WEBVTT - Secrets of a murder detective: Steve Keogh Pt.2

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Detective see a side of life the average persons never

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>exposed her. I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years I was catching killers.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to part two of my chat. We've retired

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Scotland yard detective Steve Kere. If you miss part one,

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Steve has given us a good understanding of the processes

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 1>that go into place after his murder investigation team is

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>called to a deceased talked about what happens at the

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>crime scene, the importance of the crime scene information management,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>notifying the families, and all other aspects of homicide investigation.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I really like Steve talking about standing still and just

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>taking in the crime scene and getting a feel of it.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing that you can't teach. It something

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that you learn through years of experience and probably be

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>shown by others that came before you. Let's get past

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the crime scene. Now where do you guys run your

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>investigation from?

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 2>So there are different police bases, so we call us.

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>We don't call ourselves really, but the press tend to

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>call the Scotland Dart Detectives. But nobody works out of

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Scotland Old anymore. Is shrunk.

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It does sound cool, but yeah, yeah, I wouldn't like

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Scotland Yard coming after.

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.639
<v Speaker 2>That's shrunk down to a really small building. Budget cuts

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>everything got smaller, even the buildings, so we work out

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 2>a different basis. I worked out a place called Lewisham

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Lusian Police Station in southeast London and we would have

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a section of the police station that was set aside

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 2>for homicide and all that teams would be there. So

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 2>you nominally you work at a police station, but that

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 2>you're not connected to the police station in terms of

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 2>local policing. It's just the building your workout.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And we refer to them as a strikeforce room or

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.839
<v Speaker 1>an incident room that when things are going well, each

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>police station has a room allocated that should be under

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>lock and seal in case a murder or a serious

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>investigation comes through, and they've got computers in there and

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's all right to go and ready to set up.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But I found running homicide investigations, it's crucial to have

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a good functioning strikeforce room or investigation room, a place

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>where you've got all your team together, a place where

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.119
<v Speaker 1>you've got your computers, you've got all your paperwork set up.

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Would you agree with that?

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, as is permanent. So we have as the MII.

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's the major instant room, and it's where all

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the homes computers are and you have permanent staff there.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>They're not police officers, they're civilians whose job it is

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>to maintain all the information that goes on to homes.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, that's central, that's central to it. So and

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 2>then you'd have a different office called the squad office

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 2>where the detectives would work out of. And a really

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>important element is that at some point at the beginning

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 2>of a murder, every day as a murder goes on,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe not as regular, but everybody comes together. Everybody from

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 2>the typists to all the detectives come together and share

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>in information, and that's really important.

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I learned very early in my career as a homicide detective.

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I could tell and even when I was a senior

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>detective running investigation, so I could almost tell the quality

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of investigation by the manner in which briefings were done,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>briefings in that incident room, detective's room, squad room.

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Whatever you want to call it.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And I had some people and who I looked up

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to as just great detective and they had an ability

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to put all the information in a briefing, so everyone

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>felt like they were contributing to what's gone on, summarizing

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>what we know at this point in time, and explaining

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the lines of inquiry and information and having not a

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>free for all, like someone was running the briefing, but

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>inviting everyone to have some form of input. What's your

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the importance of briefings, because I think they're crucial.

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 2>No, one hundred percent. So if you've got twenty five

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 2>detectives all running off in different directions, they need to

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>know what everybody else is doing and just as importantly,

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>how what they're doing fits in with everyone else. So

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>just as example, if you've got someone who's doing the

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 2>CCTV and then you've got if they understand what the witnesses,

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>officers the information they're coming back with, what the witnesses

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 2>are saying, what they've seen, the description of the suspect,

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Makes their job much easier. And there may

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>be something on the CCTV that wouldn't on its own,

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't make sense, but when you fit in with everything else.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm a bit of a sci fi geek, and in

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Star Trek they've got at this alien race called the

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Borg and they're like a high mind where everybody knows

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 2>what everyone else is thinking. And that's a stage where

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>you want to try and reach. You want to be

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>able to get to a stage where everybody knows what

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 2>everybody else is doing. So that so it all does

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 2>fit in, because if you're all pulling off in different directions,

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be much harder to solve the crime.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 2>And the only way, really, you know what cops a

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 2>like area if you put something in a document, they

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 2>ain't going to read it. So if you've got them

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>in a room and they're all talking to each other.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 2>They're much more likely to digest what's going on, and

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 2>they crucial and if you don't hold those meetings, you

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>don't have that cohesion and you make it much more

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 2>difficult for yourself to solve the crime.

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. I think bringing everyone into that room,

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>and obviously it was sometimes that people couldn't make it,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but you'd have someone that they're working with that could

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>make the briefing, and I would go around the room

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>like if I was running the briefing. Okay, this is

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what we know at this point in time. A lady's

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>body has been found in Parkland. We've got witnesses, have

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>been interviewed, but no one saw what happened post more

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>than result is of the pears. She's died of a

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>gunshot wound. This is what we know at this point

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in time. And then I'd go to you, Steve. You

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>might be coordinating the CCTV footage. What have we got

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>from the CCTV footage. There might be another person that's

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at the canvassing aspects. You've interviewed the person that

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>found the body, what information came from that person, And

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going round the room. So everyone's input in and

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we're all on the same page. I do like star Trek,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but I hadn't really thought of homicide investigation in the

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>form of a ball. But I take on board what

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. But it is all that information. The good

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>leaders that I saw, they would encourage everyone to have

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>an input. And it could be some new kid that's

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>just come into the homicide sitting in the back of

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the room and put his hand up nervously and say, hey, boss,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>if you consider such and such, invariably it was a

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>good idea, if it was a good idea, and so

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of course I considered that that's not but that input

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and the other thing. I think those type of briefings

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>help everyone feels like they're part of a team and

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone feels like they're contributing, because otherwise, if they're kept

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in isolation, that's hard to motivate people if they don't

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>know the bigger picture.

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm saying, if you're a good leader, you have

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to create an environment that people feel comfortable to be

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 2>able to speak up and say as you say. Because

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>everyone when I was talking about that that the the

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the analogy of a car, where it's the it's the

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>dyes that are directing it, and the d s's are

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the pedals, and the dcs are the engine. That car

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>won't work. If it was just the dill it wouldn't move.

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Which a car, it won't move. The ds is will

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>push it the pedal it would work. Everything has to

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>work together, and a murder is not solved by on

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the new, on the on the On these drama dramatizations,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>you see the DC idea run around solving murders that

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>they don't solve murders. The team sold the murder. No

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 2>one individual detective solves the murder. Even if you come

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 2>up with a really good bit of evidence, it still

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>has to fit in with everything else, and it still

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 2>has to get to a stage where it gets past

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the CPS. It gets it's not going to be ripped

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 2>apart of court, So no one person can solve the murder.

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>It has to be a team. And I've been in meetings.

