WEBVTT - A 'rathole of retaliation': Trump, Iran and what happens next

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>From Schwartz Media. I'm Ruby Jones. This is seven AM.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>America's attacks on Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend mark

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a terrifying turning point. Donald Trump has taken the US

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>into direct conflict with Iran and risked what the UN

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Secretary General is calling a rat hole of retaliation. In

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>an address at the Pentagon, the U s Secretary of

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Defense Pete Hegseth claimed Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated,

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>but questions remain about the extent of the damage and

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>whether the attack will only strengthen Iran's resolve to rebuild. Today.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Author of the Permanent Crisis, Iran's Nuclear Trajectory and defense

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>editor at The Economists, Shashek Joshi on what Iran will

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>do next and what Donald Trump, calling for regime change

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>says about how far we are from peace. It's Tuesday,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>June twenty four.

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 2>Last night, on President Trump's orders, US Central Command conducted

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a precision strike in the middle of the night against

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 2>three nuclear facilities in Iran, for Doeaux, Natan's, and Svahan

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.839
<v Speaker 2>in order to destroy or severely degrade Iran's nuclear program.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Shishang, thank you for speaking with me. The United States

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Secretary for Defense Pete Hegseth said in a press conference

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>at the Pentagon that Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to President Trump's bold and visionary leadership and his

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 2>commitment to peace through strength. Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Is that true? We don't know. We know that America

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 3>has dropped some of the very biggest bombs in its

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>arsenal on this mountain side in Four Daux, and we

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>can have confidence that that's probably caused damage to any

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 3>of the centrifuge machines inside the facility, which are typically

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 3>very very centif to any kind of disruption or vibration,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>and obviously, dropping a thirty thousand bomb on a mountain

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>causes more than a little bit of vibration. We also

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 3>know that America struck Esfahan and Tans to other nuclear

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>sites where Iran has been conversing uranium into different forms

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>in a way that you might need for a weapon

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>down the line. But and there's a very big butt.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 3>We don't know exactly how much damage has been done

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 3>to Four Dough. Even the Iranians may not be aware

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>of it, because they may not be able to enter

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 3>the facility safely, given all the rubble, given all the

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>contamination that may be inside. We don't know as well

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 3>where exactly Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium is. That

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 3>is uranium enrich to about sixty percent, which is a

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 3>very very short distance from weapons grade. It used to

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 3>be stored at Esfahan, where it was inspected by the

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 3>International Atomic Energy Agency. The IAEA no longer has any

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 3>visibility into that stockpile. Iran said it has moved some

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>of the stocks away from facilities that are known to

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 3>the US and others, and in the days prior to

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 3>these US strikes, satellite images also showed trucks and vehicles

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 3>at some of these sites. So that's the problem. We

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 3>do not know if Iran's stockpile of uranium has been destroyed,

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 3>and if it hasn't, of course, that is a problem

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 3>that could be used as the basis for an effort

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 3>towards bomb in other secret clandestine sites.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>The UN Secretary General Antonio Guterira said that the war

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>risks sinking into a rat hole of retaliation from.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 4>The outset of the crisis. I have repeatedly condemned any

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 4>military escalation in the Middle East. The people of the

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 4>region cannot endure another cycle of destruction, and yet we

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 4>now risk descending into a ref hole of retaliation.

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Iran has promised everlasting consequences to the series of attacks

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>against it, So what type of retaliation do you anticipate.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 3>You know that Iran, for example, could attempt to close

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 3>the Strait of Hormuz, and Hormuz is a very important

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 3>waterway in the Persian Gulf. It's effectively the kind of

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 3>point at which lots of key oil traffic flows. It's

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 3>the only passage from the Persian Gulf to the open Sea.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 3>And if Iran were place minds, for example, that could

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 3>cause real disruption to the energy market. However, I think

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty important that we separate Iran's rhetoric from its

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 3>real situation, which is that it's deeply wounded. It is

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 3>lost very senior commanders, it's lost a great number of

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 3>its missile launchers, perhaps two thirds of them according to

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 3>some Israeli accounts, and the regime is afraid. It's afraid

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 3>that the regime itself may be a target of strikes

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 3>in the coming days, and so they will be seeking

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>to save face to sort of strike back in a

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>way that preserves their honor without provoking a huge retaliation

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>of the kind that Donald Trump has threatened. And I

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 3>would cast your mind back to twenty twenty when America

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 3>killed Cassam Sulimani, who was a very senior Irani in general,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>and Iran responded by conducting missile strikes against a US

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 3>based in Iraq. But it was a very calibrated retaliation.

