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Hanson noted on x, Labor doesn't have a great track

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>record in predicting net migration numbers accurately. Over the past

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>two years, migration has reached a record nine hundred and

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty three thousand, which is two hundred and eight thousand

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>more than Labor anticipated. Hanson wrote two questions kosher I,

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 2>can labor quit their high migration habit? They've seemed to

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 2>have relied on that, and they're not allowing Coalition governments

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>have also indulged in that activity. And can we trust

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>their figures? Are their predictions so far out that it's

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>almost a fantasy number at the moment.

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Probably a little bit of both. So the discrepancy in

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the numbers just fits what we've seen with government. They

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't exactly covered themselves in glory in terms of their

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 1>ability to report numbers accurately and model as we've seen

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in many venues. The more cynical interpretation would be that

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe they well knew, but this is a very unpopular topic,

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's easier to, you know, sort of dampen the

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>expectation a little bit and then say, ooh, sorry, even miscalculated.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But be that as it may. Senator Hanson's point is

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>very well taken. This is an issue all around the world.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>As you said, it's the issue of our time. And

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>those numbers nine hundred and twenty three thousand is roughly

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the population Canberra. So a whole canbra is going to

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>be hosted in Sydney and in Melbourne, and that's kind

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of where these migrants concentrate and all the stress that

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>puts on infrastructure, on everything else, not to mention the

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>fabric of the culture. And this is another topic that's

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>very timely right now in terms of how these different

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 1>groups come in. And then there's this more strife between

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>groups ethnically as well. So all of that is a

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>predictable consequence of this. Constituents don't want it, and yet

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>it continues.

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Well you can say why the abes the government is

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 2>pledging to drastically cut these numbers. They are getting prepared

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>for the next federal election and they know this is

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>an enormous issue out there. Now, let's talk about labor.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Senator Fatima Payman, who is calling on the Alberanza government

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to sanction and disinvest from Israel, accusing the country of

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>genocide against the Palestinian people.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>How many mass graves need to be uncovered before we

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 3>say enough? How many images of bloody limbs of murdered

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>children must we see? How many horrors need to be

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 3>repeated before we feel that this should end. How many

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Palestinian lives are enough to call this violence against them terrorism?

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Koshasha also use the phrase from the river to the sea,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 2>which the Prime Minister has been clear to condemn, to

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 2>say that it's a statement that promotes violence. And here

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 2>has got a senator saying it.

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>He's got a problem on his hands, as do his

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>counterparts everywhere. So I look at the senator, the same

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>thing with the United States Congress with Shida Tali bilan Omar.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It comes downstream from immigration, that topic we talked about again.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>This is some of those longer term consequences, whether intended

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>or unintended, coming home to roost in many ways, but

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>right within the left side of politics and liberal democracies,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it's really coming home to roost because there's a huge

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.559
<v Speaker 1>refracturing and realignment of the fault lines in that party.

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that colors what you see in terms

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of their positions with respect to Israel with respect to

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>protesters with all of that, because they're kind of speaking.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>They've become a two headed beast in their way and

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they're speaking to two factions that don't agree on this

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>issue that's there.

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 2>The Biden administration has got these issues as well and

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about the left of politics that it Ilyidia Thorpe

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 2>has posted this image of herself with the message got

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 2>my cafear on for Parliament today. Power to all the

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>students camped down and everyone that's been coming to rallies

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 2>and standing up for justice. Seamewondovic Labor for banning affairs

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 2>in Parliament. There a real gammon lot. They are free Palestine. Really,

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the Australian Upper House is disgracing itself. What did Paul

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Keating call them an unrepresentative swell? I think it was

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 2>being kind. Now let's move on to Albo evicting one

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 2>of his tenants from one of his investment properties. This

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 2>is an incredible story. Jim Flanagan was handled an eviction

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>notice on the eighth of May to vacate the three

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 2>bedroom townhouse where he's lived for four years. The PM

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>has said I've had him in the property with the

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 2>rent being about half. What is the market rent to

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>keep him in for longer. So this is very interesting. Indeed,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the PM must be a saint just giving away free

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 2>rent there essentially. But I do question the wisdom of

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 2>evicting a tenant during his prime minister ship. You would

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>just think, yeah, sure, if you were an everyday ordinary

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>person who wasn't in public office, you may make this decision.

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>But the optics here are not great.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>That's a very interesting point. You could say that it's principled,

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's saying, hey, if you know, I want to

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>evict my turn, and I'm going to do that, and

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's right. You could say it would be

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>nice if Earlider showed principle consistency on all sorts of

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>other issues, including ones that don't directly affect them. But

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's a fair argument on the

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>facts of the case. It's as right as a landlord

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to do that. But the optics are interesting, and he's

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>injected something that becomes a proxy story for all sorts

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>of issues people have with housing and rent prices and

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>cost of living and all of that. They can project

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 1>onto those pain points, and he's invited that upon himself.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>And this is very different to that image of himself

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>that is cultivated. You know, he grew up in a

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 2>commission house. Yeah, he's Labour's socialist left faction, and yet