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>One of the most important people to having a meeting

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I always thought was were the typists who put all

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the information onto the computer because they read every single document.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 2>I didn't read every single document, and they'll be there

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and they'd be, oh, yeah, I remember I typed on

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 2>a message from a member of the public who said

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't seen that, and you know what I mean,

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 2>but the fact that you've seen him put it on,

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that could be really important. So everybody should feel comfortable

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>enough to say to put a hand up, like you say,

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the new detective or anybody is.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure you've had people on your team that

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you call the typist. We had that at one stage.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>They eliminated that. So police are putting it all on,

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a bad thing. Our skill set

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>could be better utilized. But that's that's just the way

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 1>we approach it. But some of the analysts I've worked with,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they're the ones of the attention to detail. And I

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>swear to god the crime wouldn't be solved without the

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>analysts that just got the ability to retain this attention

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to detail. And I'd be talking and no, that's not

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>what happened. This is a right, sorry correction. Like attention

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to detail, they're crucial to a good homicide investigation team,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I believe.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So when I first joined the murder teams, it

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 2>was before the our government decided to absolutely rack policing

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 2>in the UK. But when I first joined, we had

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 2>an embedded intelligence analyst who is not a police officer, civilian,

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>really really highly trained in how to use different software

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 2>and methods for collecting intelligence information. And one of the

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 2>most important roles was a timeline. So if you've got

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>thousands of bits of information, if you overlay them on

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 2>a timeline, suddenly things become more You can see how

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>different events relate to each other, how to build up

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>to a murder happened, looking for an important trigger in

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 2>the build up to a murder. There's all different aspects

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 2>of a crime that you don't jump out of you

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 2>if you don't lay them in that timeline. And that's

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 2>one of the jobs of an intelligence analyst. And they

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 2>were really fundamental, crucial to our investigations. And then when

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 2>the budget cuts came in, they took them off of

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 2>their murder teams and they centralized them, and so you

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 2>would have an analyst attached to your saying that it

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 2>wasn't the same. They weren't embedded with you, they weren't

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>living and breathing the murder like we were, and our

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>investigations one hundred percent suffered because of that decision. It

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>all comes down some money, and that really, really, really

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>pisses me off. Investigating a murder should not be about money,

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>but sadly that's the world we live in.

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the problems you're talking about are not this similar,

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and I've been out for a couple of years now,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but I know the situation you're talking about where people

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>above didn't understand the value of I need this analyst

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>working with me full time. I need this. I need that.

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You're not asking it for the fun of it. You're

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>asking it because this is what's needed to solve a murder.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>When we talk lines of inquiry, people often say, as

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>a detective, do you have a hunch, And I say, well,

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>not a hunch. When you're looking at a line of inquiry,

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a hypothesis or you might throw out this maybe this

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>person got murdered because he had a gambling habit or

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>something along like that line. That's a hypothesis.

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>It's not.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a line of inquiry that needs to be explored.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to just talk us through your mindset.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>We've got you. We've taken you from the crime scene.

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>You've done the canvassinge of the crime scene, gathered all

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the information, you've done your briefing, you've set up your

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>intint room or strikeforce room. But then you've got to

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>get to a point. Okay, which direction do I take

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>this investigation in? What's what's your mind thoughts? So what's

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the processes that you'd go through with investigations at that stage?

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, hypotheses are really important. So if you've got all

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>these detectives running around investigating stuff, they have to investigate something.

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 2>You can't. You can't ask them to go. You can't

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 2>say to the CCTV officer, go and get me CCTV.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>You can't say to the phone's officer, go and get

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>me phone's data. What you need to do is investigate something.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>That's where hypotheses come in. So so essentially what you're doing,

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 2>you're you're looking at the likely scenarios of how why

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>this murder would have happened, and you investigate them. So,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 2>if so the person was killed because they because they've

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 2>got a rival drugs gang or something along those lines,

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>because they deal dealing drugs and it could be a

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>rival gang, or it could be a robbery or it

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 2>could so if you if you come up with a

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 2>likely scenarios, you can then investigate that. So you can

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>if it is if he is a drug dealer, Well

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 2>who is who else is dealing drugs in the area.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Have there been any recent robberies on drug dealers? Does it?

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Has he had any fallings out? And so what you

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 2>need to do you need to investigate a lightly scenario

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>which will then open up potential evidence. You can't just that.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>There has to be a focus to investigation, and that's

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 2>where hypotheses come in. And they're not made up. Then

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>they're not thinking all like fanciful ideas of what could

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 2>have happened. They're very very simple. So imagine a scenario

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 2>where a dead body is found in the woods and

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 2>all you know is this person has been killed in

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the woods, and you know, we know nothing else about

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 2>them or their lifestyle or anything else. All we know

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>is you got a dead body in the woods. So

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 2>you have to investigate something. So if you set your

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>hypotheses as broad as this, that they were killed by

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>someone they knew, or they were killed by someone they

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't know. So if you start off your investigation but

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 2>they were killed by someone they knew, you could so

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>then you so then you investigate their life. Who is

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 2>in their life? Who have they had any issues? Is

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 2>there anybody in their life that's threatened them in the past,

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing, or they were killed by someone

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>they didn't know. If they're killed by someone they didn't know,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>then it would be someone in the area. What's been

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 2>going on in the area, as there been any robberies,

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 2>any for previous attacks, anyone hanging around. Then as you

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 2>get more information, your hypotheses can be more more focused.

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>But whatever happens, whatever scenario comes, it will stem from

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>one of those two things. They were killed by someone

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>they know, someone they didn't know. So in the meantime,

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you're not missing anything. You're you're not missing a line

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>of inquiry that that you could think, oh, we didn't

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>do that well, and now it's too late. And then

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 2>there's more information comes in. Supposing this person that's there

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know is in a volatile relationship with someone,

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 2>then you can you can have a specific hypothesis around that.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>But in the meantime, you've not lost anything. You and

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and more information comes in you can develop and change hypotheses.

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 2>But they're really important because I say, detectives need to

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 2>be focused, they need to investigate something, and you're giving

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 2>them a starting point to investigate.

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think you explained it very well, Because you've

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>got to start somewhere and point them in the direction.

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>The confirmation bias can cloud your judgment. Let's speak hypothetically.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>If a woman's body is found in the woods as

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you described, and being in a volatile relationship with her

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ex partner, confirmation bias can be dangerous if that's all

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for. That you think, okay, that's my hypothesis.

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>They're in a domestic situation, they've had a falling out,

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>he's probably killed her, and you concentrate there. What's the

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>dangers of confirmation bias in an investigation?

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Quite simple. If you're looking over here and the murder's

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 2>over there, you'll miss them. And so in that scenario,

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 2>you would run a number of hypotheses. One would be

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>that the woman was killed by a partner, but simultaneously

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>investigate that she wasn't. Now on the flip side of

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>that, there's a chance is it's not the partner, So you

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>have to investigate both. And confirmation bias, I think is

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the worst enemy of a detective. If you get caught

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 2>in that trap, the results from that can be horrendous.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 2>So I always refer to a case we had in

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the UK. It was a lady by named Rachel Michel.