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 3>They effectively gave America noticed that it would happen. They

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 3>showed them where the missiles were landing, and it was

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 3>a way of showing that they had done something very

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 3>robust and strong without actually trying to kill very large

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>numbers of Americans. And I think that that is along

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 3>the lines of what you could see in the coming

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>days if Iran is trying to keep tensions within limits.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And Donald Trump made this decision to attack Iran after

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>saying that he would be considering whether or not to

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>do it within the next two weeks. So what was

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>behind that statement. Can you talk to me about the

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>calculations within his administration to misdirect the public when they

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>were ultimately obviously planning this attack.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 3>Well, had Iran turned up to those diplomatic talks with

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>France and Germany in Geneva for the weekend and said, actually,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>we're willing to completely dismantle our nuclear program and give up.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps Donald Trump would have canceled these strikes, although that's

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 3>difficult to say. It does look as though he was

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 3>using both diplomacy and his own statements about making a

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 3>decision within two weeks as a smokescreen to deceive Iran

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>while preparations were being made for these strikes. And the

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.239
<v Speaker 3>reason preparations have to be made is because the journey

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>to Iran for the B two Stealth Comma, that is

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the only plane that can carry these huge bombs. It

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 3>is a thirty seven hour round trip. It's enormous, and

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 3>you need refueling planes along the way to keep these

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 3>bombers in the air. And you also need intelligence to

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>be gathered about exactly what you're hitting. You know, who's

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 3>in the area, what's the weather like, because that affects

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the movement of these gravity bombs dropped from these planes.

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 3>So that he would have been using that time to

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>prepare this attack as well as I think to prepare

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 3>US military facilities in the area to cope with any

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>subsequent retaliation, for example, evacuating families from military bases in

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 3>places like Bahrain and Katar. So I suspect the deception

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 3>was largely aimed at buying time to prepare and at

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>making American facilities more secure. And then finally there was

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 3>that last little feint of sending some B twos effectively

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the wrong way. A couple of decoy B twos taking

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 3>off and heading west, spotted over the Pacific to make

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 3>it look as though they were heading in a completely

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 3>different direction.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Shank In announcing the attacks, Pete Hegseth said that Donald

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump seeks peace. In your view, does this decision by

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the US to strike Iran bring anyone any closer to peace?

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>I think, in this narrow sense that it may accelerate

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 3>the Israeli campaign, because the Israeli campaign has largely been

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 3>about destroying around nuclear program, although there have been some

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>other interest slightly stabilizing the Iranian state. And with that

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 3>in mind, because Fodeaux is now probably neutralized to some

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 3>large degree, and Iran's nuclear program has been weakened very substantially,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 3>it makes it easier for Israel to stop the conflict. However,

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 3>we don't know the false scope of Iran's retaliation, and

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>if that retaliation is more expansive than I have suggested.

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>For example, if they launch a bunch of missiles at

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 3>a US based in the Middle East in ways it

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 3>kill marines and kill soldiers or kill airmen, that could

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 3>quite easily drag America straight back in to go hit

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>political targets into Iran. We don't know, And so whether

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 3>or not this move brings piece closer I think is

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 3>really dependent on the Iranian retaliation as much as anything else.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Coming up after the break. What America's strike on Iran

0:08:54.800 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>says about its strategy in the Middle East?

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Shashank.

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The United States has adopted Israel's frame, being that these

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from producing a nuclear weapon.

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So has there been any intelligence or any evidence presented

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to back that up.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 3>We haven't seen clear evidence in public. We've seen claims

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 3>by Israel in public on the very first day of

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the war that Iran was accelerating its progress towards what

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>we call weaponization, that is, elements of the bomb making process,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 3>in particular that it was quite publicly racking up huge

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 3>quantities of highly enriched uranium. But it was also working.

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>They say on the neutron initiators that you need to

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 3>trigger a bomb, as well as the plastic explosives that

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 3>go around it, and the uranium core itself, the round

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 3>spherical bit of fissile material that goes at the very

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 3>heart of a bomb. But we haven't seen detailed documentation

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 3>or intelligence to support that. My colleagues at the Economist

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>have been told that Iran was taking some steps, for example,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 3>about initiate a meeting of its missile forces in ways

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that would help them mate a potential warhead to a

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 3>missile down the line, But by and large Western officials

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 3>appear to be much more skeptical of some of these claims.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 3>And whilst they all agree Iran was doing concerning things

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 3>with weapons related technology, that it had not decided to

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 3>finally manufacture a bomb. And I can see no sign

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 3>from outside countries that they agree Iran was racing its

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 3>way towards that outcome at all.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And what does this strike on Iran say to you

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>about America's plans in the Middle East, given such a

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>large part of Trump's base is anti interventionist, and getting

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>involved in this way is indirect conflict with how Trump campaigned.