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>he's got multimillion dollar investment properties. I'm not saying there's

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 2>anything wrong with that. I'm just saying when you fight

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 2>the culture wars and also you know, pay this image

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 2>of fighting the Tories and the rich don't do this

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and the rich don't do that, and.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You're part of the parlor around the world. The zip

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>code outside DC is the wealthy a ship code in

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the world, one of them.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 4>It's the same same point absolutely Now.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Liberals Senator Alex Antik has called out big tech companies

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>who employ former intelligence employees and conspire with governments to

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>censor and ban speech.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Big tech is the perfect intersection between government, the ruling

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 5>class and the intelligence services along with their mates in

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 5>big business. You see what they want you to see.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Australia is at the tip of the sphere of a

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 5>global censorship movement, and I suspect that many who are

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 5>involved are blissfully unaware and think that they're doing the

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 5>right thing by shutting down and deleting so called miss

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 5>and disinformation. But let's be clear, the government isn't thinking

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 5>about your safety and it doesn't care about misinformation. What

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 5>it cares about is making sure that you see in

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 5>approved message at all times.

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>What is said in Parliament this week has been established

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 2>by investigative journalist Kosher, including Michael Schellenberger, who we've interviewed

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>on this program. This is a huge issue because these

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 2>platforms are now the digital public square. This is where

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>people discuss issues, but this is where they find out information.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It is He's one of the few elected leaders direct

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>enough and brave enough to say that it really is

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a convergence of all these power structures. As he mentioned,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a big tech. It's government people who eat in

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a bedit like the E Safety Commissioner and others, and

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>just other people at the top the ruling class. I think,

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>as he put it, is the issue. We've called it

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the battlefield of the century. In a way, it's another

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>day in that movement. The problem is that for a

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>country like Australia, certainly we shouldn't be eating in a

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>betting things like with the E Safety Commissioner, but there's

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>little recourse, little remedy. We really have in terms of

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to break up that power that big tech plays

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in it, since they're all headquartered in the United States,

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the belluy of the Beast, where something has to happen

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>along the lines of anti trust law, along the lines

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>of Section two thirty, where they're not penalized.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Problem is, we seem to be among some of the

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 2>worst in the free world in suppressing free speech. So

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 2>not only are we not fighting it, we seem to

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 2>be one of the worst in aiding and abetting it. Koshagator,

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for your time. Nexs Evening. Joining

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>me now is the author of international best sellers The

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Strange Death of Europe, The Madness of Crowds, and his

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>latest work, The War on the West. Douglas Murray. Let's

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>start with immigration. It's a big issue in Australia. We're

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>seeing record numbers of migrants coming in despite polls showing

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the majority of Australians want to see immigration numbers drop.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>And that is also the overwhelming sentiment across Europe, with

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 2>a recent poll taken in March and April this year

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 2>showing great opposition to not only illegal immigration but also

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 2>the current volume of migrants coming into Europe, more than

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>seventy percent said their country takes in too many migrants,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and that includes countries as diverses are Sweden to Spain

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 2>to Austria. The Greeks are the most opposed to their

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>migration numbers. Ninety percent there say that country takes too

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 2>many And yet Douglas, the will of the majority seems

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>to be completely ignored, whether it's Australia or Europe, when

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>it comes to migration policy, majority opinion doesn't seem to

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>matter much.

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely reach and these latest findings in Australia and across

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 6>Europe are replicated of course in America. I mean most

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 6>people in the developed world, most people in the countries

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 6>that people want to come to, are aware that we

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 6>just can't take in all of the people who would

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 6>like to come to our countries. I mean, Australia is

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 6>in a much better position societally, financial, socially, and much

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 6>more than most countries in the region. And it's the

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 6>same with Europe. Europe's more prosperous, infinitely more prosperous, even

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 6>at the lowest rung of the ladder than most of

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 6>the countries that people come to therefrom and it's the

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 6>same with America, with Central America and Southern America. And

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 6>so the publics know this, but the political response, as

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 6>you just refer to it, seems to always be, whoever

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 6>you have in power, more of the same. I mean,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 6>there are occasionally prime ministers who and presidents who are

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 6>able to slow down the flow, but even then it's

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 6>to a barely manageable level. And what these political leaders

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 6>don't realize is that the public know more than them.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 6>We the public sense in the decline in trust, in

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 6>the decline in safety, in all sorts of things. We

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 6>sense what the changes are that happen not when migration happens,

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 6>but when too much migration happens, too fast, and often

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 6>of the wrong kind. And I think you know, this

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 6>is the big challenge of the twenty first century. So far,

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 6>we haven't really thrown up politicians capable of dealing with it.