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 2>She was nineteen years old, she had a young child.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>She was on a place called Wimbledon Common and she

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 2>was brutally murdered in front of her front of a

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>young child. And the police investigated at the time, this

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>was the early nineties, brought in a criminal profiler and

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 2>he came up with a profile that essentially was it's

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 2>their local weirdo. And there was a local weirdo that

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 2>happened to be in the park at that time, known

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 2>by the name of Colin Stag, and the police went

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 2>hard for him. They even introduced a female undercover officers

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to try and get him to confess to the murder.

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 2>They went all out. They were absolutely convinced it was

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Colin Stag and it got to the point where they

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>even charged him with murder. So he was going to

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 2>trial and as soon as he got to call the

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>judge through out and Colin Stagg was acquitted of the murder.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>And he did not commit this murder. It wasn't him,

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 2>but they were absolutely convinced, and they didn't they ignored

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 2>that it could have been anyone else. When in actual

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 2>fact it was a man by the name of Robert Napper,

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and a number of a year a year or two

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>later after he killed Rachel, he in almost a ritualistic,

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 2>really brutal murder. He killed a young mum and a

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 2>young five year old child. And it was only later

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>on when some DNA came back on the Rachel and

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>thecal murder they identified Robert Napper. Now I'm not saying

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 2>that the police if they had hadn't an investigated Steak,

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 2>that they would have got Napper, but by not looking

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 2>for that, but they were never going to get him.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 2>And the result of that is that a young mum

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>and a child brutally brutally murdered when there's a chance,

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying it would have happened, but there's a

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 2>chance if they hadn't have been so caught up in

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Stag they might have got to NAPA. And that's the

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 2>danger that can happen when you'd convince yourself and what

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you end up doing confirmation bias. Essentially, what you're doing

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 2>you've made up your mind and you go and go

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 2>look for information to prove yourself right, rather than look

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 2>for information that points to who the killer is and

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>once you get caught up in that trap, as I say,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 2>the consequences can be as dire as thats was what

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>happened to someone for and HASMI.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>That's a horrendous example, but I can see how it happens.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's the pressure of homicide investigation. If you get

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it wrong, Yeah, there's consequences. If you get it wrong,

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>someone might get away with murder you. I don't think

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>there's any fair mind the detective that wants to see

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>someone put a way that hasn't done the crime. I

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>think that anyone with a fair mind would be horrified

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>by that scenario. Sometimes we'd have someone that really looked

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>good for it. It might be used to we're thinking, yeah,

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>he's good for it, and they would have inquiries trying

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to disprove it before we move forward on it. So, yeah,

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it's where the facts take you. And I think that's

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>an important thing as a dejective that you can't Yeah,

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you can have your your theories, I call them case theories.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>This might happen, but you've got to follow the facts

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to look at it objectively, and that

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>confirmation bias is dangerous. That you've got to take a

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>step away and just make sure that you're looking at

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it objectively.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so what you said earlier is so important. So

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 2>what you need to do is as well as trying

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 2>to You're not you're not trying to prove a person

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 2>committed a murder. You're gathering the evidence for someone else

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to make the decision. That's your job. Your your job

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>is to gather the information to go to court for

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 2>that jury to make a decision on someone's guilt. And

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 2>you have to test both sides. You can't. You can't

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 2>just just look for the evidence that helps you in

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>your case. You have to look for both sides because

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 2>you're not judge a jury. You're you're looking you're and

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 2>what you said, they're about trying to prove that they didn't.

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 2>That's a really important element. Well, what if we're wrong,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to the decision making, looking for

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 2>what if I'm wrong is such an important part of

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 2>that process because you might be wrong. And you told

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 2>me earlier about hunches. I think they're the most dangerous

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 2>thing in the world. I mean, yeah, you do get

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 2>as a detective, you do start to get intuition and

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 2>you get feelings for things. But you can never guarantee

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>that's right. And if you place too much emphasis on

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>your gut feeling and you're wrong, that's where that's where

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 2>you end up going down the wrong avenue and you're

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 2>chasing the wrong person.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>The hunches have got to be overlaid with the facts. Yeah,

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't. You can't have a hunch and just run

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>on a hunch. And I've seen people do it and

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it can take it in the in the wrong direction.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>When I get complicated investigations where there's a lot of suspects,

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>three eras I look at is opportunity, capability and motive.

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And to help me cut through, we might have hundreds,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>truly hundreds of potential suspects in a case, so opportunity

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>capability and motive opportunity, we might be able to eliminate

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred of these suspects because they are overseas, are

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in prison at the time, so they didn't have the

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunity capability. Would they be capable of committing the crime?

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Are they physically capable of committing the crime, has a

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>history of it, and their motive And I put motive

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that is the last because sometimes you solve murders without

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>even knowing the motive. Sometimes it's you're wishing you the

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>motive you don't know. Sometimes the crooks don't even know

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the motive. I think on occasions, how do you break

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>down when you've got a there's a whole range of suscepts.

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>It might be a child murder, it might be a

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>gangland murder. How do you cut through and prioritize what

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>lines of inquiry you or who you start to look

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>at first.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we don't use it on all murders, but

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 2>we have a method known as TIE. So they change

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>what the TIE stands for. It used to be traced

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>to eliminate, to tracing the eliminate. Now I think it's trace, interview, evaluate,

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 2>but they change the words, but it's the same thing.

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>So essentially, you've got a list of people, and that

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 2>list could be I don't know, the last person that's

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of victim alive, people that have had issues with

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 2>a victim, people in the area at the time, people

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 2>last in contact, whatever it is. You come up with

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 2>a criteria that you're going to form this list and

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 2>then and then the important part is your elimination. How

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 2>am I going to what am I going to use

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 2>to eliminate them. Have I got a description of the

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 2>suspect and I can use that as a basis because

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 2>they clearly aren't suspectause they don't fit the description, as

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you say, were they imprison were they were they not

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 2>in the area at the time, kind of play them elsewhere.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 2>And what that does is you can then start to

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 2>prioritize who you look at. That doesn't mean your elimination

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>regard to you has to be careful, because you don't

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 2>want eliminate someone, and it is that it has to

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>be really well thought out. And then and then because

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 2>you can't you had a fewer people than we did.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we had twenty five people on a murder team.