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I think it shows you the problem that so many

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>administrations have had, which is, how do you keep away

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 3>from the quagmire of the Middle East when you were

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 3>trying desperately to try to effectively pivot to Asia and

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 3>focus on the challenge post by China. And it's a

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 3>problem that confronted Barack Obama and his pivot to Asia.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 3>In twenty fourteen, he was dragged in to supporting the

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 3>European military campaign in Libya. It's a problem that the

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 3>devil Trump in his first term he had, you know,

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 3>he bombed Syria, he nearly bombed Iran. It's a problem

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 3>that afflicted Joe Biden, who ended up having to fire

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 3>at the Huthis and was pulled into the war in

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East as well after October seventh. And I

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 3>think that there will be many in the Pentagon saying

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 3>we did this, We did it once. But what's imperative

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 3>now is that we do not let this become an

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 3>open ended campaign of the kind that we have criticized

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 3>so often in the past. And that will be fine,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 3>But of course the thing to remember us we've discussed

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 3>is that the enemy gets a vote, and Iran will

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 3>have a determinant in the question as to whether how

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>bad this could eventually get and how far America may

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 3>against its will have to be pulled.

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Back in right, and what is the longer term strategy

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>here if the US does have one.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the longer term US strategy is still to

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 3>try to limit its involvement in them, at least to

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>avoid getting sucked into a very high degree. I think

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>that they realize the military balance in the Pacific against

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 3>China has been eroding. They must focus on sort of

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 3>building up forces there. And you know, just look at

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 3>the munitions you're spending. They fired scores of Tomahawk land

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 3>attack missiles yesterday, cruise missiles. These are weapons that the

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Indo Pacific Command in the Pentagon believes would be vital

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 3>for any conflict with China, and they just chewed through

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 3>more of them, having chewed through many others in the

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 3>campaign against the HUFIS earlier this year. So there will

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 3>be many military officers focused on the Pacific who will

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 3>have their head in their hands saying this is terrible.

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 3>So I think in the longer run, this administration is

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 3>still going to try its best to be disciplined if

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 3>it can, and to try to avoid committing itself in

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 3>a part of the world, in a region that it

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 3>feels has been effectively a graveyard for American resources and

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 3>lives for the last twenty five years.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And Trump is now talking very directly about regime change.

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>He's saying on truth Social I'll quote, it's not politically

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>correct to use the term regime change. But if the

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't there be regime change? So my question, I suppose,

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is how likely is that outcome?

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it's still unlikely. I think that he is

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump likes campaigns that are successful and strong, and

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 3>he didn't want this war in the first place. But

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 3>once Israel showed that it was succeeding, that appealed to him,

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 3>and it pulled him in. Israel is now flirting with

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 3>the idea of regime change, and that may also be

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>influencing mister Trump. But I think that his advisors will

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 3>be much more skeptical at any kind of effort at

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 3>political change than they will at what was seen as

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 3>a one off strike against Fourdeaux and other nuclear sites.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 3>I think, in a way, the way we should think

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 3>about this is that Trump is holding out this political

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 3>threat as a way of trying to influence the current

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 3>debate inside Iran, in inside its leadership over how to

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 3>retaliate and how severely to do so. And what it

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 3>says is, if you kill Americans and you retaliate in

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 3>a big way, I'm willing to come back and topple

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 3>your government. But if you don't do that, I'm willing

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 3>to stay out of this. That I think is more

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 3>likely to be the signal that he's sending. Although with

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump, of course, you know you never quite know

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in his head.

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Shashang, thank you so much for your time.

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>You're very welcome. Thank you so much for having me.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Also in the news today, Foreign Minister Penny Wong says

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the government is continuing to work with Australians stranded in

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Iran and Israel. Senator Wong says thirteen hundred Australians in

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Israel and three thousand in Iran have registered with the

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Department of Foreign Affairs is wanting to leave. However, evacuation

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>attempts in Iran are particularly complicated. The Department of Foreign

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Affairs says Australia has deployed support of the Azerbaijani border

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to help those able to make it there, and the

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>federal government is being urged by the Greens to disclose

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>whether the satellite surveillance base at Pine Gap in the

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Northern Territory was used in the US strikes against Iran.

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Green's defense spokesperson David Tchubridge says Australia should take immediate

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>steps to distance itself from the US over the strikes,

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>describing the development as a dangerous escalation. I'm Ruby Jones.

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>This is seven am. Thanks for listening.