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>And it seems those who screamed the loudest about threats

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 2>to democracy very silent when it comes to the will

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of the majority here being ignored. In fact, they seem

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 2>to be doing a lot to obstruct the will of

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 2>the majority. Now let's talk about President Joe Biden, who

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 2>is repeating a verifiable lie about inflation. He's repeated a

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 2>lot of verifiable lies over the years. Is saying that

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>it was nine percent when he came to office, when

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 2>it was actually one point four percent. Karine Jean Pierre

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 2>was asked to explain why the presidents repeated this lie.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 7>We got a lot of incoming on this yesterday, and

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 7>look what the president was. The point that he was

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 7>making is that the factors that caused inflation was in

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 7>place when he walked in into the administration when he

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 7>took office. As you know, the pandemic caused inflation around

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 7>the world.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Douglas. I know the US has much bigger issues to

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 2>deal with right now, the border crisis, cost of living, crime,

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>But a president who can't stop lying about verifiable data,

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not something to be overlooked.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, I would just say that, you know, the point

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 6>of the White House spokesperson is meant to be to

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 6>sort of be the mouthpiece of the president. Joe Biden

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 6>has found a mouthpiece in Queen Jean Pierre, which I

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 6>think even he must wonder at times whether what she's

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 6>saying isn't gobbledegook or not. She's by no means the

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 6>best interpreter of Joe Biden's statements, and goodness known, sometimes

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 6>Joe Biden could do with a good interpreter. Yes, I mean,

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 6>this is the sort of behavior which if it happened

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 6>under a Republican president, it would all be you know,

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 6>fact checking, the fact checkers and the Washington Posts to

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 6>be explaining to everyone how democracy dies in darkness, and

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 6>the BBC's Verify fact check would be on to it.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 6>But you know, old Joe Biden, Oh, it doesn't matter,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 6>and it can all be explained away incoherently by his

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 6>by his spokesperson.

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I even I felt a little bit sorry for

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>her because I had you defend that. And yet but

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>her explanation did not help the president or herself in

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>any way.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 6>It could have been worse, could explained. It could have

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 6>been explained by Kamala Harris, who would have who would

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 6>have explained that the thing is that that the past

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 6>has just gone before the present and the future is

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 6>yet to come. And in a very real sense, the

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 6>present is before the future and that's why inflation is there.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 2>And then we'll just have mad cackling for about sixty

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>seconds after that. But let's stick with the Biden White House.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 2>They're in coherent and inconsistent decision making. Douglas, you've written

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 2>about this about how the president says something that's very

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 2>sound one minute and the next day he does something

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 2>that's completely at odds with that. You talked about the

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 2>wise words he said last week about Israel, and then

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 2>within hours he was attempting to prevent Israel's victory in

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Gaza by withholding arm shipments. How do you explained this

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 2>erratic behavior.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's very strange. I mean, the best interpretation of

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 6>it is for some time, and you and I have

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 6>discussed this before, read it for sometime. The President has

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 6>talked a bit of one talk and acted in another way. Now,

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 6>those of us who want Israel to win in guards

0:15:54.680 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 6>and against Hamas, sometimes you know that's the red has

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 6>been unpleasant, but the actions have been supportive. So, for instance,

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 6>at various times President Biden, we presume, has sent out,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 6>for instance, Chuck Schumer to be critical of the Israeli reaction.

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 6>Occasionally Joe Biden has been critical himself, but he's done

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 6>that in order it seems to plicate a bit of

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 6>the base in his own party keep the students from

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 6>going bananas all the time on campus and hope to

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 6>get in in November, whilst at the same time supporting

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 6>America's ally Israel. The thing that was different this past

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 6>week has been that it flipped exactly the other way around.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 6>The rhetoric from the President on the day was very good,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 6>very supportive, all about standing by our allies and all

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 6>that sort of thing, and then in the evening here

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 6>he stopped the delivery of armed supplies to Israel. Now

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 6>that is that is a very serious development because a

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 6>lot of a lot of the sort of the talk,

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 6>the chaff of the media cycle in America, you know,

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 6>is performative. It's for the base, it's for a certain

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 6>bit of the base. It's for the three or four

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 6>people watching some of the smaller left wing networks. But

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 6>the really difficult thing here, as I say, is that

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 6>he actually he actually did something which he had always

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 6>said he wouldn't do. He's always held himself out as

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 6>a great ally of Israel in its fight for survival

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 6>and its fight for victory over its enemies, and here

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 6>he is in charge in the White House with holding

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 6>arms at a time when Israel is pretty close to

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 6>victory against him. As how you can say you're an

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 6>ally and you're with someone til the bitter end, only

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 6>to drop out at about last orders. I just do

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 6>not know.

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's what worries me, because, as we know, actions

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 2>are more important than words, and he has flipped that dynamic.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 2>And what would happen to Israel if they don't have

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 2>made defeat her mass after seven months of this war,

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 2>if if in the end Hamas isn't completely eradicated.