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 2>If you had closer to ten, you can't. You can't

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 2>investigate everyone at the same time. If you really resources

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 2>of finance, you have to prioritize. So then you'd be

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a case of right, we look at the person at

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 2>the top and go down. Then it might be that

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 2>you get warrants for the houses, you interview them, you

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 2>arrest them, whatever it is, but you need you need

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>to investigate them all one at a time. Thankfully, those

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>murders aren't. That's not the norm many many murders are

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 2>much more simple to solve, but you get those ones

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 2>that are really difficult.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>So the process of breaking it down is prioritize and

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>then eliminate and then okay, we've got rid of the

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>number one suspect. We'll go to the next one and

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>work your way down. That's how when I had ones

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that I felt overwhelmed with, That's that's how how I

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>approached it. Quite often a difficult stage in the homicide

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>investigation is at what stage do you move on the suspect,

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Like what stays you declared that he's a he or

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>her is a suspect? Or do you arrest a person

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>now if it's a serial killer or the person might

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>cause harm to someone else. Sometimes the pressures on talk

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>us through your thoughts on the timing of the arrest

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of a suspect.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I was always a fan of an early arrest, and

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 2>in the UK I don't always like in Australia. So

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I know I've gone over and done talks in America

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 2>and when I when I'm chatting to detectives over there,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 2>that's their their bar for arrest is much higher than

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 2>us in the UK, as is quite low, So you

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 2>need two things. You need to suspect a crime has

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>been committed. We're investigating the murder, that's an easy one.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 2>And you need to suspect the person is guilty of here.

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 2>And that level of suspicion is really low. I mean,

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 2>it could be and it's and it's subjective anyway.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So braving on the mind of the police officer exactly one.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 2>And so how did you quantify that I suspected he

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>was guilty. I can justify it. It could be. It

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 2>could be the tiniest little thing. But earlier bests quite

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 2>often lead on to information and evidence that you wouldn't

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 2>have got otherwise. So as an example, so we investigated

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 2>there was a tragic case. It was an arson attack

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>on a family home and it was a mum and

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 2>her four children. There were two older boys who were

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of in their twenties, a girl of twenty one

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 2>who is at UNI, a fifteen year old daughter who's

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 2>at school. And when we were investigating what may have happened,

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>we used hypotheses and which one of this family is

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 2>likely to be and so we're looking at the family,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>which one of the family is likely to be targeted? Well,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 2>they were all really decent people. There was nothing in

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 2>their lifestyle that would lead to that. They were all

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 2>really decent people, so there was nothing in their lifestyle

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that would indicate why someone would attack them in this way. Basically,

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 2>it's two o'clock in the morning, petrol poured through their

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>letter box, set a light and the moment what the

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 2>oldest son managed to get out the window. The two

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 2>sisters got caught in the fire and the youngest son

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 2>got caught and by the time we picked it up

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't They hadn't died, so it was it wasn't

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 2>looking good, so it wasn't a murder inquiry at the beginning,

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 2>but it was an attemptive murder. So we were looking

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 2>at things like had they had any fall ups with people,

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 2>any incidents within their life? They were Asian, so it

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 2>was was it racially motivated? Was was this attack because

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 2>of their color? Was it a mistaken identity? Had there

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 2>been in the who lived next door to them? Could

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 2>it have been that somebody else was targeted they just

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.239
<v Speaker 2>went to the wrong house. Is it Have there been

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 2>any other incidents in the area and a nactual fact

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 2>there were there have been some arsenal attacks and there

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 2>was a gang, an Afghan Afghan gang that were using

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 2>arsenals at all to arrested some of them, but we

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 2>were really struggling to come up with any any kind

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 2>of motive, and sadly, the two daughters died, so the

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 2>fifteen year old girl and the twenty one year old

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 2>they succumbed to their injuries. So it was now a

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 2>murder inquiry, and the family aison offices say that it

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 2>was so important when you build up that picture of

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 2>their life. They were at the hospital with the family

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 2>and the youngest girl, Malaya, she had been in this

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of school ground, school playground type relationship. It wasn't

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't a relationship. I think this boy had asked

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to go out of it. She said yes, and she

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 2>said no, something something as simple as that. And because

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 2>we were really struggling, we had no we had no

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 2>clues that would be of any motive that we could

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>have found. It was there only one. Was there only

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 2>one that she had had just fallen out with this boy.

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 2>So we took that decision to make the early arrest

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 2>and I went there. I arrested him. I looked him

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 2>in the eye and told him he's being arrested for murder,

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>nothing back from him, And for me, that was a

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>really important part of any I always tried to be

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 2>there for the arrest, if I tried to do the

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>rest myself, or if not, I tried to be there,

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 2>because looking someone in the eye and giving him those

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 2>words can give you such a clue as to as

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 2>to am I on the right track. I've got nothing

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 2>back from this kid, nothing at all. And we brought

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 2>him in, interviewed him, denied any knowledge of it. It

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 2>got bailed out in a process. We'd taken his phone,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 2>his laptop, et cetera. And of course so late we've

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 2>got a phone call from the lab who'd been going

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>through his stuff to say that we've got I mean,

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 2>it was an excited phone call, and he said and

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the engineer told us that the day before the murder,

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 2>he'd googled how to burn somebody's house down. So we'd

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 2>gone from thinking, well, we've got nothing, well, we'll arrest

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 2>him anyway, and then we'll see what evidence that turns up,

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 2>and from that it just it just completely opened up.

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 2>So and then from there we can build on his

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>phone evidence and there's loads of evidence and were then

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 2>we were in no doubt whatsoever. And then he was

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 2>due to fly back to Pakistan, so he's blue lights

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>asirens to get there. Rearrested him and this time wasn't

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 2>going anywhere and ended up getting convicted of both murders.

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:54.959
<v Speaker 2>But so so first off on motive, so your grounds

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 2>of arrest, you're not you're not looking for the evidence

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 2>that we're convictim, just looking for that vision. And the

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 2>early arrest can open up all sorts of avenues. When

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 2>you're searching somebody's house, you take and things are just

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 2>simple things like when like I said earlier on about

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>when someone's in a friends with knife attack, they might

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>have injuries, like injuries to the hand that will start

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 2>to heal if you don't get to them early. They

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>might have bruises on their body where they've been in

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>a fight, which will start to go. If you don't

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 2>get to them early, they've got chance to destroy evidence.

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 2>So an early arrest I always I would much rather

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 2>have an earlier rest and be wrong than dither. And

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 2>by the time you actually get to them, that evidence

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 2>is gone. You might even know it because you would

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 2>never you'd never know it was there in the first place.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>But you've got so much more chance of missing evidence,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 2>so an early arrest and if you're wrong, all right,

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 2>yeah it's not it's not. You don't you don't. You

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 2>don't arrest people willy nilly because it is a big

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>thing arresting someone for a murder, so you have to

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>give it a lot of thought. But if the grounds

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 2>are there, then then make the earli arrest and try

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 2>and get hold of the evidence.

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And Steve, I know they're tough decisions. We've had people

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in the charge room with arrest to them and we're

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>going to let them go, and we're running out of

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>our custody time, the custody time, so yeah, it's really

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>coming down do we arrest them or do we charge them?

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>They're hard decisions, aren't they, and that you're making them

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>under under pressure, and you know that those decisions that

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you make are going to be scrutinized. They're going to

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>be scrutinized big time, because yeah, I have a few

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>people that play guilty to murder, but most people will

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>defend it at court though, and and then mail appeal

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it after you've convicted them, and then you know you'll

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be five years down the track after they've already been convicted,

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll be back in court. But sometimes you've got to

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>make those hard decisions. We keep what's called the commander's

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>log or an investigation log here and the tough, high

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>profile investigations I've worked on. I'm meticulous in the way

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that I keep the log or the decisions I make

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and that and they might look back with the benefit

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of hindsight and say, well, that was the wrong decision,

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But at the time I made the decision, this was

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the information I had had at hand. What's your thoughts

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>on keeping you your record? So now you talked in

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.239
<v Speaker 1>part one about that even at the crime soon you're

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>keeping logs. But I would do that during the course

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of an investigation, yea one hundred percent.

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So when a murder happens, senior officer will open the

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 2>decision log. We call it just exactly sounds the same thing.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's a yes decision log. It's like a self

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 2>carbonated book. You write a decision in and so when

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you're recording it, you're not just recording what decision you made.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 2>You need to you need to record why you're making

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 2>a decision, what what what is the information I had

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 2>that led me to make that decision. Because what's what's

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>likely to happen is you're going to have to be

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 2>asked to justify that decision in court, which could be

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a year two, it could be it could be ten

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 2>years later for you know, and you're being asked to

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 2>justify the decision, and you will have no idea why

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>you made it. What did I know at that time?

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 2>If you haven't written it down, you will never remember it.

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>So I'm making this what what what do I know?

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 2>So the way I the way I used to write

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 2>my decisions was this, so so so what what what

0:31:58.040 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 2>do I know at this stage? What do I know?

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 2>What do I want to achieve? What is the purpose

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 2>of me making this decision? So here's where I am,

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Here's where I want to be, and how am I

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 2>going to get this? So what is my process for

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 2>getting there? Making that decision? And if you record it

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 2>like that, so anyone who comes back to you, well,

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 2>why do you make this decisions? Well, this is what

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I knew at the time, this is what I was

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>trying to achieve, and this is the decision I made

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 2>to try and get there. And right, they can try

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 2>me clever and say well you were wrong, So well, yeah, okay,

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 2>in hindsight, six weeks later, once I had the further evidence,

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I probably wouldn't have made that decision, But at that time,

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 2>that's the information I had, and that's the decision I

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 2>came to. Yeah, I was wrong, but it's a justified decision,

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and that's so important, huge impact.

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And you can retain your integrity and credibility in a

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>witness box, in a court situation, the inquiry situation if

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time I made this decision to arrest this

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.719
<v Speaker 1>personal or let this person run based on these facts.

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's a safeguard because one I think, to be

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a homicide detective, you've got to have thick skin because

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>what I know with homicide, no matter what you do,

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>someone's going to be criticizing you. It's going to be

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the defense barriss or it's going to be your own organization,

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>or the victims family, the suspects family. You're going to

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be attacked. So you go to I see the way

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of you've got to have the thick skin and you

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>get battle scarred to a point. But to have those

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>detailed records, I don't think people appreciate how comprehensive, the

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>records are and in decision making with homicide investigations.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and as the leader in a murder inquiry, you

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 2>have to make those decisions. You have to record those decisions,

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>and if you don't, you're going to come unstuck at court.

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 2>And as I say, everything you do comes back to

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 2>that courtroom. And if you're not thinking about that, there's

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 2>no good later on going Actually I should have recorded

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 2>this or sugar in that hand. If you don't write

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 2>it down at the time, you're never going to remember.

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 2>It's your integrity is gone. So well you recalled that

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 2>six months later, how do you know that was so?

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 2>And we timestampad decision lock, so so there's no there's

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 2>no there's no debate later on about it.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Contemporaneous. This was made at the time, and it doesn't

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>cut cut very well in the witness box. I can't

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 1>recall it was a long time ago like that doesn't

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't You don't have that luxury as a decision

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>making in a homicide investigation, I look at options too,

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.359
<v Speaker 1>operational options. That's another thing, though I would document the

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons why. And yeah, gangland murders, organized crime type murders.

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you've got someone running that you think, well, if

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>he stays out, this person might be killed, or if

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we move now, this will happen, or we've got the

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>advantage they don't know we're looking at them. I would

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>list all the options too, I'd document it there and

0:34:55.440 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>option one arrest well benefits he's taken off the street. Negatives,

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>he'll probably be released the first time your peers at

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>court because there's not sufficient evidence. Option to put the

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>violence on them. Yeah, and you scarlet down, But there

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is a lot about the information the documents that you

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 1>make when you're investigating homicide. Yeah.

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 2>And also what it does is if you make yourself

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 2>write down a decision and make yourself as you're saying,

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 2>you're considering your options, you'll come to a better decision

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 2>because in order to make a good decision, you have

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 2>to think about what your options are. You have to

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 2>think and more often than not, so when you're making decisions,

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 2>it should never be a binary decision. It shouldn't be

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 2>should be arresting yes or no? Well, what are my

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 2>other options? And very often when you're making decisions, really

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 2>important decisions, and you force yourself to think of your options.

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 2>You will often come up with a compromise that is

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 2>actually the best decision, that is the best way forward

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 2>because you've thought about your options, you thought about what

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 2>can go wrong, you thought about what you're trying to achieve,

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 2>and by following that process, you come up with a

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 2>better decision. And as I said before, I think decision

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 2>making is such an important skill for detectives.

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It's crucial. And you mentioned the thing there that sort

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of made me think about how I'd approached some of

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the difficult investigations where I'm looking at Okay, Steve, I'm

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 1>thinking Steve's a suspect. Do we arrest him? I quite

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>often okay, well, what facts could I present to the court?

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And I can have it in my head, I can

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>have it in all the documents, but I actually sit

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 1>down and type up, Okay, how would the fact sheet look?

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes it looks and go okay, I think we

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>have got enough there, Or conversely, it could look who

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>am I kidding? We've got no evidence when it's all

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>said and done, and just putting it in writing, and

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I take on board what you say. It makes you

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>think about think about the decisions that are floating through

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>your head. The interview room, the importance of the interview room.

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your thoughts on what goes on in an interview.

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I've got mixed feelings on this really, so so one

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 2>one thing that I think people from the outside looking

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 2>in often get confused with is that the purpose of

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 2>an interview. So it's not about getting a confession. That's

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 2>not that's not why you're interviewing a suspect. You're not

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to make them confess to the crime. What you

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 2>want them to do is commit to a story. You

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 2>don't want them to commit to even if I wasn't there,

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.479
<v Speaker 2>I didn't do it, I wasn't there, commit to that

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 2>so then we can disprove that. If we quickly there,

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 2>then then we can disprove that. So it is important,

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 2>but I personally, I think it's the least important of

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 2>all the things because if you're if you're having to

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 2>rely on a confession to prove a murder, then you

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 2>need to you need to go away and think about

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the rest of your evidence.