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, my view is, and I think it's a view

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 6>that a lot of Israeli politicians and others feel, a

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 6>lot of the Israeli public feel, is that you cannot

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 6>destroy eighty percent of Hamaz. You cannot leave them in

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 6>you cannot take them out of Gaza City, and you

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 6>cannot take them out of a set of other towns

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 6>and so on and leave them intact in Raffa. And

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 6>Raffa is reckoned to be, not just where the remaining

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 6>Israeli hostages are held, hostages who the rest of the

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 6>world seems to have forgotten about, but the Israeli people

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 6>quite rightly haven't. And there's no point in leaving that

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 6>there and leaving the leaving those people there and leaving

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 6>the heads of Hamaz, including it seems Sinoir, the mastermind

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 6>of the seventh in Raffa. All it means is like

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 6>putting out eighty percent of the fire, that you will

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 6>that the Israelis will withdraw from Gaza and Hamas will

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 6>grow back, will continue to subjugate the Palestinian population in Gaza,

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 6>will continue to enrich themselves and will prepare for the

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 6>next attack against Israel. And my prediction is that these

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, every other year wars that Hamaz has been

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 6>provoking since it took control of the Gaza, would just

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 6>go on. In that scenario, I think it is much

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 6>better for the Israelis public and indeed for the Palestinian

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 6>public in Gaza, that Hamas are done for, that it's over,

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 6>and that other partners in the region can help in

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 6>whatever way they can to rebuild the society there. It

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 6>is not going to be an easy job, but it

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 6>will be infinitely harder if Hamaz still have any kind

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 6>of a stronghold. So preventing Israeli victory once again would

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 6>lead only to another set of cycles of conflict, and

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't think that's desirable.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not desirable for either party. Is As you explained.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 2>One thing we have seen in Israel though, is the

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 2>willingness of its people to fight for the country. Young

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 2>people are willing to risk their lives to defend their country.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 2>That's not a sentiment that is shared in the West.

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 2>In the UK, only a quarter of young people twenty

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 2>seven percent said they were willing to be enlisted to

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 2>defend their country. And one doesn't I guess Douglas seek

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 2>to protect what one doesn't value. And there's certainly a

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 2>deep sense of self loathing among many young people for

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 2>their own country, whether we're talking about the UK, the

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>US or right here in Australia. What can be done

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>to combat that? I feel that's such a destructive force

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 2>with all sorts of long term dangers.

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, it has huge long term dangers. And I mean

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 6>I spoke about this a bit when I was in

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 6>Australia recently, but I mean the recent referendum in Australia

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 6>was a very very important blow to the people who

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 6>would like to make all people in West and democracies,

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 6>only in Western democracies feel utterly wretched about everything about us,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 6>to make everybody in the majority feel that we're usurpers

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 6>and colonizers and genocidists, and all of these other outrageous claims,

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 6>always claims made against the most free and the most

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 6>fair societies on Earth. But this has been done for

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 6>more than a generation. Now. You tell young Australians that

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 6>they have no right to the land. You tell young

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 6>Americans that they're they're just there because they usurped the

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 6>native peoples. You tell Europeans, even when they are the

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 6>native peoples, that although they are the native peoples, they

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 6>should be themselves userped go on and on like that,

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 6>And of course, of course you're going to have a

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 6>lot of young people who think, well, why on Earth

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 6>would I risk my life for a country I've been

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 6>told it's rotten from the beginning. I think we need

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 6>to turn this whole thing around, and I think it

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 6>can be turned around. The young Israelis have shown it

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 6>can be turned around. They've shown that when it really

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 6>comes to brutal reality in your face, you can stand

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 6>up and fight, and the young Israelis have I hope

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 6>that it never comes to that for young Australians and

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 6>Americans and Canadians and British and Europeans. But if it

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 6>did that we would be tested, and I think a

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 6>lot of people would fail that test because they've been

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 6>taught to fail that test.

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 4>They have.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Man, we've had this poison in academia and elsewhere for decades.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 2>So I'm glad you you believe it can be turned around.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I do have my doubts. Now before you go, I've

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 2>got to ask you about this ongoing sham trial of

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 2>former President Donald Trump. It's continuing in Manhattan. We've had

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Stormy Daniels testifyer much of a testimony, salacious details that

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 2>have completely relevant to the case. We've had serial Purjura

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>and Michael Cohen understand, and it seems everyone is resigned

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>to the fact that this is some sort of a

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>show trial. It's a political case as much as anything.

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy wrote in The New

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 2>York Post that New Yorkers should be outraged at the

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 2>mockery District Attorney Alvin Bragg is making of the state's

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>legal system as the entire country looks on Douglas. The

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 2>entire country is looking on but whatever the Democrats are

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 2>trying to achieve here seems to be backfiring. Because the

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 2>polls are pretty clear Trump is increasing his lead, particularly

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 2>in those crucial swing states.

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's an extraordinary miscalculation by Democrat prosecutors and others.

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 6>As you say, as these trials go on, Trump's lead

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 6>seems to strengthen. Some people say, might wonder why that is,

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 6>and I think it's got It's a couple of things.