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You're desperate at that stage, isn't it when when it

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>comes to I know, the confession.

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you if you need a confession for murder,

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 2>then then you're you're not where you need to be.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 2>I want, I want to be able to prove a

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 2>murder regardless of what they say. Oh, in an ideal world,

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.479
<v Speaker 2>they would confess everything and tell you where their murder

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 2>weapon was and tell you where they've got rid of

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>their clothing. Brilliant, because you can all add to that, really,

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 2>really really Rarely, if ever, does that ever happen. If

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 2>someone's going to talk to you an interview, generally they're

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 2>trying to talk their way out out of something, not

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 2>confessed with it.

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you're going properly prepared, sometimes the denial can

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>be as good as a confession, because you know you

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>can contradict, like now I wasn't there, and well we

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>know that you've got your DNA. You don't have to

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>declare it straight up there. Let them deny, deny, and

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>then hid them with that, and then they're less done.

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>And then by the time he gets a court, the

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 2>jury can see that they've lied. And once they've lied once,

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 2>how can we believe them now? But the problem we

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 2>have in the UK, I might say the problem, but

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 2>it's a fact is a majority of our interviews go

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 2>no comment because we've got a right to silence, so

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 2>they'll get a solicitor and they'll literally say no comment.

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And and to be honest, that never bothered me. And

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 2>in the UK there is a repercussion if you say

0:38:56.080 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 2>no comment in an interview. At trial, the judge can

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 2>direct a jury to have an influence of guilt. So,

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I e. If they were innocent, why did they not

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 2>give the account they give you now? Back at the

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 2>police station, they were doing an easy I was. I

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 2>had one trial. It was uh, it was it was

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a GameLine shooting. It was a motorbike and pulled up

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 2>next the car and shot shot the person in the

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 2>car and outside the caught. One of the jury members

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 2>came up to me, we've got the guilty verdict, a

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.839
<v Speaker 2>little old lady and she said, thank you very much

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 2>for everything you've done, she said, she said, you know

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 2>what I knew. I knew he was guilty as soon

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 2>as I heard that he said no comment in an interview. Yes,

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, they might.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Have How people think that legislation you talk about was

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>introduced over here in New South Wales and does assist

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>like an inference instead of someone making no comment when

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you've arrested them, no comment then turning up at the

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>trial and going, oh, well, and they've got their alibi

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>or created and all that, so the judge can give

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a warning on that or an inference can be taken.

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't they declare that right at the start? Homicide

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 1>trials they're exhausting. I don't think people understand. Like I

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>look back at my career, I still get a I

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>think a physical reaction when I go into a court

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>because I've had so many tense times in a court

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>through murder trials, and it's an emotional rollercoaster, isn't it.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't know which way the jury is going. They

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>don't go over one or two days. You could be

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>there for months and it's the pressures on constantly. Talk

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to us about your experience with murder trials.

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I be honest, I don't miss them.

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 2>The high I was talking about at a very beginning

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 2>where you get your conviction is fantastic, but a build

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 2>up to it, I didn't enjoy it. So just turning

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 2>up on the first day is going to be You've

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 2>got no idea where it's going to go. So we

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 2>just simple things like in the UK we have disclosure

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 2>laws where you have to disclose certain bits of information

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to the defense. State of trial, they'll hit you with

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 2>a big list of things they want disguised that they

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 2>could have asked for months ago. So you're running around there.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 2>And then for me, the most stressful part of any

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 2>murder trial is the witnesses. Are they going to turn up?

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 2>There's always a witness that such changes in mind. They

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 2>don't want to have to get a summons through them

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 2>or a warrant or something else. And then when they

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 2>do turn up, what are they going to say in

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the box? Are they going to change their account? Are

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 2>they come out with something they didn't tell you before?

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So that initial stage, because so the bigging the first

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 2>part of any murder trial is the prosecution case and

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 2>that that is the most stressful part getting through that.

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>And in the UK, I'm sure it's the same in Australia.

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 2>The start of the trial will be the prosecution with

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 2>their opening and it will be outlining what the case

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 2>is and the evidence and what you're hoping for. Really

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 2>is by the end of the prosecution case, you're at

0:41:55.560 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 2>the same level as the opening speech as you anything,

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 2>you haven't lost anything. Yeah, So that's that's that's as

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 2>much as you can hope for, and there's no guarantee

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you're going to do that, and getting through that isn't nice.

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:15.439
<v Speaker 2>I came across many decent defense barristers, but I came

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 2>across equally equal number of decades. To put it.

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Mildly, really, I think that's fair to say, Steve. I

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>understand they're doing the job, but some go way above

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and beyond, Like if it was us doing as police,

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>going that hard, there'd be criticism. And when they do

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this defense you talked about requisitions that just they would

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>do it deliberately, like it'll be a Friday afternoon, the

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>trials do the start Monday, and you receive at three

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>o'clock in the afternoon. You've got a weekend where you

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>just want to clear your head and get ready for

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the trial. And there'll be a list of requisitions that

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, they know will take you all weekend, working

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 1>through the night to get And it's just trying to

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>rattle you before. And if I say this to defense

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>barrisses or legal people listening to it, they oh, we

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do that. That's what they're doing. They're trying to

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>rattle the detective or detectives, the investigation team, the prosecution

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>before the trial with these unrealistic requisitions that, as you said,

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>they've had the brief for months, if not years, they

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>could have asked for them, but they leave it to

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the last moment, and knowing that you're just going to

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>turn up frazzled on the Monday morning before you present

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the court. I think I'm the same as you. I

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>love those highs where you get the guilty and you

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>feel like all your work's being justified. But I don't

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>miss the court. I don't miss being in the witness box.

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't miss been in there for days, been cross

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>examined and questioned about what you've done and the decisions.

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's a theater in part with the jury. There

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't it Like they're trying to rattle it and just

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to discredit you in front of the front of

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a jury. Not a pleasant place.

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 2>To be, No, not time. I mean, and you've given

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 2>everyone and it's a lot of pressure. I've given evidence

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 2>and not come out. Why did I say that? Why

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 2>didn't I say this? And it's awful and and and

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 2>what you don't want to do, You don't want to

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:11.720
<v Speaker 2>get into an argument with the barristers because that always

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 2>that always goes one way. But they're trying to undermine you.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to make you look competent, and it's not pleasant.

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Nobody wants to go through it out of there.

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>You know you don't, but you do get conditioned to it.

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And I defy. I think if you're not nervous before

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you get in the witness box, you're not properly prepared.