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 6>One is, a lot of Americans have had themselves, have

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 6>had bad experiences with the justice system, and so the

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 6>idea that the justice system can be in some way

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 6>rigged is a claim that they're sort of open to

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 6>in a way that I think in Australia and Britain

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 6>we sort of wouldn't be. But the second is that

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 6>you see people like Da Bragg effectively putting on a

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:20.479
<v Speaker 6>trial in search of a crime. And that's what this

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 6>that's what this trial has been. It's a trial in

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 6>search of a crime. And Stormy Daniels took the stand

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 6>not because she had anything new to say, although she

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 6>did actually contradict previous testimony she'd given, but because of

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 6>course it was meant to humiliate Donald Trump. There were

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 6>salacious details and you know, frankly, I mean most people

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 6>would be humiliated to hear even these allegations made against

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 6>him against themselves. Trump as ever amazingly sort of has

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 6>this ability to brush it off. If I were the

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 6>Democrats and others, I would start to be worrying about

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 6>this whole tactic, this whole tactic of let's take him

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 6>out by judicial means. There's all sorts of criticisms that

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 6>can be made in every direction here, But the ultimate

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 6>issue in America is the people. The people get to decide.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 6>They get to decide who to vote for, and eventually

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 6>who they do vote for. It's not up to Da Bragg,

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 6>it's not up to anyone else. It's up to the

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 6>American public and they may yet surprise the world.

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what the Democrats are scared of that

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I want the American public to decide. And I think

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>they were counting on a criminal conviction sealing the deal.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think even if that eventually is it's

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 2>going to make a difference. Douglas Murray, thank you so

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 2>much for your time this.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 6>Evening, Great pleasures always.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Thank you still to come and lefties losing us pass?

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 2>What is the most powerful interest group we've seen in

0:25:53.359 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 2>this country? Nick Kta joins me from Finland. Welcome back.

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 2>It's time for lefties losing it. And I've featured this

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 2>transactivist and self indulgent narcissist previously. You'll remember him because

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 2>he harassed waiters who misgentered him.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 9>Are you she her pronouns, I'm not sir. Yeah, Like

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 9>it's like a knife in the heart.

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 10>I also did specifically ask ahead of time not to

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 10>be called sir.

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I'm just gonna go.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the sweet water start, okay.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 9>I mean it is always like a knife. It always

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 9>hurts every single time. I was wondering if there's a

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 9>manager I could talk to you about something that happens. Yeah,

0:26:50.760 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 9>I was called sir. Yeah, I'm not sir, not sir,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 9>not sir.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 10>But the guy who dropped me the food off he

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 10>called me sir twice in a row.

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that attention seeking activist has taken a break from

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 2>complaining about minimum weight workers misgendering him to film this

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 2>depravity at Disneyland, of all places. Listen to this description

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of forthcoming surgeries.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 9>I'm going to get banned from Disney. That's where we're

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 9>about to get banned from Disney.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 10>Last summer I got my kick Pops removed and the

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 10>plan up until recently was to get my marshmallow wand

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 10>reconfigured into a marshmallow tunnel. Unfortunately, a few weeks ago,

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 10>I noticed some hairy growth on my marshmallow wand that's

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 10>bad because the outside of the wand is what becomes

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 10>the inside of the tunnel, so you don't want hair

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 10>growing there or else.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 4>It's very uncomfortable.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 10>So I talked to my surgeon and he said that

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 10>it would be best to postpone the procedure until after

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 10>hair removal is complete. This is obviously just pointing, because

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 10>I was really excited to have a marshmallow tunnel sooner.

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 9>That being said, it is still happening. We're just not

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 9>sure when it's happening.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 10>Harr removal is a fickle thing and it's really hard

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 10>to predict when it will finish. But my hair removal

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 10>technician thinks it will be before the end of the year.

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 10>So fingers christ.

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 2>That is the definition of TMI. Too much information. Now,

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 2>I must confess. When I first saw this next clip,

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I was convinced it was a fake, a deep fake,

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 2>a work of parody. AI. Perhaps, surely this couldn't be real.

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Surely someone working in academia couldn't be so semi literate

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>to the point where they can't even pronounce the names

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 2>of their students, the simplest of names, including the school's name,

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Thomas Jefferson University. This is what happened at the

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 2>school's College of Nursing graduation ceremony. Listen to how this

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>present to mispronounces the easiest of names.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 2>The first graduate we'll see there is called Megan Aubrey.

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 11>Mi Genelu Iabre Jessicu Lynn Bouer, Eliah, Benemonn, Alisoner, Carl Bishop, Victoria,

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 11>Lee Zuper Brass.

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 2>So we have badly mangled names like Elizabeth, Alison, Jessica.

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Surely it can't get worse, but it can. It can.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Listen to her try to pronounce Molly Elizabeth, My.

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 11>Lena, Zebeth Camp.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Mm hmm.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 9>Our Son care.

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 11>Camp Bull mm hmm, Tom Mould me m Thomas, Thomas.

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Thomas. The kid's name is Thomas is graduating from Thomas

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Jefferson University. Thomas Jefferson must be a spinning in his

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 2>grave as we speak now. It has been an apology

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>from the university, and the explanation they gave is that

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the presenters cards have phonetic spellings of the graduates' names. Really,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Thomas and Molly and Allison that they need special I'm

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 2>not buying the explanation. I don't know what was going

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 2>on there. I'm always mispronouncing things. But you know, English

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 2>is a second language. That's a good excuse. That wasn't

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the case there. The whole catastrophe reminds me of this

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>classic role call sketch from Key and Peel Blockey.

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Where is Blocke? No Blocke here today?

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sir, my name's Blake.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Are you out of your goddamn mind?

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 6>Now? D Nice?

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you mean Denise number?

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 12>You said your name right?

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 6>Right now?

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Denise say right, Denise rectly Denise de.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 6>Nice.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 12>That's better?

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 9>Thank you?

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 11>Now?

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Remember when Transactive is still in Mulvany escape to Peru

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 2>to get away from the hate in America.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 12>Okay, surprise, I'm in Peru and I met Macho picchu.

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 12>Isn't this just so beautiful? I'm here by myself. I've

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 12>seen a lot of lamas and the people here are

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 12>so kind. I feel very safe here. It's a little

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 12>sad that I had to leave my country to feel safe,

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 12>but that will get better. Eventually, and I am dying

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 12>for some Trader Joe's rolled chili lime chips. But other

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 12>than that, I am so content. Still haven't been kissed yet,

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:40.479
<v Speaker 12>but I'm holding out hope and most of all, you know,

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 12>this trip has just has me feeling like I'm my

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 12>own best friend again, and that is the best feeling

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 12>in the world. And I hope that you feel that

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 12>way about yourself too.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 2>But we haven't heard from Dylan since Peru officially classified transgender,

0:32:55.840 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 2>non binary and into sex people as mentally ill. It's

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a decision that has been slammed by LGBTQ plus activist

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>groups across Peru, who say it is a major step

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 2>backward in the fight for their rights and safety. Now

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to an old ad that has gone viral again, and

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 2>one can understand why. Here is a Malaysian shampoo commercial

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that is well, it's different.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 8>Yahdalug pashu, good lord.

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Even the Taliban can't be upset by that modesty. First, now,

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 2>let's go to Santiago, Chili, where these women are dancing

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 2>for Palestine. If they dressed and danced like this in Gaza,

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 2>that'd be shot by her mask. But go crazy, ladies,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and we do regularly feature the ladies of the view.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 2>In this portion of the show, they say so many

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 2>stupid things. But it's not just the female host. Their guests,

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 2>male or female, also to say stupid stuff. Here is

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 2>ABC hosts and Democrat operative George Stephanopoulos admitting that the

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 2>deep state is real and it's beautiful.

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 13>And these are people that come the relatively young people

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 13>who come from all over the government, the CIA, the DA,

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 13>Defense Department, military, and you know, some people like to

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 13>call those people the deep state deep state. Well, the

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 13>big thing I learned doing this book is that the

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 13>deep state is packed with patriots, people who go to

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 13>work every single day on the front lines of the

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 13>most intense crises the country faces, and do it to

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 13>serve their country.

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't too long ago that if you mentioned the

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 2>deep state, it'd be called some crazy conspiracy theorists. But

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 2>here we are. George says, they exist, and they're patriots,

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 2>patriots who hate America. Now to a couple of funny

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>comics who are off the left, but they're still droll

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 2>and clever and generally like by all sides of politics.

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 2>Bill Burr and Bill Maher came together for Mars podcast

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 2>but it didn't go as well as you'd expect.

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 10>First of all, I don't think you could change the

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 10>oil in a car, So let's talk about an architecture like.

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 4>Plants, and I wouldn't want to.

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 9>Oh, let me adjust my glasses. Can I tell you something, Bill,

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 9>Most of the you say is not smart. It's just

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 9>sort of obscure.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 14>It's not obscure the percentage of people giant.

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm just I know you're not that smart.

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Those two mens seem to like each other. I don't

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 2>think that whole weirdly passive aggressive dynamic was put on.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 2>It seemed drill to me. Joining me now a senior

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 2>fellow at the Men'sies Research Center, journalist and author Nick Kaita.

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Nick you wrote a fascinating piece for The Australian newspaper

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 2>on what may be the most powerful interest group we've

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 2>seen yet. You wrote, Australian registered environmental charities receive hundreds

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 2>of millions in revenue each year. This tax advantage, honeypot,

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 2>is fueling the rapid expansion of ecological activism and lawfare,

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 2>making it nearly impossible to open a new coal mine

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 2>or drill for gas. Tell me how these schemes work

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and who is taking advantage of them?

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 14>Well, that the amount of money that's going into environmental charities,

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 14>and all these are tax advantaged, right, you get a

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 14>tax donation for giving to the bodies. It's now around

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 14>about a quarter of billion dollars a year, and that's

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 14>gone up by more than twice in the last four

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 14>or five years. And they're employing thousands of staff. There

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 14>are thousands of people employed full time working for environmental charities.

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 14>So that's how the green left gets so active with

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 14>their law fare and their campaigning and their social media

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 14>and setting up all sorts of little astro turf groups

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 14>to argue their cause for climate change. They are tremendously influential.

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 14>And most of this money that I've been able to

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 14>trace comes in somewhere or another from people invested in

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 14>the renewable energy sector.