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I would be nervous before I got in the witness box,

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>but I due diligence. I'd do as much preparation as

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I could before I got in there, and and do

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 1>your best. And yeah, you're told not to bite back

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 1>at the questions, just to answer the questions, but sometimes

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. And the longer you've been in this business,

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the barrisss know your personality, know who you are, and

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>know how to push put push buttons. So but there

0:44:55.920 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a bit of theater there. Homicide

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>investigation generally, there's different cases and I hate it when

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>people ask me, you know, what's your hardest case or

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:12.439
<v Speaker 1>what case was your most important or yeah, because they're

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>all important. If you work a homicide that doesn't matter,

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like the bloke you turned up and there's four people

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>at the funeral, of which you're one of them, more

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the one that I turned up where there were seven people.

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>What's a homicide investigation that stayed with you, something that's

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of changed you as a personal changed you the

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>way that you look at life.

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for me, it was always about children. So if

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I investigated the murder of a child, that was always

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 2>stayed with me. And there was one in particular. So

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 2>we've not mentioned this, but I've got a TV show

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 2>in the UK and I sit down and I chat

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 2>with investigators and the only case we feature of mine

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 2>is the very first one, and it was this, and

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 2>it was probably the one that will always stay with me,

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and it was it was quite high profile in the

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 2>UK at the time. Has got a soap opria called EastEnders,

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 2>and it was a woman who was actress on there,

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and it got it got reported as a missing missing

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 2>person's case came into us, and it came into us

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 2>on a Saturday, and very quickly we realized that there's this, this,

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 2>this isn't right. So there's things like she she suffered

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 2>from moting urine disease and she's allegedly she's gone off

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 2>with her two boys and she could just look after herself,

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:22.839
<v Speaker 2>like alone or two boys. And her husband had said

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 2>she's left me and he then disappeared. So straight away,

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you got the feeling for it and like this,

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 2>this isn't good and what you're hoping for is what

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 2>what we realized when we went into the house, he

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 2>had done a cleanup and there was signs of a

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 2>really violent attack in the kitchen, and he kind of

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 2>clinging onto the hope that clearly some something's happened to

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 2>to Shah saying, but what what about the kids? That

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 2>could he have put them somewhere? So we're trying to

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 2>find the kids, go to family members, et cetera. So

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 2>you always clinging onto the hope that some something that

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 2>you an ideal. Well, with three of them live, but

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 2>you kind of you kind of condition to the fact

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 2>that someone someone's clearly been murdered by the crime scene

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.239
<v Speaker 2>where are the boys? But by the by the by

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:10.319
<v Speaker 2>a few by two days in we discovered that they

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 2>were all all be murdered and they were buried in

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 2>the garden. And then he had fled to the fled

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:19.880
<v Speaker 2>to Africa, and just the brutal nature of those crimes,

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the way in which so for into one of the

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 2>boys had defensive injuries, which which indicates that he knew

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 2>that his dad was attacked. I mean, it's just awful.

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a biological father.

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Biological father. Yeah's killed his wife and two children, and

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 2>it's those kinds of cases and that and that for me,

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 2>just the just the brutal nature of it, the circumstances

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 2>in way, the way in which we the investigation went,

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 2>it was just it was just one of those ones

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 2>that will always we make I'm not I'm not an

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 2>emotional person normally, but on the TV show, I actually

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 2>lost it at one point when I was I was.

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 2>I sat with my mate, who reinvestigated it with and

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 2>we were talking through It's almost as if we were

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 2>we were reliving it. And I've never spoken about it before.

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 2>I've spoken about it in terms of I was involved

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 2>in this investigation, but never to the depth that we

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 2>were going into and we were almost reliving it. And

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 2>it was that moment where the phone call come through

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>from the crime scene to us that the three of

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 2>them were in the in this grave, and it hit

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 2>me and I held up and I was like I

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 2>couldn't speak. I couldn't speak, and you know, it's like

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 2>you don't.

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We don't, we don't know, And it was it just

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:36.360
<v Speaker 1>shows you that deep down you're carrying these things and.

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 2>When you when you when you dip down into it

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:41.799
<v Speaker 2>and you start to open up that yeah, you must

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 2>be carrying so much that you just you just bury.

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 2>And as I say, for me, it was always about

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 2>children and a few cases I've got where where you

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 2>see did their body or at the post morton for

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 2>the child, and it's hard.

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I look, I hear what you're saying, Steve, and I

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 1>know when I was in homicide there was emotional stuff

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 1>like that when you step away from it and you

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>relive it that way, if I do talks or I

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>see the family, victims are different different things. And it's

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 1>almost like you're out of the cops and you've let

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>your guard down now like in the cops where you

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 1>had to be rock solid, and I still you know,

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a tough guy. I'm still rock solid. Just because

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm out of the cops doesn't soften me up, but

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it gives you a perspective what you actually saw and

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the emotions that you went through, and I think, yeah,

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I understand where you're coming from, and I know how

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it can hit you that way, and you think, oh,

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a strange reaction, this shouldn't be coming. But

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I've said about homicide investigation, each part of the investigation

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 1>takes a little bit out of you and also adds

0:49:48.480 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to you like you can't get. Sometimes

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you do the just the on call response and the

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>homicide we call it the smoking gun type homicide where

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you're not heavily invested in it. That's pretty obvious what's

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 1>happened and solved, and the local police are dealing with it,

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and you have just had a superficial overview of it.

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But the ones that you actually pick up and run,

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 1>whether you're leading the investigation or part of the investigation team,

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you always hold hold on to aspects of that, don't you.

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, definitely.

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:23.799
<v Speaker 1>What was your coping mechanism? Twelve years in homicide, that's

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a long stint. How did you cope with the pressures

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and the emotions that come with homicide investigation.

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say something that probably resonates for you,

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and probably every murder detective is just compartmentalize. You don't

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 2>actually deal with anything. You just bury it. So, yeah,

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing grewsome things you're dealing with. For me, the

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 2>hardest thing wasn't ever the dead bodies and at apartment children.

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I always found it difficult, but it wasn't. It wasn't

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the dead bodies because you build up their resilience to

0:50:57.560 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 2>that throughout your career. To me, it was always the

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 2>traum the family. I found the hardest thing to deal

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:06.399
<v Speaker 2>with and dealing with their grief. But but you don't

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:08.359
<v Speaker 2>dwell on it. You just push it aside, you bury

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 2>it down, and then you just focus on your investigation

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 2>and your job. You've got to do and and and

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 2>and and and if that's your focus, if that's what

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking about, you can I mean, I used to

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 2>think it was actually when when I when I I

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 2>wrote a book, and it was I was I was

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:30.919
<v Speaker 2>reflecting on on my career, and I I always thought

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I was brave in as much as I did. I

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.800
<v Speaker 2>just I don't deal with that. I don't think about that.

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I just bury it. But what I came to realize

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 2>was is it's actually I think it's braver to deal

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 2>with your feelings. So I did a eulogy at my

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:49.720
<v Speaker 2>dad's funeral, and it was it was basically me writing

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 2>down I felt about my dad and talking about it.

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 2>And I don't talk about my feelings. I don't. I don't.

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't talk about that kind of thing. And I

0:51:56.880 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 2>was an absolute mess. And my sisters, who you women

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 2>are much better, I think, deal and they deal with it.

0:52:06.960 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 2>They had to, they had to help me through. And

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:12.800
<v Speaker 2>it's because I don't. I don't have the I was

0:52:12.840 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 2>almost like, I don't have the ability to deal with

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 2>feelings because I don't. I've got no I've got in

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:21.880
<v Speaker 2>my armory. I can't. I can't deal with my feelings.

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 2>I just ignore them and bury them. And when I

0:52:24.400 --> 0:52:26.840
<v Speaker 2>have to, that's where I get caught up. And so

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:28.919
<v Speaker 2>when I'm doing the TV show and I'm talking about

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that crime, I'm talking about feelings and that I can't do.

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I can't do with that. So so where I used

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 2>to think that was the brave thing to do, I

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:39.879
<v Speaker 2>actually think the bravest and probably the most sensible thing

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 2>to do is deal with them. And because all of them,

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 2>as the occur, exactly because will they can they come

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 2>back and bite you on the ARSEMA and I don't

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 2>think I will. I don't think I've got PTSD or

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 2>anything like that. But you never know, you never quite

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 2>know how something's going to come out later on.

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, Steve, you've made me think about myself there on

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>THEES and the stuff that you're confronted with as a

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. And I didn't deal with anything during the

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 1>course of my career. I just kept Okay, well, there's

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>another job, and you'd throw yourself deeper and deeper and

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>deeper in there. And I suppose we're the lucky ones

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 1>that we got out there that we didn't have the

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, didn't fall apart during the career. But yeah,

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you step away and I do what you say resonates

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with me. I'm not going to make any confessions here, Steve.

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>You'll let you make the confessions about showing emotion. How

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 1>dare you? But yeah, when you step away from it,

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it does give you time to reflect and that those

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>emotions can surface. What are you doing post career? It

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you've got some exciting stuff to do. You've

0:53:46.200 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>two books, You've done the Murder Investigation Team, and you

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>did another one on Jack the Ripper, yeah, so it's pure.

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Everything's done now planned at all in the slightest. So

0:53:57.960 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 2>when I was leaving the police, you know, well stored

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 2>about this you making and how that's really important as detective.

0:54:02.640 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 2>What my idea was was, I when I left the police,

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I was going to set up a training company to

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 2>go into go into businesses and help train their staff

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 2>around decision making and the processes that I used and

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 2>how that can be adapted to business. And everything i'd

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:17.800
<v Speaker 2>read was if you're going to position yourself as an expert,

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 2>write a book. So I started to write a book

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 2>that supported that, but it was, it was, it was,

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 2>it was. It just wasn't working. So I ended up right,

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:27.280
<v Speaker 2>it was it was, these are how to investigate murders

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:28.719
<v Speaker 2>and this is how I can be business, and it

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 2>was trying to be two different things. So I thought, well,

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:33.720
<v Speaker 2>let's just write a book about how we investigate murders

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 2>and actual fact, in the UK no one had ever

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 2>written a book like this, so so and what had

0:54:39.600 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 2>happened since doing that. It's kind of dragged me down

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the true crime route, which I wasn't planning at all,

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:48.240
<v Speaker 2>and the book has led to speaking gigs the speeding

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:51.799
<v Speaker 2>gigs led to a TV show, so I did. That's

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:54.359
<v Speaker 2>just finished in the UK. We did two seasons, twenty

0:54:54.440 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 2>episodes Secrets of a Murder Detective. And now to set

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 2>up a business where there's a big gap in the

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:04.400
<v Speaker 2>market where you've got all these detectives over here with

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 2>all these experiences and stories, etc. And you've got TV

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 2>companies who want to use them on the TV shows,

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 2>but there's no one in the middle introducing them. So

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.879
<v Speaker 2>I've set up this company to do that as kind

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 2>of like a setting up a database for detectives willing

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to go on TV show. So that's my next project

0:55:22.520 --> 0:55:24.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm quite excited about, so we'll see where that goes.

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great that you've found found your legs

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>after leaving the police, because it's confronting at first. But

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 1>if you've got something that you can be passionate about

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that you're pear to be what you're doing now, it

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>makes moving on a lot easier. And that's interesting what

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:42.719
<v Speaker 1>you said about the book. As I was reading your book,

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:45.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking I haven't read a book like this from

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a homicide detective talking about homicide investigations. So good on you.

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great to me. You look like regardless

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that you've lost your hair, but that

0:55:56.840 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 1>happens to the best of us. You look like you've

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 1>got a sense of humor. You look like you've come

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>out relatively unscathed. But yeah, full credit to you for

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 1>the work that you've you've done.

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Verne. No, I appreciate that we're obviously very very similar.

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I think our attitudes are. I don't think we disagreed

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:18.840
<v Speaker 2>on anything today. And and when when you've got something

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that you're so passionate about, for me, it's murder. Where'd

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 2>you channel that? I mean, very difficult to There's not

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing. There's no direct comparison in the in the

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 2>civilian world of I investigate murders, I don't want to do.

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to do corporate investigations. That's not that's

0:56:35.719 --> 0:56:37.799
<v Speaker 2>not going to flow boat. I don't want to do security.

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:39.840
<v Speaker 2>It's like, well, what am I going to do? That?

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Can I can keep keep just talking for hours and

0:56:43.120 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 2>hours about the subject I'm passionate about, and who's going

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:47.319
<v Speaker 2>to want to listen to that? I mean my far

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 2>and out caol them to death? No one ever, no

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:49.880
<v Speaker 2>one ever wants to do it.

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Well, well look let's take stock of us.

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You've you've written the book going murder investigation term and

0:56:59.040 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting here in the pod car studio with signs

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>up saying I catch killers. Yeah we've really let it, but.

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:09.360
<v Speaker 2>No, I wited to move on.

0:57:09.520 --> 0:57:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Really though, I understand where you're coming from, Steve, and

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I've really enjoyed the chat. And yeah, I can tell

0:57:16.240 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the type of a cop you were and type of

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:20.640
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective, and I would have liked to work with you.

0:57:20.680 --> 0:57:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It would have been would have been good and lightwise. Likewise,

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I share your passion for things, So all the best

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for the future.

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks really appreciate mate, Thanks for having me on. Cheers.

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I know I say it a lot, but I do

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>enjoy talking to real homicide detectives, and I reckon Steve

0:57:39.480 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Ko was a definite real homicide detective. I like the

0:57:43.040 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>way he thinks, I like the way he goes about

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 1>his business, and utmost respect for him. Twelve years in

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the murder investigation team in Scotland. Yard He's done the

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 1>done the hard yards, and I really enjoyed speaking to him.

0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not amazed because I always thought it was

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a case. How similar the way they approached their investigations

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>after what we do over here.

0:58:03.840 --> 0:58:05.160
<v Speaker 2>But it was a great chat