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 14>So it's Mike cannon Brooks, for instance, who who is

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 14>a big investor in renewable energy. He's got his own

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.800
<v Speaker 14>charity has just got about thirty billion dollars thirty million

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 14>dollars in it. Sorry, But then you can follow that

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 14>through and you can trace the money, including worryingly a

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 14>lot of money which appears to be coming from the

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 14>United States and Europe. Funds like the World Wildlife Fund,

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 14>for instance, take money from Europe, and a lot of

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 14>them take money for a body called the Sunrise Foundation,

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 14>which has about seventy or eighty million dollar budget in Australia,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 14>and that's linked to a body in the United States.

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 14>So as where it comes from, it's pretty murkyrita. But

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 14>as far as you can trace it back, it all

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 14>seems to end up with people who basically want wind

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 14>and solar and hate nuclear.

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, you mentioned the World Wildlife Fund. They did get

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 2>a massive donation from tech billionaire Mike cannon Brooks's charity

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Boundless Earth, but as you mentioned, they also receive significant

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 2>funds from the overseas sources, including the European Climate Foundation,

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 2>one of Europe's biggest bank rollers of climate activism. The

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 2>question is there, Nick, why are they investing money? What

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 2>is expected in return for the larges.

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 14>Well, the one thing that's expected is that you do

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 14>not support nuclear and you do not support gas. You

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 14>have to get on board with this renewable only future.

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 14>And you can see why that is. I mean, if

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 14>you're somebody one of these people that have invested heavily

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 14>and renewable energy, your portfolio is shot to pieces the

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 14>moment we change the law in this country that we

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 14>can or in Australia, so we can have nuclear right

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 14>because you're not going to need intermittent or not so

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 14>much of this intermittent win. So that's why this is

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 14>big money for them. It is worth them putting millions

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 14>into fighting nuclear, which is what they're going to do

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 14>at the next election, because if they don't, if they

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 14>lose that battle there, then they're you know, they're going

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 14>to be toast. So that's basically it. It's money reto

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 14>it's money that's driving this. And the environmental groups in

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 14>Australia almost all of them, certainly the big ones are

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 14>all on board with this renewable only Cris Bowen sort

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 14>of madnes because they're getting the funding from those bodies.

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 14>They don't dare come out and make the sensible choice,

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 14>which is for nuclear.

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Well we know why those who have invested heavily in

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 2>renewables are behind this sort of activism and these sort

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 2>of strategies. But when you're talking about the environmental groups

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 2>who are supposed to be motivated by caring for the

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 2>environment for slashing emissions. How could they possibly justify being

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 2>anti nuclear power when if you want to dramatically reduce

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 2>emissions without destroying living standards, nuclear is the only option

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 2>right now. I mean, we could develop some new technology

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 2>in the next decade or two, but right now renewables

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.919
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to get you there because there's no base

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 2>load power.

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 14>I'm in Finland at the moment, which is a beautiful

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 14>backdrop reason. And here everybody is on board with nuclear,

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 14>the Beans, the left, everybody. Public opinion polls about six

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 14>percent of people oppose it. And I interviewed a member

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 14>of the Greens Party yesterday who was telling me, well,

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 14>of course we're for nuclear because it's the quickest way

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 14>to get to zero mission. If that's your thing, you

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 14>can do it that way. And they are doing it

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 14>here ninety five percent carbon free electricity. All right, So

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 14>they're doing it. They've proved, they've walked the walk and

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 14>they've shown it works. But in Australia, the Green groups

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 14>are just in cloud cuckoo land, you know. They they

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 14>just spout this stuff. I just don't really think in

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 14>the end they really they really do want to get

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 14>to net zero. They just want to be seen to

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 14>be the people fighting to get to net zero reach.

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 14>So that's the point, isn't it. Because if they wanted

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 14>to get to net zero, of course they go for nuclear.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 14>It's the obvious way.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 2>And in Scandinavia, not just Finland Sweden, it's used widely

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 2>beautiful part of the world. Ni Kata enjoy. Thank you

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining me tonight. You still to come canceled.

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Spacey is about to be uncanceled as a host

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 2>of Hollywood A listers come out in support of him.

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 2>Plus a Hollywood star explains why so many celebrities are

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 2>afraid to express right wing views. Kinsey Schofield is up next,

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back. I'm joined now by celebrity and royal commentator

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 2>Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey, we spoke about Kevin Spacey last week

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 2>after he broke his silence with that remarkable ninety minute

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 2>tell all interview with Dan Wootton. And now we've got

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood actors coming out in support of the Oscar winner.

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Sharon Stone, Limb Niesen and Stephen Fryer among those campaigning

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 2>for Kevin Spacey to return to acting after what's been

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 2>really seven years of a horror run in exile where

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 2>he was canceled over allegations that have not stood up

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 2>in court in criminal or civil cases.

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 4>That's right, and I do think that it's important to

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 4>note that when somebody like Liam Neeson or Sharon Stone

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 4>puts themselves out there and defends him Niecean specifically saying

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 4>that Kevin Spacey is a good man and a man

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:22.760
<v Speaker 4>of character. Their industry needs him and misses him greatly.

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 4>What they're doing is they're putting themselves on the line,

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 4>and I think that it's important to note that that they,

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 4>all of these celebrities are so fearful of canceling or

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.720
<v Speaker 4>of catching cancelation, and the fact that they are standing

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 4>up for him and saying, look, this is ridiculous. Let's

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 4>put this guy back to work. I think it means

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot to Kevin Spacey, but I also think a

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of people are going to take note of it

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 4>that can put Kevin Spacey back to work.

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 2>You're right, Kinsey, it's brave to take a stand. Even now.

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to be super critical, you'd say, where

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 2>were these actors in the past seven years when Kevin

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 2>was BA canceled? But I think so many people, including myself,

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 2>who've watched that ninety minute interview with Kevin Spacey and

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 2>looked at some of these allegations and what's transpired, have

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 2>changed their mind about this. Perhaps even those of us

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 2>who should know better jump to conclusions way too quickly.

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk more about Hollywood. Emmy winning actress Dreden Matteo

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 2>has told Donald Trump Junior during a podcast that there

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 2>are many well known celebrities, including herself, who are opposed

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 2>to President Joe Biden's agenda, but they're hesitant to voice

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:40.800
<v Speaker 2>their opinions.

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 15>And people in Hollywood are patrofied. We are you going

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 15>to speak out against rees and sex and all of

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 15>that stuff. People are afraid to have those conversations because,

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 15>first of all, you never win with a level You're

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 15>just never.

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Going to win. Kinsey, She's right, But we do have

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 2>plenty of celebrities who a get to voice leftist political opinions,

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and they're getting louder and louder right now on social media,

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 2>from Susan Sarandon to Barbara Streisan to Robert de Nier.

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, I think when it comes to politics, you know,

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 4>this is a polarizing rematch Trump versus Biden, and the

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 4>stakes are very high. So I do feel like you're

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 4>seeing a lot of celebrities that we typically see in

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 4>our faces around this time, like Taylor Swift disengage but

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 4>don't forget Dune the Rock. Johnson endorse Biden in twenty twenty,

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 4>but recently argued that he won't make that mistake again.

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 4>He told Fox and Friends, the endorsement that I made

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 4>years ago with Biden was one that I thought was

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 4>the best decision for me at the time. Am I

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 4>going to do that again this year? The answer is no,

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to do that. Musician macklmore It recently

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 4>released a scathing song tearing into Joe Biden, saying I

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:57.919
<v Speaker 4>will not be voting for you this fall. But here

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 4>we are in June Celebrity your Los Angeles Vondrazer, starring

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 4>George Clooney and Julia Roberts. So some are bailing and

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 4>then there are some that I guess I would consider

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:13.720
<v Speaker 4>in the shameless category trying to pop, you know, prop

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 4>up this eighty year old man.

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there are many of them. The fundraisers, the public endorsements,

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and also the social media activism. Some of the things

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 2>these celebrities post on social media, you would think if

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 2>you were the publicist, you would be having a heart attack.

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Now to the battle between a listers, Brad Pitt and

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Angelina Jolie. Their breakup was very ugly, indeed, and there's

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 2>claims that Angelina Jolie has encouraged the children to avoid

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 2>spending time with their father. Cans it tell me the

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 2>latest on this saga and what we've learned from the

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 2>latest legal proceedings.

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely in this accusation sounds very credible. We heard it

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:02.399
<v Speaker 4>last week. It's a former security guard and he told

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 4>the Superior Court that Angelina Jolie attempted to turn her

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 4>six children against their father, Brad Pitt by instructing them

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 4>to reject him during custody visits. The witness said that

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Angelina fired him after two of his freelance security associates

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 4>sided with Brad Pitt during the split and agreed to

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 4>testify against her on Brad's behalf during custody hearings. Now,

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Brad's attorneys accusing Jolie of using NDA's inappropriately and almost

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 4>in a threatening manner towards those security guards as the

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 4>couple were battling. It out for their chateau winery Champagne problems.

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Champagne problem is indeed now I've missed their latest films.

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:47.839
<v Speaker 2>But are they both working a lot less than they

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 2>once did? Is this impacting their public image and their career?

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 4>I think it is for Angelina Joli because she comes

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 4>off as very bitter and negative. You know, we just

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 4>found out Shiloh could be moving in with Brad Pitt

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 4>once she turns eighteen. Brad has a beautiful, young new girlfriend.

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 4>He is busy in working, Angelina kind of leading more

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:13.280
<v Speaker 4>into charity work. But I do think that this divorce

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 4>has hurt her brand. And then on top of that,

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:20.479
<v Speaker 4>like you said, she's very outspoken politically. She's got her father,

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 4>John Voight saying I'm voting for Trump Trump twenty twenty four,

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 4>and she just kind of looks problematic and toxic. Meanwhile,

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Brad is like casually walking along the beaches with his dogs,

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 4>and he's beautiful, and he just looks unbothered.

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 2>He does look unbothered, perhaps too unbolded. Kinsey Schofield, thank

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:41.280
<v Speaker 2>you so much for your time this evening.

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 9>Thank you.

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 2>That's it from May News Night is up next. I'll

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 2>see you Tomorrow at nine point thirty four, a whole

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 2>program devoted to lefties losing it. Good Night,